HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/21/98 AGENDABREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
239 4TH STREET
BREMERTON, WA 98337
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JANUARY 2'!, '1998
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M.
A. General Council Business
B. 1-Hour Executive Session Immediately Following The
The City Council Meeting To Discuss "Contract Negotiations".
CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M.
A. Pledge Of Allegiance
B. Invocation
CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in advance for study
and will be enacted by one motion. If separate discussion is desired on an item, it
may be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at
the request of a Council member.
A. Minutes - January 7, 1998 #AB98-005
CLAIMS/CH ECK REGISTERS
5. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
6. MAYOR'S REPORT
7. PUBLIC RECOGNITION - (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes)
o
NEW BUSINESS
A. Reappointment of Carl Buettgenbach To The Housing
Authority Board
Bid Award Recommendation For Video Production Equipment
- Professional Video and Tape Inc.
C. Bremerton Housing Authority And Bremerton Police
Department Contract
¢1
#AB98-008 ~
(CONTINUED NEXT PAGE)
ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance (First Reading) Authorizing The issue Of A
$1,250,000 Tax Anticipation Note And Accepting The
Purchase Offer of Seafirst Bank
#AB98-009
47
2. SUBJECT:~
AGENDA BILL
BREME~TON CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES - JANUARY 7, 1998
FOR AGENDA OF: 1-21-98
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Council
ORIGINATOR: David Farr, President
DATE SUBMITTED: 1-13-98
2. ~: (comment on back
if necessary)
ENDORS FJ~NT INFOPd~_ATI ON APPROVED
__ __ BI~' COUNCIL P .RESIDER S%~BMI_~T3.~L: ~--
4. $~Y STATEMENT AND REOU!REMENT FOR COIINC/L AcTION: ~
8. RECOMMENDATION:
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORC~M2~NT OFFICIAL:
.EX,!RATiON DATE:
R_wV~EW DATE:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED .DISAP.~ROVED
..DATE
AMENDED
_qLEARkNCE COMMENTS :- ,~ -
i..'~.'/~_ACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
TAPE #1517 UNAPPROVED DRAFT
CiTY COUCIL MEETING MINUTES
JANUARY 7, 1998
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to
order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington,
Wednesday January 7, 1998, at 5:30 P.M., with Council President David Fan'
presiding. Council members present were Jim Reed, Carlos Montgomery, Carol
Arends, Mike Shepherd, Lon Overson, John Law, Cecil McConnell, and Wayne
Olsen. Also present were Assistant City Attorney Glenna Malanca and Deputy
City Clerk Gil Johnson.
The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council President Farr
and invocation given by Reverend Cleveland Williams of Ebenezer A.M.E.
Church.
ELECTION OF CITY COUNCIL OFFICERS
Acting City clerk. Gil Johnson read into the record the procedure to be used by
the City Council to elect City Council Officers.
President Farr opened nominations for City Council President/Mayor Pro Tem:
Mr. Shepherd nominated David Farr.
Mr. Olsen nominated Cecil McConnell
President Farr closed the nominations.
Vote: David Fart- 6 Votes (Montgomery, Arends, Farr, Shepherd, Overson,
Reed)
Vote: Cecil McConnell - 3 Votes (Law, McConnell, Olsen)
David Fan' was elected City Council President/Mayor Pro Tem.
President Fart opened nominations for City Council Vice President.
Mr. Olsen nominated Carlos Montgomery.
Mr. Overson nominated Cecil McConnell; however Mr. McConnell declined the
nomination.
President Farr closed the nominations.
Vote: Carlos Montgomery - 8 Votes (Reed, Montgomery, Arends, Shepherd,
Farr, Overson, Law, OIsen)
Abstain: McConnell
Carlos Montgomery was elected City Council Vice President.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes of Meeting - December 23, 1997
#AB98-001
#0289 M/SlClU(McConnelllMontgomery) Motion to approve the Consent Agenda
as presented.
TAPE #1517
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
January 7, 1998
Page 2 of 10
CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW
42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by
RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that had been made available
to the Council
#0306 MISIClU(MontgomerylMcConnell) On January 7, 1998, the Council does
approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows:
Regular Payroll for the pedod ending 12-31-1997, in the amount of $894,782.95.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Mr. Law stated after receiving the vast majority of votes in District #3 in the last
election, the message he was given was to continue his non-political
representation and to communicate with his district. The next District #3
Neighborhood Meeting will be held January 20, 1998, 7:00 P.M., at the Senior
Center. The program for that meeting will include an update on a water reservoir
within the District, update on the new Manette Bridge project, and discuss current
legislation that will come before the City Council.
Mr. Overson wished everyone a "Happy New Year" and welcomed the newly
seated City Council members. He believes this Council will be action odented
giving sedous consideration to all Agenda items. He sees this new year as a
turning point for the City and he anticipates a good year. He congratulated Mr.
Montgomery on his being elected Council Vice President and his taking on a new
leadership role.
Mr. Shepherd thanked the dozens of people who attended the Swearing In
Ceremony showing their support of the newly elected and re-elected City Council
members and the Mayor for the coming year. District #5 will hold a
Neighborhood Meeting on January 22, 1998, 6:30 P.M., at the Memorial
Lutheran Church. The program for that meeting will include Mayor Lynn
Horton, who will talk about the development of Sinclair Landing Project and her
vision of the future for Bremerton, and Jim Spencer, Parks and Recreation
Direction, who will speak on Evergreen Park, Haddon Park and Kiwanis Park.
Mrs. Arends thanked the residents and drivers traveling through District #7 for
their patience with the detour resulting from the CSO construction project.
Mr. Mont(~omerv announced on January 22, 1998, 7:00 P.M., he and Kitsap
County Commissioner Charlotte Gaddo will host a Town Meeting regarding the
isolation of Kitsap County by the State with proposed bridge tolls, ferry fare
increases, etc. The intent of this meeting is to get input from the public on
transportation issues. Lastly, he announced the next three weekends Kitsap
Transit will run five buses between the Ferry Terminal and the Missouri Gate.
TAPE #1517
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
January 7, 1998
Page 3 of 10
Mr. Reed thanked the City Council for their gracious words to the new Council
members and the citizens of District 9 for putting their trust in him to represent
their views accurately. He is looking forward to several exciting forward moving
years for the City of Bremerton. Speaking to the business community, the City's
doors are open and our hand is stretched out ready and willing to look at any and
all new proposals that they may be interested in bringing into the Bremerton
community. He believes the new Council members and existing Council
members share the same views.
.Mr. Fan' thanked the Council for extending to him the honor of serving as Council
President and he will try to live up to their expectations. He extended a
"welcome and congratulations" to the new and returning members of the Council.
He is also hopeful that 1998 will be a turning point year for the City. He
acknowledged some special people in the audience his daughter Kandace
Klemetsrud and grandson Paul, who are visiting from North Dakota and his future
wife Anna Laurie.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Lynn Horton congratulated Council President Farr and Council Vice
President Montgomery and extended a "welcome" to the new City Council
members.
Mayor Horton announced the City prevailed in three Court cases: (1) West Park
Retraining Order issue that was established to keep people out of that area who
are known for their criminal activity and records. (2) Abatement Order of the site
formally known as Natasha's on Arsenal Way, which will allow the site to be
cleaned up. (3) Abatement Order at 1510 Snyder where the Police Department
carried out a drug bust. She thanked City staff in the Legal Department, Police
Department, and Department of Community Development for their efforts toward
resolution of these problem areas.
Mayor Horton read the following Proclamation:
(1) January 19, 1998, MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DAY, which was accepted by
Reverend Cleveland Williams of the Ebenezer A.M.E. Church. Reverend
Williams extended an open invitation to the public to attend the celebration
titled "Lift Every Voice And Sing" on January 19, 10:30 P.M., at the Kitsap
Pavilion.
Mayor Horton reminded residents and those traveling through District #7 that
over the next three weekends the Navy will hold Open House aboard the USS
Missouri, which could create considerable traffic congestion.
TAPE #1517
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
January 7, 1998
Page 4 of 10
Police Chief Paul Du Fresne introduced Henry Mincey, who has been selected
as the City's Interim Assistant Police Chief, and highlighted Mr. Mincey's
professional background in law enforcement and the Safe Street Program.
Bremerton Municipal Court Judge James Docter administered the OATH of
Office to Mr. Mincey. Henry Mincey thanked Mayor Horton and Police Chief Du
Fresne for having confidence in him to perform the duties they have identified for
the Interim Assistant Police Chief for the City of Bremerton. He thanked the very
fine officers in the Bremerton Police Department and he particularly appreciated
the positive comments he has received from them. He thanked the City Council,
as a whole, for their support and confidence in him over the past four years.
Bremerton is truly at a crossroads and some may believe the trend is going
backwards, but he sees that trend moving forward. He feels more comfortable
now than he did a few weeks ago based on the enthusiasm shown by the City
Council members. He acknowledged the public's support of his efforts over the
past four yours. President Farr extended congratulations to Mr. Mincey.
President Farr made the following announcements:
(1) City Council held a Study Session immediately prior to the Council meeting,
which included some instructions for the new City Council members.
(2) The City Council will hold an Executive Session immediately following the
Council meeting to discuss "litigation" and "contract negotiations".
(3) The City Council will hold a Study Session to discuss Public Works and
Utilities issues on January 12, 1998, 5:30 - 6:30 P.M., in the Council
Conference room.
(4) The City Council will hold a Study Session on January 14, 1998, 5:05 -5:25
P.M., in the Council Conference Room. The topic of discussion will be "Update
on design changes to Transit facility and process from this point forward".
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
Reverend Cleveland Williams, Ebenezer A.M. E Church, announced the 4th
Annual Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Celebration Program will be held on January
19, 1998, 10:30 AM - 1:00 P.M., at the Kitsap Pavilion. The young peoples'
essays will be on display around the perimeter of the pavilion from 10:30 - 11:00
AM. The program for this event will include a 100-member community choir.
Choir rehearsals will be held on January 9 and 16, 7:30 P.M., at the Ebenezer
A.M.E. Church.
Reverend Cleveland Williams, Ebenezer A.M.E. Church, thanked all of the
members of the Bremerton community who helped provide a Christmas Dinner
for those in need. He was pleased to report that 118 meals were served on
Christmas Day from 12:00 noon until 4:00 P.M., at the Sheridan Park and
TAPE #1517
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
January 7, 1998
Page 5 of 10
Recreation Center. In addition, there were 48 volunteers, which included
personnel from the USS Carl Vinson that assisted with this event.
Bob Sauter, President Kitsap County Veterans Coalition, asked when he could
expect to see the print of the USS Missouri, which he provided to the City, hung
in City Hall. He pointed out the City was in receipt of the print 7-8 weeks ago.
On another manner, due to some ethical influence on the part of the veterans,
their Coalition was able to gain access [o '1,000 ficke[s for the Open House on
the USS Missouri, which were distributed equitably among the students of all the
schools in Bremerton, Kitsap County, North Mason High, Sandhill Elementary
and Belfair Elementary. He has received many comments from various military
dignitaries that they will visit the Missoud even though they do not have tickets
for the tour.
Jack Lefcoski, Bremerton resident, expressed his concern that a free event, i.e.
Open House aboard the Missouri, would require a ticket to gain entry. He
announced a study will be conducted on Kitsap Lake, Kitsap Creek, Wildcat
Creek, and Wildcat Lake, with the idea of learning how many and what kinds of
fish come up and down the creeks into the lakes. This year Coho Salmon came
into the lake, this raised the interest of the Suquamish Tribe to possibly making
Kitsap Lake a Coho rearing lake. Since Kitsap Lake is a City owned/controlled
recreational lake that is totally inhabited, he questioned if it was a good idea to
make the lake into a salmon rearing pond. He noted 30-40,000 legal trout are
planted each year in Kitsap Lake and there is possibly a population of 200-1,000
bass in the lake as well, which he believes would have an adverse affect on
Coho Salmon eggs and young salmon, if planted in the lake. The Study also
calls for the Department of Fish and Wildlife to reduce their legal plant from
35,000 down to 20,000. He doubted the fishing sportsman would want to see
that happen. Another question raised was will the eggs successfully hatch in
calm running waters; however, some people believe the they won't hatch in
freshwater. He emphasized if that is true, then why go through the exercise. Mr.
Reed asked Mr. Lefcoski if there was an option other than using Kitsap Lake as a
rearing pen for Coho Salmon? Mr. Lefcoski stated there are four different
options. Mr. Overson requested this discussion continue after the Council
meeting based on the fact that Mr. Lefcoski had already exceeded the 3-minute
time limit.
Gordy. Byrd congratulated the newly elected Council members. He also wanted
to know how someone within the community could tour the Missouri without a
ticket. He noted Councilman Law is highly thought of in the community. Lastly,
he wanted to assure the public that he is still working on his dream to build a
shelter for the homeless.
-7
TAPE #1517
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
January 7, 1998
Page 6 of 10
Susan Brow.n, Bremerton resident, summarized the history of her activity, for the
benefit of the new Council members, on the formal complaint she filed with the
City council that involved two City Council members. She went on to explain she
had not lobbied any of the new Council members up to this point; however half of
the Council members have contacted her either personally or by telephone and
told her they support changes in the Code of Ethics. Therefore, she asked what
is the next step to be taken. President Fan' stated Council has already spent a
great deal of time on this issue. He recalled that not too long ago the City Charter
was revised and did address ethic issues, but did not recall getting any input on
that issue during the revision process. It is not outside the realm of possibility
that Council can look at the Ethics regulations, but at this time he would not
promise Mrs. Brown that it is a highest priodty item for the Council. He believes
Council has been responsible in providing her the items she requested. Council
can offer the suggestion that a response will be provided, but it may not be the
response that she particularly desired. Mrs. Brown asked what response did
she get? President Fan' stated he would not get into a debate, he was
explaining Council will consider her suggestions addressing the "Ethics" section.
However, Mrs. Brown failed to mention that her husband was defeated for an
elected office by President Farr's friend. Mrs. Brown stated that was irrelevant
to this discussion. She asked if President Fart was using his position, as Council
President, to say that no we are not going to follow this. President Fan' stated
no, Mrs. Brown misunderstood what he said.
Paul Drnievic, Citizens For Safe Water, stated on December 17, 1997, he
presented the City council with a letter requesting several items. As of January
6, 1998, he had not received a response so he called the Council Office. Due to
Council's staff being out of the office, he did not receive a call back until January
7, at which time he was informed he would need to fill out a Public Disclosure
Request form to receive the items he requested. He felt that 3-weeks was not an
appropriate length of time to receive a response to his request. He views the
actions displayed toward him, Jack Lefcoski and Susan Brown were not
indications of a truly open City Council. He would like to see more City Council
meetings and business conducted at the Wednesday evening meetings in front
of the public. He and others feel that too much business is conducted in Study
Sessions or Executive Sessions where the public does not have the right to ask
questions or give input. Mr. McOonnell emphasized the fact that Study
Sessions are used as informal discussions on issues, which are then brought
before Council for formal action in a public meeting where public input is taken.
He also reminded Mr. Drnjevic that Study Sessions are open to the public..Mr.
Dmjevic stated people do have the impression that most everything is decided
before it ever comes on the Council floor. Mr. McConnell stated he had that
same impression prior to his being seated on the Council and thanked Mr.
Drnjevic for his concern.
TAPE #1517
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
January 7, 1998
Page 7 of 10
Mr. Mont.qome~ stated in order to have more time for the public to discuss
issues during Council meetings, he recommended that the time for "Public
Recognition" be moved to the end of the Council meeting thereby taking care of
City business first. President Farr stated that will be an issue that will be
discussed in an open Study Session.
8A - LEACHATE TREATMENT AGREEMENT WITH OLYMPIC VIEW
SANITARY LANDFILL~ #AB98-002
The Olympic View Sanitary Landfill (OVSL) has a need for a reliable disposal
facility for secondary treatment and disposal of pretreated leachate generated at
its landfill in Bremerton. As a result, OVSL would like to enter into a formal
agreement with the City of Bremerton for the processing of its leachate at the
City" wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The WVVTP has the treatment
capacity. Should the City agree with the proposed agreement, OVSL will pay
$0.01 per gallon of pretreated leachate delivered to the plant.
Gene SamDle¥, Director of Public Works and utilities, stated on an emergency
basis OVSL has hauled leachate to the WVVPT and the City is knowledgeable
how the plant reacts to this type of influent. Because of the size of the City's
plant, there is no significant potential for a problem. OVSL operates on a Waste
Discharge Permit issued by the Department of Ecology so all assurances are
there that the City will have appropriate testing and that the material delivered to
the WWTP will not adversely affect that process.
Public comment - none.
Mr. McConnell referenced Section 6.2 of the agreement and questioned if he
understood correctly that the control of how much leachate is delivered is with
the OVSL driver. Mr. Sampley stated OVSL is required by their permit to keep a
log and would deliver the leachate to a point within the City that is outside the
treatment plant for dilution. If the truck would have to be brought into the WWTP
facility it would create some problems. There is a certain amount of trust;
however the log that is kept is an official log, and he believes that is adequate.
Mr. McConnell questioned the actual cost to the City to provide this service?
Mr. Sampley stated it would cost a fraction of the $.01 per gallon the City will
receive from OVSL. Mr. McConnell questioned if accepting the leachate will
have any affect on the Puget Sound Alliance? Mr. Sampley stated no.
Mr. Montgomery described a situation that he observed in 1997 whereby the
OVSL leachate ponds were nearly overflowing and would have gone into the
Union River. At that time, the City's Wastewater Department Manager, and staff
gathered tanks from around the State and Canada to collect the leachate and
shipped it to the Vvw'rP; thereby preventing any seepage into the Union River.
OVSL had a contract with the Port Orchard Sewage District, however, they were
TAPE #1517
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
January 7, 1998
Page 8 of 10
not able to handle the load. When this incident took place, the City WWTP did
not experience any overflows. He views this agreement as a "good deal" for
Bremerton.
Mr. Reed asked who measures what is delivered, i.e. the log of the driver or
VWVTP? Mr. Sampley explained OVSL keeps the official log and each tanker is
assumed to be full. Mr. Reed questioned for clarification that this action would
not impact the City's ability to have additional sewer hookups? . Mr. Sampley
stated no, it is virtually immeasurable when looking at the size of the WWTP and
the amount OVSL will deliver.
Mr. Shepherd stated this is an excellent opportunity to generate revenue for the
Wastewater Utility and encouraged Mr. Sampley to look for other such options or
organizations that need WWTP services for leachate.
President Farr stated he assumed the $50,000 listed, as an estimate of
revenues to be generated would be put back into the Wastewater Fund, and
therefore is of benefit to the ratepayers. Mr. Sampley stated president Fart was
correct.
Mr. Mont,qomery stated it was his understanding that the WWTP has operated
at as high as 40 million gallons in emergencies without any adverse affect. Mr.
Sampley stated the WWTP has an official hydraulic capacity of 29.5 million
gallons, a short-term ability to accommodate much greater flow, and it has
exceeded 40 million gallons without any adverse affect.
#2370 MISIC/U(MontgomerylShepherd) Motion to approve Leachate Treatment
Agreement and authorize the Mayor to enter into the Agreement and sign the
same subject to City Administrative Policies and Procedures.
9A - ORDINANCE #4620 (SECOND READING) VACATING UNOPENED
STREETS IN PLAT OF PORT ORCHARD AND PLAT OF CHARLESTON BY
OPERATION OF LAW~ #ABg. 7-279
John Beach, Porter Street resident, stated he views this proposal as a good way
to get rid of unusable City property so that it can get cleaned up and used. He
questioned the length of time before this action becomes final? In his
circumstance, an alley is being vacated that contains a mess that was created by
his neighbor. He questioned who is responsible for cleaning up the area? He
also wanted to know what recourse did he need to take to get the other property
owner to clean up the area that they have used as a dumping ground, as shown
in the pictures he passed to the City Council? Glenna Malanca, Acting City
Attorney, explained the first choice is to have the responsible party clean up the
site, which would be the City's enforcement officer's first attempt. She
anticipates the effective date of this action will be within 3-4 weeks. Mr..
TAPE #1517
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
January 7, 1998
Page 9 of 10
S.ampley stressed the importance of working together with the City Attorney's
Office; however, technically this vacation occurred many years ago. This is a
process by which the City officially disclaims ownership. In regard to cleaning of
the property, the City has always attached the responsibility to the responsible
party.
Admiral Ross, Cottman Street resident, questioned where could he obtain
formation on the procedures to be used to have an unopened street vacated
under operation of law?. Ms. Malanca stated she would mail that information to
Mr. Ross.
#2913 MISIClU(ArendslMontgomery) Motion to pass Ordinance #4620, on
second reading, vacating portions of Porter Street, Hartford Avenue, Farragut
Street and alleys within Blocks 3, 5, 6, 8, 9. 10, 12, 13, 14 and 15, all within the
Plat of Port Orchard.
9B - ORDINANCE #4621 (SECOND READING) VACATING D, E1 FI G, AND H
STREETS WEST OF SR 3; AND BAYVIEW BETVVEEN C AND E STREETSI
#AB97-280
Public comment - none.
#2986 MlSlC(MontgomerylMcConnell) Motion to pass Ordinance #4621, on
second reading, vacating those portions of D, E, F, G and H Streets west of SR3
and east of Oyster Bay Avenue, and Bayview Avenue between C and E Street.
Vote on Motion:
Motion carried.
In Favor: Montgomery, Arends, Reed, Farr, Overson, Law,
McConnell, Olsen
Abstain: Shepherd
President Farr thanked the TV camera crew for their services: Bob Neal, Doug
Engebretson, Kelly Kehoe, David Chivis, Shannon Watson and Tim Schnitzer.
With no further business meeting adjourned at 7:00 P.M.
GIL JOHNSON, Deputy City Clerk
TAPE #1517
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
January 7, 1998
Page 10 of 10
DAVID FARR, City Council President
City of Bremerton
P J/DF/me
Cc: Normal Distribution
FileNault
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT:
Reappointment to the Housing
Authority Board
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
Executive
Mayor Horton
January 15, 1998
2. ~: (comment on back
if necessary)
3. ~:
Application for Appointment
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRF~IDENT F/.O~_SUBMITTAL:
co czL PRESZDENT
/
4. SUMMARy STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
Carl Buettgenbach's term on the Housing Authority Board has expired.
It is recommended he be reappointed to another term.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to confirm the reappointment of Carl Buettgenbach to the
Housing Authority Board.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
AMENDED
AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
N/A
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Less than full membership on the Board.'
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES. EOUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
N/A
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
N/A
LYNN S. HORTON, Mayor
239 4th Street · Bremerton, WA 98337 o (360) 478-5266 · FAX {3(>0) 478-5883
January 8, 1998
MEMO TO:
City Council Members
FROM: Mayor Horton ~,~
SUBJECT:
Reappointment to the Housing Authority Board
The term of Carl Buettgenbach on the Housing Authority Board has expired.
I am recommending he be reappointed to another term.
Attached is his application for reappointment. Please contact me if you have
any questions or concerns regarding this reappointment.
I plan to place this item on the City Council agenda of January 21, 1998 for
a vote of confirmation.
LH:ev
· Celebrating 50 Years of Freedom ·
CITY OF BREIVIERTON
APPLICATION FOR CITY BOARDS/COMMISSIONS/COMMITTEE
NOTE:
As an applicant for a City Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and
telephone number will be available to the press and public. You will be contacted before
any action is taken on your appointment.
(Please type or print clearly)
NAME: Carl ~ BUettgenbach
HOME ADDRESS: 931 Ash Place
:B~'emer ton, WA 98310-4252
OCCUPATION: Retired Sheet Ncgtal Worker
DATE: 6, Ja~ua_~-y, 1998
PHONE: 360-377-4~17
NoAo
(H)
(W)
EDUCATION: Kigh School Grad. Served four yeast Apprentice.~hip Sheet Metal Wkr$,
PROFESSIONAL/COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES:
Sex-ced on Bremerton Housing Authority 1~ yrs. Served on Chuck-waKen Senior Nutrition
program .Present Chairman B~eme~ton School Dist. Vocational advisary program. Over ten yrs.
LOCAL REFERENCES (name & phone number):
Merrill Walaee II 36G-275-5700 John Mitchell ATT. 560-479-3000
Robert Kennedy 360-692-4405 Arthur N Morken 360-377-2591
I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON (please check one or
Disability Action Committee
Civil Service Commission(18 yrs. & older)
Urban Forest Committee
Cable Communications Advisory Committee
Community Development Block Grant
Advisory Committee
Youth Council
Safe Streets' Steering Committee
Citizen's Commission on Council Salaries
more):
Planning Commissi,,on (18 yrs. & older)
Parks & Recreation Commission
Ethics Commission
Parking Advisory Board
Solid Waste IVlanagement
Bremerton Housing Authority
Board of Appeals, Housing/Building Codes
Mayor's Select Committee on Law
Enforcement
Is this an application for reappointment? Yes
If yes; how many years have you served on this commission/committee?
15
PLEASE RETURN TO:
Mayor's Office
239 4th Street
Bremerton, WA
98337
Signature
Applications be reviewed periodically to determine continued availability.
information may be put on back.
Additional pertinent
CO~~
Vice Chairman
~ulie Evslt
~c.~
Novcmber l7, 1997
Thc Honorable Lynn Horton
Mayor, City of Brcmeaon
239 Fourth Street
Brcmcrton, WA 98337
Board of Cc~m0~c~m Reappohm~nt
Requ~ for Cad F. B~
Dear Mayor H°rton:
(3~0) 7~-SSZ~
Please be advised that Commissionex Carl F. Buettgeabach's term of office is due to
¢xpix¢ November 30, 1997.
Mr. Bucttgenbach has been a great asset and very dedicated to the Housing Authority'
mission.
At the xecomm~dafio~ ofthe four oth~ C~ixm~ic~s, and also with the coz~ren~
of Mr. Buett~enbach, we would like to request that he be nmppoint~ for a further five
year term e~cfive December 1, 1997.
We are looking forward to hearing from you in this matter.
Sincerely, '
Executive Director
110 Russell Road · P.O. Box 4460 · Bremerton, WA 98312 · TDD-'Phon¢: (360) 479-3694 · Fax: (360) 377-5355
Equal Housing Opportunity
Barrier Free
CITY OF BREMERTON CF. RTIFICATE OF APPOINTMENT OF
COMMISSIONER OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF
THE CITY OF BREMERTON
THIS IS TO CI~TIFY THAT CARL F. BUETTGENBACH is hereby appointed to the office of
Commissioner of the Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton, under the provisions of the
Housing Authorities Law of the State of Washington, for the term of Five (b') years, beginning
December 1, 1997, and ending November 30, 2002.
Mayor, City of Bremerton
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
S.S.
C1TY OF B~TON
CARL F. BUETTGENBACH, be'rog first duly sworn, on oath, disposes and says: That he is the
person appointed to the office of Commissioner of the Housing Authority of the City of
Bremerton on the. .. day of , 1997; that he will support the Constitution and
Laws of the United States and the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington, and that he
will fai~ demean himself in said office.
Notary Public in ~d for th~ State
orW
CEKTIFICATE OF APPOINTMENT
November 21, 1997
rilE
Honorable Lynn S. Horton
Mayor, City of Bremerton
239 Fourth Street
Breanerton, WA 98337
Dear Mayor Horton:
As we previously discussed, Commissioner Carl BuettsenbaCh's
appointment expires this montl~
term of
Mr. Buettgenbach is truly one of our Board's top performers. Hot only has he
unselfishly provided trade advise and recommendations on union matters, he was
also elected by the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment 0ffi~
(NAHR0) in Washington, D.C. to represent housing in the Northwest on various
local and national working committees and offices.
Carl has always, and continues to, share these experiences he has acquired with this
agency.
Again, Carl is a very active commissioner and I would like to strongly support his
appointment.
I ask your support on tNs matter, and as always, will accept muy decision you make.
Very respectfulIy,
Chairman of the Board
AM/cg
enclosure
110 Russell Road · P.O. Box 4460 · Bremerton, WA 98312 · TDD-Phone: (360) 479-3694 · Fax: (360) 377-5355
Equal HousJng Opponunity ~ I (~ Barrier Free ~-~
· GRADUATED FROM BREMERTON HIGH SCHOOL IN 1949
· SEKVRD 4 YEAR APPRENTICE~ TO BECOME A SttEET METAL WORKEK
WO~ FOKLENT'S INC., 24 YEARS AS A JOUR1N-E~ AND I.RAD
MECHANIC
· SEKVI=.I) HIS UNION AS BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE FOK THRI:.R AND ONE-
· RETIBRD IN Ai:~RIL 1994
· AP?OINTED TO TI-IE BOARD OF COMMISSIO~ OF THE HOUSING
AU'I~O~ OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON BY MAYOR GENE NELSON IN 1982
· RE-A~POINTED '170 THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BY MAYOR GENE LOBE IN
1987 AND MAYOR MENTOR IN 1992. SERVED A TOTAL OF 15 YEARS
· SERVED AS CI-IAIi~iAN OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE HOUSING
AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BREMRKTON FOUR, TIMES
· SEKVED ON COMMISSIO~ COMMITTEE FOP. FOUK YEARS AT THE
NATIONAL AND PACIFIC NORTHWEST LEVEL, AND FOUR YEARS AT THE
CHAPTEK LEVEL
· MEMBEK OF THE BREMEKTON HI-KS CLUB FOK 18 YEARS
· MEMBER. OF THE BP, E~KTON ~F KITSAP LIONS CLUB FOR 27 YEAI~
· HAS SEKVED ON THE VOCATIONAL ADVISOKY BOARD FOK THE BREMEKTON
SCHOOL DISTRICT SINCE 1983
· SEKVED ON PRESTIGIOUS AWARDS COMMITrEE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT OFFICIALS FOK THREE YEARS. SERVED AS
CHAmMAN IN 1997
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
1. SUBJECT: Bid Award Recommendation
Video Production Equipment
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT~m. Srvc.
FOR AGENDA OF: t I ;;L[ ~ cf ~ ~
ORIGINATOR: Gil ~lohnSon~.~
DATE SUBMITTED:
2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back if 3. EXHIBITS:
necessary)
Administrative Services-~/~ _(9.~.~.,-~. , Tabulation
City Attorney
City Treasurer ~_ _
Council Fiscal & Budget~~~
Council Operations ~ _~~
ENDORSEMENT
IVIAYO R~'~--
INFORMATION
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR
SUBMITTAL:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: Requests for
bids were prepared, advertised, distributed and received in accordance with accepted Call
for Bid procedures for Video Production Equipment. The equipment will be used to
upgrade City Council video production capability. Much of the current equipment was
"used" when acquired by the City when Council meetings began telecasting and ~s
obsolete. Some of the equipment used is no longer in production and can no longer be
repaired.
Two bids were received. The Iow bid for the equipment and installation was submitted by
Professional Video and Tape, Inc., in the amount of $55,864.38 including tax and
installation.
8. RECOMMENDATION: That City Council accept the bid for video production equipment
and installation from Professional Video and Tape, Inc., as to specifications and Iow bid
received in the amount of $55,864.38.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: G. Johnson
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: G. Johnson
EXPIRATION DATE: 12_/31/98
REVIEW DATE: 03/30/98
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED ,,, T~LED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
APPROVED
DISAPPROVED
DATE:
11. AGI
AMENDED
'-oo7
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
City will continue to telecast Council meetings with existing equipment.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
Prepayment by TCI of $0.21 for access included in monthly customer bills.
7. RES.EARCH SOURCES:
BID TITLE:
DATE OPENED:
CITY OF BREMERTON
BID TABULATION
VIDEO PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT
12/15197 TIME OPENED: 2:00 P.M.
OPENED BY GIL JOHNSON
WITNESS: Bob Neal
ProLine Yes $60,084.00
g~eneck mic.'s
$4,059.47 $64,143.47
Professional V'~leo & Tape Yes $53,496.90 42 ea. is' $55,864.38
gooseneck mic.'s.
$2,367.48
Totals shown include SaLes Tax
SUMMARY ! TOTAL BID COMMENTS
LOW BIDDER
Professional Video $55,864.30
SECO.D SOW B~D~E. $64,143.47
ProLine
THIRD LOW BIDDER
AGENDA BII,L
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
BHA and BPD Contract
FOR AGENDA OF:Tues, January 13,1998
ORIGINATING DEPT: Police
ORIGINATOR: Asst_ Chief ri. Mincey
DATE SUBMITTED: January 5, 1998
CLEARANCES: ( Comment on back if necessa~')
Assist. Chie~ Mincey a-'""
City Attornk~)/fl,.,c--''~
3.EXHIBITS:Copy of Contract for
"Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services" for
1998.
ENDORSEMENT')~ INFOR31ATION____ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
MAYORC--~-- ~fl' 'f'~ COUNCIL PRESIDE ....
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
Authorization for the acceptance and implementation of the contract agreement by the city police
department as delineated in the contract.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Approval for mayoral authorization for contract agreement
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Police C_hiefPaul L. Du.Fresne
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Asst.. Police Chief Henry R. Mincey
EXPIRATION DATE: December 31,1998 REVIEW DATE: Janua~ 1, 1998
10. NOTICE OF ACTtON
PULLED TABLED, APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS (cont3:
SUMMARY STATEMENT (cont.):
Scope. Police officer funded by and assigned to the Housing Authority of the city of
Bremerton are responsible for the delivery of supplemental police services to the residents
of the West Park Development. Specifically, officers are expected to work as community
officers, including and responsibilities described in attachment A and B.
IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Loss of the benefits listed below.
IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES
1. One police officer position personnel cost including salary and benefits.
2. Cost for maintenance of one police vehicle provided.
3. Enhanced police services and less drain on fiscal and human resources of the police
department as this would be a permanent assigned beat with all cost for its coverage
paid for by the contracting agency BHA.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
De~mber 17, 1997
Paul L. Du Fresne, Chief of Police
Bremerton Police Department
239 4th Street
Bremerton, WA 98312
Dear ChicfDu Frcnsc:
Enclosed is the "Contract for Supplemental La~ Enforcement Services" for 1998. Please
note that all changes are bolded.
You will notice that an additiOnal item has been added to the contract specifically requesting
that your department provide BHA with a Quarterly Crime Statistics Report The report is
critical to our continued funding from IaSJD. Enclosed you will find a draf~ copy of the form
mentioned above.
Please review and contact me regarding any comments or questions you may have.
Sincerely,
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF
THE CITY OF BREMERTON
Executive Director
lVlW/cg
Michelle Beardsley
Clarence Nelson
110 Russell Road · P.O. Box 4460 · Bremerton, WA 98312 · TDD-Phone: (360) 479-3694 · Fax: (360) 377-5355
Equal Housing Opportunity {~ Barrier Free ~-~
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is between the CITY OF BREMERTON, by and through the BREMERTON
POLICE DEPARTMENT ("Contractor"), a law enforcement agency of the State of Washington
with jurisdiction over the relevant geographical area, and THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE
CITY OF BREMERTON ("BHA"), a municipal corporation organized under RCW 35.82, et seq.
I. RECITALS
WHEREAS,
A. BHA operates a Iow-income housing area, commonly referred to as Westpark; and
Bo
Westpark contains 582 Iow-income households and comprises a geographic area of
approximately 74 acres; and
Co
The incidence of criminal activity within Westpark substantially exceeds the level of
activity in surrounding locales and requires supplemental law enforcement services;
and
Contractor is willing to provide supplemental law enforcement services on a
contractual basis but within the scope of its general law enforcement responsibilities
as a police authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual benefit to be derived herefrom, the
adequacy of which is acknowledged by each party's authorized agent affixing his or her
signature hereto, the parties now make and enter into the following:
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE I
01/98
suplawen
II. AGREEMENTS
SCOPE. Police officers funded by and assigned to the Housing Authority of the City
of Bremerton are responsible for the delivery of supplemental police services to the
residents of the Westpark Development. Specifically, officers are expected to work
as community police officers, including the duties and responsibilities described in
Attachment A and B.
One (1) community Police Officer assigned to Westpark forty (40) hours per
week. BHA to specify the hours.
Part time service with police car exclusively at Westpark for sixteen (16) hours,
Fridays and Saturdays, 5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.
Baseline Services, regular services afforded to all other residents of the City of
Bremerton to include investigative services.
Bo
TERM. Services shall commence January 1, '1998, and shall terminate on
December 31, '1998, unless extended by agreement of the parties.
C. COMPENSATION.
Cost of one new hire to replace assigned officer @ $49,'197.00 includes wages
and benefits with vacations and holidays for 2,096 hours of work per year, plus
832 hours of overtime coverage @ $36.00 per hour maximum, or $30,894.00,
for a total of $80,091.00 per year. Baseline service is at no additional cost
during the term of this agreement. No additional compensation above the
hourly patrol rate will be paid for court appearances, coordinating conferences
or other time demands arising from patrol services.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 2
01198
suplawen
Cars and Equipment. The charges set out in paragraph 1. preceding include
all compensation for cars, gasoline, repair and equipment provided by
Contractor.
Contractor will provide BHA with an itemized billing for services within ten (10)
days following the end of each calendar month during which services are
provided. BHA shall pay for such services within twenty (20) days of receiving
the bill.
REPORTS AND INFORMATION ACCESS. Contractor agrees that BHA will have
unrestricted access to all public information which in any way deals with criminal
activity in Westpark and which is disclosable pursuant to RCW 10.97, 42.17 and any
other laws pertaining to the disclosure of public records. This information will be
provided at no cost by Contractor upon BHA's request and will be in addition to daily
activity reports. In addition contractor shall provide BHA with the following
reports: Monthly Summary Report of Criminal Activity
Semi-Annual Progress Report
Eo
REASSIGNMENT. BHA shall have the right to reasonably request Contractor to
replace any assigned personnel for the following reasons:
2.
3.
4.
Neglect or non-performance of duties;
Disorderly conduct, use of abusive or offensive language, or fighting;
Criminal activity;
Selling, consuming, possessing or being under the influence of intoxicants,
including alcohol or illegal substances, while on assignment at Westpark;
Inadequate punctuality or attendance; or
Substantiated complaints from public housing residents or management.
BHA shall provide written enumeration of the reasons for the request for
replacement of the assigned personnel, including documentation and witnesses to
the alleged behaviors.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES m PAGE 3
01/98
suplawen
ADMINISTRATION. Paul L. Du Fresne, Chief, is designated as Contractor's
representative and Merrill Wallace II, the Executive Director of the Housing Authority
of the City of Bremerton, is designated as BHA's representative for administration of
this contract.
Go
NOTICES. All notices to be given by either of the parties hereto to the other party
3hall be in writing and may either be delivered personally or may be deposited in the
United States Mail, postage prepaid, as either certified or regular mail, addressed to:
Merrill Wallace II
Housing Authority of the City
of Bremerton
P.O. Box 4460
Bremerton, WA 98312
Paul L. Du Fresne, Chief
Bremerton Police Department
239 Fourth Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
or to such other respective addresses as either party may from time to time
designate in writing. Notices sent by mail shall be deemed to have been given when
properly mailed; the postmark affixed by the United States Post Office shall be
conclusive evidence of the date of mailing.
HOLD HARMLESS. Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the
BHA, its Commissioners, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and
all liability, loss, cost, damage and expense, including costs and attorney fees in
defense thereof, because of actions, claims or lawsuits for damages resulting from
personal or bodily injury, including death at any time resulting therefrom, sustained
or alleged to have been sustained by any person or persons, and on account of
damage to property arising or alleged to have arisen directly or indirectly out of or in
consequence of the negligent performance of this Agreement, whether such injuries
to persons or damage to property is due to the negligence of the Contractor, or its
agents. If, however, the negligence of both BHA and Contractor is judicially found to
be the cause of such damage or injury, the loss, cost, or expense will be shared in
proportion to the relative degree of negligence of each.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 4
01/98
suplawen
NONDESCRIMINATION. Contractor hereby certifies that it is an equal opportunity
employer and has developed and implemented an Affirmative Action Program in
accordance with the guidelines contained in Revised Order 4 of the United States
Department of Labor. Both parties agree that they will not discriminate in any
manner against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color,
religion, sex, national origin, age, marital status and disability, except for
employment actions based on a bonafide occupational qualification. Such action
includes, but is not limited to, employment, upgrading, layoff or termination, rates of
pay or other forms of compensation, or selection for training.
TERMINATION. This Agreement terminates automatically on December 31, 1998;
however, if either party fails to substantially perform through no fault of the other and
does not commence correction within five (5) days after written notice of the default
and moves to diligently complete the correction thereafter, this Agreement is
terminated upon a further ten (10) days' written notice.
K. EXAMINATION AND RETENTION OF CONTRACTOR'S RECORDS.
BHA, HUD, or Comptroller General of the United States or any of their duly
authorized representatives shall, until three (3) years after final payment under
this contract, have access to and the right to examine any of the Contractor's
directly pertinent books, documents, papers, or other records involving
transactions related to this contract which are otherwise disclosable pursuant
to public disclosure laws, including RCW 42.17 and RCW 10.97 for the
purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts and transcriptions.
The periods of access and examination in paragraph 1. above are for records
relating to: a) litigation for settlement of claims arising from the performance of
this contract; or b) costs and expenses of this contract to which BHA, HUD or
Comptroller General or any of their duly authorized representatives has taken
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES t PAGE 5
01/98
.3(
suplawen
exception shall continue until disposition of such appeals, litigation, claims, or
exceptions.
Lo
LIMITATIONS ON PAYMENTS MADE TO INFLUENCE CERTAIN FEDERAL
FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS.
The Contractor agrees to comply with Section 1352 of Title 31, United States
Code ("the Act") which prohibits the use of Federal appropriated funds to pay
any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of
any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any of the following
covered Federal actions: The awarding of any federal contract; the making of
any Federal grant; the making of any Federal loan; the entering into of any
cooperative agreement; or the modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan
or cooperative agreement.
The Contractor further agrees to comply with the requirement of the Act to
furnish a disclosure of any funds other than Federal appropriated funds
(including profit or fee received under a covered Federal transaction) that have
been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to
influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an
officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with a Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement.
APPLICABLE LAW; VENUE. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event of a dispute, such
dispute shall be litigated in the Superior Court of the State
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 6
01/98
suplawen
of Washington for Kitsap County.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This contract constitutes the entire Agreement between the
parties. Any modifications or amendments shall be in writing and shall be signed by
each party.
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON
DATED: BY:
MERRILL WALLACE II
Executive Director
CITY OF BREMERTON
DATED: BY:
LYNN S. HORTON
Mayor
DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL:
PAUL L. DuFRESNE, Chief of Police
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
lAN R. SIEVERS, City Attorney
RECEIVED FOR FILING:
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 7
01/98
suplawen.doc
HOUSING AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON
SUPPLEMENTAL POLICE SERVICES
(ATTACHMENT A)
POSITION DESCRIPTION
Police officers funded by and assigned to the Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton are
responsible for the delivery of supplemental police services to the residents of Westpark
Development. Specifically, officers are expected to work as community policing officers,
including performing the following duties and responsibilities:
1. Respond to all calls, both emergency and non-emergency in nature, involving the
Westpark Development and residents, and follow guidelines as stated in Attachment B.
2. Engage in proactive policing strategies; develop and maintain rapport with Westpark
residents, thus fostering an atmosphere of cooperation, compassion, coordination, peace
and order within the Westpark Development.
3. Encourage residents to report any and all suspicious or criminal activities as well as
suspected/observed abuse or neglect of people, animals or property.
4. Assist victims and homeless people, referring them to other agencies, when appropriate,
for further assistance.
5. Periodically engage in walking or bicycle patrols throughout the shift in all public areas of
the Westpark Development to deter disorder or crime.
6. Work with youth in the Westpark Development to help them understand and comply with
laws and regulations.
7. Work with the Bremerton Housing Authority and residents to help clean up the Westpark
Development, including removal of graffiti, trash and debris.
8. Work with Bremerton Housing Authority managers and resident councils to develop crime
prevention programs, resident patrols and youth-oriented programs.
9. Make presentations and speeches to resident organizations and groups, as assigned.
10. Remain alert to the emergency needs of residents and visitors and take the appropriate
action to protect life and property.
11. Development and maintain a working knowledge of judicial and criminal law in the areas
of: self-incrimination; right to counsel; arrest; search and seizure; interrogation and
confession; and the collection and preservation of evidence.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 8
01/98
suplawen
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
Investigate the activities of suspicious persons as encountered or upon resident complaint
using standard police techniques and in conformance with legal requirements to
determine the identity, activity and reason for the presence of the suspicious person or
persons.
Deliver citations for violations of Bremerton Housing Authority regulations as well as
vehicle and local ordinances in conformance with legal requirements and police
department policies and procedures.
Direct vehicle traffic as required to ensure the safe, orderly flow of traffic.
Serve warrants or summonses in conformance with legal requirements and police
department policies and procedures in order to comply with court orders.
Interrogate suspects in accordance with legal requirements and police department policies
and procedures using standard interrogation techniques and strategies.
Search individuals and their personal property prior to taking them into custody in
compliance with legal requirements and police department policies and procedures using
standard police search techniques to ensure the safety of the officer, other police
department personnel, arrested persons, and the residents.
Incarcerate arrested persons as required in accordance with legal requirements and
police department policies and procedures using standard police techniques in order to
detain arrested persons pending further investigation and/or processing through the
criminal justice system.
Assist in the securing of crime scenes and in the gathering and processing of evidence.
Promptly and properly prepare and submit the required daily reports to the Housing
Authority of the City of Bremerton and the police department on each shift.
Enforce towing of abandoned or stolen vehicles.
Counsel juvenile and adult residents, referring them to the appropriate persons or
agencies for further assistance.
Assist other police officers, as appropriate; accept and adhere to lawful direction and
orders issued by a superior officer.
Assist prosecuting attorney(s) and the Bremerton Housing Authority attorney(s) in the
preparation of court cases and, as required, testify at judicial trials and hearings.
Maintain a professional decorum and attitude in all dealings with residents, visitors,
superiors and other department personnel; conduct personal life in a manner that sets a
positive example for residents, especially youths.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 9
01/g8
35-
suplawen
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
Operate a vehicle (to be supplied by the police department) within assigned geographic
area at the direction of a supervisor or at own discretion according to standard police
techniques and strategies in order to deter and detect criminal activity.
Operate closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras and monitors in the Westpark Housing
Development, as required, for the purpose of deterring criminal activity and arresting
violators.
Attend training courses, as assigned, to increase and enhance professional knowledge,
skills and ability.
Maintain liaison with all law enforcement officers, Bremerton Housing Authority officials
and related agencies' personnel to exchange information and facilitate cooperative efforts.
Work in an overtime status as required by the Bremerton Housing Authority Executive
Director.
Provide any service necessary to further the Bremerton Housing Authority's mission and
objectives that is not restricted by legal or police department policy.
32, Perform other law enforcement duties as assigned.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES- PAGE 10
01/¢JB
suplawen
HOUSING AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON
SUPPLEMENTAL POLICE SERVICES
(ATTACHMENT B)
RCW 59.18.075
Seizure of Illegal Drugs -- Notification of Landlord
Any law enforcement agency which seizes a legend drug pursuant to a violation of
chapter 69.41 RCW, a controlled substance pursuant to a violation of chapter 69.50 RCW,
or an imitation controlled substance pursuant to a violation of chapter 69.52 RCW, shall
make a reasonable attempt to discover the identity of the landlord and shall notify the
landlord in writing at the last address listed on the property tax records and at any other
address known to the law enforcement agency of the seizure and the location of the
seizure of the illegal drugs or substances.
Any law enforcement agency which arrests a tenant for threatening another tenant with a
firearm or other deadly weapon, or for some other unlawful use of a firearm or other
deadly weapon on the rental premises, or for physically assaulting another person on the
rental premises shall make a reasonable attempt to discover the identity of the landlord
and notify the landlord about the arrest in writing at the last address listed in the property
tax records and at any other address known to the law enforcement agency.
(1991 c 38 &4; 1988 c 150 & 11.)
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 11
01./98
suplawen
HOUSING AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON
SUPPLEMENTAL POLICE SERVICES
(ATTACHMENT C)
AGREEMENT OF COOPERATION
BETWEEN
The HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON
and
The BREMERTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
A. AGREED UPON CONCERN:
1. Need for continued communication and cooperation between Bremerton Police
Department and the Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton.
2. Need for comprehensive and enhanced screening of Low Rent Public Housing
applicants.
B. MAJOR GOALS:
1. Reduce the number of problematic residents by utilizing an enhanced applicant
screening process in the Low Rent Public Housing Program;
2. Create a safer environment which will be attractive to law abiding, productive
residents who will contribute and enhance the quality and livability of a neighborhood;
3. Continue the communication and cooperation link between the Bremerton Police
Department and the Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton;
4. Improve the identification of applicants through more thorough review of forms
of identification.
Co
as necessary,
AGREED UPON ACTIONS BY PARTICIPANTS:
1. BHA Board of Commissioners -
a. Adopt a non-financial Agreement of cooperation to continue, and amend
the enhanced screening process;
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 12
01/98
supiawen
b. Approve the addition of Bremerton Police Department record information
to the current screening process;
c. Utilization of Guidelines for Evaluating Criminal Histories of Applicants
to LRPH for use as a reference in evaluation the seriousness of individual records; and
d. Endorse public education and awareness of this enhanced screening
process through media and community forums.
2. BHA LRPH Program Staff-
a. Participate and cooperate with The Bremerton Police Department staff in
the administration of this enhanced screening process.
3. Bremerton Police Department-
a. Provide personnel during BHA screening sessions to assist in the
identification of applicants, to answer applicant questions, and to provide other mutually agreed
upon services;
b. Provide Bremerton Police Data Service (BPDS) printouts without charge
to the Housing Authority while this Agreement is in effect;
c. Provide support from the Planning and Support Division's Statistical
Analysis unit for evaluation of the enhanced screening process; and
d. Endorse public education and awareness of this enhances screening
process through media and community forums.
D. EFFECTIVE DATES OF AGREEMENT:
The Bremerton Police Department and the Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton
concur with the terms of this Agreement. This Agreement shall remain in effect until
either party notifies the other through 30 day written notice of the need to revise or cancel the
Agreement.
mo
PROGRAM EVALUATION:
The Bremerton Police Department and the Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton
semi-annually, or as may be necessary, to review any areas of concern.
agree to meet
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 13
01/98
suplawen
This Agreement is signed and executed on behalf of the Housing Authority of the City of
Bremerton and the Bremerton Police Department by the following parties:
Merrill Wallace II, Executive Director
Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton
Date
Chief Paul Dufresne
Bremerton Police Department
Date
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 14
01/98
suplawen
HOUSING AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON
SUPPLEMENTAL POLICE SERVICES
(ATTACHMENT D)
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON
SCREEN CRITERIA FOR LOW RENT PUBLIC HOUSING APPLICANTS
1. Resident completes and submits application and reference forms. (Reference forms
include Landlord and/or professional references).
2. Detailed questionnaires are mailed to landlord and/or professional references, along with
a signed release from the applicant.
3. Criminal history checks are made through the Bremerton Police Department for all family
members age 15 and older.
4. A review of HAP's Do Not Rehouse files is made to determine if the applicant family
was a prior resident who should not be rehoused due to any or all of the following reasons:
Eviction; skip from unit without notice; history of damage to the unit; excessive move-out
charges, etc.
5. A review is made of the list of prior residents of other housing authorities (who are
members of the Association of Washington Housing Authorities), who left owing money or
moved in violation of the lease.
6. If the applicant's criminal or eviction record or landlord reference information is such
that they are likely not to pay rent in a timely manner, not to take reasonable good care of the
premises, or to interfere with the rights of other residents, the application is denied. A letter
explaining the reason(s) for denial is sent to the applicant and gives the applicant the right to
request an informal heating.
7. The Admission Hearing Panel, composed of staff representatives and a Tenant's
Commissioner meet to hear the denial cases. If the denial is upheld, or if the applicant fails to
request a hearing, the applicant must wait one year to reapply for the Low Rent Public Housing
Programs.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 15
01/98
suplawen
GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING CRIMINAL
HISTORIES OF APPLICANTS TO L.R.P.H.
The decision regarding approval or denial of an application to Low Rent Public Housing (LRPH) will
always be left to the sound discretion of the Housing Programs Manager or The Assistant Housing
Programs Manager. It is the goal of BHA to only accept applicants who BHA believes will be able to
meet the essential requirements of tenancy and who will not adversely affect the health, safety or welfare
of other residents. The following guidelines are intended to assist and guide the decision-makers in
approving or denying applications so far as criminal activities are concerned.
The denial of an application based on criminal activity shall be treated the same as a denial for any other
reason, i.e., the applicant is entitled to view before the Housing Programs Manager.
Evidence of any member of the applicant household having engaged in the listed criminal activities ~vill
be grounds for taking further screening action as described. BHA's approval or denial of an application
will be based on the criminal activity engaged in, and is not dependent upon any action or inaction by
any law enforcement agency, district attorney, or court. However, evidence of conviction for a crime
shall be conclusive proof that a particular criminal activity was engaged in, and no denial decision shall
be based solely upon the fact that an arrest was made for any particular crime.
An applicant household will be placed in Category 1, 2, 3, or 4 for further screening according to the
highest category into which an occurrence of any listed criminal activity falls. Any second and
subsequent occurrences in any one category will be placed in the next higher category. Any occurrence
more than 10 years old will be placed in the next lower category.
FURTHER SCREENING, BY CATEGORY:
Category 1 -
concerned.
No further screening, applicant household admitted so far as criminal history is
Category 2 - Applicant(s) will be asked for explanation of criminal activities.
Denial of application by Housing Programs Manager/Housing Programs Assistant requires approval of
supervisor.
Category 3 - Applicant(s) will be asked for explanation and extensive evidence of
rehabilitation, including but not limited to recommendations from social workers, parole or probation
officers, treatment centers and others. Approval of application by Housing Programs Manager/Housing
Programs Assistant requires approval of supervisor.
Category 4- Admission denied.
CRIMES LISTED BY CATEGORY:
Category 1
MISDEMEANOR TRAFFIC OFFENSES
Criminal driving while suspended
Driving while under the influence of intoxicants
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES m PAGE 16
01/98
suplawen
Failure to perform duties of driver when property damaged or person injured
Reckless driving
Catefforv 2
OFFENSES AGAINST PERSONS
Assault, 4th degree
Sexual abuse, 3rd degree
OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY
Criminal mischief, 3rd degree
Criminal trespass, 2nd degree
Deposit of trash within 100 yards of xvaters or in waters
Negotiating a bad check
Offensive littering
Placing offensive substances in waters, on highways or property
Theft, 3rd degree
OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
Abuse of venerated objects
Disorderly conduct
Harassment
Telephone harassment
OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC HEALTH, DECENCY AND ANIMALS
Animal abandonment
Animal abuse, 1 st and 2nd degree
Animal neglect, 1 st and 2nd degree
Dog fighting
Involvement in animal fighting
Participation in dog fighting
Cateeorv 3
OFFENSES AGAINST PERSONS
Abandonment of a child
Assault, 3rd degree
Assaulting public safety officer
Child neglect, 1st and 2nd degree
Coercion
Criminal mistreatment, 2nd degree
Menacing
Public indecency
Rape, 2nd and 3rd degree
Reckless Endangerment
Sodomy, 2nd and 3rd degree
Sexual abuse, 2nd degree
Unlawful sexual penetration, 2nd degree
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 17
01/98
suplawen
OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY
Burglary, 2nd degree
Criminal mischief, 2nd degree
Criminal trespass
Criminal trespass while in possession of firearm
Interfering with police animal
Possession of burglar's tools
Theft, 2nd degree
Theft of services
Unauthorized use of a vehicle
OFFENSES INVOLVING FRAUD OR DECEPTION
Criminal possession of a forged instrument, 1 st and 2nd degree
Criminal possession of a forgery device
Criminal simulation
Forgery, 1 st and 2nd degree
Fraudulently obtaining a signature
Fraudulent use of a credit card
OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
Abuse of corpse
Interfering with public transportation
Intimidation, 2nd degree
OFFENSES INVOLVING FIREARMS AND OTHER WEAPONS
Negligently wounding another
Obliteration or change of identification number on firearm
Pointing firearm at another
Possession of firearm in public building
Unlawful purchase of firearm
OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC HEALTH, DECENCY AND ANIMALS
Displaying obscene materials to minors
Disseminating obscene material
Exhibiting an obscene performance to a minor
Frequenting a place where controlled substances are used
Furnishing obscene materials to minors
Prostitution
Publicly displaying nudity or sex for advertising purposes
Sadomasochistic abuse or sexual conduct in live show
Sending obscene materials to minors
Tampering with drug records
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
Illegally selling drug equipment
Possession of controlled substance
Unlawful delivery of imitation controlled substance.
CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -- PAGE 18
01198
suplawen
WP stats
1
SUMMARY
(Attachment E)
BREMERTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
QUARTERLY REPORT FOR WESTPARK
QUARTER 19
Any change or lack of change in crime statistics: yes no
Comments:
PATROL RELATED STATISTICS FOR WESTPARK
QUARTER 19~
( 19 TO 19 )
AID CALLS
(Includes first aid calls, suicide attempts,
heart problems, falls)
ASSAULTS
DISPUTE, PHYSICAL (non-domestic)
DISPUTE, VERBAL (non-domestic)
DOMESTIC CALLS
Broken down specifically as follows:
Child Abuse
Child Neglect
copre.doc
12/17/97
4_7
WP stats
2
Custody Dispute
Runaway Reports
Verbal Dispute
Physical Dispute
FOLLOW-UP INVESTIGATIONS
FOUND PROPERTY
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF/VANDALISM
MISSING PERSONS
PROTECTIVE ORDER VIOLATIONS
RESIDENT COMPLAINTS
(Includes animal problems, noise complaints,
harassment, parking problems, unwanted
persons, disturbance, etc.)
SEX OFFENSES
Rape
Indecent Exposure
Miscellaneous
SUBJECT WITH A GUN COMPLAINTS
SUSPICIOUS PERSON
(Includes prowler and
suspicious person calls)
LARCENY COMPLAINTS
Robbery
Burglary
Auto Theft
Other Thefts
copre.doc
12/17/97
¥¥
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1, SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO.
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF A $1,250,000 TAX
ANTICIPATION NOTE AND
ACCEPTING THE PURCHASE OFFER OF SEAFIRST BANK
FOR AGENDA OF: Jan. 21,1998
ORIGINATING DEPT: Treasurer . /~)
ORIGINATOR: R. Hat~"~
DATE SUBMITTED: Jan.13, 1998
2. CLEARANCES C~ment of bac, k if necessary)
Dir. Admin. Seryices
City Attorne~,,//~/~
Council Fiscal &
ENDORSEMENTS .~ INFORMATION
3. EXHIBITS:
Proposed Ordinance
Preliminary Official Statement
Cash Flow Projection
Note Purchase Offer (at Council meeting)
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMIT
4, SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
As indicated in the exhibits attached, the City's General Fund will run a cash deficit for several months during the year
unless some form of cash flow financing is provided. Analysis indicates that a Tax Anticipation Note is the most
advantageous method of providing the necessary cash flow financing.
RECOMMENDATION:
MOTION TO APPROVE ON FIRST READING ORDINANCE NO.
MOTION TO PASS ON SECOND READING ORDINANCE NO.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Treasurer
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor
EXPIRATION DATE: Jan. 31, 1999
REVIEW DATE: N/A
PULLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
TABLED
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED
DISAPPROVED
11.
AMENDED
CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The City's General Fund will operate for much of the year with a negative cash balance which is contrary to state law.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING. BUDGETS. FACILITIES. EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES;
Budgeted.
RESEARCH SOURCES:
Cash Flow Projections.
Bond Counsel.
Negotiations with underwriting bank.
CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Bremerton, Washington, authorizing the
issuance of $1,250,000 principal amount of tax anticipation notes for the purpose
of paying City expenses pending the receipt of general City taxes; creating a note
redemption fund; providing for the sale of those notes to BancAmerica
ROBERTSON STEPHENS of Seattle, Washington.
Approved:
Passed:
January __, 1998
January __, 1998
This document was prepared by:
Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC
1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3400
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 447-4400
-4?
CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Bremerton, Washington, authorizing the
issuance of $1,250,000 principal amount of tax anticipation notes for the purpose
of paying City expenses pending the receipt of general City taxes; creating a note
redemption fund; providing for the sale of those notes to BancAmerica
ROBERTSON STEPHENS of Seattle, Washington.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington (the "City"). f'mds
that the periodic collections of sales, excise and general ad valorem taxes and other revenues in
1998 will not be sufficient to meet necessary City expenses as they are incurred in 1998, and
that it is in the best interest of the City to contract short-term debt pursuant to chapter 39.50
RCW to pay those expenses pending receipt of taxes and other revenue collected by the City;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Debt Capacity_. The preliminary assessed valuation of the taxable property
of the City as ascertained by the last preceding assessment for City purposes for the year 1997
for tax collection in the year 1998 is 1--$-} [$1,356,380,817,] and the City as ,,.
[December 11, 1997, had {x~ [$9,899,710] of outstanding general indebtedness evidenced by
limited tax general obligation bonds and notes {ead3[,1 tax anticipation notes [anti
lease/purchase contrac, ts] incurred within the limit of up to 1-1/2% of the value of the taxable
property within the City permitted for general municipal purposes without a vote of the qualified
voters therein, and unlimited tax general obligation bonds in the principal amount of 1--$-}
[$1,545,000] within the limit of up to 2-1/2% of the value of the taxable property within the
City for general capital purposes issued pursuant to a vote of the qualified voters of the City,
and the amount of indebtedness for which the notes are herein authorized to be issued is
$1,250,000. The general indebtedness to be incurred shall be within the limit of up to 1-i/2%
of the value of the taxable property within the City permitted for general municipal purposes
without a vote of the qualified voters therein.
Section 2. Note Fund; Authorization and Description of Notes. There is created in the
office of the City Treasurer a special fund called the Tax Anticipation Note Fund, 1998 (the
"Note Fund"). Pending the collection of sales, excise and general ad valorem property taxes
levied for collection in 1998 and other revenues anticipated to be received in 1998, the City shall
issue and sell its tax anticipation notes to be designated Tax Anticipation Notes, 1998 (the
"Notes"), in the principal amount of $1,250,000. The Notes shall be dated February 1, 1998;
shall mature on January 31, 1999; shall be in the denomination of $50,000 or any integral
multiple thereof; shall be numbered separately in the manner and with any additional designation
as the Note Registrar (collectively, the fiscal agencies of the State of Washington located in
Seattle, Washington, and New York, New York) deems necessary for purposes of identification;
and shall bear interest at the rate of % per annum (computed on the basis of a 360-day year
of twelve 30-day months), payable at maturity. If any Note is not redeemed when properly
presented at its maturity, then interest shall continue to accrue at the same rate from and after
maturity until that Note, with interest, is paid in full or until sufficient money for such payment
in full is on deposit in the Note Fund and the Note has been called for redemption. The City
Council declares and finds that the f~xing of the above interest rate is in the best interests of the
City. The Notes shall be general obligations of the City.
The Notes shall not be subject to redemption prior to their maturity date.
Section 3. Registration and Transfer of Notes. The Notes shall be issued only in
registered form as to both principal and interest and shall be recorded on books or records
maintained by the Note Registrar (the "Note Register"). The Note Register shall contain the
0318073.02
name and mailing address of the owner of each Note and the principal amount and number of
each of the Notes held by each owner.
Notes surrendered to the Note Registrar may be exchanged for Notes in any authorized
denomination of an equal aggregate principal amount. Notes may be transferred only if
endorsed in the manner provided thereon and surrendered to the Note Registrar. Any exchange
or transfer shall be without cost to the owner or transferee. The Note Registrar shall not be
obligated to exchange or transfer any Note during the 15 days preceding the maturity date.
.[The Notes initially shall be registered in the name..of CEDE & CO., as .the,. nominee
of~..The Depository, Trust Company, New York, New, York ("DTC"). The, No.t. es so
registered shall be held in fully immobilizpd..form by DTC ~ depository, in accordance with
the provisions of a Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations.. dated November 19, 1997,
between the City and DTC (the "Letter of Repres,ent, ations"). Neither the, City nor the Note
Registrar.shall have any responsibility or obligation to..DTC participants or the pers0n, s fqr
whom they act as nominees with resgect to the Notes regarding accuracy of any records
maintained by.. DTC or DTC participants, of any amount in respect of principal of or
interest on the Notes, or any notice which is. permitted, or.required to be given to registered
owners hereunder (except such notice as. is re, quired to be given by the Note Registrar. to
m-c).
For SO l. ong as any Notes are .held in fully immobilized fo. rm, DTC or its successor
depository shal. 1 be deemed to. be the regiaered owner f. gr..all purposes hereunder and all
references to registered owners, noteowners, noteh,01ders, or the like shall mean DTC or its
nominees and shall not mean the owners,.of any heReficial interests in the Notes. Registered
ownership of such Note.sT or any portions thereof, may not thereafter be ~ransferred except:
(i) to any successor of DTC or its nominee, i..f that suc.cessor shall be qualifie.d unde.r any
0318073.02
-3- 5D
applicable laws to provide the services proposed to be provided by itl (ii) to any substitute
depository appointed by the City or such substitute depository's successor; or (iii) to any
person if the Notes are no longer held in immobilized form.
Upon the resignation of DTC or its successor (or any substitute depository or its
successor) from its functions as depository, or a determination by the City, that it no longer
wishes to continue the system of book entry transfers through DTC or its successor (or any
substitute depository or its successor), the City may appoint a substitute depository. Any
such substitute depository shall be qualified under any applicable laws to provide the
services proposed to be provided bv it.
If (i) DTC or its successor (or substitute depository or its successor) resigns from its
functions as depository, and no substitute depository can be obtained, or (ii) the City
determines that the Notes are to be in certificated form, the ownership of Notes may be
tran.~ferred to any person as provided herein and the Notes no longer shall be held in fully
immobilized form.J
Section 4. Payment of Notes. Both principal of and interest on the rn~,.,4o~t,,,~..,.oj [Notes]
shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America upon presentation and
surrender of the Notes by the registered owners at either of the principal offices of the -{q3on~
[Notel Registrar at the option of the owners. [Notwithstanding the fore~oin~, as lon~ as the
Notes are registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, payment of principal of and
shall be made in the manner set forth in the Letter of
interest on the Notes
Representations.J
Section 5. Pledge of Taxes. The Notes shall be paid solely from the Note Fund. The
City irrevocably pledges to budget and levy taxes within the constitutional and statutory tax
limitations provided by law without a vote of the electors of the City on all of the taxable
0318073.02
-4-
property in the City in an amount sufficient, together with other money legally available and to
be used therefor, to pay the principal of and interest on the Notes at maturity. The City further
irrevocably pledges to set aside and deposit into the Note Fund from such taxes and other money
on or before the maturity date of the Notes an amount sufficient to pay, both principal and
interest, and redeem the Notes on their maturity date.
The full faith, credit and resources of the City are pledged irrevocably for the payment
of the principal of and interest on the Notes.
Section 6. Form and Execution of Notes. The Notes shall be printed, typed or
multicopied on good bond paper in a form consistent with the provisions of this ordinance and
state law, shall be signed by the manual or facsimile signature of the City Treasurer, and shall
have the seal of the City or a facsimile reproduction thereof impressed or printed thereon.
Only Notes bearing a Certificate of Authentication in the following form, manually signed
by the Note Registrar, shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of
this ordinance:
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This Note is one of the fully registered City of Bremerton, Washington,
Tax Anticipation Notes, 1998, described in the Note Ordinance.
WASHINGTON STATE FISCAL AGENCY
{-Bend-} [Note] Registrar
By
Authorized Signer
The authorized signing of a Certificate of Authentication shall be conclusive evidence that the
Notes so authenticated have been duly executed, authenticated and delivered and are entitled to
the benefits of this ordinance.
0318073.02
If any officer whose facsimile signature appears on the Notes ceases to be an officer of
the City authorized to sign notes before the Notes bearing his or her facsimile signature are
delivered or issued by the City, those Notes nevertheless may be issued and delivered and, when
issued and delivered, shall be as binding on the City as though that person had continued to be
an officer of the City authorized to sign notes. Any Note also may be signed on behalf of the
City by any person who, on the actual date of signing of the Note, is an officer of the City
authorized to sign bonds, although he or she did not hold the required office on the date of
issuance of the Notes.
Section 7. Note Registrar. The Note Registrar shall keep, or cause to be kept, at its
principal corporate trust office, sufficient books for the registration and transfer of the Notes,
which shall be open to inspection by the City at all times. The Note Registrar is authorized, on
behalf of the City, to authenticate and deliver Notes transferred or exchanged in accordance with
the provisions of the Notes and this ordinance, to serve as the City's paying agent for the Notes
and to carry out all of the Note Registrar's powers and duties under this ordinance and City
Ordinance No. 3862 establishing a system of registration for the City's bonds and obligations.
The Note Registrar shall be responsible for its representations contained in the Note
Registrar's Certificate of Authentication on the N°tes. The Note Registrar may become the
owner of Notes with the same rights it would have if it were not the Note Registrar and, to the
extent permitted by law, may act as depository for and permit any of its officers or directors to
act as members of, or in any other capacity with respect to, any committee formed to protect
the rights of Note owners.
Section 8. Notes Negotiable. The Notes shall be negotiable instruments to the extent
provided by RCW 62A. 8-102 and 62A.8-105.
0318073.02
-6- -5'5
Section 9. Use of Proceeds. The principal proceeds received from the sale of the Notes
shall be deposited in the General Fund of the City and used solely for the purpose of paying the
cash flow deficits in the City's General Fund resulting from budgeted expenditures, and any
interest received from the deposit or investment of such proceeds shall be applied and used
solely for such purposes or for deposit in the Note Fund. Any proceeds resulting from
authorized temporary investments of money on deposit in the Note Fund or such investment
proceeds of any of the taxes hereafter levied for payment of the Notes and placed in the Note
Fund shall be used for the sole purpose of retiring the Notes or paying the interest thereon.
Accrued interest on the Notes received from the sale and delivery of the Notes shall be paid into
the Note Fund.
.Section 10. Permitted Financine of Cumulative Cash Flow Deficit. Based upon the
reasonably expected amounts of sales, excise and general ad valorem property taxes and other
revenues to be collected in 1998 (including investment proceeds of the Notes) and that are
expected to be available to make General Fund expenditures in 1998 (computed by treating a
reasonable working capital reserve in an amount not exceeding 5 % of the total General Fund
expenditures in the prior fiscal year as not being available to make those expenditures), the City
Council finds that the principal amount of the Notes does not exceed the maximum anticipated
"cumulative cash flow deficit" (as defined by Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the "Code"), and applicable Treasury Regulations thereunder) expected to occur
in the City's General Fund during 1998 and that is to be financed with proceeds of the Notes.
Section 11. Preservation of Tax Exemption of Interest on Notes. The City covenants
that it will take all actions necessary to prevent interest on the Notes from being included in
gross income for federal income tax purposes, and it will neither take any action nor make or
permit any use of proceeds of the Notes or other funds of the City treated as proceeds of the
0318073.02
-7- E~
Notes at any time during the term of the Notes which will cause interest on the Notes to be
included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. The City certifies that it has not been
notified of any listing or proposed listing by the Internal Revenue Service to the effect that it is
a bond issuer whose arbitrage certifications may not be relied upon.
{-~Section 12. Small Governmental Issuer Arbitrage Rebate Exception and Designation
of Notes as "Qualified Tax-Exempt Oblitations." The City f'mds and declares that (a) it is a
duly organized and existing governmental unit of the State of Washington and has general taxing
power; (10) no Note which is part of this issue of Notes is a "private activity bond" within the
meaning of Section 141 of the Code; (c) at least 95% of the net proceeds of the Notes will be
used for local governmental activities of the City (or of a governmental unit the jurisdiction of
which is entirely within the jurisdiction of the City); (d) the aggregate face amount of all
tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds and other obligations not required to
be included in such calculation) issued by the City and all entities subordinate to the City
(including any entity which the City controls, which derives its authority to issue tax-exempt
obligations from the City or which issues tax-exempt obligations on behalf of the City) during
the calendar year in which the Notes are issued is not reasonably expected to exceed $5,000,000;
and (e) the amount of tax-exempt obligations, including the Notes, designated by the City as
"qualified tax-exempt obligations" for the purposes of Section 265(10)(3) of the Code during the
calendar year in which the Notes are issued does not exceed $10,000,000. The City therefore
certifies that the Notes are eligible for the arbitrage rebate exemption under Section 148(f)(4)(D)
of the Code and designates the Notes as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for the purposes of
Section 265(lo)(3) of the Code.{-]
0318073.02
Section 13. Undertaking to Provide Continuing Disclosure. To meet the requirements
of paragraph (b)(5) of United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 15c2-12
(the "Rule"), to the extent applicable to an issue of municipal securities with a stated maturity
of 18 months or less under paragraph (d)(3) of the Rule, as applicable to a participating
underwriter for the Notes, the City makes the following written undertaking (the "Undertaking")
for the benefit of holders of the Notes:
(a) Undertaking to Provide Notice of Material Events. The City
undertakes to provide or cause to be provided, either directly or through a
designated agent, to each nationally recognized municipal securities information
repository designated by the SEC in accordance with the Rule ("NRMSIR") or
the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board ("MSRB"), and to a state information
depository, if any, established in the state of Washington (the "SID"), timely
notice of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Notes,
if material: (i) principal and interest payment delinquencies; (ii) non-payment
related defaults; (iii) unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting
financial difficulties; (iv) unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting
financial difficulties; (v) substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their
failure to perform; (vi) adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax-exempt
status of the Notes; (vii) modifications to rights of holders of the Notes; (viii)
Note calls; (ix) defeasances; (x) release, substitution, or sale of property securing
repayment of the Notes; and (xi) rating changes.
(b) Amendment of Undertaking. The Undertaking is subject to
amendment after the primary offering of the Notes without the consent of any
holder of any Note, or of any broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer,
participating underwriter, rating agency, NRMSIR, the SID or the MSRB, under
the circumstances and in the manner permitted by the rule.
The City will give notice to each NRMSIR or the MSRB, and the SID, of
the substance (or provide a copy) of any amendment to the Undertaking and a
brief statement of the reasons for the amendment.
(c) Beneficiaries. The Undertaking evidenced by this Section 13 shall
inure to the benefit of the City and any holder of Notes, and shall not inure to the
benefit of or create any rights in any other person.
(d) Termination of Undertaking. The City's obligations under this
Undertaking shall terminate upon the legal defeasance of all of the Notes. In
addition, the City's obligations under this Undertaking shall terminate if those
provisions of the Rule which require the City to comply with this Undertaking
become legally inapplicable in respect of the Notes for any reason, as confn'med
0318073.02
-9-
by an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel or other counsel familiar
with federal securities laws delivered to the City, and the City provides timely
notice of such termination to each NRMSIR or the MSRB and the SID.
(e) Remedy for Failure to Comply with Undertaking. As soon as
practicable after the City learns of any failure to comply with the Undertaking,
the City will proceed with due diligence to cause such noncompliance to be
corrected. No failure by the City or other obligated person to comply with the
Undertaking shall constitute a default in respect of the Notes. The sole remedy
of any holder of a Note shall be to take such actions as that holder deems
necessary, including seeking an order of specific performance from an appropriate
court, to compel the City or other obligated person to comply with the
Undertaking.
(f) Designation of Official Responsible to Administer Undertaking.
The Treasurer of the City or his or her designee (or such other officer of the City
who may in the future perform the duties of the City Treasurer) is authorized and
directed in his or her discretion to take such further actions as may be necessary,
appropriate or convenient to carry out the Undertaking of the City in respect of
the Notes set forth in this Section 13 and in accordance with the Rule, including,
without limitation, the following actions:
(i) Determining whether any event specified in Section 13(a) has
occurred, assessing its materiality with respect to the Notes, and, if
material, preparing and disseminating notice of its occurrence;
(ii) Determining whether any person other than the City is an
"obligated person" within the meaning of the Rule with respect to the
Notes, and obtaining from such person an undertaking to provide any
notice of material events for that person in accordance with the Rule;
(iii) Selecting, engaging and compensating designated agents and
consultants, including but not limited to financial advisors and legal
counsel, to assist and advise the City in carrying out the Undertaking; and
(iv) Effecting any necessary amendment of the Undertaking.
Section 14. Approval of Note Purchase Contract. BancAmerica ROBERTSON
STEPHENS of Seattle, Washington, has presented a purchase cOntract (the "Note Purchase
Contract") to the City offering to purchase the Notes under the terms and conditions provided
in the Note Purchase Contract, which written Note Purchase Contract is on file with the City
Clerk and is incorporated herein by this reference. The City Council finds that entering into the
0318073.02
Note Purchase Contract is in the City's best interest and therefore accepts the offer contained
therein and authorizes its execution by City officials.
The Notes will be prepared at City expense and will be delivered to the purchaser in
accordance with the Note Purchase Contract, with the approving legal opinion of Foster Pepper
& Shefelman, municipal bond counsel of Seattle, Washington. Bond counsel shall not be
required to review and shall express no opinion concerning the completeness or accuracy of any
official statement, offering circular or other sales or disclosure material issued or used in
connection with the Notes, and bond counsel's opinion shall so state.
The proper City officials are authorized and directed to do everything necessary for the
prompt delivery of the Notes to the purchaser and for the proper application and use of the
proceeds of the sale thereof.
Section 15. Preliminary Official Statement Deemed Final. The City Council has
been provided with copies of a preliminary official statement dated January __, 1998 (the
"Preliminary Official Statement"), prepared in connection with the sale of the Notes. For the
sole purpose of the purchaser's compliance with SEC Rule 15c2-12(b)(1), the City "deems final"
that Preliminary Official Statement as of its date, except for the omission of information as to
offering price, interest rate, selling compensation, delivery date and other terms of the Notes
dependent on such matters.
Section 16. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect ten (10) days after its
passage and publication.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, this
January, 1998.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, this ~
January, 1998.
day of
day of
0318073.02
APPROVED this
__ day of January, 1998.
DAVID FARR, Council President
ATTEST:
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George M. Mack, Bond Counsel
Publication Date:
Ordinance Number:
0318073.02
-12-
I, KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk of the City of Bremerton, Washington,
certify that the attached copy of Ordinance No. ~ is a true and correct copy of the original
ordinance passed on the __
Book of the City.
DATED this __ day of January, 1998.
day of January, 1998, as that ordinance appears on the Minute
Kathleen L. McCluskey
City Clerk
0318073.02
PRELIMII~ARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JANUAR~'__, 1998
BOOK-ENTRY ONLY
NEW ISSUE RATING: Not Applied For
NEGOTIATED
In the opinion of Bond Counsel, assuming compliance by the City with applicable requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of I986, as amended, including
ad3itrage requirements, interest on the Notes is excluded from gross income of registered owners for federal income tax purposes under existing federal law
and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the alternative minimum tax applicable to individuals. However, while interest on the Notes also is not an
item of tax preference for purposes of the alternative minimum tax applicable to corporations, interest on the Notes received by corporations is taken into
account in the computation of adjusted current earnings for purposes of the alternative minimum tax applicable to corporations, interest on the Notes received
by certain S corporations may be subject to tax and interest on the Notes received by foreign corporations with United States branches may be subject to a
foreign branch profits tax. Receipt of interest on the Notes may have other federal tax consequences for certain taxpayers. See the captions "TAX
EXEMPTION' and "CERTAIN OTHER FEDERAL TAX CONSEQUENCES' herein.
CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
$1,25O,0OO
X ANTICIPATION NOTES, 1998
DATED: February 1, 1998
DUE: January 31,1999
The City's Tax Anticipation Notes, 1998 (the "Notes"), are issued in fully registered form, and will be fully registered in the
name of Cede & Co., as note owner and nominee for The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York, New York. DTC
will act as securities depository for the Notes. The Notes will be initially issued in book-entry form only in the value of
$50,000 or any integral multiple thereof within a single maturity. Purchasers will not receive certificates representing their
interest in the Notes purchased. The Notes bear interest payable at maturity. The principal of and interest on the Notes
are payable by either fiscal agency of the State of Washington, currently The Bank of New York, New York, New York and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Seattle, Washington (the "Fiscal Agent"). For so long as the Notes remain in a
"book-entry only" transfer system, the Fiscal Agent will make such payments only to DTC, which will in turn remit such
principal and interest to the DTC participants for subsequent disbursement to Beneficial Owners of the Notes as described
herein under the caption "Book-Entry Only System."
Due Amount Rate
January 31, 1999 $1,250,000 %
Price
The Notes will not be subject to redemption prior to their stated maturity.
The Notes are direct and general obligations of the City. The City irrevocably pledges to budget and levy taxes within the
constitutional and statutory limitations provided by law without a vote of the electors of the City on all of the taxable
property in the City in an amount sufficient, together with other money legally available and to be used therefor, to pay the
principal of and interest on the Notes at maturity. The City further irrevocably pledges to set aside and deposit in to the
Note Fund from such taxes and other money on or before the maturity date of the Notes an amount sufficient to pay, both
principal and interest, and redeem the Notes on their maturity date.
The full faith, credit and resources of the City are pledged irrevocably for the payment of the principal of and interest on the
Notes. See "SECURITY" herein.
The City has designated the Notes as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for banks, thrift institutions and other financial
institutions. See "CERTAIN OTHER FEDERAL TAX CONSEQUENCES" herein.
The approving legal opinion of Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC, Bond Counsel, Seattle, Washington, will be delivered
with the Notes. The Notes in definitive book-entry form will be ready for delivery at the facilities of DTC in New York, New
York, on or around February __, 1998.
This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only. It is not a summary of this issue. Investors must read
the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to making an informed investment decision.
BancAmerica
ROBERTSON STEPHENS
Representations
Neither the City nor the Underwriter has authorized any dealer, broker, salesperson or other
persons to give any information or make any representations other than those made in this
Official Statement, and, if given or made, such other information or representations must not be
relied upon as having been authorized by the City or the Underwriter. This Official Statement
does not constitute an offer to sell, nor shall there be any sale of the Notes by any person in any
jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such a sale.
The information contained in this Official Statement has been obtained from City Officials and
other sources believed to be reliable. Neither a representation, warranty nor guarantee is made by
the Underwriter as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this Official Statement
and nothing contained in this Official Statement is or shall be relied upon as a promise or
representation by the Underwriter. The delivery of this Official Statement does not imply that the
information contained herein is correct as of any time subsequent to the date of the Official
Statement as shown on the cover page.
Disclosure Statement
The City will deliver to the Underwriter at the time of delivery of the Notes a signed statement
substantially to the effect that this Official Statement, as of its date and as of the date of the
Notes, neither contains any untrue statement of a material fact nor omits to state any material fact
necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading in any material respect and that there has not been any material adverse
change in the normal operations or financial condition of the City nor, to the best of the City's
knowledge, in the general economy of the City since the date of the Official Statement.
Secondary Market
It has been the practice of the Underwriter to maintain a secondary market in municipal securities
which it sells. The Underwriter intends to engage in secondary market trading of the Notes,
subject to applicable securities laws. The Underwriter, however, is neither obligated to engage in
secondary trading nor to repurchase any of the Notes at the request of the registered owners
thereof and no assurance can be given that a secondary market for the Notes will be available.
In connection with the offering of the Notes, the Underwriter may over-allot or effect
transactions that stabilize or maintain the market price of the Notes at a level above that which
might other,vise prevail in the open market. Such stabilizing, if commenced, may be discontinued
at any time.
This Preliminary Official Statement, as of its date, is in a form that is expected to be "deemed
final" by the City for purposes of SEC Rule 15c2-12(b)(1) but is subject to revision, amendment
and completion in a final Official Statement that will be available within seven (7) business days
of the sale date of the Notes.
CITY OF BREMERTON
KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Lynn Horton
David Farr
John Law
~uff-Menees
Cecil McConnell
Carlos Montgomery
~hard Neville
Lon Overson
........R-ob:e~rt Winters
MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL
Chairperson
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Term Expires
December 31
1999
....1-9-97---
.-1-997--'
1999
1999
....4-997
1999
Richard Hanna
Kathleen McCluskey
APPOINTED OFFICIALS
Treasurer
Administrative Services
Director/City Clerk
Attorney
NOTE COUNSEL
Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC
Seattle, Washington
UNDERWRITER
BancAmerica ROBERTSON STEPHENS
Seattle, Washington
111
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1
Description of thc Notes ....................................................................................................... 1
Authorization ........................................................................................................................ 3
security .................................................................................................................................. 3
Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 4
Note Fund .............................................................................................................................. 4
Failure to Redeem the Notes ................................................................................................. 4
Debt Payment Record ........................................................................................................... 4
Future Financing ................................................................................................................... 4
Assessed Valuation Determination ....................................................................................... 4
Tax Collection Procedure ...................................................................................................... 5
Authorization of Debt ........................................................................................................... 5
General Obligation Indebtedness .......................................................................................... 5
Limits on Amount of General Obligation Indebtedness ....................................................... 6
Authorization of Short-Term Debt ........................................................................................ 6
Taxing Powers and Limitations ............................................................................................ 7
Auditing of City Finances ..................................................................................................... 7
Authorized Investments ........................................................................................................ 7
Net Direct Debt and Estimated Net Overlapping General Obligation Debt ......................... 9
Noted Debt Ratios of the City ............................................................................................... 9
Statutory Debt Limit Calculation .......................................................................................... 10
Ad Valorem Tax Collection Record of the City .................................................................. 11
Ad Valorem Property Tax Rates 1 ......................................................................................... 11
Comparative Statement of General Fund .............................................................................. 12
Contingency Reserve fund .................................................................................................... 12
Year-End Balances ................................................................................................................ 12
General Fund Budget ............................................................................................................ 13
City Profile ............................................................................................................................ 14
Schedule of General Obligation Note Debt Service for the City .......................................... 15
General and Economic information ...................................................................................... 16
Kitsap County Population .................................................................................................... 19
Taxable Retail Sales ............................................................................................................. 19
City Of Bremerton Major Taxpayers .................................................................................... 19
Seattle-Bremerton Ferry Traffic Statistics ........................................................................... 20
Kitsap County And Washington State .................................................................................. 20
Kitsap County And Washington State .................................................................................. 20
Preservation of Tax Exemptior~ ............................................................................................. 20
Conflicts of Interest .......... : .................................................................................................... 21
Tax Exemption ...................................................................................................................... 2 l
Certain Other Federal Tax Consequences ............................................................................. 22
Absence of Material Litigation .................................................................. i .......................... 22
Approval of Bond Counsel ................................................................................................... 23
Continuing Disclosure ........................................................................................................... 23
Underwriting ......................................................................................................................... 24
Concluding Statement ........................................................................................................... 24
Form of Legal Opinion ....................................................................................... Appendix A
PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT
CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
$1,250,000
TAX ANTICIPATION NOTES, 1998
INTRODUCTION
The City of Bremerton, Washington (the "City"), a municipal corporation duly organized and
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington, furnishes this Official
Statement in connection with the offering of $1,250,000 principal amount of Tax Anticipation
Notes, 1998 (the "Notes"). This Official Statement provides information concerning the City and
the Notes.
DESCRIPTION OF THE NOTES
Principal Amount, Date, Interest Rate, and Maturity
The Notes will be issued in the principal amount of $1,250,000 and will be dated and bear
interest from February 1, 1998 until their stated maturity. The Notes will mature on January 3 I,
1999, and will bear interest, payable at maturity, at the rate of % per annum. Interest on the
Notes will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months.
Optional Redemption
The City has not reserved the right to redeem the Notes prior to maturity.
Form and Denomination
The Notes will be issued in fully registered form as to both principal and interest in the
denomination of $50,000 or any integral multiple thereof within a single maturity. The Notes,
when issued, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as registered owner and nominee of
The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York ("DTC").
DTC will act as securities depository for the Notes. Individual purchases may be made in book-
entry form only. Purchasers will not receive certificates representing their interest in the Notes
purchased. So long as Cede & Co. is the registered owner of the Notes, as nominee of DTC,
references herein to the registered owners or Note owners will mean Cede & Co. and will not
mean the "Beneficial Owners" of the Notes. In this Official Statement, the term "Beneficial
Owner" will mean the person for which a DTC participant acquires an interest in the Notes.
So long as Cede & Co. is the registered owner of the Notes, principal of and interest on the Notes
are payable by wire transfer by the Paying Agent of the City to DTC, which, in turn, is obligated
to remit such principal and interest to the DTC participants for subsequent disbursement to
Beneficial Owners of the Notes, as further described under the caption "Book-Entry Only
System."
Book-Entry Only System
The following information has been provided by DTC. Beneficial Owners should confirm the
following with DTC or the Participants.
DTC will act as initial securities depository for the Notes. The Notes will be issued as fully
registered Notes, and will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC's partnership nominee).
One fully-registered Note certificate will be issued for each maturity of the Notes, in the
aggregate principal amount of such maturity, and will be deposited with DTC.
DTC is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a
"banking organization" within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the
Federal Reserve System, a "clearing corporation" within the meaning of the New York Uniform
Commercial Code and a cleann, agency" registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. DTC holds securities that its participants
(the "Participants") deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates the settlement among Participants of
securities transactions, such as transfers and pledges, in deposited securities through electronic
computerized book-entry changes in accounts of the Participants, thereby eliminating the need of
physical movement of securities certificates. Direct Participants include securities brokers and
dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations. DTC is
owned by a number of its Direct Participants and by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., the
American Stock Exchange, Inc. and the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Access
to the DTC system is also available to others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies
that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or
indirectly ("Indirect Participants"). The rules applicable to DTC and its Participants are on file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Purchases of the Notes under the DTC system, in denominations of $50,000 or any integral
multiple thereof, must be made by or through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit for
the Notes on DTC's records. The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each Note
("Beneficial Owner") is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants' records.
Beneficial Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase, but
Beneficial Owners are expected to receive written confirmations providing details of the
transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect
Participants through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction. Transfers of
ownership interests in the Notes are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of
Participants acting on behalf of Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive
certificates representing their ownership interests in the Notes, except in the event that use of the
book-entry system for the Notes is discontinued.
To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Notes deposited by Participants with DTC are registered in
the name of DTC's partnership nominee, Cede & Co. The deposit of Notes with DTC and their
registration in the name of Cede & Co. effect no change in beneficial ownership. DTC has no
knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the Notes. DTC's records reflect only the identity
of the Direct Participants to whose accounts such Notes are credited, which may or may not be
the Beneficial Owners. The Participants will remain responsible for keeping account of their
holdings on behalf of their customers.
Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by Direct
Participants to Indirect Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to
Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or
regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.
Redemption notices will be sent to Cede & Co. If less than all of the Notes are being redeemed,
DTC's practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct Participant in
Notes to be redeemed.
Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. will consent or vote with respect to Notes. Under its usual
procedures, DTC mails an Omnibus Proxy to the City as soon as possible after the record date.
The Omnibus Proxy assigns Cede & Co.'s consenting or voting rights to those Direct
Participants to whose accounts the Notes are credited on the record date (identified in a listing
attached to the Omnibus Proxy).
Principal and interest payments on the Notes will be made to DTC. DTC's practice is to credit
Direct Participants' accounts on payable date in accordance with their respective holdings shown
on DTC's records unless DTC has reason to believe that it will not receive payment on the
payable date. Payments by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing
instructions and customary practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts of
customers in bearer form or registered in "street name," and will be the responsibility of such
Participant and not of DTC, the Fiscal Agent, or the City, subject to any statutory or regulatory
requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Payment of principal and interest to DTC is
the responsibility of the City or Fiscal Agent. Disbursement of such payments to Direct
Participants will be the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the
Beneficial Owners will be the responsibility of Direct and Indirect Participants.
DTC may discontinue providing its services as securities depository with respect to the Notes at
any time by giving reasonable notice to the City or the Fiscal Agent. Under such circumstances
and in the event that a successor securities depository is not obtained, Note certificates are
required to be printed and delivered.
The City may decide to discontinue use of book-entry transfers through DTC (or a successor
securities depository). In that event, Note certificates will be printed and delivered.
The information in this section concerning DTC and DTC's book-entry system has been obtained
from sources the City believes to be reliable, but the City takes no responsibility for the accuracy
thereof.
Procedure in the Event of Revisions of Book-Entry Transfer System
If the City is unable to retain a qualified successor to DTC or the City has determined that it is in
the best interest of the City not to continue the book-entry system of transfer or that interests of
the Beneficial Owners of the Notes might be adversely affected if the book-entry system of
transfer is continued, the City will execute, authenticate and deliver at no cost to the Beneficial
Owners of the Notes or their nominees, Notes in fully registered form, in the denomination of
$5,000 or any integral multiple thereof. Thereafter, the principal of the Notes will be payable
upon due presentment and surrender thereof at the principal office of the Note Registrar; interest
on the Notes will be payable by check or draft mailed or by wire transfer (wire transfer will be
made only if so requested in writing and if the registered owner owns at least $1,000,000 par
value of the Notes), to the persons in whose names such Notes are registered, at the address
appearing upon the registration books on the 15th day of the month next preceding an interest
payment date, and the Notes will be transferable as provided in the Note Ordinance.
AUTHORIZATION
The Notes are issued in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and applicable
statutes of the State of Washington, pursuant to Ordinance No. ~ (the "Ordinance") of the
City Council, adopted on January __, 1998.
SECURITY
The City irrevocably pledges to budget and levy taxes within the constitutional and statutory
limitations provided by law without a vote of the electors of the City on all of the taxable
property in the City in an amount sufficient, together with other money legally available and to
be used therefor, to pay the principal of and interest on the Notes at maturity. The City further
irrevocably pledges to set aside and deposit in to the Note Fund from such taxes and other money
on or before the maturity date of the Notes an amount sufficient to pay, both principal and
interest, and redeem the Notes on their maturity date.
The full faith, credit and resources of the City are pledged irrevocably for the payment of the
principal of and interest on the Notes.
PURPOSE
The proceeds of the Notes will be used to provide cash flow management of the City's General
Fund revenues and expenditures, in anticipation of the collection of sales excise and general ad
valorem property taxes and other money due the City's General Fund in 1998, and paying the
costs of issuance and sale of the Notes, all as approved by the City Council.
NOTE FUND
The City has created and established in the office of the City Treasurer a special fund to be
known and designated as the Tax Anticipation Note Fund, 1998 (the "Note Fund") for the sole
purpose of payment of the principal of and interest on the Notes. Accrued interest, if any,
received from the sale of the Notes shall be deposited in the Note Fund. The City covenants to
deposit in the Note Fund on or before maturity amounts sufficient, together with other monies
otherwise available therein, to pay the principal of and interest due on the Notes.
FAILURE TO REDEEM THE NOTES
If any Note is not redeemed when properly presented at its maturity, the City is obligated to pay
interest on that Note at the same rate provided in the Note from and after its maturity until that
Note, both principal and interest, is paid in full or until sufficient money for its payment in full is
on deposit in the Note Fund.
DEBT PAYMENT RECORD
The City has always promptly met principal and interest payments on outstanding obligations
when due. Additionally, no refunding Bonds have been issued for the purpose of preventing an
impending default.
FUTURE FINANCING
The City is considering the possibility of refinancing approximately $2 to $2.5 million of its
1994 Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds for development of the Gold Mountain Golf Course
with revenue Notes sometime in 1998.
ASSESSED VALUATION DETERMINATION
In the State of Washington, the County Assessor (the "Assessor") determines the value of all real
and personal property throughout the County (including the City) which is subject to ad valorem
taxation. The Assessor's duties and methods of determining value are prescribed and controlled
by statute and by detailed regulations promulgated by the Department of Revenue of the State of
Washington. For tax purposes the assessed value of property is set at 100% of its actual value.
Property in Kitsap County is revalued annually based on market sales and receives an on-site
appraisal every six years. The property is listed by the Assessor on a tax roll at its current
assessed value and the tax roll is filed in the Assessor's office.
The Assessor's determinations are subject to revision by the County Board of Equalization and,
for certain property, subject to further revision by the State Board of Equalization. After all
administrative procedures are completed, the taxing unit receives the Assessor's final certificate
of assessed value of property within the taxing unit.
TAX COLLECTION PROCEDURE
Property taxes are levied in specific amounts, and the rate for all taxes levied for all taxing cities
in the County (including the City) are determined, calculated and fixed by the Assessor based
upon the assessed valuation of the property within the various taxing cities. The Assessor extends
the taxes to be levied within each taxing City upon a tax roll which contains the total amount of
taxes to be so levied and collected and assigns a tax account number to each tax lot. The tax roll
is delivered to the Kitsap County Treasurer by January 15 of each year, and an abstract of the tax
roll, showing the total amount of taxes collectible in each of the taxing cities for the year, is
delivered to the Board of County Commissioners at the same time. All taxes are due and payable
on the 30th of April of each year, but if the amount due from a taxpayer exceeds .thirty dollars
($30.00), one-half may be paid then and the balance no later than October 31 of each year.
The method of giving notice of payment of taxes due, accounting for the money collected, the
division of the taxes among the various taxing cities, giving notice of delinquency, and collection
procedure are all covered by detailed statutes. The lien for ad valorem property taxes which have
been levied prior to the filing of federal tax liens is prior to such federal tax liens.
In other respects, and subject to the possible "Homestead Exemption," the lien for delinquent
property taxes is prior to all other liens or encumbrances of any kind on real or personal property
subject to taxation. By law (Chapter 6.13 RCW) the taxing unit may commence foreclosure of a
tax lien on real property after three (3) years have passed since the first delinquency. Washington
State's courts have not decided whether the Homestead Exemption may give the occupying home
owner a right in the forced sale of the family residence for delinquent general property taxes to
retain the first $30,000 of proceeds of the sale. (See Algona vs. Sharp, 30 Wn. App. 837, 638
P.2d 627 (1982), holding the homestead right superior to liens for local improvement district
assessments).
AUTHORIZATION OF DEBT
The power of the City to contract debt of any kind is controlled and limited by state law. All debt
must be set forth in accordance with detailed budget procedures and paid for out of identifiable
receipts and revenues. The budget must be balanced for each fiscal year. It is unlawful for an
officer or employee of the City to incur liabilities in excess of budgetary appropriations.
GENERAL OBLIGATION INDEBTEDNESS
Under the Constitution and statutes of the State, the City may incur two types of general
obligation indebtedness. The two types are primarily differentiated by the limits on the real and
personal property taxes which may be collected for the payment thereof.
Limited tax general obligation indebtedness is payable from taxes upon all the taxable property
in the City which may be imposed by the City within the limitations prescribed by State statute
without a vote of the people (sometimes referred to as "non-voted debt" or "non-voted bonds" or
"councilmanic bonds or notes"). The statutory limits on the levy of such taxes are described in
the section herein entitled "LIMITS ON AMOUNT OF GENERAL OBLIGATION INDEBTEDNESS."
Unlimited tax general obligation indebtedness is payable from taxes without limitation as to rate
or amount, imposed upon all taxable property in the City. Unlimited tax indebtedness may be
5?
incurred only after approval by 60% of the City Voters at an election in which the total vote cast
exceeds 40% of the votes cast at the last preceding general election of the City or State. Such
unlimited tax indebtedness is sometimes referred to as "voted debt," "voted bonds" or "unlimited
tax bonds."
Bonds issued to refund outstanding general obligation indebtedness of either type may be issued
without voter approval.
LIMITS ON AMOUNT OF GENERAL OBLIGATION INDEBTEDNESS
State statutes limit the total principal amount of all City general obligation indebtedness incurred
for "general" purposes, both limited tax and unlimited tax, to 2.5% of the actual value of taxable
property within the City. Within this 2.5% limitation, non-voted indebtedness is further limited
to 1.5% of the value of such taxable property.
The City is additionally authorized to incur general obligation indebtedness for the following
"special" purposes, with voter approval, in the total principal amount of up to the following
percentages of the actual value of taxable property within the City: water, artificial light and
sewers: 2.5%; open space and park facilities: 2.5%. The combination of unlimited tax and limited
tax general obligation debt for all purposes cannot exceed 7.5% of the City's assessed valuation.
The State statutory limits on City general obligation indebtedness described in this section are
more restrictive than those contained in the State Constitution. Both the Constitutional and
statutory debt limits may be exceeded if necessary to meet obligations made mandatory by State
law or, if necessary, to maintain the corporate existence of the City.
In computing total general obligation indebtedness, the following "assets" may be deducted
against the principal amount of indebtedness outstanding: (a) money and investments on deposit
in general obligation bond retirement funds: (b) taxes (both current and delinquent) levied for the
payment of general obligation indebtedness; and (c) delinquent (but not current) taxes due the
general fund.
In addition to limits on the total principal amount of general obligation indebtedness described in
this section, the Constitution and statutes of the State impose other limitations on the City's levy
of taxes upon real and personal property (See section herein entitled "TAXING POWERS AND
LIMITATIONS".)
AUTHORIZATION OF SHORT-TERM DEBT
As a result of 1982 legislation, any Washington municipal corporation may borrow money and
issue short-term obligations, the proceeds of which may be used for any lawful purpose. Short-
term obligations may be issued in anticipation of the receipt Of revenues, taxes, or grants or the
sale of (1) general obligation bonds if the bonds may be issued without the consent of the voters
or if previously ratified by the voters; (2) revenue bonds if the bonds have been authorized by
ordinance or resolution; or (3) local improvement district bonds if the bonds have been
authorized by ordinance or resolution. These short-term obligations shall be repaid out of money
derived from the source or sources in anticipation of which they were issued or from any money
legally available for this purpose.
Additionally, the City may incur short-term indebtedness in the following ways: first, in an
emergency, the Council members may put a plan into effect and authorize indebtedness outside
the current budget. All expenditures for emergency purpose shall be paid by warrants form any
available money in the fund properly chargeable with such expenditures. If there is insufficient
money on hand in the fund, the warrants become registered interest-bearing warrants. In adopting
the budget, for any fiscal year, the Council members shall appropriate funds to retire any
6
outstanding registered warrants issued since the adoption of the last preceding budget. Second,
the City may, without a vote of the electors, purchase property on a conditional sales contract if
the total contract amount, together with the other non-voted general obligation indebtedness of
the City, does not exceed 3/4 of 1% of the value of taxable property in the City; any item so
purchased must be budgeted for payment in accordance with the terms of the contract.
TAXING POWERS AND LIMITATIONS
Pursuant to Chapter 84.52.043 RCW, cities may levy, without a vote of the residents residing
therein, a maximum of $3.375 per thousand for general city purposes (the "regular levy"). Cities
with full-time firemen may levy an additional $.225 per thousand to fund the city's Fireman's
Pension Fund (Chapter 41.16.060 RCW), thus creating a maximum annual levy rate of $3.60 per
thousand. The City is currently levying $3.325 per thousand dollars of taxable assessed valuation
for its regular levy.
According to RCW 27.12.390, any city or town annexed to a rural library district, island library
district, or inter-county rural library district, such as the City, shall be entitled to levy up to $3.60
per thousand dollars of assessed valuation less any regular levy made by such library district in
the incorporated area, notwithstanding any other provision of law.
A city's regular property taxes are subject to the provisions of a state statute limiting the growth
of annual property taxes (Chapter 84.55.010 RCW). The limitation provides that the regular
property taxes payable in the following year shall not exceed 106% of the amount of the single
highest regular levy amount lawfully levied by the municipal entity in the three immediately
preceding calendar years plus an additional amount due to the incremental assessed valuation
~ncrease ~n the municipal entity caused by new construction and property improvements. The
regular property taxes levied by a city may be increased above the 106% limitation upon the
affirmative vote of a majority of the voters residing in the municipal entity at an election held for
such purposes (Chapter 84.55.050 RCW).
On November 4, 1997, voters approved a state-wide referendum, which limits a municipality's
tax levy to an amount of 100% of the highest property tax levy of the three most recent years
multiplied by a limit factor. The limit factor is defined in the Property Tax Act as (i) the lesser of
106% or 100% plus inflation, or (ii) 106% or less, if approved by a majority plus one vote of the
governing body of the municipality upon a finding of substantial need. This limit is being
imposed beginning with collection year 1998.
AUDITING OF CITY FINANCES
The State Auditor is required to examine the affairs of cities at least once every two years. The
examination must include, among other things, the financial condition and resources of the City,
whether the laws and constitution of the State are being complied with, and the methods and
accuracy of the accounts and reports of the City. Reports of the Auditor's examinations are
required to be filed in the office of the State Auditor and in the auditing department of the City.
AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
Chapter 39.59 RCW limits the investment of public funds to the following authorized
investments: bonds of the State and any local government in the State, which bonds are rated at
the time of investment in one of the three highest credit ratings by a nationally recognized rating
agency; general obligation bonds of other states and subdivisions thereof so long as those bonds
are rated in one of the three highest categories; registered warrants of a local government within
the same county as the entity making the investment; and any investment authorized by law for
the treasurer of the State or any local government exclusive of certificates of deposit of banks or
bank branches not located in the State. Under chapter 43.84 RCW, the State Treasurer may invest
7
in non-negotiable certificates of deposit in designated qualified public depositories; in
obligations of the U.S. government, its agencies and wholly owned corporations; in bankers'
acceptances; in commercial paper; in repurchase agreements; in the obligations of the federal
home loan bank, federal national mortgage association and other government corporations
subject to statutory provisions. Utility revenue bonds and warrants of any city and bonds or
warrants of a local improvement district are also eligible investments (RCW 35.39.030).
Any municipal corporation, including the City, may authorize the investment of funds not
required for immediate expenditure by the County Treasurer. Such funds of the City, including
debt service funds, may be invested by the County Treasurer. The County Treasurer may, upon
the request of one or more units of local government that invest their money with the County,
combine those monies for the purposes of investment (RCW 36.29.022). The office of the
County Treasurer receives up to five percent of the earnings on such investments, subject to a
maximum of fifty dollars on each transaction, as its investment service fee. The County
Treasurer may reimburse its office for any expenses incurred in the establishment and
maintenance of such a County investment pool (RCW 36.29.024).
Local Government Investment Pool
The State Treasurer's Office administers the Washington State Local Government Investment
Pool (the "LGIP"), a $1.25 billion fund that invests money on behalf of more than 350 cities,
counties and special taxing districts. In its management of LGIP, the State Treasury adheres, at
all times, to the principles appropriate for the prudent investment of public funds. These are, in
priority order, (i) the safety of principal; (ii) the assurance of sufficient liquidity to meet cash
flow demands; and (iii) to attain the highest possible yield within the constraints of the first two
goals. Historically, the LGIP has had sufficient liquidity to meet all cash flow demands.
The LGIP, authorized by chapter 43.250 RCW, is a voluntary pool that provides its participants
the opportunity to benefit from the economies of scale inherent in pooling. It is also intended to
offer participants increased safety of principal and the ability to achieve a higher investment
yield than would otherwise be available to them. The LGIP is a conservatively managed, highly
liquid money market fund. The pool is restricted to investments with maturities of one year or
less, and the average investment life typically is less than 90 days. Permissible investments
include U.S. government and agency securities, bankers' acceptances, high quality commercial
paper, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and certificates of deposit issued by
qualified Washington State depositories.
Authorized Investments for Bond Proceeds
In addition to the eligible investments discussed above, bond proceeds only may also be invested
in mutual funds with portfolios consisting of U.S. government and guaranteed agency securities
with average maturities of less than four years; municipal securities rated in one of the four
highest categories; and money market funds consisting of the same, so long as municipal
securities held in the fund(s) are in one of the two highest rating categories. Bond proceeds may
also be invested in shares of money market funds with portfolios of securities otherwise
authorized by law for investment by local governments (RCW 39.59.030).
The City's Investments
The investments of the City, except those of the Community Development Block Grant Fund, are
managed in a pooled format. Interest earnings are distributed monthly to the individual funds
based on their respective balances at the beginning of the month. These pooled investments are
classified on the balance sheet as cash and equivalents. As required by state statue, all
investments and deposits of the City's funds are obligations of the U.S. Government, U.S.
agency issues, deposits with the State Treasurer's Investment Pool, prime bankers' acceptances,
deposits with Washington State banks and savings and loan institutions or repurchase agreements
with authorized securities as collateral.
NET DIRECT DEBT AND ESTIMATED NET OVERLAPPING
GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT
(As of December 31, 1997)
Direct Debt:
Voted General Obligation Bonds Outstanding ......................
Non-Voted Bonds Outstanding ..............................................
Non-Voted General Obligation Tax Anticipation Notes
(this issue) .........................................................................
Bank Line of Credit Outstanding ...........................................
Less: Debt Service Fund Balance ...........................................
Net Direct Debt .........................................................................
1,250,000
8,210
Estimated Net Overlapping Debt:
Net G.O. Debt Percent of Amount of
Outstanding Overlap Overlap
Kitsap County
Port of Bremerton
Bremerton Sch. Dist. No. 100-C
Central Kitsap Sch. Dist. No. 401
South Kitsap Sch. Dist. No. 402
$ 4.11% $
25.66
73.96
1.12
.05
Estimated Net Overlapping Debt: .......................................... $
Net Direct Plus Estimated Net Overlapping Debt: ......................................... $
NOTEED DEBT RATIOS OF THE CITY
Preliminary Assessed Valuation for collection Year 19982 .......................... $ 1,345,904,065
Estimated City Population (1997)3 ............................................................... 39,510
Assessed Valuation Per Capita .................................................................... $ 34,065
Net Direct Debt to Assessed Valuation .......................................................... %
Net Direct and Estimated Overlapping Debt to Assessed Valuation ........... %
Net Direct Debt Per Capita .......................................................................... $
Net Direct and Estimated Overlapping Debt Per Capita .............................. $
I Adjusted to reflect the issuance of the Notes.
2 Preliminary assessed valuation for tax collection year 1998 is stated as the full assessed value of all taxable real and personal
property in the City.
3 Source: Washington State Office of Financial Management (August 1997).
STATUTORY DEBT LIMIT CALCULATION
(As of December 31, 1997)1
Preliminary Taxable 1997 Assessed Valuation for Collection Year 1998 .............
I. General Purposes
a. Non-Voted Indebtedness (1.5% of Valuation)
Limit .....................................................................................................
Less: Non-Voted Bonds Outstanding ...............................................
Less: Non-Voted Notes Outstanding (the Notes) .............................
Less: Bank Line of Credit Outstanding .............................................
Plus: Cash and Investments in Debt Service Funds ..........................
Remaining Capacity for General Purposes (Nonvoted) ..............
b. Voted Indebtedness (2.5% of Valuation)
Limit ........... : .........................................................................................
Less: Voted Bonds Outstanding ........................................................
Less: Non-Voted Bonds Outstanding ...............................................
Less: Non-Voted Notes Outstanding (the Notes) .............................
Less: Bank Line of Credit Outstanding .............................................
Plus: Cash and Investments in Debt Service Funds ..........................
Remaining Capacity for General Purposes (Voted) ....................
II. Utility Purposes (2.5% of Valuation)
Limit .....................................................................................................
Outstanding ..........................................................................................
Remaining Capacity for Utility Purposes ...................................
III. Parks and Open Space Purposes (2.5% of Valuation)
Limit .....................................................................................................
Outstanding ..........................................................................................
Remaining Capacity for Parks and Open Space Purposes ..........
$1,345,904,065
$ 20,188,561
(1,250,000)
(8,210)
$
$ 33,647,602
(1,250,000)
(8,210)
$ 33,647,602
0
$ 33,647,602
$ 33,647,602
0
$ 33,647,602
Adjusted to reflect the issuance of the Notes.
10
Collection
Y~ar
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
NOTE:
AD VALOREM TAX COLLECTION RECORD OF THE CITY I
Taxable /YCollected
Assessed Tax ~ Year of Levy
Valuation2 Levy J AmQunt Percent
1,345,904,0653 N/A4/ N/A4 N/A4
1,299,548,001 t'-
1,223,940,521 $ 4,681,638 $4,478,455 95.66%
1,203,29%197 4,476,487 4,247,668 94.88%
1,169,824,600 4,144,873 3,973,275 95.86
1,072,545,656 4,292,888 4,1 I0,011 95.74
Collected as of
December 31, 1997
AmQunt Percent
N/A4 N/A4
949,107,196 3,544,019 3,397,651 95.87
Taxes are due and payable on April 30, of each year. At least one half of the tax amount due must be paid
on or before April 30, or else the total amount becomes delinquent on May 1. The second half of the tax
due is payable on or before October 31, becoming delinquent November 1.
AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAX RATES1
(Rates In Dollars per $1,000 of Assessed Valuation)
City School Emergency
Levy General City City State Kitsap Port of Dist. No. Medical Regional
Year Fund Not~ Soecial School CountyBremert9n 100C PUD Services Literary Tqtal
1997 $3.3469 $.2153 $ 0 $3.6467 $1.6641 $.4338 $5.1331 $.0998 $.2500 $.9781 $15.7678
1996 3.3573 .2255 0 3.4848 1.6347 .4287 5.1551 .0939 .2500 .4677 15.0977
1995 3.2470 .2308 0 3.5508 1.2249 .4079 2.1387 .0940 .2500 .4595 11.6036
1994 3.0635 .2393 0 3.4297 1.1731 .3897 5.0440 .0865 .2490 .4447 14.1210
1993 3.0871 .2543 .4339 3.3978 1.2383 .3955 5.2311 .0904 .2500 .4283 14.8067
1 Source: Kitsap County Treasurer
2 Assessed valuation is stated as the assessed valuation of all taxable real and personal property in the City.
3 Preliminary, subject to change
4 Not available; to be collected
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF GENERAL FUND
REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ~
(FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31)
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
Revenues:
Taxes $15,498,917 $14,501.567 $14,137,828 $13,340,322 $12,254.300
Licenses & Permits 312,203 298.989 390,454 362,968 367.369
Intergovernmental 742,432 847,272 728,407 778,927 1,199,015
Charges for Services 1,864,848 1,783,646 1,394,815 1,502,067 1,265,887
Fines & Forfeits 433,775 483,964 593,093 556,447 579,071
Miscellaneous 342,700 248.743 240.672 261.198 295.810
Total Revenues 19,194,875 $18,164,181 $17,485,269 $16,801,929 $15,961,452
Expenditures:
General Government $5,313,516 $5,009,311 $4,843,656 $5,039,485 $4,702,330
Security of Persons & Prop. 9,3 ] 3,570 8,6 [ 4,262 8,219,945 7,850,957 7,326,703
Physical Environment 942,764 848,346 587,931 698,08i0 655,845
Transportation 959,327 850,639 840,530 879,838 805,809
Economic Environment 276,689 454,250 514,320 448,824 352,504
Mental & Physical Health 30,818 264,239 250,493 249,239 236,594
Culture & Recreation 1.867,204 1,566,669 1,426,763 1,323,285 1,178,13 l
Redemption of Gen. L.T. 0 0 24,672 30,735 28,393
Debt
Debt Service 85,540 59,860 44,593 18,414 125,479
Capital Outlay 404.888 486.0Q~ 385.414 277.113 228.162
Total Expenditures $19,194,316 $18,153,581 $17,138,317 $16,815,970 $15,639.950
Other Financing Sources
(Uses)
Operating Transfers In $196,671 $6.000 $6.000 $6,000
Operating Transfers Out (357,180) (307,836) (398,376) (236,725)
General Fixed Assets
Disposa! 36,67 ! 2,886 59,640 0
Proceeds & General
L.T. Debt 237.700
Total Other Financing
Sources (Uses) $113,916 $(298,950) $(323.736) $(230,725)
$6,000
(334,764)
,893
0
$326,87
Fund Balance, January 1 $709,671 $1,064,368 $(44,548) $206.399 $217,464
Prior Year's Corrections 0 0 0 0 0
Residual Equity Transfers 6,435 (65,128) 9,717 (6,108) (1,545)
Other Equity Changes 30.554 ( 1,219) 1.084.983 (7)) (4.149)
TOTAL ENDING FUND $860.576 $709,671 $1,064,368 $(44,548) $206.401
BALANCE
CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND
YEAR-END BALANCES~,2
Ending Fund Balance
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
$673,110 $709,040 $704,922 $387,205 $360,523
Source: City of Bremerton Annual Financial Reports. All years have been audited by the Washington State Auditor's Office.
Money in this fund in excess of $650,000 is transferred to the General Fund to finance capital purchases.
12
GENERAL FUND BUDGET
FOR 1997 AND 19981
(Fiscal Year Ending December 31 )
REVENUES
Beginning Fund Balance .......................... ~ ............................. $
Taxes ......................................................................................
Licenses and Permits ..............................................................
Intergovernmental Revenue ...................................................
Charges for Services ...............................................................
Fines and Forfeitures ..............................................................
Miscellaneous and Other ........................................................
Total Revenue ............................................................................ $
1997
458,500
15,778,000
342,625
666,098
1,634,794
430,361
2,964,095
22,274,473
EXPENDITURES
General Government
City Council ........................................................................... $
Executive ................................................................................
Administrative Services2 .......................................................
Police & Fire Pension .....................................................
Intergovernmental Service ..............................................
Misc. Non-Departmental ................................................
Legal Department ...................................................................
Human Resources ...................................................................
Community Development ......................................................
City Auditor ...........................................................................
Public Safety
Police Department ..................................................................
Fire Department .....................................................................
Public Works
General Facilities ...................................................................
Engineering ............................................................................
Transportation ........................................................................
Leisure Services
General Parks .........................................................................
Recreation ...............................................................................
Senior Center ..........................................................................
Pool .........................................................................................
Cemetery Services ..................................................................
Athletics .................................................................................
Tax Anticipation Note Debt Service ......................................
Total Current Expenditures ................................................... $
146,675
204,162
1,915,763
1,315,057
110,986
1,349,771
460,133
222,867
700,189
84,983
5,793,222
3,571,381
454,908
466,986
977,105
1,026,162
198,462
154,625
264,694
69,938
286,404
2.500.000
22,274,473
Source: City of Bremerton.
City Clerk, Treasurer and Information Services are combined under Administrative Services.
13
1998
CITY PROFILE
The City was incorporated in 1901 and operates as Home Rule Charter City with a Mayor
Council form of government. The Council is comprised of nine members, elected by district by
the citizens of the City, each serving a four-year term. The Council Members are part-time
elected officials who exercise the legislative powers of the City and determine matters of policy.
The Mayor, a full-time elected official, is the chief executive officer of the City. The Officers
and department directors are appointed by the mayor with Council approval.
The City provides a full range of municipal services including fire and police protection, parks
and recreation facilities/activities, streets, planning, zoning and general administrative services.
The City operates water, sewer and stormwater utility systems. Currently, there are 322 full-time
employees of the City.
Kev Personnel
Lynn Horton, Mayor: Ms. Horton began her first term as Mayor of the City in 1994. Before her
election as mayor, she served for six years on the Bremerton City Council. She is the past Chair
and current Board Member of the Kitsap Regional Planning Council, and a board member of
Kitsap Transit, Kitsap County Cen-Com and the Bremerton-Kitsap County Health Department.
Ms. Horton is a graduate of the University of Washington and has been a resident of the City
since 1974.
Richard Hanna, City Treasurer: Mr. Hanna has been the Treasurer of the City of Bremerton
since 1986. Before joining the City, he was Treasurer of the City of Centralia, Washington. Mr.
Hanna received his Bachelor's Degree in Accounting from Western Washington University in
1974 and a Masters of Business Administration Degree in Finance from University of Puget
Sound in 1983. Mr. Hanna is a member of the Washington Finance Officers Association,
Washington Municipal Treasurers Association and Puget Sound Finance Officers Association.
Labor Relations
The City has entered into written agreements with each of the bargaining groups set forth below;
agreements contain provisions on such matters as vacations, sick leave, medical and dental
insurance, salaries, working conditions and grievance procedures.
Employees of the City represented by bargaining units are as follows:
Union Membership
Teamsters Local 589 130
Patrolman's Association 53
Police Management Association 5
International Association of 44
Fire Fighters Local 437
Contract Period Expiration Date
3 yr. ~.~7 ~ \
2 yr. 12/31/961
3 yr. 12/31/99
3 yr. 12/31/98
In accordance with State requirements, the City conducts full negotiations with all bargaining
units. The City's management considers its relations with employees to be satisfactory.
Under negotiation
14
SCHEDULE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND DEBT SERVICE FOR THE CITY~
(As of December 31, 1997)
Outstanding
Voted General Obligation Bonds
Non-Voted
General Obligation Bonds
Total
Year Principal Interest Principal Interest All Bonds
1998 . $ 230,000 $ 53,871 $ 428,769 $ 518,715 $1,231,355
1999 220,000 58,561 452,391 496,105 1,227,057
2000 170,000 48,352 480,758 471,815 I, 170,925
2001 185,000 40,805 680,000 445,850 1,351,655
2002 190,000 32,648 720,000 406,057 1,348,705
2003 205,000 23,906 760,000 363,213 1,352,119
2004 135,000 16,308 810,000 317,252 1,278,560
2005 140,000 10,085 855,000 267,563 1,272,648
2006 150,000 3,450 910,000 213,872 1,277,322
2007 0 0 965,000 155,663 1,120,663
2008 0 0 275,000 92,475 367,475
2009 0 0 290,000 75,370 365,370
2010 0 0 315,000 57,195 372,195
20 ! 1 0 0 335,000 37,017 372,017
2012 0 0 275.000 15.537 290.537
Total $1,625,000 $ 424,014 $ 8,551,918 $ 3,933,699 $14,534,631
Does not include the Notes.
15
GENERAL AND ECONOMIC INFORMATION
The City of Bremerton, is located on Puget Sound, approximately 15 miles west of Seattle and
35 miles north of Tacoma. The largest city in Kitsap County (the "County"), Bremerton was
incorporated in 1901 and has an estimated 1997 population of 39,510. Kitsap County, covering
393 square miles of land, also includes the following other incorporated areas: Bainbridge Island
(1997 population 18,920), Port Orchard (1997 population 6,965) and Poulsbo (1997 population
6,175).
Military Presence
The economy of the City is closely tied to the United States Navy. The Puget Sound Naval
Shipyard in Bremerton ("PSNS") is the largest Naval shipyard on the Pacific Coast and is the
only West Coast shipyard capable of working on nuclear ships. With 9,002 civilian employees,
10,219 military personnel, and 12,500 military family members, thc shipyard is also the only
facility capable of decommissioning and recycling nuclear submarines which are being
disassembled in accordance with Strategic Arms Limitations Treaties. The shipyard is the largest
naval employer in the State. The economic impact of PSNS locally is $700 million per year.
The Naval Supply Center is another local military facility in the City, with about 200 employees.
The addition of two admirals to PSNS in 1997 reflects the Navy's commitment to the area.
Puget Sound is now the third largest Navy fleet concentration in the U.S.
Located a few miles north of the City of Bremerton is the Naval Submarine Base at Bangor.
Bangor serves as a home base for Trident Missile submarines, the USS Parche fast attack
submarine and various support commands. The base provides employment to 5,000 civilians,
and 5,500 military personnel. Another 10,000 military family members are connected to the
base. As the only operational base of its kind on the Pacific Coast, Bangor is considered to be
very important to the country by the Department of Defense. Annual local economic impact of
Bangor is $230 million are local residents.
Another military installation located near the City is the Naval Undersea Warfare Engineering
Station at Keyport. The station tests and maintains torpedoes, provides maintenance support for
fire control equipment and mines, and provides other engineering-related services for undersea
warfare. The Undersea Warfare Station employs approximately 1,950 civilian,'150 military and
200 military family members are local residents.
Recent base closures in other geographic regions outside of Washington have had a positive
impact on growth in the City and Kitsap County. PSNS is the new home of the Carrier Group
Three staff with 70 additional personnel and the USS Bridge AOE (10) with an additional 650
personnel.
U.S. Navy Projects in Kitsap County
Recent historical and projected spending for Navy construction and related facilities support
work in Kitsap County provided by the U.S. Navy Engineering Field. Activity Northwest office
as follows:
Kitsap County
Fiscal Year Amount (millions)
1995 $ 200.7
1996 192.3
1997 142.3
1998 127.8
1999 115.8
2000 109.3
Among the larger planned Navy Construction projects over the next five years in Kitsap County
are the following:
Fiscal Project Location Estimated Value Range
Year ($Million)
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Utility Monitor and Control System
Child Development Center
W/S Housing Revitalization Keyport
W/S Housing OlallaJJP
Security Upgrade (SWFPAC)
Naval Hospital Addition
Motor Transfer FACMODS
U&SI (SWFPAC)
RB Magazine Modifications (SWFPAC)
Servmart
QAO Facility
Dredging Piers 3B&3D
Kitchens/Baths, Phase V (Housing)
W/S Revitalization
Community Support Facility
Oily Wastewater Collection
Hazardous Waste Storage
Pier Delta Expansion
Ammunition Wharf (SWFPAC)
Shore Power (TRF)
Waterfront Shops (TRF)
Waterfront Service Supply Bldg.
W/S Revitalization FY75 Phase II
Keyport 0-1
PSNS 1-5
Bangor 1-5
PSNS 5-10
Bangor 1-5
Bremerton 10+
Bangor 0-1
Bangor 1-5
Bangor 1-5
FISC 1-5
PSNS 5-10
PSNS 5-10
Bangor 5-10
Jackson Park 5-10
PSNS 1-5
PSNS 5-10
PSNS 5-10
PSNS 10+
Bangor 0-1
Bangor 1-5
Bangor 1-5
PSNS 1-5
Jackson Park 5-10
Other Major Employers
The Port of Bremerton (the "Port") operates the Bremerton National Airport and the 560-acre
Olympic View Industrial Park, both located approximately 10 miles southwest of the City. The
park includes 22 firms which employ a total of approximately 500 people. The Port has recently
been designated a foreign trade zone, which is expected to enhance international trade locally.
Several companies are undergoing expansion near or adjacent to the Bremerton National Airport,
including an aircraft parts recycling company, and an electro-mechanical products manufacturer,
which would employ up to 65 people within five years.
Bremerton National Airport is the largest airport in the County, with a 6,200-foot runway and
full instrumentation and lighting systems. The airport can handle all general aviation aircraft and
most transport and military planes. Charter passenger and air freight services are available to
SeaTac Airport, the major international airport in the Puget Sound area. The airport is currently
undergoing improvements.
Health care needs are met by several facilities in the Bremerton area including the Naval
Hospital - Bremerton with 380 civilian, 750 military and 2,500 military family members.
Harrison Memorial Hospital in Bremerton has 1,300 employees.: In late 1993, Harrison
Memorial completed a $20.5 million expansion project which doubled the number of operating
rooms; expanded the laboratory and administration areas; and provided additional space for
patient education and an outpatient mental health clinic. A number of nursing homes and
retirement complexes are also located in Bremerton.
Olympic College is a two-year public community college located in Bremerton, with an
enrollment of approximately 4,310 (full-time equivalents) and 600 employees. The college
offers associate of arts degrees in four fields, as well as adult education and non-credit courses,
and began a four-year degree program (called "2-Plus-2") in 1994. The 2-Plus-2 degree program
is associated with the University of Washington, Tacoma branch. The Olympic College campus
will be expanding in the years ahead due to a private donation of 20 acres of land for that
purpose near Poulsbo.
New Developments
Among the projects recently completed or proposed for development in Bremerton are the
following:
· Development of the first phase of a Planned Unit Development, Sinclair Landing, will soon
begin on the downtown waterfront. A combination of public and private uses make up this
38-acre project, including: a transit center, new ferry terminal, expansion of the waterfront
park, expansion of the marina, a new terminal for passenger-only ferry service, parking,
retail use, restaurants, offices, an 80-room inn, a six-plex cinema and multi-family housing,
all connected with pedestrian corridors. The majority of the project is expected to take
three years to complete and will include private investment of over $150 million. The
transportation center will constitute the first element of the project to be constructed. A
new ferry terminal, new dock for two new passenger-only ferries and adjacent transit center
will be constructed with funding from Kitsap Transit Authority and the Washington State
Department of Transportation ("DOT"). Construction is expected to begin by the end of
1997.
· The Port of Bremerton is developing a 128-acre light industrial business complex known as
West Puget Tech Park. The first phase of the project includes the construction of a 30,000
square-foot incubator building on 2.45 acres with infrastructure. Potential employment is
85 to 100 people for this phase. The remainder of the park is intended to be developed over
a 10-year period, on a demand basis.
· A Downtown Revitalization Task Force has been formed in Bremerton as a volunteer
group of downtown business and government representatives and interested citizens. Its
purpose is to improve the appearance of and bring new business and art concerns to the
area. Projects to date include flower barrels, relocation of the Kitsap Historical Museum to
downtown Bremerton, an adopt-a-block program, local concerts and festivals.
· Pope Resources, a timber and land management company based in Poulsbo, and its
subsidiary, Olympic Resource Management, have recently obtained land within the City
that is planned for development as a 61-acre business park and 209 acres for 450 new
homes. Known as West Hills, the Project is expected to be submitted to the City for permit
review soon.
· The Kitsap County Economic Development Council (EDC) has begun a five-year program
to recruit 2,001 new primary jobs in Kitsap County, in a major effort to diversity the local
economy. It is expected that at least 2,400 new secondary jobs will result from this
campaign, and will generate more than $80 million a year to the local economy. Known as
"Business Connection 2001", this campaign is being patterned after other successful
programs undertaken in communities throughout the state. The EDC's program began in
1997 with solicitation of funds needed to attract new businesses.
· Other new developments in the City include the $3 million renovation of the historic
Admiral Theater, a new art gallery, computer game store and restaurant, all in the
downtown area.
· The Doctors Clinic, a regional health care provider, recently relocated its headquarters and
70 of its employees from various sites to an existing downtown office building.
· A permit application has been received by the City for the development of a 34-unit
Alzheimer's care facility on a 2.4-acre site.
· The City is conducting a site plan review of the proposed Auto Center Industrial Park. The
project includes clearing and grading of roadways and building pads for development of a
16.4 acre industrial park.
Following are economic indicators of the City and the County.
City of
Year Bremerton
1997 38,600
1996 38,496
1995 39,610
1994 35,920
1993 36,380
1992 38,990
1991 37,040
1990 38,142
KITSAP COUNTY POPULATION
Other
Incorporated
32 060
31 210
29 915
28 625
28 160
27 405
26 639 2
12913
Kitsap County
Unincorporated
158 740
155 120
151 075
148 655
145 460
139 205
132821
138.676
Kitsap
County
Total
229.400
224.700
220.600
213.200
210.000
205600
196.500
189 731
TAXABLE RETAIL SAI: ES 3
Year Kitsap CounW City of Breme~on
1996 $1,836,198,934 $ 477,467,218
1995 1,768,304,057 451,277,414
1994 1,774,185,000 461,026,409
1993 1,658,975,823 422,329,475
1992 1,551,862,692 409,553,371
1991 1,438,615,382 390,094,567
CiTY OF BREMERTON MAJOR TAXPAYERS4
Taxpayer
Business
Assessed Valuation for
1998 Collection Year
Puget Sound Energy
US West Inc.
HMI, Inc.
Michael Connolley
Viewcrest Villages Limited Partnership
Merit Company
FirLane Terrace Conveniion Center
East Towne Center
Cascade Natural Gas
Bremerton Cascade Associates
Electric Utility $
Telecommunications
Developer
Olympic College Business Svcs.
Apartments
Retail
Convention Center
Community Center
Gas Utility
Apartments
21,832,996
18,316,212
11,039,360
8,036,000
7,828,000
6,729,000
6,504,000
6,231,000
5,918,012
5,775,000
Source: Washington State Office of Financial Management and U.S. Census.
The large increase is due to the annexation of the unincorporated areas of Bainbridge Island to the new City of Bainbridge Island.
Source: Washington State Department of Revenue.
Source: Kitsap County Assessor's Office.
SEATTLE-BREMERTON FERRY TRAFFIC STATISTICS 1
Year Number of Vehicles Number of Passengers
1996 731,926 1,863,596
1995 751,266 1,820,433
1994 719,125 1,719,414
1993 676,031 1,694,234
1992 667,251 1,856,310
1991 659,827 1,806,744
Year
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
KITSAP COUNTY AND WASHINGTON STATE
LABOR FORCE AND AVERAGE ANNUAL UNEMPLOYMENT2,3
ResidentCivilian
Labor Force
93500
89600
88600
89 600
88 500
85 200
Average Annual Total
Unemployment Employment Kitsap County (%) Washington (%)
6,300 87,200 6.7 6.5
6,000 83,600 6.7 6.4
5,300 83,300 6.0 6.4
6,100 83,500 6.8 7.6
5,300 83,200 6.0 7.6
4,200 81,000 4.9 6.4
KITSAP COUNTY AND WASHINGTON STATE
INCOME ESTIMATES4
Kitsap County
Year Personallncome($000) Kitsap County
1995 $ 4,529,000 $ 20,004
1994 4,293,000 19,802
1993 4,108,000 19,272
1992 3,902,000 18,607
1991 3,601,000 17,971
Per Capita Income
Washington
$ 23,709
22,715
22,010
21,333
20,168
PRESERVATION OF TAX EXEMPTION
The City has covenanted, in the Ordinance, to take all actions necessary to prevent interest on the
Notes from being included in gross income for federal income tax purpose, and it will neither
take any action nor make or permit any use of proceeds of the Notes or other funds of the City
treated as proceeds of the Notes at any time during the term of the Notes which will cause
interest on the Notes to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. The City
certifies that it has not been notified of any listing or proposed listing by the Internal Revenue
Service to the effect that it is a Note issuer whose arbitrage certifications may not be relied upon.
Source: Washington State Department of Transportation, Marine Division. Passengers total includes the passenger-only ferries and
vehicle ferries.
Includes nonagricultural wage and salm'y, self-employed, unpaid family workers, domestics, agricultural workers, labor disputants.
Source: Washington State Department of Employment Security.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.
20
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Some or all of the fees of the Underwriter and Bond Counsel are contingent upon the issuance
and sale of the Notes Furthermore, Bond Counsel from time to time serves as counsel to the
Underwriter with respect to issuers other than the City and transactions other than the issuance of
the Notes. None of the council members or other officers of the City have interests in the
issuance of the Bonds that are prohibited by applicable law.
TAX EXEMPTION
Exclusion from Gross Income
In the opinion of Bond Counsel, assuming compliance by the City with applicable requirements
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), including arbitrage
requirements under Section 148 of the Code, interest on the Notes is excluded from gross income
of registered owners for federal income tax purposes under existing federal law and is not an
item of tax preference for purposes of the alternative minimum tax applicable to individuals.
Continuing Requirements
The City is required to comply with certain requirements of the Code after the date of issuance of
the Notes in order to maintain the exclusion of the interest on the Notes from gross income for
federal income tax purposes, including, without limitation, requirements concerning the qualified
use of Note proceeds and the facilities financed or refinanced with Note proceeds, limitations on
investing gross proceeds of the Notes in higher yielding investments in certain circumstances and
the requirement to calculate and rebate to the United States certain investment earnings on gross
proceeds of the Notes in the event that all Note proceeds have not been spent within certain
periods prescribed by the Code. The City has covenanted in the Ordinance to comply with those
requirements, but if the City fails to comply with those requirements, interest on the Notes could
become taxable retroactive to the date of issuance of the Notes. Bond Counsel has not undertaken
and does not undertake to monitor the City's compliance with such requirements.
Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax
While interest on the Notes also is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the alternative
minimum tax applicable to corporations, under Section 55 of the Code, tax-exempt interest,
including interest on the Notes, received by corporations is taken into account in the computation
of adjusted current earnings for purposes of the alternative minimum tax applicable to
corporations (as defined for federal income tax purposes). Under the Code, alternative minimum
taxable income of a corporation will be increased by 75% of the excess of the corporation's
adjusted current earnings (including any tax-exempt interest) over the corporation's alternative
minimum taxable income determined without regard to such increase. A corporation's alternative
minimum taxable income, so computed, that is in excess of an exemption of $40,000, which
exemption will be reduced (but not below zero) by 25% of the amount by which the
corporation's alternative minimum taxable income exceeds $150,000, is then subject to a 20%
minimum tax.
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1997, the corporate alternative minimum tax is
repealed for a small business corporation that had average gross receipts of less than $5 million
for the 3-year period beginning after December 31, 1994, and such a small business corporation
will continue to be exempt from the corporate alternative minimum tax so long as its average
gross receipts do not exceed $7.5 million.
Tax on Certain Passive Investment Income of S Corporations
Under Section 1375 of the Code, certain excess net passive investment income, including interest
on the Notes, received by an S corporation (a corporation treated as a partnership for most
21
federal tax purposes) that has Subchapter C earnings and profits at the close of the taxable year
may be subject to federal income taxation at the highest rate applicable to corporations if more
than 25% of the gross receipts of such S corporation is passive investment income.
Foreign Branch Profits Tax
Interest on the Notes may be subject to the foreign branch profits tax imposed by Section 884 of
the Code when the Notes are owned by, and effectively connected with a trade or business of, a
United States branch of a foreign corporation.
CERTAIN OTHER FEDERAL TAX CONSEQUENCES
Notes are "Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations" for Financial Institutions
Section 265 of the Code provides that 100 percent of any interest expense incurred by banks and
other financial institutions for interest allocable to tax-exempt obligations acquired after
August 7, 1986, will be disallowed as a tax deduction. However, if the tax-exempt obligations
are obligations other than private activity bonds or notes, are issued by a governmental unit that,
together with all entities subordinate to it, does not reasonably anticipate issuing more than
$10,000,000 of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds or notes and other
obligations not required to be included in such calculation) in the current calendar year, and are
designated by the governmental unit as "qualified tax-exempt obligations," only 20 percent of
any interest expense deduction allocable to those obligations will be disallowed.
The City is a governmental unit that, together with all subordinate entities, reasonably anticipates
issuing less than $10,000,000 of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds or
notes and other obligations not required to be included in such calculation) during the current
calendar year, and has designated the Notes as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of
the 80 percent financial institution interest expense deduction. Therefore, only 20 percent of the
interest expense deduction of a financial institution allocable to the Notes will be disallowed for
federal income tax purposes.
Reduction of Loss Reserve Deductions for Property & Casualty Insurance Companies
Under Section 832 of the Code, interest on the Notes received by property and casualty insurance
companies will reduce tax deductions for loss reserves otherwise available to such companies by
an amount equal to 15 percent of tax-exempt interest received during the taxable year.
Effect on Certain Social Security and Retirement Benefits
Section 86 of the Code requires recipients of certain Social Security and certain Railroad
Retirement benefits to take receipt or accruals of interest on the Notes into account in
determining gross income.
Other Possible Federal Tax Consequences
Receipt of interest on the Notes may have other federal tax consequences as to which prospective
purchasers of the Notes may wish to consult their own tax advisors.
ABSENCE OF MATERIAL LITIGATION
There is no litigation of any kind now pending or, to the knowledge of the City, threatened to
restrain or enjoin the issuance or delivery of the Notes or in any manner questioning the
proceedings and authority under which the Notes are issued or affecting the ability of the City to
pay the principal of or the interest on the Notes.
APPROVAL OF BOND COUNSEL
Legal matters incident to the authorization, issuance and sale of Notes by the City are subject to
the approving legal opinion of Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC, Note counsel. A copy of the
opinion of Note counsel will be delivered with the Notes. Note counsel has reviewed this
document only to confirm that the portions of it describing the Notes and the City's authority to
issue them conform to the Notes and the applicable laws under which they are issued.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
Undertaking to Provide Notice of Specified Material Events
To meet the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") Rule 15c2-12 (the "Rule"), to the extent applicable to an issue of
municipal securities with a stated maturity of 18 months or less under paragraph (d) (3) of the
Rule, as applicable to a participating underwriter for the Notes, the City will undertake (the
"Undertaking") for the benefit of holders of the Notes to provide or cause to be provided, either
directly or through a d~signated agent, to each nationally recognized municipal securities
information repository designated by the SEC in accordance with the Rule ("NRMSIR") or to the
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board ("MSRB") and to a state information depository., if any,
established in the State of Washington (the "SID"), timely notice of the occurrence of any of the
following events with respect to the Notes, if material: (i) principal and interest payment
delinquencies; (ii) non-payment related defaults; (iii) unscheduled draws on debt service reserves
reflecting financial difficulties; (iv) unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting
financial difficulties; (v) substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform;
(vi) adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax-exempt status of the Notes; (vii)
modifications to rights of holders of the Notes; (viii) Note calls (other than scheduled mandatory
redemption of Term Notes); (ix) defeasances; (x) release, substitution, or sale of property
securing repayment of the Notes; and (xi) rating changes.
Amendment of Undertaking
The Undertaking is subject to amendment after the primary offering of the Notes without the
consent of any holder of any Note, or of any broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer,
participating underwriter, rating agency, NRMSIR, the SID or the MSRB, under the
circumstances and in the manner permitted by the Rule.
The City will give notice to each NRMSIR or the MSRB and the SID, of the substance (or
provide a copy) of any amendment to the Undertaking and a brief statement of the reasons for the
amendment. If the amendment changes the type of annual financial information to be provided,
the notice also will include a narrative explanation of the effect of that change in the type of
information to be provided.
Termination of Undertaking.
The City's obligations under the Undertaking shall terminate upon the legal defeasance of all of
the Notes. In addition, the City's obligations under the Undertaking shall terminate if those
provisions of the Rule which require the City to comply with the Undertaking become legally
inapplicable in respect of the Notes for any reason, as confirmed by an opinion of nationally
recognized Note counsel or other counsel familiar with federal securities laws delivered to the
City, and the City provides timely notice of such termination to each NRMSIR or the MSRB and
the SID.
Remedy for Failure to Comply with Undertaking.
If the City or any other obligated person fails to comply with the Undertaking, the City will
proceed with due diligence to cause such noncompliance to be corrected as soon as practicable
after the City learns of that failure. No failure by the City or other obligated person to comply
with the Undertaking will constitute a default in respect of the Notes. The sole remedy of any
holder of a Note will be to take such actions as that holder deems necessary, including seeking an
order of specific performance from an appropriate court, to compel the City or other obligated
person to comply with the Undertaking.
Prior Compliance with Continuing Disclosure Undertakings.
The City is in compliance with prior written undertakings under the Rule with respect to its
obligations.
UNDERWRITING
The Underwriter has agreed, subject to certain conditions, to purchase all of the Notes, if any are
purchased, at a price of % of the par value of the Notes, plus accrued interest from the dated
date to the settlement date. The Notes will be reoffered at an average price of ~% of the par
value of the Notes, resulting in a underwriting spread of__%. After the initial public offering,
the public offering prices may be varied from time to time.
CONCLUDING STATEMENT
All estimates, assumptions, statistical information and other statements contained herein, while
taken from sources considered reliable, are not guaranteed by the City or the Underwriter. So far
as any statement herein includes matters of opinion, or estimates of future expenses and income,
whether or not expressly so stated, they are intended merely as such and not as representations of
fact.
The information contained herein should not be construed as representing all conditions affecting
the City or the Notes. Additional information may be obtained directly from the City or the
Underwriter.
The foregoing statements relating to the Ordinance and other documents are in all respects
subject to and qualified in their entirety by provisions of such documents.
This Official Statement, starting with the cover page and all subsequent pages, including the
appendices, comprise the entire Official Statement, which has been approved by the City. The
City has represented to the Underwriter that the portions of this Official Statement directly
pertaining to the City neither contain any misrepresentation of material fact nor omit any material
fact necessary to understand the financial, economic or legal nature of the City or any
information presented herein.
APPENDIX A
FORM OF LEGAL OPINION
CITY OF BREMERTON
1998, CASH FLOW PROJECTION
Thousands
2OOO
1500
1000
5OO
0
-500
-1000
-1500
DEC
JAN
FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC