Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/14/98 AGENDABREMERTON ClT'Y COUNCIL 239 4TH STREET BREMERTON, WA 98337 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 14, 1998 5. 6. 7. 8. CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M. A. General Council Business B. Study Session 5:05 - 5:25 P.M., - Update On Design Changes Of Transit Facility And Process From This Point Forward CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. A. Pledge Of Allegiance B. Invocation CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been distributed to Council members in advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If separate discussion is desired on an item, it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at the request of a Council member. A. Minutes - December 30, 1997 #AB98-003 CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT PUBLIC RECOGNITION - (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes) NEW BUSINESS A. Amendment Three To Professional Services Agreement With Failure Analysis Inc. #AB98-004 ,~ AGENDABILL -BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL !. SUBJECT':- MINUTES - DECEMBER 30, 1997 FOR AGENDA OF: 1-14-98 ORIGINATING DEPT: C'ity Council ORIGINATOR: David Fart, President DATE SUBMITTED: (connnent on back if necessary)  E: MINUTES WILL BE DISTRIBUTED UNDER S COVER. ENDORSEMENT INFORM_AT I ON MAYOR APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTkL: COUNCIL PRESIDENT 4. $I/M24ARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR CO[~C!L ACTION: 8. RECOMMENDATION: 9..RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORC~M~ENT OFFICLA/5: .EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: PULLED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED .DISAP.~ROVED AMENDED 11. AGENDA BITJ. NO: qf-oo3 TAPE #1514 UNAPPROVED DRAFT CITY COUClL MEETING MINUTES DECEMBER 30, 1997 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4m Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday December 30 1997, at 5:30 P.M., with Council President David Fart presiding. Council members present were Carlos Montgomery, Sherril Huff- Menees, Richard Neville, Lon Overson, John Law, Cecil McConnell, and Al Colvin. Also present were Assistant City Attorney Glenna Malanca and Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council President Fart and invocation given by Councilman Al Colvin. President Farr made the following announcements: 1. Council held a Study Session prior to the Council meeting to discuss general Council business; Council will hold a Study Session Monday, January 5, 1998, from 5:30 to 7:30 P.M. to discuss 1) Economic Development Plan/City of Tacoma Presentation; 2) Discussion on Development of Fund 104 (Hotel/Motel Tax) Contracts; and 3) an Executive Session to discuss "Contract Negotiations"; and 3. Item 8B has been pulled from the Agenda tonight. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of Meeting - December 17, 1997 #AB97-273 #0030 M/S/C/U (McConnell/Montgomery) Motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. CLAIMS/CH ECK REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the Council. #0050 MISICIU (Colvin/Montgomery) On December 30, 1997, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: Retiree Payroll in the amount of $98,533.74; and 215609 through 215723 in the amount of $215,493.24. TAPE #1514 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes December 30, 1997 Page 3 of 15 contribution to replace the Scotch broom at the northern end of the Warren Avenue Bridge. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Lynn Horton also thanked the outgoing Council members, and relayed a story about one of her first experiences, which conveyed how difficult this job can be. There will be issues where even after you do your best to make the best possible decision you can, with the information you are given, there still may be those who will feel you made the wrong decision. She knows that it is not an easy position, but she thanked Sherril, Richard, and Al for making her tenure much more pleasant, and her time on the City Council and as Mayor very special. She hopes the new Council members are as successful in their endeavors as these three have been. She wished everyone a happy New Year. PUBLIC RECOGNITION David Boynton, Bremerton resident and Vice-President of Bremerton Main Street, stated that last week Carol Atkinson, Executive Director of Bremerton Main Street presented Al Colvin with a plaque to show their appreciation for his support. Tonight, he presented a plaque to Bob Winters in recognition of the support that he has also shown through the years. He wished the outgoing Councilmen good luck and best wishes, and welcomed the new members. Bob Winters thanked Mr. Boynton for the plaque, and also took this time to thank lan Sievers, City Attorney; and Mrs. Merilynn Erhart, City ,Council Legislative Assistant, for all of the help they provided to him during his years on the Council. Susan Brown, Bremerton resident, stated her opinion that the formal complaint she filed with the City Council involving two Council members was not addressed in the manner prescribed in the Bremerton Municipal Code. She feels strongly that changes need to be made to the City's Ethics Ordinance. Patricia Mathes, member of Westsound Cable Access, announced Bremerton has two community access centers. Westsound Cable Access is currently located on Pacific Avenue and open for business as a non-profit organization. 8A - GRANTS WRITER CONTRACT -JEFFRY YOUNG, #AB97-274 The attached Professional Services Agreement with Jeffry Young for grants writing services is for a pedod of one year at the rate of $1,250 per month. Kathleen McCluskey, Director of Administrative Services, explained Mr. Young would be replacing the City's previous Grants Writer, who left to take another position. Mr. Young has already stated work and has met with the Utilities representatives in order meet several grant deadlines in January. Public comment - none TAPE #1514 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes December 30, 1997 Page 5 of 15 know if any alternative had been presented to the City Council regarding pass through monies and the amount of funding needed, and what knowledgeable professionals were incorporated into the decision making process. He referenced the Agenda Bill, Section 5 - Impact on Non-Passage, which stated "The City will lack adequate funding to provide public access services.' His response to that statement was that it was not true and other alternatives were available. Mrs. McCluskey stated in response to the questions posed by Mr. Parr and Mr. Seick, the $55,000 was agreed to in the City's Franchise Agreement with TCI, which as approved by the City Council in October 1997. The City was fortunate that TCI was willing to front the money so that the City's equipment could be replaced. Council will soon be seeing the new equipment that will be acquired through a bid cell. The City also conducted the bid call for the County for their equipment in the Commissioner's Chambers. Regarding negotiations with Kitsap County, there have not been any negotiations and she was not aware of staff meeting with the County Commissioners. The County did hold a public meeting/work session a week ago, which Mrs. McCluskey attended. At that meeting, they set an appointment to for her to meet with Commissioner Endresen only to discuss the contract. The County will hold two or three public meetings in in January to discuss this issue. The City allocated funds in the 1997 budget for public access, which is being used to fund Bremerton Kitsap Community Access as well as the non-pass though funding coming from TCI. VVhen the backdated County funds are received, they will be used to cover costs that were not previously covered with the current staffing and no capital purchases or expansion of the program. She was not sure what was meant by other alternatives being considered. The City Council was presented with the program and contracts that the Administration believes the City should follow. At this point, no alternatives are being suggested and the recommendation is to enter into a one-year contract (17-months), but one-year forward and to decide after that point the future direction for public access. In reference to the statement that Kitsap County would be unable to provide public access services, they may not be unable, but it would take more funding than currently available. All of the equipment, except what was purchased earlier in the year by the County, belong to the City of Bremerton's public access and the studio at TCI is part of City of Bremerton public access, which was part of the negotiated contract, not part of the County. The intent of the contract is to merge what is owned by the City and the County, i.e. having one director, sharing equipment, etc. She believed it would be difficult, if not impossible, for the County to adequately provide public access without the use of a studio, channel and all of the equipment. The question as to the points of contact at the City and County, Ms. McCluskey is the City's representative, Bruce Stier of Bremerton Kitsap Access Television and Bill Parren and William Nogle for Kitsap County. These individuals were involved in putting together the County and City contract proposal. TAPE #1514 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes December 30, 1997 Page 7 of 15 #1452 MISICIU(Huff-MeneeslMontgomery) Motion to approve funding agreement with Kitsap County for BKAT services. 9A- RESOLUTION #2641 RE-AUTHORIZING AN INTERFUND LOAN FROM THEWATER FUND TO THE WASTEWATER FUND~ #AB97-27R By Resolution No. 2574, the City Council authorized an interfund loan from the Water Fund to the Wastewater Fund. The size of the current loan was limited to $3 million and the term was limited to the end of the current year. It is requested that the term of the loan be extended to December 31, 1998 and that the size of the loan be increased to $4.5 million. Gene Sampley, Director of Public Works and Utilities, stated this resolution was previously authorized to accommodate some cash flow issues within the Wastewater Fund. It was originally projected that those cash flow issues would be resolved in 1997 and thus the initial resolution was to be terminated December 31, 1997. However, significant events, i.e. (1) negotiations with the U.S. Navy on new rates did not produce the cash that would help off-set some of the monies, but the City anticipates receiving those funds in the near future. (2) Surplus of property, which is an issue on Council's Agenda for this meeting, was projected to have occurred prior to the end of 1997. Public comment - none. Mr. Overson expressed concern that this issue had gone on for some time and he had reservations about financing through interfund loans. Mr. Sample¥ stated he agreed particularly on a long-term basis; however, he felt it was appropriate on a short-term situation. On things that makes this saleable is a recent Iow interest loan through the State Revolving Fund for Construction of a $4.5 million improvement to the City's water system in 1997. Because the fund will be repaid in 1998, he did not see the necessity to consider Bond financing or any other type of institutional financing when money is available internally. He views it as good business move. Mr. Overson pointed out generally interfund loans are a sign of a problem; however, it appears there is a solution within 1998. President Farr questioned of the $4.5 million approximately what percentage will be resolved when the Navy money is received and sale of the properties? Mr. Sampley stated the incremental amount of $1.5 million will be accommodated by receipt of the Navy's payment and $3 million will be offset by the sale of properties. President Farr pointed out the Resolution did include provision for interest at 5%. Mr. Sampley explained it was necessary to conduct this transaction in a businesslike manner and the Water Fund will receive market interest as though it was invested in any other type of investment. #1660 MISICIU (Montgomery/Huff-Menees) Motion to adopt Resolution #2641, authorizing an interfund loan from the Water Fund to the Wastewater Fund. TAPE #1514 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes December 30, 1997 Page 9 of 15 those in the audience, who were opposed to the proposed amendments, if they wished to have Mr. Reed speak for them and their position. Mr. Reed was granted the 15-minute time allotment. Mr. Reed stated the question that cries out mostly to him is why an amendment to the Shoreline Master Plan (SMP)? The existing document, under Section 11, clearly states that piers and floating docks shall be prohibited where navigation may be impaired significantly at entrances to bays, channels and covers. Of the 61 plus homes on the channel, possibly 16 homes at those entrances would be restricted from building such structures. The difference between 4-8 homes is where the boats travel in reference to the property. Section 11 - LOCATION states: "Piers and Docks shall project the minimum distance necessary to service the vessel and shall not create a hazard to navigation." He does not support banning all docks in the channel because some docks may propose a hazard to navigation, which has never been proven by the City. He pointed out no one has conducted a study to prove where boats travel, how they travel and what would be considered a hazard to navigation. The Army Corps of Engineers have studied two locations and have yet to release their findings because the permits are tied up in appeals. In regard to comments about public trust violation, as per conversation with the Shorelines Hearings Board, there have never been a perfected legal suit against the State for violating the public trust by granting a recreational dock. Reference has been made to the case of Wilber vs. Gallagher where there was a violation of public trust, which took place in Lake Chelan where an area at the end of the lake was filled in with dirt. He emphasized a 4-foot wide dock would not be a violation of the public trust and the State has the right to grant the approval as does the City and Department of Ecology and Army Corps of Engineers. If you apply that violation to public trust to a simple recreational dock, you must apply it to the City's waterfront boardwalk, the marina and the 200 marine slips in Port Orchard and new ferry terminal. He referenced a remark made by Councilman Neville about how the docks would be allowed to go to 5 feet deep at minus 2 tide and pointed out how inaccurate the City has provided information to the Council members. Mean Iow water is approximately half tide. Mr. Reed went into detail about tide calculations and the affect it would have within the subject area. He also pointed out the SMA encourages joint use docks over single use and his proposed dock was for four houses, which in affect would significantly reduce the number of potential docks. He acknowledged there is a speed problem created by boats using the channel even though a speed limit already exists in Kitsap County. He questioned why take away his property rights because the City refuses to even post the speed limit. He suggested speed limits be posted and installing a no-wake buoy at each end of the channel thereby reducing 99% of the speed problem. In regard to the reference to the Noah map, they are aerial photos and there never has been a site inspection or physically measured the channel. He emphasized if the amendments are approved they must meet the intent of the SMA of 1971. The subject area is not a critical area, but it is one of the most heavily developed piece of waterfront that includes sewage pump stations every quarter mile that consistently spill sewage TAPE #151s City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes December 30, 1997 Page 11 of 15 Attorney, stated it was probably inappropriate to use the term "property* in a total sense of all property rights either belong to the public or private upland owner. Property is seen in modern days as a bundle of property dghts. What the public has is a set of property right uses that ebb and flow with the water both recreational and navigationa~ uses and the public's right goes with the water. Mr. McConnell referenced Mr. Reed's comment that sewage was spilling into Oyster Bay, he believed it was common knowledge that tidal movement has a tendency to "cleanse' and area. It appears to him that pilings driven into the bottom of the channel would restrict that cleansing process and possibly cause a more adverse condition than currently exists. There are many instances where the public's right will override the rights of a private individual. He referenced a letter from the Suquamish Tribe, Fisheries Department, that says the Oyster Bay channel is within the usual and custom fishing area of the Suquamish Tdbe and they support the Planning Commission's resolution to prohibit piers and docks because it would be an adverse impact on resources. Further, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife studied the area and discovered marine life that needs to be protected. They are also concerned above adverse impacts on other species of fish that would conflict with the installation of piers. He wished that a compromise could be reached, however, the only compromise he could envision was installing boat rails that would allow property owners to launch boats directly into the bay. President Fart thanked the individuals on both sides of this issue for the professional manner they displayed when speaking on this issue. He was hopeful that the professionalism they displayed during this discussion will carryover into their neighborhoods. He will continue to vote no on this issue and he was fairly sure there would be a good potential that the decision may be overturned later in the process. Mr. McConnell talked about compromise and he too feels there is some ability to compromise without prohibiting things. Mr. Overson stated Council decision to approve the amendments would not prohibit everything, only those things that are inappropriate as presented by the majority of the citizens living on that channel. There are still opportunities for people to enjoy the channel and use it from a recreational standpoint with or without boats. Mr. Law asked for the status on the appeal period that closed on December 26, 1997. Mr. Siever$ stated the DNS that was issued with a 14-day comment period was not withdrawn or amended in any way so it became final on December 26, and the Council is free to take action on this non-project item. The one appeal that was discussed about specific appeal to that DNS would be heard about January 21, 1998, because a notice period is needed on the appeal itself. Mr. Law asked if that appeal was by a proponent or opponent? Mr. $ievers stated he assumed an opponent of the DNS thinks there should be more complete discussion and possibly an ElS produced on this non-project action. TAPE #151 '~ City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes December 30, 1997 Page 13 of 15 lan Sievers, City Attorney, explained this vacation came as a request of a property owner, who was having some difficulty maintaining one of the alleys subject to this ordinance. This action will clarify ownership and the property owners abutting these particular rights-of-ways already actually own the property and it is simply a matter of cleadng title so that the owners can put the property to a higher and better use and the City escapes any liability or maintenance and it returns them to the tax rolls. Mr. McConnell asked if the subject areas were currently streets or undeveloped rights-of-way? Mr. $ieYers stated they have never been developed since being platted, which occurred at the turn of the century. Mr. McConnell questioned whether or not the City would ever want to connect Hartford Avenue straight through as street? Mr. Sievers stated the difficulty with that is even though the City may want to acquire it for right-of-way or drculation, it would have to actually go through a Condemnation as if the platting did not exist because there was an automatic reversion on these very old plats after 5-years of platting, if they were not developed, it is shown on the Auditor's Map, but not on the tax roll; however, it is actually not the City's property to use as right-of-way. President Fart referenced the portion on the map in the Agenda packet that was off the bottom of the page where Lafayette Street parallels Summit Avenue and questioned whether or not access could be made to a couple of lots on Summit Avenue allowing them to be buildable with that access. Mr. Sievers stated none of Lafayette Street was crosshatched on the map, which means it is not subject to the vacation, but there are some alleys entering onto Lafayette that are included in the vacation. #0166 M/S/C/U (Huff-Menees/Montgomery) Motion to approve ordinance, on first reading, vacating portions of Porter Street, Hartford Avenue, Farragut Street and alleys within Blocks 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14 and 15, all within the Plat of Port Orchard. 11B - ORDINANCE (FIRST READING} VACATING D, E, F, G, AND H STREETS WEST OF SR3, AND BAYVIEW BE'I'VVEEN C AND E STREETS~ #AB97-280 The ordinance vacates D, E, F, G, and H Streets west of SR 3 and Bayview Avenue between C and E Streets. The City is owner of all property abutting these rights-of-way. lan Sievers, City Attorney, stated as Council is aware the City had a condemnation program in the subject area and the City now has acquired all properties that abut these streets subject to vacation in the proposed ordinance. The City's future use and the zoning do not contemplate the need for these residential access streets in the future; therefore, they are not needed for future traffic circulation. Utility easements are reserved in the ordinance. TAPE #1516 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes December 30, 1997 Page 15 of 15 Mr. Overson pointed out this discussion should answer Mr. Yearger's early question. Mr. McConnell asked if the 90% of appraised value would cover all the costs associated with the City's acquisition of the subject properties? Mr. Sampley stated that would not be known until the appraisals are made; however, it was his suspicion that it would not. It was anticipated that there would be a certain investment from the Utility for an equivalency of an insurance premium against odor litigation and the original analysis had an approximate $500,000 value. The cost that the City did incur would be covered through the sale of the property and possible tax incremental financing back to the Utility based on the proposals submitted. #0485 MISICIU (Montgomery/Colvin) Motion to declaring the property described in Exhibit "A" as surplus, directing the Mayor to have prepared appraisal, and Request for Proposals for sale by sealed proposals to that bidder best meeting the above criteria of sale and offering not less than 90% of appraised value. With no further business meeting adjourned at 7:54 P.M. PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk DAVID FARR, City Council President City of Bremerton P J/DF/me C: Normal Distribution FileNault 1. SUBJECT: Amendment Three to Professional Services Agreement with Failure Analysis Inc. AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL FOR AGENDA OF: ORIGINATING DEPT: ORIGINATOR: DATE SUBMITYED: JanuaryS, 1998 Public Works & Utilities /~4~/ W. Eugene Sampley, P.E. December 5, 1997 Director PW&U ,~ ~ · Proposed Amendment No. 3 City Attorney ~~'~-~,-~.~_~ * City Treasurer ~ * Dir, Admin Services Dir, Parks & Rec Operations Committee Fiscal & Budget Comm. ENDORSEMENT x INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: Amendment No.3 in the amount of $47,312.00 is required based on the Change Proposal attached to the Proposed Amendment shown above as an Exhibit and will complete Failure Analysis, Inc.'s involvement in Phase II of the Evergreen Park Remediation Project. The changes include additional support services for Phase I Park Improvements and additional testing mandated by Department of Ecology. This Amendment will bring the total amount of the Professional Services Agreement to $319,959.00 and extends the Professional Services Agreement through December 31, 1998. 8. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Failure Analysis, Inc. and authorize the Mayor to sign. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: Director of Public Works/Util 12/31/98 Continuous PUIJ,ED TABLED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED DATE: 11. AGENDA BILL NO: 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: -- - 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Failure Analysis, Inc., will not be able to complete their participation in the project with out this Amendment and the project will not be completed as planned. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS, FACILmES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: None - Amount of contract is not increased. ,~ 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: {'\970122 1.ab} -- AMENDMENT NO. 3 __ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT REMEDIATION WORK - EVERGREEN PARK The City of Bremerton Washington (the "CITY"), and Failure Analysis Associates, Inc. ("FaAA") have entered into a PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, hereinafter referred to as "AGREEMENT," for a project wherein FaAA agrees to provide technical assistance to the City in the remediation of properties associated with the expansion of Evergreen Park, as set forth in the phases identified in Exhibit A of the basic Agreement. This AMENDMENT NO. 3 incorporates the conditions of Proposed Change Number 3 to the Professional Services Agreement dated October 3, 1997 and brings the total amount of the Professional Agreement from $272,647.00 (per Amendment No. 1) to a new amount of $319,959.00. This AMENDMENT NO. 3 also extends the Professional Service Agreement from an expiration date of December 31, 1997 to December 31, 1998. Except as herein modified, the provisions of the basic Agreement and Amendments Numbers 1 & 2 entered into and agreed upon on November 20, 1995, March 27, 1996 and March 6, 1997 respectively, shah remain in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AMENDMENT NO. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement the date and year indicated. FAIl JURE ANALYSIS ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineering and Scientific Services 149 Commonwealth Drive P.O. Box 3015 Menlo Park, CA 94025 DATE: By: Michael R. Gaulke, President CITY OF BREMERTON DATE: DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL By: Lynn S. Horton, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM W. Eugene Sampley, P.E. Director of Public Works & Utilities lan R. Sievers, City Attorney RECEIVED FOR FILING Kathleen L. McCluskey, City Clerk Change Proposal Number 3 to the Professional Services Agreement Remediation Work - Evergreen Park Presented to The City of Bremerton, Washington by Failure Analysis Associates, Inc. 149 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025 tel. (415) 688-7312 October 3, 1997 Roger Home, RADM (r t.) Principal Engineer PROJECT CHANGE PROPOSAL Change Proposal, 10/03/97 Page 1 Failure Analysis Associates, Inc. (FaAA) is pleased to present the following change proposal regarding the remediation work associated with the extension of Evergreen Park, located in Bremerton, Washington. Section 1. Park Closure Additional Scope The City of Bremerton (Bremerton) asked FaAA to provide additional support related to the closure (from an environmental perspective) of a portion of the existing park for the purposes of building a sea wall. Budget The budget established for this work is $29,823 Section 2. Remedial Investigation - Additional Field Work and Reporting Additional Scope Between the time the work plan was developed and the initiation of the site investigation field work, the state agency published a new interim guidance document on how to determine cleanup goals. This guidance directly affected the Evergreen Park project. The guidance relies on the use of new analytical methods. Because the guidance was an interim document, FaAA recommends that the work be performed in accordance with the new guidance in order to provide strategic flexibility. This approach involves additional field sampling time, analytical costs, and reporting time. Budget The budget for the additional remediation work is $12,490. Section 3. Site Analysis Additional Scope Compilation of historical data for the properties that surround Smith's Cove. Budget The budget for the additional site analysis work is $5,000 Change Proposal, 10/03/97 Page 2 Budget Summary Phase New Phase Phase 1 Phase V Total Task Park Closure Site Analysis RI (Field work & Current FaAASubcontract Budget Cost Cost $0 $5,964 $23,858 $31,450 $1,000 $4,000 $131,286 $2,498 $9,992 Amendment Total $ 29,822 $5,000 $12,490 $ 47,312 Revised Budget $29,822 $36,450 $143,776