HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/05/97 AGENDABREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
239 4TH STREET
BREMERTON, WA 98337
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 5, 1997
CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M.
A. Pledge Of Allegiance
B. Invocation
CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in
advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If
separate discussion is desired on an item, it may be removed
from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at the
request of a Council member.
A. Minutes of Meeting - February 19, 1997
#AB97-046
3. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
4. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
5. MAYOR'S REPORT
6. PUBLIC RECOGNITION -- (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes)
NEW BUSINESS
A. DUI Task Force Agreement
B. Bid Award To Ace paving Company, Inc., For
Gold Mountain Golf Course Complex Parking Area
~xpansion Project .
A. Ordinance #4580 (Second Reading) Amending
the Official Zoning Ordinance Text And
Map By Adopting And Applying Two New Zones:
"Health Care" and "Shoreline Mixed Use"
Be
Ordinance #4589 (Second Reading) Amending
Bremerton's Official Zoning Map For Consistency
With Two 1996 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Ce
Ordinance (First Reading) Revisions To
Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 11 Regarding
Hazardous Conditions On Sidewalks And Within
The Right-Of-Way
#AB97-047 tl
#AB97-048 ~
??_o3-o
#AB97-044 2
#AB97-049 &~
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: MINUTES - FEBRUARY 19, t997
FOR AGENDA OF: MARCH 5, 1997
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Council
ORIGINATOR: David Farr~ President
DATE SUBMITTED: 2-24-97
2. CLEARanCES.: (comment on back
if necessary)
3. EXHIBITS:
ENDORSEMENT INFORMATION
MAYOR
__ APPROVED BY COUNCIL. ~R~SIDENT~FOR SUBMITTAL:
4. SU~RY .STATEMENT AlqD R~QUIREMENT ?OR'COUNCIL ACTION:
8. RECOMZMENDATION:
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICi~:
ENFORCEMENT OFF!CI~_L:
EXPIRATION DATE:-
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED
DISAPPROVED AiM. ENDED
DATE:
TAPE #1442
UNAPPROVED DRAFT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 19t 1997
#0016
#0042
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton
was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street,
Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, February 19, 1997, at 5:30 P.M.,
with Council Vice President Richard Neville presiding. Council
members present were Bob Winters, Sherril Huff-Menees, Lon Overson,
John Law. Council members A1 Colvin, Cecil McConnell, Carlos
Montgomery and Council President David Fart were absent. Also
present were City Attorney Ian Sievers and Acting City Clerk Paula
Johnston.
The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council
Vice President Richard Neville and Invocation given by Reverend
Rodney Smith of the First Christian Church of Bremerton.
CONSENT ~GEND~
A. Minutes of Meeting -- February 5, 1997
#AB97-032
M/S/C/U(Huff-Menees/Overson) to approve the Consent Agenda as
presented.
CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required
by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified
as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that
had been made available to the Council.
M/S/C/U(Overson/Law) on February26, 1997, the Council does approve
for payment those vouchers included and further described as
follows: 206021, and 206022 through 206182 in the amount of
$358,156.15; and Regular Payroll for the period ending 2-15-97, in
the amount of $677,484.47.
Vice President Neville announced Council members David Farr, A1
Colvin, Cecil McConnell, and Carlos Montgomery were absent from the
meeting due to their attending the Association Of Washington Cities
Legislative Conference in Olympia.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Mr. Winters announced he would hold a meeting on February 24, 1997,
7:30 P.M., in the Council Conference Room, to discuss the issue of
Telecommunications. He emphasized this meeting is open to anyone
interested in learning more about this subject. He noted after the
February 12 City Council meeting, Council held a Study Session to
discuss the formation of an Ad Hoc Council Advisory Committee on
Telecommunications. At that meeting, he referenced minutes of a
TAPE #1442
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 19, 1997
Page 2 of 9
July 8, 1996, Cable Advisory Committee where he posed the question
to former Councilman Russ Johnson, a member of that committee, what
was the purpose of the committee? Mr. Johnson's response was "to
keep the Council interested in access so that the community would
not give up their rights to three channels allocated." At that
time, Mr. Johnson also acknowledged it was Mr. Winters' suggestion
that it might be appropriate to forman Ad Hoc Committee to explore
the variety of communication technologies, not just access issues.
Based on that information, Mr. Winters felt it was important to
bring the issue of telecommunications before the public so that
they could obtain information and to inform the City Council.
Today, he and several members of the Administration attended a
down-linked workshop originating in Kentucky that discussed the
Telecommunications Act. He noted the Bremerton was the only city
in the State of Washington to be part of the down-link for that
presentation. He thanked the Mayor and staff members for attending
that workshop where they spent five hours learning the potential of
what it will take to organize and implement the new
Telecommunications law the right way.
Mr. Law reported on the District #3 Neighborhood meeting held on
February 18, and expressed his appreciation for the input he
received from those attending that meeting. He will use their
advice for future votes and discussion points.
Mr. Neville announced to residents located around the Smith
Playfield that the City's Parks Department and Puget Power will be
removing four trees at the corner of 13th and Elizabeth. The
identified trees have been determined potentially hazardous to the
power lines, and there are plans for replanting in the Spring. He
announced it was with regret that he would not be attending
Councilman Colvin's District 1 Neighborhood Meeting on February20.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Lynn Horton reported she made two trips to Olympia this week
to testify at Legislative hearings concerning issues that are
important to the City of Bremerton. The first hearing was held on
February 13, where she testified before the Senate Transportation
Committee on the Transportation budget. As it stands now, the
second passenger-only ferry that Bremerton hoped to get has been
pulled from the budget. She pointed out to the Committee that
along with the State's money, they also took the three million
dollars Bremerton had in ISTEA funds, which was diverted from the
Gorst-Bremerton connector project, for this ferry. She is
optimistic that the State will return the three million dollars, if
the budget does not pass. The Committee indicated if there is a
need, such as the second passenger-only ferry, it would be funded
through a gas tax increase. Mayor Horton did not know if that
3
TAPE #1442
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 19, 1997
Page 3 of 9
would be well received by the public, but if there is no gas tax
increase, Bremerton will pursue getting the second passenger-only
boat some other way. On February 17 she testified for a bill
entitled Urban Stabilization Bill, which is a Washington State
version of tax increment financing that other States offer. When
a project comes on line, the increased taxation funds caused
directly as a result of that project (such as Sinclair landing),
can be used at the State and local level for infrastructure
improvements. The State level sum is being capped at 30 million
dollars across the State, with no one project being able to take
out more than 5 million dollars. And, 5 million dollars debt
service on an annual basis of 5 million dollars equates to about 50
million dollars in projects. There is interest on the part of the
Senate to see something like this passed; however, the Chair of the
House Finance Committee is opposed to the issue at this point, but
effort is being made to overcome that obstacle. This proposal
could mean some real advantages for the City and for all
communities that are trying to bring projects on line that need
infrastructure improvements in order to get the projects underway.
Those tax dollars are new, and relate directly to a specific
project. Other states have been very successful in financing
economic development projects as a result of this kind of
mechanism, and only relies on State Sales Tax and B&O Tax, not on
property taxes because the State Constitution ties up property tax
for education only. She will keep Council posted on these issues.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
Roy M¢Innis, Bremerton resident, pointed out he has regularly
attended City Council meetings for about 13 years and this was the
first time he came with a prepared statement to address his concern
over the "3-minutes time limit" imposed by the Council. Many of
the citizens of Bremerton have voiced their concerns to him about
certain people using 5-7 minutes to talk on a subject and not be
reminded of the 3-minute rule, such as in the case of Mr. Camp, yet
others are asked to limit their comments to the shorter time.
Members of the public have indicated there may be another reason
for Mr. Camp's lengthy speaking and that is free campaigning for
future use, which is not impressive to Mr. McInnis. After viewing
the last Council meeting live on Channel 12, he felt it was not
fair to the viewing audience or to the Council to have someone
ramble on. Mr. McInnis stressed if it becomes necessary, he would
like to see Council bring back the buzzer time clock so that
speakers will know when their time is up.
Bob Jaenicke, Bremerton resident, stated he viewed the previous
Council meeting on Channel 12 and became distressed the more he
watched. He referenced Councilman Montgomery's comment made at the
previous Council meeting about his being upset because someone
misquoted him. Later in that same meeting Mr. Montgomery commented
TAPE #1442
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 19, 1997
Page 4 of 9
that he was kind of hard of hearing. Mr. Jaenicke felt that goes
along with everything else, after watching the previous Council
meeting where the Council swiftly moved to take final action on an
agenda item immediately after Mr. Camp concluded his comments by
asking them to give consideration to his comments. He viewed
Council's action as being arrogant toward taxpayers, and what it
costs them to live in Bremerton.
Pastor Danny Allen, Grace Pentecostal Church, stated he produced
community access television with Bremerton Community Access
Television (BCAT) for about 3 years, and in his opinion the
transition from BCAT to Westsound Cable Access Television wasn't
very smooth. As a producer, it caused him to cancel his television
program. He will no longer have a part of the politics being
played with the Westsound group. He produced 88 30-minute
programs, and is grateful to the City for having that opportunity.
As a citizen of Bremerton, he is concerned that a local business,
owned and operated by Councilman Winters on Pacific Avenue, sells
tobacco related products, one of which he displayed. Pastor Allen
personally talked with drug addicts, who told him people don't
smoke tobacco out of that kind of instrument, and is generally used
for smoking marijuana. Although it may not be illegal to sell
tobacco related products, he felt it was immoral and asked the
Council to "houseclean". He stressed the fact we are trying to
teach our children that drugs are wrong and encourage them to
abstain from using drugs. He believes if there is a City Council
member who sells tobacco related products that are used to smoke
marijuana, it creates a problem for the citizens of Bremerton. He
asked Councilman Winters to resign his position as Councilman.
H. Emily Mosha¥, Bremerton resident, stated she was saddened to
hear Pastor Danny Allen will no longer produce his show because it
was a benefit to the community. As a representative of the Literacy
Council of Kitsap County, she announced MISS AMERICA will come to
Bremerton on March 1, at the Admiral Theater. Tickets for this
event are available through the Literacy Council Office, 612 5th
Street, for $50.00, which includes a Patrons Semi-Formal Social at
6:30 P.M. and seating for the 7:30 P.M. program. Tickets are
$10.00 and $15.00 for just the 7:30 P.M. program.
7A - DESIGN OF RODGERS STREET STORM DP~a!NAGE -- PROFESSIONS?,
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WARNER ENGINEERINGt ~AB97-03~
Qualifications of seven consultants from the City's consultant
roster were reviewed and evaluated for this project. Warner
Engineering was identified as having a demonstrated ability in
planning and design of storm drainage systems, sewers and streets,
and was familiar with issues related to the water system. The
scope of work includes predesign evaluations, design, and
construction services for storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and
5
#0914
TAPE #1442
city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 19, 1997
Page 5 of 9
preliminary street plan for Rodgers Street between Kean Street and
Auto Center Way. The consultant's fee for this work is $73,900.
The action before the City Council is approval of an agreement for
professional services with Warner Engineering.
Tim Richard, Senior Engineer, stated the primary purpose of this
project is to provide storm drain improvements to prevent flooding
that has occurred at Rogers Street and Kean Street. The scope of
work will also include the evaluation of the sewer in that street-
to determine if any upgrades are necessary, and to do the 30%
design of the street improvements in order to identify the right-
of-way needs. The total scope of work on the storm drainage side
is a significant analysis of the storm drainage including
downstream to make sure that any improvements made will be adequate
to convey water out of that basin. The scope of work includes all
the analysis of stormwater sewer and sanitary sewer, the design
work, preparation of construction documents and support to staff
during construction. City staff will administer the construction
of this Project.
Public comment - none.
Mr. Overson asked if there was anything in Werner Engineering's
background that makes them the best candidate for the contract?
Mr. Richard explained they are a smaller firm, located in Gig
Harbor. The City has worked with them before, and they have also
completed a number of projects for the Bremerton School District.
Gary Werner has many years of experience (15+ years) and
demonstrated strength in designing storm drainage systems and
conducting analysis. This firm also has a number of Engineering
staff members as well as technical support. Mr. Owerscn pointed
out opposed to normal projects like this, the consultant will
handoff the details to City staff, who will manage construction.
He asked if Mr. Richard would be the person providing the
construction management? Mr. Richard explained normally the City
handles all construction management other than for the Wastewater
Treatment Plant. He noted the City would also be handling the
construction management on two other projects also on Council's
Agenda.
M/S/C/U(Overson/Huff-Menees) to approve a professional services
agreement for design of Rodgers Street Storm Drainage Project with
Warner Engineering in the amount of $73,900, and authorize the
Mayor to execute the same.
7B - DESIGN OF WEST 650 WATER PRESSURE ZONE -- PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KCM, INC., ~AB97-034
Qualifications of five consultants from the City's consultant
roster were reviewed and evaluated for the design of a new water
#1031
TAPE #1442
city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 19, 1997
Page 6 of 9
pressure zone. KCM, Inc. was identified as having a demonstrated
ability in planning and design of water distribution facilities to
meet the criteria established by the City, the State Department of
Health, and other State and Federal agencies. In addition, KCM,
Inc. has previously provided design consultant service to the city
and is familiar with issues related to the water system. The scope
of work includes predesign evaluations, design, and construction
services for a new water pressure zone. The ~on~ultant's fee for
this work is $224,800. The action before the city Council is
approval of an agreement for professional services with KCM, Inc.
Tim Richa=d, Senior Engineer, stated this project is for the design
of West 650 Water pressure Zone, which will serve the area upper
areas of Werner Road that are zoned Industrial or Commercial. This
project was also included as the match for an EDA Grant that the
City is ranked #1 for this region for funding. The design includes
a pump station, transmission main and reservoir that would provide
the backbone of the system for the subject area. The specific
design services include preliminary design and route selection
work, GEO technical investigation surveying, and final design,
including the pump station, transmission main and reservoir. The
contract does include some support during construction and City
staff will administer construction of this project.
Public comment - none.
M/S/C/U(Overson/Winters) to approve a professional services
agreement for design of West 650 Water Zone with KCM, Inc. in the
amount of $224,800, and authorize the Mayor to execute the same.
7C - DESIGN OF WEST 540 WATER PRESSURE ZONE -- PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KCM, INC., ~AB97-035
Qualifications of five consultants from the City's consultant
roster were reviewed and evaluated for the design of a new water
pressure zone. KCM, Inc. was identified as having a demonstrated
ability in planning and design of water distribution facilities to
meet the criteria established by the City, the State Department of
Health, and other State and Federal agencies. In addition, KCM,
Inc. has previously provided design consultant service to the city
and is familiar with issues related to the water system. The scope
of work includes predesign evaluations, design, and construction
services for a new water pressure zone. The consultant's fee for
this work is $203,100. The action before the City Council is
approval of an agreement for professional services with KCM, Inc.
Tim Richard, Senior Engineer, stated these professional services
are identical in scope to the 650 Water pressure Zone and one of
the reasons KCM was chosen to design both projects was not only
their ability but that it would be more cost effective to provide
#1138
TAPE #1442
city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 19, 1997
Page 7 of 9
two almost identical designs rather than hiring two consultants.
This pressure zone is located within the City's water service area
that is bounded by Anderson Hill Road, Old Clifton Road to the
south, Sunnyslope Water District to the west and to the south of
Highway 16 south of Gorst. Even though this area is within the
City's water service area, it is not possible to service it with
water because there is not a reservoir/transmission system
available to that area.
Public comment - none.
M/S/C/U(Law/Huff-Menees) to approve a professional services
agreement for design of West 540 Water Zone with KCM, Inc. in the
amount of $203,100, and authorize the Mayor to execute the same.
7D - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN & Can~WELL FOR
WATER REUSE STUDYr ~AB97-056
A Scope of Work with Brown & Caldwell has been negotiated to
provide an evaluation of water reuse for Bremerton. Potential
reuse projects will be identified and cost estimates and non-
economic assessments will be evaluated. Possible uses include
irrigation and industrial use. Alternatives for treating and
conveying the reclaimed water will be identified. Total fees under
this progressional services agreement shall not exceed sixty-nine
thousand dollars ($69,000).
Kathleen Caha11, Water Resources Manager, explained water reuse is
when effluent is taken from the Wastewater Treatment Plant and
further treated so it can be used for other uses rather than
discharged out into the Sound. Water reuse is a concept that is
more common in more arid parts of the country, but is getting more
attention in the northwest. Water reuse is good for the water
system because it is like finding a new source of water and it is
good for the wastewater system because it reduces the amount of
effluent discharged into Sinclair Inlet. This contract will
evaluate the potential re-use projects for Bremerton, and identify
which projects should be pursued further.
Roy McGinnis, referred to the Professional Services Agreement where
it states the contract will "commence on January 20, 1997". He
questioned why we were hearing this issue now, since that date has
passed. Ms. Cabal1 stated this proposal was ready to go forward
about 3-4 weeks ago; however, there was concern about the insurance
and liability language that needed to be worked out before they
could proceed with the contract.
Ms. Huff-Menees stated this issue is important to the City and
there is tremendous potential use, if we are able to re-use water.
#1288
TAPE #1442
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 19, 1997
Page 8 of 9
M/S/C/U(Huff-Menees/Winters) to approve the professional services
agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign, subject to City
administrative policies and procedures. Total fees shall not
exceed $69,000.
8A - RESOLUTION NO. 2585 RE~ARDIN~ ONE-WAY STREETS -- SMITH COVE
NEIGHBORHOOD, %AB97-037
The City has met with the various neighborhoods over the last
several months to discuss parking and travel issues effecting the
residents. From these meetings, the residents in the Smith Cove
area requested establishment of a one-way street system. The
Engineering Division staff concur with this request. The
recommended changes are:
North of llth Street, the following streets will have there
direction of travel limited to northbound only -- McKenzie
Avenue and Highland Avenue up to 13th Street. North of llth
Street, the following streets will have there direction of
travel limited to southbound only -- Cogean Avenue and
Pleasant Avenue from 13th Street to llth Street Place. llth
Street Place will be one-way westbound.
The attached Resolution No. 2585 establishes the one-way street
pattern.
Mark Souza, Senior Engineer, stated this Resolution was presented
after meetings with the public dealing with the planting strip and
other parking issues. During these discussions, possible one-way
streets were mentioned. Sketches were made of possibilities they
thought would work the best, which were then shown to citizens by
even going door to door, and the overwhelming feedback was
positive. The streets in the subject area are very narrow - 25
feet wide, except for Pleasant Avenue, which is only 23 feet wide.
Elizabeth Buell asked Mr. Souza to speak slower because she had a
hard time following him.
Mr. Overson expressed his appreciation of the work Mr. Souza has
put in on this project, including his contact with the public
soliciting their comments and concerns. He agrees that this
proposal is the best solution to the problem.
Mr. Winters, on behalf of the citizens from District #9, thanked
Mr. Souza for his services. He questioned if signatures from
approving citizens were obtained? Mr. Souza explained a staff
member was sent around to each house with door knocker signs
announcing the meeting topic and date. A total of three meetings
were held, and although not many citizens attended, a lot of face
to face contact was made while distributing the notices. He
#1557
TAPE #1442
city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
February 19, 1997
Page 9 of 9
estimated approximately 80 contacts were made.
M/S/C/U(Huff-Menees/Overson) to adopt Resolution No. 2585,
declaring that portions of Highland, Pleasant, Pacific, Cogean, and
McKenzie Avenues be one-way highways (Smith Cove area).
Mr. Law joined Mr. Winters in thanking Mr. Souza on behalf of the
citizens from District #3. His efforts were appreciated, and he
was wished success in all his future plans. Mr. Souza thanked
Councilman Law and stated it has been his pleasure to work for the
City of Bremerton. Vi~e Presi4ent Neville stated the sentiments
were truly a "two-way" street!
Vi~e President Fart thanked the TV camera crew for their services:
Rob Rupe, James Noble, and all other volunteers involved.
With no further business meeting adjourned at 6:22 P.M.
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
DAVID D. FARR, Council President
City of Bremerton
KLM/DDF/me
cc: Normal Distribution
File/Vault
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
~:DUI Task Force Agreement
FOR AGENDA OF: 3-5-97
ORIGINATING DEPT: Police
ORIGINATOR: Chief Du Fresne
DATE SUBMITTED: 2-21-97
2. ~3a~: (comment an back
~~a r y)
City Attorney
'
o
See Attached Agreement
ENDORSEMENT X/ INFORMATION
= OR
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT ~~~
4. SUMY~Y STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The County Prosecutors Office has revised this Agreement and requires
that it be re-approved for this year.
8. RECOMMENDATION: Request Council approval for the Mayor to execute this
agreement.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICI3LL: Chief Du Fresn9
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Chief Du Fresne
EXPIRATION DATE: 12-31-97
REVIEW DATE: 12-97
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
iD
11.
AGENDA BILL NO:
t!
KITSAP COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
Russell D. ,.uge. Prosecuting A,orney ~ ~ /~z~~ ~
Kitsap County Courthouse, 614 Division Street, MS-35A , ~ ' 95-4992
Port Orchard, Waahington 98366-4676 ,0..j~.a/~ ~ ~ ~ Fax (360)876-7083
February 10, 1997
Chief John R. Sutton
Bainbridge Island Police Department
625 Winslow Way East
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
Chief Paul Du Fresne
Bremerton Police Department
239 4th Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
Chief Joseph L. Matthews
Port Orchard Police Department
546 Bay Street
Port Orchard, WA 98366
Chief JeffDoran
Poulsbo Police Department
P.O. Box 98
Poulsbo, WA 98370
SheriffPatrick L. Jones
Kitsap County Sheriff's Office
614 Division Street MS-37
Port Orchard, WA 98366
Ms. Lynn Drake
Bremerton/Kitsap DUI Task Force
247 4th Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
RE: DUI TASK FORCE AGREEMENT
Dear Interested Parties:
Following my last correspondence of January 31, 1997, I have not received any further
response from you regarding the changes which have been proposed. Hence, I am concluding
that there are no other suggestions or changes needed. Therefore, I ask that you submit the draft
issued to you on January 31, 1997, as the final document for signature by your respective
governing agencies and police chiefs.
Please feel free to give me a call.
Very truly yours,
RUSSELL D. HAUGE
LEILA MILLS
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
LM: awa
DUI TASK FORCE
MUTUAL Am AGREEMENT
AND INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, an entity known as the Bremerton-Kitsap County DUI Task Force has been
created for the purpose of targeting, apprehending and successfully prosecuting individuals guilty of
traffic infractions and offenses in general, and DUI's in particular; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of various law enforcement agencies within Kitsap County to
participate in such Task Force; and
WHEREAS, multi-agency participation in such a Task Force is possible by virtue of the
Washington Mutual Aid Peace Officer Powers Act set forth in Chapter 10.93 RCW and the
Inteflocal Cooperation Act set forth in Chapter 39.34 RCW;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows:
Section 1: Duration. This Agreement shall be in effect for a period of two years from its
effective date of December 15, 1996.
Section 2: Scope. Parties to this Agreement will each provide law enforcement personnel
for the apprehension of suspected DUI offenders, and the enforcement of DUI laws within targeted
areas as set forth in Attachment 1. The targeted areas at any particular time during the term of the
agreement shall be determined by the joint administrative board.
Section :5: Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement shall be the apprehension and
successful prosecution of individuals guilty of traffic infractions and offenses in general, and DUI's
in particular within specifically targeted areas of Kitsap County.
Section 4: Financing. Each participating agency shall bear the financial responsibility for
such of its employees as participate in the Task Force, including but not limited to salary, benefits
and worker's compensation insurance.
Section 5: Termination. This Agreement shall automatically terminate two (2) years
from its effective date unless an earlier termination date is agreed upon in writing by all parties.
Section 6: Administration. This Agreement shall be administered by a joint board
comprised of the Kitsap County Sheriff and the Chiefs of Police for the cities of Bremerton,
Bainbridge Island, Port Orchard, and Poulsbo, or their respective delegates.
Section 7: Operati0n$, Task Force operations shall be coordinated by a Kitsap County
Sheriff's Department employee holding a rank of sergeant or higher. Provided that the coordination
provided by Kitsap County shall not be considered an allocation of liability under RCW 10.93.040,
nor that the Task Force is acting under the direction and control of Kitsap County.
Page 1 of 6
Section 8: Use of Property. Each agency shall be responsible for its own property used
during the term of this Agreement and any property acquired by an agency during the term of this
Agreement shall remain with the agency upon termination of the Agreement.
Section 9: Coordination. The Task Force Coordinator shall be responsible for
coordinating Task Force related communications between participating agencies.
Section 10: Participating Agencies: A list of the agencies which will be participating in
the Bremerton-I<itsap County Task Force is attached here£o as Attachment 2. Such List of
Authorized Agencies may be modified fi.om time to time to add or delete agencies. Each
participating agency shall maintain a current List of Authorized Agencies on file together with a
copy of this agreement.
Section 11: Filing. A copy of this agreement shall be filed with the Kitsap County Auditor.
Section 12: Consent. The undersigned hereby individually consent to the full exercise of
peace officer powers within their respective jurisdictions by any and all properly certificated or
exempted officers engaged in any operation of the Bremerton-Kitsap County Task Force. Each
such consent shall be valid during the tenure of the responsive undersigned individuals.
Section 13: Responsibility: The consents given in Section 10 above are not intended to
reallocate, under RCW 10.93.040, the responsibility of the participating agencies for the acts or
omissions of their officers.
DATED this day of ,1997.
DATED this ~ day of ,1997.
SHERIFF PATRICK L. JONES
Kitsap County Sheriff's Office
Clqlg~F JOHN K SUTTON
Bainbridge Island Police Department
DATED this __ day of ,1997.
DATED this __ day of ,1997.
CI41RF PAUL DU FRESNE
Bremerton Police Department
CIqlF. F JOSEPH L. MATHEWS
Port Orchard Police Department
DATED this ~ day of ,1997.
CI-II~F JEFF DORAN
Poulsbo Police Department
Page 2 of 6
Approved this
day of
, 1997.
CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND
ATTEST:
MAYOR JANET K. WEST
Bainbridge Island, Washington
SUSAN KASPER, CITY CLERK
Page 3 of 6
Approved this
day of
, 1997.
CITY OF BREMERTON
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
IAN R. SIEVERS, City Attorney
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, CITY CLERK
Page 4 of 6
Approved this __
day of
,1997.
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Approved as to form this __
MAYOR LESLIE J. WEATI-IERILL
Port Orchard~ Washington
day of
,1997.
ATTEST:
CITY ATTORNEY
Port Orchard, Washington
PATRICIA PARKS, CITY CLERK
Page 5 of 6
Approved this __
day of
· 1997.
CITY OF POULSBO
ATTEST:
MAYOR RICHARD MITCHUSSON
Poulsbo, Washington
KAROL JONES, CITY CLERK
Page 6 of 6
Purpose:
Ae
Co
DUI TASK FORCE EMPHASIS PATROL
OPERATIONAL GUIDEL~S
The DUI Task Force Emphasis Patrol is committed to the prevention of
alcohol and other drug-impaired driving through coordinated, multi-agency
deterrence. .
OBJECTIVES
1. To reduce the incidence and prevalence of alcohol and other drug-impaired
driving in Kitsap County.
2. To increase law enforcement manpower to maximum levels in high-traffic, high-
DUI arrest & collision areas.
3. To increase public attention to the risks of DUI and increase public perception of
risk for DUI arrest.
4. To focus media attention on the prevalence of DUI and the coordinated efforts to
prevent knpaked driving.
5. To enhance communication and cooperation among law enforcement agencies in
Kitsap County.
SELECTION OF OFFICERS
1. Each participating agency will be asked to provide at least one officer for each
Emphasis Patrol. Agencies with restricted jurisdiction will be asked to offer an
equivalent, alternative level of participation.
2. All participating officers must have completed the basic state academy.
3. Participating agencies will be encouraged to assign highly-motivated officers who
have high numbers &DUI arrests.
SUPERVISION
1. A first level supervisor will be required from agencies where major emphasis
occurs.
2. The supervisor(s) will work the entire Emphasis patrol shift and will have overall
responsibility for the assigned officer.
Attachment- 1
BAC
o
The supervisor(s) will field all questions and complaints concerning the Emphasis
Patrol. All citizen complaints will be forwarded to the parent agency of any
officer involved in the complaint.
The supervisor(s) will have the sole authority to return an officer to Ns/her
agency as a result of inappropriate behavior.
o
Officers assigned to the Emphasis Patrol ~ be expected to follow their parent
agency's polices with regard to pursuit and arrest procedures and all other matters
of professional conduct. However, officers will also be expected to follow the
direction of the Emphasis Patrol supervisor(s).
OFFICER RESPONSIBII,1TY
Officers will work their assigned areas according to the guidelines provide by the
supervisor(s), focusing on detection and apprehension of impaired drivers.
When an arrest is made, the arrestee will be taken to the nearest participating
Verifier facility for processing or to the Kitsap County Jail.
Officers will follow their parent agency guidelines for report wdting. Unless
otherwise required by an officer's parent agency, each arrest will be filed in the
jurisdiction of the arrest.
At the end of each Emphasis Patrol shi~, each officer will provide the
supervisor(s) with an account of their activity for that shift using the activity log
form provided.
o
Emphasis Patrol officers will be responsible for one another's safety and will be
expected to provide back-up and cover for one another.
o
Officers will respond to traffic accidents to provide assistance and traffic control.
If an accident is alcohol-related, the Emphasis Patrol officer will investigate and
make any arrests or citations as necessary. If alcohol is not involved,
investigation will be left to the appropriate regular duty officer(s).
Coffee and lunch breaks will be provided, however, these breaks will be restricted
to no more than three marked units together at one time.
o
If citizens inquire as to the presence of an outside agency officer in the emphasis
area, officers will explain their role in the DUI Task Force Emphasis Patrol.
Attachment- 1
TARGET AREAS AND DEPLOYMENT
The Emphasis Patrol will be assigned to target areas based on intelligence
information fi-om participating agencies, DUI arrest and collision data, and
discussions of the DUI Task Force Enforcement Committee.
The target areas will be assigned by rotatio, n so that each participating agency's
jurisdiction is included, unless a higher priority target is identified by the
Enforcement Committee.
Deployment of officers will be the responsibility of supervisor(s). Each officer
will be provided with a map of the target area and briefing information.
COMMUNICATIONS
All Emphasis Patrol communications will be on the LERN (Law Enforcement
Radio Network) frequency.
Requests for data or impound will be made through the appropriate dispatch
agency.
GENERAL POLICIES
No arrestee will be released to their own custody. Unless booked into jail,
arrestees will only be released to a responsible, sober person or transported home.
Arrestees who are combative or otherwise uncooperative will be taken to the
Kitsap County jail. Booldng of such arrestees will be left to the discretion of the
officer based on his/her parent agency policies.
Every attempt should be made to have vehicles removed from the roadway. If
there is concern that the vehicle may be a hazard, the supervisor(s) will make an
impound order, if necessary.
Attachment- 1
LIST OF AGENCIES AUTHORIZED TO EXERCISE POLICE OFFICER POWERS
WH-EN PARTICIPATING IN THE DUI TASK FORCE EMPHASIS PATROI,
Bainbridge Island Police Department
Bremerton Police Depgrtment
Kitsap County Sheriff's Office
Port Orchard Police Department
Poulsbo Police Department
Washington State Patrol
LIST OF AGENCIES PARTICIPATING IN TH-E
DUI TASK FORCE EMPHASIS PATROL
Bainbridge Island Police Department
Bremerton Police Department
Kitsap County Sheriff's Office
NUWES Keyport Police Department
Port Gamble S'Klallarn Tribal Police
Port Orchard Police Department
Poulsbo Police Department
PSNS Police Department
Shore Patrol
SUBASE Bangor Police Department
Suquamish Tribal Police
Washington State Liquor Control Board
Washington State Patrol
Attachment - 2
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Bid Award
Gold Mountain Golf Complex
Parking Area Expansion Project
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
March 5, 1997
Public Works & Utilities
Daniel Miller, Project Mgr
February 24, 1997
2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on b~cl~ if~ary)
Director PW&U
Director Parks & Rec.
City Treasurer
Purchasing Supervisor
City Attorney
Fiscal & Budget Comm.
Operations Committee
3. EXHIBITS:
· Bid Opening List
· Budget Adjustment Request No. 97-2
-Sources & Uses of Funds
ENDORSEMENT ~/ INFORMATION
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION'
Bids were opened on Thursday, February 20, 1997, for the Gold Mountain Golf Complex Parking Area Expansion
Project. Eight (8) bids were received for this project. (See attached Bid Opening List.) The low bidder was Ace
Paving Co., Inc. from Bremerton, WA for the base bid amount of $238,995.00.
(Total contract amount, including Washington State Sales Tax, is $258,354.) 8. RECOMMENDATION: There are two (2) motions before City Council:
Motion No. 1: Approval to award this contract to Ace Paving Co., Inc. in the amount of $238,995.00, and that, if
approved, the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the same, subject to City administrative policies and
procedures; and
Motion No. 2: The approval of the attached Budget Adjustment that authorizes the expenditure of dollars from the
Enterprise Fund 407 in the amount of $400,000 in support of the Parking Area Expansion ($310,000) and Cart
Storage Facility ($90,000). (See
PULLED TABLED
attached Sources & Uses of Funds.)
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
Director Public Works & Utilities
Project Manager
N/A
N/A
AMENDED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
q7-oq-
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
$. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Motion No. 1' The present Gold Mountain Golf Complex parking lot would not be expanded. The current lot is
inadequate to support a 36-hole operation.
Motion No. 2: Budget authority would not exist to accomplish either the Parking Area Expansion or the Cart
Storage Facility.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EOUIPMF, NT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
Necessary staffing is available to oversee the construction.
Thc year end cash value $494,736.00 in the Enterprise Fund 407 will be adjusted by $400,000.00 to allow
expenditure authority for the two projects.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
sk~970305_1.ab}
Gold Mountain Golf Course Parking Area Expansion
Bid Opening List, as submitted at 2:00 PM, Thursday, February 20, 1997
Business Base Bid ~ w/W.S.S.T.*
1. Ace Paving Co., Inc. APPARENT
PO Box 4100 LOW BIDDER $238,995 $258,354
Bremerton, WA 98312
360-479-4200/fax-478-6018
2. Porter Brothers Construction, Inc.
22015 Marine View Dr. $264,995 $286,460
Des Moines, WA 98198
206-824-6950/fax-824-0424
3. Clements Brothers, Inc.
PO Box 7964 $272,757 $294,850
Bonney Lake, WA 98390
206-852-0373/fax-862-3268
4. RV Associates, Inc.
PO Box 650 $280,900 $303,853
Port Orchard, WA 98366
360-876-9767/fax-876-9760
5. Westmark Excavating, Inc.
PO Box 39 $304,000 $328,624
Sumner, WA 98390
206-862-8564/fax-845-0277
6. Olsen's Land Development, Inc.
7425 Sidney Rd., SW $309,918.35 $335,022
Port Orchard, WA 98366
360-876-9721/fax-876-9721
7. Allen Shearer Trucking & Landscape Supply
PO Box 1938 $325,226.52 $351,570
Silverdale, WA 98383
360-373-7409/fax-373-1208
8. DLB Earthworks, Inc.
PO Box 6307 $328,600 $355,217
Olympia, WA 98502
360-754-5788/fax-943-5868
* Washington State Sales Tax, in Kitsap County = 8.1%
0pae_bid.lst}
Requesting Department:
__ CITY OF BREMERTON
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
GOLF COURSE FUND 407
NO.
97-2
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Description
DECREASE:
ENDING CASH
Amount
400,000
(,Remaining Ending Cash = $94.736)
NARRATIVE:
USE OF FUNDS:
Description
Amount
INCREASE:
PARKING LOT EXPANSION
CART STORAGE BUILDING
310,000
90.000
400,000
This adjustment provides for the construction of the parking lot expansion and the cart storage building at
Gold Mountain Golf Complex. The projects were inadvertently left out of the original 1997 Budget. These
two improvements will complete the course expansion which was begun in 1994.
Depart ad Signature
Treasurer Comments:
Date
Date
/-~Recommended ~
Mayor Comments:
Not Recommended
Treasurer's Signatur~''--~ Date
Recommended [~] Not Recommended
Approved ~ Denied ~ 7~
Fiscal & Budget Committee Comments:
Mayor's Signature
Date
~ Recommended ~
[---1 Approved [--'-]
Not Recommended
Denied
SHERRIL HUFF-MENEES 5'
2-25-97
Fiscal & Budget Committee Signature Date
GOLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COMPLEX
o=o PARKING AREA EXPANSION
Enterprise Fund 407
CONSTRUCTION
Sources of Funds
uses of Funds
(Ace Paving Company)
W.S.S.T.at 8.1%
$238,995
19,359
*Total Construction Contract
Ancillary Expenditures
Contingency Expenditures
**Total Sources & Uses
$ 310,000
$ 258,354
$ 25,811
$ 25,835
$ 310,000
o:* CART STORAGE FACILITY
Enterprise Fund 407
Sources of Funds
L uses of Funds
CONSTRUCTION (Estimated Cost)
W.S.S.T.at 8.1%
*Total Estimated Construction Contract
$65,000
5,265
Ancillary Expenditures (Estimated)
Contingency Expenditures (Estimated)
**Total Sources & Uses
$ 90,000
$ 70,265
$ 12,708
$ 7,027
$ 90,000
Februa~ 27, 1996
.2?
Resolution approving emergency
purchase of pump drive for CE-4
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
FOR AGENDA OF:March 5,1997
DEPT:Public Works & Util./~
ORIGINATING
ORIGINATOR:I. Sievers, Cit~Att~.~
DATE SUBMITTED: March 5, 1997 ~.
Gene Samp~ey, D~f]. Public
on back if necessary)
Works and Util.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE
Resolution
Memo, Poppe
ENDORSEMENT [] INFORMATION []
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
MAYOR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTIOn:
Despite continued efforts to troubleshoot problems with the control boards of the
Variable Frequency Drive for pump assembly #1 at pump station CE-4, the drive
has continued to fail. This leaves CE-4, located at the Boardwalk Park,
vulnerable to overflows to the downtown waterfront area since it leaves only one
reliable VFD/pump assembly.
The resolution waives bid procedures based on an emergency situation and allows
purchase of a new drive for Allan Bradley drive $25,000 that will be compatible
with equipment being installed in other pump stations.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Approve resolution no. 2587
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED [] TABLED [] APPROVED [] DISAPPROVED [] AMENDED [] DATE:
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO.: 97-050
2. CLEARANCE COMMENT~: -- --
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
Increased risk of CSO in downtown waterfront area with delay for bid
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EOUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
Purchase is budgeted in $100,000 Capital Projects Budget
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
RESOLUTION NO. 2587
A RESOLUTION certifying an emergency, approving purchase of
replacement pump drive assembly for Wastewater Pump Station
CE-4 and waiving bid procedures.
WHEREAS, a pump variable frequency drive has failed beyond
repair at Wastewater Pump Station CE-4 on February 28, 1997; and
WHEREAS, immediate replacement is necessary to ensure the
ongoing reliability of Pump Station CE-4; and
WHEREAS, budget currently exists in the Capital authorization
within the Wastewater Fund to upgrade this pump assembly with
current technology; and
WHEREAS, estimates have been secured for an Allan Bradley VFD,
a sole source needed to standardize pump station operations; now,
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton:
1. That the failure of Pump Variable Frequency Drive at Pump
Station CE-4 is certified as an emergency situation, needing
immediate corrective action in response to the need for essential
backup pumping capacity.
2. The emergency purchase of an Allan Bradley 1336 + VFD, is
approved as necessary to address this emergency situation, and bid
procedures of RCW 35.22.620(2) are waived.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this
day of , 1997.
DAVID FARR
Council President
~c OF B~
3027 Olympus Drive · Bremerton, WA 98310-4799 · (360) 478-5318 ° FAX (360) 478-5018 /O~
March 3, 1997
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Bremerton City Council . n ~
John Poppe, Wastewater Manager~ ~rd~.
Emergency Purchase for Pump Sta~on C~4
February 28, 1997 the variable frequency drive (VFD)
controller failed for Pump Assembly #1 at pump station CE-4.
This station is located at the new water front Boardwalk and
serves the downtown area.
This electrical control unit was installed in 1984 and
has served the City well. Recent repair work and staff
research has resulted in the following summary:
1. Increasing system control system failures has
increased the potential for pump failure, resulting in
overflows to the water front area.
2. Technical support is no longer provided by the
manufacturer.
3. Repair parts have become difficult to obtain.
4. There is a six(6) to eight(8) week delivery of a new
VFD unit.
Therefore, I am requesting an emergency purchase
authorization from the Bremerton City Council for the
immediate purchase of a new,Allan Bradley VFD for $25,000.
This unit is consistent ~ith our pump station upgrade
activities and will be char~ed to our $100,000 1997 Budget for
Capital Projects. Please~all me at 478-2322 should questions
arise. ~~ ~
Equal Opportunity Employer
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: ~E'~RING-& ORDINANCE FOR AGENDA OF:.
~ amend the Official Zoning Ordinance text and ORIGINATING DEPT:
map by adopting and applying two new zones: ORIGINATOR:
"Health Care" and "Shoreline Mixed Use". DATE SUBMITTED:
Feb. 26, 1997
DCD/Planninq
Ron W. Hough
Feb 21, 1997
City Attorney' ,'-'%-4c,,_~
Dir. Comm. Dev.
Operations Commi~
ENDORSEMENT_._.~ ~MATION__
MAYOR~
3. EXHIBITS:
,/ Staff Report:
Ex. "A" Health Care zone
Ex. "B" Shoreline Mixed Use zone
Ex. "C" Proposed Zoning Map
/' Ordinance
,/' Planning Comm. Minutes of 12/17/96
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT ~ '~ ~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The Bremerton City Council adopted the Harrison District Plan in September, 1996. That Plan
included a recommendation to adopt two new zones. The "Health Care (HC)" zone is intended to
better define and protect the health care district in the vicinity of Harrison Hospital. The "Shoreline
Mixed Use (SMU)" zone would provide a more compatible mix of land uses for the high bluff area along
Campbell Way and Old Wheaton Way.
The Planning Commission studied the proposed amendments and conducted a public hearing on
December 17, 1996, after which it recommended City Council adoption of these amendments.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
City Council approval of the attached Ordinan.c_e..on first reading.
City Council passage of the Ordinanc/~on ~'~c'Ob'd reading.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
Donald L. Pratt
10. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
APPROVED
DISAPPROVED
DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
AMENDED
q?-
8A
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The proposed changes are intended for the long-term benefit of the Harrison District, but are not
mandatory or urgent. If the new zones are not adopted, the present zoning will continue. The present
zoning is more intense than the proposed zones, has been in place for nearly ten years, and is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Non-passage of these amendments will not result in a Comprehensive Plan conflict, nor in
a compliance issue with the GMA. Non-passage could slow the Harrison District's continued growth in
the directions outlined in the Plan by allowing conflicting, but allowed, land uses in an area that may be
sensitive to those uses.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
No anticipated impacts in these areas.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
ORDINANCE NO. yYg
AN ORDINANCE amending the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance
and Zoning Map to add the new "Health Care (HC)" and
"Shoreline Mixed Use (SMU)" zones.
WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council adopted the Harrison District Plan as an
amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan in September, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Harrison Plan included a number of proposals and recommendations
aimed at strengthening this district as a health care center, business, and residential center; and
WHEREAS, those recommendations included two new zones, the "Health Care (HC)"
zone to be applied to Harrison Hospital and its surrounding health-related business district, and
the "Shoreline Mixed Use (SMU)" zone which was to be applied to a narrow corridor south of
Campbell Way and Wheaton Way and along the existing high bluff; and
WHEREAS, public hearings were conducted by the Bremerton Planning Commission in
1996 prior to adoption of the Harrison Plan, and a public hearing was conducted on December
17, 1996, to consider the proposed zoning amendments, followed by a recommendation for City
Council adoption of those amendments; and
WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on February 26,
1997, to accept public comments pertaining to the proposed zoning amendments and considered
the Planning Commission's recommendation; now, therefore
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
Section 1. The Bremerton Zoning Ordinance (BMC 21.02) is amended as follows:
(a) Figure 080 Zones (table), is amended to add the the following to the "Special
Purpose" category:
"HC Health Care"
"SMU Shoreline Mixed Use"
Figure 090 PRIMARY ZONE CONSISTENCY (table) is amended to include
"HC Health Care" as a primary zone consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
designations "C-P", "C-G" and "H".
(c)
Figure 090 PRIMARY ZONE CONSISTENCY (table) is amended to include
"SMU Shoreline Mixed Use" as a primary zone consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan designations "MDR", "HDR", "C-G", and "C-P".
(d) Figure 120 ZONE SUMMARY (table) is amended to add the following
descriptions following the "MX" zone description:
ZONES Description/Intent Min. Standards (See Table Z-4)
HC The intent of this zone is to protect and strengthen the Min. Lot Size: None
Health Care medical center to ensure that it remains strong and Max. Coverage: 60%
viable and to provide for medical center expansion. Min. Lot width: None
This zone was based on the following objectives: Max. Bldg. Ht: 60 ft.
>- Establish a Health Care Campus of related and
compatible uses. SETBACKS:
;~ Preferred uses will be medical, along with their Front: I0 ft.
related support activities. Side: 10 fl. from "R' zone
>- Provide areas for new growth and expansion. None from non-R zones
~- Improve internal access and circulation. Rear: 10 ft. from "R" zone
>- Minimize land use conflicts. None from non-R zones
SMU The purpose of this zone is to establish a mixed use Base Density: None
district that responds to the constraints and special
Shoreline Mixed
opportunities of high bluff areas and to the following Min. Lot Size: None
Use primary objectives: Max. Coverage: 50%
>- Maximize the potential of bluff-top areas. Min. Lot width: None
>- Promote a mix ofwaer-oriented commercial, Max. Bldg. Ht: 40 ft.
office and residential uses.
>' Ensure that new development is designed and SETBACKS:
sited to take advantage of high bluffviews while Front: 10 ft.
enhancing the unique qualities of the shoreline Bluff-top: 25 ft.*
location. Side: 5 ft.**
>- Discourage development that endangers the Rear: i0 ft.
stability or function of the bluff.
>- Provide for public access as required by the City's * Unless a geo-technical report
Shoreline Master Program. supports a lesser setback.
· * Side yards also subject to view
corridor requirements.
(e) Figure 130 LOT REQUIREMENTS (table) is amended to add the following zone
requirements:
Requirements Health Care Shoreline Mixed Use
(HC zone) (SMU zone)
Allowed Resid. Density ..............
Setbacks: FRONT: I0 ft. 10 ft.
SIDE: ....... 5 5 ft.
REAR: ....... 5 10 ft.
Min. Lot Size ..............
Min. Lot width ..............
Maximum Height 60 ft. 40 ft.
Maximum Coverage 60% 50%
(f) Figure 140 LAND USE TABLES are amended to add the following land uses for
the subject zones:
Uses Allowed -- by zone HC SMU
Multiple-unit Structure (4 or more units) A
Townhouse (attached units on own lots) A
Residential, as a secondary use SUP A
Foster Home A A
Convalescent/Rest Home A
Day Care Facility (13 or more -- ali ages) A A
Day Care Facility (12 or fewer -- all ages) A A
Group Residential Facility - Class I SUP A
Group Residential Facility - Class 1I SUP
Bed & Breakfast A
Hotel or Motel A
Residential Hotel or Inn (weekly/monthly) A
Youth or Teen Center (social/recreational) SUP SUP
Senior Center (social/recreational) SUP SUP
Community or Neighborhood Center SUP SUP
Hospital A
Medical -- Out-patient Clinic A A
Medical Services (diagnostic, ENT, etc.) A A
Medical Laboratory A
Detoxification Center & similar facilities A
Social Service Facilities A
Welfare and Other Charitible Svcs./Fac's. A
Indoor Athletic/Recreation Facility A SUP
Tennis or Swim Club (or similar facility) SUP
Weight Control and Aerobics A A
Tanning Salon, Spa, and similar uses A A
Park, Playground, or Rec. Area & Fac's. A
Private Educational Facilities (See "PS" zone) A
Library A
Law Enforcement & Fire Facilities A
Water, Sewer, Stormdrain Facilities A A
Utility Substation SUP SUP
Communication Antenna/Relay Tower SUP
Antenna Tower (non-commercial) SUP
Restaurant/Cafe (2,500 sq.ft, or larger) A A
Restaurant/Cafe (Under 2,500 sq.fl.) A A
Food/Beverage Take-out (no inside seating) A A
Donut Shop, Baked Goods -- retail A A
Delicatessen A A
Specialty Food Sales A
Drug Store/Pharmacy A
Glasses & Optical Goods and Services A
Hair Care and Personal Grooming A A
Personal/Family Counseling Services A A
Personal Services -- other than listed SUP SUP
Banking & Other Financial Services A
Office/Business Assistance Services A A
Insurance and Investment Services A A
Real Estate, title, Escrow and Similar Services A A
Accounting, Tax Prep., and similar services A A
Copying, mailing, FAX, and similar services A A
Consultants (Arch, Planning, Design, etc.) A A
Computer Assistance, training, & repair services A A
General Offices (other than listed above) A SUP
Non-accessory Parking A
Parking Structure A
Book Store (newspapers, magazines, etc.) A
Stationery, Paper Products, Office Supplies A
Flowers, Gifts and Greeting Cards A
Art Gallery (2,000 sq.ft, or smaller) A
Recycling Collection Station A
Section 2. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Bremerton, adopted by Ordinance
No. 4555 in May, 1996, is hereby amended to apply the "Health Care (HC)" and "Shoreline
Mixed Use (SMU)" zones, as recommended by the Planning Commission, to those areas
delineated on the "Proposed Zoning" map, which attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
APPROVED by the City Council on the first reading this
day of ,1997.
PASSED by the Bremerton City Council this
,1997.
day of
DAVID FARR, President
Bremerton City Council
APPROVED this
day of
,1997.
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
Published:
Effective:
13-C:zma-5-96.ord
E;hibit "A"
Proposed Zoning:
Ne~v zones:
HC --- Health Care
SMU --- Shoreline Mixed Use
Harrison District
PROPOSED ZONING
DR
MF
MR
PO
GB
HC
SMU
PS
Duplex Residential
Multi-family Residential
Mixed Residential
Prol'essional Oflice
General Business
I-leallh Care
Shoreline Mixed Use
Parks & Schools
Iiarrisoo Zones: Page 8
The Harrison Zones
Zoning Text and Map Amendments
Prepared b~/: Ron W. Hou[th --- Dept. of Community/Development --- 286 Fourth Street, Bremerton WA 98337
INTRODUCTION:
In September, 1996, the City Council
adopted the Harrison District Plan as an
amendment to the City's Comprehensive
Plan.
Within the Plan, and adopted in concept,
were recommendations for two new zones,
tailored specifically for portions of the
Harrison District. This was done in
response to problems, concerns, or oppor-
tunities expressed during a series of neigh-
borhood meetings during preparation of the
Harrison Plan.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION'
The Bremerton Planning Commission con-
ducted a public hearing on December 17, ,
1996, to consider these proposals and to
accept public comments. Following the hearing, the Commission recommended City
Council adoption of these amendments to the Zoning Ordinance text and map.
The vote of the Commission was 5-1, with Chairman Olsen voting "no". He felt items #3
and #5 of the SMU zone "development guidelines" were incorrect. They refer to a
requirement for a hard surface public access walkway "to and along" the blufftop which
is a requirement of the City's Shoreline Master Program, which was adopted years ago.
The City Council agreed that the "to and along" requirement was inappropriate for this
location and removed controversial items #3 and #5 when the Plan was adopted last
fall. At the same time, the Plan was adjusted to propose a "landscaped pathway
system along the street side of the properties" and to acknowledge that the
Shoreline Master Program will recognize this as the adopted waterfront access plan for
the Harrision District.
Harrison Zones: Page !
"A"
Health Care (HC) zone:
A. Purpose & Objectives
A primary objective is to protect and strengthen the medical center to ensure that it
remains strong and viable. Sufficient areas must be provided in the general vicinity for
medical center expansion. At the same time, we should guard against uses that could
diminish the function of the area as a regional healthcare center.
The following primary objectives were considered in the development of the HC zone:
1. A health care campus of related and compatible uses will be established.
2. Medical and related "support" activities will be the preferred uses.
3. Areas for new growth and expansion will be provided.
4. Internal access and circulation will be improved.
5. Land use conflicts will be minimized.
The areas delineated on the Harrison District Land Use Plan as "Health Care Center"
are currently zoned "General Business" and "Professional Office" for the most part.
The General Business zone is one of Bremerton's most intense commercial zones, is
highway oriented, and allows a number of land uses that may not be in the best
interests of a health care district.
The suggested "HC" zone is a combination of the most appropriate uses from the
Professional Office zone and the General Business zone and is intended to promote the
objectives of this Plan while preventing most incompatible uses.
B. Minimum Development Standards
Minimum Lot Size
Maximum Lot Coverage
Minimum Lot Width
Max. Building Height
Max. Building Size
None
60% (building coverage)
None
60 ft. (higher requires PUD)
None
Building Setbacks (measured from property line)
Front:
Side:
Rear:
10ft.
Min. of 10 ft. is required from any "residential" zone.
No side setback required from non-residential zones.
Min. of 10 ft. is required from any "residential" zone.
No rear setback required from non-residential zones.
Harrison Zones: Page 2
C. Allowed Land Uses (SUP-- requires Special Use Permit approval)
Primary Uses:
The following are encouraged as the preferred uses within this zone.
Medical & Social Svcs.
Recreation & Health
Other Retail Business
Hospital
Medical -- Offices and Out-patient Services
Medical Services (diagnostic, ENT, etc.)
Medical Laboratory
Detoxification Center & similar facilities --- SUP
Weight Control and Aerobics
Drug Store or Pharmacy
Glasses & Optical Goods and Services
Support Uses:
The following uses are permitted in support of the primary uses within this zone.
Their size and intensity should not dominate, but should be compatible with the
overall character and purpose of this district.
Residential
Other Lodging
Entertainment/Culture
Medical & Social Services
Recreation & Health
Other Public / Quasi-public
Government & Utility Svcs.
Eating & Drinking
Personal Services
Residential, as a secondary use --- SUP
Foster Home
Day Care Facility (13 or more -- all ages)
Day Care Facility (12 or fewer -- all ages)
Group Residential Facility - Class I --- SUP
Group Residential Facility - Class II -- SUP
Youth, Senior, or Community Center -- SUP
Social Service Facility
Welfare & other charitible Services/Facilities
Indoor Athletic/Recreation Facility
Park, Playground or other recreational facilities
Educational facilities (health care emphasis encouraged)
Library
Law Enforcement & Fire Facilities
Water, Sewer and Stormdrain Facilities
Utility Substation --- SUP
Communications Antenna/Relay Tower --- SUP
Antenna Tower (non-commercial) --- SUP
Restaurant/Cafe
Food/Beverage Take-out (no inside seating)
Donut Shop, Baked Goods
Delicatessen
Health Foods, Supplements, Vitamins, etc.
Hair Care and Personal Grooming
Personal/Family Counseling Services
Harrison Zones: Page 3
Business Services
Other Retail
Auto/Transportation
Industrial / Manufacturing
Convenience banking and financial services
Office/Business Assistance Services
General Offices
Book Store (newspapers, magazines, etc.)
Stationery, Paper Products, Office supplies
Flowers, Gifts and Greeting Cards
Non-accessory Parking (structure or lot)
Recycling Collection Stations
Harrison Zones: Page 4
Exhibit
Shoreline Mixed Use_(SMU)_ one:
A. Purpose and Objectives
The purpose of this zone is to establish a mixed use district that responds to the
constraints and special opportunities of the high bluff areas that lie to the south of
Wheaton Way, Campbell Way and Lebo Boulevard.
The following primary objectives were guided the development of the SMU zone:
Maximize the potential of bluff-top areas through redevelopment and inflll.
Promote a mix of water-oriented commercial, office and residential uses.
Ensure that new development is designed and sited to take advantage of high bluff views
while enhancing the unique qualities of the shoreline location.
Discourage development that endangers the stability of the bluff or function of the
Tracyton Beach Natural System. (e.g., buildings that "step down" or cut into the bluff)
Develop a public access walkway/bikeway along the top of the bluff and acquire public
access easements along the water's edge. This is a key shoreline link in the City's future
greenways system and is of community and regional importance.
Areas delineated on the Harrison District Land Use Plan as "Shoreline Mixed Use" are
currently zoned Professional Office (PO) and General Business (GB) for the most part.
The GB zone is one of Bremerton's most intense zones, is highway oriented, and allows
a number of land uses that are not well suited to a narrow bluff-top location.
The suggested "SMU" zone borrows primarily from the Professional Office and
residential zones in providing for a mix of residential and office uses, with limited
commercial services. The following lists of uses are designed to meet the stated
objectives while ensuring a compatible mix of appropriate uses for this very limited and
sensitive area.
B. Minimum Development Standards
Minimum Lot Size None
Maximum Lot Coverage 50%
Minimum Lot Width None
Max. Building Height 40 ft.
Max. Building Size None
Harrison Zones: Page 5
¥/
Building Setbacks (measured from property lines)
Front:
Bluff-top:
Side:
Rear:
10 ft. min.
25 ft. min. or as determined by a geo-technical report.
5 ft. min. (also subject to view corridor requirements)
10 ft. min.
C. Development Guidelines
The following guidelines are intended to assist in planning for a new project, expansion
of an existing use, or in the City's consideration of unique design approaches.
Maximizing views, public access and other site amenities should guide project design
within the SMU zone.
Mixed-use developments that integrate office and light commercial uses with residential
uses are encouraged.
Because view and amenities are of foremost importance, the City will give greater weight
to public amenities that are provided along the waterfront public access pathway system,
in exchange for relief from other constraining develoment requirements. Such relief is
requested through the Variance, PUD, or Special Exception process.
Buildings having a vertical design (multi-levels) are preferred in this zone to reduce lot
coverage and result in more open space.
Parking should be limited to the street side of buildings. Multi-level parking structures are
encouraged.
New development should recognize the instability of the bluff, should minimize impacts on
the physical structure of the bluff, and should avoid cuts, fills, stepping-down the bluff, or
other unnecessary alterations of the natural landform.
D, Allowed Land Uses (SUP = requires Special Use Permit approval)
Primary Uses:
The following are encouraged as the preferred uses within this zone:
Residential Multiple-unit structure (4 or more units -- no density limitation)
Townhouse (attached units on own lots)
Other Lodging Bed & Breakfast
Hotel or Motel
Residential Hotel or Inn (weekly/monthly)
Eating & Drinking
Restaurant/Cafe (2,500 sq.ft, or larger)
Restaurant/Cafe (Under 2,500 sq.ft.)
Business Services General Offices (prefer those with limited client visits)
Harrison Zones: Page 6
2. Support Uses:
The following uses are permitted in support of the primary uses within this zone.
Their size and intensity should not dominate but should be compatible with the
overall character and purpose of the district.
Residential
Other Lodging
Entertainment/Culture
Medical & Social Svcs.
Personal Services
Business Services
Public & Quasi-public
Government & Utility Svcs.
Eating & Drinking
Residential --- as a secondary use
Foster Home
ConvalescentJRest Home
Day Care Facility (13 or more -- all ages)
Day Care Facility (12 or fewer - all ages)
Group Residential Facility --- Class I
Youth or Teen Center -- SUP
Senior Center --- SUP
Community or Neighborhood Center --- SUP
Medical services (diagnostic, ENT, etc.)
Medical -- out-patient clinic
Indoor Athletic/Recreation facility --- SUP
Tennis or Swim Club (or similar facility) -- SUP
Weight control and Aerobics
Tanning Salon, Spa, and similar uses
Personal Apparel Repair/Alterations
Hair Care and Personal Grooming
Personal/Family Counseling Services
Personal Services -- other than listed --- SUP
Insurance and Investment Services
Real Estate, Title, Escrow and similar services
Accounting, Tax Prep., and similar services
Copying, mailing, FAX, and similar services
Office/Business Assistance Services
Consultants (Arch, Planning, Design, etc.)
Computer Assistance, training, & repair svcs.
General Offices (other than listed above) --- SUP
Art gallery (2,000 sq. ft. or smaller)
Water, Sewer and Stormdrain Facilities
Utility Substation --- SUP
Food/Beverage Take-out (no inside seating)
Donut Shop, Baked Goods --- retail
Delicatessen
Harrison Zones: Page 7
Exhlb~t
Proposed Zoning:
New zones:
HC --- Health Care
SMU --- Shoreline Mixed Use
Harrison District
PROPOSED ZONING
DR
MF
MR
PO
GB
HC
SMU
PS
Duplex Residential
Multi-family Residential
Mixed Residential
Professional Office
General Business
Heallh Care
Shoreline Mixed Use
Parks &
Harrison Zones: Page 8
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
December 17, 1996
Chairman Ol/sen called the to order
/ PUBLIC HI ON RES LOT~
~onald Pratt ((~¢ of Oeve prese~ the staff is an
/
/ord!nance ~s first heard December meeting, changes are a from input
at that m The M~ addin the number of to 5 and
allowing for 3 the kicks in. Mayor had no
the followin will defer Commissil judgement: carports and'
large lots the parkixregulations. Mayor oppos, g
veh applying to yards and determinin number of ve
a] by the tuber of licen d drivers.
Zimsen
will not be
Morris
Feel
that will be by a vindictive hbor and
board.
vehi, congesting
parkint be elim on one side of street on the
ordinance.
an issue
Corn
it, it
problems
Com
about the real inten of the city with this
that the purpose :l, it will easier to entbrceable
the ordinance i.~ on the and that is already/
thc~ City that this ordi~ will force vehicles streets./i
"~: ~ stated h~co~ not sul ,p{ X/the ordinance 3 presented beca e~as he
f'l allow f°r 1~941 cars °n and/0/ff the street'/
Adams sta ed she has to ffJ: in front her home and3fis
not
had
any
/
vehicles theproperty hte, pooling~///- ple~ei
storY'_ that the is for~ Most peo r
for
/
PAfi}~ -1-
Chairman Olsen/~estioned the clause.
Donald Pratt~tated~that the ~ code does hav/o4 Grandfather in it which that
if the cond!~?n_ !s__l,e.g~al at th/g tim the law chan~e's to make it illegal condition c~ nue
as long asjif doesn't get 3~i~g ,'r. Stated the in/t~nt of the ordinanc/e/ to improve th?/r ~tial
qualiV_the neigh~fJ~°°d7' /~,,. J ////
Con?nissioner St?ne. Stated that op?fible".? already a~ of the zoning/dode in £ p 7.
/~ng to c0m/5,fip_ with an c rdi~ that ~will make/~ry°ne hapPy ~fiP°ssible'
Chairman./?lsen feels the 5~ance still leav~gl~ny questions/~swered. ~
Comm~sioner ~tone mo2r~ 1 to.adopt the z/orriS, t t a~endme_nt., ~wi/tJa/the fo. llowing
chanjg6s as outlined i~,ite~, G, no mor/o/than five boa~//motor vehicl~g, or trailers .per
~dw/ell~~h__al_l./b~_?_mf~ed in ~y~sidential zonin~,/flistricton sit/e/for longer thai 72
~urs u. nl.ess sto_.r/q~d,, or par?d in a~age or carport' in a lawful/m(anner. Secon/ffed by
Commissioner g6binson. Qu~~ckx/on; Adams, ye~, Stone,
yes; Robinso/ff/, yes; Olsen~ can helen on atie/v6te. Item
Bz~m~' stateT if the ilsue/~,' n~ ~ehiclVl~en.l. et's attack/j~vehicles'~
Commissioner ~tone moved 3ff a.dopt ~e ?re_e_ motion a s/0~ond time. ~q~conded b/y/
Commissi )
/
Chairman Olsen recommended that issue be passed/6nto Council wiOt no recom~dendatioh.
PUBLIC HEARING//2-ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENT
Chairman Olsen stated that this was adoption and application of proposed Health Care (HC) and
Shoreline Mixed Use (SMU) zones in the Harrison district.
Ron Hough, Planning Manager, presented the staff report. In September, 1996, the Bremerton
City Council adopted the Harrison District Plan as an amendment to the City's Comprehensive
Plan. Within the Plan, and adopted in concept, were recommendations for two new zones,
Health Care (HC) and Shoreline Mixed Use (SMU). Activation of these new zones requires
formal amendments to the text of the Zoning Ordinance and to the Official Zoning Map of the
City. The role of the Planning Commission in this process is to review the staff proposals in
PAGE -2-
detail, conduct a public hearing, consider any public input that's offered, and make
recommendations to the City Council. The attached Exhibits "A", Health Care Zone; 'B",
Shoreline Mixed Use zone; and 'C', Proposed Zoning Map of Harrison District; describe the
zones as they were earlier discussed and eventually adopted in the Harrison Plan. The
descriptions or applications of these zones may be adjusted as necessary to best meet the
objectives of the Harrison Plan and interests of the community.
Mary Swanson, 2503 Cherry Place, concerned about the level of traffic and parking on Cherry
Place.
Commissioner Robinson pointed out that Ms. Swanson should contact the Engineering
Department regarding her parking issues.
Commissioner Stone indicated that the zoning alone should help with the concerns expressed
by Ms. Swanson.
Mrs. Trimbull, resident, stated that many times the residents know nothing about issues until
it is a done deal.
Discussion followed regarding the pathway requirements.
Commissioner Boyd moved that the Planning Commission recommend City Council
adoption of the Health Care zone and the Shoreline Mixed Use zone, as described in
Exhibits 'A' and 'B', as amendments to the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance. Seconded by
Commissioner Hancock. Question called: Adams, yes; Stone, yes; Robinson, yes; Boyd,
yes; Hancock, yes; Olsen, no. Motion passes.
Chairman Olsen stated that he feels under C-development guidelines, #3 and #5 are incorrect.
Commissioner Adams moved that the Planning Commission recommend City Council
application of the HC and SMU zones to properties in the Harrison District, as shown on
in Exhibit "C~, as an amendment to the Official Zoning Map. Seconded by
Commissioner Stone. Question called. Stone, yes; Robinson, yes; Boyd, yes; Hancock,
yes; Adams, yes; Olsen, abstain. Motion passes.
f
/// ~?arle.sto/fl Plan: Rp~/nn Hough state~/~they had a mge~ng with ~//in atten~ce. Good/
~ ///aiscus~On and inpu//~Plan is mov/~along nicel~ //// //~ ~
CO/ / Plan~lng /~ ~;tnce is tenta/~)~y scheduleSf/o(January/3~5~ 1997 a~//t~ Given/~mmunity ~.
47
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: P~-~.~ .......... -- RDINANCE FOR AGENDA OF:
~l~.amend Bremerton's Official Zoning Map ORIGINATING DEPT:
for consistency with two 1996 Comprehensive ORIGINATOR:
Plan Amendments. DATE SUBMITTED:
February 26, 1997
DCD/Plannin,q ~
Ron W. Hough
Feb. 21, 1997
2. CLEARANCES:/~ba~ecessary)
City Attorne~:::~ ~~..
Dir. Comm. Dev. f',J'x''l~cv~L~
Operations Comm.~~~'''~''~
ENDORSEMENT~ ~RMATION__
3. EXHIBITS:
,/' Findings & Conclusions of the Planning Comm.
Ordinance with exhibits
,/ Planning Commission Minutes
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
During the summer of 1996, the City processed its annual docket of amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan. Those amendments were approved and adopted by Ordinance ~-4570 in
September, 1996. Two of the amendments require adjustments to the City's Zoning Map to maintain
Plan/Zoning consistency. The Planning Commission has processed those amendments, conducted a
public hearing to accept public comments, and recommends City Council adoption. An ordinance has
been prepared for the Council's consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
,Co~-y-GounciPapprov.al-of--the-attached-C)rdina nc_e:oa~first-reading.---
City Council passage of the Ordinanc~.~.~on s'eCortcl/reading.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Donald L. Pratt
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
'10. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
APPROVED
DISAPPROVED
DATE:
AMENDED
'11. AGENDA BILL NO: 9 7" 0/'~ 5
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
These Zoning Map Amendments are intended to ensure consistency between the City's
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map. At the present time, the zoning is in conflict with the
Comprehensive Plan designations and needs to be corrected. Non-passage of one or more of these
three proposed changes would suggest that the proposed zoning is not what was intended when
the Comprehensive Plan was adopted. Non-passage would continue the existing conflict and possibly
result in a further review and possible amendment of the Comprehensive Plan, or a different zoning
proposal.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES'
No anticipated impacts in these areas.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE revising the Official Zoning Map
of the City of Bremerton, Washington.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan by
passage of Ordinance No. 4570 in September, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Plan amendments resulted in a need to make two specific amendments
to the Official Zoning Map to maintain consistency between the Comprehensive Plan and its
implementing regulations, as required by the Growth Management Act; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the Bremerton Planning Commission
on June 18, 1996, to accept public input prior to making its formal recommendation to the City
Council; and
WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on February 26,
1997, to accept public comments pertaining to the proposed zoning amendments and considered
the Planning Commission's recommendation; now, therefore
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
Section 1.
follows:
(a)
The Official Zoning Map of the City of Bremerton is hereby amended as
(b)
The zoning of Arvon Park is changed from Single-family Residential (SF-3) to
Parks & Schools (PS), as shown in Exhibit "A", attached hereto.
The zoning of six lots in the Anderson Creek area east of Gorst is changed from
Industrial Park (IP) to Single-family Residential (SF-1), as shown in Exhibit
"B", attached hereto.
APPROVED by the City Council on the first reading this
day of ,1997.
PASSED by the Bremerton City Council this
,1997.
day of
David Farr, President
Bremerton City Council
APPROVED this
day of
,1997.
ATTEST:
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
Published:
Effective:
13-C:zrna-2-96
FINDINGS OF FACT
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
of the Bremerton Planning Commission
Zoning Map Amendments
Prepared by: Ron W. Hough --- Dept. of Community Development --- 286 Fourth Street, Bremerton WA 98337
INTRODUCTION
State law allows our Comprehensive Plan to be amended once each year. Our
schedule calls for proposals to be gathered during the year and placed on a docket for
processing as a package in the spring and summer months.
The Planning Commission conducted hearings on the 1996 package of Plan
Amendments during May and June, 1996. The following amendments required follow-
up zoning adjustments:
Arvon Park: Change zoning from "SF-3" to "PS".
Sciepko Area: Change zoning from "IP" to "SF-I".
Two other Plan Amendments will also eventually require zoning adjustments.
These are:
Harrison District Plan: Proposes two new zones (Shoreline Mixed Use and
Health Care) that were approved in concept along with the Plan itself.
Following Harrison Plan adoption, staff would fine-tune the zoning proposals and
bring them through the approval process as Zoning Ordinance and Map
Amendments.
Pope Resources: Amendments the Comprehensive Plan and text of the
Zoning Ordinance will allow the design of this PUD with Iow-density multi-unit
townhouses which are now permitted in the DR zone. Specific master plan and
zoning adjustments will be made through the PUD process later.
The Bremerton Zoning Map may be amended at any time, but must be consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan. The adjustments being proposed at this time originated as a
Plan Amendment and is already directly consistent with the Plan and necessary to
maintain Plan/Zone consistency.
FINDINGS OF FACT
ARVON PARK ---
A. LOCATION:
B. APPLICANT:
C. LAND:
D. LAND USE:
E. COMP. PLAN:
F. PROPOSAL:
See Exhibit "A"
1506 Arvon Street in West Bremerton.
City of Bremerton
A single quarter-acre lot within an established residential
neighborhood.
Vacant
The Bremerton Comprehensive Plan was amended in 1996
to designate this site "P" (park).
Rezone this lot from "Single-family (SF-3)" to "Parks &
Schools (PS)" for consistency with the Comp. Plan.
SCIEPKO AREA --- see Exhibit"B"
A. LOCATION:
B. APPLICANT:
C. LAND:
D. LAND USE:
E. COMP. PLAN:
An area along the south side of State Route 16 east of Gorst
and south of Sinclair Inlet in the Anderson Creek area of
Bremerton.
City of Bremerton
This proposal includes six parcels totaling approximately 17
acres. The area is relatively hilly and consists of steep
slopes, unstable soils, and wooded areas.
The area is mostly vacant with very few homes. The overall
density is very Iow and the lots are much larger than the
minimum lot size allowed by Bremerton zoning.
The subject properties were recently annexed to the City of
Bremerton along with adjacent industrial lands owned by
Ron Sciepko. Although they were residential in character,
they were included in a large industrial area on the
Comprehensive Plan with the understanding that a further
review would be conducted later. That review was done
during the 1996 Comprehensive Plan Amendment process
and the Plan was amended to place these smaller lots in the
"Low Density Residential" category.
F. PROPOSAL:
Rezone these six lots from "Industrial Park (IP)" to "Single-
family Residential (SF-1)". This zone is designed for large
homesites in areas without public sewer service. The zone
has a minimum lot size of 13,000 sq.ft, and will allow
considerable opportunity for further residential development
and the division of lands to smaller lot sizes. This proposal
will ensure Plan/Zone consistency.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
The criteria for approval of Rezones is contained in the "Administration" section of
Bremerton Municipal Code, chapter 21.02 LAND USE. The following criteria are
adequately met by these proposed rezones:
Criterion #1:
The rezones are substantively consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Since these rezones were triggered by Plan Amendments, they are all now
directly consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Criterion #2:
The rezones are necessary because (a) conditions in the immediate vicinity have
changed markedly to require a rezone in the public interest; or (b) the Rezone
will correct an inappropriate zone classification or boundary.
The Arvon Park Plan Amendment and Rezone resulted from a new and
unforeseen acquisition of a vacant lot on which to construct a neighborhood
park. This is a significant change in circumstances and, since the "PS" zoning
provides protection for this new park, the rezone is in the public interest.
The Sciepko Area rezone will correct an inappropriate industrial zone
classification that was imposed at the time of a recent annexation.
Criterion #3:
The rezone will not result in adverse environmental consequences.
In both of these situations, the proposed zoning is less physically intense than
the previous zoning, will allow less development, and will be more considerate
of environmentally sensitive areas, particularly in the hillsides of the Sciepko
area.
Criterion #4:
The Rezones bear a substantial relation to the public interest because there is a
need for the changes and that need will be served.
The Arvon Park rezone is directly related to a park and recreation project that
brought significant benefits to the neighborhood and is in the public interest. The
Sciepko Area proposal is aimed at the most reasonable land use and
development interests of the owners of properties in that area. The proposed
change will apply a Iow-density residential zone to an area that is predominantly
residential in character and will allow for further residential development as well.
Criterion #5:
Essential public facilities and services are presently available and adequate, or
can be reasonably made available.
A full range of urban public services are available to Arvon Park. Fewer urban
services are available to the Sciepko Area properties. However, they are within
the Urban Growth Area, inside the City, adjacent to a major transportation route
(SR-16), and can expect to see higher levels of service become available in the
future. In the meantime, the services are adequate to support the proposed SF-
1 zoning.
CONCLUSIONS
A. These areas were the subject of Comprehensive Plan Amendments in 1996.
B. The proposed rezones required City approval of their related Comprehensive
Plan Amendments, which has been done.
C. The proposed rezones adequately meet the approval criteria.
D. Approval of these rezones will maintain consistency between the Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Map, as required by State law.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Bremerton Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on these proposed
Zoning Amendments on June 18, 1996, and forwarded a recommendation to the City
Council for approval of the following rezone proposals, as attached hereto:
Exhibit "A"
Arvon Park
Change the park site from "Single-family Residential (SF-3)" to "Parks &
55-
Schools (PS)".
Exhibit "B"
Sciepko Area
Change from "Industrial Park (IP)" to "Single-family Residential (SF-1)".
This recommendation was made by the Planning Commission and forwarded for City
Council consideration on June 18, 1996.
Donald L. Pratt, Director
Department of Community Development
Secretary to the Planning Commission
Wayne 01sen, Chair/~
Bremerton Planning Corn/mission
CPA:zonamnd.696
PARK---Proposod Rezone
Arrow indicates the area proposed to be changed from
the current zoning of"Single-family Residential (SF-3)"
to "Parks & Schools (PS)".
NB
DR:
i{5
SF-3
PS
6
Exhibit
Sciepko Area --- Proposed Rezone
Arrow indicates the area proposed to be changed from
the current zoning of "Industrial Park (IP)"
to "Single-family Residential (SF-1)".
I1:'
'7
I'LANNiNG COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
UNAPPROVED DRAFT
December 17, 1996
Chairman Olsen called the meeting to order.
Approval of the Agenda: No corrections.
PUBLIC HEARING #1-VEHICLE STORAGE ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS
Donald Pratt, Director of Community Development, presented the staff report. This is an
ordinance that was first heard at the December 3rd meeting. The changes are a result from input
at that meeting. The Mayor supports adding boats, increasing the number of vehicles to 5 and
allowing uncontrolled parking tbr 3 days until the ordinance kicks in. The Mayor had no
position on the following and will defer to the Commission's judgement: excluding carports and
exempting large lots from the parking regulations. The Mayor opposes excluding inoperable
vehicles, applying regulations to front yards only, and determining the number of vehicles
allowable by the number of licensed drivers.
Dan Zimsen, homeowner, concerned that this will be entbrced by a vindictive neighbor and
will not be enforced across the board.
Morris Thompson, homeowner, concerned about commercial vehicles congesting the
neighborhood. Feels that parking should be eliminated on one side of the street on the narrow
streets.
Bill Kamp, homeowner, concerned about what the real intentions of the city are with this
ordinance. Feels that once the purpose is identified, it will be easier to draft a entbrceable
ordinance. Feels the current ordinance is intrusive on the residents and that parking is akeady
an issue for th~' City and that this ordinance will Ibrce more vehicles onto the streets.
Commissioner Robinson stated he could not support the ordinance as presented because as he
reads it, it would allow for 10 to 11 cars on and off the street.
Commissioner Adams stated she has to park in front of her home and has not had any
problems. Less vehicles on the property might encourage car pooling.
Commissioner Boyd feels that the ordinance is too simple for life. Most people use their
garages for storage.
PAGE -1-
Chairman Olsen questioned the Grandfather clause.
Donald Pratt, stated that the zoning code does have the Grandfather clause in it which states that
if the condition is legal at the time the law changes to make it illegal, the condition can continue
as long as it doesn't get bigger. Stated the intent of the ordinance is to improve the residential
quality of the neighborhoods.
Commissioner Stone stated that "operable" is already a part of the zoning code in Chapter 7.
Trying to come up with an ordinance that will make everyone happy is impossible.
Chairman Olsen feels the ordinance still leaves many questions unanswered.
Commissioner Stone moved to adopt the zoning code text amendment, with the following
changes as outlined in Item G, no more than five boats, motor vehicles, or trailers per
dwelling unit shall be parked in any residential zoning district on site for longer than 72
hours unless stored or parked in a garage or carport in a lawful manner. Seconded by
Commissioner Robinson. Question called: Boyd, no; Hancock, no; Adams, yes; Stone,
yes; Robinson, yes; Olsen, no. Tie vote, no action can be taken on a tie vote. Item
stands as no recommendation.
Discussion tbllowed among the Commissioners.
Bill Kamp, states that if the issue is junk vehicles, then let's attack junk vehicles.
Commissioner Stone moved to adopt the same motion a second time. Seconded by
Commissioner Robinson. Question called: Hancock, no; Adams, yes; Stone, yes;
Robinson, yes; Olsen, no; Boyd, no. Tie vote.
Chairman OIsen recommended that this issue be passed onto Council with no recommendation.
PUBLIC HEARING #2-ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENT
Chairman Olsen stated that this was adoption and application of proposed Health Care (HC) and
Shoreline Mixed Use (SMU) zones in the Harrison district.
Ron Hough, Planning Manager, presented the staff report. In September, 1996, the Bremerton
City Council adopted the Harrison District Plan as an amendment to the City's Comprehensive
Plan. Within the Plan, and adopted in concept, were recommendations for two new zones,
Health Care (HC) and Shoreline Mixed Use (SMU). Activation of these new zones requires
formal amendments to the text of the Zoning Ordinance and to the Official Zoning Map of the
City. The role of the Planning Commission in this process is to review the staff proposals in
PAGE -2-
detail, conduct a public heating, consider any public input that's offered, and make
recommendations to the City Council. The attached Exhibits "A', Health Care Zone; "B",
Shoreline Mixed Use zone; and "C', Proposed Zoning Map of Harrison District; describe the
zones as they were earlier discussed and eventually adopted in the Harrison Plan. The
descriptions or applications of these zones may be adjusted as necessary to best meet the
objectives of the Harrison Plan and interests of the community.
Mary Swanson, 2503 Cherry Place, concerned about the level of traffic and parking on Cherry
Place.
Commissioner Robinson pointed out that Ms. Swanson should contact the Engineering
Department regarding her parking issues.
Commissioner Stone indicated that the zoning alone should help with the concerns expressed
by Ms. Swanson.
Mrs. Trimbull, resident, stated that many times the residents know nothing about issues until
it is a done deal.
Discussion followed regarding the pathway requirements.
Commissioner Boyd moved that the Planning Commission recommend City Council
adoption of the Health Care zone and the Shoreline Mixed Use zone, as described in
Exhibits 'A' and 'B', as amendments to the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance. Seconded by
Commissioner Hancock. Question called: Adams, yes; Stone, yes; Robinson, yes; Boyd,
yes; Hancock, yes; Olsen, no. Motion passes.
Chairman Olsen stated that he feels under C-development guidelines,//3 and #5 are incorrect.
Commissioner Adams moved that the Planning Commission recommend City Council
application of the HC and SMU zones to properties in the Harrison District, as shown on
in Exhibit '.lE', as an amendment to the Official Zoning Map. Seconded by
Commissioner Stone. Question called. Stone, yes; Robinson, yes; Boyd, yes; Hancock,
yes; Adams, yes; Olsen, abstain. Motion passes.
Old Business:
Charleston Plan: Ron Hough stated they had a meeting with 25 in attendance. Good
discussion and input. Plan is moving along nicely.
Planning Conference is tentatively scheduled for January 25, 1997 at the Givens Community
Center.
PAGE -3-
Resolution regarding Planning Commission procedures. Type III meetings: Donald Pratt
stated that the procedure is being reviewed by the City Attorney and there have been no
comments back as of now.
Commissioner Stone moved that the Resolution be passed subject to adding in the last
paragraph a description of Type III decisions. Seconded by Commissioner Boyd.
Question called: Stone, yes; Adams, yes; Hancock, yes; Boyd, yes; Robinson, yes;
Olsen, yes. Motion passes.
Resolution regarding Adjustment of commissioners' terms to reflect change from nine
member commission to a seven member commission. Ms. Boyd's and Dingfield's term
moves from expiring in 1998 to 1997. The resolution also allows for reappointment.
Motion by Commissioner Stone for adoption and seconded by Commissioner Robinson.
Question called. Adams, yes; Hancock, yes; Boyd, yes; Robinson, yes; Stone, yes;
Olsen, yes. Mo6on passes.
New Business - Election of Officers
Chairman Olsen thanked everyone for their support during the past year. Chairman Olsen
moved that Larry Stone be named Chair. Seconded by Commissioner Boyd. No further
nominations. Approved unanimously. Commissioner Stone nominated Bill Robinson for
Vice-Chair. No further nominations. Approved unanimously.
Meeting Adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
V/aibel
Approved: '" _
Wyne Olden, Chairm~n
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: Ordinance No.
Revisions to BMC Chapter 11 regarding hazardous
conditions on sidewalks and within the fight-of-way.
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
2. CLEARANCE~S: (cormnent on back/~ ~ 3.
Director, Public Works/Utilities ~/~
City Attorney ..
Council Budget & Finance Committee ,:~~-~
Operations Committee __(-~~
k-~NDOP. SE~ >( rNFO~TION
5,1997
Public Works & Utilities
Randy Witt, City Engineer
January 27, 1997
EXHIBITS
A. Ordinance
APPROVED BY COUNCI~RES.I~.F_.QR SUBMITFAL:
COUNC. PP Sn cr
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
Revision to Chapter 11 of the Bremerton Municipal Code are proposed to incorporate recem changes in state
law r~garding liability and establishment of the sidewalk minimum replacement criteria. Staff recommends approval of
the ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council approve Ordinance No.
City Council pass Ordinance No.
upon first reading.
upon second reading.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
Director PW&U
City Engineer
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
.AMENDED
DATE:
11.
AGENDA BILL NO: q 7 - Oq q
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Chapter 11 BMC will remain in its current form.
IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
No effect on staffing and facilities, Street Division repair of damaged sidewalk is expected to increase and may
effect that budget item.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES
97045/bk
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE amending maintenance of hazardous conditions pertaining to sidewalks
and duties of abutting property owners, and amending chapters 11.08 and 11.10 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there are approximately 97 miles of sidewalk within
the City, that the City has historically been able to allocate only limited funds to a systematic plan
of inspecting the sidewalk system for defects and must rely on citizen correction and reporting of
defects for the prevention of injury; now, therefore,
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. Repeal. Section 11.08.010, REMOVAL OF SNOW AND ICE AND
OBSTRUCTIONS - OBLIGATION OF ABUTTING OCCUPIER - DEFINITIONS -
PENALTIES, is hereby repealed in its entirety.
Section 2. Amendment. BMC Section 11.10.010 is hereby amended to read as follows:
11.10.010 MAINTENANCE OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS PROHIBITED. It is
unlawful for the owner and/or any person, firm, or corporation occupying or having charge or
control of any premises abutting upon any public street, fight-of-way, or alley, or beneath such
public sidewalk area in the City to construct, place, cause, create;, or maintain, or permit to
remain upon any undeveloped right-of-way, or that part of said a fight-of-way located between
the curbline, or if there is no curbline, then between the adjacent edge of the traveled portion of
such fight-of-way and the abutting property line, any condition, structure, or object dangerous or
ha?ardous to the use of said fight-of-way by the members of the general public including, but not
limited to, the following conditions specified in (a) through (I):
8-WALK3.IRS - Disk 2 - 1/14/97
(~) Obst~ctions ~causcd by Ucc limbs,
ovc~ such public side~ o~ ~ghts~o~ay ~o~ ~hich the o~nc~ is ms~nsiblc undc~
13.10.030;
~> Sidc~k bl~ ha~n~ ~o~c ~ 3/4 inch vc~ical (st~p) scp~ation bct~n bl~ks
(~) B~okcn ~dYoc crocked sidc~ks havin~ ~om than 1 inch ho~zon~ (opening)
(d) R~s~ o~ sunken sidc~k ~ith a ~se o~ drop o~ ~o~e than 1 inch in 1 Foot,
(e) ~ctc~ boxes o~ other utility boxes havin~ ~om th~ a 3Y~ inch vc~i~ scp~ution.
(c~ ~e~cctive conditions on ~hc pl~tin~ s~ip, unless posted Fo~ p~n~.
~)~-~ ......... ~,,~'"--- ,v,,, ~ ..... ~umulations of ice ~d snow on public sidew~ks;
II~IIL-UI-W~ U~LW~II LIIG ~lOllll~ ~i~ i LIIGIG 1~ ~iO ~UlOllll~m tll~ll U~LWC¢Ii LIIG ~UJ~IIL ~U~
¢) Def~ consis~g of foreign ma~er on ~e public sidew~ks, including but not limited
to gravel, oil, grmse, or ~y other foreign subject matter that cause p~esth~s using s~d
sidew~k to f~l,. stumble or slip by r~son of the existence of such foreign matter.
~ Def~five h~d~s or fends or o~er simH~ s~cmr~ ~thin or imm~iately adjacent
to s~d right-of-way.
Section 3. Repeal. S~fion 11.10.020, LIABILITY FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE, is
hereby re~ in its entirety.
Section 4. Repea~New Section. BMC S~tion 11.10.030, DUTY TO MAINTAIN,
CLEAN AND REPAIR SIDEWALK, is hereby rep~ed in its entirety ~d a new S~fion
S-WA~.~S - Di~ 2 - 1/14/~ 2
11.10.030 is adopted to read as follows:
11.10.030 HAZARDOUS CONDITION - ABATEMENT. Whenever there is a hazardous
condition existing in violation of this chapter as identified under BMC 11.10.010, ~
vegetation obstructions subject to abatement under chapter 11.16, the City Engineer may give
written notice to the owner of the property abutting the location where the hazard exists requiring
such person to remove such hazard within ten (10) working days from the date of the notice,
except where the costs of sidewalk reconstruction may not be assessed under RCW 35.69.020.
At the request of the person subject to abatement procedures, the City Engineer may, at his/her
discretion, grant additional time for removal of the hazard. Such notice shall contain:
(a) The name of the owner of the property to whom the notice is addressed.
(b) The street address or legal description sufficient for identification of the property
abutting the location where the hazard exists.
(c) A description and location of the hazard in violation of this section.
(d) The date the notice was issued and the signature of the City Engineer or his designee.
(e) The date and time specifying when the hazard must be removed.
(f) A statement advising the owner that failure to comply with the order may result in
citation pursuant to Section 11.10.050.
Section 5. Repeal/New section. Section 11.10.040 SIDEWALK RELOCATION is
hereby repealed in its entirety and a new section BMC 11.10.040 is adopted to read as follows:
11.10.040 HAZARDOUS CONDITION - REPORTING.
(a) All property owners within the City shall report, in writing, to the Department of
Public Works and Utilities any hazardous condition described in section .010 within the public right-
of-way abutting their property. The City Attorney shall seek contribution for any claim or payment
for damages proximately caused by a pedestrian hazard where: 1) the abutting owner who had actual
S-WALIO.IR$ - Disk 2 - 1/14/97
knowledge of the condition failed to noti~ the Department as provided herein at least fourteen days
prior to the injury resulting from the hazard; 2) such failure to notify was a proximate cause of the
injuries, and 3) the City did not cause or create the defect or have actual knowledge of the defect.
(b) The Department of Public Works and Utilities shall create and maintain a list of pedestrian
hazards reported or otherwise known to the Department, and shall abate such hazards as soon as
reasonably practicable, given the nature of the hazard and the available resources as set forth in a
prioritized annual budget for such repairs.
Section 6. Repeal/New Section. BMC Section 11.10.050, PENALTY FOR
VIOLATION, is hereby repealed in its entirety and a new Section 11.10.050 is adopted to read
as follows:
11.10.050 VIOLATION - PENALTY. It shall constitute a civil infraction for any person,
firm or corporation to fail to comply with abatement requirements of the City Engineer pursuant
to BMC 11.10.030 or violate any other provision of this chapter. Such failure to comply and/or
violation shall be punishable as follows:
The base civil penalty per day or portion thereof for each violation is as follows:
1997.
a. First offense $100/day
b. Second offence for same violation $200/day
c Additional offenses for same violation $250/day
1997.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this
day of
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this
day of
APPROVED this~
S-WALK3.1R$ - Disk 2 - 1/14/97
DAVID FARR, Council President
day of
,1997.
ATTEST:
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
S-WALK3.IRS - Disk 2 - 1/14/97
5
SIDEWALK MINIMUM REPLACEMENT CRITERIA
F3/4' F 3/4'
SPALLING OF SIDEWALK "" ' " '
7 SIDEWALK WITH BROKEN OUT SECTION
8 OTHER HAZARD (DESCRIBE)
SC~E CITY OF BREMERTON SIDEWALK MINIMUM
HORIZ. 1:1
~ U~U~E8 REPLAGEMENT ORITERIA
PLOT 1:1
DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: RBE DESIGN BY:. OE ~ CHECKED BY: I SHE~
b- ~61 DATE 3-30-94 DATE~ DATE~ OF