The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03/11/98 AGENDABREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 239 4TH STREET BREMERTON, WA 98337 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 11, 1998 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M. A. General Council Business CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. A. Pledge Of Allegiance B. Invocation CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If separate discussion is desired on an item, it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at the request of a Council member. ~o..~ P~.. A. Minutes - February 25, 1998 #AB98-043 CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS 5. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS 6. MAYOR'S REPORT 7. PUBLIC RECOGNITION -- (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes) NEW BUSINESS A. Street Reorganization Of Personnel B. Bid Award For Kitsap Way Street Improvements From Auto Center Way To Weslon Place C. Supplemental Agreement With Washington State Department Of Transportation Regarding Funding Of Improvements To Kitsap Way, Weslon Place to Auto Center Way, And Signals On SR3 Ramps At Kitsap Way and Newberry Hill (CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) #AB98-044 #AB98-045 #AB98-046 ¢ ( 10. RESOLUTION A. Resolution #2647, Supporting The Economic Development Council Recommendation For Industrial Lands In Kitsap County ORDINANCES A. Ordinance #4624 (Second Reading) Establishing A Public Access Advisory Committee #AB98-047 11. PUBLIC HEARING: 6:00 P.M. OR LATER A. Resolution #2645 Regarding Recovery Of Fees For The Abatement Of The Property Located At 1537 Olympic Avenue Resolution #2646 Regarding Recovery Of Fees For Abatement of The Property Located At 1129 Highland Avenue #AB98-048 AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT':. MINUTES - FEBRUARY 28, 1998 FOR AGENDA OF: ORIGINATING DEPT: ORIGINATOR: DATE SUBMITTED: MARCH 11, 1998 City Council David Farr, President 3~5-98 2. ~: (comment on back if necessary) ENDORSF24F~NT MAYOR INFORMATION APPROVED BYi COUNCIL ~E~EN?~FOR SUBMITTAL: COUNCIL PRESIDENT~--~~· ' 4. S~Y STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COI~CIL ACTION: 8. RECOM24ENDATION: 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: .EXPIRATION DATE: REVYEW DATE: PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTIO~ APPROVED .DISAPPROVED ~.DATE: AMENDED 2 · cLEARANCE~ COMMENTS 5..'~.'/~_ACTON NON-PASSAGE: STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EOUIPMENT QR OTHER RESOURCES: TAPES #1527, #1528 UNAPPROVED DRAFT CITY COUCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 25, 1998 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, February 25, 1998, at 5:30 P.M., with Council President David Fart presiding. Council members present were Jim Reed, Carlos Montgomery, Carol Arends, Mike Shepherd, Lon Overson, John Law, Cecil McConnell, and Wayne Olsen. Also present were Assistant City Attorney Glenna Malanca and Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council President Farr and invocation given by Reverend Don Welt of Eastgate Assembly of God. President Farr made the following announcement: (1) The Council held a Study Session prior to the Council meeting to discuss general Council business. (2) The Council held a Study Session from 5:05 - 5:25 P.M., to discuss Medicare Payments For LEOFF I Retirees. (3) Immediately following the Council meeting, Council will hold an Executive Session to discuss "Litigation". (4) The City Council will hold a RETREAT on February 28, 1998, at Gold Mountain Golf Complex (Banquet Room). President Farr read the revised Agenda for that meeting. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of Meeting - February 11, 1998 #AB98-031 B. 1997 Excess Vacation Leave; Request for Carry Over for Dean Denis #AB98-032 #0076 MISIClU(McConnelllMontgomery) Motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the Council TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 2 of 13 #0104 MISIClU(Montgomery/Olsen) On February 25, 1998, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: 217079 through 217419 in the amount of $718,994.17; and Regular Payroll for the period ending February 15, 1998, in the amount of $698,590.86; and Retirees' Payroll for the period ending February 28, 1998, in the amount of $104,603.55. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mr. Overson announced a new business "Old Wooley Dinner & Market Place will soon be opening, at the corner of Burwell and Pacific Avenue, on March 7 with an event to support the Foodline. Mrs. Arends noted the old Bremerton School District Administration building on Montgomery and Burwell was heady demolished and much of the building materials have been recycled. Mr. Montgomery, commented on the Street Department's recent sidewalk cleaning efforts and the fact they cleaned approximately % mile of sidewalks within an hour. He commended the Street crew for making the sidewalks more usable and he hoped they would provide that service in coming years. Mr. Reed reported several Kitsap Lake Junction business owners contacted him about the possibility of moving an existing crosswalk to an area that would be more convenient to reach local businesses. As a result of that conversation, he contacted Randy Witt, City Engineer, to look into the possibility of making such a change. No official action has been taken; however, it was his understanding that it is feasible. Mr, Farr announced the Smile Mobile, which is sponsored by the Washington Dental Services, will be in Bremerton from March 9 - March 17, 1998. This service will be treating children ages 13 and younger, who are from Iow income families that do not have access to dental care. The location for this service will be the Kitsap Community Resource Center, at 1201 Park Avenue. Additional information on this program can be obtained by calling 1-800-367-4104 Ext. 6303. He was pleased that his friend David George had recently joined the ranks of non-smokers. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Lynn Horton drew Council's attention to a picture display showing 59 houses that were purchased in 1997 through the City's Down Payment Assistance program (Department of Community Development). The money for that program was received through the Block Grant Program and HOME Funds. The loans for the 59 families amounted to $259,000, which leveraged $4,453,000 in home purchases. Additionally, the City's loan is secured by a second Deed of TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 3 of 13 Trust. The down payment loan has a 3% interest for 15 years, and the principle is due upon change of use or transfer of ownership. The homeowners' first mortgage is handled through any bank or lending institution, which precludes City staff having to qualify lenders. One of the major goals in housing established several years ago by the City through Housing Bremerton was homeownership and owner occupancy since there is a high percentage of people on Iow income and the housing stock is a high percentage of non-owner occupied. This was the first year where all of the City's down payment assistance and housing rehab funds were totally utilized. She commended staff for doing a great job. Information on these programs can be obtained through Marylyn Waibel, Department of Community Development, 478-5275. Mayor Horton announced the Bremerton High School Lady Knights and Knights Basketball teams would be playing in the District playoffs on February 26, 1998, at Pacific Lutheran University. The Lady Knights play at 3:30 P.M., and the Knights play at 8:30 P.M. Both teams lost theirfirst game; however, the playoff is double elimination. Police Chief Paul Du Fresne introduced Peter W. Fisher, a new Police Office, who was then given the Oath of Office by Municipal Court Judge James Docter. Chief Du Fresne added that he was one Police Officer away from being up to full strength in the Police Department and is in the process of conducting background investigations to fill that vacancy. PUBLIC RECOGNITION Susan Brown expressed her appreciation having received a revised schedule for the City Council Retreat and appreciated Council staff assistance when she called for information. She also appreciated President Fart announcing the Retreat agenda at the beginning of the meeting; and the issue of her recommendations for changes in the City's Ethic Codes would be discussed from 10:45 to 11:15 A.M. She was also interested in the Retreat Agenda item addressing City Council meeting format, which will be discussed from 10:30 - 10:45 A.M. She liked public interest items, such as the swearing in of Police Officers, at the beginning of the meeting rather than having it at the end of the meeting. She was somewhat confused by President Farr's quote in a newspaper article that it was not appropriate to keep high ranking, high paid officials waiting to make their presentation. It was her understanding that the highest paid officials of the City are salaried and attending Council meetings would be part of their job. And, those that are paid hourly could have their hours adjusted to accommodate such meetings. If Public Recognition was moved to the end of the meeting, she could not participate due to her commitment to children. Roy Mclnnis, Bremerton resident, stated he was opposed to moving Public Recognition to the end of the meeting. He bases his opinion on the fact he has TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 4 of 13 attended City Council meeting for a number of years; however, he leaves the meeting prior to the conclusion to attend a Bible Study meeting. He announced there will be a Dedication of the name for the Downtown Branch of the Library on February 26, 1998, 5:00 P.M. Mayor Horton stated for clarification that the Administrative staff coming before the City Council are salaried and generally put in a full days work in addition to attending Council meetings. President Farr stated he might have added to the confusion by giving out information that may not have been totally accurate. 8A - COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF SEATTLE~ #AB98 - 033 RCW 39.34 permits local governments to cooperate with other government agencies in the procurements of goods and services to maximize use of purchasing dollars. The City of Bremerton has used Intergovemmental Agreements with a number of agencies for the acquisition of equipment and materials wherein the use of the agreement provides advantageous pricing and accessibility. This agreement will provide access to City of Seattle contracts, that if bid independently by the City, would not provide the same cost savings that are available from some City of Seattle contracts. The City of Bremerton also conditions its bids to permit use by other entities. This Agreement is for an indefinite term and is an optional use agreement. Gil Johnson, Purchasing Manager, stated he would be available to answer Council's questions. Public comment - none. Mr. Law questioned if it was legal for the City to enter into an agreement that had an "indefinite" term or was it limited to 10 years? Glenna Malanca, City Attorney, stated based on her review of the City's Charter, she could not find such a restriction other than franchise agreements. There may be restriction as to leases; however, even if there were restrictions relating to contracts, she has yet to find substantiation for what has been assumed over the previous years. She will continue to investigate this point and if there is such a stipulation and applied to this proposal, it could be amended. Mr. Montgomery stated he could see no reason why this kind of agreement had to be approved by the City Council. Mrs. Malanca pointed out Interlocal Agreements must be approved by the City Council per State statute. Mr. Montgomery stated his past work experience at Olympic College lead him to believed that governmental entities could enter into such agreement without going through a formal approval process. Mrs. Malanca explained based on her past experience, School Districts do have different requirements than cities. TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 5 of 13 Mr. Reed stated he viewed this action as a way for the City to take better advantage spending its money. He noted the agreement includes a hold harmless clause for the City of Seattle for any shortfall of the vendor or in the product provided. He asked whom, at the City level, makes sure that the City is getting a "good deal" and receiving the correct product? Mr. Johnson explained that control is at the departmental level. Mr. McConnell referenced items #2, 3, and 5 in the agreement and noted he was somewhat confused in that it did not clearly identify the entity identified as the "City". He assumed it meant the City of Seattle. Mr. Johnson stated before this agreement was signed, the language could be reviewed for clarity, and changes made so that it will clearly identify what is applicable to Bremerton. Mayor Horton stated in response to the earlier comment about 10-year limits for contracts, when the City's Charter was revised and approved by the voters in 1996, a change was made to clarify the language because it had been confusing. The Administration did not feel that simple contracts beneficial to the City had to be go before the vote of the people for periods longer than 10-years. Mr. Reed asked if it was legal to change language in the agreement after it was approved by the City Council? Mrs. Malanca stated yes, Council can approve it as intended and the Administration can execute it based on that direction. Mr. Reed asked if the City of Seattle would have to agree with any change in language the City might make after it was approved? Mrs. Malanca stated yes, if the changes substantially meet Council's intent at the time it is approved. #0954 MISiCIU (Arends/Shepherd) Motion to approve the Cooperative Purchasing Agreement with the City of Seattle. 8B - COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH KITSAP COUNTY, #AB98 - 034 RCW 39.34 permits local governments to cooperate with other government agencies in the procurements of goods and services to maximize use of purchasing dollars. The City of Bremerton has used Intergovernmental Agreements with a number of agencies for the acquisition of equipment and materials wherein the use of the agreement provides advantageous pricing and accessibility. This agreement will provide access to KJtsap County contracts, that if bid independently by the City, would not provide the same cost savings that are available from some County contracts. The City of Bremerton also conditions its bids to permit use by other entities. This Agreement is for an indefinite term and is an optional use agreement. TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 6 of 13 Gil Johnson, Purchasing Manager, stated the previous contract with Kitsap County was conditioned with a one-year term; however with the change in County Legal counsel they have agreed to an indefinite term, which would be consistent with the State statute. Public comment - none. Mr. Reed asked if this agreement was relatively the same as the prior agreement. Mr. Johnson stated yes, except for the term. #1105 MISICIU (Reed/Shepherd) Motion to approve the Cooperative Purchasing Agreement with Kitsap County. 8C - LETTER OF INTENT TO ANNEX THE AREA DESCRIBED AS THF SHERIDAN HEIGHTS ANNENXATION, #AB98- 03S An official Letter of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings has been received from an unincorporated area described as the Sheridan Heights Area. The Letter represents signatures collected from at least ten-percent of the area described. It is requested that the City Council determine: 1) Whether the City Council will agree to accept a future 75% Petition to annex; 2) VVhether the City Council will require the adoption of a comprehensive plan and zoning for the proposed area under RCW 35.13.177 or apply the land use designation for newly annexed lands as set forth in the Bremerton Municipal Code 21.02.260; and 3) Whether the City Council will require the assumption of a proportional share of existing City indebtedness by the area to be annexed. Terrie O'Neill, Municipal Services Coordinator, briefly reviewed the process of annexation that starts with the initial step of a "Letter of Intent to Annex~, which could only progress forward if Council approves that action. Annexation can yield both economic and govemance benefits to the community. Areas that are functionally already a part of the City are a prime example of the effective use of annexation. Cities specialize in urban services and most annexations are based on a need for services or utilities. The proper annexation of areas adjacent to cities is often crucial to establishing and maintaining urban order and effective government. Rapid development and population growth frequently occur just outside City boundaries where property is sometimes cheaper and zoning laws less rigorously enforced. These fringe areas may cause urban types of problems that concentrations of population create. Examples of this include increased traffic congestion on inadequate roads, a demand for enhanced police and fire protection and land use planning decisions, which result in disorderly growth. These problems, unfortunately, cross boundary lines and add to City problems. Problems such as the spread of congestion, lack of adequate police protection, and other urban issues may become a determent TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 7 of 13 to the social and economic health and cohesiveness of the community. Bremerton is a medium sized city of only 38,000 people with large city urban issues partially due to the impact of thousands of residents in urban neighborhoods that surround Bremerton. However, it would be inappropriate to conclude that those neighborhoods present a hardship to cities. Economic and social ties between the City and fringe areas are generally strong and local City businesses generate sales from those adjacent neighborhoods. Nonetheless, outlying areas benefit in many ways from City parks and recreational programs, streets, utilities, and other services without a proportionate contribution to the City tax base. Moreover and unquestionably characteristic of Kitsap neighborhoods, most suburban people need services the same as those found within the City and may recognize that their property tax and other costs (including utility costs and fire insurance premiums) are not necessarily lower but are quite often equal or even greater than those they would pay as residents within the City. The City has evaluated the subject area in accordance with its policies on annexation. The Sheridan Heights region depicts the characteristics of an urban community with a high level of service needs and with taxes assessed at a level generally equal to the City of Bremerton. The area service demands are at a level that can only be described as urban, based on the variety of services rendered from which many are from the City. This area is largely reliant on the services of the Bremerton community and is an important part of the City regardless of its political disassociation from it. Ms. O'Neill stated she was contacted by a property owner of a 4-acre lot that adjoins the subject annexation area and requested that it be included in the annexation area. Her recommendation to Council was to include that lot as part of the request to annex. The Staff Report included comments from the Department of Community Development, Fire Department, Police Department, Department of Parks and Recreation, and Public Works and Utilities. The following concerns were noted: (1) The Fire Department is particularly concerned about access on roads in the area. Steep grades in the western section of the annexation area promise difficulties in hazardous weather. It is recommended that those roadways be given attention in hazardous weather or that other access alternatives be developed. (2) Based on the existing service levels, this annexation would require the addition of % officer at approximately $27,0000 annually (1.7 officers serve 1000 citizens and, using square miles of territory, 6.3 officers are available for every square mile). Additionally, future growth in the annexation area may increase the need for personnel. (3) To maintain the existing level of park land service in Bremerton, 5.34 acres of park land would need to be acquired. However, according to National Park Standards, a minimum of 39.3 acres of park TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 8 of 13 land per 1,000 people or proportionally 17.8 acres for the existing population of 300 would be needed to meet this goal. (4) No wastewater or water system improvements are planned for the subject area; however the downstream wastewater pump station EB-6, located near the intersection of Lebo Blvd., and Sheridan Road, is scheduled for rehabilitation work as part of the Tracyton Beach combined sewer basin. The City has not conducted a study thus far indicating other than minor stormwater problems in the area. However, the City is aware that some residents from the subject area have voiced concerns about water runoff problems. Ms. O'Neill provided tables reflecting the following: Tax Revenue Summary, City Service Needs, Residential Tax Changes (based on 1998 for 2000), Utility Water Service 1997 Assessments, Utility Sewer Service 1997 Assessments, Utility Billing Cycles, Utility Water Rates-Utility Sewer Rates-Utility Stormwater Rates- Fireline Services, Low Income Senior and Low Income Disabled Rates, Meter Test Rates, and Miscellaneous Account Charges. Gre.q Branch, a Sahali Drive resident and representing a group of property owners in the proposed Annexation area, stated they are not strangers to the annexation process and have been involved in annexations over the past 20 years. They. are encouraged to see the request to annex progress to this point. He and those he represents are very supportive of annexation. He and his family participated in the development of the subject area with the development of Sahali Townhouse Condominiums on E. 31st Street, including construction of utility services to that area. They are in the process of working with Kitsap County and the City on development of the subject area. However, at times it can be very frustrating having to deal with the County and their lack of an accepted Comprehensive Plan. It is his hope to be able to develop property owned by Anna Marie Cole, which is adjacent to the Sahali Townhouse Condominium project. Part of their effort and supporting annexation has been in support of the concept of overall Growth Management Act. It is believed that the cross-section of densities are afforded in an urban environment and best supported in a City structure. Because of the existing infrastructure, it is a natural for the subject area be annexed to the City. Mr. Branch noted transit service is available on Ricky Road to service that area. In response to Ms. O'Neill's comments about infrastructure improvements, the project he hopes to build would provide some of those improvements. Improvements to E. 31 Street would include widening the street, sidewalks, gutters and extending the stormwater line to the manhole that was installed 20-years ago when the Sahali project was built. When that project is completed it will raise property taxation revenue almost 25%. Anna Marie Co!e, resident in Annexation Area, concurred with Greg Branch's comments and urged Council to approve the annexation as presented. TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 9 of 13 Elizabeth Buell, Bremerton resident, stated it was nice to hear that a large group of people wants to join the City. She urged Council to give their approval to this proposal. Mr. Reed thanked Ms. O'Neill for a very complete and informative staff report. He asked if he understood correctly that the comparison of taxes between the County and the City was about par, but the water and sewer costs would be lower. He acknowledged there is a $200 per single family residence impact fee on any lot in the county; however, the City does not have a similar charge. Ms. O'Neill explained if a residence is in the City, hook up fees for sewer and water are lower; and if a property is in the County but receiving City sewer and water services they would be charged at a higher rate. VVhen a property is annexed into the City those charges would be at a lower rate. Mrs. Arends corrected an earlier statement that The Willows was located on Pine Road, not Perry Avenue. Mr. McConnell asked if the proposed project identified by Mr. Branch was to be located on E. 31st Street? Mr. Branch explained the boundary of the parcel fronts on E. 31st Street Mr. Shepherd noted the Letter of Intent to annex had more than the required 10%. He asked Ms. O'Neill if the residents in the subject area were supportive of the annexation? Ms. O'Neill stated notices were sent out to all of the property owners in the affected area and she received only four telephone calls. Based on past experience, that was a very Iow call response. She did have several people stop by her office, but all of them were encouraging. And, she did have one person call and request their property be added to the annexation area. Mr. Shepherd asked if there would be a merger of fire services for that area? Ms. O'Neill stated no, the City would provide fire protection services once the area is annexed. Mr. Shepherd asked if the City experienced any difficulties in discussing this issue with the Fire District currently serving this area? Ms. O'Neill stated the City's Fire Chief met with the Fire Chiefs for District #1 and #15 and discussed with them what is appropriate in terms of economic service delivery. At this point, she did not know what their feelings were and they were not present to voice any objection. Mr. Shepherd asked if the annexation would affect the City's fire rating? Ms. O'Neill stated no. President Farr questioned the population of the annexation area? Ms. O'Neill stated it is estimated at 300; however, she felt that number might be Iow considering there are 280 parcels. #2897 MISICIU(OversonlOIsen) Motion to agree to accept the area if significant signatures are collected and submitted as a 75% petition to annex, including the TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 10 of 13 addition of a 4-acre lot (Tax Lot ¢K)32401-1-042-002 located adjacent to the water side of Tracyton Beach on the north side of the annexation area). #3056 MISIClU(OversonlMontgomery) Motion to require a Comprehensive Plan and zoning for the proposed area. #0377 MISICIU(ShepherdlMontgomery Motion to require the area to assume a proportional share of existing City indebtedness. TAPE #1528 9A- PUBLIC HEARING ON RESOLUTION NO. 26431 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 5 LOT SUBDIVISION IN SINGLE FAMILY ZONE, APPLICANT: JERRY VERGEER; LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF SHERIDAN ROAD ~. RICKEY, #AB98-036 On January 20, 1998, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this project as a Preliminary Plat for single-family unit development. The develoPer asked at Planning Commission Meeting for relief from the City road standard requirement for a minimum 18-foot paved surface on the proposed road tract. The City Engineer and DCD Acting Director recommend that this request for a substandard road not be granted at this time. Though the road tract serves only two lots, it alleviates the flag lot requirement for 150 percent of minimum lot size for interior lot. Since all lots must have a minimum of 20-feet of frontage on a road, this newly created road used for frontage on the interior lot is required to meet the road standard. The City Council is the decision-making body responsible for evaluation of Preliminary and Final Plats. The City Council shall either: 1) Affirm the decision under review; 2) Reverse the decision under review; 3) Modify in whole or part the decision under review; or 4) Remand the matter back to staff for further consideration. President Farr asked the "Appearance of Fairness/Conflict of Interest" question. President Fart announced that Mr. Vergeer purchased a house from him approximately 10 years ago and his brother was the real estate agent. He did not believe he had a conflict. Mr. Reed stated he does not personally know Mr. Vergeer, but his older brother, a Utility Contractor, had worked for Mr. Vergeer on numerous projects. Glenna Malanca, City Attorney, stated since there is no objection to either of those disclosures, all Council members may remain seated. /2--- TAPES #1527, #152§ City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 11 of 13 Judy Johnson, Interim Director of Community Development, pointed out the subject site is located at the northeast corner of Sheddan Road and Rickey Road. The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to subdivide totaling approximately .07 acres into five single-family residential lots with a road tract. Each of the proposed lots exceeds the 5,000 sq. ft. minimum requirement. The site is zoned SF-3 and there is an existing home on Lot #1, which has a garage that will be removed after the preliminary plat is approved. The existing house meets all of the current requirements and setbacks. The 20-foot road tract, located north of Lot #4, meets all City standards. Utilities are available on Rickey Road and Sheridan Road. The Threshold Determination was issued on December 8, 1997, and no additional comments were received on the preliminary plat application. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat as presented. Crai.q Baldwin, Engineer with Westsound Engineering and representing Mr. Vergeer, stated this proposal is a straightforward plat in-filling a vacant lot or portions of a site that has been vacant for a long period of time. The only issue that has been raised is the question of the driveway that is designed to provide access to Lot #5. The applicant requested that the width of that driveway be reduced for two reasons: (1) it only serves Lot #5; (2) less impervious surface to be created less impact on drainage. During the Planning commissions' discussion on this issue a lot of items were talked about in terms of improvements along Rickey Road, i.e., sidewalk, change in transit location, which are part of conditions of approval, which the applicant is willing to comply with. Mr. McConnell asked if private driveways constitute a road? Ms. Johnson stated no, a road tract is a way to access an interior lot from a right-of-way. Mr. McConnell questioned if it is a road, would it become a public road rather than a private road? Ms. Johnson stated no, in order to qualify as a private road it must meet road standards. Lot #5 is an interior in-fill lot, which meets the SF-3 zoning requirements, and is accessed by the 20-foot right-of-way. Because it is a road tract, the requirement in the Code is to pave 18 feet. There is logic in the request to only pave 12-feet for the impervious surface; however, the Code currently reads that if it is a roadway it must meet the Road Standards. Mr. McConnell stated he would interpret it to mean that it would require 20-feet of paved surface. Ms. Johnson stated not paved surface, but rather access to the lot. Mr. Shepherd asked if the Fire Department had considered the roadway access issue? Ms. Johnson stated one of the Fire Department's requirements is that the road has an 18-foot paved width. TAPES #1527, #1528 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes February 25, 1998 Page 12 of 13 Mrs. Arends stated it was her understanding that the applicant was agreeable to comply with the City's code requirements and felt those requirements should be met. Mr. Overson concurred that the City's Road Standard should be upheld. Mr. Reed stated although he wants to work with all developers to see that all proposals are brought to reality, he did not know if Council had the right to over rule standing law. He asked for an explanation why the applicant felt they needed the reduced paving requirement. Mr. Baldwin stated it was not an excessive burden. The lot is approximately 98 feet from the right-of-way on Rickey Road. Both and he and the applicant felt it was appropriate to ask that 12-feet be considered. Mr. Reed stated because he was familiar with Fire Code mandates on road widths (minimum of 20-feet) he could not see an overwhelming reason to override the existing code. He asked for a point of clarification if the proposed motion included the approval of a 20--foot right-of-way and 18-foot paved area? Paula Johnston, Deputy City Clerk, stated Mr. Reed was correct. #0330 MISIClU(MontgomerylOIsen) Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2643, accepting the Preliminary Plat of "Hand's Corner Subdivision", located adjacent to and northeast of Sheridan Road and Rickey Road, Bremerton, Washington. President Farr thanked the TV camera crew for their services: Robert Neal, Dave Chivis, Leslie Busch, and Gretchen Elliott. With no further business meeting adjourned at 7:14 P.M PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk DAVID FARR, City Council President City of Bremerton P J/DF/me cc: Normal Distribution FileNault /¥ ORIGINAL AGENDA BILL 1. SUBJECT: Street Reorganization of personnel BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL FOR AGENDA OF: March 4,/1998 ORIGINATING DEPT: PWO stFeet ORIGINATOR: Rober~ E. Tulp DATE SUBMITTED: February 19, 1998 2. CLEARANCES: (com.nt on back if n~cess~y}~ /% 3. EXHIBITS: CITY TREASURER 3. PURCHASING SUPERVISOR X ~//~ 4. HUMAN RESOURCES FISCAL & BUDGET OPERATIONS 5. ENDORSEMENT APPROVED BY COUNCIL PR~Q~ .SUBMITTAL: COUNCIL PRESIDENT 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: To approve the reorganization of Street personnel adding one supervisor position and deleting two lead service specialist positions. 8. RECOMMENDATION: To approve reorganization of Street personnel 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE: 11. AGENDA BILL NO: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: Retirement of current supervisor, April 30, 1998, makes this opportunity available. 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: None 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: None 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: CITY OF BREMERTON : DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS I ELECTRONICS SUPERVISOR ELECT. TECH. ELECT. TECH. ELECT. TECH. ELECT. TECI~ ELECT. TECH. JOURNEY LEVEL E~CIAN SERV. SPEC. { LEAD I MAYOR I I DIRECTOR, PUBLIC WORI~ AND UTILITIES I I WORKS OPERATIONS MANAOER SERVICE I SPECIALIST I SUPERVISOR I STREETS I SERVJSPEC. [ LEAD I SERV. SPEC.SR. ! SERV. SPEC. I 5ERV. SPEC. I SERV. SPEC· SERV. SPEC. SERV, SPEC. SERV. SPEC. SERVICE SPECIALIST SUPERVISOR SION SHOP SERV, SPEC. SR. · SERV' SPEC. 93 Cr~Y OF BREMERToN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS ~.T -~-CTRON~C~ SUPERVISOR MAYOR I I IDIRECTOR, PUBLIC WORKS I o~o~ I I I I SERV. SPEC. SR. I 5E. RV. SPEC. I SERV. SPEC. I SERV. SPEC. I SERV. SPEC. SR. I SERV. SPEC. SR. ~v. sPEc. ii SERV. SPEC. SERV. SPEC. SR. I ~'ERV. SPEC. I /? CiTY OF BREMERTON PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS - STREET DMSION 2 LEAD SERVICE SPECIALISTS 1998 BUDGET REMAINING (8 MOS) 1 SERVICE SPECIALIST SUPERVISOR 4 SEASONAL EMPLOYEES (~ 5 MONTHS EACH TOTAL -$76,219 $40,027 $34,008 -$2,183 FULL YEAR -$114,328 $60,041 $34,008 -$2O,279 l? SEASONAl, HE~P HATRIX- 19,98 2/20/98 WEEKS HOURS COST ] S._~TREET 21 840 8,190 STREET 2'[ 840 8, *[ 90 STREET 21 840 8,190 STREET 2 *1 840 8, '190 TOTAL 3360 $ 32,760 Seasoeul Help at $9.75 per Hr. AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: KITSAP WAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM AUTO CENTER WAY TO WESLON PLACE- BID AWARD 2. CLEA~b~S'.~(f, olnment on back if necessary) D~.'~, ?_~_~.f .,~b~i~c ~~ city .Attire'ne y City C~cil Operations Committee FOR AGENDA OF: March 11. 1998 , ~¢ ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works & Utils ORIGINATOR: R. Witt, City Eng. DATE SUBMITTED: February 26, 1998 3. EXHIBITS: 1. Location Map 2. Bid Tabulation ENDORSEMENT, J~ INFORMATION [] APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: COUNCIL PRESIDENT 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: Bids were opened for the Kitsap Way Street Improvements Project on February 3, 1998. One bid for this project was received. The bid from Ace Paving Co., Inc., was $1,193,401.02. The engineer's estimate for this project was $1,210,357.44. These street improvements will include the addition of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and illumination along Kitsap Way. In addition there will be a pavement overlay to improve the condition of the existing roadway. The City will also be incorporating a State project into this project for new signals at Kitsap Way and the North bound ramps for State Route 3. The action before the City Council is approval of a contract with Ace Paving Co., Inc. for the Kitsap Way Street Improvements Project. 5. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council approve axvard of the Base Bid for $1,193,401.02 with Ace Paving Co., Inc., for Kitsap Way St. Improvement Project, and not award the Schedule C additive optional bid, and authorize the Mayor to execute the same. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Director Pub Wks & Util ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Director Pub Wks & Util EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED Il TABLED [] COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: APPROVED [1 DISAPPROVED [] AMENDED Il (OVER) 11. AGENDA BILL NO.: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION - Continuation 6. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Funding by the State and Federal agencies used for the design of this project will have to be returned. The project will not be built and existing safety hazards will remain. 7. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT AND OTHER RESOURCES: Staffing: 3,000 staff hours for construction administration, inspection, and surveying. Budget: This project is included in the 1998 budget as part of the 1998 Arterial Street fund and sufficient funds exists to do this work with the additional funding the City will receive from other funding sources. The City will be receiving funding from the Federal Highway Administration, The State Transportation Improvement Board, and the Washington State Department of Transportation. Facilities/Equipment: No impact. 8. RESEARCH SOURCES: EXI~/'ING iilRESIOENT1AL (LOW DENSITY) RESIDENTIAL (MEDIUM DENSITY) PROJECT AREA 0 YS TER FUNERAl CHAPEL PARK l~'r 5'1' WE_STPARK COMMUNITY HOUSING PROJECT VICINITY MAP CITY OF BREMERTON ENGINEERING DIVISION DRAWN BY: ~lB APPROVED BY: DW~ Nfl- KITW~vu~ JOB NO.: FB NO. P Kitsap Way Street Improvements Bid Tabulation 2/26/98 PROJECT NAME: KITSAP WAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS AUTO CENTER WAY TO WESLON PLACE STREET NAME: KITSAP WAY AND AUTO CENTER WAY ROAD LENGTH: 2500 L.F. ADD STORM DRAINAGE, CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND ILLUMINATION, PAVEMENT OVERLAY: 2" ON REPAIR: KITSAP WAY OVER AC PAVEMENT AND 3" OVERLAY OVER PCC PAVEMENT AND I 1/2" ON AUTO CENTER WAY ITEM REF. STD. I NUMBER ITEM UNIT I QUANTITY ACE PAVING PRICE/UNIT I TOTAL COST BASE BID - SCHEDULE 1 1 ;MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION 3-1.4 L.S. $103,600.00 $103,600.00 'ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 2 REMOVAL 3-3.1(B) SY ~;~i ~ $4.63! $9,912.83 PORT~ND CEMENT CONCRETE 3 PAVEMENT REMOVAL 3-3.1(B) SY $8.97 $3,417.57 4 ISLAND REMOVAL 3-3.1(B) SY .......... ~ *,;~ $6.17 $1,851.00 ~, ~.,; ~;85~;~'~; $6.56 $12,181.92 5 COLD PLANING 3-3.1(C) SY 6 ROADWAY EXCAV. INCL. HAUL 3-3.1(A) CY ~;.~,~.~., , ., ~ $13.31 $23,186.02 7 PCC & AC PAVEMENT CUTTING 3-3.4 LF , ~, ~;;~ ;~2~,,~,;¢~ $3.15 $12,537.00 8 PCC CURB & GUTTER REMOVAL 3-3.2(A) LF :; $4.36 $1,098.72 REMOVE EXTRUDED ASPHALT OR 9 CONCRETE CURB 3-3.2(B) LF **:~ ,~¢~ $3.32 $803.44 10 SIDEWALK REMOVAL 3-3.2(C) SY ;';,'E~(&i~,~;~;~';~$6.49 $765.82 11 REMOVAL OF MINOR STRUCTURES 3-3.2(D) EACH ;;;;;;:'~¢ ,:; ;~!:~;;~ ~;~ ;: $644.00 $644.00 12 REMOVE CATCH BASINS 3-2.5 EACH $460.40 $2,302.00! 13 CRUSHED SURFACING 3-3.6 TN .,~ ~ ,~.~ ~.~,, ~,,;~,~ $17.99 $14,841.75 14 GRAVEL BORROW 3-3.7(A) TN :, ~-¢;2~(~¢~:(;,~ $16.29 $37,662.48 BANK RUN GRAVEL FOR TRENCH 15 BACKFILL 3-3.7(B) CY $42.84 $1,627.92 16 QUARRY SPALLS FOR CULVERTS 3-3.7(C) CY $34.82 $487.48 17 ASPHALT TACK COAT 3-3.12(A) TN $350.00 $5,950.00 18 AC PVMT. CL "B" 3-3.12(B) TN S38.50 $67,413.50 19 AC APPROACH CL "B" 3-3.12(B) TN ;.. ;:: ';~ S50.00 $8,850.00 20 AC PVMT. CL "G" 3-3.12(B) TN S40.00 $15,160.00 COLD P~NT MIX FOR TEMPORARY 21 PAVEMENT PATCH 3-3.5(A) TN $50.00 $9,250.00 22 PERM AC PVMT PATCH 3-3.5(B) SY ~. ~ ~862 ~;~,;~,~; .~ $13.28 $4,807.36 PCC CURB & GUTTER TYPE A-1 & 23 BARRIER CURB 3-3,9(A) LF ,~;;;:3~'~: S 10.50 $ 36,939.00 EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB, TYPE A & 24 TYPE C BLOCK CURBING 3-3.9(B) LF .~;'~e~g.i:;;~; $6.25 $1,925.00 ;;~: ;~5~~;~¢~: $18.00 $28,062.00 25 PCC SIDEWALK - TYPE B 3-3.10(A) SY 26 PCC DRIVEWAYS - TYPE C 3-3.11 SY S34.00 $7,208.00 27 STRUCTURE EX. CL B INCL HAUL 3-2.3(A) CY $9.03 $4,551.12 FHWA #STPF-6566(011 ) TIA #9W-0115(101 )-1 UATA #8-2-152(022)-1 State Contract #SA-3017 Project #E42013 City of Bremerton Engineering Department Page 1 Bidtab2 BID TAB Kitsap Way Street Improvements Bid Tabulation 2/26/98 ACE PAVING ITEM REF. STD. NUMBER ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE/UNIT TOTAL COST SHORING OR EXTRA EXCAVATION ST STD. 2 28 CLASS B 09.5 SF $1.00 $2,649.00 PLUG AND ABANDON EXIST. STORM 29 CULVERTS 3-2.6 EACH $102.62 $615.72 FURNISH AND INSTALL STORM SEWER 30 PIPE 12" CORRUGATED PE 3-2.8 LF :~:~;;:~fl;1;3~?~:~,¢ $15.55 $17,307.15 FURNISH & INSTALL STORM SEWER PIPE - 31 C~SS IV 12" REINFORCED PCC 3-2.8 LF $49.84 $4,086.88! FURNISH AND INSTALL PVC SLIPLINER - 32 18" 3-2.8 LF $125.66 $16,964.10 FURNISH AND INSTALL TYPE I CB W/ 33 FRAME & GRATE 3-2.11 EACH ~',',:~;" .... ~'~"~ $873.00 $11,349.00 FURNISH AND INSTALL TYPE I DROP 34 IN LET WIG RATE 3-2.11 LAC H ;;;~; ~: ~;~ $2,916.12 $2,916.12 35 ADJUST WATER VALVES TO GRADE 3-13 EACH $200.00 $1,800.00 36 ADJUST MANHOLES TO GRADE 3-13 EACH [ $250.00 $1,250.00 37 ADJUST JUNCTION BOXES TO GRADE 3-13 EACH , .,~.~ $150.00 $900.00 38 MOVE JUNCTION BOX 3-13 EACH $1,000.00 $1,000.00 39 ADJUST MONUMENT CASE TO GRADE 1-2.9 (A) EACH ;~ '~¢'::~ ~ $300.00 $900.00 102 REMOVE AND REP~CE MONUMENT 3-3.21 EACH ;?.:;~;:;;;;~ ~.~;,~¢;:,;::;:,~,~;.¢ $1,000.00 $1,000.00 40 ADJUST CATCH BASIN TO GRADE 1-2.9(A) EACH $250.00 $250.00 41 ILLUMINATION SYSTEM 5-29 LS ;;;;~¢~4:~,~,~ ;;.~',~ $74,000.00 $74,000.00 42 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION 4-25 LS ;E;;'~: :~:(', $27,300.00 $27,300.00 43 VEHICLE DETECTOR LOOPS 4-18.1(D) EACH :;,-¢~' '~e?',~*;;~'~; $800.00 $8,000.00 44 ROCKERY 3-3.19 SY ;; ;?:;;; ;,~;~?-;:,;;;;$75.00 $900.00 45 DITCH EXCAVATION/GRADING 3-3.14 LF $6.72 $336.00 46 ~WN RESTORATION 3-3.17 SY ,~ ~;; ~ $10.00 $6,400.00 47 TEMPORARY PVMT. MARKINGS 8-23.5 LF -~;;~;;t~6~;,1~, ;;;" ::$2.00 $1,222.00 48 REMOVE PLASTIC STRIPING 3-1.4(2) LF $0.90 $180.00 49 REMOVE PLASTIC STRIPING 3-1.4(2) SY $9.00 $1,377.00 REMOVE P~STIC TRAFFIC ARROW OR S .00 S300.00 51 REMOVE RAISED PVMT MARKING 3-1.4(2) LS ~ ,;]:; $943.00 $943.00 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ST STD 52 DEVICES 1-10.5 LS $11,193.00 $11,193.00 ST STD 103 CONSTRUCTION SIGNS C~SS A 1-10.5 SF ., ;¢~d~.;, $10.00 $1,700.00 STD 104 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISOR 1-10.5 HR $48.76 $23,892.40 FHWA #STPF-6566(011 ) TIA #9W-0115(101)-I UATA #8-2-152(022)-1 State Contract #SA-3017 Project #E42013 City of Bremerton Engineering Department Bidtab2 Page 2 BID TAB 2~26~98 Kitsap Way Street Improvements Bid Tabulation ACE PAVING ITEM REF. STD NUMBER ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE/UNIT TOTAL COST ;UNIFORM TRAFFIC OFFICER FOR 105 :TRAFFIC CONTROL 3-1.5 HR ;;~;: &~;*2 04~',:';, ¢~,,~' $33.75 $675.00 ST STD 53 TRAFFIC CONTROL LABOR 1-10.5 HR :!;~; $33.00 $48,972.00 SIC,GOO.GO 54 FORCE ACCOUNT 3-1.9 LS SIC,GOO.GO BASE BID SCHEDULE 1 TOTAL: $697,414.30! BASE BID - SCHEDULE 2 55 ;MOBILIZATION 3-1.4 L.S. $51,500.00 $51,500.00 56 AC PAVEMENT REMOVAL 3-3.1(B) SY ~ii¢~*!~ $4.63 $3,162.29 57 !ISLAND REMOVAL 3-3.1(B) SY : :L ~7....2'~%~ $6.17 $4,467.08 58 COLD PLANING 3-3.1(C) SY :4¢**;~ $6.56 $3,562.08 59 ;ROADWAY EXCAV. INCL. HAUL 3-3.1(A) CY ~'¢,.,:.;¢~:,,..~' ~::~¢~ ~,,.~, ~>~ '¢~ $13.31 $6,841.34 60 PAVEMENT SAWCUTTING 3-3.4 LF :~;.~¢;~¢ $3.15 $6,599.25 61 REMOVAL OF MINOR STRUCTURES 3-3.2(D) EACH ~4 $644.00 $644.00 62 ~REMOVE GUARDRAIL 3-3.2(E) LF ~;,-;4;'.;; $9.30 $2,511.00 63 CRUSHED SURFACING 3-3.6 TN ~:~,¢>~ m~:~;~5 ¢: $17.99 $3,885.84 64 GRAVEL BORROW 3-3.7(A) TN ;~'~;~;;; 2;6~ ; $16.29 $42,679.80 65 QUARRY SPALLS FOR CULVERTS 3-3.7(C) CY ;~'::,:,¢~*~;;.~7~,:: ,~:~.,: $34.82 $243.74 66 ASPHALT TACK COAT 3-3.12(A) TN $350.00 $1,400.00 67 AC PVMT. CL "B" 3-3.12(B) TN $38.50 $40,309.50 68 AC APPROACH CL "B" 3-3.12(B) TN $50.00 $2,350.00 COLD PLANT MIX FOR TEMPORARY 69 PAVEMENT PATCH 3-3.5(A) TN ,~,~: ~4~: ~ ~: $50.00 $2,000.00 70 PERM AC PVMT PATCH 3-3.5(B) SY ~':; ~,~-~'¢; $13.28 $1,261.60 PCC CURB & GUTTER TYPE A-1 & 71 BARRIER CURB 3-3.9(A) LF S10.50 $13,755.00 EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB TYPE A & . 72 TYPE C BLOCK CURBING 3-3.9(B) LF $6.25 $2,718.75 73 PCC SIDEWALK- TYPE 'B' 3-3.10(A) SY -~¢;:¢:::~56~;,:,;~:,~;~ $18.00 $15,40800 74 STRUCTURE EX. CL g INCL HAUL 3-2.3(A) CY ::~':~':: ,~ ;:, ~;i $9.03 $668.22 ST STD. 2 '.: 75 oR EX. 09. 91.00 $62 .00 PLUG AND ABANDON EXIST. STORM 76 CULVERTS 3-2.6 EACH S102.62 $205.24 FURNISH AND INSTALL STORM SEWER 1=,, co..UOAT FURNISH AND INSTALL STORM SEWER $44.47 $3,335.25 FURNISH AND INSTALL TYPEICBW/ * :: :':: 79 FRAME & GRATE 3-2.11 EACH . ~ 9873.00 $3,492.00 FURNISH AND INSTALL TYPE II CB (48") 80 W/FRAME & GRATE 3-2.11 EACH $1,464.44 $2,928.88 FHWA #STPF-6566(011 ) TIA #9W-0115(101)-1 UATA #8-2-152(022)- 1 State Contract #SA-3017 Project #E42013 City of Bremerton Engineering Department Bidtab2 Page 3 BID TAB 2~26~98 Kitsap Way Street Improvements Bid Tabulation ACE PAVING ITEM REF. STD. NUMBER ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE/UNIT TOTAL COST FURNISH AND INSTALL TYPE 4 CB W/ 81 FRAME & GRATE 3-2.11 EACH $1,478.50 $2,957.00 FURNISH AND INSTALL MANHOLE TYPE 82 1 48" 3-2.11 EACH $1,905.87 $1,905.87 83 ADJUST WATER VALVES TO GRADE 3-13 EACH $200.00 $1,000.00 84 ADJUST MANHOLES TO GRADE 3-13 EACH ~ $250.00 $250.00 85 ADJUST JUNCTION BOXES TO GRADE 3-13 EACH $150.00 $750.00 86 MOVE JUNCTION BOX 3-13 EACH ;:~¢J~: ~, $1,000.00 $1,000.00 87 ADJUST MONUMENT CASE TO GRADE 1-2.9 (A) EACH ~ ........ ~ ~,~ ......... $300.00 $1,800.00 88 ADJUST CATCH BASIN TO GRADE 1-2.9 (A) EACH ; ~ ~: $250.00 $250.00 89 ILLUMINATION SYSTEM 5-29 LS -;2~?~ :~ $3,000.00 $3,000.00 90 VEHICLE DETECTOR LOOPS 4-18.1(D) EACH ~ : $800.00 $8,000.00 91 ROCKERY 3-3.19 SY ~ $75.00 $3,975.00 92 DITCH EXCAVATION/GRADING 3-3.14 LF ~.:~, ~;: $6.72 $2,116.80 93 ~WN RESTORATION 3-3.17 SY $10.00 $4,190.00 ST STD 94 TEMPORARY PVMT. MARKINGS 8-23.5 LF ::,;;:; ;; ~:; :;:::$2.00 $408.00 95 REMOVE PLASTIC STRIPING 3-1.4(2) LF ;~:}:~.~ ~ $0.90 $6~ 3.80 0~ R~MOV[ ~SIIC SIRI~I~G 3-~.4(2) SY ~: :~¢~}~*; ~::~ $900 $~ ,~43.00 97 REMOVE PLASTIC ARROW OR LE~ER 3-01.4(2) EACH ;:;;;;;~4¢*~;~ "~;~ $15.00 $105.00 98 REMOVE RAISED PVMT MARKING 3-1.4(2) LS ; ~ S500.00 S500.00 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ST STD 99 DEVICES 1-10.5 L.S. $2,500.00 $2,500.00 ~ ~., 106 CONSTRUCTION SIGNS CLASS A 1-10.5 SF ;~,¢; "~;'&O~~::¢ :;: $10.00 S400.00 107 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISOR 1-10.5 HR ;..:,';~¢;~,~;~.~g~;~¢:; $48.76 $5,363.60 UNIFORMED POLICE OFFICER FOR 108 TRAFFIC CONTROL 3-1.5 HR $33.75 S675.00 ST STD 100 TRAFFIC CONTROL LABOR 1-10.5 HR S33.00 $12,012.00 101 FORCE ACCOUNT 3-1.9 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 8~-lOl~k: $27~,022 ~ 3 SCHEDULE 'B' BID TRAFFIC DISPLAY & DETECTION B1 SYSTEM KITSAP WAY 8-20.5 L.S. $69,600.001 $69,600.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM B2 KITSAP WAY 8-20.5 L.S. ;; ;(~;;;:;;:;~;~:~,:;;:;; t; $14,000.00 $14,000.00 TRAFFIC DISPLAY & DETECTION B3 SYSTEM NEWBERRY HILL ROAD 8-20.5 L.S. $69,000.001 $69,000.00 FHWA ¢STPF-6566(011) TIA ¢9W-0115(101)-1 UATA ¢8-2-152(022)-1 City of Bremerton State Contract ¢SA-3017 Project ¢E42013 Engineering Department Bidtab2 Page 4 BID TAB 2~26~98 Kitsap Way Street Improvements Bid Tabulation ACE PAVING ITEM REF. STD. NUMBER ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE/UNIT TOTAL COST TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM ~i i-': :'~ :; ;~:~-':~:', ;~'~ B4 NEWBERRY HILL ROAD 8-20.5 L.S. '' :'~'~:~' ;'~ ..... '~ ; :;;~;'. :~::;?:!~.12~i~;:~¢;:~: $14,000.00 $14,000.00 B5 TRAFFIC CONTROL LABOR 1-10.5 HR $33.00 $13,200.00 SCHEDULE B SUB-TOTAL: $179,800.00i BASE BID SCHEDULE 2 SUB-TOTAL:I $458,822.13 I SALES TAX e s.~°/oI $37,164.59 BASE BID SCHEDULE 2 TOTAL:I $495,986.721 BASE BIDS, SCHED. 1 AND SCHED. 2 WI SALES TAXI $1,193,401.021 ISCHEDULE 'C" BID C1 ITELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM 3-3.20 L,®>¢ d $33'350'00l SCHEDULE Cl SUB-TOTAL:I $33,350.001 $33,350.001 C2 ITELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM I 3-3.20 I SCHEDULE C2 SUBTOTAL:I I SALES TAXI $2,300.00t $2,300.00I $186.301 SCHEDULE "C1" AND "C2" WITH STATE SALES TAX TOTAL:I $35,836.301 GRAND TOTAL (Schedules 1, 2, C1, and C2):I $1,229,237.321 FHWA #STPF-6566(011 ) TIA #9W-0115(101 )-1 UATA #8-2-152(022)-1 State Contract #SA-3017 Project #E42013 City of Bremerton Engineering Department Bidtab2 Page 5 BID TAB Kitsap Way Street Improvements Funding Array 2/26/98 3:48 PM GRANT OR I CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FUND SOURCE AGREEMENT DATE DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OTHER MANAGEMENT TOTAL FHWA ( STPF-6566(0'I 1) ) 6/16/93 $101,138.00 $292,686.00 $16,582.00 $43,059.00 $453,465.00 UATA (TIB # 8-2-152(022)-1) 3/3/97 $439,265.00 $10,266.00 $34,870.00 $484,401.00 TIA (TIB #gw-0115(101 )-1 ) 6/21/93 $15,718.00 - $15,718.00 WSDOT (GCA 0914, Signals) 7/3/97 $218,887.81 $32,833.17 $251,720.98 C ITY(STORM) $24,500.00 $24,500.00 ClTY(TELECOMM) $35,836.30 $35,836.30 PROPOSED CITY(ARTERIAL) $5,144.00 $99,278.11 $14,362.00 $118,784.11 PROPOSED WSDOT DIRECT $118,784.10 $118,784.10 TOTALS $122,000.00 $1,229,237.32 $26,848.00 $125,124.17 $1,503,209.49 City of Bremerton Engineering Division Page 1 State of Transportation Improvement Board Transportation Building, Rm. 2C5 Post Office 8ox 40901 Olympia, Washington 98504-0901 (360) 705-7300 FAX (360) 705-6830 February 9, 1998 Mr. Randy Witt, P.E. City Engineer City of Bremerton 3027 Olympus Ddve Bremerton, WA 98310-4799 Transportation Improvement Project TIB No. 8-2-152(022)-1 Kitsap Way/Auto Center Bruenn Avenue to Weslon Place ___.~¢,,~,~, City of Bremerton Dear M r.~~.' Please refer to the Updated Cost Estimate dated February 3, 1998, which advised that a Iow bid of $1,229,237 was received for the construction of the subject project. Based on the Iow contract bid and availability of funds, this letter is a written confirmation of approval to award. Your request for an increase in Urban Artedal Trust Account (UATA) funds is approved in the amount of $43,896. The total amount of Urban Artedal Trust Account (UATA) funds now authorized for participation in this project is $528,297. For progress billings use 49.9 percent in calculating the pro-rata share for reimbursement from the UATA program. In accordance with Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Guidelines, an Updated Cost Estimate (TIB Form 190-015) and a Final Summary of Construction Quantities are required upon completion of the contract but prior to final settlement with the Transpor[ation Improvement Board. If you have any questions, contact Gloria Bennett at (360) 705-7591. Sincerely, Executive Director JMF/ALD:gjb Enclosures cc: Bob Holcomb Accounting AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: Supplemental Agreement with Washington FOR AGENDA OF: March 11,1998 /,,~ State Department of Transportation regarding funding ' ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works & Ut. of improvements to Kitsap Way, Weslon Place to Auto Center ORIGINATOR: R. Witt, City Engineer Way, and signals on SR3 ramps at Kitsap Way and Newberry Hill DATE SUBMITTED: February 26, 1998 2. CL .E~Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: 1. WSDOT Agreement #GCA-0914 ~ of Ru~lic ~or~sr& Utilities 2. WSDOT Agreement #GCA-0914 Q/~d.~., )(.-7~~ Supplement No. 1 Cit~n~ ~ --'e~: ~2ou' ' Fiscal &_Budget Co ,~ttee ~il Operations Committee ENDORSEMENT,~INFORMATION [] APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDE4NT FOR SUBMITTAL: COUNCIL PRESIDENT 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The City of Bremepton and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) previously entered into an agreement on July 3, 1997 which provided for the City to construct traffic signals at the Kitsap Way and the Newberry Hill Road Interchanges on SR3. The attached Supplemental Agreement adjusts the costs for the traffic signals based on the low bid received for the Kitsap Way improvement and in addition identifies WSDOT's responsibility to pay for a portion on the improvements on Kitsap Way within their limited access area for SR3. The Supplemental Agreement reimburses the City for the related construction and inspection costs in the estimated amount of $373,048.22. 5. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the WSDOT Agreement No. GCA-0914 Supplement No. 1 and authorize and direct the Mayor to execute the agreement. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Director Pub Wks & Util ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Director Pub Wks & Util EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED [1 TABLED Il COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: APPROVED [] DISAPPROVED [] AMENDED [] (OVER) 11. AGENDA BILL NO.: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION - Continuation 6. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Additional funding from WSDOT will not become available for the improvement of Kitsap Way between Weslon Place and Auto Center Way requiring rejection of bids on the project. The project would require redesign and rebidding with potential loss of total project funding. 7. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT AND OTHER RESOURCES: No impact since this agreement will fund the construction of State improvements including city staff inspection. 8. RESEARCH SOURCES: Washington State Department of Transportation State Participating Agreement Work by Local Agency Actual Cost Agreement Number GCA-0914 State Route Number Control Section Number 3 .1804 Region Olympic Region Organization and Address City of Bremerton 239 4th Street Bremerton, Wa 98337 Section / Location SR 3 Kitsap Way and Newberry Hill Signals Description of Work Construct Traffic Signals THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this J"~"~' day of ~--'/1~' , .?. _¢~,~, between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Department of Transportation, acting by and through the Secret,aCC'of Transportation, (hereinafter the "STATE") and the above named organization, (hereinafter the "LOCAL AGENCY"). WHEREAS, the LOCAL AGENCY is planning the construction of a project as shown above, and in connection therewith, the STATE has requested that the LOCAL AGENCY perform certain work as herein described, and WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interest for the STATE to include specific items of work in the LOCAL AGENCY's construction contract proposed for the above-noted project, and WHEREAS, the STATE is obligated for the cost of work described herein. NOW THEREFORE, by virtue of RCW 47.28.140 and in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performances contained herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: I GENERAL The LOCAL AGENCY, as agent acting for and on behalf of the STATE, agrees to perform the above "Description ofWork", q.~. '~'T'~'X~ Plans, snecific¢ons and cos~e~timates shall be prepared by the-L~ ..... - -'-.h~O~. in accordance with the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, and amendments thereto, and adopted design standards, unless otherwise noted. The LOCAL AGENCY will incorporate the plans and.specifications into the LOCAL AGENCY's project and thereafter advertise the resulting project for bid and, assuming 'bids are received and a contract is awarded, administer the cont'ract. The LOCAL AGENCY agrees to submit plans and .specifications for the described work as shown on E~hibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT, to the STATE for approval prior to advertising the project. The STATE may, if it desires, furnish an inspector on the project. Any costs for such inspection will be borne solely by the STATE. All contact between said inspector and the LOCAL AGENCY's contractor shall be through the LOCAL AGENCY's representative. The STATE agrees, upon satisfactory completion of the work involved, to deliver a letter of acceptance which shall include a release and waiver of all future claims or demands of any nature resulting from the performance of the work under this AGREEMENT. II PAYMENT The STATE, in consideration of the faithful performance of the work to be done by the LOCAL AGENCY, agrees to reimburse the LOCAL AGENCY for the actual direct and related indirect cost of the work. An itemized estimate of cost for work to be performed by the LOCAL AGENCY at the STATE's expense is marked Exhibit "A", and is attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. Partial payments shall be made by the STATE, upon request of the LOCAL AGENCY, to cover costs incurred. These payments are not to be more frequent than one (1) per month. It is agreed that any such partial payment will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and that, at the time of the final audit, all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment. DOT Form 224-067 EF Revised 1/97 The LOCAL AGENCY agrees to submit-a final bill to th6 STATE within forty-five (45) days after the LOCAL AGENCY has completed the work. III DELETION OF WORK In the event the estimate of cost, Exhibit "A% is in excess of $10,000 and the total actual bid prices for the work covered by this AGREEMENT exceeds the estimate of cost by more than 15 percent, the STATE shall have the option of directing the LOCAL AGENCY to delete all or a portion of the work covered by this AGREEMENT from the LOCAL AGENCY's contract. Except, that this provision shall be null and void if the STATE's portion of the work exceeds 20 percent of the actual total contract bid price. The STATE shall have five (5) working days from the date of written notification to inform the LOCAL AGENCY to delete the work. Should the STATE exercise its option to delete work, the STATE agrees, upon billing by the LOCAL AGENCY, to reimburse the LOCAL AGENCY for preliminary engineering costs incurred by the LOCAL AGENCY to include the work covered by this AGREEMENT in the LOCAL AGENCY's contract. IV EXTRA WORK In the event unforeseen conditions require an increase in the cost of 25 percent or more from that agreed to on Exhibit "A", this AGREEMENT will be modified by supplemental AGREEMENT covering said increase. In ihe event it is dete'Fmined that any change from the description of work contained in this AGREEMENT is required, approval must be secured from the STATE prior to the beginning of such work. Where the change is substantial, written approval must be secured. Reimbursement for increased work and/or a substantial change in the description of work shall be limited to costs covered by a written modification, change order or extra work order approved by the STATE. V RIGHT OF ENTRY The STATE hereby grants and conveys to the LOCAL AGENCY the dght of entry upon all land which the STATE has interest, within or adjacent to the right of way of the highway, for the purpose of constructing said improvements. Upon completion of the work outlined herein, all future operation and maihtenance of the STATE's facilities shall be at the sole cost of the STATE and without expense to the LOCAL AGENCY. VI LEGAL RELATIONS No liability shall attach to the LOCAL AGENCY or the STATE by reason of entering into this agreement except as expressly provided herein. INW TNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above written. LOCAL AGENCY Title Yu~.YO R STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Hight-o.f-w~v Accommodations Engineer Title ATTEST ': KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, CIT~ CLERK . DEPAI{TME~AP~ROVAL W. EUGENE SAM~, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES DOT Form 224-067 EF Revised 1197 EXHIBIT "A" AGREEMENT GCA-0914 ITEM DESCRIPTION MOBILIZATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL DISPLAY AND DETECTION SYSTEM KITSAP WAY TRAFFIC SIGNAL DISPLAY AND DETECTION SYSTEM NEWBERRY HILL TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM KITSAP WAY TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM NEWBERRY HILL TRAFFIC CONTROL LABOR UNIT MEASURE L.S. UNIT PRICE 61,200.00 L.S. 54,000.00 L.S. 15,000.00 L.S. 15,000.00 HOUR 28.00 CONTRACT TOTAL SALES TAX @ 8.1% SUBTOTAL ENGINEERING @15 % CONSTRUCTION TOTAL QUAJ',H'~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 400.00 AMOUNT $15,640.00 $61,200.00 $54,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $11,200.00 $172,040.00 $13,935.24 $185,975.24 $24,176.78 $210,152.02 -1- EXHIBIT "A" GCA-0914 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT AGREEMENT GCA-0914 SUPPLEMENT NO 1 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this __ day of ,1998 between the STATE OF WASHINGTON Department of Transportation, acting through the Secretary of Transportation, hereinafter called the "STATE" , and City of Bremerton, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, WA 98337, acting through the Mayor herein after called the "CITY". WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into AGREEMENT GCA-0914 on the 3rd day of July, 1997, which provided for the CITY to construct traffic signals at the Kitsap Way and the Newberry Hill Road Interchanges on SR 3, and WHEREAS, the CITY included the STATE's traffic signals in a CITY project on SR 310 (Kitsap Way) from the SR 3 Southbound OffRamp (Auto Center Way) to Welson Place, and WHEREAS, the CITY's project included channelization revisions on SR 310 between the SR 3 Ramp Terminals and, WHEREAS, SR 310 between the SR 3 Ramp Terminals is within the limited access of SR 3 and in accordance with RCW 47.24.020(2) the STATE is solely responsible for improvements to that section of Kitsap Way, and WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to supplement the original agreement for the STATE to participate in the cost of the construction of the CITY's project on SR 310 between the SR 3 Ramp Terminals and, WHEREAS, the CITY has opened bids on the project, and WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to supplement the original agreement to reflect the low bid for the STATE's traffic signal systems and the STATE's share of the CITY's project on SR 310 between the SR 3 Ramp Terminals. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of' the terms, conditions, covenants, and performance contained herein or attached and made part hereof, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOW. S: SECTION I, GENERAL, of the original agreement is amended to include the following: GCA-0914 -1- The limits of the STATE's participation in the CITY's project on Kitsap Way (SR 310) are shown on Exhibit "B-I" attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. SECTION II, PAYMENT, the second paragraph is revised to read as follows: An itemized estimate of cost for the work to be performed by the CITY at the STATE's expense is marked EXHIBIT "A-I" attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. All other terms and conditions of the original agreement shall remain in full force and effect except as modified by this sUpplemental agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this' AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above written. APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO FORM Assistant Attorney General Glenna L. Malanca, City Attorney DATE: DATE: ATTEST: Kathleen McCluskey, City Clerk DATE: STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF BREMERTON BY: BY: Lynn Horton, Mayor DATE: · : BY: W. Eugene Sampley Director of Public Works and Utilities DATE: -2- EXHIBIT "A-I" AGREEMENT GCA-0914 GCA-0914 ESTIMATE OF COST OF THE STATE'S PARTICIPATION TOTAL SCHEDULE B STATES SHARE @100% TOTAL SCHEDULE 2 STATES SHARE @33.5117478% $256,807.24 $346,8666.36 TOTAL STATE COST $256,807.24 $116,240.98 $373,048.22 -1- EXHIBIT "A- 1" AGREEMENT GCA-0914 EXHIBIT "A- 1" GCA-0914 ITEM NO B1 B2 B2 B4 ITEM DESCRIPTION MOBILIZATION SCHEDULE B ESTIMATE OF COST UNIT MEASURE UNIT PRICE TRAFFIC SIGNAL DISPLAY AND DETECTION SYSTEM KITSAP WAY LS LS 69,600.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM KITSAP WAY LS 14,000.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL DISPLAY AND DETECTION SYSTEM NEWBERRY HILL lS 691000.O0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM NEWBERRY HILL LS 14,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LABOR QUANTITY 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HOUR 33.00 400.00 SCHEDULE B CONTRACT SALES TAX @ 8.1% ENGINEERING @15 % TOTAL SCHEDULE B AMOUNT $26,777.84 $69,600.00 $14,000.00 $69,000.00 $14,000.00 $13,200.00 ~206,577.84 $16,732.81 $33,496.6O $256,807.24 THE STAE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 100% OF SCHEDULE B -2- EXHIBIT "A-I" AGREEMENT GCA-0914 SCHEDULE 2 EXHIBIT "A- 1" GCA-0914 Item No. 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 8O 81 82 83 ESTIMATE OF COST Description Quantity Unit MOBILIZATION 1 SY AC PAVEMENT REMOVAL 683 SY ISLAND REMOVAL 724 SY COLD PLANNING 543 SY ROADWAY EXCAV. INC. HAUL 514 CY PAVEMENT SAWCUTTING 2095 LF REMOVAL OF MINOR STRUCTURES 1 EACH REMOVE GUARDRAIL 270 LF CRUSHED SURFAFACING 216 TN GRAVEL BORROW 2620 TN QUARRY SPALLS FOR CULVERT 7 CY ASPHALT FOR TACK COAT 4 TN AC PAVMT. CL, "B" 1047 TN AC APPROACH CL"B" 47 TN COLD PLANT MIX FOR TEMPORARY 40 TN PAVEMENT REPAIR PERM AC PAVT PATCH 95 SY PCC CURB &CUTTER TYPE A-1 & 1310 LF BARRIER CURB EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB TYPE A & 435 LF TYPE C BLOCK CURBING PCC SIDEWALK - TYPE "B" 856 SY STRYCTURE EX. CL B INC. HAUL 74 CY SHORING AND EXTRA EX. CL B 628 SF PLUG AND ABANDON EXIST. STORM CULVERTS 2 EACH FURNISHING AND INSTALL STORM SEWER PIPE 164 LF 12" CORRUGATED PE FURNISHING AND INSTALL STORM SEWER PIPE 75 LF 18" CORRUGATED PE FURNISH AND INSTALL TYPE 1 CB.W/FRAME 4 EACH GRATE FURNISH AND INSTALL TYPE II CB (48") 2 EACH FRAME AND GRATE FURNISH AND INSTALL TYPE 4 CB W/FRAME 2 EACH AND GRATE FURNISH AND INSTALL MANHOLE TYPE 1 48" .1 EACH ADJUST WATER VALVES TO GRADE 5 EACH -3- EXHIBIT "A-I" AGREEMENT GCA-0914 SCHEDULE 2 Unit Price Amount $51,500.00 $51,500.00 $4.63 $3,162.29 $6.17 $4,467.08 $6.56 $3,562.08 $13.31 $6,841.34 $3.15 $6,599.25 $644.00 $644.00 $9.30 $2,511.00 $17.99 $3,885.84 $16.29 $42,679.80 $34.82 $243.74 $350.00 $1,400.00 $38.50 $40,309.50 $50.00 $2,350.00 $50.00 $2,000.00 $13.28 $1,261.60 $10.50 $13,755.00 $6.25 $2,718.75 $18.00 $15,408.00 $9.03 $668.22 $1.00 $628.00 $102.62 $205.24 $15.55 $2,550.20 $44.47 $3,335.25 S873.00 $3,492.00 $1,464.44 $2,928.88 Sl,478.50 $2,957.00 $1,905.87 $1,905.87 $200.00 $1,000.00 EXHIBIT "A- 1" GCA-0914 ESTIMATE OF COST 84 ADJUST MANHOLES TO GRADE 85 ADJUST JUNCTION BAOXES TO GRADE 86 MOVE JUNCTION BOX 87 ADJUST MONUMENT CASE AND COVER 88 ADJUST CATCH BASIN TO GRADE 89 ILLUMINATION SYSTEM 90 VEHICLE DETECTOR LOOPS 91 ROCKERY 92 DITCH EXECVATION GRADING 93 LAWN RESTORATION 94 TEMPORARY PVMT. MARKINGS 95 REMOVE PLASTIC STRIPING 96 REMOVE PLASTIC STRIPING 97 REMOVE PLASTIC ARROW OR LETTER 98 REMOVE RAISED PVMT. MARKINGS 99 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 100 TRAFFIC CONTROL LABOR 101 FORCE ACCOUNT 106 CONSTRUCTION SIGNS CLASS A 107 TRAFFIC.CONTROPL SUPERVISOR 108 UNIFORMED POLICE OFFICE FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 EACH 5 EACH 1 EACH 6 EACH 1 EACH 1 LS 10 EACH 53 SY 315 LF 419 SY 204 LF 682 LF 127 SY 7 EACH 1 LS 1 LS 364 HR 1 LS 4O SF 110 HR 20 HR $250.00 $150.00 $1,000.00 $300.OO $25O.OO $3,000.00 $800.00 $75.OO $6.72 $10.00 $2.00 $0.90 $9.OO $15.00 $5OO.OO $2,500.00 $33.00 $5,000.00 $10.00 $48.76 $33.75 CONTRACT AMOUNT SALES TAX @ 8.1% ENGINEERING @ 15% SCHEDULE 2 AMOUNT $250.00 $750.00 $1,000.00 $1,800.00 $250.00 $3,000.00 $8,000.00 $3,975.00 $2,116.80 $4,190.00 $408.00 $613.80 $1,143.00 $105.00 $5OO.OO $2,500.00 $12,012.00 $5,000.00 $4OO.OO $5,363.60 $675.00 $279,022.13 $22,600.79 $45,243.44 $346,866.36 THE STATE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 33.5117478% OF SCHEDULE 2 -4- EXHIBIT "A-I" GCA-0914 4( 1. Subject: .... ,~2647 ~. A ~esomuon~suppomng ~e EDC recommendation for industrial lands in Kitsap County. AGENDA BII,I, BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL FOR AGENDA OF: 3/11/98 ORIGINATING DEPT: Executive ORIGINATOR: Mayor Horton DATE SUBMIIWED: 3/5/98 2. Clearances: (Comment on back if necessary) ENDORSEMENT INFORMATION 3. Exhibits: 4- Resolution t12647 4' City letter to County APPROVED BY COUNCIL 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT & REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The Economic Development Council of Kitsap County has worked diligently over the past several years to provide a plan for economic diversity. The primary motivation for this effort is the continued heavy dependence of the community on the down~izlng United States Navy. The provision of adequate supplies of market-supported industrial land to accommodate future demand goes to the heart of the economic diversification issue. The EDC Industrial Land Market Analysis combines the knowledge and experience of public community development and private business professionals to calculate shortfalls in developable industrial land in Kitsap County. A public declaration of support is attached in resolution form. This resolution is presented to cause the Council to have a public dialog on the issue and to pass or reject the resolution as an indication of the official legislative and administrative position of the city. The resolution, as presented, supports the recommendations and policies contained within the Economic Development Council Industrial Land Market Analysis, prepared July. 1994. 8. RECOMMENDATION: t/2647 By passing the attached resolution,/the City Council indicates its endorsement of and firm determination to support the intent and recommendations of the study. City Growth Management staff'recommends the passage of this resolution for two reasons. First, the study is accurate using scientific analytical approaches focused on the critical linkage between adequate supplies of well- located, developable industrial land and because the EDC study mirrors city positions on economic development and growth. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION: PULLED __ TABLED __ APPROVED __ DISAPPROVED ~ COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE: 0+7 RESOLUTION NO. ,~(-o ~ 7 A RESOLUTION supporting the Economic Development Council of Kit~ap County Industrial Land Market Analysis of July 1994. WHEREAS, the Economic Development Council of Kitsap County has worked diligently over the past several years to provide a plan for economic diversity; and WHEREAS, the Economic Development Council of Kitsap County is a coalition of broad-based, private and public leaders working for a sustainable quality of life for residents now and in the futura; and WHEREAS, the provision of an adequate supply ofm~kct-supported industrial land in Kitsap County to accommodate future demands is necessary to secure the eeonomi¢ prosperity and employment for the area; and WHEREAS, it is essential that new opportunities for industrial diversification are provided to the area economy which is presently overly dependant upon the ever downsizing United Sts_t~ Department of Defeuse; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires that the municipal and county Comprehensive Plans must designate and zone an adequate supply of industrial land for a 20 year time span; and WHEREAS, the city has coneluded that areas within or directly adjacent to Urban Growth Areas where services are logically and economically available within a reastmable time frame and the EDC study does not compete with this underlying philosophy; and WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan discloses that many large tracts of land are located within or directly adjaceat to the city; and · WHEREAS, Bremerton concurs that properties identified by the Port of Bremerton, Port Blakely and McCormick Land Company for industrial purposes meet the objectives of the GMA, the cities and the EDC study; and WHEREAS, of the 2,029 acres of vacant land zoned for industrial uses in Kitsap County (as of 1994), less than five- hundred acres were found to have reasonable development potential; and WHEREAS, the EDC industrial supply recommendation uses a land reserve multiplier of 2.5 thereby producing a proper supply of resources without supply constraint distortions which would make the area non-competitive with other regions consequently discouraging interested industry from locating here; LET BE IT RESOLED that the same recommendation fix)m Economic Development Council of Kitsap County to designate and zone 2,575 additional acres of developable industrial land to accommodate the market place and to meet GMA planning requirements for the next 20 years also be a recommendation shared and supported without hesitation by the City Council of the City of Bremerton. PASSED by the City Council of Bremerton this __ day of March, 1998. David Farr, President Bremerton City Council 43 LYNN S. HORTON, Mayor 239 4th Street · Bremerton, Washington 98337 · (360) 478-5266 - FAX (360) 478--5883 March 4, 1998 Chris Endresen, Commission Chair Charlotte Garrido, Commissioner Phil Best, Commissioner 614 Division Street, MS 4 Port Orchard WA 98336 Re: City of Bremerton Comments on Proposed Components of Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan Dear Commissioners: The City of Bremerton is concerned about the following aspects of the Comprehensive Rlan Kitsap County is presently developing. The Designation of UGAs The County once again has ignored the requirement imposed by the Growth Management Act ("GMA") (RCW 36.70A.110) that it "attempt to reach an agreement with each city on the location of an urban growth area within which the city is located." Failing to reach such an agreement, the County must "justify in writing why it so designated the UGA." Id; WAC 365-195-335(2). Kitsap County Planning Policy ("KCPP") A-1 also establishes a cooperative city-county process for establishing mutually agreed upon UGA boundaries.~ The County Plan must be consistent with KCPPs, including KCPP A-1. COPAC/I~Af~C~.~C~m~, CPSGMHB No. 96-3-0013 SEA, Final Decision and Order (1996), at 6. The GMA contemplates that "more than one city" will be located in a UGA and "territory outside of a city ...if such territory is characterized by urban growth". RCW 36.70A.110(1). City ofTacomaR P~rce Count, Final Decision and Order CPSGMHB 94-3-0001 (1994) at 16, held that the GMA requires that if urban land is located adjacent to a city's corporate boundaries, such land should be included in the same UGA as the city: Where a city has "territory located outside of a city" ...that is unquestionably territory "already characterized by urban growth" it is assumed that such land should be included within that city's final UGA. No authorization is provided in the GMA for dividing the continuous urban area located in Bremerton UGA and Silverdale UGA into separate UGAs; the GMA clearly contemplates that urban areas adjacent to cities shall be included within the same UGA. See, e.g., RCW 36.70A.110(1). The Kitsap County Plan shows numerous joint planning areas around cities; the GMA provides no authority for the creation of such areas. The requirement that counties must attempt to reach an agreement with each city located in a UGA about the boundaries of a UGA CPP A-1 references Element 2 of the region-wide growth management strategy adopted by the Kitsap Regional Planning Council which provides for a cooperative city/county process for establishing mutually agreed upon UGA boundaries. ~ Equal Opportunity Employer ~ Kitsap County Commissioners Page 2 imposed by RCW 36.70A.110 reflects the legislative conclusion that cities and adjacent urbanized unincorporated areas should be located in a single UGA. The tiering requirements of the GMA are based on the same legislative determination. See ~~R.A~o¢iatton ~ ~'~at¢om Count, WWGMHB No. 96 2 0008 Final Decision and Order (1996) at 5 (2061). The County has provided no justification for identifying a separate UGA for Silverdale. Nor is there any justification for making the Silverdale UGA larger than the Bremerton UGA, when Bremerton is the most populated city in Kitsap County, and Silverdale is an undefined sprawling unincorporated area, which provides no urban services. One version of Kitsap County's comprehensive planning map shows an arbitrarily configured greenbelt extending from the DNR land to Dyes Inlet as a boundary between the Bremerton UGA and the Silverdale UGA, which is the only greenbelt in the Kitsap County Plan. This greenbelt is inappropriate and will prevent Bremerton from annexing contiguous urban areas. The designation of the Silverdale UGA violates fundamental GMA planning principles. The GMA expresses the preference that urban areas should be municipal areas and that cities are the preferred providers of municipal services. See, e.g., Co~eH¢~FFooW~¥~, CPSGMHB No. 96-3-0032 (1997) at 9; RCW 36.70A.110. Dividing the Silverdale and Bremerton into separate UGAs will divide the Highway 303 corridor. Bremerton has proposed that the entire urban corridor be included in Bremerton's UGA so that it can be planned and managed by a single jurisdiction. Kitsap County has ignored the urban character of the Sheridan Heights area along Tracyton Beach Road, Pine Road, Riddell Road, and Erlands Point, which is shown as a tier 3 area and has not been included in the Bremerton UGA. The area is within Bremerton's water and sewer service areas, as is documented in Bremerton's Comprehensive Plan, and is partially served with utilities. This area includes two multi-unit condominium projects (approved by the County), which are adjacent to the City limits and are in the process of being annexed into the City. Such areas are urban and should be included within Bremerton's UGA and not left as rural islands directly in the path of the City's future growth. Gorst, overlooking Sinclair Inlet, is proposed for inclusion in the UGA even though it has very difficult access, lacks utilities and has low density development. It is inappropriate to include this area in the UGA. The DNR land north of Riddell Road is shown as a joint planning area. This area should be designated as part of the City's UGA. The DNR lands are needed for urban park purposes. Lands east and south of the airport and the Port Blakely lands should be included within Bremerton's UGA. Such areas are proposed for industrial development. The City of Bremerton presently provides water service and a recent study identified Bremerton as the most logical and economical provider of future sewer service. It is appropriate that Bremerton be able to annex such areas if it provides this land with utility service. Delineating the Bremerton UGA in the manner proposed in Exhibit A is consistent with the GMA. The proposed Bremerton GMA area includes territory characterized by urban growth or lands adjacent to areas characterized by urban growth as is required by the GMA (RCW 36.70A.110). The proposed UGA is bounded on the north by Barker Creek and Waaga Way, on the south by the proposed industrial lands adjacent to the Bremerton National Airport, on the east by Port Kitsap County Commissioners Page 3 Orchard Bay, and on the west by the City of Bremerton Union River Watershed lands. The City of Bremerton is eager to reach an agreement with Kitsap County about the boundaries of the UGA, and to resolve misunderstandings pertaining to the City plans for growth and the designation of the Bremerton UGA. The City of Bremerton UGA does not include all of the land within the city limits; areas annexed into the City watershed, which annexations have been certified by the Washington State Office of Financial Management, were deleted from the Bremerton UGA. Bremerton urges Kitsap County to involve'Bremerton in the planning process to ensure that issues pertaining to the designation of the Bremerton UGA are worked out in a cooperative manner to avoid further appeals of comprehensive plans developed by Kitsap County. Proposal to Establish Rural Neiqhborhoods, Rural Communities and Rural. Villages The County has proposed four new rural designations; rural neighborhood, rural community, rural village, and rural commercial/industrial area. Kitsap County conducted a public workshop on February 9, 1998, about such rural areas, at which Kitsap County Planning Consultant Richard Weinman explained that designating areas in unincorporated Kitsap County in accord with such rural classifications would allow more intense future development to occur in these areas. Kitsap County's plan to establish possibly seven rural communities, five rural villages and twenty-five rural neighborhoods will blur the distinction established by the Growth Management Act ("GMA") between urban and rural development and promote suburban sprawl. Allowing large portions of rural areas located in unincorporated Kitsap County to be more intensely developed violates significant restrictions placed on the development of rural developments by the Growth Management Act ("GMA"). The GMA only contemplates more intense rural development which (1) preserves the rural character of areas (RCW 36.70A.030(15), (2) conserves open space and allows the landscape and vegetation to predominate over the built environment, and (3) avoids the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling low-density developments (RCW 36.70A.030). The designation of Manchester area as a rural village ignores that this area is urban in character and has water and sewers. Keyport similarly has been inappropriately designed as a rural village; it is also urban in character and appearance. Kitsap County's plan to designate a substantial portion of the county as either rural communities, villages or neighborhoods is inconsistent with the GMA's rural element, which only allows "limited areas" of more intense rural development and requires that planning jurisdictions shall "adopt measures to minimize and contain existing areas of more intense rural development." ~CW 36.70A.070(D) (iv). For example, classification of the entire McCormick Woods area as a rural village runs afoul of the GMA restriction that more intensely developed rural areas must occur in "existing areas" which are "clearly identifiable and contained" and where there is a logical outer boundary which is "delineated by the built environment." Much of McCormick Woods is undeveloped. The rural element of the GMA does not contemplate developing large new areas in a suburban fashion, but instead only allows existing lots within existing identifiable contained areas to be developed in a more intense fashion. Kitsap County Commissioners Page 4 Rural Commercial Industrial Areas Kitsap County's plan to designate large tracts of land as rural commercial/industrial areas violates with the GMA. The GMA only allows development in rural areas of (1) "small scale recreational and tourist uses" that "rely on a rural location", (RCW 36.70A.070(D) (ii)), (2) "isolated cottage industries" and (3) "isolated small scale businesses." (RCW 36.70A.070(D) (iii)). Kitsap County's plan to designate the 14-acre Streibles Corner site, which has been developed with a large Albertson's supermarket, and the 48-acre Pioneer Way site, which has been developed as an industrial park, as a rural commercial development runs afoul of the above GMA restrictions. Such enterprises are neither rural cottage industries, isolated small businesses, recreational nor tourist enterprises. There is no support in the GMA for designating such areas as being appropriate for rural commercial enterprises. Designation of these urban areas as rural is perhaps a plan to prevent such areas from being annexed by a city to allow the County to enjoy tax revenues generated by such enterprises. The placement of excess land in non-urban areas will prevent the effective development of industrial sites within cities, as is contemplated by the GMA. One GMA planning goal is to reduce the impact of development on rural resource lands. The Kitsap County plan will result in the improper consumption of rural resource lands and will decrease the chance of industrial lands located within UGAs or adjacent to UGAs of being developed. New industrial areas should be located as close as possible to UGAs and existing urban services, e.g., Port Blakely. The Kitsap County plan to designate a 20-acre site on Dickey Road, a 22- acre site at George's Corner, a 1-acre site at Luoto Court, a 30-acre site at Lemolo for an unspecified commercial purpose is not authorized by the GMA. The GMA does not allow setting aside large rural tracts of land for commercial purposes. Draft Industrial Commercial Land Study The County Preliminary Draft Industrial and Commercial Land Supply and Demand Analysis dated February 2, 1998, ("Draft Study") improperly concludes that "There are few, if any, large parcels existing within the contiguous urbanized area" and that "The search for industrial sites therefore will have to look beyond.., the likely boundary of the county's Urban Growth Area." Draft Study, pp.2-3. .The Draft Study erroneously states that "much of the industrial land base is located in unincorporated areas." Draft Study, p. 11. Review of the City of Bremerton's Comprehensive Plan would have disclosed that there are many large tracts of land located within the City of Bremerton, which have been identified as being appropriate for industrial and commercial development. As of 1993, there were 217 acres of existing industrial development and 256 acres of vacant, industrially zoned property. Since that date, the City has zoned additional property for industrial use. The net usable area of such properties is approximately 160 acres. Bremerton concurs with Kitsap County's conclusion that more industrial lands are needed; in determining the quantity of additional industrial zoned property which is necessary, the lands which are already available for industrial use must be counted. In designating additional industrial properties, the County should ensure that lands located in or adjacent to UGAs which have access to urban services are identified. Kitsap County Con~issioners Page 5 The County's conclusion about the deficient supply of land available in the cities for future industrial and coramercial development ignores that presently Pope Resources is developing 60 acres in the City of Bremerton for industrial purposes, and that in the Anderson Hill area, Ron Sciepko and Ellen Lunde plan a commercial development. The County's conclusion that it is necessary to designate land in unincorporated Kitsap County outside the boundaries of UGAs for future industrial and commercial development violates fundamental GMA planning principles. Under the G~, urban industrial commercial develoPments are appropriately located in cities. Cities have the capability of providing such uses with urban services. The G~ expresses the preference that urban areas should be municipal areas and that cities are the preferred providers of municipal services. See, e.g., Cosine Hensley ~FFoodinville, supra; RCW 36.70A.110. Good planning principles dictate that such facilities be located in cities where workers live to avoid adverse traffic impacts on surrounding areas. Kitsap County should designate industrial lands adjacent to city UGAs because cities are the entities which the GMA contemplates will provide urban services to such developments. The County should not, as the Study proposes, designate industrial lands in rural areas. Such a plan perpetuates past patterns of urban sprawl and is contrary to the planning objectives of the GMA. The County needs to meet with Bremerton City officials and review its Comprehensive Plans to determine how much land is available in cities to accommodate future industrial and commercial development, before it determines how much land for such development needs to be provided in unincorporated Kitsap County. The City of Bremerton wants to work with Kitsap County to reach an amiable solution to the above problems with the Comprehensive Plan. Bremerton hopes to participate in a cooperative planning process, such as that which has contemplated by the GF~ and the KCPPs. Sincerely, Lynn S. Horton May~r of the City of Bremerton Glenna Malanca City Attorney City of Bremerton David Farr, President Bremerton City Council AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SU~ECT: Ordinance Public Access Advisory Committee FOR AGENDA OF: J- ~- ~ ORIGINATING DEPT: Admin. Services ORIGINATOR: K. McCluskey DATE SUBMITTED: February 17~ 1998 · bac 3. EXHIBITS: 2 ~: (comment on .~ if .... Attorney ~~ Fiscal & Budge Operations ENDORSEMENT__~~ IN~O~RMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRE~DENT~FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SI/MMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The Public Access Citizens Advisory Committee is a joint county/city committee organized to promote and develop optimal utilization of the public access television system. This committee of nine individuals will work with the BKAT Executive Director to make recommendations regarding the provisions of public access facilities and services, promote community outreach and provide a forum for citizen concerns. BECQMMENDATION: 1. Motion to approve ordinance on let reading· 2. Motion to pass Ordinance # ~/ on 2nd reading. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: K. McCluskey ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: K. McClus~ey EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE: 11. AGENDA BILL NO: CLEARANCE COMMENTS (cont.): 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (cont.): 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: The citizen committee can provide a community perspective regarding public access services and programming. They will also be used in the evaluation of effectiveness of BKAT. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES. EOUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES None. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE establishing a Public Access Citizens Advisory Committee and repealing Chapter 2.100 of the Bremerton Municipal Code. THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: PUBLIC ACCESS CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Section 1. 2.100.010 ESTABLISHED. There is established a Public Access Citizens Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as "committee", which shall act solely as an advisory body to the City of Bremerton Council, the Mayor and the Kitsap County Commissioners to promote and develop optimal utilization of the Public Access Television system. Section 2. 2.100.020 MEMBERSHIP AND TERMS OF OFFICE. (a) The committee shall consist of nine members. The Mayor, with confirmation of the City Council, and the County Commissioners, shall appoint members to the committee, considering ethnic, gender and professional diversity, as follows: (1) One staff member representing the City of Bremerton (City appointment); (2) One staff member representing Kitsap County (County appointment); (3) Two members representing users (one City appointment, one County appointment); (4) Four members representing the community at large, professional and educational interests (two City appointments, two County appointments); and (5) One member (18 years old or younger) representing youth (joint appointment by City and County). (b) Terms of appointment for the seven citizen members identified in Subsections (a)(3) to (5) will be two years. Initial term lengths will be staggered as decided by the members. Outgoing members will continue to serve until successors are appointed. The anniversary date of any members term will be the date of appointment by the Mayor with confirmation by City Council and the date of appointment by the County Commissioners respectively. The Public Access Citizens Advisory Committee chairman will notify the Mayor and County Commissioners as applicable of vacancies and representation. (c) Staff.membership shall be for one year with reappointments each succeeding year by the Mayor and City Council, and County Commissioners respectively. (d) As this is a county-wide advisory committee Citizen members may reside outside the City of Bremerton. Section 3. 2.100.030 SALARIES AND PERSONAL EXPENSES. The members of the committee shall receive no salaries or other remuneration for their services in such capacity, and shall not be entitled to personal expenses incurred by them in the discharge of their official duties, except when such expense is first authorized and approved in advance by the City of Bremerton Administrative Services Director. Section 4. 2.100.040 OFFICERS. (a) The committee shall elect a chairman, vice chairman and secretary by a simple majority of the members present. (1) The officers so elected shall serve for a term of one year. Therea~er annually, new officers shall be elected by committee members and shall serve until their successors are elected. (2) A vacancy in any position of any office of the committee shall be filled by a vote of a simple majority of the members present. Section 5. 2.100.050 RULES OF PROCEDURE. Any action to be taken by the committee shall require the concurrence of a simple majority of the members of the committee qualified to vote. Section 6. 2.100.060 COMPLIANCE WITH CODE OF ETHICS. The committee shall comply with the city code of ethics ordinance codified as Chapter 2.96. Section 7. 2.100.070 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. The committee shall have the following specific functions: (a) Through the Bremerton Kitsap Access Television Executive Director make recommendations regarding general policy relating to the services and facilities provided to subscribers and users of the system; (b) Promote community outreach; (c) Provide a forum for citizen complaints and concerns regarding use of facilities, programming and other related issues; (d) Submit an annual report to the council regarding all activities of the committee during the reporting year; and (e) Perform such other duties as requested by the City Council, Mayor or County Commissioners. Section 8. 2.100.080 MEETINGS. The committee shall establish a regular meeting day and time and shah meet at least once every month. All meetings of the committee shall be held in accordance with city and state law regarding public meetings. Section 9. 2.100.090 OPERATING EXPENSES. All approved operating costs of the committee shall be paid out of revenues derived for the operation of public access. Section 10. 2.100.100 REMOVAL OF MEMBERS. Members of the committee serve at the pleasure of the City Council and County Commissioners. Respective appointees may be removed by the Mayor, with the concurrence of the City Council, and the County Commissioners. A member shall not be absent more than three consecutive meetings. After the absence from three consecutive meetings, the remaining members of the committee shall vote to retain or recommend to the Mayor or County Commissioners that the absentee member be relieved of his or her duties on the committee. Section 11. 2.100.110 VACANCIES. Vacancies shall be filled in accordance with Section 2.100.020 for the unexpired term of the member affected. Section 12. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after passage and publication. APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __ 1998. day of PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __ 1998. day of DAVID FARR, Council President APPROVED this day of ,1998. LYNN HORTON, Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk Chapter 2.100 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Sections: 2.100.010 2.100.020 2.100.030 2.100.040 2.100.050 2.100.060 2.100.070 2.100.080 2.100.090 2.100.100 2.100.110 ESTABLISHED. MEMBERSHIP AND TERMS OF OFFICE. SALARIES AND PERSONAL EXPENSES. OFFICERS. RULES OF PROCEDURE. COMPLIANCE WITH CODE OF ETHICS. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. MEETINGS. OPERATLNG EXPENSES. REMOVAL OF MEMBERS. VACANCIES. 2.100.010 ESTABLISHED. There is established a cable communications advisory, committee, hereinafter referred to as "committee", wkich shall act solely as an advisory body to the CiD' Council and the Mayor to promote and develop optimal utilization of the cable communications ~'stem. (Ord. 4030 § 1, 1986). 2.100.020 MEMBERSHIP AND TERMS OF OFFICE. (a) The committee shall consist of eight members: (1) The Mayor, v, Sth confirmation of the council, shall appoint members to the committee, considering ethnic and gender diversity, as follows: i. Three members shall represent the communiD' at large; ii. One member shall represent the education communiD'; iii. One member shall be under 21 years of age representing the commtmity's your.h; iv. One member shall represent non-profit civic organizations: (2) One Ci~' staff person, not subject to confirmation: (3) The council shall appoint one council person. Co) Terms of appointment for the five citizen members identified in Subsection (a) i. - iv. will be three years. Initial term leng~.hs will be staggered as decided by the members so that no more than two vacancies will occur in any one year. Appointments for outgoing members will continue to serve until successors are appointed. The anniversary, date of any members term will be the date of appointment by the Mayor and confirmation by Council. The CCAC chairperson will notify the Mayor of vacancies and representation. (c) Staff and council membership shall be for one year with reappointments each succeeding year by the mayor and council, respectively. (d) Neither the franchisee nor any of its agents, servants, employees or their families, nor any of its subsidiary, parent, or affiliate corporations or any of their agents, servants, employees or members of their families, nor any person with financial interest in the D'stem, shall be appointed as a voting member of the committee. (e) Citizen members may reside outside the City. of Bremerton if procedures promulgated by the council for soliciting applicants fail to generate a qualified candidate who is a Ci~' resident. (Ord. 4472 ~I, 1994: Ord. 4230 51, 1989; Ord. 4030 §5, 1986). 2.100.030 SAL:KRIES AND PERSONAl, EXPENSES. The members of the committee shall receive no salaries or other remuneration for their ser~-ices in such capaci~~. and shall not be entitled to personal expenses incurred bv them in the discharge of their official duties, except to the ex'tent and purposes and amount such expense is first authorized and approved in advance by the Mayor. (Ord. 4030 §3. 1986). 2.100.040 OFFICERS. (a) The committee shall elect its officers by a simple majori~' of the members present. (1) The officers so elected shall serve for 2-64 a term of one year. Thereafter annually, new officers shall be elected by committee members and shall serve until their successors are elected. (2) A vacanc?' in any position of any officer of the committee shall be filled by a vote of a simple majoriLy of the members present. (Ord. 4472 §2. 1994; Ord. 4030 §4, 1986). 2.100.050 RULES OF PROCEDURE. Any action to be taken by the committee shall require the concurrence of a simple majority of the members of the committee qualified to vote. (Ord. 4030 §5, 1986). 2.100.060 COMPLIANCE WITH CODE OF ETHICS. The committee shall comply with the ci.ty code of ethics ordinance codified as Chapter 2.96. (Ord. 4030 §6, 1986). 2.100.070 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. The committee shall have the following specific functions: (a) Advise the council and mayor regarding general policy, relating to the sevtices provided to subscribers and users of the system by the licensee; Co) Make recommendations to the franchisee, through the mayor and council relating to services provided to subscribers and users of the ~'stem; (c) Make recommendat/ons to users, through the mayor and council, regarding utilization of the communi~, service channels and the institutional network; (d) Pro,,ide ad,,-ice to the mayor and council regarding the performance of the franchisee; (e) Review and critique any plans submitted during the year by the franchisee for the development of new services; (f) Submit an annual report to the council regarding all actMties of the committee during the reporting year; (g) Maintain knowledge of current developments in cable and related communications tecknology: (h) Submit a budget request to the council, through the mayor as a part of the executive's budget, to cover expenses incurred 'with respect to the performance of the committee's functions. This request may include moneys to be used for the development of community service channels, including production grants to users and the purchase and maintenance of equipment not required to be provided by the franchisee: (i) Develop funding proposals for the ongoing development of cable communications in the city; (j) Perform such other duties as requested by the council and/or the mayor. (Ord. 4030 §7, 1986). 2.100.080 MEETLNGS. The committee shall establish a regtdar meeting day and time and shall meet at least once every, month. All meetings of the committee shall be held in accordance with city and state la~v regarding public meetings. (Ord. 4030 §8, 1986). 2.100.090 OPERATENG EXlaENSES. Ail approved operating costs of the committee shall be paid out of revenues derived from cable communications revenue. (Ord. 4030 §9. 1986). 2.100.100 REMOVAL OF MEMBERS. Members of the committee sen'e at the pleasure of the council and may be removed by the mayor ~ith the concurrence of the council. A member shall not be absent more than three consecutive meetings. After the absence from three consecutive meetings, the remaining members of the committee shall vote to retain or recommend to the mayor that the absentee member be relieved of his duties on the committee. (Ord. 4030 § 10, 1986). 2.100.110 VACANCIES. Vacancies shall be filled in accordance with Section 2.100.020 for the unexpired term of the member affected. (Ord. 4030 §1. 1986). 2-65 3'5 AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: Public Hearing Resolution #.,,~ 4/.5 , regarding recovery of fees for the abatement of the property located at 1537 OLYMPIC AVENUE. FORAGENDA OF: March 11~ 1998 ORIGINATING DEPT.: Building Dept. ORIGINATOR: Judy Johnson (~ DATE SUBMITTED: 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) City Clerk..- ~'- ~_ ~ City Attorney: ~ /~ EXHIBITS: 1. Resolution # 2. Clerk Report 3. Photos 4. Letter from Wingos ENDORSEMENT3<__ INFORMATION __ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: On January 16, 1998, the City removed appliances, garbage and debris from the property located at 1537 Olympic Avenue, after the owner, David Wingo, failed to do so as ordered by the building official. The cost charged to the revolving abatement fund for this action totaled $243.00. Council must now decide if the fees are just and reasonable and how they should be collected. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council, by Resolution # mT~ c/j'-, order that the fees incurred for the abatement of appliances, garbage and debris located at 1537 Olympic Avenue be collected as reasonable abatement costs and become a lien against the property. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Judy Johnson ,~ ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Judy Johnson EXPIRATION DATE: N/A REVIEW DATE: N/A PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED DATE: 11. AGENDA BILL NO.: ?~- 6~ 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: The City would forfeit the costs incurred for this action. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: The City's revolving abatement fund would suffer the deficit of not collecting these funds. RESEARCH SOURCES: N/A RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION reviewing charges for the abatement of the property at 1537 Olympic Avenue and determining means of collection. WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton incurred costs for removal of appliances, garbage and debris from the property located at 1537 Olympic Avenue, and; WHEREAS, the Bremerton Municipal Code allows the City to recoup these costs either by personal judgment against the property owner or as a lien against the property; and WWEREAS, the City Council is charged with determining whether the fees are just, and how they should be collected; and has considered the report of charges filed by the Building Official and any protests or objection filed; and WI:IEREAS, the Building Official of the City of Bremerton recommends the fees be collected as a lien against the property located at 1537 Olympic Avenue, now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Bremerton: 1. That the abatement charges included in the report of the Building Official in the amount of $243.00 for the property located at 1537 Olympic Avenue, Bremerton, attached hereto, are just and reasonable. 2. That the City of Bremerton will exercise its right to recapture abatement fees by filing a lien against the property. 19 PASSED, by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of DAVID FARR Council President CITY OF BREIVIF_I~N · 239 4th Street * Bremerton, WA 98337 Memorandum DATE: TO: FROM: RE: CC: February 13, 1998 Paula Johnston, Deputy City Clerk Janet Lunceford, BDS II Public Hearing Judy Johnson The City removed appliances, garbage and debris from the yard of the property located at 1537 Olympic Avenue after the owner, David Wingo, failed to do so as ordered by the Building Oitieial. The cost incurred for the action totaled $243.00 as indicated on the attached billing fi.om Public Works. I have scheduled a public hearing for March 11, 1998. · Celebrating 50 Years of Freedom Order lTasto 9 C1TY OF BREMERT~N PWO-~TREET DIVISIO~ Work Order ~. SD980~17 Proje~ #: lq4014280 Customer:. BLAB Work Type: AO Supervisor:. 006 t Lead Employe~: 0524 Priority.: i Location ~D: 1 History, #: 1 Title.: ~I.AB - 1537 Olympic Ancillary. Operations Building Department ANCILLARY OPERATIONS Riley Thompson Colen Corey Unspcci~cd Location Unspecified Equipment Abate. meats Stan~: S Labor Hours Estimate,: 0 Materials Estimate: $0 Equipment Estimate: Date Entered: i/t/97 Date Updated: ~4/98 4:21:42 Date Targeted: 3/6/9,'. Date ,~igned: Date Started: 1/16/9~ Date Finished: 1/16/9~ Work Description Remove appliances and debris from north endof duplex TAKE BEFORE )aND .AFTER PICTURES, MAaNDATORY FOR ALL ABAT'-mM:ENT PROJECTS ! u~otca~ BLAB - 1537 Olympic No BLA~ 0524 Colen Corey 1.00 hr $30.00 3013 '92 GMC 1-TONP/U 1.00 hr $9.00 1904 Jim Iovinelli 2.00 hr $60.00 3078 '95 1-TON CI-~VY 2.00 hr $1&00 0583 Mark A. Thompson 2.00 hr $60.00 0061 R/Iey Thompson 1.00 hr $30.00 3060 '91 GMC S-15 4X4 EXT. CAB P/U 1.00 hr $6.00 DUMPAP Dump appliances at Oly. View San. Landfill 2.00 in $30.00 6.00 hr 0.00 hr $243.00 SUMMARY FOR WORX<ORDER: SD980017 Labor:. $180.00 Benefits: $0.00 Equipment: $33.00 Materials: $30.00 Sales Tax: 50.00 Total: $243.00 Total Regular Labor Hours: Total Overtime Labor Hours: Total Labor Hours: Total Regular Equipment Hours: Total Overtime Equipment Hours: Total Equipment Hours: 6.00 0.00 6.00 4.00 0.00 City of Bremerton 239 4th Street Bremerton, Wa. 98337 February 20-1997 1998 TO: Janet Lunceford Received Notice about the property at 1537 Olympic, Beautiful Sea Shell was taken offthe property. the Washer, dryer and the I did receive Notice in May 30 1997, We did haul one load offthe property. When we went back to finish up, the tenant said she wanted the Washer and Dryer, said her friend could use it. When we started in cleaning up the rest of the garbage in the yard, she called Police on us for taken her personal property. Two Police, Jenet Lunceford and a Lady from the City came. they all told Gail Radzick she could not live like this, that the place had to be cleaned up. Because lot of the things could be Personal property, washer, Dryer, tires, and the beautiful Sea Shell this was not garbage, if you went out to buy this Shell it would cover the cost of hauling of the washer and dryer. Police, Janet ore the r Lady did not give me the power to haul one thing off, So all I could do just leave. At no time by law can a landlord go in and haul offa tenant property even if it is garbage, without a legal notice, a~er she called the Police on me for removing her personal property. If at this time I was given legal papers to do so I would have finished the Job or if Gall had given me a written letter telling me what I could haul off then I could, but not without her consent in writing. I did all I could do legal without braking the landlord tenant law. So this is between the City and Gall Radzick and, Dennis Beavers. I did what I could without braking the law. David B. Wingo Ina M. Wingo J P.O.BOX.2226. Bremerton, Wa. 98310 AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: Public Hearing Resolution # ,~/,, z~. , regarding recovery of fees for the abatement of the property located at 1129 Highland Avenue. FOR AGENDA OF: March 11, 1998 ORIGINATING DEPT.: Building Dept. ORIGINATOR: Judy Johnson ~ DATE SUBMITTED: 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) City Clerk: EXHIBITS: 1. Resolution # 2. Clerk Report 3. Photos ENDORSEMENT/)2~_ INFORMATION __ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: On January 16, 1998, the City removed garbage, debris, furniture, appliances, clothing and auto parts from the property located at 1129 Highland, after the owner, Rawan Maju, failed to do so as ordered by the building official. The cost charged to the revolving abatement fund for this action totaled $1383.78. Council must now decide if the fees are just and reasonable and how they should be collected. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council, by Resolution #~ f/~ , order that the fees incurred for the abatement of garbage and debris located at 1129 Highland be collected as reasonable abatement costs and become a lien against the property. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Judy Johnson (J~ ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Judy Johnson EXPIRATION DATE: N/A REVIEW DATE: N/A 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED DATE: 11. AGENDA BILL NO.: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: The City would forfeit the costs incurred for this action. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: The City's revolving abatement fund would suffer the deficit of not collecting these funds. e RESEARCH SOURCES: N/A RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION reviewing charges for the abatement of the property at 1129 Highland Avenue and determining means of collection. WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton incurred costs for removal of garbage, debris, furniture, appliances, clothing and auto parts from the property located at 1129 Highland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, as adopted by the Bremerton Municipal Code, allows the City to recoup these costs either by personal judgment against the property owner or as a lien against the property; and WHEREAS, the City Council is charged with determining whether the fees are just, and how they should be collected; and has considered the report of charges filed by the Building Official and any protests or objection filed; and WHEREAS, the Building Official of the City of Bremerton recommends the fees be collected as a lien against the property located at 1129 Highland Avenue, now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Bremerton: 1. That the abatement charges included in the report of the Building Official in the amount of $1,383.78 for the property located at 1129 Highland Avenue, Bremerton, attached hereto, are just and reasonable. 2. That the City of Bremerton will eXercise its right to recapture abatement fees by filing a lien against the property. 19 PASSED, by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of DAVID FARR Council President CITY OF BREMERTON · 239 4th Street · Bremerton, WA 98337 Memorandum DATE: TO: FROM: RE: CC: February 13, 1998 Paula Johnston, Deputy City Clerk Janet Lunceford, BDS II Public Hearing Judy Johnson The City removed appliances, furniture, clothing, auto parts, garbage and debris from the yard of the property located at 1129 Highland Avenue after the owner, Rawan Maju, failed to do so as ordered by the Building Official. The cost incurred for the action totaled $1383.78; $577.28 as indicated on the attached billing from Public Works and $806.50 in administrative fees. I have scheduled a public hearing for March 11, 1998. · Celebrating 50 Years of Freedom Order tory CITY OF BREMERTON PWO-STREET DIVISION Work Order ~ SD980016 Project #: N4014280 Customer: BLAB Work Type: AO Supervisor. 0061 Lead Employee: 0524 Priority.: i Location ID: 1 History ii: I TiII~ BI.AB - 1129 Highland Ave. Am/llazy Operatic~ Building Department ANCrf_L ARY OPERATIONS Riley, Thompson Colen Corm/ Unspecified Location Unspecified Equipment Abatements Work Description Stat~: S Labor Ho~r~ EaXimat~ 0 Materials E~mate: ~0 Equipment E~a~: ~ Da~ Ente~d: 1/~98 Date Updated: ~4/98 4:21:42 PM Date T~geted: 3/6, 98 Date .~i~ed: I/$ 98 Date Started: 1/16~98 Date Finished: 1/16/98 Remove garbage, debris and furniture from yard, parking enforcement may need to haul off junked cars, building will contact them for thaLTAKE BEFORE AND AFFEK PICTURES ,MANDATORY FOR ,MX. AtBATEMENT PROJECTS ! ~;~oia:~ BLAB - 1129 Highland Ave. No BLAB 0051 Scott Corey 3.50 hr $I05.00 3015 '92 GMC 1-TONP/U 3.00 hr $27.00 0053 Terry Devery 3.00 hr $90.00 3078 '95 1-TON CHEVY 3.00 hr $27.00 1904 Jim Iovinelli 2.00 hr $60.00 3078 '95 1-TON CHEVY 2.00 hr $18.00 0583 Mark A. Thompson 4.00 hr $120.00 3025 '93 GMC 1-TON DUMP 4.00 hr $32.00 0061 Riley Thompson 1.00 hr $30.00 3060 '91 GMC S-15 4X4 EXT. CAB P/U 1.00 hr $6.00 DUMPIN Dump Fees - Oly. View San/tary LandFall 6.00 yd S62.28 13.50 hr 0.00 hr $577.28 SUM)IARY FOR WORKORDER: Labor:. $405.00 Benefits: $0.00 Equipment: $110.00 Materials: $62.28 Sales Tax: $0.00 Total: $577.28 SD980016 Total Regular Labor Hours: Total Overtime Labor Hours: Total Labor Hours: Total Regular Equipment Hours: Total Overtime Equipment Hours: Total Equipment Hours: 13.50 0.00 13.50 13.00 0.00 13.00