HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/13/96 AGENDABREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
239 4TH STREET
BREMERTON, WA 98337 --
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 13t 1996
CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M.
A. Pledge Of Allegiance
B. Invocation
CONSENT ~GEND~
Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in
advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If
separate discussion is desired on an item, it may be removed
from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at
the request of a Council member.
A. Minutes - February 21, 1996
#AB96-049
3. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
4. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
5. MAYOR'S REPORT
6. PUBLIC RECOGNITION -- (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes)
NEW BUSINESS
A. Interlocal Agreement - Traffic Control
Signals With The City Of Port Orchard
Interlocal Agreement - Traffic Control
Signals With Kitsap County
Overwater Park Biological Mitigation
Monitoring Contract With Fish Pro Inc.
D. Kitsap Physicians Service Contract For 1996
ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance #4547 (Second Reading) Reorganizing
The Hearing Examiner Function
B. Ordinance (First Reading) Setting Wastewater
Rates
#AB96-048 ~i
#AB96-054 ~
1. SUBJECT:
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
~INUTES'- FEBRUARY 21; 1996
3-13-96
FOR AGEND~i OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Council
ORIGINATOR: 3ohn Law~ President
DATE SUBMITTED: 3-6-96
2. ~: (comment on back
if necessary)
3. ~XHIBI~$:
8. ~COMMENDATION:
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
AMENDED
TAPE #1359
UNAPPROVED DRAFT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
February 21, 1996
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton
was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street,
Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, February 21, 1996, at 5:30 P.M.,
with Council President John Law presiding. Council members present
were Bob Winters, A1 Colvin, Cecil McConnell, Carlos Montgomery,
David Farr, Lon Overson. Council members Richard Neville and
Sherril Huff-Menees were absent. Also present were City Attorney
Ian Sievers and City Clerk Kathy McCluskey.
The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council
President Law and Invocation given by Councilman A1 Colvin.
CONSENT AGENDA - NONE
CLAIMS/CHECK RE~ISTERS
Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required
by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified
as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that
had been made available to the Council.
M/S/C/U(Colvin/Montgomery) on February 21, 1996, the Council does
approve for payment those vouchers included and further described
as follows: 195310 through 195436 in the amount of $164,913.77; and
Regular Payroll for the period ending 2-15-96, in the amount of
$674,858.85.
President Law announced Councilman Richard Neville is recovering
nicely and should be returning in a week or two.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Mr. Overson commented on the new trash cans recently installed
downtown.
Mr. McConne11 announced this evening starting at 6:00 P.M., at the
Parks and Recreation Center,a meeting is being held regarding the
development of a 20-acre parcel between Eagle Hardware Store and
Almira Drive. He encouraged any residents in that area to attend
that meeting. He also urged residents of District #2 to attend the
District #1 Neighborhood Meeting on February 22 to hear a
presentation on the downtown waterfront by Fletcher Wright
representatives.
Mr. Colvin announced the District #1 Neighborhood Meeting on
February 22, 1996, 7:00 P.M., at the Parks and Recreation Center.
TAPE #1359
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 21, 1996
Page 2 of 12
The two main topics for that program will be the Sinclair Landing
Project and Scotch broom.
Mr. Law reported on a good turn out at District #3's Neighborhood
meeting. The presentation made by Kitsap County Prosecuting
Attorney Russ Houge was quite enlightening and Sergeant Tom Pratt
listened to citizen concerns and passed on the latest things
happening in their area.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Horton brought the results of a survey she conducted several
weeks ago.
Mayor Horton read the following Proclamation: Month of February as
NARFE (National Association of Retired Federal Employees). Don
Serry accepted the proclamation.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
Carol Adkinson, Bremerton Main Street Association read into the
record a letter from Lou Weir, President of Bremerton Main Street
Association, in which her referenced a newspaper article by Devin
Dwyer in which it stated:" .... Lou Weir, President of the Bremerton
Main Street Association, is lobbying for more citizen input on the
project." Mr. Weir did not attend the meeting Mr. Dwyer
referenced; therefore he had no comment. And, as a downtown
property owner and member of the Bremerton Task Force, he
wholeheartedly supports the Sinclair Landing project and has stated
so publicly several time.
7A - WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION CONTRACT -
JOHNSTON & CULBERSONt ~AB96-036
The City's self-insures its workers' compensation obligations and
utilizes the services of a certified third party claims
administrator to make claim payments. In response to a City RFP,
three claims administration firms were recently interviewed and
Johnston & Culberson was selected as the most qualified service
provider. The service fee for this contract is $12,500 per year
plus a one-time takeover fee.
Pegq7 Lesser, Risk Manager, stated the City has been using the
services of Willis Caroon Administrative Services to handle Workers
Compensation claims process for about five years. The City decided
it was time to check the market and sent out a request for
proposals, resulting in six submittals, which were screened down to
three. The review committee interviewed the three top applicants,
and unanimously chose Johnston & Culberson.
Public comment - none.
TAPE #1359
city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 21, 1996
Page 3 of 12
#0924
Mr. Overson stated he understood that contracting with this firm
would provide some cost savings to the City and was Ms. Lesser
prepared to quantify those over the next six months? Ms. Lesser
stated she felt it would be difficult to quantify, but she could
provide Council with statistics. She anticipates the City will be
contracting with a better qualified firm with better professional
service providers. It is known that better claims management
reduces claim costs.
Mr. Fart asked the number of open claim files? Ms. Lesser stated
there are 20 open files. The current claims administrator has been
actively working to close those files so that on March 1 very few
of them will remain open.
M/S/C/U(Montgomery/Winters) to approve the Professional Services
Agreement with Johnston & Culberson.
7B - BUDGET ARENDMENTREQUESTS FOR FOREST RIDGE PARK ANDPENDERGAST
PARK IMPROVEMENTS, AND CONCESSIONS AT LIONS FIELD AND PENDERG~ST
P]tRK, #~B96-037
The Parks and Recreation Department requires budget amendments to
accomplish the following three tasks: (A) Remodel of the Forest
Ridge Restroom was targeted for completion in the 4th quarter of
1995. Scheduling conflicts made this impossible. Request
reappropriation of the $10,000 allocated in 1995 out of the Real
Estate Tax fund to 1996. (B) In the past, operation of the
concessions at Lions & Pendergast was contracted out. The Parks &
Recreation Department is proposing to operate this service. First
year costs are estimated at $64,120, which includes labor,
supplies, and capital purchases. We anticipate breaking even in
the first year of operation. Profits in future years will be
diverted to the Pendergast Construction Fund. (C) In order to
bring fields 4, 5, and 6 up to grade at Pendergast, stabilization
of the toe of the slope on field 5 is required. It is requested
that an additional$10,000 toward "capital outlay" be reallocated
within the Pendergast Park Construction Fund so that this task can
be accomplished. This$10,000 comes out of "Ending Working
Capital".
Jim Spencer, Parks and Recreation Director, asked that each Budget
Adjustment be discussed and acted upon separately. He explained
item (A) and the fact that the work would be completed in the first
quarter of 1996; therefore they are requesting re reapportion the
$10,000 to cover the restroom improvements at Forest Ridge Park.
Public comment - none.
Mr. Winters asked if work had begun on the restrooms? Mr. Spencer
TAPE #1359
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 21, 1996
Page 4 of 12
#1026
stated yes, and they are nearing completion of the project.
M/S/C/U(Overson/Montgomery) to reappropriate $10,000 from Real
Estate Excise Tax Fund 109 from 1995 to 1996 so that restroom
improvements can be completed at Forest Ridge Park.
Mr. Spencer outlined Item (B) and explained with Pendergast
Regional Park coming on line his department looked at the
concession operation and as a department decided it would be
beneficial to the City to assume responsiblity for concession
services. He sees taking on those responsibilities as an
opportunity to raise revenue that could be used for construction in
completion of the Pendergast facility. He wants to offer full
service operations at the ball parks and that the Parks Department
is in the best position to provide that full service since they are
responsible for scheduling the events. He believes he has a built
in labor pool in the form of their summer Leadership In Training
Program, which is made up of young people, who have worked as
volunteers in the department for a number of years. In year one
they are looking at worst case scenario that the services will
break even, but he is hopeful they can achieve a greater success.
Public comment - none.
Mr. Farr stated at first he was skeptical of the City getting into
the concession business, but after receiving complaints from some
ball tournament participants about the lack of concession services
available during tournament play he now sees the need for better
coordination of those services. He also liked the idea of
providing an employment opportunity for youth within our community.
Mr. Winters asked the number of years the concession service was
handled by a private contractor? Pat Westhoff, Parks Department,
stated 14 years off and on by Darrell Erickson of Crazy Erics. Mr.
Winters stated he felt the City owed Mr. Erickson a great "thank
you" for his work over the years at the ball park, and having %he
City take over the concessions is no reflection on his fine work.
Mr. Overson noted he believes the Parks Department is prepared to
address the concerns identified and heartily endorses their
enthusiasm and anticipates the program will succeed under Mr.
Spencer's direction. He would like some input on how the program
is working in the not to distant future.
Mr. Winters questioned the size of the ice machines to be acquired?
Mr Spencer stated he is looking at two different sizes, the largest
of which would be a 700 lb. capacity, a smaller would be 400 lb..
TAPE #1359
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 21, 1996
Page 5 of 12
#1259
#1395
When a large tournament is scheduled, they will bag ice ahead of
time in order to have an adequate supply available.
M/S/C/U(Montgomery/Farr) to appropriate $64,120 to General Fund
001-51 to allow for in-house operation of the concessions at Lions
Field and Pendergast in 1996.
Mr. Spencer outlined Item (C) and explained in order to move along
development of fields #4, #5 and #6, at Pendergast Regional Park,
to a rough grade condition, work needs to be done at the toe of
field #5, which is located by the detention pond. An offer has
been made by an individual to assist with the improvement, which
will cost $10,000. The original budget appropriation for 1996,
$12,000, was allocated for development of fields #4, #5 and #6.
Currently, approximately $6,000 has been spent on erosion control
measures associated with the slope above the detention pond. In
order to fix the problem and allow the opportunity to bring field
#5 to grade, an additional $10,000 will be needed. The Budget
Adjustment proposes allocation of those funds to commence the
needed work. This funding would come out of Ending Capital.
Public comment - none.
Mr. Farr noted during the Fiscal and Budget Committee Mr. Spencer
indicated that the $10,000 was much less than what the work would
actually cost if the normal process was used. He asked how much is
the City saving through this process? Mr. Spencer explained the
work would be done by Ace Paving and they estimated the work could
cost as much as $35,000; therefore, the City is looking at a
dramatic savings and provide a significant improvement.
M/S/C/U(Farr/Winters) to appropriate an additional $10,000 to
"capital outlay" from "ending working capital" in the Pendergast
Park Construction Fund 308 for stabilization of the toe of the
slope.
7C - APPROVAL OF LON~ TERM LICENSE FOR PUGET POWER PARK, ~AB96-058
In April of 1994, Mayor Horton contacted Puget Power about joint
use of their property, which is located at the North end of
Elizabeth Street under the Warren Avenue Bridge. This is a
beautiful piece of waterfront property with both mountain and water
views. This lease agreement allows the City an opportunity to
create a passive park that will offer citizens the opportunity to
picnic, fish and enjoy a spectacular Olympic Mountain view.
Jim Spencer, Parks and Recreation Director, showed slides of the
subject area pointing out the beauty aspects of the site, i.e.
access to the water, view of Olympic Mountains, areas for picnic
TAPE #1359
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 21, 1996
Page 6 of 12
#1649
#1715
tables, benches, etc. Puget Power is providing the City an
opportunity, at virtually no cost, to share in this piece of
property as long as it is used for public recreation.
Bill Enqer, Puget Power, stated this is a great opportunity for the
City and Puget Power to participate in a project that will be
beneficial to the community. He pointed out there is no lease fee
involved in this transaction.
Don Larson, President of Washington Scuba Alliance, commented the
subject site is a spectacular dive site for scuba divers.
M/S/C/U(Colvin/Montgomery) to authorize and direct the Mayor to
sign the Lease Agreement with Puget Power for the establishment of
this park.
8A - ORDINANCE #4544 (SECOND READING) TRACYTON BEACH PRE-ANNEXATION
ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION, #AB96-031
President Law asked the "Appearance Of Fairness/Conflict of
Interest" question with Council members being seated.
Public comment - none.
M/S/C(Overson/Farr) to pass Ordinance #4544, on second reading,
amending the Official Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map of the City
of Bremerton for property located west of the City limits along
Tracyton Beach Road.
Vote on motion: In Favor: Overson, Farr, Law, McConnell, Colvin
Opposed: Montgomery, Winters
Motion carried.
8B - ORDINANCE ~4545 (SECOND READING) TO AMENDCITY'S COMPREHENSIV~
PLP.N TO COMPLY WITH THE FINAL DECISION AND ORDER OF THE GROWT~
NANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD, ~AB96-035
Kathleen McCluske¥, City Clerk, read into the record the following
letter received from Helen Haven-Saunders, 3353 Anderson Hill Road
SW: "My latest experience with the Bremerton City Council was a
truly painful one. I have spent many hours listening to your
meetings and waiting for a turn to be heard. Your Valentine's Day
meeting included several time-consuming agenda items, and I warned
our children that we'd be gone late. The Council was generally
quite civil to the Tracyton neighbors who came to address plans for
their area, although the developer's exhibits were not scrutinized
and the neighbors were... As I listened, I crossed out several
points I had intended to make, and softened my language. Finding
TAPE #1359
City Council .Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 21, 1996
Page 7 of 12
the right tone is very difficult, because I always hope for more
understanding and do not wish to shut doors myself. In the wake of
the hearing on the 14th, however, the points I decided to omit need
to be made.
Members of our group, the Association to Protect Anderson Creek,
have always attempted to be respectful to you as public servants
and elected officials, as well as fellow human beings; we too
deserve to be treated with respect. Although our homes, our wells,
and our neighborhood are at risk, we have attempted to deal with
you honorably. During the last hearing on the option to sell this
land, some of the Council members became very angry and dismissive
toward the opposition members. Mr. Overson said something about
how residents of the area were more likely to be careless stewards,
and to pollute the water by bad management practices, than any
industrial developer; and Mr. Montgomery made statements about
nonvoters, for which he later apologized, and our status as non-
City residents. I was shocked and disheartened by the tone of
hostility and contempt toward us at that hearing. Your
responsibility to be leaders includes creating an atmosphere at
public hearings in which issues can be debated in a humane and
evenhanded fashion. The British have a tradition of polite debate
in which the other partisan is thought of as the Honorable
Opposition. In many venues, we in Kitsap County would benefit by
emulating this tradition.
Our group's president and I waited for more than five hours to
speak to you for a few minutes last week. All of us were tired and
strained by the eventful agenda. You listened patiently to Mr.
Sciepko's repeat sales pitch. Only three people remained to speak
in opposition to him; very little more patience would have been
necessary to end the evening with dignity and humanity. You were
all, during~the time that I spoke, quite polite to me, and to the
Bremerton citizen who preceded me. However, you were remarkably
savage with Mr. Della-Rovere, who has always spoken to you with
respect and restraint. Mr. Overson had, apparently, stayed up too
late, and had quite lost his temper; he interrupted Mr. Della-
Rovere repeatedly, cutting short his questions about school impacts
with misinformation which was not corrected by staff or other
Council members, and summing up his diatribe with a comprehensively
dismissive and insulting attack on both of us.
I respectfully raise several questions, and request answers to be
given now as they are asked:
To the Planning Manager or the City Attorney: Has the City indeed
enacted impact fees, and does the Comprehensive Plan address the
issue of impact to schools within or outside the Bremerton School
TAPE #1359
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 21, 1996
Page 8 of 12
District, as was asserted by Mr. Overson? (City's response will be
identified by a #1)
To the Planning Manager or the City Attorney: Are any changes in
the Plan possible at this date, or are these hearings merely a
hollow formality? If that is not a fair characterization, what
sorts of changes could be made? (City's response will be identified
by a #2)
To the Council Chair and the Council in general:
wish to consider a policy about civility?
Does the Council
To Council person Overson: Does Mr. Overson regret his testiness?
This city has some very viable neighborhoods, with a clear sense of
who they are and what they want. Your city government could be an
energetic synergy between these neighborhoods, with activists
pulling hard for new projects because they feel invested in the
process. Instead, when faced with a really hard issue, like the
sewer plant's persistent problems, or siting industry near the city
to plan for future independence from the Navy's whims, you have
attempted to solve the problem by condemning elderly people's
homes, or impacting neighborhoods on your borders whose citizens
aren't your constituents and are therefore inconsequential to you.
Bremerton is developing the reputation of being a dangerous
municipal neighbor.
We hope, as a neighborhood on your borders, that your experiences
so far will be merely an unhappy episode in a mutually rewarding
future. We need changes; there's a long way to go."
Ron Houqh, Planning Manager, answer Mrs. Haven-Saunders' questions
as follows: (1) In this case it is not the Bremerton School
District, but rather South Kitsap School District. The City has
not initiated Impact Fees for anything, especially any kind of
school impacts, which was a City decision not to impose Impact Fees
on new development. Part of the Hearings Board decision on the
appeal of the City's Comprehensive Plan stated the City is not
required to conduct an impact analysis to designate a certain area
for a particular use, if there is no proposal for any kind of
development. That statement was made specifically in regard to the
Industrial Park area of the Anderson Creek vicinity. To do a study
on a hypothetical situation would be a waste of City time and
resources, so it was suggested waiting until some sort of concept
is submitted. (2) Until the final reading of the ordinance is
acted upon, there is the possibility to make a change. Ian
Sievers, City Attorney, stated perhaps the writer of the letter at
the last meeting noted there were qualitatively two issues and one
being to correct the plan. As he stated in his opening comments,
TAPE #1359
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 21, 1996
Page 9 of 12
#2229
Council held extensive hearings on the basic Plan, but on the area
around Anderson Creek, this was the first City Council hearing on
those Comprehensive Plan designations for those areas because of
the annexation and because of the change in surplusing decision
made a few weeks ago. If there was a substantive change in the
rest of the Plan besides that area, in fairness Council would need
to go back and reopen the public hearing according to their own
procedures.
Kathleen McCluskey, City Clerk, stated the last two questions
raised by Mrs. Haven-Saunders have nothing to do with this Agenda
item.
David Saunders, Port Orchard, questioned if the any member of City
Council had discussion of any kind with the proponent or their
representatives on the issue of Anderson Creek at any other time
other than a public hearing? President Law stated it may have been
at a Study Session, which was open to the public; however, he
wasn't completely sure the issue was address in a Study Session.
Mr. Fart reported he had one phone discussion just directing the
proponent to another organization, but there was no substantive
discussion. Mr. Montqommry asked Mr. Saunders if he was aware of
anyone making that statement? Mr. Saunders stated no. Mayor
Horton stated an Executive Session was held when the City was
considering surplusing the property concerning the terms of the
potential sale, but beyond that there has been no discussion having
to do with land use. She clarified that neither Mr. Sciepko or his
wife were present at the Executive Session.
M/S/C/U(McConnell/Montgomery) to pass Ordinance #4545, on second
reading, adopting the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and including
amendments ordered by the Growth Management Hearings Board.
Mr. Overson stated sometimes his business like military approach
has an adverse affect on people, but he was not apologizing because
it has served well in the past. And, the community has a definite
benefit that this area is being developed in this manner and the
property that is appropriate to the Anderson Creek area has been
defined and set aside to be untouched so that Anderson Creek will
stay as pristine as it is.
Mr. Colvin wanted those opposing this proposal to know he
appreciates their concern.
Vote on motion - Unanimous.
Law stated in reply to Mrs. Haven-Saunder's concern over Mr.
Overson's attitude, he recognizes Mr. Overson's value to the City
TAPE #1359
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 21, 1996
Page 10 of 12
and believes the City is getting a bargain in having him as a
Councilman.
9A - PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION ~2540 REGARDING RECOVERY OF FEES
FOR THE ABATEMENT OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT WERNER ROAD ~
MADISON STREET, KITSAP COUNTY ASSESSOR'S TAX NUMBER 4564-001-027-
0007, OWNED BY WILLI~%~ & NATAS~]% gESKO, #~B96-039
In October and November of 1995, the City performed demolition of
two buildings which had been declared unsafe after the owners of
the property, William and Natasha Sesko, failed to do so as ordered
by the Building official. The fees for the work totaled
$18,707.20.
Kathleen McCluske¥, City Clerk, stated Council received copies of
"Objections To Request For Approval Of Lien" filed by Mr. Sesko
this afternoon.
Ian Sievers, City Attorney, explained this is a hearing on the
reasonableness of abatement costs. The Building Official is to
file with the Clerk a report specifying the work completed and
itemizing the total cost of the work. Council is to adjudicate the
reasonableness and correctness of that report. This is not an
appeal on the abatement itself or the conditions and terms of the
abatement order. There is a separate appeal process for that
process; however, he was not sure if the property owner has filed
an appeal of the abatement order.
Mr. Winters questioned if he should step down from this issue since
he received a call from Mrs. Sesko on February 16, regarding his
personal company providing services for an event? Mr. Sievers
stated he may want to judge whether or not he had any personal
judgement against the community of Mr. Sesko and his wife, or if
there was something about that conversation relating to this issue
he could remain seated if he states the substance of that
conversation. Mr. Winters stated the substance of that
conversation was the celebration of the Chinese New Year holiday,
which was to be held at the Suquamish Clear Water Casino, and Mrs.
Sesko wanted to know his fees and if he was available to perform on
a specific date.
President Law asked the "Appearance Of Fairness/Conflict of
Interest" question with Mr. Winters asking to step down and the
remaining Council members being seated.
Janet Lunceford, Building Department, stated the subject site was
annexed into the City in December 1994 or January 1995. In March
of 1995 the Building Official abated three structures on the site,
one being a site built house and two that had been moved onto the
TAPE #1359
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 21, 1996
Page 11 of 12
#2733
property by Evan Burley. The Abatement Orders gave Mr. Sesko a
chance to obtain permits for the repair or demolition of the
structures by April 30, with all the work to be completed by May
31, 1995. On April 28, two days before the permit deadline, Mr.
Sesko and Mr. Burley appealed the abatement, which then went to the
Board of Appeals. The Board of Appeals upheld the Building
official's determination that the buildings were dangerous. In
July 1995, the Building Official allowed Mr. Sesko to obtain a
Demolition Permit for the site built house. Mr. Sesko had until
August 1, 1995, to complete the abatement and have all debris
removed. On August 18, Mr. Sesko was informed by the Building
Official that due to his failure to complete the demolition, the
City would go ahead with the abatement of all three structures on
that site. Mr. Burley subsequently demolished one of his "moved"
buildings on that site, leaving the site built house and one
building resting on cribs. The City conducted an asbestos
abatement and took action to demolish both houses starting on
October 26, 1995.
Bob Tulp, Public Works Operations Manager, stated he would standby
for any questions.
William Sesko stated for clarification that most of the property
was owned by Evan Burley and it was by an agreement, with
cooperation of the City and County, that those houses were moved
there, and one of the houses was to be moved farther up on the hill
and the other one was to be demolished, which he did. The house
that was to be moved further up the hill was not completely on his
property, one half on his property and half on the alley. He
believed Mr. Tulp would agree that the house was on wheels ready to
be moved.
Public comment - none.
M/S/C/U(Montgomery/Overson) to approve Resolution #2540, order the
fees incurred for the abatement of the unsafe structures located on
the Sesko property at Werner and Madison Streets be collected as
reasonable abatement costs and become a lien against the property.
Mr. McConne11 asked if Mr. Tulp knew how long the one house was
setting on wheels? Mr. Tulp stated the cribs and wheels were still
there when they removed the house. The house was supported by 8'
X 8' cribs, not the wheel structure.
Mr. Farr asked Mr. Tulp to address Mr. Sesko's comment that one
house was only on half of his property and the other half on the
alley. Mr. Tulp explained there is a plotted undeveloped City
right-of-way (alley), which would only be developed in cooperation
TAPE #1359
city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 21, 1996
Page 12 of 12
with the property owners as they develop the property. There was
no current development on the property. Mr. Sesko owns the
property and it is his choice to work that development. He did
have several conversations with Mr. Sesko about his wanting the
right-of-way rocked, but Mr. Tulp stressed that was not what they
do at the maintenance operations, that is an engineering
development and there are steps and permitting processes as
property is developed. It was his knowledge that Mr. Sesko also
accepted rent from Mr. Burley from the time it was parked at that
site.
Vote on motion - unanimous.
With no further business meeting adjourned at 6:54 P.M..
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
JOHN E. LAW, Council President
City of Bremerton
KLM/JL/me
cc: Normal Distribution
File/Vault
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT:
Interlocal Agreement -
Traffic Control Signals
with the City of
Port Orchard
FOR AGENDA OF: March 13, 1996
ORIGINATING DEPT: PWO Street Division
ORIGINATOR: Robert E. Tulp
DATE SUBMITTED: March 4, 1996
2. CLEARANCES: (conFaent on back
OPERATIONS COMM.
PW DIRECTOR
back i.~necessary) . 3. EXHIBITS:
Interlocal Agreement
PURCH. SUPERVISOR ~ CAL/BUDGET
~YOR ~. H~A COUNCIL PRESIDENT ~ ~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
Approval of agreement between the City of Bremerton and the City of
Port Orchard to maintain traffic signals located within the City of
Port Orchard
8. RECOMMENDATION: TO APPROVE INTERLOCAL AGREEb~NT BETWEEN CITY OF BRE~RTON AND
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD TO MAINTAIN TRAFFIC SIGNALS.
9.RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED
DISAPPROVED
AMENDED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
no ne
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Loss of income
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
none
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
This is an on-going contract.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Port Orchard owns Traffic Control Signals situated within the
Port Orchard City limits; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has personnel skilled in maintaining traffic control
equipment and is desirous of providing maintenance services to the traffic control equipment
owned and operated by Port Orchard; NOW, THEREFORE,
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS CONTAINED HEREIN, IT
IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Parties: This Agreement is by and between the City of Bremerton,
hereinafter referred to as "Bremerton" and City of Port Orchard, hereinafter referred to as "Port
Orchard".
Section 2: Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1996, and will
terminate on December 31, 1998, at 11:59 p.m.
Section 3: Payment: In consideration for the services provided, Port Orchard shall pay
Bremerton the sum of Fourteen Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-three and 71/100 Dollars
($14,663.71) for the term of this Agreement, due to Bremerton in equal monthly installments
in the amount of Four Hundred Seven and 33/100 Dollars ($407.33) In the event that the Port
Orchard adds traffic signals requiring maintenance, Port Orchard shall pay the sum of Two
Thousand Four Hundred Forty-three and 95/t00 Dollars ($2,443.95), per year, for each signal
added, due to Bremerton in equal monthly installments.
pro-rated for the remaining months of the current year.
Payment for additional lights shall be
Thereafter, payments shall be due to
Bremerton by January 1st for the remaining successive years of the contract.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT --1--
PORCHARD.AGI - Disk 13 - 1/30/96
At the beginning of each successive year thereafter, the annual payments due on January
1st shall automatically be adjusted by the percentage change in the "All Items" category of the
Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) as published by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor for the Seattle-Everett
metropolitan statistical are (1982-84 = 100), as published for the month of August.
If at any time during the term of the contract the practice of computing the Index for the
City of Seattle, shall be abandoned or altered by the U.S. Department of Labor, and not
assumed by some other federal or state governmental agency, then there shall be substituted
therefore as mutually agreed the most nearly comparable cost of living index.
Section 4: Service Provided:
(a) All services listed in this agreement shall be provided and limited to locations of
traffic signals, flashers, school warnings, fire signals and street light installations listed in
Appendix "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
(b) Bremerton shall provide electronic, electrical repairs, electrical inspection, preventive
maintenance and equipment upgrades as requested or directed by the Port Orchard City
Engineer; Provided, That Bremerton shall not be required to perform major electrical repairs
as determined by the Port Orchard City Engineer and Bremerton's Electronics's Supervisor; and,
Provided further, Bremerton shall not be required to perform electrical repairs where labor costs
exceed Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) per occurrence, based on cost of materials and the city's
outside services labor rate.
(c) Bremerton shall provide repair parts which shall include, but are not limited to,
transistors, integrated circuit chips, resistors, diodes, capacitors, tubes, wire, and modules;
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -2-
PORCIIARD.AGT - Disk 13 - 1/30/96
Provided, Bremerton shall not be required to provide major components and/or assemblies; and,
Provided.further, That the determination of what constitutes a major component and/or assembly
shall be made by the Port Orchard City Engineer and Bremerton's Electronics Supervisor.
Bremerton shall not be required to provide repair components and/or assemblies in excess of
Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) in value.
(d) Bremerton will replace all lamps upon bum-out.
(e) Bremerton shall provide labor and materials for the repair of defective traffic signal
loops. Bremerton shall not be responsible for saw cutting and sealing of traffic signal loops,
replacement of loops due to damage created by contractors, or additional loops necessary for
intersection upgrade or design change.
(f) Upon approval of the Port Orchard City Engineer, Bremerton shall provide parts for
upgrade of traffic signals, and will bill Port Orchard within thirty (30) days of installation;
Provided, That the annual total of upgrade parts shall not exceed Fifteen Thousand Dollars
($15,000.00).
(g) In the performance of the services set forth in (a) through (e) above, Bremerton shall
be responsible for and shall provide and pay all wages, salaries, tools, vehicle usage, training,
utilities, postage, freight, telephones, overhead costs, and all other direct or indirect costs or
expenses incurred; Provided, That in the performance of the services set forth in (f) above,
Bremerton shall provide wages, salaries, tools, vehicle usage and all costs with the exception
of the cost of the upgrade of parts, as set forth in (f) above.
Section 5: Equipment: Bremerton shall provide services described in Section 4, for
the traffic control equipment listed in Appendix "A". The equipment includes and is limited to:
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -3-
PORCHARD.AGT - Disk 1~ - 1/30/96
a. Traffic signal controller equipment;
b. Traffic signal indicator load switches;
c. Traffic signal detection equipment;
d. Traffic signal conflict monitor units;
e. Traffic signal pre-emption equipment (OPTICOM);
f. Traffic signal cabinet wiring;
g. Traffic signal loops; and
h. Street lighting, including control, ballast, photo cells, igniters, and lamps.
Section 6: Time of Service: The services set forth in Section 4 shall be available
Monday through Friday during regular business hours. After regular business hours and during
weekends, and holidays, Bremerton shall have available for Port Orchard, those same services
as it provides for its own needs. Provided, That during weekends, holidays or after regular
hours, if Port Orchard is unable to secure services from Bremerton listed in this Agreement,
then Port Orchard may secure such services elsewhere and deduct the cost thereof from any
amounts owing or to be owed to Bremerton under the contract. Bremerton shall make available
to Port Orchard telephone numbers through which services can be obtained.
Section 7: General Conditions:
a. Entire Agreement - This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties and both parties acknowledge that there are no other~ agreements, written or oral, that
have not been fully set forth in the text of this Agreement.
b. Amendments - The parties hereby further agree that this Agreement cannot be
amended or modified without the written concurrence of both parties.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -4-
PORCHARD.AGT - Disk 13 - 1/30/96
c. Notices - Any notices required to be given by Bremerton to Port Orchard, or by Port
Orchard to Bremerton shall be in writing and delivered to the following parties at the following
addresses:
Bremerton City Clerk
239 Fourth Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
Port Orchard City Clerk
736 Prospect
Port Orchard, WA 98366
d. Waiver - Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any terms, covenants or
conditions of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such, nor shall any waiver or
relinquishment of such right or power at any time be taken to be a waiver of any other breach.
e. Compliance with State, Local and Federal Laws - Parties agree to comply with all
applicable local, state and federal laws in performance of all services under this Agreement.
f. Applicable Law; Venue - This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and, in the event of dispute, the venue of
any action brought hereunder shall be in Kitsap County Superior Court.
Section 8: Hold Harmless: Bremerton agrees to indemnify Port Orchard from any loss,
cost, or expense claimed by third parties for property damage and bodily injury, including death,
caused solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of Bremerton, its employees, or agents
in connection with the performance of this Agreement.
Port Orchard agrees to indemnify and defend Bremerton from any loss, cost, or expense
claimed by third parties for property damage and bodily injury, including death, caused solely
by the negligence or willful misconduct of Port Orchard, its employees, or agents in connection
with the performance of this agreement.
Section 9: Nondiscrimination: Bremerton shall not discriminate in employment or
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -5-
PORCHARD.AGT - Disk 13 - 1/30/96
services provided on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status
or disability in employment or the provision of services.
Section 10: Subsequent Contracts: In the event Bremerton desires to provide
maintenance service to Port Orchard beyond December 31, 1998, Bremerton shall submit, in
writing, to Port Orchard and estimate of its monetary requirements no later than July 31, 1998.
In the event that Bremerton does not desire to provide maintenance service to Port Orchard
beyond December 31, 1998, Bremerton shall notify count, in writing, no later than July 31,
1998.
Section 11: Termination: This Agreement shall be terminated by either party, without
cause, upon twelve (12) months written notice to the other party, or for cause if either party fails
substantially to perform through no fault of the other and does not commence correction within
five (5) days of written notice and diligently completes the correction thereafter.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the dates and
year written below.
CITY OF BREMERTON
Date
DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL:
BY:
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
W. EUGENE SAMPLEY, Director of Public Works & Utilities
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -6-
PORCHARD.AGT - Disk 13 - 1/30/96
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
IAN R. SIEVERS, City Attorney
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Date
BY:
RECE~-VED FOR FU_.ING:
KATHLEF_.N L. McCLUSKEY, CITY CLERK
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT --7--
PORCHARD.AGT - D~sk 13 - 1/30/96
APPENDIX "A"
The following is a. list of the traffic signals that are covered by the Agreement and is hereby
appended to the contract:
SIGNALS
1. Tremont Street/Sidney Avenue
2. Tremont Street/Pottery Street
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -8-
PORCHARD.AGT - Disk 13 - 1/~0/96
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT:
Interlocal Agreement -
Traffic Control Signals
with Kitsap County
2. CLEARANCES: Icomment on back i~ necessary)
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT: PWO Street Division
ORIGINATOR: Robert E. Tulp
DATE SUBMITTED: February 2, 1996
3. EXHIBITS:
.~~g4 --'~',/~&~ / ~ Interlocal Agreement
PW D RECTOR / \
PW OPERATIONS MGR. ~ ~ , ,,~~ - ! ~~ ·
EN~M~~ I~O T,ION~~Y CO~CI~RESID~
~. S~Y ST~TBM~T ~D REQHIRE~NT FOR
Approval of agreement between the City of Bremerton and Kitsap County
to maintain traffic signals located within Kitsap County
8. RECOMMENDATION: TO APPROVE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF BREMERTON AND
KITSAP COUNTY TO MAINTAIN TRAFFIC SIGNALS.
9.RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
DISAPPROVED
AMENDED
DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
7B
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
none
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Loss of approximately $60,000 per year in income
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
none
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
This is an on-going contract.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, Kitsap County owns all Traffic Control Signals situated within Kitsap
County; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has personnel skilled in maintaining traffic control
equipment and is desirous of providing maintenance services to the traffic control equipment
owned and operated by Kitsap County; NOW, THEREFORE,
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS CONTAINED HEREIN, IT
IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Parties: This Agreement is by and between the City of Bremerton,
hereinafter referred to as "Bremerton" and Kitsap County, hereinafter referred to as "County".
Section 2: Tern: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1996, and will
terminate on December 31, 1998, at 11:59 p.m.
Section 3: Payment: In consideration for the services provided, County shall pay
Bremerton the sum of One Hundred Thirty Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety-one and 08/100
Dollars ($130,791.08) for the term of this Agreement, due to Bremerton in equal monthly
installments in the amount of Three Thousand Six Hundred Thirty-three and 09/100 Dollars
($3,633.09) In the event that the County adds traffic signals requiring maintenance, the County
shall pay the sum on One Thousand Six Hundred Seventy-six and 81/100 Dollars ($1,676.81),
per year, for each signal added, due to Bremerton in equal_monthly installments. Payment for
additional lights shall be pro-rated for the remaining months of the current year. Thereafter,
payments shall be due to Bremerton by January 1st for the remaining successive years of the
contract.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT --1--
TRAPFICC.AOT- Disk 13 - 1110196
At the beginning of each successive year thereafter, the annual payments due on January
1st shall automatically be adjusted by the percentage change in the "All Items" category of the
Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) as published by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor for the Seattle-Everett
metropolitan statistical are (1982-84-100), as published for the month of August.
If at any time during the term of the contract the practice of computing the Index for the
City of Seattle, shall be abandoned or altered by the U.S. Department of Labor, and not
assumed by some other federal or state governmental agency, then there shall be substituted
therefore as mutually agreed the most nearly comparable cost of living index.
Section 4: Service Provided:
(a) All services listed in this agreement shall be provided and limited to locations of
traffic signals, flashers, school warnings, fire signals and street light installations listed in
Appendix "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Co) Bremerton shall provide electronic, electrical repairs, electrical inspection, preventive
maintenance and equipment upgrades as requested or directed by the Kitsap County Traffic
Engineer; Provided, That Bremerton shall not be required to perform major electrical repairs
as determined by the Kitsap County Traffic Engineer and Bremerton's Electronics's Supervisor;
and, Provided further, Bremerton shall not be required to perform electrical repairs where labor
costs exceed Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) per occurrence, based on cost of materials and the
city's outside services labor rate.
(c) Bremerton shall provide repair parts which shall include, but are not limited to,
transistors, integrated circuit chips, resistors, diodes, capacitors, tubes, wire, and modules;
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -2-
TRAFFICC.AOT- Di~ 13 - 1110196
Provided, Bremerton shall not be required to provide major components and/or assemblies; and,
Provided further, That the determination of what constitutes a major component and/or assembly
shall be made by the Kitsap County Traffic Engineer and Bremerton's Electronics Supervisor.
Bremerton shall not be required to provide repair components and/or assemblies in excess of
Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) in value.
(d) Bremerton will replace all lamps upon bum-out.
(e) Bremerton shall provide labor and materials for the repair of defective traffic signal
loops. Bremerton shall not be responsible for saw cutting and sealing of traffic signal loops,
replacement of loops due to damage created by contractors, or additional loops necessary for
intersection upgrade or design change.
(0 Upon approval of the Kitsap County Traffic Engineer, Bremerton shall provide pans
for upgrade of traffic signals, and will bill the County within thirty (30) days of installation;
Provided, That the annual total of upgrade parts shall not exceed Fifteen Thousand Dollars
($15,000.00).
(g) In the performance of the services set forth in (a) through (e) above, Bremerton shall
be responsible for and shall provide and pay all wages, salaries, tools, vehicle usage, training,
utilities, postage, freight, telephones, overhead costs, and all other direct or indirect costs or
expenses incurred; Provided, That in the performance of the services set forth in (f) above,
Bremerton shall provide wages, salaries, tools, vehicle usage and all costs with the exception
of the cost of the upgrade of parts, as set forth in (f) above.
Section 5: Equipment: Bremerton shall provide services described in Section 4, for
the traffic control equipment listed in Appendix "A". The equipment includes and is limited to:
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -3-
TRAFFICC.AOT. Disk 13 - 1/10/96
a. Traffic signal controller equipment;
b. Traffic signal indicator load switches;
c. Traffic signal detection equipment;
d. Traffic signal conflict monitor units;
e. Traffic signal pre-emption equipment (OPTICOM);
f. Traffic signal cabinet wiring;
g. Traffic signal loops; and
h. Street lighting, including control, ballast, photo cells, igniters, and lamps.
Section 6: Time of Service: The services set forth in Section 4 shall be available
Monday through Friday during regular business hours. After regular business hours and during
weekends, and holidays, Bremerton shall have available for County, those same services as it
provides for its own needs. Provided, That during weekends, holidays or after regular hours,
if County is unable to secure services from Bremerton listed in this Agreement, then County
may secure such services elsewhere and deduct the cost thereof from any amounts owing or to
be owed to Bremerton under the contract. Bremerton shall make available to County telephone
numbers through which services can be obtained.
Section 7; General Conditions:
a. Entire Agreement - This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties and both parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that
have not been fully set forth in the text of this Agreement.
b. Amendments - The parties hereby further agree that this Agreement cannot be
amended or modified without the written concurrence of both parties.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -4-
TRAFFICC.AOT- D~k 13 - 1/10/96
c. Notices - Any notices required to be given by Bremerton to County, or by County
to Bremerton shall be in writing and delivered to the following parties at the following
addresses:
Bremerton City Clerk
239 Fourth Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
Kitsap County Traffic Engineer
Public Works Department
614 Division Street MS-26
Port Orchard, WA 98366
d. Waiver - Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any terms, covenants or
conditions of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such, nor shall any waiver or
relinquishment of such right or power at any time be taken to be a waiver of any other breach.
e. Compliance with State, Local and Federal Laws - Parties agree to comply with all
applicable local, state and federal laws in performance of all services under this Agreement.
f. Applicable Law; Venue - This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and, in the event of dispute, the venue of
any action brought hereunder shall be in Kitsap County Superior Court.
Section 8: Hold Harmless: Bremenon agrees to indemnify Kitsap county from any
loss, cost, or expense claimed by third parties for property damage and bodily injury, including
death, mused solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of Bremerton, its employees, or
agents in connection with the performance of this Agreement.
Kitsap County agrees to indemnify and defend Bremerton from any loss, cost, or expense
claimed by third parties for property damage and bodily injury, including death, c~used solely
by the negligence or willful misconduct of Kitsap County, its employees, or agents in connection
with the performance of this agreement.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -5-
TRAIzFIC~2.AOT- Di~ 13 - 1110/96
Section 9: Nondiscrimination: Bremerton shall not discriminate in employment or
services provided on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status
or disability in employment or the provision of services.
Section 10: Subsequent Contracts: In the event Bremerton desires to provide
maintenance service to County beyond December 31, 1998, Bremerton shall submit, in writing,
to County and estimate of its monetary requirements no later than July 31, 1998. In the event
that Bremerton does not desire to provide maintenance service to County beyond December 31,
1998, Bremerton shall notify count, in writing, no later than July 31, 1998.
Section 11: Termination: This Agreement shall be terminated by either party, without
cause, upon twelve (12) months written notice to the other party, or for cause if either party fails
substantially to perform through no fault of the other and does not commence correction within
five (5) days of written notice and diligently completes the correction thereafter.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the dates and
year written below.
CITY OF BREMERTON
Date
DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL:
BY:
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
W. EUGENE SAMPLEY, Director of Public Works & Utilities
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -6-
TRAFFICC.AGT- Disk 13 - 1110196
0 FORM:
IAI~ I~SIEVERS, City Attorney
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Date
BY~
CHAIRPERSON
COMMISSIONER
COMMISSIONER
RECEIVHD NOR FIL1NO:
KATI-ILEEN L. McCLU~KEY, C1TY CLERK
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -7-
TRAFFICC.AGT- Disk 13 - 1/10/96
APPENDIX "A"
The following is a list of the traffic signal, flasher, school warning, fire signal, and street
lighting installations that are covered by the Agreement and is hereby appended to the contract:
SIGNALS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
Anderson Hill Road & Provost Road
Bethel Avenue & Wal-mart (to be added 1st Qtr 1996)
Bucklin Hill Road & Mickelberry Road
Bucklin Hill Road & Randall Way
Bucklin Hill Road & Tracyton Boulevard
Central Valley Road & Fairgrounds Road
Kitsap Mall Boulevard & Plaza Road
Kitsap mall Boulevard & Randall Way
Lund Avenue & Bethel Avenue
Lund Avenue & lackson Avenue
Mickelberry Road & Myhre Road
Mickelberry Road & Ridgetop Boulevard
Mile Hill & Village Lane
National Avenue & Loxie Egans Boulevard
Pine Road & Riddell Road
Randall Way & North Point Mall
Ridgetop Boulevard & Hilkboro Drive (to be added 1st Qtr 1996)
Ridgetop Boulevard & Myhre Road
Ridgetop Boulevard & Pinnacle (to be added 1st Qtr 1996)
Sidney Road & Sedgewick Road
Silverdale Way & Bucldin Hill Road
Silverdale Way & Byron Street
Silverdale Way & District 1 Fire Station
Silverdale Way & East Kitsap Mall Entrance
Silverclale Way & Kitsap Mall Boulevard
$ilvcrdale Way & Myhre Road
Silverdale Way & Pedestrian Crossing
$ilverdale Way & Randall Way
FLASHERS
1. Lincoln Road & Widme Road (Eagles Approach)
2. Waghom Road & Pioneer Way
3. Clear Creek Road & Half Mile Road
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -8-
TRAFFICC.AGT- Disk 13 - 1/10/96
4. Brownsville Hiway S-curves (2 units)
5. Bucklin Court
6. Alder & Jacobsen
7. Trenton Avenue & East 30th
8. Newberry Hill Road & Dickey Road
9. Seabeck Hiway & Holly Road
10. Seabeck Hiway & Newberry Hill Road
11. Silverdale Way & Anderson Hill Road Crosswalk
12. Central Valley & Foster Road
13. $outhworth Drive at Harper Dock
14. Southworth Drive at Stolhton Road
SCHOOL FLASHERS
1. West Kingston Road - Kingston Junior High School
2. Barber Cut-off Road - Gordon Elementary
3. Waghom Road - Briedablik Elementary
4. Clear Creek Road - Monfissouri School (Private)
5. Olympic View Road - Cougar Valley Elementary
6. Ridgetop Boulevard at Boardwalk - Ridgetop Junior High School
7. Central Valley Road at Foster - Cottonwood Elementary
8. Central Valley Road - Woodlawn Elementary
9. Tracyton Boulevard (May Street) - Tracyton Elementary
STREET LIGHTING
1. Newberry Hill Road at Chico Way
2. All Street Lighting Mounted on Traffic Signal Poles at Intersections
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -9-
TRAPFICC.AGT- Disk 13 - i/10/9~
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT:
Overwater Park Biological Mitigation Monitoring
Contract with Fish Pro, Inc.
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
March 13, 1996
Public Works&itilities ~N
R. Witt, City_ En~nee~r~oq 'x
February_ 29, 1996
2. CLEARANCES: (comment on'
Director, Public Works/Utilities
Director, Parks
City Attomey
City Treasurer -
Budget & Finance Committee
Operations Committee
MAYOR
EXHIBITS
Consultant Services Comract
Budget Adjustment Request
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR &l ~~L~.. ~
COUNCIL PRESIDENT ,:~~v'>' ~.~-~'-''''
SUivlMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COU~'CIL ACTION:
As part of the Overwater Park project, the beach immediately adjacent was rehabilitated as a condition of the permits
to construct the Boardwalk. The permit also required the city to periodically monitor the biological activi~ on the
beach. A consultant services agreement in the amount of $21,370 has been negotiated with Fish Pro, Inc. to determine
the biological activity and document the activity to the permitting agencies.
Additionally, a budget amendment is attached increasing the project budget by $4,100, fi.om $19,200 to $23,300. T'nis
reflects the funds available for the 1996 mitigation monitoring.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize and direct the Mayor to execute the attached agreement with Fish Pro, Inc. in the
amount of $21,370 for the biological monitoring of the Overwater Park mitigation beach and to approve the budget
amendment increasing the project budget by $4,100 to $23,300.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENTORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXTIRATION DATE:
REYqEW DATE
City Engineer
Cit3,_' Engineer
1/1/97
PULLED TABLED
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
AMENT)ED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE
DATE:
11. AGENT}A BILL NO: c7~'- (P:5:~._
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The biological monitoring of the Overwater Park mitigation beach will not be completed and the city will be in
violation of its permit.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFENG, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPh, IENT OR OTHER RESOU~RCES:
The city has $60,000 in an escrow account controlled by the US Army Corps of Engineers, who issued the
permit to construct the Overwater Park and wants assurance the monitoring is complete. Biological
monitoring is required in years 2, 4 and 5 (1994, 1996 and 1997) of the pemfit. The $60,000 distributed over
the remaining 2 years of monitor:rog provides an annual monitoring budget of $30,000. The budget adjustmem
increases the 1994 budget by $4,100 from $19,200 to $23,300 to reflect this.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES
96140
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The biological monitoring of the Overwater Park mitigation beach will not be completed and the city will be in
violation of its permit.
6. hS,WACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQU2PMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The city Ires $60,000 in an escrow account comrolled by the US Am~y Corps of Engineers, who issued the
permit to construct the Overwater Park and wants assurance the monitoring is complete. Biological
monitoring is required in years 2, 4 and 5 (1994, 1996 and 1997) of the pemfit. The $60,000 distributed over
the remaining 2 years of monitoring provides an annual monitoring budget of $30,000. The budget adjuament
increases the 1994 budget by $4,100 ~om $19,200 to $23,300 to refleet this.
7. RESEARCH SOU~R. CES
96140
Requesting Department:
CITY OF BREMERTON
- No. 96-6
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
WATERFRONT PARK CONSTRUCTION FUND NO. 305
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Description
Increase Revenue:
Draw on Assigned Funds
Amount
4,100
USE OF FUNDS:
Description
Increase Expenditures:
Mitigation Monitoring
Amount
4,100
NARRATIVE:
This adjustment will provide for costs of monitoring which will exceed the odginal estimate included in the
budget.
Dep~rtmei~t Head'Signature Date
Treasurer Comments:
Director Signature
Date
Recommended
Mayor Comments:
Not Recommended
Treasurer's Signature--~
~[~ Recommended ~-~ Not Recommended ~
~ Approved ~ Denied ~Sg~nn~ur~e/~i t
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
ate
Recommended ~
Approved ~-~
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature
Date
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Biological Monitoring - 1996
THIS AGREEMENT is between the City of Bremerton, a municipal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City") and FISHPRO,~,C/
re e=. a.
W I T N E S S E T H: ,
1. SCOPE: FISHPRO agrees to provide the City with consulting
services necessary to meet the habitat monitoring schedule of the
Bremerton Overwater Park U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit OYB-1-
014605. FISHPRO services are more fully outlined in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference which
address monitoring during year 4 (1996) of the five year Mitigation
Monitoring Plan.
Z. TERM: Contract shall commence on
and will terminate on January 1, 1997.
3. COMPENSATION:
follows:
City shall pay FISHPRO compensation as
Total fees under this Agreement shall not exceed Twenty-one
Thousand Three Hundred Seventy Dollars ($21,370.00). Charges for
services shall conform to the fee schedule attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibits A-8, A-9 and A-10.
FISHPRO shall submit a monthly statement describing the
services rendered with a breakdown for work completed as authorized
under this Agreement. The City upon receipt of the completed
statement, shall promptly process said claim for payment.
If the description of services on the Proposal designates
additional services which may be requested by the City, said
additional services will be paid for by the City at the rate set
forth in the Proposal, which sum may exceed the "not to exceed"
amount set forth above; however, said services will only be
performed and compensated by the City after the City has directed
such performance in writing.
4. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES: The parties understand and agree
that FISHPRO is a firm skilled in matters pertaining to fisheries
habitat and will perform independent functions and responsibilities
in the area of its particular field of expertise. FISHPRO and its
personnel shall act as independent contractors and not employees of
the City. As such they have no authority to bind the City nor
control employees of the City, contractors, or other entities.
Within the performance of these duties, FISHPRO shall work under
the direction of the City Engineer.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT --1--
~$~RO.~A - Disk 13 - 2~9/96
5. INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE: FISHPRO agrees to provide for State
industrial insurance coverage for its personnel as required by
State law.
6. LICENSE AND TAXES: FISHPRO shall possess a current
Bremerton Business License and any regulatory license required to
fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. B & O taxes shall be
paid when due and FISHPRO, by this Agreement, assigns any payments
due under this Agreement to the City Clerk for payment of such
taxes which have been declared delinquent.
?. INSURANCE AND HOLD HARMLESS: Prior to and during the
performance of the work covered by this Agreement, FISHPRO shall
provide the Risk Manager for the City of Bremerton with evidence
that it has obtained and maintains in full force and effect during
the term of this Agreement a policy of professional liability
insurance, providing coverage of at least $1,000,000.00 against
professional liability or errors and omissions in connection with
the work to be performed by FISHPRO under this Agreement. Risk
Manager shall be provided thirty (30) days' written notice of any
cancellation of said professional liability insurance.
FISHPRO agrees to defend, indemnify and save harmless the
City, its appointed and elected officers and employees, from and
against any and all liability, loss, costs, damage and expense,
including costs and attorney fees in defense thereof because of
actions, claims or lawsuits for damages resulting from personal or
bodily injury, including death at any time resulting therefrom,
sustained or alleged to have been sustained by any person or
persons and on account of damage to property, arising or alleged to
have arisen directly or indirectly out of or in consequence of or
the performance of this Agreement, whether such injuries to persons
or damage to property is due to the negligence of FISHPRO, its
subcontractors, agents, successors or assigns. This provision
shall be inapplicable to the extent the City is judicially found
solely negligent for such damage or injury.
8. GENERAL CONDITIONS:
a. Reports and Information - FISHPRO, at such times and in
such forms as the City may require, shall furnish the City such
reasonable periodic reports and documents as it may request
pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this
Agreement, the costs and obligations incurred or to be incurred in
connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this
Agreement. FISHPRO will maintain accounting records in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principals and practices to
substantiate all invoiced amounts.
b. Entire Agreement - This Agreement constitutes the entire
agreement between the parties and both parties acknowledge that
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -2-
~S~RO.~A - Di~ 13 - 2~9/96
there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been
fully set forth in the text of this Agreement. There are attached
hereto and incorporated by reference as part of this Agreement as
Exhibit "A".
c. Amendments - The parties hereby further agree that this
Agreement cannot be amended or modified without the written
concurrence of both parties.
d. Notices - Any notices required to be given by the City to
FISHPRO or by FISHPRO to the City shall be in writing and delivered
to the parties at the following addresses:
City Clerk
239 Fourth Street
Bremerton, WA. 98337
Gary
Silver
ro, ...... ~ /
3780 SE. Mile Hill 'Drive
Port Orchard, WA. 98366
e. Waiver - Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any
terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall not be
deemed a waiver of such, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of
such right or power at any time be taken to be a waiver of any
other breach.
f. Compliance with State, Local and Federal Laws -
FISHPRO agrees to comply with all applicable local, state and
federal laws in performance of all services under this Agreement.
g. Applicable Law; Venue - This Agreement shall be construed
and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of
Washington and, in the event of dispute, the venue of any action
brought hereunder shall be in Kitsap County Superior Court.
h. Attorney Fees - The substantially prevailing party in any
litigation arising hereunder shall be entitled to its reasonable
attorney's fees and court costs, including appeals, if any.
9. ~OI~DISCRIMI~ATIO~: FISHPRO shall not discriminate in
employment or services to the public on the basis of race, color,
national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status or disability,
except employment actions based on a bona fide occupational
qualification.
~0. TERMInATIOn: This Agreement may be terminated by either
party for convenience upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the
other party, or for cause if either party fails substantially to
perform through no fault of the other and does not commence
correction within five (5) days of written notice and diligently
completes the correction thereafter. Upon such termination, City
will be entitled to reports showing the status of all matters upon
which FISHPRO is advising the City as of the effective date of
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -3-
FISHPRO.~A - Di~ 13 - 2~9/~
termination.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement the date and year indicated.
CITY OF BREMERTON
Date
BY:
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McC~USKEY, City Clerk
D EPA~~AL:
W. E~3GENE/~A/~PL~eotor of
Public Works & Utilities
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
IAN R. SIEVERS, City Attorney
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -4-
~$~RO.~A - Di~ 13 - 2~9/~
Bremerton Overwater Park Mitigation Monitoring - Year 4
Scope and Budget
FishPro is pleased to submit to the City of Bremerton our scope and budget for carrying
out the biological portion of the Overwater Park Mitigation Monitoring Plan for year 4.
Performance at the mitigation beach must be monitored according to the protocols
contained in the Overwater Park Mitigation Plan (Revised February 25, 1993) for up to 5
years to satisfy permitting requirements. Monitoring, as spelled out in that document,
has two components. The first measures the structural performance of the new beach.
It is FishPro's understanding that the City intends to carry out this phase of the
monitoring plan internally. The second component measures the biological
performance of the mitigation beach habitat. FishPro presents herein our approach to
this phase of the monitoring plan for year 4. This monitoring function must strictly
adhere to the performance criteria spelled out in the above noted document and will be
carried out as specified by qualified biologists. Details are as follows:
Biological Performance
Monitoring of epibenthic density at the mitigation beach will be carried out in 1996,
which is year 4 for the project. We will random sample at specific intertidal elevations
for total densities (no./m2) of key epibenthic species known to be prey items for
migrating juvenile salmonids. The values will be compared with samples taken similarly
from the control beach. The necessity for monitoring at year 5 will be reviewed with the
agencies by the City after year 4, if production levels on the mitigation beach meet or
exceed the control beach.
Harpacticoid copepods and gammarid amphipods are two primary prey items of juvenile
salmonids during early madne residence (Parametrix 1985, Cardwell and Koons 1981,
Cordeil and Simenstad 1981, Fresh and Cardwell 1979, Gerke and Kaczynski 1972,
Thom et al. 1986)*. There is a very wide array of these species which could be
inhabiting the local environment. Several have been previously identified from surveys
conducted in years 1992 and 1994 adjacent to and under the Overwater Park boardwalk
(FishPro 1992', FishPro 1994). A few key species were determined from the 1992
observations to be most relevant in the context of importance to foraging juvenile
saimonids in consultation with Washington Department of Fisheries. The following taxa
* Refer to Reference List in the Bremerton Overwater Park Mitigation Monitoring Plan for references cited.
1/3/96 .Brem. OP Mit Plan
EXHIBIT A-2
are included in the density analysis as specified in the agency approved monitoring
plan. -' "'
1. Total density of all harpacticoids (no/m2)
2. Total density (no/m2) for the following:
a. Genus Harpacticus
b. Genus Zaus
c. Genus Tisbe
d. Family Ectinosomatidae
3. Total density (no/m2) of all gammarid amphipods
4. Total density (no/m2) for the following:
a. Genus Eogammarus
b. Genus Anisogammarus
c. Genus Pontogeneia
d. Genus Corophium
5. Total density (no/m2) of all Cumacea
6. Total (no/m2) for the following:
a. Either genera Cumella or Lamprops
Any of these species which show consistently Iow densities on both the mitigation and
control beaches will be dropped from the list, with resource agency approval.
Sampling Methods
Sampling for epibenthic organisms will be conducted twice in 1996. The.first sampling
will be conducted from early April to April 15. The second sampling will take place
between mid and late May. Both of these sampling windows coincides with annual
peak epibenthic production pedods (Thom et al. 1986, Fresh and Cardwell 1979, Beak
1990, Hiss et al. 1990)*. Epibenthic density remains depressed throughout the rest of
the year. Epibenthic density will be measured within two strata established at both the
mitigation (M-l, between +0.5' to +1.5' MLLW, and M-2, between -1.5' to -0.5' MLLW)
and the control beach (C-1, between +0.5' to +1.5' MLLW, and C-2, between -1.5' to
-0.5' MLLW) as specified in the approved plan. The sampling will consist of 22
randomly selected points within each strata on both the mitigation and control beach for
a total of 44 samples at each site(Figure 1). Dudng each sampling period all stations on
one beach will be sampled during one tide change when there is at least 1' of water over
* Refer to Reference List in the Bremerton OvenNater Park Mitigation Monitoring Plan for references cited.
1~ .Br~ffl. OP Mit Plan
EXHIBIT A-3
+ O
MHW LINE
\
"
t
,/
I t
STRATA M--1
STRATA 1~-2 ~
MITIGATION BEACH
SAMPLING AREA
NEW TOE OF R
AT +2.0' blLLW
INNER HARBOR LINE--"~/
BEACH
-1133 M2(0.2B
ACRES)
C-1
C-2
NOTE:
STRATA M-1 AND C--1 (+'0.5 TO +1.5 MLLW)
STRATA 1~-2 AND C-2(-I .5 TO --0.5 MLLW)
EPIBENTHIC
SITE
PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON
MONITORING
PLAN
FIGURE I
EXHIBIT A-4
the station being sampled so that the sampling pump may work effectively..The two
beaches will be sampled on consecutive days to limit temporal affects on epib~nthic
species diversity. This will provide 88 samples during each sampling period for a total
of 176 samples for the year.
Epibenthic zooplankton will be sampled with a battery powered epibenthic suction pump
(Figure 2). This is the identical pump used in years 1992 and 1994; an important
consideration for this project, in terms of continuity, because these are
quantitative samples based on water volume collected repeatedly over a carefully
measured time interval, The pump consists of a 2.1 I/sec bilge pump attached to a
PVC pipe handle. A sampling cylinder constructed of a 10.16 cm X 15.24 cm (4" X 6")
PVC reducer is attached to the bilge pump. Four 5.08 cm (2") circular ports drilled in the
sides' of the sampling cylinder are screened with a 75 micron nylon mesh to exclude
organisms outside the sampling area. The pump is powered by a 12 volt battery
connected to a toggle switch. A 2.54 cm (1") clear plastic hose is used to run the
sample into a 100 micron sieve. The sampling area of the epibenthic pump is 0.018 m2
(0.19 ft2). The epibenthic pump will be placed gently on the substrate so as to not
disrupt any zooplankton which may be present. The water volume in the sampling
cylinder will then be evacuated into the sieve for a period of exactly 10 seconds .
Careful attention to the elapsed time for pumping allows for an accurate and repeatable
quantitative sample of the water containing the organisms which exists over the
substrate being sampled. Organisms recovered from the 100 micron sieve will be
preserved in 5% buffered formalin phosphate containing rose bengal stain. The
samples will be analyzed for organism quantification and identification to the taxa
previously described (Figure 3).
A total of 22 random samples will be collected and compared from each of two strata on
the control beach and mitigation beach. These comparisons will be made for each of
two months during each sampling year (April and May, years 2, 4 and 5). Within each
of the two months, density of 12 taxa or minimal growth will be statistically compared
between the mitigation beach and control beach for each of the two strata. Each strata
will be treated separately in the analysis. This gives a total of 24 statistical tests to
perform for each monitoring month.
As spelled out in the approved monitoring plan the data will first be analyzed to
determine if it meets assumptions of parametric statistics(i.e, normally distributed about
I/3/~,Bmm, OP Mit Plan EXHIBIT AZ5
NO.LE)NIH~¥M '(3EIVHO~IO .LblOd
3]~S ON
dlAInd NOIIONS OIHJ_NZlSIdZl
]9DAD~OIO~
13Non~
ONIOqOH
SdlqO A~]IIVB-~
~-- HO 1 I MS
iILO001
I~DS HS3~
NO~DI~ O~
d~nd
SHOID3NNOD
ON, -]di~/VS ,~,1<~
~ 8NHON (,,~2)~::) Z:9'L ~
I
~'"----HS31N NOW:) I IN
001, '3A31S
ON I 10219900
3SOH
OIISYqd
~¥3q0
G~OD
(~qONVH DAd
~)~o ~'~
Figure 3. Epibenthic Data Sheet
SO RT'ER: %QAJQC: # FOUND:
DATE; BY: DATE;
STATION: SAMP~_E:~- ' ' DEPTH,:
TAXA LINE # TOTAL. QA~QC
WEIGP:T
ARTHROPODA
CRUSTAC-~".
Ha~c:.~ccics
~s~e
Eminosommid~e
CumAceA
Cume[l~
~moroas
AmDhiood~
G~m~dAe
Eo.~smmsrus sa.
Coronhium SD.
Pom0c. eneia so.
NOTES:
EXHIBIT A-7
a single mean value). A transformation using Iog~o (X+I), where X = density, will be
applied, if necessary (e.g. data not normally distributed). If transformation of the data is
successful, or if the data distribution is initially normal, a one-way ANOVA will be
applied. If the data cannot be normalized by transformation then non-parametric
statistics will be applied.
At year 5, adequate epibenthic density on the mitigation beach will be accomplished if at
least 75 percent of all tests indicate no significant difference(P<0.05), or that the
treatment is greater than the controls. If more than 25 percent of the tests indicate a
significant depression in density, relative to the control, the contingency plan spelled
out in the approved monitoring plan must be implemented.
Reporting
Reporting of all monitoring functions will be provided by FishPro to the City and
resource agencies by August 15, 1996.
Budget and Cost Breakdown
Assumptions
1. Epibenthic community diversity and density to be assessed in late spring, 1996.
2. Taxonomic analysis conducted by subconsultant.
3. Number of samples to be analyzed is 176.
4. Sub consultant fee is $49.50 per sample.
5. Reporting annually on August 15th concurrent with Substrate Analysis Report.
The total cost for this work-not to exceed $21,370.00.
References
FishPro. 1994. Bremerton Overwater Park Epibenthic Monitoring Report.
Bremerton, 286 Fourth Street, Bremerton, WA 98310. 21pg. Appendices
City of
1)'3~96.Brem. OP Mit Plan
EXHIBIT A-8
FISHPRO, INC.
RATE SCHEDULE*
ENGINEERING
Senior Project Engineer
Project Engineer
(Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Structural)
Design Engineer
Senior Engineering Technician
Engineering Technician
CAD Technician
Construction Observer
$96/Hr
$89/Hr
$76/Hr
$66/Hr
$50/Hr
$44/Hr
$64/Hr
ENVIRONMENTAL
Senior Fisheries Scientist
Senior Environmental Scientist
Environmental Scientist
Fisheries Technician
$78/Hr
$76/Hr
$68/Hr
$38/Hr
1/2/96
OTHER COSTS
Administrative Assistant
Word Processing
Clerical
Expert Witness
Copies
Mileage
Plots
Fax
Airfare, Lodging and Meals
- Permit Fees
Subconsultants
$36/Hr
$33/Hr
$28/Hr
1.5 x Billable Rate
$0.1 O/Copy
$0.28/Mile
$1.50/Plot
$1.00/Page
As Quoted
Cost plus 5%
Cost plus 5%
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
Fishery Sampling Equipment
Water Quality Sampling Equipment
Laboratory Analyses
Wetland Delineation Equipment
Boat & Motor - Lake (plus fuel)
Boat & Motor - Sound (plus fuel)
Outside Services
Marine Field Gear
As Quoted
As Quoted
As Quoted
$30/Day
$75/Day
$200/Day
As Charged Plus 10%
$50/Day
* Personnel hourly rates include labor, general and administrative overhead and profit.
EXHIBIT A-9
FishPro, Inc.
- 3780 S.E. Mile Hill Ddve
Port Orchard, WA 98366
Estimate of Professional Services
Client: City of Bremerton
Project: Mitigation Beach Biological Monitoring - Year 4
Date: 12/21/95
Services: Type: [] Engineering
Activities: [] Planning/Feasibility Study
[~ Construction Observer
Labor Costs
[] Preliminary Design
[] Environmental Study
[] Environmental
[] Design
[] Permitting
I Establish Transects 3 8 8 19 1,172
and layout in field
2 Conduct Sampling 32 32 64 4,608
Twice in year 4
3 Sampling Preparation 16 16 1,088
and sorting
4 Report Preparation 32 16 8 8 2 66 4,192
5 City and Agency
Coordination 8 8 608
Meetings charged on a per hour basis as per rate sheet.
Hours Subtotal 75 72 8 8 8 2 173 -
Hourly Rate 96 89 76 78 76 68 66 50 44 33 28 - -
Labor Cost Subtotal 5700 4896 400 352 264 56 - 11,668
Other Direct Costs Quantity Rate Subtotal
Car Mileage 200 miles 0.30 / mile 60
Chemicals I unit 300 /unit 300
Field Gear 4 days 50 /day 200
Communications 4 months 20 /month 80
Copies 500 copies 0.10 /copy 50
Benthic Lab Analysis 176 samples 49.50 /sample 8,712.
Boat and Motor 4 lump sum 75 /day 300
iTotal Labor Cost
' ITotal Other Direct Costs
[Total Project Cost
$11,668
$9,702
$21,370
Client ResP(~nsibilities: [~ Soils Investigation
[] Other
[] Construction Budget [] Survey [] Design Cdteda
'10T'l
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Kitsap Physicians Service
Contract for 1996
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
~3
March ~, 1996
Adnin. Services
Kathl een McCluske¥
February 26, 1996
2. CLEARANCES: (comment or~.~ack 3. EXHIBITS:
if ne~ _~
At t orney
Huron Resources
City ~easurer
~cil Stu~ Session 3/4/96 --
ENDORSEMENT ~ INFO~ATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESID~ENfl~R SUBMITTAl:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ATC~ION:
This is the seventh year of our contract with KPS for employee medical services.
Through the efforts of our consultant and the Insurance Benefits Conmittee, which
represents all unions and management, we reccrmnend a one year contract 1/1/96 to
12/31/96, We further reccamend the stop loss be lowered to $100,000 from the
$150,000 ISL in 1995.
'8.
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to approve one year contract with I{PS for employee medical services and
budget adjustment.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO: ~0,95%
CLEARANCE COMMENTS (cont.):
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (cont.):
IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Insurance coverage will lapse.
e
IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EOUIpMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES
The City budgeted a 10% increase in medical dental for 1996. The actual increase is
15.19%. The budget adjustment wi 11 cover the difference between the amount budgeted
and actual premi~n.
RESEARCH SOURCES:
Premi~n is an estimate. The cost to the City is the medical services. If all of
the premiun is not required to cover the medical services, the funds drawn from
the medical reserve will not be used and will go back into the reserve.
Requesting Department:
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE RESERVE and OTHERS
No.
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Description
TRANSFER FROM RESERVE
Amount
119,321
USE OF FUNDS:
Description
MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUMS
GENERAL FUND
PARKING FUND
WATER FUND
GOLF FUND
Amount
69,660
388
48,261
1,012
119,321
NARRATIVE:
This adjustment will provide for the transfer of funds from reserve necessary for the 1996 contract with KPS
for employee medical insurance.
Department Head Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Date
Director Signatur~('-~~
Date
r-~ Recommended ~ Not Recommended Treasurer's"s-Sighatu'te--- ~'Date ~-'
Mayor Comments:
Recommended ~ Not Recommended 7~///
Approved ~ Denied ~~. ~ D~a~e~/~
Mayor's Signature
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
~ Recommended ~
~-1 Approved [-~
Not Recommended
Denied
Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature Date
GROUP ENDORSEMENT VI
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN
KITSAP PHYSICIANS SERVICE
AND
THE CITY OF BREMERTON
for its active employees and retirees
GROUP NUMBERS:
22900
21001 (PLAN A)
21002
21003
21004
21005
21010 (PLAN B)
21011
21012
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ENDORSEMENT: January 1, 1996
It is understood and agreed that the original Agreement between
Kitsap Physicians Service (the Corporation) and The City of
Bremerton (the Group) originally dated January 1, 1990 shall be
amended as follows:
Modify paragraph D.2. to read:
D.2. "Administrative Expenses" - Administrative expenses shall
mean those expenses incurred by the Corporation in
fulfilling its contractual obligations under this
contract and include but are not limited to the
following: claims adjudication expense, overhead,
printing, case managment, utilization review, assumed
risk and printing. Administration expenses shall be
eleven dollars and eight cents ($11.08) per beneficiary
per month.
In addition, the Corporation shall charge two percent
(2%) of Premium for a Legislatively-mandated Premium Tax.
Modify Paragraph F.1. to read:
PREMIUM
The Monthly Premiums which follow will be effective through
December 31, 1996 unless otherwise opened for re-examination
by either the Corporation or the Group by giving siXty (60)
days written notice. In no event will the monthly premiums be
changed before January 1, 1997 except by the mutual agreement
of the Corporation and the Group. The Monthly Premium rates
shall be as follows:
RATE SUMMARY
The rates that follow are effective January 1, 1996 and guaranteed
through December 31, 1996.
Plan A
LEOFF I Active
Regular & LEOFF II Active
Spouse
1st Dependent
2nd and all other Dependents
Net Premium ISL Total
$168.87 4.70 $173.57
121.55 4.70 126.25
134.94 5.00 139.94
58.92 4.50 63.42
46.74 4.50 51.24
LEOFF I Retirees Under 65
Spouse
1st Dependent
2nd and all other Dependents
$429.56 4.70 434.26
233.44 5.00 238.44
55.59 4.50 60.09
43.70 4.50 48.20
Plan B
LEOFF I Active
Regular & LEOFF II Active
Spouse
1st Dependent
2nd and all other Dependents
N/A N/A N/A
104.59 4.70 109.29
117.38 5.00 122.38
51.48 4.50 55.98
39.20 4.50 43.70
LEOFF I Retirees Under 65
LEOFF I Retirees Over 65
Spouse
1st Dependent
2nd and all other Dependents
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
201.57 5.00 206.57
48.48 4.50 52.98
38.46 4.50 42.96
The monthly charges which have been established for Individual Stop
Loss are as follows:
$100,000 INDIVIDUAL STOP LOSS
CATEGORY RATE
Subscriber
Spouse
1st Dependent
2nd and all other Dependents
$ 4.70
5.00
4.50
4.50
In all other respects, the terms and provisions of said contract
between the parties heretofore amended shall continue in full force
and effect.
In witness whereof the parties have executed this agreement this
day of 19 .
SIGNED IN DUPLICATE
KITSAP PHYSICIANS SERVICE
THE CITY OF BREMERTON
By
Its President Its
Attest:
By
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
By
City Attorney
E-22900 (01/96)
KITSAP PHYSICIANS SERVICE CONTRACT
1990 - 1996
YEAR
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
est.
RESERVE
$220,631
434,008
645,788
798,892
748,164
538,500
538,500
GROSS 2%
PREMIUM TAX CONVERSION
828,859 4,102 .5
968,366 4,778 .5
1,025,078 5,036 .5
1,034,563 5,036 .5
830,567 16,611 -0-
843,073 16,860 -0-
1,019,452 20,389 -0-
ADMINISTRATION
FEE
69,731 8.5%
81,234 8.5%
85,613 8.5%
85,595 8.5%
82,064 $10.50
88,561 $10.80
90,811 $11.08
pmpm*
pmpm*
pmpm*
STOP LOSS
ISL** $100,000 $100,000
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
subscri~r 1.40 2. O0 2.60 3.85 4.80
$~use 1.60 2.25 3.00 4.10 5.15
Child .95 1.30 2.05 3.80 4.60
Fee $8,496 $12,678 $17,782 $27,561 $34,588
Claim over
$100,000 -0- -0- -0- $21,547 -0-
$150,000
$150,000 $100,000
1995 1996
3.10 4.70
3.30 5.00
3.35 4.50
$24,586 $37,110
$6,602
* per member per month
** Individual Stop Loss
RATE COMPARISON
AWC/CITY OF BREMERTON
1996 Monthly Premium
Plan A
LEOFF I Active
Regular & LEOFF II Active
Spouse
First Dependent
Second & All Other Dependents
LEOFF I Retired Not Medicare Eligible
LEOFF I Retired Medicare Eligible
AWC
1996 Rate
$213.90
160.45
153.10
69.75
61.90
377.60
251.80
CITY
1996Rate
$173.57
126.25
139.94
63.42
51.24
434.26
Plan B
LEOFF I Active
Regular & LEOFF II Active
Spouse
First Dependent
Second & All Other Dependents
AWC
1996 Rate
N/A
$131.00
131.00
60.80
52.45
CITY
1996 Rate
N/A
$109.29
122.38
55.98
43.70
A~ENDA B'rLL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Ordinance #
Reorganizing the Hearing
Examiner Function
FOR AGENDA OF: March 6, 1996
ORIGINATING DEPT: Admin. Services
ORIGINATOR: Kathy McCluskey ~
DATE SUBMITTED: February 29, 1996
2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back 3. EXHIBITS:
City Attorneyf~,ing~ry) /~ ~
ENDORSEMENT~.~INFQ~fl~ATIONc~~ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRE$~D~-N~OR/ ~"//--~--~-~SUBMI~T~TAL:
MAYOR ~y~n~ . COUNCIL PRESIDENTC / ~f
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL~CTION:
The provisions for appealing to the Hearing Examiner were made uniform
throughout the BMC including a filing fee of $50, giving the appellant
7 wking days to file an appeal, and requiring that the appeal be based upon
a written decision authorized by the Department Director.
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to pass proposed ordinance.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Admin. Services
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Admin. Services
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
AMENDED
11.
AGENDA BILL NO:
CLEARANCE COMMENTS (cont.):
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (cont.):
Se
IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Hearing Examiner provisions will not be uniform throughout code.
IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES
N/A
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
V
~ OI~IN,~S~¢E reorganizing the hearing examiner ~netion as part
of the Bremerton Municipal Court and amending Chapters 2.62, 5.02,
6.04, 6.32, ?.07, ?.08, 10.11, 10.40 and 15.08 of the Brcmerton
Municipal Code.
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. Amendment. Section 2.62.045 is hereby amended to read as follows:
2.62.045 HEARING EXAMINER - PROCEDURE - APPEAL. The hearing examiner shall
have iurisdiction to receive and rule on appeals by aggrieved appellants of administrative decisions
after a written complaint has been denied by the Department Director or designee. Appeals to the
office of the hearing examiner from any final administrative decision covered by the provisions of
this chapter shall be made within ~ seven (7) working days from the date of appellant's
notification of the decision. Date of mailing shall be considered date of notification. Appeals shall
include the appellant's name, address and telephone number, ~nd the written decision being
appealed and the municipal code section establishing the appeal. Appeals shall be accompanied by
a Fifty Dollar ($50.00) filing fee, which shall be refunded if the appellant substantially prevails. The
Municipal Court Judge shall adopt rules for scheduling and conduct of administrative hearings.
Enforcement of the administrative decision being appealed to the examiner shah be stayed
during the pendency_ of an appeal which has been properly and timely filed provided there is not
imminent threat to the public's safe_u/and weffare.
The hearing examiner's decision shall be final and conclusive unless the appellant or the City
files for a Writ of Certiorari in Kitsap County Superior Court within thirty (30) days. Procedures
of this section, including filing fee, and appeal of the examiner's decision shall apply unless different
procedures are specified in the ordinance establishing the administrative appeal.
The examiner shah have jurisdiction to receive and rule on appeals of administrative
decisions specified in the following Titles of the Bremerton Municipal Code:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(5)
(.6)
Business Licenses and Regulations, Title 5
Health and Sanitation, Title 6
Animals and Fowl, Title 7
Peace, Safety and Morals, Title 9
Traffic, Title 10
Municipal Utilities, Title 15
Section 2. Amendment. Section 5.02.310 is hereby amended to read as follows:
5.02.310 APPEALS. Any taxpayer aggrieved by the amount of the fee or tax found by the
Treasurer to be required under the provisions of this chapter may file a written appeal with the
office of the hearing examiner within ~ seven (7) ' ~ '~
working ca:en~ar days from the time such
taxpayer was sent written notice of such amount. Such notice shall also contain the taxholder's
~ ....,~ ..... c,_a: ...... ; ,u~ r~:,. t~u ..... ,~ Qax The determination appealed from shall be
regarded as prima facie correct. The examiner may reverse or modify an action of the Treasurer
and ascertain the correct amount of the fee or tax due if the Treasurer's determination violates the
terms of this chapter or is contrary to law.
Section 3. Amendment. Section 5.02.360 is hereby ame_nded to read as follows:
5.02.360 REVOCATION OF BUSINESS LICENSE CONDITIONS. The Treasurer may
revoke or suspend the business license issued to any person engaged in business activities within
the City who is in default in any payment of any license fee or tax owed under Title 3 or 5 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code; or who shall fail to comply with any of the provisions of this chapter;
or where any licensee or employee of the licensee is engaged in any conduct which violates any state
2
or local laws or ordinances at the licensee's place of business, and of which the licensee has actual
or constructive notice; or upon the recommendation of the county health department that such
business is being managed, conducted or maintained without regard to proper sanitation and
hygiene. In the event the Treasurer shall suspend or revoke the license, (s)he shall cause to be
served upon the licensee an order by certified mail which states the reasons therefor and the
licensee's appeal rights. Such revocation or suspension shall take effect ~ seven (7) working
eatead~ days from the date of receipt of notice by certified mail from the Treasurer unless the
licensee files a written appeal with the office of the hearing examiner before the effective date of
the Treasurer's administrative decision of revocation or suspension. A licensee who has been
licensed in the preceding license year may continue to engage in the activity for which the license
is required, pending decision by the examiner, unless the Treasurer determines that a clear,
substantial and imminent hazard to the health, safety, welfare, privacy or property of any person
would result. The administrative decision appealed from shall be regarded as prima facie correct.
The examiner may affirm or deny the Treasurer's decision to suspend or revoke a license. The
decision of the examiner shall be final unless a pet'.'t/cn *' ........:~' .... :~- '--' '~'~ exarnLner is
/meept-ed-~ appeal of the decision is filed under BMC 2.62.045.
Section 4. Amendment. Section 6.04.090 is hereby amended to read as follows:
6.04.090 APPEALS. Determinations made by the garbage contractor regarding the
frequency of collection or the size of solid waste containers required of the public may be appealed
C!.~' r-~_l.:_~.~ ~.~ ^~ ^ .... ~. e..~l. ~.~ ~i.~. ha', ....... '~-:"' + ....."-~ ~; .... +~
to the ': ............ re .............. : ~,v ....
cvcr thc. .... ~.~ charged '--',~j +*'~...~ ~,----~',..~,~ ..... ~w.v." .... Hearing Examiner.
Section 5. Amendment. Section 6.32.090 is hereby amended to read as follows:
3
6.32.090 RIGHT TO APPEAL. Any person aggrieved by an order, decision, ruling or
interpretation by the administrator may file an appeal in writing with the office of the Bremerton
Hearing Examiner pursuant to BMC g:84 2.62.
Section 6. Amendment. Section 7.07.200 is hereby amended to read as follows:
7.07.200 I-IEARING. The custodian of a dog declared dangerous may file a request within
ten (10) days from the date of such notice for a hearing before the hearing examiner of the City
of Bremerton to contest such declaration under procedures of BMC g:84 2.62.
Section 7. Amendment. Section 7.08.200 is hereby amended to read as follows:
7.08.200 ABATEMENT - IMPOUNDMENT. To abate a nuisance defined above, or to
rescue an animal from cruel treatment as defined in BMC 7.08.600, an animal control officer may:
(d) (2) If the custodian does not request the hearing provided for by 7.07.200 or if such
hearing is requested and the Hearing Examiner upholds the Animal Control Officer's Ndangerous
dog" determination, said animal may be detained until the custodian shows proof that he/she has
complied with requirements of this Chapter pertaining to the keeping of a dangerous dog.
(i) If the custodian shows proof that he or she has met the requirements for keeping
a dangerous dog in the City, the dog will be released upon payment of impound and boarding fees.
(ii) If the custodian has not shown proof that hr or she has met the requirements for
keeping a dangerous dog within ~ thirty (30} days of the Hearing Examiner's decision,
the animal may be immediately destroyed.
Section 8. Amendment.
Section 10.11.050 is hereby amended to read as follows:
4
10.11.050 NUISANCE DECLARED - APPEAL.
(a) In addition to the enforcement provisions of Section 10.11.040, if any person fails to
respond to three or more outstanding infractions for parking a vehicle in violation of this Title, the
City Attorney shall mail a Declaration of Vehicle Nuisance to the registered and legal owners of
said vehicle as shown by the records of the Washington State Department of Licensing informing
them that the cited vehicle shall be declared a nuisance and subject to immediate impound or
immobilization unless, within ten (10) days, either owner (1) pays the underlying infractions or (2)
appeals the Declaration of Vehicle Nuisance.
(b) Appeal of the Declaration of Nuisance Vehicle may will be przgcntcd ~ a ....... o ~
Jgehiete heard by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to BMC 2.62. Failure to appear at the scheduled
hearing will be deemed a waiver of any rights to contest the Declaration.
At the hearing, the owner shall have the burden of showing the registered owner did not fail
to respond to three or more outstanding infractions for parking.
Section 9. Amendment.
10.40.130 APPEALS.
(a)
(1)
Section 10.40.130 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Hearing an Appeal.
Venue. The affected employer ~ may appeal the initial order of the
iding Offi :_ ~:,~.~. ,~.~ r-:,.. ~, r}.~_~..,~_,~ ~s.._:~:.,~ r-,,,.., ,,~ through the administrative
Pres cer ................~ ................ ~ ..~.. o v ..... ~ -
process set forth in BMC 10.40.130(a)(3).
Section 10. Amendment. Section 15.08.020 is hereby amended to read as follows:
15.08.020 APPEAL - MUNICIPAL COURT. Bremerton Municipal Court shall have
jurisdiction to receive and rule on appeals from customers aggrieved by the Department's decision
to shut off water, or any decision regarding the amount charged for water, sewer or stormwater
services after a written complaint has been denied by the Department under section 15.08.010.
The administrative appeal under this chapter shall be conducted according to procedures
of municipal code chapter 2 62 pr~vi~e~ *~-~ ~-~:-~ ~'~' t.~ ~, _.:,,.:~ ,~.:~,.. r-m~ ~ ..... ~' ~:~:- ~ and
Section 11.
passage and publication.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this
Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days from
1996.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this
day of ,
day of
1996.
APPROVED this
JOHN LAW, Council President
__ day of ,1996.
ATTEST:
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk
6
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT:
ORDINANCE NO.
SETTING WASTEWATER RATES
FOR AGENDA OF: March 13, 1996
ORIGINATING DEPT.:TREASURER/~
ORIGINATOR: R. HANNA'~ ~ .
DATE SUBMITTED: March 4, 1996 ~ '-~
3. EXHIBITS:
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
ENDORSEMENTS -~ , ,. INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL P_EI~ESIDENT FOR SUBMITTA
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION.~-~
The proposed ordinance will increase the City's retail wastewater rates by an average of five percent. Staff analysis has
demonstrated that an 'd~.increase is necessary to allow the utility to pay for current operations and to implement the
capital improvements which are mandated to meet environmental regulations.
8, RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to approve on first reading Ordinance No.
Motion to pass on second reading Ordinance No.
setting wastewater rates.
setting wastewater rates.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
Treasurer
Mayor
~A
~A
PULLED
COUNCIL DIRECT~E:
TABLED
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED
DISAPPROVED AMENDED
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Current wastewater rates will remain in effect with a resulting shortage of revenue to the wastewater utility.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
Will increase the operating revenues of the wastewater utility by approximately $260,000 per year.
RESEARCH SOURCES:
Wastewater comp. plan
Wastewater rote analysis by staff.
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE amending rates and charges for municipal wastewater services;
and amending Ordinance No. 4529.
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. Amendment. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 4529 is amended as follows:
PURPOSE. This ordinance establishes assessments, rates and charges for municipal
water, wastewater and stormwater services. Except as expressly provided herein, nothing
in this ordinance shall affect the application of annual adjustments of General Facility Fees,
or Connection Fees as set forth in BMC 15.06.020.
I. WATER.
(a) ASSESSMENTS:
(1) General Facility Fee.
(a) Within City limits $150.00/ERU
(b) Outside Citylimits $225.00/ERU
(2)
Front Footage Fee.
(a) Within City limits
(b) Outside City limits
$8.00 per foot
$12.00 per foot
(3) Connection Fee.
Rate Per Connection
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29196
'7,/
Size Within City Limits Outside City Limits
3/4" $ 733.00 $1099.00
1" 788.00 1182.00
1 1/2" 1408.00 2112.00
2" 1579.00 2368.00
Greater than 2" Time & Materials 150% of Time & Materials
(4) Pavement Restoration.*
Asphalt $300.O0
Concrete $300.00
* Refundable, if assessed and not required.
(5) County Road Permit N/A
$450.00
$450.00
Cost
Co) RATES:
(1) Retail Water Service Rates.
Monthly Service Charge
Meter Size
5/8 & 3/4 inches
1 inch
1-1/2 inch
2 inch
3 inch
Within City Limits
$ 1.98
2.25
3.18
4.30
8.18
Outside City Limits
$ 2.96
3.38
4.77
6.45
12.27
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
2
4 inch 15.25 22.88
6 inch 54.18 81.27
8 inch 197.50 296.25
10 inch 705.35 1,058.00
12 inch 2,652.15 3.978.23
Commodity Charge $0.75/1-t. C.F. $1.125/H. C.F.
(2) Fire Protection Service.
Monthly Service Charge
Service Size Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2 inch $ 7.65 $11.48
3 inch 8.43 12.65
4 inch 9.18 13.77
6 inch 11.48 17.22
8 inch 15.30 22.95
10 inch 21.43 32.15
12 inch 30.60 45.90
(3)
Monthly Service Charge
Meter Size 5/8 X 3/4" Within City Limits
Base Charge $1.75/Acct
Low-Income Senior Citizen and Low-Income Disabled Citizen Rates.
Outside City Limits
$2.63/Acct
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
Commodity Charge
0 o 1000 CF/Billing
Over 1000 CF/Billing
No charge
$0.75/H.C.F.
No charge
$1.125/H.C.F.
(4)
Temporary/Construction Meter.
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
Size Deposit Base Fee Base Fee
3/4" & 1" $ 75.00 $20.00/mo $ 30.00/mo
Hydrant meter 300.00 40.00/mo 60.00/mo
Commodity Charge $0.75/H.C.F. $1.125/H.C.F.
(5) Water Inspection Fees.
Main Extensions
Pump Stations
Miscellaneous
Within City Limits
$0.75/ft. but
not less than
$300.00
$500.00
$40.00/Hr.
Outside City Limits
$1.125/ft. but
not less than
$450.00
$750.00
$60.00/Hr.
II. WASTEWATER
(a) ASSESSMENTS:
(1) General Facility Fee.
WASTEW~R.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2129196
(a) Within City limits
Co) Outside City limits
(2) Front Footage Fee.
(a) Within City limits
(b) Outside City limits
$150.00/ERU
$225.00/ERU
$ 8.00 per foot
$12.00 per foot
(3) Inspection Fee.
Lateral connection at P/L
Lateral connection at main
Conveyance Facility Ext.
Pump Station
Miscellaneous
Within
City Limits
$ 40.00
$250.00
$1.25/Ft.
but not
less than
$300.00
$500.00
$40.00/Hr.
Outside
City Limits
$ 60.00
$375.00
$1.90/Ft.
but not
less than
$450.00
$750.00
$60.00/Hr.
(b) RATES:
(1) Retail Wastewater Service Rates.
Monthly Service Charge
Within City Limits
Single Family
Base Charge $3.004.49/Acct
Outside City Limits
$g-:455.16/Acct
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Di~k 2 - 2/29/96
5
Commodity Charge
3.70/H.C.F.
4.25/H.C.F.
Duplex on 1 Meter or 2 Bldgs.
on 1 Meter or Single Parcel
Base Charge
Commodity Charge
Sg-:403.59/Unit
3.70/H.C.F.
$2.754.12/Unit
4.25/H.C.F.
Multiple Family
Base Charge
Commodity Charge
$-2~,03.59/Unit
3.70/H.C.F.
$2.754.12/Unit
4.25/H.C.F.
Commercial I
Base Charge
Commodity Charge
$,~ ~r~q.24/Acct
3.70/H.C.F.
$4-:036.03/Acct
4.25/H.C.F.
Commercial II
Base Charge
Commodity Charge
Sg.505.24/Acct
5.80/H.C.F.
$4~36.03/Acct
6.67/H.C.F.
(2) Low-Income Senior Citizen and Low-Income Disabled Citizen Rates.
tliMonthly Service Charge
Within City Limits
Single Family Account Class
Base Charge $1.20.97/Acct
Outside City Limits
$!.591.12/Acct
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
6
Commodity Charge
0-1000 CF/Billing
Over 1000 CF/Billing
No charge
3.70/H.C.F.
No charge
4.25/H.C.F.
(3) Septage Disposal
$0.10/gal of tank capacity.
III. MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES.
(a) METER TEST FEE SCHEDULE:
Size
3/4" & 1"
1 1/2 & 2"
3" or greater
Utility Customers
$72.00
$88.00
$105.00 (W/Test Port)
Time and Materials (WO/Test Port)
(b) OFFICE SERVICES:
Account Maintenance
Delinquency Notice (Mailer)
A.C.H. Per Service
Lien Recovery Charge
Duplicate Bill Charge
(per billing period)
Within
City Limits
2.50
< 1.00>
50.00
Others
$ 72.00
$ 88.00
$105.00
Outside
City Limits
2.50
< 1.00>
50.00
(c) FIELD SERVICES:
WASTEW'rR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29196
(c) FIELD SERVICES:
Wet tapping (water main only) 2179.00
3268.00
Fire Hydrant Installation
3153.00
Water Meter Removal Charge 40.00
Cross-Connection Control
Device Test/Inspection
30.00
Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on -
(Customer Reques0
Regular Hours N/C
After Hours 80.00
Delinquency Notice (Door Knocker) 10.00
Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on -
(Delinquent Accounts)
Regular Hours
After Hours
30.00
80.00
Flow and Pressure Test (Uncertified)
3/4"& 1" meters only 30.00
4729.00
40.00
30.00
N/C
80.00
10.00
30.00
80.00
30.00
Utility Plant Locates
Regular Hours N/C N/C
After Hours 80.00 80.00
Emergency N/C N/C
Within
City Limits
UTILITY PLANT INSPECTIONS:
(Miscellaneous) 30.00
Outside
City Limits
30.00
(e) PARK RESERVATION FEE:
(non-refundable) 25.00
25.00
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
8
(f) PLAN CHECK:
(1) Water:
(i) Main Extensions
(Includes hydrants
and appurtenances and
connection to water system)
(ii)Pump Stations
(iii) Fireline Extensions
(iv) Irrigation Systems
(v) System Connections
(vi) Miscellaneous
$0.10/ft but not
less than $100.00.
$500.00
$54.00
$54.00
$54.O0
$27.00/Hr
(2) Wastewater:
(i) Conveyance Facility Extensions
(Includes manholes and
appurtenances and
connection to wastewater system)
(ii) Pump Stations
(iii) System Connections
(iv) Miscellaneous
IV. STORMWATER
(a) ASSESSMENTS:
(1) Storm Drainage Plan Review Fees**
(i) Preliminary Drainage Plans
Residential Development
$0.10/ft but not
less than $100.00.
$500.00
$ 54.O0
$ 27.O0/I-Ir
Within City Limits
$325.00
Outside City Limits
N/A
WASTEWTR.ORD. Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29196
9
Non-Residential Development $225.00 +
$10.00/ISU
(2) Final Detailed Drainage Plans
(ii) Residential Development
0-20 Lots
21-50 Lots
51-1013 Lots
100+ Lots
Minimum Charge
Non-Residential
Development
Minimum Charge
(iii) Resubmittal Fees
First Resubmittal
Subsequent Resubmittal
(2) Storm Drainage Inspection Fees**
Resident. iai Development
Non-Residential Development
Minimum Charge
Conveyance Fac. Ext.
Unscheduled Inspections
$35.00/Lot
$25.00/Lot
$22.50/L0t
$20.00/Lot
$250.00
$10.00/ISU
$150.00
No Charge
$250.00
$15.00/Lot
$10.00/ISU
$100.00
$ .75/Ft with
a minimum of
$300.00
$40.O0/Site Visit
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
10
(Unscheduled inspections shall be tracked through the course of project and
billed after the final site inspection. Fees for unscheduled inspections shall
be paid prior to final occupancy approval)
**Storm drainage plan review and inspection fees do not apply to single family residence or
duplex construction on an existing established lot. Fees payable at time of submittal.
(b) RATES:
(1) Retail Stormwater Service Rates.
Monthly Service Charge
(i) Single Family
Base Charge
Low Income Senior
Citizen and Low Income
Disabled Citizen Rate
Exception: Duplex
W/2 Meters
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
$4.00/Acct N/A
$2.50/Acct N/A
$2.00/Acct N/A
(ii)
Multiple Family
Base Charge
$4.00/ISU N/A
(iii)
Commercial
Base Charge
$4.00/ISU N/A
(iv) Public School Districts
$4.00/Acct* N/A
*Parcels owned or leased by public school districts which provide
activities which directly benefit the surface and stormwater
management program. The activities may include: curriculum
specific to the issues and problems of surface and stormwater
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29/96
11
(v)
(vi)
(2)
management and student activities in the community to expose
students to the efforts required to restore, monitor, or enhance the
surface and stormwater management system. Pursuant to RCW
35.92.021, the amount of the service charge shall be determined
by the Director, based upon the cost of the activities to the school
district, but not to exceed the value of the activity to the
stormwater management program. Determination of which
activities qualify for the stormwater management service charge
reduction will be made by the Director. Reductions in Stormwater
Management service charges will only be granted to school
districts which provide programs that have been evaluated by the
Director. The service charge adjustment for the school activity
may be applied to any parcel in the service area which is owned
or operated by the school district.
Retail Stormwater Rate Adjustment
Multiple Family & Commercial
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
Water Quality $.50/ISU N/A
Water Quantity $1.50/ISU N/A
Stormwater Penalty
for new Multiple
Family & Commercial
development without
on-site detention
(BMC 15.06.050Co))
$.50/ISU N/A
Implementation Schedule. All multiple family and commercial accounts with two
or more ISU's will receive the credits in b(1)(v) above per ISU until December
31, 1997; Provided, The property owner submits engineering plans and
specifications for on-site stormwater quantity and quality improvements for their
property by October 1, 1995, and said plans are approved by the Department
according to System Development and Construction Standards. Failure to comply
with any of the aforementioned provisions will result in these accounts being
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29196
12
Section 2. Effective Date.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this
,1996.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this ~
This ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1996.
day of
day of
,1996.
APPROVED this
JOHN E. LAW, Council President
__day of
,1996
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
ATrEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
WASTEWTR.ORD - Ordinance Disk 2 - 2/29196
13