Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/25/98 TAPES #1527, #1528 CITY COUCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 25, 1998 The regular meeting of the City Coundl of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Coundl Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, February 25, 1998, at 5:30 P.M., with Council President David Farr presiding. Council members present were Jim Reed, Carlos Montgomery, Carol Arends, Mike Shepherd, Lon Overson, John Law, Cecil McConnell, and Wayne Olsen. Also present were Assistant City Attorney Glenna Malanca and Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council President Farr and invocation given by Reverend Don Welt of Eastgate Assembly of God. President Farr made the following announcement: (1) The Council held a Study Session prior to the Coundl meeting to discuss general Council business. (2) The Council held a Study Session from 5:05 - 5:25 P.M., to discuss Medicare Payments For LEOFF I Retirees. (3) Immediately following the Council meeting, Council will hold an Executive Session to discuss "Litigation". (4) The City Council will hold a RETREAT on February 28, 1998, at Gold Mountain Golf Complex (Banquet Room). President Farr read the revised Agenda for that meeting. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of Meeting - February 11, 1998 #AB98-031 B. 1997 Excess Vacation Leave; Request for #AB98-032 Carry Over for Dean Denis #0076 M/S/C/U(McConnell/Montgomery) Motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS Vouchers audited and cedified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the Council TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 2 of 13 #0104 M/S/C/U(Montgomery/Olsen) On February 25, 1998, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: 217079 through 217419 in the amount of $718,994.17; and Regular Payroll for the period ending February 15, 1998, in the amount of $698,590.86; and Retirees' Payroll for the period ending February 28, 1998, in the amount of $104,603.55. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mr. Overson announced a new business "Old Wooley Dinner & Market Place will soon be opening, at the corner of Burwell and Pacific Avenue, on March 7 with an event to support the Foodline. Mrs. Arends noted the old Bremerton School District Administration building on Montgomery and Burwell was nearly demolished and much of the building materials have been recycled. Mr. MontGomerY commented on the Street Department's recent sidewalk cleaning efforts and the fact they cleaned approximately % mile of sidewalks within an hour. He commended the Street crew for making the sidewalks more usable and he hoped they would provide that service in coming years. Mr. Reed reported several Kitsap Lake Junction business owners contacted him about the possibility of moving an existing crosswalk to an area that would be more convenient to reach local businesses. As a result of that conversation, he contacted Randy Witt, City Engineer, to look into the possibility of making such a change. No offscial action has been taken; however, it was his understanding that it is feasible. Mr. Farr announced the Smile Mobile, which is sponsored by the Washington Dental Services, will be in Bremerton from March 9 - March 17, 1998. This service will be treating children ages 13 and younger, who are from low income families that do not have access to dental care. The location for this service will be the Kitsap Community Resource Center, at 1201 Park Avenue. Additional information on this program can be obtained by calling 1-800-367-4104 Ext. 6303. He was pleased that his friend David George had recently joined the ranks of non-smokers. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Lynn Horton drew Council's attention to a picture display showing 59 houses that were purchased in 1997 through the City's Down Payment Assistance program (Department of Community Development). The money for that program was received through the Block Grant Program and HOME Funds. The loans for the 59 families amounted to $259,000, which leveraged $4,453,000 in home purchases. Additionally, the City's loan is secured by a second Deed of TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 3 of 13 Trust. The down payment loan has a 3% interest for 15 years, and the principle is due upon change of use or transfer of ownership. The homeowners' first mortgage is handled through any bank or lending institution, which precludes City staff having to qualify lenders. One of the major goals in housing established several years ago by the City through Housing Bremerton was homeownership and owner occupancy since there is a high percentage of people on low income and the housing stock is a high percentage of non-owner occupied. This was the first year where all of the City's down payment assistance and housing rehab funds were totally utilized. She commended staff for doing a great job. Information on these programs can be obtained through Marylyn Waibel, Department of Community Development, 478-5275. Mayor Horton announced the Bremerton High School Lady Knights and Knights Basketball teams would be playing in the District playoffs on February 26, 1998, at Pacific Lutheran University. The Lady Knights play at 3:30 P.M., and the Knights play at 8:30 P.M. Both teams lost their first game; however, the playoff is double elimination. Police Chief Paul Du Fresne introduced Peter W. Fisher, a new Police Office, who was then given the Oath of Office by Municipal Court Judge James Docter. Chief Du Fresne added that he was one Police Officer away from being up to full strength in the Police Department and is in the process of conducting background investigations to fill that vacancy. PUBLIC RECOGNITION Susan Brown expressed her appreciation having received a revised schedule for the City Council Retreat and appreciated Council staff assistance when she called for information. She also appreciated President Farr announcing the Retreat agenda at the beginning of the meeting; and the issue of her recommendations for changes in the City's Ethic Codes would be discussed from 10:45 to 11:15 A.M. She was also interested in the Retreat Agenda item addressing City Council meeting format, which will be discussed from 10:30 - 10:45 A.M. She liked public interest items, such as the swearing in of Police Officers, at the beginning of the meeting rather than having it at the end of the meeting. She was somewhat confused by President Farr's quote in a newspaper article that it was not appropriate to keep high ranking, high paid officials waiting to make their presentation. It was her understanding that the highest paid officials of the City are salaried and attending Council meetings would be part of their job. And, those that are paid hourly could have their hours adjusted to accommodate such meetings. If Public Recognition was moved to the end of the meeting, she could not participate due to her commitment to children. Roy Mclnnis, Bremerton resident, stated he was opposed to moving Public Recognition to the end of the meeting. He bases his opinion on the fact he has TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 4 of 13 attended City Council meeting for a number of years; however, he leaves the meeting prior to the conclusion to attend a Bible Study meeting. He announced there will be a Dedication of the name for the Downtown Branch of the Library on February 26, 1998, 5:00 P.M. Mayor Horton stated for clarification that the Administrative staff coming before the City Council are salaried and generally put in a full days work in addition to attending Council meetings. President Farr stated he might have added to the confusion by giving out information that may not have been totally accurate. 8A - COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF SEATTLE. #AB98 - 033 RCW 39.34 permits local governments to cooperate with other government agencies in the procurements of goods and services to maximize use of purchasing dollars. The City of Bremerton has used Intergovernmental Agreements with a number of agencies for the acquisition of equipment and materials wherein the use of the agreement provides advantageous pricing and accessibility. This agreement will provide access to City of Seattle contracts, that if bid independently by the City, would not provide the same cost savings that are available from some City of Seattle contracts. The City of Bremerton also conditions its bids to permit use by other entities. This Agreement is for an indefinite term and is an optional use agreement. Gil Johnson, Purchasing Manager, stated he would be available to answer Council's questions. Public comment - none. Mr. Law questioned if it was legal for the City to enter into an agreement that had an "indefinite" term or was it limited to 10 years? Glenna Malanca, City Attorney, stated based on her review of the City's Charter, she could not find such a restriction other than franchise agreements. There may be restriction as to leases; however, even if there were restrictions relating to contracts, she has yet to find substantiation for what has been assumed over the previous years. She will continue to investigate this point and if there is such a stipulation and applied to this proposal, it could be amended. Mr. Montgomery stated he could see no reason why this kind of agreement had to be approved by the City Council. Mrs. Malanca pointed out Intedocal Agreements must be approved by the City Council per State statute. Mr. Montgomery stated his past work experience at Olympic College lead him to believed that governmental entities could enter into such agreement without going through a formal approval process. Mrs. Malanca explained based on her past experience, School Districts do have different requirements than cities. TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 5 of 13 Mr. Reed stated he viewed this action as a way for the City to take better advantage spending its money. He noted the agreement includes a hold harmless clause for the City of Seattle for any shorffall of the vendor or in the product provided. He asked whom, at the City level, makes sure that the City is getting a "good deal" and receiving the correct product? Mr. Johnson explained that control is at the departmental level. Mr. McConnell referenced items #2, 3, and 5 in the agreement and noted he was somewhat confused in that it did not clearly identify the entity identified as the "City". He assumed it meant the City of Seattle. Mr. Johnson stated before this agreement was signed, the language could be reviewed for clarity, and changes made so that it will clearly identify what is applicable to Bremerton. Mayor Horton stated in response to the earlier comment about 10-year limits for contracts, when the City's Charter was revised and approved by the voters in 1996, a change was made to clarify the language because it had been confusing. The Administration did not feel that simple contracts beneficial to the City had to be go before the vote of the people for periods longer than 10-years. Mr. Reed asked if it was legal to change language in the agreement after it was approved by the City Council? Mrs. Malanca stated yes, Council can approve it as intended and the Administration can execute it based on that direction. Mr. Reed asked if the City of Seattle would have to agree with any change in language the City might make after it was approved? Mrs. Malanca stated yes, if the changes substantially meet Council's intent at the time it is approved. #0954 MISICIU (Arends/Shepherd) Motion to approve the Cooperative Purchasing Agreement with the City of Seattle. 8B - COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH KITSAP COUNTY. #AB98 - 034 RCW 39.34 permits local governments to cooperate with other government agencies in the procurements of goods and services to maximize use of purchasing dollars. The City of Bremerton has used Intergovernmental Agreements with a number of agencies for the acquisition of equipment and materials wherein the use of the agreement provides advantageous pridng and accessibility. This agreement will provide access to Kitsap County contracts, that if bid independently by the City, would not provide the same cost savings that are available from some County contracts. The City of Bremerton also conditions its bids to permit use by other entities. This Agreement is for an indefinite term and is an optional use agreement. TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 6 of 13 Gil Johnson, Purchasing Manager, stated the previous contract with Kitsap County was conditioned with a one-year term; however with the change in County Legal counsel they have agreed to an indefinite term, which would be consistent with the State statute. Public comment - none. Mr. Reed asked if this agreement was relatively the same as the prior agreement. Mr. Johnson stated yes, except for the term. #1105 M/S/C/U (Reed/Shepherd) Motion to approve the Cooperative Purchasing Agreement with Kitsap County. 8C - LETTER OF INTENT TO ANNEX THE AREA DESCRIBED AS THE SHERIDAN HEIGHTS ANNENXATION. #AB98 - 035 An official Letter of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings has been received from an unincorporated area described as the Sheridan Heights Area. The Letter represents signatures collected from at least ten-percent of the area described. It is requested that the City Council determine: 1 ) Whether the City Council will agree to accept a future 75% Petition to annex; 2) Whether the City Council will require the adoption of a comprehensive plan and zoning for the proposed area under RCW 35.13.177 or apply the land use designation for newly annexed lands as set forth in the Bremerton Municipal Code 21.02.260; and 3) Whether the City Council will require the assumption of a proportional share of existing City indebtedness by the area to be annexed. Terrie O'Neill, Municipal Services Coordinator, briefly reviewed the process of annexation that starts with the initial step of a "Letter of Intent to Annex", which could only progress forward if Council approves that action. Annexation can yield both economic and governance benefits to the community. Areas that are functionally already a part of the City are a prime example of the effective use of annexation. Cities specialize in urban services and most annexations are based on a need for services or utilities. The proper annexation of areas adjacent to cities is often crucial to establishing and maintaining urban order and effective government. Rapid development and population growth frequently occur just outside City boundaries where property is sometimes cheaper and zoning laws less rigorously enforced. These fringe areas may cause urban types of problems that concentrations of population create. Examples of this include increased traffic congestion on inadequate roads, a demand for enhanced police and fire protection and land use planning decisions, which result in disorderly growth. These problems, unfortunately, cross boundary lines and add to City problems. Problems such as the spread of congestion, lack of adequate police protection. and other urban issues may become a determent TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 7 of 13 to the sodal and economic health and cohesiveness of the community. Bremerton is a medium sized city of only 38,000 people with large city urban issues partially due to the impact of thousands of residents in urban neighborhoods that surround Bremerton. However, it would be inappropriate to conclude that those neighborhoods present a hardship to cities. Economic and social ties between the City and fringe areas are generally strong and local City businesses generate sales from those adjacent neighborhoods. Nonetheless, outlying areas benefit in many ways from City parks and recreational programs, streets, utilities, and other services without a proportionate contribution to the City tax base. Moreover and unquestionably characteristic of Kitsap neighborhoods, most suburban people need services the same as those found within the City and may recognize that their property tax and other costs (including utility costs and fire insurance premiums) are not necessarily lower but are quite often equal or even greater than those they would pay as residents within the City. The City has evaluated the subject area in accordance with its policies on annexation. The Sheridan Heights region depicts the characteristics of an urban community with a high level of service needs and with taxes assessed at a level generally equal to the City of Bremerton. The area service demands are at a level that can only be described as urban, based on the variety of services rendered from which many are from the City. This area is largely reliant on the services of the Bremerton community and is an important part of the City regardless of its political disassociation from it. Ms. O'Neill stated she was contacted by a property owner of a 4-acre lot that adjoins the subject annexation area and requested that it be included in the annexation area. Her recommendation to Council was to include that lot as part of the request to annex. The Staff Report included comments from the Department of Community Development, Fire Department, Police Department, Department of Parks and Recreation, and Public Works and Utilities. The following concerns were noted: (1) The Fire Department is particularly concerned about access on roads in the area. Steep grades in the western section of the annexation area promise difficulties in hazardous weather. It is recommended that those roadways be given attention in hazardous weather or that other access alternatives be developed. (2) Based on the existing service levels, this annexation would require the addition of % officer at approximately $27,0000 annually (1.7 officers serve 1000 citizens and, using square miles of territory, 6.3 officers are available for every square mile). Additionally, future growth in the annexation area may increase the need for personnel. (3) To maintain the existing level of park land service in Bremerton, 5.34 acres of park land would need to be acquired. However, according to National Park Standards, a minimum of 39.3 acres of park TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 8 of 13 land per 1,000 people or proportionally 17.8 acres for the existing population of 300 would be needed to meet this goal. (4) No wastewater or water system improvements are planned for the subject area; however the downstream wastewater pump station EB-6, located near the intersection of Lebo Blvd., and Sheridan Road, is scheduled for rehabilitation work as part of the Tracyton Beach combined sewer basin. The City has not conducted a study thus far indicating other than minor stormwater problems in the area. However, the City is aware that some residents from the subject area have voiced concerns about water runoff problems. Ms. O'Neill provided tables reflecting the following: Tax Revenue Summary, City Service Needs, Residential Tax Changes (based on 1998 for 2000), Utility Water Service 1997 Assessments, Utility Sewer Service 1997 Assessments, Utility Billing Cycles, Utility Water Rates-Utility Sewer Rates-Utility Stormwater Rates- Fireline Services, Low Income Senior and Low Income Disabled Rates, Meter Test Rates, and Miscellaneous Account Charges. Greg Branch, a Sahali Drive resident and representing a group of property owners in the proposed Annexation area, stated they are not strangers to the annexation process and have been involved in annexations over the past 20 years. They are encouraged to see the request to annex prograss to this point. He and those he represents are very supportive of annexation. He and his family participated in the development of the subject area with the development of Sahali Townhouse Condominiums on E. 31 Street, including construction of utility services to that area. They are in the process of working with Kitsap County and the City on development of the subject area. However, at times it can be very frustrating having to deal with the County and their lack of an accepted Comprehensive Plan. It is his hope to be able to develop property owned by Anna Marie Cole, which is adjacent to the Sahali Townhouse Condominium project. Part of their effort and supporting annexation has been in support of the concept of overall Growth Management Act. It is believed that the cross-section of densities are afforded in an urban environment and best supported in a City structure. Because of the existing infrastructure, it is a natural for the subject area be annexed to the City. Mr. Branch noted transit service is available on Ricky Road to service that area. In response to Ms. O'Neill's comments about infrastructure improvements, the project he hoes to build would provide some of those improvements. Improvements to E. 31st street would include widening the street, sidewalks, gutters and extending the stormwater line to the manhole that was installed 20-years ago when the Sahali project was built. When that project is completed it will raise property taxation revenue almost 25%. Anna Made Cole, resident in Annexation Area, concurred with Greg Branch's comments and urged Council to approve the annexation as presented. TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 9 of 13 Elizabeth Buell, Bremerton resident, stated it was nice to hear that a large group of people wants to join the City. She urged Council to give their approval to this proposal. Mr. Reed thanked Ms. O'Neill for a very complete and informative staff report. He asked if he understood correctly that the comparison of taxes between the County and the City was about par, but the water and sewer costs would be lower. He acknowledged there is a $200 per single family residence impact fee on any lot in the county; however, the City does not have a similar charge. Ms. O'Neill explained if a residence is in the City, hook up fees for sewer and water are lower; and if a property is in the County but receiving City sewer and water services they would be charged at a higher rate. When a property is annexed into the City those charges would be at a lower rate. Mrs. Arends corrected an earlier statement that The Willows was located on Pine Road, not Perry Avenue. Mr. McConnell asked if the proposed project identified by Mr. Branch was to be located on E. 31st Street? Mr. Branch explained the boundary of the parcel fronts on E. 31 st Street Mr. Shepherd noted the Letter of Intent to annex had more than the required 10%. He asked Ms. O'Neill if the residents in the subject area were supportive of the annexation? Ms. O'Neill stated notices were sent out to all of the property owners in the affected area and she received only four telephone calls. Based on past experience, that was a very low call response. She did have several people stop by her office, but all of them were encouraging. And, she did have one person call and request their property be added to the annexation area. Mr. Shepherd asked if there would be a merger of fire services for that area? Ms. O'Neill stated no, the City would provide fire protection services once the area is annexed. Mr. Shepherd asked if the City experienced any difficulties in discussing this issue with the Fire District currently serving this area? Ms. O'Neill stated the City's Fire Chief met with the Fire Chiefs for Distdct #1 and #15 and discussed with them what is appropriate in terms of economic service delivery. At this point, she did not know what their feelings were and they were not present to voice any objection. Mr. Shepherd asked if the annexation would affect the City's fire rating? Ms. O'Neill stated no. President Farr questioned the population of the annexation area? Ms. O'Neill stated it is estimated at 300; however, she felt that number might be low considering there are 280 parcels. #2897 M/S/C/U(Overson/Olsen) Motion to agree to accept the area if significant signatures are collected and submitted as a 75% petition to annex, including the TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 10 of 13 addition of a 4-acre lot (Tax Lot #32401-1-042-002 located adjacent to the water side of Tracyton Beach on the north side of the annexation area). #3056 MISICIU(Overson/Montgomery) Motion to require a Comprehensive Plan and zoning for the proposed area. #0377 MISICIU(Shepherd/Montgomery Motion to require the area to assume a proportional share of existing City indebtedness. TAPE #1528 9A- PUBLIC HEARING ON RESOLUTION NO. 2643. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 5 LOT SUBDIVISION IN SINGLE FAMILY ZONE. APPLICANT: JERRY VERGEER: LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF SHERIDAN ROAD & RICKEY, #AB98-036 On January 20, 1998, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this project as a Preliminary Plat for single-family unit development. The developer asked at Planning Commission Meeting for relief from the City road standard requirement for a minimum 18-foot paved surface on the proposed road tract. The City Engineer and DCD Acting Director recommend that this request for a substandard road not be granted at this time. Though the road tract serves only two lots, it alleviates the flag lot requirement for 150 percent of minimum lot size for interior lot. Since all lots must have a minimum of 20-feet of frontage on a mad, this newly created road used for frontage on the interior lot is required to meet the road standard. The City Council is the decision-making body responsible for evaluation of Preliminary and Final Plats. The City Council shall either: 1 ) Affirm the decision under review; 2) Reverse the decision under review; 3) Modify in whole or part the decision under review; or 4) Remand the matter back to staff for further consideration. President Fan' asked the "Appearance of Fairness/Conflict of Interest" question. President Farr announced that Mr. Vergeer purchased a house from him approximately 10 years ago and his brother was the real estate agent. He did not believe he had a conflict. Mr. Reed stated he does not personally know Mr. Vergeer, but his older brother, a Utility Contractor, had worked for Mr. Vergeer on numerous projects. Glenna Malanca, City Attorney, stated since there is no objection to either of those disclosures, all Council members may remain seated. TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 11 of 13 Judy Johnson. Interim Director of Community Development, pointed out the subject site is located at the northeast corner of Sheddan Road and Rickey Road. The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to subdivide totaling approximately .07 acres into five single-family residential lots with a road tract. Each of the proposed lots exceeds the 5,000 sq. ft. minimum requirement. The site is zoned SF-3 and there is an existing home on Lot #1, which has a garage that will be removed after the preliminary plat is approved. The existing house meets all of the current requirements and setbacks. The 20-foot road tract, located north of Lot #4, meets all City standards. Utilities are available on Rickey Road and Sheridan Road. The Threshold Determination was issued on December 8, 1997, and no additional comments were received on the preliminary plat application. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat as presented. Craga Baldwin, Engineer with Westsound Engineering and representing Mr. Vergeer, stated this proposal is a straightforward plat in-filling a vacant lot or portions of a site that has been vacant for a long period of time. The only issue that has been raised is the question of the driveway that is designed to provide access to Lot #5. The applicant requested that the width of that driveway be reduced for two reasons: (1) it only serves Lot #5; (2) less impervious surface to be created less impact on drainage. During the Planning commissions' discussion on this issue a lot of items were talked about in terms of improvements along Rickey Road, i.e., sidewalk, change in transit location, which are part of conditions of approval, which the applicant is willing to comply with. Mr. McConnell asked if private driveways constitute a road? Ms. Johnson stated no, a road tract is a way to access an interior lot from a right-of-way. Mr. McConnell questioned if it is a road, would it become a public road rather than a private road? Ms. Johnson stated no, in order to qualify as a private road it must meet road standards. Lot #5 is an interior in-fill lot, which meets the SF-3 zoning requirements, and is accessed by the 20-foot right-of-way. Because it is a road tract, the requirement in the Code is to pave 18 feet. There is logic in the request to only pave 12-feet for the impervious surface; however, the Code currently reads that if it is a roadway it must meet the Road Standards. Mr. McConnell stated he would interpret it to mean that it would require 20-feet of paved surface. Ms. Johnson stated not paved surface, but rather access to the lot. Mr. Shepherd asked if the Fire Department had considered the roadway access issue? Ms. Johnson stated one of the Fire Department's requirements is that the road has an 18-foot paved width. TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 12 of 13 Mrs. Arends stated it was her understanding that the applicant was agreeable to comply with the City's code requirements and felt those requirements should be met. Mr. Overson concurred that the City's Road Standard should be upheld. Mr. Reed stated although he wants to work with all developers to see that all proposals are brought to reality, he did not know if Council had the right to over rule standing law. He asked for an explanation why the applicant felt they needed the reduced paving requirement. Mr. Baldwin stated it was not an excessive burden. The lot is approximately 98 feet from the right-of-way on Rickey Road. Both and he and the applicant felt it was appropriate to ask that 12-feet be considered. Mr. Reed stated because he was familiar with Fire Code mandates on mad widths (minimum of 20-feet) he could not see an overwhelming reason to overdde the existing code. He asked for a point of clarification if the proposed motion included the approval of a 20-foot right-of-way and 18-foot paved area? Paula Johnston, Deputy City Clerk, stated Mr. Reed was correct. #0330 MISICIU(Montgomery/OIsen) Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2643, accepting the Preliminary Plat of "Hand's Corner Subdivision", located adjacent to and northeast of Sheridan Road and Rickey Road, Bremerton, Washington. President Farr thanked the TV camera crew for their services: Robert Neal, Dave Chivis, Leslie Busch, and Gretchen Elliott. With no further business me tin adjourned at 7:14 P.M. City of Bremerton PJ/DF/me cc: Normal Distribution File/Vault