HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/11/96 AGENDABREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
239 4TH STREET
BREMERTON, WA 98337
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 11t 1996
CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M.
A. Pledge Of Allegiance
B. Invocation
CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in
advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If
separate discussion is desired on an item, it may be removed
from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at
the request of a Council member.
NONE
3. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
4. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
5. MAYOR'S REPORT
6 o
PUBLIC RECOGNITION -- (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes)
NEW BUSINESS
A. Three Year Contract Extension for Uniform #AB96-200
and Laundry Services
ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance #4568 (Second Reading) Amending
The 1996 Budget (Budget Adjustments #96-13,
and #96-15 through #96-26)
B. Ordinance #4569 (Second Reading); and
Resolution #2558, Acknowledging A Revised
Employee Expenses Reimbursement Policy
C. Ordinance (First Reading), Setting Additional
Compensation for Council and Council President
(CONTINUED NEXT PAGE)
RESOLUTION
A. Resolution #2559, Revisions to city Charter
10.
PUBLIC HEARING 6:00 PM OR LATER
A. Public Hearing, and Ordinance (First Reading)
To Consider and Adopt Amendments to the
Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: Contract Extension FOR AGENDA OF: ~--I(- ~ ~
Uniform & Laundry Services ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT:Purc--hasina
ORIGINATOR: Gil Johnson ~
, 199~:~
DATE SUBMITTED: June 27
2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back 3. EXHIBITS:
if necessary)~
Admini~e S e rvic e s '~_~Agr eement
Legal-%~-~, ~ Proposal
Publl~-~W~ks ~3~ ,/
qounc%kOperatio~~
ENDORSEMENT I~FORMATION APPROVED BY COUNC~J~PRESIDENT FO~
A ~ ~ J~ SUBMITTAL~
MAYOR~Q~ ; ~ COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The City
entered into a three (3) year contract with Superior Linen Services
to provide uniform rental and laundry services on July 1, 1993.
Service ~r~ provided to the City's public works employees. Staff
review of product and services provided by the contractor reflects
that it is in the best interests of the City to extend the contract
for an additional three year period. The contractor has agreed to
maintain current pricing through the extension period and to add
two additional products consistent with current contract pricing.
8. RECOM~{ENDATION: That City Council approve a three year extension
for uniform rental and laundry services provided by Superior Linen
Service.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: G. Johnson
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: G. Johnson
EXPIRATION DATE: DATE:06/30/99
REVIEW DATE: 05/01/99
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10.
APPROVED
NOTICE OF ACTION
DISAPPROVED AMENDED
DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO: ~--~OO
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: Re-Bid
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER
RESOURCES:
1995 Contract cost ....... $31,000.00
Budgeted
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
AMENDED PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Uniform Rental & Laundry Service
THIS AGREEMENT amends that Purchase Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement"
executed July 1, 1993 between the City of Bremerton, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter
referred to as "City") and Superior Linen Services, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor~).
WlTNESSETH:
A. Paragraph I of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
1. SCOPE: Contractor shall perform all work and furnish all labor, tools,
materials and equipment for:
Uniform Rental and Laundry Services
All work shall be in accordance with and as described in the attached Contractor's
Proposal herein as Exhibit "A". Contractor shall conform to the updated
performance instructions attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit
B. Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
2. TERM: Work shall start July 1, 1996 and shall end June 30, 1999.
C.. Paragraph 4 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
4. COMPENSATION: City agrees to pay Contractor according to the terms
of the Contractor's proposal hereto attached as Exhibit "A" and at a time and in a manner
provided for in the contract.
D. All other terms and conditions of the Purchased Services Agreement referenced
above, not inconsistent with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
suPE O sE . _LCE
Date: ~.. 'Z~ ,~,%~ BY: ,, .~".... /~;..,
3
BY:
Date:
CITY OF BREMERTON
Director of Public Works & Utilities
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
IAN R. SIEVERS,
City Attorney
AMENDED PURCHASE AGREEMENT
-2-
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSAL
DATE:
TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CLERK, CITY OF BREMERTON:
In accordance with the specifications and item descriptions on file in the office of the City Clerk,
the undersigned agrees to provide uniform rental and laundry services for the period July 1, 1996
through June 30, 1999. It is understood that, except for new items requested by the City
following execution of this Agreement, prices will remain fixed for the term of this Agreement.
New item prices will be negotiated between City and Contractor.
Description Price Each
1. 100% Cotton shirts/blouses long sleeve .45
2. 100 % Cotton shirts/blouses short sleeve .4.'5'
3. 100% Cotton trousers/pants .55
4. 100% Cotton coveralls .95
5. 100% Cotton shop coats .80
6. 100% Cotton Polo shirts .,~0
7. 65/35 Dacron Cotton shirts/blouses long sleeve .40
8. 65/35 Dacron Cotton shirts/blouses short sleeve .40
9. 65/35 Dacron Cotton trousers/pants .50
10. 65/35 Dacron Cotton coveralls .90
11.
12.
13. Jacket liners
14. Shop Towels
15. Walk-off mat, 3' x 4'
16. Walk-off mat, 3' x 5'
17. Walk-off mat, 4' x 6'
18. Walk-off mat, g x iv
19. Walk-off mat, 5 xq
20. Dust mop head, 18"
21. Dust mop head, 24"
22. Dust mop head, 36"
23. Dust mop head, 48"
Warranty. and Service
65/35 Dacron Cotton shop coats
Jackets
.80
8.00
,05
2.00
2.00
4.00
$.SC)
.80
.90
1.10
1.35
* Quality of goods delivered and services provided shall meet accepted industry standards.
City shall have the right to terminate future delivery in the event service and/or quality
does not meet the aforementioned standards.
* Contractor can provide/tem~-a~y garments or products within 24 hours notification, with
permanent service ~)(nmen~//wi~e (5)working days.
CONTRACTOR /q~.-~,~. ~ ~)~_/.// Signature
FIRM NAME SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE
ADDRESS
1012 CENTER STREET
TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98409
TELEPHONE NUMBER 800-232-1012
NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF PIERCE
2~,0 ff~' ~,~- being first duly sworn, on his oath says that he is
~/¢,~,~ ~',~a. that the bid above submitted is genuine and not a
sham or collusive btd, or made m the interest or on behalf of any person therein named: and he
further states that the same bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any bidder
on the above work or supplies to put in a sham bid, or any other person or corporation to refrain
from bidding; and that the said bidder has not in any mann/gr-aoxught by collusion to secure _
self any advantage over any other bidder or bidders.~ /) ~
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ,9 5- day of ,D-ce ~ .~
1996,
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
residing at '~.~c
7
EXHIBIT "B'
TECHNICAL INSTRUCTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
UNIFORM RENTAL & LAUNDRY SERVICES
The City of Bremerton presently employ approximately 80 employees in various service divisions
who require uniform rental and laundry services. These services shall be for three (3) years
commencing July 1, 1996 and ending June 30, 1999.
CONDITIONS OF SERVICE:
1. Number of employees may increase or decrease according to the needs of the City,
therefore, any quantifies stated herein shall be interpreted to be a guideline for the Contractor
in the preparation of their proposal.
2. Each department supervisor shall determine number of employees requiring uniform
service.
3. Uniforms will be of colors and selected by department and shall remain the property of
the Contractor.
a. Contractor shall have at not less than five (5) colors available tbr selection by
departments.
4. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to insure that all personnel requiring uniforms
shall be properly sized.
a. Contractor shall provide a variety of women's clothing.
5. Contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of all items in such condition as to insure
neat appearance of employees by mending, repairing or replacing uniforms as needed.
6. Contractor shall place names on uniforms as needed. If emblems are required, City shall
provide. Sewing requirements will be provided by Contractor.
7. Service will be at such frequency appropriate as to insure rotation and cleaning of
uniforms and other launderable items.
8. Contractor will, at a minimum, provide the following unitbrms and other specified items
as follow:
ITEM DESCRIPTION
100% Cotton shirts/blouses long and short sleeve
100% Cotton trousers/pants
100% Cotton coveralls
100% Cotton shop coats
100% Cotton polo shirts
65/35 Dacron cotton shirts/blouses long sleeve
65/35 Dacron cotton shirts/blouses short sleeve
65/35 Dacron cotton trousers/pants
65/35 Dacron cotton coveralls
65/35 Dacron cotton shop coats
Jackets
Jacket liners
Shop towels
Walk-off mats, 3' X 4'
Walk-off mats, 3' x 5'
Walk-off mats, 4' x 6'
Walk-off mats, J ' X~O'
Walk-offmats, 3'X V' ~4-'-x
Dust mop heads, 18"
Dust mop heads, 24"
Dust mop heads, 36"
Dust mop heads, 48"
-2-
q
PURCHASE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into in triplicate, this 1st
day of July, 1993, by and between the City of Bremerton,
hereinafter called "City", and SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE
1-800-232-1012
hereinafter called "Contractor".
WITNESSETH:
That in consideration of the terms and conditions contained
herein and attached and made a part of this Agreement, the parties
hereto covenant and agree as follows:
1. SCOPE: Contractor shall perform all work and furnish all
labor, tools, material and equipment for:
Uniform Rental and Laundry Services
All work shall be in accordance with and as described in the
attached Request for Proposal, and Performance Specifications for
services, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made
a part hereof.
Contractor shall provide and bear the expense of all equip-
ment, tools, materials and labor of any sort whatsoever that may be
required for the performance of services provided for in this
contract and every part thereof, except such as are mentioned in
the specifications to be furnished by the City.
2. TERM: Work shall start July 1, 1993 and shall end June
30, 1996.
3. PREVAILING WAGE: Contractor agrees to comply with pro-
visions of RCW 39.04 and RCW 39.12 as defined in WAC 296-127-101,
011, 025, 040, 045.
4. COMPENSATION: City agrees to pay Contractor according to
1
;0
the terms of the Contractor's proposal and at a time and in a
manner provided for in the contract.
5. LICENSES AND TAXES: Contractor shall possess a current
Bremerton Business License and any' regulatory license required to
fulfill Contractor's obligations under this contract. B & 0 taxes
shall be paid when due, and Contractor by this agreement assigns
any payments due under this contract to the City Clerk for payment
of such taxes which have been declared delinquent.
6. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: The City's Authorized Repre-
sentative shall act as advisor and consultant, to the City in all
matters relating to the contract, and responsibilities shall
include approving the amount, quality and acceptability of the
services which are to be paid for under the contract and approve
all pay estimates prior to payment by the City.
The decision of the authorized representative in the matters
described above shall be final. The a~thorized City representative
for this project is Gil Johnson, 478-5293.
7. INSURANCE: Prior to commencing work under this agree-
ment, Contractor will provide the City Risk Manager with a certif-
icate of insurance evidencing comprehensive general liability
insurance for all contractor operations in the minimum amount of
$500,000 per occurrence for bodily' injury and property damage.
This certificate of insurance must be issued by an insurer accep-
table to the City, must name the City of Bremerton an additional
insured and must provide for 30 days advance notice of cancella-
tion. Contractor shall keep the required insurance coverage
current throughout the life of the contract and shall present the
City with subsequent certificates of insurance as necessary to
2
evidence the existence of on-going insurance coverage.
8. INDEMI~ITY: Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and
save harmless the City, its appointed and elected officers and
employees, from and against any and all liability, loss, costs,
damage and expense, including costs and attorney fees in defense
thereof because of actions, claims or lawsuits for damages result-
ing from personal or bodily injury, including death at anytime
resulting~therefrom, sustained or alleged to have been sustained by
any person or persons and on account of damage to property, arising
or alleged to have arisen directly or indirectly out of or in
consequence of or the performance of this Agreement, whether such
injuries to persons or damage to property is due to the negligence
of Contractor, its subcontractors, agents, successors or assigns.
This provision shall be inapplicable to the extent that the City is
judicially found solely negligent for such damage or injury.
9. NON-DISCRIMINATION: Except to the extent permitted by a
bona fide occupational qualification, Contractor agrees to the
following practices during the term of this contract:
a. Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or
applicant for employment because of race, color, national origin,
sex, religion, age or disability. Such action shall include, but
not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion
or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or
termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and
selection for training.
b. Contractor shall, in all solicitation for employees or
job orders for employees placed with any employment agency, union
or other firm or agency, state that all qualified applicants shall
3
receive consideration for employment withoutregard to race, color,
national origin, sex, religion, age or disability. The words "Equal
Opportunity Employee" in advertisement shall constitute compliance
with this section.
c. Contractor shall send to each labor union or representa-
tive of workers with which s/he has a collective bargaining agree-
ment or other contract or understanding a notice advising the said
labor union worker's representative of their commitment under this
section, and send notice to the City of same. The successful
bidder shall be required to submit such reports as determined
appropriate to the contract in a format acceptable to the City's
Affirmative Action Officer.
In the event of non-compliance by Contractor with any of the
non-discrimination provisions of this Agreement, the City shall
have the right, at its option, to cancel this Agreement in whole or
in part.
10. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: The following docu-
ments are incorporated by reference, to include, but not be limited
to:
writing and delivered to the following parties at
Terms and Conditions
Performance Specifications
Proposal
11. NOTICES: Any notices required to be given shall be in
the following
addresses:
City Clerk
239 Fourth Street
Bremerton WA 98310
12. APPLICABLE LAW: VENUE:
and interpreted in accordance
Contractor
SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE
1012 Center gtr.~t. Tmnn~m: WA QR409
This contract shall be construed
with the laws of the State of
4
Washington and, in the event of dispute, the venue of any action
brought hereunder shall be in Kitsap County Superior Court.
13. TERMINATION: This Agreement may be terminated by either
party for convenience upon thirty (30) days written notice to the
other party, or for cause if either party fails substantially to
perform through no fault of the other and does not commence cor-
rection within five (5) days of written notice and diligently
completes the correction thereafter. Upon such termination, City
will be entitled to reports Showing the status of all matters upon
which Contractor is providing services to the City as of the
effective date of termination.
14. ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS: In the event of any action or
proceeding brought by either party against the other under this
contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover for the
fees and costs of its attorneys and such action or proceeding,
including an appeal thereof, if any, in such amount as the court
may find reasonable. In addition, should it be necessary for
either party to employ legal counsel to enforce any of the pro-
visions herein, the defaulting party shall pay all attorney's fees
and costs reasonably incurred.
15. ASSIGNMENT: The rights and obligations established by
this Agreement, except the receipt of payment, may not be assigned
without the written consent of the City.
16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement constitutes the entire
agreement between the parties and both parties acknowledge that
there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been
fully set forth in the text of this Agreement.
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have Caused this
Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.
CITY 0 REMERTON ~ CONTRACTOR:
~~ ~ SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE
MAYOR v
1012 Center Street
Tacoma, WA 98409
ATTEST:
CItY ' CLERK
S TO FORM:
-iCIlY ~TORNEY
By: John McMasters, Sales bianager
6
1012 Center Street
Tacoma, WA 98409
1-800-232-1012
DATE:
/993
May 26~ 1993
TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CLERK, CITY OF BREMERTON:
In accordance with your advertisement, plans and specifications on
file in the office of the City Clerk the undersigned hereby
agree(s) to provide Uniform Rental and Laundry Services for the
period July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1996 as follows:
100% Cotton shir~s
100% Cotton trousers'
100% Cotton coveralls
100% Cotton shop coats
65/35 Dacron cotton shirts
65/35 Dacron cotton trousers
65/35 Dacron cotton coveralls
65/35 Dacron cotton shop coats
2.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Price each
.45
.55
.95
.80
.40
.50
.90
.80
1.00
8.00
.05
2.00
2.00
4.00
.80
.90
1.10
1.35
Jackets
Jacket liners
Shop towels
Walk-off mats, 3' x 4'
Walk-off mats, 3, x 5'
Walk-off mats, 4' x 6'
Dust mop heads, 18"
Dust mop heads, 24"
Dust mop heads, 36"
Dust mop heads, 48"
Herewith find our Bid Deposit for ~
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO.
AMENDING THE 1996 BUDGET
FOR AGENDA OF: Sept.~, 1996
ORIGINATING DEPT: Treasurer
ORIGINATOR: R. Har~
DATE SUBMITTED:August 21, 19'96
~ Comment of back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
Dir. Administrative,,S~/")~/',,.0..Jv~t,-/ Proposed Ordinance
City Attor~:~*.~ SupporUng Budget Adjustment Forms
Fiscal and Budget Comm. /~J~.~/'~ ~ [~'~'/~-/w' ~-17{~'
ENDORSEMENTS
INFORMATION
AP PROVED BY COUNCIL PRE SI D.E(..~R SUBM[TTA
COUNCIL PRESIDENT("~.~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIl. ACTION:
A number of actions have been taken by the City which need to be incorporated into the Budget in order for the document
to remain an accurate projection of City financial activity.
8, RECOMMENDATION;
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Treasurer
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor
EXPIRATION DATE: 12/31/96
REVIEW DATE: N/A
PULLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED
AMENDED__
11. AGENDA BILL NO: ~ ~ -- / ff(~
8A
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The 1996 Budget will not accurately project anticipated financial activity of the City. Several previously authorized
actions will exceed current appropriations.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
As indicated in the attachments.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
1996 Budget Adjustment Requests.
AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No. 4552
relating to the budg~ of the City of Bremerton for Fiscal Year 1996
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1: Section 1 of Ordinance No. 4552 is hereby amended as follows: That the financial
budget for the City of Bremerton, to wit: "Official Budget for the year 1996, City of BremertonH, now on file
in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Bremerton, be and the same is hereby approved and adopted, and
the respective amounts provided for in said budget for the several funds of the City of Bremerton, be and the
same are hereby fixed and adopted as follows:
ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE YEAR 1996
001
101
102
103
104
105
106
108
109
110
112
201
305
307
308
401
407
451
481
503
DES CRIPTION AMOUNT
General ..................................................... $22,005,!6!
Arterial Street .................................................2,506,156
City Street ~ n,~ ~n~
Contingency Reserve ............................................ 733,500
Civic Improvement/Stadium ..................................... 155,000
Parking System Revenue ........................................ 664,638
Comm. Development Block Grant ............................. 1,374,000
Abatement Revolving Fund ...................................... 414,000
Real Estate Transfer Tax ........................................885,000
Police Special Projects ............................................ 43,199
Parks Facility Construction ...... n~ n
G. O. Bonds ................................................... 1,024,787
Waterfront Parks Consturction .................................... 31,300
Fire Department Capital .........................................314,570
Pendergast Regional Park Const ................................. 119,000
Water Operating ............................................. 10,040,073
Municipal Golf Course ........................................ 4,224,012
Wastewater Operating ........................................ 15,268,985
Stormwater Operations ........................................ 1,258,715
Risk Management ............................................. 1,898,000
22,434,813
2,080,190
98,446
510
601
621
622
623
624
Equipment Rental Reserve ..................................... 2,~57,79'1
Cemetery Perpetual Care ........................................ 123,500
Local Improvement Dist. Guaranty .............................. 116,000
Roosevelt Capital Asset ......................................... 356,000
Gift and Donations Fund .......................................... 32,400
Employee Medical Insurance Reserve ............................ 555,000
2,508,649
GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EX~ENDITURES: ... $5~,757,!g0 $69,259,933
Of the total revenue, the sum of $4,703,968 is the estimated amount to be received f~om a $3.8020
levy per $1,000 of assessed valuation of all property within the city limits of the City of Bremerton as set
forth in Ordinance No. 4532.
APPROVED by the City Council on the first reading this
day of August, 1996.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, signed by the Mayor and attested by the City
Clerk in authentication of such passage this day of September, 1996.
APPROVED this
JOHN E. LAW, Council President
day of September, 1996
ATTEST:
LYNN HORTON, M~or
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
EFFECTIVE DATE:
PUBLISHED:
ORDINANCE NO:
1996 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.2
SUMMARY OF BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
001 GENERAL
101 ARTERIAL STREET
102 STREET
103 CAPITAL RESERVE
104 CIVIC IMPROVEMENT
105 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE
106 C.D.B.G.
108 ABATEMENT REVOLVING FUND
109 REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX
110 POLICE SPECIAL PROJECTS
112 PARKS FACILITY CONSTRUCTION
201 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
305 WATERFRONT PARKS CONSTRUCTION
307 FiRE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL
308 PENDERGAST REGIONAL PARK CONST.
401 WATER OPERATING
407 GOLF COURSE
451 WASTEWATER OPERATING
481 STORMWATER OPERATING
503 RISK MANAGEMENT
510 EQUIPMENT RENTAL RESERVE
601 CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE
621 LID GUARANTY
622 ROOSEVELT CAPITAL ASSET
623 DONATIONS FUND
624 EMPLOYEE MEDICAL INSURANCE RES.
CURRENT NET
1998 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
$22,005,161 $429,652
2,506,156
2,070,390 9,800
733,500
155,000
664,638
1,374,000
414,000
885,000
43,199
96,000 2,446
1,024,787
31,300
314,570
119,000
10,040,073
4,224,012
15,268,985
1,258,715
1,898,000
2,457,794 50,855
123,500
116,000
356,000
32,400
555,000
TOTAL
AMENDED
BUDGET
$22,434,813
2,506,156
2,080,190
733,500
155,000
664,638
1,374,000
414,000
885,090
43,199
98,446
1,024,787
31,300
314,570
119,000
10,040,073
4,224,012
15,268,985
1,258,715
1,898,000
2,508,649
123,500
116,000
356,000
32,400
555,000
$68,767,180 $492,753 $69,259,933
Rpquesting Department:
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
No.
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Regular salaries
524.2016-51010
Amount
$15,000
USE OF FUNDS:
Professional Services
524.2016-54110
$15,000
NARRATIVE: Due to the loss of one full-time employee who filled the Building Official
position, two county employees were hired on a temporary basis to fill the void in the
Building Department. One of these county employees was subsequently hired as a full time
permanent employee of DCD. The cost of her temporary time while still on the county payroll
~as $2,741. The second employee works as an inspector for Bremerton DCD and will continue to
do so until vacancies at DCD are filled. To da~e, the cost for these professional services is
$4146. In addition, plan reviews for buildin~ oermits which were not ~hle ~n h~ p~rf~rm~H
by DCD sta~f~..durin~f.~th.ismime~.~._period were submitted to an outside engineerin'g firm, at $1200.00]
epa~me~q~a~,gnatd~'~ate ,~.,//Y/~?~ Director Signature ~ Data~/'~
Treasurer Comments: / '
~ecommended ~ Not Recommended
Mayor Comments:
Treasurer's Signature -
Da{e
/~ Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Date
Fiscal-& Bu-~get'C(Jmmittee Signature
Requesting Department:
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
STREET FUND NO. 102
No. 96-15
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Description
Amount
increase:
Beginning Cash 9,800
USE OF FUNDS:
Description
Amount
Increase:
Capital Projects 9,800
NARRATIVE:
This adjustment will provide expenditure authority necessary to complete two improvements to the Public
Works Complex site. The improvements include the pedmiter fence and drainage improvements.
Departmen~ H'ea-~ Si{7'ratb'~e
Director Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Date
~-~commended
Not Recommended
Treasurer's Signatbre Date
Mayor Comments:
,~Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
r~ Recommended
[-~ Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
M,~yor's Signature
Date
Requesting Department:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Description
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
PARK DEPT. - GENERAL FUND
Amount
NO.
96-16
Increase:
Donations 2,000
Reduce:
Supplies & Services 1,800
Total 3.800
NARRATIVE:
USE OF FUNDS:
IDescdpti0n
Increase:
Capital
~q~/. 7~ 5/ - ~--~/J.~
Amount
3,800
This adjustment will allow the replacement of a copy machine at the Senior Center. The old machine is no
longer functional.
Department Head Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Date
(,~rector Sighature O'
~'~ecommended
Mayor Comments:
Not Recommended
Treasurer's Signature
Date
~Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
~ayo~ Signature
Date
Recommended
Not Recommended
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
No. 96-17
Requesting Department:
TRANSPORTATION DEPT. - GENERAL FUND and EQUIPMENT RENT
SOURCE OFFUNDS:
~ Amount
Beginning Cash 100,000
Sale of Old Cars ~
Total 125,000
Decrease:
Reduce Ending Cash 60,000
Sale of Old Cars 15.000
Total 75,000
USE OF FUNDS:
Ees.c, Amount
New Patrol Cars
125,000
New Fire Cars 75,000
This adjustment will provide expenditure authority necessary to allow for the replacement of five police cars
which were unexpectedly removed from front line service for mechanical reasons. Staff wishes to replace
three Fire Dept. cars at the same time to maintain standardization within the fleet.
Department Head Signature Date
Treasurer Comments:
~)ire~or Signature
Date
~'~'commended
Mayor Comments:
Not Recommend~-~ ....
Trea s u re r's-Sig n"atu re
Date
[~ Recommended
~-~ Approved
~-~ Not Recommended
~ Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
2.5
M~yofs Signature
Date
Fi$c.~i-& I~dg~C~mittee Signature
Date
Requesting Department:
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
PARKS DEPARTMENT - GENERAL FUND
NO.
96-18
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Description
INCREASE REVENUES:
Timber Sales
Insurance Recoveries
Amount
1,000
2,851
Total 3,851
NARRATIVE:
USE OF FUNDS:
Description
Amount
INCREASE EXPENDITURES:
Equipment Purchases
3,851
This adjustment will all.{the expenditure of unplanned revenue from two sources; first is $1,000 from the sale
of wind-downed trees in NAD Park and the second is an insurance recovery for water damaged tables. The
revenue will be used to purchase replacement tables and maintenance equipment for the department.
Department Head Signature Date ~ S~gnatur~a~/ Bate / -
Treasurer Comments: (~/ector
~--~"~commended
Not Recommended
Treasurer's Signature
Date
Mayor Comments:
Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
ignature
Date
Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
26
t-C~Cf'~tee Signature
Date
Requesting Department:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - GENERAL FUND
Description Amount
BANK LOAN 237,700
No. 96-19
USE OF FUNDS:
Description
Amount
REDUCE MAINTENANCE COSTS (9,000)
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT 243,500
DEBT ISSUE COSTS %cI~-. ~ ~. 3,200
NARRATIVE:
TOTAL 237,700
This adjustment will provide expenditure authority necessary for the financing and acquisition of the City's
new computer system.
Department Head Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Date
Director Signature
.
Date
~S::~0mmended ~ Not Recommended
Mayor Comments:
Treasurer's Signature
Date
Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
I-~ Recommended
~ Approved
I-~ Not Recommended
~ Denied
Date
· & Budget Cor~tfq~tee Sigr~ature Bate
CITY OF BREMERTOI '
BUDGET ADJU~I'MENT REQUE~'
Requesting Department: C,.,,,,,.m.'Lt¥ Development
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
No funds i~volved
Amend oL~nization listing,
1, Delete Building
Official
2, Delete Planner
001-16
NARRATIVE:
I USE OF FUNDS: oo1-16
No funds involved
Add Building. Development
Permits Manager
Add Building Develo[xaent Specialist II
The reorganization of the City Permitting process requires job descriptions which are
more systems and customer service oriented. These two job description changes a~co,~lish
· this goal.
Department Head Signature Date
Treasurer Comments:
Director Signature
Date
Recommended ~-] Not Recommended
Mayor Comments:
Treasurer's Signature
Date
[-~ Recommended
[----] Approved
[---] Not Recommended
~ Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
Mayor's Signature
Date
Recommended
Approved
[---] Not Recommended
[-~ Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature Date
Requesting Department:
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
POLICE DEPT. 001-20
No. 96-21
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Descriotion
CONTRACT REVENUE
NARRATIVE:
Amount
17,920
USE OF FUNDS:
DescdDtion
PERSONNELCOSTS
Amount
17,920
This adjustment will provide necessary expenditure authority to carry out the scope of the contract between
the City and the Housing Authority for reduction of gang activity.
Department Head Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Date
Director Signature
Date
[~'~Recommended ~'~ Not Recommended
Mayor Comments:
Recommended [~ Not Recommended
Approved ~-~ Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
Signature
Date
~] Recommended
~ Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & BuUget Committee Signature
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
No. 96-22
Requesting Department: POLICE SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 110
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Description
Reduce Ending Cash
Remaining Ending Cash = $19.599
NARRATIVE:
Amount
2,600
USE OF FUNDS:
Increase Capital Equipment
Amount
2,600
This adjustment will allow the purchase of an alarm system which is attached to a digital pager. This
item is necessary for the safety of the Special Operations covert narcotics buys. It is used by most of
the narcotics divisions in the State as a safety measure for the officers and confidential informants.
Treasurer Comm'ents:
Director Signature
Date
ended
Mayor Comments:
Not Recommended
Treasurer's Sig'~
[~ Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
Date
Recommended ~-1 Not Recommended
Approved ~ Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature Date
Requesting Department:
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
Con~r~nity Develo~nent
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
oo1-16
333.- - -
Intergovernmental Revenue
Washington State CTED.
Amount
£40,000
NARRATIVE:
USE OF FUNDS:
~ 001-16
558.2016
Long Range Planning
Amount
$.40,000
The City has been awarded a Planning and Environmental Review Fund Grant to develop a
S. pecific Area Plan for the Charleston Cc~unity. This grant will be matched by 1996
CDBG~~ amount of $39,000.
Department Head Signature Date ' Director Signature
Treasurer Comments:
ate -
[~ Recommended
[---] Not Recommended
Mayor Comments:
Recommended
Approved
~-~ Not Recommended , /
r---] Denied ~
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
Mayor's Signature
Date
[---] Recommended
~-~ Approved
r--] Not Recommended
~ Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature Date
Requesting Department:
CITY OF BREMERTON
NO,
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
PARK FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION FUND NO. 112
96-24
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Description
Increase:
Insurance Recoveries
Reduce:
Other Park Imp. Projects
Amount
2,446
5,554
8,000
USE OF FUNDS:
Description
Increase:
Security Fence Project
Amount
8,000
NARRATIVE:
This adjustment will allow the replacement of the secudty fence at the vehicle storage area of the Sheridan
Department Head Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Date Director Signature Date
Recommended
Mayor Comments:
Not Recommended
Treasurer's Signature
Date
Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
Mayor's Signature
Date
Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature Date
Requesting Department:
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
GENERALFUND-POLICE DEPARTMENT
No. 96-25
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Descd~3tion Amount
STATE SHARED REVENUE
CRIMINAL JUSTICE 3,181
REDUCE SUPPLIES &'SERVICES
INVESTIGATION 11,282
COMMUNITY RESOUR 1,218
15,681
NARRATIVE:
USE OF FUNDS:
Description Amount
INCREASE:
SAFE POLICY PROGRAM 1,063
ALIVE SHELTER 899
COMMUNITY RESOURCES EQUIP. 13,719
15,681
This adjustment increases the State criminal justice funding from the preliminary estimates to the final
allocations and corrects allocation of the innovative strategy funds within the Police Dept. budget.
Department Head Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Date
Director Signature
Date
~Recommended
Mayor Comments:
Not Recommended
Treasurer's Signature
Recommended
Approved
r~ Not Recommended
~-~ Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
~'~Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
/
(~oCs Signature
Date
Fis"'C'al & BucTg~t Committee Signature
Date
Requesting Department:
CITY OF BREMERTOI
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
Public ~brks
No. 96-26
SOURCE OFFUNDS:
Equipment Rental Reserve Fund 510
365. 2100 $35,854.48
NARRATIVE:
USE OF FUNDS:
Purchase Scat Trak
594.4846.56410
$31,=oo =
One time funds received from Petroletrn Products Antitrust Litigation $2,998.48
and City Hardship Assistance Account Distribution $32,856.00
Department Head Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Date
~ Recommended
Mayor Comments:
~-~ Not Recommended ._~~~.~~ ]l-.{'l~'~
/reasu-rer s Signature ~ Date '
Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
M~yor's Signature
Recommended
Approved
[-~ Not Recommended
~-~ Denied
Fiscal & Budget Corm~ttee ~gnature Date
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE No. 4~
1. SUBJECT: ~sec~nd reading-7~
Acknowledging a revised Employee
Expense Reimbursement Policy; and
Resolution No. 2558, adopting policy
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
Sept. , 1996
Human Resources
Jim Meith
Aug. 14, 1996
E8: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
Proposed resolution,
ordinance and policy.
CITY
Old ordinance and policy.
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
cou.cIL PRESIDENL -
4. SUM_MARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The current "Employee Expense Reimbursement" policy can only be changed by City
Council approval. There is a need to update and revise the policy. Further, by
repealing the existing ordinance any future changes can be appropriately done by
administration.
8. RECOMMENDATION: to pass Ordinance No. 4569 on second reading, repealing Section 3 of
Ordinance No. 4374; and to adopt Resolution No. 2558, acknowledging a
revised Employee Expense Reimbursement policy.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED [] TABLED []
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
APPROVED
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
[] DISAPPROVED [] AMENDED [] DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO.:
35
(OVER)
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
Administration would not be able to function as efficiently.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
None.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
ORDINANCE NO. 45- O
AN ORDINANCE repealing Section 3 of Ordinance No. 4374.
CITY OF B~MERTON DOES ~BY O~:
Section 1. Repeal. Se~ion 3 of Ordin~ce No. 4374 "Expense Policy
Co~ed" sh~l be repe~ed in its entire~.
~PRO~D by the City Council of the City ofBreme~on t~s day of
, 1996.
PASSED by the City Council of the CiW of Bremenon tbs day of
, 1996.
JOHN E. LAW, Presidem
City Council
APPROVED this day of ,1996.
ATTEST:
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY
City Clerk
37
Acknowledging a revised Employee Expense Reimbursement policy.
Wl:I~REAS, it is to the benefit of the citizens of Bremerton, City employees, City
administration and the City Council to establish a uniform City policy for the Employee
Expense Reimbursement; and
WI:IE, REAS, the Mayor has established a revised Employee Expense
Reimbursement Policy which addresses guidelines for authorization and reimbursement of
job-related expenses;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tme~ CITY OF
BREMERTON:
That the Council ask the Audit Committee to direct the City Auditor to perform
periodic audits and report on the effectiveness of, and the City's adherence to, the
Employee Expense Reimbursement policy; and
BE IT FURTItER RESOLVED that any future revisions to the Employee
Expense Reimbursement policy will be reported to the Council by the Mayor.
PASSED bythe City Council of the City of Bremerton this
day of ,1996.
JOHN E. LAW, President
City Council
APPROVED this day of ,1996.
ATTEST:
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY
City Clerk
CITY OF BREMERTON
Human Resources Policy
INDEX
Administrative
3-1
E~ie'ECTIVEDATE: Oct. 15, 1996
REVIEW DATE:
REVISED DATE: Aug. 21, 1996
APPROVED
REFERENCE
City of Bremerton
PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for authorization and
reimbursement of job-related expenses.
POLICY
It is the responsibility of the City to provide reimbursement to employees
for expenses incurred in the performance of duties related to employment
with the City. The guidelines in this policy provide for such
Reimbursement. If the employee decides, at his or her own discretion, to
exceed the guidelines, it will be done at the employee's own expense. All
reimbursable expenses will be at the level that represents the lowest cost to
the City.
Employees are reminded that monies reimbursed for expenses are public
funds. It is the employee's responsibility to use the funds for approved
purposes and to properly document expenditures.
Employees will use City funds in a conservative, reasonable and a
responsible manner. Reimbursement will not be allowed for expenses
determined to be unreasonable by the Department Head. Reimbursement
will be made by check after approval by the City Council, except where the
amount to be reimbursed is less than $25.00, in which case reimbursement
may be made by petty cash, upon aplSroval of the Department Head or
designee.
ALLOWABLE EXPENSES
Mileage -- For employees using personal vehicles, mileage will be
reimbursed at the rate currently in effect by the Internal Revenue Service.
Airline Tickets -- Ail airline tickets will be purchased at the most
economical rates available at the time of booking.
Meals -- Reasonable meal costs will be reimbursed on actual receipts,
or as required by an applicable labor agreement. Reimbursement for
alcoholic beverages will not be made and, if included in receipts, must be
clearly deducted or isolated from allowable expenses. Family
members or guests' meals are not reimbursable.
EMPREIM. POL 8/5/9 6
PAGE 1 OF 3
To qualify for meal allowance, the employee must be on City business. If
an employee is attending a meeting or conference where meals are
included, reimbursement for substitute meals will not be 'made and should
not be requested, except in the case of a bona fide religious or medical
dietary restriction.
Lodging -- Reasonable lodging will be reimbursed on actual receipts, or as
required by applicable labor agreement. Lodging will be reimbursed at the
single-occupancy rate, unless two or more employees are sharing
accommodations. When an employee attends a conference or meeting at a
specific hotel, the actual room rate (single-occupancy) will be reimbursed.
Documentation of the conference rate and receipts are required. The rate
should be the most economical that is practical. A Department Head may
direct an employee to stay at a lower cost facility, if such facility is located
near the conference site.
Miscellaneous Expenses -- Reasonable out of pocket expenses incurred in
conjunction with City business will be reimbursed, with the approval of the
Department Head.
NON REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Employee expenses of a personal nature will not be reimbursed.
Non employees may accompany employees on City travel subject to the
following guidelines:
The City incurs no more expense than would be paid to the employee
traveling alone;
Meal receipts must clearly segregate costs for the employee from his or her
family;
Lodging will be reimbursed at the single-occupancy rate. If receipts are
billed at double or multiple occupancy, the employee must submit
documentation of the single occupancy rate and will be responsible for
paying the difference.
Employees WILL NOT transport a non employee in any City-owned
vehicle on City business, without the PRIOR approval of the Department
Head or designee.
PER DJ[EM
Employees may elect to be paid a per diem rate in lieu of actual meal and
lodging expenses, when travel requires an overnight stay. The per diem
rate is $40.00 per day or as set by an labor agreement. Receipts are not
PAGE 2 OF 3
q'0
required for per diem allowances.
REIMBURSEMENT
Employees requesting reimbursement, will submit the appropriate expense
reimbursement voucher to the Department Head or designee no later than
30 calendar days following the date on which such expense was incurred.
Vouchers for reimbursement not presented in a timely manner may be
denied payment by the City.
Except as stated below, all reimbursement requests must be supported by
itemized receipts or invoices which include: 1. Date of service
2. Vendor name and address location
3. Amount of charges
4. Number of persons;
If more than one, must be named on the
invoice/receipt
Receipts or invoices are not required for ordinary out of pocket
expenditures such as taxi fare, parking, ferry tolls, etc.
APPROVALS
Up to $500 total estimated cost of travel - Department Head.
More than $500 total estimated cost of travel - Mayor.
Travel that is both out of State and is more than 200 miles - Mayor.
ADVANCE TRAVEL REVOLVING FUND
Employees may be advanced funds to pay travel costs, lodging, meals and
registration fees. A "Request for Travel Authorization - Advance" must be
submitted to Accounts Payable in the Treasurer's Office at least three(3)
working days in advance of departure.
PAGE 3 OF 3
oar)rsANCE NO. 7/"
AN ORDINANCE repealing provisions of the Municipal Code establishing
wages, hours and benefits, chapters 2.36,2.40,2.44and 2.52 of the Bremerton
Municipal Code, and recodifying City Hall hours and holidays.
THE CITY OF B~RTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. Repeal. The following Chapters of the Bremerton Municipal Code ~re
hereby repealed in their entirety:
Chapter 2.36 SALARIES.
Chapter 2.40 EMPLOYEES -HOURS, VACATIONS, SICK LEAVE
Chapter 2.44 EMPLOYEES -RETIREMENT AND PENSIONS
Chapter 2.52 EMPLOYEES EXPENSES
Section 2. New Chapter. A new chapter, 2.02 CITY BUSINESS HOURS, is
adopted to read as follows:
2.02.010 CITY OFFICE HOURS. All offices of the City shall be kept open for the
transaction of business during nine hours scheduled between the hours of seven-thirty a.m.
and five p.m. of each business day from Monday through Friday of each week, holidays
excepted, unless amended by City Council resolution.
City Hall shall be closed on Saturday, Sunday and holidays.
2.02.020 LEGAL HOLIDAYS.
(a) The following holidays are adopted as legal holidays for the City: The fi~st day
of January (New Year's Day); the third Monday of January (Martin Luther King's Birthday);
the third Monday of February (President's Day); the last Monday of May (Memorial Day);
the Fourth day of July (Independence Day); the first Monday in September (Labor Day);
the eleventh day in November (Veteran's Day); the fourth Thursday and Friday in
November (ThanksgiviCg holiday); the twenty-fifth day of December (Christmas Day); and
any other day designated by public proclamation of the Chief Executive of the State as a
legal holiday or as a day of thanksgiving.
(b) Whenever any legal holiday falls upon a Sunday, the following Monday shall be
a legal holiday, and whenever any legal holiday falls upon a Saturday, the preceding Friday
shall be a legal holiday.
Section 3. Expense Policy Conf'mmed. 'Employment Expense Reimbursement',
Policy 3-1 of the City's Admin/strative Policy and Procedures Manual, shall remain in full
force and effect unless amended by Council resolution or Council approved Collective
Bargaining Agreement.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this ~.~ day of
(J-~C~ , , 1992.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this
~/)~) , 1992.
L'~'/XlN HORTON, Council President
APPROVED this ~2'~/ day of ~~ ,1992.
LOUIS ME.OR, Mayor
~- ~- day of
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Q~erk
CITY OF BREMERTON
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES ~ PROCEDURES
SUBJECT: FILE UNDER SECTION: NO.
EMPLOYEE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
EFFECTIVE DATE:
January 15, 1992
APPROVED BY:
CITY COUNCIL - May 4, 1982
POLICY
Whenever it becomes necessary for an elective or appointive official or
employee of the City to travel away from his designated post of duty
while engaged on official business, and s/he is authorized by the
Department Head to use his/her personally owned automobile for such
travel, s/he shall be reimbursed at a mileage rate that is in accordance
with the reimbursement rate currently in effect for business related
travel by the Internal Revenue Service. Reimbursement for mileage shall
be submitted on the Claim for Expenses form and must include the
destination, the number of miles driven and the purpose of the trip, for
each day that mileage is claimed.
When properly authorized and approved, officers and employees shall be
entitled to reimbursement when they are required to make out of pocket
expenditures (not to exceed $25.00 per item) for ordinary and necessary
out of pocket expenditures such as taxi fare, parking, ferry tolls, etc.
Such expenditures shall be made only where it is not feasible to use the
established purchasing procedures or when the need arises on an
emergency basis. Proper documentation is required of such expenditures
(when practical) in order to qualify for reimbursement. If any such
expenditures exceeds the $25.00 limit, it shall be subject to City
Council approval at the discretion of the City Auditor.
Officers and employees may, when properly authorized, be reimbursed for
the cost of meals incurred within the City or at other normal areas of
employment while they are conferring, consulting or otherwise meeting
with non-city specialists, technicians, executives or others. Such
expenses must be necessarily incurred in the performance of the official
duties of the municipal officials and employees.
Reimbursement will be allowed for the cost of meals incurred by
volunteer commission members and Council approved committees, provided
that such costs are necessary to the conduct of city business and are
reasonable in amount, officials and employees may be reimbursed for the
reasonable cost of a meal when they are called out on an emergency after
normal working hours to perform vital City services. Such reimbursement
shall be in accordance with the current non-uniform employee's union
agreement.
EMPLOYEE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 3-1 Page-2-
If persons other than the claimant are included on the reimbursement
request, they shall be listed by name and title. Identification of
elected or appointed officials by group, such as Civil Service
Commission, shall be sufficient. All employees must be identified
individually. Under no circumstances will reimbursement be made for
expenses incurred on behalf of any person, group or comm{ssion that is
not an elected or appointed official or employee of the City.
Expenditures for which reimbursement will not be made include but are
not limited to the following:
Liquor
Expenses of a spouse or other person not authorized to receive
reimbursement under this policy.
For each meeting or trip that expenses are incurred, the official or
employee shall indicate, on the "Claim for Expenses", the purpose of the
meeting/trip. Each meal (for which reimbursement is requested) must be
supported by proper documentation which shall accompany the claim.
Claims for employee expenses shall be approved by the appropriate person
(Department Head or Mayor) in writing on the claim form prior to being
submitted.
The following is established as guideline for meal expenditures:
Breakfast $ 5.00
Lunch $ 8.00
Dinner $13.30
Reimbursement for meals will not exceed $26.30 per day in total; unless
the additional expense incurred is deemed to have been necessary. This
amount shall be adjusted at the end of each year based on the Consumer
Price Index for all urban consumers. Tips and gratuities shall not
exceed 15% of the cost of the meal. Proper documentation shall include
any of the following: a bill, invoice, cash register receipt, or other
corroborative evidence of the transaction.
Employee incurred expenses for lodging (while out of town on City
business) will be reimbursed by the City only for the employee
submitting the claim when the following conditions are met:
Original documentation supporting the expense is submitted
with the claim. Such documentation shall be in the form of a
bill, invoice, cash register receipt or other evidence of the
transaction.
EMPLOYEE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 3-1 Page-3-
e
The purpose of the trip is indicated, in writing, on the claim
form.
Written approval is obtained from the appropriate person
(Department Head or Mayor) and indicated on the claim form.
The daily limit for reimbursement of lodging expense shall be $40.00
within Washington State, provided that this.limit may be exceeded when
the additional expense is justified or deemed necessary. Reimbursement
for out of state lodging expenses will be based upon amounts deemed
reasonable for the geographical location.
As an acceptable alternative to the limits as set forth above, the
employee may elect the per diem method of reimbursement. To claim per
diem, the official or employee need only obtain and submit a receipt for
the hotel/motel where s/he stayed overnight. If an alternative mode of
lodging is chosen such as a camper, trailer, or relative's house, other
corroborative evidence of the overnight stay shall be submitted. The
per diem rate will be $40.00 per day.
No city official or employee shall be entitled to receive any expenses
provided for in this chapter until s/he shall have first set forth on
forms prescribed by the Division of Municipal Corporations in the Office
of the State Auditor the amount thereof and the nature of the business
transacted.
Any intent to defraud the City of Bremerton by falsely claiming expenses
will constitute cause for immediate termination.
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
Ordinance Setting Additional
Compensation for Council and
Council President
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
City Council
Ian R. Sievers~
City Attorney
August ~ 1996
2. CLEARANCES..' (Cqmment on back if necessary)
Proposed Ordinance
ENDORSEMENT [] INFORMATION [] APPROVED BY COUNCIL/~E/~DENT F_OR~q~ITTAL:
MAYOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT~~-- ~--c-~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The proposed ordinance increases the salary of council members by $2,190.00 pe~
year and the council member appointed by the City Council as Council President b}
$100.00 per month as compensation for additional responsibilities enumerated ir
the Council Rules and Procedures. An annual cost of living adjustment is included
beginning January 1, 1997.
Article XI, Sec. 8 of the Washington Constitution prohibits an increase in th(
salary of any county, city, town or municipal officer after his election or durin¢
his term of office. The increase approved in this ordinance can be paid only t¢
councilmembers filling the next term for each district council seat, beginning foI
some in 1998, and extending to all council positions in 2000. This ordinance i~
inoperative as to incumbent councilmembers during their present terms of office.
Approve ordinance providing additional compensation to councilmembers and to th(
Council President on first reading. Pass ordinance on second reading
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED [] TABLED [] APPROVED [] DISAPPROVED [] AMENDED [] DATE:
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO.:
8C
(OVER)
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
None.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING,
Increase of $ ~ {9~--
early as 1996.
BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EOUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
per year in Council budget, possibly beginning a:
COUNCIL.AB - Agendas - 8/]4/96
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE setting additional compensation for the City Council President.
WHEREAS, the compensation for City Council members has not been increased for
several years; and
WHEREAS, the Council should have a cost of living adjustment established by ordinance,
to retain the value of salaries and prevent gross disparity between active council members when
adjustments are made infrequently; and
WHEREAS, the City Council President's administrative responsibility for managing the
Council office and the business of the City Council demands an extraordinary commitment of time
and effort, and should be compensated by a stipend in addition to the Council member salary;
now, therefore,
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. Amendment. Section 1 of Ordinance 4009 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
COUNCIL MEMBERS SALARY: Each Council member of the City of Bremerton shall
receive a salary of $1C,0.,~, $136.50 per Council meeting attended by the Council member,
not to exceed an annual amount of $6,000.C,¢, $8.190.00. Council members shall receive
no medical or dental benefits. The Council President shall receive an additional stipend
of $100.00 per month during his or her appointed term as President. Beginning January.
1, 1997. the salary rates for Council members, including the Council President stipend.
~ball be adjusted annually on January. 1st by ninety percent (90%) of the July CPI-W
Seattle Index. (1982-84 = 100) as published by the United States Department of Labor.
provided the adjustment shall not exceed five percent (5%).
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of
, 1996.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of
,1996.
JOHN E. LAW, Council President
COUNCIL.IRS - Diak 2 - $113t96
APPROVED this ; day of , 1996.
AT'lEST:
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
COUNCIL.IRS - Disk 2 - 8113196
2
5O
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
ORIGINATING DEPT:
Revisions to City Charter ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
Council y~
I.Sievers, City A~t
8/29
2. gJ~F. AP~%NCES: (Comment on back if necessary)
N/A . Council Study Session~
COUNCIL COMMITTEE
3. ~:
~. Resolution #2559
1. Draft Revised Charter
ENDORSEMENT [] INFORMATION []
APPROVED BY COUNCIL ~PJ~ENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT///~
4. SUM-MARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The revised charter removes redundant and inconsistent language, updates th
current language to reflect changes in state law, such as the election of th
municipal court judge, and clarifies a number of ambiguous passages. A secon
emphasis is to remove the majority of references to administrative organization,
including position titles and duties of officers and employees.
A summary of substantive changes is attached as a coversheet to the draft.
The first hearing will provide an opportunity for public input and incorporatio
of changes to the draft. A resolution refering the revised charter to the Novembe
general election will be considered the following week.
Hearing of Sept. 4th- No action
Hearing of Sept. llth - Adopt Resolution #2559, Referring Charter Revisions to Ballot.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED [] TABLED [] APPROVED [] DISAPPROVED [] AMENDED [] DATE:
RESOLUTION NO. 255q
A resolution setting forth amendments to the City Charter for submission to the qualified voters of
the City for approval or rejection at the general election to be held November 5, 1996
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON:
1. That the Kitsap County Auditor be requested to call a special municipal election to be held in
conjunction with the general municipal election of November 5, 1996, for the purpose of submitting
to the electors of the city of Bremerton the following amendments set forth as Proposed Bremerton
Charter Revision, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein.
2. That the Charter contains certain misleading or ambiguous passages and in other respects is
inconsistent with state law or the most efficient operation of city government. For these reasons it
is hereby found and declared that an emergency exists, which emergency requires the submission of
the Proposed Bremerton Charter Revision to the qualified electors of the City, for their ratification
or rejection at a special election to be held November 5, 1996.
The Kitsap county Auditor, as ex officio supervisor of Elections, is hereby requested to also find
the existence of such emergency and to call and conduct said special election on November 5, 1996
and to submit the proposition of whether or not said charter revision shall be adopted.
3. That the revised charter shall be published in the Bremerton Sun at least once each week for four
weeks next preceding the day of submitting the same to the electors for their approval.
PASSED by City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of
,19
JOHN E. LAW
Council President
CHARTER
OFTHE
CITY OF BREMERTON
ARTICLE I.
Name, Boundaries, Powers, ' -- ' ' Definitions
Section I - Name:
The corporate name ofth~s C~ty ~ , u,~ is BREMERTON.
Section 2 - Boundaries:
The existing boundaries o£ this ,~,t) ~... ,,~,..,. ,~ ~l,,.y aic al. iJ~.~cl~t
and may be changed in the manner provided by law.
Section 3 - Definitions:
As used in this Charier. unless the context indicates otherwise:
(D Gender- The inclusion of male or female eender shall not avoid
the intent of gender neutrality.
(2) RCW - Means the Revised Code of Washington. and refers to
any subsequent amendments to statutes referenced in this Charter
~ Residence - Residence within auv territory included in. annexed
to, or consolidated with the City is construed to have been residence
within the City.
(4) Shall- Means mandatory.
(5) May- Means optional.
Section 3 ................ Right
- · o.~,., -'-r.-~ a,,u .~...,,,,.~ 4 - s and Powers:
By and in the corporate name, the City shall have perpetual succession:
dcg~c~ and all powers ora First Class city; may sue and be sued in all
courts and proceedings; nsc a corporate seal approved by its legislative
body; and, bv and through its legislative body, may contract and be
contracted with: may purchase, lease, receive, or othenvise acquire real
and personal property of every kind. und use. enjoy, hold. lease, control.
convey or other, vise dispose of it for the common benefit.
Section 4 _5 - Powers - How Exercised:
Ali powers of this City, unless otherwise provided in this Charter, shall
be exercised by, through and under the direction of a mayor, xvho shall be
2
the City administrator, ,and nine council members who shall constitute the
City Council (hereafter referred to as Council) and be the legislative body
of the City. The Mayor and Council shall be subject to the control and
direction of the people at all times by means of the initiative, referendum
and recall provided for in this Charter.
ARTICLE II.
Elective Officers
Section 5~- Officers - Election and Term rff:
The elective officers of this City shall be ten eleven in number: The
Mayor ,and Municipal Judqe, who shalI be elected by majority vote from
the City at large, and nine part-time members of ....~:~v Councd, v, ho
shall be elected by majority vote from each of their respective districts.
~- ....... ~ ......... t,~ . No person shall be eligible for election
to an,/ City office, unless he is a citizen of the United States and has
resided in Bremerton for at least one year preceding election, except the
Municipal Judge, who need only be a citizen and reside in Kitsap County
and licensed to practice law in the State of Washin~on. Candidates for
Council must also be residents of their respective districts at the time of
filing. The Mayor shall continuously reside within the City and Council
members shall reside continuously within their district during their
elective terms, except as provided in Section 7 of this Charter. The terms
of all elective officers shall commence on the first day in January
following their election and shall be for a period of four years and until
their snccessors are elected and have qualified
4
5(o
thc 1997 election positions 1..3, 3.7 and 9 shall stand £or election, and
remainin~ positions 'Mil stand for election in 1999. Thereafter municipal
elections shall be held biennially and the requisite Council members shall
be elected for four vear terms.
57
Section 7 - Change in Districts:
Council may change the boundaries of existing districts bv ordinance to
make each as equal in population as practicable, so long as redistricting
is approved for~'-five days before the fourth Monday in July. No change
in the boundaries of districts shall affect the terms of any council
members; they shall serve out their terms representing the district for
which they were elected even though such change of district bonndaries
may result in more than oue council member rcsiding in thc same district.
Section 8 - Compensation - Reimbursement:
(1) The compensation and benefits of the Mayor, Municipal Judge
and council members shall be fixed by ordinance and may be revised
from time to time. but any change in council members compensation shall
not be applicable to council inembcrs scrvine thc remainder of unexpire4
temps. The Mayor's and Jude, e's compensation may be increased durim,.
a term of office.
~ The Mayor, Municipal Judgc and council members shall receive
reimbursement for their necessary expenses incurred in the performance
of the duties of their office as provided to City management and
professional employees.
Section 3t 9 - Vacancies;: Events Creating:
The position of an elected officer shall become vacant upon the
occurrence of any of the following events: i
(1) Death.
(2) Resignation.
(3) Judicially declared incompetency.
(4) Failure to maintain residency as required by Charter.
(5) Failure to qualify within two days after the beginning of the
(6) Continuous absence from the City for more than 30 thirty days
during _a his oi .=, term of office without consent of thc .~,Ly Council,
unless on business of the City.
(7) Conviction of or the plea of guilty to a felony7 or to a crime
involving moral turpitude, or an offense involving the oath of office.
Section ~ 1_~0 - Vacancies,-1 ........ ,~ Fflhng:
LD A vacancy in the office of the Mayor or Council shall be filled
for the remainder of the unexpired term, if an,,', at the next municipal
generalelection b~ -: .... ' "- ~':' ~' "~- ' - ' ap.dointc~
7
o_ the remaunng members o, ,.c x.~ou~i,7.i~, thereof by a majority vote, niay
shall appoint a qualified person to fill the vacancy until the person elected
to serve the remainder of the unexpired term takes office.
(2) If, after thirty days, thc have passed since the occurrence of a
vacancv, Council i_s unable to agree upon a person to be appointed to fill
cuut~ iio~i~iiiccs [o ~.he Ma,,or, ,,.u shall make the appointment from
amon~ the persons nominated bv members of
~ If at any time the membership of Council is reduced below
quorum, the remainin~ members, if any. shall appoint the requisile
number oF qualified persons to create a quorum who will appoint
qualified persons to fill the remaining vacancies. The appointees shall
serve until persons are elected to serve the remainder of the unexpired
terms at the next available special election unless there is an earlier
available general election.
(4) If no council members remain, the Mayor shall appoint qualified
persons to temporarily fill the vacancies and a special election to fill the
remainder of the unexpired temps shall be called unless there is an earlier
available general election. The appointees shall serve until persons are
elected to fill the remainder of the unexpired terms.
(5) In the eveut all Council positions aud the Mayor's position
become vacant, the Municipal Judee, or the Governor of the State o£
Washineton if the position of Judge is vacant, shall appoint a qualified
person as Actine Mayor. The Actin~ Mayor shall perform, and
appointees shall serve, pursuant to subsection £our above.
~) A vacancy iu the office of Muuicipa[ Judee shall be filled bv the
Mayor for the remainder o[' the unexpired term. subject to Council
confirmation.
9
Section 11 - Pro Tempore Appointment:
(1] Annually at the first meetina of Council. or when needed to fill
a vacancy, the members thereof, by maiorit~ vote, shall desi~ate one of
their number as Council President to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore, Io
serve at the request of the Mayor. or to fill an unanticipated need in the
absence or temporary disability of the Mayor.
~). The Mayor Pro Tempore shall perform all duties of the Mayor,
except he max, only remove appointive officers subject to Council
confirmation after the Mayor has been absent for thirW consecutive days
at which time the Mayor Pro Tempore may remove such persons subject
to any applicable law. nde. or rc~xtlation relating to civil service, with the
approval of Conncil majority plus one.
3r~) The Mayor ma',' appoint qnnlified persons to serve as Municipal
Judge pro tempore pursnant to RCW 3.50.090.
ARTICLE 111.
Legislation and-Au,.,..~u ~mon
Section8 '~ ' .... of .................. 12
Powers Vested in Council:
10
11
~3
u'w ~uoJt-t-[ u~ ~IOI-', up, ,-utJ,,~. Council shall have power to oreanize and
regulate its internal affairs, to define the functions, power, and duties of
the City's officers and employees; to fix the compensation and workinq
conditions of such officers and employees and establish and maintain
civil service or merit systems, retirement and pension systems not in
conflict xvith state laxv or this Charter. Council mav adopt and enforce
ordinances relating to and rcmdatine its local or nmnicipal affairs and
appropriate to the ~ood of the governlnent of the City. and. pursuant to
state laxv. may impose penalties of fine. or imprisonment, or both. for the
violation of soch ordinances constitutinp, a misdemeanor or ~'oss
misdemeanor as provided thereto. Council may provide that violation of
such shall constitute a civil violation suNcct to a monetary penalty.
Conncil shall have all leqislative powers possible for a city or town
hnve trader the Constitution of this Stnte. Bv xvnv ofillustrntion and not
12
in limitation, such poxvers may be exercised in regard to acquisition, sale,
ownership, improvement, maintenance, protection, restoration.
regulation, use, leasing, disposition, vacation, abandonment or
beautification of public ways, real property of all kinds~ water',rays.
structtu'es, or any other improvement or use of real or personal propertx,.
Such poxvers may be exercised in regard to all aspects of collective
bamainin~;, in the rendering of social, coltural, recreational, educational,
governmental, or corporate services, includine operating and supplvim,
of utilities ,'md mtmicipal sen, ices commonly or conveniently rendered bv
cities or towns. In addition and not in limitation, Council shall have any
authority ~iven to any class of mtmicipalitv or all municipalities of this
state, such authoriw to be executed th the manner provided_ if any. bv
the grantin~ statute. Within constitutional limitations. Council shall have
xxdfl~in the City corporate limits all powers of taxation for local purposes
allowed bv state laxv.
Section 13 - Council Meetings - Public Notice of Meeting Agendas:
LD Council shall meet at least once each xveek.
2~) Council shall meet at a place xvithin the corporate limits of the
Git;,. at such times as may be fixed bv ordinance or resolution.
~ A maioritv of Council constitutes a quomn~.
4~) Meetings of Council shall be presided over bv the member
13
selected as Council President. Appointment of a Council President shall
not in any way abridge the President's right to vote on matters coming
before Council at such meetings.
(5) In the absence of the City Clerk or Deput~ Clerk or other
qualified person appointed bv the Clerk, a council member may perform
the duties of Clerk at such meetin~ while retainin~ rights to participate
and vote during the meeting.
Section 14 - Open Meetlng:s - Requisites:
All meetings of Council and City b~ard~ conmfissi~ns and
~6~5i~ shall be opeu to the public except as excluded by 42.30 RCW
or this Charter.
(2) Conditions for attendance: time and place: procedures for
interruption, adjournments, continuauces: executive sessions: adoption
of ordinances, rules and regulations: and prohibition of secret ballots
shall be as prescribed witbiu Chapter 42.30 RCW: except inembers of
the body, by announcement one week in advance, may reschedule a
meeting fallin~ on a legal holiday of an,., day within thc same xveek as
originally scheduled.
(3) Cotmcil. bv ordinance, shall establish a procedure for notilMng the
public of upcoming open meetines and ageodas.
14
Section 13 - E,,,,,.tlng Clause 15 - Ordinances - Styles - Requisites -
Veto:
The enacting clanse of all ordinances shall be
follows: "The City of Bremerton does ordain". No ordinance shall
contain more than one subject and that must be clearly expressed in its
title.
(2) No ordinance, or any section or subsection thereof, or any
mtaficipal code section or subsection, shall be revised or amended, unless
the ne\v ordinance sets forth thc revised ordinance or the amended section
or subsection at fall length
15
67
(3) All legislation and appropriation of money shall be by ordinance,
save where there is a special fund created for a particular purpose;
payments from such fm~ds shall be made on order of the Council. Every
ordinance and resolution shall be in writing and if requested by a
member of Council or any person in attendance shall be read in full at a
Council meeting before a vote is taken tlrereon, and upon every such vote
the yeas and nays shall be called and recorded.
4~) Except as otherwise provided in this Charter. every ordinanee
u~tm CiliGi.~OU~,} u u 16 6~"~. shall have two public hearings.
Amendments or revisions within thc scope o£tbe ordinance may be made
during either hearing without rcintroduction. At least ouc ~veek shalI
elapse between the introduction and the final passage of thee any
16
~,~ u,,. ,~,[y ~.~,m,,... No ordinance shall take effect until thirty days after
the date of its publication or an earlier date at least ten days after
publication stated in the ordinance, except as provided below:
(a) Upon the happening of any non-debatable emer~.encv as
ennmerated m RCW 35.33.081. Conncil may adopt an ordinance
addressing the emergency or appropriating funds not available in the
annual budget to meet it bv a vote of one more than the maioritv of all
members of Council. statin~ the facts constitutin~ the emergency. Such
ordinance shall become effective at passage without notice or hearing,
but requires publication in the official newspaper.
(b) Ordinances addressing public emergencies not specifically
enumerated m RCW 35.33.081 or appropriating funds to meet such
emergencies which could not have beeu anticipated in the annual budaet_
may bc appropriated bv ordinance declaring an cmergencv and stating the
facts constituting the emergency. Such ordinance shall not be voted on
until five days have elapsed after its introduction, and shall require the
17
vote of one more than the majoriW of all members of Council for
passage. Any taxpaver of the City may appear at the meetin~ at which
the ememencv ordinance is to be voted on and be heard for or aeainst the
adoption of it. The ordinance sfiall become effective upon passaee and
publication.
(c) Initiative ordinances adopted by the volers of the City shall
take effect at the time fixed therein or. ii' no such time is desienated
~vithiu ten days after the official canvass of the ballots pursuant to state
18
~) Every ordinance that passes Council in order to become valid
must be presented to the Mayor, If approved, it shall be si ened, but if not,
it shall be returned x~4th written obiections to Council who shall cause the
objections to be entered on the record and proceed to reconsideration
thereof. If npon reconsideratiou, a majority plus one of the whole
membership favor its passage, the ordinance shall become valid
notwithstandine the Mayor's veto. The Mayor's veto with respect to
budget measures shall extend to specific items only, and not to the whole
budget. If the Mayor fails for ten davs to either approve or veto an
ordinance, it shall becolne valid withoot approval. Ordinances shall be
si~ned bv the Mayor and attested bv the City Clerk.
Section 16 - Ordinances - Authentication and Recording:
The Citx, Clerk shall authenticate and record in full in a properly
indexed book or file kept for thc purpose of rctainin~ all ordinances and
resolutions adopted bv Council. Copies of such shall be available for
inspection bv the public.
Section 17 - Publication of Ordinances or Summary of Ordinances:
Promptly after adoption, the text of each ordinance or a summary of the
content of each ordinance shall be published at least once in the City's
official newspaper except bond ordinances which may be poblished bv
title alone. For the purpose of this sectiou, a summary shall mean a brief
description which soccinctlv describes the main points of the ordinance.
Publication of a summary shall include notice that the full text is
19
avhilable from the City Clerk. An inadvertent mistake or omission in
publishing the text or a summary of the content of an ordinance shall not
render the ordinance invalid.
Section 18 - City Auditor:
There shall be an Auditing Committee consisting of two Council
members and all independent Certified Public Accountant to be
designated by Council. and two Bremerton residents selected by tile
designated members of thc Auditing Committee. The Auditing
Committee shall appoint a City Auditor who shall serve at the pleasure
of the Committee. The City Auditor shall oulv be rcmoved bv the
maiority rotc of the entire mcmbcrship of thc Committee sitting as a
xvhole.
ARTICLE IV.
Administration
Section 19 - Duties and Authority of the Mayor:
The Mayor:
(~ Shall be the chief executive ,'md achmnistrative officer of the City
in charge of all &partments and employees.
20
70.-
2~) Shall see that all laws and ordinances are faithfully enforced and
that law and order are maintained in the City.
(3) Shall have general supervision of the administration of ciW
government and all city interests.
(4) Shall see that all contracts and agreements made with the City or
for its use and benefit are faithfully kept and performed, and to this end.
may cause any legal procedures to be instituted and prosecuted in the
nme of the City. subiect to approval bv maiorit¥ vote of all members of
Council.
~ Shall report to Council. in a public meeting, concernin~ the
affairs of the City and its financial and other needs, and shall make
reconmaeudations for Council consideration and action.
Shall prepare and submit to Couucil a proposed budeet.
Shall be the official and ceremonial head of the City and shall
represent the City. except that xvhcn illness or other duties prevent the
Mayor's attendance at an official function and the Mayor Pro Tempore
is unavailable, a member of Council or some other snitable person may
be desim~ated by the Mayor to represent the City on such occasion.
~ Shall devote fall-time, during business hours, to the service of
the City and shall not hold any other public office except notary public.
Section 20 - Appothtive Officers - Duties - Compensation:
The appointive officers shall be those provided for bv City Charter or
ordin,'mce and shall include a Ciw Clerk. The office of Ciw Clerk may be
merged xvith any other compatible appointive offi~. The Fire Chief shall
be Fire Marshal of the Cit-,,. The authority, duties and quail fications of
21
7.3
all ~ppointive officers shall be prescribed bv chart~? or ordinances, and
the compensation of appointive officers shall be prescribed by ordinance.
Section 21 - Appointment and Removal of Officers and Employees
- Terms:
The Mayor shall have the power of appointment and removal of all
appointive officers and employees, except the City Auditor, City
Attorney, Court employees and Council empIovees, subiect to any
applicable laxv. rule or reaulation relating to civil sen'ice. Council
employees who serve at the pleasure of the Council may only be removed
by a majority ~ 6~ Conncil sittinq as a whole. The head of a
department or office of the City goverument may be authorized bv the
Mayor to appoint and remove subordinates in such departments or office.
snbject to any applicable civil service provisions. All appointments of
City officers and employees shall be made on the basis of ability and
trainine or experience in the duties of the position, and in compliance
with provisions of any merit system applicable to the City. Confirmation
bv Council of appointments of officers may be required bv ordinance.
Appointive officers shall be without a definite term unless a term is
established for such office bv law or ordinance.
Section 22 - Oath of Officers and Employees:
Any officer or ~a~Pl6y~. before enterine opon the performance of his
duties, may be reqoired to take an oath or affirmation as may be
prescribed by ordinance for the faithfol perforumnce of his duties as a
condition of employment.
22
Section 3t- 23 - City Attorney:
The Legal Department of the City shall consist of a City Attorney,
appointed by the Mayor and confirnmd by th~ Council, and such
assistants as the budget will allow. All must be duly licensed attorneys
of the State of Washington in accordance with state statute or court rule.
The City Attorn%' shall be a full-time in-house City Attorney, who shall
have no outside practice or clients. The City Attorney may be removed
by the Mayor, with the concurrence of a majority of Ahe Council sitting
as a whole, or by the Council alone, provided that removal by the Council
alone shall require a 2/3 vote of thc entire Council. The City Attorney
may remove his assistants a_t ,'rs-his pleasure.
Section ~ 24 - Legal Advisor:
The City Attorney shall be legal advisor of all el'ricers, commissions.
boards and committees-dcpadiiicnts of the City and shall bring and
prosecute all actions which may be directed by the Mayor or Council, and
defend fl~e City in all actions against it and any action in which the City,
any past or present employee, officer, board, committee, or coniiiii§Sioi~
is a para., as a result of ac£s or omissions in the eood faith performance
of the city's busiuess as determined bv Council.
Section 33 25 - Special Counsel:
Council naa5' at any time employ other or special counsel, xvhose
compensation shall be fixed ' , .........
u2 ,[ at the tune of emplox meat ~ll~61.~t~llll..ll~.,
to take charge of special matters or to assist the City Attorney.
23
ARTICLE V.
Finance
Section :33 26- Organization:
ar-The Mayor shall have charge of finance and shall be responsible for
the custodv~ and management of the__ City. assets. ~'· ........... .,. ~v,,,.,.,, ~... appo.i:
26
78
,~,~ ..... ~,~ o, 1988.
Section ~; 27 - Receipt, Custody, and Disbursement of Funds:
......... u~,. ,~,unctl. All payments authorized by ti'ce Council shall be
,,:, ........ ,~ ...... ~ .... ~ ............., signed by the Mayor and City
Clerk The City Treasurer shall receive and keep all monies due and
belon~g to ~e Ciw, ~d all trust funds held by the City, and shall keep
an accurate detailed acconnt of the same in such manner as to show the
exact financial condition of the City. * ..........
The Ci~ Treasurer shall: at tbe close of each month: repo~ to thc City
Co~cil all the monies received and disbursed during the month.
Sectiou 28 - Fiscal Year:
The City's fiscal vear shall be file calendar year
Sectiou 59-2.._9_9- Public Utilities:
Tbe CiW sball bave power to own and operate any public utility and may
purchase, coustruct, condenm or acquire any public utility provided by
laxv, and may make any additious or betterments or extensions of any
existing utility, and the provision therefor shall be by ordinance wbicb
shall specil? and adopt the plan or system proposed hud declare the
estimated cost thereof. Any ordmnnce providing for n nevdy owned and
operated utiliLy shall be submitted for ratification or rejection to tbe
qualified voters of the City at n general or ~ special election called for
that purpose. Provided, however, tbat an ordinnnce providing for the
27
extension, enlargement or improvemeut of an ~xisting utility shall
conform to:~,,~ ~,,:~z: RCW ~>.92.070 and n~ only be submitted to the
voters as required thereby.
28
29
~t
ARTICLE t-~ VI__~.
Civil Service
Section 34 3._~0 - Commission, Creation of:
There is hereby established a Civil Service Commission of five
members .....i,.h who shall be appointed by the Mayor and approved
bv. Council, __and ~..,~.. =.,., ~u.=,=[-- ' ' u~".,~ ~ .,~,l,U~=, who sball be
citizens of the United States, residents of the City for at least three on~
year~ ..,.~,,,~,> preceding such ' - ..............
~u~,.[~. The term of office of such commissioners shall be for three
years on sta~eered terms ~ except that" - : '' ,
vacancies in the commission shall be filled by the Mayor and approved
by ~ Council for the unexpired term. Any member of said
commission may be removed from office for incompetency,
incompatibili~, or dereliction of duty, ~ malfeasance in office, or other
good cans~ after charges m writing have been preferred, duc notice
given and a full hearing had in Snperior Coua unless such hearin,e is
xvaived in ~witin~.
Section ~ 3~ - Commissimh Rules and Powers:
3O
,-r. LD Thc ConlnllSSIOn ~u~ u~t~ ,~pla~,. - ' r~ ..
m m~ ~..~d, shall make
snch roles and regulations for the conduct of its business and to
enforce the pu~oses of this a~icle as shall be necessa~ and proper.
~ ~ The · ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~u~ Commission shall provide for the
classification of all em oyees ~.~v..~ ~.~.,~ ~,,y .~
.... : .... ~" :~ ~ ............. ~ .... sly
this A~icle.
~ ~ All frill paid employees of the Fire d~p,a,. ...... and Police
depamnents of the City. except thc ChieFs. shnll be included under th~
provisions of this Agicle, and all existing provisions of State law
pe~aining to such employ'ecs shall b~ substantially complied with by
the Commission. All other full time employees shall be included nndcr
the provisions of this Article unless excluded in Scction 33.
d: (4) The Commission, among other things, shall provide for open
competitive .,...cc examination as to fitness; ,,,,,,.,, .,.,~ u~ .,,.tcu
to p,'o.notio.al c.,..d.,.tio.= for an eligibility list from wbich
vacancies shall be filled; for a period of probation before employment
is made permanent; and lbr promotion on the basis of merit.
experience, and record Promotional processing/testine fees shall not
be charged.
~ ~ Employees within the scope of this A~icle who are in office at
31
the time of the adoption of this Charter shall retain their positions,
unless removed for cause.
(6~ The Commission. among other things, shall provide for rules
and procedures to ensure employees due process in re~ard to any
proposed disciplinary action.
Section 36 32 --g¢ci-etai'., Civil Service Officer:
The Commission shall provide for the selection of a civil sera, ice
officer bv the Mayor. with Council confirmation who shall also serve
32
Section 39 3.~3 - Classification of Service:
(-I-) There shall be excepted from the operation of this article the
following: lviay*,,,
ouu[,., u,.l~a, tl.,~.t .~.,tu~, elected officlals, manaaement and
professional appointed positions excluded bv ordinance unless
other,vise provided bv this Article, all non-salaried members of
appointive boards and commissions, and any other employee
exempted from the operation of this Article by the Commission,
ARTICLE IX.I VII,
Boards ,mad: Commission and Committees
Section 40 34 - Member Residency Requirement:
Tbe Mayor shall appoint all boards, commissions and committees
established bv ordinance or charter, except the Audit Committee. with
Council confirmation as required bv ordinance. All members of
boards ,and .- commissions and committees established by ordinance or
charter shall be resideuts of the City for at least one year prior to
appointment, unless otherwise provided by ord m me o~ cha~mr. Any
member ora board and: commission and committee established by
ordinance or charter who is not a resident of the City at the time tbis
provision takes effect shall serve out the balance of the term for which
hc or ~,,,~ ,,,,~ appointed.
1974.
1974.
34
ARTICLE ,K-14 VIll.
Recall. Initiative and Referendum
Section 45 3_~5 - Recall:
The holder of any elective office may be recalled and removed from
said office as provided b3 I;,x~ in 29.82 RCW.
Section 36 - Initiative and Referendum:
The po;vets of initiative and referendum shall be exercised in tile
manner set forth in RCW 35 17.240 throueh 35 17 360.Sec6o,i 52:
No ordinance heretofore or hereafter enacted by vote of tile people
shall be amended or repealed by the Cooncil unless such amcndato~
or repealing ordinance shall be submitted to the qualified electors for
their approval or rejection in the same manner as is required by this
~in respect to the sobmission of an ordinance initiated or
referred.
35
.36
37
ARTICLE XIV IX.
Franchises
Section 53 37 - Franchises - Term - Renewal:
No ~...~.,u~,w franch sc, : ' ' '
.~.t o, p, ~, m.~. shall ever be granted, iio, ally
excepting npon a majority vote of the electors, and m no event ,,viii n
franchise c,¢.' be granted for a period longer thnn rift)' vcars Mr ail)
franchise :~''
,,~,,t oi v,,, ,,,-~- b~e renex~ed or extended until xwthln txvo
years of the expiration thereof
Section 54 38 - Franchise - Compensation - Publication:
All franchises shall be granted bx
ordinance and shall specie' plainly the streets or other public placcs or
parts thereof to which they apply, and no franchise shall be provided
xvithout provisioo for proper compensation to the Cit.',, thcrefor. The
Council shall adopt such mode of determining the compensation to be
paid by such grantee o~ assiS,is as it shall determine to be reasonable
38
alia'just n
its ..... ppli
....... uu,,,s. Every. a cant for a franchise shall bear all expenses
of advertising and submitting the proposed ordinance, including the
expense of election, if any.
Section 55 39- Franchise - Council Rights:
The grant of eveD, franchise shall be made expressly subject to the
condition that the Council sball have the right xvith respect to any
francbise so granted to hear and detemline what are just, fair and
reasonable rates, fares and charges for public service unless ree~nlated
by tbe State or Federal ~ovemmcnt, and to order that only reasonable
charges shall be imposed; to require reasonable exte ~s ons of any
public sep~'ice system; to make such roles and regulations as may bc
required to secure adequate and proper service, and to provide
sufficient accommodation for the public: to repeal, amend or modify
the same; to canccl, forfeit and abrogate the same if thc franchise righL
or privilege is not operated or exercised in full accordance with its
provisions, or an.,,' part thereof, or at all; to acquire by purchase or
condemnation upon a majority vote of the electors for the usc of the
City itself or its inhabitants, the property of the grantee at a fair and
just value, which sbalI not include any valuation of the franchise, right
oi p, ~ ,,~.g,., whicb shall thereupon terminate.
39
Sec-t'~on 56 40 - Franchise - Trausfers:
No franchise shall be transferred, sold or leased without the consent of
the Council, under such rules and regulations as the Council may
impose.
ARTICLE ...... X.
Miscelhrueous
Section 60 4._~1- Legal Continuity:
All ordinances and resolutions: ~ ....
m tu~.~ a~ u~u tiiiiC cousistent with this
Ch Il
iii force remain in effect until amended or repealed or until they expire
by limitation. All rights and obligations m favor of or against the City
existing at the time this Charter shall go into effect, shall continue
without modification. All street and other improvements, ail vacations
of public streets, alleys or places, all assessments for improvements,
40
all'suits and actions in court, all fines and Forfeitures and all other
matters relating to the Ci.ty that ma5' have been begun and not
completed, shall be completed according to the chaffer, ordinances and
laxv existing prior to the time this Chaaer shall go into effect, and all
taxes and assessments levied and remaining unpaid when this Chaaer
shall wil~ go into effect, shall be collected as provided by ordinances
and laws existing and in effect at the time same were levied.
Section ~ 4~ - Employment Continuity:
Whenever by the provisions of this Chaacr duties and fnnctions
~u,,,~ oi u~,,~ ,,.,v ~,, ar~ transFcrred to soi~c o[l~ci a different
depaament, board ~or office, the employees engaged in the
perfommnce of such duties aod ~unctions at the time this Chaaer shall
goes into effect, shall be transfexed accordingly and be deemed to
have been regularly appointed to the respective positions involved in
41
the performance of such duties and functions, until removcd therefrom
in accordance with the provisions of this Charier.
1974.
o~t,u,, 66:
6, 1984.
42
Section 66(a): 43 - Report - Requisites of Claim - Time
Limitations:
All claims for damages for personal injuries or for injuries to property
sustained by an5' act of the City or any officer, agent, servant, or
employee, must be presented to ~.hc Cit) Council and filed with the
City Clerk xvithin the time specified by State Law. All such claims for
damages must be in writing and verified and must accurately locate
and describe the act causing the injury, describe the injm3', giving the
residence for six (40 months last past of the claimant and contain the
items of damage claimed. No action shall be maintained against the
CiW for ,--L' cl,-,i.,s a claim for tort damages until the saiii¢ claim has
been prcsci-,;.cd to filed with flic Cit) Council or the officer designated
by ordinance and sixty (60) days haxe elapsed after such presentation
ARTICLE ...... XI.
Amendlnents
Section 6-7 4-.1 - Conform to State Law:
Amendments ol'this Charter shall lbllow and conl'ornl [o the
procedures set fox~.h in the State Constitution and Laws oF the State of
Washington.
43
PROPOSED ALTERNATE SECTIONS
Council Conflict of Position,Sec 6, three insertion options-
·.. No person shall be eligible for election to any City office, unless he is a citizen of the United States and
has resided in Bremerton for at least one year preceding election, except the Municipal Judge, who need only
be a citize~ ,arid reside in K!tsap County ~nd licensed to practice law in the State of Washin~on. ~:~6n
~[~'¢~ [li~ ~.i;~4,. Candidates for Council must also be residents of their respective districts at the time of
filing ....
II.
eleeti~e~pubh e o~'fice.
III.
Council Compensation, Sec. 8 (1), three replacement options-
I. ~ The compensation and benefits of the Mayor. Municipal Judqe and council members
shall be fixed by ordinance and may be revised from time to time. but any change in council members
compensation shall not be applicable to council members serving the remainder of unexpired terms unless it
~s an increase fixed bv ordinance approved bv the voters. The Mayor's and Judge's compensation may bc
increased durin~ a term of office.
II. (1) The compensation and benefits of the Mayor and Municipal Judge shall be fixed bv
ordinance. Council salary shall be set bv a commission appointed bv the Mayor.
IlL (1) The compensation and benefits of elected officials shall only be chanaed by
ordinance approved by the voters.
Mayor Pro Tem, Sec. 11 (1) and (2), replacemeut option-
(1) Within the first ninety days of each year, the Council members shall, by majority vole,
desi~ate one of their number, or any qualified registered voter of the City of Bremerton. as Mayor Pro
Tempore to serve in the absence or disability of the Mayor.
(2) The Mayor Pro Tempore shall hold office at the pleasure of the Council, and perform all
the duties of the Mayor, except that Mayor Pro Tempore may only remove department heads of the City of
Bremerton after the Mayor has been absent from his position as Mayor for thirty consecutive days. in which
event the Mayor Pro Tempore may remove department heads of the City of Bremerton with the approval of
the Council.
ct6,
Civil Service Status of Chiefs, Sec 31(3), replacement option-
er. ~ All full paid employees of the Fire dctaai2i,ieiit, and Police departments of the City
shall be included under the provisions of this Article, and all existing provisions of State law pertaining to
such employees shall be substantially complied with by the Conmfission. All other full time employees shall
be included under the provisions of this Article unless excluded in Section 33.
Disposal of Utility Assets, Sec 29, new subsections (2) and (3) option-
~)...[ current section 29]
[ .~2~Nothin.g in this Charter shall be construed to permit the city of Bremerton to sell all or
any portion of any of the real property now owned or hereafter acquired for water supply purposes ecnerallv
'known as watersheds, whether or 130t cnrl'en.tlv used ~r water snpply purposes., unlegs ~ ques~on, of such.
proposed sale shall ha~'e%e'~n~rs-~ ub~itte~t~lified electo~d~,"by~'.'_~t~_us _"'~.._~f
c~mail-a~muni~:ipal general or special election and assented,to by sixty percent of said electors voting on
such question. //}.~ E.~-d-. .q'~ dcr(.t ~' EC-~ E~.~
~ -fc'~The City shall not sell. lease or dispose of anv utility lands, svstems or parts thereof
essential to c4tinued effective utility service, nnless and until such disposal is approved bv a majority plus
one vote of C/pnncil. ~ tO ~ ~
' ' ~ ,~ ~,~ d-"/~'~
~ (43 ~ · w - -~"~"'-~
Age requirement for Boards and Commissions unless excepted by ordinance, Sec.34,
replacement option-
The Mayor shall appoint all boards, commissions and committees established bv ordinance or charter, except
the Audit Committee, with Conncil confirmation as reqnired bv ordinance. All members of boards
commissions and committees established by ordinance or chartcr shall be residents of the City for at least one
year prior to appointment and eighteen vears of age, unless otherwise provided by ordinance ~. Any
member of a board zmd, conunission and committee established by ordinance or charter who is not a resident
of the City at the time this provision takes effect shall serve out the balance of the term for which h,. or
,,,.~ appointed.
q7
CHARTER
by ordinance. (Added by vote of the people on November
Article
CITY MANAGER, CITY CLERK, AND CITY
ATTORNEY
Secfiou 3.01 City Munager; Q,mli~tmas: The city
council shall appoint a person who shall have the title of
city manager and shall have the powers and perform the
duties in this charter provided. No councillzlc~thor shall
receive such appointment during the t~rm for which
elected, nor within one year after the expimtioB of term.
Thc city manager shall be chosen by t~ city cotmcil
solely on ~e basis of executive and administr~tiYe quail
fications, with special rder~nc¢ to actual exlnxicnce in.
or knowledge of, accepted practice in respect to th~ duties
of this office a., hereinafter set for~ At the time of
appointment, Ibc city managra' need not b¢a resident of
the city or state, but during tenure of office .~.11 reside
within the city.
Section 3.0l Removal: Thc city council gaall appoint
the city manager ,~4thout any definite ~ atxi may
effect removal by a majority vote of all its memben. At
least thirty days before such removal aha,Il bce. omc effec-
Uvc. the City council shall, by a majority vo~e of its
membevL adopt a preliminary rer, olution stating the rea-
sons for removal. The city manager may reply in writing
and may request a public heanng, which alml] be held not
earlier th~n twenty days, nor later than thilTy days lifter
the filing of such rr. queSL A~ter such public he~ng, if
one be requeste<i, and after full consideration, the city
council, by majority vot~ of its member, ~ adopt a
finaJ resolution of removal. By the preliminary x-~olution,
the city council may suspend the city manages' ilia:la duty,
but the manager's salary shall continue unlil the removal
shaJl become effective, aa provided in the final resolution.
In ca.~e of the absence, suspension, or disability of the
city manager, or if a vacancy shall occur in the oflice, the
city council may designate a qualified
officer of thc city to perform the duties of the office until
the city manager shall return to duty or until the
mcnt of a successor shaJl have been mad/:.
Section 3,03 Powers and Duties: The city ilasm~er
shall be: head of the administrative brlmch of tha city
government and shall be responsible to th~ city council
Ior the proper administration of all ~fairs of the city and
to that end, subject to the personnel in'~vi$ion$ of this
charter, shall have the power mad shall be reciutl~d to: (I)
appoint or remove the city attorney, subject to the ap-
proval of the city council; (2) appoint and, when neces-
sary for the good of the service, remove all officers attd
employe~ of the city except as otherwise provided by
this ctiartcr, or by state laws and except ~.~ the manager
may autholir, e the head of a department or office tO
appoint and remove subordinates in such department or
OffiCe; (3) pr~olre the budget ennoally and submit it to
the city council and be responsible for its administration
upon ~doplion; (4) prepare ~l submit to thc city council
as of th~ end of the fiseaJ year a complete repor~ on the
finances and administrative activities of the city for the
preceding ye~, (5) keep the city council advised on the
finatleial eonditinn and future needs of the city and make
such recom~end~lions as may to the manager ~eem
desirable; (6) perform such other duties as may be pre-
scribed by this charter or required by thc city council, not
inconsistent with this charter. (As amended by vo~e orate
people on November 6, 1979.)
S~tiott 3,.04 Co~acil Not to Interfere: Neither tile
city counell nor any of its commitlees or members shall
dixect Or r~lueSt the appdinttnent of any person to. or any
person's r~moval from office by thc city manager or by
any of thc manager's subordinates, or in any manner take
part in the appointment or removnl of Officcr~ and em-
ployees in thc schniniswative scrvlce~ of the city Except
for the purpose of inquil3,, the city council and irs mere
ben shall deal with the achninisu-auvc service solely
through the city manager and neither the city council nor
any cormmll~e or members thereof shall give orders to
any subordinates of the city manager either publicly or
privately; provided, however, that nothing herein shall bc
construed to prohibit the couuciL while in session, fi.om
fully discussing with the city manager md Oepartment
heads an3ahing pertaining to city a..ffau's nor to prohibit
city council, nor uny conuniuee or members thereof from
s~king the msist,ence of the city attorney as provided for
in $~clion 3.06 of tiffs charter. (A~ amended by vote of
the people on No~ember 6, 1975. and November 8, 199-4. )
Section 3.1~ City Clerk, Duties of: (Deleted bv vote
of the people on November 6, 1979 by which vote the
people directed that the dutie$ of xhe city clerk b~ ~et by
ordiname. )
Se~lon 3,06 City Attorney) Duties of: It shall be the
duty of the city attorney to advise the city council, city
manager, and all other officers of the city on lcga] mat-
ters counom<i with ~cir duties, to ~ ordina.ncea,
resolutions, and all other required legal documen~.~, m
prosecute violastions of city ordinances, anti to reprcscm
¢-5
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING & ORDINANCE
To consider and adopt amendments to the
Bremerton Comprehensive Plan.
FOR AGENDA OF: Sept. Jar, 1996
ORIGINATING DEPT: DCD/Planninq
ORIGINATOR: Ron W. Houoh
DATE SUBMI'~'ED: Sept. 5. 1996
2. CLEARANCES: ~c~k if necessary)
Operations
3. EXHIBITS:
,/ Staff Report
Ordinance to adopt amendments
Revised Capital Facilities Program
Planning Commission Minutes
MAYOR ~ ~- '~'~ COUNCIL PRESlDEB~3' _ ...,~~--
4, SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The Comprehensive Plan may be amended only once each year. Proposed amendments to the Plan
are collected during the year and processed as a package during the spring and summer, The
Planning Commission reviewed and held public hearings on all proposed amendments and has
recommended City Council approval. The amendments were submitted to state agencies in late June
for a mandatory 60-day review. Any comments received will be considered prior to adoption of the
proposed amendments. The Harrison District Plan is also a Plan Amendment but, because of its
complexity, it will be considered at a separate public hearing and adopted by separate ordinance.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
City Council approval of the attached Ordinance on first readinq.
City Council passage of the Ordiannce on second readinq.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED TABLED APPROVED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
DISAPPROVED
DATE:
AMENDED
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
IOA
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Non-passage would have the following effects: 1. The PUD being planned by Pope Resources would be limited to the Comp. Plan in effect
several years ago and would be more difficult to design with.
2. A few residential properties that were included in the Sciepko Annexation area would continue
to be inappropriately designated "Industrial Park",
3. The adopted Evergreen Park expansion around Smith Cove would be inconsistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. The newly acquired Arvon Park would remain in a residential zone.
5. The six-year Capital Improvement Program would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive
Plan, which could adversely affect future funding of needed projects.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The overall effect of the proposed changes should be minimal on City staff and budgets. The
proposed changes to the Capital Facilities Program are very important to the budget process and to
the implementation of proposed capital projects.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
I01
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE adopting 1996 amendments
to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton adopted a revised Comprehensive Plan by
resolution in April 1995 and readopted the Plan by Ordinance No. 4545 in February 1996 to
include amendments ordered by the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board;
and
WltEREAS, requested and proposed amendments to the Plan were docketed in
accordance with an adopted procedure for amending the Plan once per year, were processed
through the Planning Commission in April, May, and June, and were submitted for a mandatory
60-day review by state agencies at the end of June 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Bremerton Planning Commission, following public study sessions and
hearings during May and June 1996, has recommended City Council adoption of the proposed
amendments, as presented, subject to any adjustments that may be necessary as a result of
comments from state agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on these proposed
amendments on September 11, 1996 to accept additional public comments and to consider the
recommendations of the Planning Commission and state agencies; now therefore
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
Section 1. The Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Map is hereby amended in the vicinity
of the Pope Resources Planned Unit Development to expand the Industrial Park designation from
approximately 25 acres to 60 acres, and to change an area at the extreme southwestern end of the
PUD area from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, as shown in attached
Exhibit "A".
Section 2. The Comprehensive Plan Map is hereby amended in the vicinity of the
Sciepko Annexation Area, located east of Gorst and south of Highway 16, to change the
designation of six existing lots from Industrial Park to Low Density Residential, as shown in
attached Exhibit "B".
Section 3. The Comprehensive Plan Map is hereby amended in the vicinity of Smith
Cove to achieve consistency between the adopted Evergreen Park Master Plan and the
Comprehensive Plan, as shown in attached Exhibit "C'.
Section 4. The Comprehensive Plan Map is hereby amended to change the designation
of the new neighborhood park at 1506 Arvon Street from Low Density Residential to Park, as
/ 0,,T
shown on attached Exhibit "D".
Section 5. The text of the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to incorporated the
annual update of the Capital Facilities Program portion of the Capital Facilities Element, as
attached hereto as Exhibit "E".
APPROVED by the City Council on the first reading this
day of ,1996.
PASSED by the Bremerton City Council this
,1996.
day of
JOHN LAW, President
Bremerton City Council
APPROVED this
day of ,1996~
ATTEST:
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
Published:
Effective:
/03
Exhibit "A"
Pope Resources PUD Amendment:
This portion of the West Bremerton Land Use Plan is amended to add the "MDR" designation at
the southwestern comer of the PUD area and to expand the Industrial Park (IP) designation to
approximately 60 acres.
LDR
MDR
IP
P
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Industrial Park
Park (Pendergast)
Exhibit "B"
Sciepko Annexation Area Plan Amendment:
Proposed Map Amendment:
The Amendment Area is shaded.
This area is proposed to be changed
fi.om "Industrial Park (IP)" to "Low
Density Residential (LDR)" on the
Bremerton Comprehensive Plan.
Exhibit "C"
Smith Cove Area Plan Amendment:
Proposed "Adjusted" Comprehensive Plan Map:
P Park
MU Mixed Use
NC Neighborhood Convenience
LDR Low Density Residential
MDR Medium Density Residential
HDR High Density Residential
CBD Central Business District
MDR
Exhibit "D"
Arvon Park Plan Amendment:
This Plan Amendment changes one lot from "Low Density Residential" to "Park" to
accommodate a new neighborhood park at 1506 Arvon Street.
-- MDR C --
City of Bremerton
1996
Comprehensive ]Dlan
AMENDMENTS
STAFF REPORTS
INTRODUCTION
SUMMARY OF PLAN AMENDMENTS
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
GENERAL LOCATIONS (map)
IMPACTS ON GOALS & POLICIES
1
2
3
3
4
A. Pope Resources PUD Adjustment
B. Harrison District Plan
C. Sciepko Annexation -- Plan Adjustment
D. Capital Facilities Annual Update
E. Smith Cove Area Plan Amendment
F. Arvon Park Plan Amendment
5
11
15
20
23
31
STAFF REPORT
Comprehensi, e Ph, _Amen~men~:s
NC. OF_ &~.
Prepared by: Ron W. Hough --- Dept. of Community Development --- 286 Fourth Street, Bremerton WA 98337
INTRODUCTION
A. Plan Adoption:
The revised Bremerton Comprehensive Plan was adopted on April 5, 1995 to replace the
City's 1986 Comprehensive Plan.
The Plan was amendment in response to a Growth Management Heatings Board Order
and re-adopted by Ordinance on February 21, 1996.
B. Appeals of the Plan:
The Plan was appealed to the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board
in July 1995. The appellants, the Association to Protect Anderson Creek (APAC),
questioned a number of issues in the Anderson Creek area. The Heatings Board issued its
Findings and Order on December 26, 1995, which required the City to make some
changes to the text of the Plan to resolve some consistency issues, and to adjust the Plan
Map as necessary to clarify the Anderson Creek issues. The City made the changes as
directed and the Hearings Board issued a Finding of Compliance on April 15, 1996.
C. Plan Amendment Process:
Plan Amendments may be initiated by property owners, organizations, City staff, the
Planning Commission or City Council. Amendments are submitted on a City application
form and accepted throughout the year. Those received prior to April 1 are processed
during the following months with the final decision expected in July. The Planning
Commission is the focal point for citizen involvement and recommends City Council
action on each requested amendment. In order to arrive at the City Council in July, the
amendments are processed by staff during the month of April, submitted to the State the
£zrst week of May for its 60-day review, and subjected to Planning Commission study
sessions and hearings during May and June.
D. Plan Amendment Schedule:
The Growth Management Act requires most Plan amendments to be placed on a docket
and processed at one scheduled time o£the year. Bremerton's Comprehensive Plan
includes an amendment schedule that leads to City Council action during the month of
July so that any £mancial impacts can move ahead into the fall budget process.
SUM_MARY OF PLAN AMENDMENTS
The 1996 docket of Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests includes:
A. Pope Resources PUD Adjustments (File: PLN 7-8: CPA-02-96)
The Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map both reflect an earlier approval of a
Planned Unit Development of approximately 270 acres in West Bremerton. This PUD is
in the design stages and Pope Resources has requested a slight increase in the mount of
land that may be used for industrial purposes.
B. Harrison District Plan (File: PLN %10: CPA-03-96)
This "neighborhood plan" is being prepared with the assistance of a community
development block grant and is scheduled for completion by June 30 of this year. The
Plan must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and state planning goals and
will be adopted as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.
C. Sciepko Annexation Plan Adjustment (File: PLN 7-8: CPA-04-96)
In 1995, Bremerton annexed a 76-acre parcel owned (in part) by Ron Sciepko. This
property was to be combined with adjacent lands being surplussed by the City of
Bremerton for future industrial park development. In order to comply with a Boundary
Review Board request to "square off°' the annexation area, the City added additional lands
and included them in the "Industrial Park" Plan designation. These added lands are now
being reviewed and their Plan designations and zoning adjusted as appropriate.
D. CapitalFacilities Annual Update (File: PLN 7-8: CPA-05-96)
The Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan includes a procedure for the
annual review and update of the Capital Facilities Plan and 6-year CIP. Annual
adjustments are not expected to be major, but are very important because they have direct
impacts on the budgets of the City and its departments.
E. Smith Cove Area Plan Amendments (File: PLN 7-8: CPA-06-96)
This is a very active area. The City is expanding a major community park, is negotiating
the removal of inappropriate land uses, is encouraging redevelopment, and is promoting
higher density residential and mixed use development. The proposed Plan amendments
are the next step and may lead to related Zoning changes as well.
F. Arvon Park Plan Amendment (File: PLN 7-8: CPA-07-96)
An opportunity came along unexpectedly for the City to acquire a small parcel and
develop a neighborhood park in an area that is deficient in such facilities. This request is
to amend the Plan Map to include this park site. A related amendment is being included
in the Capital Facilities Element to cover th/s project.
2
io "l
CRITIERIA FOR APPROVAL
Each requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment must meet all of the following criteria to be
eligible for City Council approval. These criteria will be addressed specifically in the
description of each proposed amendment.
The proposal is consistent with the provisions of the Growth Management Act and will
not result in Plan or regulation conflicts; and
The proposal will change the development or use potential of a site or area without
creating significant adverse impacts on existing sensitive land uses, businesses, or
residents; and
The proposed amendment can be accommodated by all applicable public services and
facilities, including transportation; and
The proposal will help implement the goals and policies of the Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan; and
If the proposal could have substantive impacts beyond the City limits, it has been sent to
Kitsap County for review and comment.
GENERA L LOCATIONS
A. Pope Resources
B. Harrison District
C. Sciepko Annex.
D. Cap. Facilities (citywide)
E. Smith Cove
F. Arvon Park
3
((o
I35PACTS ON GOALS & POLICIES
Element "C" (Planning Goals) of the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan lists the state planning goals and local
supporting goals. The following matrix provides an indication of how the goals may be affected by each &the. plan
amendments. Turn to the portion of th~s report that describes the particular amendment for addmonal mformatmn
Plan Amendments *
State
Goals
1 Urban Growth
2 Reduce Sprawl
Transportation
4 Housing
5 Economic Development
Property Rights
7 Permits
8 Natural Resource Industries
9 Open Space & Recreation
10 Environment
Citizen Participation & Coord.
Public Facilities & Services
Historic Preservation
Impact Assessment Symbols:
No significant impact.
Minimal positive impacts.
Significant positive impacts.
* Plan Amendments:
A Pope Resources PUD
B Harrison District Plan
C Sciepko Annexation Area
D Capital Facilities Element Update
E Smith Cove Area
F Arvon Park
4
III
A. POPE RESOURCES PUD ADJUSTMENT
File: PLN %8:CPA-02-96
Applicant:
Pope Resources
P.O. Box 1780, Poulsbo WA 98370-0239
Contact:
David Cunningham, Vice President, Land Use
Phone: 360-697-6626, ext. 525
Location:
A portion of an area of approximately 270 acres in West Bremerton, adjacent to
Pendergast Regional Park.
Location Map:
5
Request:
The subject property was approved and zoned for a mixed use Planned Unit
Development several years ago. Rather than being site specific within the Pope
property, the zoning allowed a master plan to be developed with the following
combination of residential and industrial zones:
70% Single-family Residential (SF-2) -- low-density
20% Multi-family Residential (MF) -- medium-density
10% Industrial Park (IP)
Since that time, Pope Resources has completed a more detailed analysis of the
site, has harvested timber from portions of the site, has studied its sensitive
environmental features, and has made progress toward its master plan. The next
phase requires some frae-tuning adjustments to the City's Comprehensive Plan in
order to allow the plan to be finalized and development to occur.
The proposal calls for a change in the land use proportions, as follows:
36% Low-density Residential (97 acres)
42% Medium-density Residential (113 acres)
22% Industrial Park (60 acres)
The expansion of the Industrial Park area from 27 acres to 60 acres is based in
part on the natural systems of topography and drainages in the areas immediately
west of Union Avenue. The larger area will provide greater flexibility in
designing a small industrial park that will also include the primary entrance into
the larger development. It also offers the attractive option of an undivided large
industrial site in a key location.
The residential portion of the applicant's project would include small clusters of
townhouses in "row-house" configurations. Although the design falls within the
Comprehensive Plan's "LDR" (low density residential) parameters, that particular
housing type is not presently allowed within any of the City's four Iow-density
zones. For that reason, the applicant is requesting a change to "MDR" (medium
density)" in order to include within the PUD a zone that does allow this type of
housing. It should be pointed out that the City is currently revising its Zoning
Ordinance and one of the proposed changes would allow townhouses within the
"DR" (duplex residential) zone, which is one of the four low-density zones. If
that change is adopted, it would not be necessary to apply the "MDR" Plan
designation as requested. Instead, the applicant would simply include the "DR"
zone in the PUD under the low-density Plan designation. This Plan Amendment
must be processed now because we don't yet know if the zoning amendment will
be approved. Adjustments can be made later.
6
EXISTING
Comprehensive Plan:
Low Density Residential
P P~k ~enderg~t Regional)
~dusmal P~k
Utilities
U
LDR
M DR--'
REQUESTED
Map Amendments:
7
Goals &
Policies:
This proposal has no apparent adverse effects on state or local goals or policies,
but is expected to have positive effects in the following areas:
1. Urban Growth: The proposed chances will allow the applicant's Planned
Unit Development to be designed with a better variety of housing types, within
the density ranges allowed by the Comprehensive Plan, and will provide
additional land for industrial development within the City.
2. Reduce Sprawl: Providing more land for industrial development inside
inside the city where the needed facilities and services can be provided will reduce
the pressure to seek new industrial sites in rural areas.
3. Transportation: The proposed PUD is near and has good access to State
Route 3, the backbone "freeway" through K/tsap County. The industrial park
portion of the PUD is located nearest SR-3 for ease of access and to keep
industrial traffic out of surrounding neighborhoods.
4. Economic Development: By doubling the size of the industrial park
portion of the PUD, the applicant will have better design and marketing flexibility
and will be better able to attract new economic growth to the City and region,
which is a primary objective of the Comprehensive Plan.
5. Permits: Through this process, the applicant is ensuring that the
Comprehensive Plan and zoning are in place, consistent, and won't become
obstacles to the smooth processing of the site plan for the PUD.
6. Environment: The applicant has undertaken an environmental analysis of
the 270 acre site, has delineated wetlands, steep slopes, and other features, and is
preparing the most suitable sites for development while protecting others. The
requested Plan Amendment will, in part, ensure that the PUD can contain low-
density clustered townhouse type development, which will make the most
efficient use of the site while maximizing environmental protection.
7. Other: This PUD was envisioned and approved in concept by the City of
Bremerton in 1990. That approval process included public meetings and hearings.
The property was again reviewed and adjusted in early 1996 to ensure that the
"industrial park" designation was shown on the Plan Map. That process also
included public meetings and hearings. Citizen involvement has been an element
in this process from the beginning and no significant concems have been raised to
date. This "early and continuous" planning process is expected to pave the way
for the approval of permits when we arrive at that phase of development.
Approval
Criteria:
All proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan must meet all five criteria
listed on page 3. This proposal meets the criteria as follows:
Consistent with GMA and regulations:
The Pope Resources PUD was initially approved in 1990. It was
consistent with the City's 1995 Comprehensive Plan which, in mm, was
consistent with the provisions of the Growth Management Act. The
proportional zoning was based on the land uses that were intended in the
initial PUD approval. If the Plan designations are adjusted as requested,
the PUD will be designed around only zoning and land uses that are
consistent with those Plan designations.
No significant adverse effects:
The applicant has done a considerable amount of site and environmental
analysis since the initial PUD concept approval in 1990. Wetlands, steep
slopes and other important features have been delineated and protected
from logging operations. The proposed changes are based, in large part,
on these environmental features and will help ensure their protection.
Public Services and Facilities:
The most significant change is the addition of industrial park acreage at
the southeastern comer of the property. This portion of the property is
most easily accessible from Union Avenue which provides access to
Wemer Road and direct freeway access. This is consistent with the City's
recent extension of utilities into the Wemer Road corridor specifically for
industrial development. Although this site is not within that corridor, it is
nearby, is inside the City limits, and needed utilities can be provided
during the life of this Plan. The level of utilities was factored into the
Capital Facilities Element of the Plan prior to its adoption in 1995 and will
be adjusted annually, if necessary, to adjust to the industrial needs as they
become better known.
Will help implement the goals and policies of the Comp. Plan:
Development of the applicant's PUD is essential to implementation of the
City's Comprehensive Plan. It is directly consistent with the City's goals
of accommodating its allocation of countywide population, improving the
regional economics through business and job growth, reducing sprawl by
providing suitable development sites within the City, providing jobs in
close proximity to housing, and providing a variety of housing choices and
opportunities. The proposed amendments are needed and appropriate for
this PUD and are consistent with all adopted goals and policies.
9
o
Impacts beyond the City limits:
This project is within the City of Bremerton, will be served by City
utilities and City streets, and will have minimal impacts on areas outside
the City limits. Kitsap County, as an adjacent jurisdiction, will be asked
to review this proposal and comment on its possible adverse effects.
Recommendation:
There are two significant parts to this proposal. Expansion of the Industrial Park area is
simple and straight forward. However, the residential component is directly related to a
Zoning Ordinance text amendment that, if approved, would allow the types of
development being planned within tiffs PUD under the "LDR" designation. Without that
text amendment, the applicant would need a higher density zone which could only be
approved under the "Medium Density" Plan designation.
The recommendation on this proposed Plan Amendment is presented in two options:
Approval of the requested amendment, as shown on page 7, is recommended if
the City does not adopt a Zoning Ordinance text amendment that allows
townhouses or other multi-unit structures in the "DR" (Duplex Residential) zone,
as currently proposed.
If the City does approve the "DR" zone amendment, it is recommended that the
proposed Plan Amendments shown on page 7 be approved, but that all areas
shown as "MDR" (Medium Density Residential) be changed to "LDR" (Low Density
Residential).
10
117
B. HARRISON DISTRICT PLAN
File: PLN 7-10:CPA-03-96
Applicant:
Contacts:
Location:
City of Bremerton Dept. of Community Development
286 Fourth Street, Bremerton WA 98337
Ron W. Hough, Planning Manager
Kay Wilson, Senior Planner
Phone: 360-478-5275
The Harrison District, as delineated for ttfis project, consists of approximately 171
acres and is located on the east Bremerton side (north side) of the Warren Avenue
Bridge. The district is bounded by Warren Avenue on the west, Sheridan Road on
the north, the East Park neighborhood on the east, and Port Washington Narrows
on the south.
Location Map:
%
11
Proposal:
Goals &
Policies:
The Harrison District Plan is one in a continuing series of neighborhood plans
being prepared by the Dept. of Community Development's long-range planning
program. This particular area was chosen for several reasons. First and foremost,
this is the location of Harrison Hospital, the primary health care facility in Kitsap
County. As growth and development continue, it is more important to ensure that
good access is provided to the hospital and that the surrounding health care
district be well planned and protected.
Key elements of the Harrision District Plan include:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Improved access and circulation.
Better separation between residential and commercial areas.
Shoreline and high-bluff protection.
A new "Shoreline Mixed Use" zone for bluff-top development.
A new "Health Care" zone for a medical/business campus.
Integration of SEPA into the Plan to streamline future permits.
Early and continuous Citizen Involvement in the process.
This Plan is being prepared to avoid adverse effects on adopted state and local
goals and policies. It is expected to have positive effects in the following areas:
1. Transportation: Vehicular access to Harrison Hospital and circulation
within this district are primary concerns for both emergency and convenience
reasons. A number of important street system recommendations will result in
significant transportation improvements.
2. Permits: This is the first neighborhood plan in the series to attempt the
integration of SEPA for the purpose of streamlining the permitting process.
Lessons learned from this project will benefit the next.
3. Ooen Soace & Recreation:
The Port Washington Narrows and high bluffs form the south boundary of this
district. Views of Bremerton, Puget Sound, and the Olympic Mountains from
this location are considered a major asset of the community. A foremost concern
of this project was to establish a plan and zoning for the bluff-top areas that will
allow the most appropriate types of development while protecting the views and
enhancing public access to the shoreline and bluff-top trail system. The
"Shoreline Mixed Use" zone was developed for that purpose.
The East Park Nature Area is a significant natural greenbelt along the eastern edge
of the district and separates Harrison Hospital and its surrounding business disthct
from the East Park residential area. Protection of this greenbelt has long been a
high priority of the community. The Plan proposes minimal recreational
12
improvements, such as hiking paths and picnic facilities, to enhance its
recreational value to the community.
The Sheridan Park Community Center, at the comer of Clare and Lebo, is an
important social and recreational center and also houses the administrative offices
of the Bremerton Department of Parks & Recreation. This facility is linked
directly with a park across the street to the south and to the Community Theater
on the west side of the Warren Avenue Bridge. The District Plan proposes to
expand the park with an adjacent land acquisition, and to better link these
facilities with the bluff-top trail system.
4. Environment: As described above, the Port Washington Narrows and
related high bluff areas, the East Park Nature Area, and the existing urban parks
within this district are all important environmental features that will be protected
and enhanced (in some cases) for recreational use. Integrating the SEPA process
more closely with this Plan should help ensure adequate environmental
consideration of all future projects.
5. Citizen Participation and Coordination: During preparation of this
district plan, several neighborhood meetings were held wittfin the district and
hosted by Harrison Hospital, Claremont East (retirement/convalescent facility),
Canterbury Manor (retirement apartments), and the City of Bremerton.
Participants were involved in visioning, analysis of problems and opportunities,
and discussion of possible solutions and Plan recommendations. Prior to Plan
adoption, the City Planning Commission will conduct at least one public hearing
before recommending the Plan to the City Council for another hearing and
adoption as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Approval
Criteria:
All proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan must meet all five criteria
listed on page 3. Since the Harrison District Plan is much more "comprehensive"
than the typical amendment request, it has been designed with the thirteen state
planning goals in mind, as well as the additional supporting goals and policies that
were adopted by the City.
The Harrison District Plan meets the approval criteria as follow:
The District Plan was designed around the requirements of the GMA and
is consistent with the GMA and related regulations and requirements.
The Plan was tested for consistency with all other Comprehensive Plan
elements, the proposed zoning is consistent with Plan designations, and
the project has followed the City's adopted Citizen Involvement process.
13
Adoption and implementation of this Plan will have no significant
adverse effects on the immediate area, the community, or the region. The
intent of the Plan is to find ways to improve the district and correct
problems at a more detailed level than was possible in the Comprehensive
Plan.
Public services and facilities was a major consideration in all proposals.
For the most part, the proposals and recommendations were not of the type
that will require significant changes to the Capital Facilities Element.
Traffic and street modifications are the most costly public facilities in this
area. Financing has been discussed and more detailed strategies for
financing those improvements will follow approval of the Plan. Most
land use and zoning changes will not have significant effects on the
provision of public services and facilities.
This District Plan will help implement the goals and policies in the
City's Comprehensive Plan. Protection and enhancement of the health
care district that includes and surrounds Harrison Hospital is a major City
objective. Atthe center of the district is a thriving general commercial
center which deserves equal consideration of its needs, as do the peripheral
residential neighborhoods. This project will help coordinate all of the
visions, goals, and related policies into an overall plan for the future.
Tiffs district is in the heart of Bremerton and will have no significant
impacts beyond the City limits that would require the coordination with
Kitsap County or other jurisdictions.
Recommendation:
The Harrison District Plan has been distributed as a separate free-standing document for
public review, leading to Planning Commission public hearings in June and/or July. In
accordance with the City's Plan Amendment schedule, the City Council should take
action on the Plan in July.
The recommendation is for ADOPTION of the Harrison District Plan by ordinance as an
amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan.
14
C. SCIEPKO ANNEXATION - PLAN ADJUSTMENT
File: PL1N 7-8:CPA-04-96
Applicant: City of Bremerton Dept. of Community Development
286 Fourth Street, Bremerton WA 98337
Contact:
Ron Hough, Planning Manager
Phone: 360-478-5275
Location:
Properties along the south side of State Route 16 (SR-16) east of the
unincorporated commtmity of Gorst and on the south side of Sinclair Inlet.
Location Map:
15
Background:
In 1995, a 76-acre parcel owned by Ron Sciepko was annexed into the City of
Bremerton. The purpose of the annexation was to combine this parcel with other
adjacent surplus utility lands that were being purchased from the City. The
combination would become the site of a future industrial park similar to the
"Anderson Creek Corporate Campus", a concept described on page 76 of the
Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
During consideration of the annexation, the Boundary Review Board asked the
City to "square off' the annexation area to include several smaller properties that
existed between the Sciepko properties and Highway 16 to the north. Those
properties were ultimately included in the annexation.
When the annexation was fn:st proposed and was being considered for its
Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning, only the Sciepko property was
involved. The proposal was to designate and zone the annexation area "Industrial
Park" on both the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map. When the
additional properties were added near the end of the process, they too came into
the City under the Industrial Park designation with the understanding that the City
would reconsider that designation at the next annual review of the Plan.
Six properties were added to the Sciepko Annexation at the suggestion of the
Boundary Review Board. They have since been reviewed and considered for this
Comprehensive Plan Amendment. These parcels comprise the "Amendment
Area" as shown on the map entitled "Proposed Map Amendment". The
Assessor's account numbers, acreage and owners are as follow:
A. 332401-3-007-2005 4.11 acres
B. 332401-3-008-2004 2.76 acres
C. 332401-3-009-2003 0.71 acres
D. 332401-3-010-2000 3.15 acres
E. 332401-3-011-2009 4.0+ acres
F. 332401-3-018-2002 2.56 acres
Donna & Lawrence Roberts
Joseph & Judith O'Donnoghue
Eligio & Lynda Decano
Lena V. Forehand
Herbert Kabelac
Joseph & Judith O'Donnoghue
Most of these properties are currently residential homesites. They are located
along the hillside that slopes downward toward Sinclair Inlet. Much of the slope
is steep and heavily wooded. The soils are unstable in places and not well suited
to development, particularly industrial development of the kind envisioned for the
higher plateau areas. The owners of these properties generally enjoy their water
and mountain views, the privacy, and other aspects of the location. Their primary
interest is in maintaining their residential sites and, therefore, expressed little or
no interest in being included in the Industrial Park designation.
16
Proposal:
The proposal is to amend the Watershed and Utility Lands Plan (page 80 of the
Land Use Element) to remove the six parcels in the area shown as "Plan
Amendment Area" from the "Industrial Park" designation and designate them
"LDR (Low Density Residential). If approved, the City will also amend its
Zoning Map to be consistent with this Plan designation.
The "LDR" designation allows residential development to a maximum density of
8 units per acre. Bremerton has four residential zones that fall into that category.
One of those zones would be applied to these properties through the Rezone
process, probably before the end of 1996. Since this is a "housekeeping"
amendment, the City will be the applicant for the Rezone at no cost to the
property owners.
Proposed Map Amendment:
The Amendment Area is shaded.
This area is proposed to be changed
from "Industrial Park (IP)" to "Low
Density Residential (LDR)' on the
Bremerton Comprehensive Plan.
IP
IP
17
Goals &
Policies:
This amendment might be considered a "correction' to the City's Plan Map that
would have ideally been handled during the annexation process. The purpose is
to apply the most appropriate designation to all lands within this area by returning
the residential lands that were included in the annexation to their previous and
most appropriate "residential" status.
This amendment will result in a slight increase in residential development
potential on the six properties. They are all within the City limits and future
development should discourage sprawl in rural areas. The higher density City
zoning will provide greater flexibility in development options, should the owners
want to add another house or two, an accessory dwelling, or other improvements
to their properties that would not be allowed under "Industrial Park" zoning. The
residential designation will also ensure that the existing homes will continue to be
"conforming" uses with all the rights enjoyed by similarly zoned lands within the
City. Finally, this change will remove the possibility of a future industrial
development being built along this sensitive hillside area.
Approval
Criteria:
All proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan must meet all five criteria
listed on page 3. This proposal meets those criteria as follows:
Consistent with GMA and regulations:
This proposal has been weighed against the state planning goals, local
goals and policies, and planning requirements, and was found to have no
apparent conflicts. The LDR designation of the subject properties is the
most reasonable land use designation, considering the present land uses in
the area, the views and other amen/ties, the present deficiency of urban
level utilities, and the steep, wooded, unstable hillsides.
No significant adverse effects:
This change from "Industrial Park" to "Low Density Residential" will help
minimize adverse effects of land uses and development on the sensitive
hillside areas, and also preserve the privacy and tranquility of the existing
residential environment. The effects of this change should be positive.
Public Services and Facilities:
Although the subject area is inside the City limits of Bremerton, all urban
level services and facilities are not yet present in this location. The LDR
Plan designation allows very low density residential zones. The City's
SF-1 zone has a minimum lot size of about one-third acre and is generally
applied to locations where sewer systems don't exist. For this
amendment, public sewer, water, or other urban systems are not essential,
but will follow later in the 20-year planning period.
18
o
Will help implement the goals and policies of the Comp. Plan:
This proposal to correct the land use designation on the residential
properties is consistent with goals and policies that encourage the
protection of residential areas, property rights, environmentally sensitive
areas, etc. It will also help avoid land use conflicts in the future.
Impacts Beyond the City Limits:
This amendment is in recognition of existing residential development and
is not expected to encourage or trigger significant new development. No
significant impacts or conflicts are expected beyond the City limits as a
result of this change.
Recommendation:
Amend the Watershed and Utility Lands Plan (page 80 of the Land Use Element) to
remove the smaller residential properties, identified on the map as "Amendment Area",
from the "Industrial Park" designation and designate them "LDR (Low Density
Residential).
19
D. CAPITAL FACILITIES ANNUAL UPDATE
File: PLN 7-8:CPA-05-96
Applicant:
Contact:
Location:
Background:
City of Bremerton Dept. of Community Development
286 Fourth Slzeet, Bremerton WA 98337
Kay Wilson, Senior Planner
Phone: 360-478-5275
Citywide
The Bremerton Comprehensive Plan includes a Capital Facilities Element. That
element consists of two parts: (1) the Capital Facilities Plan (policy plan) and
(2) the Capital Facilities Program (CFP).
To comply with the Growth Management Act, all capital expenses must now be in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the City's budget must
be consistent with the CFP. The CFP includes six-year fmance plans for Fire,
Police, Water, Sewer, Stormwater, etc. Since Bremerton prepares an armual
budget, the CFP must be updated each year.
The CFP established a timeline for annual review that begins in January and
culminates in the adoption of the annual budget at the end of each year. If this
process triggers the need for any other amendments to the Comprehensive Plan,
they too must be processed in accordance with the Plan Amendment schedule
which calls for City Council consideration in July of each year.
Initial development of the six-year finance plans was done through a coordinated
effort involving each affected City department. This first annual review and
update is being done more efficiently by a Capital Facilities Technical Team
(CFTT). Most of the CFTT's work is done by May when the CFP amendments
are drafted and prepared for Planning Commission consideration. Later in the
process, an Interdepartmental Finance Team (IFT), appointed by the Mayor, will
work with the Mayor and Treasurer in preparing the City's budget.
Request:
The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is an annual amendment that must rely to some
extent on other Comprehensive Plan amendments that may trigger changes in the
City's f'mance plans and annual budget. Because of this, the CFP Amendments
will lag behind the other amendments by a couple weeks to a month. This is
expected and will not result in project/budget coordination problems.
2O
This staff report will focus on the Plan consistency and approval criteria aspects
of this Plan Amendment. However, the document itself will be considered in
much greater detail as it takes shape in May, June and July.
Goals &
Policies:
Proposed amendments to the CFP are intended to implement the Plan and ensure
consistency with state and local goals and policies. No adverse effects are
anticipated. These amendments are expected to have particularly positive effects
in the following areas:
1. Economic Development: Economic development is an important
ingredient in the City's 20-year Comprehensive Plan, particularly in the provision
of needed utilities to new commercial and industrial sites. This is ensured
through annual adjustments to the CFP. The City's goals also acknowledge the
importance of small businesses, tourism, health services, education, and social
and cultural activities in diversifying Bremerton's economy.
2. Public Facilities and Services: Many of the most important capital
expenditures go toward new and extended urban services, facilities and utilities.
The extension of sewer and water lines, street improvements, stormdrain facilities,
and similar projects will ensure the adequate provision of the utilities and services
that will be needed to accommodate the City's growth projections.
3. Other Goals and Policies: It's important to note that an important function
of the Capital Facilities Element is to tie together the specific needs, plans and
proposals of the other Plan elements in a fiscally sound and efficient manner. In
accomplishing that task, the spin-off effects will allow Bremerton to better
accommodate new growth and change which, in turn, will ease the pressures for
continued sprawl in rural areas. Implementing transportation goals and policies is
expensive and must rely on the CFP. Having our capital facilities and utilities in
place or committed gives the City an advantage in being able to approve permits
for new development more quickly and with greater assurance and predictability.
The advantages of having attractive parks and recreational facilities, efficient
well-equipped police and fire departments, and adequate infrastructure will help
the City move along toward implementation of its Comprehensive Plan.
Approval
Criteria:
Annual amendments to the Capital Facilities Program are intended to implement
the Comprehensive Plan and its goals, policies and proposals. During the CFP
update process, the proposed amendments are checked to ensure that they meet all
of the approval criteria, as follows:
21
The CFP proposed amendments are consistent with the Growth
Management Act and will not result in Plan or regulation conflicts; and
The CFP proposals may allow desirable changes to occur on a particular
site or in a general area, but without creating significant adverse impacts
on existing sensitive land uses, businesses, or residents; and
The proposals will maintain a balance and not result in additional burdens
on another public facility or service.
The proposals result from specific needs identified by the departments that
are most responsible for the implementation of their portions of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Most of the CFP proposals fall into the area of"fme-mning" and are not
major modifications of a scale that might have substantive impacts beyond
the City limits. Even so, all City CFP data is being provided to Kitsap
County and available to others.
Recommendation:
Amendments to the Capital Facilities Program are the responsibility of a number of
affected City departments. Their work depends, in part, on the nature of other Plan
amendments that are being processed concurrently. The final proposals will be delivered
to the Planning Commission in June and to the City Council in July or August.
The CFP amendments are necessary for Plan implementation and for the City's annual
budget process. It is recommended that they be approved when ready.
.22
19-9
E. $~ITH COVE AREA PLAN A~E~E~
File: PLN 7-8:CPA-06-96
Applicant:
Contact:
Location:
City of Bremerton, Dept. of Community Development
286 Fourth Street, Bremerton WA 98337
Ron W. Hough, Planning Manager
Phone: 360-478-5275
The area south and west of Smith Cove, generally north of Eleventh Street and
east of Park Avenue.
LocafionMap:
PUGET SouND NAVAL SHIPYARD
Background:
Future possibilities for Evergreen Park and Smith Cove were discussed in the
"Campus/Evergreen Neighborhood Plan", which was adopted in 1992. It was
recommended that Evergreen Park be expanded southward and eventually
continued in a shoreline greenbelt configuration along the south shoreline of
Smith Cove. The illustration below was included in the Plan to show the
park expansion and greenbelt and also to stimulate thinking about how the rest
of the area might redevelop.
The deteriorating and blighted areas along Sheldon Boulevard were encouraged to
redevelop with a mixture of compatible uses that might include multi-mt
residential as well as offices, small-scale convenience commercial, and other
small businesses. The preferred development method would be through the
City's Planned Unit Development (PUD) process which allows considerable
flexibility in the mixing of zones. Development standards can also be adjusted to
accommodate creative projects within a PUD.
SOUTH SMITH COVE AREA
Development Concept
24
The neighborhood planning efforts were incorporated into the 1995 Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan, which identified the need for continued planning in the area
surrounding Smith Cove. The following goals and objectives for Smith Cove
originated in the "Campus/Evergreen Neighborhood Plan" and were included on
page 69 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan:
1. To redevelop residential areas that have fallen into a severe state of deterioration.
To work toward the relocation of all industrial uses from the Smith Cove area, including
the City maintenance yard at 14th and Park Avenue. (To be used for the realignment of
14th Street and expansion of Evergreen Park.)
To provide visual and physical public access to shorelines, including the southward
expansion of Evargreen Park and eventual public greenway along the south shore of
Smith Cove.
To recognize the environmental importance and sensitivity of the shorelines and waters
of Puget Sound and protect them from over-use, pollution, and poor development
practices.
To establish a "mixed use redevelopment" plan designation for the neighborhood around
South Smith Cove and follow up with similar zoning with the additional requirements
that any significant new development be based on a Planned Unit Development for the
entire area to help ensure harmony and Iand use compatibility.
To consider improvement to Sheldon Boulevard to create a pedestrian-oriented central
street onto which the new mixed-use neighborhood would fi.ont.
Most properties between Smith Cove and Eleventh Stxeet consist of a variety of
older residential structures. The quality of this neighborhood has been damaged
by surrounding influences over the years --- primarily traffic noise and
congestion, along with the encroachment of incompatible land uses. Auto-related
services and larger industrial businesses have located along Sheldon Boulevard,
which is a narrow road in need of repair. The traffic, noise and odors emanating
fi.om certain types of industries, primarily the solid waste and oil businesses, have
had blighting effects on nearby properties for many years. The Smith Cove
shoreline has suffered similar consequences as a result of its long history of fuel
handling and storage facilities. Those industries are now gone but the fear of
long-term environmental effects may be preventing this area from redeveloping to
its potential. Contamination is suspected but not yet fully documented.
The City is taking the initiative to move this area toward improvement and
redevelopment. It has made recent improvements to utilities in the area, is
helping local businesses in their relocation plans, and is moving ahead with the
expansion of Evergreen Park in accordance with the following master plan.
25
SMITH COVE
view
%
\
\
The revised Bremerton Comprehensive Plan was adopted in April, 1995. The
portion of the Plan Map showing the Smith Cove area is shown below.
Evergreen Park was shown to expand southward slightly. Most o£the Sheldon
Boulevard and shorelines areas south of the cove were designated "Mixed Use
(MU)" to encourage a mixed use Planned Unit Development. Areas south o£ 12th
Street were designated "High Density Residential (HDR)" to encourge residential
redevelopment and because this would be a good location for apartments or
condominiums within walking distance of Evergreen Park, Olympic College,
downtown Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, the ferry terminal, etc.
Due to later developments related to the expansion of Evergreen Park, the City is
now making some minor adjustments to the Plan Map to accommodate those
changes.
Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
Adopted: April 5, 1995
p Park
MU Mixed Use
NC Neighborhood Convenience --
LDR Low Density Residential
MDR Medium Density Residential
IIDR High Density Residential
CBD Central Business District
foGn
NO
DR UlIHIH Itlll
Proposal:
There is an ongoing need to coordinate plans with needed improvements and with
the general redevelopment of the area. In this case, the City is updating its
Comprehensive Plan Map to show the latest plan for this specific area.
Adjustments to zoning, if necessary, will following the Plan Amendments.
#1:
The Comprehensive Plan Map is being adjusted to be consistent with the
master plan for Evergreen Park. This adjustment moves the "P" (park)
designation southward to include all of the south shoreline of Smith Cove.
#2:
The "Mixed Use (MU)" designation will be reduced in size slightly by the
"P" designation north of Sheldon Boulevard but will continue to
encourage redevelopment in a mixed use configuration.
Proposed "Adjusted" Comprehensive Plan Map:
P Park
MU Mixed Use
NC Neighborhood Convenience
LDR Low Density Residential
MDR Medium Density Residential
HDR High Density Residential
CBD Central Business District
-- HDR__
135
Goals &
Policies:
The proposed amenrkaxnts are steps toward implementation of the "Campus/Ever
green Neighborhood P~t', which is part of the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan.
The proposals are dhgaz~y consistent with the recommendations of these plans and
in harmony with the C_<mprehensive Plan's goals and policies, particularly in the
following areas: (see:~bte on page 4)
1. Urban Growth: The proposal expands a major City park which is needed
to provide for the grmvi~g park and recreational needs of the commtmity. The
Mixed Use designafim is intended to help stimulate redevelopment through
flexible developmem ~._mirements. And, the High Density Residential area will
provide incentives for ~ redevelopment of what is currently a medium-density
deteriorating reside~.~l ~rea.
2. Reduce Snrawt: By providing adequate parks, recreational facilities, and
other urban services ~ the City, and by encouraging higher density
residential developxrmx a~d mixed use, Bremerton is maximizing its
opportunities which, :m ,'m-n: will reduce development pressures in rural areas.
4. Housing: The ,~nmprehensive plan for the South Smith Cove area includes
high-density residenfiv. L This Plan amendment will help encourage more
residential developme:x ~ increasing the park size and recreational facilities as a
major neighborhood 2:zerfity.
9. Onen Space and Recreation: Protention and enhancement of the Smith
Cove shoreline is an 5; ~rtant objective. This Plan Amendment will expand
Evergreen Park to ind~a2-e the entire shoreline of Smith Cove. This will
eventually result in ~ removal of existing industrial and commemial uses from
these shoreline areas z:d rEeir replacement w/th recreational facilities, trails,
protected natural ar ~ezs~ ~d a much cleaner and aesthetically pleasing overall
environment.
Others: These ame:x~.ents are also expected to have positive effects in the
area of economic deveSc~,xuent and should expedite the process of plan review and
permitting when a fi~v~ project is proposed.
Approval
Criteria:
This Map Amendmez,~ =eets the Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval
criteria as follows:
Consistent ,nkk GMA and Comprehensive Plan:
The proposed 2r:re~dments are based directly on plans and
recommendations from an earlier (1992) neighborhood plan and the 1995
Comprehenshe ?Saxz There are no conflicts with GMA nor with State or
29
tS(o
local goals or policies.
No significant adverse impacts:
The primary intent of this Plan Amendment is to remove the adverse
impacts of incompatible commercial and industrial development that has
been impacting this general area and Smith Cove for decades, and to
provide amenities that are needed in the neighborhood and that will help
stimulate redevelopment.
Public services and facilities available:
The proposed amendment will slightly reduce the area that was previously
designated "Mixed Use" by extending Evergreen Park around the cove.
This may also slightly reduce the need for utilities and other urban
services. The City's Capital Facilities Plans have taken the land use
proposals for this area into consideration and there are no known
deficiencies at this time.
Goals and Policies of the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan:
No conflicts with the goals an policies of the City's Plan.
Impacts beyond the City limits:
This area is in the heart of Bremerton, not near any City boundaries, and
its redevelopment will have virtually no impacts beyond the City limits
that might require coordination with Kitsap County or other local
agencies.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Map be amended to expand
Evengreen Park to the south and around the south side of Smith Cove, as shown on the
map entitled "Proposed 'Adjusted' Comprehensive Plan Map" on page 28.
It is further recommended that the City adjust its Zoning Map with/n the subject area to
apply a high-density residential zone within the "HDR" Plan designation area.
3O
t37
F. ARVON PARK PLAN AMENDMENT
File: PLN 7-8:CPA-07-96
Applicant:
Contact:
City of Bremerton, Dept. of Community Development
286 Fourth Street, Bremerton WA 98337
Ron W. Hough, Planning Manager
Phone: 360-478-5275
Location:
A quarter-acre vacant residential lot, located with/n an existing West Bremerton
neighborhood at 1506 Arvon Street.
LocafionMap:
Illllllll} I I l-ltl ~l Ill]l I Ix._
ST.
31
Background:
Early in 1996 the Bremerton Department of Parks & Recreation had an
opportunity to accept the donation ora small vacant residential tot for the purpose
of developing a neighborhood park. The older neighborhood in wkich the
property is located has no elementary school nearby, no public open space or
other recreational areas, and is deficient in neighborhood parks. This opportunity
was welcomed.
The Parks Department requested approval ora Special Use Permit (SUP) for
development of Arvon Park. Neighborhood parks are important to residential
neighborhoods and are allowed with approval of a SUP, even if not identified
specifically on the Comprehensive Plan. At least one neighborhood meeting was
held, as well as a public hearing before the Planning Commission, leading to
Commission approval.
The SUP application included a master plan for Arvon Park that proposed to
develop the 10,000 sq.ft, vacant lot with the following improvements:
Irrigation system and water meter.
Top soil, sod, ground cover, other plantings, and 8 new trees.
Retaining wall at the east end of the property.
Crashed rock walking trail.
Identifying and informational signs.
Off-streetr paved parking lot for three cars (one handicapped space).
Perimeter fencing with locking gate to Arvon Avenue.
Variety of tot-lot and playground type play equipment.
Picnic tables (2), benches (4), garbage receptacle (1).
Proposal:
Although small parks are permitted by Special Use Permit, it's the general policy
of the City of Bremerton to show all public parks and recreation areas on the
Comprehensive Plan Map and to include them in the "Parks & Schools (PS)"
zone. The proposal is to amend the Plan Map to designate Arvon Park "P"
(Park). This will be accompanied by the related Zoning Map Amendment.
Proposed Map Amendment:
32
Goals &
Policies:
This is a Plan Map adjustment to show a park that has already been approved for
development through the zoning and approval process already in place. The
zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and its goals and policies.
This proposed amendment relates most directly to state goal #9 (Open Space and
Recreation) since its primary purpose is to provide a neighborhood park in which
local residents can picnic, play, walk, jog, relax, or socialize.
Also of importance is the positive impact this facility will have on the specific site
and the overall neighborhood environment (Goal #10), on the implementation of
the City's Capital Facilities Plan as it provides for adequate parks (Goal #12), and
it's positive impacts on quality of life, property values and neighborhood pride
(Goal #4).
Approval
Criteria:
This Map Amendment meets the Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval
criteria as follows:
o
Consistent with GMA and Comprehensive Plan:
This small neighborhood park is consistent with the goals and policies of
the State and City for the provision of parks, open space, and recreational
opportunities within the City and within neighborhoods.
No significant adverse impacts:
A threshold determination of non-significance (DNS) pursuant to WAC
197-11-34 was issued by the City's Responsible SEPA Official on March
5, 1996. An EIS was not required. During the neighborhood meetings
and Planning Coxmnission public hearing, some potential problems were
discussed but not determined to be significant enough to prevent approval.
Those concerns included the possibility of loitering, gang activity, after-
dark illegal uses, drag dealers, noise, vandalism, etc. The City will
monitor the park's usage and adjust as necessary to minimize such
negative uses.
Public services and facilities available:
Arvon Street provides direct access to the site, which is located less than
200 feet north ora collector street. All public services customarily
available within a residential neighborhood are available to the site.
Goals and Policies of the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan:
This neighborhood park is directly consistent with the goals and policies
of the Comprehensive Plan and in the best interests of the neighborhood,
as determined through application of the Special Use Permit approval
33
criteria by the Planning Commission on March 19, 1996.
Impacts beyond the City limits:
This small neighborhood park is in the heart of Bremerton, not near any
City boundaries, and will have virtually no impacts beyond the City limits.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that Arvon Park be designated on the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
Map as "P" (park).
34
ATTACHMENT 3
BREMERTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
REVISED
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM
The Draft Capital Facilities Element Amendments consist of two parts:
CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT, Part 2 of 2: Capital Facilities
Program, DRAFT REVISIONS, June 26, 1996.
Attached by Reference - This draft contains the Planning
Commission recommendations. A copy was provided to City Council
members during August 1996. Section D. of this draft was
incomplete.
2. D. Sanitary Sewer (Updated/REVISED), August 20, 1996.
Attached -- this replaces Section D. of the June 26 draft plan. It
contains updates authorized by the Planning Commission with its
recommendation.
STAFF PROPOSAL: Capital Facilities Program ADDENDUM I,
PROJECTED REVENUE AND EXPENSES.
Attached -- Excerpts from the City's adopted 1996 - 2001 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) are attached to update those sections
which were not able to be updated within the time alloted.
is~ion~tidn tidfi~-a~
**NOTE:
REVISIONS submitted by Public Works Department after Auqust 19, 19,c
draft was issued are double-underlined (but not shaded).
Sanitary sewer facilities are provided by the Bremerton Department of Public Works and
Utilities. A complete inventory, analysis of need, and capital improvements program are
provided in the ;a'do'~te~d Wastewater Comprehensive Plan (a.k.a. the
'~Vastewater Plan")
1. Service Area
The dr~,'t Wastewater Comprehensive Plan identifies a service area consisting of territory
currently served by the Wastewater Utility, as well as areas adjacent to the city limits
that are not now serviced but which could logically be served based on natural
topography."
The service area covers 13 drainage basins, of which four fiv~e extend beyond the city
limits into unincorporated county areas: Kitsap Lake, Tracyton Beach, Trenton Avenue,
Sinclair Park, and Oyster Bay. The Utility provides sewage treatment to the sewered
areas in the service area through direct service and through specific contractual
agreements with the U.S. Navy and Kitsap County Sewer District No. 1 (Navy Yard
City). (Figure ~E~-'~ ~em,~O~ Was~ewa~¢~Yst~ Service Area)
2. Inventory of Existing Facilities
The City sewerage system consists of sewage collection, transmission, treatment, and
bio-solids utilization facilities. Included are more than 188 miles of gravity sewers,
approximately 16 miles of pressure lines, and 9-~ 33 pump stations. These facilities
convey sewage to a secondary wastewater treatment plant located just south of West
Hills. Additionally there are 16 combined sewer overflow (CSO) sites located within the
Draft Capital Facilities Program
CFP - 44
September 5, 1996
sewer collection system. Approximately 60 percent of the system is composed of
combined sanitary and stormwater sewers. Table SS-f)
Bremerton Wastewater Treatment Plant (1) 1600 Oyster Bay Ave W (3) 10.1 mgd
Collection System: Pipe various 204 miles
Wastewater Liftstations various 34
Forest Enhancement Sites One & Two (2) Near Gold Mtn. Golf Course 600 acres
(1) City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan, May 1996.
(2) City of Bremerton 1993 Biosolids Report to Bremerton-Kitsap County Health District.
(3) Average flow for maximum month per NPDES permit.
(a) Wastewater Treatment Plant
The existing wastewater treatment plant was designed to have a peak hydraulic
capacity of 29.5 million gallons per day (mgd). Peak flows in excess of 25 mgd
are typical ~,th',-,' durinq wet months. Normal dry weather peak flow capacity
without stormwater inflow is estimated at 8 mgd. Current annual average and
maximum monthly flows to the wastewater treatment plant are about 80 percent
of the average annual and maximum monthly flows for which it was designed. It
is estimated that 21 percent of the annual average flow and 44 percent of the
maximum month flow is stormwater inflow. Stormwater will be reduced from the
system over the next several years under the City's CSC) Reduction Plan.
Once stormwater inflow is reduced, the treatment plant will have the capacity to
approximately 58 000 people
serve .....................
(b) Forest Enhancement Proqram -- Biosolids Utilization
The wastewater treatment plant produces approximately five million gallons of
anaerobically digested biosolids each year. Because biosolids have fertilizer and
soil amendment value the City began an active land application program several
years ago to utilize the benefits of this wastewater process by-product. Biosolids
are used to enhance tree growth and are currently applied to 600 acres of Utility-
owned forest land. Since June 1992, 100 percent of the biosolids produced at
the treatment plant have been utilized in this beneficial manner. The objective of
the City's forest enhancement program is to develop an environmentally sound
Draft Capital Facilities Program
CFP - 45
September 5, 1996
method of using the resource value of bioso~ids in accordance with federal, state,
and local regulations.
3. Future Needs
a. Existino Demand
The Wastewater Plan estimates the 1990 population of the service area at
45,210, of which 38,140 were within the city limits and 7.070 outside the city.
The plan estimates that approximately 37,000 Demons within the service area
were connected to the sewer system, leavinq an unsewered oooulation of
8,210.~
Kitsap County estimates that the total 1994 service area DoDulation was 46.928.
The City estimates that the 1996 ~o~ulation is ar~roximatelv 52.762.a There :~r:
The average daily flow, includin(~ stormwater inflow, is .~ 6.~0 mgd. As CS.~.._0_O
separation occurs, the averaqe flow will be reduced accordinolw4 Minimum
peak flow (peak flows occurring without storm water inflow) is estimated at 8
mgd. While the U.S. Navy is allocated 3.8 mgd, it is currently discharging only 1
mgd -- roughly equivalent to 10,000 population. (Table SS-2)
b. Level of Service {LOS)
The capacity of existing sewer facilities to serve future needs is determined by
comparing the gallons of effluent per day now approved by the State, the
number of existing connections, and the number of new people to be served.
The number of new people is converted into the number of new residential
connections based on assumptions of the number of persons per household, and
the number of gallons of effluent generated per capita per day (gpcd). The
capacity can also be estimated based on an existing and planned LOS for sewer
service.
~Source: Table 1., City ofBremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan, December 1995, p. A-2 ('Estimate
re~_~p_~_ed in 1992)~
2Source: Table SS-2. Kitsap County CaPital Facilities Plan Sewer Facilities - 20-Year Population Allocation -
CSF #1, Draft Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, Part II, April 1996, PG. 3-87. The County oopulation estimate is for
the total service area, and does not include an estimate of the sewered or unsewered ooDulations.
3The City population estimate is based on the Kitsap County oopulation estimate for the unincoroorated part of
the sewer service area, a[onq with the City estimate within the city limits. (See ~a(Te CFP-9)
4Source: Bremerton Wastewater Utility, 9~96.
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP - 46
September 5, 1996
The calculation of the current LOS excludes stormwater inflow. (Although the
City's system experiences some infiltration, it is not a major component of the
flow.) The proposed LOS is the existing county-wide average.
· Current LOS =
97 gallons per capita per day (gpcd)5
· Proposed LOS = 100 gpcd
5"Executive Summary", City of Bremerton Sewer Comprehensive Plan, October 1991, p. 10.
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP - 47 September 5, 1996
FOtU~i'e~D~nd
996 !~dZ~a.,~
992~ Th'b'~'C~Unt~
t o~th~s~e~,~t~m~irF1992
2000 72: o 2 2o 2
~ 61!an~e ihcr6a~e
TOt~! E'oP~!aOP~ ~618;~ 46,~28 54370 66,096 29.92% 19 168
S~r~ 45 ~0 NE N~ 66 096
S~U[ce ~ab~ss 2 D[~ Kjt~aAcoun~ CaPital F~a~i(i~plan May 199~ pg 3~87
C~9~,;~;~;~h~'~0u~tyla!10.cat!~ ad~reSsgs yeat~;~ 994 a~ ~(~0 (rather than years
1996~200~Yintorde[to c0mDIv,with a: Puq~[S~und Growth Hbarinqs Board
oboblation~da f~ 996'~n~001 5a~ ~bh~the~C6~nt~' forecast
(Table~SS~3)
Draft Capital Facilities Program
CFP-48
September 5, 1996
Future Need:~'' Sanitary Sewer
: Time Period Demand cepac ty Average Daily
(Population in City;County (Populat oni Demand ~ 100 GPCD
· Service Area) . (MGD)
Six:Year N~ed
~1996 SeP~ce;~Area Population 52,762 58,000 5.28
~997~200;1 New Population ~-) 2128 3110 0.21
Tota 20012~ewered Population = 54;890 3;110 5.49
TWenty-Year Need
200~[~20;t2 New Population (4) 11;206 (8.096) 1.12
Total 2012 Sewered Population = 72.077 (14,077't 721
Total ~1996~2012 Increase = 19;315 (4,986) 1:93
Notes: For the purposes of this projection, it is assumed that all persons within the service area will connect to the
sewer system by year 2001.
d. Need for Capital Facility Imnrovements
The dr;~ Wastewater Plan was developed for an ultimate service area population of
80,610. Therefore, planned improvements will be adequate to serve the projected
~ 72;077 sewered population, orovided there are no maior industrial hookups..
The City is participating in a feasibility study to sewer Gorst and the industrial properties
in the vicinity of the Port of Bremerton and Anderson Creek. Sewerinq ail or a portion
of these areas utilizinq Bremerton's treatment facility are included as options. The
results of this study may affect the need and timinq for treatment plant expansion.
e. Plans of Other Providers
The Kitsap County Public Works Department Wastewater Division is in the process of
preparing a County-Wide Wastewater Facility Plan. The draft plan integrates the
individual wastewater plans within the county, and includes recommendations for
expanding county facilities to serve projected needs.
m
Proposed Facilities
The ~it~'~ Wastewater Plan recommends four types of improvements at the treatment plant
to accommodate projected sewage flows at ultimate plan service area development and to
solve some current and anticipated operational problems:
Draft Capital Facilities Program
CFP-49
September 5, 1996
Infrastructure improvements -- repairs or replacements of existing sewer system
facilities to restore structural integrity;
Regulatory requirements -- improvements needed as a result of new or modified
codes, guidelines, or laws initiated from federal, state, and local government;
Growth and system extensions -- improvements resulting from new development
or system extensions
Other system improvements -- recommendations that contribute to the improved
operation or function of the system but are not a result of infrastructure needs,
regulations, or system growth.
The Utility will acouire orooeriies in the vicinity of the wastewater treatment facility for
future plant expansion and buffer for odor manaoement.
5. Six-Year Financial Plan
It is estimated that the existing sanitary sewer system has a total capacity of 8 million
gallons per day (mgd). with aooroximiatelv 3 ma~d available capacity, which is sufficient
to meet the total need of 5.23 5?49 mgd through the next six years, provided there are
no maior new industrial demands. (This assumes removal of stormwater from the
system over the next several years under the City's CSO Reduction Plan.)
a. Six-year Fundino and Proiects
The following table is a summary of the City's Si× Yea~ (1996~2001~ Wastewater
~ CaPital I~Or'0~/ement Plan .......................... ............. *~
....................................................... ~,,,,,,T,. Improvements ...........
£ooo are shown to be ~ t~d~a'ril~:Utility financed thi'baah 2001, assuming
no grants will be available. Of the Non-Utility financed projects, most of the
growth-related improvements are anticipated to be financed by special utility
local improvement districts (ULIDs) or by developers directly. ~
that toughly 20 percent of the expenditures beyond 2000 =~c ~-,rc,:cctcd toW'Il be
funded by non-utility sources of revenue. (Table SS.e-,C)
THE EQLLQWING~E ..... HAS BEEN UPDATED CONSISTEN~ WITH THE CI~S
!*'Ig~EDRAFT;CA.I~(~AE I~pROVEMEN~;P~OGAM (CIP)"PR:on To ;~2C,""T;O,'V C"' '"' 'E CF,n`
Draft Capital Facilities Program
CFP- 50
September 5, 1996
Utility Bonds 0~0 0;0 0;0 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Non-Utility Assessments (LID) 0;0 0~0 0;0 00 0.0 0;0 0.0
Wastewater Utilit7 5~595 1;411,5 789;0 1;,104:0 ~1;040:5 1;277;0 11;381.5
TOTAL SOURCES = 53759;5 1;~41¢1 5 ~8~;Q ~;d,04;0 1;040:5 1,277.0 11;381,5
Treatment Plant I zl05:0 t70:Q 2950 950 200:0 0.0 2;165.0
Bs~pStati0~s ~90;5 1~;5 12~;0 t370 83.5 275.0 977.5
Colle~ion System ~230 42~;0 220;0 245,0 220.0 ~0;0 1;455.0
CSO Reduction 4;~0 6500 1A70 627;0 537.0 782.0
TOTAL COSTS = 5~59;5 ~;41~ 5 789:0 1~ 0 1;~0:5 1~277;0 11~381.5
~oto: All amounts are time~ $~,000
Source: ~opa~ment o~ ~uDlic Works and Utilit~os,
b. Capacity Balance
The following chart demonstrates how the projects to be developed over the next
six years provide the required amount of capacity at the adopted level of service
standard to meet the needs of the existing population and projected growth.
(Table SS--7-5)
Draft Capital Facilities Program
CFP- 5'I
September 5, 1996
15o
'ITHE EOEEOWING~TAB~E~ ....... HAS BEEN UP~D~,,TED , ~,~,,~ ..... IoN SINCE
P~I~ININGr~OMMISS!ON,;REt/IEI;,V~
?1996~ctua! 5.28 1 o. 1 o 4.82
:199~2oo~ ~ 4.82 4t61
Total as of 200~t 5.49. 4.61 4.61
Warren Avenue Stormwater Separation (1995) **
Callow Avenue Stormwater Separation (2000) **
Total as of 2000 = *~
· Contracted Flows to PSNS are 3.1 MGD, which are not anticipated during six year term of finance plan
** These two projects will eliminate some stormwater inflow to the wastewater system: thereby increa$inq capacity.
*** Year 2000 total capacity is not quantifiable at this time.
Source: Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, 4/95.
CFP~SEW3.96
Draft Capital Facilities Program
CFP - 52
September 5, 1996
LEGEND
~ Wastewater Comprehensive Plan
Service Area Boundary
............ City Limits
Sewered Portions
O! Basins
Non-Sewered
Portions of Basins
Include in Service Area
Only i! Annexed
Figure CFP-6 Bremerton Wastewater System Service Area
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP - 53
June 26,1996
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP - 54 September 5, 1996
STAFF PROPOSAL
Capital Facilities Program
ADDENDA
INTRODUCTION
Due to a lack of staff time available to complete work on this project, it was not
possible to update all sections of the Capital Facilities Program in 1996.
An Addendum is attached showing six-year finance plans for three of the four
sections that were not updated, in order that planned expenditures will be
consistent with the comprehensive plan.
LIST OF ADDENDA
Attached:
Section E
Section I
SCHOOLS
PROJECTED REVENUE & EXPENDITURES
To be Submitted at Auqust 28 City Council Study Session:
NOTE: The following Addenda will be drawn from the 1996 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP):
Section F
Section G
Section H
STORMWATER
TRANSPORTATION
WATER
Department of Community Development
CFP-ADDN.96 (8/22/96)
STAFF PROPOSAL
Capital Facilities Program
ADDENDA
INTRODUCTION
Due to a lack of staff time available to complete work on this project, it was not
possible to update all sections of the Capital Facilities Program in 1996.
An Addendum is attached showing six-year finance plans for three of the four
sections that were not updated, in order that planned expenditures will be
consistent with the comprehensive plan.
LIST OF ADDENDA
Attached:
Section E
Section I
SCHOOLS
PROJECTED REVENUE & EXPENDITURES
To be Submitted at Auaust 28 City Council Study Session:
NOTE: The following Addenda will be drawn from the 1996 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP):
Section F
Section G
Section H
STORMWATER
TRANSPORTATION
WATER
Department of Community Development '1
CFP-ADDN.96 (8/22/96)
STAFFPROPOSAL
Capital Facilities Program
ADDENDUM E
SCHOOLS
The attached information was submitted by the Bremerton School District for
incorporation into the 1996 Capital Facilities Program.
Department of Community Development 2
CFP-ADDN.96 (8/22196)
March 14, 1996
Ms. Kay Wilson
Senior Planner
Department of Community Development
286 4th Street
Bremerton, Washington 98337
Dear Kay,
As we discussed recently on the telephone, Bremerton School District, as well as the other
surrounding Districts, has spent a great deal of time and effort in preparing a suitable
submission for the Schools Section of the revised Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan.
That plan is currently undergoing review, but should be available in the final form in the
near fi~ture.
We propose to use the same submission for this update of the Capital Facilities Program
section of the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan. Attachment 1 contains the same
information on school capacity, including permanent and interim classroom space, student
population projections, and a six year financial plan that we have submitted to Kitsap
County.
You should note that the growth projection is insufficient to generate the need for entire
new schools. The financial plan, however, does envision tile need to replace our two
oldest buildings, Bremerton Junior High and Olympic View Elementary, as well as the
Administration Building and the Maintenance/Transportation/Warehouse building.
4. I hope this information eets your requirements.
Sincere~_~
.~alter JS. Draper
WSD/dx
WALTER $ DRAPER IV, Director of Finance and Ofleratlons, (20~) 478-5113
Bremerton School District 100-C, 30~ North Montgomery. Bremerton. WA 98312
B,emenon High School
Toll] Settlor lliSh School :Permeqient Fecillti.
'Foul Senior .H, igh~lntertm (.l'or~able)Face!eries
Tots] SenfQr HIsh School Permanent end Interim Facilities
- la2?5 ,,
C~plul Flcilit/ Capacity Requlrementa
Table SC-12 compEes current and f~ture enroilraent to the carol]meat capacity of the Brumer~on
School District. The enrollment data in column 2 was derived fi.om population forecasts
p~'ovided by Kitsap County used to develop the County's Comprchcs~v. Phn (which aru b~ed
on ofl~clsl forecamll by the 0~ of Fbt~ndal Manascment'Sttte of Wm~bt~ofl).
The exiftin~ capacity (~olumm 3 ami 4) is taken fi'om T~10 SC-Il, and includea exJs~S
pe~t and portable I'mcLlitiem.
The net referve or deficiency is the difference between enrollees and capacity. The net rem~ve
or deficiency in permanent facilities (co~ 5) is cal~ated by ~bt~g efl~iJm~t ~om
~e~nt capacity: COlu~ 3 ~um col0m~ 2. Thc n~ tese~e or d~de~ in ~ &d~timm
(colu~ 6) is e~cul~ by s~r~ct~ e~ollm~t ~om ~th pe~t ~d in~m ~apacity: ~
co~ 3 ~d 4, then sub.act cohere 2 Ifc~acity is ~ ~ enroHm~ the di~ ~ ~
'ros~e" ~t ~ a~odate ~turc c~oUmem, If capa~ is less ~n ~oH~nt. the
de.ct has t "doflcJ~' w~ch c~ bo addrus~ by ~d~S c~pacity (s~ Capit~ Proj~ts ~
~i~c~8 Plan. Table SC-13) or by ~S the ~dmd ~or level of ~ if pa~ of ~ ~
~efldmoflt to the Compreh~ive Plan.
Immediately be. low the cdcull]to~ of not reserve or deficiency is a list of each
improvement proj~t fica the District's CFP th~ provides capacity to oKs~t any deficiency
(see Table SC-13 for CYt' project list). The new capacity is list~l in column 3, and the
net rele~ve o~' deflclene7 il [ill4md bt columns < Illd 6.
]~lem~nta~v School Capacity R.e~uJr~mcn. t!
Th'oush the year 2000, the Bremertm~ School District will not need any additional permanent
spece ~r elementary students.
l~iddle School/Judor I-U~ School Coadtv
Thr~J~ the year 2000, the 13rerne~on School District wtll need permanent space for 176 middle
schoo~unior hiah school students. Since this caps~ity deficiency does not equal or exp..ced the
capacity of an sddition'.d m~ddla s .hool orjurdor 1~ school, the Di*tric~ does not Include a new
s~'~ish school in its capital £scllifies plan th~u~h the 2001-o2 school ye,,r
l~[~l'l~'~2d~0~Tab/e SC-t2. Bremerton School District Facility Cspacily R~quirmen~
and Proposed Capacity Fr~ects Thrnulh 2001-0~ School Yur
(t) ~) 0) "
Net nm~'l~
or Net
taut ~n~-rlm ~rmm~m
"
1994 A~ 2,777 3,58~ 2~o 808 1,056
199~-2~0: Oro~, ~22
Tot~ ~ of 20~ 3~499 3a$85 250 86 336
1~5-2000~ ~owth 220 -~0 -220
S~nlor H~ ~ch°911 (1~ "
,~995-2~0: Gm~t~ 30 -30 -30
To~ ~ of 20~ 16~2 ,1&2~5 [ l ~ -357 -242
No~ schemed**
ca~,,,,,,~, may ~ ru~St~ed Whc~ the DISU~'j ~nrdm,~. ~Klty b ~
~me~ 6m~ ~ W~l~
~iqr Hip S~hool Capacity R~uirame.n_f~
By the year 2000, the Bremenon School District will need pam~anent sp~e for 357 scnlor hi~
school students. Since tl~ capacity deficiency doe~ not equal o~ exceed tbs cap.ky of* an
addision~l p:nlor hllih ~chool, the Di~ricl doff not include · new ~enlor hlsh Ichooi ia
facilities plan t~ou~h the 2o01.o2 Khool year.
~ll4~Ulxbfs
the Dhtr[~ h~ d~u~in~ th, n~d ~or such capit~ projectl, and th~ am ~nclu~ in ~e ~pital
~mprove~flla proje~s aud fin~cin8 pIMx li~ed bel~.
Capital Proj.cta mud Financial Plan
Table SC-13 presents BrerMrton School's six-ycar plan For capital improvcmcflt projc;tJ~
includin8 sources of publio moncy within proJ~-ted f~ndin8 capacltic~ that constitutt the
proh,ble rundins of the District's capital iinprov~ncnt projects.
Lq 1991. the voters of the Breme~ton School District luthorized a $1'7 mlllion bond Issue. The
Da,tract doen not anticipate requestlns additional voter authofizatiofl be~r. 1998, The Distrlot
uses a citizens revlaw cor-nmitte~ to identifi/ edture capital projects f'or recommendation to the
District's Botrd of Directors.
Table $C-13.
Br.mertOn School Di-trtct Capital l~oJt~ti ami lrtnancin~
run (sooo)
Loc~t l~lnds'
L~cul Bmul Ptmdn
Smm Match
1,500,0
1,200.0
1,500.0
1.200.0
1:~0,0
5,60.1.0
· 2,300.0
t.~,O
7,920.0
0.0
8sOOO.O
~.4,200.0
120,0
20.0 20.0 20,0
l,f00.O 20.0 34,330.0
0.0 ~20,0 20,0
I,.'M(LO 2a,,100.0 ~,~20,0
1,410,o '~.015.0
24,200.0
2,30o. o
20.0 20.0 liS,0
20.0 ~0.0 J3,';00,0
20.0 20.0 IO.O ·
Khmp Cmmt7 CFi): Schools
The Diet,ct m~icip-'ms continued ellgibillt¥ for State ~te~8 ~. ~p~t ~ r~
[or~ ~ co~istent with p~t income ~om n~w fesidenl~ d~elopmenc (~e Dis~m hsJ
~ltl~ Coun~ CI~: Schools
qn'4 qofl'oN II:OI 96,~ ~H ~EOZ-~9-90[:dI [% SIq]3 S3J~9
Inventory
The Bremecton :School l~strtct is looted on the Kitsap Peninsula bet3amen Port Oteh~d Bay,
Dyes Inlet and Sinclair Inlet. The District is adjacent to the Puset Sound Naval Shipyard, tad its
enrollment is dlre~tly related to the mi]ilAr7 bate, The D~rlct set. es the City of' Bra,morton and
unlr~corpotated ar,.-,, adjacent to the city.
The Bremerton School Dislrict has sevefl elementiry schools, one midcUo school, oneJuniar
~chool lad one hJsJ3 school plus ~n alternative hash school, The l~strict ~s~ adminlsteta
vocational skills center flint se~es other school (;flstrlctl. The current fla"~le ~onl~-ntion in
Dla~ct il bund on grades K.5, elementary; Srades 6-7, middle IChOo]; Fades 8-9, jun~or
and ~-adee 10-]:2. basil school. Table SC-II lists the aremerton School District's Kbooll
their enrollment capacity
Table SC-IL ' Rremerton School Dlstrtet Kxlslin$ Capacity
Elementary Schools
Attain
· ,, Crown Hill (effective?/9,6)
]Chlap_. ,,Lake
Olympic View
V~uw Ridge
Wes~ Hills
School
481
~28
484
Existing
Ciptclt,/
Total l~lementnr,/Permanent FacJlltlet
Total ][:lementar7 Interim (Portable) Faciliti~'s
Total I:lementasT_ Permanent and tnt~r~lm, Facilities I 31935
Middle/Jr. Hiih ~cheob (6-9~
Mt. ¥tewM~dd!e School , J $10
· Total Middle/tr. HIsh Permanent Facditlts ' 1 ~2g
Total Middle/Jr. ~igh Interim (Portable) Yaciliti~ [ , tls
Total Middle/Ir. HiBh Permanent and Interim Facilities
tt
~'n' J qnn'nlq ,~N:NT a,q n? ~HI4 77N~-CTq-qnT:/lT Tq qT~3~i q~lHq ~lFtlq
STAFF PROPOSAL
Capital Facilities Program
ADDENDUM I
PROJECTED REVENUE AND EXPENSES
The attached 1996 - 2001 Program Summary table is excerpted from the 1996
Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
The adopted City of Bremerton Capital Improvement Program 1997-2001 is
hereby incorporated into this Capital Facilities Element by reference.
Department of Community Development 3
CFP-ADDN.96 (8/22/96)
C!TY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PP"~GRAM
¶~ - 2001 PROGRAM
SUMMARY - TOTAL ClP
PRIOR 1g~6 19~7 1998 19gg 200(] 2001
General Govemme~al 0.0 160.0 107.3 201.8 269.8 209.5 274.~
G,mnt~ - CDBG 0.{~ 30.0 42.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.C
~1~ - lAC 0.0 0.0 540.0 632.0 0.0 0.5 300.5
Waler 455.{] 3,683.9 3,433.5 5,533.0 2,026.0 2,418.0 1,820..
Wa~tewater 3,053.C 7,459.5 1,705.5 788.0 1,104.0 1,047.~ 1,277.01
.Stom~a~er 0.0 206.0 600.0 250.0 160.0 167.(~ 160.0
O. O. Bond~ - Vo~ed 314.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.{~ 0.0
G.O. Bonda: Non-Voted 0.(~ 234.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(~ 0.0!
Revenue Bond~. 5,000.{~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.C 0.0
Arlelflal Sl~eet 101 133.5 353.9 392.7 391.0 320.5 233.C 160.0
Real F_.~tate Exc~e Tax 10~ 60.C 300.0 485.0 34O.5 50.(~ 500.C
P~ r' ~¢,~al Facility 112 0.¢ 96.0 78.0 70.0 180.2 287.~ 205.0
Pen~t Prat( 308 0.C 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0! 0.0i 0.0
Gold MIn Ge~ Ce~me 407 0.C, 345.8 275.0 850.0 300.0 2,t00.0~ 100.0
Equip. Rental Re~e~ve 510 0.0; 250.0 1,047.4 438.1 415.5 730.7 596.4
Rooeeve# Ca~ A~et 622 0.0 250.0 100.0 150.0 75.0 75.0 ?5.O
~B(UATA) 1,066.8 574.7 2,965.2 3,548.0 1,250.8 0.0 0.0
FAUS 0.0 12.7 34.0 111.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
WSDOT 624.5 138.0 200.0 200.0 159.6 0.0 0.0
ISTF_A. 21.6 35.3 2,838.1 2,185.0 1,077.0 0.0 0.0
County/Stale/Fed 156.5 10.0 135.0 220.0 235.5 133.0 10.0
Navy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sl~ee{ Vac~lion 8.5 0.5 0.0 0.{~ 0.0 0.0 0.0
Olher 3.4 5.1 322.7 135.0 18.5 40.0 687.5
GRAND TOTAL 10r898.3 14~173.9 15,302.g 16,044.4 7~642.2 7,941.3 5,715.g
[INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
I 5,201-71 8.625-21 12,079.51 12,997.01 8,274.01 5,203.01 4,556.01
[FACIUTIES PROJECTS
2,740.01 7,239.91 1,642.51 2,357.01 612.01 3,758.01 1,413.01
IEQUIPMENT & VEHICLES
I 237.01 675.01 1,613.41 1,020.41 o .51 1,404.3
JGRAND TOTAL
I 8,17a.71 16.741.0J 15.335.41 16.374.41 9.s49.61 10,355.31 6,871.91
JOIFFERENCES SOURCES LESS USES I 2,719.61 (2,567.1] (32.5] (330.0] (2,201.6] (2,424.0] (1,156.0j
CiTY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
I gg~ - 2001 PROGRAM
SUMMARY - STORM WATER
PRIOR 199~ 1997 1998 1999 2000; 2001
Geneml Govemmenla~ o.¢ O.C 0.o .0.0 0.o o.0 o.0
Grant~ - CDBG 0.C 0.¢ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Grenl~ - lAC O.C O.C 0.0 o.n 0.0 0.0 0,0
Wate~ 0.C 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wa~a~water 0.¢ 0.C 190.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Stam~ler 0.C 205.£ 600.0 250.0 160.0 160.0 160.0
Q.O. Bonda - Voted O.C O.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Q,O. Bond~: Non-Voted 0.¢ 0.¢ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0.0
Revem.m Bar, d~. O.C 0.¢ 0.0 O.O 0.0 0.0 0.0
,Ntm~a~ ~ 101 0.¢ 0.¢ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Real Ealete Exdae Tax 109 O.C O.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0.0
Parka Capital Facility 112 0.C 0.¢ 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pe~t Pad( 308 0.C 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0; 0.0
GeaJ MIn ~ Cour~ 40? O.C 0.¢ 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0l 0.0
Equip. Rental Re~e~e $10 0,¢ 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0l 0.0
Ra~eevelt Capaal ,a~aet 622 0.¢ 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.C 0.0
T1B(UATA) 0.(] 0.¢ 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0.¢ 0.0
FAUS 0.¢ 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0.0! 0.¢ 0.0
WSDOT 0.(~ 0.(3 0.0 0.0 0.(~ 0.(~ 0.0
ISTEA. 0.(~ 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0.{~ 0.(~ 0.0
County/Slate/Fed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.~ 0.~ 0.0
Navy O.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(] 0.(] 0.0
SIn~ Vaca~n 0.0 O.O 0.0 0.0 0.{~ 0.{~ 0,0
Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.~ 0.~ 0 0
TOTAL SOURCES 0,0 205.0 790.0 250.( 160J 160.(~ 160,0
INFRASTRUCTURE p
STORM01 KEAN STR,"e:;/KOGERS STREETSTORM DRAJN ~,GE 55.0 430.0;
STORM03 STORM DRAINAGE MAiN REPLACEMENT PROG! ,add 50.0 60.0 60.0 60.(3 60.(~ 60.0
STORMO4 STORM DRAINAGE BASIN STUDIES 100.0 100.C 100.0 100.(] 100.(3 100.0
LJTiLWW25 WWTP STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS lg0.(~
STORM02 EAGLE AVENUE STORM DRAINAGE 10.(~ 90.0
SU B-TOT~ ~L 0.0 205.0 790.{~ 250.0 160.0 160.(~ 160.0
IGRAND TOTAL
[DIFFERENCES SOURCESLESS USES
O.Ol o5.ol? o.oI = .ol eo.o[ eo.ol eo.ol
r O.Ol o.ol O.Ol O.Ol O.Ol o.ol o.o[
CiTY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
lgg~ - 2001 PROGRAM
SUMMARY - TRANSPORTATION
PRIOR lg~6 1997 1998 lg99 2000 2~0t
General Governmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,(3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Grants - CDBG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.0
Granls. lAC 0,0 0.0 240,0 82.(3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wata' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wastawaler 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Slonnwatar 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.ii 0.0 0.0 0.0
O.D. Bonds - Voted 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0.0
O.O. Bonds: Nen-Voted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(3 0.0 ' 0.0 0.0
Revenue Bonds. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.~ 0.0 0.0 0.0
Adertal Street 101 t33.5 353.9 392.7 391.C 320.5 233.0 160.(]
ReeJ Estate Excise Tax 10g 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.0
Parks Capital Facility 112 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.C 0,0 0.0 0.0
Pendergast Park 308 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.(3
Gold Mln Golf Course 407 0.0 0.0 0.(3 0.0l 0.0 0.0 0.(3
Equip. Renbd Reserve 510 0.0 0.0 0.(3 0.01 0.0 0.0
Roosevelt Capital Asset 622 0.0 0.0 0.(~ 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.(~
TIB 1,066.8 574.7 2,965.2 3,548.01 1,250.8 0.0 0.(~
FAUS 0.0 12.7 34.(3 111.0 0.0 0.0
WSDOT 624.5 138.0 200.(3 200.0, 159.6 0.0 0.(~
ISTEA. 21.6 35.3 2,839.1 2,185.0 1,077,0 0.0 0.C
County/State/Fed 156.5 10.0 135.(3 220.0 235,5 133.0 10.C
Navy 0.0 0.0 0.(3 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.¢
Slmet Vaca~n 8.5 0.5 O.C 0.0~ 0,0 0.0 O.C
Ob~e~' 3,4 6.1 322.7 136.0i t8.5 40,0 25.C
TOTAL SOURCES 21014,5 1~130,2 7r128.7 6r872.0 31061,9 406.0 195.C
TRANS1
TRANS2
TRANS4
TRANS6
TRANS7
TRANS5
TRANS8
TRANS3
INg7As01
IN97AS02
SUB-TOT.4
LGRAND TOTAL
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
MISCELLANEOUS
11 ST. RECONSTRUCT- CHESTER TO WARREN
SYLVAN WAY OVERLAY - OLYMPUS TO WHEAT
KITSAP WAY RECONSTRUCT - WESLON TO AUT
SR3/SR304 BREMERTON FERRY TERMINAL TO
WARREN AVE SOUTHBOUND OFFRAMP TO CAL
SR303 CORRIDOR - MAJOR INVESTMENT STUD'1
WERNER RD/LOXIE EOANS BLVD. IMPROVEME
KEAN & UNION IMPROVEMENTS
RODGERS ST. CONST. KEAN TO AUTO CENTER
31.3
2O
25
1950
.AHAN
8.5
2~034,8
150.0
45~.7
203.0
50.0
250,0
20.0
0.5
1~130,2
150.(3
- 5,57g.7
44.(3
120.(3
345.C
7~128
150.0:
6.243.C
t76.01
40.0
33.0~
80,6:
6~872,0
150.0 150.0 150.0
4,704.5 1.600.0 786.0
300.035.0 150.0 936.0
5,189.5 1,900,0
I 2,034.81 1,130.21 7,128.7! 6,872.01 5,189.51 1,9oo.ol 936.ol
[DIFFERENCES SOURCES LESS USES I (2o.0] 0.01 0,01 0.0[ (2,127.6] (1,494.01 (741.0J
C-ITY OF 8REMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PoOGRAM
1006 - 2001 PROGRAM
SUMMARY - WASTE'WATER
PRIOR 1906 lg97 1908 1999 2000 2001
Oener~ Oowemme~tel 0.0 0.0 0.~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Grants - CDBG 0.0 0.0 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Grants - lAC 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Water 0.0 0.(~ 0.0! 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wastewate~ 3,053.0 7,450.5 1,515.5 78~.0 1,104.0 1,040.5 1,2T'f.0
Sk~nwat~' 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
O.O. Bond~ - voted 0.0 0.(] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
O.D. Bo~d~: No~-Voted 0.0 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Reveoue Bonds. 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Attedal Slreel 101 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Reel Elate F.,xc~e Tax 100 0.0 O.0J 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pa~ks Capital Facility 112 0.0 0.0! 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pendergast Pmk 308 0.0 0.0i 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Gold MIn Golf C,~,Jme 407 0.0 0.0! 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0
Equip. Rentel Re~'e 510 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Roosevelt Ca~te~ Asset 622 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
TIB(UATA) 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FAUS 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
W~DOT 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ISTEA. 0.0 0.0! 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cou~tylStete/Fed 0.0 O.Oi 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.~ 0.0
Navy 0.0 0.0: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(~ 0.0
Slreet Vaca~oo 0.0 0.0; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Olher 0.0 0,0! 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0
tOTAL SOURCES 3~053.0 7~450.5~ 1~515.5 789.0 1,104.0 1,040.5 1~277.0
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
JTILWW17 OYSTER BAY BASIN INTERCEPTOR 23.0 207.0
~JTILWW20 SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 100.0 220.0 220.0 220,0 220.(3 220.0
LJTILWW22 ODOR CONTROL & HEADWORKS MOD. 1,365.(~ 1,200.0
LJTILWW9 CALLOW AVE. DRAINAGE BASIN CSO PROJ. 1,409.(J 3,996.0 565.0 270.0
~,SOMONO1 PACIFICAVENUEBASINOF.15/15A 25.0 .
IN97WWO2 WERNER ROAD SEWER F-XTENSION 104.0
~SOMISCO1 CSO SOUDS & FLOATABLE CONTROL POLICY 20.0 60.0 60.0 50.(~
UTILWW38 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER AND CSO PLAN 100.C
IN97WW01 ANDERSON COVE BASIN CSO SEPARATiON PR 30.01 25.0 87.0 552.C 537.0 512.0
SUB-TOTAl 2,804.0 5,364.0 1,181.0 367.0 922.¢ ?57.0 1.002 0
FACIUTIES PROJECTS
UTILWW43 PUMP STATIONS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 140.0 190.5 164.5 t27.0 112.0 83.5 275.0
FA97WW01 ww'rP PROPERTY ACQUISTION 1,700.0
UTILWW24 WWTP FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS 25.0 80.0
UTILWW33 NEW ROOF ON CONTROL BUILDING 15.0
SUB-TOTAl 149.0 1,890.5 189.5 222.0 112.0 83.5 275~
EQUIPMENT & VEHICLES
UTILWW42 VEHICLE PURCHASE 55.0 20.0
UTILWW37 SC, ADA SYSTEM AND CONTROLS 100.0 150.0
u'rILWW31 DIGESTER RENOVATION 60.0
UTILWW35 AUTOMATIC POWER SWITCH GEAR 40,0
UTILWW3~ TELEPHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE 10.0
UTILWW41 VIBRATION ANALYSIS PACKAGE 15.0
UTILWW34 METHANE BOILER 50.0
UTILWW26 BUBBLE TYPE DIFFUSERS IN THE AERATION I~ ;IN 20.0 200.0
SUB-TOTA 100.0 205.0 145.0 200.~ 70.0 200.0 0¢
IGRANOTOT L I 3.0 .01 7.4. .51 1.515.sl ? o.ol 1.1o .ol 1,o o.s[ 1,2.
IOlFFERENCE SOURCES LESS USES I 0.01 O.OI
CiTY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1096 - 2001 PROGRAM
SUMMARY - WATER
PRIOR 1~06 1907 lg08 1~ 2000 2001
Gem~at Gavemmentai 0.0 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0.0~ 0.0 0.0
Gtanta - CDBG 0.0 0.(3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
C-~anta - lAC 0.C '. 0.C 0.0 0.ti 0.0 0.(] 0.0
Watat 455.g 3,586.-= 3,413.0 5,533.0 2,026.0 2,411.C 1.820.5
Wa~tawatar 0.{~ 0.0 0.0
Sten'nwatar 0.£ 0.0
G.O. Bond~ - Voled 0,01 0.0 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.C ' 0.(~
G.O. Bend~: Non-Voted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0! 0.0 0.0 0.C
Revmme Bo~ds. · 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.£
~ Slreet 101 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(
Renl Estate Excise Tax 1(~ 0.0 0.0 0.(3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(
Parks Capital Facility 1t2 0.0 0.~ 0.(3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(
Pendeegast Park 308 0.0 0.0 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(
Gold MI~i ~ Coume 407 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(3 0.0 0.(
Equip. Rental Res~ve 510 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(~ 0.0 0.(
Roe~eve~ Capital Asset 622 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(; 0,0 0.1
TIR(UATA) 0.0 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0J
FAUS 0.0 0.~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,(3 0J
WSDOT 0.0 0.~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.~
I~TF__A. 0.(3 O.C 0.0 0.(3 0.0 O.C OJ
County/State/Fed
Navy 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.(; 0.0 0.01 0.
Slreet Vaca6en 0.¢ 0.0 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.
Oliver 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
TOTAL SOURCES 455.8 3~586.5 3,413.0 5,533.0 2-026.0 2.411.0 2.4.83.
IJ~FRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
UT]LWA~O u'rlUTY LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN 105.0 105.0
UT]LWA27 PUMP STA ~u14 REP[_ & 12' TRANS. MAIN 32.9 66.0 588.0
UTILWA84 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 165.0 250.0 250.(3 250.0 250.0 250.0 25(
UT]LWA48 RESERVOIR SEISMIC IMP ROVEMENTS 150,0 100.(3 100.0 100.0 100.0 10(
JTILWA4g ALEXANDER LA~E DAM REPAIR 20.0 10.01 10.0 45.0 425.0
[JT1LWA47 WEST 650 ZONE DEVELOPMENT 810.0 660.0
LITILWA51 WEST 540 ZONE DEVELOPMENT 80.0 140.0 1,310.(;
LIT]LWA23 E396 ZONE TRANSMISSION MAIN & STORAGE 60.0 103.0: 930.0
UT]LWA89 CORROSION CONTROL TREATMENT FACIETY 150.(3 500.0
UT]LWA18 SR #3 TRANSMISSION MAIN SYS. IMPROVE 45.(3 800.0 3,3,SO.0
UT]LWA83 WARREN AVENUE BRIDGE MAIN 110,~ 0.0
IN97WA01 12' DIST. WATER MAIN - SHOREWOOD DR TO R ~S21 20.¢ 200,0
UT]LWA2 SILVERDALE MOBILE ESTATES WELL 75.0
UT]LWA7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/WATER 75.0
UT1LWA87 12- DISTRIBUTION WATER MAIN 25.0 225.0~
UTILWA26 PORT WASHINGTON NARROWS PUMP STAT~O~ 65.0 585.0
UT]LWA64 18' SHERMAN HEIGHTS TRANSMISSION MAIN 340.0
UT]LWA45 DOMS EA WELL DEVELOPMENT 90.0
UT]LWA71 NW 64TH ST. - CENTRALVALLEY TO HOLLAND 8.0 72.0
UT~LWA70 WEST KITSAP LA~E - CAMP MCKEAN TO LAKEHI [RST 25.0 225.0
INgTWA02 PINE ROAD - PINECREST DR. TO WOODS PL 20.0 100.0
UT~LWA72 PINE RD. MCW~LMAMS TO WELL21 20.0 13
JT1LWA21 36' MAIN EXTENSION 214.0 1.92
SUB-TOTAL 302.9 1,866,0 2,900.0 5,458.0 1,951.01 2.336.(3 2-4~
FACIUTIES PROJECTS
UT]LWA36
LrT]LWA81
WATER01
UTILWA.gl
UT]LWA82
FAgTWA01
FA97WA02
FA97WA02
FA97WAD~
FA97WA0.·
FA97WA0(
FA~TWAO8
LAND ACQUISTiON SECT]ON 6 MCCORMICK
WATER SUPPLY SYS. IMPROVE - LAND ACQUISI
FIRE SPRINKLER & ALARMS 3027 OLYMPUS DR
DE'WATERED BIOSOMDS STORAGE ROOF
D~ I ~RIORATED METERS UPGRADE PROGRAM
CASAD DAM EARLY WARNING
~ACKENNA IMPROVEMENTS
RESERVOIR #4 COVER
GORST CREEK BRIDGE
BIOSOLIDS MAINTENANCE FACILITY
VEHICLE STORAGE BUILDING - GORST
3027 OLYMPUS DR. - VEHICLE COVER
152.0
482.(3
425
100,(; 75.0
75.C 75.0
400.0 100,0
16.C 170,0
22.0
30.0
62.0
63.0
75.(3 75.0 75.C)/ 71-
II
CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IIdPROVEMENT~-ROGRAM
1996 - 2001 PROGRAM.
SUMMARY - WATER
EQUIPMENT & VEHICLES
~UTIL SYS. CONTROL & MONITORING EQUIP. IM I 137.0 125.0 llX).O
I-'-~2?-~?AO'~6'0~0GALLONBIOSOUDSTANKTRUCK ' I I-- 2o.ol '-I I · I I
137.0 145.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.G
SOURCES LESS USES 455.g 3586.53413.05533.0 2026.0 411.0 2483.0
il
I!
II
I1
II
II
I1
!
!
I
!
CiTY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PDOGRAM
1~ - 2001 PROGRAM
SUMMARY - OTHER FUNDS
PRIOR 1996 1997 1998 199~ 2000 2001
SOURCE.q OF FUND8
~ Govemmental 0.{3 0.0 4.8 0.0 1.'" 0.0 0.0
Granta - CDBG 0.{: 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.0
Granta - [AC 0.{: 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.{: 0.0 0.0
Warm' 0.{: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.{: 0.0 0.0
Wastawatar 0.{3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.{~ 0.0 0.0
Stom~water 0.{3 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.0
G.O. Bonds - Voted 314.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.0
0.O. Bonds: Non-Voted 0.{3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.{3 0.0 0.0
Revenue Bends. 5,000.{3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Arterial Slmel 101 0.{3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.{3 0.0 0.0
Real Estate Excise Tax 109 60.{3 60.0 50.0 g0.5 50.0 50.0 50.0
Parks Capital Facility 112 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 55.2 100.0 20.0
Pende~'gast Park 308 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Gold Mln Golf Course 407 0.0 345.8: 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Equip. Renta/Reserve 510 0.{3 250,0 1,047.4 438.1 4t5.5 730.7 596.4
Roosevelt Capital A~$e! 622 0.0 0.0~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
T]B(UATA) 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FAUS 0.0 0.¢ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
WSDOT 0.0 0.¢ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ISTEA. 0.0 O.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
County/State/Fed 0.0 O.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Navy 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Street Vacaticn 0.0 0.{~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Olher 0.0 0.{3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0~
~'OTAL SOURCES 5,374.6 655.8 1,237.2 628.6 622.2 980.7 766.41
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
PARK22 IEVERGREEN PARK ENTRANCE - 14TH ST. RELO{ 10.01 10.0I
INS,OF01 IICONTINOENCY FOR UNID. INFRAsTRucTURE PI 60.0 60.0
IN97OF02 /TRAFFIC CALMING & SAFE'I'Y DEVICES I 50.0 50.0
SUB'TOTAU
50.0 50.0 50.0
79.8 S0.0 51.5
29.8 1.5
FAClUTIES PROJECTS
PSFIRE14 IFIRE DRILLTOWER I 2,575.0
PARK21 /GOLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE EXPANSION 314'61
2,655.8
/
SUB-TOTAq 2,575.0 2,970.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0 50.0
50.0 50.0
0.0 0.0
EQUIPMENT &'
EQ97OF01 GOLD MTN. GOLF COURSE- OLD COURSE EQ. 115.0
EQUlPRENT REPL OF VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT IN ERR 250.( 1,047.4 438.1 415.5 730.7 596.4
EQ97OF02 MISCELLALNEOUS EQUIPMENT- INFIELD M, ACH 10.{3
EQ97OF04 MISC. EQ. - 20 PASSENGER MINI-BUS 70.0
EQ97OF05 GOLD MTN GOLF COURSE- ANN. REPL OF CAP EQ 100.{~ 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.{3
EQg7OF06 SENIOR CITtZENS CENTER- UPGRADES 40.2
EQ97OF07 GLEN JARSSTAD AQ. C'IR. - PUBUC ENHANCE. 40.5
EQgTGF05 GLEN JARSSTAD AQ. CTR. - DEHUM. SYS. REPA R/UPGD 30.0
EQ97GR04 GLEN JARSSTAD AQ. CTR. - ALT. CHEM. DISINFE CT, SYS. 10.{3
EQ97GF06 GLEN JARSSTAD AQ, CTR. - BOILER TUBE REPA R 10.0
EQgTGF03 PARKS & RECREATION COPY MACHINE 15.0
SUB-TOTAl 0.0 365.0 1,157.4 578.~ 570.7 030.7 716.!
IGRAND TOTAL
2'63'5'0t 3,395-4t 1,237.21 62~-61 622.21 geo.71 76e.~I
{OlFFI:HI::NCES SOURCES LESS USES I 2,739.61 (2,739.61 (0.11 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 ~ll
CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1896 - 2001 PROGRAM
FACIUTIES SU I~,#,~Ry
CIP ID it DESCRIPTION PRIOR 189~ 1897 1898 1~ 200~ 200t
Genem~ Governmental 0.6 58.5 44.5 40.0 25.6 37.6
Grant~ - CDBG ' 0.(] 30.C 17.5 0,0 0,0 0.6 O.C
Gmnls - lAC 0.0 0.C 300.0 550.0 0.0 0.{~ 300.¢
Wate~ 16.0 1,575.5 313.0 75.0 75.6 75.{~ 75.C
Wa~lewater 149.0 1,890.5 189,5 22Z0 112,0 83,5 275,C
SIom3water 0.{] 0.C 0.0 0,0 0.6 0.6 0.C
G.O. Boade - Void 3t4.6 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.(~ 0,C 0.¢
Revenue Bonds 5,000,{~ 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.C 0,C 0.c
Nte~al BI, el 101 0.6 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.6 0,~ 0.C
Real Estate Exc~e Tax 109 0.(3 240.C 435.0 250.0 0.(] 450.(~ 0.C
Park~ Ca~ Facility 112 0.6 96.01 68.0 70.0 125,6 187.5 185.C
Pen~t Pad( 308 0.6 29.01 0.0 0.0 0.(~ 0.~ O.C
Go~d MIn Golf Co, me 407 0.C 230.8 175.0 750.0 200.C 2,000.C 0.C
Equ~o. Re~I~ Re~e~ve 510 O.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(~ 0.C 0.C
Roo~ve~ Ca~ta~ ~ 622 0.(~ 250.0 100.0 150,0 75.C 75.C 75.C
TIB(UATA) 0,C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0,01 0.C
FAUS 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,01 0.C
WSDOT 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0,01 0.C
ISTEA 0.(~ 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0: 0,01 0.C
CotmtylSlate/Fed 0.(~ 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.01 0.0~ 0.C
Navy 0,~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0! 0.0! 0.C
Slmet Vacallon 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0! 0,01 0.C
Other 0.~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0i 0,01 0,C
TOTAL SO JRCES 5,479,6 4,400.3 1,642.5 2,107.0 612,01 2,908,0i 898.C
WATER UTILITY
UTILWA36 LAND ACQUISTION SECTION 6 MCCORMICK 152.0
UTILWA81 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS IMPROVE - LAND AC~ )UISIT, 482.0
WATER01 FIRE SPRINKLER & ALARMS 3027 OLYMPUS DR 40.0
UTILWAgt DEWATERED BIOSOUDS STORAGE ROOF 42.S
UTILWA82 DETERIORATED METERS UPGRADE PROGRAM 100.0 75.0 75.0 75.0: 75.0 75.0
FA97WA01 CASAD DAM EARLY WARNING 75.0 75.0
FA~TWAO~ MCKENNA IMPROVEMENTS 400.0 100.0
FA97WA03 RESERVOIR ~ COVER 16,(~ 170.0
FA97~NA~4 GORST CREEK BRIDGE 22.0
FA97WAO~. BIOSOUDS MAINTENANCE FACILITY 30.0
FA~~NAC~ VEHICLE STORAGE BUILDING - GORST 62.0
FA97WAO 3027 OLYMPUS DR. -VEHICLE COVER 63.0
SUB-TOT kL 16.C 1~575.5 313.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0
WASTEWATER UTIUTY
UTILWW4~ PUMP STATIONS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 149.01 190.5 164.5 127.0 112.0 83.5 275,0
FAgTYC, N0 WWTP PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS 1,700.0
UTILWW2,~ INWTP FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS 25.0 80.0
UTILW~N3~ NEW ROOF ON CONTROL BUILDING 15.0
SUB-TOT kL. 149.C 1,890.5 189.5 222.0 112.0 83.5 275,0
PARKS
PARK1
PARK3
PARK6
PARK12
PARK17
PARK19
FAgTOF01
FA97OF02
FAg7OF03
FA.97OF04
FA97OF05
EVERGREEN PARK
PURCHASE & DEVELOP HADDON SCHOOL SITE
SWIMMING POOL EXTERIOR UGHTING UPGD
WARREN AVE. PARK TENNIS COURTS & FENCI~
IRRIGATION PROJECTS
EASTPARK SKATEBOARD PARK PHASE I
DEV. NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS - NAVAL & ARVOI
PENDERGAST PARK - FIELDS 4, 5, & 6 DEV.
PENDERGAST PARK - PORTABLE TOILET
R/Y GREEN CEMETERy SIDEWALK & ENT. IMP.
KIWANIS PARK - REPAIR/REPLACE STAIRWAY
350,0 600.0
150.0 225.0
5.0
25.0
10.0 8.0
10.0
120,0
22.0
7.0
15.0
5.0
10.0
t0,0
CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
lg~6 - 2001 PROGRAM
FACILITIES SUMMARY
CIP ID it DESCRIPTION PRIOR lgg6 1~7 lgg~ lg~9 2000! 20011
FAg7OF06 MAN· I I · pARK - RESURFACE TENNIS COUR'i'~ 10.0
FA97OF08 BALL FIELD IMPROVEMENTS 6.0 10.0 10.1~ 10.0 t0.0 10.0
FA97OF10 UNIDENTIFIED & EMERGENCY PROJECTS 10.0 10.0 10.{~ t0.0 10.0 10.0
FAgTOF20 LIONS PARK - TENNIS COURT REHAB 20.0
FA97OF16 GOLD MTN GOLF COURSE - CART STOR. BLDG ! 100.0
FA97OF12 GLEN JARSTAD AQUATIC CTR - ADA ADAPTATIC N 17.5
FAgTOF{~} PICNIC TABLES & PARK BENCHES REPLACEMEI' T 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
FA97OF07 PLAYGROUND EQUIP. REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 15.0 15.0 20.0 t8.0 15.0
FA97OF19 LENT LANE - MASTER PLAN - DEVELOPMENT 10.0 100.0
FAg7OF14 GOLD MTN GOLF COURSE AUTO. IRRIGATION -, )LO 75.0 750.0
FAGTOF29 SR3 - REHAB TENNIS COURTS 20.0
FA97OF26 PENOERGA~T REGIONAL PARK - UGH'IS :500.0
FA97OF24 NAD PARK - DEMOLISH HOUSE 10.0
FA97OF23 MANE I '1 t:: - DEVELOP. - RESTROOM REHAB 95.0 95.0
FAgTOF21 lIONS FIELD - PARKING LOT RENOVATION 30.0
FAgTOF18 KIWANIS FIELD - RECONFIGURE BALL FIELD 10.0
FAgTOF1 .~ GOLD MTN GOLF COURSE - NL=W CLUB HOUSE 200.0 2,000.0
FAgTOF27 SHERIDAN RECREATION CTR - ENERGY UPGRA 3E 55.0
FA.97OF31 PENDERGAST REG. PARK FIELDS 4,5, & 6 CONS r. 850.0
PARK2 BLUEBERRY PARK - DEVELOPMENT 450.0
FAg?OF25 NAD PARK - RESTROOM RENOVATION 12.0
FA97GF06 GLEN JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER - FAC. UPGD. 14.5
FA97OF17 KITSAP LAKE PARK - PHASE 18 DESIGN .50.0
FAgTOF22 LIONS FIELD - SHELTER 30.0
FA97OF30 ~NARREN AVENUE PLAYFIELD 125.0
PARK11 N.A~D. MARINE PARK - SHOREMNE STUDY 600.{~
PARK g PARK MAINTENANCE FACIETY 12(].(~
SUB-TOT L 0.0 745.{: lr095.5 2.020.0 400.0 3,562.E 975.C
GENERAL FUND
PSFIRE15 ~ REMOVE UNDGRD TANK, REPL W~ ABOVE GRN :) 17.~
PARK8 SENIOR CENTER - ELECTRICAL UPGRADE 10.C
FAg7GF05 KITSAP LAKE PARK - NEW ROOF 9.01
FA97GF12 FACIMTiES PLAN 22.01 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
:A97GF01 AIR CONDITIONING FOR FIRE STATIONS 2 & 3 12.0 6.0
=A97GF09 KITSAP LAKE PARK - PARK BOAT/TRAILER 5.0
:A97GF11 SHERIDAN RECREATION CTR- ELECT. UPGD 15.0
FA97GF13 SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER HVAC 14.5
FA.97GF08 GLEN JARSTAD AQUATIC CTR - ROOF REPAIR 30.0
FA97GFt0 SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER- ROOF 20.0
FA97GF14 PAINT FIRE STATIONS 2 & 3 7.0
SUB-TOT~ ,L 0.0 58.5 44.5 40.C 25.0 37.0 88.0
PSFIRE14 [FIRE DRILL TOWER
P~Ks..2.11OT,I~OLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE EXPANSION
OTHER FUNDS
2,575.0 314'61
IGRANOTOTAL I 2,7'm.01 ?,23 .01 1,S 2.51 ,3S?.01 8t2.01
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
UNAPPROVED DRAFT
May 21, 1996
Chairman OIsen called the meeting to order at 6:10 PM
Chairman 01~en announced that the Commission had just completed a study session and asked
Commissioner Dingfield to announce the name of the gentlemen that had talked to the
Commission.
Commissioner Dingfield stated that Patrick Downs, Environment and Permitting Specialist for
Fletcher Wright had just addressed the Commission regarding all of the permitting processes
needed lbr the Sinclair Landing Project.
The meeting began with the Secretary calling the roll: Those present were:
Chairman Olsen. Vice-Chairman Stone. Commissioners Hancock. Dingfield, B0yd. Adams. and
Robinson.
Staff Present: Ron Hough. Jack Allingham. and Mary. lyn Waibel,
Motion by Commissioner Stone and seconded by Commissioner Dingfield to approve the agenda.
Ouestion called: Stone. yes: Robinson. yes: Hancock. yes: Adams. yes: Dingfield, yea; Bgyd,
yes: Olsen. yes. Motion passes.
Chairman 0tsen announced that on the back of the agenda is the procedures for the meeting.
Ron Hough announced that the Commission has a Study Session scheduled for June 4th, in the
City Council Room at 4:15 PM until 7:00 PM to discuss the Harrison District Plan and
Regulatory Reform Act of the State.
Hearing gl-Harrison District Plan
Kay Wilson, Senior Planner from the City_ of Bremer~gn, presented the staff report on the
Harrison District Plan. Highlights presented:
Land Use:
A new Health Care Center should be established where medical and related uses
will be preferred uses.
A parking garage and an emergency access helipad should be constructed convenient to
the hospital.
PAGE - 1-
A new Shoreline Mixed Use zone should be established, where any mix of commercial
and or residential use is permitted, as long as commercial uses are water-oriented.
A geotechnical study of the Tracyton Beach Natural System should be prepared.
Additional areas should be designated for medium and kigh density housing.
Transportation:
A southbound off-ramp should be constructed from Wheaton Way to Lebo Boulevard.
Lower Wheaton Way should be closed and vacated at Sheridan.
Cherry Street should be widened between Sheridan and Cailahan.
The south end Ash Street should be closed and vacated (at the hospital).
Campbell Way should be closed and vacated or realigned.
Clare Street should be closed at Callahan.
Parks:
Sheridan Park should be expanded to the east. The Park Department maintenance facility
should be relocated away from the shoreline.
The best future use of the Sheridan Park Community Center should be determined through
a facilities study.
The East Park Nature Area should be maintained as a conservancy area. A parking
structure should be considered at the site of the existing joint-use parking lot next to the
hospital if the integrity of the Nature Area can be preserved.
The Hal's Comer beautification area should be enlarged into a neighborhood pocket park
when Wheaton Way is closed at Sheridan Road.
A public access pathway system should be developed along the top of the bluff, with
viewpoints and possible beach access at the Magnussen Viewpoint and the Main Street
fight-of-way. (Current shoreline regulations already require new development to construct
a public access pathway.
also presented a map showing the I0 areas affected by thc plaai.
PAGE -2-
Public Comment:
Gerry Van/bssen citizen, concerned about the goals and policies on Page 3-5, regarding charging
a tee everytime there is a vacancy. Also, concerned about the inspection as well as the amount
of the inspection fee.
Kay Wilson, stated that this provision in 3-5 lists the regulations that are 'already in effect in the
City-wide Comprehensive Plan as strategies and are not recommendations of the Harrison Plan.
Dayton Griffin, citizen, concerned about the Shoreline Mixed-Use District. Stated that the Plan
itself represented alot of work and was an excellent job. Concerned about water uses, i.e.
possibility of a marina; fast food restaurants as opposed to sit-down restaurants. Feels plan needs
to be thoroughly reviewed.
End of hearing--continued until June 18, 1996.
Heating #2-Pope Resources
Ron Hough. Planning Manager. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, West Bremerton, Werner
Road area, 200 acres, expanding the light industrial area from about 25 to 60 acres and adding
Medium Density Residential, formerly Low Density Residential.
David Cunningham. Pope Resources, stated that this Comprehensive Plan Amendment is putting
a solid foundation under the development plan which will be the next step.
Hearine #3-Sciepko Annexation
Ron Hough. Plannine Manager. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Anderson Creek area, 76
acres, Industrial Park designation, presented the history of the Sciepko Property.
Hearing #4-ArvQn Park
Ron Hough. Planning Manager. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, small residential lot on An, on
Avenue, Neighborhood Park designation.
Hearing #5-Smith Cove Area
Ron Hough. Planning Manager, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, south of Evergreen Park,
expanding Evergreen Park around Smith Cove, Park designation.
Hearing #6-Holtz Dock
Chairman Olsen asked the appearance of fairness question. No objections. Commissioner Stone
PAGE -3-
DRAFT REVISIONS
June 26, 1996
Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
CAPITAL FACILITIES
ELEMENT
Part 2 of 2: Capital Facilities Program
Prepared by:
BREMERTON PLANNING
Adopted Apdl 5, 1995
Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
ELEMENT H
CAPITAL FACILITIES
Part 2 of 2: Capital Facilities Program
CONTENTS
Paqe
1. INTRODUCTION .................................................... I
A. AUTHORITY .................................................. 1
B. OVERVIEW ..................................................
C. DESCRIPTION ................................................ 2
D. BACKGROUND ............................................... 3
E. SCOPE ...................................................... 3
F. PURPOSE AND INTENT ........................................ 5
G. DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDMENT PROCESS ..................... 6
2. CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM (CFP) ................................. 8
A. FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ..................... 12
B. LAW ENFORCEMENT ........................................ 22
C. PARKS & RECREATION ....................................... 31
D. SANITARY SEWER ........................................... 43
Not included in proposed revisions:
E. SCHOOLS .................................................. 51
F. STORMWATER .............................................. 61
G. TRANSPORTATIQN .......................................... 66
H. WATER .................................................... 69
Bremerton Comprehensive P/an
ELEMENT H
CAPITAL FACILITIES
Part 2 of 2 -- Capital Facilities Program (CFP)
This Capital Facilities Program (CFP) document is the ,~r;t ~ of ~ two~
documents that make~ up the Capita/Facilities Element of the Bremerton Comprehensive P/an.
A. AUTHORITY
The State of Washington Growth Management Act of 1990 (GMA) requires that the City of
Bremerton develop a comprehensive plan which contains several elements, including a "capital
facilities plan element". The long-range Capital Facilities Plan and the short-range Capital
Facilities Program make up the capital facilities element required by the GMA.
This Capital Facilities Element was developed under the direction of the City's Planning
Commission and adopted as an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The element was
developed pursuant to the authority conferred by the Washington State Constitution; the
Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 36.70A; and Chapter 2.12 of the City's Municipal Code.
B. OVERVIEW
The Capital Facilities Element is organized into two documents, which contain the following
sections:
PART I- CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
1. INTRODUCTION -- Includes authority, overview, description, background, GMA
requirements, scope, purpose and intent, and development and amendment
process.
2. PLANNING FRAMEWORK -- Lists applicable GMA goals and regional policies
with which the Capital Facilities Element must be consistent.
3. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN -- A long-range policy plan containing guidelines
for capital improvements.
CFP - 1
Capital Facilities Program
D. BACKGROUND
The Capital Facilities Plan and Program (CFP) differ from the City's previous Capital
Improvement Program (CIP). Previously, the scheduling of physical improvements was
based on anticipated available financial resources and on a priority listing of capital
improvement needs for a five year period. VVhile some projects in the CIP were
incorporated into the Annual Budget, the CIP acted merely as a "wish list" of projects,
often with no identified funding sources.
In contrast, this Capital Facilities Plan sets policy direction for determining capital
improvement needs, evaluating proposed capital improvement projects, establishing
funding priorities, and guiding funding alternatives. The Capital Facilities Program
(CFP) contained in Part 2 of the element establishes level of service standards for
facilities and a financing plan for facility improvements covedng the entire six-year
period.
Along with the Capital Facilities Element, the City's capital facilities planning effort also
involves preparation of a Capital Improvement Program and an Annual Budget.
Capital Improvement Program (ClP) - The City's Capital Improvement Program
is a six-year plan for spending public funds on capital facilities and amenities
needed to address, support and implement the City's Comprehensive Plan and
other adopted City plans and programs. The CIP only covers City of Bremerton
programs.
Annual Budget- The City's annual budget authorizes expenditures for all city
expenses, including the acquisition or development of capital facilities. The
annual capital budget differs from the financing plan contained in the Capital
Facilities Program in that it covers only capital projects receiving City funding.
E. SCOPE
The scope of the Capital Facilities Program (CFP) is city-wide and beyond. It includes
all areas within the incorporated city limits, as well as areas surrounding the city which
have been identified as Bremerton's urban growth area in accordance with the Growth
Management Act.
Public facilities and utilities include a variety of properties, improvements and services
often administered by governmental agencies for the general public. Examples of public
facilities include city administration buildings, parks and recreational facilities, libraries
and public schools. Utilities include electrical, telecommunication, and refuse collection
utilities. Certain facilities and utilities are provided by the City of Bremerton, while others
are provided by other agencies, special districts, or companies. The Definitions section
of this element defines "capital facilities", "capital improvement project", and related
terms.
Capital Facilities Program CFP - 3
F. PURPOSE AND INTENT
The purpose of the shod-range Capital Facilities Program (CFP) is to establish the City's
work program for capital facilities for the next six years, to carry out the intents and
policies of the Capital Facilities Plan, Transportation Element, and Utility Element, and to
give further direction to implement the strategies of the plans.
The Capital Facilities Plan and CFP make up the plan element that will bring the rest of
the Comprehensive Plan to life. It fulfills the GMA requirement to assure that needed
capital facilities will be financed. This requirement is the mechanism to ensure that the
growth envisioned in the plan can really happen. The available capacity of public
facilities will affect the type, amount and rate of growth.
Because of the complexity of the relationships between land use and public facilities and
services, the Capital Facilities Plan and Program will lay a foundation for the
coordination and consistency of infrastructure plans and programs, including those of
transportation and utilities.
The Capita/Facilities Element is a tool for coordination of the City's physical and fiscal
planning. It is a mechanism for ongoing communication and cooperation between
various City departments, and between the City, the County, and other providers of
public services.
The Capital Facilities Element promotes efficiency by requiring the City to prioritize
capital improvements for a longer period of time than the single budget year. Long
range financial planning presents the opportunity to schedule projects so that the
various steps in development logically follow one another; with regard to relative
urgency, economic desirability, and community benefit. In addition, the process of
identifying adequate funding sources results in the prioritization of needs, and allows
trade-offs between projects to be evaluated frankly. The Six Year Financial Program
contained in the Element will guide decisionmaking to achieve the community goals as
articulated in the Vision for Bremerton and Planning Goals Elements.
The purpose of the Capital Facilities Element is to:
Serve as a guide for making decisions that will improve the quality of
facilities and services.
Ensure the proper coordination and timing of the provision of adequate
facilities and services with land use development.
Coordinate and provide consistency among City plans for public facilities,
including transportation and utilities, and capital facilities plans of
regional, state and federal governments and plans of special districts
(e.g. schools, libraries, and port districts).
Capital Facilities Program CFP - 5
Relationship Among Capital Facilities Element's Policy
Plan, Capital Facilities Program, and City Budget
April
through
July:
Programs
Agencies*
Capital
n Cq~ay
'< .. · S~s I Deflciu
...... · C~pim Sudi,~n
Budget
Capital
Budget
Prol~
Reveaue~ &
Capital
Facilities
Program
Summary
City's
Operating
Budget
Figure CFP-1 Capital Facilities Element Timeline
Capital Facilities Program CFP - 7
Fire and City of )rovides facilities that support the provision of
Emergency Bremerton Fire fire and emergency services.
Services Dept.
Law City of Provides facilities that support the provision of
Enforcement Bremerton law enforcement services.
Police Dept.
Parks City of Provides facilities for passive and active · Land Use Element
Bremerton recreational activities. · ~ Parks & Recreation
Parks & Comprehensive P/an
Recreation
Dept.
Streets City of ~rovides streets, sidewalks, traffic controls, · Transportation Element
Bremerton and street lighting. · Six-Year Transportation
Dept. of Public Improvement Program
Works & (TIP)
Utilities
Sanitary Sewer Bremerton Provides facilities used in collection,
Municipal transmission, storage, treatment or discharge ·
Wastewater of waterborne waste within most developed Wastewater
Utility portions of city and some surrounding Comprehensive Plan
unincorporated areas.
Schools Bremerton Provides elementary and secondary facilities · Bremerton School District
School District for instruction in the several branches of Capital Facilities Plan: In
learning and study required by the Basic Support of the School
Education Code of the State of Washington. Impact Fee Program,
July 1992
Storm Water Bremerton Provides facilities that collect and transport · Ord. 4454
Management Municipal stormwater runoff. ·
Stormwater ~orm~ate~ Ma~agement
Utility Plaq
Water Bremerton Provides supply of potable water from system · !~ Water System
Municipal of surface water and wells. Service area Comprehensive Plan
Water Utility includes developed portions of city and
surrounding unincorporated areas. Utility
also contracts to provide water to additional
areas (Tracyton, Rocky Point, PSNS, and
Port of Bremerton airport and industrial park.
Capital Facilities Program CFP - 9
uo!lelndod
Figure CFP-2 Population Forecast: 1990-2012
Capital Facilities Program CFP - 10
has been increasing even though the population has not grown. This is
due to a combination of factors, including an aging population, a
concentration of convalescent centers and retirement homes near the
hospital, and an economy in which people may tend to call for EMS to
avoid the expense of a doctor ^'--'" ~'~" "-- --" .... :--:'~ '"~ "':"'
-- -- ~ -. ~- . ~. 't~ The current
response time is about 3.3 ~ minutes for all responses. There are
deviations in some areas, such as the golf course. These are handled
through mutual aid agreements with other fire districts.
(2) Level of S m/ice LOS
The level of service for EMS facilities is a function of response time and
call volumes. These in turn are dependent on the number and location of
fire stations, the number of fire apparatus units, and the number of
firefighters available. The City is developing a LOS monitoring system
that measures EMS response time (time needed to respond to a call) and
call volumes (the number of calls received from different areas). In the
meantime, the need for EMS facilities can be estimated by monitoring
response times. The American Heart Association recommends a 4.0
minute EMS response time for Basic Life Support (BLS) and an 8.0
minute response time for Advanced Life Support (ALS). Past these
times, a heart patient's chance of survival goes down significantly.
· Current LOS
minutes for BLS and ALS (9r~3~.3
· Proposed LOS = 4:9 5_~,~0. minutes for BLS
8.0 minutes for ALS
(3) Future Demand
Bremerton's population is expected to grow by 3,410 by year 2000, and
by an additional 16,590 by year 2014. CenCom projects a two-fold
increase in calls between 1992 and 2005. The City is expected to
continue to receive about half of these calls regardless of whether the
population increases. (Table EM-2)
Capital Facilities Program CFP - 12
c. Six-Year Financing Plan -- EMS
(1) Six-Year Need
The total need for year 2000 is three EMS units -- two active units and
one reserve unit. Because the City currently has three units, no
additional units will be required to meet the City's need for the next six
years. However, three units will need to be replaced within that time.
(This includes one unit scheduled to be replaced in 1994, which will not
be available until 1995.)
(2) Six-year Funding and Projects
The following chart contains the funding sources, capacity projects and
non-capacity projects for the next six years. The last portion of the chart
reflects the balancing of funding sources and money expended on
projects. Any surplus or deficit is indicated. (Table EM-3)
NOTE: Table EM-3 to be completed by Fire Dept.
General Fund 0.0
EMS Levy 0.0
ALS Billings 0.0
TOTAL SOURCES Q0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EMS Unit Replacement 100 100 0 200.0
TOTAL COSTS 0.0 100.0 0.0 0,0 100.0 0.0 200 0
SurplusorDeficit I 0'0 I-100'0 I 0'0 I 0'0 I-'iO0'O I 0'0 [I -200'0
Note: All amounts are times $1,000
Sources: Bremerton Fire Department
Capital Facilities Program CFP - 14
Engine #2 Callow Avenue to West Bremerton City 1
Limits
En~iine ¢Y2-A (Reserve) Same as Engine #2 1
Engine #3 East Bremerton to City Limits 1
Engine #3-A (Reserve Same as Engine #3 1
Total Fire Engines = 6
Total Fire Apparatus = 7
Marine-20 Fireboat Sinclair and Dyes Inlets 1
Rescue One City-wide 1
Total = 2
b. Forecast of Future Needs -- Fire Protection
('1) Existing Demand
The City has three fire stations and four active fire apparatus serving
about 3°,?,,000 ~0~0 persons ~- approximately one station per
11~-i~.~ people, and one fire apparatus unit per ~ ~ people. The
current response time is about 4-~ 5~ m nutes
~!~. The City has a Class 3 insurance rating based on
manpower, water supply, etc.
(2) Level of Service ~LOS}
The need for fire protection facilities is a function of response time and
call volumes. These in turn are dependent on the number and location of
fire stations, the number of fire apparatus units, and the number of
fireflghters available. Until the City's monitoring system can be further
quantified, fire facilities needs can be estimated by monitoring response
times.
· Current LOS = 4-.-_7- 5!~4~ minutes response time for both
· Proposed LOS -- 5.0 minutes response time.
Capital Facilities Program CFP - 16
(6) Proposed Facilities
(a) Buildinas
The City, in partnership with several Fire Districts, plans to replace
the existing drill tower with a more suitable facility.
(b) Fire Apparatus
Because the City currently has seven apparatus, no additional
apparatus will be needed. However, the City will need to replace
its existing fire engines toward the end of the 20 year period, and
additional crews will be needed to staff all seven apparatus. No
change in the existing number of stations will be needed.
c. Six-Year Financing Plan -- Fire Protection
(1) Six-Year Need
The total need for year 2000 is three fire apparatus. Because the City
currently has six fire apparatus, no additional fire apparatus will be
required to meet the City's need for the next six years. (Table FP-2)
(2) Six-year Fundinq and Proiects
The following chart contains the funding sources, capacity projects and
non-capacity projects for the next six years. The last portion of the chart
reflects the balancing of funding sources and money expended on
projects. Any surplus or deficit is indicated. (Table FP-3)
Capital Facilities Program CFP - 18
Figure CFP-3 Location of Fire Department Facilities
Capital Facilities Program CFP - 20
b. Level of Service ~LOSi
The need for law enforcement facilities can be estimated by projecting the
number of officers that will be needed to serve the forecasted population, and
calculating the building space needed per officer. Currently, with 62 officers,
there is one officer per 615 persons.
There is no consensus on staffing levels for local police departments. The ratio
of both officers and total police employees to population size is significantly
related to crime rates. However, there are many variables that enter into crime
rates. Such standards have limited meaning because the actual number
required will vary depending on the size of a city, geographic region, and type of
city. Even cities of the same population size and type may differ widely in
staffing needs because of differences in demographics, socio-economic
characteristics, climate or other unique conditions. Washington State cities as a
whole have an average of 1.6 officers per 1,000 population. Bremerton's
staffing level is the same as the state average. Compared with available staffing
levels from several Washington cities, Bremerton's staffing level falls between
Yakima, which has a higher population, and Des Moines, which has a lower
population?
City Pooulation Officers/1000
Seattle (1989) 531,400 3.06
Yakima 54,843 1.7
Washington average -- 1.6
Bremerton ~ 1.6
Des Moines 21,330 1.5
Moses Lake 12,190 1.9
Poulsbo 5,415 2.3
The Police Department feels that its current staffing level is too Iow, given the
City's crime rate. The Department recommends that 70 officers could provide a
preferred level of service for the existing population. While the City's staffing
level is the same as the state average, it may be that escalating crime rates are
catching many cities short of staff.
Another difficulty in linking staff levels to population in Bremerton is that the
City's population fluctuates up and down with Navy population levels. For
example, Bremerton's population dropped from 38,142 in 1990 to a Iow of
35 920 in April 1994
~d~~~t~8.?~p~ Police Department staffing levels need to take
into account these typical population fluctuations. The following table contrasts
1990 and 1005 [~96 levels of service for officers with the Department's preferred
staffing level.
~Source: Level of Service Standards: Measures for Maintaining the Quality of Community Life, Municipal
Research Services Center of Washington, Repod No. 31, September 1994.
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP - 22 June 26, 1996
Population ~ ~ 58,142
Officers 62 S~ 94 32
Officers 71 76 107 36
Source: Bremerton ."~.','.;c 9¢pc. rt. mc~.t
d. Need for Capital Facility Improvements
To maintain existing staff levels to year--2~ ~ at 250 sq.ft, per officer, the
Police Department would need -2S-,-,-,-,-,-,-,-~ ~ square feet -- an increase of ~
sq.ft, over L:~ ~ years. To maintain the Department's preferred ~ level of
service to -29-t4 [~, it would need 26,750 square feet -- an increase of ~
~5, sq.ft. (Table LE-4)
1,996 Officer LOS ~8~03~ 15,500 16~750 23;500 5;~465
Preferred Officer LOS ~8;~ 17,500 19,000 26,750 8~15
* Staff levels per Table LE-3 @ 250 sq.ftJofficer.
~1996~20~ 2~lnC~ease'?~ 2012~N~1
The following table shows the future need for Police Department building area by
year 2000 ~:! and by year -2e-t4 29~1~ at the proposed LOS of 250 sq.ft, per
officer.
The year .... 200~ need is based on continuation of the ~ ~"'= 1996
Officer LOS (1.6¢ officers per 1,000 population).
The year -20t4.2.~.~ need is based on a gradual increase in staff levels
after year .... 20Q1 w~th the goal of achieving the Preferred Officer
LOS (1.8~ officers/1000) by year ~ ~0~2. (Table LE-5)
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP - 24 June 26, 1996
needs for various City departments. The goal and objective of this plan are the
following:
Consolidation of Departments to improve communication; coordination;
and streamline department management goals and objectives; and
Economics resulting in less property to maintain; centralize departmental
needs; and reduce department managers lost-time due to existing
decentralized departments.
The City is concerned about the rising costs of providing jail services. However,
there is no expectation that it would be cost-effective for the City to construct and
staff a new jail facility in compliance with State regulations. Therefore, the City
proposes to continue to contract with Kitsap County to provide jail services for
the foreseeable future.
3. Six-Year Financial Plan
The total need for year 2~0a~ is estimated at 17,000 sq.ft, in one consolidated facility
designed for law enforcement needs, c,~_~.~,,__ _, .... ,, .... '~ ~'~'~ gr;;; ;q ~ ) of
;fo e~ i;~ ~al ~r ~el G~ty
2The City Permit Center, located at 286 Fourth Street, currently houses the Department of Community
Development and the Engineering Department. The Engineering Department will be moved to the Public Works and
Utilities Administration Center at 3027 Olympus Ddve in spring 1995.
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP- 26 June 26, 1996
~9~ (Existing Need) 15,500 ~[~ 4,000
~9~(~ 1,500 4,000 2,500
Total as o~ = 17,000 ~ 2,500
Total as o~ = ~ ~
* LOS -- 25~ sq.~. per o~r.
CFP-PT2.DFT
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP - 28 June 26, 1996
The City of Bremerton provides a system of local parks (neighborhood and community parks),
regional parks, and open space parks. This system is managed by the City's Parks and
Recreation Department with the help of the Bremerton Parks and Recreation Commission. The
park system service area consists of all land within the incorporated city limits.
reflect; F;¢',:,~,,:,ncD' ;cca,T,~,,cnd;t:;;;,; cf ~c d;c,'t ,'-;; .......................................... ":-'- ......
1. Inventory of Park Lands
The following inventory lists local, regional, ~,~ open space~~I park lands·
a. Local Parks
To assist in analyzing service levels, local parks are divided into two categories:
neighborhood and community parks. ~ ~ ~ ~Pi~
(1) Neiqhborhood Parks
A neighborhood park is a combination playground and park designed
primarily for non-supervised, non-organized recreation activities. In
addition to their recreation value ..... '"~"z n~eig~!, ~i~,· ~ a so prov de a
source of open space and aesthetic quality in the, neighborhood. They
are generally small in size (about 3-10 acres) and serve an area of
approximately one half mile radius. The City's neighborhood parks range
in size from less than one acre to more than 27 acres.
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP- .30 June 26, 1996
12 Bataan Park Sylvan & Olympus Dr 1.00
13 Blueberry Park S~/Ivan Way 6.90
14 City Hall Park 4th & Washington 0.30
18 Jarstad Park Old Belfair Highway 4.00
20 Manette ~ & Senior ~ Center 1140 Nipsic 2.60
24 Warren Avenue Pla¥field 11 th & Warren Avenue 3.00
25 VV¥coff Memodal Park 1st & Pacific Ave. (CBD) 0.02
Subtotal = 17.82
11 Bachmann Park Shore Drive & Trenton 0.50
15 Eastpark & G. Jarstad Aquatic Center Ma~nusson Way & Homer Jones 17.50
16 Ever.0reen Park 14th & Park Avenue 6.00
19 Kitsap Lake Park Pdce Road 31.90
4 Lent Lane Park Lebo Boulevard 1.50
22 N.A.D. Marine Park Shorewood Drive end 27.50
21 N.A.D. Park (upper) 6002 Kitsap Way 54.00
8 Sheridan Park (lower) Lebo Boulevard & Clare Street 6.00
23 Sheridan Park Community Recreation 680 Lebo Boulevard 4.00
Center
Total Community Parks of Re~]ional Significance = 148.90
Total Community Park Acres = 166.72
b. Reoional Parks
Regional parks are recreation areas that serve an entire region. They are
usually large in size and often include areas of natural quality suitable for outdoor
recreation activities such as golfing, picnicking, boating, fishing, swimming,
camping and hiking. If located within an urban area, they sometimes offer a
wider range of facilities and activities which serves the entire region. The City's
regional parks range from two to 100 ~ acres.
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP - 32 June 26, 1996
M~P~
7 Eastpark Nature Area Wheaton Way at Ma~nusson 14.40
11 Holl;/Terrace West Near Monticela Way off Sylvan Way 3.00
13 Ivy Green Cemetery Naval Avenue 13.00
31 Stephenson Canyon Between Lewis Lane & Willow 28.00
Beautification Areas/Pocket Parks various locations
~ Open Space Acres = 58.40
Total Park Lands
The City has a total of 520 6~J acres of park lands, including t,hc ,';cw ,*,ndy
....... u ...... u .................................... ~
~th~b~a ,-,, ,,- ...... ,. ,~.~A .~o
...... ~ .... ,___~ ,__, =-A,..~= ........... , (Table PR 6)
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP - 34J June 26, 1996
Regional ~ 5 - 10 (1~ ~60
Open Space 58.40 3.6 1.5 ~39
The NRPA standards are intended for a "typical" community, and of course all
communities differ. For example, while the LOS indicates
that Bremerton is deficient in open space parks, the City is surrounded by
thousands of acres of open water. Although water bodies may not fall within the
traditional meaning of "open space", nevertheless many Bremerton waterfront
parks provide visual and physical access to miles of open water that would be
difficult to quantify with a LOS. Likewise, "-""~
......... ~. ................. ~, distant
mountain views visible from many parts of the city add to the fccl Pi~t..~ce~ti~ of
open space.
The proposed LOS of ~ ~5~ acres per 1,000 persons will
.........................................
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP - ,36 June 26, 1996
12.75 acres per 1,000 persons. Both the existing and proposed City LOS are
above the proposed County standard.
The county-wide plan recommends that Kitsap County park and recreation
agencies undertake a "strategic role" service approach where: a) the county
provides park and recreation facilities and programs that no other agency can or
is willing to provide; b) the county acts as a coordinator of local interests where
facilities are provided by many other agencies; and c) the county pen~orms as a
facilitator where unique acquisition or development opportunities may occur that
could be implemented or operated by the local city or other agencies. Under this
strategy, the county will --' .........
for ~ facilities that have regional use benefits. Examples
in Bremerton are: Bremerton Boardwalk; Lions Field; Pendergast Regional Park;
and EastparkJBremerton YMCA.
rc.';cr`u::,: c.;ur`t£;;;d: ,~ ;c,';,"~ ;m,,;c,~ f:~., - ............
.......... ] ..... ;:~; *nd rc:r::t:r.n b:r`d. ,*,ooumir,~
b. Proposed City Facilities
The City's 1995 Pa/ks & Recreation Comprehensive Plan proposes ~ add!~g
184 acres of park lands. The largest project ;;'~II bc ~ an 18-hole addition to the
Gold Mountain Golf Course (170 acres).
The Golf Course is a high
priority, as it provides revenues for other city parks. The Plan also anticipates
acquisition of an additional 14 acres of local park
. (Table PR-8)
The City recognizes the diMculty in maintaining the recommended LOS past the
year 2000. There are few large tracts of undeveloped land left within the
developed parts of the City today. As infill development continues there will be
even less vacant land, and land prices are likely to increase correspondingly.
~ards
The City will need to seek creative ways of adding park lands within developed
pads of the city where vacant land is scarce. For example, the City and School
District are exploring the possibility of shared use of school recreation lands.
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP - $~ June 26, 1996
General Govemment 24 69 57.5 37.5 25 13.5 226.5
1994 Revenue Bond (~olf cts.) 2771 275 850 300 2100 100 6,396.0
Future Grants 30 317.5 300 300 947.5
Bond/Impact Fees 0.0
Golf Course Fund 112 96 88 74 165.2 265.5 194.6 883.3
Real Estate Excise Tax 340 475.5 250 450 1,515.5
Roosevelt Trust Fund 250 100 150 75 75 75 725.0
Pender~ast 29 29.0
Donations 50 65 115.0
Unspecified 250 850 350 1,450.0
Total Sources = 3,540.0 1,325.0 1,981.5 577.7 3,765.5 1,098.1 12,287.8
Arvon Site & 12th/Naval Site 120.0 120.0
Blueberry Park 450.0 450.0
Bremerton Boardwalk 1.2 1.2
Eastpark 10.0 100.0 1100
Eastpark Nature Area 5.0 4.0 9.0
Evergreen Park 350.0 600.0 300.0 1,250.0
Glen Jarstad Aquatic Center 5.0 72.5 37.5 37.5 25.0 13.5 191.0
Go~d Mountain Golf Course 2,771.0 .275.0 850.0 300.0 2,100.0 100.0 6,396.0
Haddon Site (Brem. Sch. Dist.) 150.0 225.0 375.0
Ivy Green Cemetery 15.0 9.6 24.6
Kitsap Lake Park 9.0 18.8 50.0 77.8
Kiwanis Field 5.0 10.0 15.0
Lent Lane 10.0 100.0 1100
Lions Park 20.0 30.0 4.0 30.0 84.0
Manette 10.0 95.0 95.0 2000
NA.D. Park 10.0 12.0 22.0
N.A.D. Marine 600.0 6000
Pender~ast Regional Park 29.0 500.0 850.0 1,379 0
Senior Citizens Center 10.0 9.5 20.0 40.2 79.7
Sheridan Recreation Center 5.0 15.0 56.0 120.0 196.0
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP - 40 June 26, 1996
....... " ....... 11)
.","/,^, N!^
.";L'", N/A H/A
CFP-PT2.DFT
Draft Capital Facilities Program CFP- 42 June 26, 1996