HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/26/96 AGENDABREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
239 4TH STREET
BREMERTON, WA 98337
CITY cOUNCIL AGENDA
NOVEMBER Z6~ 1996
CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M.
A. Pledge Of Allegiance
B. Invocation
CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in
advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If
separate discussion is desired on an item, it may be removed
from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at
the request of a Council member.
A. Minutes - November 13, 1996
B. Resolution #2572, Establishing December 11,
1996, As A Public Hearing Regarding SR3/SR304
Bremerton Ferry Terminal to Gorst Transportation
Re-evaluation Of SR304 Access Between The
Charleston District And Downtown
#AB96-267 ~
CLAIMS/C~ECK REGISTERS
4. cOUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
MAYOR,S REPORT
PUBLIC RECOGNITION -- (comments Limited to 3 Minutes)
NEW BUSINESS
A. New Phone System for Parks Facility At Sheridan
Park
B. Police/Special Projects 110 Fund - Request For
Approval of Budget Adjustment Request #96-31
C. Budget Adjustment Request Olympic Course At
Gold Mountain
#AB96-270
#AB96-271 J9
RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution #2571, Setting Fees For Gold Mountain 9AB96-272 3~
Golf Course And Repealing Resolution #2532
1. SUBJECT:
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES -- NOVE~fl~ER 13, 1996
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
November 26, 1996
City Council
John E. Law~ President
11-20-96
2. C~_C_C_C~: (comment on back
if necessary)
ENDORSEMENT __ INFORMJ%TION __ APPROVED BY coUNcIL p~R~ID~T FOR S~BMI~TAL:
4. $~y STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR'COUNCIL ACTION:
8. ECOM]4ENDATION:
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED __ TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOT CE OF ACT ON
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
~MENDED __
TAPE #1421
UNAPPROVED DRAFT
CITY cOUNCIL MEETING MINUTE8
NOVEMBER 13, 1996
The regular meeting of the city Council of the city of Bremerton
was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street,
Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, November 13, 1996, at 5:30 P.M.,
with Council President John Law presiding. Council members present
were Bob Winters, Carlos Montgomery, Sherril Huff-Menees, David
Farr, Richard Neville, Lon Overson, Cecil McConnell, and A1 Colvin.
Also present were city Attorney Ian Sievers and City Clerk Kathleen
McCluskey.
The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council
President Law and Invocation given by Jeffrey Flood of New Vision
Christian Center.
President Law made the following announcements:
(1) Immediately following the city Council meeting the Council will
hold a Study Session to discuss "1997 Budget Review."
#0029
#0037
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes of Meeting - October 30, 1996
#AB96-256
M/S/C/U(Neville/Montgomery) to approve Consent Agenda as presented.
CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required
by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified
as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that
had been made available to the Council.
M/S/C/U(Colvin/Montgomery) on November 13, 1996, the Council does
approve for payment those vouchers included and further described
as follows: 203368 through 203561 in the amount of $302,827.84.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Mr. Colvin reminded citizens that District #1 will hold a
Neighborhood Meeting on November 21, 7:00 P.M., at the Sheridan
Park & Recreation Center. He announced on November 14, he and his
wife Hazel will celebrate their 50th Wedding Anniversary.
Mr. Neville extended congratulations to Hazel & A1 Colvin. He
announced a Neighborhood Meeting will be held November 14, 6:30
P.M., in the city Council Chambers to discuss problems caused by
trees along 5th Street between Park Avenue and Naval Avenue.
TAPE #1421
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
November 13, 1996
Page 2 of 10
Mr. Fart stated he had the opportunity to tour two facilities under
construction in the downtown area, the Admiral Theater and the
Kitsap County Historical Museum. He was quite impressed with what
he saw happening, and the co~ununity can be proud to show off those
facilities when completed.
Mr. Winters thanked all citizens who have contacted him with their
concerns regarding the one-way street issue in and around the
downtown and the Callow Avenue areas. He urged the public to
continue to support local fund raising efforts. He also
congratulated the Colvin's on their 50th Wedding Anniversary.
Mr. Law joined others in congratulating the Colvins. He reminded
everyone that the District #3 Neighborhood Meeting will be held
November 19, 1996, 7:00 P.M., at the Senior Center. The format for
the program will be an "open forum".
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
Bob Sauter, Commander Galen G. McLoughlin, Post 3694 Veterans of
Foreign Wars, gave a glowing report of Veterans Day activities at
Bremerton Junior High School. Over 4,000 Bremerton students and
800 adults participated in Veterans Day observance activities. Mr.
Sauter presented a letter of thanks to Gary Simon, Junior High
School Principal and Andy Baker, Com~missioner of the Student
Council. Mr. Simon acknowledged the efforts of Andy Baker, Rene,
Erin Pratt and Karen Harmes in the creation of the "Veterans Brick
Wall" that was erected as part of this event. He also recognized
Mr. Hall, ASB Advisor, and Social Studies Teacher, Mr. Baker, Mrs.
Gillis for the Choir presentation, and Mrs. Helm for the music and
Drill Team presentation, along with all of the Social Study
teachers and the veterans group lead by Mr. Sauter, who gave
outstanding performances in the classes.
Mr. 8auter warned Bremerton to "WAKE UP", the USS Missouri is not
a done deal. If Congress does not indicate anything after 60 days
from the time they are given the recommendation, the Secretary Of
Navy's decision will become final. He urged everyone to write
letters to their Congressmen and to every newspaper.
Kal Leichtman, Bremerton Resident, stated his support of allowing
parking of vehicles on planting strip based on his knowledge of the
kinds of damage trees planted in planting trips can do to
sidewalks. It is his opinion, that roots from trees and other
vegetation causes more damage and more liability than a parked
vehicle.
Larry Eyer, Executive Director Kitsap Community Action Program,
announced a dedication ceremony will be held for the remodel of
3
TAPE #1421
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
November 13, 1996
Page 3 of 10
their facility on November 15, 12:30 P.M. Earlier that day (9:00
A.M. - Noon), they will be hosting a Conference On Welfare Reform
at that facility. Anyone wishing to attend either of these events
can sign up by calling their office 478-2301.
Bob sauter stated he was appalled that the Kitsap County
Commissioners have denied the Wal-Mart Corporation their
constitutional right to fly an American flag at their Bremerton and
Port Orchard stores. He asked the city Council to look into this
matter and find out the reason behind their decision.
Wayne Olsen, representing Council District #1, encouraged
attendance at the District #1 Neighborhood Meeting on November 21,
7:00 P.M., at the Sheridan Park & Recreation Center.
Gordy Byrd announced free Thanksgiving Dinners will be served by
Neighborhood Christian Center on November 27, 5:30 7:30 P.M.;
Salvation Army on November 27, 11:30 A.M. - 1:00 P.M.; Olympic High
School Helping Hands student group will provide a dinner at the FOE
Eagles Hall, 6th and Washington on November 26, 3:00 - 7:30 P.M.
Andy Parypa, Bremerton resident, stated he disagreed with Mr.
Leichtman's comments regarding parking on planting strips and
recalled a comment made by a woman who had broken her leg due to a
damaged planting strip. He wrote a letter to The Sun in response
to an editorial on the subject, but that his letter was edited
beyond its original intent, and his main point was lost. He was
upset that there was nothing in the information packet passed out
to the public, stating that parking on planting strips is not being
mandated by "recent law", as stated by the Mayor, but by Supreme
Court Law, mandated back in 1965. It has been prohibited by State
Law since then, it has just not been enforced. He also questioned
the new definition of a planting strip.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Lynn Horton presented Andy Parypa with a Certificate of
Appreciation in recognition for his continuing service and support,
and for his contributions to the re-writing of the Bremerton city
Charter. The Mayor also thanked Larry Stone, Ian Sievers, City
Attorney, and everyone else, who spent a lot of time in re-writing
the Charter.
7A - BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE, LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK
GRANT - 1997, #AB96-257
The city has been awarded $52,029.00 from the U.S. Department of
Justice for the year 1997. This block grant must be accepted by
the Mayor within the next two weeks. We request approval for the
Mayor to accept.
#1250
TAPE #1421
City Council Reg.
November 13, 1996
Page 4 of 10
Mtg. Minutes
These funds will be included in the 1997 budget and presented to
Council during budget review.
captain craiq Roqers, stated the intent is to designate the block
grant towards equipment in the Police Department for crime
prevention. A public meeting on this issue, as required, will be
held within the next week and a half.
Public comment - none.
M/S/C/U(Huff-Menees/Colvin) to accept the $52,029.00 block grant
award from the U.S. Department of Justice.
8A - ORDIN/%NCE (FIRST READING) REDUCING THE B&O TAX ON GARBAGE AND
REFUSE BUSINESS, ~AB96-258
This ordinance will continue the process begun in January of 1995
of gradually reducing the B&O Tax on garbage and refuse businesses
within the City to a level consistent with utility tax rates. The
intention is to reduce the tax rate by one percent each year.
Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, stated this item is part of the Mayor's
1997 preliminary budget, and also continues a practice that has
been in place for the last several years. It is not within the
financial ability of the City to deal with a reduction all at once,
so this is an incremental approach to the problem.
Ms. McCluske¥ read into the record a letter received from Del
Knauss: "Legislative acton in 1986 has cast a cloud over the
authority of cities and towns to impose refuse collection taxes at
rates exceeding 2/10th of 1%. The problem arises from the language
within RCW 35.21.710, which limits the taxation authority of cities
over certain business entities to a rate of .0020; excepting those
activities subject to the taxes imposed by RCW 82.16. As you may
be aware, in 1986 the Legislature removed refuse collection taxes
from RCW 82.16 and codified them in RCW 82.18.
Therefore, the question arises as to the extent that cities can tax
refuse collection. I feel the City's taxation authority over
refuse collection is limited by the language of RCW 35.21.710
considering that refuse collection no longer is found within RCW
82.16.
Until this Council gets clarification on this matter from Christine
Gregoire, Attorney General of Washington, I urge this Council to at
least lower the refuse tax to 6%. By doing so it won't have as
severe impact on your 1997 budget, if the Attorney General rules
that cities and towns should be in compliance with RCW 35.21.710."
Public comment - none.
5
TAPE #1421
City Council Reg. Mtg.
November 13, 1996
Page 5 of 10
Minutes
Mr. Parr asked the City Attorney for his comments. Mr. Sievers
stated this issue was reviewed in a recent memo to Council, and it
is his opinion, as well as other City Attorneys and the Association
of Washington cities (AWC), that the statute still allows a higher
than .2 of 1% tax on garbage, even though the solid waste tax was
recodified by the RCW. There is a section that regulates any
publicly regulated service industry. The City also has a
grandfather right, meaning that any city that had a higher rate in
place in 1982, can continue that rate, so regardless how the
opinion may come out, the City has a legal right to impose this
rate.
Mrs. Huff-Menees stated since the statement has been made publicly,
that this would not impact the 1997 budget, could the Treasurer
address that issue? Mr. H&nna pointed out that each one of those
1% changes in the tax rate equates to approximately $43,000 revenue
to the city. Adjusting the rate down to 6%, rather than the
proposed 17%, is roughly, in round numbers, a half-million dollar
impact to the General Fund for the City in 1997, that is why the
rate needs to be lowered in increments, rather than all at once.
Mr. Winters asked how long the City has had a contract with Brem-
Air and where are we currently? Ms. M~Cluske¥ stated since about
1962, and we are in our 4th or 5th year of the current contract.
Mr. Winters stated he had previously asked the Mayor when would
this end, and he was told it will top off at 10%. He will vote yes
on this issue because a 1% reduction is better than nothing, but he
would like to see the rate go lower, and at a faster rate.
Mr. M¢Connell agreed with the prior comments and would like to see
the rate lowered at least double or triple, to 2% or 3% per year,
and eventually down to 6% by the end of his term. At 1%, it could
take 12 to 13 years!
Mr. Overson stated to the average ratepayer, we are only talking an
average of less than 50-cents per month, but that equals one worker
in the city. If the rate is dropped by a greater percentage, he
would like to know what would be proposed on how to save the money?
He emphasized it costs money to run a city, and asked that this be
kept in perspective. He believes the 1% rate is good, and is
meeting the promises of what was meant to happen.
Mr. Farr concurred with Mr. Overson's comments, and according to
his calculations from his own garbage bill, the difference will
only be between 20 and 40 cents. He believes there are other areas
where the Council can make a bigger difference.
Mr. Colvin agreed with Mr. Farr and did not think the trade off was
worth it. A City has to pay for its services.
#1665
#1688
TAPE #1421
City Council Reg.
November 13, 1996
Page 6 of 10
Mtg. Minutes
M/S/F(McConnell/Winters) to reduce the rates from 1% to 3%.
Vote on motion: In Favor: McConnell, Winters
Opposed: Farr, Neville, Overson, Colvin,
Montgomery, Huff-Menees, Law
Motion failed.
M/S/C/U(Montgomery/Huff-Menees) to approve ordinance on first
reading, reducing the B&O Tax on the garbage and refuse businesses,
and amending Chapter 5.02 of the Bremerton Municipal Code.
8B - ORDINANCE (FIRST READING) AUTHORIZING THE CONDEC[NATION OF
PROPERTY FOR THE EXPANSION OF EVERGREEN PARK~ ~AB96-259
The proposed ordinance authorizes acquisition of the remaining
properties in the area surrounding Smith's Cove to the south of
Evergreen Park, which has been designated for park use in the
Evergreen Park Master Plan. The condemnation area is bounded by
Smith's Cove, Sheldon Boulevard, and Highland Avenue.
The City has contracted with Failure Analysis Associates to
complete a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study on the
expansion area. Cleanup costs are expected to equal or exceed fair
market value for the properties. The City has entered into an
option agreement for the Brem-Air Site separating the condemnation
area and Evergreen Park. Council approval will be required to
exercise the option on this property and to finalize any purchase
of the condemnation properties.
Ian sievers, City Attorney, stated it is difficult to assess the
fair market value of those properties knowing they are listed on
the Department of Ecology's Register of Contaminated Properties.
An evaluation needs to be done on the extent of contamination
before settling on a condemnation or purchase price.
Roy McGinnis, Bremerton resident, asked if the property has the
possibility of being contaminated, why would the City want it for
a park? Mr. $ievers stated that is the reason for the testing, to
see if the City wants to purchase it or complete the condemnation.
If the cost of the remediation is not manageable, the City will not
purchase the property. As of now, the City has adopted an
Evergreen Park Expansion Plan, which includes these properties, so
the plan is moving forward to see if it is conceivable. Mayor
Horton added several years ago the City adopted the Campus
Evergreen Neighborhood Plan, which was developed in the same
fashion as other neighborhood plans involving input from the local
community. It was decided by the neighbors that they would like to
see the area cleaned up, and the park expanded. This proposal is
a continuation of that neighborhood plan and the park design that
was commissioned a year and a half ago. There is contamination
throughout the property, and the City is working with the
7
#2155
TAPE #1421
City Council Reg.
November 13, 1996
Page 7 of 10
Mtg. Minutes
Department of Ecology in order to gain access on to the property to
complete the consent decree, and hopefully move forward with
property acquisition.
Mr. Montgomer7 stated the Department of Ecology has different
standards for remediation based on what the land is to be used for.
This process will allow the City to find out the severity of the
contamination, and if using the property for the park expansion is
possible.
Mr. Winters asked since condemnation is being considered, has the
City exhausted all other resources in its attempts to purchase the
property outright? Mr. Sievers stated yes.
Mr. Parr pointed out other examples in the region where
contaminated areas were turned into parks, such Gas Works Park in
Seattle. He referred to the maps and pointed out the approximate
location of a buried submarine and submarine tender on the
property, and the endless possibilities for their use.
Mr. Colvin asked the city Attorney about liabilities? Mr. Sievers
stated if the City does purchase the property, the City would be
liable for clean-up costs now and in the future, or for potential
resource damage to other properties. It is not possible to know
the extent of the risk until testing is done. Before the City
comes into ownership of the properties, results, obligations, and
liabilities will be brought before Council.
Mr. Neville pointed out the Campus Evergreen Neighborhood Plan took
place in 1992, and since then the City has been in communication
with the surrounding property owners, and an impasse has been
reached. It looks like this is the only way the City can move
forward, and it is disappointing that a proud, past businessman in
the city refuses to deal openly with the City forcing this process.
Mrs. Huff-Menees passed on a word of support from citizen Del
Knauss, who wanted to let Council know to "go for it!"
M/S/C(Neville/Montgomery) to approve ordinance on first reading,
authorizing the purchase of properties through condemnation for the
purpose of expanding Evergreen Park.
Vote on motion:
Motion carried.
In Favor: Montgomery, Huff-Menees, Farr, Law,
Neville, Overson, McConnell, Colvin
Opposed: Winters
9A - PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. 2567, REGARDING THE RECOVERY OF
FEES FOR THE ABATEMENT OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2908 13TH STREET,
#2322
TAPE #1421
City Council Reg.
November 13, 1996
Page 8 of 10
Mtg. Minutes
~AB96-260
On September 17, 1996, the City's Public Works Department removed
garbage and debris from the yard of the property located at 2908
13th Street after the owners Cuchullaine & Johanna O'Reilly failed
to do so as ordered by the Building Official. The revolving
abatement fund was charged a total of $1,082.30. Council must now
decide if the fees were just and reasonable.
Janet Lunceford, Building Department, stated this property was
first brought to their attention by a neighbor in July The
property was visited and resulted in a letter being sent to the
owners on July 17. Mrs. O'Reilly telephoned the Building
Department on August 5 notifying them that all of their properties
were going "back to the bank", so they did not intend to do the
work. The property was then cleaned up by the Street Department on
September 17, 1996.
Public comment - none.
Mr. Overson referred to pictures showing the garbage and debris and
estimated the cost of removal should be more in the area of $1,000.
Ms. Lunceford stated the pictures may not accurately show all of
debris since was quite a bit of construction debris behind one
house as well as appliances, and furniture in the yard.
Mr. Neville spoke from personal experience that it does not take
long for dumping fees to add up. He is glad this process is
working, but it is a shame the city has to come in and do the work
because it can be expensive to the City and the property owner.
M/S/C(Neville/Farr) to adopt Resolution No. 2567, ordering the fees
incurred for the abatement of garbage and debris at 2908 13th
Street be collected as reasonable abatement costs and become a
personal judgment against the owners, which will become a lien
against the property if not paid within 30 days.
Vote on motion:
Motion carried.
In Favor:
Abstain:
Winters, Montgomery, Huff-Menees,
Farr, Law, Neville, McConnell, Colvin
Overson
9B - PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. 2568. REGARDING THE RECOVERY OF
FEES FOR THE ABATEMENT OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1706 ELIZABETH
AVENUE, ~AB96-261
On September 17, 1996, the City's Public Works Department removed
furniture, garbage, and debris from an open garage located on the
property at 1706 Elizabeth Avenue after the owner, R.A. McConkey
failed to do so as ordered by the Building official. The revolving
abatement fund was charged a total of $774.80 Council must now
#2615
TAPE #1421
City Council Reg. Mtg.
November 13, 1996
Page 9 of 10
Minutes
decide if the fees were just and reasonable.
Janet Lunceford, Building Department, stated this property had a
similar problem, with furniture and a mattress in the garage
entrance, preventing the door from closing.
H. Emily Mosha¥, Bremerton resident, stated she has not seen this
particular property, but has participated in other property clean
up efforts, and would like to thank Janet Lunceford for the
excellent job she does in responding quickly whenever she gets a
complaint. Also, based to her involvement in other clean ups, she
believes the charges are very fair.
Mr. Winters pointed out to the landlord the action taken by the
City is costing him double what it would have cost if he had
completed the clean up work himself. The object of this program is
to encourage property owners to take care of their own property.
He supports this type of program, but is disappointed that the City
has to resort to it because property owners will not clean up their
own property.
Mr. Colvin asked what would be the result if the property owner did
not pay back the City.? Mr. Sievers stated if payment is not
received in 30 days, a lien would be filed against the property and
then sent to collections to get a judgment against the property
owner.
Mr. Farr reported appliances that do not contain freon can be
recycled, at no cost, at the Navy Yard Metal Yard, and before the
furniture or mattresses deteriorate they can be recycled at
Goodwill Industries or the Salvation Army.
Mr. Overson commented on Mr. Farr's observations, and stated his
only concern is that the money will not be paid back, and the
burden would then fall on the taxpayer. However, he feels that is
a risk worth taking even though it is an expensive process. He
appreciates the program.
M/S/C(Huff-Menees/Montgomery) to adopt Resolution No. 2568,
ordering the fees incurred for the abatement of garbage and debris
at 1706 Elizabeth Avenue be collected as reasonable abatement costs
and become a personal judgment against the owner, which will become
a lien against the property if not paid within 30 days.
Vote on motion:
Motion carried.
In Favor:
Abstain:
Winters, Montgomery, Huff-Menees,
Law, Neville, Farr, Colvin, McConnell
Overson
/0
TAPE #1421
city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
November 13, 1996
Page 10 of 10
President Law thanked the TV camera crew for their services: Debbie
Harris, Mike Pebbles, Patricia Mathes, and Nadine Price.
With no further business meeting adjourned at 6:56 P.M.
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
JOHN E. LAW, Council President
City of Bremerton
KLM/JL/me/ls
cc: Normal Distribution
File/Vault
AGENDA BILL
BREIVlERTON CITY COUNCEL
1. SUBJECT: Consent Agenda - Resolution #
establishment of December 11, 1996 as a public hearing
regarding SR3/SR304 Bremerton Ferry Terminal to Gorst
Transportation Re-evaluation of SR304 Access between the
Charleston District and Downtown
2. CLEARANCES: (conmamat on back if necessary)
~;::~g~Director, Public Works/Utilities ~c~
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
3. EXHIB1TS
Resolution
November 26, 1996
Public Works & Utilities
R. Witt Ciw Engineer
November 21, 1996
ENDORSE~ INFORMATION / AJ~'PROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FQR S~UB~ITTAL:
m¥OR -
- '~" '"'~'~""~'.~; m, ~:.,~,,../'
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
At the City Council Study Session of September 16, 1996, the City Council discussed issues regarding the re-
evaluation of SR304 alternative selected in August 1995 between the Charleston District and Downtown as part of
subject project. At that meeting, the City Council was advised a community outreach will be initiated to determine if
there was a consensus that the issue should be revisited. A committee was selected by the Mayor and has had seven
committee meetings as well as two public involvement meetings to gain knowledge of the issue and develop a
consensus. At the City Council study session of November 20, 1996, the City Council was presented and discussed
the committee recommendation, which is to modify the previous "do-nothing" alternative on Burwell Street to provide
a three lane street, with two lanes toward downtown and one lane out of downtown. This agenda item establishes
December 11, 1996 as a public hearing before the City Council to consider modification of the preferred alternative for
the Burwell Street portion of the SR3/SR304 Bremerton Ferry Terminal to Gorst Vicinity Transportation
Improvement Project for inclusion in the Environmental Impact Statement.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt the attached resolutioryestablishing December 11, 1996, not earlier than 6:00 P.M., for a
public hearing on the re-evaluation of SR304 access between the Charleston District and Downtown as part of the
SR3/SR304 Bremerton Ferry Terminal to Gorst Vicinity Transportation Improvement Project.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
City Engineer
N/A
N/A
N/A
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
AMENDED
DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO:_
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The preferred alternative to "do-nothing" on Burwell Street will stay in effect.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
N/A
7. RESEARCH SOURCES
96809',BK
/.3
RESOLUTION NO. ~ff~,_~ ~
A Resolution establishing the December 11, 1996 City Council meeting as a public hearing
to re-evaluate the SR304 access between the Charleston District and Downtown as part of the
SR3/SR304 Bremerton Ferry Terminal to Gorst Vicinity Transportation Improvement Project.
WHEREAS, The City Council adopted Resolution //2534 on November 21, 1995
establishing a preferred alternative for inclusion in the Environmental Impact Statement for the
SR3/304 Bremerton Ferry Terminal to Gorst Vicinity Transportation Improvement Project; and,
WHEREAS, Certain issues have lead to a re-evaluation of the SR304 access between the
Charleston District and Downtown; and,
WHEREAS, The Mayor established a citizen's committee to re-evaluate the SR304
access between the Charleston District and Downtown; and,
WHEREAS, the Committee and Staff desire to open a public hearing for City Council
consideration of modification to the "do~nothing" alternative on Burwell Street portion of SR304
to provide three lanes of traffic on Burwell, two eastbound and one westbound.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Bremerton:
That a public hearing to consider modification of the preferred alternative on SR304
between the Charleston District and downtown as part of the SR3/304 Bremerton Ferry Terminal
to Gorst Vicinity Transportation Improvement Project be held as part of the regular City Council
meeting on December 11, 1996 at City Hall, 239 Fourth Street, City Council Chambers
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of , 1996.
ATTEST:
JOHN LAW
Council President
KATHLEEN L. MCCLUSKEY, Clerk
9680932~bk
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
2o
SUBJECT: New phone system for
Parks facility at
Sheridan Park
CITY TREASURER
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
11/26/96
PWO - Electronics Div.
Robert E. Tulp
11/18/96
3. EXHIBITS:
1. Quotation Tabulation Form
2. Quotation from US West
3. Quotation from GTE
PURCHASING SUPERVISOR x_~~=~___4_~ation from Sprint
CITY ATTORNEY x--~-~, 5.
FISCAL & BUDGET x //-~d~-~ 6.
OPERATIONS 7.
ENDORSEMENT ~ INFO~TION.~PPROVED BY CO~CIL PR~ FOR SU~:
~YOR ~ ~ ~ COUNCIL PRESIDENT ~~//~
4. S~RY STATEMENT ~D REQUIREMENT FOR CO~CIL ACTION:
See Attached
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize reallocation of funds and authorize purchase of new
for Parks Department in the amount of $15,768.27 from US West.
phone
system
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED__
DISAPPROVED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
DATE
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
4. SUI~FLARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
$5000.00 was originally budgeted in 1996 for an
electronic key phone system to replace the existing key system
at Parks Department Headquarters. Due to costs savings
realized by the City in facilities capital projects, there is
enough left over money for the purchase of a small PBX
(Private Branch Exchange), the best long term solution for
both phone service and computer networking services. This
will meet all current and any future phone needs. This system
also seamlessly integrates with the City Hall phone system as
it is made by the same manufacturer, NorTel, formerly known as
Northern Telecom. Written quotes were requested from NorTel
distributors in the area, Sprint, GTE, and U.S. West. The
lowest quote received was from U.S. West and was for
$15,768.27. A summary of all the quotes received is provided
on the attached Quote Tabulation Form.
2. CLE~/~ANCE COMMENTS:
Funding for this phone system will come from four sources:
594.1849-56310 $5,000.00 Budgeted in Parks for new phone system
594.1849-54839 $4,930.29 Unused from Senior Center Electrical Upgrade
594.1849-56310 $3,899.60 Unused from City Hall Security System
594.1913-56440 $1,938.38 Budgeted in IS for Wide Area Network
$15,768.27 Total Requested Funding
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The Electronics Division will purchase the budgeted electronic key system for
Parks. This will alleviate their immediate phone problems. It will be
limited to a maximum of 32 phones and 12 phone lines. It will not allow them
to give each employee a phone number as they desire to do. Requiring that
the receptionist answer phone calls just to route them to a person in the
building. Not having separate phone numbers for each employee will not allow
them to have voice mail for those employees.
Information Services will have to lease a data circuit from US West ~o
provide Wide Area Network service to the Parks Department. This will cost
$600 to install and over $200 a month for operating costs not including
equipment charges. The purposed system would allow Information Services to
use the same data circuit that the phone system will use and have a one time
cost for equipment of only $1938.38. These savings will allow the City to
save money ($2,400 a year) in the very first year of operation of this
network.
The budgeted phone system will not allow the City to track phone usage by
employee just as their current system does not have this ability.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The new phone system will use the same equipment as PBX's at the Public Works
& Utilities Operations Complex and Public Works & Utilities Administration
requiring no new maintenance equipment. It will require no additional
training to install or program the new system as staff is already trained for
installing, programming, and maintaining this system.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Larry, NTD
Cheryl Gilinsky, Sprint United Telephone
Hugh Simpson, US West
Panasonic Telephone Distributor
NorTel Distributor & Installer
NorTel Distributor & Installer
CITY OF BREMERTON
Parks Phone System
Quote Tabulation Form
Sprint GTE US West
Part # Description Qty 3,ost Qty Cost Qty Cost
JTSF1001 Option 11C I 1 11,275.40
NT6R78AA Option 11C Release 22 Documentation 1 1 1117.73
4TSFS022 Option 11C Enterprises Software 1 1 13,188.49
AS1074 DTI/PRI Package 1 1 11,569.72
NTAK20AD Clock Controller Card 1 1 1490.54
NTBK51BA Downloadable D Channel Handler Interface I I I564.12
NTSD02AE Digital Line Card 1 1 11,716.88
NTSD08AK Analog Message Waiting Line Card I 1 11,716.88
Option 1 tC Equipment Cost 9,58t .63 10,639.76
AS103035 Centralized Answering Position 2
NT2K16GH9 32616 Phone with Display, Gray 2 765.70 2 721
NT2K22VH9 Key Expansion Module, Gray 2 233.36 2 219.76
P0760193 Single Key Foot Stand, Gray 2 14.58 2 13.74
Option 11C Installation Kit 584.92 1 I 443.32
T-SERV II Kentrox T-Serv II CSU 2 1,980.60 2 2 1,601.1
Total for Phone System 13,160.69 12,825.25 12,793.60,
Upgrade to Kentrox DataSmart DSU/CSU 2 3,025.90 2 1,790.00 2 1,793.14
Total Package Price before Tax 16,186.59 14,615.25 14,586.74
State Sales Tax 1,311.11 1,183.84 1,181.53
Total System Price with Tax 17,497.70 15,799.09 15,768.27
Difference from Iow bid t,599.85 28.5t 0.00
Funding Sources
5,000.00 Currently budgeted in Parks for new phone system
4,930.29 Reallocated from unused funds for Sr Center electrical upgrade
3,899.60 Reallocated from unused funds for Cith Hall security system
1,938.38 From Information Services for Wide Area Network
15,768.27 Total from all funding sources
BARS # Project #
594.1849-56310 G627218
594.1849-54839 G628119
594.1849-56310 G627601
594.1974-56440 96006
Prepared by Allen Jacobs 11/19/96
Page 1
From: Hugh Simpson To: Alan Jacobson Datei 1'[i~ 3/96 ~me: 06:18:5~ Page 1 of 2
! WinFax PRO Cover Page
Before you
dive into
something
else...
please
read the
following.
U S WEST, Phone 206-224-1159, Fax: 206-224-1159
To: Jacobson, Alan
From: Hugh Simpson
Cover pages by Deldna
Fax Number 0-360-478-5880
Pages: 2 Oate: 11/13/96
Ar~ork used ~th permission ,[, 1990 ,John Caldwell
/?
From: Hugh Simpson To: Alan Jacobsen Date: 1 t/13/96 Time: 06:19:45 Page 2 of 2
,stomer Name: City of Bremerton
Requested By: Alan Jacobson
Date: 11/11/96
TDC: Hugh Simpson
Unit Extended
Description Part # QTY. Price Price
Option 11 C, System Package NTSFI001 3014120N
DTI/PR1 Package( AS1074 ) 3012233N
Clock Controller Card (NTAK20AD) 3013056N
Downloadable DCHI(NTBK51AA) 3013670N
Universal Trunk Card (NT8D14BB) 3013232N
Digital Line Cards (NT8D02AE) 3013087N
Analog MsgANait Line Card(NT8DO9AK) 3012221N
Meridian Set Users Guide(AS1082) 3110050N
M2616 w/D~splay 3013770N
Key Expansion Module 3012253N
Single Key Module Footstand 3013762N
Central Answering Position, 2616 w/2 KEM's
Pre-Printed Feature Key Cap Pkg. 3013487N
Opt. 11C English NTP's(NT6R78AA) 3013289N
RIs 22 Enterprise Sftwr, 200 TN'$(NTSFS022) 3014134N
Sub Total NT material for City of Bremerton
Installation Materials
Kentrox T_Serv II CSU
Kentrox CSU Power Supply
CSU DTE Cable
CSU Network Cable
Bix lA Connectors
Bix 10A Mounts
Switch to MDFCables,25 Ft Female
Opt. ll BIX Dezi Strips
1870114N
1870080N
1870038N
1870018N
8550167N
8550352N
8610036N
Sub Total Installation Materials
Sub Total for Hardware and Software
The Price quoted is a drop ship only.
Nortel warranty for hardware is 12 months from ship date.
1 $1,275 40 $1,275 40
1 $1,569 72 $1,56972
1 $490 54 $490 54
1 $564 12 $56412
0 $1,76594 $0 00
I $1,71688 $1,71688
1 $1,71688 $1,716.88
1 $000 SO 00
2 $36055 $72109
2 $10988 $219 76
2 $6 87 $1374
0 $570 00 $0 00
2 $000 $000
1 $117 73 $11773
I $3,18849 $3,18849
$11,594.34
2 $800 56 $1,601 11
2 $38 92 $77 83
2 $9451 $189 02
2 $3892 $77 83
14 No Charge $0 00
3 $14 08 $42 23
14 $959 $134 24
3 No Charge $0 00
$2,122.26
L $12,866.61
Options
Kentrox DataSmart CSU/DSU
CSU to Network Cbl 50Ft
CSU Cables
Alpha Tech UPS ( CFR 1000) 15Min
1870446N
7000207N
1870024N
$1,69713 S1,697 13
$t50 10 S150 10
$28909 $289 09
1 $1,342 11 $1,342 11
PROPRIETARY
INFORMATION Page 1
11/13/96
Office, (i06) ~7~-9102
F~, (206) 575-9331
"IT'S A1KA ZING WI-L&T Vv-E CAN DO TOGETHER!"
(~,~-~ From:
(~.ucludi=g co,er
If there is a~y problem wlth this/ransmlsslon or ff you have any questlons, please call
(206) 575-9102. Thankyou!
October 13, 1996
City of Bremerton
Public Works Operatmns
Allen Jacobs
100 Oyster Bay Ave. North
Bremerton, WA 98312
Customer Networks
Dear Allen,
(J'fE Customer Networks is proud to provide thc City of Bremerton with a quote for a
new Option 1 lC. As we discussed, this PBX w~ll be installed by your staffand this quote
reflects this. Any labor that OTE will need to perform will be done on a time and material.~
basis. You will need the following:
NISFI001
NT6R77AA
NTSFS022
NTSF8501
AS1074
N TAK20AD
N'rBK51BA
2 A.q 103035
AS1082
1 NTSD02EA
NT8D08AK
2
1
Option 1 lC
Option i l C Rele~.se 22 Documentation
Option 11C Emcrprisc Software
Option I lC Package i22-DISA
DII/PRI Package
Clock Controller Card
Option I I Downloadable DCHI
Centralized Answering Positions
User Guide~
Digital Linc Card
Analog Message Wai~ing Line Card
Kentrox Data Smart T-Serv
Installation Pack(blocks. misc Cables, etc.)
Total Cost $14.625.25 plus tax
Ple~e let me know if you have an.-,' questions. I can bc contacted at 206 575-9102.
Sincerely,
,~5 .. ~__ ~_ .~__
Ed Weise
Sellior Account F. xecutive
To: 3eft Collln~
Date: November 5, 1996
Fax No.; (206) 478-~880
Total Pages: 3
United Telephone Northwest
Fax Transmission
From: Cheryl Gilinsky
AgCORI~ Manager
Sprint
820 West Armour Slxeet
Seattle, WA 98119
Voice 206-284-g047
Fax 206-281-9035
Subject: llC and componentx
Dear
Sorry I took so long with the quote Enclosed you will find the following: Option 11 C and
components.
IfI can be of further assasiance please call me at (.06) 21~-0026/or page me at 800-407-~212.
Tbunk you for all your support.
Account Manager
Be there now.
NT2K16GHB N TELOOM
2 NT2K22VH9 N TELCOM
2 p0780193 N TELCOM
I NTAK76AB N TELCO~
1 NTAK75AB H TELCOM
OPTION.q:
TELEPHONE IN$'~UMENT OPTION:
l~6t$ PERF.PLUS TEL WtDISPLAY, GRAY $ 3~2..85 $ 765.70 '/
NOTES:
1 NO LABOR INCLUDED
2 CALJL ACCOUNTING I~JFFER INFO. TO FOLLOW
SALI~P~8ON:
rint.
~ OF URF. FIfRTON
C. 6IUI~K¥
RE~4JIIILD #Mr~ VI:J~OR
N8 ATRAN I00 TSU WITH V.36 INTERFACE
NS DSX-I MODULE
'tOTAL
'DUMB" 14.4 EXTERNAL MODEM OPTIO~:
NS U.S. ROBOTICS 14.4 MODEM
STANDALONE CSU OPI'K)NS;
NG K~NTROX T-SERV II BASIC T', CSU
NS KENTROX T- SMART DIAGNOSTIC TI CSU
$ 1 ,~3.31$ 1,50331
$ 320.10 $ 32010
$ 1,923.40
$ 212.&2 $ 212.9~
NS
"SMART" ORO~ & INSERT CSU~DSLI
KENTROX DATA SMART ADD DROP C,~U/DSU
V.35 INTERFACE
$ g90.30 $ DSO.*30
$ 2,276.40 $ 2,276.,~
$Z,503,25 $ 2,5(]~ 25
AGENDA BILL
BBY_/~ERTON CITY COLTNCIL
Police/Special Projects 110
Fund; request for approval of
Budget Adjustment Request # 96-31
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
11-26-96
POLICE
CAPT. ROGERS
11-13-96
2. ~: (comment on back 3. EXHIBITS:
City Treasurer
Fiscal & Budget Committee 11~-~5-96
MAYOR ~ ~- COUNCIL PRESIDENT
o
SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
It is requested that City Council approve the transfer of $6,400.00 to
110 Capital Outlay to facilitate purchase of computer equipment.
City Council approve Budget Adjustment Request No. 96-31.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:~
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
11.
AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS /cont.):
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT {cont./:
IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Needed computer equipment will not be purchased.
capital in 1997 General Fund budget.
No authorization for
IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EOUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES
110 expenditure will not impact the 001 General Fund.
Requesting Department:
CiTY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
Police/Special Projects 110 Fund
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Description
Ending Balance $
Amount
6,400.00
USE OF FUNDS:
Description
110 Captlal Outlay - Computer Hardware
Amount
$6,400.00
NARRATIVE:
Transfer funds to facilitate purchase of computer equipment.
Department Head Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Director Signature
Date
ended
Mayor Comments:
Not Recommended
Treasurer's~,i~nature
I--~ Recommended
~ Approved
Not Recommended //
Denied ~
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
Mayor's Signature
Date
Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature
Date
1. SUBJECT:
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
OLYMPIC COURSE AT GOLD MT.
FOR AGENDA OF: Nov. 2 f~ 1996
ORIGINATING DEPT.:Treasure_( _~_
ORIGINATOR: R. Hanr~a
DATE SUBMITTED: Nov. 12, 1996
2. CLEARANCES: Comme. nt of back if necessary)
Dir. Parks & R ~ec.~ ~
Council Fiscal and Budget 11-25-96
3. EXHIBITS:
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST 96-33
ENDORSEMENTS ~ INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTA
4, SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ~'CTIOr~f''
This adjustment provides for the opening of the Olympic Course at Gold Mountain in September of this year. The original
budget had assumed that the Olympic Course would not open un*J[ April of 1997.
8, F'. MM D I N'
Motion to approve Budget Adjustment Request No. 96-33
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
Dir. Parks & Rec.
Mayor
12/31/96
N/A
PULLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10, NOTICE OF ACTION
TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED__
11. AGENDABILL NO: 0--7~- '---~7 /
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5, IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The City will lack budget capacity necessary for the operation of the Olympic Course during the current year.
6, IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
As indicated in the attached document.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Revenue Analysis.
Requesting Department:
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
GOLD MT. GOLF COURSE 407
NO.
96-33
SOURCE OFFUNDS:
Description
INCREASE:
GREEN FEES
Amount
265,000
USE OFFUNDS:
Description
INCREASE:
GOLF PRO OPERATIONS
MA NTENANCE
TRANSF. TO PARK FAC.
TRANSF. TO PENDERGAST
ENDING CASH
Amount
50,000
100,000
17,000
49,000
49,000
NARRATIVE:
This adjustment provides for the opening of the Olympic Course at Gold Mountain in September 1996.
This opening was originally planned for April of 1997.
Department Head Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Date
Director Signature Date
~..Recommended
Mayor Comments:
Not Recommended
TreasureCs Signa ~- ~
Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Mayor's Signature
Date
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature Date
~GENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Resolution No. ~-~-'7/
Setting fees for Gold Mountain
Golf Course and repealing
Resolution No. 2532
FOR AGENDA OF: November 26 , 199/~
ORIGINATING DEPT: Treasurer
ORIGINATOR: R. Hanna~
DATE SUBMITTED: ~ ~
2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back 3.
-~f necessaryt
Park Dir.~'~ ~-
Council Fiscal & Budget 11-25-96
Council Operations
EXHIBITS:
Proposed Resolution
summary of Financial Analysis
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
In order for the city's Gold Mountain Golf Course to remain financially
sound through the current period of expansion and on into the future, it
is necessary to implement fee changes on a regular basis. As has been
demonstrated through the financial modeling of the course expansion, a
rate of increase of approximately three percent over inflation is
required for the course to remain financially sound. Fees at the course
were last changed January 1, 1996. The proposed fee changes will
increase course revenue by approximately 3.1 percent.
8 o
RECOM~ENDATION:
Motion to pass Resolution No. ~ i~/ as presented.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Park Director
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor
EXPIRATION DATE: N/A
REVIEW DATE: Annual
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
AMENDED
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS ¢cont. ):
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (cont.):
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES
Included in the 1997 Budget and the proforma from the course expansion.
RESEARCH SOURCES:
Current pricing schedule.
Historical usage information.
RESOLUTION NO. ,~O"-'?,'/
A RESOLUTION setting forth a fee structure for Gold Mountain Golf Course
and repealing Resolution No. 2532.
WHEREAS, the City Council established the operating procedures for the Gold Mountain Golf
Course; and
WHEREAS, the operating procedures require that any changes to the fee structure at Gold
Mountain Golf Course be approved by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Gold Mountain Golf Course has recommended the
proposed fee structure which provides a reasonable increase of all fee categories; now, therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL that Resolution No. 2532 is
repealed; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the fee structure attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by this reference is approved and shall take effect Janua~ 1, 1997.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of
1996.
JOHN E. LAW, President
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF BREMERTON
GOLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COMPLEX
PROPOSED GREEN FEES EFFECTIVE JANUARY '1, '1997
CASCADE OLYMPIC
COURSE COURSE
WEEKDAY 18 *
WEEKEND 18'*
SENIOR 18 *
JUNIOR 18 *
WEEKDAY 9 *
WEEKEND 9**
CONTINUATION
TWILIGHT
PRIVATE CART
BASSES & PUNCHCARDS
ANNUAL PASS SINGLE
ANNUAL PASS COUPLE
SEMI-ANNUAL PASS SINGLE
SEMI-ANNUAL PASS COUPLE
ANNUAL PASS SENIOR SINGLE*
ANNUAL PASS SENIOR COUPLE*
SEMI-ANNUAL PASS SENIOR SINGLE*
SEMI-ANNUAL PASS SENIOR COUPLE
REGULAR PUNCH CARD (20)
SENIOR PUNCH CARD (10)*
SENIOR PUNCH CARD LOW INC.*(10)***
CORPORATE PASS (500) *
SCHOOL TEAM
ANNUAL PRIVATE CART
$20 CASCADE COURSE + $5
24 "
16 "
7.5 "
13 "
16 "
18 RATE-9 RATE 18 RATE-9 RATE
9 HOLE RATE 9 HOLE RATE
9 HOLE RATE CASCADE 9 HOLE RATE
1,100
1,650
550/600
825/875
735
1,100
367/417
550/600
32O
140
6O
8,000
100
125
SAME RATE+ 5PERROUND
NOT AVAILABLE
125
AVERAGE REVENUE PER PLAYER
* Available Monday - Friday
** Includes City Holidays
***RCW 74.38.070; age>62, household income<S18,000
$17.25
$22.25
CITY OF BREMERTON
GOLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COMPLEX
ANALYSIS OF GREEN FEES 1996 and 1997
1995 1996 1997 PROPOSED CHANGE
DAILY FEES 73% PLAYERS RATE REVENUE RATE REVENUE RATE REVENUE PERCENT
WEEKDAY 18' 18,537 19 352,203 20 370,740 1 18,537 5.3%
WEEKEND 18 17,721 23 407,583 24 425,304 I 17,721 4.3%
SENIOR 18 * 3,454 16 55,264 16 55,264 0 0 0.0%
JUNIOR 18 * 1,539 7.5 11,543 7.5 11,543 0 0 0.0%
WEEKDAY 9* 5,070 13 65,910 13 65,910 0 0 0.0%
WEEKEND 9 1,219 16 19,504 16 19,504 0 0 0.0%
CONTINUATION WEEKDAY 672 6 4,032 7 4,704 I 672 16.7%
CONTINUATION WEEKEND 28¢- 7 2,009 8 2,296 I 287 14.3%
TWILIGHT WEEKDAY* ---- 3187 13 41,431 13 41,431 0 0 0.0%
TWILIGHT WEEKEND _ ' ..... ____ ~9.~43~ 161 15,088 -- . ...... 16 15,088 0 0~ 0.0o~-o
TOTAL FULL PRICE PLAYERS 974,567 1,011,784 37,217
PASSES & PUNCHCARDS 27%
ANNUAL PASS SINGLE 1,100! 1,100 0
ANNUAL PASS COUPLE 3,812 1,650 36,950 1,650 36,950 0
;EMI-ANNUAL PASS SINGLE 550/60( 550/600 0
;EMI-ANNUAL PASS COUPLE 825/87,' 825/875 0
735 735 0
3.8%
ANNUAL PASS SENIOR SINGLE *
ANNUAL PASS SENIOR COUPLE *
6,418
1,100
52,734
1,100
52,734
0
;EMI-ANNUAL PASS SENIOR SINGLE * 367/41'; 367/417 0
2,532
SEMI-ANNUAL PASS SENIOR COUPLE *
550/60(
140
60
32O
.,ooo
;ENIOR PUNCH CARD (10)*
;ENIOR PUNCH CARD LOW INCOME* (10
35,448
75,072
34,752
550/600
~EGULAR PUNCH CARD (20)
CORPORATE PASS (500) * _
TOTAL DISCOUNTED PLAYERS
140
60
320
8,000
35,448
4,692
75,072
34,752
234,956 234,956
2,172
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL ALL PLAYERS
72,255 1,209,523 1,246,740
AVERAGE REVENUE PER PLAYER
$16.74 $17.25
* Available Monday - Friday
***RCW 7438.070; age>62, household income<S18,000
1995 Average Revenue/Round:
Annual Pass
Sr. Annual Pass
0.0%
0.0%
O.O%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
O.O%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
O.O%
0.0%
0 0.0%
37,217 3.1%
$0.52 3.1%
9.26
7.84