The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/28/96 AGENDABREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 239 4TH STREET BREMERTON, WA 98337 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 28t 1996 CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M. A. Pledge Of Allegiance B. Invocation CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If separate discussion is desired on an item, it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at the request of a Council member. ~0~. A. Minutes - February 7, 1996 #AB96-040 ~ CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS 4. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS 5. MAYOR'S REPORT 6. PUBLIC RECOGNITION -- (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes) NEW BUSINESS A. Request To Council To Accept A Revised Letter Of Intent To Annex The Werner Road Area B. Appointment Of Donna R. Adams To The Planning Commission #AB96-041 l~ #AB96-04 . ORDINANCES A. Ordinance #4543 (Second Reading), Restricting Storage Of Oversize Vehicles (CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) #AB96-030 ~ RESOLUTIONS A. ResOlution #2541 Authorizing An Interfund Loan From The Water Fund To The Wastewater Fund 10. PUBLIC HEARING - 6;00 P.M. OR LATER A. To Amend The Bremerton Zoning Ordinance To Better Accommodate Recycling Facilities; And Ordinance (First Reading) #AB96-043 #AB96-044 3~ 1. SUBJECT: AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY '7, 1996 FOR AGENDA OF: February 28, 1996 ORIGINATING DEPT: City Council ORIGINATOR: John E. Law~ President DATE SUBMITTED: 2-21-96 2. ~: (comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: ENDORSEMENT INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR'COUNCIL ~CTION: 8. RECOMMENDATION: 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE- REVIEW DATE: PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED DAT] AMENDED 11. AGENDA-KILL NO: TAPE #1353 UNAPPROVED DRAFT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 7, 1996 #0020 #0034 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, February 7, 1996, at 5:30 P.M., with Council President John Law presiding. Council members present were Carlos Montgomery, Sherril Huff-Menees, David Farr, and Richard Neville. Council members Bob Winters, A1 Colvin, Cecil McConnell, and Lon Overson were absent due to their attending the AWC Legislative Conference in Olympia. Also present were City Attorney Ian Sievers and Deputy City Clerk Gil Johnson. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council President Law and Invocation given by Pastor Bud Fraser of First Baptist Church of Bremerton. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes - January 17, 1996 #AB96-029 M/S/C/U(Neville/Montgomery) to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the M/S/C/U(Farr/Montgomery) on February 7, 1996, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: 194837 through 195026 in the amount of $456,391.84. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mr. Montgomery reported today he had the pleasure of touring the old Elks building and was amazed with its size and the decor in the building prior to its restoration. The facility is soon to be renamed the Max Hale Center and will offer 33 single occupancy rooms, 16 studio apartments, 3-one bedroom apartments, 2-two bedroom apartments. These units will house individuals below the 50% median income level and will be available for occupancy on approximately May 1. Mrs. Huff-Menees thanked those citizens attending the District Neighborhood meeting for Districts #6, #7 and #8 on February 1. The program for that meeting was a presentation of the Sinclair TAPE #1353 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 2 of 9 Landing project, which was excellent and brought out a lot of questions from members of the public. Additional presentations of the Sinclair Landing project will be coming up in the near future and she urged members of the public to take advantage of those opportunities to learn first hand what the project entails. Mr. Fart expressed his thanks to all of the people attending the combined District Neighborhood Meeting and he believes the more people see the project the more they will like it. He also urged members of the public to attend the public presentation opportunities to learn about the project. Mr. Law announced the next District #3 Neighborhood Meeting will be held February 20, 7:00 P.M., at the Senior Center. Prosecuting Attorney Russ Houge will be the guest speaker at that meeting. F~%¥OR'S REPORT - State Of The City Address Mayor Lynn Horton gave an overview of her 1995 goals and objectives describing those attained in 1995, and how some of them would be carried over into 1996. She emphasized the City's financial constraints and how to deliver services to the public within those limited funding resources, and the necessity for economic diversity, improving housing inventory, working to implement the Growth Management Act and doing the things necessary to make Bremerton an attractive and liveable city. Mayor Horton outlined her 1996 TARGET ISSUES for the City of Bremerton (copy attached and made a part of the minutes). Mr. Neville stated he has tracked the Mayor's goals since 1994, and truly appreciates her having a plan and focus to get things done. The Mayor does follow through with her plan and as always he enjoys lobbying her to move some of the items around to possibly put on a little higher priority. Mayor Horton stated she has taken into consideration Council's goals and objectives developed at their Retreat, which was why they saw the parking issue come up on the priority list. President Law announced Councilmen Lon Overson, cecil Mcconnell, Bob Winters and A1 Colvin were absent due to their attending the AWC Legislative Conference in Olympia. PUBLIC RECOGNITION Charlie Brown - Mayor Horton kept her campaign promise to reduce the City's tax on Brem-Air collection fee. Emily Moshay - YWCA Of Kitsap County's 7th Anniversary of Women of Achievement - April 30, at the Kitsap Golf and Country Club. TAPE #1353 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 3 of 9 Elizabeth Buell - Scotch broom issue. ?A - ORDIN/%NCE (FIRST READING) RESTRICTING STORAGE OF OVERSIZED VEHICLESt ~AB96-030 The proposed ordinance restricts reparking oversized vehicles over 10,000 lbs. or 22 feet in length to 120 hours in any 30 day period. The restriction will not apply to motor homes. Deborah Goode11, Parking Supervisor, stated this issue has been studied by the City since 1992, and she feels confident that a solution has been identified to respond to the problem that the City has experienced involving large vehicles, dump trucks, buses, paint trucks, utility vehicles, and trailers that were not addressed under current City ordinances. Terry Sears, 1919 5th Street, raised the following questions: (1) will motor homes be included in the 10,000 lb. limitation? (2) What is happening with enforcement in the 2-hour residential parking areas? (3) The source of the 10,000 lb. limit. (4) Will the City be going by a guesstimate rather than having a vehicle weighed to prove it is a specific poundage, if there is a disagreement? (5) Would the City entertain allowing a parking permit in the 2-hour parking zones if a vehicle's weight is under 10,000 lbs? (6) Will enforcement of the weight restriction be implemented only at the time the 2-hour parking limitation is implemented? (7) Prior to the 2-hour residential parking zone implemented in his neighborhood was it ok for him to park his motor home in front of his house without any restriction? Lastly, he is opposed to the limitation and he sees no good reason for it in his neighborhood where there is plenty of parking once the shipyard commuters were restricted from parking in that area during the day time. His neighbors have not have any difficulty finding parking when his motor home is parked in front of his home and the street is wide enough to allow emergency vehicles to pass through. He does not live in his motor home and does not feel it is a public nuisance, Ms. Goode11 responded to Mr. Sears' questions in the following numbered sequence: (1) the proposed ordinance excludes motor homes and the definition being used is through Recreational Vehicle through the B.M.C.. There would not be any restriction for motor homes except in the 2-hour residential parking permit areas. (2) Enforcement would remain the same. There were no allowances for motor homes or vehicles in excess of 8,000 lbs allowed in 2-hour residential parking areas. The proposed ordinance raises the weight limit to 10,000, which would allow a little more, but most motor homes will usually exceed the 10,000 lbs. (3) The City would generally go through the makes of registered vehicles with the Department of Motor Vehicles or with the manufacturer to find TAPE #1353 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 4 of 9 out the gross weight. (4) The City will not guess the weight; however, if the owner has documentation from the manufacturer specifying the weight is less than 10,000 lbs., the City would accept that data. If such documentation was not available, the City could have the vehicle weighed at a truck scale. (4) As far as entertaining, she would go by the ordinance, which is stated in the B.M.C., that they will not issue a residential permit to a vehicle exceeding 10,000 lbs. (5) The proposed ordinance does not affect Mr. Sears particular motor home. It was affected in the first place - this action is not amending that portion of the ordinance except to raise the restriction. (6) During the past five years the 8,000 lbs limit has been in effect as far as the residential permit requirement. (7) Answer to #7 was yes. Mr. Sears could petition his neighborhood and get 65% of the petitioners to agree to withdraw the 2-hour parking zone, then it would be back the way it was previously. Mrs. Huff-Menees called for a point of order and recommended that Council note Mr. Sear's objection to the ordinance and if wishes to discuss the issue further with Ms. Goodell he do so at another time. Mr. Montgomery acknowledged Mr. Sear's objection to motor homes; however, he personally did not concur in his rational. Many City streets are too narrow to allow parking of motor homes and it would be too difficult to identify that some areas are acceptable and other not acceptable. The ordinance needs to apply to the whole City and if a person owns a motor home they should be able to afford to house them on their own property away from the street or into a rental lot. The same thing applies to people, who have boats on trailers and travel trailers. Mr. Fart asked if the proposed ordinance was in response to a long standing history of complaints? Ms. Goodell stated yes, she is personally aware of 5-years of background of chasing paisley covered buses, dump trucks, paint wagons, utility vehicles, etc. One City resident owned a construction business and would bring 4-8 construction vehicles back to the residential neighborhood and park them. That kind of activity resulted in sight limitations when residents backed out of their driveways. There were instances of several buses being moved once every 72 hours on to City rights-of- way then on to private property and then back to City rights-of- way. Parking oversized vehicles in residential neighborhoods impacts a lot of people and because there are more vehicles per household there is more congestion to contend with. An oversized vehicle in most areas takes up the space of two vehicles. Mr. Neville stated he believed Mr. Sears could address his concerns to not just Ms. Goodell, but also the Traffic Safety Committee Ms. #1823 TAPE #1353 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 5 of 9 Goodell stated Mr. Sears would have several options: (1) Under the Residential Parking Permit process, 65% of the residents of an area is necessary to petition the City for a Residential Parking zone. If Mr. Sears wants to remove the 2-hour parking, then he would be back to regular parking and he would be allowed to park his motor home. If he wants a combination of the 2-hour parking, but wants to exclude the motor home, she believed his option at that point would be to try the Traffic Safety Committee and see if he could get some relief for just that street. Mr. Sears is the only complaint she has received as far as parking a motor home in a 2- hour residential area. Mr. Neville emphasized the intent of this ordinance is to get commercial vehicles off City streets in residential areas. M/S/C/U(Neville/Farr) to approve ordinance on first reading, amending the parking code to restrict reparking of oversized vehicles; and amending BMC Title 10. Vote on motion: In Favor: Law, Neville, Farr, Huff-Menees, Opposed: Montgomery Motion carried. 8A - PUBLIC HEARING ON TRACYTON BEACH PRE-ANNEXATION ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION; AND ORDINANCE (FIRST READING) m #AB 6-0 The City of Bremerton is considering the annexation of properties located adjacent to the west of city limits and along Tracyton Beach Road. Prior to the final decisions on the annexation, the City must determine the most appropriate Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations for these parcels when they become part of Bremerton. On January 16, 1996, the Bremerton Planning Commission held a public hearing and developed a recommendation for the area. It is recommended that, upon annexation, the are be designated "Low Density Residential (LDR)" on the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan. The Commission further recommended SF-2, which allows for a density of four dwelling units per acre. Deputy City Clerk Gl1 Johnson announced the City Council received a petition signed by 76 individuals requesting that the hearing on this issue be delayed one week because they were concerned their District representative A1 Colvin, as well as three other Council members, will not be present at this hearing and they felt it was important to have full representation. President Law stated he would entertain a motion at this time in response to that request. #1909 TAPE #1353 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 6 of 9 M/S/C/U(Huff-Menees/Farr) moved that the presentation on this issue be made this evening and comments received from those individuals wishing to comment this evening, but the decision and further comments be held over one week when all of the Council members will be present. Mr. Law announced the following ground rules: (1) the City Council members not present at this meeting will be requested to review the tape of this meeting prior to their being seated; (2) it is hoped individuals making comment during this hearing would be courteous enough not to repeat the same comments at next week's hearing. That is not saying they could not come back and comment again, if they have new information to present. Deputy Clerk Johnson read into the record letters received from the following individuals opposing any zoning greater than SF-2: Mr. & Mrs. Palmer L. Drachenberg, 313 E. 29th Street; Ron and Marianne Gavre, 314 E. 28th Street; Jerome and Carolyn Nelson, 2932 Pawnee Drive. President Law asked the "Appearance of Fairness/Conflict Of Interest" question with all Council members present being seated. Ron Hough, Planning Manager, explained this proposal is a pre- annexation, Comprehensive Plan and zoning issue. The subject site is located in East Bremerton and comprised of 15.22 acres made up of fifteen parcels of different shapes and sizes. The site includes six existing dwellings. The City's boundary line is on the south, which includes an apartment complex that is zoned Multi-family. There are Single Family residential neighborhoods to the east and north east zoned SF-3 and generally on lots of 8-10,000 sq. ft.. Access to the site would be by Tracyton Beach Road and E. 19th Street. Adequate Utility services are available and can be provided for urban level development. The City received a Letter Of Intent to annex property within this area into the City, which was accepted in December 1995, and directed staff to proceed with the annexation process. The procedure in this case is to first take it through the pre- annexation, Comprehensive Plan and zoning, which starts at the Planning Commission level. Planning staff prepared a report that included looking at the County's Comprehensive Plan and zoning and the City's Comprehensive Plan and zoning, the City's policies for future growth and development, population, etc. Four zones were considered under the Low Density Residential designation, which is in the City is 3-8 units per acre. There were three zoning TAPE #1353 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 7 of 9 categories that fell into that designation, SF-1, SF-2-3, and Duplex. They analyzed all of those zones to determine which would be the most suitable. SF-1 is the City's lowest zone and allows lots about 1/3 an acre size. Generally, the only time that designation is applied is when sewers are not available. SF-2 is also large lot zone, about 1/4 acre in size, and generally applied in shoreline areas where density is already low, and usually applied to existing developments. There is not much call for SF-2 for new development. SF-3 is most typical of the new subdivisions being built around the County and offers a density up to 9-units per acre and a bonus density up to 10-12 units given additional open space/common areas or other amenities. Duplex Residential isn't applied to any new areas in the City, but is applied to existing Duplex neighborhoods. Staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission was Low Density Residential and a Comprehensive Plan designation with City zoning of SF-3. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 16, 1996, and took considerable testimony that touched on the following: view blockage, density is not consistent with the existing neighborhood, lot sizes, access by E. 29th Street was not a good idea because that street goes through an existing residential neighborhood. The property owners that live in this particular neighborhood are looking at the proposed zoning of SF-3, which would allow roughly 120 units on that 15 acres, if developed to the maximum. The impact of traffic from those 120 single family residences out onto 29th Street would cause considerable impact on their neighborhood. Also, noise associated with such traffic was another concern. Members of the public felt if the lots were larger they would generate higher value homes that would have a more positive impact on the values of their own neighborhood as opposed to a higher density, smaller house on smaller lots, less value that might have adverse impact on their property values. The Planning Commission listened to all of the concerns and came to the conclusion that Low Density Residential was the best Plan designation and SF-2 as opposed to SF-3 would be the best zoning. SF-2 allows roughly 4- units per acre contrasting with about 9-units per acre for SF-3. The minimum lot size for SF-2 is 9,600 sq. ft.,(nearly 1/4 acre) and it also allows a bonus density. Compared to the recommendation from the Planning Commission of 4-units per acre, there is a decision to be made on the potential annexed property owners to remain in the County in order to achieve a high density. Mr. Neville asked if he understood correctly that Kitsap County's Comprehensive Plan shows Urban low residential with a density of 1- 6 units per acre? Mr. Houqh explained the Comprehensive Plan shows 1-9 units per acre, not Low Density Residential and zoned Urban Residential 6. The next step up in the County's zoning is Urban Residential 9, which would also be consistent with their TAPE #1353 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 8 of 9 Comprehensive Plan designation. Mr. Farr asked Mr. Hough to elaborate on the bonus density at the SF-2 designation. Mr. Hough stated bonus densities are allowed in all residential zones, which is identified in a Table in the City's Planned Unit Development section of the Zoning Ordinance, that provides a certain additional density based on additional open space provided. A PUD requires 15% open space as part of a sub- division/new development. If up to 25% of open space is provided, a few more units per acre are granted. Mr. Montqomer¥ asked if it wouldn't be advantageous for the property owner to remain in the County in order to gain the higher density designation and apply for annexation later on? Mr. Hough responded that would be a possibility. Davi4 Smith, representing the applicant, stated they have had quite a bit of discussion over the events that have occurred over the absence of several Council members. He and the applicant would like to make their presentation next week before the full Council. Douq Berger, 2926 Pawnee Drive, stated the petition with 70+ signatures was generated from a neighborhood meeting and they supported the idea of making any formal presentation at the hearing on February 14. He also supported the idea of delaying the hearing an additional week if the Council's Agenda was already full for the February 14th meeting. He asked for a show of hands of those in the audience that were in support of the Planning Commissions recommendation. John McConnell, E. 28th Street, registered his concern over impact of traffic onto E. 28th Street and E. 29th Street. He is not opposed to development, but did support the SF-2 designation. Jim McDonald, 2994 Pawnee Drive, stated he hoped Council would make their decision based on testimony and what is best for Bremerton. Adri&n Weaver, 2801 Cierra Road, stated her property is adjacent to the subject site. She urged any Council members not familiar with the site to please make a visit so they understand the topography of that area. TAPE #1354 Bob Tyson, Alta Drive, stated he was in support of the lower density and was not sure why SF-1 was not being considered. TAPE #1353 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 7, 1996 Page 9 of 9 With no further business meeting adjourned at 7:05 P.M.. KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk JOHN E. LAW, Council President City of Bremerton KLM/JL/me cc: Normal Distribution File/Vault /0 - TOP PRIORITIES Z MARKET BREMERTON · Finalize development of marketing tools for- Bremerton Residents Commercial development Multi-family & single family infill housing · Implement a community newsletter · Adopt development incentives · Continue streamlining permit process conduct development/contractor workshop · Institutionalize customer service · Initiate town meetings in conjunction with Bremerton School District PROVIDE WATER/WASTEWATER/STORMWATER SERVICE AT RATES WHICH DON'T EXCEED COST OF LIVING · Complete treatment plant and stormwater improvements · Monitor in house treatment plant maintenance · Integrate pump station maintenance CRIME PREVENTION FOCUS · Burglary reduction · Business crime reduction · Gang violence and graffiti · Drug activity FACILITATE SINCLAIR LANDING DEVELOPMENT UJ HIGH PRIORITIES CONTINUE COMMUNITY POLICING SUPPORT · D.A.R.E. · G.R.E.A.T. · Bicycle Patrol CONTINUE HOUSING STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION · First time home buyer program · Housing and rental rehab programs · Establish neighborhood target sites · Continue abatement program PARKS · · · · CAPITAL PROGRAM Complete golf course expansion Complete Arvon children's park development Complete skateboard park development Complete Haddon acquisition Evergreen Park upgrades and expansion TARGET REDEVELOPMENT SITES · Smith Cove · Charleston District · Werner Road/Auto Center · Sheridan Neighborhood FINALIZE STREET MAINTENANCE PLAN · Complete 1996 improvements REVIEW FUNDING OPTIONS NEEDED FOR ADEQUATE STREET MAINTENANCE FINALIZE DIVERSIFICATION PLAN DJ LI_I n- MODERATE PRIORITIES ESTABLISH DROP OFF SITE FOR BULK GOODS FINALIZE COUNTY WIDE PUBLIC ACCESS TELEVISION FINALIZE NEW UTILITY BILLING FORMAT IMPLEMENT PARKING CHANGES · Eliminate "repark" issues in business district FINALIZE CHARTER REVIEW FOR FALL BALLOT COMPLETE IVY GREEN CEMETERY UPGRADES · Assist in removal of Evergreen Park Training Tower EXPAND URBAN TREE NURSERY CONTINUE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL TRAINING FACILITY ELIMINATE SCOTCH BROOM PROBLEM ALONG WARREN AVENUE REVIEW STREET LIGHTING OPTIONS REVIEW TRAFFIC LIGHTS FOR BETTER TRAFFIC FLOW COMPLETE GORST CONNECTOR DESIGN CONTINUE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN IMPLEMENTATION · Expand Neighborhood K Prep CONTINUE EMPLOYEE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM CONTINUE PROVIDING PROACTIVE LEGAL SERVICE CONTINUE YOUTH AGENDA SUPPORT · Coordinating Council on Youth · Bremerton Youth Council 2001 GOALS GORST CONNECTOR · Property acquisition and construction PENDERGAST REGIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX · Phase II AGENDA BYLL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. Subject: - FOR AGENDA OF: 2/28/96 Request to Council to accept a revised Letter ORIGINATING DEPT: Executiv~/ of Intent to Annex the Werner Road Area. ORIGINATOR: T. 02qeill ~ DATE SUBMITTED: 2/21/96 2. Clearances: (Comm~ack if necessary) 3. Exhibits: City Attorney:~ Letter of Intent Certification Community Development:~ '~ ~~~--~<~ Council Committ~/e~/~.~:~,~-~-. ~ ENDORSEMENT z~_ INFORMATION ~ AP?ROVED BY COUNCIL COUNCIL PRES: (_~/. "~ 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT & REQUIREMENT FOR COIJN~IL ACTION: On November 8, 1995, the City Council approved a Letter of Intent to Annex the area designated as the Werner Road Annexation, into the City of Bremerton. The process is defined by R.W. 35.13.125. The City Council determined that they would accept the area as geographically proposed and require the area to assume a proportional share of the City's current indebtedness as a condition of any future petition for annexation. Additionally, Council allowed for the provisional administrative assignment of zoning according to BMC 21.02.260. This would exempt the staff from taking the new area through the zoning process until after annexation. City Council is asked to accept a modified Letter of Intent to Annex, which would replace the Letter of Intent accepted by Council on November 8, 1995. The new Letter of Intent requires the City to perform necessary work to obtain pre- annexation land use planning and zoning. The new letter of Intent reduces the area to exclude properties that will not be included in the final petition. 8. RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends the City Council accept the Werner Road Annexation, as geographically modified, oin the Letter of Intent dated 2/20/96, subject to t h e a s s share of the city's current indebtedness~and require the simultaneous adoption of a comprehensive plan and zoning designations upon annexation. e RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: /3 CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPkCT ON NON-PASSAGE: 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGET. S, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: Certification of Letter of Intent I, Kathleen McCluskey, City Clerk for the City of Bremerton, do hereby certify that I have received today a Letter of Intent supported by owners of not less than ten percent of the value of the property for which annexation is petitioned, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation puposes as required in R.W. 35.13.125. The assessed valuation of these parcels, according to the Kitsap County Tax Assessors official record, is $12,674,422.00. The assessed valuation of property represented by signatures is $6,268,000.00. These signatures therefore constitute at least the required 10%, which figure would be $1,267,442.00. SIGNED AND SEALED this ~c~ day of February, 1996. Kathleen McCluskey, City Clerk ~ City of Bremerton RECEIVED OFFICE OF CiTY CLERK February 20, 1996 The Honorable Mayor and City Council of Bremerton 239 Fourth Street Bremerton WA 98337 RE: Letter of Intent to annex Dear Legislators: This letter is an official letter of intent to commence annexation proceedings as required by R.W. 35.13.125. This letter is supported by the owners of not less than ten percent of the value of property for which annexation is petitioned, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation purposes. The area is entitled the Werner Addition and is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" and further depicted on Exhibit "B", also attached hereto. The supporters of this petition ask that the Bremerton City Council set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a meeting with initiating parties to determine: 1. Whether the city will accept reject, or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. Whether it will: I. Require the simultaneous adoption of comprehensive planning and preannexation zoning for the area under R.W. 35.13.177 and 35.13.178; or ii. Ask for the application of land use designations for the newly annexed property administratively as set forth in the Bremerton Municipal Code 21.02.260. 3. Whether the City Council will require the assumption of a proportional share of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This notice and any other notices containing identical text material and additional signatures are intended by the undersigned to be presented and considered as one notice of intent. Petitioner's Signatures and Agreements, CFFiCE OF C!TY CLERK The Honorable Mayor and City Council of Bremerton Page 2 Respectfully, James L. Riddle 729 Eden Dr; Bremerton Kitsap Co Cons Hous Auth 9265 Bayshore Dr NW; Silverdale Cascade Natural Gas 222 Fairview Ane N; Seattle Ray C McCotter 5840 Wemer Rd; Bremerton Gene Johnson 744 Eden Rd W; Bremerton Robert & margaret Kirkland 738 Eden Rd; Bremerton Olsen, BA & TA 740 Eden Rd;Bremerton Marjorie E. Pilotte 748 Eden Rd N; Bremerton Eugene Johnson 744 Eden Rd.;Bremerton Eugene Johnson 734 Eden Rd SW; Bremerton Jerry E. Nelson 4874 NW 82nd St; Silverdale Lewis Daniel 5861 Wemer Kd W; Bremerton - Bremerton Associates 4624 NE 89th St; Seattle 212401 2 058 2009 $ 29590 9204290078 202401 1 003 2008 1815000 7905090014 212401 2 078 2005 0 212401 2 077 2006 212401 2 086 2005 52510 210120 212401 2 118 2007 14600 7902020020 212401 2 060 2005 48230 7902020020 212401 2 107 2000 17600 7902020020 21240! 2 120 2003 19180 7902020020 212401 2 121 2002 79930 7902020020 212401 2 119 2006 31000 7902020020 212401 2 126 2007 125000 8301070028 212401 2 128 2005 366000 212401 2 129 2004 35000 8301070028 212401 2 130 2001 35000 8301070028 Bremerton Associates 4624 NE 89th St; Seattle Bremerton Associates 212401 131 2000 227000 8301070028 212401 2 132 2009 35000 The Honorable Mayor and City Council of Bremerton Page 3 Bremerton Associates 212401 2 133 2008 35000 4624 NE 89th St; Seattle 8301070028 Bremerton Associates 4624 NE 89th St; Seattle Frederick 7 Diane Clayton 10511 Willamette Meridian; Silverdale 212401 2 134 2007 0 8301070028 212401 2 127 2006 8909260041 117000 Michael & Mikeline Meurs 934 52nd St SE; Auburn Michael & Mikeline Meurs 934 52nd St SE; Auburn William Schoump 6581 Tracyton Blvd NW Bremerton 212401 2 113 2002 8909260041 212401 2 076 2007 8909260041 212401 2 072 2001 9502240029 255000 167000 2343000 Willi~d Heyer 224 SunnyNllRdW; Breme~on David & Vanessa Harper 5226 Francis St; Bremerton David & Vanessa Harper 212401 2 110 2005 9108210052 212401 2 139 2002 9204290079 212401 2 137 2004 9204290079 130520 17050 14520 David & Vanessa Harper 212401 2 138 2003 9204290079 14520 ,~TA"~ (~1~ WASHINGTON a~. SS COUNTY OF KITS,AP ,~ The Above and foregoing is Hereby Ce~lfled to be a true and corr~t copy of: ~HT ~Y:Bre~rton En$~neerin~ o I EXHIBIT NO. ", ~ ~NT BY:Brem~r~on ~n~$neerin~ 36~785161 EXHIBIT NO." SUNNYHILL ROAD ANNEXATION THIS AREA CONTAINS 130.28 ACRES 20 FEBRUARY 1996 G PATRICK THORNBURGH CHECKED BY NED LEVER Beginning at the northwest corner of the El/2 SE1/4 NE1/4 NE1/4 of Sec. 20 T24N, R1E, WM; (said NW uorner being on the existtn~ City Limit~ Line) thence ~ollowing along the City Limits Line south to the SW corner of said El/2; thence east to the SE corner of said El/2; thence south along the east line of said ~ec. 20 to the north margin of Warner Rd; thence west along said north margin to the west line of %he E1/2 NE1/4 SE1/4 NE1/4 o~ said Sec.20: thence south to the kW corner of the El/2 SE1/4 8E1/4 NE1/4 o~ said Sec. 20; thence east along maid south lin, o~ the NE1/4 of said Sec. 20 and continuing eamt along the south line of the NWl/4 of Sec. 21T24N, RiE, WM and continuing east along the south line of the NE1/4 of said Sec. 21 to the SE corner of the W1/2 $E1/4 SW1/4 NE1/4 of said Sec. 21; thence north along the east line of said W1/2 to the no=th margin of Warner Rd: %hence wes% along said north margin to the west margin of Blumer St; thence north alon~ said west mar~in to =he NE corner S1/~ NWl/4 $W1/4 NE1/4 of said Sec. 21: thence west along the north line of said S1/~ to the NW corner of said $1/2; thence north along the west line of the NWl/4 SW1/4 NE1/4 of said Sec. 21 to the north line of the NEL/4 SE1/4 NWl/4 of said ~ec 2~; thence west to the SE corner of the W1/2 NE1/4 NWl/4 of said Sec. ~1; thence leaving the City Limits line and runnin~ south alon~ the east line o~ the W1/2 of the SE1/4 of the NWl/4 of said $ec.21 to the north margin of Warner Rd~ thence wes% along said north margin to the east margin of Maple St; thence north along said east mar~in to the south line of the NWl/4 NWl/4 of said Sec. 21; thence west along said south line to the west margin of Ida ~t extended south; thence north along said west mar~in to the north margin o~ Rogers St; %hence west alon~ said north mar~in to the east margin of Broad S%: thence north a~ong said ea~% margin and its no~therl~ extension to the north margin of ~arlow Dr: thence northwesterly along said north margin to the centerline o~ Price Rd~ thence west along said centerline and the City ~imits line to the west line of Sec, ~6 T24N, R~E, WM; thence south along said west ~ine to the Section corner common to Sections 16, 17, 20 and ~1 of T24N, RIE, WM: thence west along the north line o~ said Sec. 20 a distance of 142 ft; thence southwesterl~ in a straight line to a point on the west line of the El/2 NE1/4 NEX/4 NE1/4 of said Sec. 20, said point being 411 ft south of the North line of said Sec. 20; thence south to the point of beginning. -- AGENDA BILL - BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: Appointment to the Planning Commission FOR AGENDA OF: February 2R: ]Qq~ ORIGINATING DEPT: Executiv~ ORIGINATOR: Mayor ~nr~n DATE SUBMITTED: February 22,1996 2. ~: (comment on back if necessary) 3. ~: Application for Appointment ENDORSEMENT__~ INFORMATION __ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRE~IDENT~OR SUBMITTAL: YORC ,,/. COUNCIL PRESIDENT / ~/~'~ 4. ~~Y STATEMENT ~D REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: There is a vacancy on the Planning Commission and it is recommended the vacancy be filled by Donna R. Adams. 8. RECOM~ENDATION: Motion to confirm the appointment of Donna R. Adams to the Planning Commission. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE: AMENDED 11. AGENDA BILL NO: ~ ~ ~ 2. CLEARANCE CQMMENTS: - - N/A 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Less than full membership on the Planning Commission 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILiTIeS, EOUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: N/A 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: N/A CITY OF BREMERTON APPLICATION~OR CITY BOARDS/COMMISSION~'COMMITTEE NOTE: As an applicant for a City Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and telephone number will be available to the press and public. You will be contacted before any action is taken on your appointment. (Please t'/pe or print clearly) NAME: [~o~4 ~ ~. ~,. DATE: HOME ADDRESS: l~E~ ~t~-r~ ~-'r'. ~,,~t-~-o~ ~ ,~J~. ct~'7 OCCUPATION (if retired, indicate former occupation/profession): PHONE: ('~o} '~'"/:D - 1 ~'5;;z.. (H) (~c,~ q..~,+- ~;z.,-z ,-/ (w) EDUCATION: PROFESSIONAL/COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: LOCAL REFERENCES (name & phone number): I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON (please check one or more): () () () () (v~ () () Disability Action Committee ~ Civil Service Commission ( ) Housing Authority Board (v~ Cable Communications Advisory Committee ( ) Community Development Block Grant ( ) Advisory COmmittee (~ Crimestoppers ( ) Safe Streets Steering Committee ( ) Planning Commission ~' Parks & Recreation Commission Ethics Commission Parking Advisory Board Solid Waste Management Board of Appeals, Bremerton Housing Code Board of Appeals, Uniform Codes Special Committees as needed Is this an application for reappointment7 If yes, how many years have you served on this commission/committee? PLEASE RETURN TO: Mayor's Office 239 4th Street Signature Bremerton, WA 98310 Applications be reviewed periodically to determine continued availability. Additional pertinent information may be put on back. Ordinanc'~ Restricting Storage of Oversize Vehicles BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL FOR AGENDA OF: c~- 7- ORIGINATING DEPT: Police ORIGINATOR: Ian R. Slevers.~,~. City Attorney DATE SUBMITTED: 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) CHIEF O~--PdLICE ' CoUN~kL CO~iTTEE 3. EXHIBITS: Proposed Ordinance ENDORSEMENT ~ INFORMATION [] APPROVED BY COUNCI~,~DENT FOR SUBMITTAl,: COUNCIL PRESIDENT SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL A~¢TiON: The proposed ordinance restricts reparking oversized-vehicles over 10,000 lbs or 22 feet in length to 120 hours in any 30 day period. The restriction will not apply to motor homes. 8. RECOMMENDATION: · _ --- first reading--Qr~Lina~ce_No.- .......... Motion t¢ pass on second reading Ordinance No. ~/~4/~ 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED [] TABLED [] APPROVED~ DISAPPROVED [] AMENDED [] DATE: 11. AGENDA BILL NO.: (OVER) '2. CLE~ANCE COMMENTS: IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: Continued fines and time limit regulations. 6. IMPACT ON ST~tFFINGt BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: PARKIHG2.AB - Agendas - 1/~/96 - ORDINANCE'~'~ 5~ ~ - AN ORDINANCE amending the parking code to restrict reparking of oversize vehicles; and amending BMC Title 10. THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. Amendment. Section 10.09.020 is amended to read as follows: 10.09.020 DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this chapter, the words and phrases set forth in this section are defined as follows: [b-f renumbered] Section 2. Amendment. Section 10.09.050 is amended to read as follows: ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA. Parking permits may be issued for motor vehicles not in excess of ten thousand pounds only upon application of the following persons: (a) A legal resident of the residential parking permit area who has a motor vehicle registered in his name, or who has a motor vehicle for his exclusive use and under his control. (b) A person who owns or leases commercial property and actively engages in business activity within a residential parking permit area. There shall be a limit of two (2) residential permits issued per dwelling unit, unless parking availability allows a greater number. No more than one parking permit may be issued for each business establishment for a motor vehicle registered to or under the control of such person. Section 3. 10.11.010 Amendment. Section 10.11.010(1) is amended to read as follows: ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS. In addition to those statutes adopted by reference in BMC 10.04.010 restricting standing, stopping and parking of vehicles, it shall be PARKING2.IRS - Ordinance Di~k 2 - 1/3/96 1 unlawful and punishable ag-a civil infraction for any person to commit any of the following actions: (1) Storage of Vehicles within Right-of-Way. Parking in excess of seventy-two (72) consecutive hours, of non-motorized conveyances or motor vehicles in a public right-of-way shall be unlawful without a right-of-way use permit. Motor vehicles or non-motorized conveyances exceeding ten thousand pounds (10,000 lbs.) gross vehicle weight or twenty-two (22) feet in length, efl~ ,~ ho,.rl3esS, may not repark in excess of one hundred twenty (120) hours within any consecutive thirty (30) day period:---g..s uac. d ;" this :cetic, nmmtor~ veh' , -- _ tm'ed as a recreation'al vehicle, w-h-ich do not rgqlxffe-a~mit_ Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days from passage and publication. APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __ day of _ ,1996. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __ day of , 1996. JOHN E. LAW, Council President APPROVED this ATTEST: __day of , 1996. LYNN HORTON, Mayor KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk PARKING2.1RS - Ordimmce Disk 2 - 1/3/96 2 AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1, SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~'~{ Authorizing an Interfund Loan from the Water Fund to the Wastewater Fund 2. CLEARANCES: C~~if necessary) Public Works Dir. Dir Admin. Sar. ~..~X~ .. City Attorne)~----'~-'~''-~ Council Fiscal and Budget ENDORSEMENTS ~ INFORMATION FOR AGENDA OF: Feb. 28, 1996 ORIGINATING DEPT: Treasurer- ORIGINATOR: R. Hanna DATE SUBMITTED: Feb. 12, 1996 3. EXHIBITS: Proposed Resolution APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTA COUNCIL PRESIDENT ~'~'-x ~"~:~ 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The City's Wastewater Fund will receive over $6.25 million during fiscal 1996 from various non-operating sources. These include moneys due from the U.S. Navy, the State of Washington and Kitsap County. However, it is possible that the timing of the receipt of these funds may be such that a temporary cash flow deficit in the Wastewater Fund will occur. Authorization of this interfund loan is requested as a means of financing this cash flow deficit if it should occur. 8, RECOMMENDATION: Motion to adopt Resolution No. ~t authorizing an interfund loan from the Water Fund to the Wastewater Fund. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Treasurer ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor EXPIRATION DATE: Dec. 31, 1996 REVIEW DATE: N/A PULLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: TABLED 10, NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED 11. AGENDA BILL NO: 9A 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5, IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Other means of financing the possible cash flow deficit will need to be arranged or the Wastewater Fund may operate in a deficit position contrary to statute and bond ordinance. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: A budget adjustment will follow if the Interfund Loan authority is actually used. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: Staff analysis of utility cash flow projections. A RESOLUTION authorizing an interfund loan to the Wastewater Operating Fund from the Water Operating Fund. WHEREAS, the Wastewater Fund has a short term need for operating cash pending the receipt of monies due from several contracts, grants and long term loans; and WHEREAS, the size and term of this transaction does not lend itself to an external financing; and WHEREAS, surplus cash in an amount sufficient to accommodate this short term need is presently on hand in the Water Fund; NOW, THEREFORE, let it be resolved that the City Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to make an interfund loan to the Wastewater Fund from the Water Fund in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000. This loan shall bear interest at the rate of five percent per annum and shall be repaid in its entirety on or before December 31, 1996. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of , 1996. JOHN LAW, Council President ATTEST' KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk ¸FI AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING & ORDINANCE To amend the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance to better accommodate recycling facilities. FOR AGENDA OF: ORIGINATING DEPT: ORIGINATOR: DATE SUBMITTED: February 2~, 1996 DCD/Planning Ron W. Hough Feb. 13, 1996 3. EXHIBITS: Staff Report ,/' Ordinance ,/ Planning Commission Minutes 2. CLEARANCES:,,'(Os~) bac~"~ necessary) City Attorne ~y~~~ Dir. Comm. Dev. Operations C o ~-~./-~--,..:~_/ / ENDORSEMENT~ INFORMATION JAPPROVED aY COUNCIL PRESI~T F SUBMI~L: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The Bremerton Zoning Ordinance allows "recycling centers" in two zones --- Industrial General and General Business. To better administer these types of uses throughout the community, amendments to the Zoning Ordinance have been drafted to better define the terms for recycling facilities, to include those facilities in more zones in the Land Use Tables, and to establish design standards for collection stations intended for public use. The Bremerton Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed amendments on January 16, 1996 and unanimously recommended City Council approval. 8. RECOMMENDATION: City Council approval of the attached Ordinance on first reading. City Council passage of the Ordiannce on second reading. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION: PULLED.~ TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE: 1'1. AGENDA BILL NO: AMENDED IOA 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: If these amendments are not approved, "Recycling Centers" will continue to be permitted outright in the Industrial General zone and by Special Use Permit in the General Business zone. Other zones that may also have appropriate locations will not be considered, or will require rezones to accommodate this kind of use. A possible effect could be that a sufficient number of recycling facilities of the needed types cannot be located throughout Bremerton, resulting in the inconvenience of having to transport recyclables greater distances, or simply not recycling certain things at all. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: No anticipated impacts on staff other than normal permitting and site plan review procedures. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: ORDINANCE NO.__ AN ORDINANCE amending the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance to better accommodate recycling facilities and amending chapter 21.02 of the Bremerton Municipal Code. WHEREAS, the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance includes a broad definition of "Recycling Center" but no definition for "Recycling Collection Station"; and WHEREAS, recycling centers are permitted outright in the Industrial General zone and by Special Use Permit in the General Business zone; and WHEREAS, the Bremerton Planning Commission has studied ways to better accommodate recycling-related facilities and, following a public hearing on January 16, 1996, recommended City Council approval of several amendments to the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council considered the proposed amendments, conducted a public hearing on February 21, 1996 to accept public comments, and approved the amendments for inclusion in the Zoning Ordinance, which is currently undergoing review; now, therefore, THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. Amendment. amended to read as follows: 21.02.050 DEFINITIONS. Section 21.02.050 of the Bremerton Municipal Code is For the purposes- of interpreting the Zoning code, all words used in this chapter shall have their normal and customary meanings, unless specifically defined in this chapter or in the Uniform Building or Fire code adopted by the City. ... [(a)(1) through (r)(2) unchanged] (3) "Recycling center" An c.~'~,bl:.~mc, nt A facility for the collection, storage and processing of recyclable materials including crushing, breaking, sorting and packaging and related operations. This definition does not include a junk yard. (4) "Recycling collection station",s· o~,,,.~,.,,.' .......... ,,, ~,.,,,,~,,,.~:-~- A facility consisting_ of RECYCLE.OR.D - Disk 2 - 2114196 3_5 structures, bins, or other containers designed or intended for the collection and temporary storage, ~"*,,,,, ,.,,~ .... ~..,-~' ........ w,,,.,.oo.,,~,:~ of recyclable materials until they are picked up and transported to another location for processing and/or packaging. (5) "Recycling Collection Station (Limited)" A recycling collection station for the collection of glass, tin cans, aluminum, cardboard, newspaper, magazines, plastics, and other recyclables in small units, but not including large appliances, furniture, auto parts, tires, hazardous or liquid wastes, or any forms of domestic garbage (petrucible wastes). (~5_) "Rehabilitation" The upgrading of a building or structure, previously in a dilapidated or substandard condition, for human habitation or use. (67_) "Restaurant" Commercial use (excluding fast food restaurants) which sells prepared food or beverages and generally offers accommodations for consuming the food or beverage on the premises. (78_) "Restaurant, Fast-food" An establishment whose principal business is the sale of pre-prepared or rapidly prepared food directly to the customer for consumption either on or off premises. This definition does not include sidewalk vendors. ... [(s)(1) through (y)(4) unchanged] Section 3. Amendment. The Land Use Tables of Chapter 21.02 of the Bremerton Municipal Code are hereby amended according to Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Section 4. New Section. A new Section 21.02.225,RECYCLING COLLECTION STATION, is hereby added to Chapter 21.02 to read as follows: 21.02.225 RECYCLING COLLECTION STATION. (a) The following standards apply to collection stations intended for public use. They are not mandatory (but may be applied voluntarily) for private on-premise collection RECYCLE.ORD- Disk 2 - 2/14/96 and storage of recyclables by owners or tenants organizations. Such on-premise collection and storage is considered accessory principal use of the property and not available to the general public. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) manner. Section 4. Effective Date. passage and publication. of residential properties, businesses or to the Areas to be used in the collection operation must have a gravel, asphalt or concrete surface and shall be landscaped to the same standards that apply to any other development or use within the subject zone. The facility shall be closed to public access between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. in residential zones. A sight-obscuring fence or wall built to the maximum allowed height of the zone shall be constructed and maintained along the sides and rear of the facility. Chain-link type fences and gates are permitted along front lot lines. The facility may be lighted for use during hours of darkness, but shall not be lighted between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. in residential zones. The site shall be monitored and maintained in a clean, safe and healthful This ordinance shall take effect ten (10) days from APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton ,1996. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton ,1996. this __ day of this ~ day of RECYCLE.ORD - Disk 2 - 2/14/96 3 JOHN E. LAW, Council President APPROVED this ~day of ,1996. LYNN HORTON, Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk RECYCLE.ORD - Disk 2 - 2/14/96 4 LAND USE TABLES sv Sl~ sg 1 2 3 DR MF CBR MR HD PO NB GB SC BC BP IP IG MX Uses allowed --- by zone Apparel and other Textile Products Mfg. SUP A A A Drugs, Chemicals & related Mfg. SUP SUP Soap, Cleaning Products Mfg. SUP SUP Food Products Mfg. SUP SUP A A Machinery & Metal Products Mfg. SUP A A Machine Shop -- general purpose SUP SUP A Recycling Center SUP A Recycling Collection Station SUP SUP SUP SUP Recycling Collection Station (Limited) * A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Junk Yard SUP SUP Petroleum bulk Storage & Terminals SUP A * Allow only when it meets all design standards. ZONES: Page 23 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING January 16, 1996 The meeting began with the Secretary calling the roll: Those present were: Chairman OBen. Commissioners Hancock. Jackson. Dingfield. Boyd. Stone, and Robinson. Absent was Commissioner Goetze. Staff Present: Ron Hough. Shane Jensen. Jack Allingham and Marylyn Waibel. Chairman Olsen asked if there was a quorum? The Secretary responded yes. Chairman Olsen stated that on the back of the meeting agenda for tonight are the procedures for holding a public hearing. The Chairman requested that everyone read it carefully because the Commission follows the procedure listed. Chairman OBen called the meeting to order. Chairman Olsen requested approval of the Agenda. Motion to approve agenda was made by Commissioner Stone and seconded by Commissioner Jackson. Approved unanimously. Chairman OBen requested approval of the December 19, 1995 minutes. Commissioner Stone stated that since he had not received the minutes that this item be deterred until the next meeting. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Boyd. Approved unanimously. Chairman Oisen requested any public input from any item that was not on the agenda: Doug Berger: wants to speak about the Tracyton Beach annexation. 'Chairman Oisen informed Mr. Berger that this item was on the agenda and he would have the opportunity to speak to the issue at that time. Director's Repot'ii I~x.o.n__H_o..ugh reported that regarding Pope Resources, the Commission had made a recommendation to City Council to approve a minor map amendment on the Comprehensive Plan to include about a 25 acre industrial area near Pendergast Regional Park. That was approved by the City Council on January 10, 1996 and it goes to second reading tomorrow night. Ron Hough reported that the Growth Management Hearings Board made its decision at the end of December on the appeals of our Comprehensive Plan. They gave us about two months to make some changes in the Anderson Creek area to Comprehensive Plan Maps, texts and tables, etc. We have drafted those changes and will bring them back for a public hearing in two weeks with the Planning Commission. February 7th it will go to the Council Operations PAGE -I- (~K. iio T'o ~ ~)"--~ Ron Hough stated th. about 15 properties and if someone w how they are g~ to get in and out. Those things going up further develo that will show what with the ~. That is not what we This is an annexation issue. we are not sure the acce,, right to all of those properties. There are ere and I am not sure th,~ of them have good acceis for development to build a house on particular one of them we ould want to know sort of a design issue than a zoning issue. the road when we get sort of a plan for of an access program the going to develop along considering tonight, bec~ e we do not have proposal. stated that .wrier of the property access through Mr. Shulmer's Mc( resid, of the area, concerned wi designation, value of their/6~roperw, :yofthenei n~)~ :l, supports SF2. /// Jerome Nelson, r tiden~ of the area, concern?(1 with impact on sewer system// Ron Hough in, gh~ :ed that from hearing//J, lqe speakers it appeared the confi4nsus~ was for SF2. Stated btJil, dfii. g heights are the sam/SF1, SF2, and SF3--30 f.~rt. Stated reason for recommens;Fifion of SF3 was becaus,gAt is efficient density for provpt~ng public services. Stated 7s and cons for higher/lower density. ~closed the/~,~flic hearing to the CommisV 5~tnffiLS$i°n~c~°Nn'~g/fJfiterated the purp°se ° f the/~1lng was z°ning °nly' '-'Ammi-~i'mer D~n-fi~d asked Ron Hough what the izes of the lots that are located ound E ~ asked Ron Hough whTizes of the lots that are loc/~oun{ . R°n H°ugh in/~ted that he was un_sule'/ ~airmag-Q/~ as-ked R°n H°ugh if_/Var~ea_already l°cated in the/~'J !f in fact it is'SF2? nH u~ indicatedthatitwas~atedSF3. / ' Commissioner Stone stated he f~~ty wi~ the neighbgdiood. Motion by Commissioner St ne to forward a recomme:.~d~on to the City Council tl3a(the area to be included in the Tracyton Beach Annexation be ~ignated as follows upoW"annexation, Comprehensive Plan Designation LDR with Zoning ~ reference of SF2. Mpfion seconded by Debra Jackson. Question called: Olsen, yes; ,d, abstain; Stone, yeg; Robinson, no; Hancock, no; Jackson, yes; Dingfield, yes. Motion passes. Hearing//2 - Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Chairman Olden announced the second hearing and asked the appearance of fairness questions. PAGE -6- Ron Hough presented the staff report with regard to the zoning text amendment as it pertains to recycling centers. Definitions were drafted for recycling terms. Proposing to amend the land use tables of the zoning ordinance to allow recycling centers in the Industrial Park Zone by special use permit and in addition to where it is allowed in the Industrial General Zone and General Business Zone. Amend the same table to allow recycling collection stations by special use permit in the General Business Zone/Shopping Center Zone and the Industrial Park Zone and the Industrial General Zone. The recycling collection station limited is proposed to allow that outright in all zones when it meets recycling collection station design standards. These are for public use facilities only. Chairman Olsen requested public input. Tom Triggs, Bremerton resident, agrees with 99% of the proposal. Concern with the collection stations turning into garbage dumps. Chairman Olsen closed the public hearing to the Commission. Commi~$i0ner Stone in response to Nh-. Triggs remarks questioned paper and cardboard bins'? Ron Hough indicated that there are already paper and cardboard bins throughout the City and it would be difficult to require them to landscape around them and added that they are not really a problem. Commissioner B0yd asked if there are any controls over the bins to require them to empty them? Commissioner Stone indicated that the Lion's club has several bins and that Brem-Air is good about emptying them. Also questioned recycling center design centers, with regard to the landscaping. Ron Hough indicated the landscaping requirements are for the public facilities, not for example, apartment complexes. Commissioner Robinson questioned definition//3, recycling center and recycling collection both have attached to them approval of a SUP, the collections station limited does not. Ron Hough indicated that it is good to be able to review them under the SUP, because you are never sure what that are going to look like. Commissioner Stone asked that the limited situation applies primarily to apartment complex, etc.? Ron Hough responded not necessarily, it could be a private operation on a vacant lot, limited to lighter weight recyclables. Commissioner Dingfield asked if the City were to establish public recycling collection centers, would that open up the door for removing the mandatory paid requirements for residential residents? PAGE -7- Ron Hough indicated that was not the intent, but would supplement the program. Commis~i0ner Robinson asked Ron Hough what the down side of including cardboard and paper'? Ron Hgugh indicated the old ones could be grandt'athered in. The new ones would have to mezt the standards. Ron Hough reminded the Commission of Nh'. Triggs concern with regard to the landscaping. Chairman Olsen asked if that would be taken care of by staff? R0n Hough indicated that it would be treated like a new parking lot going in. Chairman Olsen recommended that paper and cardboard be added to any motion made. Motion by Robinson, after reviewing and considering the proposed amendments and input provided by the public and by City. staff, I f'md the proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments to meet the City's approval criteria with the addition of accommodating both paper and cardboard recyclable products and I move that these amendment be recommended for Ciw Council for approval. Second by Commissioner Stone. Question Called. Boyd, yes; Stone, yes; Robinson, yes; Hancock, yes; Jackson, yes; Dingfield, yes; Olsen, yes. Motion passes. Hearing ~3 - Our Lady Star of the Sea Parish (:hai/~n OBen~ced the hea~ and asked the a, of fairness qu~ G6mmissionerl'lancock indic: he is a member o parish and audience if he hould re~/~ himself or erry $.gfian0 stated thja( audience should have to object that if anyone on tl~ Co;/r/dssion has a c/o/~ic they should re,~y~ ~self. / / R.,6n Hough added~ that Commissioner ] ~ncoc} had abstainesVon the first decision a cj>dple of //X'veeks ag°-/,~mmissi°ner HanTy :t the r°°m- Jack, in_,gh_am presented the st~-pres, :ntafion. Red,~./vffl_op a school at their cuyfent location on/ 6th S e'i. Changes have be/e,~ made to the plan sifl:e the hearing in Nove~. her. A. pplicafi/oh for a te plan review and .~ecial use permit anl' a zoning ordinance s~cial exception ,f.& a red~ front yard se Also the parish p ; to use a security lest4 which exceed~/fieight Ii Vacation and ' of the alley mirg staff recomsl~"nds approval of)l~e right- [ vacation -8-