HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-105 AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works & Utilities
Bid Award for Re-drilling the City's Well 18 ORIGINATOR: K. Cahall, Water Resources
DATE SUBMr]-FED: April 17~ 2001
2. CLEARANCES: (comment~~sa~)~~ 3. EXHIBITS:
Director PW&U _ . . ~. ,, ,~.-.~ Bid Tabulation Sheet
City Attorney
City Treasurer
Fiscal&Budget IDS WILL BE OPENED ON 5/11;/01
Operations
ENDORSEMENT X IN,FORMATION -- APPROVED BY COUNC_,JJ.,--PR~SIDENT F~R SUBMITTAL:
MAYOR ~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
In August 2000, the City's Well 18 failed from sand production and is unusable. A video inspection by,~
hydrogeologist indicateql that the well nee,dad to be replaced by re-drilling a new well in the vicinity. ~-' bids
were received with {~J~ ~ v'~,~ ~0v'~, 11 ~ v~ having a Iow bid at $~.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
That City Council award the installation of the new well to the lowest bid~'au~t~(~;~z?the Mayor to sign,
subject to City administrative policies and procedures.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION:
11. AGENDA BILL NO: ~)[
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS (Continued):
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (Continued):
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
The City would lose the capacity of this well at 0.8 million gallons per day. During this year's drought situation,
use of this well will be critical.
6~ IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, OR OTHER RESOURCES:
Capital funds in the Water Utility 2001/02 budget are available for this project. Estimates cost is $40,000.
7. RESEARCH RESOURCES:
Video inspection by Well Scan.