HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/20/96 AGENDABREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
239 4TH STREET
BREMERTON, WA 98337
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 20, 1996
CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M.
A. Pledge Of Allegiance
B. Invocation
CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in
advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If
separate discussion is desired on an item, it may be removed
from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at
the request of a Council member.
A. Minutes - February 28, 1996
#AB96-055
CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
4. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
5. MAYOR'S REPORT
6. PUBLIC RECOGNITION -- (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes)
NEW BUSINESS
A. Appointment of Lionel Collins, Sr., to the
Parks and Recreation Commission
B. Reappointment Of Carol Johnson To The Parks
And Recreation Committee
C. CPG Composting Parks Waste Pilot Project
De
Interlocal Agreement Between The City Of
Bremerton and Bremerton Housing Authority
For Supplemental Police Services
#AB96-056 ~/
#AB96-057 ~
RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution #2542 Renaming The Bremerton
Municipal Swimming Pool
#A 9 -0 0 5O
CONTINUED NEXT PAGE)
ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance #4548 (Second Reading) Setting
Wastewater Rates
Ordinance (First Reading) Amending Parking
Regulations To Enhance Penalties, Repeal
Reparking
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: MINUTES - FEBRUARY 28, -1996
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
3-20-96
City CoBncil
John E. Law~ President
3-14-96
2. ~J~: (comment on back
if necessary)
3. EXHIBITS:
ENDO~S~.ME~T INFOm~T~ON APPROVED BY CO~CIL ~S~--~m~FO~
MAYOR coUNCIL PRESIDE~/~''
4. SUMYnARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCrL ACTION:
8. RECOMMENDATION:
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
11. AGENDA-~ILL NO:
TAPE #1360
UNAPPROVED DRAFT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
#0042
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton
was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street,
Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, February 28, 1996, at 5:30 P.M.,
with Council President John Law presiding. Council members present
were Bob Winters, A1 Colvin, Cecil McConnell, Carlos Montgomery,
Sherril Huff-Menees, David Farr, Richard Neville, and Lon Overson.
Also present were City Attorney Ian Sievers and City Clerk Kathy
McCluskey.
The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council
President Law and Invocation given by Councilman A1 Colvin.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes -- February 7, 1996
#AB96-040
M/S/C/U(Neville/Farr) to approve Consent Agenda as presented.
#0074
CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required
by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified
as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that
had been made available to the Council.
M/S/C/U(Colvin/Montgomery) on February 28, 1996, the Council does
approve for payment those vouchers included and further described
as follows: EFT3522, EFT3523, 195445 through 195466 in the amount
of $180,163.45; and Retiree Payroll for the period ending 2/29/96
in the amount of $97,395.85; and Regular Payroll for the period
ending 1-31-96, in the amount of $786,872.41.
COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Mr. Overson announced a meeting will be held on February 29, 5:30
P.M., in the Washington Mutual Building, that will address downtown
Bremerton's image. This meeting is sponsored by Bremerton Main
Street Association, The Sun, Bremerton Area Chamber Of Commerce,
Economic Development Council and Waterfront Task Force.
Mr. Neville thanked everyone for the cards, flowers and well wishes
as well as the help he received from professionals at Harrison
Hospital.
Mr. Fart noted Mr. Neville is a valued member of the Council and he
TAPE #1360
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 2 of 19
was glad to have him back.
Mrs. Huff-Menees stated it was good to have Councilman Neville back
and in good health.
Mr. Montqome~ echoed welcome back sentiments to Mr. Neville, and
the fact he was sorrily missed.
Mr. MoConnell announced the next District #2 Neighborhood Meeting
will be held March 12, 6:30 P.M., at Fire Station #3. The guest
speaker at that meeting will be Police Chief Paul DuFresne and the
Beat officers for that area.
Mr. Colvin was pleased to report 41 people turned out for the
District #1 Neighborhood Meeting and complimented Randy McGreal, of
Fletcher Wright, on the excellent presentation he made on the
downtown waterfront project. He encouraged residents of District
#1 to attend the District #2 Neighborhood Meeting on March 12. He
assured those concerned about the Scotch broom that the issue will
not go away and he expects it to accelerate.
Mr. Winters reported on Tuesday, February 27, he and Councilman
Montgomery attended a meeting of the Downtown Waterfront Task
Force. He acknowledged that the image of Bremerton has been
tainted, changed or needs an uplift and that process will begin at
the meeting on February 29, at the Washington Mutual building,
starting at 5:30 P.M.. He was pleased to announce applications for
housing at the new Max Hale Center are available for local people,
and copies of the application will be available in the City Council
office. The Swing city Committee is sponsoring a fund raising
dance on March 15, at the Bremerton Eagles.
Mr. Law reported the Bremerton School District followed through on
their commitment to clean up the property on the east side of the
Middle School facing Trenton Avenue.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Horton reported the Parks Commission voted to accept a
recommendation from Gold Mountain golfers and members of the
community to name the new and old golf courses at Gold Mountain.
The new course will be named Olympic Course At Gold Mountain and
the old course will be named the Cascade Course at Gold Mountain.
The new course construction is on schedule and is anticipated to
open for play in the fall.
Mayor Horton conveyed the BEST REPORT AWARD on the February 26th
Police Activity Report, which read as follows: "On February 26
Animal Control Officer Olson responded to a guinea pig stuck in a
wood stove vent pipe. She could not get the pig out on first
TAPE #1360
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 3 of 19
attempt and requested the Bremerton Fire Department. The Bremerton
Fire Department could not get the pig out. Olson used cooking oil
to lubricate the pig up and was able to remove the little ham
without harm. Pig advised his goose was cooked."
Pollce Chief Paul DuFresne, Lt. Ron Mox and K-9 Officer Bogen
introduced the City newest K-9 Police Dog - P.D. Rebel. Rebel was
funded through donations from citizens of Bremerton. Officer Bogen
extended a special thanks to the Rotarians for their part in
acquiring Rebel. Chief DuFrense pointed out Rebel comes with a
unique "replacement guarantee" in the event he didn't meet the
City's requirements.
Mayor Horton extended congratulations to the Bremerton High School
students, who were honored as outstanding academic students at a
special recognition event on February 27, and to the teachers and
School District personnel.
Henry Mincey, Manager Community Recourse Division, stated last year
his division was created as part of the Police Department
reorganization and one of the first things they did was establish
a partnership with the Bremerton School District. That partnership
involved the City providing a School Resource Officer along with
the duties of D.A.R.E., and G.R.E.A.T classes. Now, the Bremerton
School District wishes to report back to the City Council on how
that partnership is working. Carol Whitehead, Assistant
Superintendent, complimented the City, Chief DuFresne, and the
Police Officers for the outstanding job they are doing in the City.
The Bremerton School District is particularly appreciative for the
excellent support they receive on a day-to-day basis from the
Police Department, and have received for a number of years. This
year they have had the special opportunity to have Officer
Fitzpatrick, who works with the Middle School and Jr. High,
assigned to the School District full time. The partnership is
possible because of a State Security grant, which is for a two year
period, if the State Legislature continues to approve funding.
officer Fitzpatrick's job with the schools is to be proactive with
students as well as being available on site if his services are
needed in an emergency situation. Officer Fitzpatrick teaches the
G.R.E.A.T. program, helping students learn early on about gangs in
the community and how they can make a choice to say "no" and make
the right decisions to move forward.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
Jack Lefcoski, Kitsap Lake Neighborhood Association - A group
addressing weeds in lakes within Kitsap County will hold a meeting
on March 5, 6:30 P.M., at the Cascade Natural Gas building on
Kitsap Way.
TAPE #1360
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 4 of 19
Gene Hart - recognition given to Bremerton High School students for
their outstanding academic achievements. The following question
was raised: "what is the real reason Pastor Larry Robertson is not
allowed to speak on Black History at Bremerton High School?
President Law suggested Mr. Hart contact the Bremerton School
Board.
Klaus Golombeck, Bremerton Central Lions Club - District Lions Club
Convention at the Bayview Inn on March 2-3. The Bremerton Central
Lions Club will sponsor the Armed Forces Day Parade.
Carol Atkinson, Bremerton Main Street Association - Image Of
Bremerton Forum, February 29, 5:30 P.M., at the Washington Mutual
Community Room.
Gord¥ Byrd - enjoyed the presentation on the Sinclair Landing
project at the District #1 Neighborhood Meeting.
Del Knauss - thanked Councilman Huff-Menees and Mayor Horton for
stepping down from the Sinclair Landing Association Board of
Directors. He asked the following questions and requested a
written response: (1) Has Mayor Horton signed a new Memorandum Of
Understanding with the Sinclair Landing Association. And, what are
the differences between the new one and the one City Council voted
on a couple of months ago? (2) Concerning the City Utility Tax on
garbage bills, charging an 18% tax. I called the State Attorney
General's Office and State Representative Lois McMahan's Office.
It appears from the information I have from the Association Of
Washington Cities, that the City has been overcharging its
residences since 1986. The AWC Bulletin states we have concerns
regarding potential ambiguities relating to the authority of cities
and towns to impose solid waste taxes at rates exceeding 2/10th of
1%. Those concerns arose from the absence of a statutory amendment
to RCW35.21.710. This happened by a series of bills in 1982, 1985
and 1986 that changed references and codification. In 1982 the
Legislature limited City Utility Taxes for telecommunications,
electricity and Natural Gas to 6%. The Legislature also limited
City B&O Taxes to 0.2% unless the activity was taxed under RCW
82.16. In 1985, the Legislature increased the State Utilities Tax
(RCW 82.16) on solid waste to help fund the Public Works Trust
Fund. In 1986, the Legislature moved the Solid Waste Tax from RCW
82.16 to a new Chapter RCW 82.18. This means the tax is no longer
exempt from the 0.2% limit, because it is no longer taxed under RCW
82.16. Question - since it appears to me that the City is in
violation of State Law, can the residents expect a roll back of
this tax and a refund for the years of overcharging?"
Thomas Delahay, Bremerton resident - questioned the Planning
TAPE #1360
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 5 of 19
Department requirement for professional drawings of projects
needing a Building Permit when doing small type rehabilitation work
on rental properties; and was there some type of drawing that he
could submit somewhere between a drawing on a napkin and a blue
print?
John Thomas, Bremerton resident - asked that individual property
owners clean up Scotch broom plants and by doing so may embarrass
the City into cleaning up Scotch broom on City properties.
REQUEST TO COUNCIL TO ACCEPT A REVISED LETTER OF INTENT TO
~/TNEX THE WERNER ROAD AREA, ~AB96-041
On November 8, 1995, the City Council approved a Letter of Intent
to Annex the area designated as the Werner Road Annexation, into
the City of Bremerton. The process is defined by RCW 35.13.125.
The City Council determined that they would accept the area as
geographically proposed and require the area to assume a
proportional share of the City's current indebtedness as a
condition of any future petition for annexation. Additionally,
Council allowed for the provisional administrative assignment of
zoning according to BMC 21.02.260. This would exempt the staff
from taking the new area through the zoning process until after
annexation.
City Council is asked to accept a modified Letter of Intent to
Annex, which would replace the Letter of Intent accepted by Council
on November 8, 1995. The new Letter of Intent requires the City to
perform necessary work to obtain pre-annexation land use planning
and zoning. The new Letter of Intent reduces the area to exclude
properties that will not be included in the final petition.
Terrie O,Neill, Municipal Services Coordinator, reviewed the
Summary Statement data and explained at this point she is asking
Council to back up to the Letter Of Intent to consider requiring
staff to go through the zoning and Comprehensive planning of the
area prior to completing the annexation at the request of several
petitioners. Council is also being asked to eliminate some areas
from the annexation area since there were not sufficient petitions
for the city to proceed without the owners of those properties
being concerned. The City has been activity trying to address
concerns of the area property owners and a meeting is scheduled on
February 29, 1996, 7:00 P.M., at the Fire Station on Kitsap Way to
talk more about the annexation process.
Public comment - none.
Mr. Overson stated he could not see where the City could do
anything to the property related to zoning when the area is not
#1851
TAPE #1360
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 6 of 19
within the City? Ian Sievers, City Attorney, stated State statutes
RCW 35.13.177 and 35.13.178 allow cities to zone property that
would take affect upon annexation. The City Council, by State law,
is to indicate in the minutes of this meeting whether they will
require zoning to take affect simultaneously or whether there will
be zoning action after annexation. Mr. Overson stated because such
action is legal and if the process has been followed, there would
be no leverage on the Council. Mr. 8ievers stated yes, the
decision here is not to decide the zoning, but whether to have it
in place by the time of annexation.
Mr. Colvin asked if zoning action would be taken without a public
hearing. Mr. Sievers stated no, identifying a zoning designation
would require Planning Commission review, Council hearings and
adoption of an Ordinance. Typically, the City uses the same
Ordinance to implement the annexation. Mr. Colvin asked the amount
of increased taxes to the City once the area is annexed into the
City? Ms. O'Neill explained the assessed value of the property
proposed for annexation is $12,000,000, and could include other
kinds of tax revenue benefits.
M/S/C/U(Montgomery/Farr) to accept the Werner Road Annexation as
geographically modified in the Letter of Intent dated February 20,
1996, subject to the assumption of a share of the City's current
indebtedness, and require the simultaneous adoption of a
comprehensive plan and zoning designations upon annexation.
7B - APPOINTMENT OF DONNA R. ~DAMS TO TN~ PLANNING COMMISSION,
#1995
~AB96-042
There is a vacancy on the Planning Commission and it is recommended
that the vacancy be filled by Donna R. Adams.
Mayor Horton reviewed Ms. Adams background noting the value of her
bringing the perspective of the Washington State Ferries to the
City. Ms. Adams planned to be at this meeting, however, she had
not yet arrived.
Public comment.
M/S/C/U(Neville/Montgomery) to confirm the appointment of Donna R.
Adams to the Planning Commission.
8A - ORDINANCE NO. 4543 (SECOND READING) RESTRICTING STORAGE OF
OVERSIZE VEHICLESv ~AB96-030
Deborah Goodell, Parking Supervisor, stated this proposal is to
restrict reparking oversized vehicles over 10,000 lbs., or 22 feet
in length, to 120 hours in a 30-day period.
Kathleen McCluske¥, City Clerk, made a statement of clarification
TAPE #1360
city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 7 of 19
that the wording "except motor homes" is in the proposed ordinance.
Council rescinded an earlier motion to "include motor homes", so
first reading of the ordinance was as approved on February 7th.
Mr. Overson talked about prior Council action to include "motor
homes" in the restriction and the adverse affect it would have on
motor home visitors coming to Bremerton. He questioned if
his understanding was correct. Ms. Goodell stated if the motor
home is an oversized vehicle, they would be allowed to park 120
hours within a 30-day period. When the discussion had motor homes
excepted, they had unrestrictive parking. Mr. Owerso~ asked Mr.
Montgomery if that was the intent of his prior position on this
issue? Mr. Montqomez7 stated his intent was to not have oversized
vehicles, including motor homes, parking on narrow City streets for
long periods of time. And, if a person owns a motor home they
should park it on their own property or in a storage lot. Ms.
Goodell explained the problem they have encountered has been the
need to chase around the City large, and generally commercial
vehicles, buses, etc., every 72 hours. Currently, there is no
other law to apply to address these problems; however, there are
laws addressing visibility. Mr. Overson asked why Ms. Goodell did
not want a 34 foot motor home parked on the street in a residential
neighborhood. Ms. Goodell stated her original proposal was to
include motor homes, since they are oversized vehicles. If motor
homes are exempted, it would depend on the width of the street and
the attitude of the neighborhood. She believed it should be
enforced city wide, not street-by-street. Mayor Horton emphasized
when the ordinance was originally drafted, it included motor homes,
so they too would be banned from long term storage on City streets.
It was her position, for political reasons, that issue would be too
tough to deal with at this point, especially when the primary
concern had to do with buses, horse trailers, construction
vehicles, etc. At the second reading of the ordinance, Council
changed the ordinance to ban motor homes as well and she asked
Council to rescind that motion to allow the public an opportunity
to give their input on such a proposal. The Administrative
recommendation was to exempt motor homes, which was supported at
the time of first reading of the ordinance. From an Administrative
standpoint, their main concern was dealing with the non-motor home
vehicles and Council brought a different element at the time of
second reading of the ordinance.
Mr. McConne11 asked why the weight of oversized vehicles increased
from 8,000 lbs., to 10,000 lbs. Ms. ~oodell stated that increase
came about based on research of auto dealerships and the fact most
motor homes were in the 10,00-12,000 lb. range. Mr. McConnell asked
if motor homes are to be exempted then why aren't RV trailers
exempted as well? Ms. ~oodell pointed out the ordinance states
motorized conveyances. In the case of a travel trailer, a motor
TAPE #1360
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 8 of 19
vehicle would have to be attached to it in order to have a
Residential Parking Permit. Vehicles that end up being stored on
the street are junk vehicles, old buses, construction vehicles and
trailers. Mr. McConnell stated if motor homes are exempted, he
believes it will be a temptation for people to take out their motor
homes that are currently being stored and park them on the street.
MS. Goodell explained motor homes are defined differently as far as
the definition the city is using than RV trailers. Mr. McConnell
stated he did not have a 2-hour parking limit on his street, but he
has a problem with a trailer being parked on his street.. Ms.
Hoodell explained the trailer could be parked on the street, but it
would have to be moved once every 72-hours.
Elizabeth Buell, High Avenue, asked if this included rental trucks
used for moving? Ms. Hoodell stated if the Oversized Vehicle
Ordinance was not in effect the vehicle would only have to be moved
once every 72-hours. If that ordinance is in effect and the
vehicle is over 10,000 lbs., and longer than 22 feet, it could not
be parked for more than a 5-day period, that is provided it is not
posing any blocking problems.
Klaus Holombek, 2505 E. Phinney Bay Pl., stated he preferred the
City fix a problem that exists rather than make it more difficult
for people to live in the City. Personally, he could bring his
vehicle under the 22 foot length regulation by removing two
bumpers. He questioned how will the City determine the weight? He
described pickup trucks 22 ft. in length could also present
blocking and visual hazards; however, not all problems can be
addressed by this ordinance. He cited the ugliness of the power
lines and poles that exist in the City, but there is not an easy
solution to rid of the City of that blight as well. He had no
objection to purchasing a City Residential Parking Permit to place
in his motor home as an identification of the owner for benefit of
the Police. He felt strongly that out-of-state licensed motor
homes should be exempted, and such action is precedented in Salt
Lake City, Utah and some areas of Seattle.
An4¥ Parypa, Hayward Avenue, raised several concerns having to do
with the Council providing the public ample opportunity to give
input on whether or not motor homes and travel trailers should be
allowed to park on City streets for indefinite period of time; and
the process used in approving the ordinance. He concurred in the
proposal to remove oversized vehicles off City streets. He
referenced BMC Chapter 10.11.010 and noted in his travels around
the City he has not been aware of any logging trucks, tractors with
double trailers, etc., parking long term on the streets or planting
strips. However, he has observed many boats and RV's parked on
City streets for long periods of time and questioned will the
oversized vehicles have to be driven around the City for thirty
TAPE #1360
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 9 of 19
days before reparking or must they leave the City. He questioned
"does the requirement of having a right-of-way permit to park a
vehicle in excess of 72 consecutive hours include those within
Residential Parking Zones? And, how does the City plan on keeping
track of how long any vehicle has parked or if it has been moved?
TAPE #1361
Mr. Parype pointed out section 10.09.050 (Eligibility Criteria)
reads after the words motor vehicles "not in excess of ten thousand
pounds", but fails to add "or 22 feet in length. And, the first
paragraph of sub-paragraph (a), was completely wiped out so there
is no definition except for those items numbered b-f, which would
be renumbered. He interpreted BMC 10.11.010 to read that oversized
vehicles in residential parking zones only go up to 10,000 lbs.,
and 22 feet in length, but when reading Section 10.11.010 as
amended it tells him that you must move a vehicle after it has been
parked in one spot for 72 consecutive hours. It also tells him
that motor vehicles or motorized conveyances exceeding 10,000 lbs..
gross legal weight or exceeding 22 feet in length, except motor
homes, may not repark in excess of 120 hours within any 30-day
period. That tells him anywhere in East Bremerton or any where
outside of a 2-hour zone, you could have a 120,000 lb. vehicle that
is 55 feet long.
Mr. Parypa brought up the issue of parking on City right-of-way
and asked if the proposed ordinance included non-posted for parking
planting strips? He presented photos showing how a planting strip
was damaged by a trailered boat being parked on it for several
days. At the present time, three vehicles parked on that same
site. He agreed with Mr. Montgomery that those owning motor homes
and travel trailers should be able to afford to pay for storage
and/or park the recreational vehicles on their own property. Many
people pay higher taxes because they have a "view" from their
residence and he did not consider oversize Vehicles on the street
as "view". Photos were provided showing various situations where
-boats and motor homes were parked on sidewalks, across sidewalks,
and on planting strips.
Mr. Parypa suggested decreasing the authorized weight of vehicles
rather than increasing it; grant a short permit for a visiting
motor homes to park on the street, providing there is sufficient
width of roadway; allow temporary parking to commercial trucks
making deliveries or providing a service; allow no non-motorized
conveyances, boats, recreational motorized vehicles, or commercial
trucks, other than those previously mentioned on any part of the
right-of-way for the purpose of parking.
Earl Nelson, Olympic Avenue, supported including motor homes in the
TAPE #1361
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 10 of 19
ordinance.
Del Knauss, Olympic Avenue, supported including motor homes in the
ordinance.
Mr. Neville stated due to there being some confusion about the
number of readings this issue has already received, he asked the
City Clerk to read into the record Ordinance #4543 starting from
Section 2. Kathleen McCluske¥, City Clerk, stated for
clarification the first reading of the ordinance took place on
February 7, second reading took place on February 14, which
included motor homes, but later in the evening that motion was
rescinded. Therefore, Council is at a point of second reading on
the same ordinance that was before them at first reading on
February 7, and reads as follows: "Section 2. Amendment. Section
10.09.050 is amended to read as follows: ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA.
Parking permits may be issued for motor vehicles not in excess of
ten thousand pounds only upon application of the following persons:
(a) A legal resident of the residential parking permit area who has
a motor vehicle registered in his name, or who has a motor vehicle
for his exclusive use and under his control. (b) A person who owns
or leases commercial property and actively engages in business
activity within a residential parking permit area.
There shall be a limit of two (2) residential permits issued per
dwelling unit, unless parking availability allows a greater number.
No more than one parking permit may be issued for each business
establishment for a motor vehicle registered to or under the
control of such person.
Section 3. Amendment. Section 10.11.010(1) is amended to read as
follows: 10.11.010 ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS. In addition to those
statues adopted by reference in BMC 10.04.010 restricting standing,
stopping and parking of vehicles, it shall be unlawful and
punishable as a civil infraction for any person to commit any of
the following actions: (1) Storage of vehicles within Right-Of-Way.
Parking in excess of seventy-two (72) consecutive hours, of non-
motorized conveyance or motor vehicles in a public right-of-way
shall be unlawful without a right-of-way permit. Motor vehicles or
non-motorized conveyances exceeding ten thousand pounds (10,000
lbs.) gross vehicle weight or twenty two (22) feet in length,
except motor homes, may not repark in excess of one hundred twenty
(120) hours within any consecutive thirty (30) day period. As used
in this section motor homes are vehicles, originally manufactured
as a recreational vehicle, which do not require a special permit
for highway travel." Mr. Neville stated he believed the proposed
ordinance would address and correct current problems and would lend
his support to the proposal as presented.
Mr. Montgomery restated his position that motor homes should not be
TAPE #1361
city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 11 of 19
stored on City streets because most City streets are too narrow and
in many instances the motorized vehicles are unsightly.
Mr. Colvin asked the City Attorney if the second reading is the
same as that approved at first reading on February 7? Mr. Sievers
stated yes. In answer to Mr. Parypa's comment that the ordinance
contained reference to two B.M.C. Chapters, the subject of the
ordinance is reparking oversized vehicles and the intent is to have
a comprehensive legislative scheme, which is why they included
Chapter 10.09 as well as 10.011, which included specific
restriction on long-term parking. Chapter 10.09 was included
because it deals with the City's Residential Parking Permit areas
and a threshold was established as to what is a normal vehicle and
what is a large vehicle, previously it was 8,000 lbs., and needed
to be increased to 10,000 lbs., to make it consistent with the new
restrictions. Again, vehicle owners will be required to abide by
the short parking limits in the Residential Parking Permit areas
if the vehicles are under 10,000 lbs.. Mr. Parypa raised the
question why use 10,000 lbs., instead of an alternate 10,000 lbs.,
or 22 feet in length in the Residential Parking Permit chapter.
Mr. Sievers wasn't sure why just 10,000 lbs., was listed and may
have been an oversight; however, it may be a good point to include
both criteria in that section. In reference to Mr. Parypa's
comments about where in the right-of-way oversized vehicles would
be allowed, that would be a different topic than this legislation.
The proposed ordinance address duration, it does not talk about
where it is legal to park. If there is another issue that needs to
be addressed on further limitations of large vehicles in places
such as planting strips, then that would need to be addressed in
the Parking Code. Ms. Goodell was asked to response to Mr.
Parypa's question as to how the City would track the 120 hours.
Ms. Hoodell pointed out weight has been a problem in certain areas
as far as travel on the street and the length of time a vehicle has
been parked. Upon researching that point, she found most of the
ordinances written in Washington included weight. On the length of
time issue, currently the City is using tire stem location to judge
the length of time a vehicle has been parked in one spot rather
than chalking tires, which can be easily removed.
Mr. Overson stated of the seven pictures presented by Mr. Parypa,
six of them would not be influenced by what is being proposed. He
questioned one of the pictures identified as one area since in his
opinion they were two different locations. The only area pictured
that would have been influenced was the single 24 ft. motor home.
Based on his experience traveling in his motor home, many cities
welcome visitors and he personally enjoyed their friendly
treatment. He was sorry that there were people in Bremerton, who
wanted to be unfriendly to motor home owners by making it difficult
for them to park when visiting. He supported excluding motor homes
#1204
TAPE #1361
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 12 of 19
from the ordinance. Mr. Par~a challenged Mr. Overson's statement
relating to one of the pictures he handed out.., it is the same
location.
Mr. McConnell emphasized motor homes, trailers, and other oversized
vehicles, that are parked on City streets are a problem. He has
such a situation in his own neighborhood that causes a visibility
problem. Whether a vehicle is motorized or non-motorized, the
danger is still the same. He pointed out the absence of normal
sized vehicles parked on the streets in the photographs distributed
by Mr. Parypa. He disagreed with the increase in weight from 8,000
lbs., to 10,000 lbs. This past weekend he drove around the City
and observed many of the violators, as identified under this
ordinance, were located on narrow streets. He believed the motor
home exception in the ordinance should be removed because a motor
home or trailer is a recreation vehicle.
Mr. Winters stated he drove around his district and observed most
people with RV type vehicles parked them in their yards, except for
the one down the street from his residence. He was not aware of
anyone lodging a complaint that particular oversized vehicle.
Mr. Colvin asked if the proposed ordinance addressed safety issues?
Ms. Goodell stated no; however, State law does addresses safety and
any hazard created by restricting visibility.
M/S/C(Montgomery/Huff-Menees) to pass Ordinance No. 4543 on second
reading, modified under'Section 3 (1) deleting the words "except
motor homes" and deleting the last sentence: "AS used in this
section motor homes are vehicles, originally manufactured as a
recreational vehicle, which do not require a special permit for
highway travel." amending the parking code to restrict re-parking
of oversize vehicles; and amending BMC Title 10.
Vote on motion:
In Favor: Montgomery, McConnell, Winters, Farr,
Huff-Menees, Law
Oppose:
Abstain:
Overson, Neville
Colvin
Motion carried.
8B - RESOLUTION NO. 2541 AUTHORIZING AN INTERFUND LOAN FROM
WATER FUND TO THE WASTEWATER FUND, ~B96-043
The City's Wastewater Fund will receive over $6.25 million during
fiscal 1996 from various non-operating sources. These include
moneys due from the U.S. Navy, the State of Washington, and Kitsap
County. However, it is possible that the timing of the receipt of
these funds may be such that a temporary cash flow deficit in the
Wastewater Fund will occur.
#1517
TAPE #1361
city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 13 of 19
Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, reviewed the Summary Statement and
assured everyone that the proposed action was not indicative that
the budget is broken or any way in jeopardy, but there is a
possibility that a significant amount of the expenses associated
with capital improvements will occur before receiving the funds
from the various sources.
John Thomas asked the following questions: (1) Is this two million
dollar shortfall generated by the condemnation of property near the
wastewater treatment plant? (2) How much money is in the Water
Fund? (3) What was the original purpose of the Water Fund money?
Mr. Hanna responded as follows: (1) Yes, that is one of the capital
projects undertaken, but it is not limited to just that one. (2)
The present cash balance in the Water Fund is approximately five
million dollars. (3) The use of the money will be to carry out
several capital projects of the Water Fund both in 1996 and future
years. It is anticipated that the Water Fund will end 1996 with a
substantial cash balance, based on the anticipated completion of
the replacement of the main water transmission line between Cascad
Dam and Bremerton. That improvement will cost approximately 3.5
million dollars and will be constructed in 1997.
Mr. MoConnell pointed out the Wastewater Fund started out the year
with 3.1 million dollars and asked the current balance in that
account? Mr. Hanna stated at the end of January the fund balance
was approximately 2 million dollars. Mr. McConnell referenced
wording in the Summary Statement..."it is possible if it should
occur." When he votes on something he prefers a more definitive
statement. Mr. Hanna stated he felt confident the City would
receive funding from the several non-operating sources, which
include two Public Works Trust Fund loans, two Centennial Clean
Water Fund loans, the Assessment Rolls for LID #327 and LID #328,
and two contractual issues with the United States Navy. What he
was not as confident about was the timing of receipt of those funds
and wanting to assure that the Wastewater Fund would not get into
a deficit condition.
Mr. Montgomery asked if he understood correctly that the funds
would not be spent unless there was a need to borrow from that
fund? Mr. Hanna stated yes, it is his intention to use the
requested authority only if there is a need.
Mr. Overson pointed out the loan will bear interest at 5% and it
shall be repaid in its entirety before 12-31-96. Generally,
interfund loans are discouraged and are not a good practice, but if
it is necessary, then those kind of principles need to be observed.
M/S/CU(Overson/Montgomery) to adopt Resolution No. 2541,
authorizing an interfund loan to the Wastewater Operating Fund from
TAPE #1361
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 14 of 19
the Water Operating Fund.
9A - PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND THE BREMERTON ZONING ORDINANCE To
BETTER ACCOMMODATE RECYCLING FACILITIES; ~ND ORDINANCE (FIRST
READING), ~B96-044
The Bremerton Zoning Ordinance allows "recycling centers" in two
zones -- Industrial General and General Business. To better
administer these types of uses throughout the community, amendments
to the Zoning Ordinance have been drafted to better define the
terms for recycling facilities, to include those facilities in more
zones in the Land Use Tables, and to establish design standards for
collection stations intended for public use. The Bremerton
Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed
amendments on January 16, 1996, and unanimously recommended City
Council approval.
President Law asked the "Appearance Of Fairness/Conflict Of
Interest" question with all Council members being seated. He also
announced the presentation made to the City Council can only
contain the information that was presented to the Planning
Commission, whether it is the comments or documentation. Mr. Hough
will be asked to alert Council if the information being presented
was not part of the Planning Commission's discussion on this issue.
Ron Hough, Planning Manager, pointed out this is one issue within
the Zoning Ordinance that was not adequately covered previously and
the City is being asked to address "recycling centers" separately
from the rest of the Zoning Ordinance. The City's current Zoning
Ordinance, which was adopted in 1988, included a definition for
recycling center and allowed them in two zones, Industrial General
(IG), the heavy industrial zone, and General Business (GB) with a
Special Use Permit. There were no provisions for lighter weight
facilities, drop off stations or collection stations and the
definition of recycling center was a little vague, which presented
a problem when a new use came in and there were only two zones that
allowed that kind of activity. The City was asked to open up the
opportunity for recycling centers in more locations and provide a
clear definition, which is what this proposal attempts to do.
The ordinance contains three main components, the first being
DEFINITIONS - defining Recyclinq Center, which is where materials
are taken after being collected to be crushed, sorted and packaged
and made ready to process into other things or trucked away.
Recycling Collection Station, which is the more intense of the two
collection station types that would allow the collection of all
kinds of things. Recyclinq Collection Station L~mited would allow
the collection of glass, tin cans, aluminum, cardboard, newspapers,
magazines, plastics and other recyclable in small units, but would
not include furniture, large appliances, auto parts, tires or
/5
TAPE #1361
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 15 of 19
hazardous liquid waste or any form of garbage.
The second component is the development of STANDARDS. The following
standards would only apply to public facilities: (1) gravel,
concrete or asphalt on the surface; and landscaped according to
landscaping requirements of any business; (2) fenced or some kind
of containment and locked between the hours of 8:00 P.M. and 6:00
A.M.; (3) no lighting between 8:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. (4) a sight-
obscuring fence or wall along the sides and rear lot lines,
particularly in residential areas; (5) wire/chain link type fence
would be required where it abuts the street; and the area must be
monitored and maintained in a clean safe and healthful manner.
Private collection facilities related to a business, such as K-Mart
or a large apartment complex, designed to sort their own recycling
products would be exempt. There are several ways to allow types of
uses outright, if it is a type of use that is not a problem in a
particular zone. In other cases, if there is something that the
City needs to look at or it is not clear as to what it might look
like when it comes through the Planning office, they might attach
the Special Use designation, which can be approved administratively
or by the Planning Commission. The intent of the ordinance is to
allow more uses outright and fewer uses by Special Use Permit.
The third component is the Land Use Table, which now reflects
Recycling Center, Recycling collection Station and Recycling
Collection Station (Limited). What is being proposed is a
recycling center allowed by a Special Use Permit in the Industrial
Park Zone and allowed outright in the Industrial General Zone. The
Recycling Collection Station would be allowed with a Special Use
Permit in a General Business, Shopping, Industrial Park and
Industrial General Zone. The Recycling Collection Station
(Limited) would be allowed virtually anywhere. The Planning
Commission has recommended to Council approval of those kinds of
facilities outright in all zones. Mr. Hough noted Council may want
to reconsider that particular point based on some comments about
whether or not they would be appropriate in all zones. He pointed
out the City recently approved a Recycling Collection Station about
two months ago in a General Business Zone on Kitsap Way. As of this
date, there has not been a request for an appeal on that proposal
and he views this as a test case.
Mr. Winters questioned Mr. Hough's comments regarding the "test
case" application? Mr. Hough stated it was not designed to be a
test case, but it is a test of the proposed design standards, which
is the first time they have been applied to an actual Special Use
Permit. Mr. Winters asked if the City had received applications
for such facilities prior to the Kitsap Way facility? Mr. Houqh
stated not to his knowledge. He has talked with people about
putting recycling facilities in other zones, but those were denied
TAPE #1361
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 16 of 19
because they were not allowed in those particular zones. Mr.
Montgomez7 asked the zoning designation and if any restrictions
were place on the Kitsap Way recycling facility? Mr. Hough stated
it is a recycling Collection Station with a Special Use Permit
under General Business.
The following comments were made by the individuals listed:
Elizabeth Buell, High Avenue; Tom Trigqs, 700 D Werner Road; John
Thomas; James Castle, 3415 Mathews Drive W.; (1) If the citizens of
Bremerton have to pay Brem-Air Disposal for recycling we don't need
recycling centers. (2) There is a need for a place to dispose of
cardboard and other recyclable materials not already collected by
Brem-Air. (3) Concerned such a facility will draw mice and rats.
(4) According to current City ordinances, no permit should be
issued for a recycling center in the City. (5) Under current City
law every recycling container in the City of Bremerton is illegal
by the Land Use Table. (6) The City telling a business they must
shut off their security lights at 8:00 P.M., is inviting thieving.
(7) Special Use Permits in Industrial Park Zone is another ticket
to "procrastination and infringement on freedom" by Planning
Department when a developer tries to fit a recycling facility
within the City. (8) The proposed ordinance is a way to get
recycling business back in Bremerton. (9) Recycling Centers should
not be located in residential areas. (10) Because the City's
process for issuing a Special Use Permit took so long, the
developers of the proposed recycling center on Kitsap Way lost
their site and must now reapply for a different location. (11) A
lot of the misconception about cleanliness of recycling centers
came about when absentee owners took over Peninsula Recycling.
(12) Did not want a recycling center located in a residential area.
Mr. Hough stated in response to Mr. Castle's questions about how
long it would take to start over the permit process, Mr. Castle has
an active Administrative approved Special Use Permit, which
required the surrounding property owners to sign off on the request
and would be usable within a year. In response to Mr. Triggs
comments about the lighting between 8:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. applied
only to residential areas. If that facility was located in an
Industrial Park Zone or a Commercial Zone, those standards would
not apply, i.e., lights could be left on all night, closing time
would be not limited to 8:00 P.M.
Mr. Fart stated he supports recycling and wants to see it brought
back into the City. Responses from his constituents have been in
support of having a drop off site for recyclable items. He
strongly disagreed with the proposal to allow recycling center
stations in residential neighborhoods. He believed there are
abundant zones where such facilities can be placed without bringing
them into the residential neighborhoods.
TAPE #1361
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 17 of 19
Mr. Colvin stated he is in support of having a recycling center in
Bremerton, but not in residential neighborhoods; and he was
concerned about the possibility of such areas being littered with
debris and garbage. Mr. ~ouqh stated if Council wanted to exclude
residential neighborhoods, then Recycling Center Station (Limited)
should be removed from the first four categories on the Land Use
Table or any others that might be objectionable.
Mr. Winters thanked Mr. Castle for providing the opportunity to
recycle when he owned Peninsula Recycling Center. He questioned,
how did the decision to allow location of recycling centers across
the board on the Land Use Table get through the Operations
Committee?. He expressed emphatically that common sense would have
told him that there are certain areas that certain zoning and items
should be allowed. A few months ago, he was contacted by residents
of a mobile home park about their having to pay for dumpster
service in their park as well as being billed individually,
including the cost of recycling. He supports making changes to
allow entrepreneurs to pursue the freedom of being in business, but
in the right places and under the right conditions. He also
acknowledged the importance of lighting as a safety issue and felt
that standard needed rethinking because of the benefit derived by
the business owner and surrounding area. He expressed concern over
how the City has dealt with Brem-Air over the years; however that
is another issue. He also felt the City had been very slow in
bringing the proposed change forward. Mr. Montqomer¥ stated in
answer to Mr. Winters earlier question, the Committee does not make
changes on issues prior to presentation before the full Council.
The committee can make recommendations and it was the their
decision to recommend that the issue be presented to the full
Council as presented instead of being sent back to the Planning
Commission or Planning staff. Mr. Winters stated his question is
how did we get to the point before it came to Committee? Mr. Houqh
explained Planning staff saw drop or collection station as limited
to a small scale for aluminum cans, paper, etc., which would be
minor facilities that could be accommodated fairly easy within
neighborhoods, almost as an accessory to a neighborhood. And, it
may be an alternative to curb side pick up some time in the future,
or it may be useful to pick up items that are not picked up as part
of the curb side recycling program. Such a facility could be a
small dumpster placed on a corner or alley. But, they concluded
design guidelines were needed in order to have control and not just
leave it wide open. It is a liberal beginning, but if Council
desires they can trim it back to selective areas.
TAPE #1362
Mayor morton reminded Councilman Winters that she has very
professional staff members and they go through a process with the
TAPE #1362
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 18 of 19
staff, Council and in some instances with the community. Mr.
Winters had an ample opportunity to raise his question with Mr.
Hough as to how he got through the process developing this issue
and she saw no reason for him or any other Council member or anyone
else at a City Council meeting to try and embarrass any staff
member, Council member or anyone else. She resented the
implication that the staff is incompetent.
Mr. McConnell asked why are the proposed standards mandatory, but
applied voluntarily? Mr. Hough explained the standards would be
required for any recycling collection station open to the public,
and are voluntary for any collection station that is exempt from
those regulations, such as on-premise collection facilities for a
large apartment complex, mobile home park, business complex, etc.
Mr. McConnell asked if a commercial Recycling Collection Station
(Limited) could be set up in all of the designated areas. Mr.
~ouqh stated yes, it doesn't specify if it is commercial,
organizational, or a private operation. Mr. McConnell questioned
why can't a collection station be allowed outright in an Industrial
Park area? Mr. ~ough stated Recycling Collection Station (Limited)
is allowed outright in all zones because it comes with design
guidelines. The recycling collection station that is not limited
is the one they want to look at more closely.
Mrs. ~uff-Menees stated she felt there was an unfortunate over
reaction to the issue of this use in a residential area. She
reminded everyone that we have had a very successful recycling drop
off center up against a residential area and the entire residential
area and surrounding residential areas were saddened to see it
relocated to a distant industrial site. It is not as though this
is some outrageous idea that was inappropriate utilized in this
situation.
Mr. Overson pointed out an example of a limited recycling operation
located between 5th and 6th Street at an apartment complex, which
appears to be working without any visible problems.
President Law raised the question what would happen if a Special
Use Permit was used for Recycling Center Station (Limited) within
the first four areas on the Land Use Table? Mr. ~o~qh stated it
would require a permit process that is more substantial than would
be allowed otherwise. If the zoning area has an "A" designation,
it would require a site plan review. A Special Use Permit could be
handled administratively, but is a little more detailed and
provides more notice to the surrounding property owners and it may
go to the Planning Commission if someone registers an objection.
The Special Use Permit process allows public input ahead of time
and the allowed outright process allows public input through an
appeal process.
#0207
TAPE #1362
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 28, 1996
Page 19 of 19
M/S/C/U(McConnell/Montgomery) to approve ordinance on first
reading, with the following modification to the Land Use Table:
delete use in SF-1, SF-2, SF-3 and DR, MF, CBR, MR and HD allowed
with a Special Use Permit and all other zones be allowed usage; to
amend the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance to better accommodate
recycling facilities and amending Chapter 21.02 of the Bremerton
Municipal Code.
Mr. OYerson strongly urged non passage of the motion as presented
by Mr. McConnell. He supports the proposal as presented by staff
and if there is any intent to vary from what is proposed, an
amendment should be presented, not a rewrite of the ordinance.
Mrs. Huff-Menees supported Mr. Overson's position and reminded
Council this item was unanimously approved by the Planning
Commission.
Vote on motion:
Motion carried.
In Favor: Colvin, Winters, Farr, Montgomery,
McConnell, Law
Opposed: Overson, Neville, Huff-Menees
With no further business meeting adjourned at 8:50 P.M..
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
JOHN E. LAW, Council President
City of Bremerton
KLM/JL/me
cc: Normal Distribution
File/Vault
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT:
Appointment to the Parks and
Recreation Commission
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
March 20, 1996
Executive
Mayor Horton
March 14~. 1996
2. ~: (comment on back
if necessary)
3. ~:
Application for Appointment
ENDORSEMENT ~ INFORMATION
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PR~T~EN~TFOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUM~4ARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
There is a vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Commission and it is
recon%mended Lionel Collins, Sr. be appointed to fill the vacancy.
8. RECOMMENDATIQN:
Motion to confirm the appointment of Lionel Collins, Sr. to the
Parks and Recreation Commission.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
AMENDED
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
N/A
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Less than full membership
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OT~$R RESOURCES:
N/A
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
N/A
CITY OF BREIVIERTON
APPLICATION FOR ~TY BOARDS/COMMISSIONS/COMMITTEE
NOTE:
As an applicant for a City Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and
telephone number will be available to the press and public. You will be contacted before
any action is taken on your appointment.
(Please type or print clearly)
NAME: LIONEL COLI.INS, SK.
HOME ADDRESS: 2016 NORTH CAMBRIAN AVENUE
BREMERTON,WA. 98317
DATE:2-. '2.8 - 0b
PHONE: (360)'/92-2294 (H)
(360)4?8-5025 (W)
OCCUPATION: CAY, PUS SEC[!RIT'F- Bremerton Junior High School
EDUCATION: GHA'DUA"£'E OF CLINTON HIGH SC, HOOL, CLIN'["ON, L,A.
PROFESSIONAL/COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES:
ETHNIC RI'~AT,I'F¥~,.
V()[,U!>;TEER }"O1~ SAFE ~ ....... ~ .... , , ,,~;,
oIRE,EF,~,BOARD C,F ADVISORS FOR YOUTH VO~,UNiE~,R CORPE, N.A.A.C. P
LOCAL REFERENCES (name & phone number):
HENRY
I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON (please check one or more):
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
Disability Action Committee ( )/
Civil Service Commission (18 yrs. & older)
Urban Forest Committee ( )
Cable Communications Advisory Committee (
I
Community Development Block Grant ( )
Advisory Committee ( )
Youth Council (
Safe Streets Steering Committee ( )
Planning Commission (18 yrs. & older)
Parks & Recreation Commission
Ethics Commission
Parking Advisory Board
Solid Waste Management
BremerLon Housing Authority
Board of Appeals, Housing/Building Codes
Special Committees as needed
Is this an application for reappointment? /'?~
If yes, how many years have', you served on this commission/committee?
PLEASE RETURN TO:
Mayor's Office
239 4th Street
Bremerton, WA
98337
Signature
Applications be reviewed periodically to determine continued availability.
information may be put on back.
Additional pertinent
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT:
Reappointment to the Parks and
Recreation Commission
FOR AGENDA OF: March
ORIGINATING DEPT: Executiv~
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
(comment on back'
if necessary)
3. ~:
Application for Appointment
ENDORSEMENT )~ I~RMATION __
APPROVED BY COUNCIL P~E_~NT FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
Carol Johnson's term on the Parks and Recreation Commission.
recommended she be appointed to another term.
It is
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to confirm the appointment of Carol Johnson to another term
on the Parks and Recreation Commmission.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE'
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
AMENDED
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: _
N/A
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Less than full membership on the Parks and Recreation Commission
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EOUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
N/A
7. RESEARCH SQURCES:
N/A
RE-APPOINTMENT __
C I TY OF B RE M E R T O N
APPLICATION FOR CITY BOARDS/GOM]~IS$IONS/COMMITTEE
NOTE: As an applicant for a City Board, Commission or Committee,
your name, address, and telephone number will be available
to the press and the public. You will be contacted before
any action is taken on your appointment.
(Please type or print clearly)
Z -3
DATE:
TELE:
(If ret/red please indicate f6rme~ccupation/profess~.~n)
PROFES ACTIVITZES: I~ Q~ ~ 3 ~ cc ~
ADD,ITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION~EFERENC~ .~ ~
Please return to: I am interes ed in serving on the:~VV
(Please check one or more)
City of Bremer~on ( ) Planning Commission
239 Fourth Street
Bremer~0n, WA 98310 (~) Park Board
Signat Da're~ · .
) Civil Service Commission
) Housing Authority Board
) Cable C~,,,runi ca t ions
Advisory Coami t tee
(Applications will be
reviewed periodically
to determine continued
availability.)
) Handicapped Action Committee
) Ethics Commission
) Library Board
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: CPG COMPOSTING
PARKS WASTE PILOT
PROJECT
FOR AGENDA OF: March 2Q, 1996
ORIGINATING DEFT: Parks & Recreation
ORIGINATOR: Jim Spencer, Dir.
DATE SUBMITTED: March 12. 1996
2. CLEARANCES: (Co,BfLent on back
Parks
City Treasurer
Fiscal & Budget
Operations
ENDORSEMENT X INFORMATION
MAYOR
o
EXHIBITS:
1. Budget Adjustment Request
2. Letter from Mayor Horton to
Kitsap County Dept. Public Wks.
3. Project Task Description
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESI FOR SUBMITTAL:
4. SU~WARY STATEM~NTAND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The City has been awarded a $9,000 Coordinated Prevention Grant (CPG) for a
pilot project for Park yard and brush waste composting. Yard and brush waste
would be collected, composted, and returned to benefit City parks and land.
Three enclosures (approximately 18' x 18' and 6' high), with drainage and air
holes, would be located within Stephenson Canyon, for this purpose. The
action before the City Council is approval of the grant.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize and direct the Mayor to accept the CPG funds
for the establishment of a composting Parks yard waste project and approve
the associated budget adjustment.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Tom Cressman
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Jim Spencer
EXPIRATION DATE:December 30. 1996
REVIEW DATE: N/A
P~L~ T~L~
COUNCIL DIRECTI~:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL #_
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
The CPG provides the opportunity to promote Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management Plan goals. It provides the start-up capital needed to implement
the program. Refusal of CPG support dollars would table this pro-active,
enviroranentally -kind re-use of natural plant byproducts.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EOUIPMENT OR OTHER R~SO{/RCES
Minimal impact to staff to initiate the program. Existing equipment will be
used for shredding, bulldozing, and air compression. A budget adjustment and
assignment of a project number for the Parks Maintenance section is
necessary.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
N/A
Requesting Department:
C "Y OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
GENERAL FUND - PARKS DEPT.
NO,
96-9
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Description
COORDINATED PREVENTION
GRANT
Amount
9,000
USE OF FUNDS:
Description
Amount
COMPOST FACILITY CONSTRUCITON
9,000
NARRATIVE:
This adjustment will provide for the use of a Coordinated Prevention Grant to construct a composting facility
for use by the Park Dept.
Department Head Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Date
gnature"'~~
3 /,~
Date
.[~;~--Recommended ~-~
Mayor Comments:
Treasurer's Sig~'~ture ! ~ -
~ Recommended ~-~ Not Recommended
r--] Approved r---] Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
Mayor's Signature
Date
Recommended
Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
F~s~cal & Bud'~et'Com~iffee Signature
Date
LYNN S. HORTON, Mayor
239 4th Street · Bremerton, 'vVA 983:37 · (:360) 478-$266 . FAX (:360) 478-$883
August '25,' 1995
Mr. Dave Peters
l~tsap County Department of Public Works
614 Division Street MS-27
Port Orchard, WA' 98366-4699
RE: 1996-199'7 CPG COMPOSTING PARKS YARD WASTE PILOT PROJECT
Mr. Peters,
In support of Kitsap County's promotion of the Cgmpr&he~sive SolM waste. 'Management Plan
goals, its ongoing efforts to raise awareness and redude solid. ,~aste',' while recognizing the
county's population concentration in Bremerton; we suggest including a Parks' Yard and Brush
Waste Composting Pilot program in the unified 1996-97 Coordinated Prevention Grant application.
This would be modeled after the composting program at Olympic College, in that yard and brush
waste from City parks would be collected, composted, and returned to benefit City parks and
lands. It would use additional, semi-permanent ecology blocks for three enclosures approximately
18'x 18' and 6' high modeled after the main yard's storage enclosures, but with drainage and air
access holes created by block placement.
The City will assure a site, (current ~ndept-is a~jac~nt to the' forthcoming tree nursery at
St~p~en~on ~Canyon.'Y~d);:current :.sl~redding,: .buildOzin.q, and-aJr'co'mpres~ion.equipment
needed~ct~rreht .P~s.!staff to attend~c~._.rnposting efforts, deliver-raw matefials,~'and prioritize
~~n. ds~'.would be used for site prepar.aUon'~,vhich' could include .pile enclosures,
ventilation system,'drainage system, tarping, and additional facii".it;y improvements for permitting
(api~f6~mately .$9,00~.).' '"
Th~Oo'u.~ty~vbbid. ri'e. ed.to'~otdihat~'d_ata. ~lle'ction. a~i repbrting need~ for'6-ubi ards diverted:
Th~s ~s.to codfirm thatthe City'~s'.mteres.ted m purs.u, mgth~s,projebt' and working wit.'_h the County
to ass~r~'~~Se'.coverage forits-~r8g~am§-and:pr~tihg'the. Comprehensive' Solid Waste
No. ~
Prevention Gra~t
A~reement with Kksap County
Expected Oute. ornesflmpacts:
The RECIPIENT hopes to see an increase in eon~tmction, demolition, and land clearing w-~ste
recycling and a decre~e ~ the amount of construction, demolition, and land clea~g xva~te that is
land-filled.
PRO,TECT TASK: (WI~RC) WASTE I~EDUCTION AND RECYCLING - CAPITAL
..M. aximum Eligible Cost: $25,300
Schedule; January 1, 1996 to December 31, 1997
Goal State~. e~t:
The $o~1 ofthi~ project i$ tO site a new recycling drop box station ~ the ciW of Bremerton to incre~e the
number of commodities ¢ollectefl; to provide sm~ll businesses a convenient place to recycle; and to provide
a location for collection ofwhlte goods md used motor oil for recycling.
?r~ect Description:
The R~C~I~NT will construct a new recycling drop box etation to ~erve the need~ of Bremerton and
nearby county residents. The RECIPIE'NT will carry out modifications, including fencing, leveling, a~d
concrete slabs for collection ofwhi~e gcxxis and used motor off. A con~ractor will be retained by
si~es will be deweloped by the RECIPient' for composing ve§eLa~on originating ~tom city ~ .._]
p~rks. _. ' -
Expected Ouw. omeq, flmpac+.s:
h is hoped that the drop station will provide city and nearby county residerits and businesses with a place to
recycle more commodides than m'e currently available throu.~h the curbs!de recycli~ ~ro.~xn.. The
'-C~aC~mmenmmP°dm~d~m_~.enstin' pr°grara is designed t° divert Park 'maerated wartes f~°m the landfill' ~hile the f'ree s°il ~)
t produced fix~m compostkng ~vill save the city some money_ff -~
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Supplemental Police Service
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF BREKERTON AND BREMERTON
HOUSING AUTHORITY
FOR AGENDA OF: 3-20-96
ORIGINATING DEPT: Police
ORIGINATOR: Paul Du Fr~n¢
DATE SUBMITTED: 3-14-96
2. CLEARANCES:
(comment on back
if necessary)
EXHIBITS: See Attached
ENDORSEME?~Tc~,v. INFOBY~TIO~__/ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESI~q~-~FOR~~SUBMITTAL:
MAYOR ~ /d. ~ )~ COUNCIL PRESIDENT Q-_~//~-"-~"
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL 4~V~ON:
Request approval for the Mayor to sign an Inter/Local agreement for
Supplemental Police Services for the Bremerton Housing Authority and approval
of a General Fund Budget Adjustment Request related to this agreement.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that CounCil approve.
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE: 3-31-97
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TkBLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10.
APPROVED
DATE:
NOTICE OF ACTION
DISAPPROVED
11. AGENDA BILL N~: q~-~)5~
CLEARANCE COMMENTS (cont.):
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (cont./ :
Se
IMPACT ON NON-PASSAgE:
Services will not be provided
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EOUIPMENT OR OTHER RESQURCES
Funding provided will cover actual personnel cost. Minor additional
cost will be absorbed in Department budget.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is between the CITY OF BREMERTON, by and through the BREMERTON POLICE
DEPARTMENT ("Cxamact~'), a law enforceanem ageacy of the State of Washington with jurisdiction over the
relevant geographical area, and THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON ("BHA"),
a municipal corporation organized under RCW 35.82, et seq.
I. RECITALS
A. BHA operates a low-income housing area, commonly referred to as Westpark; and
Bo
Westpark contains 582 low-income households and comprises a geographic area of
approximately 74 acres; and
Co
The incidence of criminal activity within Westpark substantially exceeds the level of activity in
surrounding locales and requires supplemental law enforcement services; and
Do
Contractor is willing to provide supplemental law enforcement services on a contractual basis
but within the scope of its general law enforcement responsibilities as a police authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual benefit to be derived herefrom, the adequacy of
which is acknowledged by each party's auflmfized agent affixing his o~ her signature hereto, the parties now make
and enter into the following:
II. AGREEMENTS
AG
SCOPE. Police officers funded by and assigned to the Housing Authority of the City of
Bremerton are responsible for the delivery of supplemental police services to the residents of
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 1
03/96 ~uplawen. doc
the Westpark Development. Specifically, officers are expected to work as community police
officers, including the duties and responsibilities described in Attachment A and B.
One (1) community Police Officer assigned to Westpark forty (40) hours per week.
BI-IA to specify the hours.
Part time service with police car exclusively at Westpark for sixteen (16) hours, Fridays
and Saturdays, 5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.
Baseline Services, regular services afforded to all other residents of the City of
Bremerton to include investigative services.
TERM. Services shall comanence April 1, 1996, and shall terminate on March 31, 1997, unless
extended by agreement of the parties.
C. COMPENSATION.
Cost of one new hire to replace assigned patrol officer ~ $46,373.00 includes wages
and benefits with vacations and holidays for 2,096 hours of work per year, plus 832
hours of overtime coverage ~ $35.00 per hour maximum, or $29,120.00, for a total
of $75,493.00 per year. Baseline service is at no additional cost during the term of this
agreement. No additional comlx~afion above the hourly patrol rate will bo paid for
court appeammes, coordinating conferences or other time demands arising from patrol
services.
Cars and Equipment. The charges set out in paragraph 1. preceding include all
compensation for cars, gasoline, repair and equipment provided by Contractor.
Contractor will provide BHA with an itemized billing for services within ten (10) days
following the end of each calendar month during which services are provided. BHA
shall pay for such services within twenty (20) days of receiving the bill.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 2
03/96
mplawemdoc
35'
REPORTS AND INFORMATION ACCESS. Contractor agrees that BHA will have
unrestricted acc~s to all public information which in any way deals with criminal activity in
Westpark and which is disclosable pursuant to RCW 10.97, 42.17 and any other laws pertaining
to the disclosure of public records. This information will be provided at no cost by Contractor
upon BHA's request and will be in addition to daily activity reports.
REASSIGNMENT. BHA shall have the right to reasonably request Contractor to replace any
assigned personnel for the following reasons:
1. Neglect or non-performance of duties;
2. Disorderly conduct, use of abusive or offensive language, or fighting;
3. Criminal activity;
Selling, consuming, possessing or being under the influence of intoxicants, including
alcohol or illegal substances, while on assignment at Westpark;
5. Inadequate punctuality or attendance; or
6. Substantiated complaints from public housing residents or management.
BHA shall provide written enumeration of the reasons for the request for replacement of the
assigned personnel, including documentation and witnesses to the alleged behaviors.
Fo
ADMINISTRATION. Paul L. Du Fresne, Chief, is designated as Contractor's representative
and Merrill Wallace II, the Executive Director of the Housing Authority of the City of
Bremerton, is designated as BHA's representative for administration of this contract.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 3
03/96
suplawen, doc
NOTICES. Ail notices to be given by either of the parties hereto to the other part3~ shall be in
v~ritmg and may either be delivered personally or may be deposited in the United States Mail,
postage prepaid, as either certified or regular mail, addressed to:
Merrill Wallace II
Housing Authority. of the City.
of Bremerton
P.O. Box 4460
Bremerton, WA 98312
Paul L. Du Fresne, Chief
Bremerton Police Department
239 Fourth Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
or to such other respective addresses as either party, may fi.om time to time designate in writing
Notices sent by mail shall be deemed to have been given when properly mailed; the postmark
affixed by the United States Post Office shall be conclusive evidence of the date of mailing.
HOLD HARMLESS. The "Contractor" agrees to defend and mdemni~' and hold harmless
the "BHA", its appointed and elected officers and employees, from and against any and all
liability., loss, costs, damage, and expense, including costs and attomey fees m defense thereof,
because of actions, claims or lawsuits for damages resulting fi.om personal or bodily injury,
including death at anytime resulting therefrom, sustained or alleged to have been sustained by
any person or persons, and on account of damage to property, arising or alleged to have risen
directly or indirectly out of or in consequence of the negligent performance of this Agreement,
whether such injuries to persons or damage to property is due to the negligence of the
"Contractor", its subcontractors, its agents or assigns. If, however, the negligence of both the
"BI-IA" and"Contractor" is judicially found to be the cause of such damage or injury, the loss,
cost, or expense will be shared in proportion to the relative degree of negligence of each.
NONDISCRIMINATION. Contractor hereby certifies that it is an equal opportunity
employer and has developed and implemented an Affmnative Action Program in accordance
with the guidelines contained in Revised Order 4 of the United States Department of Labor.
Both parties agree that they will not discriminate in any manner against any employee or
applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, marital
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 4
03/96
suplawe~.doc
disability, except for employment actions based on a bonafide occupational qualification. Such
action includes, but is not limited to, employment, upgrading, layoff or termination, rates of pay
or other forms of compensation, or selection for training.
Jo
TERMINATION. This Agreement tea f.linates automatically on March 31, 1997; however, if
either party fails to substantially perform through no fault of the other and does not commence
correction within five (5) days after written notice of the default and moves to diligently
complete the correction thereafk-x, this Agreement is terminated upon a further ten (10) days'
written notice.
K. EXAMINATION AND RETENTION OF CONTRACTOR'S RECORDS.
BHA, HUD, or Comptroller General of the United States or any of their duly
authorized representatives shall, until three (3) years after final payment under this
contract, have access to and the right to examine any of the Contractor's directly
peflJnent books, documents, papers, or other records involving transactions related to
this contract which are otherwise disclosable pursuant to public disclosure laws,
including RCW 42.17 and RCW 10.97 for the purpose ofmaking audits, examinations,
excerpts and transcriptions.
The Contractor agrees to include in first-tier subcontracts under this contract a clause
substantially the same as paragraph 1. above. "Subcontract," as used in this section,
excludes purchase orders not exceeding $10,000.00
o
The periods of access and examination in paragraphs 1. and 2. above are for records
relating to: a) litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this
contract; or b) costs and expenses of this contract to which BHA, HUD or Comptroller
General or any of their duly authorized representatives has taken exception shall
continue until disposition of such appeals, litigation, claims, or exceptions.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE
03/96
suplawen, doe
Lo
LIMITATIONS ON PAYMENTS MADE TO INFLUENCE CERTAIN FEDERAL
FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS.
The Contractor agrees to comply with Section 1352 of Title 31, United States Code
("the Act") which proh~oits tl~ use of Federal appropriated funds to pay any l~xson for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member
of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with any of the following covered Federal actions: The
awarding of any federal contract; the making of any Federal grant; the making of any
Federal loan; the catering into of any cooperative agreement; or the modification of any
Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement.
The Contractor further agrees to comply with the requirement of the Act to furnish a
disclosure of any funds other than Federal appropriated funds (including profit or fee
received under a covered Federal transaction) that have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing ca' attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency,
a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Con~ in connection with a Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative
agreement.
APPLICABLE LAW; VENUE. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of th~ State of Washington. In the ~vent of a dispute, such dispute
shall be litigated in the Sup~ior Court of thc State of Washington for Kit.sap County.
No
ENTIRE AGRF~F~MENT. This contract ecnstitutes the entire Agreement between the parties.
Any modifications or amendments shall be in writing and shall be signed by each party.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 6
03/96
suplawen, doc
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON
DATED:
BY:
MERRILL WALLACE H
Executive Director
CITY OF BREMERTON
DATED:
DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL:
BY:
LYNN S. HORTON
Mayor
PAUL L. Du FRESNE, Chief of Police
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
[AN R. SIEVERS, City Attorney
RECEIVED FOR FILINO:
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 7
03/96
suplawen, doc
HOUSING AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON
SUPPLEMENTAL POLICE SERVICES
(ATTACHMENT A)
POSITION DESCRIPTION
Police officers funded by and assigned to the Housing Authority of the City of Brernerton are responsible for the
delivery of supplemental police services to the residents of Westpark Development. Specifically, officers are
expected to work as community policing officers, including performing the following duties and responsibilities:
Respond to all calls, both emergency and non-emergency in nature, involving the Westpark
Development and residents, and follow guidelines as stated in Attachment B.
Engage in proactive policing strategies; develop and maintain rapport with Westpark residents, thus
fostering an atmosphere of cooperation, compassion, coordination, peace and order within the
Westpark Development.
Encourage residents to report any and all suspicious or criminal activities as well as
suspected/observed abuse or neglect of people, animals or property.
Assist victims and homeless people, referring them to other agencies, when appropriate, for further
assistance.
Periodically engage in walking or bicycle patrols throughout the shift in all public areas of the
Westpark Development to deter disorder or crime.
Work with youth in the Westpark Development to help them understand and comply with laws and
regulations.
Work with the Bremerton Housing Authority and residents to help clean up the Westpark
Development, including removal of graffiti, trash and debris.
o
Work with Bremeaon Housing Authority managers and resident councils to develop crime prevention
programs, resident patrols and youth-oriented programs.
Make presentations and speeches to resident organizations and groups, as assigned.
10.
Remain alert to the emergency needs of residents and visitors and take the appropriate action to
protect life and property.
ll.
Development and maintain a working knowledge ofjudicial and criminal law in the areas of: self-
incrimination; right to counsel; arrest; search and seizure; interrogation and confession; and the
collection and preservation of evidence.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 8
03/96
~uplawe~doe
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
Investigate the activities of suspicious persons as encountered or upon resident complaint using
standard police techniques and in conformance with legal requirements to determine the identity,
activity and reason for the presence of the suspicious person or persons.
Deliver citations for violations of Bremerton Housing Authority regulations as well as vehicle and
local ordinances in conformance with legal requirements and police department policies and
procedures.
Direct vehicle traffic as required to ensure the safe, orderly flow oftraffc.
Serve warrants or summonses in confm with legal requirements and police department policies
and procedures in order to comply with court orders.
Interrogate suspects in accordance with legal requirements and police department policies and
procedures using standard interrogation techniques and strategies.
Search individuals and their personal property prior to taking them into custody in compliance with
legal requirements and police department policies and procedures using standard police search
techniques to ensure the safety of the officer, other police department personnel, arrested persons, and
the residents.
Incarcerate arrested persons as required in accordance with legal requirements and police department
policies and procedures using standard police techniques in order to detain arrested persons pending
further investigation and/or processing through the criminal justice system.
Assist in the securing of crime scenes and in the gathering and processing of evidence.
Promptly and properly prepare and submit the required daily reports to the Housing Authority of the
City of Bremerton and the police department on each shift.
Enforce towing of abandoned or stolen vehicles.
Counsel juvenile and adult residents, refaxing them to the appropriate persons or agencies for further
assistance.
Assist other police officers, as appropriate; accept and adhere to lawful direction and orders issued
by a superior officer.
Assist prosecuting attorney(s) and the Bremerton Housing Authority attorney(s) in the preparation
of court cases and, as required, testify at judicial trials and hearings.
Maintain a professional decorum and attitude in all dealings with residents, visitors, superiors and
other department personnel; conduct personal life in a manner that sets a positive example for
residents, especially youths.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 9
03/96
suplawen, doc
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Operate a vehicle (to be supplied by the police department) within assigned geographic area at the
direction of a supervisor or at own discretion according to standard police techniques and strategies
in order to deter and detect criminal activity.
Operate closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras and monitors in the Westpark Housing
Development, as required, for the purpose of deterring criminal activity and arresting violators.
Attend training courses, as assigned, to increase and enhance professional knowledge, skills and
ability.
Maintain liaison with all law enforcemem officers, Bi-exaerton Housing Authority officials and related
agencies' personnel to exchange information and facilitate cooperative efforts.
Work in an overtime status as required by the Bremerton Housing Authority Executive Director.
Provide any service necessary to further the Bremerton Housing Authority's mission and objectives
that is not restricted by legal or police deparUnent policy.
Perform other law enforcement duties as assigned.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 10
03/96
~uplawen. doc
HOUSING AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON
SUPPLEMENTAL POLICE SERVICES
(ATTACHMENT B)
RCW 59.18.075
Seizure of Hlegal Drugs -- Notification of Landlord
Any law enforcement agency which seizes a legend drug pursuant to a violation of chapter 69.41
RCW, a con~xolled substance pursuant to a violation of chapter 69.50 RCW, or an imitation
controlled substance pursuant to a violation of chapter 69.52 RCW, shall make a reasonable attempt
to discover the identity of the landlord and shall notify the landlord in writing at the last address listed
on the property tax records and at any other address known to the law enforcement agency of the
seizure and the location of the seizure of the illegal drugs or substances.
Any law enforcement agency which arrests a tenant for threatening another tenant with a firearm or
other deadly weapon, or for some other unlawful use of a firearm or other deadly weapon on the rental
premises, or for physically assaulting another person on the rental premises shall make a reasonable
attempt to discover the identity of the landlord and notify the landlord about the arrest in writing at
the last address listed in the property tax records and at any other address known to the law
enforcement agency.
(1991 ¢38 &4; 1988¢ 150& 11.)
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 11
03/96
suplawen, doc
Requesting Department:
C ¥ OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
GENERAL FUND - POLICE DEPT.
No. 96-8
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
INCREASE:
CONTRACT REVENUE
Amount
56,620
USE OF FUNDS:
Description
INCREASE:
PERSONNEL COSTS
Amount
56,620
NARRATIVE:
This adjustment will provide for the creation of one additional Police Officer position effective Apdl 1, 1996
and provide funding for that position and additional overtime sufficient to provide the services specified in
the contract between the City and Bremerton Housing Authority.
Department Head Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Date
Director Signature
Date
Recommended
Mayor Comments:
Not Recommended
Treasurer's Signature
Recommended [-~ Not Recommended
Approved ~--~ Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
M a~ure~' /~~
y S'g
Date
~ Recommended
~-~ Approved
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature Date
CITY OF BREMERTON
DEPARTMENT: Police
FUND: General 001-20
DEPARTMENT FUNCTION
The Chief of Police and ail officers under his immediate direction and command are tasked with the performance of
functions including but not limited to: executing all processes issued by the Municipal Court Judge or any committing
:magistrate of the City; making arrests, as a peace officer may do under the laws of the State of Washington, for
breach of the peace and for commission of a crime or misdemeanor; maintaining correct records of all arrests made;
and performing other duties as provided by ordinance.
COMMUNITY RESOURCE DIVISION:
The function of this Division is to reduce the circumstances under which crime occurs through community involvement
social intervention and opportunity programs using the coordinated services of the Crime Prevention,
D.A.R.E.IG.R.E.A.T. and other programs. Advocate for youth-focused school site prevention programs to increase
community involvement and expanded support.
OPERATIONS DIVISION:
The Operations Division is responsible for twenty-four hour patrols and call-for service response capabilities. In addition
the function of this Division includes but is not limited to: traff'm enforcement and safety education; criminal investigations;
enforcement of the criminal codes of the City and the State; arrests; and call-for-service responses. In general, the
Operations Division is the front line for ensuring citizens that Bremerton is a safe community in which to live.
SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION:
The Support Services Division encompasses units of work that support the other Divisions of the Police Department.
These units of work are: General Investigations, Special Operations Group, Records management, Parking
Enforcement/Animal Control, and general administration. The Support Services Division ensures that all units of work
within the Department work toward common goals in a coordinated fashion.
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
1994 1995 1996
DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ~ BUDGIE3
Ending Working Capital
Person riel 3,956,083 4,112,908 4,439,173
Supplies & Services 802,252 747,750 739,277
Taxes 347,987 369,402 414,417
Capital Outlay 18,322 27,590
Operating Transfers
Debt Service
TOTAL 5,124,644 5,257,650 5,592,867
1
STAFFING AUTHORIZATION -
POSITION
Police Chief
Police Captain
Police Lieutenant
Police Sergeant
Police Officer (Investigations)
Police Offmer (Detective)
Police Officer (Gambling/SlU)
Police Officer (Community Resources)
Police Officer (Crime Scene)
Police Officer (Crime Prevention)
Police Officer
Community Resources Manager
Warrant Server
Department Secretary
Office Assistant Senior
Office Assistant II
Office Supervisor
Animal Control Officer
Traffic Safety Coordinator
i TOTAL STAFFING
1994
ACTUAL
1
2
0
10
0
5
4
0
2
1
38
0
3
1
7
2
1
2.5
80.5
1995
1
2
3
7
0
5
4
0
2
1
37
1
3
1
7
0
1
2.5
--.
78.5
1996
BUDGET
1
2
3
7
12
0
0
3
2
0
32,75
1
3
1
7
0
1
2.50
79.25
2
ADMINISTRATION 521.1020
Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
CHIEF'S OFFICE 521.1120
Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
FTE
INVESTIGATION 521.2120
Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Oullay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
FTE
PATROL 521.2220
Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPEN DITU RES
FTE
SPECIAL UNITS 521.2320
Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
CRIME SCENES 521.2420
Personnel
Suppr~es & Services
Capital Oullay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
FTE
GAMBMNG/NARCOTIC$ 521.2520
Pemonnel
Supplies & Sewices
Cap~ ou'a~y
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
RESERVE UNIT 521.2620 Pemonnel
Supplies & Sewices
Cap~t~ Out~y
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
COMMUNITY RESOURCES 521.3020
Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capita[Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
TRAINING 521.4020 Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
TRAFFIC UNIT 521.7020 Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
FTE
POLICE DEPARTMENT
BUDGET BREAKDOWN
1994
ACTUAL
465,245
95,525
560,770
99,489
99,897
359,497
7,983
367,480
1,864,197
125,141
1,989,338
0
10,096
10,096
98.502
12,240
110,742
275,979
12,819
288,798
51,601
23,220
o
74,821
0
43,983
1 59,238
51
1 59,289
1995
457,280
95,087
552,367
10.0
120,306
0
120,306
2.0
18,403
427,983
7.0
1,952,173
88,650
2,040,823
38.0
0
13,062
13,062
109,605
14,170
123,775
2.0
276,518
12,625
289,143
5.0
0
2,000
2,000
54,757
23,635
78,392
1.0
0
48,550
48,550
162,162
1,000
163,162
3.0
1996
BUDGET
320,986
98,225
419,211
7.0
0
1,132,381
45,766
1,178,147
20.0
2,320,953
74,724
2,395,677
39.75
0
13,493
13,493
116,093
14,638
130,731
2.0
0
0
266,738
37,126
303,864
5.0
0
50,153
50,153
172,453
1,034
173,487
3.0
3
POLICE DEPARTMENT
BUDGET BREAKDOWN
CARE/CUSTODY OF PRISONERS 523.6020
Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
COMMUNICATIONS 528.8020
Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ANIMAL CONTROL 539.3020
Pemonnet
Supt31ies & Services
Capital OulJay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
FTE
DRUG/GANG VIOLENCE UNIT 521.9120
Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
FTE
DWI TASK FORCE 521.9320
Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
FTE
SAFE STREETS
Personnel
Supplies & Services
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
CAPITAL 594.2120 596.2120
Cap~ Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ELECTRONIC MTCE. 518.9020
GRAND TOTAL
TOTAL FTE
23,047
360,952
383,999
0
347,987
347,987
107.404
35,731
143,135
420,300
9,443
429,743
31,584
1,876
33,460
41,901
41,901
18,322
5,124,644
1,995.0
0
318,952
318,952
0
369,402
369,402
109,573
37,500
147,073
2.5
430,149
13,275
443,424
8.0
30,825
8,512
39,337
1.0
0
25,829
0
25,829
1.0
27.590
27,590
5,257,650
78.5
0
338,005
338,005
0
414,417
414,417
109.569
38.738
148,307
2.50
0
0
0
0
27,375
5,592,867
79.25
4
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Resolution
Re-naming the Bremerton Municipal
Swinuning Pool
CLEARANCES: (comment on back i )
City Attorn .cy-'-~2~-'-'-~
Fiscal & Budget Committee ~ ~-rl~ ,~,\ ~
Operations Committee ~ ,/~.~/] ~'~p
ENDORSEMENT ~'~ INFORMATION
FOR THE AGENDA OF: March 20. 1996
ORIGINATENG DEPT: Parks & Recreation Dept.
ORGINATOR: Jim Spencer. Interim Dtr.
DATE SUBMITTED: March 07. 1996
3. EXHIBITS:
A. Resolution
B. Policy, regarding naming of parks.
C. Petition to honor Glenn Jarstad
D. Memorandum from Kathleen McCluskcv
E. Memorandum from Beclcy Lorber
F. KBRO news sto~'
G. LeUer from Gordon Walgren
APPROVED BY CITY~ FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:~~'~-~'~/'f J
SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENTS FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
Inspitc of all of the trials and tribulations regarding the funding and building of thc indoor swinmfing pool project
(1979), it was through Mayor Glenn Jarstad's perseverance that thc project was completed. Ar~lle Ohlde. former Parks &
Recreation Director, recalled that thc bond issue that passed to fund thc swimming pool construction was disqualified and
the school district couldn't participate as anticipated. But then-Mayor Jarstad found the funding to complete the
construction. Mayor Jarstad stated that if a pool was built, he would jump off the diving board in his suit. He did!
As a tribute to Mr. Jarstad's commitment to the swimming pool project, plus his long standing and continuing
dedication of the Civ,."s parks and recreation programs, a group of citizens proposed to rename thc Bremcrton Municipal
Swimming Pool to the "Glenn Jarstad Aquatic Center".
On FebruaD~ 27, 1996. the Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposal and concurred with the evidence of
Mr. Jarstad's contributions to the park system and the City of Bremerton. The Connnission voted unanimously to
reconm~end the renaming of the Bremerton Municipal Swimming Pool to "Glenn Jarstad Aquatic Center".
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to adopt the Parks & Recreation Commission's recommendation ~ passing Resolution ~.~
the swimming pool "Glenn Jarstad Aquatic Center".
that names
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Jim Spencer. Interim Director
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Jim Spencer. Interim Director
EXPIRATION BATE:
REVIEW BATE:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
AMENDED
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE
The sx~imming pool would continue to be known as Bremerton Municipal S~4nmfing Pool.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES;
Cost for the new sign will be $1,200. No other impacts are anticipated.
7. RESEARCH RESOURCES:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION re-naming the Bremerton Municipal Swimming Pool
"Glenn darstad A quatic Center".
WHEREAS, Glenn Jarstad was the Mayor of the City of Bremerton from 1964 to
1981 during which time numerous significant improvements and acquisitions were made to
the Bremerton Parks & Recreation system; and
WHEREAS, the Bremerton Municipal Swimming Pool was constructed in 1979
during Mayor Jarstad's term of office and through his perseverance and significant effort;
and
WHEREAS, Glenn Jarstad continues to actively support the City of Bremerton,
especially the parks and recreation programs; and
WHEREAS, on February 27, 1996, after considering the letters and petition as
well as former and current staff support, the Bremerton Parks & Recreation Commission
voted unanimously to recommend to City Council naming the Bremerton Municipal
Swimming Pool, located in EastPark, "Glenn darstad Aquatic Center" in recognition of
his contribution to the building of this facility as well as other achievements during his
term of office, and his continuing support of the City of Bremerton and its parks and
recreation programs; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton:
That the Bremerton Municipal Swimming Pool be re-named "Glenn darstad
Aquatic Center".
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this
day
of ,1996.
John Law
Council President
Approved this __ day of ,1996.
ATTEST:
Kathleen McCluskey, Clerk
Lynn Horton, Mayor
CITY OF BREMERTON
BREMERTON POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
BREMERTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT
Provisions for Naming of Parks
FILE UNDER SECTION
Parks Department
NO.
REVISION DATE
APPROVED BY
Parks and Recreation Commission
Ail Revisions Are Marked By An Asterisk (*)
The naming of all parks, recreation areas, open space,
greenbelts, vista sites, parkways, roads, trails and paths
shall be a function of the Parks and Recreation Commission to
make recommendations to the Parks and Recreation Director and
staff. Names may be solicited from community organizations
and individuals.
Ail facilities in the Parks and Recreation system of the City
shall be under management and control of the Department of
Parks and Recreation.
It should be determined whether geographic location, geology,
archaeology or history of the site is of significance in
naming a Park site.
No site or facility shall be named for a person except when an
unusually outstanding service to the Bremerton Parks and
Recreation system so justifies. Park sites may be named for
a living person if the site has been donated by the
individual. Where it is desirable to give recognition to a
living person for his/her contribution to the Parks system, it
is permissible to name for them individual, natural or man-
made features within a Park.
A Park and Recreation naming committee shall be appointed from
members of the Parks'and Recreation Commission to solicit a
name for a particular Park or facility in the Park. The
committee will submit the names obtained to the Parks and
Recreation Commission. After 3/4 majority vote of the Parks
and Recreation Commission the Director will submit the
recommendation to City Council for adoption.
02-09-96 10:93 CK HIGH SCHOOL ID= P.~2
=o s~eud uime =ogetker tha~ was easily accessible and fnee of
charge.
· ~reen space is to claims. Thi~ is one reason why ~=em~rucn ~ow
During Glenn'~ ~enure, and wish nhe agreemen= and assiszance
of his fellow co~issioners, acqui~i=ionm, imprc-vemenzs and
developing occurred for =he be=termen: of Bzemez=en ~nd iuz
I. ~uii= Hal's Corner i'ark on
Z. Bull: new =enniz ,:ou£~ on
building
property
7. Buil= 0=%o Jars:ad ~ark an ..~.= Gozsu Creek land
9. £~tablishad Ro=ary ~ark on W~=sld~ .:f wa:ten
10. ~urchased property o~ souch ~nd of Ki:zap
es=ab{ishea park and lake access--saved faf=ration
!!. Bull= l~-hole Municipal Golf Course :Geld
I~. Bought proper=y cn heath from Licn'~ Field
14. ~eauuified Whoa=eh Way off-ramp~ on
!~. Rebuil~ dock at Liont& Field ~nd bull=
l~. ~uii. t Ba.:hman ~'ark :~ Ea&=~Ide .
~ ~cu~h~ old Smi~h $ch~ci ~/ce cn
a ,::mmunity playfie!d ~nd ~.,: .
deve!opea into open space including soc.:erfieid, s~ftba!!
and tennis
19. Acquired 3urDlus government groperty at N.A.5., upland
and marine waterfront on Wes:~ide
20. Built Community Theater Building on
2~. Continued the ~arge development of Lion's Field
~f. Developed seven acres ~f Roosevelt Field with ~igh=s and
manv other i~.D:Gv~men==. (City Council traded with
washing=on for parking lot o~ wat~r~ront i~ 1993)
Glenn was known =o ex,riss "pleasure in arguing befor~
.%omm. itne~s and legislauive groups for money to build parks..." In
fac=, the Bremer=on Sun's Chief Ki=sa9 Jr. had this uo say abou5
him: "To Glenn Jarstad, Mayor: Talking ~o you about Bremer=on
is like ta~king to a mo%her abou% an onIy child..."
He loves =his city. Glenn has been a resident of
Coun=y for over sevent~ three yea=~ and more spe.=ifically, of
8remerton for fifty one years--same house,, same Sheridan
neighborhood. Our ~roposal is to rename either the Eastpark
or the Zas=park Nature Trail after this man ,who has contributed
so much to the Bremerton Parks ~ys=em. This seems a
=ribute to someone who has spent his life crying to make =his
We ask you =o make this recommends=ion to =he Parks and
R~creation Director an~ suaff. Please.give serious consideration
to our re~uest.
CITY OF BREMERTON
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
Oa:e:
~o:
~rom:
~e:
May 20, 1994
BremerCon Parks and Recreation Commission .
Kath!een McCluskey, Administrative Se_-vices Director .
Glenn Jarsta4 Recognition
This memo is in support of dedication of a'park area in ~ae name of
former Mayor Glenn Jarstad. As many of you know, Glenn was Mayor
of the City of Bremerton for approximately 18 years. Far longer
~han any mayor in the history of Bremer~on. During his tenure as
mayor and since, Mr. Jarstad's commitment to his community has been
unwavering. His tremendous support of parks and recreation was
obvious through his many efforts over the years to Dreser~.e open
space and protect the city's watershed.
I bad the pleasure of working with former Mayor Jarstad for four
year~. ~n that shor~ period White's Blueberry Farm was purchased
by the City, the Parks and Recreation Swimming Pool was built and
the partnershi~ with the YMCA formed. I am sure if I.researched
=he records ~ could find many more· examples of his dedication Co'
parks and recreation issues.
I encourage you t° supDorCthe dedication of a Dark area to former
Mayor ~arstad.
To:
From:
Date:
RE:
Jim Spencer,~l~.~/
Becky ~ ~
January 5, 1996
Renaming the pool
Spoke with Arvilla Ohlde on January 4, 1996 (late afternoon). Her
comments about Mayor Jarstaad's involvement in the pool
construction process were very positive. They included:
"The indoor swimming pool was always a dream of Jarstaad. He
led the charge for making it happen. The pool was combined with a
public safety issue on a public bond, which did pass approval by
the voters. However the bonding agent disqualified the bond
because two conflicting issues were presented to the community.
Jarstaad then contacted Norm Dicks to help find federal
dollars for the construction of the pool. They found money in a
Department of Education Grant. My recollection is a little vague
but supposedly this money could be used for development of
facilities that can be jointly used. In this case, the school
district could benefit by having youth taught swim lessons.
However when the project was nearing completion, the school
district decided to use their portion of the funds on other needs,
leaving the city short (how much I would have to research).
Jarstaad found money within the city to meet whatever the shortfall
was". The person who worked extensively on this project was Bob
Thoreau, who must have retired. His father comes to the senior
center. If needed, I could ask him how to contact his son.
Arvilla felt that naming a facility was different than naming a
park. If you want, I can research any guidelines on this matter.
She feels that Jarstaad has been a long-time supporter of parks and
recreation. He stated that if a pool was built, he would jump off
the diving board in his suit, and did at the opening. He worked
diligently on several park development projects during his tenure
as mayor, and continued as a citizen activist during the 1986
failed bond levy and saving Roosevelt Field.
She thinks renaming the pool would be most appropriate.
AM
/
106.9
FM
UG HICKS
1490
RADIO F'EWS
Eleventh Street at Park Avenue
P. O. Box 1490
Bremerton, Washington 98310
N EWSLI N E -- (206) 479-1069
Serving Puget Sound West Since 1947
The followincj story mode the news on KBRO Radio,
KBRO COMMENTARY: .TIIMF.. ~-~., 1979.
THE NEW BREMERTON MUNICIPAL SWIMMING COMPLEX IS OPEN
AT EAST PARK. IT IS A BEAUTIFUL FACILITY.. .AND BADLY
NEEDED IN THIS COMMUNITY...WHERE ENTERTAINMENT AND
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES ARE LIMITED. IT IS NOT ONLY
BEAUTIFUL...BUT IT'S A SOLID AND BEAUTIFUL STRUCTURE
COMING TO US AT A TIME WHEN CHEAP AND SHODDY BUILDING
OCCURS ALL TOO OFTEN. MANY PEOPLE FROM THE CITY...
THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS...AND INTERESTED VOLUNTEERS CAN
BE THANKED FOR DEMONSTRATING THAT GOVERNMENT STILL
CAN WORK FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMUNITY IN A WORTH-
WHILE PROJECT.
WE BELIEVE MAYOR GLENN JARSTAD...WHO HAS PURSUED THIS
PROJECT.. .DOGGEDLY AT TIMES AND SOMETIMES ALONE. .FOR
THE PAST DECADE DESERVES SPECIAL RECOGNITION. HAVING
A GREAT VISUALIZATION JARSTAD PURSUED THE REALITY...
OFTEN IN THE FACE OF A LOT OF NEGATIVE CRITICISM.. .AND
TURN' DOWNS AT THE POLLS. JARSTAD PERSERVERED LOCALLY...
AND WITH STATE AND FEDERAL OFFICIALS THE NEW INDOOR
POOL REPRESENTS A GREAT VICTORY FOR BREMERTON. BUT IT
DIDN'T HAPPEN ACCIDENTLY...WE THINK IT'S ONLY FITTING
NOW... THAT THE OTHER TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS MOVE TO NAME
OUR NEW FACILITY...THE GLENN K. JARSTAD MUNICIPAL
SWIMMING COMPLEX.
Remember, you hear it first o.
ICBP O
Wi~ff~~, (~DNS~JLTII~G SI~I~VI~S
4105 N.W. Erland Point Road
Bremerton, Washington 98312
June 18, 1994
Nr. Craig Smith, Chair
Bremerton Parks and Recreation con~ission
2746 Hefner
Bremerton, Washington 98310
Dear Mr. Sm/th:
It is my understanding that at your next Commission meeting
you will Be considering a proposal to name a Bremerton park
facility in honor of former Mayor Gle-n 3arstad. I want to add my
support for the acceptance of such a proposal.
Glenn has demonstrated a full personal commitment to outdoor
recreation and the need to make recreational facilities available
to all. In his work as Mayor of Bremerton and as a private citizen
-he has argued aggressively ~or increased numbers of, and Better
access to, parks and playgrounds. As Mayor he insisted that his
staff Be sensitive to the needs of Both children and adults
regarding outdoor activities. He loBbi'ed Both in Olympia and
Washington D.C. for the dollars necessary to provide recreational
opportunities in Bremerton. It would be a most appropriate honor
for his years of service (which service is continuing) that an
appropriate fa=ility be named ~or him. I urge favorable
consideration of the proposal.
Since/
GOR~ L. WALCREN
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO.
SEITING WASTEWATER R~TES
FOR AGENDA OF: March 13, 1996
ORIGINATING DEPT.:TREASURER 0
ORIGINATOR: R. HANNA'~ ~
DATE SUBMITTED: March 4, 1996 ~ '-~
3. EXHIBITS:
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
ENDORSEMENTS -~" INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL P~I~ESIDENT FOR SUBMITTA
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION.~
The proposed ordinance will increase the City's retail wastewater rates by an average of five percent. Staff analysis has
demonstrated that an ~l~increase is necessary to allow the utility to pay for current operations and to implement the
capital improvements which are mandated to meet environmental regulations.
o
RECOMMENDATION:
~J...c 3,,,,'-- ;o &pprG','c, ,,.-~. ~': :.~.~.'. r_~_d!n~, m,,~""~ ~c,c,._.
Motion to pass on second reading Ordinance No.
~_e~, wa~,c:;'~tsr r='~'_~---
setlJng wastewater rates.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
Treasurer
Mayor
N/A
N/A
PULLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
TABLED
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED
DISAPPROVED AMENDED
9A
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Current wastewater rates will remain in effect with a resulting shortage of revenue to the wastewater utility.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES;
Will increase the operating revenues of the wastewater utility by approximately $260,000 per year.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Wastewater comp. plan
Wastewater rote analysis by staff.
AN ORDINANCE amending rates and charges for municipal wastewater
and amending Ordinance No. 4529.
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. Amendment. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 4529 is amended
PURPOSE.
water, wastewater
services;
as follows:
This ordinance establishes assessments, rates and charges for municipal
and stormwater services. Except as expressly provided herein, nothing
in this ordinance shall affect the application of annual adjustments of General Facility Fees,
or Connection Fees as set forth in BMC 15.06.020.
I. WATER.
(a) ASSESSMENTS:
(1) General Facility Fee.
(a) Within City limits $150.00/ERU
(b) Outside City limits $225.00/ERU
(2)
Front Footage Fee.
(a) Within City limits
(b) Outside City limits
$8.00 per foot
$12.00 per foot
(3) Connection Fee.
Rate Per Connection
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Diak 2 - 2129196
Size Within City Limits Outside City Limits
3/4" $ 733.00 $1099.00
1" 788.00 1182.00
1 1/2" 1408.00 2112.00
2" 1579.00 2368.00
Greater than 2" Time & Materials 150% of Time & Materials
(4) Pavement Restoration.*
Asphalt
Concrete
$300.00
$300.00
* Refundable, if assessed and not required.
(5) County Road Permit N/A
$450.00
$450.00
Cost
Co) RATES:
(1) Retail Water Service Rates.
Monthly Service Charge
Meter Size
5/8 & 3/4 inches
1 inch
1-1/2 inch
2 inch
3 inch
Within City Limits
$ 1.98
2.25
3.18
4.30
8.18
Outside City Limits
$ 2.96
3.38
4.77
6.45
12.27
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2~29/96
2
4 inch 15.25 22.88
6 inch 54.18 81.27
8 inch 197.50 296.25
10 inch 705.35 !,058.00
12 inch 2,652.15 3.978.23
Commodity Charge $0.75/H. C.F. $1.125/H. C. F.
(2) Fire Protection Service.
Monthly Service Charge
Service Size Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2 inch $ 7.65 $11.48
3 inch 8.43 12.65
4 inch 9.18 13.77
6 inch 11.48 17.22
8 inch 15.30 22.95
10 inch 21.43 32.15
12 inch 30.60 45.90
(3)
Monthly Service Charge
Meter Size 5/8 X 3/4" Within City Limits
Base Charge $1.75/Acct
Low-Income Senior Citizen and Low-Income Disabled Citizen Rates.
Outside City Limits
$2.63/Acct
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
3
Commodity Charge
0 - 1000 CF/Billing
Over 1000 CF/Billing
No charge
$0.75/H.C.F.
No charge
$1.125/H.C.F.
(4)
Temporary/Construction Meter.
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
Size Deposit Base Fee Base Fee
3/4" & 1" $ 75.00 $20.00/mo $ 30.00/mo
Hydrant meter 300.00 40.00/mo 60.00/mo
Commodity Charge $0.75/H. C.F. $1.125/H. C. F.
(5) Water Inspection Fees.
Main Extensions
Pump Stations
Miscellaneous
Within City Limits
$0.75/ft. but
not less than
$300.00
$500.00
$40.00/Hr.
Outside City Limits
$1.125~ft. but
not less than
$450.00
$750.00
$60.00/Hr.
II. WASTEWATER
(a) ASSESSMENTS:
(1) General Facility Fee.
WASTEW~rR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
(2)
(a) Within City limits
(b) Outside City limits
Front Footage Fee.
(a) Within City limits
(b) Outside City limits
$150.00/ERU
$225.00/ERU
$ 8.00 per foot
$12.00 per foot
(3) Inspection Fee.
Lateral connection at P/L
Lateral connection at main
Conveyance Facility Ext.
Pump Station
Miscellaneous
Within
City Limits
$ 40.00
$250.00
$1.25/Ft.
but not
less than
$300.00
$500.00
$40.00/Hr.
Outside
City Limits
$ 60.00
$375.00
$1.90/Ft.
but not
less than
$450.00
$750.00
$60.00/Hr.
(b) RATES:
(1) Retail Wastewater Service Rates.
Monthly Service Charge
Within City Limits
Single Family
Base Charge $2.~cu0~4.49/Acct
Outside City Limits
$~4--55.16/Acct
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordimmc¢ Disk 2 - 2/29~96
5
Commodity Charge
3.70/H.C.F.
4.25/H.C.F.
Duplex on 1 Meter or 2 Bldgs.
on 1 Meter or Single Parcel
Base Charge
Commodity Charge
S3,403.59/Unit
3.70/H.C.F.
$'~ '~ 12/Unit
4.25/H.C.F.
Multiple Family
Base Charge
Commodity Charge
$~v403.59/Unit
3.70/H.C.F.
$2.754.12/Unit
4.25/H.C.F.
Commercial I
Base Charge
Commodity Charge
$g.505.24/Acct
3.70/H.C.F.
$4-:0-36.03/Acct
4.25/H.C.F.
Commercial II
Base Charge
Commodity Charge
$2.505.24/Acct
5.80/H.C.F.
$4d~36.03/Acct
6.67/H.C.F.
(2) Low-Income Senior Citizen and Low-Income Disabled Citizen Rates.
/tiMonthly Service Charge
Within City Limits
Single Family Account Class
Base Charge $!.30.97/Acct
Outside City Limits
$~ ~n~ 12/Acct
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
6
Commodity Charge
0-1000 CF/Billing
Over 1000 CF/Billing
No charge
3.70/H.C.F.
No charge
4.25/H.C.F.
(3) Septage Disposal
$0.10/gal of tank capacity.
III. MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES.
(a) METER TEST FEE SCHEDULE:
Size
3/4" & 1"
1 1/2 & 2"
3" or greater
Utility Customers
$72.00
$88.00
$105.00 (W/Test Port)
Time and Materials (WO/Test Port)
(b) OFFICE SERVICES:
Account Maintenance
Delinquency Notice (Mailer)
A.C.H. Per Service
Lien Recovery Charge
Duplicate Bill Charge
(per billing period)
Within
City Limits
2.50
<1.00>
50.00
Others
$ 72.00
$ 88.00
$105.00
Outside
City Limits
2.50
<1.00>
50.00
(c) FIELD SERVICES:
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2129196
7
(c) FIELD SERVICES:
Wet tapping (water main only) 2179.00
3268.00
Fire Hydrant Installation
3153.00
Water Meter Removal Charge 40.00
Cross-Connection Control
Device Test/Inspection
30.00
Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on -
(Customer Request)
Regular Hours N/C
After Hours 80.00
Delinquency Notice (Door Knocker) 10.00
Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on -
(Delinquent Accounts)
Regular Hours
After Hours
Flow and Pressure Test (Uncertified)
3/4" & 1" meters only
30.00
80.00
30.00
4729.00
40.00
30.00
N/C
80.00
10.00
30.00
80.00
30.00
Utility Plant Locates
Regular Hours N/C N/C
After Hours 80.00 80.00
Emergency N/C N/C
Within
City Limits
(d) UTILITY PLANT INSPECTIONS:
(Miscellaneous) 30.00
Outside
City Limits
30.00
(e) PARK RESERVATION FEE:
(non-refundable)
25.00
25.00
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
(f) PLAN CHECK:
(1) Water:
(i)
(ii)Pump Stations
(iii) Fireline Extensions
(iv) Irrigation Systems
(v) System Connections
(vi) Miscellaneous
Main Extensions $0.10/ft but not
(Includes hydrants less than $100.00.
and appurtenances and
connection to water system)
$500.00
$54.O0
$54.00
$54.00
$27.O0/Hr
(2) Wastewater:
(i) Conveyance Facility Extensions
(Includes manholes and
appurtenances and
connection to wastewater system)
(ii) Pump Stations
(iii) System Connections
(iv) Miscellaneous
IV. STORMWATER
(a) ASSESSMENTS:
(1) Storm Drainage Plan Review Fees**
(i) Preliminary Drainage Plans
Residential Development
$0.10/ft but not
less than $100.00.
$500.O0
$ 54.00
$ 27.O0/Hr
Within City Limits
$325.00
Outside City Limits
N/A
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
9
Non-Residential Development
(2) Final Detailed Drainage Plans
(ii) Residential Development
0-20 Lots
21-50 Lots
51-100 Lots
100 + Lots
Minimum Charge
Non-Residential
Development
Minimum Charge
(iii) Resubmittal Fees
First Resubmittal
Subsequent Resubmittal
(2) Storm Drainage Inspection Fees**
Residential Development
Non-Residential Development
Minimum Charge
Conveyance Fac. Ext.
Unscheduled Inspections
$225.00 +
$10.00/ISU
$35.00/Lot
$25.00/Lot
$22.50/Lot
$20.00/Lot
$250.00
$10.00/ISU
$150.00
No Charge
$250.00
$15.00/Lot
$10.00/ISU
$100.00
$ .75/Ft with
a minimum of
$300.00
$40.00/Site Visit
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
10
7(
(Unscheduled inspections shall be tracked through the course of project and
billed after the f'mal site inspection. Fees for unscheduled inspections shah
be paid prior to final occupancy approval)
**Storm drainage plan review and inspection fees do not apply to single family residence or
duplex construction on an existing established lot. Fees payable at time of submittal.
(b) RATES:
(1) Retail Stormwater Service Rates.
Monthly Service Charge
(i) Single Family
Base Charge
Low Income Senior
Citizen and Low Income
Disabled Citizen Rate
Exception: Duplex
W/2 Meters
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
$4.00/Acct N/A
$2.50/Acct N/A
$2.00/Acct N/A
(i0
Multiple Family
Base Charge
$4.00/ISU N/A
Commercial
Base Charge
$4.00/ISU N/A
(iv) Public School Districts $4.00/Acct*
N/A
*Parcels owned or leased by public school districts which provide
activities which directly benefit the surface and stormwater
management program. The activities may include: curriculum
specific to the issues and problems of surface and stormwater
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
11
(v)
(2)
management and student activities in the community to expose
students to the efforts required to restore, monitor, or enhance the
surface and stormwater management system. Pursuant to RCW
35.92.021, the amount of the service charge shall be determined
by the Director, based upon the cost of the activities to the school
district, but not to exceed the value of the activity to the
stormwater management program. Determination of which
activities qualify for the stormwater management service charge
reduction will be made by the Director. Reductions in Stormwater
Management service charges will only be granted to school
districts which provide programs that have been evaluated by the
Director. The service charge adjustment for the school activity
may be applied to any parcel in the service area which is owned
or operated by the school district.
Retail Stormwater Rate Adjustment
Multiple Family & Commercial
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
Water Quality $.50/ISU N/A
Water Quantity $1.50/ISU N/A
Stormwater Penalty
for new Multiple
Family & Commercial
development without
on-site detention
(BMC 15.06.050(b))
$.50/ISU N/A
Implementation Schedule. All multiple family and commercial accounts with two
or more ISU's will receive the credits in b(1)(v) above per ISU until December
31, 1997; Provided, The property owner submits engineering plans and
specifications for on-site stormwater quantity and quality improvements for their
property by October 1, 1995, and said plans are approved by the Department
according to System Development and Construction Standards. Failure to comply
with any of the aforementioned provisions will result in these accounts being
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2~29/96
12
Section 2. Effective Date.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __
,1996.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __
,1996.
This ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1996.
day of
day of
APPROVED this
JOHN E. LAW, Council President
~day of
,1996
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
13
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. ~UBJECT:
Ordinance Amending Parking
Regulations to Enhance Penalties,
Repeal Reparking
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
PoliCe
City Attorney
2. /~LEARAN~ES: ( Comment
CHIEF OF P6LIcE
on back if necessary)
3. EXHIBITS:
Proposed Ordinance
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
COUN0~[L COI~ITTEE
ENDORSEMENT [] INFORMATIQN []
APPROVED BY COUNCIL P~~ FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT ~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The proposed ordinance addresses complaints about the reparking prohibition in the
downtown business district, which is felt to be confusing and unfair to visitors
to the City or others who have multiple trips downtown during the day. This
provision is replaced with a more conventional approach to controlling commuter
parking on the streets, with the aid of mobile computer units. The base fine for
overtime parking has increased from $5.00 to $10.00, with second and third tickets
during any rolling 30 day period costing $25.00 and $50.00 respectively. The
tickets will be tracked during the 30 day period with the use of mobile computers
in the field. In conjunction with these changes, the free parking zones downtown
will be reduced from a 3 to 2 hour limit. With the greater likelihood of tickets
and a higher cost for repeat offenses, it is intended to make it more economical
for commuters to use off-street commercial parking lots.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to approve on first reading Ordinance No.
Motion to approve on second reading Ordinance No.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED [] TABLED [] APPROVED [] DISAPPROVED [] AMENDED [] DATE:
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO.:
(OVER)
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
Continued fines and time limit regulations.
IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OT~ER RESOURCES:
Software reprogramming to allow tracking of 3 or more tickets is estimated to cost
$2,250.00. Revision to 123 downtown parking signs is estimated to cost $1,845.00
in materials and $1,173.00 in City labor and equipment, for a total of $3,018.00.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
PARKING1.AB - Agendas - 1/3/96
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE amending the parking code to remove prohibition on reparking
except in residential permit arms, increasing penalties for overtime parking and
repeat offenders; and amending BMC Title 10.
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. Amendment. Section 10.09.130 of the Bremerton Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
10.09.130 SERVICE VEHICLES. Clearly marked service or delivery vehicles are
exempt from the time zone requirements while providing service or making deliveries to
dwellings within a residential parking permit area. Service vehicles shall comply with time
limits for parking in commercial zones, ~'"~
Section 2. Amendment. Section 10.11.010 of the Bremerton Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
10.11.010 ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS. In addition to those statutes adopted by
reference in BMC 10.04.010restricting standing, stopping and parking of vehicles, it shall
be unlawful and punishable as a civil infraction for any person to commit any of the
following actions:
(a) Overtime Parking. It is unlawful for any person to permit a vehicle to remain
parked, or to be reparked between two intersections within a residential parking permit
area, if the parking time or combined parking time for the vehicle, exceeds the time
limitations of the parking zone., .................. ,
--,,~, .... ~, .....7 ...... J .................... l~ ........... Vehicles issued permits under BMC
PARKINGI .IRS - Ordinance Disk 2 - 1/3/96
-77
Chapter
the permit.
Section 3. Amendment. Section
hereby amended to read as follows:
10.11.030 PENALTIES. Unless
10.09 and 10.10 shall be exempt from posted time limits according to the terms of
10.11.030 of the Bremerton Municipal Code is
specifically set forth elsewhere in this title, the
and Chapter 10.04,
penalties for each parking violation of the provisions of this chapter
defined as an infraction, shall be:
(a) Overtime or non-payment in collection devices:
(i)
.................. ~, .... , ~,v ........ ~,~, c, urs ,~ ....First viola n
within past thirty (30) days - .$10.00
(ii) All ot~cr: $10.00 Second violation within thirty (30) days -$25.00
(iii) Third and additional violations of
............. on within thirty (30) days
~r~ ~r~ $50 00
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective sixty (60) days from
passage and publication.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton
,1996.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton
~, 1996.
this ~ day of
this ~ day of
PARKINGI .IRS - Ordinance Disk 2 - 1/3/96
JOHN E. LAW, Council President
2
APPROVED this ~ day of ,1996
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
PARKINGI .IRS -Ordinancc Disk 2 - 1/3/96
3
FAX TRANSMITTAL
F~ NUM~F.~ (360) 47&5360
DATE: _,, ~$- Iq-/~ TIME:.
ADDRESS:
FAX NUMBER:
PHONE NO:
FIZOM:
COMPANY:
NO. OF PAGES TRANSMrrTED (INCLUDINO COVER SHEET):,
If this commu, nication is not clearly received, please call (360) 478-5920. Thank You.
~ C¢[cl)raling $0 ~ar~ .r Freedom ·
~Aq~IL~. Held ]legalese= 8remerton agrees t~ indemnify
Kltsap county from any lose, cost, or expense claimed by third
parties for property damage and bodily injury, includfng death,
caused solely by the negligence or wilful misconduct of Bremerton,
it~ employees, or agents in connection with the performance of this
Agreement.
Kitsap County agrees to indemnify and defend Bremerton from
any loss, cost, or expense claimed by third parties for property
damage a~d b0dlly injury, including death, caused solely by the
negligence or wilful misconduct of Kitsap County, its employees, or
agents in connection with the performance of this Agreement.
~~L--_~. No~dijGrimination: Bremerton shall not
discriminate in employment or services provided on the basis of
sex, race, color, creed, or national origin, age, ~arital status,
physical, mental or sensory handicap unless an employment action
based on a bona fide occupational qualification.
~P_.~,.;~_.L~; Bubsequon~ Con~raets~ In the even~ Bremerton
desires to provide maintenance service to County beyond December
31, 1993, ~remerton shall submit, in writing, to County an estimate
of its monetary requirements no later than July 31, 1993. In the
event that Bremer:on does not desire to provide maintenance service
=o County beyond December 31, 199~, Bremerton shall notify county,
in writing, no la:er than July ~1, 1992.
~_~L~L~_~A: Te~l~nationl This Agreement shall be terminated
by either party, w~thout cause, upon twelve (lg) months written
notice to the other party, or for cause if either party falls
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -~-
wHEREAS, Kltsap County owns all Traffic Control Signals
~ltuated within Kitsap County$ and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has personnel skilled in
maintaining traffic control equipment and is desirous of providing
main=enance services to the traffic control equipment owned and
operat=d by Kitsap County; NOW, THEREFORE,
IN CONSIDERATION OF TH~MUTUALCOVENANTS CONTAINED HEREIN, IT
IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS~
~_9_g_~~: Parties: .This Agreement is by and between the
City of Br=merton, hereinafter referred to as "Bremerton" and
Kitsap County, hereinafter referred to as "County".
Ter~: This Agreement shall become effective on
and will terminate on December 31, 1990, at
~a~uary ~, ~990~
11:59 p.m.
~eotion 3:
Payment~ In consideration for the services
provided; County shall pay Bremerton the sum of Thirty-six Thousand
Two Hundred and Twenty-five Dollars ($36,225.00) for the term of
this Agreement, due to Bremerton in e~ual monthly installments in
the amount of Three Thousan~ Eighteen and 75/100 Dollars
($3,018.75). In the event that the County adds ~raffic signals
r=quiring maintenance, the County shall pay the sum of one Thousand
Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00), per year, for each signal added,
due to Bremerton in equal monthly installments. Payment for
additional lights shall be pro-rated for the remaining months of
the current year. Thereafter, payments shall be due to Bremerton
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -1-