The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08/06/97 AGENDABREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 239 4TH STREET BREMERTON, WA 98337 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 6, 1997 CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M. A. Pledge Of Allegiance B. Invocation CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If separate discussion is desired on an item, it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at the request of a Council member. A. Minutes - July 23, 1997 #AB97-179 B. Change Order #1 - 1997 Reservoir Rehabilitation #AB97-180 3. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS 4. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS 5. MAYOR'S REPORT 6. PUBLIC RECOGNITION -- (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes) NEW BUSINESS A. Easement Grant To US West On Park Land RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution #2621 Regarding The Development Of Docks And Piers Within The Channel Between OstriCh Bay and Oyster Bay ORDIN~tNCES A. Ordinance #4599 (Second Reading) Repealing Ordinance #4282 And Eliminating The Admiral Theater Fund (CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) #AB97-182 / f #AB97-174 ~ ~ Be Ordinance #4600 (Second Reading) Repealing Ordinance #4180 And Eliminating The Athletic Sports Fund #AB97-175 Ce Ordinance #4601 (Second Reading) Setting Legislative And Administrative Controls Of The city Budget #AB97-176 D. Ordinance #4602 (Second Reading) Adopting A #AB97-177 Two-year Biennium Budget Beginning January 1, 1999 Ordinance #4603 (Second Reading) Amending The 1997 Budget (Budget Adjustments 97-1 through 97-24) #AB97-178 10. PUBLIC HEARIN~ - 6:00 PM OR LATER A. Ordinance (First Reading), Approving A Right- #AB97-183 Of-Way Dedication At Marine Drive And Dora Avenue; Applicant: Loren & Karen Olsen ¢? AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL !. SUBJECT':- MINUTES - JULY 23, 1997 FOR AGENDA OF: AUGUST 6, 1997 ORIGINATING DEPT: City Council ORIGINATOR: David Farr; President DATE SUBMITTED: 7-29-97 2. ~: (comment on back if necessary) ENDORSEMENT INFORMAT I ON MAYOR APPROVED BY COUNCIL COUNCIL PRESIDENT UBMITTAL: 4. SUM/W3d~Y STATEMENT AND R~QUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ActION: 8. RECOMMENDATION: 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: .EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED TAPE #1479 UNAPPROVED DRAFT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 23, 1997 #0034 #0057 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers~ Z39 4th Stre=tI Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, July 23, 1997, at 5:30 P.M., with Council President David Fart presiding. Council members present were Bob Winters, Carlos Montgomery, Sherril Huff-Menees, Richard Neville, Lon Overson, John Law, Cecil McConnell, and A1 Colvin. Also present were City Attorney Ian Sievers and Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council President Farr and Invocation given by Reverend Peter Webster of Westpark Christian Church. President Fart made the following announcements: (1) City Council Study Session - July 23, 1997, immediately following the city Council meeting, in the Council Conference Room. Topic of discussion: Sinclair Landing Update and Pending Agreements; and (2) City Council Study Session - July 30, 1997, immediately following the City Council meeting, in the Council Conference Room. Topic of discussion: 1997 - 2002 Capital Improvement Plan. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of Meeting -- July 9, 1997 #AB97-167 B. Sole Source Purchase of a Sweeper-Vac from #AB97-168 Barnett Implement, Inc. for Gold Mountain Golf Complex M/S/C/U(McConnell/Montgomery) to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the Council. M/S/C/U(Colvin/Montgomery) on July 23, 1997, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: 210987 through 210989 in the amount of $5,484.09; and Regular Payroll for the period ending July 15, 1997, in the amount of $774,062.41. TAPE #1479 city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 23, 1997 Page 2 of 9 COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mr. Colvln acknowledged Ron Anderson in the audience, and noted he would be speaking during Public Recognition. Mr. Montqomer~. announced a Town Meeting will be held by the Kitsap County Veterans Coalition on August 21, 1997, 7:00 - 9:00 P.M., at the Westside Improvement Center. The purpose of the meeting is to hear from candidates for the 35th District, City of Bremerton Mayoral race, and other candidates. All veterans and their families, active duty military personnel and their families, and the general public are invited to this event. He was pleased that the Concert on the Boardwalk was well attended and the weather was great. Mr. Winters thanked all participants and particularly the children performers involved in Summer Fest '97, which was held on July 19. He thanked Robert Boddie for asking him to volunteer his services for that event. On July 24, at 12:00 Noon, he will attend the Bremerton Area Chamber of Commerce luncheon, and at 6:30 P.M. he will attend a meeting on lake weed control at the Cascade Natural Gas building on Kitsap Way. Mr. Fart reminded everyone that Council Districts #6, #7 and #8 will hold a joint Neighborhood Meeting on July 31, 1997, 7:00 P.M., at the new Bremerton School District Office, 134 N. Marion Avenue. PUBLIC RECOGNITION Ron Anderson, Port Of Call Hospitality House, stated the Port of Call Hospitality House is an organization that is affiliated with Cadence International, which formerly was known as Overseas Christian Servicemen's Centers. He and his wife Sunny have established a hospitality house at 901 Times Avenue, Bremerton, WA 98312. They offer a variety of services for active military personnel. Donald Zimmerman, former Westsound Cable Access Board member and Kitsap County resident, stated he believes Westsound filled all of the requests made of it by the City of Bremerton. This involves such things as the construction of a studio set, which Westsound never received reimbursement, special events, including the Armed Forces Parade, and manning of the TV crews for broadcasting City Council meetings. Those services were funded by Falcon subscribers, who brought $200,000 to Westsound, and yet Falcon subscribers have not yet been connected to the output of Westsound. In the meantime, TCI funds and City of Bremerton funds have either been withheld or very slow in coming. Westsound even acquiesced to the City's demand, represented by one person, to remove Westsound's Executive Director. He asked the City Council to fund what the TAPE #1479 city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 23, 1997 Page 5 of 9 referenced the Westsound users Handbook wherein it specifically states the programming comes from the community. Westsound follows FCC regulations, i.e. programming must be non-commercial, not obscene or pornographic, not constitute liable, slander, invasion of privacy or violation of trademark copy right, must not be fraudulent, must not attempt to incite any violence to persons or property or contain speech not protected by State or Federal constitution. Programming must not violate local, State, or Federal law. He asked the Council to give Westsound time to fix the problems. Patricia Mathes, Westsound member, referenced a newspaper article that came out in today's Port Orchard Independent about Westsound in which the Kitsap County Commissioners decided to hold a Study Session followed by a Public Hearing concerning the termination of their contract with Westsound. She suggested the City of Bremerton consider scheduling a Study Session and allow members of Westsound members, producers, directors and members of the public explain why it is important that Westsound continues to function and the City continues its support, which would then be followed by a Public Hearing. She pointed out those watching this City Council meeting broadcast over Channel 12 were watching Westsound at work. Shannon Bell, Bremerton resident, reported on a recent Special Olympics Softball Tournament in Lynden, Washington, where Bremerton was represented with two teams. Carol Atkinson, Bremerton Main Street Association, announced inscribed bricks and granite blocks will be installed on the boardwalk on July 24 and 25. The Blackberry Festival is shaping up and vendor spots on the boardwalk are all taken; however, a few spaces adjacent to the boardwalk are still available. Work continues putting together a hydroplane exhibition. She was pleased with the large turnout for the Concert on the Boardwalk on July 18, the weather was great and the fly over by the Mig 17 was enjoyed by all. The next Concert on the Boardwalk is scheduled for July 25, by 'the group "Bochinche". Charlene Burnett, Parks and Recreation Department, reported the Parks and Recreation Department is sponsoring the July 25 concert featuring "Bochinche", which is a Latin Salsa band, and funded by a grant from Kitsap Community Network. 7A - ORDINANCE NO. 4598 (SECOND READING) GRANTING A NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO TCI CABLEVISION OF WASHINGTON, #AB97-166 Paula Johnston, Deputy City Clerk, identified several housekeeping changes following first reading of the ordinance as well as input from Council that was incorporated into the contract: TAPE #1479 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 23, 1997 Page 6 of 9 (1). Under Section 2.2 FRANCHISE TERM, TCI agreed to tighten up the upgrade construction schedule so that it would read: ""The term of the Franchise shall be ten (10) years from its effective date. However, if TCI has not upgraded the capacity of its Cable System so that at least 75 video analog or digitally compressed channels are available on the System to either 75% of the Subscribers within the entire Franchise area, or to all the Subscribers within 75% of the Franchise Area, within 24 months followinq the effective date of the Franchise, then the Franchise term shall be shortened by 2 years to a total of $ years from its effective date." (Note: the previous percentage rate was 50% and was increased to 75%.) (2) Under Section 2.5 FRANCHISE RENEWAL - language that was in conflict with the City's Charter was removed so that it would be compatible. (3) Under Section 4.3A SYSTEM CHANNEL CAPACITY UPGRADE - TCI agreed to formalize within the agreement a commitment to retain an analog level of 48 channels, so that when the upgrade is completed those subscribers that do not want other services available with the digital compression would have the same service as that offered to County residents. (4) Under Section 12.13 EFFECTIVE DATE - the effective date is 10 days from passage and publication of the ordinance. Patrick McDonald, TCI General Manager, complimented Ms. Johnston on her outlining the proposed changes. The commitment TCI made on the analog issue was to cover concerns expressed by Council that Bremerton subscribers would have the same number of analog channels as Kitsap County subscribers, which is 48 channels. There is an adjustment number of 5, which is if the market place dictates fewer channels on the Expanded Basic Tier, which 90% of the customers subscribe to, maybe moving some of those to a tier where only 20% subscribe if the pricing structure can be changed to meet consumer demands. On the upgrade time frame, the percentage was changed from 50% to 75%~to be met within a 2-year term. Public comment - none. Mr. Montqomery stated he found a conflict between Section 2.2 ( 24- months) and 4.3A (36 months), and questioned which one was correct? Mr. McDonald stated the entire Section places out is a 3 year term that puts in place an 8-year agreement, but TCI is moving towards a 10-year term by meeting a 2-year commitment to have 75% of the subscribers activated to the additional services within that time frame. Ms. Johnston emphasized the sections referenced by Mr. Montgomery are not meant to be identical; and when a penalty kicks TAPE #1479 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 23, 1997 Page 7 of 9 in TCI would lose their opportunity to have a 10-year agreement, which is to their disadvantage. Under Section 4.3A, the 36-months is the "drop dead" date and means that TCI will be in violation of the franchise and subject to revocation, if they do not upgrade the entire system within 36 months. Mr. Law referenced Section 4.3A (3rd paragraph) Channel Capacity Upgrade And Completion Schedule were it talks about if the market conditions exist, TCI can reduce the intended number of channels by 5; however it does not limit the requirement of 75 activated analog or digitally compressed video channels. Mr. McDonald explained the combination of analog (48 channels) and the digital compression services that could range from 50-70 would make up the 75 channels. There was some initial concern that TCI would maintain the exact same analog package they currently offer and then add on compressed services so that people would be required to have a "box" to provide those additional services. The referenced section states that TCI will mirror what the County is receiving, which is 48 analog channels. Mr. Law questioned the need for the language as identified by Mr. McDonald? Mr. McDonald stated that language could be removed, but it was put in to reassure that a total of 75 channels would be available upon completion of the upgrade. Mr. Neville referenced the statement: "During the construction period of the upqrade, .TCI shall not be obligated to provide a refund or credit to customers where an outaqe was necessitated by the cut-over from the present system to the rebuilt or modified system", and questioned the length of outages? Mr. McDonald noted it would be for short interruption (5-10-30 minutes depending on the size of the area), which typically occur in the early morning hours. If it would involve a longer period of time, work would be carried out, for example at 2:00 AM, so that subscribers would not be adversely affected. In situations where a customer does not receive service after a rebuild connection has been made, TCI servicemen are on call 24- hours per day to trouble shoot that connection problem. Mr. Neville asked if the actual construction would include several blocks at a time? Mr. McDonald stated that would depend on a specific area. A detailed study will be made of the existing plant and what is required for the upgrade, which will identify utilization of existing equipment and overlaying of new equipment. Mr. ~eville stated it was a shame that it took 18 months to get to this point in the Franchise Agreement and hoped future negotiations would happen in a shorter time frame. Mr. McDonald stated this process involved a lot of things having to do with new regulations, which took concerted efforts by TCI and the City to move through the negotiation process. Although negations did take a long time, he was pleased with the efforts achieved over that time frame. TAPE #1479 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 23, 1997 Page 8 of 9 #1789 Mr. Winters stated from his own experience dealing with technical equipment, he understands the importance of having the right equipment to carry out the work required. For several months he has asked the Administration to provide him with an inventoried list of equipment; however, neither TCI nor the Administration have provided him with that information. Before talking about upgrades, he felt it was important to know what equipment is currently available. It was important to him to know the existing inventory of equipment in order for him to vote effectively, on behalf of the taxpayers, formalizing the $.21 per subscriber pass-through charge. Because he did not receive the requested inventory list, he will vote "NO" on this issue. He is aware that the City's Purchasing Agent is working on the inventory list. Ms. Johnston explained the inventory list is not complete, but they have been identifying equipment at all Access locations since July 18, and anticipates the list will be available by July 28/29 that will show all existing equipment purchased before and after the formation of Westsound, and the source of funds. The Administration feels confident that the funding identified in the Franchise for updating City equipment is adequate to improve programming. Mr. Colvin questioned the dollar amount resulting from the $.21 pass-through and who receives those funds? Ms. Johnston stated the $.21 pass-through goes toward funding access television and is approximately $18-20,000 per year. Mr. ~aw questioned when the larger channel network will be available to the subscribers, i.e. by each neighborhood as it is upgraded or at the end of the first year of construction? Mr. McDon&ld stated area-by-area is upgraded and the subscribers receive the expanded programming as their area is added to the upgrade system. TCI has to achieve activation of 75% of the subscribers to the upgraded system by the end of two years to meet that time line. By the time the analysis design and initial construction is completed to launch those services, active subscribers will come on line for about a year and building up to 75% by the 2-year time frame. Mr. M¢Connell stated he doubted the City or TCI were 100% satisfied with the contract, but believes it is as fair as it can get between the two entities. He will again abstain on the vote, which has nothing to do with the contract between the City and TCI, but rather for personal reasons. M/S/C(Huff-Menees) to pass Ordinance No. 4598, on second reading, granting TCI Cablevision of Washington a non-exclusive franchise to operate a cable system within Bremerton. TAPE #1479 city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 23, 1997 Page 9 of 9 Mr. Overson stated his support for the proposed agreement and complimented Mr. McDonald and city staff for their efforts in negotiating this agreement. He appreciated TCI's incorporation of the comments made during first reading of the ordinance. President Fart stated the only comment he received from a constituent had to do with the quality of reception on Channel 19 and his response was the data provided by Mr. McDonald on the importance of checking input cable connections to their TV set. He will support the proposal with a "YES" vote. He also complimented city staff and Mr. McDonald for their patience working through the items. Vote on motion: Motion carried. In Favor: Huff-Menees, Neville, Farr, Overson, Law, Colvin Opposed: Montgomery, Winters Abstain: McConnell President Fart thanked the TV camera crew for their services: Bob Neal and Patricia Mathis. With no further business meeting adjourned at 6:30 P.M. PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk DAVID FARR, Council President city of Bremerton PJ/DDF/me cc: Normal Distribution File/Vault AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - 1997 RESERVOIR REHABILITATION FOR AGENDA OF: August 6, 1997 ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works & Utils , ORIGINATOR: R. Witt, City Eng.~ ~ DATE SUBMITTED: July 22, 1997 2. ~ (Comment on back 3. EXHIBITS: __ 1. Change Order No. 1 ~ Operations, q.~_Cnm m i -~e (~,~ ENDORSEMENT,~]' INFORMATIO-~-I]-~APPROFED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION' Change Order No. 1 consists of two items. The first item is for extra work including removal of repair coatings from the roof of Reservoir 18 and removal of the float gauge from Reservoir 10. The cost of this work is $1,788. The second item is to pressure wash and coat Reservoir 19. The total cost of this work is $31,500. This cost is based on Reservoir 19's exterior area and the per square foot cost bid on the 1997 Reservoir Rehabilitation contract. The total cost of this Change Order is $33,288. The action before the City Council is approval of Change Order #1 to the 1997 Reservoir Rehabilitation contract. 5. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council approve Change Order No. 1 to the 1997 Reservoir Rehabilitation contract in the amount of $33,288 and authorize the Mayor to execute the same. PULLED Il TABLED [l COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: APPROVED [1 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Director Pub Wks & Util ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Director Pub V~qcs & Util EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION DISAPPROVED [] AMENDED [] (OVER) 11. AGENDA BILL NO.: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 3. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION - Continuation 6. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Reservoir #19 will not be recoated at this time. 7. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT AND OTHER RESOURCES: Staffing: No impact. Budget: An expenditure of $33,288 from the 1997 Water Resources Operation Fund is necessary. Adequate funds exist for this work. Facilities/Equipment: No impact. 8. RESEARCH SOURCES: CITY OF BREMERTO,_ CHANGE ORDER Project Name 1997 RESERVOIR REHABILITATION Project No. O.711;3152 Contractor COATING APPLICATORS INC. Page 1 of 1 Contract Change Order No. 1 Orig. Contract Amt. $ 84.500 Days 50 Prey. Appvd. Changes $ N/A Days N/A This Change $ 33,288 Days 7 Revised Contract Amt. $ 117.788 Days ,57 This Change Order covers changes to the subject contract as described herein. The Contractor shall construct, furnish equipment and materials, and perform all work as necessary or required to complete the Change Order Items for a lump sum price agreed upon between the Contractor and the City of Bremerton. Description of Changes Increase in (Decrease) Contract Contract in Contract Time Amount Amount Extension ($) ($) (days) Item #1: Extra work including removal of repair coatings from the roof of Reservoir 18 and removal of the float gauge from Reservoir 10. $1,788 0 Item #2: Pressure wash and coat Reservoir 19. $31,500 7 Totals $33,288 7 Net change in contract amount $33,288 increase or (decrease) The undersigned Contractor approves the foregoing Change Order as to the changes, if any, in the contract price specified for each item including any and all supervision costs and other miscellaneous costs relating to the change in work, and as to the extension of time allowed, if any, for completion of the entire work on account of said Change Order. The Contractor agrees to furnish all labor and materials and perform all other necessary work, inclusive of the directly or indirectly related to the approved time extension, required to complete the Change Order items. This document will become a supplement of the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. It is understood,,that the Change Order shall be effective when approved by the C!ty of Bremerton. Recommended: ~,_~,-q~',~'/'hz¢ -' ~ ./v'~_.,~Proiect Enqineer Date: - Recommended: ~-,.~¢J_~ ~_ ~ /City Engineer Date: ~¢~,' _~~ /Contractor Date: -'~ ' Accepted: Approved: /Mayor Date: ?? AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Easement Grant to US West on Park Land ORIGINATING DEPT: Parks & Rec ORIGINATOR: Jim Spencer 2. if ne~~) _, CLEARANCES: (comment/~r~back city Attorney~=F-~~-~ City Clerk Fiscal/Budget Operations ~h~-~-~-~' - ENDORSEMENT~ ~NF~TION MAYOR ~ 3. EXHIBITS: 1) Easement Agreement 2) Request Letter COUNCIL PRESIDENT SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: US West Communications has requested an easement grant on Park property South of Jarstad Aquatic Center at the intersection of Magnuson Way and Homer Jones Dr. They would like to replace an existing utility cabinet with a larger one that requires a 10 ft by 10 ft easement grant from the City. US West proposes to pay $500.00 for the easement. The Parks Commission recommends granting this easement and dedicating the $500.00 for tennis court backstops. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve 10 ft by 10 ft easement grant to US West on Park Land at the intersection of Magnuson Way and Homer Jones Dr. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Parks/Rec Di~ ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: ~ ~ EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE: 11. AGENDA BILL NO: CLEARANCE COMMENTS (cont.): 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (cont.): IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: US West will not be able to install a larger cabinet at that location. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES N/A 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: RECORDING INFORMATION ABOVE Any claim, controversy or dispute arising out of this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the applicable rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The arbitration shall be conducted in the county where the property is located. Dated this day of ,19 ~ Grantor Grantor Grantor Grantor (Official name of company or Corporation) Its ~ IS E A L] Attest Secretary of Corporation (Individual Acknowledgment) State of WASHINGTON } } ss County of On this day personally appeared before me known to me to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this ~ day of , 19 Notary Public of the State of Washington Residing at My commission expires: /¢ (Corporate Acknowledgment) State of WASHINGTON } } ss County of } On this day personally appeared before me who did say he/she is the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and an oath stated that was authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of the corporation. Given under my hand and official seal this . · day of. ,19_. Notary Public of the State of Washington Residing at My commission expires: AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETLq~N TO: R-D.ATKINS 19324 SPRAGUE DR. BOTI~LL, WA. 98012 DOCUMENT PREPARED BY RECORDING INFORMATION ABOVE D. ~:/7'7~'~,p~ TELEPHONE # EASEMENT AGREEMENT The undersigned Grantor(s) ~,'z'9' ~rz~ ~'Aa,~-~~ for and in consideration of ~-/t/z,- /,-/-~,,z/zO/d~"z> Dollars ($ o"',~',cx:~ ) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant and convey unto U S WEST Communications, Inc., a Colorado corporation, hereinafter re- ferred to as "Grantee", whose address is /,Y/-~ ~'-7 ~t:~ o',.~../~',',,qj .~~,~ ~ ~'a zZ-r-, its successors, assigns, lessees, licensees and agents a perpetual easement to construct, reconstruct, modify, change, add to, operate, maintain and remove such telecommunications facilities, electical facilities and gas facilities, and appurtenances, from time to time, as Grantee may require upon, over, under and across the following described land situated in the County of /.<~i 7~-~ , State of ,~[/,46J~Aff'r~v~-e~ , which the Grantor owns or in which the Grantor has any interest, to wit: LOT -- BLK SECTION / a~. TOWNSHIP c2 ff'/y' RANGE ?~- ~ TAX PARCEL # '~q7~, -Dc,/-- aPo/o/ SEE EXHIBIT ",4 *' ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOE Grantor further conveys to Grantee the following incidental rights: /k/,4- '~ A temporary right-of-way to be used during all periods reconstruction, reinforcement, repair and removal upon a strip of land the side of, and a strip of land feet wide on the said easement. of construction, feet wide on side of (2) The right of ingress and egress over and across the lands of Grantor to and from the above-described property and the fight to clear and keep cleared all trees and other obstructions as may be necessary for the Grantee's use and enjoyment of the easement area. Grantee shall indemnify Grantor for all damage caused to Grantor as a result of Grantee's negligent exercise of the rights and privileges herein granted. Grantee shall have no responsibility for pre-existing environmental contamination or liabilities. Grantor reserves the right to occupy, use and cuki.v, ate said easement for all purposes not inconsistent with the rights herein granted. Grantor covenants that he/she/they is/are the fee simple owner of said land or in which the 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL #: 3976-00 t-00 l 01 JOB #: 72WB846 REFERENCE #: EXHIBIT "A" A 10 toot by l 0 toot easement on City of Bremerton property between Wheaton Way and Homer Jones Dr. Southeast of Magnuson Way and further described as follows: Cormnencing at the intersection of the centerline of Homer Jones Dr. extended and Magnusop Way extepded; thence S0utheast along the center!the of Homer Jones Dr. a distance of $0 feet; thence Southwesterly at right angles to said centerline 36 feet to the T.P.O.B. of this easement; thence continuing Southwesterly at right angles to said centerline 10'; thence Southeasterly parallel with said centerline 10'; thence Northeasterly at right angles to said centerline 10'; thence Northwesterly to the T.P.O.B. · ~.....~nuson Way ~ 20' from poic ~,, 60'.~., .e~' ...... Proposed ............... l O'X10."'"' , C/L ~ ~"~/ i .... '-[ ._.-easeme.t Ri§bt-of-Way Reference ~ Code 45C U S WEST Communications, Inc. on the Property of C,i~' nf Rremertnn 3027 Olympus Drive Brcmcrton, WA. 98310 Section 12 Township. Kitsap Bremerton Job .Number 72WB846 24N Range 1E Willamette Meridian County, Washington State Exchange or Toll Lead Length 10'Xl 0' /7 T E S INC. Richard D. Atkins Right-of-Way Agent 19324 Sprague Drive, Bothell, WA. 98012 Ph. 206-672-7532, Fax. 206-774-8287 Cellular 206-819-4179 April 12, 1997 Mr. Randy Witt City Engineer, City of Bremerton 3027 O13mapus Drive Bremerton, WA. 98310 Mr. With U S WEST Communications has asked me to contact you to see if they could purchase an easement for a cabinet on City property. They need to replace an existing cabinet as shown on the attached sketch. Per my corvve~sation with Mary Ellen Babbitt, please find enclosed an easement, and a drawing shov~dng where U S WEST Communications would like to place their cabinet on a tract in Bremerton that used to be Navy land. I have been authorized to offer you five dollars a square foot for a total of five hundred dollars ($500.00) for a 10 foot by 10 foot easement. The cabinet is approximately five feet high, three feet v, fde and two feet thick. This cabinet will provide a central point ~br the technicians to make their connections. The inside is full of connectors attachcd to the cables that pass by this location. By having all the cables in this area enter this box, they have greater flexibility in choosing a line fbr a particular customer. This allows them to have access to every line in the area for trouble shooting purposes. This will also facilitate service to any new development in the immediate area~ If you would like to talk to me about this, I can be reached on 206,672-7532. (after 4-27- 97 this will be area code 425 instead of 206) Sin,,5~gre!~Yours,' Richard D. Atkins /? AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Resolution Regarding the Development of Docks and Piers within the channel between Ostrich Bay and Oyster Bay FOR AGENDA OF: August 6, 1997 ORIGINATING DEPT.: Dept. of Comm. Dev. ORIGINATOR: D. Pratt DATE SUBMITTED: July 31, 1997 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: City Attorney: A. Resolution No. A (,,.1, l B. Bremerton Shoreline Master Program (Section re. docks and piers) ENDORSEMENT INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The Bremerton Shoreline Master Program (implemented through the Washington State Department of Ecology) has a sedous lack of cladty and policy regarding the development of some docks and piers within the Oyster Bay Channel. In order to cladfy the City Council's policy and intent toward such development, an amendment to the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program is in order. It is believed that continued development with the current policies may irreparably damage characteristics desired to be preserved by new regulations. The resolution proposes an option to remedy this situation. All existing complete applications will be decided under the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program in effect which are submitted prior to adoption of this resolution. 8. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve Resolution No. o~o~l as submitted. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Donald L. Pratt ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: J. Johnson EXPIRATION DATE: May 6, 1998 REVIEW DATE: April 6, 1998 PULLED TABLED 10. NOTICE OFACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED A DATE ' AGENDA BILL NO.: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: 1 .) Current regulations remain in effect for the development of piers and docks. 2.) New applications will be accepted and processed. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: Staffing: There is potential for high impact on Planning and Zoning staff. Although the administration intends to focus the research and development on narrow issues, the Department of Ecology review process may be broader and does require City comment. It is believed, however, that leaving the issue unresolved will result in a significant amount of staff time addressing each application which would be processed without the benefit of clear policy, goals and objectives for the issue. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: A. Bremerton Shoreline Master Program B. Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (Chapter 90.58RCW) C. Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 173-19 D. Alice Schisel, Department of Ecology, Shorelines Regional Representative (425-649-4309). agbill6.doc 0.2O RESOLUTION NO. ,~.~/ A Resolution Setting a Moratorium on The Development of Docks and Piers Within the Channel between Ostrich Bay and Oyster Bay WHEREAS the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 requires the Bremerton City Council to adopt a Bremerton Shoreline Master Program which the State reviews and adopts as part of the Washington Administrative Code; and, WHEREAS the Bremerton City Council finds that the current Bremerton Shoreline Master Program does not adequately address the following issues in the Oyster Bay Channel: A. The level of potential navigational hazards created by docks and piers requiring substantial shoreline development permits in the Channel between Ostrich Bay and Oyster Bay; B. The aesthetic quality of large docks and piers in the Channel between Ostrich Bay and Oyster Bay; C. The environmental and public trust issues (public waters and underlying lands are a public resource owned by and available to all citizens equally for navigation, fishing, recreation and similar uses) related to docks and piers which rest directly on the beach at Iow water; and, WHEREAS the Council understands that the City of Bremerton public use of shoreline may suffer irreparable damage if development is not prohibited while regulations are changed: and, WHEREAS the Bremerton City Council believes that a study period is necessary process the change locally (estimated at 2.5 months for developmental work, public notice, Planning Commission hearing and City Council hearing); and, WHEREAS the State Department of Ecology is allowed 5 months to review and implement changes to the Administrative Code amending the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program; and, WHEREAS such delays may result in permits being filed under current regulations which may seriously impose navigational and environmental hazards; undesired situations involving the public trust of the shoreline and well as cause a loss of irretrievable aesthetic quality; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. that a development moratorium prohibiting the issuance of substantial shoreline development permits for all Docks and Piers within the confines of Oyster Bay Channel as defined on Exhibit A is hereby adopted; 2. that this moratorium shall take effect immediately and should terminate 9 months from the date of this moratorium or until an amendment to the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program can be approved by the State Department of Ecology, whichever shall occur first.. City Council President Date Disk 93.05 docks5.doc RESOLUTION NO..~ b ~l [ A Resolution Setting a Moratorium on The Development of Docks and Piers Within the Channel between Ostrich Bay and Oyster Bay WHEREAS the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 requires the Bremerton City Council to adopt a Bremerton Shoreline Master Program which the State reviews and adopts as part of the Washington Administrative Code; and, WHEREAS the Bremerton City Council finds that the current Bremerton Shoreline Master Program does not adequately address the following issues in the Oyster Bay Channel: A. The level of potential navigational hazards created by docks and piers requiring substantial shoreline development permits in the Channel between Ostrich Bay and Oyster Bay; B. The aesthetic quality of large docks and piers in the Channel between Ostrich Bay and Oyster Bay; C. The environmental and public trust issues (public waters and underlying lands are a public resource owned by and available to all citizens equally for navigation, fishing, recreation and similar uses) related to docks and piers which rest directly on the beach at Iow water; and, WHEREAS the Council understands that the City of Bremerton public use of shoreline may suffer irreparable damage if development is not prohibited while regulations are changed: and, WHEREAS the Bremerton City Council believes that a study period is necessary to process the change locally (estimated at 2.5 months for developmental work, public notice, Planning Commission hearing and City Council hearing); and, WHEREAS the State Department of Ecology is allowed 5 months to review and implement changes to the Administrative Code amending the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program; and, WHEREAS such delays may result in permits being filed under current regulations which may seriously impose navigational and environmental hazards; undesired situations involving the public trust of the shoreline and well as cause a loss of irretrievable aesthetic quality; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. That a development moratorium prohibiting the development of docks and piers and issuance of substantial shoreline development permits for all Docks and Piers within the confines of Oyster Bay Channel as defined on Exhibit A is hereby adopted; 2. That this moratorium shall take effect immediately and should terminate 9 months from the date of this moratorium or until an amendment to the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program can be approved by the State Department of Ecology, whichever shall occur first. City Council President Date Disk 93.05 docks5.doc 2 August 1997 FROM: THE GREATER MAJORITY" RE: ISSUE OF RESIDENTIAL JOINT USE DOCKS/PIERS IN THE "CHANNEL" FLOWING INTO OYSTER BAY. SHOULD THEY BE PERMITED? ANSWER; YES! The vocal minority has expressed concern.regarding the above mentioned issue. They have yet to substantiate any factual safety concerns. The Shorelines Management Act has been in place since the earlier 1970's providing guidelines over the development of waterfront. It has consistently served its pupose effectively providing rights to both public and private property rights. It appears that the vocal minority is attempting to change very clear guidelines at the local level. The issue is safety of navigatable waterways which is governed by. the Federal Army Corps of Engineers, State Department of Ecology, and State Fisheries & Wildlife. As the City Council is very a~vare of the majority is often silent (please see attached signatures obtained in a short time). All parties involved recognize the amount of energy the vocal minority has continually expended. It appears they are attempting to make a clearly defined standard by. xvhich the public and individual property owners can abide by. seem obsolete. At this time the greater majority MUST be heard. We must preserve our civil rights as the pendulum has sxvung more towards socialism and away from democracy. We believe that individuals wanting to develop their property on the channel of Oyster Bay deserve to do so under existing federal, state and local guidelines. Please don't "strip" us of our property rights. If anything, you should consider making it more attractive to be a property owner residing in the City. of Bremerton versus a property, oxs-ner with rentals in the City of Bremerton. Make us proud. I am in support of those citizens who currently and in the future desire to have docks/piers in the channel of Oyster Bay. see attached map & signatures pg. 1 of 9 ~u9-91-~/ 12:31P City of Bremerton +1360 478-5251 0 S TRICH BA¥ 0 ¥S TER BAY PARCELS SUBJECT TO RESOLUTION NO. REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT OF DOCKS AND PEIRS WITHIN THE CHANNEL BE'PNEEN OSTRICH BAY AND OYSTER BAY. SCALE: 1": ,.500' SIGNATURE PAGE: LETTER TO BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL/BREMERTON DCD DATED 2 AUGUST 1997 _/ SIGNATURE PAGE: LETTER TO BREMERTON CITY COUNCILfBREMERTON DCD DATED 2 AUGUST 1997 ADDRESS I~Z2.. PG_~OF~ Bremerton City Council 239 Fourth Street Bremerton, WA 98337 August 6, 1997 Reference: Resolution Number 2621 - Moratorium on Docks and Piers on the CHANNEl, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Council: I will echo the congratulations due to whomever drafted Resolution 2621. It is concise, articulate, germane, and without a doubt - cogent. It was also a pleasant surprise to find that someone can locate the site of our general concern as being on the CHANNEL between Oyster and Ostrich Bays - and NOT 1N OYSTER BAY itself. This little geography lesson should be posted down at the Department of Community Development for all to see. In most elected governing bodies, you will invariably find a wide assortment of personalities, motivations, philosophies and character. Some individuals will struggle to make themselves knowledgeable of the facts and mechanics of the issues to be brought before them; some will render hip shooters decisions; some will automatically classify everything that is New as being a sign of Progress and therefore Good; while some will sleep through most of the meetings and upon awakening cast their vote for their own personal best political advantage. It would not be surprising if some of these characterizations were present, to some degree, in you ladies and gentlemen. I would ask each of you to be aware of these little idiosyncrasies, and make an extra effort to vote in consonance with your primary responsibility as Protectors of the Public Trust. I would further ask, in the matter presently before you, to weigh for a moment the touted "rights" of property owners to do just about anything their little hearts desire - with the somewhat constraining fact that their "rights" to total dominion over their own land are already limited by overriding considerations for the rights of neighbors and the public - and when they attempt to project those individual land owner "rights" over lands which are owned by the people of the state of Washington - those "rights" must be weighed in the balance of the wants of a few versus the aggregated right of the many. Thank you for your time and attention. I hope that you will approve this Resolution. Sincerely submitted for your consideration; George JMiller P. O. Box 788 Bremerton, WA 98337 August 6, 1997 Bremerton City Council 239 Fourth Street Bremerton, WA 98337 Reference: Resolution Number 2621 Moratorium on Docks and Piers on the CHANNEL Ladies and Gentlemen of the Council: #1: Congratulations to whomever drafted Resolution 2621. It is concise, articulate and germane; and by God needed. #2: It is indeed refreshing to find someone who can locate the site of our general concern as being on the CHANNEL between Oyster and Ostrich Bays - and NOT IN OYSTER BAY itself. This little geography lesson has been a long time in coming. It is to be sincerely hoped that you members of the Council will find it reasonable that a neighborhood, or the general citizenry, can legitimately recognize and defend an area of umque environmental features and pristine aesthetic quality; to preserve that uniqueness for the enjoyment of future generations. It is similarly hoped that you will also be able to place the interests of the many over the desires of the few. You are the de facto guardians of the public trust. May you take heart in knowing that Chapter 90.58 RCW fully supports the soul and spirit of this resolution. Sincerely submitted for your consideration; August 6, 1997 Bremerton City Council 239 Fourth Street Bremerton, WA 98337 Reference: Resolution Number 2621 Moratorium on Docks and Piers on the CHANNEL Ladies and Gentlemen of the Council: #1: Congratulations to whomever drafted Resolution 2621. It is concise, articulate and germane; and by God needed. #2: It is indeed refreshing to find someone who can locate the site of our general concern as being on the CHANNEL between Oyster and Ostrich Bays - and NOT IN OYSTER BAY itself. This little geography lesson has been a long time in coming. It is to be sincerely hoped that you members of the Council will find it reasonable that a neighborhood, or the general citizenry, can legitimately recognize and defend an area of unique environmental features and pristine aesthetic quality; to preserve that uniqueness for the enjoyment of future generations. It is similarly hoped that you will also be able to place the interests of the many over the desires of the few. You are the de facto guardians of the public trust. May you take heart in knowing that Chapter 90.58 RCW fully supports the soul and spirit of this resolution. Sincerely submitted for your consideration; WATER ACCESS AND MOORAGE Applicability Water access and moorage facilities: Facilities, including piers, docks, recreation floats, mooring buoys, marine railways, and boat launching ramps, that are designed ', provide access to water areas for boats and people and to provide facilities for secudn boats. (Also see Marina Section.) Pier: A fixed structure built over the water, intended for use as a loading Place f¢ marine transport or for recreational purposes. Floating dock: A platform built over the water and attached to the shore or a fixed pier by a loosely coupled ramp, intended for use as a loading place for marine transport or for recreational purposes. Recreational float: An anchored floating platform for water-dependent recreational activities such as swimming and diving. Mooring buoy: An anchored floating device for the purpose of securing a boat or ship. Marine railway: A pair of sloping tracks usually on top of a concrete or piling base for the purpose of placing a boat in and out of the water. Boat launching ramp: A platform constructed of concrete or other material which extends from the shore onto the tidelands, usually intended for boat launching by trailers. Goal Assure that adequate water access and moorage facilities are available to the public and individuals without adversely impacting the natural aesthetic qualities of the shoreline. Policies Community Boating Facilities: Multiple use and expansion of existing consistent piers, wharfs and docks is encouraged (in lieu of the addition and/or proliferation of new facilities) in order to minimize the consumption of limited shoreline resources. Joint-use facilities are preferred over new single use piers, docks and floats. Piers, Docks and Floats: Construct piers, docks, and recreational floats should be constructed so as to minimize obstruction of navigable waters and not significantly reduce use of the water sudace. Piers and Docks: The number, size, and length of piers and docks should be no more than the minimum that provides the required service. SMP SHORELINE USE POLICIES AND REGULATIONS 5 - 29 Piers/Floating Docks: Encourage the use of floats in lieu of piers in those areas where scenic values are high, and where conflicts with recreational boaters and fishers are not greatly increased. Piers: Only open pile piers should be permitted where shore trolling is important and/or where there is significant longshore drift. o Boat Launching Ramps/Marine Railways: Boat launch ramps and marine railways should be designed so as to minimize detrimental effects to natural shore processes. Public Access: Pier and dock projects are encouraged to provide for public docking, launching and recreational access. View Protection: Locate, design and operate piers, wharves, docks and floats so as to be aesthetically compatible with the area visually affected, and protect surrounding properties from undue impairment of views. Regulations General Proposals for moorage facilities shall be consistent with State Department of Natural Resources Moorage Design Guidelines. Prior to granting a permit for a pier, dock, or float, the effects of the structure upon navigation, recreation, and adjacent shorelines shall be determined, and disposition of the permit by the City shall reflect such determination. 3. Water access and moorage facilities shall be located, designed and constructed so as to cause minimum interference with navigation and public use of the water surface and shoreline, and to protect surrounding properties from undue impairment of views. 4 Public Access: Water access and moorage facilities that are accessory to uses requiring public access shall provide public access facilities consistent with the scale of the. project. Community Boating Facilities2 Subdivisions: New subdivisions with shoreline frontage shall provide community docks if any docks are proposed. (See also: Residential Development) 2The te= "COa~L~ity docks", "joint-use aoorage fa¢i!.ity~, "joint-use facil, ity~, and "joint-use conau3ity piers and docks" are used interchangeab[y. ALso see definition of .¢oamanity boating fs¢il, ity**. SMP SHORELINE USE POLICIES AND REGULATIONS 5 - 30 Pre-existing Residential Lots: For residential lots existing at the time this program is adopted (2/2/92): No more than one (1) private, noncommercial single-use dock is permitted per platted shoreline lot or unplatted shoreline tract owned for residential or recreational purposes. Multifamily/Commercial Developments: Multi-family residences, hotels, motels, and other commercial developments proposing to provide moorage facilities shall construct a single, joint-use moorage facility: PROVIDED, that the City may authorize more than one joint use moorage facility if a single facility would be inappropriate or undesirable given the specific conditions of the site. Commercial/Industrial Developments: Permits for docks or piers serving single commercial or industrial enterprises shall not be granted unless it is determined that adjacent commercial and/or industrial enterprises are not willing to cooperatively develop a joint-use facility. Maintenance: Proposals for joint-use community piers and docks shall demonstrate and document that adequate maintenance of the structure and the associated upland area will be provided by identified responsible parties. Piers and Docks 10. Prohibited: Piers and floating docks shall be prohibited where navigation may be impaired significantly at entrances to bays, channels, or coves. 11. Location: Piers and docks shall project the minimum distance necessary to service the appurtenant vessels and shall not create a hazard to navigation. 12. Inside Harbor Areas: When State harbor lines have been designated, piers and docks shall be located shoreward of the outer harbor line. 13. Outside Harbor Areas: Where State harbor lines do not apply, piers and docks shall project the minimum distance necessary to service the appurtenant vessels and shall not create a hazard to navigation. 14. Size: ao Length: Maximum length of a residential pier or dock shall be the minimum necessary to accomplish moorage for the intended boating uses, and shall be only so long as to obtain a depth of five (5) feet of water as measured at Mean Low Water (MLVV) in marine shorelines or as measured at Ordinary High Water (OHWM) in fresh water shorelines. bo Height: Dock shall not exceed three (3) feet in height above OHWM on the landward side, and shall extend above the water surface no more than two (2) feet at all other locations. SMP SHORELINE USE POLICIES AND REGULATIONS 5 - 31 c. Private, Single Use Docks: 1) Landing area deck maximum length parallel to shore of 'T' end: Ten (10) feet; 3) Landing area deck maximum width: Eight (8) feet. 2) Walkway maximum width: Four (4) feet; d. Community Piers and Docks: 1) Maximum Width and Length: To be determined by the City on a case-by-case basis. 2) Density: No more than one (1) thirty foot (30') moorage space per dwelling unit or lot. e. Side Yard Setbacks: 1) Docks shall be set back a minimum of ten (10) feet from side property lines; EXCEPTION: Community piers and docks may be located adjacent to or upon a side property line when mutually agreed to by contract/covenant with the owners of the adjacent property, a copy of which must be recorded with the County Auditor and filed with the application for permit. Recreational Floats/Mooring Buoys 15. Location: Recreation floats and mooring buoys shall be located no further seaward than existing floats and mooring buoys. 16. Visibility: Recreational floats and mooring buoys shall be readily discernible under normal conditions to the unaided eye at a minimum distance of 100 yards. 17. Float Design: Height: Floats must be built so that the deck surface is no more than two (2) foot above the water's sudace and must have reflectors for nighttime visibility. b. Maximum Size: 1) Single Property Owner Recreational Floats: Sixty-four (64) square feet. 2) Joint-use Floats: Ninety-six (96) square feet. SMP SHORELINE USE POLICIES AND REGULATIONS 5 - 32 Boat Launching Ramps/Marine Railways Longshore Drift: Boat launching ramps and marine railways shall be designed as to not obstruct longshore drift. 19, Residential Launch Ramps: Boat launching ramps may be permitted for individual residences where the upland slope within twenty-five (25) feet of the OHWM does not exceed twenty-five (25) percent and/or where substantial cutting, grading, filling or defense works are not necessary. SMP SHORELINE USE POLICIES AND REGULATIONS 5 - 33 -' AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ~ ORDINANCE NO. ,~//',.?~7~' FOR AGENDA OF: July-'~'~:~', 1997 REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 4282 AND ELIMINATING ORIGINATING DEPT.: TREASURER THE ADMIRAL THEATER FUND ORIGINATOR: R. HANlq'A'-- DATE SUBMITTED: July 9, 1997 2. CLEARANCES Comment of back if necessary) DIR. ADMIN SERVICES '~' L," 3. EXHIBITS: PROPOSED ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 4282 ENDORSEMENTS MAYOR Q~,~_ NFORMATION APPROVED BY C~'OUNCIL PRESIDE-N.T FOR SUBMIT COUNCIL PRESIDENT ~ ~-~ ~) ~,.4~,,. 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The Admiral Theater Fund was created by Ordinance No. 4282 in 1990 shortly after the City purchased the theater building. The intended purpose of the fund was to provide a budgeting and accounting for the rehabilitation and subsequent operation of the building. As we now know, these functions are being carried out by a non-profit corporation rather than the City and therefor, this fund of the City is not necessary. 8. RECOMMENDATION: -M;'Jc,;; *,;, ,~,~,,uv~ uf~ i~f~ fun, d;,,5,.,,,~,,,o,,,.~ ......... Motion to pass on second reading Ordinance No. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: Treasurer Mayor N/A N/A PULLED Cl R TIV ' TABLED 10. NO~ APPROVED DISAPPROVED 11. AGENDA BILL NO: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Ordinance No. 4282 will remain in effect. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: None. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: BMC 3.21 ORDNANCE AN ORDINANCE repealing Ordinance 4282 which created the Admiral Theater Fund. TIlE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ltEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. Repeal. Ordinance 4282 creating the Admiral Theater Fund is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after passage and publication. APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __ 1997. day of PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this 1997. day of DAVID FARR, Council President APPROVED this ~ day of ,1997. LYNN HORTON, Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE creating a special revenue fund of the City of Bremerton to be called The Admiral Theater Fund and designating the use thereof. WHEREAS, a special revenue fund restricted to support for the City's Admiral Theater facility would encourage direct public contribution in support of this program, as well as serving as a cumulative reserve for City appropriations for the program, now, therefore, THE CITY OF BI~RMF~RTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. New Chapter. A new Chapter 3.21, ADMIRAL THEATER FI/ND, is hereby added to Title 3 of the Bremenon Municipal Code to read as follows: 3.21.100 ESTABLISHED. There is hereby established a special revenue fund to be called "The Admiral Theater Fund" for the purpose of receiving and disbursing funds for the support of the City's Admixal Theater performing and visual arts complex to include donations, bequests and city appropriations, including admission tax revenue from the Admiral Theater and any contracted revenue sources. 3.21.200 ADMINISTRATION AND EXPENDITURES. The Admiral Theater Fund shall be operated as a special revenue fund administered by the City Treasurer and the Mayor. All monies received by the fund, together with investment earnings thereon, may be expended only for the following program purposes: (a) Capital expenditures for renovation, maintenance and improvements to the Admiral Theater facility; fo) Repayment of General Fund or Civic Improvement Fund appropriations to The Admiral Theater Fund: APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton , PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this APPROVED this ~ day of this ~2 5- L~qN HORTON, Council President /~c~,~.~_s~¢~ , 1990. L0~LIIS MEN~O'I~, Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN MCcLUSKEY, City~21erk day of day of '- AGENDA BILL -- BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 3~_~[.[~ ORDINANCE NO. ~-V'~'dE FOR AGENDA OF:July ~, 1997 REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 4180 AND ELIMINATING ORIGINATING DEPT.:TREASURER THE ATHLETIC SPORTS FUND ORIGINATOR: R. HANR~ DATE SUBMI'I-I'ED: July 9, 1997 2. CLEARANCES Comment of back if necessary) DIR. ADMIN SERVICES FISCAL AND BUDGET COMM. ~~ 3. EXHIBITS: PROPOSED ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 4180 ENDORSEMENTS MAYOR INFORMATION APPROVED BY C..OUNClL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMIT 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The Athletic Sports fund was created by Ordinance No. 4180 in 1988 to provide budget and accounting for several activities administered by the Parks Department. For the past several years, these activities have been included within the Parks Department of the General Fund. Since the fund is no longer used, it is recommended that it be eliminated. 8. RECOMMENDATION; ......... ,,~ ai~prc, v~ ,,,. ~"~+ r_~d!_-.~ r~rd!n~_nce .Hc. Motion to pass on second reading Ordinance No. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: - Treasurer Mayor N/A N/A PULLED CI DI CTIV : TABLED a I APPROVED DISAPPROVED 11. AGENDA BILL NO: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS; 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Ordinance No. 4180 will remain in effect. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: None. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES; BMC 3.98 ORDNANCE AN ORDINANCE repealing Ordinance 4180 which created the Athletic Sports Fund. THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES 1]EREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. Repeal. Ordinance 4180 creating the Athletic Sports Fund is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after passage and publication. APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this 1997. day of PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this 1997. day of DAVID FARR, Council Presidem APPROVED this ~ day of ., 1997. LYNN HORTON, Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk AN ORDINANCE creating a fund of the City to be called the Athletic Sports Fund and designating the purpose of uses thereof. THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1: Athletic Sports Fund Created: There is hereby created a fund of the City to be called the Athletic Spot.ts Fund. Said fund shall be operated as a special revenue fund administered by the Director of Parks and Recreation under the direction of the Mayor in a manner conforming to state statute and the city.charter. SECTION 2: Fund Purposes: The purpose of the fund shall be to operate a sports and athletic program within the City. Activities include, but are not limited to softball, basketball, volleyball, and soccer leagues. The purpose of the fund shall further include the accumulation of financial resources for construction and improvement of the City's athletic facilities. SECTION 3: Effective Date: This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after publication. APPROVED/~by~the ,City Council on the first reading this PASSED by the City Council of the City o~ 8re~erto~ HANK WATBEr., Council President 'E LOBE, Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ~ ORDINANCE NO. ~/~ ~)// SETTING LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS OF THE CITY BUDGET FOR AGENDA OF:July 30, 1997 ORIGINATING DEPT: Treasu~r ORIGINATOR: R.'l~anna DATE SUBMITTED:July 15, 1997 2. CLEARANCES Comment of back if necessary) Dir. Administrative Ser. ~ 3. EXHIBITS: Proposed Ordinance ENDORSEMENTS /~ INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMIT 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION; The ordinance controlling administration of the City's budget was last amended in 1991. The proposed modifications will increase the authority of the Mayor and the Fiscal and Budget Committee to offset the effects ,~f inflation and will provide a simpler mechanism for dealing with technical errors. ' o RECOMMENDATION: Motion to pass Ordinance No. ~ on second reading. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Treasurer ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor EXPIRATION DATE: N/A REVIEW DATE: N/A PULLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE; TABLED 10 NOTI T N APPROVED DISAPPROVED =_D 11. AGENDA BILL NO: C~7_ J 7& 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: The City will continue to administer the budget under the current ordinance with more stringent limitations on the authority of the Mayor and Fiscal and Budget Comm. to make amendments. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: Nominal savings of staff and Council time as more amendments are authorized at lower levels of authority. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: Ordinance No. 4332 om mA CZ AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 4332 setting forth legislative and administrative comrols on the budget of the City of Bremerton. The City of Bremerton does ordain: Section 1. Amendment. Ordinance No. 4332 is hereby amended as follows: SECTION 1: BUDGET STRUCTURE - The adopted armttat budget of the City of Bremerton shall consist of various Funds and Departments within those Funds as provided in the chart of accounts pursuant to statute. Each Department shall contain ~ ~i~ distinct Category Groups, which shall be classified ~i~i~::~ Personnel, ~ Supplies, Services and Taxes, Debt Servi~ and ~i Capital Expenditur~.~i~i!~ii~~. SECTION 2: GENERAL BUDGET POLICY - Except as specifically authorized in subsequent sections of this Ordinance, no administrator or legislator shall expend or authorize expenditure of monies that would cause ~ the over expenditure of any budget Category Group. Further, no administrator or legislator shall employ or authorize the employment of a person into a permanent position not specifically authorized in the adopted budget. SECTION 3:~A,~,~'"~'~'"" ~. ~,.,~, ~'"'~ ,., GENE~RAL~ ~ ~,~',~,,o~"'~. POLICY (~'~YOR) ~i~.~..~.~i~~i~i~~~~~~!~ii~· ~.."-:~%?.~:..~::.:~r'~ -~.:*.-y.~.~.~?~..c%~.::?."~..../..%..:://../..~.:.::;:..~:::~:?...:?:...:.....ea~'z:::~ .~C4:~....~:....~..~:.:~:.......~:.~:~.~:.k ~.~..~.~:..~..~..~:~k::~:.::....:~..~.~:~.:~..~:..../~e~:~:~.~*.:.:.~.~::]......:~..~:~:~.~.~:.].~.~.~::.~.~:..:..~:.~..~c~:~.~:~::..~.k:~..::~.~:~..~.~5~.~.~:~.~.~..~:~:~:~:~:~:~...~.~.~.~.~.~:~:~:.~:~..~:.~.~:~.~.~.~..~c..~:~:~..~. I. UI %~lLllLflS q~l.l~ll%~lL%ll~m I. IIUVI~q~I ~L ~U~II fiUIUI~UII UU~ IIUL I~UlL ~i Lii~ ~l~Ull UL ~IUY~ ~lt~ UU~ ~IUJ~L3 Ui ItUlfl~. I IIU IVM~UI ~li HUt ~LIIUI~ ~1~ il~l~l~l WI~II {UU~ ~ ' ......... May i ~ ~i ,,~ ~,~y ~, ~.,~ ~,u ~uu~ ~,,,,,~. Ym~er, The or s empower to autho~e r~tm~t for ~d filling of a peseta ~sifion at a level lower t~ approv~ in the adopt~ budge. SEC~ON 4: ~~'~"~ ~ ~ ~ ,,~,o ,~ ,,~ G~~ BUDGET POLICY CITY CO~C~ ~SC~ ~ B~GET CO~~~~~..~..~ _~:F"?r'"}{'"{~i'i~F:~'"'?:i}7~~''~'':~,'''~''''~:'~ ........... i ~e Ci~ Counc~ Fi~ ~d Budget Co~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~e addition or delmion of mpit~ ~ proj~s ~d itms, pro~d~ ~m N~hd~ deletions or ad~tions do not ex~ a ""~{?">~{'""~'":'"":2~gi~:i~?!ii~s:~<<[~s:::~:~il:.~:::~:~:..i~i¢:2......i5~:::g~:::~:i:i:~:::::~:3~...)B::::::}~22::s:g?..:~2~:i:i2:y...::~::~:~s::..~::2s~ s:i::s:~2x:~::..:s:::~::x:s::::~`:s::~:~....:~:..::::::~:::x.....::c:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: i.. ~{~. Fmher, the Coma~ ~ ~ ~tho~e ~e tr~sfer ~ of appropriations be~n Catego~ ~oups to ac~mpHsh mpit~ ~ additions ~Wor to r~ppropfime su~lus ~nds generat~ by mpit~ ~ deletions. Such tr~sfer ~ authomtiom s~ be a~mpHsh~ in a m~er wNch pro, des for ~dit renew. N exercising tNs exception ~thofi~, ~e Com~ s~ not de~ate ~om the poH~ outHn~ in the adopted budget, nor sh~ it ~tho~e ~y budget adjustment ~at ex~eds the tot~ Depmment appropfimion. DeN~s of requests for ~thomtions ~ow~ N tNs ~ion may be app~ed to · e Ci~ CouncH. SECTION 5: ~}~ION~ : ~,'~=' ...... ~ · ~,~' ~u~,~' ~"~ AU~IO~TY BY ~,~'"" CITY CO,Cra ~~$~8 - Ex,pt ~ sp~y pro~d~ N tNs OrdN~, ~ adjustmems to the ~opt~ budget sh~ be ~o~ o~y by ~e Ci~ Council. Fu~her, no ~jummems to the ~opted budgm sh~ be mnsider~ by ~e Ci~ Council Mthout prior renew and recommendation or comment by the Mayor and the Fiscal and Budget Committee. SECTION 6: ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION - Policies and procedures to insure the implementation and maintenance of the policies set forth in this Ordinance shall be prepared by D-~,,,,~, ~i~...,~ and provided to the administrator responsible for each Department. Approved by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of , 1997. Passed by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of ,1997. Approved this day of DAVID FARR, Council President , 1997. ATTEST: LYNN HORTON, Mayor KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ~-~,4,.( ,~ '~ 1. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. z/'~,2-, FORAGENDA OF: July ae,, 1997 ORIGINATING DEPT.: TREASURER ADOPTING A TWO-YEAR FISCAL BIENNIUM BUDGET ORIGINATOR: R. HAhlNA'-~'~ BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 1999 DATE SUBMITTED:July 9, 1997 2. CLEARANCES Comment of back if necessary) ENDORSEMENTS MaYO R ~ 3. EXHIBITS: PROPOSED ORDINANCE INFORMATION APPROVED BY C~NC.~~~ SUBMIT COUNCIL PRESIDENT 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION; The Legislature, through RCW 35.34.040 has authorized cities to budget on a two year biennium basis. The proposed ordinance will have the City begin budgeting in this manner beginning with the 1999 fiscal year. 8. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to pass on second reading Ordinance No. ~t~ 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor EXPIRATION DATE: N/A REVIEW DATE: N/A Treasurer PULLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE; TABLED 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED 11. AGENDA BILL NO: q7-177 2. CLEAI:[ANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: The City will continue with the annual budget process which is currently used. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES; It is anticipated that a significant savings of staff and Council time can be achieved through this process. The extent of these savings will depend on how complex the mid-biennium review process becomes. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES; City of Vancouver RCW 35.34 AN ORDINANCE adopted under RCW Chapter 35.34 and by which the City Council elects for the City to have a two-year fiscal biennium budget beghming January 1, 1999. TI-IE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. That pursuant to RCW 35.34.040 the City Council hereby establishes a two- year biennium budget for the City of Bremertort, beginning with the two-year biennium which begins January 1, 1999. The 1999-2001 Biennial Budget and all subsequent budgets shall be prepared, considered and adopted under the provisions of RCW Chapter 35.34 and of this ordinance. As permitted by RCW 35.34.070 the proposed preliminary budget shall be submitted to City Council no later than October 31 for the ensuing biennium. Section 2. Pursuant to RCW 35.34.130 the City Council hereby provides for a mid- biennial review and modification of the biennial budget. No later than the thirty-first of October of the first year of each biennial budget the Mayor shall prepare proposed budget modifications proposed to be effective as of the next January 1. Such proposal shall be sent to City Council members and shall be a public record and available to press and to any resident of the City. Council Fiscal and Budget Committee shall consider such proposed modifications and refer them to City Council with any recommendations. A public hearing shall be advertised at least once and shall be held at a City Council meeting in the month of November, and-may be continued bom time-to-time. At such hearing or thereafter Council may consider a proposed ordinance to carry out such modifications, such ordinance shall be subject to other provisions of RCW Chapter 35.34. A complete copy of any modification ordinance as adopted shall be transmitted to the Division of Municipal Corporations in the office of the State Auditor and to the Association of Washington Cities. Approved by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of ,1997. Passed by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of ,1997. Approved this day of DAVID FARR, Council President · 1997. ATTEST: LYNN HORTON, Mayor KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ~/~D.~ AMENDING THE 1997 BUDGET FOR AGENDA OF: July al~, 1997 ORIGINATING DEPT: Treasurer [) ORIGINATOR: R. Hanna DATE SUBMITTED: July 8, 1997 . v ,,,..._ 2. CLEARANCES Com. Tent of back if necessary) Dir. Administrative So~ · Fiscal and Budget Comm. ~/~d.~/ L~" L 3. EXHIBITS: Proposed Ordinance Supporting Budget Adjustment Forms ENDORSEMENTS MAYOR ~ ,T INFORMATION APPROVED BY~UNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMIT 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: A number of actions have been taken by the City which need to be incorporated into the Budget in order for the document to remain an accurate projection of City financial activity. RECOMMENDATION: - .......... ~ ........ Motion to pass Ordinance No. ~/~ on second reading. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Treasurer ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor EXPIRATION DATE: 12J31/97 REVIEW DATE: N/A PULLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: TABLED 0 NOTIC A T ON APPROVED DISAPPROVED 11. AGENDA BILL NO: (~ 7-- ) '7'00 z/? 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: The 1997 Budget will not accurately project anticipated financial activity of the City. actions will exceed current appropriations. Several previously authorized 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: As indicated in the attachments. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: 1997 Budget Adjustment Requests. AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No. 4579 relating to the budget of the City of Bremexton for Fiscal Year 1997 THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1: Section 1 of Ordinance No. 4579 is hereby amended as follows: That the financial budget for the City of Bremerton, to with: "Official Budget for the year 1997, City of Bremerton', now on file in the office of the City Clerk of ~ City of Bremerton, be and the same is hereby approved and adopted, and the respective amounts provided for in said budget for the several funds of the City of Bremerton, be and the same are hereby ~xed and adopted as follows: FUND# 001 101 102 103 104 105 106 108 109 110 112 201 305 307 308 401 407 451 481 503 510 601 621 622 623 ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE YEAR 1997 DESCRIF1XON AMOUNT Arterial Slxeet ....................................................................... 7,~0,5~ Street .................................................................................... !,93~,300 Capital Reserve ....................................................................... 739,000 Civic Improvement .................................................................. 158,000 Parking System Revenue ......................................................... 527,750 C.D.B.G .................................................................................. 552,~ Abatement Revolving Fund ..................................................... 415,000 Real Estate Tranffer Tax ......................................................... 7494;000 Police Special Projecls ............................................................... 42,400 Parks Facility Construction ....................................................... ~,~ Bond Fund ............................................................................ 1,062,429 Waterfront Parks Construction .................................................. 31,500 Fire Dcpaxtment Capital .......................................................... 314,570 Pendergast Regional Park Const .............................................. 114,000 Water Operating ................................................................... 8,687,868 Gold Mountain Golf Course .................................................. 2,558,325 Wastewater Cmemtinv ~ ~ '~'~ ~': Stormwater Operating ............................................................. 937,673 Risk 1Vfanagement ................................................................. 2,148,000 Equipment Rental Reserve .................................................... 2,794,500 Cemetery Perpetual Care ......................................................... 128,500 LID Guaranty .......................................................................... 135,000 Roosevelt Capital Asset ........................................................... 926,000 Donations Fund ......................................................................... 38,613 22,503,391 7,540,546 2,166,300 564,750 2,683,530 813,427 138,573 18,437,326 624 Employee Medical Insurance Reserve ...................................... 425,000 GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: $7!,927,772 $76,504,221 Of the total revenue, the sum of $4,872,194 is the estimated amouat to be received from a $3.8127 levy per $1,000 of assessed valuation of all property within the city limit5 of the City of Bremerton as set forth in Ordinance No. 4574. APPROVED by the City Council on the first reading this day of July, 1997. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk in authentication of such passage this day of August, 1997. DAVID FARR, Council President APPROVED this day of August, 1997 LYNN HORTON, Mayor ATrEST: KATHY MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk EFFECTIVE DATE: PUBLISHED: ORDINANCE NO: 1997 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1 SUMMARY OF BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS 001 101 102 103 104 105 lO6 108 109 110 112 201 3O5 3O7 308 401 407 451 481 503 510 601 621 622 GENERAL ARTERIAL STREET STREET CAPITAL RESERVE CIVIC IMPROVEMENT PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE C.D.B.G. ABATEMENT REVOLVING FUND REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX POLICE SPECIAL PROJECTS PARKS FACILITY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND WATERFRONT PARKS CONSTRUCTION FIRE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL PENDERGAST REGIONAL PARK CONST. WATER OPERATING GOLF COURSE WASTEWATER OPERATING STORMWATER OPERATING RISK MANAGEMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL RESERVE CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE LID GUARANTY ROOSEVELT CAPITAL ASSET 623 DONATIONS FUND 624 EMPLOYEE MEDICAL INSURANCE RES. TOTAL CURRENT NET 1997 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS 22,274,473 $228,918 7,480,546 60,000 1,936,300 230,000 739,000 158,000 537,750 27,000 553,000 2,130,530 415,000 784,000 29,427 42,400 88,000 50,573 1,062,429 31,500 314,570 114,000 8,687,868 2,558,325 16,627,326 1,810,000 937,673 2,148,000 2,794,500 128,500 135,000 926,000 38,613 425,000 $71,937,773 $4,566,448 AMENDED BUDGET 22,503,391 7,540,546 2,166,300 739,000 158,000 564,750 2,683,530 415,000 813,427 42,400 138,573 1,062,429 31,500 314,570 114,000 8,687,868 2,558,325 18,437,326 937,673 2,148,000 2,794,500 128,500 135,000 926,000 38,613 425,000 $76,504,221 CITY OF BREMERTOI~ BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST Requesting Department: WASTE WATER No.97-1 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description Amount PVVTF LOAN 1810000 USES OF FUNDS: Description CALLOW AVE. CSO PROJECT Amount 1810000 Total 1810000 Total 1810000 I NARRATIVE: This adjustment will provide for the bids received for the construction on this project. Department Head Signature Date Directo~ Treasurer Comments: ~ Recornmcndcd ~"~ Not Recommended Treasurer's Signature Date Mayor Comments: Reconunended Approved Not Recommended Denied -~ 'Mayor's Signa~ Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied , ~'i'~.~ & Budget ¢o~ Signature Date Requesting Department: CITY OF BREMERTON BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST GOLF COURSE FUND 407 No. 97-2 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description Amount DECREASE: ENDING CASH 400,000 (Remaining Ending Cash = $94.736) NARRATIVE: USE OF FUNDS: Description Amount INCREASE: PARKING LOT EXPANSION CART STORAGE BUILDING 310,000 90,00O 400,000 This adjustment provides for the construction of the parking lot expansion and the cart storage building at Gold Mountain Golf Complex. The projects were inadvertently left out of the odgina11997 Budget. These two improvements will complete the course expansion which was begun in 1994. Departmg~ Head Signature Treasur~ Comments: Date irector Signatur~ Recommended ~ Mayor Comments: Not Recommended Treasure~r~----~ ~-~ Recommended ~ Not Recommended /- ~ Approved ~-~ Denied ~ ~._ Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied SHERRIL HUFF-MENEES 5 Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature 2-25-97 Date Requesting Department: _ CiTY OF BREMERTON _ BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST GENERAL FUND - TRANSPORTATION No. 97-3 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description REDUCE: POLICE SUPPLIES & SE INCREASE: SALE OF VEHICLES Amount 4,400 3.500 7,900 USE OF FUNDS: Description Amount INCREASE: CAPITAL 7,900 NARRATIVE: This adjustment will provide additional expenditure authority necessary to purchase two new staff cars for the Police Department. The odginal appropriation was $25,000 which has proven to be inadequate. The vehicles to be replaced are 1988 models which are no longer economical to maintain. Department Head Signature Treasurer Comments: Date Director Signature Date .~'~~Recommended Mayor Comments: Not Recommende-d~'~ Treasurer's Date Recommended [----1 Not Recommended ./ Approved ~ Denied ~ ~ Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied t-iscal & Budge(~.,~mm~tee Signature Date Requesting Department: CITY OF BREMERTON__ BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST GENERAL FUND 001-73 No. 97-4 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: BEGINNING CASH Amount 12,800 USE OFFUNDS: Des~ption INCREASE: MEMBERSHIP KRCC Amount 12,800 NARRATIVE: This adjustment will provide for the City's membership in the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council. Department Head Signature Treasurer Comments: Date Director Signature Date ~1" Recommended Not Recommended Treasurer's Signature Mayor Comments: ~ Recommended [---] J---J Approved J---J Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Md~or's Signature Dat~ ~~Recommended [-~ Approved Not Recommended Denied - Fiscal'"& Budget C°,¢~mi{-tee Signature Date Requesting Department: _. CITYOF BREMERTONv BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST GENERAL FUND POLICE DEPT. No. 97-5 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description Amount INCREASE: BHA CONTRACT 22,395 USE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: PATROL DIV. OVERTIME Amount 22,395 NARRATIVE: This adjustment will provide for the extention of the contract for law enforcement services at BHA through the end of the current fiscal year. The contract was initially budgeted only through March 31. Department Head Signature Date Director Signature Date Treasurer Comments: Recommended Mayor Comments: Not Recommended Treasurer's Signature -'~ Date /~~ Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Ma~or's Signature Date m-~_ Recommended [~ [~ Approved ~ Not Recommended Denied SEa'l & Bu~dget~itte~ Signature Date Requesting Department: CITY OF BREMERTOI BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST Con~anity Develo~nent SOURCE OF FUNDS: 001.16 558. 1016 53530 Computer related items $1857.19 USE OF FUNDS: 001.16 594.1816 $1857.19 56440 Planning Capital - Computer Hardware NARRATIVE: This amendment allows the purchase of a computer capable of utilizing the Sierra Permit system. The con~puter is assigned to Building, Land-use and Environment. This upgrade now allows all Building Development Specialists to access the Permit system at their work stations. epartment Head Signature Treasurer Comments' Date Director Signature Date Recommended Mayor Comments: N°t Rec°mmende~l--Treasurer~ ______~ Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Date Recommended Approved ~ Not Recommended [---'1 Denied (~1 & Bud~ Com~nittee Signature ~a-~ Requesting Department: _. CITY OF BREMERTON_ BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST POLICE DEPARTMENT 001-20 No. 97-7 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: STATE REVENUES Amount 27,150 USE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: POLICE OVERTIME Amount 27,150 NARRATIVE: This adjustment will provide expenditure authority for the performance of traffic control for the State DOT on the oveday of SR 303. City expenditures to be reimbursed by the State. Department Head Signature Date Treasurer Comments: Director Signature Date R~~e~mmended [-~ Mayor Comments: N°t Rec°mmended Treasur ~e~s .~~re~~ a~te~2'' [-~ Recommended ~ Not Recommended J---j Approved ~ Denied ~. '~-~_~ -.///.~ ~/'~'~ Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: ~/'Recommended ~-1 Approved Not Recommended Denied Mayor's Signature Date Fiscal & Budget ~:~ittee/Signature Date Requesting Department: _ CITYOF BREMERTON _ BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST WATER UTILITY- FORESTRY No. 97-8 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description REDUCE: One Service Specialist Position Amount USE OF FUNDS: Description Amount INCREASE: One Service Specialist Senior Position NARRATIVE: This adjustment will change the authorized staffing in the Forestry Division to provide for a recent position classification review. No additional expenditure authority is requested. Treasurer Comments: Director Signature Date Recommended ~ Not Recommende~-'~Treasurer'~ Mayor Comments: Date ./~. Recommended [~ Not Recommended Approved [~ Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date [-~ Recommended ~-~ Approved Not Recommended Denied a[~get cCommittee Signature D-~ Requesting Department: CITY OF BREMERTON BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No. ADIMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPT. GENERAL FUND 97-9 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: UNSPENT BOND PROCEED BEGINNING CASH Amount 21,570 24.500 46,070 USE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: COMPUTER REPLACEMENT PROJ EQUIP TRAINING ROOM Amount 21,570 46,070 NARRATIVE: This adjustment provides for two changes to the Information Services budget: The first adjusts to actual the amount of bond proceeds carded forward from 1996 and re-authorizes their expenditure on the computer replacement project in 1997. The second change provides expenditure authority to equip a computer training room within City facilities funded from beginning cash in excess of the amount budgeted. Department Head S~ig ture Treasurer Comments: DireEtor Signatur~ - 0~- Date ' Recommended Not Recommended Treasurer's Dat?/~ Mayor Comments: ' Recommended ~ Not Recommended - ~] Approved ~--~ Denied Mayor's Signature D~te Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: ~ Recommended [--] Approved Not Recommended Denied ~Asb. al &"Budget Committee Signature Date CITY OF BREMERTON Requesting Department: BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST MISC. NON-DEPARTMENTAL 001-73 NO. 97-10 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: VEHICLE REPAIR REV. Amount 5,000 USE OF FUNDS: IDescdption INCREASE: PERSONNEL - EXTRA HELP Amount 5,000 NARRATIVE: This aJ,iusurer~t will provide e:~pendltu~e authority to add a seasonal employee at Fleet Maintenance through the summer construction season. Necessary money will be generated ~ greater than anticipated vehicle repair revenues. Department Head Signature Treasurer Comments: Date Date / ~:::;~e~e~mmended ~ Mayor Comments: Not Recommended Treasurer's Date Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature ~-~Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Cord~,[7~ittee Signature Date Requesting Department: CITY OF BREMERTON_ BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No. 97-11 GENERAL FUND - PARK DEPT. & PARK FACILITY CONST. SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description Amount Revise Project Budgeting as Indicated on the Attached Page. USE OF FUNDS: Description Amount NARRATIVE: This adjustment will revise several Park Dept. capital projects to reflect actual costs as they are now known. Department Head Signature Treasurer Comments: Date Director Signature Date ~-~ Recommended ~ Not Recommended Treasurer'~e ~ Date Mayor Comments: Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date ~ Recommended ~-~ Approved Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & BUdget Cofnmittee Signature Date CITY OF BREMERTON 1997 BUDGET CAPITAL FUNDING Al ~ENDED FUNDED DEPARTMENT MOUNT AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 107,000 COMPUTER UPGRADE POLICE DEPARTMENT 10,400 COMPUTER HARDWARE TRANSPORTATION 5,000 SHOP MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 15,000 PURCHASE VAN FOR PARKS DEPARTMENT 75.000 REPLACE 2 PATROL CAR, AND 2 STAFF CARS TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 95,000 GENERAL FACILITIES 5,600 ROOF - VARIOUS POLICE BUILDINGS 4,500 FIRE STATION #1 MECHANICAL 1,000 FIRE STATION ti2 MECHANICAL 8,000 LIBRARY- PLUMBING, ELECT. PLUMBING 2,000 OYSTER BAY- PLUMBING 6.000 SIU MECHANICAL TOTAL GENERAL FACILITIES 27,100 PARKS 19500 ~ SENIOR CENTER HVAC TOTAL PARKS 19,500 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2S9,000 ARTERIAL STREET 6,764,088 SEE ATTACHED WORKSHEET STREET 24,834 TRAFFIC SAFETY DEVICES COMMUNITY DEV. BLOCK GRANT 427,449 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 50,000 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT/INFILL 6,000 SLIDE AT JARSTAD POOL 15,000 PURCHASE VAN FOR PARKS DEPARTMENT ~.000 HADDON SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT TOTAL REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 296,000 POLICE SPECIAL PROJECTS 5,000 UNIDENTIFIED CAPITAL PARKS CAPITAL FACILITY 15,000 PLAYGROUND IMPROVEMENTS 10,000 UNIDENTIFIED/EMERGENCY PROJECTS 10,000 INFIELD MACHINE FOR LIONS PARK .v~w TENNIS COURT REHABILITATION 5,000 SKAG MOWER FOR PENDERGAST REGIONAL PARK 8.000 KITSAP LAKE BOAT/TRAILER 5.000 CHEMICAL DISINFECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE FOR JARSTAD POOL TOTAL PARKS CAPITAL FACILITY 65,000 WATERFRONT PARKS CONSTRUCTI:)N 20,000 MITIGATION FIRE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL 314,570 TRAINING TOWER PENDERGAST PARKCONSTRUCTIOi~I 30,000 UNIDENTIFIED CAPITAL WATER UTILITY 3,198,900 SEE ATTACHED WORKSHEET Requesting Department: _ CITY OF BREMERTON BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST EQUIPMENT RENTAL RESERVE FUND NO. 97-12 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Amount DECREASE: ENDING CASH 30,000 USE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: CAPITAL - TRUCK PURCHASE Amount 30,000 NARRATIVE: This adjustment will allow the purchase of a used 10yd. dump truck for use by the Street Department. Source of funds will be reserves for other trucks which are performing better than anticipated and thus have excess funds in reserve. Department Head Signature Treasurer Comments: Date Director Signature Date ~-~ecommended [~ Mayor Comments: Not Recommended Treasurer's S~e ~-~ Date ~ Recommended [---] r-~ Approved ~ Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature Date Requesting Department: _ CITY OF BREMERTOI BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST Community Deve lo~ment No. SOURCE OF FUNDS: 001.16-334. 0422 WA CTSD PERF GRANT $10,00o USE OF FUNDS: 001.16-558.2016 54110 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Amouo~ $10,00o NARRATIVE: The current Washington State CTED grant ($28,000) has been increased by $10,000. No local match is required. The funds are proposed to be used by the consultant currently under contract to · assist in the Charleston Neighborhood Plan Project. Department Head Signature Date Treasurer Comments: Director Signature Date [7~ecommended Mayor Comments: Not Recommended Treasu~t"b'r-e.~'~' Date [--~ Recommended [----1 Approved Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Oate' -- [----] Recommended ~ Approved F--] Not Recommended [-~ Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature Date Requesting Department: CITY OF BREMERTON BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE No. 97-14 SOURCE OFFUNDS: INCREASE: BEGINNING CASH PARKING REVENUE Amount 25,000 2,000 27,000 USE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: IMPROVEMENTS TO PARKING GARAGE Amount 27,000 NARRATIVE: This adjustment will authorize expenditures for improvements to the elevator, lighting and other elements of the City's parking garage at Fourth and Washington. It is anticipated that these improvements will enhance the structure making it more marketable and thereby increasing parking revenue. Department Head Signature Treasurer Comments: Date DireCtOr Signature~'~ Date Recommended Not Recommended Mayor Comments: Treasurer's Signature Recommended Approved [---] Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied ~/~. Fiscal & Budget Committee-Signature Date Requesting Department: ._ CITY OF BREMERTON _ BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST GENERAL FUND - PARK DEPARTMENT NO. 97-15 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description Amount INCREASE: CAPITAL LEASE 16,629 DECREASE: PARKS SUPPLIES & SER. 2,936 USE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: CAPITAL - COPY MACHINE Amount 16,629 INCREASE: DEBT SERVICE 2,936 NARRATIVE: This adjustment will allow the purchase of a copy machine by the Park Dept. on a capital lease and provide for the required payments in the current fiscal year. Department Head Signature Treasurer Comments: Date [~~Re~mmended Not Recommended I'% Treasurer's Si ~" Mayor Comments: Recommended E~ Not Recommended F~ Approved ~----~ Denied M~yo~ ~ s Signature Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Date [~Recommended ~-~ Approved ~ Not Recommended Denied ~is-)ca, &-~u d ~'~g~U re Requesting Department: CITY OF BREMERTON BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST STREET FUND No. 97-16 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: STATE REVENUE Amount 230,000 USE OF FUNDS: DescriPtion Amount INCREASE: TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION 230,000 NARRATIVE: This adjustment will provide for the construction of traffic signals in two intersections under contract with the State DOT. All costs will be reimbursed by the State. The budget adjustment amount is larger than the contract to allow for contingencies and change orders. D6~'artm&nt Head Signature Treasurer Comments: Date Director SIgnatu~.e j D~te' ~ended Mayor Comments: Not Recon~mended Treasure~ [~ Recommended ~-~ [-~ Approved ~ Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date [~Recommended [---] Approved ~ Not Recommended Denied t Col~r~tte~'Signature Date Requesting Department: CITY OF BREMERTON BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST GENERAL FUND - HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT. NO. 97-17 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description DECREASE: GENERAL MISC. SUPPLIES & SERVICES Amount 8,000 USE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: HUMAN RESOURCES SUPPLIES & SERVICES Amount 8,000 NARRATIVE: This adjustment provides for the City's employee drug and alcohol testing program ($5,000) and for administration of the medical and child care reimbursement account ($3,000). _~epa;~ent Head Signature Treasurer Comments: D~f'e / ~e'ct6~S~gnature ~Recommended ~ Mayor Comments: Not Recommended Treasurer's Signature Date Recommended ~ Not Recommended Approved [~ Denied '--~' Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date [~ Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied sc~ ~,,~:l~,dget ct6mmittee Signature Requesting Department: CITY OF BREMERTOk_ BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST Conmmmity Development SOURCE OF FUNDS: 001.16 524.2016 51010 $22,000 USE OF FUNDS: 001.16 524.2016 54110 $22,000 NARRATIVE: Funds are proposed to hire contractor who will fill the personnel vacancy of Senior Planner until the hiring process is completed. Department Head Signature Date Director Si~]naturo Date Treasurer Comments: Recommended Mayor Comments: Not Recommended Treasurer's Signature(~~ D%te ' ~ Recommended L----J Approved Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature Date Requesting Department: CITY OF BREMERTON BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX FUND 109 No. 97-19 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description DECREASE: ENDING CASH Amount 150,000 USE OF FUNDS: Description Amount INCREASE: CAPITAL - SMITH COVE PROJ. 150,000 NARRATIVE: This adjustment provides for completion of the scope of work in the City's contract with Failure Analysis for environmental analysis in the Smith Cove area. Department Head Signature Treasurer Comments: Date Director Signature Date F--] Recommended ~-] Not Recommended Mayor Comments: Treasurer's Signature Date Recommended ~ Not Recommended ,/ Approved ~ Denied ;~'/'"' Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature Date CITY OF BREMERTON Requesting Department: BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST GENERAL FUND - LEGAL DEPARTMENT No. 97-20 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: BEGINNING CASH Amount 15,000 USE OF FUNDS: Descdption INCREASE: PERSONNEL - LEGAL DEPT. Amount 15,000 NARRATIVE: This adjustment provides for the addition of a one half FTE Assistant City Attorney II position effective August 1, 1997. Department H~ead Signature Treasurer Co~mments: Date Director Signature Date ,~T'"~Recommended Mayor Comments: Not Recommended Treasurer's Signature Date [~ Recommended ~-~ Approved Not Recommended Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date [~/ Recommended ~ Approved J---J Not Recommended '-Fi'scal~udge~/Committee Signature Date Requesting Department: - CITY OF BREMERTON-- BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST COMM. DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT NO. 97-21A SOURCE OFFUNDS: Descdption INCREASE: BEGINNING CASH FEDERAL DIRECT FEDERALINDIRECT Amount 81,744 1,570,886 477,901 2,130,531 USE OF FUNDS: Descdption INCREASE: ENDING CASH PERSONNEL SUPPLIES CAP ITAL OPERATING TRANSF. NARRATIVE: Amount 161,096 4,521 1,768,562 3,000 193,351 2,130,530 This adjustment corrects the budget to the actual 1997 CDBG allocation and carry-over from the preliminary estimate. Department Head Signature Date Director Signature Date Treasurer Comments: ended Not Recommended Treasurer's Si'gnat'~Fe ~ Mayor Comments: .~'" Recommended [-~ Not Recommended / ~ Approved [---j Denied '_~.-~--,~ '7/'~-/~ 7 Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date ' [~Recommended [---] Approved Not Recommended Denied ' -FiScal ~udget/~0mrhittee Signature Date Requesting Department: - CITY OF BREMERTON - BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST GENERAL FUND NO. 97-21 B SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: CDBG- COMM. DEV. DE CDBG - PARKS DEPT. Amount 13,851 4,500 18,351 USE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: COMM. DEV. PARKS DEPT. Amount 13,851 4,500 18,351 NARRATIVE: This adjustment corrects the CDBG allocations to the Community Development Department and the Parks Department. Department Head Signature Date Director Signature Date Treasurer Comments: ~"~ecommended Not Recommended Treasurer's Signature~ Mayor Comments: Recommended F--1 Not Recommended J---J Approved ~ Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date [~ Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied 'Fiscal & ~,u~get 0bmmittee Signature Date CITY OF BREMERTON_ BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 97-21 C Requesting Department: PARK FACILITY CONSTRUCTION FUND SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description Amount INCREASE: CDBG ALLOCATION 50,573 USE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: PARKS FACILITIES CAPITAL Amount 50,573 NARRATIVE: This adjustment provides for the CDBG allocations to development of the City's park system. Department Head Signature Date Treasurer Comments: ~ .,Director Signature' ~mended ~ Not Recommended Treasurer's Signature~~ Mayor Comments: Recommended ~ Not Recommended Approved ~ Denied '~'-~'"" Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date [~ Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied "Fi-'c~ g,~:~ge~ Signature Date Requesting Department: CITY OF BREMERTON BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX FUND NO. 97-21 D SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description CDBG ALLOCATION Amount 29,427 USE OF FUNDS: Description CAPITAL - HADDON SCHOOL SITE Amount 29,427 NARRATIVE: This adjustment provides for the CDBG allocation for development of the Haddon site into a City park. Department Head Signature Treasurer Comments: Date Signatu~Ce' / ii'ate- ~mended ~-] Not Recommended Treasurer's Signature ~ Mayor Comments: CYat ' Recommended [---] Not Recommended Approved ~ Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date" E~ Recommended ~-1 Approved Not Recommended Denied cai & ~?get (~(~mmittee Signature Da{e CITY OF BREMERTON BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No. Requesting Department: GENERAL FUND- PARKS DEPARTMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: BEGINNING CASH KITSAP COMM. DONAT. SENIOR CENTER REV. Amount 23,255 5,000 8.000 36,255 USE OF FUNDS: Descdption INCREASE: STREET TREE PROGRAM PLAYGROUND EXPRESS SENIOR CENTER CLASSES 97-22 Amount 23,255 5,000 8,000 36,255 NARRATIVE: This adjustment will provide for several programs within the Park Department which were not anticipated in the original budget. The Street Tree Program in the completion of a DNR funded project. The addition to Playground Express is funded by a donation from the Kitsap Community Network. The additional programs at the Senior Center are funded from participant fees. Department Head Signature Treasurer Comments: Date /,.,,/Director Signatu~/ ~~ecommended [---] Not Recommended . Treasurer's Signature~_-- Dat~ v¢ f Mayor Comments: ~ Recommended [-~ Approved F--] Not Recommended IVYayor's Signature Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Date ~Recommended ~-~ Approved Not Recommended Denied (-A~s~al~,dget C.¢)~mittee Signature Date Requesting Department: - CITY OF BREMERTON - BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST ARTERIAL STREET FUND No. 97-23 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: COUNTY FUNDING Amount 60,000 USE OF FUNDS: Description Amount INCREASE: CAPITAL - SYLVAN WAY 60,000 NARRATIVE: This adjustment will provide for the County's participation in the Sylvan Way improvements as detailed in the interlocal agreement. Department Head Signature Date Director Signature Date Treasurer Comments: Recommended ~ Not Recommended Mayor Comments: Treasurer's Signature Date ~ Recommended ~ Not Recommended J---1 Approved [-'--J Denied Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Mayor's Signature Date ~r' Recommended ~-~ Approved ~ Not Recommended Denied L-Pfsdal/~/B~u dge~C om mittee Signature Date Requesting Department: CITY OF BREMERTON BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST GENERAL FUND - GENERAL FACILITIES No. 97-24 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Description INCREASE: BEGINNING CASH Amount 15,768 USE OF FUNDS: Descdption INCREASE: CAPITAL - PARKS PHONE SYS Amount 15,768 NARRATIVE: This project was budgeted in 1996 however the equipment was not invoiced until first quarter of 1997. Department Head Signature Treasurer Comments: Date Director S~gnature- Date ~ended Mayor Comments: Not Recommended '- ~ ~'~ Treasurer's Signa~-ure ~ Efate, '~ ~ Recommended r-~ Approved Not Recommended ., / Denied Mayor's Signature Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments: Date ~¥Recommended Approved Not Recommended Denied ~r:is-~udg~ ~ommittee Signature Date 77 AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJ~,~,~T: Public Hearing -ORDINANCE Applicant: Loren & Karen Olsen Location: Marine Drive & Dora Avenue FOR AGENDA OF: ~ 1997 ORIGINATING DEPT: Comm. Dev. ORIGINATOR: M .Mathes DATE SUBMITTED: 6/25/97 2. CLEARANCES: (Co,~=~Lent onba~if/necessary) 3.EXHIBITS: Director of Comm. Dev.:~~A~ 1 - Staff Report City Attorney: ~~ ~. ~. ~-~4~ City Engineer: ---~-~.~~ ~--~-- 2 - Exhibit A & B 3-Planning Comm.Minutes - 6/3/97 Fiscal/Budget Comm: N/A - QUASI JUDICIAL Operations Comm: N/A - QUASI JUDICIAL ENDORSEMENT INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council has been requested to approve a right-of-way vacation and dedication under BMC Chapter 11.040, first making a resolution, then adopting an ordinance following a public hearing, under BMC Chapter 11.060. The vacation action would allow a uniform width 60' right-of-way along Marine Drive. The dedication action would provide for large radius vehicle turning movements at the intersection of Marine Drive and Dora Avenue, a sharp angle intersection. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed action. The Planning Commission has recommended approval on June 3, 1997. Payment amount to City for value of vacation, less dedication lands : $5,766.11 5. RECOMMENDATION: on first readin§~ Motion to approve Ordinance/ approving a right-of-way vacation and dedication at Marine Drive and Dora Avenue, as described on Exhibit A & B. 6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Donald L. Pratt,AICP ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Jud~ EXPIRATION DATE: N/A 7. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: APPROVED D I SAP PROVE D DATE: AOENDA ILL NO.: BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL (CONT.) 9. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 10. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: The right-of-way width along ~4arine Drive will remain larger than current roadway standards require. The sharp angle intersection will remain at Dora Avenue and Marine Drive. 11. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: Approval will make recognition of the Marine Drive right-of-way limit (60' wide) in the field more readily identifiable for enforcement and maintenance issues on a daily basis. School buses which access Dora Avenue will have better sight visibility and turning movement at intersection. Staff and budget impacts are expected to be minimally improved, except for time to make map change. Tax base is increased by net addition of private lands to adjacent property. 12. RESEARCH SOURCES: Bremerton Comprehensive Land Use Plan ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE vacating 20' portion of row on Marine Drive. WHEREAS, Loren and Karen Olsen, the owners of property abutting Dora Street and Marine Drive at 1327 Dora Ave., BREMERTON, WA, have petitioned for vacation of 4,486.25 square feet of Marine Drive as described and depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; WHEREAS, notice has been posted and published according to the law and a public hearing held on August 6, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that the portion of the right-of-way set forth herein is not needed for present or future traffic circulation and should be vacated to the adjoining property owners; now therefore THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. Vacation. The following right-of-way is hereby vacated: See Exhibit "A"attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. Section 2. Conditions. This right-of-way vacation shall be subject to the following conditions and deed restriction: 1. Applicant shall dedicate as additional right of way to the City the parcel described and depicted in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, in a form approved by the City Attorney. 2. Applicant shall deposit the sum of $5,766.11 with the City Clerk prior to second reading of this ordinance as compensation for the net right of way vacated after crediting the above dedication. Section 3. Effective Date. This vacation shall become effective ten (10) days from passage and publication. APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this__ day of , 1997. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of ., 1997. APPROVED this ~ day of ,1997. ATTEST: KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk DAVID FARK Council President LYNN S. HORTON, Mayor EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POL'~T WHICH IS NORTH ~9~52'I$'' WEST 900 FEET, SOUTH 0'16'54" WEST 412.63 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 0°16'54'' WEST 189.77 FEET; THENCE NORTH 42°23'00'' WEST 47.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 47*37'00" EAST 20.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 42~23'00'' WEST 200.00 FEET; THF. NCE SOUTH 47*37'00" WEST 5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 42'23'00'' WEST 97.41 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MOST CORNER OF RESULTING LOT A, CITY OF BREM,ERTON BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER FILE NUMBER 9602080143, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH SOUTH 47°37'00'' WEST 15.00 FF_,ET; THI~.NCE SOUTH 420?.3'00" EAST 297.41 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "B" A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QIIARTER OF SECTION 1.~, TOwNSHIp 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. I}ESCRI~£D .aS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 89%~2'I.~" WEST 900 FEET, AND SOUTH 0°16'~'' WEST 412.6,~ FEET FROM TI~ NORTHEAST COI~N~R OF TBE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION TIIENCE SOUTH 00al6?A'' WEST 151.36 FEET TO TH POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTi'NUITgG SOUTH 00~6'~4" WEST J8.41 FFET; NORTH 42°2Y00'' WEST ALONG THE BACK TANGENT OF A COUNTER-CLOCKWISE CURVE TO RIGHT HAVING A RAI}I'US OF 15,00 FEET AND AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 11~20wt16'', 38.41 FEET;THENCE ALONG SAlt} CURVE 3~.95 FEET TO THY. POINT OF BEGINNI]qG; // RIGHTS-OF-WAY VACATION / DEDICATION Request: Applicants: Adjacent Property ID #: DCD File #: Repo~ By: Vacate / Dedicate City of Bremerton Right-of-Way under BMC 11.20 Loren & Karen Olsen Tax Parcel No. 152401-2-114-2009 SV97-0001 Matt Mathes, Land Use Specialist Description of Action The applicant and consultants requested a pre-application conference to discuss all necessary approval action needed to permit a site plan for 12 units on a site (42,658.5 square feet) which is located north of the intersection of Dora Avenue and Marine Drive. Given the triangular shape of the parcel at the south and west property boundaries and the applicant preferred housing unit, the site plan would create the need for a right of way vacation, to allow the mix of unit types desired. The existing right-of-way width along Marine Drive is variable, ranging between 60'- 100' widths within two blocks of the subject property. The variable width is believed to be the result of two factors-slope and state requirements applicable at time of road dedication. Vacation of the requested portion of lands would allow a 60' wide right-of-way to exist after approval of the subject application. The vacation would add 4,486.85 square feet to the current site size 42,658.50 square feet, an increase of 10.5 %. The dedication would subtract about 385 square feet for a larger radius at the corner. The result of approval of both vacation / dedication would add about 4,101.85 Square feet, an increase of 9.6%. The applicant has filed for site plan approval. Site Conditions There is a cut bank within the portion of right-of-way to be vacated currently, with a change in grade of about 6-10' from pavement surface on Marine Drive to existing grades on subject property. Vegetation cover (about 85% of the slope) is mostly exotic noxious plants (blackberry, Scotch broom). Regrading of the applicant property is likely, given the current zoning, the stated intent of the applicant to develop a medium density residential complex within the current zoning and requirements for frontage improvements upon development approval. Modifications Required by Vacation No modifications to Marine Drive or the applicant property are required directly as a result of the right-of-way vacation. The applicant would be required to meet frontage improvement standards upon request for development approval. Currently the condition along the frontage is unimproved (no sidewalk, curb &gutter, drainage system or street lights). There are no known utilities in the portion of right-of-way to be vacated. Puget Sound Energy has requested a set of plans to review utility impacts of vacation action (no comments have been received on gas or electric). Impacts of the Vacation / Dedication Approval on Traffic & Density The changes in the right-of-way pattern will not change the auto or pedestrian circulation pattern. The applicant is seeking a right-of-way vacation along Marine Drive to allow a favorable lot layout, to avoid a setback variance request, on a site which is constrained by a triangular shape, which affects setback measurement for the particular type of unit selected by the owner. A site plan for 12 units (duplex, fourplex and sixplex) was reviewed at a preapplication conference, which represents a density of 12 du/acre, after vacation.The right-of-way vacation would not affect the density calculation, because the applicant has not proposed a site plan which approaches or exceeds the 18 du/acre maximum density, due to market factors. There is no guarantee that the current owner or future owners will build above the 11 du/acre density, nor is there any reason to prevent development at the maximum density. Using lot size after vacation (47,145.35 square feet) as basis for the existing multifamily residential (MF zone) zoning which allows 8-18 du/acre, the applicant could qualify for two additional units, after the right-of-way vacation, at the maximum zoned density of 18 du/acre. Using lot size after dedication and vacation (46,760.35 square feet) as basis for the existing multifamily residential (MF zone) zoning which allows 8-18 du/acre, the applicant could qualify for two additional units, after the right-of-way vacation, at the maximum zoned density of 18 du/acre. Staff Comments: None Community Comments & Notification The notice of application and comment period of thirty days resulted in several drop- by file reviews by adjacent property owners and a few phone calls to DCD offices. There were no objections stated or received on the action. The BMC 11.20. 030 allows the Planning Commission the option to hold a public hearing prior to recommendation on the final action by City Council. The following portions of rights-of-way will be vacated: General physical description of property to be vacated: A strip of land 5' X 97.37' and 200'X 20' along the southwest boundary of Parcel # 226. General physical description of property to be dedicated: A triangle of land approximately 38' X 38' X 22' at the southwest corner of Parcel # 226. Legal descriptions of property to be vacated / dedicated are attached. (See Exhibit "A"& "B") Request Basis to Dedicate Right-of way The above requested dedication is sought in order to develop the property. Dedication of the comer portion of the public street will serve the following public purposes: - Facilitate turning movements of school buses and other large turn radius vehicles from southbound Marine Drive to Dora Avenue. - Allow safe visibilty at corner for southbound traffic on Dora Avenue, at stop sign. Request Basis to Vacate Surplus Right-of way The above requested vacation is sought in order to develop the property. Vacation of the slope portion of the public street will serve the following public purposes: · place erosion control and soil embankment in perpetual responsibility of private ownership · allows private property owner to better control surface and subsurface drainage and soil moisture conditions affecting sublateral structural support of private property development · creates additional setback dimension to permit preferred residential unit and preferred site plan layout by owner, due to setback distances and lot configuration (triangle parcel) adjacent to the vacated portion of right-of-way for Marine Drive · creates a uniformly dedicated standard right-of-way width (60' wide) along Marine Drive, for purposes of maintenance, enforcement and liability demarcation for city public works Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and other state and local law: Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive Plan Residential Goals, Policies and Strategies establish the following directions applicable to the proposed right-of-way vacation: There is one goal and several policies: (3,) Affordable Housing (7. b.) Consider allowing Infill development housing of vacant or undeveloped parcels at somewhat higher densities than surrounding properties, with assurances.., of fit...; (12. b.) Promote increased housing density to provide a broader customer base. Discussion: Currently the site is undeveloped and unimproved, located and surrounded by properties which are single family in type (4-6 du/acre) although located in a multifamily zone. The highest densities in Bremerton are the Central area at 8.1 du/acre. If buildout at maximum density takes place, a density of 11.4 du/acre would result. The applicant site plan is near the build out average density anticipated in the comprehensive plan and zoning for Bremerton overall. The vacation action is consistent with the goal and policies to fully use vacant property. Additionally, there is one strategy which applies: 1. Revise Development Standards: Modify site planing/building design requirements (setbacks, street widths, etc.) to allow performance based standards to increase flexibility in housing development. Discussion: Revising original right-of-way width dedications which enabled natural grading of slopes to meet grades for Marine Drive road access can now provide efficiencies in land use and housing development. Today an owner has several options for grade changes and wall on site which are economical and useful to resolve grade changes at right-of-way limits. The strategy of the city to increase flexibility is met by approval of the vacation. The site areas in the right of way vacation areas would be subject to the perimeter landscape requirements for maintenance, street trees, etc. upon site plan approval. The above goals, policies and strategies can be best achieved by creating residential developments within lands currently zoned for densities which meet state and local comprehensive plans. The proposed vacation will create a parcel that will optimize the development potential of private land while also optimizing public benefits such as reduced ongoing maintenance of slopes, realigned right-of-way limit lines, which benefits the entire city. Public interest for right-of-way vacation / dedication Vacation / dedication of the requested streets within the subject property will serve the following public interests: · A new development which meets the necessary requirements given the triangular lot configuration constraint formed by the intersection of Dora Avenue and Marine Drive. · Public tax revenues from property tax base will be increased slightly by creating a site plan layout that optimizes residential use which will be desirable to the general public. Easements: None required for utilities for the proposed vacation / dedication Planning Commission Recommendation to City Council Approve right-of-way vacation / dedication as shown on Exhibit A & B. PUGET SOUND ENERGY July 9, 1997 Matt Mathes Department of Community Development City of Bremerton 286 4th Street Bremerton, WA 98337 RE: Street Vacation/Marine Drive Dear Mr. Mathes: Puget Sound Energy has review the above reference street vacation. We have no facilities that would be affected by the granting of a vacation in this area and therefore, we have no objection to the proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to review this matter. SinC~rely~ ,..'- / ~_ Linda E. S~eissgU~ Municipal Land Planer "" ;~,i297 BUILDING DEPARTMEt,;} Chapter 11.20 STREET AND ALLEY VACATION PROCEDURE 11.20.010 11.20.020 11.20.030 11.9.0.040 11.20.050 11.20.060 11.20.070 PETITION - DESIGNATED. PETITION - EXAtVil]qATION, FEE AND REFERRAL wI~.ARING BY PLANNING COMI~SION KECOMZM~NDATIONS- ~'E. ARING BY COUNCIL - RESOL~ON NOTICE. PROCESSI2~G COSTS AND ~ffXNG FEE. ORDI2qANC~ DENIAL - RETITRN OF YILI2~G TEE. 11.20.010 PETITION - DESIGNATED. Any. ownem hav[ug an interest in any real emate abutting upon any stree~ or alley who may de~ire to vacate the street or alley, or any part thereof, sbalI petition the city council to make vac~ion in the m:anner provided in. ~ chapter. (Ca'cl. 2334 §i, 1959). 11.20.020 PETITION - EXANEINATION, FEE AND KEYERRAL. The petition ~hall be presented to the city engineer for examination prior to the payment of the filing fee. The petitioners shall then present thc petition to thc city treasurer, and pay the_ treasurer a filing fee as provided for by resolution of thc city council. Tl~ city receipt of such filing tee, shall endorse upon the petition a receipt of payment, and, in addition t~tO, furnish to t~ petitioner a separate written receipt showing the payment. The petition ~hall then be prec~nte~ to th~ clerk who turn refer the l~titioa to the p!an~J~g Gommi~sfion for cxamimtion and recommendation. (Ord. 3688 §9, 1982; Ord. 3597 §7, 1980; 0rck 2334 ~2, 1959). 11.20.034) HEARING BY PLA~G COM31I~ION RECOMMENDATIONS. The planning mmmission may, Lf it sees fit, hold a preliminary public hearing thereon at nm~h time, place, and upon such notice as the commi~on may determine. The petitioners and ail ocher persons interested ir, the vacation _ed-mil have an oppommity to be heara at ,he hearing. The planning commi~qon after tach hearing shall tetm-n t~ petition to ,he city. council wi,h its written recommendations. (Ord. 2334 ~;3, 1959). 11.20.040 HEARING BY COUNCIL - RESOLUTION AND NOTICE. Upon rec~pt of the petition and recommendation., the council will then set a wb~, the petition s~il be heard and sh~] instn~ thc. city attorney to draft a resolution, in which the time the petition ~hall be heard shall be de~tmlnec[, which shall be nO{: more than sixty days nor le~s ~han twenty days after the date adoption of the resolution, and the city clerk shall g~ve twenty da~' notice o£ the pen&ncy of the petition by written notice posted in three of the most public places in the dty and a like notice in a conspicuous place on the street or alley sought to be vacated. The notice shall contain a statement that a petition has been fi.led to vacate the street or alley dot, ch'bed in the n<~ice, together with a statement of the time and place fixed for the hearing thereof. (Ord. 2334 ~4, 1959). 11.20.050 PROCESSING COSTS AN33 FILING FEE. If the costs of prccessing the ~fifion for ~don is ~ter t~n ~e f~, ~en ~e ~ shall &~nd ~d ~ive ~m ~e ~fifio~ ~fo~ ~ ~oN~ ~d ~e filing f~. (~d. 2334 ~5, 1959). 11.20.060 AUTHORIZATION BY ORDINANCE. At the time appointed/'or the bearing of the petition, the petition shall be heard and/f the council determines to grant the petition or any 11-12 ri~ht~: in re~:~c~, to th~ v.a~ t~.~.t Lam/ for the coastrt~oa, repair a~ ~,~int,.~r~ of publ/c ~tities a~d se~c~s. (Ord. 2334 ~6, 1959). 11-~0.070 DENIAL - RETU'R2q OF Ia the event th~ the city co,m~] a~ t~ ~,'mg on t~ petitio~a ~.~U d~y the v"~'~__don of the sa~ or ails, the ciD' ~ if it __~,~m~ it to the be~t iamrem of ttm city, remm the ~H.~ fe~ m th~ p~tiomers. (Ord. 233-$ §?, 19~9). 11-13 UNAPPRO VED DRAFT PLANNING CO1VEVIISSION MEETING MINUTES June 3, 1997 Note: Taperecorder malfunctioned. No audio tape is available for this meeting. I. Chairman Stone announced and called the meeting to order. The Secretary called the roll: Those present were Adams, Dingfield, Robinson, Boyd, Olson, Stone. Absent was: Hancock. IH. The agenda was approved as written, except that item X-1 (ROW Vacation) would be taken f'n'st. That item was scheduled for the May 20 meeting but wasn't considered due to lackof time. X. New Business: 1. Right-of-way Vacation/Dedication: IV: PUBLIC HEARI~G: 1. Item XI. Right of Way Vacation - Type III Matt Mathes presented the staff report for the Dept. of Community Development. Commissioner Dingfield questioned the zoning (MF) in the neighborhood. Mr. Mathes confirmed that the existing zoning is "MF" on the site adjacent to the proposed fight-of-way action. Commissioner Robinson stated the right of wa.,,' to be vacated has varied widths along the area proposed to be vacated. Mr. Mathes confirmed the fight of way widths to be vacated vary (5 ft. wide, 20 ft. wide), so that the fight-of-way after vacation wSll be a uniform width set at 60 ft. wide. Chairman Stone and Commissioner Robinson commented that any erosion control plans would be approved administratively. Commissioner Robinson moved that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the fight-of-way vacation and fight-of-way dedication as shown on Extfibits A & B. Commissioner Gray seconded the motion and it passed 5 to 1 (Dingfield). P.C. Minutes: Page I