Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/04/96 AGENDA BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 239 4TH STREET BREMERTON, WA 98337 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 4. 1996 1. CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M. A. Pledge Of Allegiance B. Invocation I 2. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If separate discussion is desired on an item, it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at the request of a Council member. ~Q.~e.._ A. Minutes - November 20, 1996 #AB96-273 I 3. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS 4. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS 5. MAYOR'S REPORT 6. PUBLIC RECOGNITION -- (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes) 7. NEW BUSINESS A. utility Easement for Cascade Gas Location: 17th And Warren Avenue, Northeast Corner B. Public Works Project Contract for Above Ground Fuel Tank & Dispensing System 8. ORDINANCES A. Ordinance #4578 (Second Reading) Setting Water And Wastewater Rates B. Ordinance (First Reading) Adopting The 1997 Budget 9. PUBLIC HEARING - 6:00 P.M. OR LATER A. Resolution #2573, Regarding Recovery Of Fees For the Abatement Of the Property Located At 1246 Ivy Road #AB96-274 ::z.. #AB96-275 tQ #AB96-263 /9 #AB96-276 37 #AB96-277 1;;;... AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: MINUTES - NOVEMBER 20, T996 FOR AGENDA OF: 12-4-96 ORIGINATING DEPT: City Council ORIGINATOR: John E. Law DATE SUBMITTED: 2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: COPIES OF HINUTES TO BE DISTRIBUTED ON MONDAY - DECEMBER 2, 1996 ENDORSEMENT MAYOR INFORMATION _ APPROVED BY COuNCIL. ?NT FO~BMITTAL: COUNCIL PRESIDENT ~ STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: 4. SUMMARY 8. RECOMMENDATION: 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: PULLED TABLED 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE: 2A ll. AGENDA "BILL NO:~fo -.2 73 , / / TAPE #1422 UNAPPROVED DRAFT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 20. 1996 The regular meeting of the city Council of the city of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, November 20, 1996, at 5:30 P.M., with council President John Law presiding. Council members present were Carlos Montgomery, Sherril Huff-Menees, David Farr. Richard Neville, Lon Overson, Cecil McConnell, and Al Colvin. Councilman Bob winters was absent. Also present were City Attorney Ian Sievers and city Clerk Kathleen McCluskey. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council President Law and Invocation given by Reverend Sam Rachal, Jr. of Mt. Zion Missionary Baptist Church. President Law made the following announcement: (1) Council will hold a study Session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss liRe-evaluation of SR304 access from the Charleston District to Downtown. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of Meeting - November 6, 1996 #AB96-262 #0025 M/S/C/U(Neville/Montgomery) to approve Consent Agenda as presented. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the Council. #0045 M/S/C/U(Colvin/Overson) on November 20, 1996, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: 203584 -203751 in the amount of $368,223.13; and Regular Payroll for the period ending 11/15/96, in the amount of $697,859.69. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mr. Montqomerv complimented the City'S Street Department crews for doing a fantastic job during the snow storm. Mr. Farr welcomed a new restaurant in Bremerton - Greenhouse Restaurant located on Campbell Drive. He is enjoying a visit from his daughter, his grandson and their aunt. TAPE #1422 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 2 of 13 Mr. Colvin echoed comments about the excellent response by the ci ty' s crews in keeping the streets passable and safer for the citizens of Bremerton. He reminded everyone of the District #1 Neighborhood meeting on November 21. Information regarding Tax Exemption Programs for senior citizens will be available at that meeting. He also complimented the Cable Access TV crew for a job well done. It was his hope that some organization would take on the task of decorating empty windows in the downtown area for the holiday season, and offered his assistance in that endeavor. Mr. Law reported the District #3 Neighborhood meeting was canceled due to snow and issues and concerns will be addressed at the December 17th meeting. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Lynn Horton read a news release she received just prior to the Council meeting: liThe Washington state Ferries Director and CEO Paul Greene today announced Dakota Creek Industries Inc., of Anacortes is the apparent successful proposer to build two state of the art passenger only vessels for the ferry fleet." Mayor Horton noted the proposed boats would be built with the capability of creating a lessor wake at a speed of 30-34 knots through Rich Passage than the current passenger only vessels at 11-12 knots. And, the speed of the boats would allow 30-minute crossings (45- minute turn around time) between Bremerton and Seattle. This is important news to Bremerton since the first boat is slated for the Bremerton/Seattle route. The cost of the two boats is $19.4 million dollars. PUBLIC RECOGNITION Wayne Olsen, Bremerton resident, encouraged attendance at the District #1 Neighborhood meeting on November 21, 7:00 P.M., at the Sheridan Park Recreation Center. The guests speakers at that meeting will be Mayor Lynn Horton and representatives of the Sinclair Landing Association. Carol Atkinson, Bremerton Main Street Association, announced Santa will arrive downtown on December 6th, which will include a Christmas Tree lighting ceremony, photographs with Santa will be available with a donation to The Sun Bell Ringer Fund, and music will be provided by the Bremerton High School Choir. This event is sponsored by Bremerton Main Street Association, The Sun, and Americorp. On December 7 the Swing City Committee and North Pole Connection are sponsoring a Puppet Show by the Evergreen Children's Theater, at 123 Pacific at 2:30 P.M., Caroler's will perform at 2nd and Pacific, and at 3:00 P.M., the Bremerton High School Knights Marching Band and Drill Team will perform. She noted the "Welcome To Bremerton" was removed from the mural at 2nd an Washington because it was not what was originally planned and will be replaced TAPE #1422 city council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 3 of 13 as soon as the weather permits. Kal Leichman, Bremerton resident, stated he attended a meeting on "parking on planting strips II at Lutheran Memorial Church where he asked a city official the dollar amount for the liability for people injuring themselves on planting strips. At that time, the ci ty official did not have an answer. Now, he is asking the question what is the liability for the past five years for injury due to planting strips. He wants to make the point that if the liability is great he would support stopping vehicles from parking on planting strips. If the liability is little or nearly nothing, then he believes the city should stop any proposed action not allowing parking on planting strips. Wayne Olsen, Chairman of the Bremerton Planning Commission, apologized to anyone who attempted to attend their November 19th meeting, which was canceled due to road conditions. That meeting has been rescheduled for December 3, 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers. 7A - ORDINANCE NO. 4576 (SECOND READINGl REDUCING THE B&O TAX ON GARBAGE AND REFUSE BUSINESS. #AB96-25B Charlie Brown, Bremerton resident, stated it appears the proposal would decrease the tax by 1% to 17%. His understanding under state law is the tax is limited to .2 of 1%; however, he asked if the City Attorney or Mayor could provide a clearer explanation. He believes the Mayor and City Council take a Oath Of Office to uphold the laws of the state of Washington. If there is an interpretation of the law on this issue, it should be in favor of the taxpayers, not city government. Ian Sievers, City Attorney, stated the Association of Washington cities conducted a survey in 1995 and he recalled that 90% of the cities are paying at between 5-10%. There are some other larger jurisdictions that are also up in the neighborhood of 15-17%. It may be seen as a matter of interpretation, but the City believes the level of taxation in Bremerton for the garbage utility is legal. Mr. Overson stated he personally believes collection of that tax is in the best interest of the citizens of the City. City services cost money and this money has to come in to provide services. He referenced a news article in The Sun stating Brem-Air is moving out of the City and asked if this changed the city's tax situation? The implication was that by their moving out the City would potentially lose some income. Mayor Lynn Horton stated with Brem- Air leaving the City will lose some income from their corporate enterprise beyond city limits, but they will still be a business in the city of Bremerton and all appropriate taxes will be collected. TAPE #1422 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 4 of 13 Mr. Overson asked if the loss of income would result in a reduction of employees? Mavor Horton stated no. Mr. McConnell stated according to some figures he received from the Treasurer's Office in 1994-l995-1996, each year the tax was reduced by 1%, the city generated more income than the prior year based on that tax. At the prior Council meeting, the City Treasurer stated the City would lose $43,000 for each 1%. He disagreed with Mr. sievers's explanation; however, he would support the motion because a 1% reduction was better than none. Mayor Horton stated if you look at an isolated year that is correct, the income coming in exceeds the money the City would lose by ramping down the 1% tax, but what you have to realize is the city has been ramping down the tax each consecutive year and it is cumulative, i.e. 4.5% times the $43,000. In answer to Mr. McConnell's question it appears people are using more garbage service. She noted for the most part the rates have been frozen in the City of Bremerton. Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, stated as Mayor Horton indicated, this is the third year the rate has been ramped down. The revenue from this tax to the city has continued to trend upward even though the rate has been reduced. The garbage business is obviously expanding in the City at a rate greater than the rate of reduction in taxes. The point that he made last week was if all things were held equal, the dollar affect of the 1% reduction of the tax rate was approximately $43,000. Had the rate been left at 18% that line item in the 1997 budget would be approximately that much larger than as presented. Mavor Horton pointed out the City made a commitment to ramp that tax down each year until a reasonable rate is reached. She emphasized the tax base in Bremerton is somewhat limited due to the fact the City does not receive any tax revenue from the federal installation located in Bremerton. #0612 M/S/C/U(Huff-Menees/Montgomery) to pass Ordinance No. 4576 on second reading, reducing the B&O Tax on the garbage and refuse businesses, and amending Chapter 5.02 of the Bremerton Municipal Code. 7B ORDINANCE NO. 4577 (SECOND READINGl AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF PROPERTY FOR THE EXPANSION OF EVERGREEN PARK. #AB96-259 Public comment - none. #0857 M/S/C/U(Farr/Neville) to pass Ordinance No. 4577 on second reading, authorizing the purchase of properties through condemnation for the purpose of expanding Evergreen Park. BC - BUDGET HEARING FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997. #AB96-266 Pursuant to State statute, the City is required to have on public TAPE #1422 city council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 5 of 13 hearing regarding the proposed 1997 budget. Mayor Horton stated the proposed 1997 looks very similar to the 1996 budget with the primary difference being the cost of living increases for personnel, supplies and services. Some minor changes are being recommended to allow the Administration to function more efficiently internally, but for the most part she is not looking to bring on new additional staffing in the General Fund; however there is a new staffing level primarily in the Police Department Community Resources Division. In terms of public works and projects, the City received a grant to renovate the existing Evergreen park in 1997 and she hoped to acquire and renovate the old Hadden School site. There are several projects in the Wastewater and Water Utility, with the primary one in Wastewater being the Callow Avenue Basin Phase 2. In regard to the Hotel/Motel Tax, she emphasized those funds are to directly provide revenues to encourage tourism. In the case of Bremerton Main street, their mission is not to attract tourism, but to work on downtown issues. However, the reason why they are funded at all is their sponsorship of the Blackberry Festival. The Chamber Of Commerce may fall into the same situation, but 2-3 years ago when the visitor and Convention Bureau (VCB) got out of the visitor information side of the VCB the Chamber of Commerce stepped in and has directed and staffed a visitor Information booth on the waterfront; therefore, they are involved in the visitor information process. The Naval Museum has been funded for many years and in reality the museum is basically the City's Naval Museum in that the Navy loans the City the artifacts and in turn contracts out the running of the museum. She supports funding the museum; however a question has been raised about funding the museum, which needs to be addressed at some point. She assumes that question involves both the Naval Museum and Kitsap Historical Museum, although there are some issues that will be brought to the State Legislature to get changed in 1997. She recommended funding the Admiral Theater because the building belongs to the City. If the Admiral Theater cannot not repay its loan, the City has made an agreement with HUD that the building will default to them. She did not believe it was in the best interest of the City to have a City owned building default to HUD; therefore, it was important to fund that activity as well as to talk about the affect it can have to revitalize the downtown, such as has been done in the city of Olympia. In reference to her funding recommendation for an RV Park feasibility study, many people, including the Executive Board of the VCB, have commented that we don't have any RV facilities in this area. Lots of people come into the community with recreational vehicles, especially now that we have Pendergast Regional Sport Complex; however, they are unable to find appropriate over night accommodations. She did not see this as conflicting with hotel TAPE #1422 city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 6 of 13 revenues because it is an entirely different market. The one issue that may be a bit controversial is the lack of funding for the VCB. As she explained to council at the time she submitted her preliminary budget, she had not met with the Director of the VCB and there were some long outstanding issues that needed to be addressed. She did meet with the VCB Board earlier in the summer, but felt those outstanding issues needed to be brought to the new director. She did eventually have a positive meeting with the new director where those issues were discussed. She pointed out the Hotel/Motel Tax area is one that council has never passed without changing. She was quite confident that would be the case during this budget process. She noted there are funds in reserve if Council chooses to fund the VCB or to do something else. Mayor Horton described how Dan Miller, Project Manager for the City, will work with Kitsap Transit on construction of the new Transportation Plaza. Mr. Miller is presently working with Kitsap Transit because the City needs to make sure whatever is done on the Ferry Terminal site coordinates with whatever is done in the rest of the downtown. If the City is involved with a parking structure, she wants to make sure the city has management oversight over that project. Georqe Bieda, representing the Bremerton Naval Museum, gave background information on the formation of the Naval Museum and the role it plays today in serving both the military/retired military and tourists. He also expressed their appreciation of the funding proposed for 1997. Grant Griffin, Executive Director of the visitor and Convention Bureau (VCB) expressed his devastation when he learned that the VCB was not recommended for funding. He re-emphasized the fact that the Hotel/Motel Tax is specifically for tourism and the VCB 's single and primary mission is tourism. This tax is support by members of their organization, who feel strongly that they would like to see VCB put the effort forward to continue operating. He heard that there were several reasons why the VCB might not be funded, one being they basically did the same job as the Bremerton Area Chamber of Commerce, which is not true in that the Chamber is more "business" oriented. The VCB books conventions and tour groups and operates a County-wide visitor and Information Center where they see thousands of people on a monthly basis. He emphasized those activities are not done, with the exception on a local basis, by the Chamber. The VCB is the only full time agency devoted strictly to tourism in Kitsap County and when they get inquiries that are germane to the City of Bremerton that is shared with the Chamber of Commerce. As Mayor Horton mentioned, he met with her several weeks ago to discuss past experiences that are being carried forward to this day. He pledged to Mayor Horton that TAPE #1422 City council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 7 of 13 the VCB' s support would be there for Bremerton and yes, some mistakes were probably made in the past, but he wanted to put the past behind and move forward, which cannot be done without funding. He found it odd that Bremerton would choose not to fund the VCB when all other municipalities and Kitsap County are funding them at the level of 50% of the Hotel/Motel Tax. Renee Keh1, Super 8 Motel, stated support for the VCB and Bremerton Area Chamber of Commerce receiving Hotel/Motel Tax funding. Rowena Jonqeward, Mid-Way Inn, stated she has seen their tourist business drop. Three or four years ago there were larger numbers of people coming to this area from out-of-town. She agreed the Naval Museum is great; however, she felt strongly that they could charge a $1.00 admittance, which would help pay their own way. she did not feel the Hotel/Motel Tax revenue being given to either the Chamber of Commerce or VCB was sufficient to do the job and to do it well. She referenced Yakima and the fact that they have a VCB and Convention Center, which became a reality because their Hotel/Motel Tax went to promote the interests of Yakima County, not just the city of Yakima. As a smaller scale hotel business, they do not have the money to advertise in nationally distributed brochures or magazines. However, her tax dollars combined with others tax dollars given to the VCB and Chamber of Commerce can be pooled and do the kind of advertising they need to promote their businesses. She cannot afford to give her employees a wage increase or maintain the property in the manner they would like to, if they do not get people into their establishment. Not funding the VCB is being short sighted and a disservice to this community. Ric Raybourn, President of the Kitsap Lodging Association, emphasized the VCB is vital to the lodging facilities in Bremerton. with the exception of one hotel in Bremerton, these facilities do not have on-site sales staff, which means the VCB serves as their sales staff, i. e. providing referrals, convention leads, educational opportunities dealing with public relations, press releases, and marketing. wi thout a properly funded VCB these facilities will face an uphill battle trying to diversify and move away from their dependence on the military. He asked Council to consider the legal and appropriate use of these dollars. The lodging facilities that collect those taxes should be given a great deal of consideration in their decision to distribute the Hotel/Motel Tax funds. At this time, 48% of the Counties 1,169 guest rooms are in the City of Bremerton. He urged the City to allot a commensurate amount of Hotel/Motel Tax dollars the city receives to over-night tourism, which will expand the base from which those dollars are generated. As the General Manager of the Silverdale Hotel, he is in the business of exceeding their customers' expectations every day and when that doesn't happen he TAPE #1422 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 8 of 13 is in the business of going back and exceeding their expectation and how those problems are dealt with. As the incoming President of the VCB, he guaranteed that whatever problems existed in the past would not continue to come between the City and the VCB to promote tourism. Council's funding decision will greatly impact the future of the lodging industry in the city of Bremerton and he urged Council to listen to the concerns brought forward by those who run the lodging businesses. He also urged Council to send a message to not only the existing facilities that are currently doing business in the city, but to proposed facilities, such as in the Sinclair Landing project, that the City Council and the Mayor truly support over night tourism in the city and that they will show their support for new hotels coming into the area by supporting the agency that will be charged with bringing people into to the area to fill those lodging facilities. Yonq Kanq, owner of Oysterbay Inn & Restaurant, stated he believes Bremerton is a beautiful destination and lots of people can be attracted to it, but there needs to be a concentrated effort to promote the area. Government funding is being cut back and the loss of revenue needs to be replaced through the promotion of tourism to bring more people into our area. Louis soriano, representing Bremerton Main street, stated it was not Main Street's intent to have lots of people speaking on their behalf at this time, but he asked those in attendance to stand up and be recognized. He wanted to make sure Council was aware of who serves as the Director as well as the Board members: Director - Carol Atkinson; President - Lawrence Soriano; Vice President - Bob Tulp; Secretary - Cheryl Mccullough; Treasurer- Ann Laubach, Dave Boynton, Ray Clarke, Pam Martin, Rich McDonald, Emily Moshay, Susan Peterson, Rex-Zane Rudee and Brad Smith. Mr. soriano pointed out Main street has over 200 volunteers. He provided background information on the formation of Main Street and the hope that some day they will become part of the Federal Main street Association. He emphasized Main Street's involvement, some of which include: participating in the Downtown/Waterfront Task Force, Santa's Arrival, st. Patrick's Day Parade, Concerts on the Boardwalk and the Blackberry Festival. He introduced Richard Brandenberg, Executive Director of the Port of Bremerton. Richard Brandenberq stated he is in his fourth month as Executive Director of the Port of Bremerton and arrived in time to experience the Blackberry Festival, where he watched 10's of thousands of people pack the boardwalk for that activity. The Port Marina was filled to capacity during that event and people were making docking reservations a year in advance so they could enj oy next year's festival. The Concerts on the Boardwalk have been extremely successful and the Port of Bremerton is very supportive of the efforts of Main Street. Seattle would not be the same without a TAPE #1422 city council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 9 of 13 strong downtown organization representing other than the government or just citizens. He views Main Street as extremely effective and the work that goes on should be highly appreciated and recognized not only in the city's activities support but also financial support. Mr. Soriano noted the Kiwanis Club was represented in the audience in support of Main street and their involvement is through the Blackberry Festival. Main Street requested $20,000 for support of the Main street Office and one paid employee. He emphasized the importance of volunteers to their organization. In past years the city had funded Main street as follows: 1994 - $25,000; 1995 - $20,000, 1996 $5,000. He pointed out Main street requested $20,000, but the proposed 1997 budget shows an allocation of $5,000. Main Street agrees that all of the organizations recommended for funding are worthwhile, but it is interesting that Main street does bring in 60,000 people into the Central business District. In 1996 the city Treasurer anticipated having a $46,000 carryover, but actually had $58,000. That $58,000 has been transferred into Fund 104 of the proposed 1997 budget. The City Treasurer anticipates a $28,000 carryover in Fund 104 in 1997. Main street would not be requesting $20,000 unless it was warranted to do so, but their very existence is at stake due to loss of members as more downtown businesses close their doors. 7C - ORDINANCE (FIRST READINGl SETTING WATER AND WASTEWATER RATES. #AB96-263 The proposed ordinance will increase the City's retail water and wastewater rates by an average of three percent (3%) effective January 1, 1997. Staff analysis has demonstrated that this increase is necessary to allow the utility to pay for current operations, and to implement the capital improvements which are mandated to meet environmental and water quality regulations. Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, stated much of this information had been presented to the City Council earlier in the year. And, he emphasized the 3% increase would be on the fixed portion of the bill and the reason for proposing it in that fashion was based on the fact it will provide a more stable, predictable revenue stream for the utility. Russ Nickerson stated he recently learned the City offered a variable rate for senior citizens and was concerned that information was not publicly published. He was very interested to know the "senior" rate and who sets them? Mr. Hanna stated the utility does not have a "senior rate"; however, there is a below cost of service rate provided for low income disabled and low income seniors. Anyone wishing information on the availability of such a rate can contact his office or the utility Customer service TAPE #1422 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 10 of 13 Department. He pointed out the city provides information on this reduced rate through the publishing of the adopted ordinance and through the utility billing process. Mr. McConnell pointed out the recent newspaper article about the proposed rate increase left out the words "1ow income" in front of the words "senior citizen". Kathleen McCluskey, City Clerk, read into the record a letter received from Bremerton resident Lauraine E. Skoka: "We the people who wished to a attend the public hearing on rate increases protest the proposed water/sewer rate increases. As a single person, not qui te a senior, not disabled, but reaching those descriptions sooner than later. Living in a community of many low income, senior citizens and young families, which non can afford these rate increases. I work five days a week from 7:00 AM to 4:20 PM. I conserve water/sewer. I reuse my washing machine water, I run my dishwasher once a week. Yet my water sewer bill is higher than my heating bill. I can put water restrictors on faucets, limit toilet tank waters, but I still get no credit for these items. Rates continue to rise not just for me, but for all citizens of Bremerton. Bremerton looks like a dying city and you put rate increases on the people who are the hardest pressed to meet these rates. My salary is not increased, but my living increases are. I no longer get raises and I am approaching retirement with yet a smaller income. I am not in favor of rate increases." o PM Mr. Neville asked Mr. Hanna to explain the income cut off point to qualify for the low-income senior rate. Mr. Hanna explained it is the same threshold to qualify for the reduction in property taxes. Inquiries regard the reduced rate can be made to the Customer Service staff - 478-5316. Mr. Neville stated he was happy to see the rate increase was no longer on the volume flow, but rather on the fixed rate, which makes it more equitable for everyone. Mr. Colvin asked if the city had a brochure program? Mr. Hanna stated yes, and is utility Customer Service Department. outlining reduced rate available through the Mr. Farr stated no one is happy about a rate increase, but he firmly believes an increase of 3% and a steady small increase is more fair and less of a shock to people than having no increase for several years and then by necessity facing a 15-20% increase. Switching more emphasis of the cost of billing to the fixed rate verses the volumetric charges has been something he has been in favor for a long. He tired to gather support to go to basically or nearly all at a fixed rate. Mr. Hanna explained the benefits to the utility of being in a more stable position and able to predict TAPE #1422 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 11 of 13 income, but the benefits there are just like that for the consumer in that it takes the spikes out of the billing. He questioned for clarification if the overall billing is a 3% increase? Mr. Hanna stated yes. As he mentioned in his opening comments, in the case of water currently only 23% of revenue comes from the fixed portion. To do a 3% increase in our total water rate revenue, we're actually increasing the fixed portion of the bill by 13%. To quantify that in terms of dollars for a city resident that would amount to 27 cents per month and for a County resident it would be 39% per month of rate increase. Mr. Farr noted the City receives a lot of bad press over water and sewer bills, and asked if there were figures available as to what other surrounding communities are charging for their sewer and water services? Mr. Hanna stated he could not quote what other water/sewer districts or cities are charging in terms of dollars, but relative to other major utility purveyors in the County Bremerton has the lowest water rates (excepting a very small district within the County). At the same moment, the City's rates on sewer are the highest in the County. He anticipates other wastewater purveyors within the county will be catching up with City rates. Mr. Colvin asked if he understood correctly that the city's wastewater rate is tied to water usage? Mr. Hanna stated yes, as mentioned the water and sewer bills are composed of a heavy fixed portion and a portion based on water consumption. Both the water and sewer bills volume is measured through the water meter. Mr. Colvin stated he too favors smaller incremental increases. He asked for an example of the average water/sewer bill? Mr. Hanna explained an average water bill for a single family residence in the City would be $10.00 per month and an average sewer bill would be about $35.00 per month. Mr. Colvin questioned the average fixed portion? Mr. Hanna stated that varies, i.e., for a single family residence the fixed portion of a water bill is presently $1.98 per month and that would increase by 27 cents ($2.25 per month). Obviously, larger establishments would have a proportionally higher bill. Mr. McConnell asked if the surcharge attached to the water bill is based on the volume of the water or the dollar amount of the bill? Mr. Hanna explained the sewer bill is composed of two components - a fixed portion on a single family residence bill is presently $4.49 per month, which would increase to $5.30. Then, there is a volumetric portion and there is no proposal to change that rate of $3.70 per hundred cubic feet of water consumed. Mr. McConnell questioned the rate increase that came about as a result of the lawsuit relating to the sewer treatment plant? Mr. Hanna stated all of the rate increases that have taken place on the City's utility rates are a function of all the costs of running the utility, which would include capital renewals or replacements, TAPE #1422 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 12 of 13 capital expansion, all O&M costs. Clearly, lawsuits are expenses of running that utility. if it was based on the volume of water usage the bill? Mr. Hanna stated it is both. the litigation and Mr. McConnell asked or on the amount of #3216 M/S/C(Montgomery/Huff-Menees) to approve ordinance on first reading, amending rates and charges for municipal water and wastewater services; and amending Ordinance No. 4548 and No. 4565. Vote on Motion: In Favor: McConnell, Overson, Montgomery. Huff- Menees, Farr, Neville, Law Opposed: Colvin Motion carried. BB - PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. 2570. REGARDING THE RECOVERY OF FEES FOR THE ABATEMENT OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2006 11TH STREET. #AB96-265 On September 24, 1996, the Street Department removed debris and garbage from the property located at 2006 11th street after the owners, Richard and Hwa Cha Petersen, failed to do so as ordered by the Building Official. The cost to the abatement fund was $387.90. This action will recoup these charges. JudY Johnson, Building Department, stated on September 11, 1996, the property was posted for the large accumulation of trash, which was then removed by the City's street Department on September 24, 1996. TAPE #1423 Public comment - none. #0072 M/S/C(Neville/Colvin) to adopt Resolution No. 2570, ordering the fees incurred for the abatement of garbage and debris at 2006 11th Street be collected as reasonable abatement costs and become a personal judgment against the owners, Richard and Hwa Cha Petersen, which will become a lien against the property if not paid within 30 days. Vote on motion: In Favor: McConnell, Colvin, Montgomery, Huff-Menees, Farr, Neville, Law Abstain: Overson Motion carried. President Law thanked the TV camera crew for their services: James TAPE #l42.J City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 20, 1996 Page 13 of 13 Noble, Mike Peeble, Patricia Mathis, Nadine Price. with no further business meeting adjourned at 7:30 P.M.. KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, city Clerk JOHN E. LAW, Council President city of Bremerton KLM/JL/me cc: Normal Distribution File/Vault AGENDA BilL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL I. SUBJECT: Utility Easement for Cascade Gas Location: 17th and W arren Ave, Northeast Corner FOR AGENDA OF: December 4, 1996 ORIGINATING DEPT: Public WorkslUtilities ORIGINATOR: R. Witt City Engineer DATE SUBMITTED: November 25, 1996 2. CLEARANCES: (conunent on back ifneces5{lI)') 3. EXHIBITS ~irector, Public WorkslUtilities ~. City Attorney _______________ Attachment A - Easement Budget & Finance Committee , . , Operations Committee . - ENDORSEMENT X INFO~ON _APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT MAYOR ~ ..;J. l&.b- COUNCIL PRESIDE 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cascade Gas Company has requested a ten foot easement across the City's property located on the northeast corner of 17th Street and Warren Ave, tax parcel number 3804-004-006-0107. This request will allow Cascade Gas to place their new gas main extension under the City's sidewalk at this location instead of in W arren Ave.. 8. RECOMMENDATION The City Council approve the easement with Cascade Gas Company and authorize the Mayor to execute the same. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL City Engineer ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL N/A EXPIRATION DATE REVIEW DATE 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE DATE: 2.. ]1 AGENDA BILL NO_<fC, -27 '-I 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Cascade Gas Company would be required to place their gas main in Warren Ave. This will cause impacts to the traveling public due to construction_ 6. IMP ACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EOUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES There are no impacts to budget or staffing. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES FORMS\96140 -3 CNG317 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION 222 FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109 ATTENTION: Marilyn Bostock EASEMENT Ci!~" county' Slate' E.R. No : Bremerlon KilS<lp Washington ]070.]07.5] ]56 The undersigned, CITY OF B~EMERTON, a municip<ll corporation, (hereinafter rderreo 10 as lhe "Grantor"), for and in consideration of Ten Dollars (SIO.CX)), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, con\'ey. and warrant 10 CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Gramee"), a permanent nonexclusive easement burdening the following described property of the Grantor. located in the: County of Kitsap State of Washington Prooertv Descriotion: That pOrlion of Lots 6 and 7, Block 4, of SMITHS WARREN ACRE TRACTS described as fol1u\\s Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Lot 7; thence East 15 feet to the True Point of Beginning: thence cOlltinuing E:lst 82.45 fee!; thence North 95.08 feet; thence East 62.38 feet: thence North 32 feet: thence \Vest 5.41 fcct; thence North 63.54 feet; thence West 139.38 feet; thence South 19062 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Tax Parcel No. 3804-00HXJ6-0107 Easement Location: The West 10 feet of the above described property. The Grantee is granted the right to construct. install, operate. maimain. prOlecl. impro\'e. repair, and :lbandon in place a natural gas pipeline or pipelines under, over. through. and across the Jbo\'e described property. The Grantee is further granted an easement for the none.'l;clusi\'e right of access 10 .md from said properly for the purposes of utilizing the rights herein granted. The term "pipeline" includes g:lS lines, services, machinery, equipmcnt, and facilities related to the operation or maintenance of s:lid g:lS lines. The GrJlltor, on behalf of itself and its agents, illvitees and licensees. agrees not to impair or illlerfere with the full use and enjoyment by the Grantee of the rights herein granted. Without limiting the generality of lhe foregoing. the GrJlltor shall not erect any structure within the easement area, or conduct or permit any acti\'ities which Illay impair or interfere with the rights herein gramed. The Grantee agrees to hold the Gramor harmless from any loss, cost, or lbmage resulting from the Grantee's negligence in connection with the operation or maintenance of allY pipelines installed under or over the easemellt premises and the Grantor agrees to hold lhe Gramee harmless from any loss, cost, or damage caused by the Grantor, its agents. im'itees. or licensees from any breach of this contrac\. Grantor agrees to cooperale with Grantee to obtain all necessary permits. licenses and governmental action so that Grantee may enjoy the full use and benefit of this easement This e:lsernent shall be binding upon the heirs. executors. administrators. personal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto In witness whereof, the undersigned have e:'\eeutcd this casement tIle , ]996. UJyof CITY OF BREMERTON, a municipal corporation By: B, KATHLEEN /lh:KLUSKEY, City Clerk LYNN !lORTON, Mayor 4- "ATTACHMENT A" State of Washington County of Kitsap ACKNOWLEDGf>..lENT BY AUTHORIZED REPRESE:'-lTA Tl\'E ss. I cerlify thai I know or have satisfactory evidence that LYNN HORTON and K.'\THLEEN McKLUSKEY are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged ,hat they signed this instrument, on oath staled that they are authorized to e:r;ecule the instrument and acknowledged it as the f>..layor and City Clerk of CITY OF BREMERTON, to be the free and \'oluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Given under my hand and official seal this day of 1996. (Print Name) Notary Public for: Residing at: My appointment expires: 5 AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: Public Works Project Contract for Above Ground Fuel Tank & Dispensing System. FOR AGENDA OF: /)1'<: f , /~,.1f' ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Pub 1 i c Works & Ut i 1 ~ I ORIGINATOR: W. Hami lto n, Ut il s Oprns Mg r il~ DATE SUBMITTED: /V4V ;lS, I '''Ii" 2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back if necessary) Administrative Services _~ ~ City Treasurer .- k::;' City Attomey Public Works Director Purchasing Supervisor Council Fiscal & Budget Council Operations 3. EXHIBITS: (1) Project Cost Summary (2) Contract ENDORSEMENT X MAYOR ~ J ~ /,- 04'L~--~ '/ INF9R~ATION _ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESID . -1f.-J--. COUNCIL PRESIDE T 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: Request for proposals were prepared, distributed and received in accordance with Public Works Small Works Roster project for the purchase and installation of an above ground fuel storage tank and dispensing system. The low bid was submitted by Ace Tank & Equipment Company in the amount of $16,668.21. 8. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the contract for the purchase and installation of an above ground fuel storage and dispensing system be awarded to Ace Tank & Equipment Company, as to specifications and low bid received in the amount of $16,668.21 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE REVIEW DATE: COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED 11. AGENDA BILL NO: "" - .J.75 CD 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: s. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: City Fire and and other emegency vehicles will continue to use existing underground fueling system at Fire Station 3,3029 Olympus Drive. This system was installed in 1978 and, by federal and state laws, is subject to continued and expensive monitoring and testing. Costs of compliance with future underground fuel storage systems regulations are unknown. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING BUDGETS FACILITIES EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: Staffing: Budget: Facilities: Equipment: None $35,000.00 is budgeted for the project, including site improvements and underground storage tank removal. None None 7 PROJECT COST SUM~~RY ABOVEGROUND FUEL SYSTEM 3029 OLYMPUS DRIVE H.O.~R6226307 QUOTE ~t30705 ITEMS FROM WA. STATE CONTRACT #10091, AND COST OF EACH: ] EA. FUEL TANK - UL2085, 2 COMPARTMENTS. 1 EA. ST~IR PLATFORM, THO-STEP. 2 EA. SPILL CONTAINMENT BUXES. 2 EA. OVERFILL VALVES. 2 EA. SUBMERGED FILL TUBES. 2 EA. FILL CAPS. 2 EA. PRIMARY TANK VENTS, H/FLAME ARRESTERS 2 EA. PRIMARY TANK EMERGENCY VENTS. 1 EA. CONTAIM1ENT TANK EMERGENCY VENT. I EA. CONTAINMENT MONITOR. ] EA. FREIGHT TO SITE. $7,106.00 $ 169.00 $ 223.00 $ 731.00 $ 12.00 $ 9.00 $ 154.00 $ 52.00 $ 75.00 $ 14.00 $ 105.00 TunL FOR TANK AND EQU1P~lENT ON \,A. STATE CONTRACT=' $9.831.00 [TEMS PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR, AND COST OF EACH: LIS eJI SC . TANK FITTINGS, DECALS, & GAUGES. $ 495.00 LIS FUEL PUHP SYSTEMS. $ 1,222.00 LIS FUEL LOCK CARD SYSTE~1 . $ 1,842.00 LIS SYSTHl ASSEMBLY CHARGE. $ 2,015.00 TOT..\ L FOR EC-IU lPMENT PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOH =' $ 5,574.00 SUB TOTAL=' $15,405.00 STi\TE SALES TAX @ 8.2%=' $ 1,263.21 GRAND TOTAL=' $16,668.21 g PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into in triplicate, this _ day of ,19 ,by and between the City of Bremerton, hereinafter called "City," and Ace Tank and Equipment Company, hereinafter called "Contractor." WIT N E SSE T H: That in consideration of the proposal submitted by Contractor attached hereto as Exhibit "A", the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows: 1. SCOPE: Contractor shall perform all work and furnish all labor, tools, material and equipment to: Provide and install one (1) above ground Fueling System, including tank and equipment, tank fittings, fuel pump systems, card system and assembly at 3029 Olympus Drive, Bremerton, Washington. All work shall be in accordance with and as described in the attached Request for Proposal, Plans, Special Provisions and the Standard Specifications for Municipal Public Works Construction, which are by this reference incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". Contractor shall provide and bear the expense of all equipment, tools, materials and labor of any sort whatsoever that may be required for the transfer of materials completing the work provided for in this contract and every part thereof, except such as are mentioned q in the specifications to be furnished by the City. 2. TERM: Work shall start within ten (10) calendar days after the date of Notice To Proceed is issued to the contractor and shall be completed within One Hundred Sixty (1"l361 calendar days. If said work is not completed within the time specified, contractor agrees to pay to the City the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for each working day said work remains uncompleted after expiration of the specified time as liquidated damages. 3. COMPENSATION: City agrees to pay Contractor according to the terms of the Contractor's proposal and at a time and in a manner provided for in the contract in the amount of Sixteen Thousand Six Hundred Sixty eight and .21/100 Dollars ($16,668.21). 4. LIEN FOR LABOR. MATERIAL. TAXES ON PUBLIC WORKS: Contracts for public works or improvements shall provide, and there shall be reserved by the City from moneys paid to the contractor as progress or completion payments a sum not to exceed five percent (5%) as a trust fund for the protection and payment of any person(s), who shall perform any labor or provide equipment, materials and services for performing such work and the State of Washington with respect to taxes imposed pursuant to Title 82 RCW which may be due from the contractor. Funds withheld under this section are placed in escrow with a bank or trust company acceptable to the City until thirty days following final acceptance of the improvement or work or until releases are received by the City from the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries and Department of Revenue and that all liens and claims are satisfied. 2 10 The contractor shall complete and enclose with the executed contract a Retainage Instruction form stating the contractor's option relative to investment of retained funds during the retention term. 5. PERFORMANCE BOND: Prior to commencing work pursuant to this contract, Contractor shall file with the City Clerk, as Contracts Administrator, a bond as surety, conditioned that the contractor shall faithfully perform all the provisions of the contract and pay all laborers, mechanics, subcontractors, materialmen and all persons who supply such person or persons or subcontractors with provisions and supplies for the carrying on of such work. The bond shall be in an amount equal to the full contract price agreed to by paid for such work or improvement. On contracts of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or less, at the option of the contractor, the City may, in lieu of the bond, retain fifty percent (50%) of the contract amount for a period of thirty days after date of final acceptance or until receipt of all necessary releases from the Department of Labor and Industries and settlement of any lien filed under RCW 60.28, whichever is later. 6. PREVAILING WAGES: Contractor agrees to comply with provisions of RCW 39.04 and RCW 39.12 as defined in WAC 296-127-101, 296-127-011, 296-127-025, 296-127-040,296-127-045. Schedule attached as Exhibit "C". 7. LICENSES AND TAXES: Contractor shall possess a current Bremerton 3 /1 Business License and any regulatory license required to fulfill Contractor's obligations under this contract. B & 0 taxes shall be paid when due, and Contractor by this agreement assigns any payments due under this contract to the City Clerk for payment of such taxes which have been declared delinquent. 8. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: The City's Authorized Representative shall act as advisor and consultant to the City in all matters relating to the contract, and responsibilities shall include: a. Approving the amount, quality, acceptability and fitness of the work, materials and equipment which are to be paid for under the contract and approve all pay estimates prior to payment by the City. b. Deciding all questions relative to the true construction, interpretation, meaning and intent of the contract documents. c. Deciding all questions relative to the classification and measurement of quantities and materials and the fulfilling of this Contract. d. Shall have the power to reject and disapprove of work or material which does not conform to the contract documents. e. May direct the sequence of work where such direction is for the purpose of avoiding conflict with other work being performed by the City or by others in the same general locality. Nothing herein shall be construed as requiring the Authorized Representative to direct the method or manner of performing the work. The decision of the authorized representative in the matters described above shall be final. The authorized City representative for this project is Chris L. Mottner. 4 I:J- 9. CONFLICT AND PRECEDENCE: In the event of a conflict between the contract documents, the document which rates higher on the following list shall take precedence. a. Change orders, if any, b. Contract, c. Contract drawings and plans, d. Special provisions, e. Instruction to bidders, f. Contractor's proposal. 10. INSURANCE: During the performance of the work covered by this Agreement, the Contractor shall provide the Risk Manager for the City evidence that Contractor has obtained and maintains the insurance listed below in the amounts stated: Comprehensive general liability insurance and automobile liability insurance covering all owned and non-owned automobiles or vehicles used by or on behalf of Contractor with a $500,000.00 each bodily injury and property damage limit. Contractor shall furnish the City with a copy of Certificate of Insurance evidencing policies required above and evidencing policies of insurance for subcontractors, if applicable. Such certificate shall specifically state that the insurance company or companies issuing such insurance policies shall give the City at least thirty (30) days' written notice in the event of cancellation of or material change in any of the applicable policies. The Certificate of Insurance shall give a brief description of the work being performed under this contract and shall name the City as a co-insured. 5 13 11. INDEMNITY: Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and save harmless the City, its appointed and elected officers and employees, from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, damage and expense, including costs and attorney fees in defense thereof because of actions, claims or lawsuits for damages resulting from personal or bodily injury, including death at any time resulting therefrom, sustained or alleged to have been sustained by any person or persons and on account of damage to property, arising or alleged to have arisen directly or indirectly out of or in consequence of or the performance of this Agreement, whether such injuries to persons or damage to property is due to the negligence of Contractor, its subcontractors, agents, successors or assigns. This provision shall be inapplicable to the extent that the City is judicially found solely negligent for such damage or injury. 12. MBEIWBE REQUIREMENTS: All Public Works contracts between the City and contractors for any public work or improvement exceeding the sum of $10,000.00 shall comply with the following: Contractor shall actively solicit the employment of minority group members. Contractor shall actively solicit bids for the subcontracting of goods or services from qualified minority businesses Contractor further agrees to consider the grant of subcontracts to said minority bidders on the basis of substantially equal proposals in the light most favorable to said minority business. The contractor shall be required to submit evidence of compliance with this section as part of the bid. 13. NON-DISCRIMINATION: Except to the extent permitted by a bona fide 6 /1 occupational qualification, Contractor agrees to the following practices during the term of this contract: a. Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of payor other forms of compensation; and selection for training. b. Contractor shall, in all solicitation for employees or job orders for employees placed with any employment agency, union or other firm or agency, state that all qualified applicants shall receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability. The words "Equal Opportunity Employer" in advertisement shall constitute compliance with this section. c. Contractor shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which s/he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding a notice advising the said labor union worker's representative of their commitment under this section, and send notice to the City of same. In the event of non-compliance by Contractor with any of the non-discrimination provisions of this Agreement, the City shall have the right, at its option, to cancel this Agreement in whole or in part. Contractor is required to submit such reports determined appropriate to the contract in a format acceptable by the City's Equal Employment Opportunity Officer. 15 7 14. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: The following docu- ments are incorporated by reference, and include, but not limited to: Terms and Conditions Specifications Drawings Proposal 15. NOTICES: Any notices required to be given shall be in writing and delivered to the following parties at the following addresses: City Clerk 239 Fourth Street Bremerton WA 98310 Ace Tank & Equipment Company 1143 Elliot Avenue W. Seattle, WA 98109 16. PRODUCT WARRANTY: The products provided in accordance with these specifications must be warranted to be merchantable within the meaning of the Uniform Commercial Code. Furthermore, the Contractor warrants that all material furnished and all work performed under this Agreement will be free from defects in material and workmanship and will conform to the requirements of this Agreement. 17. TERMINATION: This Agreement may be terminated by either party for convenience upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party, or for cause if either party fails substantially to perform through no fault of the other and does not commence correction within five (5) days of written notice and diligently completes the correction thereafter. Upon such termination, City will be entitled to reports showing the status of all matters upon which Contractor is providing services to the City as of the effective date of termination. 8 /~ 18. ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS: In the event of any action or proceeding brought by either party against the other under this contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover for the fees and costs of its attorneys and such action or proceeding, including an appeal thereof, if any, in such amount as the court may find reasonable. In addition, should it be necessary for either party to employ legal counsel to enforce any of the provisions herein, the defaulting party shall pay all attorney's fees and costs reasonably incurred. 19. TERMINATION PROVISION: This contract may be canceled by either party for cause upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party and may be canceled by either party without cause upon sixty (60) days written notice to the other party. 20. ASSIGNMENT: The rights and obligations established by this Agreement, except the receipt of payment, may not be assigned without the written consent of the City. 21. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and both parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been fully set forth in the text of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF BREMERTON: CONTRACTOR: LYNN HORTON, Mayor 9 17 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL EUGENE SAMPLEY, Public Works ATTEST: KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: IAN SIEVERS. City Attorney I~ 10 1 SUBJECT' AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. /..fS 7--9 1;1.- '-1- '1 ~ FOR AGENDA OF: Nov.~i'(), 1996 ORIGINATING DEPT.: TREASURER ORIGINATOR:R. HA A DATE SUBMITTED: Oct. 28, 1996 SETTING WATER AND WASTEWATER RATES 2. CLEARANCES. Comm 3. EXHIBITS: PROPOSED ORDINANCE CITY ATTORN FISCAL AND BU~ C9M~.,;Cf t)JE t2 ~ _ _ h <'fP <U~. . A j-<<.Jj~ --fuy. Q.<.lr1 J/J~.4'r 1/ ~ f ENDORSEMENTS INFORMATION APPROVED BY MAYOR COUNCIL PRESIDE CIL PRESIDENT FOR SU MITTA 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTIO : The proposed ordinance will increase the City's retail water and wastewater rates by an average of three percent effective January 1, 1997. Staff analysis has demonstrated that this increase is necessary to allow the utility to pay for current operations and to implement the capital improvements which are mandated to meet environmental and water quality regulations. 8. RECOMMENDATION: ~qGtiQR tQ ~pprove on first readina Ordinance No gettins utility rates. Motion to pass on second reading Ordinance No. Lf:17 fJ setting utility rates. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: Treasurer Mayor NIA N/A 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: I' 11. AGENDA BILL NO: q~-.:t~3 8A 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Current water and wastewater rates will remain in effect with a resulting shortage of revenue to the City's utilities. 6, IMPACT ON STAFFING BUDGETS FACILITIES EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: Will increase the operating revenues of the water and wastewater utilities by approximately $76,000 and $155,000 per year respectively. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: Capital Improvement Plan Water and Wastewater rate analysis by staff. ':;0 FlLE""'-"1LREV 25-0<:1-96 RETAIL WATER SALES SUMMARY FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 1996 FIXED VOLUME SERVICES CHARGES CHARGE CHARGE 1 5/8"x3/4" CITY WATER 286,674 286,674 21" CITY WATER 11,387 11,387 31112" CITY WATER 8,871 8,871 4 Z' CITY WATER 11,372 11,372 53" CITY WATER 4,548 4,548 6 4" CITY WATER 5,438 5,438 7 6" CITY WATER 3,806 3,806 115/8x3/4"COUNTYWATER 159,597 159,597 121" COUNTY WATER 5,947 5,947 131112" COUNTY WATER 4,741 4,741 142" COUNTY WATER 2,563 2,563 153" COUNTY WATER 736 736 164" COUNTY WATER 1,379 1,379 176" COUNTY WATER 2,203 2,203 21 5/8x3/4" PORT WATER 623 623 221" PORT WATER 567 567 231112" PORT WATER 177 177 242" PORT WATER 237 237 253" PORT WATER 152 152 264" PORT WATER 275 275 31 5/8x3/4" SD#l WATER 30,009 30,009 321" SO#l WATER 205 205 331112" SO#l WATER 799 799 342" SO#l WATER 488 488 353" SO#l WATER 297 297 41 5/8x3/4" TRACYTON WATER 23,249 23,249 421" TRACYTON WATER 1,458 1,458 431 112" TRACYTON WATER 95 95 453" TRACYTON WATER 123 123 75 CITY WATER COMMODITY 1,123,488 1,123,488 76 COUNTY WATER COMMODITY 641,534 641,534 77 PORT WATER COMMODITY 18,465 18,465 78 SO#l WATER COMMODITY 89,334 89,334 79.1 RACYTON WATER COMMODITY 84,088 84,088 80 NORTH PERRY COMMODITY 128 128 90 2" CITY FIRELlNE 761 761 91 3" CITY FIRELlNE 101 101 924" CITY FIRELlNE 3,069 3,069 936" CITY FIRELlNE 9,260 9,260 948" CITY FIRELlNE 6,651 6,651 95 10" CITY FIRELlNE 257 257 98 3" COUNTY FIRELlNE 480 480 994" COUNTY FIRELlNE 1,299 1,299 1006" COUNTY FIRELlNE 1,498 1,498 1018" COUNTY FIRELlNE 3,002 3,002 10312" COUNTY FIRELlNE 556 556 193 COUNTY LOW INCOME WATER 511 511 195 CITY LOW INCOME WATER 2,798 2,798 197 ACH DISCOUNT (12,001) (12,001) 198 DUPLICATE BILL CHARGE 0 TOTAL RETAIL RATE REVENUE 2,543,293 586,257 1,957,036 PROPOSED RATE INCREASE 3% 13.0% INCREMENTAL REVENUE 76 299 76 299 Q TOTAL PROPOSED REVENUE 2.Q1 9 592 66? 555 1 957 036 ..2.1 F1LE"RATES 28-Od.Q6 RETAIL SEWER SALES SUMMARY FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 1996 MONTHLY FIXED VOLUME CHARGES J..1.t'IJTh FIXED RATE CHARGE CHARGE 118 SUL SPR SEWER (COUNT 263 1 5.16 62 201 119 NP SEWER (CITY) 459 2 4.49 108 351 120 CITY SEWER - 1 FAMILY 1,885.443 7,215 4.49 388,744 1.496,699 121 COUNT SEWER - 1 FAMILY 154,973 1,007 5,16 62,353 92,619 123 N P SEWER - 1 FAMILY 10,554 34 5,16 2,105 8.449 125 CITY SEWER -MULTI FAM 1,781,926 8,052 3.59 346,880 1.435,046 127 COUNTY SEWER - MULTI F 91,443 299 4,12 14,783 76,660 131 NP SEWER - MULTI FAM 1,681 8 4,12 396 1,286 132 NP SEWER MULTI FAM (CI 184 1 3.59 43 141 135 PORT COMMERCIAL 1 & 2 2,355 17 6.03 1,230 1,125 139 NP SEWER COMM 1 (CITY) 635 2 5.24 126 510 140 CITY SEWER - COMM 1 954,841 795 5.24 49,990 904,851 141 COUNTY SEWER - COMM 1 10,391 12 6.03 868 9,522 143 NP SEWER - COMM 1 5,528 9 6.03 651 4,876 146 CITY SEWER - COMM 2 299,097 91 6.03 6,585 292,512 147 COUNTY SEWER - COMM 2 1,747 1 6.03 72 1,674 194 COUNTY LOW INCOME SE 61 7 1.12 94 (33) 196 CITY LOW INCOME SEWE 3.407 83 0.97 966 2A41 CURRENT RETAIL REVENUE 5,204,988 876,056 4,328,932 PROPOSED RATE INCREASE 3,00% 17.8% 0.00% INCREMENTAL REVENUE 156150 1561.50 Q TOTAL PROPOSED REVENUE 5361 138 ~U06 ~8_9;l2 ? .:l_ ORDINANCE /.j,-n AN ORDINANCE amending rates and charges for municipal water and wastewater services; and amending Ordinance Nos. 4548 and 4565. TIlE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. Amendment. Section I of Ordinance No. 4548, as amended by Ordinance No. 4565, is further amended as follows: PURPOSE. This ordinance establishes assessments, rates and charges for municipal water, wastewater and stormwater services. Except as expressly provided herein, nothing in this ordinance shall affect the application of annual adjustments of General Facility Fees, or Connection Fees as set forth in BMC 15.06.020. 1. WATER. (a) ASSESSMENTS: (1) General Facility Fee. (a) Within City limits $150.00/ERU (b) Outside City limits $225.00/ERU (2) Front Footage Fee. (a) Within City limits $8.00 per foot (b) Outside City limits $12.00 per foot (3) Connection Fee. Rate Per Connection WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 10/29/96 I 23 Size Within City Limits Outside City Limits 314" $ 733.00 $1099.00 1" 788.00 1182.00 1 1/2" 1408.00 2112.00 2" 1579.00 2368.00 Greater than 2" Time & Materials 150% of Time & Materials (4) Pavement Restoration. * Asphalt Concrete $300.00 $300.00 $450.00 $450.00 * Refundable, if assessed and not required. (5) County Road Permit NIA Cost (b) RATES: (1) Retail Water Service Rates. Monthly Service Charge Meter Size Within City Limits 518 & 314 inches Outside City Limits 1 inch 1-1/2 inch 2 inch 3 inch $ t:9tlU.5. H52..5.5. 3-:-Hl3..6Q 4-:3B4...8i --1l--:-tS~ 2 $ 2:-%3...15. ~1..W --4-:-R.L4Q 6:-45L3Q -H--:7!T 1l.2Q WASTEWTR.ORD ~ Ordinance Disk 2 - 10129/96 ..21- 4 inch t5-:-Z5 .11.25: tt$2i.2Q 6 inch 54-:-Hl6L2l1 ~ 8 inch 197.5022320 296.25334.80 10 inch 705. J5797 05 1,058.001,195.60 12 inch 2,652.152,99695 J .')78.2J4,495 .40 Commodity Charge $0.75/H.C.F. $1.l25/H.C.F. (2) Fire Protection Service. Monthly Service Charge Service Size Within City Limits Outside City Limits 2 inch $ "f:{j5lLQ5. $-H-:--48l.1..OO 3 inch ~ -tZ:-65H.1Q 4 inch 9:-ffllQAQ B:-99' liW 6 inch -H-:--48l.1..OO t7-:-2-2li5.Q 8 inch t5-:-3Bl1...3Q Z2-:-95~ 10 inch z+.-4:32UQ 32-:-l:53.ll.lQ 12 inch 3&.-ffi}tiQ 45-:965.L2Q (3) Low-Income Senior Citizen and Low-Income Disabled Citizen Rates. Monthly Service Charge Meter Size 5/8 X 3/4" Base Charge Within City Limits $-t:-15b.QQ/ Acct 3 Outside City Limits $2-:{i33...QQ/ Acct WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 10/29/96 ..25 Commodity Charge o - 1000 CF /Billing No charge No charge Over 1000 CF/Billing $0.75/H.C.F. $1.125/H.C.F. (4) Temporary/Construction Meter. Within City Limits Outside City Limits Size Deposit Base Fee Base Fee 3/4"&1" $ 75.00 $W:0022...5.Q1 mo $ 3e:003.:l.12/ mo Hydrant meter 300.00 4&.004.i..QQ/ mo 6&.-OO!il.iQ/ mo Commodity Charge $0.75IH.C.F. $1.125/H.C.F. (5) Water Inspection Fees. Within City Limits Outside City Limits Main Extensions $0.75Ift. but not less than $300.00 $1.125Ift. but not less than $450.00 Pump Stations $500.00 $750.00 Miscellaneous $40.00/Hr. $60.00/Hr. II. W ASTEW A TER (a) ASSESSMENTS: (1) General Facility Fee. WASTEWfR.ORD. Ordinance Disk 2 - 10/29/96 4 ~(O (a) Within City limits $150.oo/ERU (b) Outside City limits $225.00/ERU (2) Front Footage Fee. (a) Within City limits $ 8.00 per foot (b) Outside City limits $12.00 per foot (c) Properties not included in UUD $64.30 per foot #327 fronting the sewer main in Northlake Way installed as part of the Kitsap Lake Sewer Extension (DUD #327) Project. (3) Inspection Fee. Conveyance Facility Ext. Within Outside City Limits City Limits $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $250.00 $375.00 $L25/Ft. $1.90/Ft. but not but not less than less than $300.00 $450.00 $500.00 $750.00 $40.00IHr. $60.00/Hr. Lateral connection at PIL Lateral connection at main Pump Station Miscellaneous (b) RATES: (I) Retail Wastewater Service Rates. WASTEWTRORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 10/29/96 5 .;L7 Monthly Service Charge Single Family Base Charge Commodity Charge Duplex on 1 Meter or 2 Bldgs. on 1 Meter or Single Parcel Base Charge Commodity Charge Multiple Family Base Charge Commodity Charge Commercial I Base Charge Commodity Charge Commercial II Base Charge Commodity Charge WASTEWfR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 10/29/96 Within City Limits Outside City Limits $4-:-495...1Q1 Acct $5:-t66...lQ1 Acct 3.70/H.C.F. 4.251H.C.F. $3-:-59!1:...2.5./U nit $4-:-tZ:L2Q/Unit 3.70/H.C.F. 4.25/H.C.F. $3-:-594...25.IU ni t $4-:-tZ:L2Q1U ni t 3.70IH.C.F. 4.251H.C.F. $5:Z4li.2.Q1 Acct $6:-001...li1 Acct 3.70IH.C.F. 4.25/H.C.F. $5:Z4.6...2Q1 Acct $6:-001...li1 Acct 5.801H.C.F. 6.67IH.C.F. 6 ;LK (2) Low-Income Senior Citizen and Low-Income Disabled Citizen Rates. BiMonthly Service Charge Within City Limits Outside City Limits Single Family Account Class Base Charge $:97 L15J Acct $t:-tZL3Q1 Acct Commodity Charge 0-1000 CF/Billing No charge No charge Over 1000 CF/Billing 3.70IH.C.F. 4.25IH.C.F. (3) Septage Disposal $O.IO/gal of tank capacity. III. MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES. (a) METER TEST FEE SCHEDULE: Utility Customers Others Size 314"&1" 1 1/2 & 2" 3" or greater $72.00 $88.00 $105.00 (W/Test Port) Time and Materials (WO/Test Port) $ 72.00 $ 88.00 $105.00 (b) OFFICE SERVICES: Within City Limits Outside City Limits Account Maintenance 5.00 5.00 Delinquency Notice (Mailer) A.C.H. Per Service 2.50 < 1.00 > 2.50 < 1.00> WASTEWfR.ORD. Ordinance Disk 2 - 10/29/96 7 .2Cf Lien Recovery Charge 50.00 50.00 Duplicate Bill Charge (per billing period) 1.00 1.00 (c) FIELD SERVICES: Wet tapping (water main only) 2179.00 3268.00 Fire Hydrant Installation 3153.00 4729.00 Water Meter Removal Charge 40.00 40.00 Cross-Connection Control Device Test/Inspection 30.00 30.00 Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on - (Customer Request) Regular Hours N/C NIC After Hours 80.00 80.00 Delinquency Notice (Door Knocker) 10.00 10.00 Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on - (Delinquent Accounts) Regular Hours 30.00 30.00 After Hours 80.00 80.00 Flow and Pressure Test (U ncertified) 3/4" & I" meters only 30.00 30.00 Utility Plant Locates Regular Hours NIC N/C After Hours 80.00 80.00 Emergency N/C NIC WASTEWfR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 10/29/96 8 30 Within City Limits (d) UTILITY PLANT INSPECTIONS: (Miscellaneous) 30.00 (e) PARK RESERVATION FEE: (non-refundable) 25.00 (f) PLAN CHECK: (1) Water: (i) Main Extensions (Includes hydrants and appurtenances and connection to water system) $0. 101ft but not less than $100.00. (ii)Pump Stations $500.00 (iii) Fireline Extensions $54.00 (iv) Irrigation Systems $54.00 (v) System Connections $54.00 (vi) Miscellaneous $27.00IHr (2) Wastewater: (i) Conveyance Facility Extensions (Includes manholes and appurtenances and connection to wastewater system) (ii) Pump Stations (iii) System Connections (iv) Miscellaneous WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 10129/96 3/ Outside City Limits 30.00 25.00 $0. 101ft but not less than $100.00. $500.00 $ 54.00 $ 27.00/Hr 9 IV. STORMWATER (a) ASSESSMENTS: Within City Limits (1) Storm Drainage Plan Review Fees** (i) Preliminary Drainage Plans Residential Development Outside City Limits $325.00 N/A Non-Residential Development $225.00 + N/A $1O.00/ISU N/A (2) Final Detailed Drainage Plans (ii) Residential Development 0-20 Lots 21-50 Lots 51-100 Lots 100+ Lots Minimum Charge Non-Residential Development Minimum Charge (iii) Resubmittal Fees First Resubmittal Subsequent Resubmittal (2) Storm Drainage Inspection Fees** WASTEWfR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 10/29/96 3:;).... $35.00/Lot $25.00/Lot $22.50/Lot $20.00/Lot $250.00 $10.00/ISU N/A N/A NIA NIA N/A N/A $150.00 NIA No Charge $250.00 NIA N/A 10 Residential Development $15.00/Lot N/A Non-Residential Development $lO.OO/ISU N/A Minimum Charge $100.00 N/A Conveyance Fac. Ext. $ .75/Ft with a minimum of $300.00 N/A Unscheduled Inspections $40.00/Site Visit N/A (Unscheduled inspections shall be tracked through the course of project and billed after the final site inspection. Fees for unscheduled inspections shall be paid prior to fmal occupancy approval) **Storm drainage plan review and inspection fees do not apply to single family residence or duplex construction on an existing established lot. Fees payable at time of submittaL (b) RATES: (1) Retail Stormwater Service Rates. Monthly Service Charge Within City Limits Outside City Limits (i) Single Family Base Charge $4.00/Acct N/A Low Income Senior Citizen and Low Income Disabled Citizen Rate $2.501 Acct NI A Exception: Duplex WI2 Meters $2.00/Acct N/A (ii) Multiple Family Base Charge $4.00/ISU NIA (iii) Commercial WASTEWfR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 10/29/96 11 33 Base Charge $4.00/ISD N/A (iv) Public School Districts $4.00/Acct* NIA *Parcels owned or leased by public school districts which provide activities which directly benefit the surface and storm water management program. The activities may include: curriculum specific to the issues and problems of surface and stormwater management and student activities in the community to expose students to the efforts required to restore, monitor, or enhance the surface and stormwater management system. Pursuant to RCW 35.92.021, the amount of the service charge shall be determined by the Director, based upon the cost of the activities to the school district, but not to exceed the value of the activity to the stormwater management program. Determination of which activities qualify for the stormwater management service charge reduction will be made by the Director. Reductions in Stormwater Management service charges will only be granted to school districts which provide programs that have been evaluated by the Director. The service charge adjustment for the school activity may be applied to any parcel in the service area which is owned or operated by the school district. (v) Retail Stormwater Rate Adjustment Multiple Family & Commercial Within City Limits Outside City Limits Water Quality Water Quantity $.50IISD $1.50/ISD N/A N/A (vi) Stormwater Penalty for new Multiple Family & Commercial development without on-site detention (BMC 15.06.050(b)) $.50/ISU N/A (2) Implementation Schedule. All multiple family and commercial accounts with two or more lSD's will receive the credits in b(I)(v) above per ISU until December 31, WASTEWfR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 10/29/96 12 31 1997; Provided, The property owner submits engineering plans and specifications for on-site stormwater quantity and quality improvements for their property by October 1, 1995, and said plans are approved by the Department according to System Development and Construction Standards. Failure to comply with any of the aforementioned provisions will result in these accounts being charged at the rate of $4.00IISU/Month beginning January 1, 1996. V. REBATE. Properties within Kitsap County provided with water, wastewater or stormwater services by the City of Bremerton are required to pay an additional fee. In the interest of fairness and to recognize potential annexation of these sites into the City, a rebate of the surcharge portion of the front footage and facilities fees would be made to any owner(s) whose property becomes annexed into the City of Bremerton within twelve (12) months from the date of payment of such fees. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective January I, 1997. APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this _ day of , 1996. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this _ day of , 1996. JOHN E. LAW, Council President II II WASTEWTR.ORD ~ Ordinance Disk 2 - 10/29/96 13 35 APPROVED this _ day of , 1996 LYNN HORTON, Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk WASTEWfR.ORD - Ordirtance Disk 2 - 10/29/96 14 30 AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL L.SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. Adopting the 1997 Budget FOR AGENDA OF: Dec. 4, 1996 ORIGINATING DEPT: Treasurer ORIGINATOR: R. Hanna DATE SUBMITTED: Nov. 19, 199 , 2. CLEARANCES' Comment of back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: Proposed Ordinance DJr Admin Ser. Mayor's Preliminary Budget Council Comm. ~ ~ r-(~~ ENDORSEMENTS x: INFORMATION MAYOR CV7~ ...,J. -1L1---- ./ APPROVEDBYC~A COUNCIL PRESIDENT 4 SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: This Ordinance adopts the City's 1997 Budget at the fund level as described in the text of the Ordinance and as presented in the Mayor's Preliminary Budget document. 8. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the Ordinance adopting the 1997 Budget on first reading. Motion to pass the Ordinance adopting the 1997 Budget on second reading. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Treasurer ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor EXPIRATION DATE: Dec. 31. 1997 REVIEW DATE: NIA 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 11. AGENDA BILL NO: qro-27~ 37 88 2 CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: The City will lack the authority to spend money or to employ staff after Dec. 31, 1996. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS FACILITIES EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: As presented in the several study sessions. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES. Preliminary Budget Document. 3g ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Bremerton approving and adopting the financial budget for the several funds of the City of Bremerton for the fiscal year 1997, and appropriating the amounts set forth in each budget to each fund in accordance with RCW 35.33.075. THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1: That the financial budget for the City of Bremerton, to wit: "Official Budget for the year 1997, City ofBremerton", now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Bremerton, be and the same is hereby approved and adopted, and the respective amounts provided for in said budget for the several funds of the City of Bremerton, be and the same are hereby fixed and adopted as follows: ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE YEAR 1997 FUND # DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 001 General ..................................................... $22,274,473 101 Arterial Street ................................................. 7,480,546 102 Street ......................................................... 1,936,300 103 Contingency Reserve ........................................... 739,000 104 Civic Improvement/Stadium ..................................... 158,000 105 Parking System Revenue ........................................ 537,750 106 Community Development Block Grant ........................... 553,000 108 Abatement Revolving Fund ...................................... 415,000 109 Real Estate Transfer Tax: ........................................ 784,000 110 Police Special Projects ............................................42,400 112 Parks Facility Construction ........................................88,000 201 General Obligation Bonds ..................................... 1,062,429 305 Waterfront Parks Construction ....................................31,500 307 Fire Department Capital ......................................... 314,570 308 Pendergast Park Construction ................................... 114,000 401 Water Operating .............................................. 8,687,868 3t:t 407 Municipal Golf Course ........................................ 2,558,325 451 Wastewater Operating........................................ 16,627,326 481 Stormwater Operations.......................................... 937,673 503 Risk Management ............................................. 2,148,000 510 Equipment Rental Reserve ..................................... 2,794,500 601 Cemetery Perpetual Care ........................................ 128,500 621 Local Improvement District Guaranty............................ 135,000 622 Roosevelt Capital Assets ........................................ 926,000 623 Gift and Donation Fund ...........................................38,613 624 Employee Medical Insurance Reserve ............................ 425,000 GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: $71,937,773 Of the total revenue, the sum of $4,872,194 is the estimated amount to be received from a $3.8127 levy per $1,000 of assessed valuation of all property within the city limits of the City of Bremerton as set forth in Ordinance No. 4574. SECTION 2: That the separate totals set forth in Section 1, hereoffor each of said funds, as particularly itemized in the "Official Budget for the year 1997, City ofBremerton on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City ofBremerton, be and the same are hereby appropriated to each of said departments for the fiscal year 1997. SECTION 3: Nothing contained herein shall be construed to reqUire the City of Bremerton or its officers to fill any vacancy in any of the positions established by this ordinance resulting from the discharge, resignation or retirement of such employee. Nothing herein contained shall require the City ofBremerton or its officers to pay the maximum amount budgeted for any position shown therein. SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following passage and publication as provided by law. APPROVED by the City Council on the first reading on this day of December, 1996. PASSED by the City Council of the City ofBremerton, signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk in authentication of such passage this day of December, 1996. 40 JOHN LAW, Council President APPROVED this day of December 1996. LYNN HORTON, Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk EFFECTIVE DATE: PUBLISHED: ORDINANCE NO. 4/ AGENDA BILL \ BRDIERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: Puhlic Hearing Resolution # ~ 573 , regarding recovery of fees for the abatement of the property located at 1246 Ivy Road. FOR AGENDA OF: Decem her 4.1996 ORIGINA TING DEPT.: Buildin2 DePt. ~~ ORIGINATOR: Judv Johnson DATE SUBMITTED: 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: CUyO"k, ~~ City Attorne . n . . ~.'-"J City Treasu~---Ic:-1i '---- ENDORSEMENT >( INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDE MAYOR ~~ -d.1L!-.. I. Resolution # 2. Clerk Report ;;2..573 COUNCIL PRESIDENT 4. SUMl"IARY STATEiVIENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: On October 16, 1996, the Public Works Department demolished and removed a mobile home and its appurtenances from the property located at 1246 Ivy Road after the owner, Jackie Adams, failed to do so as ordered by the Building Official. The cost charged to the revolving abatement fund for this action totaled $7,226.03. Council must now decide if the fees are just and reasonable and how they should be collected. RECOMlVffiNDA TION: It is recommended that Council, by Resolution # ~ 5 7.3, order that the fees incurred for the removal of the mobile home located at 1246 Ivy Road be collected as reasonable abatement costs and become a lien against the property. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Judv Johnson ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Judv Johnson EXPIRATION DATE: N/A REVIEW DATE: N/A 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED DATE: 11. AGENDA BTLLNO.: 9W-~77 9A 4d... 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: The City would forfeit the costs incurred for this action. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BTffiGETS. FACILITIES. EOUTPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: The City's revolving abatement fund would suffer the deficit of not collecting these funds. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: N/A i-3 RESOLUTION # ,2573 A RESOLUTION reviewing charges for the abatement of the property at 1246 Ivy Road and determining means of collection. WHEREAS, the City ofBremerton incurred costs for the removal of the mobile home and its appurtenances ITom the property located at 1246 Ivy Road; and WHEREAS, the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, as adopted by the Bremerton Municipal Code, allows the City to recoup these costs either by personal judgment against the property owner or as a lien against the property; and WHEREAS, the City Council is charged with determining whether the fees are just, and how they should be collected; and has considered the report of charges filed by the Building Official and any protests or objection filed; and W~EREAS, the Building Official of the City ofBremerton recommends the fees be collected as a lien against the property located at 1246 Ivy Road, now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City ofBremerton: 1. That the abatement charges included in the report of the Building Official in the amount of$7,226 03 for the property located at 1246 Tvy Road, Bremenon, attached hereto, are just and reasonable. 2. That the City of Bremen on will exercise its right to recapture abatement fees by filing a lien against the property. PASSED, by the City Council of the City ofBremerton this day of 19 JOHN LAW Council President '-/'1 CITY OF BRE.vIERTON · 239 4th Stret!t . Bremerton, WA 98337 Memorandum DATE: November 18,1996 TO: Kathy McCluskey, Dir. of Admin. Svcs. FROM: Judy Johnson, Dev. Permits Mgr. ~ RE: Abatement fees for removal of mobile home, 1246 Ivy Road cc: Don Pratt The Public Works Department removed a dilapidated mobile home and its appurtenances from the property located at 1246 Ivy Road after the owner, Jackie Adams, failed to do so as ordered. The abatement fund was charged $7,226.03, per the attached interfund transfer. A public hearing is scheduled for December 4, 1996 for Council to decide how the fees should be collected. 45 . Celebrating 50 Years of Freedom. '-~~ -; .,.. .. ....-..:'l'~ .--'~~ ~'"'I "'~."""_~ .'; .- ~,....._~..- ~4. Oc:2:. 1~96 4,04 pm C:ty of 3~eme=~o~ - S~=eet3 ~c~k C:ce= ~:s:=r! Cate :Jesc::-:..:;;t.:..:::: C:..:.s=:;~e= ~o=k Cr~e= ~ :S~96CC9a T.:.cle :.~;".':'E.V.E~"7 :246 :~l":" MCE:.L ;":,-'V":" S::a~'..:.s : S Customer :3~;3 Work '!':I'pe : AC Foreman :225 Lead Em~loyee;24J P::-iority Ca:e Ta::-gec..e>:c: :ate E~:ered :C9/16!96 ~ate Ass:gneG:09!16/96 Date Started :lC!15j96 =ate Fi~ishec:~C/:l/96 ?A.G:E; ~ : Req'-...:.:'a.:- :'.-e::-: :":":':e: ::':5:3 E~:";::7\ef'.c. Es: :abc~ H~u=s 2s:: C Mate::-:.a:'s ~St SC :'ccat:.~n :0/16/96 BLAB PRE? FOR A3ATE~E~ 1246 I~~ MCSI~ HeME COLE:i COREY '95 l-TON C!lEVY RILEY THOMPSON KeB,Inc. Asbestos Remcval 1245 Iv! ~c. Health Dept. septic ta::k layout copy fee 3remerton Bu:..ldi~g pe=mi: fo= demc:'ac~on AEATEMEY!' 1246 I.VY MOSI:' :::CME A.."-"-ON COREY MARK A. 7.~OMPSON COLE~ CORSY '94 JD410 BACKhCE '90 INT. 5 YA.~ JG~P TRCCK '86 ~RAILK:~G EQw:?ME~~ 7~~:~ZR, 1:7 '92 GMC l-TON ?/U RILEY !'HCMPSON , 91 GMC $-15 4X:2 EXT. C)..B P/T: ABA':'EME~"":' 1246 r~,r[ MOSIi. :-:CME COLEN COREY '94 JD410 BAC~"OE '92 GMC l-TON F/U JOEN COREY '90 INT. lO YA..~D DC.,...!? TRC"CK SCOTT COREY 190 Z~. 10 ~~~D CG~P t:.A.SLEY KENTNE~ '90 r~. 10 Y~~D CL~P RILEY THOr~PSON '91 G~C 5-15 4X4 EXT. C.~ P/U Dv~P FEES FOR 1996 ABATEME~~ 1246 :VY MOBIL ECME COLEN COREY '92 GMC l-TON ?!U '94 JD4l0 BAC~~OE SCOTT COREY '90 HIT. 10 Y."-"-D D\,11? HADLEY KENTNER '90 I~l. 10 YARD Dv~P T~UCK RILEY THOMPSON ACE CRUSHED ROCK CITY ?/D DUMP FEES FOR 1996 10/17/96 E:...A.B ,. 10/:8/96 SLAB 10/21/96 BLA3 4230 sc :N.;Ol';2S0 : .0 .-- 1.0 HR. 2.J h::- 1.0 ::..n - .0 .:.n 1.0 -'- ~" 3 . 0 h:- 3.0 hr 7 .0 h::- 7.0 HR 7 .0 H? 7.0 Hx 7.0 H? 5.0 ", 2.0 HR 7.0 ).,. i.O ::12 7 .0 H:? 8 .0 r:r a .0 HR 8 .0 C':= 6.0 HR 8 .0 hr 8. 0 HR 2.0 hr 1.0 :-iR 140.0 YD 5.0 hr 5.0 HR 5 .0 :-IR 5.0 h::- 5.0 ~R 6.0 hr 6 .0 HR 2. 0 hr 13 .4 T~ 50.0 YD 2 c - 0 9 0 C 5 - C'G , 4 - c 7 - 0 - - - :; - - ::..cc 8:.5: 15: .5G 224.00 9::'.~:: ::8. ;";'.J ':l": . 00 :37.50 __ .00 192.5'] 224.CC 63 . CO 2:::G.CO 2"" c:: . u:) 22J.CG ~ c.::: . CO ., '?:; . 00 2'Je.00 55.CO 5. DC 1~S3.20 137.50 ..;,.5. CO 16e.OO 137.50 130.GO 165.00 155.00 55.00 87.1.J 519.DO _40 . -~ ,. " -.. -. . . ".'"."~-,-.."-... . ...~....- ~~:::..";"\>'.~':'- ~ - - - '-~C;:';<2-;":'.~i'''.''~f;''''~',~~_...:___ . ~~~r-.4-',j.F.';'.l-""-~ ~ :'-.;e Cc::: Ja:e " --, 19:?6 -1:0'; C~st=~e= Desc=~~::=~ Wc:-k c~:: cE 3re~e=:c~ - S:=ee:s 1"'..,......"'.... ,.,.... ..........- :'..':'5:==:; - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - s:.:~_:...-;.'[ ~C::, .~..J. ::; S:?6'>:3S Labc:' Bene:.:.ts Equ.:.pmer:t ~ate::"~a~s Sales Tax Tatal Use Tax 1f7 S:,:::'3.50 sa.ce S:', '7S 2 . CC 53,52';.53 SO.CO $/,225.03 SO.QO :'."'\v:" = R~q:..:.:'.5.: c:.:~ =: ~:-:-.-= ......=5 :-.:-5