The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/02/98 AGENDABREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 239 4TH STREET BREMERTON, WA 98337 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 2, 1998 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M. A. General Council Business CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. A. Pledge Of Allegiance B. Invocation CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If separate discussion is desired on an item, it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at the request of a Council member. A. Minutes of Council Meeting - November 10, 1998 #AB98-268 B. Professional Services Agreement Update for Wastewater #AB98-269 Treatment Plant SCADA Process Control System 5. 6. 7. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT PUBLIC RECOGNITION -- (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes) ORDINANCES A. Ordinance No. 4641 (Second Reading) Reducing the Business & Occupation (B&O) Tax on Garbage and Refuse Business Ordinance (First Reading) Updating City Purchasing Policy Ordinance (First Reading) on 1999/2000 Budget (CONTINUED ON BACK) #AB98-266 #AB98-270 #AB98-271 RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 2683 Setting Fees for Jarstad Aquatic Center Resolution No. 2684 Setting Fees for Gold Mountain Golf Complex #AB98-272 #AB98-273 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS - (TO BEGIN AT 6:00 P.M. OR LATER) A. Public Hearing and Resolution No. 2681, Regarding Recovery of Fees for the Abatement of Garbage and Debris on the property located at 654 Highland Avenue Bo Public Hearing and Resolution No. 2682, Regarding Recovery of Fees for the Abatement of Garbage and Debris on the property located at 428 S. Lafayette #AB98-274 #AB98-275 /rD AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF MEETING -- NOVEMBER 10, 1998 FOR AGENDA OF: ORIGINATING DEPT: ORIGINATOR: DATE SUBMITTED: DECEMBER 2, 1998 CITY COUNCIL DAVID FARR, PRESIDENT NOVEMBER 23, 1998 2. ~: (comment on back 3. ~: if necessary) ENDORSEMENT INFORMATION, ~"APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: 8. RECOM]4ENDATION: RESPONSIB_LE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE: 11. AMENDED 3A TAPES #1580 - t.~APPROVED DRAFT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 10, 1998 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Tuesday, November 10, 1998, at 5:30 P.M., with Council President David Farr presiding. Council members present were Jim Reed, Carlos Montgomery, Carol Arends, Mike Shepherd, Lon Overson, John Law, Cecil McConnell, and Wayne Olsen. Also present were City Attorney Glenna Malanca and Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council President Farr, and invocation given by Council member Carol Arends. President Fart made the following announcements: (1) The City Council held a Study Session prior to the meeting tonight, to discuss general Council Business; (1) Following the Council meeting tonight, there will be a Study Session to discuss the 1999/2000 Budget, in the Council Conference Room; and (1) City Council will hold a 45-minute Executive Session on Thursday, November 12, 4:45 P.M. in the Council Conference Room, followed by a Study Session to discuss the 1999/2000 Budget. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of Meeting - October 28, 1998 #AB98-249 #0034 M/S/C/U (McConnell/Montgomery) Motion ~ approve the Consent Agenda as presented. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the Council. #0060 MISICIU (Montgomery/Arends) On November 10, 1998, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: 225336 and 225374 through 225467 in the amount of $170,999.53; and Regular Payroll in the amount of $914,785.82 for the period ending October 31, 1998. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mrs. Arends provided a brief report on the Gateway project, and added it seems to be moving along on schedule. TAPE #1580 - City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 10, 1998 Page 2 of 7 Mr. Shepherd reported on a "Livable Communities Fair" he attended in Seattle over the weekend. He also announced the next District 5 Neighborhood meeting to be held Thursday, November 19, 1998 at 6:30 P.M. at the Memorial Lutheran Church at 10th & Veneta. The Program will include a presentation on Block Watch; an awards ceremony for Larry Dickerson; and a discussion on Emergency Preparedness. Mr. Overson reported on the United States Roller Hockey team, and reminded the public that 6 of the 10-member team are from the Bremerton area. On Sunday they defeated South Africa 11-1; on Monday they tied with England 3-3; and this evening they are playing Angola. Mr. Law thanked all the people who called him and sent cards showing concern about his health this past week. President Farr reported it was nice to be back after a recent trip to the Washington Coast. LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT REPORT A response was provided to a list of questions asked by Del Knauss at the October 28, 1998 City Council meeting: 1) What is the cost for sidewalk improvements, bulb outs and lights along Burwell Street? Approximately $594,000, which also includes the cost of landscaping and storm drainage adjustments required for the bulb outs. The total contract cost for the Burwell Street improvements is currently $1,194,000. On this stage of work, all construction costs, including construction management, are being paid for by a combination of Federal Highway Administration and State Transportation Improvement Board funds. There are no City Arterial Street Funds being used for this stage of work. City funds will be used in future stages. 2) Will this Council take steps to change the Council Rules & Procedures to stop Council from taking action on initiative items that are on the ballot? Per the City Attorney, RCW 42.17.130(1) permits elected legislative bodies to consider and vote upon ballot propositions. The action of the Council must be structured as required by that statute. The City Council is considering whether to address Council Rules with clarifications and updates involving several of the provisions.- The Council would likely consider the Public Recognition Rule, and addressing ballot propositions during a review. It is a policy decision for the Council to make. 3) Is the parking lot behind City Hall supposed to be used for political campaigning since it is City property? The response to this question assumes that the issue is the presence of campaign signs in Council Member(s) private vehicles parked in the City parking lot. Again, the relevant statute is RCW 42.17.130, which prohibits any public official or public employee from using public facilities to further a campaign or ballot issue. Since the signs are within the private property of the Council member, there is no cost or involvement of the City, and the TAPE #1580 -- City Council Reg. Mtg. l~i'r:.utes November 10, 1998 Page 3 of 7 private vehicle is only :~'~.¢orarily in the C~y .~arking lot, it appears there is no violation of the code. ' Since the Cou,my .~ trying to find a way to set the Commissioners pay a~; have rulings an~- advice from the Attorney General, doesn't the Council ;~'ee/ :hey should ge~ ,'YG~ner legal advice? The City has reviewed the issues wi~ Municipal ResearCq on several occasions within the last two years. The City has determined to alt.~, its process in order to eliminate any possible concern relatirG_ ,-o the setting of ~ City Council's salaries. The City believes the issue to be. m..solved. 5) When w~i the City know whether tax share from the County is going 22 be severely low.. =_nd what steps are being taken to cover any shortfall? T~ 1999/2000 prelimi~,y budget shortfall has been made up by a combination ~ ~ucing supplies ~ services as well as some minor reduction in staffing whi% ',vas achieved t~ attrition and not layoffs. 8A - MOTION TO ABEND THE LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP, #AB98-250 Resolution No. 2666, section 1 states h..in the event a member becomes incapacitated...the ~r's organiz~ may appoint a designee to serve.., until the City ~ appoints a new member." Due to the passing of Mr. Russell Nickerson, Mr. L:y~e Nelson has bc.."n requested by the Bremerton Naval Museum to represent their interests. I~r. Nelson has been serving in this capacity since August 1998. It is recommended that the City Council appoint Mr. Nelson to the Lodging Tax Advisory Comm~ by Motion. Mrs. Arends, Chairman ~f the Lodging T~x Advisory Committee, stated that Mr. Nickerson was a valued ,-'~mber of the CorrcrC~ee, and a very brave person who continued to serve ever~ ',hen seriously ill After his passing, Mr. Lyle Nelson replaced him on the Ournmittee, and has also done an excellent job. She recommends Council pass this Resolution. Mr. Law added that he has known Mr. Nelson for a number of years, and believes he will be an ~ to the Committee. #0390 MISICIU (Montg~?~ery/Arends) Motiar~ to approve the appointment of Mr. Lyle Nelson and amend ~ Lodging Tax Ack~ Committee membership. 9A - ORDINANCE (~ READING) LEVYING PROPERTY TAXES FOR COLLECTION IN 1999~ ¢,,AB98-251 The City's property taxes a'e levied on an at, ual basis through passage of an ordinance. The proposed ordinance will implement a general property tax levy at the statutory rate limit and special levies ~ EMS and bond redemption at rates previously authorized by ~ voters. The ~ Department of Revenue, via the County Assessor's Offi~ has provided the ]angu_ age of the ordinance, in order to comply with the provisk:r~s of Referendum 47. TAPE #1580 --' City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 10, 1998 Page 4 of 7 Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, explained that this is the first of two ordinances required under Referendum 47 to levy up to the 106 Levy Limit. With a passage by a simple majority of Council, this ordinance levies up to the first threshold limitation on the City's authority to levy property taxes, which is limited to 1998 property tax revenue, plus a percentage increase equal to the change in the Implicit Price Deflator (IPD). This is a measure of inflation similar to the CPI, but at a more conservative rate, which is .85 percent. Passage of this ordinance will levy property taxes up to that limit. Mr. McConnell was under the impression that the tax levy rate was going to be the same as last year, so he questioned the .85 percent increase. Mr. Hanna explained the limitation under Referendum 47 is not the only one of the limits that State Law places upon the ability of the City to levy property taxes. The other constraint is the State Statute placing an absolute limit on the maximum rate that a City is allowed to levy, which for Bremerton, would be $3.325 per thousand dollars of assessed valuation. Presently, the City is at that limit for 1998. The new preliminary assessed value numbers received from the County Assessor show that the assessed valuation for the City may actually go down. Mr. Law asked if a person's property remained at the same assessed value, there would not be any difference in the tax that individual would pay?. Mr. Hanna stated that as far as what the City would levy, that was correct, but he reiterated that the City is only one of a multitude of tax entities allowed to levy property taxes. Mr. Reed asked why the City was proposing this ordinance, and what would happen in the event this ordinance does not pass? He also wanted to know if the City was adding the increase because it is allowable or just because the City wants to levy all it could? Mr. Hanna responded this ordinance is the Legislative action, which levy's property taxes for 1999, and the City cannot tax without it. The increase is being added because it is allowable, and the City wants to levy all that it can, which is the way the ordinance is worded. #0656 M/SIC (Montgomery/Arends) Motion to approve ordinance (first reading) levying property taxes for collection in 1999. Vote on Motion: Motion passed. In Favor: Oppose: Arends, Montgomery, Shepherd, Overson, Law McConnell, Olsen, Law, Fart Reed 9B - ORDINANCE (FIRST READING) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF PROPERTY TAXES AT A RATE IN EXCESS OF THE INCREASE IN THF IMPLICIT PRICE DEFLATOR, #AB98-252 TAP E #1580 ~ City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 10, 1998 Page 5 of 7 The requirements of Referendum 47, passed by the voters of the State in 1997, require that the City Council pass by super-majority a separate action stating their intention to levy property taxes at a rate greater than the change in the Implicit Price Deflator, IPD. For 1999 taxes, the change in the IPD is .85%. If this ordinance is not passed by a vote of at least 6-3, the growth of future tax levies will be limited by this rate of change. Rich Hanna., City Treasurer, explained that this was the second of the two ordinances required under Referendum 47 to levy up to the 106 percent Levy Limit. He further explained that because the City is currently at the statutory maximum for property tax levies, the effect of the passage or non-passage of this ordinance on the 1999 property tax revenue is zero. The only advantage in passing this ordinance is that the City will reserve that authority to "cover" the balance of that 6% increase in some future year should the assessed valuation begin to increase rapidly. In his opinion, this is not very likely to occur; however, it is a decision to be made by the City Council. Elizabeth Buell asked for clarification on the definition of the "lmplidt Pdce Deflator". Mr. Hanna stated that it is a measure of inflation, similar to the Consumer Price Index. He explained the affect of this ordinance is to increase the property tax revenue to the City from the current .85% increase over the 1998 revenue level (which is approximately $4 million) to a maximum of a 6% increase over the 1998 revenue to the City. Mr. McConnell asked which year this tax levy would apply, and would it be reserved for a one-time use, or used each and every year. In order to help explain what would happen, if the City passed both ordinances this year, Mr. Hanna gave a hypothetical example. If in the year 2000, the City's assessed valuation increased by 20% over 1999, the City would be constrained by the change in the IPD, with the passage of the first ordinance, but could increase the property tax revenue to the City up to a maximum of 6% with the passage of the second ordinance. There would be an additional 6% carried forward from 1999 that the City was not able to use, and could now use at the Council's discretion. However, if the ordinance does not pass, the City would be able to increase property tax revenue up to 6% over 1999, but no further. Mr. Law asked if this only goes back two years, or is this 106% accumulative back to 1985. Mr. Hanna explained that the statute says "... of the highest amount of regular property taxes that could have been lawfully levied in the City in any year since 1985", but in practical terms, 1998 was the City's largest allowable levy in that time span. It is a one-time 6%. Mr. Overson felt that the Treasurer would not propose this ordinance if it was not in the best interest to the City, but also noted that City Council passes the actual levy amount, not the rate, each year. This ordinance is not changing anything currently, but simply TAPE #1580 - City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 10, 1998 Page 6 of 7 provides the authority to change it, if it would benefit the City. #1315 M/S/C (MontgomerylOverson) Motion to approve ordinance (first reading) limiting the City's levy increase to 106% of the 1998 levy. Vote on Motion: Motion failed. In Favor: Oppose: Shepherd, Arends, Montgomery, Overson, Fart Reed, Olsen, McConnell, and Law 10A - PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ORDINANCE (FIRST READING) FOR SHERIDAN HEIGHTS ANNEXATION 75% PETITION, #AB98-25_3 A legally sufficient petition, representing 75-percent of assessed value of real property within the Sheridan Heights area, has been secured. The area proposed to be annexed has been modified by staff to represent not only an area represented by sufficient signatures, but an area that complies with the state requirements for annexation. A public hearing shall be held before City Council, in accordance with RCW 35.13.140. Any interested persons may appear and voice either approval or disapproval for this annexation. Following the hearing the Legislative body must approve the ordinance annexing the area as proposed and establishing land-use designations on the first reading and pass it on the second reading; or reject the annexation. Terrie O'Neill, Municipal Services Coordinator, stated approximately 400 people live in the 80 acres that make up this area, which contains dense population, as well as opportunities for development within the City. Larry Branch and E.L. Sturdivant were in attendance at the meeting, and spoke in favor of the annexation. Christopher & Susan Bell sent an e-mail voicing their support. Janice Smith lives adjacent to the proposed annexation area, and felt strongly that her area should be included. Mr. Reed asked what dictates the boundaries for an annexation. Ms. O'Neill explained that there is a list of criteria contained in the State statute, which define what can and cannot be annexed. In addition, there must be 75% of the assessed value based on the County. For now, this was the largest petition area that could be done while keeping in compliance with the State. #1733 MISICIU (Montgomery/Olsen) Motion to approve ordinance (first reading) annexing the area known as Sheridan Heights and fixing the effective date of annexation. 10B - PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ORDINANCE (FIRST READING) FOR CAMP McKEAN ANNEXATION 75% PETITION, #AB98-254 TAPE #1580 -- City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes November 10, 1998 Page 7 of 7 A legally sufficient petition, representing 75-percent of assessed value of real property within the Camp McKean area, has been secured. A public hearing shall be held before City Council, in accordance with RCW 35.13.140. Any interested persons may appear and voice approval or disapproval for this annexation. Following the hearing the Legislative body must approve the ordinance annexing the area as proposed and establishing land-use designations on the first reading and pass it on the second reading; or reject the annexation. Terrie O'Neill, Municipal Services Coordinator, stated the Department of the Navy owns this area. She explained the difference between this annexation and the previous annexation, is that this is going to be by "default zone", which means that zoning has been assigned administratively and there will be a review in 60 days. This is because the use will remain the same, which is a park and recreation facility. (Councilman John Law left the Council Meeting at 6:15 P.M.) #1900 MISICIU (Montgomery/Overson) Motion to approve ordinance (first reading) annexing the area known as Camp McKean and fixing the effective date of annexation. With no further business, meeting adjourned at 6:25 P.M. PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk DAVID FAI~R, City C~f'~l Presi,d~ 4¢ ~ City of Bremerton P J/DF/Is cc: Normal Distribution FileNault AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - UPDATE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SCADA PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM FOR AGENDA OF: ORIGINATING DEPT: ORIGINATOR: DATE SUBMITTED: December 2, 1998 Public Works and Utilities J. Poppe, Wastewater Mark'd:) November 17, 1998 2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back/~,/D 3. EXI41BITS Director, Public Works/Utilities -~4~,~~ ,, Professional Services Agreement with City Attorney .~)~~~ne Engineering City Treasurer Council Budget & Finance Committ~,~ Operations Committee X/, APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT B2/R SUBMITTAL: MAYOR~ ~. COUNCIL PRESIDEIq~,~,-%.~~ 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The Department of Public Works and Utilities seeks approval of the attached professional services agreement with Casne Engineering to update the software and control logic for the Bremerton Wastewater Treatment Plant SCADA system. The consultant's quotation is for $41,802 to complete the tasks contained in the Scope of Work, and not to exceed $50,000, should the City of Bremerton request, in writing, additional services. 8. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with Casne Engineering to update the control logic for the WWTP SCADA system for a price not to exceed $50,000 and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract subject to City Administrative Policies and Procedures. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: Wastewater Manager WWTP Manager PULLED TABLED 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 11. AGENDA BILL NO: qB- 2. ~ ~ q 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Decrease reliability of treatment plant process control. Increase liability of City should WWTP discharge to Puget Sound violate water quality standards. Increase employee safety hazards. Violation of NPDES Permit. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: STAFF: BUDGET: EQUIPMENT: The improved automation will allow for more effective use of operations and maintenance time and reduce required overtime for emergency response. The 1998 budget includes the costs of this professional services agreement. This will improve optimization of process equipment increasing the reliability of meeting water quality standards from the WWTP. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES AGENDABL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is ~veen the City c,£ E_~-emerton, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City" and CASNE Enginee~x 27.c.(hereinafter referred to as CASNE Engineering). ' WITN ES SETH: 1. SCOPE: To redesign the controls tbr the five ~ ._-dreary effluent pumps, including the primary effluent tank level sensor =d transmitter, a sir :o the primary effluent sampler, P.E. bypass valve control and the control ~ogic for level contra5 :[~e P.E. tank with revised SCADA screen. This work will include prox-iding a new Siemens 545 PLC at Building 500 along side the existing PLC in CP-2 and providing new remote I/O Iocm~.i in the Primary Effluent Pump room alongside the existing panel LP-A2_ " A. Control Description & Programming Standards The goal of this task is to develop a set of desz.~zdons for new process controls. The descriptions will be used to determine equipment ~mming requirements, and SCADA requirements. 1. CASNE Engineering xdll meet with City persrrrnel to discuss existing control strategies and revise as requires. 2. CASNE Engineering will provide standards m ?e used on this project along the lines of that submitted for City review. Modules w;2 '_~ implemented in ladder and special function blocks. 3. CASNE Engineering aSil provide written desz,'.$.qions o~' programmed operation of the primary effluent pumping. B. Hardware Specifications The goal of this task is to clearly identify all hm4a-are components needed for the system upgrade. The specification Mll be used for ovmer requisition and for the bid specifications. All equipment will be identified ns~g_ the manufacturer name and Model Number of the hardware of software. 1. PLC hardware specifications for procuremem C. Electrical Drawings The goal of this task is to document all wiring ,zz-e5 in the upgrade, identify unused wires, and include in bid specification documents. 1. CASNE Engineering will develop the wiring diagrams as required. Wiring diagrams will be based on existing diagrams and modified as required. 2. City personnel will verify the accuracy of the wiring diagrams. D. Bidding and Construction Assistance The goal of this task is to develop a set ofbidd~]e specifications for the assembly and installation of new equipment and provide coma-action assistance. 1. City personnel will supply CASNE Engin ~eer?'.,-,_ng with standard working for Bremerton bid specifications. 2. CASNE Engineering will contact Under~vk,.,~rs Laboratories and get a determination from them concerning this specific project. 3. CASNE Engineering will submit a set ofslx2dfications to be reviewed and commented on. 4. City will send for bids. 5. CASNE Engineering will assist the City in evaluating the bids. 6. City to award the contract. E. PLC Programming and Startup CASNE Engineering's effort is based on implementing the control strategies in ladder logic. CASNE Engineering will test the compie*,ed system and place the P.E. pumps into operation. CASNE Engineering will perform the following work: 1. Primary effluent pumping controls. 2. Programming status, alarms and set points .:40,:~ from SCADA. 3. PLC configuration. F. SCADA System Enhancements The goal of this task is to make the SCADA ~-s',em modifications associated with the primary effluent pumping. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. CASNE Engineenng will provide a revised Communication Networks diagram. CASNE Engineering will provide a fiber patch panel diagram with connection table. CASNE Engineering will develop a P.E. SC,-x. DA screen. CASNE Engineering will modify SCADA database. CASNE Engineering will collect and display mn times. CASNE Engineenng will modify alarm on P.E. pumps. -2- G. Documentation and Training The goal of this task is to provide operator training and documentation of the upgraded P.E. pumping control system. Make it operable and maintainable. CASNE Engineering will perform the following work: 1. SCADA screen documentation. 2. PLC program documentation and training. 2. TERM: Contract shall commence on November 2. 1998 and will terminate April 1, 1999, unless otherwise extended by the City.. 3. COMPENSATION: The City. shall pay CASNE Engineering Inc. the sum Forty. -One Thousand Eight Hundred Two Dollars ($41.802.00), for the services provided hereunder, as specified below. In the event The Citx~ requests, in writing, additional services at the rate set forth in the proposal, the total amount of compensation under this agreement shall not exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00). CASNE Engineering shall submit regular statements describing the services rendered with a breakdown for work completed as authorized under this Agreement. The City, upon receipt of the completed statement, shall promptly process said claim for payment. 4. RELATIONSHIP OF P.MtTIES: The parties understand and agree that CASNE Engineering is a finn skilled in matters pertaining to SCADA and will perform independent functions and responsibilities in the area of its particular field of expertise. CASNE Engineering_and its personnel shall act as independent contractors and not employees of the City. As such they have no authority to bind neither the City. or control employees of the City, contractors, or other entities. Within the performance of these duties, CASNE Engineering shall work under the direction of the Pat Coxon, City. ofBremerton, W'WWP Manager. 5. INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE: CASNE Engineering agrees to provide for State industrial insurance coverage for its personnel as required by State law. ° 6. LICENSE AND TAXES: CASNE Engineering shall possess a current Bremerton Business License and any regulatory, license required to fulfill CASNE Engineering obligations under this Agreement. B & O taxes shall be paid when due and CASNE Engineering, by this Agreement, assigns any payments due under this Agreement to the City Clerk for payment of such taxes, which have been declared delinquent. 7. INSURANCE AND HOLD HARMLESS: Prior to and during the performance of the work covered by this Agreement CASNE Engineering shall provide the Risk Manager for the Citw of Bremerton with evidence that it has obtained and maintains in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement a policy of professional liability, insurance, providing coverage of at least $500,000.00 against professional liability for errors and omissions in connection with the work to be performed by CASNE Engineering under this Agreement. Risk Manager shall be provided thirty. (30) days' ~vritten notice of any cancellation of said professional liability insurance. CASNE Eng!neering shall, at all times, be solely responsible for the acts or failures to act of its personnel which occur or arise in any way out of the performance of this Agreement CASNE Engineering agrees to save and hold the City., its personnel and officials, harmless from all costs, expenses, losses, and damages, including the cost of defense, incurred as a result of any acts or omissions of CASNE Engineering personnel relating to the performance of this Agreement. 8. GENERAL CONDITIONS: a. Reports and Information -CASNE Engineering, at such times and in such forms as the City may require, shall furnish the City such reasonable periodic reports and documents as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Agreement, the costs and obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Agreement. CASNE Engineering will maintain accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices to substantiate all invoiced amounts. Entire Agreement - This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and both parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been fully set forth in the text of this Agreement c. Amendments - The parties hereby further a~ee that this Agreement cannot be amended or modified without the written concurrence of both parties. d. Notices - Any notices required to be given by the City to CASNE Engineering or by CASNE Engineering_to the City shall be in waiting and delivered to the parties at the following addresses: City Clerk 239 Fourth St. Bremerton, WA 98337 Pat Coxon, Bremerton WWTP 1600 Oyster Bay Ave. S. Bremerton, WA 98312 e. Waiver - Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of such right or power at any time be taken to be a waiver of any other breach. f. Compliance with State, Local and Federal Laws - CASNE Engineering_agrees to comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws in performance of all services under this Agreement. g. Applicable La'az Venue - This Ag~ment shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws o:-5:e State of Washin=~.cn and, in the event of dispute, the venue of any action brought hereunder si.ail be in Kitsap Count-.- Superior Court. h. Attorney Fees - 77ze mbstantially prevaii~, g party, in any litigation arising hereunder shall be entitled to its reasonable a-tome?s fees and cotax costs, including appeals, if any. 9. NONDISCRI3~IL~-ATION: CASNE Fn~neering shall not discriminate in employment or services to the public on 5~e basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status or disability, excep('empto)2ent actions based on a bona fide occupational qualification. 10. TERMI ATION: This Agreement rnv. v be terminated by either party, for convenience upon thirty (30) days' v, virt~ notice to the other parc).-, or for cause if either party fails substantially to perform through no fauh of the other and does net commence correction within five (5) days of written notice and diligently completes the correction thereafter. Upon such termination, City will be entitled to reports showing rite status of all maners upon which CASNE Engineering_is advising the City as oft he effective date of termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF ~he parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year indicated. CITY OF BREMERTON Date: BY: Lh~X S. HORTON, Mayor DEPA/~T~,EN, J~ APPROVAL: -W. EUGE~iE S LEAM~.E., Director of Public Works and Utilities APPROVED AS TO FORM: GLENNA MALANCA, Ciw Attorney RECEIVED FOR FILING: KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, CiTY CLERK i~ICASNE ENGINEERING, INC E/ectrical En~ineerfn~l Consultants 'EE ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Project Name WWTP PRhMARY EFFLUENT CONTROLS UPGRADE File FEESg-l-98 Project Number 98010.302 Tab FEEST1 Phase Tasklt DescripUon of Task Project Senior ! Senior Auto Clerical TotaJ Labor Manager Englneer!~nglneerl CAD (WP) I Code [(PM) [SE) i (SE) ii (CADDR. 1. DISCUSS CONTROL STRATEGY & WRITE OUT 2 16 I 21,730 ~ 21,900 2. PROVIDE PROGRAMMING MODULES - 20 ~ : B. .AR°WARE SP C,F,OAT,ON ! ' '. PLC SPEC,.,C^T'ONS i SAMPLER PUMP W~RING OIAGR^MS i I S iS BYPASS VALVE WIRING'DIAGRAMS I I 6~l i $ $912 ~ 5 I 2912 P.E. TANK LEVEL OIAGRAMS 6 ~ ~ CP-2 ELEVATIONS 12 8 ~ $1,596 CP-2 AUXILLIARY ELEVATIONS 12 , 8 LP-A2 ELEVATIONS [ 12 ~ 8 t $1,596 QC REVIEW 8 2840 D. BID & CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE I WRITE SPECIFICATION j 2 16 I I 8 $2,090 REVIEW WITH CITY 8 [ 4 ~ 2940 EVALUATE THE BiOS [ 2 8 $970 REVIEW SUBMITTALS i 16 I ! ;FACTORY TEST t i ) S 1 ,S20 E. PLC PROGRAMMING I I [ ~ I I 1. P.E. PUMPING CONTROL PROGRAMMING [ 2 I 40 I I 2. PROGRAMMING STATUS & ALARMS, & I t 12 I ~ I 24,010 SETPOINTS TO/FROM SCADA [ I I ! I 3. PLC CONFIGURATION ) ) 10 ii Ii ~ !t $950 ~ 23,040 4. STARTUP & TESTING i 32 I I F. SCADA ENHANCEMENTS ] fIi i REFINECOMMUNICAT'ONSNETWOR DIAGRAM,I , i 2. PROVIDE A FIBER PATCH PANEL DIAGRAM 2 I 1612 ) 22,414 WITH CONNECTION TABLE t 3. DEVELOP SCADA SCREEN 14 ,I $1,330 G. DOCUMENTATION AND TRAINING PLC OOCUMENTAnON & TRAiNiNG 2 ~ 2~,~0 SCREEN DOCUMENTATION AND TRAiNiNG ~ 2~90 WARRANTY 2 30 $3,060 Total Hoursi 22 J 354 j ~ i j 72 j 12 Expense c°m p utatl°n: 1SubT°tal $40'584Expenses Sl ,218 THE ABOVE RATES & FEES QUOTED ARE VALID FOR A PERIO0 OF 90 DA YS. TOTALI $4~1-,802 1. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. Reducing the B & O Tax on Garbage and Refuse Business AGENDA BILL -- BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ¢'~1 FOR AGENDA OF: ORIGINATING DEPT: ORIGINATOR: DATE SUBMITTED: Treasurer Rich Nov. 5, 1998 2. CLEARANCES: Comment of back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: Dir. Admin. Services~,..~//'¢/.--~-~-~~ Proposed Ordinance Deputy City City Attomey~~. ~ Fiscal & Budget Comm~~-- ENDORSEMENTS ~ INFORMATION ~PROVED BY CO~IL PRESIDENT FOR~BMI~AL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: This ordinance will continue the process, begun in January of 1995, of gradually reducing the B & O Tax on garbage and refuse businesses within the City to a level consistent with other utility tax rates. The intention is to reduce the tax rate by one percent each year until the rate is reduced to six percent. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve on first reading the Ordinance reducing B & O tax on garbage and refuse businesses. Motion to pass on second reading the Ordinance No.~&~'~ reducing B & O tax on garbage and refuse businesses. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: Treasurer Mayor NIA November 1999 PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDEDSA 11. AGENDA BILL NO: ~"~- 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: The tax rate on garbage and refuse businesses will remain at the current level. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS~ FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES' This change is included in the revenue assumptions of the 1999 - 2000 Preliminary Budget. This creates a reduction of General Fund revenues of approximately $47,500 compared to the prior tax rate. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: BMC 5.02.070(p) ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE relating to occupation tax for the garbage/refuse business, and amending Chapter 5.02 of the Bremerton Municipal Code. THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. Amendment. Section 5.02.070 of the Bremerton Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 5.02.070 OCCUPATION TAX - RATES - WHO MUST PAY - UTILITIES. There is hereby levied upon and there shall be collected from every person as hereinafter provided for the act or privilege of engaging in business activities within the City, whether his office or place of business be within and/or without the City, an occupation tax, sometimes herein referred to as the "tax", in amounts to be determined by application of the rates given against the value of products, including byproducts, gross proceeds of sales or gross income of the business, as the case may be, as follows: (p) Upon every person, firm, or corporation engaged in the business of collecting garbage, refuse, hazardous materials or other waste within the corporate limits of the City an annual tax of six, teer~ ~i~!! percent (-16%) ~--'"~i~ of the total gross income rendered within the City, effective January 1, -1-998 ~!~. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days from passage and publication. APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __ day of PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __ day of , 1998. , 1998. APPROVED this __. day of DAVID FARR, Council President ,1998. ATTEST: LYNN HORTON, Mayor KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk 1. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. Updating the City's Purchasing Policy AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL FOR AGENDA Of: ORIGINATING DEPT: ORIGINATOR: DATE SUBMITTED: Dec. 2, 1998 ~ Treasurer _~,t RiCh Hanna ~ Nov. 18, 1998 ~ 2. CLEARANCES: Comment of back if necessary) Dir. Admin Serv. tff 3. EXHIBITS: Proposed Ordinance APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION' The City's current purchasing policy has been in place since 1984. Since that time, no adjustment has been made to the dollar values at which the various procedures are required. The proposed ordinance will raise the threshold for formal bidding of general purchases from $10,000 to $20,000. It will also increase the thresholds for services as follows; letter agreement increased from $5,000 maximum to $10,000 maximum; contract with Mayor's approval increased from $10,000 maximum to $20,000 maximum; contracts exceeding $20,000 will require Council approval. o RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve on first reading the ordinance up-dating the City's purchasing policy. Motion to pass on second reading Ordinance No. updating the City's purchasing policy. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: Dir. Admin. Serv. Purchasing Manager N/A N/A PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED AME 11. AGENDA BILL NO: ~) oa- c~5:~ ~0 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Continuation of current policy. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: Modest savings of staff and Council time as fewer purchases will require Council action. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: BMC 2.76, CPI index. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE amending Chapter 2.76 of the Bremerton Municipal Code and updating the City's purchasing procedures. Section 1. Amendment. Section 2.76.100 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.76.100 GENERAL PURCHASES- UNDER (a) A department manager or designee, acting within their department budget appropriation, may authorize the purchase of goods, rnatedals and equipment, or the lease or rental of equipment costing less than ....... '"'"'":~:' ......... :~ ........... $ ......... ~~. Projects or purchases may not be divided into units or phases to ~-void bid call requirements. (b) If the cost is less than $I 0,O0O.OO2~~, the Purchasing Officer has the authority to determine whether the acquisition is made in the best interests of the City through the use of telephonic or facsimile quotations, sealed quotation or formal bid call. Section 2. Amendment. Sec~on 2.76.200 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.76.200 FORMAL BID- OVER $~' .... ^"~',~,,.,,,.,~0...'.~.~'~' ......... ~ ............ ~:~ ........ (a) The procurement of goods, materials or equipment for which the cost of a single item .0..[..~..~!.u....a~!!y of a single item is ~ excess of Ten Thousand Dollarst,,,'"'~",,,,~,,,,.~'"" ~,,,]~~'"======r============================= ~~.!~!!~!.~i~i~)~ inc ud ng sa es transact on taxes, shall be by bid call. Section 3. Amendment. Section 2.76.300 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.76.300 PROFESSIONAL AND PURCHASED SERVICES. (3) All professional and purchased services utilized by the City from $.-0- to $Sfl~36d~.~:. ~ in value may be by purchase order and letter of understanding. Professional and Purchased Service Agreements in excess of $~~..'.::~!~, but less than · ~ f'~ .""'t~'"~,"~ .-'~.~,""':""':!i~:'"":'"":'""::!.:::'''*:'''~': · ~ ~ .1 $,'-',""'-'.','-'~i~, require a formal contract ,,, ,,, approval by the Professional and Purchased Service Agreements in"'~'~'~'~'"'~ ......................................... '"~'~"~F;~ ~ ~ i'":~:'"?'::~::':::::':':!ii::'::' ...... · · $,-,,,-,,,,,.,,,.,2~~ require Councd approval. Section 4. Effective Date. ~ ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days from passage and publication. APPROVED by the City ~1 of the City of Bremerton this 1998. day of PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this 1998. __ day of APPROVED this __ day of DAVID FARR, Council President , 1998. ATTEST: LYNN HORTON, Mayor KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. Adopting the 1999 - 2000 Biennium Budget FOR AGENDA OF: ORIGINATING DEPT: ORIGINATOR: DATE SUBMITTED: Dec. 2, 1998 Nov. 23, 1998 ' 2. CLEARANCES: Comment of back if necessary) Dir Admin Serv'~'2'~Q)~ / ] 3. EXHIBITS: Proposed Ordinance Mayor's Preliminary Budget (by reference) ENDORSEMENTS MAYOR~------~'~ INFORMATION '"APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: This ordinance adopts the City's 1999-2000 Biennium Budget at the fund level as described in the Mayor's Preliminary Budget. 8. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the Ordinance adopting the 1999 - 2000 Budget on first reading. Motion to pass Ordinance No. ~ adopting the 1999 - 2000 Budget on second reading. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: Treasurer Mayor Dec. 31,2000 N/A PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED 11. AGENDA BILL NO: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: The City will lack the authority to spend money or to employ staff after Dec. 31, 1998. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: As presented in the several study sessions. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: Preliminary budget document. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Bremerton approving and adopting the biennial budget for the several funds of the City of Bremerton for the years 1999 and 2000, and appropriating the amounts set forth in each budget to each fund in accordance with RCW 35.34. THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1: That the biennial budget for the City of Bremerton, to wit: "Official Budget for the years 1999 and 2000, City of Bremerton", now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Bremerton, be and the same is hereby approved and adopted, and the respective amounts provided for in said budget for the several funds of the City of Bremerton, be and the same are hereby fixed and adopted as follows: ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE YEARS 1999 AND 2000 AMOLrNT FUND # DESCRIPTION 1999 2000 001 General $23,838,941 $24,156,072 101 Arterial Street 11,588,476 4,802,176 102 Street 2,087,005 2,160,750 103 Contingency Reserve 740,000 740,000 104 Civic Improvement 195,000 198,000 105 Parking System 680,500 695,500 106 Community Development 2,749,960 1,896,800 108 Abatement Revolving Fund 67,500 67,500 109 Real Estate Excise Tax 610,000 920,000 110 Police Special Projects 136,000 117,500 112 Parks Facility Construction 98,884 64,869 201 Bond Fund 1,080,192 1,025,916 401 Water Operating 13,157,257 10,377,676 407 Municipal Golf Course 2,524,144 2,631,153 451 Wastewater Operations 12,766,208 13,216,484 481 Stormwater Operations 1,473,209 948,921 503 Risk Management 2,120,000 2,165,000 510 Equipment Rental Reserve 3,667,772 4,416,316 601 Cemetery Perpetual Care 130,000 132,000 621 LID Guaranty 41,000 46,000 622 Roosevelt Capital Assets 1,257,693 699,054 623 Gift and Donation Fund 53,475 24,806 624 Employee Medical Insurance Reserve 222,000 87,000 GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES & EXPENDITURES $81,285,216 $71,589,493 GRAND TOTAL BIENNIUM $152,874,709 Of the total revenue for 1999, the sum of $5,385,657 is the estimated amount to be received from a $4.0342 levy per $1,000 of assessed valuation of all property within the city limits of the City of Bremerton as set forth in Ordinance No.4637. SECTION 2: That the separate totals set forth in Section 1, hereof for each of said funds, as particularly itemized in the "Official Budget for the years 1999 and 2000, City of Bremerton on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Bremerton, be and the same are hereby appropriated to each of said departments for the fiscal year 1999 and 2000. SECTION 3: Nothing contained herein shall be construed to require the City of Bremerton or its officers to fill any vacancy in any of the positions established by this ordinance resulting from the discharge, resignation or retirement of such employee. Nothing herein contained shall require the City of Bremerton or its officers to pay the maximum amount budgeted for any position shown therein. SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall become effective 10 days from its passage and publication. APPROVED by the City Council on the first reading on this day of December, 1998. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk in authentication of such passage this day of December, 1998. APPROVED this DAVID FARR, Council President day of December 1998. LYNN HORTON, Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk EFFECTIVE DATE: PUBLISHED: ORDINANCE NO. - AGENDA BILL --~ BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: ({qSc, lq~(cm ~¢ ~ FOR AGENDA OF: 2 December 1998 Setting Fees for the Glenn Jarstad ORIG/NAT/NG DEPT: Parks & Recreation Aquatic Center. ORIGINATOR: Jim Spencer, tntehm Oir¢~tor DATE SUBMITTED: 23 November 1998 2. CLEARANCES: 3. EXHIBITS: (Comment on back ifnecessary~. ' /~ Parks & Recreation Director'.//~/~ Proposed Resolution ~(a ^drain. Services Director.'~/'5~_ _'~...~~¥-~. Rate ~hange Proposal Fis~ & Budge..~ ~'~~r Pool Rate Survey Operations: ~ ~/ ENDORSEMENT INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRES~I~NT FOR SUBMIT1;AL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTIOn: The existing fee structure of the Glenn Jarstad Aquatic Center has been in effect since 1 January, 1995. The proposed fee increases help to offset pool costs driven by inflation, and make our rates more compatible with other pools in the area. 8. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to pass resolution as presented. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: Jim Spencax Jim Spencer N/A Annual PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED DATE: 11. AGENDA BILL #: 2. CLEARANCE CO~MM3r~X-I'S: - 5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: The existing fee schedule woaid remain in effect. The ?rrvosed fee increases help to offset the $74,791 increase (34.2%) in Peol operational costs _eongaring the 1995 Actuals to the 1999 budget amounts. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS~ FACil/IIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: Included in the 1999 General ?and Budget. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION setting forth the fee structure for the Glenn Jarstad Aquatic Center. WHEREAS, the costs associated with the operation and maintenance of the Glenn Jarstad Aquatic Center have steadily increased over the past several years; and WllEREAS, City Council is required to approve the fee structure for the Glenn Jarstad Aquatic Center, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton: That the fee structure attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference is approved and shall take effect on 1 January, 1999. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that beginning 1 January 2000, and the beginning of each calendar year thereafter, the Schedule of Regulatory License Fees attached hereto as Exhibit "A" may be adjusted by using the revised Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all urban consumers as published by the United States Department of Labor for U.S. City Average, all items for the most current period preceding the beginning of the calendar year. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this 1998. day of DAVID FARR Council President APPROVED this day of ,1998. LYNN S. HORTON, Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF BREMERTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT GLENN JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER PROGRAM FEES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1999 Youth (0-3 yrs.) Youth (4-17 yrs.) Adult (18-54 yrs.) Senior Citizens (55 & up) Disabled Citizens Fitness/Drop-in Lesson Senior/Disabled Fitness Special Public Single Discount Cards Admission 10 Punch 20 Punch Free~ _ $1.75 $14 $28 $2.25 S18 $36 S1.75 $14 $28 S1.75 $14 $28 $2.25 $18 $36 $1.75 $14 $28 $1.00 - Season Passes2 6 Months 12 Months $80 $155 $95 $185 $8O $155 $80 $155 Swimming Lessons Parent/Tot Lessons Private Lessons Semi-Private $2.75/class $2.25/class $9.00/¼ hour $13.50/¼ hour Rentals: Private (Non-profit) Private (For profit) Team/School District $45/hour3 $35/hour + staff cost; $4.75/lane/hour $2.25/lane/hour Notes: 1. Children under 4 years of age are admitted free when accompanied by a paying adult. 2. Season passes apply only to Adult, Lap, Senior/Disabled, Open, and Family swims. Passes do not provide access to Fitness or l_esc-7-7-7-7-7-7-~m programs. 3. Private Rental rates apply to a 1-hour rental with 50 or fewer swimmers. Rates increase to $50/hour when the rental is over 1 ho~r and when the number of swimmers exceeds 50. GLENN JARSTAD AQUA TI~ CENTER RATE CHANGE PROPOSAL EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1999 Current Proposed Admissions Fees Fees : $ Increase S/Unit % Savings Youth (0-3 yrs.) Free ! Free - ; - Youth (4-17 yrs.) $1.50 i $1.75 $0.25 - Adult (18-54 yrs.) = $1.75 i $2.25 $0.50 Seniors (55 & up) $1.50 $1.75 $0.25 -- Disabled i $1.50 : $1.75 $0.25 Adult Fitness $1.75 : $2.25 $0.50 ~ _ Senior Fitness ! $1.50 i $1.75 $0.25 - Disabled Fitness ! $1.50 ! $1.75 $0.25 Special Public ~ $0.75 $1.00 $0.25 Punchcards ! ', S/Punch Youth 10 Punch i $12.00 ~ $14.00 : $2.00 $1.40 20.0% Youth 20 Punch i $24.00 i = ~ I $28.00 ' $4.00 i $1.40 20.0% Adult 10 Punch i $14.00 [ $18.00 ,, $4.00 I $1.80 20.0% Adult 20 Punch i $28.00~i $36.00 i" $8.00 ! $1.80 i' 20.0% Sr./Dis. 10 Punch $12.00 ! $14.00 i $2.00 $1.40 i 20.0% Sr./Dis. 20 Punch $24.00, i $28.00 i $4.00 , I $1.40 ] i 20.0% Fitness/Lesson 10 $16.00 I $18.00 $2.00 $1.80 I 20.0% -- Fitness/Lesson 20 $32.00 ! $36.00 ] $4.00 $1.80 i 20.0-90 Sr./Dis. Fitness 10 $12.00 I $14.00 ~ $2.00 I $1.40 I 20.0% ,Sr./Dis. Fitness 20 ! $24.00 ' $28.00 " $4.00 !. $1.40 ,~ 20.0% Passes ~ , i i i #Swims 65/130 Youth: 6 months $75.00 ~ $80.00 I $5.00 i $1.23 ~ 29.7% 12 month ~ $145.00 $155.00 $10.00 i i $1.19 ! 31.9% Adult 6 months ; $85.00 i $95.00 I $10.00 $1.46 35.0% 12 months $165.00 i $185.00 $20.00 $1.42 36.8% Senior: 6 months $75.00 I $80.00 $5.00 $1.23 , 29.7% 12 months ~ $145.00 $155.00 $10.00'1 $1.19 '~ 31.9% Disabled: 6 months $75.00 ! $80.00 i $5.00 ; $1.23 ~ 29.7% 12 months I $145.00 $155.00 $10.00 i $1.19 ~ 31.9% Swimming Lessons i i Youth/Adult (30rain) $2.50 $2.75 I $0.25 I(Typically 10 classes = $27.50) Parent/Tot $1.75 $2.25 i $0.50 '~ ! -- Private (1/2 hr) $7.50 I $9.00 ! $1.50 i(One on one instruction) Semi-Private (2-3) $11.25 $13.50 $2.25 i($9 for 1st student, $4.50 ea. add.) Family Lessons $50.00 $55.00 $5.00 (Family of 4) [ Rental Rates ~ Private (Non-profit) ' $40 $45 $5 I(Parties, youth groups, etc.) Private (For profit)* $30 $35 $5 *Plus staffcost ($7.50 min.) Private (For profit) $4.50/In/hr $4.75/In/hr $0.25/In/hr ($2&50/hr- 6 lanes) Team/School Dist. $2/In/hr $2.25/In/hr $0.25/In/hr ($13.50~r- 6 lanes) GLENN JARSTAD AQUATIC tEN' INDOOR POOL RATE SURVEY -- PROPOSED JANUARY 1, '/,999 ........... I Kitsap County Indoor Pools Jarstad AC I Olympic HS I North Kitsap I South Kitsap I Bain. Is. Admissions Youth ~' $1.75 (4-17) $1.60 (>6yrs) $1.75 (2-17yr) , $2.50 $1.25 (2-17yrs) Adult $2.25 $2.40 $2.50 $2.50 $2.25 ~r._/_D_!s~abled $1.75 (55&>) $1.60 (65&>) $1.75 (6o&>) : $1.75 (60&>) $1.25 (60&>) Family i NA, $6.50 Adult Fitness i $2.25 i $2.40 $3.00 i $2.00 = $3.25 Sr. Fitness , $1.75 I $1.60 $3.00 ~ $1.75 = $2.25 Punchcards I : i i $23/24 (0.96) Youth , $14/10 (1.40) ~ , $17.50/12 (1.45) i *No passes ~l punch (0.96) $28/20 (1.40) , may pay in Adult , $18/10 (1.80) $19.50/10 (1.95) $25/12 (2.06) i advance at i 2 punches (1.92) i $36/20 (1.80) ! $39/10 (1.95) i~[' regular rate !' I Sr./Disabled I $14/10 (1.40) i $13.50/10 (1.35) i $17.50/12 (1.45) I 1 punch (0.96) -- I $28/20 (1.40) i $27/10(1.35) ,, [ Fitness $18/10 (1.80) , ! 3 punches (2.88) $36/20 (1.80) i I I Passes i i [ : Youth 3 month I : i i r, i $51 i ,~ $33 Youth 6 month i $80 : : i , ! $59 Youth 12 month ~ $155 ' $135 i ; $104 Adult 3 month ¢i ' $54 i $77 II $65 Adult 6 month $90 $97 i I $107 Adult 12 month j $175 $173 I $203 I $178 I Sr./Dis. 3month I '! $38 ! $51 i '1 $33 i ' Sr./Dis. 6 month ] $80 I $65 i I i $59 Sr./Dis. 12 month $155 I $130 i $135 I , ! $104 Family 3 month ~ $87 $154 I $92 Family 6 month $173 $155 Family 12 month $368 $407 , $294 Lessons Youth/Adult LTS $27.50/10 (2.75) $28.5o/10 (2.85) $3/$3.50 $35/10 (3.50) $32/10 (3.20) Parent/Tot 2.25 $3/$3.50 $35/10 ($3.50) Private (1/2 hr.) i $9/1/2 hr. $6/1/2 hr. [ $12/1/2 hr. $12.50/1/2 hr. i $15/1/2hr. Semi-Private (<3) i $9/$4.50ea. ] i $14/1/2hr Rentals ~ i 1 Hour (<50) $45/hr $30/hr I $50 $40 I $43 / $40ea 1+ hours (<50) $50/hr i $30/hr I 1 Hour (>50) , $50/hr (3) I $38/hr I -- AGENDA BILL - BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. ~ z~ FOR AGENDA OF: ORIGINATING DEPT: Setting fees for Gold Mountain Golf Complex and ORIGINATOR: Repealing Resolution No. 2640 DATE SUBMITTED: Dec. 2, 1998 . Rich Hanna¢~ Nov. 13, 1998 \ 2. CLEARANCES: Comment of back if necessary) Parks & Recreation Dir.~ ~ Operations Comm. ~ '--.---c-~ 3. EXHIBITS: Proposed Resolution Summary of Financial Analysis ENDORSEMENTS INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: In order for the City's Gold Mountain Golf Complex to remain financially sound, it is necessary to implement fee changes on a systematic and regular basis. Fees at the complex were last changed in January 1998. 8. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to pass Resolution No. ~o~"~ as presented. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: Park Director Mayor N/A Annual PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED 11. AGENDA BILL NO: ¢~-g~g 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Greens fees will remain at their current levels. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: Included in the 1999 - 2000 Preliminary budget and the 1998 - 2003 ClP. Passage will increase revenue to the Golf Course Fund by approximately $90,000. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: Staff analysis. RESOLUTION NO. ~t A RESOLUTION setting forth a fee structure for Gold Mountain Golf Course and repealing Resolution No. 2640. WHEREAS, the City Council established the operating procedures for the Gold Mountain Golf Course; and WHEREAS, the operating procedures require that any changes to the fee structure at Gold Mountain Golf Course be approved by the City. Council; now, therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL that Resolution No. 2640 is repealed; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the fee structure attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference is approved and shall take effect January 1, 1999. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __ day of , 1998. DAVID FARR, President EXHIBIT A CITY OF BREMERTON GOLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COMPLEX GREEN FEES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,1999 CASCADE OLYMPIC COURSE COURSE WEEKDAY 18 * $22 CASCADE COURSE + $10 WEEKEND 18'* 26 SENIOR 18 * 17.50 JUNIOR 18 * 8.25 WEEKDAY 9 * 15 18 WEEKEND 9'* 18 22 CONTINUATION 18 RATE-9 RATE 18 RATE-9 RATE TWILIGHT 9 HOLE RATE 9 HOLE RATE LEAGUE PLAY* 9 HOLE RATE CASCADE 9 HOLE RATE PRIVATE CART 9 HOLE RATE CASCADE 9 HOLE RATE ANNUAL PASS SINGLE 1,200 ANNUAL PASS COUPLE 1,800 SEMI-ANNUAL PAS~ SINGLE 600/650 SEMI-ANNUAL PASS COUPLE 900/950 ANNUAL PASS SR. SINGLE * 800 ANNUAL PASS SR. COUPLE * t,200 SEMI-ANNUAL PASS SR. SINGLE * 400/450 SEMI-ANNUAL PASS SR~ COUPLE * 600/650 REGULAR PUNCH CARD (20) 355 SR. PUNCH CARD (10} * 155 SR. PUNCH CARD LOW INC.*(10} *** 62 CORPORATE PASS (500) * 9,000 SCHOOL TEAM 100 ANNUAL PRIVATE CART 130 SAME RATE + $t0 PER ROUND NOT AVAILABLE 130 * Available Monday - Friday The golf professional, with the approval of the director of parks and recreation, may offer discounts to the greens fees shown above. These discounts shell not be less then the twilight rates end shall not result in any rebate on passes or punchcards and can bo rescinded as the market dictates. CITY OF BREMERTON GOLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COMPLEX ANALYSIS OF GREEN FEBS 1998 and 1999 OLYMPIC COURSE ¶ 1/97-10198 t998 1999 PROPOSED CHANGE i~)~i~ii~i~i~5!ili:ii:ii:iiiii!ii!ili?ii!iii:ii::ii:ii~I PLAYERS RATE REVENUE RATE REVENUE RATE REVENUE PERCENT WEEKDAY 16' 17,604 31 545,724 32 563,328 I 17,604 I 3.2%, WEEKEND 18 16,995 35 594,625 36 611,620 I 16,995 i 2.9% SENIOR 18 * 2,640 27 71,280 27.50 72,600 I 1,320 1.9% .)UNIOR 18 * 721 t8.0 12,978 18.25 13,158 0.25 160 1.4% WEEKDAY 9* 410 18 7,380 16 7,380 0 0; 0.0% WEEKEND 9 149 22 3,278 22 3,278 0 0 t 0.0% CONT. WEEKDAY * 183 13 2~379 14 2~562 I 163 7.7% CONT. WEEKEND 48 13 637 14 686 I 48 7.7% TWILIGHT WEEKDAY* 3,873 18 69,714 16 69,714 0 0 0.0% TWILIGHT WEEKEND 1,729 22 38,038 22 38,038 0 0 0.0% LEAGUE PLAY * 18 0 15 0 (3) 0 -16.7% MORNING SPECIAL* 988 22 2t,736 23 22,724 I 968 4.5% TOTAL DAILY FEE PLAY PLUS $10 44,353 1,367,969 1,405,288 36,331 2.7% ,687 10 16,870 10 16,870 TOTAL PASS & PUNCHCARD TOTAL ALL PLAY AVERAGE REVENUE PER PLAYER * Avallmblo Monday - Friday 1~959 18,230 18,230 40,312 1,366t199 1,423,518 36,321 $29.93 $30.74 $0.78 2.8% CITY OF BREMERTON GOLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COMPLEX ANALYSIS OF GREEN FEES 1998 and 1999 CASCADE COURSE 11/97-1019, 1998 1999 PROPOSED CHANGE !~i~i~!ii!iiiii!!!iii!!iiiii!i!iiii!ii!iii!i~ PLAYERS RATE REVENUE RATE REVENUE RATE REVENUE PERCENT WEEKEND 18 17,116 25 427,90028 445,016 I 17,118 4.0% SENIOR 18 * 2,731 17 44,427 17.5 47,793 0.50 1,366 2.9% JUNIOR 18 * 1,904 8 18,232 8.25 15,708 0.25 476 3.1% WEEKDAY 9* 1,039 14 14,546 15 15,585 I 1,039 7.1% WEEKEND 9 267 17 4,839 181 4,808 I 287 5.9% CONT. WEEKDAY 228 7 1,599 7 1,598 0 0 0.0% CONT. WEEKEND 141 8 1,128 8 1,128 0 0 0.0% !TWILIGHT WEEKDAY* 6,145 14 86,030 15i 92,175 I 6,145 7.1% TWILIGHT WEEKEND 1,839 17 31,263 18 33,102 I 1,839 5.9% LEAGUE PLAY" 14 15 TOTAL DAILY FEE PLAY 880,451 920,689 40,238 4.6% :ANNUAL - SINGLE 1,180 1,200 40 3.4% ANNUAL - COUPLE 3,711 1,740 44,820 1,800 42,228 60 1,408 3.4% SEMI-ANNUAL - SINGLE 580/930 800/950 40 3.5% SEMI-ANNUAL - COUPLE 870/920 900/950 80 3.5% ;ANNUAL - SR SINGLE * 775 800 25 3.2% ANNUAL - SR COUPLE * 6,555 1,190 51,015 1,200 53,902 40 1,787 3.4% SEMI-ANNUAL - SR SINGLE * 387/437 di00t450 26 3.3% SEMI-ANNUAL - SR COUPLE * 580/630 600/6S0 40 3.5% SR PUNCH CARD (10) * 1,973 150 29,595 155 30,582 5 987 3.3% SR PUNCH CARD LOW INCOME* (10) *** 60 62 2 0 3.3% PUNCH CARD (20) I 3,054 340 51,919 355 54,209 15 2,291 4.4% CORPORATE PASS (500) *I 1,812 8,500 30,804 9,000 32,810 500 1,812 5.9% TOTAL PASSES & PUNCHCARDS 204,052 213,235 8,283 4.0% TOTAL ALL PLAY 60,505 1,085,403 1,t33,924 44,521 4.5% AVERAGE REVENUE PER PLAYER $17.04 $18.74 $0.80 4.5% AVERAGE REVENUE PER ROUND: ANNUAL PASSES $11.00 SR. ANNUAL PASSES $7.90 · Available Monday - Friday '*'RGW 74.38.070;, ago)S2, household AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: Public Hearing Resolution # ~.{o~l , regarding recovery offees for the abatement of garbage and debris on the property located at 654 Highland Avenue. FOR AGENDA OF: December 2~ 1998 ORIGINATING DEPT.: Buiidine Dept. ORIGINATOR: Judy Johnson DATE SUBMITTED: 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if 3. EXHIBITS: necessary) ~ Comm. Dev. Dir.: f//_...-~ ~ 1. Resolution # City Clerk: ~---~'~ ~ 2. Clerk Report City Attorney~ ~/.)('t/~/~/~.//L-~.~_~..~.~ 3. Photos ENDORSEMENT X INFORMATION __ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: On October 1, 1998, Public Works removed garbage and debris on the property located at 654 Highland Avenue after the owner, Daniel Cole, failed to do so as ordered by the Building Official. The cost of the action, including administrative fees, totaled $792.02. Council must now decide if the fees are just, and how they should be collected. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council, by Resolution # ~(a~ ~. , order that the fees incurred for the abatement of garbage and debris located at 654 Highland Avenue be collected as reasonable abatement costs and become a lien against the property. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Judy Johnson ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Judy Johnson EXPIRATION DATE: N/A REVIEW DATE: N/A PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION IOA APPROVED DISAPPROVED AME] DATE: 11. AGENDA BILL NO.: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: e IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: The City would forfeit the costs incurred for this action. .IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: The City's revolving abatement fund would suffer the deficit of not collecting these funds. RESEARCH SOURCES: N/A SO T ON# A RESOLUTION reviewing charges for the abat~nent of garbage and debris on the property at 654 Highland Avenue and demnnining means of collection. WHF~REAS, the City ofBremerton incarred costs for the removal of garbage and debris on the property located at 654 Highland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Bremerton Municipal Code allows the Ckx to recoup these costs either by personal judgment against the property owner or as a lien against the propem_, and W~REAS, the City Council is charged with determining whether the fees are just, and how they should be collected; and has considered the report of charges filed by_ the Building Official and any protests or objection filed; and WHEREAS, the Building Official of~e City of Bremerton recommends the fees be collected as a lien against the property located at 654 Highland .Avenue, now, therefore. BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Cotmcil of the City of B~on: 1. That the abatement charges included in the report of the B~ilding Official in the amount of $792.02 for the property located at 654 Highland Avenue, Bremerton, attached hereto, are just and reasonable. 2. That the City of Bremerton will ~ercise its fight to recapture abatement fees by filing a lien against the property. 19 PASSED, by the City Council of the City of Bremerton tiffs day of ., DAVID FARR Council President RECEIVED OFFIC.c OF CITY CLERK December 1:1998 Dear Sim: This leper is in place of my absence at the Public Hearing I have been notified of. I regret that this hearing conflicts with my worl< schedules that cannot be altered. This ir, unfortunate as I would like to establish a reputation in the proper light. City of P~remerton 239 4th Street Bremerton, WA 98337 November 25, 1998 Bremert0n City Council Members, This statement is regarding the past situation at 654 Highland Ave., specifically the re- quest to recoup ccs~ ir, cuffed ir, the abatement cf said prope~'. My situatio,~ is best ex- plained through a chronology of events concerning this maBer. I received an 'Order to Remove Refuse within 72 Hours' August 14, 1998. I notified the tenant and the,/told me that the "bags of garbage" specifically mentioned were soon to be moved The bag~ were removed at a cost of $200 on August 16 and I ~s within ~e p~scrip~d o~er. I investigated the garage (whe~ the debris was Ioca~d) the~a~r and was satisfied that ~Mere was not a nuisance situation, i~ appeared to be ~pical carpo~ items and all Io~e items were bundled or :,n bags. Not long affe~ard the tenan~ m~ed out and when I came to the residence on October 1 ~ere ~s a ci~ vehicle. Apparently aiding the move, due to the welfare status of the tenant. I became fully aware of the whole situation when t r~eived the notice dated November 13. However, I have now been notified by the tenant that some clothing and other ~tems picked up by the Ci~ of Breme~on were actually pe~onal belongings that were to be taken to the new place of residence. I h~e since reimbu~ed the tenant the amount of $!75 for lost belongings. In conclusion, I have no objection to the action [aken by the ci~ and my compliance will be absolute. However, i would like to protest the costs by the amount of the to~i I have p~id ($200 plus $175) toward the solution of this problem. Respectfully Submitted, Daniel Cole 697 i492 ORDER TO REMOVE REFUSE WITHIN 72 HOURS DANIEL COLE 17096 LEMOLO SHORE DR NE POULSBO, WA 98370 OWNER/OCCUPANT OF THE PROPERTY AT 654 HIGHI~AND AVENUE You are hereby notified that a violation of Section 6.04.050 of the Bremerton Municipal Code exists on the property at 654 HIGHLAND AyENI. IE in that as o~vner/eccupant, you have permitted the collection of refuse as defined in Section 6.04.030 of the Bremerton Municipal Cede to collect on the property described above. Description of refuse: BAGSOFGARBAGEANDDEBRIS Pursuant to Section 6.04.062 df the Bremerton Municipal Code, this order serves as written notice to remove the refuse described above within seventy-two(72) hours. Failure to comply with ~his order may result in citation by the Building Official for a civil !nfraction, pursuant to Section 6.04.062 of the Bremerton Municipal Code, and further, if deemed necessary the City shall cause the refuse to be removed and the charges collected as a personal obligation and a lien as set for,~h in Section 6.04.064. THE MINIMUM FEE FOR WORK PERFORMED BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE CITY IS $575.00. ORDER ISSUED: AUG UST_IJ_,_I0.99_~ ~;lc~'tl,.1~/.)~'~ ~ ~,~., JUDY JOHNSON, DEVELOPMENT PERMITS MGIC. CH'Y OF BREMERTON REFUSE TO BE REMOVED BY: CITY OF BREMEgrON , 239 4th Street · Bremerton, WA 98337 ' CITY OF BREMERTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS I:I~REBY GIVEN that there will be a public hearing before the City Council of the City of Bremerton on DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1998 TLME: 5:30 P.M. OR LATER in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 239 Fourth Street, Bremcrton, Washington, and ail interested persons are requested to be present. To be considered is the following: APPLICANT: City of Bremerton ACTION: Request approval of lien to recoup cost~ in the amount of $792.02 incurred in the abatement of the property located at 6~ HIGitLAND AVENUE ALL PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS TO TI:ilS ACTION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING IN ~ OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 239 FOURTH STREET, PRIOR TO CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON T~d'E DATE OF THE HEARING. DATED at Bremerton, Washington this 13th day of November, 1998. For more information regarding this action, you may contact Janet Lunceford, at (360) 478-5275. 694 CITY OF BII~N * 239 4th Street * Bremerton, WA 98337 Memorandum DATE: TO: FROM: RE: CC: November 12, 1998 Paula Johnston, Deputy City Clerk Janet Lunceford, BDS II --~._ Public Hearing, 12/2/98 Judy Johnson, Building Official On 10/1/98, Public Works removed garbage and debris from the property located at 654 Highland Avenue after the owner, Daniel Cole, failed to do so as ordered by the Building Official. The charge to the abatement fund by Public Works totaled $217.92 per the attached copy of the interfund transfer. Administrative fees for garbage abatements are $575.00, making the total fee for this action $792.02. I have scheduled a public hearing for December 2, 1998. · Celebrating 50 Years of Freedom · DATE I1~/~ DESCRIPTiCN TOTAL Charges per attached summary. (or:. October 1998 BL,MB LABOR $735.00 EQUI~IvI~NT $332.$0 NLA. TERIALS $296.54 SALES TAX $0.00 TOTAL $1,3 64.04 ACCOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT AMOUNT 42-349.3900 (Si~ Here) EXPENDITURE DEPARTMENT SUPERVIsoR BLAB I0113198 10/21/98 10/26/98 s:~mmu 0524 oo5[ O05.* !02.* DL','MPIN 2013 17{2 3069 ~21 ~101 ~3051 1712 11¢7 Remove Garbag~ Bill Edwar~ '93 OMC i-TCN DLSIP Dump Fees - Oly. View Samta.,'y Landfig Remove Debris from 428 Layfayctte Brian Brewer '94 SD410 BACK?.'OE Colen Corey '92 GMC I-TON Jokn Corey W '90 INT. 10 Y.~.D DU,'MP TRUCK .rim lovinetli '88 Int'l I0 Yard Z'nmp Truck Dispose of tires Dump Fees - O .ly.',~ew Sanitary Landfill Set fence posts for ciera removal at 428 1olin Corey IV '93 GMC 1-TON DUM~P Jerry Edland ~,.50 hr 4.50 hr 4.00 yd 4.00 hr 4.00 hr 2.00 hr 2.00 hr 4.00 hr 1.00 hr 4.00 hr 4.00 hr 7.00 ea 20.00 yd Kit~ap Lumber Ax-' .masts & concrete mix 1.00 BLAB - 1903 W. ~ Lake Road Reboardi~_ ~tme for Bldg. Dept. Colen Corey 1.00 Scott Corey 1.00 2.00 hr 2.00 hr 2.00 hr $120.OO $12~.00 $6O.OO $1g.OO $120.00 $26.00 $120.00 $104.00 $17.50 $207.60 $60.00 $16.00 560.00 $29.92 $30.00 S30.O0 $1,3 64.04 AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: Public Hearing Resolution # o9.$8~9_ , regarding recovery of fees for the abatement of garbage and debris on the property located at 428 S. Lafayette. FOR AGENDA OF: December 2~ 1998 ORIGINATING DEPT.: Buildin~ Dept. ORIGINATOR: Judy Johnson DATE SUBMITTED: 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if 3. Comm. Dev. D~r.L _~ L~.~> City Clerk: ~~~ EXHIBITS: 1. Resolution # 2. Clerk Report 3. Photos ENDORSEMENT ~ INFORMATION __ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: ~~ On October 13, 1998, the Public Works Department removed garbage, debris, appliances and a dilapidated camper shell from the property located at 428 S. Lafayette after the owners, Alan Faessler and Keith Davidson, failed to do so as ordered by the Building Official. Council must now decide if the fees are just, and how they should be collected. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council, by Resolution # c,~ ~c~, order that the fees incurred for the abatement of garbage and debris located at 428 S. Lafayette be collected as reasonable abatement costs and become a lien against the property. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Judy Johnson ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Judy Johnson EXPIRATION DATE: N/A REVIEW DATE: N/A PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED 11. AGENDA BILL NO.: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: The City would forfeit the costs incurred for this action. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: The City's revolving abatement fund would suffer the deficit of not collecting these funds. RESEARCH SOURCES: N/A RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION reviewing charges for the abatement of garbage and debris on the property at 428 S. Lafayette and determining means of collection. WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton inctrrred costs for removal of garbage and debris on the property located at 428 S. Lafayette Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, as adopted by the Bremerton Municipal Code, allows the City. to recoup these costs either by personal judgment against the property owner or as a lien against the properts; and WHEREAS, the City Council is charged~ with determining whether the fees are just, and how they should be collected; and has considered the report of charges filed bv the Building Official and any protests or objection filed; and WHEREAS, the Building Official of the City of Bremerton recommends the fees be collected as a lien against the property located at 428 S. Lafayette Avenue, now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Bremerton: 1. That the abatement charges included in the report of the Building Official in the amount of $1,893.52 for the property located at 428 S. Lafayette Avenue, Bremerton, attached hereto, are just and reasonable. 2. That the City of Bremerton will exercise its right to recapture abatement fees by filing a lien against the property. PASSED, by the City Council of the C~' of Bremerton this day of , 19 DAVID FARR Council President Memorandum DATE: TO: FROM: RE: CC: November 12, 1998 Paula Johnston, Deputy City Clerk Janet Lunceford, BDS II --~ Public Hearing, 12t2/98 Judy Johnson, Buildmg Official On 10/13/98, Public Works removed garbage and debris ~om the property located at 428 S. Lafayette Avenue after the owners, Alan Faessler and Keith Davidson~ failed to do so as ordered by the Building Official_ The charge to the abatemem fund by Public Works totaled $1,087.02 per the attached copy of the interfund trsn.~fer. Administrative fees for dangerous building abatemems are $806.50, malting the total fee for this action $1,893.52. I have scheduled a Public hearing for Decem_ _her 2, 1998. · Celebrating 50 Years of Freedom · ..... ND TRANSFER- DATE TRANSFEt~ ';: ~LETE THIS FORM 3' DUPLICATE AuND R.5?L~ 'PuN TO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Building Deparm~ent DIVISION FROM Abatements (REVENUE DEP)d~TMENT) (EXPEN'DITURE DEP.~RTMENT) DESCRIPTIC4'q TOTAL Charges per attached summar:' i-az. October 1998 BLAB LABOR 5735.00 EQUIPMENT $332.50 MATERIALS $296.54 SALES TAX $0.00 TOTAL $1,364.04 ACCOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT AMOUNT 42-349.3900 S 1,364.04 REVEN U.,~~PARTMEr~T SU-i~ERVISOR Here) EXPENDITURE DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR W 'I I~/~8 1:,~3.'27 PM CFIW OF BREMERTON ~ _~~ ~'-~, Customer: BLAB Page I PWO-$TREET DIVISION Buildin~ Departmem - A~a~emen~ ~ ~)escr/ption 10/1/98 swsoloo 0o54 3024 DUMPIN 10/13/98 0oA~9 3039 0524 3013 1712 3069 ! 904 002 TIRES DUMPIN 10/21/98 srmo~o~ 9s~o~ 1712 3025 1147 45808 10/26/98 srnsoo,~ 9ssos6 0524 0051 Remove Garbage 65: Highland Avenue Bill Edwards '93 GMC 1-TON DL.-MP Dump Fees - Oly.'~ew Sanitary. Landfill Remove Debris from-'23 Layfayerte Brian Brewer '94 JD410 BACKEOE Colen Corey '92 GMC I-TON ? U John Corey IV '90 INT. 10 YARD DU~'MP TRUCK Jim Iovinelli '88 Inet l0 Yard ~ Track Dispose of tires Dump Fees - Oly. V:~ew Sanitary Landfill ~t~gulal: Overtim{ Costs 4.50 hr $135,00 4.50 hr 340,50 4.00 yd $41.52 4.00 hr $!29..00' 4.00 hr $1,28:00 2.oo hr s6o.oo 2.00 hr $ ! 8...00': 4.00 hr $120.60 1.00 hr $26.00 4.00 hr $~2o.0O 4.00 hr 7.00 ea 517.5.0` 20.00 yd $207.60'; Set fence posts for deix~z removal at 428 Layfayerre ~ ~olm Corey IV 2.00 hr ~' $60:00 93 GMC 1-TON DLS[P 2.00 hr ~$16.00 Jerry Edland 2.00 hr ~$60.00 Kitsap Lumber -4x~ posts & concrete mix 1.00 in /'$29.92 BLAB - 1903 W. Kitsap Lake Road Reboarding house for Bldg. Dept. ~ Colen Corey 1.00 hr ~$30.00 Scott Corey 1.00 hr / ~$30.00