Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/29/98 AGENDABREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 239 4TH STREET BREMERTON, WA 98337 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 29, 1998 5. 6. 7. CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M. A. General Council Business B. City Council Study Session 5:05 - 5:25 P.M., in the Council Conference Room. Topic of discussion: "Workforce Diversity Plan". CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. A. Pledge Of Allegiance B. Invocation CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If separate discussion is desired on an item, it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at the request of a Council member. A. Minutes - April 15, 1998 #AB98-085 B. Minutes - April 22, 1998 #AB98-086 CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT PUBLIC RECOGNITION -- (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes) NEW BUSINESS A. Sole Source Purchase Of Digester Recirculating Scumbuster For Wastewater Treatment Plant B. Interlocal Agreement - Traffic Signals With City Of Shelton, WA #AB98-087 #AB98-016 ~? (CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) PUBLIC HEARING -6:00 P.M. OR LATER A. Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) IN Single - Family Zone; Applicant: Kitsap Mobile Home Park; Location: 6201 Price Road; Resolution #2649 Resolution #2650 Regarding Extension Of The Moratorium Regarding Development Of Piers And Docks Within The Channel Between Ostrich And Oyster Bay #AB98-089 ,~'7 #AB98-088 ~ AGENDA BIL!, BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT':- MINUTES - APRIL 15, 1998 FOR AGENDA OF: April 29, 1998 ORIGINATING DEPT: Qi~y Council ORIGINATOR:David Farr. Prm~iHmnt DATE SUBMITTED: 4-'21-98 2. ~~_~: (comment on back if necessary) ENDORS E/~ENT __ INFORMATION MAYOR ~_oPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: COUNCIL PRES!DENT ~~ 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIRE~fENT FOR COI~C!L AcTION: 8. R~COSfMENDATION: 9..RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFOR~ OFFICIAL: _EXPIkATiON DATE: REVIEW DATE: PULI,ED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: !0. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISkP.~ROVED ..DAT] AMENDED 2. CLEARANCE COMHENT~ :. ~ _ 5..'~.t~o~ACT ON NON-PASSAGE: .STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EOUIP,MENT OR OTHiiR RESOURCES: TaPE #1538 UNAPPROVED DRAFT CITY COUCIL MEETING MINUTES April 15, 1998 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday April 15, 1998, at 5:30 P.M., with Council President David Fart presiding. Council members present were Jim Reed, Carlos Montgomery, Carol Arends, Mike Shepherd, Lon Overson, John Law, Cecil McConnell, and Wayne Olsen. Also present were Assistant City Attorney Glenna Malanca and Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council President Fart and invocation given by Reverend Talmage Wilson of Charleston Baptist Church. President Farr made the following announcements: (1) City Council Study Session 5:00 - 5:30 P.M., to discuss General Council business. (2) The City Council held a 15-minute Executive Session 5:15 - 5:30 P.M., in the Council Conference Room to discuss "personnel". (3) Immediately following the City Council meeting the City Council will hold a 20- Minute Executive Session to discuss "Real Estate" (4) The City Council will hold a Study Session on April 22, 1998, 5:05 - 5;25 P.M., the Council Conference Room. Topic of discussion: "Workforce Diversity Plan". CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of Meeting - April 1, 1998 #AB98-075 B. Minutes of Meeting - April 8, 1998 #AB98-076 #0055 MISlClU(McConnelllMontgomery) Motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the Council TAPE #1538 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April15, 1998 Page 2 of 10 #0076 MISICIU(MontgomerylArends) On April 15, 1998, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: 218688, and 218715 through 218905 in the amount of $641,895.86. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mrs. Arends reported the joint Districts #6, #7, #8 Neighborhood Meeting held on April 14, 1998, was well attended. A special "Thank You" was extended to Terrie Olson, Animal Control Officer, and Assistant Police Chief Henry Mincey for their presentations and responding to lots of questions generated by those in attendance. Mr. Shepherd reminded everyone of the variety of clean-up events scheduled for April 18, 1998, i.e. First Street Dock, Lions Field and volunteers from District #5 will meet at the Chester Arms Apartments. He also announced the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Library Improvement Fund will hold a fund raising Spaghetti Feed at 1201 Park Avenue on April 25, 1998, 12:00 - 3:00 P.M. Cost of the dinner is $5.00-adults and $2.50-children. He reminded the public that over the next couple of months the City would be removing trees and conducting construction activities in Evergreen Park, which will result in playground equipment upgrades, new restrooms and replanting of trees. During his visit to Tampa, Florida last week, the Tampa City Council welcomed him and he had the opportunity to learn how they handle their city's business. Ironically, on the day he arrived in Tampa, the Tampa City Council was giving direction to their staff to produce a City ordinance allowing parking on residential properties. Mr. Law announced the next District #3 Neighborhood Meeting will be held on April 21, 1998, 7:00 P.M., at the Senior Center. The guest speaker at that meeting will be the principal architect, Alex Young, for the new Manette Bridge. He encouraged the public to take advantage of this opportunity to give their input on the design of the new bridge. He emphasized District #3 meetings are open to all Bremerton residents. Mr. McConnell announced District #2 will hold a Neighborhood Meeting on April 30, 1998, 6:00 P.M., at Fire Station #3 located on #.31st Street and Olympus Drive. The guest speaker for that meeting will be Mayor Lynn Horton. Mr. Farr extended his thanks to the presenters and those in attendance at the joint District #6. #7 and #8 Neighborhood Meeting. As Assistant Police Chief Henry Mincey answered questions at that meeting, he stirred up considerable interest in other areas of the judicial system. As a result, Municipal Court Judge James Docter has agreed to participate in the next joint District meeting. He was also looking into the possibility of having Kitsap County Prosecutor Russ Hauge at that same meeting. The time and date of that meeting will be announced at a later date. In response to comments and suggestions by citizens, Council will TAP E #1538 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April15, 1998 Page 3 of 10 start a new procedure next week where questions posed by the public during Public Recognition will be reported on by Council's Legislative Assistant Merilynn Erhart, at the end of Public Recognition portion. He thanked Susan Brown for her comments on initiating this kind of follow-up response to citizens' questions. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Lynn Horton announced the City is seeking volunteers to help with the annual Children's Art Festival on May 9, 1998, 10:00 A.M. - 2:00 P.M., at Olympic College. Information on this event can be obtained by calling Charlene Burnette or Cynthia Engelgau of the Parks Department 478-5305. Mayor Horton expressed sincere thanks to Tim Richard, Sr. Engineer, who is leaving the City of Bremerton to take a promotional position in Lewiston, Idaho. She, all the Department Heads, and the City Coundl have appreciated Mr. Richard's efforts on behalf of the City and he will be sorely missed. She extended "best wishes" for his new endeavors. Mayor Horton administered the OATH of Office to Fire Chief Al Duke and Firefighters Troy Reynolds, and James Hendryx. Fire Chief Al Duke thanked Mayor Horton and City staff, the City Coundl, Fire Department staff and his family for their support, which is deeply appreciated. Mayor Horton extended congratulations to newly sworn-in Fire Department personnel and thanked them for their service to the community. President Farr extended his congratulations to Fire Chief Duke and the two new Firefighters. He agreed with Mayor Horton that the City would feel the loss of Tim Richard. He particularly acknowledged Mr. Richard's ability to remain calm and maintain a professional attitude during the many presentations he made before the City Council. PUBLIC RECOGNITION Paul Scheyer, Bremerton resident, pointed out there was suppose to be a Declaration of Non-significance hearing as part of this Council meeting, but was apparently pulled. Therefore, he wished to comment on that issue considering the City is the violator of the SEPA rules. President Fan' stated for clarification that the item was not "pulled" from the Agenda, it was never made a part of it. Mr. Scheyer stated the City sent out notices announcing the hearing date. President Fan' asked the City Attorney whether or not hearing something at this time would cause the Council not to be seated during a public hearing on this particular issue. Glenna Malanca stated she believed Mr. Scheyer's comments would be more appropriate at the public headng. Mr. Scheyer stated he believes it is good to plan ahead as to the kind of meeting when the issue does come before the Council. He believes the Madrona Point Drive residents that have been clashing before will unit and take on the City for violation of the SEPA TAPE #1538 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April15, 1998 Page 4 of 10 rule. He feels strongly that the City has a big liability in this area. When this issue is before the City Council he wanted to make sure that the public would get an equal opportunity to speak as the Director of Community Development would be granted. He also wanted to know if there would be an "Appeal" process automatically for a "Closed Record Hearing". He submitted a letter to the City Council through Council's Legislative Assistant, and asked that it be read at the hearing. Because of that submittal, he believes he should have status on the Closed Record Hearing. President Fan' assured Mr. Scheyer that the procedure would be clearly identified for those participating. The City Council has tried to be fair; however, usually those on one side or the other of an issue are not pleased with the process. Teresa Finlay, Citizens for Safe Water, read a news release announcing Citizens for Clean Water were leading an initiative drive against fluoridation in the City of Santa Cruz, California. Ramona Hopkins, Citizens for Safe Water, read five questions that were asked the Santa Cruz City Council regarding implementation of fluoridation. Paul Drnievic, Citizens for Safe Water, proceeded to read into the record a letter he wrote to Mayor Lynn Horton. President Farr interrupted Mr. Dmjevic and referenced Council's Policies and Procedural Manual Rule 9(3): "....Letters addressed to City officials will not be read in Public Recognition." He stressed the importance for the City Official to be given time to address a letter prior to its being made public. Mr. Drnjevic questioned the reasoning for that rule. President Fan' emphasized Council's rules apply to everyone and he would not carry on a public debate over the long-standing Council rules. Mr. Drnjevic submitted copies of the letter for each Council member and the Legislative Assistant. Tom McDonald, Quality Tire located at 4th Street and Warren Avenue, reported for eleven years he has furnished a restroom for parade participants. He is anticipating moving his business to 5th and Naval in the near future and suggested that someone address the lack of "restroom" facilities for parade participants. He also reported as a tire business he will dispose of old tires at a cost of $1.00 each, if they are dropped off at his place of business. President Fan. thanked Mr. McDonald for allowing members of the public to use his facilities. Gordy Byrd passed onto Councilmen Carlos Montgomery and Wayne Olsen the fact that several people, over the past few weeks, have complemented them on the good job they are doing as Council members. TAPE #1538 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April15, 1998 Page 5 of 10 Paul Drnievic, Citizens for Safe Water, invited City Council members and the general public to attend the next meeting of Citizens for Safe Water on April 23, 1998, 7:00 P.M., in the Community Room of Washington Mutual Bank. Additional meetings will be held at the same location on May 7, 21, June 4, 18, 1998. For further information call 377-7206. 8B - LETTER OF INTENT TO ANNEX A KITSAP LAKE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS CAMP MCKEAN~ OWNED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY~ #AB98-078 The City of Bremerton has received a letter of Intent to commence annexation proceedings from the Department of the Navy for the Camp McKean property, which is located on the shoreline of Kitsap Lake adjacent to the southwest section of the City. The site is valued at $296,750 and consists of 18.75 acres of land. The letter signifies the initiating step in the annexation process. According to the Revised Code of Washington (RCW 35.13.125), after being notified of the proposed annexation, the City Council must set a date within sixty days of the filing of the notice for a meeting. The notice was received on April 2, 1998. At the required meeting, the City Council is to determine: 1. Whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation. o Whether it will require the simultaneous adoption of a land use designation or accept an administratively assigned provisional zone most similar to the former County zoning as allowed in the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC 21.02.060); and 3. VVhether it will require the assumption of all or any portion of existing City indebtedness by the area to be annexed. Terrie O'Neill, Municipal Services Coordinator, stated in 1991, the City of Bremerton annexed portions of the lands lying northwest of Kitsap Lake into the City. Property owners of the area were interested in services available from the City. Up to that time, the area had managed its own surface water district and due to the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act's stern mandates, decided to dissolve the district and become part of the City system. Residents on the shoreline shared concerns about health and environmental factors of the lake, which was being impacted by failing on-site septic systems. Following annexation, area property owners decided to form a Utility Limited Improvement District to pay for the extension of City wastewater services. On April 2, 1998, the City of Bremerton received a Letter of Intent to annex the Camp McKean property into the boundaries of the City of Bremerton through the petition method of annexation. The annexation of this site will have little impact -7 TAPE #1538 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 15, 1998 Page 6 of 10 on the City inasmuch as the City already provides sewer and water services to the site, traffic flowing to the site already flows over City right-of-way, and because the Camp McKean site is a Federal reserve does not require municipal services. The site is not assessed property tax because of its Federal exemption. Annexation of this site is proposed in order to comply with the objectives of the State with regards to the preservation of neighborhoods and the prevention of illogical boundaries. The Camp McKean site is an area that, if not incorporated, might prevent the logical extension of the City's services to areas beyond Camp McKean to the southwest portions of the lake and to the west where plans are underway for the Port Blakely developments. The property is within the current intedm Urban Growth Area Boundaries as adopted by the County on December 23, 1996, for interim purposes. It is anticipated that the new UGA boundary will be adopted sometime in Apdl 1998. The new UGA boundary as proposed in the "discussed draft" map, does not include the Camp McKean site. The City has indicated to the County that this site is served by the City and has requested incorporation. If the annexation is not completed before the new plan takes affect and the site is not within the UGA, the annexation would not be able to proceed according to recent court decisions. The City has no choice but to file the Letter of Intent for Council's decision. The City Council must decide whether to proceed now with the annexation and attempt to complete the process prior to the adoption of a new map (if the site is omitted from the final County Plan) or refuse the Letter of Intent. If the Letter of Intent is refused, the annexation cannot move ahead and a new signature would need to be obtained in the future from the Department of the Navy if annexation was to occur.. The City has worked with the Navy since 1991 to obtain this letter of intent. City staff recommends that the area be accepted as proposed. This proposal is a one-parcel annexation due to the fact that it is Federal land, which cannot be mixed with school lands or other properties. It is also recommended to allow for Administration assignment of provisional zoning to the site. The County's designation is a Residential Zone, so administratively the City would assign it a comparable zone and hold a Public Headng within 60-days to consider changing the zoning to Parks and Open Space. It is also recommended that the subject site assume a proportional share of existing City indebtedness. Mrs. O'Neill re- emphasized that no property tax would be collected due to the site being Federal land; however, if it was sold and passed to another property owner it would then be assigned a proportional share of the City's existing indebtedness. Public comment - none. TAPE #1538 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April15, 1998 Page 7 of 10 Mr. Shepherd asked if the property is annexed would the rates for sewer and water service change. Mrs. O'Neill stated yes, they would be lowered by 50%. Mr. Shepherd asked if there were any plans for offsetting budgetary reduction. Gene Sampley, Director of Public Works and Utilities, stated no, due to the fact that type of impact was insignificant in the scheme of the Utilities budget of approximately fifty million dollars. Mrs. Arends asked if the Department of Navy would continue to maintain Camp McKean. Mrs. O'Neill stated yes. #1427 MISICIU(MontgomeryiOverson) Motion to accept the proposed annexation as proposed; allow the administrative assignment of provisional zoning to the site; and require the area to assume a proportional share of existing City indebtedness. 8C - $6-1NCH WATER MAIN GORST/RESERVOIR 4 AMENDMENT #1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PARAMETRIX INC., #AB98- 079 Amendment No. 1 increases the Scope of Work and Budget of Parametrix's Professional Services Agreement. Additions to Parametrix's scope of work include: additional assistance in obtaining construction permits and easement from WSDOT, the Navy and the Navy's railroad operator; design of reservoir inlet and outlet connections; updating contract specifications to WSDOT 1996 base specification; coordination with the City's corrosion control project and transient (surge) analysis of the pipeline. Also, because final design work on this project was delayed because of funding difficulties, the Amendment includes an amount to cover escalation of labor costs from 1995 to 1998 levels. The total amount of Amendment No. 1 is $35,202.00. The action before the City council is approval of Amendment No. 1. Tim Richard, Senior Engineer, on a personal note, thanked the City Council and Mayor Horton for giving him the opportunity to serve the citizens of Bremerton. It has been a challenging and very enjoyable experience. He also thanked City staff members for their support, which has allowed the City to accomplish many tasks over the past four years. The proposed project would include construction of a 36" water main from the vicinity of Gorst into Reservoir #4, which is located at 3r'~ and Union. The 36" main will carry all of the surface water, which makes up approximately 60% of the annual use, from a portion of the line that cardes water from McKenna Falls to Reservoir #4. The project will generally parallel SR-3, cross underneath and TAPE #1538 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April15, 1998 Page 8 of 10 along local streets to the Reservoir site. Both crossings of SR-3 will be jacked underneath so that there would not be any disruption of traffic. The primary purpose for this project is to replace an aging main that was built in the early 1940's. Until some interim measures were taken in 1991, this main had failed seven times in the late 1980s and early 1990s and short-term measures were taken to prevent further failures. In addition, the larger diameter of the pipe will allow more detention time in the pipe, which allows the City to meet requirements for chlorine contract time and providing additional capacity to provide water as more demands are placed on the system in the future. This project was originally undertaken in 1991, and at that time the City entered into a Professional Services contract with Parametrix Inc., in an amount of $380,000 to design the project of which $330,000 was for the design and construction services specifically related to this water main. Parametrix Inc., completed approximately 70% of the design and permitting when the project was placed on hold in early 1993. At that time, $240,000 of the$330,000 had been expended for design/construction services. In 1995, the City had intended to move forward with the project and entered into a new agreement with Parametrix Inc., for $65,000 to complete the design and construction services related to this project. Unfortunately, because of some funding problems, the City did not undertake construction, which was rescheduled for 1998. As a result, finalizing the design and permits was delayed until this time. The proposed amendment consists of three primary parts: (1) $25,000 for design services primarily related to design of a new reservoir inlet. The existing inlet has been determined to be a questionable integrity and not replacing it at this time would place the reliability of that main in question. In addition, there is a by-pass main around the reservoir that allows the City to operate the reservoir during emergency situations when a reservoir might have to be taken off-line. That reservoir is the same vintage as the rest of the main and prudent practice would dictate its replacement at this time in order to provide a reliable by-pass. This proposal includes a surge analysis that was not originally completed in order to insure the adequate strength of the main, since it is the City's only surface water supply. (2) Approximately $4,000 will be used for permit assistance. The majority of the line is located within the railroad right-of-way, which is owned by the Navy, and getting through the permitting process has been more difficult than anticipated. The City must also work through the permit process with Washington State Department of Transportation because their only access to that portion of the project is off SR-3. (3) Rate adjustment of $3,700 increasing the rates from 1995 to 1998. Public comment - none. TAPE #1538 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April15, 1998 Page 9 of 10 Mr. law asked Mr. Richard to explain the reasoning for Task #6 - Rate adjustment. Mr. Richard explained the current Professional Services agreement was entered into with Parametrix Inc., in 1995. At that time, the intent was to proceed with the design and complete the project; however, the City was not able to proceed with the project. The rate adjustment is to increase the hourly rate for the requested services from the 1995 rate to the 1998 rate, which amounts to an 8% increase, i.e., equivalent to the CPI increase for that same period. Mr. McConnell asked if he understood correctly that the design of the reservoir inlet and outlet connections was not part of the original contract. Mr. Richard stated Mr. McConnell was correct. Mr. McConnell asked if some of the work had already been completed under the prior agreement. Mr. Richard stated yes. #1822 MISICIU(MontgomerylMcConnell) Motion to authorize and direct the Mayor to execute Amendment #1 to Professional Services Agreement for the 36 inch water transmission system improvements - Gorst to Reservoir 4 with Parametrix Inc., in the amount of $35,202.00. 9A - RESOLUTION #2648, 36" WATER MAIN GORST TO RESERVOIR 4 CONSTRUCTION/ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND LOAN (NO PW-98-791-008), #AB98-080 The City applied for and received a Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) loan in the amount up to $3,150,000 for construction of the 36" Water Main - Gorst to Reservoir 4 improvements. The loan is to be paid back over 20 years at 1% interest. The attached Resolution accepts the loan and authorizes the Mayor to sign all documents relative to the loan. Tim Richard, Senior Engineer, noted the net savings compared to the use of a Revenue Bond to fund the project would be about $1.4 million over the 20-year life. The attached Resolution authorizes the Mayor to sign that agreement and any other loan agreement documents. Public comment - none. Mr. Reed questioned the source of the loan? Mr. Richard explained the funding source is Washington State Public Works Trust Fund. #2002 MlSlClU(McConnelllLaw) Motion to pass Resolution #2648 accepting the loan and authorizing the Mayor to sign all documents relative to the loan. President Farr acknowledged Mr. Richard's departure from the City and asked everyone to give him a round of applause. TAPE #1538 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April15, 1998 Page 10 of 10 Mr. McConnell stated he has enjoyed working with Mr. Richard and observing how he puts highly technical answers into language that is easily understood. He extended a special "thank you" for his service to the City and "good luck" on his future. Mr. Shepherd expressed his pleasurable experience working with Mr. Richard, which included a number of citizen meetings for public discussions from the sewer treatment plant and the implementation of all the separation systems, his support in litigated court cases and dealing with full engineering activities. He applauded Mr. Richard for his openness and ability to talk to dtizens when addressing their needs. Mr. Montqomery wished Mr. Richard well and views his leaving as a gain for the City of Lewiston Idaho and a loss for the City. President Farr thanked the TV camera crew for their services: Robert Neal, Jay Bennet, Gretchen Elliott, Mike Peebles, and Anthony Silas. With no further business meeting adjourned at 6:38 P.M. PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk DAVID FARR, City Council President City of Bremerton P J/DF/me C: Normal Distribution FileNault /2- AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL !. SUBJECT': MINUTES - APRIL 22, 1998 FOR AGENDA OF: April 29, 1998 ORIGINATING DEPT: City Council ORIGINATOR: David Farr, President DATE SUBMITTED: 4-23-98 2. ~: (comment on back if necessary) ENDORSEME~NT INFORMATION MAYOR __ A-~PROVED B~ COUNCIL PRESIDENT ~OR S%~MITTA/L: 4. SU%94ARY STATEMENT AND REOUIR~NT FOR CO[~CIL AcTION: 8. R~COM34ENDATION: 9..RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFOR~ OFFICIAL: .EX~I~ATiON DATE: REVIEW DATE: PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: !0. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED .DISAPPROVED AMENDED 2. CLE3dlANCE COM24"ENT$:. - -- NON-PASSAGE: STAFFING. BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EOU!PMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: TAPE #1539 UNAPPROVED DRAFT CITY COUCIL MEETING MINUTES APRIL 22, 1998 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, April 22, 1998, at 5:30 P.M., with Council President David Farr presiding. Council members present were Jim Reed, Carlos Montgomery, Carol Arends, Lon Overson, John Law, Cecil McConnell, and Wayne Olsen. Councilman Mike Shepherd was absent. Aisc present were City Attorney Glenna Malanca and Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council President Fart and invocation given by Councilman Carol Arends. President Fart made the following announcement(s): (1) The Council held a 15-minute Executive Session prior to the Council meeting to discuss "litigation". CONSENT AGENDA - NONE CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the Council #0046 MISIClU(MontgomerylArends) On April 22, 1998, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: 218906- 218909, 218913 through 219127 in the amount of $395,034.68; and Regular Payroll for the period ending April 15, 1998, in the amount of $743,594.67. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mr. law reported the District #3 Neighborhood Meeting held on April 21, 1998, was well intended and had a very educational presentation by the Washington State Department of Transportation architect, who will be designing the new Manette Bridge. An update on the design process will be provided in two months. Mr. Overson announced a fund raising Spaghetti Feed will be held April 25, 1998, 12:00 (Noon) to 3:00 P.M., at the Kitsap Community Resource Center, located at 1201 Park Avenue. The proceeds from this event will be used for the TAPE #1539 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 22, 1998 Page 2 of 9 renovation of the Martin Luther KJng Jr. Library building on 5th Street. Cost of the dinner is $5.00 for adults and $2.50 for children under 10 years of age. Information on this event can be obtained by calling Janet Shepherd at 377-3285 or Reverend Cleveland Williams at 373-1063. He noted the location of the event was incorrectly advertised as 1205 Pacific Avenue. Mrs. Arends announced a public hearing on the new Gateway Into Bremerton Project will be held on April 23, 1998, starting with an Open House at 4:30 - 5:45 P.M., and the formal hearing starting at 6:00 P.M., at the West Hills Elementary School. Information on this event/project can be obtained by calling 705-7095. Mr. Montaomerv reported the City did not come out the winner in a lawsuit relating to the wastewater treatment plant; however, it was not a total loss. The jury found, as owners of the sewage treatment plant, the City had a responsibility over the contractor in its operations. Unfortunately, the jury felt the City started to late and failed in their management of the contract. VVhen Mayor Horton advised the City Council that she wanted to cancel the contract with Metcalf & Eddy, this was a major step in correcting the problems associated with this operation. Metcalf & Eddy failed to operate and maintain the plant properly, however, the jury stated, as owners the City is still responsible. When the City hires experts on a contract, they are expected to perform to the highest standards; however, this did not happen. The lesson learned is simply do not contract out unless there is a qualified contract administrator over seeing the contract operations. And, the elected officials, Mayors and City Council member, cannot keep their head in the sand. For elected officials and managers, let this be a lesson to everyone that the ultimate responsibility rests on us. The City is considering its options at this time. Mr. Reed announced work on the intersection of Kitsap Way and Shorewood Drive has started and long awaited. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Lynn Horton announced the City of Bremerton has been selected as the site for a 1999 project undertaken by the World Changers organization. This program involves the rehabilitation of local housing by a group of Junior and Senior High School students from other parts of the country. The renovation activities will take place July 10-17, 1999. Students will be housed at a school facility and will contract out for breakfasts and dinners; however, local churches will be asked to provide lunches. Local organizations will be approached about donating funds and/or materials at cost for this effort. The rehabilitation work will consist of light carpentry, painting, roofing, yard maintenance etc. The City has agreed to provide some of the 1999 Housing Rehabilitation funds toward the cost of materials that cannot be funded through other sources. Anyone knowing of a residence that needs this kind of attention can call her office 478-5266. The City TAPE #1539 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 22, 1998 Page 3 of 9 must follow HUD guidelines for Iow income and the assistance will be in the form of a grant to the homeowners. She views this as a wonderful opportunity for a lot of people in the community and for people within the community helping one another. On Monday, April 27, 1998, 6:30 P.M., Dr. Carol VVhitehead and Mayor Horton will host their final City/School Forum, at Mountain View Middle School. Mayor Horton introduced the City's new Assistant City Attorney Doug Fortner, whose background includes his serving as a Deputy Prosecuting attorney for Kitsap County and as a Special Assistant City Attorney for the cities of University Place and Federal Way. Mr. Fortner has a number of years of experience in legal issues, particularly in the area of Land Use Law, and will be working closely with the Department of Community Development. He will fill in for Glenna Malanca at City Council meetings in her absence. President Fan' extended a warm "welcome" to Mr. Fortner and hoped that he would have some success in the area of abatements. He would welcome some suggestions as to how the abatement regulations could be tightened up in order to address properties that continue to be eyesores. PUBLIC RECOGNITION Larry Dickerson, Bremerton resident, thanked Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston, and Legislative Assistant Merilynn Erhart for their assistance in his research on the issue of a business license for the Far East Sauna. He noted US West, in its great wisdom, did differentiate between "massage parlors" and "massage therapists". Mr. Cornelius Ross, the manager of his three children of the Far East Sauna stated in a newspaper article dated July 1, 1997, that he never had an inkling of any sexual acts being conducted at his properties. That statement may have been true at that time; however, since then there have been three acts of prostitution cited since 1997. It was his hope that the City ordinance could be revised in that if an incident of this type occurs that a letter would be sent to the owner. In his opinion, Mr. Ross is only concerned with making money. Through the Freedom of Information Act, he has reviewed the address and names of the current applicant in the hopes that a letter writing campaign can be started to encourage him not to locate in Bremerton. Bob Jaenicke, Bremerton resident, expressed concern that City officials were not represented at the opening night of the Charleston Cinema. He stressed the importance of supporting new businesses in Bremerton. He offered City Council members the opportunity to sign a petition to place the issue of fluoridation on a ballot measure. President Fart agreed with Mr. Jaenicke that the Charleston Cinema is a welcome addition to the neighborhood. Mrs. Arends stated she did announce the opening of the Cinema during a Council meeting. She has also TAPE #1539 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 22, 1998 Page 4 of 9 heard very favorable comments on the work that has been done to refurbish that facility. Frances Myers, owner of Charleston Cinema, informed the public Charleston Cinema opened approximately three weeks ago and showing second run movies. Admission to the theatre is $3.00 for adults and $2.00 for children. A special they are running currently is "buy one get one free admission" between April 22 and April 30. It took three months to renovate the theatre into an elegant, tasteful, clean and comfortable setting to enjoy viewing movies. Prices for concession food are moderate. It is their hope that their attendance will pick up rapidly and so far they have received lots of support and encouragement from the businesses along Callow Avenue. Don Larson, President Kitsap Diving Association, reported the clean up activities around Sinclair Inlet and Port Washington Narrows on April 18, 1998, were very successful. As part of that clean up effort, a Iow-income family residing close to the downtown area was assisted with the removal of old discarded furniture. Volunteers included Puget Sound Naval Shipyard employees, crews from the USS Carl Vinson, Brownie Troops, Parks Department personnel, and many others. He extended a special "Thank You" to all of the businesses that supported this effort with donated goods. President Farr thanked Mr. Larson for his efforts. Marilyn Mantzke, West Sound Arts Council, reminded everyone that the Dale Chiluly Exhibit at 263 4th Street would be open through May 10, 1998. To her knowledge, an exhibit of this caliber has not been brought to Bremerton. Gallery hours are Tuesday through Saturday 11:00 AM - 5:00 P.M., and Sundays 1:00- 4:00 P.M. Them will be a showing on May 1, which is the First Friday Gallery Walk, until 8:00 P.M. The second Annual Art Walk will take place downtown on May 2, 1998, which will involve closing Pacific Street from 6TM Street to Burwell Street. Activities that day will include wondering musicians and dancers, and every building will be displaying artwork. Paul Drnjevic, President Citizens for Safe Water, asked that the following questions be answered: 1) Why was the name changed from Corrosion Control Facility to Corrosion Control and Fluoridation Facility? 2) VVhat documents mandates this facility or require the addition of any new compounds to our water?. 3) What are the required compounds or compound options? 4) VCnat compounds will be used? TAPE #1539 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 22, 1998 Page 5 of 9 5) What are the studies or tests, which support this mandate, and their titles? 6) Where and when are the above mentioned studies, tests, or mandating documents available for public review? In addition, he announced Citizens for Safe Water will hold an open meeting on April 23, 1998, in the Community Room of Washington Mutual Bank. For more information call 377-7206. Le.qislative Report on questions raised at previous Council meetin.qs: April 1, 1998 City Council Meeting: · Charlie Brown asked if the City had considered implementing a monthly budget plan for sewer and water charges. Administrative Response: After reviewing the issue with the Customer Service Supervisor, it was viewed as a good step both in terms of customer service and administration of the Utility. However, there are no definite plans to implement such a program, but it would be considered in planning for a new billing/receipting system Del Knauss submitted a list of questions relating to the formation and function of the Council Salary Commission. Administrative Response: The Administration has not finalized a response; however, new information has become available that will be included. April 8, 1998, City Council Meeting: Larry Dickerson requested a status report on licensing of the Far East Sauna Administrative Response: The City is in receipt of an application for a Business License, however, it will not be issued until Building and Fire Code requirements are met. Brandi Lurachy, student at Klahowya Secondary School, explained she had previously attended Bremerton's Middle School and believed student behavior at that school could be improved by more student activities and interaction with their teachers. Administrative Response: Ms. Lurachy's concerns were passed on to the Youth Council and Bremerton Police Officer Daniel Fatt, Resource Officer at the Middle School. Officer Fatt reported since Ms. Lurachy's departure changes have taken place and the result has been fantastic among the students. April 15, 1998, City Council Meeting: Tom McDonald, Quality Tire, alerted the City that he has provided the only restroom facility for parade participates over the past 11 years and suggested they find alternative facilities since he would be moving his business to a new location. TAPE #1539 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 22, 1998 Page 6 of 9 Administrative Response: The Bremerton Area Chamber of Commerce was notified of this situation and has agreed to provide portable restrooms on parade days. 8A - APPOINTMENTS TO BREMERTON KITSAP ACCESS TELEVISION PUBLIC ACCESS CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE: CITY STAFF - TERRIE O'NEILL; CITY USER - DAVID GOLDMAN; COMMUNITY- DONALD RICKS AND VICKIE BUSHNELL; AND STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE - DAN GOMEZ, #AB98-O81 The following appointments are recommended to the BKAT Advisory Committee: City Staff- Terrie O'Neill; City User - David Goldman; Community - Donald Ricks and Vickie Bushnell; and Student Representative - Dan Gomez. Mayor Lynn Horton reviewed the background data on each of the proposed committee members as listed in the Agenda packet, which showed each of them had a strong background in either public access itself or some sort of facet of working with the media. Public comment - none. Mrs. Arends stated she was pleased that Dan Gomez was included considering his being an outstanding young man with many talents. #1138 MISICIU (Arends/Olsen) Motion to approve the recommended appointments to the BKAT Advisory Committee. 8B - ACCEPTANCE OF DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES {DNR) GRANT, #AB98-082 The City has been awarded a $15,000 Urban Forestry Grant from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). This funding will be used for tree purchases for Evergreen Park Phase I and Haddon Park, plus a greenhouse for starting tree seedlings. These seedlings will allow for a steady inventory of trees for future plantings, better utilizing existing and potential resources for urban forestry. The first action before the City Council is approval of the grant. Should the grant be approved, a budget adjustment is required, reflecting the increased revenue and subsequent expenditures related to project completion. The second action before the City Council is approval of the required adjustment. Becky Lorber, Parks and Recreation Department, stated in the past the City has received three $50,000 grants and very successful in utilizing that to increase trees within the Bremerton community and completing several requirements to be eligible to receive the Tree City USA award. This grant came to the City because another community could not complete their requirements within the specified TAPE #1539 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 22, 1998 Page 7 of 9 time period. Part of the grant will be used for tree planting at Evergreen Park Phase I Development, which will take place later this year, development of Haddon Park, which will soon be going into the development phase, and the construction of a greenhouse at the Watershed Utility Department, which will be a joint venture with the Utility. Public comment - none. #1340 MISICIU(McConnelllArends) Motion to authorize and direct the Mayor to accept the Urban Forestry Grant from DNR in the amount not to exceed $15,000. #1364 MISIClU(McConnelllOverson) Motion to authorize Budget Adjustment #98-12 to the Parks and Recreation budget for up to $15,000 in revenue and expenditure. 8C - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WASHINGTON TIMBERLAND MANAGEMENT~ INC. FOR FOREST DISEASE MITIGATION/SALVAGE, #AB98-083 In 1996 and 1997, identification of forest disease centers and salvage of merchantable timber was accomplished under a Professional Services Agreement with Washington Timberland Management (VVTM). To date, this program has treated approximately 60% of the identified disease centers and met revenue goals for 1996 and 1997. Continuing this program in 1998 will address most remaining disease centers that have been identified and are accessible. This project implements specific silvicultural practices to mitigate disease and salvage merchantable timber. Utilizing VVTM's expertise in technical forestry, harvesting, and marketing will further the goals of this project and maximize revenue return to the Water Utility. WTM will be compensated by receiving a percentage (8%) of the delivered log price on salvaged timber. Gene Sampley, Public Works and Utilities Director, stated forest health is addressed in the Utility Forest Land Management Plan with a main focus of eliminating/managing the laminated root rot disease. This program started in 1996 continued throughout 1997 and hopefully the majority of the balance of diseased trees will be eliminated through this harvesting. In 1996 and 1997 the City achieved its allowable harvest and revenue goals. Washington Timberland Management has been helping the City with this issue. Their previous fee was 10% and he was pleased to present a negotiated contract agreement for 8% of revenues. In addition, Bill McKinney, Forester, included in the agreement approximately $12,000 for road improvements in the watershed and an additional $6,000 in professional services for timber crew cruises and competitive bid timber sales efforts. The Utility will be issuing several competitive timber sales, TAPE #1539 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 22, 1998 Page 8 of 9 which are very difficult to do in areas that are contaminated with laminated root rot. He pointed out the recommended contractor has had an excellent working relationship with the City. Public comment - none. Mr. Reed stated he was familiar with the laminated root rot disease and how it transfers underground from one area to another. He questioned if the disease died when the stump died after the tree was cut down? Mr. Sampley stated no, all of the stumps are marked so that the area is clearly identified for replanting with species of trees that are resistant to that disease. The most vulnerable specie of tree to that disease is the Douglas Fir. Tree harvesting is conducted outside of the diameter of the affected areas, which creates a buffer that is then re-seeded with tolerant species. #1612 MISlClU(McConnelllOIsen) Motion to authorize the Mayor to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Washington Timberland Management for forest disease mitigation and salvage of merchantable timber. 8D - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF BREMERTON AND BEAK CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED - SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OUTFALL SEDIMENTS, #AB98- 084 The City of Bremerton NPDES Permit for the Wastewater Treatment Plant provides for sediment monitoring in Sinclair Inlet which includes collection and analysis of sediments in Sinclair Inlet. The Washington Department of Ecology (DOE) requires the submission of a Sediment Data Report containing the results of the sediment sampling and analysis no later than June 30, 1998. Proposals were received from four qualified contractors and Beak Incorporated (Beak) was selected for this work. The professional services agreement provides for Beak to provide the services outlined in the Scope of Work to enable the City to meet the DOE requirement, at an estimated cost of $55,454. This agreement also provides for additional work to be performed by Beak upon the request and approval of the City. Total costs of the entire contract including additional work to be performed, if any, shall not exceed $75,000. Gene Sampley, Director of Public Works and Utilities, explained this contract will provide the necessary sampling, analysis and produce a report that is presented to the Department of Ecology under the NPDES Permit. The contractor previously provided this work under the prior permit in 1995. They prepared the Wastewater Treatment Plant Sediment Baseline Sampling and Analysis Plan, which will be the basis for the proposed work. The Department of Ecology has reviewed that Plan with some minor adjustments based on their comments, which allows this work to proceed. The additional money requested to the base TAPE #1539 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 22, 1998 Page 9 of 9 amount is for additional sampling that will be necessary in 1998 through the Water Resources group. Public comment - none. Mr. Olsen asked if Beak, Inc., was the lowest qualified bidder? Mr. Sampley stated yes. #1764 MISlCIU(ArendslOIsen) Motion to approve the professional services agreement and authorize the Mayo to sign the professional services agreement with Beak Incorporated in an amount not to exceed $75,000 subject to City policies and procedures. President Fart thanked the TV camera crew for their services. With no further business meeting adjourned at 6:26 P.M. PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk DAVID FARR, City Council President City of Bremerton P J/DF/me cc: Normal Distribution FileJault AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: FOR AGENDA OF: April 29, 1998 SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF DIGESTER ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works & Utilities RECIRCULATING SCUMBUSTER FOR ORIGINATOR: Pat Coxon, WWTP Mgr WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT DATE SUBMITTED: April 14, 1998 back~ 2. CLEARANCES: (comment on 3. EXHIBITS Director, Public Works/Utilities ~ ',~"~,~(~,,. ~J-c~. '/ Quote fi-om Vaughn Company. City Attorney ,.~~~, ('~._~_,~f Purchase requisition. City Treasurer -~~~ Council Budget & Finance Operations Committee Purchasing Supervisor ~'-' m¥o couNcm si ,r 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The Wastewater Treatment Plant is in need of a new digester recirculating scumbuster to replace an existing unit. The scumbuster breaks up the debris accumulated in the digesters in order to speed up the process. A quote was obtained fi-om Vaughn Company of Montesano, Washington, a sole supplier of this equipment. 8. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approves the purchase of a digester recirculating scumbuster from Vaughn Company in the amount of $19,424.00 including applicable freight costs and State tax and to authorize the Mayor to approve the requisition and/or sign the contract to purchase, subject to City Administrative Policies and Procedures. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: PW & Utils Dir N/A PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 10. NOTICE OFACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED 11. AGENDA BILL NO: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: The digester will continue to be unable to break up the debris accumulated thereby slowing the digesting process. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: The funds necessary for the purchase are included in the Wastewater Budget. No impact on staffing. The equipment will improve the operation of the Wastewater Treatment Plant. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES AGENDABL %04155d55 BRENERTON WASTEWATER City of Bremerton PuDli¢ W<3rl<s & Utilities 160(] Oyster Bay Raad Bremerton, Washington 98312 Altn: P~t Coxon Re: New Scumbusters PAGE 82 ~ 0az/aa3 ~ 1,471 nAT~: 12/1 PAGE: ~ of 2 I 2 EA VAUG~AN MODEL 5300-086 REC2RCf, JLATING SCUMBUSTER, 15 CONSISTING OF: DIGESTER FF..ET LONG, CASING, c~st ductile iron, ASTM A536. IMPELLER, CUTTER ~AR UPPER CUTTER AND CUTTER NUT, cast alloy steel, AS. TM A148, case hardened ,'o minimum 60 Rockwell C Hardness. impe:llcr dynamically bate,riced_ !ntemal cutter on c':_,~er bar. OISCHARGE FLANGE, ~-" 150 lb ANSI rated. RECIRCULATION NOZZLE ASSEMBLY, includes m~nually ooerated vane assemldy for rec:~ul~tion and/or discharge, 4" nczz!e and deflec*.cr (adius~able 19G' horfzom~ly a, nd 70" ve~ically). Recircula~icn noz~',e is ',ocatad 30 ;,n. above rump inlet. ~EA~fNGS. ball ,.h/ge oil him iuor:ca~ed, excei:t icc bearings ~re grelse oacked_ MECHANICAL SEAL. 316 sl~inless s~c2et camrimge type with silicsn :i¢Oida faces, as manufactured by Vaughan AUTOIVlATIC OIL ' ~'"" MONITO,q., '..~v~L deck mounted reservoir with s'~n-tEq & ~'ntr;nsica~y szfe reiay for ; TO vdt ccmrol power COUPUNG. elastomenc type by T.B. Wacom. MOTOR MOUNT, fsbricated fram 10'8 steel, piloted for 'C" fi,~nged mounted motor. MOUNT1NG BASE, gas tight fabricated irom 101,8 ~f. eel customiz~:t tG fit axi~dn(j 125 LB 38" ANSi flange manway in digester cover. Complete with neoorene gasket and SHIPMENT: TERM~S: Kevin Hauser *- TO_6 WE'-KS ,'NORMAL ~ MONTI~_,SA NO, WASHINGTON M-F~R .;{ECEIPT OF QRDE.:I AND RE.Q'O 0glAWttiG ,~p~OVAL vlz~; WAY NE'T_ ~ r3AyS_ © A_C_: (3t JQTAT1OI%VAL 113 FOR 60 DA¥.~ % C~ of 8remerton Pul~Jic Works & Utilities 1600 Oyster Bay Road Bremerton, Washington 98312 Attn: Pst Coxcn BREMERTON WASTEWATER ¥&UGI{A~ CO lNG New ~cumbusters PAGE 03 ~ oas/ua3 NO: 11471 nATl.: 12_/15Jg7 PAGE: 2 of 2_ rl'eJ QUAN ~ uz~rr ) OE~RtPT[OH c'~vered hazsd hole. '28 in. minimum diameter opening required. MOTOR, 20 HP, 1750 RPM, 230/460/~'60. 1_15 SF, "C" flanged, Class I Grcu[:) ©, Explosion Prccsf electric motor with drip FINISH, SSPC-F. F5 white metal sanCblas~ and coated with 8 MOFT of WP_sser MC Tar Inctudes ~ainless steei fa-<tenem and zinc ~ode for cathodic ~rotecdon TOTAL PRICE: PUMP PERFORMANCE: 900 GPM @ 2] ~ TDH APPLICATION: CIGEST~R SCUM ELANKET ,~/IIXING {NOUSTFY- WlNTP 7,599 TOTAL S 35,198 T~.RM~.' Kevin Hau~er .4 TO 6 W~FK~q ;NO_RNIAt ~ MON]-~A NO ._WAS_H_JN_ GTC N NEq' 2~30AY.q_C) A C:, OtJOTAT1ON VAI I_F) cOP 60 r)~YS : PURCHASE REQUISITION THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER REQUISITIONING DEPARTMENT AUTHORIZED BY MARl'( FOR ~,-.~ ~ P.O. # ' ~ASSiGN~D ~Y PURCHASING DEPT.~ R 68893 dNDIVIDUAL~ ITEMUNITS ORDEREDQUAN DESCRIPTION INTENDED USE I UNIT PRICE ~i TOTAL PRICE SUB- TOTAL FREIGHT TAX OTHER TOTAL PURCHASING DEPARTMENT DATE PURCHASING COPY AGEN ABIII. BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: FOR AGENDA OF: Apr ±~L. 29 , 1998 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT- TRAFFIC SIGNALS ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works & Utilities WITH ~ CITY OF SHELTON, WASHINGTON ORIGINATOR:"~_~ KE. Tulp, PW Opms Mgr DATE SUBMITTED: January 27, 1998 2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back if~) 3. _EXHIB~_b.S Director, Public WorksAJtilities / '~/ 7,J~;~/ , ;' Inteflocal Agreement City Attorney oty T easure ,..-- Council Budget & Finance Committee-~ ~',-~-- Operations Committee ~- ~ 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The City of Bremerton Electronics Section Las been servicing the traffic signals within the City of Shelton since January 1995. This interlocal agreement proposes to renew the contract automatically on an annual basis, provided either party shall have the option to notify, in writing, the other party no later than October of the current contract yea~ of its intention to terminate the contract. RECOMMENDATION: That City Council approve the interlocal agreement with the City of Shelton and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement, subject to City Administrative Policies and Procedures. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED APPROVED DIS APPROVED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE Dir/PW&Utils Mgr/PW Opms AMENDED DATE: 11. AGENDA I 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Loss of income used to offset some of the costs of maintaining City of Bremerton traffic signals.. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIP~NT OR OTHER RESOURCES: None; no additional personnel or equipment required. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES AGENDABL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Shelton owns and operates Traffic Control equipment situated within the City of Shelton; and WHEREASi the City of Bremerton has personnel skilled in maintaining traffic control equipment and is desirous of providing maintenance services to the traffic control equipment owned and operated by Shelton; NOW, TI-iEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS CONTAINED HEREIN, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Parties: This Agreement is by and between the City of Bremerton, hereinafter referred to as "Bremerton" and City of Shelton, hereinafter referred to as "Shelton". Section 2: Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1998 for up to one year, and ending on December 31, 1998. This Agreement shall automatically be renewed on a calendar year basis unless written notice of termination is given by either party by the preceding October 1 of any such year. Failure of either party to notify the other of such termination on or before October 1 of any such year shall cause this Agreement to automatically be renewed for the next ensuing calendar year. Section 3: Payment: In consideration for the services provided, Shekon shall pay Bremerton Two Hundred Seventeen and 11/100 Dollars ($217.11) per month, per signal for the first year of this agreement, due to Bremerton in quarterly installments thirty (30) days after receipt, beginning on January 1, 1998. In the event that Shelton adds traffic control signals requiring INTERLOCAL AGRF. F. MF~NT -1- maintenance, Shelton shall pay the sum of Two Hundred Seventeen and 11/100 Dollars ($217.11) per month, per signal for each signal added, which will be paid quarterly thirty (30) days after receipt and pro-rated to the date to activation of the traffic control signals. At the beginning of each successive year thereafter, all charges shall automatically be adjusted by the percentage change in the "All Items" category of the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor for the Seattle-Tacoma metropolitan statistical area (1982-84=100), as published for the month of June. If at any time during the term of the contract the practice of computing the Index for the City of Seattle shall be abandoned or altered by the U.S. Department of Labor, and not assumed by some other federal or state governmental agency, then there shall be substituted therefor in Bremerton's sole discretion the then most nearly comparable cost of living index. In addition to the above payments, Shelton shall pay Bremerton a surcharge of one (1) hour travel time for each employee that responds to a call in Shelton, at the rate that Bremerton currently charges other Brernerton Departments (for 1998 this is $30.00 per hour, rate shall be adjusted annually through Treasurer's Office clearing rate), for which Bremerton will bill Shelton on a monthly basis. Scheduled preventative maintenance will not be subject to this travel time surcharge. Section 4: Service Provided: (a) Bremerton shall provide electronic, electrical repairs, electrical inspection and preventative maintenance as requested or directed by the Shelton City engineer. Provided, Bremerton shall not be required to perform major electrical repairs as determined by the Shelton City Engineer and Bremerton's Electronic's Supervisor, and, Provided, further, Bremerton shall not be required to INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -2- Shelton..a. gt - Nlq Agn~ 1 - 3/18/98 perform electrical repairs where labor costs exceed Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($500.00) per occurrence. (b) Bremerton shall provide repair parts which shall include, but are not limited to, transistors, integrated circuit chips, resistors, diodes, capacitors, tubes, wire, and modules; Provided, Bremerton shall not be required to provide major components and/or assemblies; and Provided, further, the detenuination of what constitutes a major component and/or assembly shall be made by the Shelton City Engineer and Bremerton's Electronics Supervisor. Bremerton shall not be required to provide repair components assemblies in excess of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) in value. (c) Bremerton shall provide labor and materials to repair luminaries not to exceed Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) per calendar year. (d) Bremerton shall provide annual lamp changes for all indications as required. All yellow lamps and the 3M heads will be relamped once every (5) years. Bremerton will replace all lamps, L.E.D. indicators and heads, as needed, upon breakage or bum-out. Shelton to provide red L.E.D. indicators to replace red lamps at Shelton's cost. Bremerton will provide labor at no extra cost while performing annual lamp change to install L.E.D. indicators. (e) Bremerton shall provide labor and materials for the repair of defective traffic signal loops. Bremerton shall not be responsible for saw cutting and sealing of traffic signal loops, replacement of loops due to damage created by contractors, or additional loops necessary for intersection upgrade or design change. (f) In the performance of the services set forth in (a) through (e) above, Bremerton shall be INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -3- responsible for and shall provide and pay all wages, salaries, tools, vehicle usage, training, utilities, postage, freight, telephones, overhead costs, and all other direct or indirect costs or expenses incurred. Section 5: Equipment: Bremerton shall provide services described in Section 4, for the traffic control equipment located within Shelton. The equipment includes and is limited to: a. Traffic signal controller equipment; b. Traffic signal indicator lead switches; c. Traffic signal detection equipment; d. Traffic signal conflict monitor units; e. Traffic signal pre-emption equipment (OPTICOM); f. Traffic signal auxiliary cabinet wiring; g. Traffic signal loops; h. Miscellaneous flasher, school warning and fire station signaling equipment; i. Street lighting at traffic signal locations, including control, ballast, photo cells, igniters, and lamps; j. Other street lighting locations, including control, ballast, photo cells, igniters, and lamps; and k. Traffic signal coordination - create, install and maintain timing places from data provided by Shelton. Section 6.' Time of Service: The services set forth in Section 4 shall be available Monday through Friday during regular business hours. After regular business hours and during weekends, and INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -4- Shctton. A~ - Nlq Agn~ 1 - 3/1g/95 holidays, Bremerton shall have available for Shelton, those same services as it provided for its own needs. Provided, during weekends, holidays or after regular hours, if Shelton is unable to secure services from Bremerton listed in this Agreement, then Shelton may secure such services elsewhere and deduct the cost thereof from any amounts owning or to be owed to Bremerton under the contract. Bremerton shall make available to Shelton telephone numbers through which services can be obtained. Section 7: Hold Harmless: Shelton agrees to defend, indemnify and save harmless the City, its appointed and elected officers and employees, from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, damage and expense, including costs and attorney fees in defense thereof because of actions, claims or lawsuits for damages resulting from personal or bodily injury, including death at any time resulting therefrom, sustained or alleged to have been sustained by any person or persons and on account of damage to property, arising or alleged to have arisen directly or indirectly out of or in consequence of Shelton's performance of this Agreement, whether such injuries to persons or damage to property is due to the negligence of Shelton, its subcontractors, agents, successors or assigns. This provision shall be inapplicable to the extent such damage or injury is judicial found to be cause by the sole negligence of the City. Section 8: General Conditions: a. Entire Agreement - This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and both parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been fully set forth in the text of this Agreement. b. Amendments - The parties hereby further agree that this Agreement cannot be amended INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -5- Shelton.Agt - N'N Agmls 1 - 3/18/98 or modified without the written concurrence of both parties. c. Notices - Any notices required to be given by Bremerton to Shelton, or by Shelton to Bremerton shall be in writing and delivered to the following parties at the following addresses: Bremerton City Clerk 239 Fourth Street Bremerton, WA 98337 City of Shelton City Hall P.O. Box 1277 Shelton, WA 98584 d. Waiver - Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of such right or power at any time be taken to be a waiver of any other breach. e. Compliance with State, Local and Federal Laws - Parties agree to comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws in performance of all services under this Agreement. f. Applicable Law; Venue - This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and, in the event of dispute, the venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Kitsap County Superior Court. Section 9: Nondiscrimination: Bremerton shall not discriminate in employment or services provided on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status or disability in employment or the provision of services unless an employment action based on a bona fide occupational qualification. Section 10: Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by either party, without cause, upon six (6) months written notice to the other party, or for cause if either party fails INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT-6- Shelton.~gt - NN Agn~ 1 - 3/18/98 substantially to perform through no fault of the other and does not commence correction within five (5) days of written notice and diligently completes the correction thereafter. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the dates and year written below. CITY OF SHELTON CITY OF BREMERTON BY: BY: DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: LYNN S. HORTON, Mayor DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: GLENNA MALANCA, City Attorney Received for fili~g: Kathleen ~skey, City Clerk INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -7- Shelton.Agt- Nlq Agmts 1 - 3/lg/gg APPENDIX "A' 2. 3. 4. 5. Olympic Highway North & "K" Street 7th & Alder 7th & Railroad 4th & Railroad 13th & "K" Street 1Nt'ERLOCAL AGREEMENT -8- Sh~llon.Agt - NN A? 1 - 3/1 g/95 AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT:PUBLIC HEARING/RESOLUTION FOR AGENDA OF: April 29, 1998 RESOLUTION #2649 DEPT. OF ORIGIN: DCD - Land Use ACTION: Preliminary Planned Unit ORIGINATOR: James Coombes Development in single-family zone. DATE SUBMITTED:April 23, 1998 APPLICANT: Kitsap Lake Mobile Home Park LOCATION: 6201 Price Road 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: DCD Director : ,~ ~~ o PC Findings and City Attorney:~t'~__~_~/~/.~/_~,Z/~~_~,~_~ o PC Minutes (3/17/98) City Engin~er:'-~~ ~ ~ o Resolution No l~4q ~+~__~~o ~'~- - '~- ' 0PE~TION~~--~° Written testimony ENDORSEMENT X INFORMATION ~ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: See Attached. 5. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the Preliminary PUD subject to the conditions contained in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the Planning Commission Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Resolution No.~/~ accepting the Preliminary Planned Unit Development at Kitsap Lake Mobile Home Park. o RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Judy Johnson ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Judy Johnson EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 7. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: APPROVED D I SAPPROVE D DATE: o CLEARANCE COMMENTS: !0. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: If the Preliminary PUD is denied, the applicant will be unable undersake the project as proposed. !1. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: Additional staff resources will be required to review final plans and permits. 12. RESEARCH SOURCES: Zoning Ordinance File Site Visits ATTACHI~ENT TO: AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT:PUBLIC HEARING/RESOLUTION ACTION: Preliminary Planned Unit Development for a two phase 61 total unit expansion of the Kitsap Lake Mobile Home Park. FOR AGENDA OF: April 29, 1998 DEPT. OF ORIGIN: DCD - Land Use ORIGINATOR: James Coombes DATE SUBMITTED:April 23, 1998 APPLICANT: Kitsap Lake Mobile Home Park LOCATION: 6201 Price Road 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: On March 17, 1998, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this project as a Preliminary Planned Unit Development. The two phase expansion includes 32 units in Phase I and 29 units in Phase II. The 13.12 acre site is immediately adjacent to the existing mobile home park. The proposed density of 4.65 units per acre is well within the 8 units per acre allowed in this 'SF-3' zone. The typical unit site would be approximately 5000 SF. This is consistent with the minimum lot size in the 'SF-3' zone, though the home sites would be undivided sites in the 13.12 acre plan. The park does not allow single-wide homes. Ail existing and proposed sites require double- wide homes. The site includes 24.5 percent open space. The Zoning Ordinance minimum requirement for open space is 15 percent. Ail required landscape buffers and circulation requirements for both vehicles and pedestrians are provided in the proposed development. The City Council is the decision-making body responsible for evaluation of Preliminary and final PUDs. The City Council shall either: 1) Affirm the decision under review; 2) Reverse the decision under review; 3) Modify in whole or part the decision under review; or 4) Remand the matter back to staff for further consideration. RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~ ~/? A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TWO PHASE EXPANSION OF THE KITSAP LAKE MOBILE HOME PARK, LOCATED ADJACENT TO AND WEST OF THE EXISTING HOME PARK AT 6201 PRICE, BREMERTON, KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. WlllgREAS, pursuant to BMC 21.02.350 Kitsap Lake Mobile Home Park, proponent for the proposed expansion of the existing home park in a two-phase PUD development, comprising 13.12 acres adjacent to and west of the existing home park at 6201 Price Road within the City of Bremerton, has made application for approval of a preliminary planned unit development containing a total of 61 unit sites; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this matter on March 17, 1998 and recommended Council approval; and WBlgREAS, an environmental checklist has been prepared and considered by the responsible official and a determination of environmental nonsignificance issued; and WItEREAS, the Bremerton City Council held a public heating on April 29, 1998, concerning the preliminary planned unit development; now, therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY TIlE BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL That the City Council adopts the Planning Commission's Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations and hereby approves the Kitsap Lake Mobile Home Park Preliminary Planned Unit Development subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A". Property in the City limits of Bremerton included in this Preliminary Planned Unit Development is described as follows: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1E, W.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17, TI-~NCE RUN N 88° 42' 13" W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 17, 703.16 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (POB); THENCE N 03° 40' 40" W, 950.88 FEET TO THE SOUTHIERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PRICE ROAD; THENCE N 71° 52' 00" W, ALONG THE SAID SOUTI-tERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, 461.74 FEET; THENCE S 40° 17' 01" W, 122.46 FEET; TI-IENCE S 01° 52' 57" W, 985.91 FEET; THENCE S 88° 42' 13" E, 702.82 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (POB): CONTAINING 13.12 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF BREMERTON, KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this ,1998. day of DAVID FARR, President Bremerton City Council APPROVED this day of ,1998. LYNN S. HORTON, Mayor City of Bremerton ATTEST: PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk CITY OFBREMERTON "EXHIBIT A" FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION BREMERTON PLANNING COMMISSION REGARDING: OFTHE Prepared by James Coombes Planning Commission Review Date: March 17, 1998 I. SUMMARY A. Applicant: Kitsap Lake Mobile Home Park 6201 Price Road Bremerton, WA 98312 aw II. A. Application: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Expansion of an existing mobile home park Location: 6201 Price Road Attachments: I. Application II. Preliminary PUD Plan BACKGROUND Procedural Backqround: The Planning Commission is being requested to review a residential PUD application to expand an existing mobile home park in two phases with an additional 61 dwelling unit sites. The site is 13.12 acres of vacant land immediately adjacent to and west of, the Kitsap Lake Mobile Home Park. The Planning Commission is to review the staff report for the preliminary PUD and make a recommendation to the Bremerton City Council. B, Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan Map Designation for the site is Low Density Residential - LDR, 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The following Comprehensive Plan Elements state relevant Goals and Policies applicable to this proposal. Land Use Element. Residential Land Use Goal: Provide attractive, livable residential areas that are compatible with the prevailing or planned character of surrounding areas and that are in keeping with land capabilities and available public services. Policies: Encourage housing construction, rehabilitation and maintenance in residential areas where public services are available and adequate. Provide opportunities for a range of various types and densities of housing throughout Bremerton to accommodate the lifestyles and income levels of present and future residents. Provide areas for a variety of housing types and densities that are in keeping with neighborhood characteristics and the availability of utilities. Encourage innovative but compatible site and structure layout and design through a Planned Unit Development. Housinq Element, Housin.q Supply Goal: Ensure an adequate housing supply to meet changing needs of Bremerton residents. Policies: General Housing Supply - Support the private sector's efforts to meet changing housing demands and identified housing needs. 2 C= Zoninq Ordinance: Zoninq: The site is zoned "Single-Family -3" (SF-3). Chapter 21.02 Appendix: Figure 140, Land Use Tables allows the use "Manufactured Home Park" within the SF-3 zoning distdct through the PUD process. PUD: A PUD application is reviewed by the City in a two-part process; review of a preliminary plan followed by review of a final plan. The purpose of this process is to minimize development costs prior to a city determination of acceptability of the preliminary plan and to allow greater public involvement. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) Section 21.02.340 of the Zoning Ordinance is intended to: Permit diversity and variety in allowable uses, location, and types of structures; Promote the efficient use of land by facilitating a flexible arrangement of buildings, circulation systems, land uses, and utilities; Preserve, to the greatest extent possible, the existing landscape features and minimize adverse effects on sensitive environmental areas; Allow the combination and coordination of architectural styles, building forms, and building relationships within the planned area; Lessen development impacts on adjacent areas through site design and necessary mitigating measures; Preserve the value, character, and integrity of surrounding areas which have been, or are being, developed under traditional zoning district regulations; Provide greater predictability of the applicant's chances of gaining approval; Provide City officials with assurances that the project will retain the character proposed at the time of approval; and Allow the general public greater opportunities to participate in the development process. 3 Perimeter Setbacks: A residential Planned Unit Development one acre or larger in area shall maintain minimum setback requirements of the zoning district in which it is located. If the PUD includes a combination of zones, the most restrictive setbacks shall apply. The PUD shall maintain minimum front, side, and rear setbacks according to the height of the buildings, as follows: Zoning Ordinance Lot Development Requirements - SF-3 Zone: SETBACKS: FRONT 15ft. Maximum Building Height: Minimum lot size: Minimum lot width: Minimum lot coverage: Parking: SIDE REAR 5ft. 15ft. 30 FT 5,000 SF 40 FT 40% Two parking spaces per manufactured home site. SEPA: A Threshold Determination of Mitigated Non-significance pursuant to WAC 197-11- 34 was issued by the City's Responsible Official on March 4, 1998. An environmental impact statement was not required. Comment Survey: Public Works - Ned Lever, Civil Engineer IIh The access road shall be constructed prior to Final P.U.D. approval and shall be constructed in accordance with City Standards. This development does not cause the subdivision of land, therefore, the access road does not serve separate lots and does not meet the definition of a public or private street. Road improvements will be subject to the requirements of the Department of Community Development. 2. Storm drainage improvements must be designed and constructed in accordance with Title 15 of the Bremerton Municipal Code. Erosion control measures must be designed in accordance with the Department of Ecology's Stormwater management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 3. The storm drainage analysis must be revised at final design to incorporate the bypass flows from lots 17-19, 22-25, and 52-60. 4. The storm system and the sanitary sewer system will be privately operated and maintained. 5. The water main shall be located within a 10 foot wide easement and shall be looped by connecting to the existing water main. Fire Department- Scott Rappleye, Deputy Fire Marshal: l. Prefer roads as close to BMC Roadway Standards as possible. 2. Hydrant per UFC App III A&B. All other departments stated they had no problems, or no relevant comments to the PUD process were submitted. Transportation/Circulation: The primary access to the site is via Price Road. streets: All streets and rights-of-way shall require special inspection for alignment, compacting, material, installation, and final approval. pedestdans: A pedestrian circulation system shall be designed to assure that pedestrians can move safely and conveniently both on the site and between the site and nearby properties and activities, as appropriate. 5 Open Space: A minimum of fifteen percent (15%) of the total area of a PUD shall be dedicated as common open space. Open space shall be provided for active as well as passive recreational activities, and for the preservation of existing natural site amenities whenever possible. Open space shall not include: streets, alleys, and other right-of-way; vehicular drives, parking loading and storage areas; required buffering and landscaping; perimeter setback areas of the PUD project. Open space and its intended uses shall be clearly designated on the site plan. At least two-thirds of the open space area shall be suitable for active recreational purposes. The City will base its acceptance of these areas on their dimensions, usability, location, slope, and physical improvements. The locations of natural site amenities shall be considered when planning for open space, siting buildings, and other structures, routing underground services, and determining finished grade levels and areas to be paved. Natural amenities might include rock out-cropping, ravines, groves of trees, ponds or streams. Up to one-third (1/3) of property intended to satisfy the open space requirement can be unsuitable for recreational purposes if consisting of existing natural site amenities. When a PUD is constructed in phases, common open space shall not be less than fifteen percent (15%) of the total area developed in each phase and must be completed in accordance with approved specifications at the time of completion of each phase of the PUD. Provisions shall be made for the perpetual maintenance of all common open space areas. The total requirement for active open space may be reduced by no more than twenty-five percent (25%) through the provisions of a recreation building, swimming pool, or similar major recreational facility that, in the opinion of the Planning Commission, wilt better provide for the needs of the residents without significantly detracting from the project's appearance or environmental quality. 6 IV. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Criteria for Action and Findin.cls: Section 21.02.480, General Development Standards of the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance states: A PUD may be approved if it is found that the development conforms to all of the following general criteria: Findings: Findings: o Findings: 4. Findings: The location, design and uses of the PUD shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and with other applicable plans and ordinances adopted by the City. In general, the plan provides enough detail to show compliance with the zoning requirements allowable by PUD. The PUD shall be integrated with its surroundings and designed to harmonize with existing or proposed development in the neighborhood, in the case of a departure in character from the surrounding land uses, the scale, intensity and design shall adequately reduce the impact of the development in such a way that the project will not be detrimental to the neighborhood. The proposed manufactured home park expansion is compatible with the character, scale, intensity, and design of the surrounding single-family residential area and is not a detriment to the neighborhood. Adequate consideration has been made for landscape and open space buffers. The traffic generated by the PUD shall be accommodated safely without congestion on existing or planned streets. Traffic mitigation issues are being adequately addressed as conditions of approval. All development will be adequately served by existing or planned facilities and services. Existing public utilities and services are adequate and available to serve this project. The PUD will result in an attractive, healthful, efficient and stable environment for living, shopping, working and leisure activities. Findings: Findings: The preliminary PUD does not conflict with this criterion. This commercial use is an important convenience to the community. The development sufficiently addresses the aesthetic, health and safety, and efficient aspects of this single-family residential use. The development plan shall make adequate and appropriate provisions for the preservation of the environment, both natural and man-made, and the conservation of energy. The preliminary PUD does not conflict with this criterion. V. CONCLUSIONS In general, the site plan provides enough detail to show compliance with zoning. This is a preliminary PUD application which will be used to design a final site plan. The proposed development and use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site plan provides adequate areas to comply with open space and landscaping requirements. The proposed use will generate relatively Iow volumes of traffic compared to other residential uses. No significant traffic impacts are anticipated. If the preliminary PUD is conditioned to provide storm drainage and erosion control measures per state and city standards. The plan will be consistent with the Zoning Ordinance's PUD Section 21.02.490, Specific Development Standards, E.3 Circulation. 5. Existing public services and facilities are adequate to serve this use. The application, as conditioned, is consistent with the minimum criteria for granting approval of a PUD. 8 VI. RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION P ~ (-~ .~-A.c~-~,-,.... RE IT RESOLVED, the Bremerton ¢_,~il, after considering oral and written testimony and the staff report, approves the Preliminary Planned Unit Development for expansion of an existing manufactured home use subject to the following conditions: The access road shall be constructed prior to Final PUD approval and shall be constructed in accordance with City Standards. Stormwater drainage improvements must be designed and constructed in accordance with Title 15 of the Bremerton Municipal Code. Erosion control measures must be designed in accordance with the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 3. The storm system and the sanitary sewer system will be privately operated and maintained. Final PUD shall meet all provisions of the Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, and all other applicable codes. BILL ROBINSON, Chair Bremerton Planning Commission Date JtJDY JOHNSON ~t~ng Exe~tive Secretary Date 9 Nothing scheduled. Nothing to report. VIII. Study Session IX. Old Business X. Ne~v Business Prelimina~' Planned Unit Development, Kitsap Lake Mobile Home Park, 6201 Price Road Mr. James Coombes gave the staff report. An aerial photo,apb was presented to the comrmssioners. which indicated the area tbr expansion. This is a 2 phase e.,cpansion. The first phase will be an expansion of 32 units and the second phase will be 29 units. The site is 13.12 acres adjacent to the current mot>ile home park. A SEPA, Mitigated Deterrrunation of Non-Significance was issued bv the Cits.- on March 4. 1998. Overheacls were presented including a vicimty map, zoning map. and highlights of the minimum development requirements and the proposed development requirements. All proposed development standards exceed minimum standards. Commissioner Wolfe inquired as to if these were rental umts. Mr. Coombes answered that the pads were rented but the homes were owned bv the occupants. Commissioner Wolfe ex-pressed concerns as to the numerous homes and rentals in the cit?- which are vacant or pending sales, and why additional housing is required. Mr. Coombes indicated that according to the requirements of the growth management act the city must absorb 20,000 people in the next 10 years. There is a need for more housing units, in a range which fits different lifestyles and income groups. Dianna Galland spoke regarding the park and the fact that it is a retirement park for persons 62 years old and up. Chairman Robinson wanted to know how long the site propert)- had been in control of the applicant. It was responded since 1967. Commissioner Boyd noted that a number of single-wide mobile homes were in the park according to the photograph shown by Mr. Coombes. Dianna Galland responded that the single-wides are no longer in the park and it is exclusively double- aides. And the park does not look now as it appears in the photograph. Commissioner Wolfe wanted to know how long the residents stax' in the park. Ms. Galland indicated that some residents have been there for 20 years, and they "leave when they leave." Page 7 Planmng Commission Meeting, March 17, 1998 John Gailand wanted to state that when a vacancy becomes available it is immediately filled and that the-,' have a waiting list. Mr. Coombes wanted to add that it is one of the nicest mobile home parks in the county and has a very good reputation. Chairman Robinson asked if the pen'mt office had reviewed the plans. Mr. Coombes ~ndicated ves. Chairman Robinson wanted clarification as to the open space that the mobile home park was proposing. Mr. Coombes referred to the map included in the packets. Mel Wortman. 132 Sorino Circle Drive. spoke to the good reputatmn of the park and that it was a great place to live. He felt that an increase in the park would be a favorable one and urged the comm~ssmn to approve the expansion. Jane Wortman. 132 Sorino Circle Drive. commented on the safety and beautiful atmosphere of the park and that an addition would only add to the beauV,'. Commissioner Stone inquired if there was a distinction bet~vecn mobile home and manufactured home language. Mr. Coombes stated that homes built after 1976 are referred to as manufactured housing. Pre-1976 housing is referred to as mobile homes. Commissioner Wolfe stated that his first inclination was not to approve the expansion, but after the testimon'v feels that the expansion would be a good addition. Commissioner Oingfield commented on the area and the lovely setting. This type of development is a good addition to the ciry. A motion was made by Commissioner Stone that the Planning Commission approve the PreliminaD' Planned Unit Development for expansion of an existing manufactured home use subject to the following conditions as they read on page 9 of the staff report. (5 conditions are listed) Seconded by Commissioner Dingfield. Question called: Boyd, yes; Robinson, yes; Stone, yes; Ding, eld, yes; Wolfe, yes. Motion passes. 2. Bremerton School District Rezone, 1312 13th Street Commissioner Dingfield commented that even though this matter was not quasi-judicial she would abstain on this vote due to appearance of fairness. Mr. Ron Hough presented the staff report. This is a requested rezone of a single lot at the northeast comer of 13th and Ohio across the street from the Bremerton 1-l.igh School. Currently the house is being used as a daycare and is presently under the "CBR" zoning. The School would like to utilize the house for classroom purposes and therefore is requesting a "PS" zoning. The Comprehensive Plan zoning is consistent with this requested rezone classification. The application is consistent with the zoning ordinance for rezones and with the schools long range plan. Staff recommends approval of this rezone. Commissioner Stone inquired as to if the school district owned the propem.-. Mr. Hough indicated that the school district did own the property in question. Page 8 Planning Commission Meeting. March 17. 1998 -j L'.LJ © 12..I __1 ..../ C) (/) u) City of Eremerton Application for PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DEC O4 UNIT BREMERTON BUILDING DEPARTM~ Planning Commission Recommendation City Council Decision FEE: A Planned Unit Development (PUD) application shall be flied with the Depar~ument of Community Development to be reviewed and approved in a two-stage process. City Council approval of the Pretiminary'P. ,UD Plan is followed by adminis[radve approval of the Final Plan. To be complete for processing purposes, this application must include the required fees, maps, plans, and any other su~ ~C'~.~ that'may be helpful, .~s determined dunng a pre- application conference or volunteered by the applicant. o NAME OF PROJECT: KITSAP LAKE MOBILE HOME PARK ADDITION, APPLICANT: City: CONTACT PERSON: (If other than applicant). Telephone: WORK: ~ 74'- 2 d" ~ ~ TITLE HOLDER: (if other than applicant). Name: Galland Family Limited Partnership Address: 6201 Price Road C)ty:Bremerton State: Wa Eh i ngtoq Telephone: (206 / 479-2533 ZIP: 983~-~859 PUD Application -- Page 1 PROPERTY LOCATION: Address: 6201 Price Road Asse,sscr's Acc:. Nc: Bremerton, Washinaton 98312-8859 Legal Description:(Ar~c~ex~ra sheetifnecessa~) See Attached PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: (Show these features on map) Size (acres or sq.,",.): 13.13 acres Overall General Dimensions: 703 x 986 Feet Public Street Access: PricP Rnad Existing Dwellings: None Other Existing Structures: None Adjacent Development: KitsaD Lake Mobile Home Park Natural Features (creek, shoreline, bluff, weUand, etc.) Wet i ands 7. CURRENT ZONING: SF - 3 8. PUD PROPOSAL: I am requesting a Planned Unit Development for the following reasons: To enable development of the orooerty as a Mobil Home Park PROPOSAL: Please describe your PUD proposal as clearly and completely as possible. Attach separate pages if necessary and attach any maps, sketches, or other illustrations that will help describe the proposal or its location. The PUD proposal contains development cf the prooert¥ into a sinqle family residental manufactured home park. PUD Application -- Page 2 10. THE Your Q Q Q Q Q APPROVAL PROCESS: PUD will be processed as a Type III application through the following steps: Pre-application Conference with City staff (to Ciscuss s~andarcs, prccess, etc.). Concept P~an is submitted fcr staff review. Neic_hborhccd Mee,,ing (at discretion of Director) ~c discuss Ccnce~t P~an. Prelirninary PUC) ApplicaQcn submitted. Technical Review of Preliminary PUD. City Council Public Hearing and Decision on the Preliminary PUD. Final PUD Application Su0mitted (within two years of Council approval). Director reviews and approves the Final PUD P!an. Cons[ruction be¢ins within two years of Final PU0 Approval. 11. PUD PROPOSAL: A. (Summarize the Proposed PUD) Land Use Breakdown: ~,~ 7~_~ sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ff. sq.ft. sq.ft. ,f~. ~4-oo sq.ft. /~ Z. ,¢¢~ sq.ft. '¢'lo g~' "~ Single-unit Residential Multi-unit ~esidential Mixed Residential Commercial Office Industrial Parks & Open Space Wo-r//vc,'. Other PubliclQuasi-pu biit~'~z'~'~''~* ~ Off-street Parking Streets & Other ROW B. Residential Units: Residential Density: Off-street pari<ing providec: Base Zone Requested: Efficiency Units (no bedrooms) 1 bedroom units 2 bedroom units 3+ bedroom units DU/ac,'e Basic tenant/oc~l~ant spaces. , Visitor spaces. .... Motorcycle spaces. Handicapoed spaces. F. Other Zones Requested: PUD Application -- Page 3 12. ATTACHMENTS: NOTE: The O/red:or may waive any cf the following re-',uiremen[s when it is c~ear t, ha: :he infcrmation would not be relevant or helpful tc an informed dec!sion. Ao Notification List and Ma/line Lobe!s: ~ Applicant will provide. C~ City w/il provide.' Name/address labels for the owners of all proper'o/within a radius of: 300 ft. radius when the PUD is smaller than 2 acres. 500 ft. radius when the PUD is 2 to 5 acres in size. 700 ft. radiu~ when the PUD is larger than 5 acres in size. * Mailing labets may be provided, at the applicant's option, by the City at an additional per-label cost to the appli~nt. Vicinity Mac: Show the location of the site in reiadon to all other propefdes and major structures within a radius of at least 250 feet. Site Plan;. Provide a Site Plan, drawn to scale, showing at least the following information: ,.q'his Plan is for purposes ot~ PUO approval on.K, and not intended to meet all the requirements of a development-related Site Plan Review] ,Q Location, size, bulk, height, number of si. odes and use of all structures and areas on the subject parodi, beth existin.c and pro¢¢sed. Existing and propcsed pedestrian walk-ways, bikewc=ys, pad(s, playgrounds, recreational areas, acdvity centers, !ancscmsed areas, and other areas and facilities of a public or recreational nature. Exisdng and proposed ut/lit'/systems, drainage struc,'ures, fire hydrantS, and relate, c_ features. An environmental summaw, including such features as shorelines, bulkheads, creeks, cuive~s, wetlands, steep slopes, unstable so/is, rock outcroppings, significant trees, c~her'sensitive areas*, etc. All prcber~ lines, easements, fences, wails, signs, and other points of reference. Other information, maps or data that is heipful or that was requested at the pre- application conference to better unders~.and the nature and scooe of the proposal and i~.s impacts on surrounding prope.~ies, people, and land uses. Phasina PIan: If the project is designed to be permitted and/or constructed_in phases. provide a ma.~ snowing the phases and a schedule for development. The Preiiminary PUD aporovm must include the total PUD and all phases. PUD Application -- Page 4 12. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT: I hereby ce,qify that the statements contained herein are ccrrec:. I understand that conditions of approval may be required to adequately protec: the zone or neighborhood within which the proposed PUD is located. ~-nd I agree to abide by those conditions. I understand that the decision on this application may be appealed and possibly overturned. I also understand that an approved PUD is subject to possible forfeiture of the right to proceed for failure to develop within approved time limits. I have read, unders'tapd, and agree with all of the above statements.. Applicant~J Sheikh M. Hasan Date The Ci,~. of Bremerton does nct discriminate on t,~e basis cf rac~., sex, ccior, retigicn, national origin, age, or disabilit.v in the provision cf services, in programs or actiw'ties, cr employment opportunities end benefits. FORMS:PUC.APP SUP Appfication ~ Page 5 City of Bremerton Department of Community Development MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD97-0006, SEP97-0036) for 13.13 acre, 61 unit expansion of an existing mobile home park. Proponent: Kitsap Mobile Home Park Addition 6201 Price Road Bremerton, WA 98312 Location of proposal: 6201 Price Road Lead Agency: City of Bremerton Department of Community Development Threshold Determination: The City of Bremerton has determined that the project as proposed, as mitigated under City, State, and Federal law, and as subject to the agreed upon mitigation, will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.2 lC. This decision was made after the review of a completed environmental checklist and other/rfformation on file with the lead agency. This informat/on is available to the public on request. Mitigation Conditions: 1. The access road shall be constructed prior to Final PUD approval and shall be constructed in accordance with City Standards. 2. Stormwater drainage improvements must be designed and constructed in accordance with Title 15 of the Bremerton MuniciP.al Code. Erosion control measures must be designed in accordance with the 'Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 3. The storm system and the sanitary sewer system will be privately operated and maintained. 4. Final PUD shall meet all provisions of the Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, and all other applicable codes. City of Bremerton Department of Community Development Comment Period: This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-350; the City will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by: March 18, 1998 Responsible Official: Judy Johnson Acting Director of Community Development Signature: Phone: (360) 478-5275 Address: 286 Fourth SL, Bremerton, WA 98337 Date Posted: March 4, 1998 Appeals: You may appeal this determination to the Bremerton City Counc/1. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Bremerton Planning Division or refer to the adopted Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 21 for SEPA appeal procedures. DEC 1997 BREMERTON .BUILDING DEPARTMENT Tl~e checklis~ questions apply to a.z parts olyour proposal, even ir you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The aoenc¥ tb which you subln,~t this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional ln£ornmation r~uon=bl¥ related to determiuin~5 il' there may be stBnificant advers~ impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSAL: ': Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even thou(hh questions may be answered "does qot apply. In addition, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON~.ROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project'. 'applicant' and "property or site" should be read as 'proposal', "proposer,' and 'affected geoB~aphic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name. of proposed project, if applicable: KITSAP LAKE MOBILE HOME PARK ADDITION Name of applicant: Address and phon~; number of applicant and contact person: P.O. B0x Ocal~lorida S.l~. Hasan 34478-2019 Date checklist prepared: (352) October 24, 1997 2 A'~ency request[n~ checklist:. City of Bremerton, Washington Proposed t~in8 or schedule (includ[n8 phasing, if applicable): Phase I 1998 Phase 2 1999 Do you have any plans for future additions,, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None Known List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related tc this proposal'. Wetland delineation report as prepared by Wiltermood and Associa. tes and verified by Moss Environmental Do you know whether applications are pending for ~overnmenta[ approvals of other proposals directly a£fectin~ the property covered by your proposai~ If yes, e×p!ain. None Known 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. PUD approval from City of Bremert3n,Construction plans approval from city of Bremerton, Erosion and Sedimen: Control plan approval from State ef Washington Department of Ecology, 11. Cive brief, comp[eta description of your =roposa[, includln5 the proposed uses and the size of th~ project and sit~. There are several questions ldter in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your propou~l. You do not need to repmat those anuwers on this paSe. (Lead asmnci~u may modii'y ch[~ form to include additional specific [n£ormation on project description.) ~! The proposal involves addition of a ~J' space manufactured home park over an area of 13.!3 acres. Roadways, utilities and stormwater drainage facilities will be a part of this. proposal. 12-' Location of the proposal. Cive sufficien't infcrmation for a person %o understand the precise location of ycur proposed project, includ[nE a street address, if any. and s~ct[~n, township, and ranse, if known. I£ a proposal would occur over a ran8~ of ~r~. provide the rans~ or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topcsraph!c map, if reasonably available. ~hi!e you shou!~ submi~ any plans required by the asency, you are not requi~ed to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted 'with any permit app!ica%ions related to this checklis%. The project is located on Price Road. and the vicinity map are enclosed. The lega' ~escription ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS "' TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FO~ AGENCY USE ONLY EARTH Cenera~ ~ription of the~:_e__(circle one}: Flat,~ b'il!y,~p s~~, mountainous, other b o What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)7 e o What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)7 If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify then, and note any prime farmland. In accordance with soi]s mao orepared by the 5oi]$ Conservation Service. soi]s on the site are ~ravellv loamy sand 15 - 30% slopes Are' there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the irm~,ediate vicinity7 If =o, describe. No~e Known Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading 'p'~oposed. Indicate source of fill· sitm ~terial lO.O00 c~ic ya~s,, _ Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use7 If so, generally describe. Y~$ A. bout what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project con~trucCio. (£or ~amp!e, asphalt or build~.n~u'7 Proposed mmasurms to reduce or control mrosicn. or other impacts to the earth, if any: Filter fence,~ sediment oonds..construction ~n dry weathe~ . AIR What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.,e,. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) durin8 construction and when the project is completed? If any. ~enerally describe and 8~ve approximate quantities if known. Some dust and equipment., f.uaes dur~n~ construction of street,utilities and residential structures. It is anticipated that most residences will contain ~ wood burnin~ fire Dlace$~ Autc~le emissions can be expected vmeq complete. Are thebe any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so~ 8enerally describe. None Known Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other Impacts to air, ~f any: ~ter ~q~sc~Id be used duri~ c0nstructiont0cont~] dust ~ATER Surface: Is there any surface water body on or in-lhe i~unediate vicinity of the site (includins year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wet- lands)? If yes. describe type and provide names, If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is ala~e ~tl~h~ ~ site. 2) Viii the project require any work over. in. or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described water? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. There is a possibility that the drainaqe from the proposed detention facil,ity,m~, y be Dioed do~n the stee~ slopes. The pipe shall be stoooed short of the ~et]and boundary (see attached drainage plan). 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NQn~ Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give gene'Kal description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 7 5) Does the proposal lie within a lO0-year floodplain? I£ so, not. location on the site p!an. N~Knmwn 6) Does th. proposal involve any discharses o£ waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe tile type o£ waste and anticipat~d volume of dischar~le. Nnn~ Known Cround: Will Bround water be withdrawn, or will water be discharBed to ~round water? Cive seneral description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Non~ Known 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the 8round from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewase; Industrial, containin8 the followins chemicals...; asricultural; etc.). Describe the seneral s'ize of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or %he number of animals or humans the system(s) are :xpected to serve. Nnn~ Knr~9 2) V~ter Runoff (incIuding stormwaterl: Describe the source o£ runoff (incIudin5 stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (includin~ quantities, if known). Where will this water flow7 Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm~ater and domestic water from ~idential landscaoing is the o~lv anticipated source of runoff. Storm drainaoe svst~n will be .~rov_i.ded to collar the turnoff frcm ,impervious surfaces," Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, 6enerally describe. Pollutants frcm~ v~ic]es ~yc0]]~tonim~er¢i0us ~u~ace~a~ ~ ~hedi~o~tormdrainag~y~t~ lo Proposed measures to reduce or control surface. Eround, and runoff water impacts, if any: Stom drainage requir~nt~ ~ t~ City of Br~n=~ ~]] ~ ~trir~ly ~d~tn ..... PLANTS Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: other eversremn tree: ~ther ,, ~ shrubs , ~/' srass pasture crop or stain wet soil plants: cattail, bulrush, skunk cabbage,. other other types of vmgmtation aspen, buttercup. 9 bo Vhat kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ~assa~Weeds. E×istingtree~l~t~ ~fhinfh: ~adwavsa~ h~sesites ~ll List threate~6d or endanEered species known to be on or near the site. Nnn~ d o Proposed landscapins, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vesetation on the site, if any: l~ndqcnpi~ for i~ividuml hrm~itm~i~ nativ~ 9la~ Al$os~ attachedla~ scaDinq plan. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, ea6le, son6birds, other: mammals: ('d~r~ bear, elk, beaver, other: ' fish: bass, salmon, trout, herrinE, shellfish, other: '. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ~neKnc~n 10 Is the site part of a misration route7 so, explain. None Known If Proposed measuPes to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N /"~A b o ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's enersy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. ~ u~ and i~or~orationofel~tric ~ating alo~ ~ natural qas. Oil a~WocdStovesa~ ~tallow~, Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties9 If so, Eenerally describe. ~n~ Knnw~ What kinds of enersy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? L~st other proposed measures to reduce or control enersy impacts, if any: 11 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Are the~'e any environmental health hazards, includ|n(50Xl,ouure to toxic chemicals, risk of tlr: ,~Hd ~,aplo~iurl, ~p111, or I~,~z~r'd,~uu waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal7 If so, describe. 1) 2) Describe speci~l emersency services that mi8ht be required. Yes. Polio, FiR and ~ l~: ~re~ Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: ,N/A Noise What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Traffic ~ ~iceRoadand Power ~ats ~ Kitsau Lake _ 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the prdj.ect on'-a short-term or a lon~-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)7 Indicate what hours noise would como from the site. Typical,. no. jse associated.~ith co_nstructjon of st~eets~u:~ilities and residential construction may he anticinnt~d d~m-in~, normal w~rking h~r~_ VmhimHlar nni~m~ a~nria~! wifh ~yp~ral residential devPln,rr~ntq n~y h~ antirinm~m~i_ anH ~H1H ~m~r mt ~i~: as consistent ~ ~is ty~ of develo~nt. !2 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impact~, if any? None LAND AND SHORELINE USE What is the current use of the site and adjacent prol~e, rti es? The site is vac.ant. To the East is existinQ Mobile Hcme Park, City Park is located on the West side of the project site,residential developn~nt~ are l o~al;ed On th~ North and S~gt~h sides. Has the sit~ beun used for asricultur~? I£ so;'~' describe. ~ ~tKnown Describe any structuros on the slim. d o Will any structures be demolished? what? If SO, What is the current zonin6 clas~i£ication of the site7 5F '~ ' f o Vhat is the current comprehensive plan desi8nation o£ the site? .... t~_,densitv ~sidential 13 If applicable, what is the current shoreline master proEram designation of the site? N /A h o Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area7 If so. specify. ~ereisa ~t]a~ am st~o$]o~$0na ~]0nof ~e$ite Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? ~p~xi~telv ~peoole ~uld ~sideinthe~ .. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Nnn~ Proposed measures to avoid or reduce dis- placement impacts, if any? N/A k o Proposed measures to ensure the propgsal is compatible with existin8 and projected, land uses and plans, if any: Citv to aDD.ye ~velopment Plans 14 9. HOUSING a. Ap,proximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, m.'}ddle, or low-income housing. ~p( 6j~Units Middle Incc~e Approximately how many units, if any, would ~v~Al~4~. 7~ be eliminated. Indicated whether high, ~~. middle, or low-income housing. ~neKn0wn Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. AESTHETICS What is the tallest height of any Froposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 'w0od What views in the immediate vicinity would be. altered or obstructed? ~ Known Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 15 11. LIGHT AND CLABE Wh'at type of l isht or 81are will the proposal pl-oduco? WI~,,t [[..e of day would it Inuinly occur? Lights frcm individual dwellin~ units; Residential str~,t lighting and car headliQhts durin~ the hours of darkness: chiefly between 7 PM and 12PM Could lisht or 8]are from the finished project be a safet.y hazard or interfere with view? ': C · What existin6 off-site sources of l iEht or 51aru ,.~y .,Ffuct your proposal? Non~_ Known Proposed measures to reduce or control lisht and slate impacts, if any: N/A 12. RECREATION What desisnated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A Ci~ Park isl~at~hin ~lki~ dista~e. Kitsaotakeis atsol~at~ ~thin ~lkinqdistanc~, Would the proposed project displace any existin8 recreational uses? If so, describe. 16 C · P~oposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, includins recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: R~ationint~rn~ofo~ens~ac~s ~tl ~ pmvid~ ~ ~e proi~t. HISTORIC AND.CULTURAL PRESERVATION Are there any :places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. ~ne Known C · Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. TRANSPORTATION Identify public streets and highways serving the site. and describe proposed access to the ex'istin8 street system. Shown on site plans, i f any. Price Road is ]0cared in front of the $i1~, Th~ site has easy access to State Hiahwa¥ and other City Streets. Is site currently served by public transit? If not. what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes 17 e o How many parkin8 spaces would the completed project have? How many would the Froject el iminate? Tach hou~in? ~nit ~x,r~n.t~ tn h~v~ ? ~n~r~ Vill the proposal require any new roads or streets, or i~p~ovements to existin$ roads or streets, not includin8 driveways7 If so, 8enerally describe (indicate whether public or private). New roadsa~ p~ ~in t~ proj~t_ existing road~ a~ ~ta~icipat~. Viii the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation7 If so, senerally ~escribe. ~~nt~ c~ld u~ ~ter: rail orairtran~r~tion ~r How many vehicular trips per day would be ~enerated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. ~3 VTPD Peak volute ~%1 in 7 out 19 Peak volu~e PM in 22 out 14 Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the proj~ct result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, pollce protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, 8enerally describe. Yes. The pro,~sal ~1t ~sultinneedfor Fi~ a~ Police P~t~ti0n Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Thiswill be mitigated through property taxes ~n the new residential hOTeS 18 b o Proposed measures to reduce or control ~[rect impacts on public services, if any. 16. UTILITIES Circle utilities currently avai!abj~_at the ~_ef~___si : efectricit natur~~__~. ~ ~_~rv~v~e,~ep~on~e,~..~an~cary s~eyer, septic system, oth~ r7. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge, I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Date AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Public Hearing regarding an extension of the Moratorium Resolution No: -7~50 regarding development of piers and docks within the channel between Ostrich and Oyster Bay. FOR AGENDA OF: April 29, 1998 ORIGINATING DEPT.: DCD ORIGINATOR: Judy Johnson ~ DATE SUBMITTED: April 23, 1998 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if 3. necessary) CityDir' DCD:Attorney~~/~x~'j/~c-~/ ,~ i ,~5~/~ ~,x~/~~~. ENDORSEMENI X INFORMATION EXHIBITS: 1. Resolution 2. Staff Report __ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PREll,DENT FOR SUBMITTAL: COUNCIL PRESIDENT ~_~~ ~ o ge SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council passed a Moratorium with Resolution #2621 on Aug. 6, 1997 which would terminate after 9 months or when the amendments to the Shoreline Master Program could be approved by the state Dept. of Ecology. We are requesting the moratorium be continued until we can get the SMP properly updated. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council, by Resolution # ~-5'~> , continue the Moratorium which was established with Resolution 2621, for an additional ~ months or until the Shoreline Master Program has been amended properly, whichever shall occur first. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Judy Johnson ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Judy Johnson EXPIRATION DATE: N/A REVIEW DATE: N/A PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. APPROVED NOTICE OF ACTION __ DISAPPROVED AMENDED DATE: 11. AGENDA ~.: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: e IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: Piers and docks could become vested in the channel between Oyster and Ostrich Bay. I~IPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: There has been a considerable amount of staff time already expended on the piers and docks issue in the Oyster / Ostrich Bay channel. There will continue to be additional time and resources expended. RESEARCH SOURCES: N/A II RESOLUTION # ~(~--0 A RESOLUTION extending the Moratorium on the development of docks and piers within the channel between Oyster and Ostrich Bay. WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has previously passed a Moratorium: and, WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has intention to review specific lan~mage in the Shoreline Master Program pertaining to this particular area; and WHEREAS, the Department of Ecology is allowed 5 months to review and implement changes to the Administrative Code amending the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program; and, WHEREAS, the ordinance which was repealed (~4619) because of procedural errors, needs to go back through the proper process for change and adoption; BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Bremerton: 1. That the development moratorium prohibiting the issuance of substantial shoreline development permits for all docks and piers within the confines of Oyster Bay Channel as defined on attached Exhibit A is hereby continued; 2. That this extension shall take effect immediately on May 6, 1998 and shall terminate 6 months from the date of this or until an amendment to the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program can be approved by the state Department of Ecology, whichever shall occur first. PASSED, by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this ,19 day of DAVID FARR Council President