HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-083 AGENDA BILL ~
· BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1 5/
I. SUBJECT. Public Mearin,q &Ord,nance to amend FOR AGENDA OF: ,lll~ll~allaJLl~l~
BMC Chapter 21.02 (the Zoning Code) by providing regulatory DEPT. OF ORIGIN: ~
measures that will promote in-character, urban infill and ORIGINATOR: Chris Hugo, Director
efficient use of land by allowing front yard setbacks of residential DATE SUBMITTED: April 16, 2002
development to reflect established setbacks of existing structures.
2, CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
DCD Director: ~ .~s-=,~C'-7;, ,, ,,.;:,r,~ :. "~-~ .....
City Attorne~ o PC Minutes March 29, 2002
City Clerk:'~ -' .-.~' o Staff Report
Fiscal & Budget Council Comm.:~ o Ordinance to amend Zoning Text
Operations Comm.:~ ~0, ~'7~'c(
MA 'O OUNC,L PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
A substantial number of residential structures in Bremerton were constructed prior to the adoption of current
setback requirements. In some neighborhoods, the pattern of non-conforming front (street side) setbacks has
become part of the unique character of the City. The Growth Management Act and Comprehensive Plan
encourage the efficient use of land and smaller lots, and in some instances, decreased front setbacks are an
appropriate way to promote such efficiency and consistency with existing character.
The Planning Commission has reviewed this proposal, conducted a public hearing and adopted Findings &
Conclusions at their March 29, 2002 meeting, and recommends City Council approval. On July 17, 2001 the
Planning Commission recommended approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding this matter. The
City Council conducted a public hearing on August 1, 2001 and approved the Plan Amendment. The Council
must conduct a public hearing prior to its final decision and action on this proposed Ordinance that will implement
the Plan Amendment.
5. RECOMMENDATION: ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ *~/[S,/~ o~
Move '0 pass the attached Ordinance # on second readinq. G.~ c~A,I,x.o.~C~d'
6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Christopher R. Huqo
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Christopher R. Huqo
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
7. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED L/~ DISAPPROVED AMENDED
COUNCIL
DIRECTIVE:
9. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
10. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
If the proposed ordinance is not approved, opportunities for compatible residential infill
development in some older neighborhoods will be diminished.
11. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FAClLITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The proposed amendment will create no operational changes for the city with the possible
exception being residential infill development in older neighborhoods that might not be
possible without approval.
12. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Ordinance
File