HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/13/03 AGENDA FILE
239 4th Street · Bremerton, WA 98337 · Phone (360) 478-5280 · Fax (360) 478-5251
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
AUGUST 13, 2003
1. PRE-COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M. in Council Conference Room
A. General Council Business
2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. in Council Chambers
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation
3. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes of Meeting -July 23, 2003 (#AB03-~2) ~0'~
B. Bid Award to LORI LEITE/WOMEN'S WORK CONSTRUCTION for Renovation of
Restroom at Sheridan Park Community Center (#AB03-143)
C, Bid Award to WHITNEY EQUIPMENT, INC. for two new chopper pumps for
Pump Station EB-3 (#AB03-144)
D. Supplemental Agreement No. 2 with CAMP DRESSER MCKEE for Comprehensive
Sewer Plan Update & Facility Plan and Design of the Westside CSO
Treatment Facility (#AB03-145)
E. Professional Services Agreement with BERGEPJABAM for Civil Engineer Services
for the Fire Station Headquarters and Police & Court Facility (#AB03-146)
4. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
5. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
6. MAYOR'S REPORT
7. PUBLIC RECOGNITION - Comments limited to 3-minutes
8. NEW BUSINESS
Establishment of Finance Officer position within the Finance Department (#AB03-148)
Professional Services Agreement with EXELTECH CONSULTING, INC. for Design of
Downtown Pedestdan/BTC Access Improvements (#AB03-149)
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE...
E-rnail: citycouncil@ci.bremerton.wa.us · Web: www. ci.bremerton.wo.us
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS - ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. ' ' '
thro,..~ *,~?rate Or_Ld~nance (#AB~_.~..,;3=-%~) fOS'f~~r'
B. Ordinance No. 4863 [Second Reading] approving Amendments to Ordinance
No. 4839 relating to the Ci~ of Breme~on Fiscal Year 2003 Budget (¢AB03-141)
C. Ordinance [First Reading] amending Title 10 of the Bremedon Municipal Code relating
restricted Parking Zones (¢AB03-150)
D. Resolution No. 2899, authorizing an Intedund Loan from the Equipment Rental Rese~e
Fund to ULID No. 2002-01 Fund (¢AB03-151)
E. ~se~ud~c~',]. H~,i,,9; ~,,d v, upu~d ~soluuon NO., ~Z~00~ ap~._.
Sotid Seven Construction application fCnew ~'-'. ,-, u'~,,~ ...... ,.~. P~¢-~17) ,~.
)
inier V BO3-1R? o
10. ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
DATE SUBMITTED: June 25, 2003 BILL # ~).g
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON ~~
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Minutes of Meeting- Committee Meeting Date: N/A
July 23, 2003 COUNCIL MEET1NG Date: ~o.~3 o.$'[" 13~
Depaament: Cit~Council -
Presenter: C~ol Mends
Phone: (360) 478-5280
SUMMARY: Attached ~e ~e minutes for the Council Meeting held July 23, 2003.
ATTACHMENTS: Minutes for July 23, 2003
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): 0
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
FISCAL/BUDGET: CONSENT AGENDA []
OPERATIONS:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT: ~."/~c.c..v_(77.d'~' c~/~'._-,.e,¢..~.~,. .... ~ /'
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass the Consent Agenda as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table / [] Continue [] No Action
TAPES #1901 & #1902
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
July 23, 2003
The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City
Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 5:30
P.M., with Council President Carol Arends presiding. Council members present were Mike Short,
Will Maupin, Eric Younger, Mike Shepherd, Daren Nygren, Cecil McConnell, and Wayne Olsen.
Council member Ed Rollman was absent. Aisc present were City Attorney Roger Lubovich;
Assistant City Attorney Simon Stoker; Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston; and Legislative Assistant
Lori Smith.
The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councit Member Cecil McConnell,
followed by the invocation provided by Pastor Roger Hennigan of Apostolic Life Tabernacle
Church.
President Arends made the following announcements:
1. A Pre-Council session was held in the Council Conference Room to discuss updates to the
meeting agenda;
2. An Executive Session will be held at the conclusion of regular business tonight to discuss
"POTENTIAL LITIGATION" per R.C.W. Chapter 42.30.110(1)0); and
3. A Study Session will be held Thursday, July 24, beginning at 5:15 P.M. in the Council
Conference Room to discuss "2003 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS",
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes of Meeting - June 25, 2003 (#AB03-129)
#0025 M/SIC (McConnell/Olsen) Move to approve Consent Agenda as presented.
Voted in favor of Motion: Olsen, McConnell, Nygren, Shepherd, Maupin, Short, and Arends
Abstained: Younger
Motion carried: 7-Yes; l-Abstention
CLAIMS & CHECK REGISTERS
Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those
expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090 have been recorded on a
listing that had been made available to the Council.
#0050 MISIClU (Younger/McConnell) On July 23, 2003, the Council approved payment for Check
Numbers 282743 through 282852 in the total amount of $1,972,759.36; and Regular Payroll for
the pay period ending July 15, 2003 in the amount of $974,138.4.
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Wayne Olsen reminded the public about the District 1 & 2 Town Meeting planned for Thursday,
August 21 to discuss the Bremerton Pedestrian Access Tunnel.
Damn Nv~lren wished Ed Rollman a speedy recovery.
Mike Shepherd was happy to be back from a recent vacation; invited citizens to attend the 5th
Annual District 5 neighborhood picnic this Saturday, July 26, from 12:00 noon to approx. 2:00 P.M.
at Evergreen Rotary Park; and discussed upcoming events sponsored by the Poggie Club.
Eric Younger discussed the denial of an appeal by the Hearing Examiner regarding a land use
issue filed on behalf of several citizens in District 6.
TAPES # 1901 & #1902
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
July 23, 2003
Page 2 of 5
Will Maupin discussed his attendance at the Marine Transportation Association of Kitsap
(formerly Sinclair Landing Association) meeting to discuss marine transportation issues.
Mike Short announced the Bremerton Channelman Club's 17th annual Fun Run beginning at 1:00
P.M. this Friday and continuing Saturday
Carol Arends also wished Ed Rollman a speedy recovery and belated "happy birthday", and
discussed visits to several World Changer project sites.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Council President Arends read a proclamation on behalf of the Mayor, declaring the Week of
July 19-26, 2003 as "World Changers Week", which was accepted by Bob Tulp, City of
Bremerton Public Works Operations Manager.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
Allen Shute expressed his concern that the U.S. Post Office on National is not ADA compliant.
Carol Atkineon of Bremerton Main Street Association invited the public to attend the next
"Concert above the BoardwalN' this week from 6:00 to 8:00 P.M. on Friday night.
Gordy Byrd provided an update on his goal to collect toothbrushes.
Don Larson was concerned about all the dead grass in and around the City.
Jonathan Wood expressed his concern that the City is not considering alternatives to the
proposed tunnel, which he does not support, and asked that if a study is done, it should be made
available to the public prior to August 21. Gene Sampley, Director of Public Works & Utilities,
indicated that a study of alternatives should be completed in a couple weeks, and noted that the
City is required to participate in a full public process. Mr. McConnell noted that this issue is
scheduled for discussion at the next District 1 & 2 Town Meeting on August 21.
Roy Runyon also expressed his concern regarding the proposed tunnel.
Scott Buckingham appreciated the concept for the need of the tunnel, but did not agree that it
would be the best alternative to solve the problems with traffic from the ferries.
Pamela Kruse-Buckin~:lham expressed her concern that any construction for a proposed tunnel
might damage cultural collections in local art galleries and museums.
8A - BUDGET ADJUSTMENT NO. 2003-01; AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH ECONOMIC & ENGINEERING SERVlCES~ INC. FOR COMPREHENSIVE WATER~
SEWER~ AND STORMWATER RATE STUDY (#AB03-'132): Gene Sampley, Public Works &
Utilities Director, emphasized that the City's Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Utility rates have not
been comprehensively analyzed since 1994 and are in need of review. ECONOMIC & ENGINEERING
SERVICES, INC. (EES) has been selected to perform this review, and the attached Professional
Services Agreement (PSA) has been negotiated. This review will include the Water Utility's use of
timber resources and the methodology and rates for the U.S. Navy facilities. A budget adjustment
for the amount of this work is required. It is recommended that the attached Budget Adjustment
and PSA be approved for EES to perform the required study in an amount no-to-exceed $104,400.
TAPES # 1901 ݮ
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
July 23, 2003
Page 3 of 5
Mike Wilson, Finance Director, provided additional input, also noting that the City of Bremerton
has one of the lowest water rates in the state.
There were no comments from the public.
Several Council members expressed their reluctance in paying a consultant $104,400 for this
study, however, agreed that the information that would be obtained from the study would be vital in
making informed decisions about future rates, and ways to limit dependence on revenue from
timber sales from watershed forests.
#1705 M/S/C/U (Maupin/Short) Move to approve Budget Adjustment No. 2003-01.
#1725 M/S/C/U (Maupin/McConnell) Move to approve the attached Professional Services
Agreement with ECONOMIC & ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. in an amount not-to-exceed $104,400,
and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the same.
8B - APPROVAL OF 2004 CDBGIHOME POLICY PLAN AND APPLICATION PACKET (#AB03o
133): Marylyn Waibel, CDBG Program Coordinator, summarized that several meetings have
been held to discuss this issue. The recommendations from the City Council Study Session held
on June 4, 2003 are listed on Attachment-A. It was noted that after additional discussion, an
amendment was made to Item No. 3(a), changing "1 member from the Manette Area" to "1
member at larqe". The recommendations from a meeting with Council Committees held on June
24, 2003 are listed on Attachment-B. It was noted that after additional discussion, an amendment
was made to Item No. 1, changing "Technical Assistance Training should be mandatory" to
"Technical Assistance Training is_.advisable". It is also possible that a decision tonight may
eliminate Item No. 5 which references that "There should be no City Staff on the review
committees". A City Department Head meeting was held on July 14, 2003 to discuss the
distribution of monies, which are listed on Attachment-C. It was clarified that 15% is being
allocated for "Public/Human Services" which is based on new money ($600,000) received from
HUD.
The following citizens expressed their concerns about the proposed changes to the process for
allocating CDBG funds...
Beverly Kincaid representing CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES (also submitted a letter into the
record); Patricia Peterson representing BREMERTON FOOD LINE; Alex Heflreth from POSITIVE
SOLUTIONS; Larry Eyer from KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES (also submitted a letter into the
record); H. Emily Moshay (concurred with statements made by Larry Eyer); Sister Pat Millen
from CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES; and Aletha Carter James, Social Worker with STATE OF
WASHINGTON (concurred with all previous comments made on this issue).
Don Larson asked if landscaping projects could be included for future funding allocations.
Council held extensive discussion...at one point suggesting this issue be continued to allow for
further study, but a consensus on suggested amendments was reached prior to approving the
proposed plan...
TAPE #1902
A lO-minute recess was held prior to the vote...
TAPES # 1901 & #1902
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
July 23, 2003
Page 4 of 5
Chris Hullo wanted to clarify that the suggestion was originally made for the DCD Director to be a
member of this Committee only in a technical capacity as a means of providing continuity between
the City's Comprehensive Plan and other community building initiatives that the Department might
be aware of.
Prior to the vote, Mr. McConnell suggested that the DCD Director remain as a "Technical
Advisor". Mr. Younfler clarified that if the vote passes, the Council would be approving the draft
2004 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan and Application as presented with the proposed distribution of
funds for Capital Projects at a fora~ sum of $590,000, not broken down into $500,000 for City
Administration Projects and $90,000 for Non-City Projects.
#0170 M/S/C (Younger/Shepherd) Move to approve the draft 2004 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan and
Application as amended: Page 2, Item No. 3(a) to read "1 City Resident at Large" (replacing "f
member from the Manette Area'h; and Page 2, Item No. 4(a) to read "1 City Resident at Large"
(replacing "1 member is the DCD Director'S.
Voted in favor of Motion: Younger, Maupin, Short, McConnell, Nygren, Shepherd, and Arends
Voted opposed to Motion: Olsen
Motion carried: 7-Yes; 1-No
9A - PUBLIC HEARING AND RESOLUTION NO. 2895~ PLACING ON THE SEPTEMBER 16~
2003 BALLOT A CONTINUATION OF THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE AND SERVICE TAX
LEVY FOR A SlX-YEAR PERIOD (#AB03-134): Fire Chief Al Duke, stated that the Bremerton
Fire Department provides Emergency Medical Care to the citizens of Bremerton. The "Rescue
One" program is funded through a property tax of $0.50 per thousand of assessed valuation. The
property tax has to be renewed every 6 years. This is not a new tax, but a continuation at the
same rate approved in 1997. Before the City Council is the Resolution to place this measure on
the September 16th ballot.
There were no comments from the public.
#0360 M/S/C/U (Shepherd/McConnell) Move to approve Resolution No. 2895.
President Arends established that to meet legal requirements, statements both "for" and "against"
need to be provided for this ballot measure. Therefore, citizens who would like to volunteer their
time to submit a statement approximately one-paragraph in length are asked to call the Bremerton
City Council office at 478-5280.
9B - PUBLIC HEARING AND RESOLUTION NO. 2897, REGARDING SURPLUS AND SALE OF
PUBLIC UTILITY PROPERTY (#AB03-t35): Gene Sampley, Public Works & Utilities Director,
explained that the City has received an offer from the Kitsap Square Dance Association to
purchase certain public utility property. The property is not currently used for public utility service
nor will it be required for providing public utility service in the future. The offer to purchase the
property is fair-market value, and the City and greater community would be better served by the
surplus and sale of the property.
Several citizens were in attendance to express their support for this proposal.
#0600 M/S/C/U (Maupin/Olsen) Move to approve Resolution No. 2897, declaring the public utility
property surplus, approving a negotiated sale of the property pursuant to BMC 2.78.030(e) to the
Kitsap Square Dance Association, approving the purchase and sale agreement and authorizing
the Mayor to execute any and all documents necessary to close the transaction.
TAPES # 1901 & #1902
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
July 23, 2003
Page 5 of 5
9C - PUBLIC HEARING AND RESOLUTION NO. 2898, AUTHORIZING AN INTERFUND LOAN
TO THE CONFERENCE CENTER FUND FROM THE EQUIPMENT RENTAL AND REVOLVING
FUND (#AB03-136): Michael Wilsor~, Finance Director, summarized that the Conference Center
needs interim financial resources in the amount of $300,000 to pay for the conference center
management company (Columbia Hospitality) for operating expenses. Interim funding is needed
until such time the conference center generates sufficient case to repay such debt obligation or an
alternative plan for repayment has been developed within the Fiscal Year 2004 budget. This loan
shall be repaid to the Equipment Rental Reserve Fund on or before October 1, 2004. Future
cash flow and capital expense needs for the Conference Center beyond this initial $300,000 loan
will be addressed in the Conference Center Fiscal Year 2004 Budget.
There were no comments from the public.
Mr. McConnell asked questions on future funding from Lodging Tax monies. Mr. Wilson
responded that plans are to request funds from the Lodging Tax Committee.
#0935 MISICIU (YoungedMcOonnell) Move to approve Resolution No. 2898 authorizing the
Director of Finance to make an interfund loan from the Equipment Rental Reserve Fund (Fund
510) to the Conference Center Fund (Fund 410) in the amount not to exceed $300,000.
t0A - EXECUTIVE SESSION (#AB03-'135): Simon Stoker, Assistant City Attorney, explained
that an Executive Session was held to discuss "POTENTIAL LITIGATION" per R.C.W. Chapter
42.30.110 (1)(i).
There were no comments from the public.
#0970 M/S/C/U (Short/McConnell) Move to authorize the City Attorney to file a lawsuit for
negligence and breach of contract against Dr. Bonny Westlake and the Wheaton Way Veterinary
Clinic, Inc. for dental work performed on City Police Dog "KG".
With no further business, the regular meeting of the City Council was adjourned at 8:15 P.M.
Prepared and Submitted by:
LORI SMITH
Legislative Assistant
Attest:
PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk
CAROL ARENDS, City Council President
City of Bremerton
CNP JIIslcge
DATE SUBMITTED: July 30, 2003 BILL #
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON 3b
CITY COUNCIL
SUI~IECT: Bid Award for Restroom Committee Meeting Date: August ~,, 2003
Renovation for Sheridan Park Rehabilitation COUNCIL MEETING Date: AuSust 13, 2003
Department: Parks & Recreation
Presenter: Jodi Wroblewski
Phone: 473-5429
SUMMARY: Bids were opened on Monday, July 28, 2003 for the restroom renovation of the
Sheridan Park Community Center. A total of one (1) bid was received for this project. (See attached
Bid Opening List) The low bid was received from Loft Leite, Women's Work Construction, of
Colby, Washington for the lump sum bid ors 36,700.00. The total contract amount, including WSST
is $ $ 39,819.50.
ATTACHMENTS: ~' Bid Opening List
~ 2003 Budget for Capital Funding for Park Facilities Construction
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None
This bid is part of the Sheridan Park Community Center Rehabilitation project that has already been
budgeted in Fund 112 (Park Facilities Co~truction), in the amount of $65,000 for 2003.
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: ,,.jc
CItY ATTORNEY: ~'/~"~ i~ ~;~~~-~:?;
F1NANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR:
OPERATIONS: .~ .fi{ .x.~.-~z~4~.7_~_____~t_..,~__- CONSENT AGENDA
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION: That the City Council approve the contract to Lori Leite, Women's
Work Construction from Colby, Washington, for the restroom renovation of Sheridan Park
Community Center, in the amount of :$ 39,819.50, including Washington State sales tax, and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
2003 BUDGET
PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND
AMENDED
2002 2003
CAPITAL PROJECTS: BUDGET BUDGET
Evergreen Project 220,000
Cemetery Fencing 10,000 10,000
Cemetery Building Improvements 5,000 5,000
Cemetery Platting 10,000 10,000
Irrigation Projects (CIP) 8,069 15,000
Haddon Toilet 12,750
Tennis Court Resurfacing (ClP) 0 13,000
NAD - Demolish House/Build Picnic Area 0
Jarstad Rehabilitation (CDBG) 50,000
Sheridan Park Rehabilitation (CDBG) 65,000 ~
Senior Center Rehabilitation (CDBG) 35,000
Lions Coal Dock Repair 50,000
Turf Terra Machine (ClP) 10,000
Senior Center Floor Repair ' 5,0~0
Mower/Bagger 13,000
Power Vacuum for Boardwalk/Downtown 4,000
Lions Tennis Courts 250,000
Aerator 10,000
HVAC for Jarstad Pool 260,400
Rehabilitation of Boardwalk 500,000
Drag Package for infield Machines 5,000
Total Capital Projects 1,276,219 300,000
NON CAPITAL PROJECTS:
Kitsap Lake Aquatic Weed Grant 10,000 42,000
Pendergast Improvements 11,000
Picnic Tables, Benches & Bleachers (CIP) 20,000 15,000
Ballfield Improvements (ClP) 15,000 10,000
Park Signs (CIP) 8,000 5,000
Playground Equipment (CIP) 25,000 35,000
Fencing Replacement (ClP) 10,000 10,000
Maintenance for Parking Lot 14,800 15,800
Restroom Rehabilitation (ClP) 50,000
Parks and Recreation Equipment Replacement (CIP) 5,000
Sheridan Basement Cleanup 15,000
Resurface Lions Walking Path 10,000
Unidentified Capital (ClP) 11,840 26,000
Total Non Capital Projects 125,640 238,800
Pendergast Lease Payment 20,496 20,497
Loan Payment to Equipment Rental 33,300 33,301
Ending Cash 0, 302.259
TOTAL FUND 1.455.655 894.857
!
66
DATE SUBMIrrED: July 28, 2003 BILL It ~3 'l'~'~
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON 3 6
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Bid Award to Whitney Committee Meeting Date: August 5, 2003
Equipment Inc.for two new pumps for Pump COUNCIL MEETING Date: August 13, 2993
Station EB-3. Department: PW & U/Wastewater
Presenter: Pat Coxon, WWTP
Mgr
Phone: 473-5448
SUMMARY: This bid award is for the purchase of two new chopper pumps for Pump Station EB-3.
These pumps were required due to the changes that have occurred in the discharge head at the pump
station. These changes were due to the improvements to the Trenton/Cherry Basin CSO. The
Engineer's estimate was $38,000 to $39,000. PumpTech Inc. submitted the lowest bid, but it did not
meet the required specifications and was deemed non-responsive. Whitney Equipment Inc.submitted
the first responsive low bid price of $37,254.00 including tax and shipping, which is in line with the
Utilities preliminary estimates.
ATTACllMENTS: Bid Tabulation Sheet
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The pump upgrade for Pump Station EB-3 was
included in the Trenton/Cherry Basin CSO budget.
APPROVALS: ~~
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY: ~"-~ ~ _~_~. ~_'
CONSENT
AGEND^ ~[~
OPERATIONS: ,~( . !) ~.f~. ,~ff'/~/~~
co cIL P Sn)Em: Z
RECOMMENDED MOTION: That the City Council approves the award of the bid to Whitney
Equipment Inc. for the purchase of two new chopper pumps for Pump Station EB-3, in the amount of
$37,254.00 including tax and shipping, and authorize the Mayor to execute the same.
DATE SUBMITI'ED: BILL #
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON '~ ~'~
.......... ...... .............. ..... 3 ..... ........ ......... .... ..,
SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL Committee Meeting Date: AUGUST 5, 2003
AGREEMENT NO. 2, CDM - WESTSIDE COUNCIL MEETING Date: August 13, 2003
CSO TREATMENT FACILITY AND Department: Public Works & Util
SEWER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Presenter: John Poppe
Phone: 1-360-478-2322
SUMMARY: Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM) is currently under a PSA for preparation of the City's
Comprehensive Sewer Plan Update and Facility Plan and Design of the Westside CSO Treatment
Facility. Additional environmental studies have been required to comply with EPA requirements for
the project. Completion of this "Professional Services Agreement" is December 2003.
ATTACHMENTS: SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT #2
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Increase cost of completing the 2001
"Professional Services Agreement for Comp Plan and Facility Plan for the Westside CSO Treatment
Facility" by $113,000". The funding for this incr ~ is included in the 2003 Budget.
/
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
MAYOR: --
FISCAL/BUDGET:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staffrecommends approval of"SUPPLEMENTAL AGRF. F. MENT
#2" WITH Camp Dresser McKee for $113,000.
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent
New Business
Old Business
Ol~inml¢~
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Postpone [] No Action Resolution
Public Hearing
Information
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 2
Project No.: 58238
Agency: City of Bremerton
Name of Project: Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update and Westside CSO
Treatment Facility Plan
City Contract No. 570
The City of Bremerton (City) and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) desire to
supplement the standard Professional Services Agreement executed on October 31, 2001
and subsequently modified by Supplemental Agreement No. 1 and identified as City
Contract No, 570 (Agreement).
All provisions in the Agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this
Supplemental Agreement as follows:
L Scope is hereby amended, as shown in Exhibit "B", to adjust for required
work performed and to be performed beyond the previously agreed scope.
H. Term is hereby amended to provide for a termination date of December
31, 2003.
Ill. Compensation is hereby amended, as shown in Exhibit "B", to increase
total fees under this agreement by One Hundred Thirteen Thousand dollars
($113,000) from Six Hundred Fifty One Thousand Five Hundred Eighty
Six Dollars ($651,586) to Seven Hundred Sixty Four Thousand Five
Hundred Eighty Six ($764,586). The amounts for individual tasks may
vary provided the total is within the not-to-exceed amount of this
Agreement.
13
Concurrence with this Supplemental Agreement #2 to the changes as stated above is
indicated by signature below.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. City of Bremcrton
Charles H. Bolton, Senior Vice President Cary Bozeman, Mayor
DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL
W. Eugene Sampley, P.E.
Director of Public Works & Utilities
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Roger Lubovich, City Attorney
Attest:
Paula Johnston, City Clerk
DATE SUBMITTED: 7/25/03 BELL
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON 3
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Berger/Abam Committee Meeting Date: August 5, 2003
Civil Engineer Contract COUNCIL MEET1NG Date: August 13, 2003
Public Safety Bond Projects Department: Admin Services
Presenter: Kathleen McCluskey
Phone: 473-5234
SUMMARY: The City issued an RFQ for Civil Engineer services for the Fire Station Headquarters
and Police/Court Facility. We received 12 applications and interviewed three firms. The firm of
Berger/Abam was unanimously selected by the interview team based upon their qualifications and
experience. It was determined that there is an increased efficiency and direct value to the city using
the same firm for both projects. The scope of services and fees are shown as contract Exhibit "A" Fire
Station Headquarters and Exhibit "B" Police/Court Faclity.
ATTACHMENTS: Professional Services Agreement
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): $27,945 Fire Headquarters
$24,336 Police/Court Facility
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
FISCAL/BUDGET:
OPERATIONS: ..¥fO~_._.~/.~_~ CONSENT AGENDA
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Motton to approve the Professional Services Agreement with
Berger/Abam in the amountof $$1,lSlto provide Civil Engineering services for the Fire Station
Headquarters and Police/Court Facility projects and authorize the mayor to sign in substantially the
same form as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BERGER/ABAM ENGINEERS INC.
PUBLIC SAFETY BOND PROJECTS
The City of Bremerton ("City") and Berger/Abam ("Consultant"), referred to collectively
as the "Parties," enter into the following Agreement for professional services:
I. Scope: The Consultant agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the
"Scope of Work and Fees", attached hereto as Exhibit A - Fire Station Headquarters and Exhibit
B - Police/Court Facility, which is incorporated by reference herein. The Scope of Work may be
modified only pursuant to Section VII.H. of this Agreement. If the Scope of Work provides for
unspecified additional services such services shall only be performed upon the express written
request of the City. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this
Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in
effect at the time such services are performed.
II. Term: The City and the Consultant agree that work will begin on the tasks described in
Exhibits A and B immediately upon execution of this Agreement. The parties agree that the
work described in Exhibits A and B is to be completed as provided for in the work schedule
stated, provided however, that additional time shall be granted by the City for excusable delays
or extra work as provided for in section IX (A) of this agreement.
IIL Compensation: In consideration of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, the
City shall pay Consultant in an amount not to exceed $52,281. Consultant's charges and bills
shall conform to the fees shown in Exhibits A and B and incorporated herein by this reference.
The Consultant shall submit regular billing statements showing percentage of work
completed on each task or portion thereof. The descriptions shall conform to and fall within the
categories set out in the Scope of Work and Fee Schedule. Upon receipt of a conforming billing
statement and written approval by the Department of Economic Development, the City will
promptly process payment. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, the City reserves the right to prioritize
scoped work and accelerate and/or delay work tasks under the time frame set forth in Section II
herein. The Consultant's labor rates and billing fees shall be as delineated in Exhibits A and B.
Consultant shall not perform work beyond the Scope of Work, nor shall be compensated
for such work, unless the Scope of Work or amount of compensation is modified pursuant to this
Agreement. Consultant shall only be compensated for additional services if requested pursuant
to Section I and, if not otherwise provided, such compensation shall be in accordance with
Exhibits A and B.
Berger/Abam
Public Safety Bond Projects
Page 1 of 7
17
IV. Relationship of Parties: Consultant represents that it is skilled in the matters addressed
in the Scope of Work and is performing independent functions and responsibilities within its
field of expertise. Consultant and its personnel are independent Consultants and not employees
of the City. Consultant and its personnel have no authority to bind the City or to control the
City's employees and other Consultants. None of the benefits provided by the City to its
employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance
are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-Consultants of the
Consultant. Consultant will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of
Consultant's agents, employees, representatives and sub-Consultants during the performance of
this Agreement. The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent
Consultants to perform the same or similar work.
As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for its own management. The
City's administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall not be deemed an exercise of
managerial control over Consultant or its personnel.
As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for payment of all taxes and
licensing fees necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement. These taxes and fees
include but are not limited to State industrial insurance, Business & Occupation, State
professional licensing, and City business licensing. If any taxes or fees due the City have been
declared delinquent, the City may withhold the delinquent amount, plus any additional charges
arising from the delinquency, from any payments due Consultant.
V. Indemnification: Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers,
officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages,
losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the
performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the
City's sole negligence.
The City's review or acceptance of any of the work when completed shall not be grounds
to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to
RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons
or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant
and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability
hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence.
IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE
INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S
WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER
ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER.
The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
Berger/Abam
Public Safety Bond Projects
Page 2 of 7
VI. Insurance: The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in
connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, employees, sub-consultants or sub-Consultants.
Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Consultant shall
provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing:
1. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single
limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and
2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no
less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and general aggregate for
personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be
limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations/broad form property
damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCU) if applicable; and employer's
liability; and
3. Excess Liabili .ty insurance with limits not less than 1,000,000 limit per occurrence and
aggregate.
4. Professional Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 limit per
occurrence/claim.
Any payment of deductible or self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the
Consultant.
All required policies shall be provided on an "occurrence" basis except professional
liability insurance (if required), which may be provided on a "claims-made" basis.
The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability
insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and a copy of an
endorsement that is acceptable to the City, which names the City as an additional insured shall be
attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of
all the required insurance policies and endorsements. The City further reserves the right to reject
any unacceptable policies and/or endorsements.
The Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating
that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is
brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability.
The Consultant's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and the City
shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of
any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage.
The City also reserves its unqualified right to require at any time and for any reason,
proof of coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements as
evidence of coverage.
Berger/Abam
Public Safety Bond Projects
Page 3 of 7
VII. General Conditions:
A. Reports and Information: When requested by the City, Consultant shall furnish
periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement. The reports and
documents shall be furnished in the time and form requested. Consultant shall maintain
accounting records in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to
substantiate all billed amounts.
B. Ownership and Use of Records and Documents: Original documents, drawings,
designs and reports, including those in electronic format, developed under this Agreement are the
property of the City. All written information submitted by the City to the Consultant in
connection with the services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be
safeguarded by the Consultant to at least the same extent as the Consultant safeguards like
information relating to its own business. If such information is publicly available or is already in
Consultant's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Consultant from third
parties, Consultant shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise.
All data, documents and files created by Consultant under this Agreement may be stored
at Consultant's office in Seattle, Washington. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and
files available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing,
modifying and updating as necessary until such time as the City is capable of storing such
information in the City's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the
City upon its request, and at reasonable cost.
All documents, including all reports, drawings, specifications, computer software or other
items prepared or furnished by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, are instruments of service
with respect to the project and are the property of the City. Any reuse by the City for other than
the specific purpose intended will be at City's sole risk.
C. Consultant to Maintain Records to Support Independent Consultant Status: On the
effective date of this Agreement (or shortly thereafter), Consultant shall:
1. File a schedule of expenses with the Internal Revenue Service for the type of
business Consultant conducts;
2. Establish an account with the Washington State Department of Revenue and other
necessary state agencies for the payment of all state taxes normally paid by
employers, register to receive a unified business identifier number from the State
of Washington; and
3. Maintain a separate set of books and records that reflect all items of income and
expenses of Consultant's business, all as described in the Revised Code of
Washington (RCW) Section 51.08.195, as required to show that the services
performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall not give rise to an employer-
employee relationship between the parties which is subject to RCW Title 51,
Industrial Insurance.
Berger/Abam
Public Safety Bond Projects
Page 4 of 7
D. Work Performed at Consultant's Risk: Consultant shall take all precautions necessary
and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and sub consultants in the
performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose.
All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss
of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the
work.
E. Place of Work: The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this
Agreement at its offices in Seattle, Washington as well as at the project sites. Meetings with the
City staff as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices, or at
locations mutually agreed upon by the parties.
F. Entire Agreement: This Agreement and its Exhibits constitutes the entire agreement
between the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or
oral, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement.
G. Severability: Should any part of this Agreement be found void, the balance of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
H. Modification: This Agreement may only be modified by written instrument signed by
both Parties.
I. Written Notices: All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the
parties at the addresses listed below by registered or 1st class mail, or by personal service, and
shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement
or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing.
City Address Consultant Address
Kathleen McCluskey Berger/Abam
239 Fourth Street 2005 Fifth Avenue
Bremerton, Wa. 98337 Seattle, Wa. 98121
J. Waiver: Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not bc deemed a
waiver of that provision. Waiver of any right or power arising out of this Agreement shall not be
deemed waiver of any other right or power.
K. Non-Waiver of Breach: The failure of thc City to insist upon strict performance of
any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred
in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said
covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect.
L. Compliance with Laws: Consultant shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and
local laws in performing its obligations under this Agreement.
Berger/Abam
Public Safety Bond Projects
Page 5 of 7
M. Choice of Law and Venue: This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws
of the State of Washington. Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement
shall be brought in Kitsap County Superior Court.
N. Attorneys' Fees: In the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or provisions
herein, each party shall pay all its own costs and attorney's fees.
O. Assignment: Any assignment of this agreement by the Contractor without the written
consent of the City shall be void.
VIII. Nondiscrimination: Consultant shall not discriminate in employment or services to the
public on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, or disability,
except for employment actions based on bona fide occupational qualification.
IX. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated, at will, by either Party upon sixty (60)
days notice to the other Party. This Agreement may be immediately terminated for cause by a
Party if the other Party substantially fails to perform through no fault of the terminating Party,
and the non-performing Party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within
thirty (30) days of the terminating Party's sending notice to the non-performing Party. Notice by
Consultant shall include a report showing the status of all items listed in the Scope of Work
current through the termination date.
If the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in
Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is
cancelled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the
completion of the work, the City may summarily terminate this Agreement. Termination shall be
effective ten calendar days after Consultant's receipt of the written notice by certified mail.
A. Excusable Delays: The right of Consultant to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall
Consultant be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due
to: 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials,
equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other national emergency; 2)
any acts of the City, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay; and 3) causes
not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are
beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not
restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity. PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, that the Consultant must promptly notify the City within ten (10) calendar days in
writing of the cause of the delay. If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement,
the delay is properly excusable, the City shall, in writing, extend the time for completing the
work for a period of time commensurate with the period of excusable delay.
B. Rights Upon Termination: In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all
services performed by the Consultant to the effective date of termination, as described on a final
invoice submitted to the City. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and
data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City
Berger/Abam
Public Safety Bond Projects
Page 6 of 7
without restriction. Any such use not related to the project which Consultant was contracted to
perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant.
CITY OF BREMERTON BERGER/ABAM
By: Cary Bozeman By:
its: Mayor Its:
Date: Date:
Approved as to form: Attest:
Bremerton City Attomey City Clerk
Department Approval:
Kathleen McCluskey
Administrative Services Director
Berger/Abam
Public Safety Bond Proiects
Page 7 of 7 ~,3
Exhibit A
City of Bromerton Fire Station
Scope of Civil Engineering Services
Basic Services Tasks
The following tasks are itemized, based on the standard professional service agreement with the City
of Bremerten:
Task A Schematic Design Phase
Develop civil design criteria with department of Economic Development and coordinate
with City Planning and Construction Departments; review of the Architectural concept
building layout and utility requirements; preliminary site grading design; determine
storm and sewer connections to existing system; and develop preliminary cost estimate.
Receive final approval from Department of Economic Development.
Task B Design Development Phase
Continue coordination through Department of Economic Development with Architect
and Department of Public Works; develop Design Development level of civil drawings for
site, demolition, grading, and utility plans; update the cost estimate based on the Design
Development package; and provide outline specifications. Receive final approval from
Department of Economic Development.
Task C Construction Document Phase
Provide the final civil engineering design, drawings, and specilications. Update the cost
estimate per the final documents. Receive final approval from Department of Economic
Development.
Task D Bidding and Construction Phase
To assist owner in answering bidding questions and issue added items if required; to
review RFI questions if required; to review submittals; and to conduct any site v/sits
(maximum of 3 visits) and coordinate construction by phone.
Fee Schedule
Civil Basic Services
Task A Schematic Design Phase $4,192
Task B Design Development Phase $8,383
Task C Construction Document Phase $11,485
Task D Biddin~ and Construction Phase $3.885
Civil Total: $27,945
BERGER/ABAM Rates
Project Manager $142.60
Senior Engineer $108.00
Junior Engineer $78.00
CAD Drafter $68.00
Reimbursable expenses are in addition to the above fees and will be invoiced at cost for such as
reundtrip ferry fares to the city. Invoices will be submitted on a monthly basis based on percentage
complete.
Exkibit A
Exhibit B
City of Bremerton Police Courts Building
Scope of Civil Engineering Services
Basic ~ervices Tasks
The following tasks are itemized, based on the standard professional service agreement with
the City of Bremerten:
Task A Schematic Design Phase
Develop c/vii design criteria with the department of Economic Development and
coordinate with City Planning and Construction Department~; review of the
Arch/tectural concept bu/lding layout and utility requirements; prehminary site
gradin~ design; determine storm and sewer connections to existing system; and
develop preliminary cost estimate. Receive final approval from Department of
Economic Development
Task B Design Development Phase
Continue coordination through Department of Ecanomic Development with
Architect and Department of Public Works; develop Design Development level of
civil drawings for site, demolition, grading, and utility plans; update the cost
estimate based on the Design Development package; and provide outline
specifications. Receive final approval from Department of Economic
Development.
Task C Construction Document Phase
Provide the final civil engineering design, drawings, and specifications. Update
the cost estimate per the final documents. Receive final approval from
Department of Economic Development·
Task D Bidding and Construction Phase
To assist owner in answering bidding questions and issue added items if
required; to review RFI questions if required; to review submittals; and to
conduct any site.visits (maximum of 3 visits) and coordinate construction by
phone..
Fee Schedule
Civil Basic Services
Task A Schematic Design Phase $3,650
Task B Design Development Phase $7,300
Task C Construction Document Phase $10,596
Task D Biddine and Construction Phase $2.790
Civil Total: $24,356
BERGER/ABAM Rates
Project Manager $142.60
Sen/or Engineer $108.00
Jun/or Engineer $78.00
CAD Drafter $68.00
Reimbursable expenses are in add/tion to the above fees and will be invoiced at cost for such
as roundtrip ferry fares to the city. Invoices will be submitted on a monthly basis based on
percentage complete.
Exhibit B
City of Bremerilon - Fire Station
L~r~ ~ ~t1~ ~ '
DATE SUBMITTED: 7/7/03 BILL # ~.~ -{ q '~
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON ~
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Real Estate Surplus and Sale Committee Meeting Date: ~ ~/I 3/03
COUNCIL MEETING Date: 7/23/03
Department: Economic Dev.
Presenter: Kathleen McCluskey
Phone: 473-5234
SUMMARY: The City owns two parcels of property on Oyster Bay Avenue shown on the attached
parcel map. We have received an Earnest Money Receipt and Sale Agreement from Global
Investments Limited, agent for Chuck & Joanne Ha~lwood. They have offered assessed value or
appraised value, whichever is higher. The current assessed value is $17,600 per parcel. An appraisal
is being performed. BMC 2.78.030 (e) provides for a negotiated sale in the event that the council
finds that a unique development potential exists which creates benefits to the City and the greater
community. Mr. Ha~elwood's property surrounds a number of paracels fronting Oyster Bay Avenue.
It is his intent through his agent to acquire those parcels to expand and enhance his dealership as well
as provide for visibility and beautification.
ATTACEIMENTS: (1) Parcel Map; (2) Assessor Property Reprt and Value History; (3) Earnest
Money Receipt and Sale Agreement.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): $35,200 minimum at closing which will go to the
Bremerton Utiity as these parcels were purchased as part of the prope~ies surrounding the Bremerton
Wastewater Treatment Plant.
APPROVALS: //~,~--Za~~
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: ~/v -~.~'~?~...~.5__~~
CITY ATTORNEY: :: . i'~ -
O CTO : ....2
t ' ~ / /7 t..:' .. ,~ ~at.r,' ~<l,~..,, ·,
1~ if ~e~';d~c ~ -- ~ ~
OPE~TIONS: ~ [~
CO~C~ P~S~ENT: ~. ;~
~COMMENDED MOTION: Motion to su~lus ~d sell ~o p~cels of City Utilitv o~ed
prope~ on Oyster Bay Avenue to Global Investmems Limit~ by negotiated ~le for $20,000 per
~arce] at a total of $~0,000,~or both, and authorize the 8ayor to sign the e~rnest
money ~flreement in substantia]ly the same form.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Den5, [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
Legend
i~--i Pirc, ehl
W H Street
~ W F Street
:~iMER: This map ~ ~tended ~r d~ay ~ on~ a~ ~ not i~ded ~r
[Click here to Print]
Kitsap County Assessor's Property Report Page I of 1
Property Report
Tax Account No. Process No. Situs Address
[4S46--005-007-0005 111692540 I~NO ADDRESS FOUND
I~!~ ~e ~y ('l~s: [111- Sin$1e family residence
Parcel Information
i a, Ci~tt~ :\~ [0010 1# of Buildings: [0
Jarlsdiction: [BREMERTON ]Acres: [.11
Sec-Twp-Rllg: [21 24N IE I ,~ ICity
>~e:,gt:l>o~l~o(~:~[7100517 ]Account Status: IA - Active
Last Inspected: [26-FEB-0~
Taxpayer Information
Name: [BREMERTON CITY OF
Mailing
Address: [
http://kcwppub2.co.kitsap.wa.us/pls/ilisw/lis.online lis info_pkg.acct info?p_in_rp_acct_ ... 6/26/2003
Kltsap {;ounty Assessor's Value/'lax l-~story Page Iot I
Value History
Tax Account No. Process No. Sims Address
[4546-005-007-0005 {11692540
Tax Land Value Improvement Total Value Taxable Assessed
Year Value Value Annual Taxes
2004[ 17,600 ]. 0 ] 17,600 [ 0 I 0.00
20031 17,600I o[ 17,600[ 0I 0.00
20021 16,oooI 37,030 I 53,030 I 0 I 0.00
20011 16,000I 37,030 I $3,030 ] 0 [ 0.00
2000I 16,000I 35,340[ 51,340I 0 I 0.00
clo~e this ~dow
http://kcwppub2.co.kitsap.wa.us/pls/ilisw/online lis info_pkg.tax histTp in rp acct_id=l... 6/26/2003
Kitsap County Assessor's Property Report Page 1 of I
Property Report
Tax Account No. Process No. Situs Address
[4546-005-005-0007 ]11692524 I[NO ADDRESS FOUND
Pi ~,p::~, Clils~ [111- Single family residence
Parcel Information
t",',, ~ o~.<-~:~, 10010 J# of Buildings:[0
Jurisdiction: IBREMERTON JAcres: [.11
Sec-Twp-Rng: 121 24N 1E ] Zgl;i~--' ICity
Neigt~b~ilw >d 17100517 J Account Status: [A - Active
Last Inspected:I2 -FE -o3 J
Taxpayer Information
Name: [BREMERTON CITY OF
Mailing
Address: [
http://kcwppub2.co.ldtsap.wa.us/pls/ilisw/lis.online lis info_pkg.acct info?p in_rp_acct ... 6/26/2003
K~tsap County Assessor's Value/laX I~SIOI3' Fage i o! I
Value History
Tax Account No. Process No. Situs Address
[4546-005-005-0007 111692224 I[
Tax Land Value Improvement Total Value Taxable Assessed Annual Taxes
Year Value Value
2004 17,600I 0I 17,600 I 0t 0.00
2oo~ 17,600I 0 I 17,600 ] 0I 0.00
2002 16,000 I 46,000 I 62,000 J 0 I 0.00
2001 16,000I 46,000I 62,000 I 0 I 0.00
2000 16,000t :19,~9oI 55,~9o I o I o.oo
close this window
http://kcwppub2.co.kitsap.wa.us/pls/ilisw/online lis info_pkg.tax hist?p in rp acct id=l... 6/26/2003
EARNEST MONEY RECEIPT
AND SALE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is hereby made and entered into on the date fully executed below, by and
between CITY OF BREMERTON, hereinafter referred to as "Seller" and GLOBAL
INVESTMENTS LIMITED, a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Pumhaser".
Purchaser shall, within 5 days of the date of this Agreement, deposit the stun of $1,000.00 in
escrow with PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE, hereinat~er referred to as Escrow Agent.
Seller hereby agrees to sell and purchaser hereby agrees to purchase that certain real
property commonly known as Lot 5 and Lot 7 of Block 5 of Ole Hanson's Navy Yard Addition,
City of Bremerton, Kitsap County, Washington; tax parcel nos. 4546-005-005-0007 and 4546-005-
007-0005.
Purchaser and Seller hereby authorize Escrow Agent to correct the foregoing legal description over
their signatures.
1. Purchase Price: The purchase price shall be Forty Thousand and no/100 Dollars
($40,000.0O).
2. Payment of Purchase Price: The total purchase price shall be paid as follows:
a. One Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) in the form of earnest money.
b. Thirty Nine Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($39,000.00) in cash at the time of
closing.
3. Contingencies:
a. The obligation of the Purchaser to purchase the real property is contingent upon
and subject to the following conditions:
i. Purchaser to make inspections and investigations concerning the
property, including but not limited to a survey, which cost shall be paid
solely by the Purchaser.
In the event these contingencies cannot be satisfied within 30 days from the date of this
Agreement, the Purchaser shall have the right to cancel this Agreement and all earnest money shall
be reflmded to the Purchaser. Provided, however, that all of these conditions are for the benefit of
the Purchaser and may be waived in writing by the Purchaser.
b. The obligation of the Seller to sell the real property is contingent upon and
subject to the following conditions:
i. City Council approval of this agreement within 30 days from the date of
this agreement.
20280q66, ted Page 1
Earnest Money Receipt and Sale Agreement doc
Rev, 8-5-03 3q
4. Cooperation: The Seller shall cooperate with the Purchaser regarding all aspects of this
Agreement.
5. Inspections and Tests: The Purchaser shall have the right to enter upon the property,
make inspections, conduct engineering studies, perfoma surveys, conduct tests and analyze the
property in order to determine its suitability for the needs of the Purchaser.
6. Title: The title to the property shall be flee and clear of all encumbrances or defects at
closing except those specifically approved in writing by the Purchaser. For purposes of this
agreement, the following shall not be deemed encumbrances or defects: rights reserved and
federal patents or state deeds; building or use restrictions consistent with current zoning, and
utility and road easements of record. Additionally, Purchaser agrees to execute and record
against the property at closing an odor easement for the benefit of the Seller in substantially the
same form as attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The payment of any encumbrances and assessments
may be made from the funds available at closing.
7. Title Insurance: The Seller shall deliver to the Purchaser a commitment for title
insurance from the PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE within fifteen (15) days of the date of
acceptance of this Earnest Money Receipt and Sale Agreement by Seller. The commitment for title
insurance shall be for a standard form purchaser's policy of title insurance. The title policy to be
issued at the time of closing shall contain no exceptions other than those provided for in said
standard form and those specifically approved in writing by the Purchaser. If title is not so
insurable and cannot be made so insurable as of the date of closing, this transaction shall terminate
and the earnest money shall be refunded to the Purchaser. Provided, however, that the Purchaser
may waive any defects in title and elect to purchase.
8. Conveyance: Title shall be conveyed by Statutory Warranty Deed containing no
exceptions except those as noted in Section 6 above and except those specifically approved in
writing by the Purchaser.
9. Closing: This transaction shall be closed in the offices of PACIFIC NORTHWEST
TITLE which shall be the Escrow Agent. The date of closing shall be on or before October I, 2003.
Prior to closing the Seller and the Purchaser shall deposit in escrow with the closing agent all
instructions, instruments and monies necessary to close this transaction. The real property taxes
shall be prorated as of the date of closing. The Seller shall pay the title insurance premium, excise
tax, its recording fees and one-half of the escrow fee. The Purchaser shall pay its recording fees and
one-half of the escrow fee.
10. Possession: The Purchaser shall be entitled to possession on the date of closing.
11. Default: In the event of any default by the Seller, the earnest money shall be refunded
to the Purchaser unless the Purchaser elects to institute suit to enforce this Agreement, in which
case the earnest money shall be held in the Registry of the court pending resolution of the suit. In
the event of any default by the Purchaser, the Seller shall retain the earnest money deposited
herewith as liquidated damages. Said forfeited earnest money shall be the sole remedy of the Seller
and the Seller shall make no further claim or seek any further relief against the Purchaser.
12. Binding Effect: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
20280-166, ted Page 2
Earnest Money Receipt and Sale Agreement,doc
heirs, executors, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Provided, however, that this
Agreement shall not be assignable by either party without the express prior written consent of the
other party which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Each party warrants that it has the authority
to enter into this Agreement and said Agreement to be binding on the respective party.
13. Notices: Any and all notices between the parties hereto shall be in writing and shall be
sent by certified mail, return receipt requested or personally delivered.
14. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed and applied in accordance with
the laws of the State of Washington.
15. Jurisdiction and Venue: In the event any lawsuit shall be brought in connection with
this Agreement, the parties hereto hereby agree that jurisdiction and venue of such lawsuit shall
properly lie in Kitsap County, Washington.
16. Attorney Fees and Court Costs: In the event any lawsuit is instituted in connection
with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to judgment for its reasonable attomey
fees and costs as determined by the court at both the trial and appellate levels.
17. Time: Time is expressly made of the essence of this Agreement.
18. Entire Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties
with respect to the property. There are no verbal or other arrangements which modify or affect this
Agreement.
19. Titles: The titles used on the paragraphs in this Agreement are for information
purposes only.
20. Absence of Commissions: Each party represents and warrants to the other party that
there are no real estate commissions payable in connection with this transaction.
21. Offer to Purchase: The Purchaser hereby offers to purchase the property on the terms
and conditions stated herein. This offer is made subject to the approval of the Seller by midnight of
August 31, 2003. In the event that the Seller does not accept this offer within the aforementioned
time, this transaction shall be null and void and of no force or effect whatsoever.
DATED: August .:-~T~2003.
PURCHASER:
Address~' P.O. Box 5479
Bremerton, WA 98312
Phone: (360) 265-0391
20280-166, ted Page 3
Earnest Money Receipt and Sale Agreement.doc
Rev. §-5-03 3~
The Seller hereby agrees to sell the property on the terms specified herein.
DATED: August ,2003
SELLER:
CITY OF BREMERTON
By: Cary Bozeman
Title: Mayor
Address: 239 Fourth Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
Phone: (360) 473-5345
R:~LEGAL~Files\Current Active Files\Oyster Bay Lots~Eamest Money-final.doc
20280-166, ted Page 4
Earnest Money Receipt and Sale Agreement.doc
Rev. 8-5-03 37
Return Address: City Clerk
City of Bremerton
239 Fourth Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
AUDITOR/RECORDER'S INDEXING FORM
Document Title(s): 1. Odor Easement
Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: N/A
Grantor(s): ].
[] Additional names onpage of document.
Orantes(s): 1. The City ofBremerton
[] Additional names onpage of document.
Legal Description:
(abbreviated)
of document.
[~_so~s Property Tax Parcel/Account Number:
I Project Name:
ODOR EASEMENT
(Corporate)
THIS INSTRUMENT made this __ day of , 200 , by and
between (hereinafter "Grantor") and the
CITY OF BILEMERTON, a Washington municipal corporation of Kitsap County, State of
Washington (hereinafter "Grantee").
WITNESSETH that Grantor for and in consideration of mutual benefits derived and/or
other valuable consideration, receipt of' which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor, do by these
presents grant, bargain, sell, convey, and eon firm forever unto Grantee, its successors and/or
assigns, an odor easement for air emissions from the Wastewater Treatment Plant on or over the
following described property situated in Kitsap County, Washington, more particularly described
as follows:
SEE EXHIBIT" "ATTACHED
ODOR EASEMENT (Corporate) - Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT A
This easement shall be a covenant running with the land, and shall bind Grantor's
successors and assigns and all furore owners of the real property affected by this easement.
GRANTOR:
By:
Its:
DATE:
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF KITSAP )
On this_ day of ,200 , before me a Notary Public in and for the
State of Washington, personally appeared to me known to be
the of ., a
corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged it
to be the free and voluntary act and deed of the corporation, for the uses and proposes mentioned in
this instrument, and on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute said instrument.
-Notary Seal Must Appear Within This Box-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year
first above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State
of Washington, residing at
My appointment expires
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH
City Attorney
R:\LEGAL\FormsXEasements\Odor Easement Form (Coq~orate),doc
ODOR EASEMENT (Corporate) - Page 2 of 3
EXItlBIT A
DATE SUBMITTED: July 31, 2003 BILL # t~ '~ - i ~
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON /~ ~m~
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Establishment of the position of Committee Meeting Date: August 5, 2003
Finance Officer within the Finance COUNCIL MEETING Date: August 13, 2003
Department Department: Finance Department
Presenter: Michael R. Wilson
Phone: 473-5590
SUMMARY: The most pressing issue within the Department Finance is to fill a replacement
position within the Department through the creation of the Finance Officer position. In addition to
positions being cut in the Department of Administrative Services and Finance in the past, the Finance
Department has operated for nearly a year without adequate staffing. The City has filled some of this
void with a temporary contract accountant position; however, this position will expire in September
and we will not be able to fill it with another temporary position. This has placed a tremendous
burden on the Assistant City Treasurer and Accounting Clerks. In addition, the Finance Department
has now assumed the responsibility for managing the financial affairs of the new Conference Center
and Parking Garage, Government Center and numerous other accounts and funds..
ATTACHMENTS: July 31, 2003 Memorandum; 2) Finance Officer job description
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Based on the Council's approval of the 2003
Budget Amendment, no fiscal impact or adjustment is anticipated within the Department of Finance's
budget this year.
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY: x_~~- ~~ .
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
FISCAL/BUDGET:
OPERATIONS:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT: :5;~: r ,,, (; .; ~ c. ~ ~,.':: ~: ~.. ~ __
RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve the establishment of the position of Finance
Officer with the Department of Finance and further approve the attached job description and salary for
the position at pay band 16.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
Department of Finance
239 Fourth Street, Bremerton, WA 98337
Telephone: 360-478-5590
Fax: 360-478-5200
mwilson~ci, bremerton, wa. us
Michael R, Wilson, Director of Finance
TO: Carol Arends, Council President
Bremerton City Council members
/
FROM: MichaelR. Wilsc[n. It&· - -x
Director ofFinan~~''' Y
SUBJECT: Administrative Services and Finance Organization
DATE: July 31, 2003
The action taken by the City Council last evening to not approve the proposed reorganization of the
Departments Administrative Services and Finance has left this organization function at a status quo level until
the upcoming budget session or unless we bring "individual" organizational or personnel issues back the
Council for resolution. The most pressing issue which can not wait until the 2004 budget process, ho~ever,
is the crisis we are facing with the expiration of our temporary contract accountant services.
In addition to the Finance and Administrative Services Department absorbing staffcuts from its budgets over
the past years, the Finance Department has operated fbr nearly a year without a key accountant position. The
City has filled some of this void with a temporary contract accountant. This position, however, will expire in
September and we will not be able to fill it with another temporary position. This interim "fix" within
Finance has placed a tremendous strain on the Assistant City Treasurer and Accounting Clerks. Furthermore,
the Finance Department has recently assumed the additional responsibilities of managing the financial
welfare of the new Conference Center and Parking Garage and is also handling the accounting for a nex~ LID,
Government Center, Public Safety bond projects, and numerous other accounts and funds.
As a result, it is our proposal that the City Council approves a replacement position within the Finance
Department to be filled through the creation of the position of Finance (?~c'er at a salary band 16.
CITY OF BREMERTON
JOB DESCRIPTION
POSITION TITLE: Finance Officer
DEPARTMENT: Finance
DIVISION: Finance
SALARY: Range 16:$5,412 - 6,593
DATE: July, 2003
GENERAL FUNCTION
Under general direction of the Director of Finance, performs complex professional,
administrative and technical accounting and finance duties or functions in maintaining the fiscal
records and systems of the City. Plan, organize, control and direct the day to day financial
operations of the City including budget, accounting, financial reporting, debt issue and
management, cash and investment management, capital improvement program, utility rate-
making, financial analysis and modeling of current and potential City activities and projects.
REPRESENTATIVE ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
· Provides financial support, advice and guidance to all departments o£the City.
· Assists in the preparation and monitoring of the annual City budget, development of the
capital improvement program, and assessment of the annual revenue estimates for use in
the annual budget.
· Oversees and coordinates the City's financial reporting efforts, including coordinating the
preparation and production of the City's CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report), State BARS (Budgeting, Accounting and Reporting System) reports, and other
financial surveys and reports.
· Manages the daily investment and cash position of all City funds to ensure that
investment returns are maximized to the extent consistent with the City's investment
policies.
· Assists in planning and directing the analysis necessary for the setting and
implementation of rates for the City's utilities through the public and political process.
· Supervises, evaluates and directs the work of Finance department employees.
· Directs the City's accounting and reporting operations, including maintaining its
accounting systems, establishing and maintaining internal financial controls, preparing all
required financial reports, conducts internal audits, all in accordance with sound business
practices, applicable City ordinances/resolutions, State laws, and GAAP (Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles).
· Directs the development and maintenance of the City's cash receipting and disbursement
systems, including accounts receivables, centralized cashiering, accounts payable,
payroll, non-expense disbursements, travel advance, debt service, LID accounting, and
other finance and accounting related systems.
· Demonstrate the effects of alternative decision options using financial modeling, studies
and analysis.
· Prepares various State, Federal and other agency reports and ensures that payments made
are in compliance with State and Federal statutes and regulations.
· Works with the State Auditor during the annual audit of the City to ensure the City's
compliance efforts.
· Ensures that the City's accounting structure complies with State BARS.
· Trains, develops, directs and evaluates Finance Department staff to: 1) help expedite
work flow and to improve efficiency and effectiveness of department operations; 2)
achieve their individual goals; 3) foster teamwork; 4) collectively achieve the depart-
ment's mission; and 5) lead to employees' growth and accountability for their actions.
KNOWLEDGE~ SKILLS AND ABILITIES (Entry Requirements)
Knowledge of: · State BARS and general state and federal laws regulating the financial activities of
Washington municipalities
· In-depth knowledge of generally accepted accounting and auditing principles, theory and
practices, as well as financial analysis and reseamh techniques.
· The bond market and forces affecting the price of fixed income securities
· Mastery of municipal accounting and budgetary principles, practices, operations and
procedures.
· General business and financial practices needed to operate effectively in the City's
general business environment.
Ability to:
· Analyze complex and interrelated financial functions and planning programs to promote
accuracy and compliance with laws and financial management standards, and to produce
information which will assist the City in achieving its objectives and overall mission.
· Purchase and sell fixed income securities to maximize the City's financial return within
an acceptable level of risk and liquidity
· Communicate effectively both verbally and in writing, and maintain quality working
relationships with other City employees and the public during the course of work. Tact,
patience and courtesy are needed, as well as the ability to effectively communicate
technical concepts to lay people.
· Manage multiple complex financial assignments and to allocate resources effectively
· Be proficient with PC and financial systems application software
Assist in the preparation of budgets, analyses, reports and recommendations.
· Establish and execute complex oral and written instructions and to apply available
guidelines to various situations.
· Quickly grasp technical financial principles and procedures, and to carry on more than
one function at a time in an environment subject to many distractions.
· Plan and organize and to meet rigid schedules and demanding time-lines.
QUALIFYING EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE (Minimum Requirements)
Four year degree in business, accounting, finance or closely related field and six years
increasingly responsible work experience with five years in a supervisory or administrative
capacity. Public accounting experience and MBA, MPA or CPA highly desirable.
PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS
Work requires frequent sitting and standing, the ability to operate office machines including
telephone, fax, computer terminal and copy machine, and occasional lifting over 30 pounds.
Occasional presentations require public speaking ability and the use of andio visual equipment.
Frequent automobile and occasional air travel are required.
WORKING CONDITIONS
Work is primarily performed in an office environment. Occasional public presentations of
complex and sometimes controversial information are required. Frequent evening and
occasional weekend meetings are required. Frequent local travel and occasional in state and out
of state travel required.
LEGAL AND REGULATORY EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS · Fair Labor Standards Act: The classification is exempt under the laws of fair Labor
Standards Act minimum wage and overtime provisions.
· Representation: Non-represented
· Civil Service: The classification is excluded in the City's Civil Service System.
· Appointment and Removal Authority: This position is filled by appointment of the
Finance Director and removal is at the will of the Finance Director in conformance with
procedures established by the City.
This classification specification does not constitute an employment agreement between the City
and employee. It is subject to change by the City as the needs of the City and requirements
change.
DATE SUBMITTED: Jul5 15, 2003 BILL
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON 8 C
CITY COUNC1L
SUBJECT: Professional Services Committee Meeting Date: July 22, 2003
Agreement - Design of Downtown COUNCIL MEETING Date: July 30, 2003
Pedestrian/BTC Access Improvements Department: PW&U
Presenter: Gene Sampley
Phone: 5315
SUMMARY: As a consequence of Bremerton's Downtown economic development efforts, the City
needs to reroute exiting ferry traffic through its downtown core and has secured federal funding for
the design of the Downtown Pedestrian/BTC Access Improvements. Exeltech Consulting Inc., has
been selected from qualified engineering firms to provide engineering and environmental consulting
services for this project and a professional services agreement (PSA) has been negotiated for the
required services for Design of Downtown Pedestrian/BTC Access Improvements in the amount of
$3,885,804 with a Management Reserve of $39,888 for a total authorized amount of $3,925,692.00. It
is recommended City Council approve eXecution of the attached PSA
ATTACHMENTS:
(1) Project Summary
(2) Professional Services Agreement
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): This project is included in the 2003 amended
budget.
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
ECON DEV. DIRECTOR
MAYOR:
FISCAL~UDGET:
]'
/ -/ -
CO~CIL P~SIDENT: .
~COMMENDED MOTION: I move that City Council approve the Professional Semices
Agreement with Exeltech Consulting Inc. for Design ofDowmown Pedestfia~TC Access
Improvements for a total authorized amount of $3,925,692.00 and authorize the Mayor to finalize and
execute the same.
Attachment (1)
PROJECT SUMMARY
Professional Services Agreement - Design of Downtown Pedestrian/BTC Access Improvemems
The Downtown Pedestrian/BTC Access Improvements are needed as a consequence of
Bremerton's revitalization and economic development efforts. The City of Bremerton is the lead
agency for this federally funded project. Bremerton's project partners include Kitsap Transit,
U.S. Navy, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Authority, Washington State
Department of Transportation, and Washington State Ferries.
Currently, vehicular access to the Bremerton Transportation Center (BTC)/Washington State
Ferry is from Pacific Avenue to 1a Street; exiting ferry traffic is routed down Washington
Avenue. With development of the Bremerton Conference Center and many other waterfront
properties along Washington Avenue, together with Maritime Park by the City and Heritage Park
by the Navy, a substantial increase in pedestrian traffic will be generated in Bremerton's
downtown urban core. The existing flow of exiting ferry traffic presents an obstacle to beneficial
and safe use of the downtown area and needs to be rerouted. Under Phase I of this project,
various alternatives were developed and evaluated to provide the needed relief to the urban
environment. A preferred alternative has been selected for further study under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and implementation. Opportunity for public input during this
process is an important aspect of the projects success. The City will proceed carefully by
authorizing elements of the contract aher each milestone is achieved; i.e., successful
environmental review and acceptance~
The Phase II work to be performed by the consultant consists of preparing NEPA Environmental
Assessment (EA), preliminary engineering, right of way acquisition and relocation services, final
design (Plans, Specifications & Estimate) and construction management for improvements to
pedestrian and vehicular access, within the downtown Bremerton core, with the BTC. The
proposed improvements include a ferry exit tunnel, roadway reconstruction and realignment,
transit enhancements, channelization, signalization, sidewalk and streetscape improvements,
illumination, landscaping and utility modifications. As noted above, work by the consultant will
be authorized and managed by Task; i.e., NEPA and preliminary engineering will be performed
first. Subject to City approval, right-of-way acquisition and final design will be authorized; then,
construction management.
Assuming an August 2003 start date, the NEPA EA with preliminary engineering will be
complete in January 2005 with construction beginning summer 2005 and completed in the spring
of 2006.
Federal funds in the amount of $1.5 million ~ zero °A match and $4.7 million ~ 20% match
have been secured for initial studies and design for this project. The total estimated cost for these
improvements is approximately $27,000,000. Construction will be funded through 2005 and
2006 federal appropriations.
! Consultant/Address/Telephone
Local Agency EXELTECH CONSULTING, INC
Standard Consultant 2627A Parkmont Lane SW
Ag reement Olympia, WA 98502
Agreement Number (360) 357-8289
Federal Aid Number Project Title And Work Description
Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton
Agreement Type (Choose one) Transportation Center Access Improvements
[] Lump Sum
Lump Sum Amount $
[] Cost Plus Fixed Fee
Overhead Progress Payment Rate ]62.35 % DBE Participation
Overhead Cost Method []Yes [] No 54.46 %
[] Actual Cost WBE Participation
[]Yes []No 1.67 %
[] Actual Cost Not To Exceed %
Federal ID Number or Social Security Number
[] Fixed Rate % 91-1491880
Fixed Fee $ Do you[]requireyes []a 1099No for IRS? Completion Date
[] Specific Rates Of Pay
[] Negotiated Hourly Rate Total Amount Authorized $ 3,885,804.00
[] Provisional Hourly Rate Management Reserve Fund $ 39,888.00
[] Cost Per Unit of Work
Maximum Amount Payable $ 3,925,692.00
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
between the Local Agency of City of Bremerton , Washington, hereinafter called the
"AGENCY", and the above organization hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT".
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires to accomplish the above referenced project, and
WHEREAS, the AGENCY does not have sufficient staff to meet the required commitment and therefore
deems it advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide the necessary
services for the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that he/she is in compliance with the Washington State
Statutes relating to professional registration, if applicable, and has signified a willingness to furnish
Consulting services to the AGENCY,
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performance contained
herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows:
DOT Form 140-089 EF Page 1 of 8
Revised 12/99 t.~
I All repot[s, PS&E materials, and other data, furnished
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY shall be
returned. All designs, drawings, specifications,
The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of documents, and other work products prepared by the
the above described work and services as herein CONSULTANT prior to completion or termination of
defined and necessary to accomplish the completed this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for this
work for this PROJECT. The CONSULTANT shall PROJECT and are property of the AGENCY. Reuse
furnish all services, labor and related equipment by the AGENCY or by others acting through or on
necessary to conduct and complete the work as behalf of the AGENCY of any such instruments of
designated elsewhere in this AGREEMENT. service, not occurring as a par~ of this PROJECT,
shall be without liability or legal exposure to the
II CONSULTANT,
SCOPE OF WORK
IV
The Scope of Work and project level of effort for this TIME FOR BEGINNING AN D COMPLETION
project is detailed in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and
The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under
by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT.
the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in
III writing by the AGENCY. All work under this
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date
shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under
All aspects of coordination of the work of this
completion date.
AGREEMENT, with outside agencies, groups or
individuals shall receive advance approval by the The established completion time shall not be extended
AGENCY. Necessary contacts and meetings with because of any delays attributable to the CONSULT-
agencies, groups or individuals shall be coordinated ANT, but may be extended by the AGENCY, in the
through the AGENCY. event of a delay attributable to the AGENCY, or
because of unavoidable delays caused by an act of
The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination,
GOD or governmental actions or other conditions
progress and presentation meetings with the beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. A prior
AGENCY or such Federal, Community, State, City supplemental agreement issued by the AGENCY is
or County officials, groups or individuals as may be required to extend the established completion time
requested by the AGENCY. The AGENCY will
provide the CONSULTANT sufficient notice prior V
to meetings requiring CONSULTANT participation. PAYMENT
The minimum number of hours or days notice -
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY
required shall be agreed to between the AGENCY
for completed work and services rendered under this
and the CONSULTANT and shown in Exhibit "B"
AGREEMENT as provided in Exhibit "C" attached
attached hereto and made part of this AGREEMENT.
hereto, and by this reference made part of this
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a monthly
AGREEMENT. Such payment shall be full compen-
progress report, in a form approved by the AGENCY,
sation for work performed or services rendered and
that will outline in written and graphical form the
for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and
various phases and the order of performance of the
incidentals necessary to complete the work
work in sufficient detail so that the progress of the
specified in Section II, "Scope of Work". The
work can easily be evaluated. Goals for Disadvan-
CONSULTANT shall conform with all applicable
raged Business Enterprises (DBE) and Women
portions of 48 CFR 31.
Owned Business Enterprises (WBE) if required shall
be shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT.
Page 2 of 8
VI employees of the CONSULTANT only and not of the
SUBCONTRACTING AGENCY, and any and all claims that may or might
arise under any Workmen's compensation Act on
The AGENCY permits subcontracts for those items
behalf of said employees or other persons while so
of work as shown in Exhibit G to this Agreement.
engaged, and any and all claims made by a third party
Compensation for this subconsultant work shall be
as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of
based on the cost factors shown on Exhibit G,
the CONSULTANT's employees or other persons
tached hereto and by this reference made a part of this while so engaged on any of the work or services
AGREEMENT. provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole
The work of the subconsultant shall not exceed its obligation and responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
maximum amount payable unless a prior written The CONSULTANT shall not engage, on a full or
approval has been issued by the AGENCY. part time basis, or other basis, during the period of the
Ali reimbursable direct labor, overhead, direct non- contract, any professional or technical personnel who
salary costs and fixed fee costs for the subconsultant are, or have been, at any time during the period of the
shall be substantiated in the same manner as outlined contract, in the employ of the United States Depart-
in Section V. All subcontracts exceeding $10,000 in merit of Transportation, the STATE, or the
cost shall contain all applicable provisions of this AGENCY, except regularly retired employees,
AGREEMENT. without written consent of the public employer of
such person.
The CONSULTANT shall not subcontract for the
performance of any work under this AGREEMENT VIII
without prior written permission of the AGENCY. No NONDISCRIMINATION
permission for subcontracting shall create, between
The CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate
the AGENCY and subcontractor, any contract or any
other relationship, against any client, employee or applicant for employ-
ment or for services because of race, creed, color,
VII national origin, marital status, sex, age or handicap
EMPLOYMENT except for a bona fide occupational qualification with
regard to, but not limited to the following: employ-
The CONSULTANT warrants that he/she has not
merit upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or
employed or retained any company or person, other
any recruitment advertising, a layoff or terminations,
than a bona fide employee working solely for the rates of pay or other forms of compensation, selection
CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this contract, and
for training, rendition of services. The CONSULT-
that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or
ANT understands and agrees that if it violates this
person, other than a bona fide employee working provision, this AGREEMENT may be terminated by
solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, the AGENCY and further that the CONSULTANT
percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consider-
shall be barred from performing any services for the
ation, contingent upon or resulting from the award or AGENCY now or in the future unless a showing is
making of this contract. For breach or violation of this
made satisfactory to the AGENCY that discrimina-
warrant, the AGENCY shall have the right to annul
tory practices have terminated and that recurrence of
this AGREEMENT without liability, or in its discre-
such action is unlikely
tion, to deduct from the AGREEMENT price or
consideration or otherwise recover the full amount of During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the
such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees and
or contingent fee. successors in interest agrees as follows:
Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or A. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS: The
other persons while engaged in the performance of CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regula-
any work or services required of the CONSULTANT tions relative to nondiscrimination in the same
under this AGREEMENT, shall be considered manner as in Federal-assisted programs of the
Page 3 of 8
Department of Transpodation, Title 49, Code of sive possession of another who fails or refuses to
Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be furnish this information the CONSULTANT shall
amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred so cer[ify to the AGENCY, or the United States
to as the Regulations), which are herein incorpo- Depadment of Transportation as appropriate, and
rated by reference and made a part of this shall set forth what effods it has made to obtain
AGREEMENT. The consultant shall comply the information.
with the American Disabilities Act of 1992, as
amended. E. SANCTIONS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE: In the
event of the CONSULTANT's noncompliance
B. NONDISCRIMINATION: The CONSULTANT, with the nondiscrimination provisions of this
with regard to the work performed by it during the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose
AGREEMENT, shall not discriminate on the such sanctions as it or the Federal Highway
grounds of race, creed, color, sex, age, marital Administration may determine to be appropriate,
status, national origin or handicap except for a including, but not limited to:
bona fide occupational qualification in the selec-
1, Withholding of payments to the CONSULT-
tion and retention of subconsultants, including
ANT under the AGREEMENT until the
procurements of materials and leases of equip-
ment. The CONSULTANT shall not participate CONSULTANT complies, and/or
either directly or indirectly in the discrimination 2. Cancellation, termination or suspension of the
prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, AGREEMENT, in whole or in part.
including employment practices when the contract
F. INCORPORATION OF PROVISIONS: The
covers a program set forth in Appendix II of the
Regulations. CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of
paragraphs (A) through {G) in every subcontract,
C. SOLICITATIONS FOR SUBCONSULTANTS, including procurements of materials and leases of
INCLUDING PROCUREMENTS OF MATERI- equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or
ALS AND EQUIPMENT: In all solicitations directives issued pursuant thereto. The CON-
either by competitive bidding or negotiation made SULTANT shall take such action with respect to
by the CONSULTANT for work to be performed any subconsultant or procurement as the
under a subcontract, including procurements of AGENCY or the Federal Highway Administra-
materials or leases of equipment, each potential tion may direct as a means of enforcing such
subconsultant or supplier shell be notified by the provisions including sanctions for noncompli-
CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT's ance; provided, however, that, in the event a
obligations under this AGREEMENT and the CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is
Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant or
grounds of race, creed, color, sex, age, marital supplier as a result of such direction, the CON-
status, national origin and handicap. ULTANT may request the AGENCY to enter
into such litigation to protect the interests of the
D. INFORMATION AND REPORTS: The
CONSULTANT shall provide all information AGENCY, and in addition, the CONSULTANT
may request the United States to enter into such
and reports required by the Regulations, or
litigation to protect the interests of the United
directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall
States.
permit access to its books, records, accounts,
other sources of information, and its facilities as G. UNFAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES: The
may be determined by the AGENCY to be CONSULTANT shall comply with RCW
pertinent to ascedain compliance with such 49.60.180.
Regulations or directives, Where any information
required of the CONSULTANT is in the exclu-
Page 4 of 8
IX In the event of the death of any member, partner or
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT officer of the CONSULTANT or any of its supervi-
The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate sory personnel assigned to the project, or, dissolution
of the partnership, termination of the corporation, or
this AGREEMENT at any time upon ten days written
disaffiliation of the principally involved employee,
notice to the CQNSULTANT.
the surviving members of the CONSULTANT hereby
In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the agree to complete the work under the terms of this
AGENCY other than for default on the part of the AGREEMENT, if requested to do so by the
CONSULTANT, a final payment shall be made to the AGENCY. The subsection shall not be a bar to
CONSULTANT as shown in Exhibit F for the type of renegotiation of the AGREEMENT between the
AGREEMENT used. surviving members of the CONSULTANT and the
AGENCY, if the AGENCY so chooses.
No payment shall be made for any work completed
after ten days following receipt by the CONSULT- In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in
ANT of the Notice to terminate. If the accumulated the previous paragraph, should the surviving members
payment made to the CONSULTANT prior to Notice of the CONSULTANT, with the AGENCY's concur-
of Termination exceeds the total amount that would rence, desire to terminate this AGREEMENT,
be due computed as set forth herein above, then no payment shall be made as set forth in the second
final payment shall be due and the CONSULTANT paragraph of this section.
shall immediately reimburse the AGENCY for any
excess paid. Payment for any part of the work by the AGENCY
shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any
If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated remedies of any type it may have against the CON-
by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CON- SULTANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by
SULTANT, the above formula for payment shall not the CONSULTANT, or for failure of the CONSULT-
apply. In such an event, the amount to be paid shall be ANT to perform work required of it by the
determined by the AGENCY with consideration AGENCY. Forbearance of any rights under the
given to the actual costs incurred by the CONSULT- AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of entitle-
ANT in performing the work to the date of ment to exercise those rights with respect to any
termination, the amount of work originally required future act or omission by the CONSULTANT.
which was satisfactorily completed to date of termina-
tion, whether that work is in a form or a type which is X
CHANGES OF WORK
usable to the AGENCY at the time of termination;
the cost to the AGENCY of employing another firm The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and
to complete the work required and the time which revisions in the complete work of this AGREEMENT
maybe required to do so, and other factors which as necessary to correct errors appearing therein, when
affect the value to the AGENCY of the work per- required to do so by the AGENCY, without additional
formed at the time of termination. Under no compensation thereof. Should the AGENCY find it
circumstances shall payment made under this subsec- desirable for its own purposes to have previously
tion exceed the amount which would have been made satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof
using the formula set forth in the previous paragraph, changed or revised, the CONSULTANT shall make
such revisions as directed by the AGENCY. This
If it is determined for any reason that the CONSULT-
ANT was not in default or that the CONSULTANT's work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be
failure to perform is without it or it's employee's fault paid for as herein provided under Section XlV.
or negligence, the termination shall be deemed to be a
termination for the convenience of the AGENCY in
accordance with the provision of this AGREEMENT.
Page 5 of 8
Xl that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT to
DISPUTES indemnify the AGENCY and the STATE against and
hold harmless the AGENCY and the STATE from
Any dispute concerning questions of fact in connec-
claims, demands or suits based solely upon the
tion with the work not disposed of by AGREEMENT
conduct of the AGENCY and the STATE, their
between the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY shall
agents, officers and employees and provided further
be referred for determination to the Director of Public
that Jf the claims or suits are caused by or result from
Works or AGENCY Engineer, whose decision in the
the concurrent negligence of (a) the
matter shall be final and binding on the parties of this
CONSULTANT's agents or employees and (b) the
AGREEMENT, provided however, that if an action is
AGENCY and the STATE, their agents, officers and
brought challenging the Director of Public Works or
employees, this indemnity provision with respect to
AGENCY Engineer's decision, that decision shall be
(1) claims or suits based upon such negligence, (2) the
subject to de novo judicial review,
costs to the AGENCY and the STATE of defending
Xll such claims and suits, etc. shall be valid and enforce-
VENUE, APPLICABLE LAW AND able only to the extent of the CONSULTANT's
PERSONAL JURISDICTION negligence or the negligence of the CONSULTANT's
agents or employees.
In the event that either party deems it necessary to
institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any The CONSULTANT's relation to the AGENCY shall
right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the be at all times as an independent contractor,
parties hereto agree that any such action shall be The CONSULTANT specifically assumes potential
initiated in the Superior court of the State of Washing- liability for actions brought by the CONSULTANT's
ton, situated in the county the AGENCY is located in,
own employees against the AGENCY and, solely for
The parties hereto agree that all questions shall be the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the
resolved by application of Washington law and that
CONSULTANT specifically waives any immunity
the parties to such action shall have the right of appeal under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51
from such decisions of the Superior court in accor-
RCW. The CONSULTANT recognizes that this
dance with the laws of the State of Washington. The waiver was specifically entered into pursuant to the
CONSULTANT hereby consents to the personal provisions of RCW 4.24.115 and was the subject of
jurisdiction of the Superior court of the State of
mutual negotiation,
Washington, situated in the county in which the
AGENCY is located in. Unless otherwise specified in the AGREEMENT, the
AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of
Xlll construction contracts, if any, on the project. Subject
LEGAL RELATIONS AND INSURANCE
to the processing of an acceptable, supplemental
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all Federal, agreement, the CONSULTANT shall provide on-call
assistance to the AGENCY during contract adminis-
State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the
work to be done under this AGREEMENT. This tration. By providing such assistance, the
AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and construed in CONSULTANT shall assume no responsibility for:
accord with the laws of Washington. proper construction techniques, job site safety, or any
construction contractor's failure to perform its work
The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold the in accordance with the contract documents.
AGENCY and the STATE, and their officers and
employees harmless from and shall process and The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force
defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or during the terms of the AGREEMENT, or as other-
wise required, the following insurance with
suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from
the CONSULTANT's negligence or breach of any of companies or through sources approved by the State
its obligations under this AGREEMENT; provided insurance Commissioner pursuant to RCW 48.
Page 6 of 8
XlV
Insurance Coverage EXTRA WORK
A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability A The AGENCY may at any time, by written order,
insurance as required by the STATE, make changes within the general scope of the
AGREEMENT in the services to be performed,
B. General commercial liability insurance in an
amount not less than a single limit of one million B. If any such change causes an increase or decrease
and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily in the estimated cost of, or the time required for,
injury, including death and property damage performance of any part of the work under this
per occurrence. AGREEMENT, whether or not changed by the
order, or otherwise affects any other terms and
Excepting the Worker's Compensation insurance and conditions of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY
any professional liability insurance secured by the shall make an equitable adjustment in the
CONSULTANT, the AGENCY will be named on all (1) maximum amount payable; (2) delivery or
certificates of insurance as an additional insured. The completion schedule, or both; and {3) other
CONSULTANT shall furnish the AGENCY with affected terms and shall modi~ the AGREE-
verification of insurance and endorsements required MENT accordingly.
by this AGREEMENT. The AGENCY reserves the
right to require complete, certified copies of all C. The CONSULTANT must submit its "request
required insurance policies at any time. for equitable adjustment" (hereafter referred to
as claim) under this clause within 30 days from
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance the date of receipt of the written order. However,
company authorized to do business in the State of if the AGENCY decides that the facts justify it,
Washington. The CONSULTANT shall submit a the AGENCY may receive and act upon a claim
verification of insurance as outlined above within submitted before final payment of the
14 days of the execution of this AGREEMENT to AGREEMENT.
the AGENCY.
D. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be
dispute under the Disputes clause. However
effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to
nothing in this clause shall excuse the CQN-
the AGENCY. SULTANT from proceeding with the
The CONSULTANT's professional liability to the AGREEMENT as changed.
AGENCY shall be limited to the amount payable E. Notwithstanding the terms and condition of
under this AGREEMENT or one million dollars, paragraphs (a) and (b) above, the maximum
whichever is the greater unless modified by amount payable for this AGREEMENT, shall
Exhibit H. In no case shall the CONSULTANT's not be increased or considered to be increased
professional liability to third padies be limited in except by specific written supplement to this
any way. AGREEMENT.
The AGENCY will pay no progress payments XV
under Section V until the CONSULTANT has fully ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS
complied with this section. This remedy is not exclu-
sive; and the AGENCY and the STATE may take The CONSULTANT shah place his endorsement on
such other action as is available to them under other all plans, estimates or any other engineering data
provisions of this AGREEMENT, or otherwise in law. furnished by him.
Page 7 of 8
XVI XVIII
FEDERAL AND STATE REVIEW COMPLETE AGREEMENT
The Federal Highway Administration and the This document and referenced attachments contains
Washington State Department of Transportation all covenants, stipulations and provisions agreed upon
shall have the right to participate in the review or by the parties. No agent, or representative of either
examination of the work in progress, party has authority to make, and the parties shall not
be bound by or be liable for, any statement, represen-
XVll tation, promise or agreement not set forth herein. No
CERTIFICATION OF THE CONSULTANT
AND THE AGENCY changes, amendments, or modifications of the terms
hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and
Attached hereto as Exhibit "A-1", are the signed by the parties as an amendment to this
Certifications of the Consultant and the Agency, AGREEMENT.
Exhibit "A-2" Certification regarding debarment, XlX
suspension and other responsibili~ matters - primary EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE
covered transactions, Exhibit "A-3" Certification
regarding the restrictions of the use of Federal funds This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed
for lobbying, and Exhibit "A-4" Certificate of Current in several counterparts, each of which shall be
Cost or Pricing Data. Exhibits "A-3" and "A-4" are deemed to be an original having identical legal effect.
only required in Agreements over $100,000. The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all
statements, representations, warranties, covenants,
and agreements contained in the proposal, and the
supporting materials submitted by the CONSULT-
ANT, and does hereby accept the AGREEMENT and
agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof.
in witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first
above written.
___ ~ ~' By
Consultant Sa~'~osh .]. KuTu¥i]].a Agency
Page 8 of 8
Exhibit A-1
Certification Of Consultant
Project No.
Local Agency
I hereby certify that I am Santosh J. Kuruvilla, President and duly authorized
representative of the firm of EXELTECH CONSULTING, INC whose address is
2627A Parkmont Lane SW, Olympia, WA 98502 and that neither I nor the above
firm I here represent has:
(a) Employed or retained for a commission, pementage, brokerage, contingent fee or other consideration, any firm
or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) to solicit or
secure this contract.
(b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or to retain the services of
any firm or person in connection with carrying out the contract.
(c) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any fa-m, organization or pemon (other than a bona fide employee working solely for
me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee, contribution donation or consideration of any kind for, or in
connection with procuring or carrying out the contract; except as here expressly stated (if any):
1 further certify that the firm 1 hereby represent is authorized to do business in the State of Washington and
that the firm is in full compliance with the requirements of the board of Professional Registration.
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the State Department of Transportation and the Federal
Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection with this contract involving
participation of Federal aid funds and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
7/11/2003 ~
Certification of Agency Official
I hereby certify that I am the AGENCY Official of the Local Agency of City of Bremerton Washington
and that the above consulting firm or their representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an express
or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this contract to:
(a) Employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person, or
(b) Pay or agree to pay to any firm, person or organization, any fee, contribution, donation or consideration of any
kind, except as here expressly stated (if any).
I acknowledged that this certificate is to be available to the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, in connection with this contract involving participation of Federal aid highway funds and it subject
to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
S~n~um
Exhibit A-2
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility
Matters-Primary Covered Transactions
1. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its
principals:
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded
from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment
rendered against them for commission or fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting
to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction;
violation of federal or state antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery,
falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
(c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal,
state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph l.b. of this certification; and
(d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public
transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such
prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Consultant (Firm): EXELTECH CONSULTING, INC
7/11/2003
(D~e)
Exhibit A-3
Certification Regarding The Restrictions
of The use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief, that:
1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person
for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of Congress,
an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with the awarding
of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any
cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing
or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this federal contract,
grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL,
"Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was
made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this
transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 3 l, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required
certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each
such failure.
The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that
the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts which exceed $100,000 and that all
such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Consultant (Firm): EXELTECH CONSULTING, INC
Exhibit A-4
Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data
This is to verify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in
section 15.401 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and required under FAR subsection 15.403-4)
submitted, either actually or by specific identification in writing, to the contracting officer or to the
contracting officer's representative in support of Downtown Ped/BTC Access Improvements
* are accurate, complete, and current as of July 11, 2003 **. This certification includes
the cost or pricing data supporting any advance agreements and forward pricing rate agreements between
the offeror and the Government that are part of the proposal.
Firm EXELTECH CONSULTING, INC
Name Santosh J. Kuruvilla
Title President
Date of Execution***
* Identify the proposal, quotation, request for price adjustment, or other submission involved,
giving the appropriate identifying number (e.g., RFP No.).
** Insert the day, month, and year when price negotiations were concluded and price agreement
was reached.
*** Insert the day, month, and year of signing, which should be as close as practicable to the date
when the price negotiations were concluded and the contract price was agreed to.
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton Transportation Center
Access Improvements
7/18/03 1
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
Table of Contents
Scope of Services
Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton Transportation Center Access Improvements
SCOPE AND BUDGET
:[01 Prepare Scope and Budget
:[02 Project Logistics
:[03 Collection of Available Data
:[04 General Assumptions
PRO.1ECT MANAGEMENT
20:[ Project Management Guide
202 Monthly Progress Reports
203 Project Schedule Report
204 Coordination
205 Project Management Deliverables - Project Management Guide
NEPA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
30:[ Prepare Environmental Classification
302 Update Preliminary Purpose and Need for Protect
303 Prepare and Carry Out Public [nvolvement/InformaUon Plan
304 Interview Businesses
305 Conduct Stakeholders Workshop
306 Meet with Resource Agencies
307 Publicize and Conduct Public Open House
308 Presentation to City Council
309 Prepare Discipline Reports and Biological Assessment
3:[0 Qualitative Evaluation of Non-Critical Environmental Elements
3:[~. Revise Biological Assessment and Discipline Reports
3:[2 Preliminary Environmental Assessment (EA)
313 Camera Ready EA
3:[4 Publicize and Conduct EA Public Open House / Hearing
3:[5 Prepare Response to Comments
3:[6 Prepare Revised EA
3:[7 Prepare Notice of EA~ Adopt EA for SEPA and FONSI Approval
3:[8 Publication of Documents
3:/.9 Environmental Permits
PRELIMINARY DESIGN 300/0
40:[ Design Record
402 Develop Horizontal and Vertical Alignment Plans
403 Traffic Circulation Study
404 Roadway Sections
405 Structural Alternatives and T. S. & L. Study
406 Tunnel Support Systems
407 Surveying
408 Geotechnical Report
409 Hydraulic Analysis and Report
4:[0 Utilities Design Report
4:[:[ Right of Way
4:[2 Develop Design-Phase Public Information Plan
4:[3 Implement Design-Phase Public Tnformation Plan
2
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
4~.4 Preliminary Cost Estimates for Right of Way and Project
4~.5 Preliminary Design Deliverables
500. FI~NAL DESTGN AND PS&E
50! Description of Work
502 Preparation of Civil Plans
503 Preparation of Tunnel Plans
504 Tunnel Suppor~ Systems
505 Final Design and PS&E Deliverables
506 Specifications
507 Cost Estimating
508 Develop Construction-Phase Public Information Plan
600. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORTSERV~CES
700. QUALZTY ASSURANCE/QUALZI'Y CONTROL 70! Zntra-Znter Discipline QC Review
702 Calculations QC Review
703 Drawings QC Review
704 Specifications QC Review
705 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost QC Review
706 Document/Technical Reports QC Review
707 Construction Administration QC Review
708 Value Engineering
709 Constructability Review
800. WSF OFFZCE BUZLDZNG &TOLL BOOTHS 80! Review & Update Program Needs
802 Preliminary Design - WSF Office Building & Toll Booths
803 Final Design - WSF Office Building & Toll Booths
~18/03 3
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
Scope of Services
Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton Transportation Center Access Improvements
100 SCOPE AND BUDGET
101 Prepare Scope and Budget
The report and plans preparation work under this agreement consists of preparing an
Environmental Assessment, Design Record, Hydraulic Report, Utility Report, Geotechnical Report,
Preliminary Plans, Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates (P.S. & E.), Public involvement Plan,
Public Information Plans, WSF Office and Toll Booth Plans, and Tunnel Plans. The services
provided under this agreement will also include Project Management and Construction Support.
It is the City's intent that the entire development from the Environmental Assessment through
the final project closeout be included within this scope of services. Excluded is the determination
of the Preferred Alternative, which is prior work.
This project is on a fast-track schedule, and will construct a two-lane, one way cut-and-cover
tunnel, approximately 1,100 feet total length, from the ferry off-loading area at the Washington
State Ferries Bremerton terminal to a point approximately 200 feet west of Pacific on BurwelL
The tunnel alignment is anticipated to be S-shaped, somewhat conforming to the alignment of
surface streets Ist, Pacific, and Burwell. Grade is estimated as an approximately 2-2.5% rise
from the tunnel entrance at the ferry terminal to the tunnel exit on Burwell.
A major goal for this project is completion as early as possible, targeting open-to-traffic in fall to
winter of 2005, where that range depends on subsurface conditions and funding. The project
anticipates using one construction contract for retaining structure (piles), struts, and excavation,
construction of the cut and cover tunnel and restoration of the surface streets, lighting, signing,
landscaping, etc.
Contract work will include demolition, grading, utilities, drainage, surfacing, paving, tunnel
construction including lighting, ventilation and safety systems, traffic control, channelization,
signals and signing, illumination, landscaping, and other work necessary to provide a completed
project as described herein.
The City will provide overall direction for the Project. The Consultant shall accomplish studies as
may be pertinent and necessary as approved and requested by the City to provide information
and recommendations on the features of the work and on various aspects of the design in order
to achieve the most cost effective and appropriate project. When alternates are being
considered, the City will have the right of selection.
:1.02 Project Logistics
The project development process requires that the City's project development personnel provide
certain necessary support services to the Consultant. To facilitate an orderly and efficient
preparation of contract documents, the Consultant will coordinate work with the City's project
development office in Bremerton.
The Consultant shall provide labor and services necessary to complete the work of this
agreement, including supplies, equipment, incidentals and materials, except as designated
elsewhere in this agreement, necessary to prepare and deliver to the City, items of work as
designated in this Scope of Services.
103 Collection of Available Data
Upon receipt of notice-to-proceed, the Consultant shall initiate the Project related activities as
follows:
4
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
A, Review pertinent information and technical data generated and provided to date by the
City and other agencies.
B. Assemble Project data available and identify that which is needed.
C. Site visits
D. Tour the Project with the City's staff and conduct a pre-operational orientation meeting
(inclusive of site visit).
E. Review as-built data, available pertinent information and technical data
F. Confirm design criteria to be utilized in the development of the design
G. Confirm procedures to be followed in connection with preparing and/or carrying out the
public information plan and the public involvement plan.
H. Other agency public information data assembly and procedures.
Additional traffic data needed: A. Signal plans - opticom transit preemption
B. Signal timing plans - fire preemption
C. Synchro files relative to other development, Navy, etc.
D. Parametrix Traffic Circulation Study with Synchro files
E. Other pertinent information possessed by the City and/or WSDOT.
Establishing the Project design criteria will be one of the key elements in the early-on work
efforts. Design criteria and standards will be developed in accordance with AASHTO Guidelines,
City of 0remerton Public Works Design Standard, LAG Manual for design criteria and standards,
and WSDOT practices and procedures. These standards will include channelization requirements,
design speed, side and back slopes, structural requirements, clearance windows, and traffic
control requirements.
Data collection items to be provided by the City will include (as available): A. As-Built Or As-Designated Roadway Plans
B. City Street Standards
C. Traffic Data
D. Downtown Redevelopment Design And Criteria Standards
E. Maintenance Data OmSite Problems
F. Right-Of-Way Mapping
G. Existing Survey Control Data
H. Existing Environmental Documents
T. Environmental Data
3. City-owned utility routing
K. In addition to any technical documents/data that will assist in gaining familiarity with the
project itself, the following information will be necessary to proceed with the public
involvement, public information aspects of the project.
L. Design plans for retaining wall(s) parallel to Burwell and Pacific
M. Other Pertinent Project Data As May Be Available
Data collection items (as available), which will be requested by the Consultant from other
agencies, include:
A. Gas, Power, Telephone, And TV Utility Routings (From Respective Utility Owner)
B. School Bus Routes
C. Emergency Vehicle Routes
D. Local And Regional Transit Agencies
E. Environmental Data
F. Other Pertinent Project Data As May Be Available
5
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
:[04 (~eneral Assumptions on Which This Scope of Work Is Based
Phase 1 work done by others for development of the project includes several elements that will
be provided to Exeltech Consulting prior to Notice to Proceed, including project records, base
maps, cost estimates, design drawings, and all other pertinent materials developed under Phase
I. These will serve as the baseline for development of the design and environmental analysis and
documentation.
A. Basic structure type will be a cast in place concrete or precast concrete Cut & Cover
Tunnel
B. Tunnel cross-section will be uniform "single cell configuration" except for tapering the
width as required to accommodate the exit onto Burwell.
C. No Right of Way (ROW) costs included
D. Alignment nominally follows existing streets (minimal Right of Way acquisition)
E. No Groundwater/soil liquefaction issues
F. No allowances for art/artists
G. Longitudinal venting will be used for tunnel ventilation.
H. One Construction contract approach - completion 12/05
KPFF will provide Preferred Alternate in Mid-July 03
a. Project records, base maps, cost est., design drawings & other pertinent
materials developed in Phase i' will be made available.
J. Hazardous materials will not be found.
K. Schedule will be as assumed by Consultant and not delayed. Schedule delays outside of
Consultant control will increase project cost.
L. NEPA compliance will be an Environmental Assessment (EA). SEPA compliance will be
NEPA FONSI Adoption.
M. The tunnel, WSF Office Building and tollbooths will be consolidated into one NEPA/SEPA
process or action.
N. An EIS will not be required.
O. Timely payment of invoices. (Fast tracking requires cash flow).
P. 1~ Pacific & Burwell construction area can be closed to through traffic - local access
possible if Navy clears Pacific and allows temporary use.
Q. Final acceptance authority during construction resides with Bremerton. (Consultant
provides construction support)
R. Consultant will use AutoCAD Software for plan preparation.
S. Open house for presentation of Purpose and Need and Alternatives by others.
T. Preferred Alternative will be selected by the City. Consultant will analyze one "build" and
one "no-build" alternative.
U. The Alternatives Analysis Report will be prepared by others documenting the process for
selection of the preferred alternative, including evaluation criteria, public outreach, etc.
V. Update of the City's Comprehensive Plan will include the project and other land use
improvements in the downtown area. The Plan will be completed and adopted in time to
be referenced in the EA, and will support the tunnel & downtown redevelopment.
W. City to provide available data needs necessary to conduct the design and environmental
studies.
X. Project records, base maps, cost estimates, design drawings, and all other pertinent
materials developed under Phase ! will be made available to the consultant.
Y. This scope includes providing a list of incidents that are typically identified for highway
tunnels, as modified during a workshop with emergency response providers. Tt is
assumed that the Emergency Response/Emergency Management Plan will be developed
by the agencies charged with responding to emergencies. An Emergency
Response/Emergency Management Plan can be developed and provided by the
consultant at an additional expense.
~18/03 6
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
z. Design plans for the retaining walls separating the PSNS from Burwell and Pacific are
available, and subsurface investigation are not necessary to determine the wails' as-built
type, size and location.
AA. All plans and documents will be based on English Units of measurement.
BB. Security surveillance and/or tunnel access control barriers or systems are not included.
200 PRO.1ECT MANAGEMENT
The consultant shall provide clear and concise documentation of' work progress, including
coordinating work products by the design team that is critical to the overall design effort. This
task shall include the preparation of monthly progress reports and monthly schedule reports.
201 Project Management Guide
Tn order to closely monitor, define, and schedule work products, the Consultant will prepare a
manual that summarizes significant project activities. The manual will be developed with
chapters devoted to the following: Project Plan, Directory, Budget Baseline, Schedule Baseline,
Scope Baseline, Deliverables Log, Communications Plan, Change Control Plan, CADD
Management, Project Closeout, and Cost Hanagement.
202 Monthly Progress Reports
Monthly progress reports shall be prepared to document work occurring by each discipline
member. Monthly reports shall be forwarded to the Client's Project Manager for review and shall
form the basis for tracking the progress of work throughout the project life.
203 Project Schedule Report
The consultant shall provide a schedule report that provides a concise statement of the status of
the work and critical project milestones. The Consultant shall use a single graphic to show both a
summary schedule in bar-chart form and a progress curve that allows comparison of actual work
done (earned value) to the baseline budget and the actual expenditures. The main elements of
work completed shall be covered in more detail in the body of the monthly progress report. These
reports shall be forwarded to the Client's Project Manager by the 5t~ of each month for the previous
month's activities. The Consultant shall make these reports available in electronic format.
204 Coordination
The Consultant shall provide thorough and continuous coordination to ensure the overall success
of the Project. The Consultant shall accomplish this on multiple levels for the various disciplines
involved. In addition to the overall agency coordination required for this project, the Consultant
shall provide in-house coordination as follows. The Consultant shall hold monthly meetings with
the Client's Project Manager to provide an overall briefing of project activities. Secondly, the
Consultant shall hotd the weekly project team meetings that the Client's Project Manager is
invited to attend.
Coordination meetings shall be required as part of the environmental process for this project.
For the benefit of interested public entities, the Consultant is available to provide project-related
presentations to Iocat individuals or groups as requested. The Consultant shall also provide
briefings or assist in briefings to the local governmental councils as required.
205 Project Management Deliverables - Project Management Guide ^. Project Plan
B. Directory
C. Budget Baseline
D. Schedule Baseline
E. Scope Baseline
F. Deliverables Log
G. Communications Plan
7/18/03 7
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
H, Change Control Plan
I. CADD Management Plan
~1. Project Closeout Plan
K. Other Deliverables
a, Schedule- Honthly Updates
b. Budget Tracking (task and deliverables log)
c, Meeting Ninutes Documentation
d. Documentation Nanagement Log
e. Action Item Log
f. Project Archival Records
g. Subconsultant Nonthly Progress Reports and Invoices
h. Monthly Progress Reports
i, Monthly Invoices
300 NEPA ENVIRONI~IENTAL ASSESSf4ENT
301 Prepare Environmental Classification Summary
Environmental Classification Summary to validate project classification as a Class III,
Environmental Assessment. Submit to the City and WSDOT Local Programs for a 15-day review
and approval.
Assumption: Presumes project requires an Environmental Assessment
De/iverab/e.. Environmental Classification Summary
:302 Update Preliminary Purpose and Need for Project
The Purpose and Need for the Project will be updated to provide substantiation for the need for
and primary objectives of the Project.
Assumptions; A. Pre data supplied by the City.
B. City will provide final approval within 10 days and provide the decision on conflicting
objectives by various stakeholders.
De//verab/e: Purpose and Need Documentation
303 Prepare and Carry Out Public l'nvolvement Plan
The Public Involvement Plan (PIP) will identify the methods and milestones for involving
stakeholders and the public during the design, environmental and construction phases of the
project. It will also include publicity plans for encouraging public participation. Contents ofthe
PIP will include those provisions outlined in Section 23.34 of the Local Agency Guidelines. The
PIP will be submitted to the City for review and approval.
The Consultant will develop and carry out the PIP.
Assumption: One round of revisions of the PIP
Deliverable: Public Involvement Plan
304 Interview Businesses
All businesses abutting and potentially affected by the project will be interviewed to identify
issues and coordinate development of mitigation strategies. A. Draft interview questions and edit summary report.
B. Conduct interviews (Assume 20 businesses, each interviewed twice.)
C. Compile results
7/18/03 8
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
Deliverab/e: Draft and edit two Summary Reports
305 Conduct Stakeholders Workshop
Conduct Workshop with the key stakeholders to review purpose and need, further identify issues,
and review preferred design option.
Assumptions: A. One four-hour workshop
B. Preliminary list of stakeholders includes: To be determined by the City of Bremerton.
C. Two design options to be carried forward including the preferred design option.
D. Up to eight exhibits as needed.
De/iverab/e: Written Summary of Workshop
306 lUleet with Resource Agencies
Meet with resource agencies to identify key permit or regulatory issues that need to be taken into
consideration.
Assumption: Two-hour meeting each with five resource agencies (Washington Department of
Fish and Wildlife, Environmental Protection Agency, NOAA Fisheries, Washington
Department of Ecology, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers)
Deliverable: Written Summary of resource agency meetings
307 Publicize and Conduct Public Open House
Conduct public open house to display purpose and need statement, key issues, and design
options considered preferred design option, and seek input.
A. Draft, prepare and deliver display advertisement to City for publication in newspaper(s)
of general circulation.
B. Draft text for mailed notices publicizing the event
C. Draft news release publicizing the event
D. Draft text for up to five handouts for distribution at the open house.
E. Coordinate logistics for event, including site reconnaissance, room set-up, etc
F. Set up and break down event.
Assumptions: A, Four-hour open house for 100 people
B, Consultant to prepare notices for mailing and newspaper publication.
C. Costs for mailing and duplication to be reimbursed by City.
D, Consultant will develop mailing list that will be approved by the City,
E. City will place ad in newspaper(s).
Deliverables: A. Up to 15 exhibits as needed
B, Mailing Notices
C, Prepare Display Advertisement
D, Written Summary of Comments received
308 Presentation to City Council
Make presentation to the City Council that includes the following: history of Project; Purpose and
Need for the Project; Project issues; design options considered; input from the public,
stakeholders, and resource agencies; and the identified preferred design option.
9
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
Assumption: Consultant Project 1'4anager and Environmental Hanager to attend meeting
Deliverable: Prepared presentation to the City Council
309 Prepare Discipline Reports and Biological Assessment
Prepare Discipline Reports based on preliminary design of the preliminary preferred alternative(s)
that includes horizontal and vertical alignment, proposed improvements footprint, and preliminary
right-of-way limits. Discipline Reports shall follow the outline for the specific Discipline Report
and Biological Assessment checklists included in the WSDOT Environmental Procedures Manual
(M 31-11) for the following elements:
309.1 Water (~uality
The Discipline Report will be prepared based on the WSDOT Environmental Procedures Manual
Exhibit 431-4.
309.2 Hazardous I~laterials
Studies will be performed to investigate, assess, rank and describe the potential hazardous
materials impacts that could occur with the project. The hazardous materials analysis will:
A. Characterize known and suspected hazardous material releases in the project area;
B. i'dentify probable adverse impacts of the screened project alternatives on hazardous
materials;
C. Identify possible impacts that the existence of hazardous materials may have on the
construction of the project; and
D. Recommend mitigation measures that could be implemented for unavoidable adverse
impacts.
Hazardous materials information will be summarized in the EA, with supporting data contained in
the Hazardous Materials Discipline Report (prepared according to WSDOT Environmental
Procedures Manual)
A. Data Collection: Consultant will complete a gap analysis of existing information, historical
and agency record review, and a windshield survey of the most industrial portion of the
corridor. Preliminary studies performed by others will be reviewed, refined and
evaluated by property rather than by city block to provide more site-specific information
along the selected alignments to identify potential recognized environmental conditions.
The following sources will be used:
a. Department of Ecology Environmental Database Search
b. Sanborn Fire Insurance maps
c. Polk City Directories
d. Washington State Archives
e. King County Assessor's Office
f. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) maps
g. Aerial photographs (if available)
The information obtained from these sources will be summarized. All known or
suspected contaminated sites based on regulatory records and historical research will be
mapped by site address using G~S format and summarized in tables.
B. Affected Environment: Characterization of the affected environment as impacted by the
known and suspected contaminated sites will be performed, including a discussion of the
land use history and physical environment considerations that could impact the
distribution, migration, and cleanup of contamination.
C. ~mpacts: Potential impacts that the existence of contamination has on project
development will be evaluated. These impacts may include but not be limited to,
construction impacts, worker safety, regulatory impacts, and local requirements. Further
7/18/03 10
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
investigation will be necessary to fully evaluate project impacts and develop cleanup
costs.
D. Mitigation: Mitigation measures will be identified for the purposes of avoiding or
controlling contaminated site impacts. The mitigation measures will be site specific
where possible, including but not limited to, avoidance of contaminated sites, permit
requirements, and cleanup options.
E. Documentation: A Hazardous Materials Discipline report will be prepared in general
accordance with the WSDOT Environmental Procedures Manual. The detailed
information provided in the discipline report will be summarized for inclusion into the EA
document.
309.3 Biology
The Biology Discipline Report will be based on WSDOT Environmental Procedures Manual Exhibit
4.37-11.
309.4 Biological Assessment
The Biological Assessment and required consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act will comply with the BA checklist (Exhibit 436.4) in WSDOT Environmental Procedures
Manual.
309.5 Transportation
See Section 403
309,6 Bicycles and Pedestrians
See Section 403
;309.7 Historic and Archaeological
Section 106 of NHPA requires federally assisted undertakings to take into account the effects of
those undertakings on historic properties, which are included in, or which may be eligible for the
National Register of Historic Places. · Historic properties' refers to prehistoric and historical
archaeological sites as well as buildings, structures, and other historic sites. Also of importance
are Washington state laws dealing with archaeological sites and Native American burials (the
Archaeological Sites and Resources ACt [RCW 27.53] and the Indian Graves and Records Act
[RCW 27.44]).
Three elements are involved in cultural resources studies following Section 106 procedures: A. The identification and evaluation of historic properties,
B. Assessment of effects of the proposed undertaking on historic properties, and
C. Consultation among principle parties to consider ways to resolve adverse effects.
Consultant will assist the City in fulfilling its responsibilities for cultural resources by completing
several tasks including development of an Area of Potential Effect (APE), if necessary,
identification and evaluation of historic properties, and assessment of project impacts on them.
The following sections outline the tasks, which will be undertaken.
Project Coordination
This task includes coordinating with city, state, and federal officials, tribes and EA team members
throughout the project. An initial task, developing the APE, must be done in consultation with
the Washington State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and affected tribes. The APE is
generally understood to be the geographic area within which an undertaking may directly or
indirectly cause changes in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist
[36 CFR § 800.16(d)]. Consultant will advise the City on the requirements for an APE and help
present this material to the lead federal agency. Tasks that follow are based on Section 106 and
are subject to modification following consultation of the lead federal agency and the SHPO.
7/18/03 11
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
Archival and Background Research
Archival and background research, including a check of the Washington state site inventory and
records at the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP), will be conducted prior to
any field activity in order to determine the locations and character of sites and buildings already
recorded in the project area and its vicinity. Other information will be collected from contacting
the Suquamish Tribe and individual tribal members, from ethnographic and historic accounts,
previous regional cultural resource investigations, informants, museums, libraries, and city and
county offices, maps, photographs, and from environmental information. Locations of
archaeological sites may be identified by this process, or the potential for buried and hence,
undiscovered sites that could be damaged can be determined.
The $uquamish Tribe will be contacted to solicit any concerns about traditional use areas or other
heritage issues; however, this contact does not constitute formal consultation, which must be
completed by the lead federal agency or its designee.
Field Survey
The survey will verify field conditions and identify historic properties. An important part of the
fieldwork will be to determine the relationship of any recorded sites and any newly discovered
sites to the project boundaries. Expectation for discovery of archaeological sites is Iow because
the ground surface is not visible within the project. This task also includes fieldwork associated
with geotechnical work. Consultant will monitor geotech boring, determine the presence of
cultural material, and advise the geotech team on the location of probable sites. Geotechnical
bores will provide some subsurface exploration however; site discovery may not occur until
ground disturbing activities begin.
Newly identified sites and buildings will be recorded on the appropriate Washington State
Inventory form that includes written description of the site and its setting, sketch maps, location
on USGS 7.5 minute maps, and photographs. It is assumed no more than 8 buildings will be
recorded. Previously recorded sites will be updated if the existing record is more than 10 years
old.
Analysis and Report Preparation
The results of these investigations will be presented in a technical report for submittal to the City,
WSDOT, SHPO, the Tribes, agencies, and any other concerned parties. The report will present
the results of archival and field investigations and include an assessment of effects based on
available design information, recommendations for dealing with sites discovered or for any
additional discovery measures needed. This report can be used to support preparation of SEPA
or NEPA environmental assessment documents and contributes to the completion of the
identification and evaluation elements of the Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act.
Assumpt/on~, A. The APE is the route of the tunnel and adjacent property.
B. No more than eight buildings will be recorded.
De//verab/e: A defined APE, as necessary, and a technical report, as described above, for
submission to the City, WSDOT, SHPO, the Tribes, agencies, and any other concerned party.
309.8 Air Quality
The Air Quality Report will document the results of "hotspot' modeling for carbon monoxide and
will determine if the project meets the Conformity Requirements of the Clean Air Act
Amendments. The Air Quality Discipline Report will be based on WSDOT Environmental
Procedures Manual Section 425, Exhibit 425-4.
7/18/03 12
7o
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
The air quality analysis will consist of sections describing existing conditions, the impacts of the
proposed project and mitigating measures. Five scenarios will be modeled: existing; no-build and
build opening year; and design year no-build and build. The project budget assumes that the
outputs of the traffic noise model along with area CAD files for the analysis are available.
The EPA computer models, Mobile5b and CAL3QHC will be used to estimate the current carbon
monoxide concentrations at the existing intersections identified as being most likely to be
significantly affected by the project. All intersections with Levels of Service of D, E or F will be
modeled. Data from the intersection model regarding lane configuration, peak hour volumes,
and turning movements and signal timing will be used as inputs to CAL3QHC.
A technical report will be produced and summarize the findings of the air analysis. Existing
conditions will include a discussion of the applicable national, state and local regulations from the
Environmental Protection Agency, and the Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE). An
examination of available data from WDOE monitoring stations that describing current regional
and local concentrations of the priority air pollutants will also be included.
The impacts section will include the carbon monoxide concentrations from traffic modeled for the
five scenarios cited above. A paragraph on this issue of conformity as it applies to the project
will also be included.
If the analysis indicates that mitigation measures are needed to meet air quality standards, the
intersections will be reconfigured (in coordination with the traffic consultants) to provide effective
air quality mitigation.
309.9 Visual Quality
The Visual Quality Discipline Report will be based on WSDOT Environmental Procedures Manual
Section 459, Exhibit 4S9-1.
309.~.0 Relocation, Disruptions, and Displacemen~
The Relocation, Disruptions, and Displacements Discipline Report will be based on the checklist in
WSDOT Environmental Procedures Manual Section 457, Exhibit 457-3.
309.11 Economic (Employment, property values, taxes, overall economic activity)
The Economic elements Discipline Report will be based on the WSDOT Environmental Procedures
Manual Section 457, Exhibit 457-2.
Assumptions for Task 309:
A. One Build Alternative and one "No-Build" Alternative will be analyzed for the Discipline
Reports.
B. Analysis for discipline reports will be based on approximately 30% preliminary design.
C. Elements requiring discipline reports could change once more detailed information of the
Project is discovered.
D. Hazardous Material analysis and Discipline Report is based on an Initial Site Assessment.
E. No water quality samples/analysis will be conducted.
Deliverables for Task 309: Discipline Reports for each of the technical areas (Listed under
section 309 Prepare Discipline Reports and Biological Assessment above), describing the
methodology, existing conditions, impacts and recommended mitigation measures
3~.0 Qualitative Evaluation of Non-Critical Environmental Elementa
The evaluation of non-critical environmental elements likely to have minor impacts include:
7/18/03 13
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
31o,1 Noise/Vibration
An on-site visit and land use inventory will be performed to identify the existing noise sensitive
land uses and to assist in the screening analysis.
Existing noise environment will be determined using a simplified traffic noise model. Input to the
model will include existing traffic volumes, mixture (passenger vehicles, medium trucks and
heavy trucks) and speeds. The model will assume a direct line-of-sight to the project roadway
and not include any additional noise reducing factors, such as existing structures or area
topography. This method will predict the worst-case noise levels for the project corridor. Future
condition noise levels will also be projected using the methods described above with the future
traffic volumes, mixture and speeds. Mitigation measures will be discussed for those locations
where noise impacts are likely under the full build scenario. The traffic noise impact criteria against
which the project traffic noise levels are evaluated are taken from the WSDOT Traffic Noise
Manual.
Construction noise and vibration related to the project will also be evaluated. Potential
construction noise and vibration impacts and mitigation will be identified.
A memorandum will be prepared that qualitatively describes sensitive noise/vibration receptors
and analyzes potential impacts by the project both during construction and operation.
310.2 Land Use/Section 4 (f)
A memorandum will be prepared that describes impacts to land use and land use plans at a
qualitative level. The analysis will examine consistency of the alternatives with current and
proposed comprehensive plans, zoning, and related city, county, and state policy plans. An
evaluation will be conducted to determine if properties are impacted by the project.
310.3 Public Services and Utilities
A memorandum will be prepared that describes the public services and utilities potentially
impacted by the project at a qualitative level. Public service and utility providers in the project
area will be identified including police, fire, emergency, schools, parks, sewer, water, power,
phone, storm water, and solid waste. This analysis will include a discussion of which utilities may
require relocation because of the project.
310.4 Geology and Soils
Studies will be performed to assess the geology and soils along the project corridor. The studies
will be used to provide input to preparation of the NEPA EA. The evaluation will include the
following:
A. Collect and review available soils information including boring logs, laboratory test
results, and reports from previous geotechnical studies for projects completed along the
proposed tunnel corridor. Review published geologic information and site history.
B. Develop description of affected environment including geology, geologic hazards, and
general topographic setting.
C. Evaluate potential impacts for the preliminary preferred alternative and develop
recommendations for mitigation of these impacts.
D. Prepare written sections and figures for inclusion into the EA documents. Prepare a
technical memorandum summarizing the studies.
310.5 Energy
A memorandum will be prepared that describes the energy impacts of the project. The
memorandum will evaluate how much energy the project will use during construction and
operation, the availability of energy sources, any conservation measures incorporated into the
design, and the consumption of nomrenewable resources.
7/18/03 14
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
310.6 Environmental lustice
A memorandum will be prepared that describes environmental justice at a qualitative lever. The
memorandum will evaluate the presence, if any, of minority or Iow-income populations in the
project area and potential impacts on those populations.
Assumptions for Task 310:
A. One Build Alternative and one "No-Build" Alternative will be analyzed for the Qualitative
Evaluation of Non-Critical Environmental Elements.
B. No technical memorandums for wetlands, farmlands, flood plains wildlife and vegetation
will be necessar,/.
C. The City of Bremerton will provide copies of geotechnical information of previous projects
completed along the tunnel corridor.
D. Washington State Ferries will provide copies of geotechnical information at the
Bremerton Ferry Terminal.
E. Other site history information collected by others will be provided to consultant for
review.
F. No Section 4(F) properties will be impacted.
G. No disproportionate minority or Iow-income populations will be impacted.
Deliverable for Task $10: Technical memoranda for each element incorporating the existing
environmental conditions and potential impacts of the non-critical elements listed.
311 Revise Biological Assessment and Discipline Reports
A. Submit Discipline Reports and Biological Assessment to City and WSDOT Local Programs
for review.
B. Revise Biological Assessment and resubmit to the City and WSDOT Local Programs for
forwarding on to FHWA and NOAA Fisheries Service for approval.
C. Revise Discipline Reports per comments received from City and WSDOT.
31:2 Preliminary Environmental Assessment (EA)
Prepare Preliminary Environmental Assessment (EA). Submit to the City for approval and to
WSDOT Local Programs office for transmittal to FHWA and FTA for approval.
Assumpt/ons: A. 30-day ageno/review period by WSDOT, FHWA, and FTA
B. EA to be maximum of 75 pages
C. EA to include a maximum of 25 figures
De/iverab/e: 25 copies of Preliminary EA
313 Camera Ready EA
Revise EA as necessary; submit to and obtain approval and signatures on the title page from
City, WSDOT and FHWA.
Deliverable: Five copies of Camera Ready EA for approval and signature on title page
314 Publicize and Conduct EA Public Open House / Hearing
A. Draft and prepare display ad.
B. Draft mailed notices publicizing the event
C. Draft news release publicizing the event
D. Draft up to five handouts for distribution at the open house.
E. Coordinate logistics for event, including site reconnaissance, room set-up, etc.
F. Set up and break down event.
7/18/03 15
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
Assumption: City to arrange for and pay for court reporLer and hearing transcript directly.
Deliverable: Hearing Transcript
315 Prepare Response to Comments
Upon conclusion of the 30-day public review period, evaluate public and agency comments
received and prepare responses to comments.
Assumption: Preparation of responses for up to 50 comments on different issues will be
prepared.
De//verab/e: Summary of significant comments and recommended action or response
316 Prepare Revised EA and Draft FONSI
Prepare Revised EA that will include revised EA text, hearing transcript, responses to comments,
and draft Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). Submit approved Biological Assessment,
revised EA and request for FONSI to City, WSDOT Local Programs and FHWA for approval.
Assumption: One round of revisions to the Revised EA
Deliverables; A. Five copies of Revised EA for City, WSDOT and FHWA for 30-day review
B. Project Commitment File
C. Draft Finding of No Significant Impact
317 Prepare Notice of EA and FONS! Approval
Prepare notice of EA and FONSI approval and availability for City's publication in newspaper of
general circulation (The Sun) and submittal to agencies and other parties that commented on the
EA.
Assumptions:
A. City to publish notice in newspaper
B. City to send notices to agencies and people who commented on EA
De//verab/e: Notice for publication in newspaper and mailing to agencies and public
318 Publication of Documents
Prepare SEPA Adoption of Existing Environmental Document (FA and FONSI) for City's approval
and signature and publishing in newspaper of general circulation (The Sun).
Assumptions,. A. City to concur with notice in newspaper(s) of general circulation.
B. City to reimburse Consultant for cost of advertisement in newspaper(s).
Deliverable: SEPA adoption notice
319 Environmental Permits
Prepare applications for permits from the regulatory agencies
Assumptions:
A. Permit applications will include:
a. Shoreline Substantial Development from City of Bremerton
b. Hydraulic Project Approval from Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
c. Nationwide permit from United States Army Corps of Engineers
d. 401 Water Quality Certification from the Washington Department of Ecology
7/18/03 16
75
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
B. Consultant will coordinate with agencies and the Suquamish Tribe.
C. City to submit applications to agencies.
D. No wetland or buffer impacts.
E. City to pay permit fees directly.
Deliverable: Permit applications (excluding fees)
400 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 30°/0
401 Design Record
The Design Record is a formal documentation of design considerations and may be prepared
concurrent with the EA and the Preliminary Plans. The Design Record records the evaluations of
the various disciplines, which result in design recommendations and, after review and
concurrence by the City, will provide the basis for the approved design. The Design Record is
instrumental in preparation of the PS&E. The Design Record must receive concurrence from the
City prior to beginning work on the PS&E.
The Consultant shall refine the concept identified as the preferred alternative in the Draft Design
Record to produce designs and drawings for the development of the drainage, landscaping,
utilities, and other plans.
402 Develop Horizontal and Vertical Alignment Plans
The horizontal and vertical alignments are to be developed to such refinement that horizontal
and vertical clearances can be reasonably checked, drainage concepts resolved, utility conflicts
identified and R/W requirements accurately estimated. These plans shall be developed in a
manner consistent with design criteria established for this Project. Corresponding horizontal and
vertical alignments will be shown on the same plan sheet wherever possible.
403 Traffic Circulation Study
The consultant will prepare a temporary detour route circulation report utilizing the Parametrix
Traffic circulation study to analyze traffic movements (including pedestrians and bicycles) during
and after construction.
Assumption~.
A, No additional traffic data or studies will be needed to accomplish this task.
13. Several coordination meetings with stakeholders will be essential to support the detour
route analysis, It is assumed that meetings will be held with each of the following
stakeholders:
a, One meeting with Washington State Ferries
b, One meeting with Kitsap Transit
c, One meeting with Police/Fire Emergency response
d. One meeting with each private developer along detour route (up to 6 meetings)
e. Two meetings with Navy regarding their development and access needs
C, The final alignment traffic analysis report (preferred alternative) will utilize the
Parametrix study as an appendix,
D, It is assumed that there will be one review of comments and responses for the draft
report and one for the final report.
De/iverab/e~
A. Temporary detour mute report that will address the following:
a. Temporary Signal timing revisions
b. Additional Fire preemption
c. Transit signal priority
d. Conceptual layout and schematics of the roadways and intersections
7/18/03 17
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
B. Preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost for temporary and permanent traffic items will be
prepared at this stage and will be included in the Besign Record
404 Roadway Sections
The Consultant shall prepare roadway sections for each type to be used on the Project. The
typical sections shall be the basis for preparing preliminary Opinion of Probable Costs for the
Project. The typical sections shall show lane widths, shoulder widths, and other pertinent
features.
405 Structural Alternatives and T. S. & b. Study
The Consultant shall prepare conceptual level design calculations to determine structure Type,
Size and Location CT. S. & L.), and wall height and length for a cut and cover tunnel. The
Consultant shall prepare T. S. & L. drawings of the 2 most viable structural alternatives and
conceptual level Opinion of Probable Costs for the 2 most viable alternatives. Alternatives will
most likely be cast in place concrete option and a modular precast concrete option.
The Consultant shall prepare preliminary level design calculations for unique structural features
and as necessary to ensure the most viable alternates are feasible. (Special studies work shall not
begin before approval by the City). The result of the design shall include: A. Plans And Profiles At 1" = 20' Scale
B. Cut and cover tunnel And Wall Site Data For The Preferred Alternative For Each Structure
Per WSDOT Design Manual Section 11
C. Cut and cover tunnel Width And Wall Heights Defined By Roadway Sections And Profiles
D. Cut and cover tunnel T. S. & L. Per WSDOT Bridge Design Manual
E. Architectural Renderings Of Alternatives
Assumptions:
A. The two most viable alternatives will be a cast-in-place concrete alternate and a precast
concrete alternate.
B.Both these alternatives will have a uniform tunnel cross-section.
C. Both these alternatives will not be required to be designed for superimposed "air-rights"
or building loads other than regular traffic and backfill loads.
D. The setback distances from Puget Sound Naval Shipyard to tunnel will be adequate for
meeting the Anti-Terrorist Force Protection (ATFP) criteria, and that no specialized blast
resistant modeling and design will be required.
406 Preliminary Design Tunnel Support Systems
A. Incident Identification
B. Mechanical Electrical
C. SafeLy Systems
D. Tunnel Environment Control Study
406.1 Zncident Identification
A. Hold Workshop with emergency service group
B. Define and document potential incidents
Assumptions;
A. Prior to the workshop, Consultant will prepare a complete listing of probable incidents
and circulate this to the various stakeholders for comment and input prior to the
workshop.
B. City to provide the list of stakeholders.
C. At the workshop, the list will be agreed to and the General Contractor will undertake
further development and refinement.
7/18/03 18
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
D, Consultant can provide assistance during the construction phase on an hourly rate if
required,
De#verab/es: Consultant will produce a complete list of probable incidents that can occur in
tunnel and the responsible agency for responding and reacting to the situation.
406.2 Mechanical / Electrical
Ventilation A. Determine number of vehicles and traffic mix
B. Review fire mode operations
C. Ventilation controls and monitoring
D. Noise levels permitted for plant equipment
E. Prepare Opinion of Probable Cost for each reviewed system
F. Prepare draft report detailing system
Assumpt/ons:
A. The ventilation used will be a longitudinal system designed in accordance with PIARC
recommendations.
B. No other options will be reviewed.
C. There will be no portal extraction system.
De//verab/e: Report on ventilation system, control philosophy and costing of system.
Fire Detection / Suppression Systems A. Detarmine level of fire security required with Fire Department
8. Prepare concept report from supplied info:
C. Prepare Opinion of Probable Cost and prelim design
D. Review draft report with Fire Department and select system parameters
Assumpt/on~. A. It is assumed no deluge or sprinkler system is required for the tunnel because of the Iow
traffic volume and intermittent use. This must be confirmed with the Fire Department.
B. A standpipe system will be designed for the tunnel.
De#verab/e$: A. Report on fire detection / suppression systems
B. Confirmation of Fire Department
C. Design of standpipe system.
D. Opinion of Probable Cost for system.
Tunnel Power Supply
A. Determine utility services providers capacity
B. Determine level of high voltage redundancy acceptable
a. Single or dual high voltage connection
C. Determine level of Iow voltage redundancy acceptable
a. Generator, UPS, automatic changeover etc
D. Prepare Opinion of Probable Cost and draft report for each reviewed system
E. Ensure optimal 'Power Smart' ideas considered
De/iverables : A. Report on power system requirements.
B. Opinion of Probable Cost for same.
7/18/03 19
77
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
Tunnel Lighting
A. Tunnel lighting levels and standards to follow
a. IES REP 22
b. Determine access zone luminance
c. Use counter-beam, symmetrical, continuous rows of fluorescent
B. Determine if external lighting required
C. Prepare Opinion of Probable Cost and prelim design
De/iverab/e~. A. Report on lighting system requirements.
B. Opinion of Probable Cost for same.
Control Building / Substations A, Define building requirements for control, safety, mechanical/electrical requirements
B. Prepare Opinion of Probable Cost for each building mechanical/electrical system
De/iverab/es:
A. Report on building system electrical / mechanical system requirements.
Opinion of Probable Cost for same.
406.3 Safety Systems
Emergency Egress Locations
A, Review and determine the requirement for the following systems
a. Spacing and location of emergency egress points
b. Equipment required at each station
B. Prepare Opinion of Probable Cost for each reviewed system
Tunnel Specific Safety & Security Systems
A. Determine what Traffic Management and Control Systems required
a. Tunnel variable message signs
b. Lane use signals
c, Closed Circuit Television Systems
d. Visibility monitors
e. Air flow monitors
f. Notorist Emergency Telephone systems
g. Radio Communication system
h. Public Address System
i. Automatic Incident Detection System
j. Tunnel Closed Devices
k, Network Communication Systems
I, Direct Telephone Lines to emergency services groups
B. Prepare Opinion of Probable Cost and prelim design
C, Select location for tunnel operations center - suggest at WSF office
Deliverables. A. Report on tunnel safety system requirements.
B. Recommendations re requirements.
C. Opinion of Probable Cost for same.
406,4 Tunnel Environmental Control Study
Tunnel Specific Environmental l~ssues
A. Determine accepted air quality inside tunnel
7/Z8/03 20
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
B. Determine if portal emissions are acceptable
C. Review if external air monitoring systems are required
D. Review if baseline air quality reports are necessary
406.5 Tunnel Support Services
"Tunnel Support Services" encompass the service and logistical functions required to deliver the
services as listed in 4-06.1, 406.2, and 406.3. These services include:
A. Project Review Meetings with other members of team
B. Project Controls/Scheduling effort
C. QA/QC effort, as part of one subcontractor's ISO 9000:2000 certified process
407 Surveying
407.:1. Horizontal and Vertical Control
The Consultant shall establish a project wide survey control network based upon the following
datum: Horizontal - Washington State Plane Coordinate System (WCS), North Zone, 1983 (1991
Adjustment); Vertical - North American Vertical Datum (NAVD), 1988.
Control points established will consist of permanent type materials, set outside of the proposed
tunnel alignment, for usage through the construction phase. Materials to be used could consist of
a "PK" nail in asphalt, a 1/2" rebar with cap or a 3" brass cap on 2-1/2" iron pipe.
The system for vertical datum will equate NAVD 1988 with NOAA and the Army Corp of Engineers
vertical datum.
Primary control shall be established using GPS Fast Static methods adjusted to two (2) sigma
certainties (95% statistical positional tolerance certainty).
407.2 Base Mapping
The Consultant shall prepare a topographic base map and review existing as-built WSDOT data of
the project corridor consisting of the entire Bremerton Ferry Terminal site and right of way for SR
304 beginning at said terminal and terminating approximately at Warren Avenue, a distance of
2500 feet, more or less. Topographical data collected shall represent one-foot (Y) contour
accuracy with spot elevations accurate to the one-tenth of a foot vertically (true measurement)
although said spots will delineate elevation to the one one-hundredth of a foot (0.00).
Site specific data collection could include, but is not limited to, horizontal and vertical position of
potholes for utility identification, underground utilities as marked on the surface by others,
utilities having surface of above ground features, geotechnical bore hole locations, any hazardous
material sites, existing structures or bridges within the right of way, any railroad tracks, roadway
centerline and crown, columns, rockeries, traffic barriers, top of curbs and flow lines, parking,
ferry terminal improvements, adjoining buildings or improvements and vertical clearances from
roadway to overhead structures.
Field surveys will be performed throughout the corridor area to locate catch basins and obtain
invert elevations of the catch basins or drainage structures, surveys to locate culvert sizes and
invert elevations and drainage features not identified on existing mapping.
Said mapping will be conducted using a variety of methods that could include traditional
terrestrial ground mapping, CYRA 3-D Scanning and/or Low Altitude Aerial Mapping.
Assumptions:
7/18/03 21
77
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
A. Data collected for adjoining buildings include position at surface grade, at top of the
building and elevation of the building's lowest level.
B. Right of Entry for field crews into buildings shall be obtained by City.
C. This Scope of Services does not include, but it is highly recommended, research for all
adjoining foundation plans, which delineate walls and footings, or the location of said
footings by ground penetrating radar or other means.
407,3 Right of Way Establishment
Centerline and right of way shall be established by the Consultant on the horfzontai datum
defined in ~07,1, Alignment and right of way for SR ~0~ shall be based upon methodology for the
State re-establishment procedures. Once right of way is determined, adjoining buildings and
other improvements can be mathematically determined for spatial and clearance relationships
within the project corridor.
Consultant shall determine exterior boundary lines for the ferry terminal. Consultant shall require
receipt of a land description for the terminal and a title report for the site if encumbrances of
record are to be delineated.
A$$umpt/on$:
A. Requesting permission for surveying on private property and traffic control will be the
responsibility of the Consultant.
B. ff property owners are unwilling to allow access for surveying purposes, the City is
responsible for acquiring permission through negotiations or court settlement
408 Geotechnical Report
Geotechnical field explorations and engineering studies will be performed to develop geotechnical
recommendations for preliminary design of the project. Naximum use shall be made of existing
soils information. Available geologic studies by others and previous City studies shall be
reviewed.
Field Explorations:
A. Make site visit to locate borings and evaluate traffic control needs.
B. Perform utility check by calling the public utility locating service (one-call center). Private
utility locates in the field are not included in the Scope of Work. Coordinate with the City
of Bremerton and Washington State Ferries for boring locations, site access, Street-Use
permits, and utilities.
C. Drill 6 borings along the proposed tunnel alignment to depths of about 50 to 70 feet
each. Drill 2 borings for the proposed storage tank locations to depths of about 50 feet
each. Borings will be drilled using hollow stem auger techniques in the soil above and
within 5 feet below the groundwater table. Below this depth, mud-rotary drilling
techniques will be used.
D. Geotechnical Soil samples will be obtained generally at 2.5-foot intervals in the upper 25
feet of each borehole and at 5-foot intervals thereafter using the Standard Penetration
Test (SPT). An experienced engineer/geologist will record the drilling and sampling
information and prepare a field log of the boring.
E. Environmental screening will be performed by using a Photo-Ionization Detector (PID) on
each soil sample and the air space around the drilling operation to check for potential
hazards and contamination. Tf contaminated soil is encountered, drilling will be halted
and the City of Bremerton and Project Team will be contacted for direction as to whether
or not to continue drilling and sampling.
F. Two observation wells will be installed in borings performed for the proposed tunnel to
observe groundwater levels.
7/~.8/03 22
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
G. Following completion of the borings, the holes will be beckfilled according to State and
Federal regulations and a concrete patch placed at the ground surface. A paint mark will
be placed at the borehole location for surveying by others, if necessary.
Groundwater Monitoring: A. Develop monitoring wells to provide connection to groundwater table.
B. Obtain groundwater level measurements in each well approximately once per month for
a duration of 5 months.
Laboratory Testing: A. Perform geotechnical index testing on soil samples obtained from the borings.
B. Water content determinations will be performed on all non-gravel samples.
C. Grain size analyses and Atterberg Limits determinations will be conducted on selected
samples.
Boring Logs and Subsurface Profile:
A. The field record of the boring will be entered into a geotechnical database and a drafted
boring log including laboratory test results will be generated for each boring.
B. A generalized subsurface profile will be prepared along the proposed tunnel alignment
based on the existing and new subsurface information.
C. Geologic units and groundwater data will be identified and noted on the boring logs and
profile
Geetechnical Engineering Studies:
Based on the geometric and conceptual design information for the preferred alignment and the
subsurface soil and groundwater conditions encountered, geotechnical recommendations will be
developed for preliminary design.
A. Evaluate suitable shoring/wall typos and develop lateral pressure diagrams for the
proposed tunnel walls and bracing system.
B. Provide geotechnical recommendations for the tunnel base slab including evaluation of
potential uplift pressures.
C. Evaluate suitable shoring systems and develop recommendations for excavation of the
storage tanks.
D.Develop base slab support recommendations for the proposed storage tanks.
E.Provide groundwater control recommendations, if necessary.
F. Develop geotechnical construction considerations for proposed tunnel and storage tank
installation.
Draft Geotechnical Report:
Prepare a draft geotechnical report presenting Lhe results of the field explorations and laboratory
testing, generalized subsurface profile, engineering studies and geotechnical recommendations
for the preferred tunnel alternative. The report will be submitted as draft for review and will be
finalized during the P$&E phase (see Task 503.4). The report will include the following:
A. Summary of Work Performed
B. Site and Project Description
C. Results of Current and Previous Field Explorations
D. Results of Current and Previous Laboratory Testing
E. Subsurface Description and Recommended Design Soil Parameters
F. Geotechnical Design Recommendations
G. Construction Considerations
Assumption~,
A. The City of 8remerton and Project Team will assist with obtaining rights-of-entry required
to complete the field explorations. ~'t is assumed that City permit fees will be waived.
7/18/03 23
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
B. The borings will be performed during normal daylight hours in parking areas or shoulders
of the existing streets.
C. No flaggers will be required to perform borings in these areas. Traffic control will consist
of cones and signs only.
D. It is assumed that the borings will not encounter contaminated soils. The drilling mud,
cuttings or excavated soil will be containerized in drums, labeled, and removed from the
site if no contaminants are observed.
E. If contaminated soil is observed, the Project Team and City will be contacted for further
direction. The drill rig and equipment will be steam cleaned prior to moving to another
borehole if contamination is observed. I~lud and cuttings within the potentially
contaminated zone will be drummed separately from the mud and cuttings obtained from
outside the contaminated zone. The drums containing the segregated contaminated soils
will be left on site at a designated area for future disposal by the City of Bremerton.
F. Sampling, analytical testing, and disposal of contaminated soils, water, or drilling mud
will not be performed by Consultant unless requested, and would constitute Extra Work.
G. The locations of the borings will be measured from existing site features using a cloth
tape and will therefore be approximate.
H. Studies related to potential environmental issues such as soil or groundwater
contamination are not included and would constitute Extra Work. If collected data
indicates that these issues may exist, an additional scope of work and Opinion of
Probable Cost will be prepared.
De//verab/~. Draft Geotechnical Report
409 Hydraulic Analysis and Report
The Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Hanagement Nanual for Western
Washington (DOE 1'4anual) will be used in the preparation of the Hydraulic Analysis and Report.
The DOE Nanual considers existing roadway area that is completely replaced as new impervious,
regardless of its current use as existing roadway. The consultant will prepare the Hydraulic
report and drainage analysis per local agency's standards and requirements.
The report will include the following:
A. Summary of Work Performed
B. Project Description
C. All calculations necessary to identify and design the storm drainage conveyance system
and water quality facility for the project
D. Preliminary Opinion of Probable Costs for the storm drainage system and water quality
facilities for the preferred alternatives
Assumption~.
A. The roadway area above the proposed tunnel falls into this category and will necessarily
be classified as new impervious. This triggers a DOE Nanual threshold requiring that
detention and water quality treatment be provided for all of the new and existing
impervious areas.
B. Proposed Stormwater facilities will be designed and sized to accommodate runoff from
the total project length, approximately 1,600'.
C. Surface water runoff will be collected and conveyed in a system of new catch basins and
storm pipe to proposed stormwater quality and quantity facilities located at the end of
the project in the vicinity of the tunnel entrance near the ferry terminal.
D. An underground concrete detention vault is the most likely option for quantity control, as
open area for a pond does not appear available.
E. Quality control will be provided in bioswales or a media-filter vault.
F. Stormwater runoff collected at the tunnel exit will require pumping a short vertical
distance to finished grade of the proposed storm conveyance system.
G. No storm improvements are anticipated in the tunnel itself.
7/~.8/03 24-
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
De//verable: Hydraulic Analysis and Report
410 Utilities Design Report
A comprehensive research and analysis of existing utilities and potential conflict areas will be
performed throughout the project area. Extensive coordination with public and private utility
agencies shall be provided during the early stages of the project to facilitate orderly
development.
The proposed tunnel alignment is anticipated to impact all existing utilities throughout the project
corridor. Underground utilities such as power, gas, communications, water, sewer, and storm
will be relocated from the tunnel entrance at the ferry terminal to the tunnel exit on Burwell
Street, :~st Street, 2"d Street, Burwell Street, and Pacific Avenue. Street reconstruction will include
restoration of all overhead and surface facilities.
Assumption~.
A. It is assumed that the following public and private utilities are impacted on this project:
a. Power - Approximately 2000 ft of power including vaults, boxes, streeUights and
street connections.
b. Gas - Approximately ~-500 ft of gas including valves and street connections.
c. Communications - Approximately 2000 ft including vaults, boxes and street
connections.
d. Water - Approximately 1500 ft of waterline including services, fire hydrants,
valves, manholes and street connections will be relocated
e. Sewer - Approximately ].500 ft of sewer, including manholes and street
connections
f. Storm - Approximately 1500 ft of storm including catch basin, manholes and
street connections.
De/iverab/~..
A. The Utilities Design Report will be submitted during the Preliminary Design Phase. The
report will include:
a. Summary of work performed
b. Project description
c. Exploratory pothole results
d. Utility description and contact information
e. Construction considerations and recommendations
f. Design verification to confirm impacts on existing public and private utilities and
outline how those impacts and the relocation of those utilities will be addressed.
4~.1 Right of Way
The Consultant will establish the proposed right-of-way needs and coordinate with the City of
Bremerton and WSDOT during the design process. The Consultant will prepare this information
with hand annotated right-of-way requirements on the most appropriate plan sheets. The
Consultant will establish the proposed right-of-way lines and other related instruments including
parcel maps and legal descriptions. The Consultant shall provide certification to City of
Bremerton that the right-of-way requirements are ready for requisition. City will acquire
necessary easements and right-of-way, following the procedures outlined in the Uniform
Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act. The Consultant has considerable
experience in this regard, and is available to assist or provide complete services as Extra Work.
The Consultant shall incorporate the appropriate right-of-way information in the contract
documents.
7/18/03 25
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
412 Develop Design-Phase Public Information Plan
A. Identify key milestones in design process where the public will need to be kept apprised
of progress.
B. Prepare purpose statement, key audiences, tools, tactics, budget, timeline and key
messages.
Assumpt/on: One cycle of Client revisions.
De//verab/e: Five copies of Design-Phase Public fnformation Plan.
413 Implement Design-Phase Public Information Plan
Provide updating information/education regarding the project to the public per the public
information plan.
Assumption~. A. Three to five written pieces (e.g., news releases/websiLe information)
B. One presentation for the Consultant Project Manager and others to deliver to individuals
and groups.
C. One round of Client revisions per piece.
De/iverab/~. Collateral as prescribed by plan.
414 Preliminary Cost Estimates for Right of Way and Project
Right of Way cost estimates will be developed by researching property assessed values and sales
data in the area. A correlation will be developed between assessed value and sales price; from
this an adjustment factor will be derived that can be applied to assessed value as a tool for
estimating property costs. Making use of this technique will allow the consultant to develop a
total Right of Way and Displacement cost estimate. This will include the cost to acquire the
property inclusive of acquisition services, relocation services and administrative costs (Le. client
admin, eminent domain, etc.) for each impacted parcel. It is assumed that the project will
impact very few parcels, that use of the described methodology is appropriate for this task and
that the acquisition areas will be adequately delineated to allow an analysis of the impacts on
each parcel
415 Preliminary Design Deliverables
Design Record
A. A Draft Working Paper on Forecasting Results for Existing, Future Baseline and Future
Alternatives
B. 60%, 95%, and 100% Design Record Document
C. Horizontal and Vertical Alignment Plans
D. Typical Roadway Sections
E. Preliminary Opinion of Probable Costs for Each Alternative
F. Final Approach and Methods Report
Traffic Analysis
A. Temporary detour route report that includes;
a. Signal Timing revisions
b. Recommended Fire preempt revisions if necessary
c. Additional Transit signal priority recommendations
d. Conceptual layout and schematics of the roadways and intersections
B. Preliminary Opinion of Probable Costs for temporary and permanent traffic items
Tunnel Structure
A. Tunnel Site Data Plans
7/t8/03 26
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
B. Layout Plan
C. Preliminary Type, Size, and Location Plan
Surveying A. Log and Status of Requests
B. Final Base Map and Terrain Model
Geotechnical Report A. Written Detailed Geotechnical Requests for Data
B. Foundation Design Criteria Memorandum
Hydraulic Analysis Report
Utilities Design Report
500 FTNAL DESTGN AND PS&E
501 Description of Work
This work consists of preparing one complete PS&E package for the Project. The work shall be in
accordance with the approved Design Record and other pertinent documents.
502 Preparation of Civil Plans
502.1 Vicinity ~4ap
The consultant shall prepare a vicinity map for incorporation into the PS&E document. The
vicinity map shall be prepared in accordance with standard WSDOT format.
502.2 l~ndex
The consultant shall prepare an index of plans for incorporation into the PS&E document. The
index shall be prepared in accordance with standard WSDOT format.
502.3 Summary of Quantities Demolition Plans
The Consultant shall define the necessary demolition activities (items to be abandoned, salvaged,
recycled or removed) and identify facilities that need to be protected during construction. This
work is necessary for work areas associated with building demolition(s), reconstruction of
sidewalks, and demolition associated with urban design work.
502.4 Preparation of Site Plans (Alignment/Plan & Profile)
The Consultant shall prepare a complete set of site preparation plans in accordance with the
approved Design Record, preliminary plans, field data, and other City furnished information. The
plans shall show all demolition, removal items, alignment, clearing and grubbing, and other
required features.
502.5 Roadway Paving
The Consultant shall prepare a complete set of roadway paving plans, paving details, and
roadway sections in accordance with the approved Design Record, the approved roadway
sections, the approved intersection plans, preliminary design plans, and other City furnished
information. Roadway Paving Plans shall include paving limits, barrier location, wall locations,
guardrail, intersection configurations, and other associated items. The roadway paving plans
may be combined with the channelization plans.
The Consultant shall prepare vertical profiles for only those roadways being constructed as part
of this project.
7/18/03 27
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
The Consultant shall prepare roadway drawings to include preparation of plans for modifications
to roadways including pavement designs, conform requirements (to existing streets, face of
buildings or neighboring properties) as necessary, sidewalk modifications, and pavement
sawcuLting and overlay requirements. Roadway cross-sections, cross street profiles and curb
profiles shall be prepared to accurately define the construction requirements and design intent.
Roadway contour grading shall be prepared including intersections where significant warping will
be necessary and to accurately delineate conformance to existing pavement.
502,6 Roadway Drainage, Utilities, Stormwater Hanagement Plans
The Consultant shall prepare a complete set of drainage / utility plans, profiles, details, and
structure notes, in accordance with the approved Design Record, and other City furnished
information. Appropriate temporary erosion control and sediment control devices shall be
designed and coordinated such that the Project area runoff will be effectively controlled. The
Consultant shall prepare an addendum to the Hydraulic Report if significant design changes are
made during the PS&E phase. The Consultant shall be responsible to locate and include in the
plans ali existing or proposed utility lines that may be in conflict during construction. Preliminary
PS&E drainage features prepared during the Hydraulic Report shall be incorporated into the final
Design PS&E unless deemed inapplicable.
The Consultant shall be responsible to locate and include in the plans all existing or proposed
utility lines that may be in conflict during construction. Public utilities impacted and may be
relocated include 8 inch to 16 inch sanitary sewer lines, 8 inch to 12 inch water lines including all
connections to private properties. Relocation of private utilities wifl be coordinated with each
utility agency to incorporate into the final contract plans.
Drainage and Stormwater Management Plans: Prepare drainage and stormwater management
plans in accordance with applicable codes, ordinances and standards.
Miscellaneous Details: Prepare miscellaneous details for roadways, grading, landscaping or
drainage or other items needing detailing.
502,7 Walls
The Consultant shall prepare PS&E for the retaining walls necessary for the Project. Retaining
wall design shall be in accordance with the approved Design Record, Design Hanual, approved
Geotechnical Report, structural design criteria and other pertinent data. WSDOT pre-approved
proprietary wall designs shall be considered as well as other wall designs for this Project.
502,8 Illumination, Signing, and Striping
The Consultant shatl prepare plans in accordance with approved preliminary design plans, the
WSDOT Design Manual, the WSDOT Traffic Manual, and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD).
502.9 Traffic Control/Traffic Signals
The Consultant shall prepare detailed traffic control plans to accommodate each phase of the
Project during construction. Traffic control plans shall include all signing, striping, and
delineation for each required traffic shift.
Traffic control plans shall be closely coordinated with the City's traffic department to ensure
conformity with local codes and regulations. All lane closures and roadway closures shall require
the concurrence of the City's traffic department.
Traffic signal modification plans for three signals will be prepared for the ultimate configuration.
Temporary signal revisions for approximately 8 signals during construction will be included in the
traffic control plans.
7/18/03 28
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
502.10 Landscaping
The Consultant shall prepare landscape enhancement plans for pedestrian amenities.
Landscaping features shall incorporate features and themes determined during the Environmental
Phase. The Consultant shatl receive prior concurrence from the City for inclusion of landscaping
enhancements into the Project PS&E package.
502.11 ]~tems For Complete PS&E
The Consultant shall furnish the following items, which make up the complete PS&E for the
construction contract:
A. 1 set of all sheets comprising the set of plans for the construction contract on the City's
title and block format. No tape or stickons are allowed. Black line prints on paper or
vellum shall be acceptable for 60% and 95% submittals. The 100% submittal shall be
on half size reproducible and full size mylars. Quantity tabulations, structure notes, sign
specifications, and other spreadsheet files shall be printed on sheets conforming to City
of Bremerton standard title and border blocks format. All sheets shall be signed and
stamped for inclusion into the PS&E document.
B. ! set of Contract Special Provisions for the construction contract. A listing of the General
Special Provisions with fill-ins completed and amendments to the Standard Specifications
required for this Project shall be provided.
C. A draft Summary of Quantities, with unit and lump sum prices, from which an Engineer's
Estimate will be developed. Sufficient backup information to substantiate lump sum,
estimated, or nonstandard items shall be provided.
503 Preparation of Tunnel Plans
503,1 Structures Final Design
The Consultant will use the approved grade and alignment and the preferred structure types
identified in the final T. S. & L. report and proceed to develop final plans.
The consultant shall prepare structural design and construction documents for the cut and cover
tunnel structure. The Consultant shall furnish design calculations for all structures, which shall
have been prepared by a Professional engineer, licensed under Title 18 RCW, in the State of
Washington, in structural engineering. The Consultant shall pay a great deal of attention to soil-
structure interaction for gravity and seismic loading. The Consultant shall detail all structures,
retaining walls and foundations in sufficient clarity to be constructible at minimum impact to the
local traffic and businesses. All structural work shall be in strict conformance with AASHTO and
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual.
The Consultant shall prepare preliminary support of excavation schemes that will support the
existing structures, soils and adjacent roadway.
All structure final plans shall be prepared in accordance with WSDOT approved plan preparation
procedures. Final plans shall be consistent with structure site data, previously approved layout
plans, and approved channelization plans.
The Consultant shall assist the City in obtaining permits required for the project. The Consultant
shall prepare a design memorandum.
Plans for the structure(s) shall be fully dimensioned and shall show complete construction
elevations. The plans shall also include schedules for steel reinforcing bars. Such schedules shall
provide all of the necessary detail required for the fabrication of the reinforcement.
7/18/03 29
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
503.2 (~A/QC Review
The Consultants internal QA/QC procedures will be utilized throughout the design effort on this
Project. Independent check of the structural analysis and design calculations and structural plans
will be performed. Checks will also be made of computer program input as well as the accurate
use of the results. Drawings and details will be reviewed for constructability and conformance to
the design and the approved drawing standards.
Prior to the 60 percent design submittal, the Consultant intends to conduct a plan-in-hand or
constructabilRy review on site for the various elements on the Project. Experienced senior
engineers who are familiar with construction practices will perform this review. A 60 percent set
of plans will be used for the review wherein they will be checked for coordination with existing
facilities, site constraints, utilities, construction staging, construction access, and various other
constructability issues that are site specific.
503.3 Geotechnical Services
The Consultant shall analyze and provide foundation documentation to substantiate the types of
retaining walls, and tunnel foundations proposed in this Project. The tasks required to complete
the geotechnical work will be as outlined below.
Consultant will provide geotechnical consultation during the final design phase of the project.
A. Once the project features have been finalized, the draft geotechnical report prepared
during the preliminary engineering phase will be updated and finalized (see Task 408.6).
B. Technical memoranda with geotechnical recommendations will be submitted, as needed,
throughout the final design process. These memoranda will be incorporated into the
final geotechnical report.
C. Review of the geotechnical portions of the 60%, 95% and 100% plans and specifications
will be performed.
De/iverable~. A. Technical Memoranda (as needed)
B. Final Geotechnical Report
504 Final Design Tunnel Support Systems
504.~. ~[ncident Zdentification
Provide Summary of Incident ~'dentification Workshop to Emergency Responders for the
Contractors use in creating an Incident Response/Management Plan.
Assumpt/on$: From workshop noted in 406.1, Consultant will include a scope of work in the
Construction Documents for the contractor to undertake during the construction
of the project to finalize any incident response plans with the emergency services
groups. The number of meetings, expected deliverables and participants
expected will be detailed so the Contractor is aware of their responsibilities.
504.2 Mechanical / Electrical
Ventilation
A. Select thrust required for air flows
B. Select number of fans based on air movement required
C. Prepare detail design and specification of ventilation system
D. Prepare detail design and specification of controls systems
E. Based on the preliminary design requirements, detail traffic detection loops and controller
for ventilating equipment.
7/18/03 30
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
Deliverable. Detail design of system.
Fire Detection / Suppression Systems
Based on system parameters determined in preliminary study, detail the following:
A. Water main standpipe with hose reels
B. Tunnel heat detection system
C. Flame traps in tunnel to capture fuel fire
Assumption~. A. It is assumed no deluge or sprinkler system is required for the tunnel because of the Iow
traffic volume and intermittent use.
B. This must be confirmed with the Fire Department.
C. A standpipe system will be designed for the tunnel.
Deliverab/~. Detail design of system.
Tunnel Power Supply
Based on system requirements determined in preliminary study detail the following,
A. ]nterconnection(s) with Power Supply Authority
B. Single or dual high voltage connection
C. Low voltage power connections to lights, fans, pumps and control systems
D. Back up supplies such as generator, UPS, automatic changeover etc
Deliverable: Detail design of system.
Tunnel Lighting
Based on lighting standard and access zone luminance, detail the following: A. Threshold, transition, interior lighting zones
B. Select luminaire photometrics and performance requirements
C. Detail mounting arrangements and circuiting for lighting
D. Select portal luminance meter and specify same
Deliverable: Detail design of system.
Control Building / Substations A. Interface with Architect and building designer as required
B. Design mechanical electrical systems for buildings as required
Deliverable. Detail design of electricaJ / mechanical systems.
504.3 Safety Systems
Emergency Egress Locations
Based on preliminary design requirements, detail the following systems:
A. Spacing and location of emergency egress points
B. Equipment required at each station
Tunnel Specific Safety & Security Systems
Based on preliminary design requirements, detail the following systems:
A. Tunnel variable message signs
B. Lane use signals
C. Closed Circuit Television Systems
D. Flotorist Emergency Telephone system
E. Radio Communication system
7/18/03 31
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
F. Public Address System
G. Automatic Incident Detection System
H. Tunnel Closed Devices
Network Communication Systems
Direct Telephone Lines to emergency services groups
K. Prepare and list operation and maintenance requirements
L. Detail tunnel operations center
De//verab/e: Detail design of system.
504.4 Tunnel Environmental Control Study
Tunnel Specific Environmental Issues A.
Deliverab/es: A. Incident Identification Summary
B. Nechanical / Electrical
C. Safety Systems
D. Tunnel Environment Control Study
E. Opinion of Probable Cost
504,5 Tunnel Support Services
"Tunnel Support Services" encompass the service and logistical functions required to deliver the
services as listed in 504.2 and 504-.3. These services include:
A. Project Review IHeetings with other members of team
B. Project Controls/Scheduling effort
C. Estimating Effort
D. QA/QC effort, as part of one subcontractor's [SO 9000:2000 certified process
505 Final Design and PS&E Deliverables
A. General Plans - 60%, 95%, 100%
B. Demolition Plans - 60%, 95%, and 100% Submittals
C. Roadway Plans - 60%, 95%, and 100% Submittals
D. Cross Section Notebook
E. TESC, Drainage and Stormwater Plans - 60%, 95%, and 100%
F. Submittals
G. Sitework Plans - 60%, 95%, and 100% Submittals
H. Right of Way Needs (takes, permanent and construction easements)
[. Document
-]. Right of Way Plans - Incorporation into 60%, 95%, and 100% Submittals
K. Street Lighting Plans - 60%, 95%, and 100% Submittals
L. Utility Plans - 60%, 95%, 100% Submittals
M. Traffic Plans - Incorporation into 60%, 95% and 100% Submittals
N. Architectural Plans - Incorporation into 60%, 95%, and 100% Submittals
Assumpt/on~: It is generally assumed the following number of drawings represent the level of
effort involved in Final Design and PS&E Deliverables.
General Plans- 10
Roadway Section and Details - 12
Alignment of Right of Way - 5
Quantity Tabulations - 12
Site Preparation - 12
7/18/03 32
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
Drainage and Utilities - 30
Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Control - 4
Landscape and Streetscape - 24
Paving Plan - 8
Channelization and Striping - 8
Illumination and Lighting - 8
Signalization - 8
Traffic Control Detour - 18
Structural - 102
Tunnel, Ventilation, Mechanical, Electrical - 36
Architectural (WSF Building) - 2S
506 Specifications
Special Provisions using WSDOT standard format will be prepared.
507 Cost Estimating
Opinion of Probable Costs will be prepared using WSDOT standard format.
508 Develop Construction-Phase Public Information Plan
At the 60-percent design stage,
A. Analyze Environmental findings and preliminary design for key public information points,
milestones, items of interest, safety considerations and potential public concerns.
B. Develop plan, including purpose statement, key audiences, too~s, tactics, budget, timeline
and key messages.
~lssumpt/on: One round of Client revisions.
De/iverab/~.. Five copies of Construction-Phase Public Information Plan.
600 CONSTRUe: I ~ON SUPPORT SERVICES
The Consultant shall provide engineering support throughout the construction duration of the
Project. The consultant shall work under the City's Project Engineer / Project rvlanager in charge
of construction. Consultant shall provide services during bid period by responding to bidder's
questions and updating drawings and specifications during construction bid period for addenda as
required. Issuance of photocopies with hand notations is acceptable for minor changes.
The Consultant shall perform bid support services and conform Bid documents to "Issue for
Construction"; and shall respond to Contractor's request for information during the bid phase and
modify contract documents when appropriate.
The Consultant will assist the City of Bremerton staff with support services during construction.
These services may include:
601 Assist City in Contract Award
Attend Pre-Bid Meetings.
602 Preconstruction Conference
Attend The Preconstruction Conference
603 Attend Weekly Coordination Meetings
Attend periodic construction office progress meetings when requested by the City of
Bremerton and contractors.
604 Prepare As-Built Drawings
Prepare As-Built Drawings For The Project.
605 Review Contractor Submittals
Review of submittals, including shop drawings and Formwork Submittals
606 Review Construction Methods and Procedures
7/18/03 33
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
A. Review Contractor Proposed Construction Methods And Procedures For The Various
Components Of The Structures
B. When requested, perform periodic field visits during construction to observe construction
progress and document any relevant observations to City of Bremerton.
C. Prepare Field Observation Reports
607 Clarification of Contract Drawings
A. Provide The Clarification And Interpretation Of Contract Drawings.
B. Review and response to Requests for Information (RF~'s)
C. Provide design clarification and decisions as required and requested by City of Bremerton
for response to the construction contractor.
608 Carry Out Construction-Phase Public Information Plan
A. Draft written materials: News releases, fact sheets, flyers, web postings, Rider Alerts,
etc. Reproduction costs, graphic services and distribution costs will be billed as direct
costs. Assumes one site visit.
B. Coordinate three on-site events during construction (could be news conferences,
milestone marker events, etc.) Assumes two site visits each, media kits with up to five
inserts, one-page handout for participants, and 100 participants.
C. Issues management: For unforeseen issues that arise requiring community outreach,
media relations, etc. Assumes five site visits, five 2-page handouts each Reproduction
billed as direct costs.
Assumption: The City will plan and coordinate groundbreaking ceremonies or ribbon-cutting
ceremonies without the assistance of the Consultant.
Deliverable: All collaterai pieces as prescribed by the plan.
609 :Instrumentation and Iqonitoring
Pre-Construction Survey
Prior to any on site Contractor activities, pre-construction surveys of existing structures (those
that will remain in place) will be performed. This will include visual inspection of accessible
building foundations, exterior and interior walls, and surrounding slabs/walkways.
Documentation of this survey will include digital photographs, video, and sketches. Some crack
monitoring devices may be installed on existing cracks during this survey.
Construction Instrumentation
A. Develop design drawings for instrumentation layout and configurations.
B. Develop instrument monitoring schedule.
C. Procure and perform pre-installation testing of instrumentation
D. Subcontract a local surveying company to establish monitoring points along alignment
surface and adjacent buildings. Baseline readings will be performed prior to start of
construction. During construction, readings should follow developed schedule.
E. install inclinometer casings at selected locations along proposed excavation to monitor
wall deflections, which could result in surface settlement. Baseline readings will be
performed after installation. During construction, readings should follow developed
schedule.
F. i'nstall strain gages on Contractor-installed bracing struts. Baseline readings will be
performed prior to installation. During construction, readings should follow developed
schedule.
G. Monitor water levels in wells along alignment. Baseline readings will be performed prior
to construction. During construction, readings should follow developed schedule.
7/~-8/03 34
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
H. Consultant will provide results of instrumentation monitoring within 1 business day of
collecting data. All data will be plotted to represent deformations and changes in water
level as a function of time and rate of excavation.
Assumptions for Task 600: Since the level of effort for Construction Support Services cannot be
accurately predicted, the Consultant's estimated level of effort represented in the Cost Proposal
for Construction Support Services is an allowance only; which is to be expanded on a time and
material basis. Additional work in this task will be carried by mutual agreement under a Contract
Change Order. Full definition of services and costs under this task will be developed by
Consultant and City of Bremer/on and the Contract amendment executed prior to project
construction advertisement.
700 QUAL/TY ASSURANCE/QUALTTy CONTROL
The quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program for the project shal~ follow Consultant's
QA/QC process outlined in its Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program I~anual. Each member
of the consultant team will be expected to subscribe to Section QAP-600 - Quality Control
Reviews and QAP-700 - Quality Assurance Measurement. The specific elements of the program
include:
701 Tntra-Znter Discipline ~C Review
Section QCP-601 of the QA/QC Manual provides guidelines for intra/inter-discipline checking of
drawings, calculations and specifications for technical and formal review. This procedure applies
to all projects unless otherwise specified by the Consultant Project Manager. The intra-discipline
review process outlines procedures for the Originator, Checker, Originator Follow-up Procedure
(Backchecking) and Rechecker.
The inter-discipline review procedure is to verify consistency throughout project disciplines.
Project standards will be provided to all disciplines that will provide the desired quality product.
The process for inter-discipline reviews includes; inter discipline coordination review meeting
preparation; inter disciplinary coordination review meeting; client submission; and review and
revision after receipt of comments.
702 Calculations QC Review
Design calculations preparation shall follow Section QCP-620 of the QA/QC Manual, which sets for
the procedures for calculation preparation and review. Design calculations shall conform to all
applicable code regulations established or adopted by the City of Bremerton and shall form a
complete record of the design process, including tried and rejected solutions.
703 Drawings QC Review
Section QCP-630 of the Consultant QA/QC Manual prescribes the procedure for preparation and
checking of drawings for projects.
704 Specifications QC Review
Section QCP-64*0 of the Consultant QA.QC Manual outlines the procedure for developing the
specification format, preparation of specifications, methods for checking and revising the
specifications.
705 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost QC Review
Section QCP-650 of the Consultant QA/QC Manual outlines the procedures for developing and
maintaining the project construction cost estimates. The procedure includes consultation with
the City of Bremerton and project cost estimator to define the contractual cost estimating criteria.
In the absence of City standards, Exeltech Consulting, Inc.'s standards will apply.
~18/03 35
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
706 Document/Technical Reports QC Review
Section QCP-660 of the Consultant QA/QC Manual prescribes specific procedures and stands for
preparing technical and Discipline Reports for the project. All technical reports will follow the
same general format unless otherwise modified by the Consultant Project Manager. The
procedure outlines content and format, document format standards, technical report review, and
technical report approval.
707 Construction Administration qC Review
Section QCP-670 of the Consultant QA/QC Manual prescribes guidelines for the documentation of
all correspondence, clarifications, site observations, and submittal reviews for the project
construction. Alt interactions with the contractor, owner, or other design team members shall be
documented and filed with the City.
708 Value Engineering
Value Engineering will be integrated into the project as a philosophy rather than a one-time
effort. Project team meetings and discussions will consider ideas and proposals that will improve
the project and final product. Value Engineering effort will occur near the end of Phase 2
Preliminary Design to verify and/or modify assumptions used in the design of the project.
709 Constructability Review
Prior to final design of the project, an independent review by a party not involved in the design of
the project will conduct a review to evaluate the construction elements of the project. After
consideration of comments from the independent constructability review, revisions to the project
design, specifications or cost will be compiled and incorporated into the project prior to contract
advertising.
800 WSF OFFI'CE BUl'LDi'NG & TOLL BOOTHS
801 Review & Update Program Needs
The program for the Agent Office and Toll Booth, dated 16 September 1997, will be the basis of
design. The program was developed during the planning phase for BTC as a portion of BTC
Phase C work. An update of requirements for WSF needs was reviewed during the Phase 1 of
the BTC & Pedestrian Access project (spring 2003).
Assumption~.
A. This scope includes one meeting with the project team and the City of Bremerton, WSF
and Kitsap Transit to update the program.
B. The siting issues relative to the BTC car holding area, First St. right-of-way and BTC
entry approach is assumed to be a product of Phase I of the BTC & Pedestrian Access
study, or provided by others.
C. The design team will develop the site plan and general arrangement of the Agent Office
and Toll Booths based on the program and designated site location. The program is
understood to generally require an approximately 1000 square foot office building with
general office space and restrooms.
D. There will be accommodation for 4 Toll Booths with 3 assumed to be constructed during
the first phase of construction. Toll Booths will have a customer service window,
accommodation for point-of-sales operations, cash register, counter top or similar limited
work space, future automated tariffs kiosk, and basic office-like sheltering including
HVAC, but no restroom or other plumbing fixtures.
De//verab/~. Revised program for final approval.
802 Preliminary Design - WSF Office Building & Toll Booths
7/18/03 36
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
Prel!minary design will include schematic and design development architectural design and
engineering design of the Agent Office and Toll Booths. This includes architectural services for
both the buildings and the site, structural design engineering for the buildings, mechanical
engineering and electrical engineering for the building, and design coordination with an interior
designer or furniture vendor. The submittal documents for schematic design (SD) shall be
schematic architectural drawings of the site and buildings with design narratives from the support
disciplines describing the overall schematic design concept. The design development (DD)
submittal will be the "preliminary design" submittal including design development level
architectural drawings with plans, elevation views and limited details for the building and site.
This submittal will also include design development level drawings for buildings' structure,
mechanical, electrical and communications systems. Outline specifications will be developed and
submitted with the design development submittal.
These services are generally described as follows:
Schematics
A. Review scope of work/criteria for requirements for tollbooths and support offices.
B. Review approved site layout for determining adaptation of tollbooths and support offices.
C. Establish architectural theme acceptable to all relevant parties.
D. Create an approved concept for the facility along with adaptation of this scheme into the
given site configuration.
E. Provide preliminary research into the various potential products needed by all the
disciplines for use in the new facility.
F. Verify through preliminary costing that the concept is economically viable.
Design Development
A. Research and gather more in-depth information about the products determined in the
schematic phase to be candidates for use on the project. Includes determination of
compatibility of materials and systems chosen.
B. Review costs of materials and systems selected for compatibility with budget goals.
C. Work with the various disciplines (structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, interior
design, civil, and landscape) to insure their work integrates one to the other and with the
architectural concept.
D. Begin formal drawings carried to a level of detail that verifies that the major elements of
the facility fit the parameters detailed by project scope, budget, and constructability.
Elements of the schematics and design development package are as follows:
802.1 Design MeeUngs
One meeting with the Project Team and City of Bremerton, WSF and Kitsap Transit for the
purpose of developing an approved concept prior to final submission of Schematic Design and
Design Development Documents.
802.2 Architectural Plans
Presentation of the architectural plans, elevations and sections that clearly depict the concept for
the facility. Written narrative included.
802.3 Structural Plans
Presentation of the type of structural framing system selected and a general framing layout
showing preliminary framing member sizes, lateral resisting system and proposed foundation
system. Written narrative included.
802.4 Electrical
7/18/03 37
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
Presentation of the general, conceptual layout for lighting, power and communications. Written
narrative included. Written narrative included.
802,6 Nechanical
Presentation of the general, conceptual layout for the heating, ventilating and air conditioning
systems. Written narrative included.
802.6 Specifications
Outline specifications indicating the major sections intended to be used for the facility.
802.7 Cost Estimate
Statement of probable costs for the Agent Office and Toll Booth facility based on the concept
developed from the SD and DD phases.
A$$urnpt/on: Work included and excluded in preliminary design will be similarly included or
excluded in the final design phase.
De/iverab/e~. One reproducible-ready copy of all electronically generated drawings and
specifications of the schematic and design development phase documents.
803 Final Design - WSF Office Building & Toll Booths
Final design will include completion of the design effort described above. The submittal product
will be construction technical documents including necessary drawings and the technical
specifications for the Project Manual.
These services are generally described as follows:
Construction Documents A. Expand on the work performed in the design development phase to refine all elements
and how they will inter-relate.
B. Examine costs based on the more refined documents.
C. Perform imdepth research of materials chosen for final decision on their use in the
project and to provide the basis for the final drawings and specifications.
D. Complete the construction documents to a permittable, constructible set of plans and
specifications.
Elements of the final design package are as follows:
803,1 Interior Design & Furniture
Presentation of selected interior colors, fabrics, furnishings for the Agent Offices and Toll Booths.
803,2 Architectural Plans
Plans, elevations, sections and details suitable for permitting and construction.
803.3 Structural Plans
Complete structural calculations, framing plans and details suitable for permitting and
construction.
803.4 Electrical
Complete electrical calculations, power, lighting and communicatJon plans suitable for permitting
and construction.
803.5 Mechanical
7/18/03 38
Exhibit B-1
Scope of Services
complete HVAC calculations and plans suitable for permitting and construction.
803,6 Specifications
Detailed technical specifications based on the outline specifications provided in the DD phase
describing the products, materials and level of quality to be adhered to in the installation of those
products and materials.
803.7 Cost Estimate
Opinion of probable costs for the Agent Office and Toll Booth facility based on the final
construction documents.
Deliverables. A. One reproducible copy of all electronically generated drawings and specifications of the
final design phase documents.
B. Opinion of Probable Cost.
7/18/03 39
97
Exhibit B-2
Scope of Work
(Task Order Agreement)
Each item of work under this AGREEMENT will be provided by task assignment. Each assignment will be
individually negotiated with the CONSULTANT. The amount established for each assignment will be the
maximum amount payable for that assignment unless modified in writing by the AGENCY. The AGENCY i.,; not
obligated to assign any specific number of tasks to the CONSULTANT, and the AGENCY'S and
CONSULTANT'S obligations hereunder are limited to tasks assigned in writing. Task assignments may include
but are not limited to, the following types of work:
A. Phase 1 Environmental Documents and Supporting Work
B. Phase 2 Pre!iminary Dj_sign and Supporting Work
C. Phase 3 Final Design and Supporting Work
D. Phase 4 Construction Support Services and Supporting Work
E.
F.
Task assignments made by the AGENCY shall be issued in writing by a Formal Task Assignment Document similar
in format to page 2 of this exhibit.
An assignment shall become effective when a formal Task Assignment Document is signed by the CONSULTANT
and the AGENCY, except that emergency actions requiring a 24-hour or less response can be handled by an oral
authorization. Such oral authorization shall be followed up with a Formal Task Assignment Document witlrin four
working days, and any billing rates agreed to orally (for individuals, subconsultants, or organizations whose rates
were not previously established in the AGREEMENT) shall be provisional and subject to final negotiation and
acceptance by the AGENCY.
Formal Task Assignment Document
Task Number Phase 1
The general provisions and clauses of Agreement shall be in full force and effect for this
Task Assignment
Location of Project: Bremerton, Washington
Project Title: Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton Transportation Center Access Improvements
Maximum Amount Payable Per Task Assignment: $565,844.00
Completion Date:
Description of Work:
(Note attachments and give brief description)
Environmental Documents and Supporting Work
Agency Project Manager Signature: Date:
Oral Authorization Date: See Letter Dated:
Consultant Signature: Date: July 11, 20_03 _
Agency Approving Authority: Date:
/00
Formal Task Assignment Document
Task Number Phase 2
The general provisions and clauses of Agreement shall be in full force and effect for this
Task Assignment
Location of Project: Bremerton, Washington
Project Title: Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton Transportation Center Access Improvements
Maximum Amount Payable Per Task Assignment: $1,094,833.00
Completion Date:
Description of Work:
(Note attachments and give brief description)
Preliminary Design and Supporting Work
Agency Project Manager Signature: Date:
Oral Authorization Date: See Letter Dated:
Consultant Signature: ~ Date: July_ 1__1, 2003
Agency Approving Authority: ~./ ~/ Date:
Formal Task Assignment Document
Task Number Phase 3
The general provisions and clauses of Agreement shall be in full force and effect for this
Task Assignment
Location of Project: Bremerton, Washington
Project Title: Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton Transportation Center Access Improvements
Maximum Amount Payable Per Task Assignment: $1,610,114.00
Completion Date:
Description of Work:
(Note attachments and give brief description)
Final Design and Supporting Work
Agency Project Manager Signature: Date:
Oral Authorization Date: See Letter Dated:
Consultant Signature: Date: J~!y 11, 20_03 _
Agency Approving Authority: Date:
Io2,.
Formal Task Assignment Document
Task Number Phase 4
The general provisions and clauses of Agreement shall be in full force and effect for this
Task Assignment - -
Location of Project: Bremerton, Washington
Project Title: Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton Transportation Center Access Improvements
Maximum Amount Payable Per Task Assignment: $615,013.00
Completion Date:
Description of Work:
(Note attachments and give brief description)
Construction Support Services and Supporting Work
Agency Project Manager Signature: Date:
Oral Authorization Date: See Letter Dated:
Consultant Signature: ~ Date: July 11, 2003
Agency Approving Authority: Date:
Io3
Exhibit C-2
Payment
(Cost Plus Fixed Fee)
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for all work performed or
services rendered and for all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work specified
in Section Il, "Scope of Work." The CONSULTANT shall conform with the applicable portion of 48 CFR 3 I.
A. Actual Costs
Payment for all consulting services for this project shall be on the basis of the CONS ULTANT's actual cost
plus a fixed fee. The actual cost shall include direct salary cost, overhead, and direct nonsalary cost.
1. Direct Salary Costs
The direct salary cost is the direct salary paid to principals, professional, technical, and clerical personnel tbr
the time they are productively engaged in work necessary to fulfill the terms of this AGREEMENT.
2. Overhead Costs
Overhead costs are those costs other than direct costs which are included as such on the books of the
CONSULTANT in the normal everyday keeping of its books. Progress payments shall be made at the rate
shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT, under "Overhead Progress Payment Rate." Total overhead
payment shall be based on the method shox~m in the heading of the AGREEMENT. The three options are
explained as follows:
a. Actual Cost Not To Exceed Maximum Percent: If this method is indicated in the heading of this
AGREEMENT, the AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT at the actual overhead rate
verified by audit up to the maximum percentage shown in the space provided. Final overhead payment
when accumulated with all other actual costs shall not exceed the total maximum amount payable shown
in the heading of this AGREEMENT.
b. Fixed Rate: If this method is indicated in the heading of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY agrees to
reimburse the CONSULTANT for overhead at the percentage rate shown. This rate shall not change
during the life of the AGREEMENT.
A summary oftbe CONSULTANT's cost estimate and the overhead computation are attached hereto as
Exhibit D-1 and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. When an Actual Cost method, or the
Actual Cost Not To Exceed method is used, the CONSULTANT (prime and all subconsultants) will submit
to the AGENCY within three months after the end of each firm's fiscal year, an overhead schedule in the
format required by the AGENCY (cost category, dollar expenditures, etc.) for the purpose of adjusting the
overhead rate for billing purposes. It shall be used for the computation of progress payments during the
following year and for retroactively adjusting the previous year's overhead cost to reflect the actual rate.
Failure to supply this information by either the prime consultant or any of the subconsultants shall
cause the agency to withhold payment of the billed overhead costs until such time as the required
information is received and an overhead rate for billing purposes is approved.
The STATE and/or the Federal Government may perform an audit of the CONSULTANT's books and
records at any time during regular business hours to determine the actual overhead rate, if they so desire.
3. Direct Nonsalary Costs
Direct nonsalary costs will be reimbursed at the actual cost to the CONSULTANT. These charges may
include, but are not limited to the following items: travel, printing, long distance telephone, supplies,
computer charges, and fees of subconsultants. Air or train travel will only be reimbursed to economy class
levels unless otherwise approved by the AGENCY. Automobile mileage for travel will be reimbursed at the
current rate approved for AGENCY employees and shall be supported by the date and time of each trip with
origin and destination of such trips. Subsistence and lodging expenses wilt be reimbursed at the same rate as
for AGENCY employees. The billing for nonsalary cost, directly identifiable with the Project, shall be an
itemized listing of the charges supported by copies of original bills, invoices, expense accounts, and
miscellaneous supporting data retained by the CONSULTANT. Copies oftbe original supporting
documents shall be provided to the AGENCY upon request. All of the above charges must be necessary for
the services to be provided under this AGREEMENT.
4. Fixed Fee
The fixed fee, which represents the CONSULTANT's profit, is shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT
under Fixed Fee. This amount does not include any additional fixed fee which could be authorized from the
Management Reserve Fund. This fee is based on the scope of work defined in this AGREEMENT and the
estimated man-months required to perform the stated scope of work. In the event a supplemental agreement
is entered into for additional work by the CONSULTANT, the supplemental agreement may include
provisions for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The fixed fee will be prorated and paid
monthly in proportion to the pementage of work completed by the CONSULTANT and reported in the
monthly progress reports accompanying the invoices.
Any portion of the fixed fee earned but not previously paid in the progress payments will be covered in the final
payment, subject to the provisions of Section IX, Termination of Agreement.
5. Management Reserve Fund
The AGENCY may desire to establish a Management Reserve Fund to provide the Agreement Administrator
the flexibility of authorizing additional funds to the AGREEMENT for allowable unforeseen costs, or
reimbursing the CONSULTANT for additional work beyond that already defined in this AGREEMENT.
Such authorization(s) shall be in writing and shall not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of the Total
Amount Authorized as shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. The amount included for the
Management Reserve Fund is shown in the heading of this agreement. This fund may be replenished in a
subsequent supplemental agreement. Any changes requiring additional costs in excess of the "Management
Reserve Fund" shall be made in accordance with Section XIV, "Extra Work."
6. Maximum Total Amount Payable
The maximum total amount payable, by the AGENCY to the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT,
shall not exceed the amount shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT.
The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount Authorized, which includes the
Fixed Fee and the Management Reserve Fund. The Maximum Total Amount Payable does not include
payment for extra work as stipulated in Section XIV, ~'Extra Work."
Io5
B. Monthly Progress Payments
The CONSULTANT may submit invoices to the AGENCY for reimbursement of actual costs plus the
calculated overhead and fee not more often than once per month during the progress of the work. Such invoices
shall be in a format approved by the AGENCY and accompanied by the monthly progress reports required under
Section lll, General Requirements, of this AGREEMENT. The invoices will be supported by an itemized listing
for each item including direct salary, direct nonsalary, and allowable overhead costs to which will be added the
prorated Fixed Fee. To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for CONSULTANT employees,
the AGENCY may conduct employee interviews. These interviews may consist of recording the names, titles,
and present duties of those employees performing work on the PROJECT at the time of the interview.
C. Final Payment
Final payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned will be made promptly
upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work under this AGREEMENT, contingent
upon receipt of all PS&E, plans, maps, notes, reports, and other related documents which are required to be
furnished under this AGREEMENT. Acceptance of such final payment by the CONSULTANT shall
constitute a release of all claims for payment which the CONSULTANT may have against the AGENCY
unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the AGENCY by the
CONSULTANT prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not, however, be a bar to any claims that the
AGENCY may have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the AGENCY may pursue with respect to
such claims. The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item
and that at the time of final audit, all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment. In the
event that such final audit reveals an overpayment to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT will refund
such overpayment to the AGENCY within ninety (90) days of notice of the overpayment. Such refund shall
not constitute a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any claims relating to the validity of a finding by the
AGENCY of overpayment.
D. Inspection of Cost Records
The CONSULTANT and the subconsultants shall keep available for inspection by representatives of the
AGENCY and the United States, for a period of three years after final payment, the cost records and accounts
pertaining to this AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon these records with the following
exception: if any litigation, claim, or audit arising out of, in connection with, or related to this contract is
initiated before the expiration of the three-year period, the cost records and accounts shall be retained until
such litigation, claim, or audit involving the records is completed.
Exhibit D-1
Consultant Fee Determination - Summary Sheet
(Lump Sum, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, Cost Per Unit of Work)
Project: Downtown Pedestrien/Bremerton Trensporte~on Center Access Improvements
Direct Salary Cost (DSC)
Consultant:. EXELTECH
Code Ctessiflcatlon Han Hours
LABOR Hours Rate Dollars
05 Principa~ 612 x ;50.60 = $30,967.00
10 (~A/QC 489 x ;49.00 = $23,961.00
15 Structural Lead 2,493 x ;49.00 = $122,157.00
20 Structural Engineer 1 2,028 x ;41,00 = $83,148.00
25 Structural Engineer 2 2,375 x ;32.00 = $76,000.00
30 Environmental Lead 1,398 x ;40.00 = $55,920.00
35 Environmental Support 904 x ;29.00 = $26,216.00
40 Civil Lead 2,648 x ~41.00 = $1.08,568.00
45 Civil Engineer I 536 x ~35.00 = $1.8,760.00
50 Civil Engineer 2 105 x ;32.00 = $3,360.00
55 Civil Engineer 3 80 x ~26.00 = $2,080.00
55 ConstmclJon Management Lead 268 x ;37.00 = $9,916.00
55 Construction Engineer 1. 0 x ;30.00 = $0.00
55 Consb-uctten Engineer 2 0 x ;27.00 = $0.00
55 Building Engineer 1 320 x ;38.00 = $1.2,160.00
55 ProJect Controller 520 x ;28.00 -- $14,560.00
55 Admtn Support I 176 x ;21.00 = $3,696.00
55 Admin Suppo~ 2 288 x ;15.00 = $4,320.00
55 Document Editor 144 x ;26.00 = $3,744.00
55 CADD Tech 1 1,788 x ;25.00 = $44,700.00
55 CADD Tech 2 940 x ;22.50 = $21,150.00
55 CADD Tech 3 340 x ;20.00 = $6,800.00
Total Hours 18;452
Total DSC = $672,183.00
% [ncraase % of Work
Escalation for '04 5 50 = $16,804.58
Escalation for 'OS 5 20 = }13~443.66
Escalated Total DSC $702,4:31.24
Overhead (OH Co~c -- including Salary Additives)
OH Rate x DSC of 162.35% x 702r431..24 $:1.,:L40,397.11.
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 30.00% x 702~431.24 $2:1.0,729.37
Relmbursabtes
Z~mized Quantity Units Rate
Meals and Lodging 130 each @ $15.00 $1,950.00
Plans - PlotUng / Repro 5,400 each @ $4.50 $24,300.00
Happing/Photos/Surveys each @ $3.50 $0.00
Reproduction and Pdnflng 25,000 copies @ $0.15 $3,750.00
Field Equipment Rental Lump Sum $4,000.00
Computers $0.00
Postage and Supplies 300 Est @ $2.00 $600.00
Ferry Fare 80 $8.00 $640.00
Travel 18,000 miles @ $0.36 ~6t480.00
Reimbursables Total $41,720.00
Subconsultant Costs (See Exhibit G): $1f790f525.86
Grand Total $3,885,803.58
Prepared ~ Santosh Kumvilla & Bernie Chaplin Date: June 26f 2003
7/11/03
Exhibit E
Breakdown of Overhead Cost
Exeltech Consulting, Inc.
December 31, 2000
as reported by WSDOT Audit June 2001
Audited %
Account Titles Amount of Direct Labor
Direct Labor Base 644,578
Indirect Expenses
Indirect Salaries 348,099 54.00%
Bonuses 48,450 7.52%
Vacation 46,179 7.16 %
Sick Leave 27,316 4.24%
Holidays 33,776 5.24%
FICA & Medicare 93,136 14.45%
FUTA 2,509 039%
Employment Security 22,019 3.42%
L&I 4,552 0.71%
Health Insurance 73,210 11 36%
Pr-TR Differences - Salaries 2,556 0.40%
401(k) Matching Contributions 0.00%
Personnel Recruitment 1,773 0.28%
B&O Taxes 29,297 4.55%
Property Taxes 566 0.09%
Legal 4,813 0.75%
Accounting 250 0.04%
Computer Services 6,993 1.08%
Bank Cha~ges 969 0.15%
Rent 89,398 13.87%
Postage & Equipment Rental 821 0.13%
Lease Equipment 32,365 5.02%
Utilities 4,747 0.74%
Computer Software 1,033 0.16%
Maintenance 4,470 0.69%
Supplies - Clerical 8,790 1.36%
Supplies - Drafting 2,716 0.42%
Supplies - Maintenance & Computer 2,090 0.32%
Postage & Freight 5,401 0.84%
Printing & Reproduction 12,691 1.97%
Telephone/Communications 36,967 5.74%
Prof. IFesslLic. IDues 6,176 0.96%
Professional Seminars 2,078 0.32%
Client Meetings & Meals 535 0.08%
Travel- Meals 499 0.08%
Travel - Mileage 645 O. 10%
Travel - Transportation 14,196 2.20%
Parking 4,462 0.69%
Travel- Lodging 1,937 0.30%
Moving - Job Related 000%
Vehicle Expense- Gas & Misc. 5,104 0.79%
Professional Literature 388 0.06%
Publications 227 0.04%
Advertising 310 0.05%
Insurance - Auto 2,863 044%
Insurance - Professional Liability 22,107 3.43%
Insurance- Disability 2,812 0.44%
Insurance - General Liability 3,250 050%
Subscriptions 1,855 0 29%
Miscellaneous (459) -0 07%
Depreciation 22,646 3.51%
Staff Functions 2,780 043%
Coffee & Suppies 4,125 0 64%
Ir046,488 162 35%
Exhibit F
Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
By the Agency Other Than for
Fault of the Consultant
(Refer to Agreement, Section IX)
Lump Sum Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made shall
total the same percentage of the Lump Sum Amount as the work completed at the time of termination is to the total
work required for the PROJECT. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra work
completed.
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made, shall
total the actual costs plus the same percentage of the fixed fee as the work completed at the time of termination is to
the total work required for the Project. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra work
completed.
Specific Rates of Pay Contracts
A final payment shall be made to thc CONSULTANT for actual hours charged at the time of termination of this
AGREEMENT plus any direct nonsalary costs incurred at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT.
Cost Per Unit of Work Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual units of work completed at the time of termination
of this AGREEMENT.
Exhibit G
Subcontracted Work
The agency permits subcontracted work for the following portions of the work of this agreement
Activity Subconsultant Fee
Project Management Demich Consultin~l $274,733.75
Environmental thru Construction H.W. Lochner $480,365.30
Streetscape, Env. Supp, ROW, Survey David Evans & Assoc. $285,297.30
Mechanical & Electrical Sandwell $284,059.87
Geotechnical Shannon & Wilson $166,991.38
Environmental Support NWA $41,673.07
Environmental Support Michael Minor $ Assoc. $29,240.00
Public Information The Demich Group $65,030.54
WSF Office Building & Toll Booths Art Anderson $163,134.65
Total Subcontracted Work $1,790,525.86
Ii0
Exhibit G- 1
Subconsultant Fee DeterminaUon - Summary Sheet
Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton TransportaUon
Center Access Zmprovements Start Date 3une 1, 2003
City of Bremerton
Task Description: Environmental through Construction End Date April 1, 2006
$ubconsultant Fee Determination
Subccmsultant: Demich Consulting Project # 0324
Classification
Hours Rate Dollars
Project Manager 2,006 x $125.00 $250,750.00
Total Hour 2,006
Total DSC $250,750.00
% Tncrease % of Work
EscalaUon for '04 5 50 = $6,268.75
EscalaUon for '05 5 20 $5,015.00
Escalated Total $262,033.75
Overhead (OH Cost -- including Salary Additives)
OH Rate x DSC of 0.00% x 262,033.75 = $0.00
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 0.00% x 262,033.75 = $0.00
Reimbursables
Ztemized Quantity Units Rate
Meals and Lodging day @ = $0.00
Mileage 35,000 mi @ $0.36 = $12,600.00
Mapping/Photos/Surveys 0 each @ = $0.00
Reproduction and Printing 0 copies @ = $0.00
Field Equipment Rental 0 each @ = $0.00
Postage and Supplies Est @ : $100.00
Reimbursables Total $12,700.00
Grand Total $274,733.75
Prepared By Gary Demich Date: 3une 26, 2003
7/10/03
Exhibit G-1
Subconsultent Fee Determination - Summary Sheet
Downtown Pedastrian/Bremerton Transportation
Center Acce~ Improvements Start Date 2une 1, 2003
City of Bremerton
Task Description: Support Services End Date April 1, 2006
Subconsultent Fee DoterminaUon
Subconsultent: David Evans & Assoc. Project # 0324
Classif'K~tion
Hours Rate Dollars
Principal in Charge 96 x $56.00 $5,376.00
Sr. Professional Land Surveyor 96 x $45.00 $4,320.00
PnYJect Surveyor 224 x $35.00 $7,840.00
Survey Technician 256 x $25.00 $6,400.00
Party Chief 38q x $26.00 $9,984.00
Instrument Person 384 x $18.00 $6,912.00
Property Specialist 36 x $20.00 $720.00
Sr. Property Specialist 78 x $35.00 $2,730.00
Real Estate Manager 30 x $38.00 $1,140.00
Managing Scieldist 97 x $41.00 $3,977.00
Sr: Scientist 112 x $33.00 $3,696.00
Sr. Planner 176 x $35.00 $6,160.00
Sr. Graphic Specialist 26 x $25.00 $650.00
AdministraUve Assistant 126 x $20.00 $2,520.00
Landscape Architect 291 x $34.00 $9,894.00
Landscape Architect 24 x $28.00 $672.00
Landscape Designer 375 x $22.00 $8,250.00
Landscape De~mgner 358 x $19.00 $6,802.00
Total Hour 3,169
Total DSC $88,043.00
% Increase % of Work
Escalation for '04 5 25 $1,100.54
Escalation for '05 5 25 $2,201.08
Escalated Total $91,344.61
Overhead (OH Cost - including Salary Additives)
OH Rate x DSC of 169.96% x 91,344.61 $155,249.30
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 30.00% x 91,344.61 $27,403.38
Reimbursables
Itemized Quanti~/ Units Rate
Meals and Lodging/Ferry Est. @ $1,500.00
Plans - Plotling / Repro 0 each @ $0.00 = $0.00
Mapping/Photos/Surveys 0 each @ $0.00 = $0.00
Reproduction and Printing FSt. @ = $750.00
Field Equipment Rental 0 each @ $0.00 = $0.00
Postage and Supplies 0 ESt @ $0.00 $250.00
Mileage 5000 Miles @ 0.36 = $1,800.00
Utility Locate Est, $4,000.00
Traffic Control ESt. $3,000.00
Reimbursables Total $11,300.00
Grand Total $285,297.30
Prepared By: Ron Anderson Date: June 26, 2003
Exhibit G-1
Subconsultant Fee DetorminaUon - Summa~/Sheet
Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton TransportaUon
Center Access Improvements Start Date 3une 1, 2003
City of Bremerton
Task DescrilYdon: Environmental through Construction End Date April 1, 2006
Subconsultant Fee Determination
Subconsultant: H.W. Lochner Project # 0324
Classification
Hours Rate Dollars
Principal 60 x $62.85 = $3,771.00
Project blanager 470 x $48.27 = $22,686.90
Senior Tra~c Engineer 545 x $45.00 = $24,525.00
Traffic Engineer 376 x $36.70 = $13,799.20
Drainage/UUlities Engineer 584 x $35.00 = $20,440.00
Civil Engineer 1 1,248 x $29.43 = $36,728.64
Civil Engineer 2 751 x $26.39 = $19,818.89
CADD Tech 594 x $20.61 = $12,242.34
Admin Sul~ort 128 x $24.38 = $3,120.64
Total Hours 4,756
Total DSC = $157,132.61
% Increase % of Work
EscalaUon for '04 5 50 = $3,928.32
EscalaUon for '05 3 10 = $1~257.06
Escalat~J Total = $162,317.g9
Overhead (OH Cost -induding Salary Additives)
OH Rate x DSC of 165.14% x 162~317.99 = $268~051.92
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 30.00% x 162,317.99 = $48,695.40
Reimbursables
~ ~uanUty Units Rate
Meals and Lodging 1 day @ $200.00 : $200.00
Mileage at .36 per mile I mile @ $350.00 = $350.00
Mapping/Photos/Surveys 1 each @ $100.00 = $100.00
Reproduction and Printing I copies @ $500.00 = $500.00
Reid Equipment Rental 0 each @ $0.00 = $0.00
Postage and Supplies I est. @ $150.00 = $150.00
Reimbursables Total $1,300.00
Grand Total $480,365.30
Denny Ingham Date: ]une 26, 2003
7/10/03 II 3
Exhibit G- 1
Subconsultant Fee Determination - Summary Sheet
Downtown Pedea~.;an/Bremerton TraesportaUon
Center Access Zmprovements Start Date 3une 1, 2003
City of Bremerton
Task Description: Support Services End Date April 1, 2004
Subconsultent Fee DeterminaUon
Subconsultent: Michael Minor & Assoc. Project # 0324
Classification
Hours Rate Dollars
Michael Minor 148 x $80.00 = $11,8zlO.00
Carl Bloom 220 x $75.00 = $16,500.00
Keri Stone 18 x $50.00 = $900.00
Total Hours 386
Total DSC = $29,240.00
% Increase % of Work
EscalaUon for '04 0 10 = $0.00
Escalation for '05 0 0 = $0.00
Escalated Total DSC $29,240.00
Overhead (OH Cost - induding Salary Additives)
OH Rate x DSC of 0.0% x 29,240.00 = $O.OO
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 0.00% x 29,240.00 = $0.00
Retmbu~ables
~ quantity Units Rate
Meals and Lodging = $0.00
Plans - Rotting / Repro 0 each @ $0.00 = $0.00
Mapping/Photos/Surveys 0 each @ $0.00 $0.00
Reproduction and Printing 0 mpies @ $0.00 = $0.00
Field Equipment Rental 0 each $0,00 = $0.00
Postage and Supplies 0 Est @ $0.00 = $0.00
Reimbursables Total $0,00
Grand Total $29,240.00
Prepared By: Michael Minor Date: 3une 26, 2003
Exhibit G-1
Subconsultant Fee Determination - Summary Sheet
Downtown Pedestrlan/Bremerton Transportation
Center Access Zmprovements Start Date 3une 1, 2003
City of Bremerton
Task Description: Support Services End Date April 1~ 2004
Subconsultent Fee Determination
Subconsultont: NW Arch. Assoc.
Hours Rate Dollars
Project Manager/Historic Preservation S 104 x $33.00 = $3,432.00
Senior Archaeologist 220 x $21.00 = $4,620.00
Historian 134 x $5~.$0 = $7,303.00
Staff Archaeologist 72 × $33.50 = $2,412.00
Graphics/Production 48 x $10.50 = $504.00
Total Hours ~
Total DSC = $18,271.00
% Increase % of Work
Escalation for '04 5 30 $274.07
Escalation for '05 5 0 = $0.00
Escalated Total DSC = $18f545.07
Overhead (OH Cost -- including Salary Additives)
OH Rate x DSC of 90.91% x ~18r5a,5.07 = $16,859.00
F'nged Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 30.00% x ~18~545.07 = $5,564.00
Reimbursables
Z~ed Quantity Units Rate
Meals and Lodging = $0.00
Plans - Plotting / Repro 100 each @ $3.00 = $300.00
Mapping/Photos/Surveys 50 each @ $3.50 = $175.00
Reproduction and Printing 25 copies @ $6.00 = $150.00
Field Equipment Rental = $0.00
Computers = $0.00
Postage and Supplies 40 Est @ $2.00 = $80.00
Outside Computer = $0.00
Outside Consultants = $0.00
Reimbursables Total $705,00
Grand Total $41,673.07
Prepared By: Lorlea Hudson Date: June 26~ 2000
7/11/03
Exhibit G-1
Subconsultant Fee Determination - Summary Sheet
Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton Transportation
Center Access Improvements Start Date lune 1, 2003
City of Bremerton
Task DescripUon: Hech & Elect End Date April 1, 2006
$ubconsultant Fee Determination
Subconsultant: Sandwell Project # 0324
ClasslficaUon
Hours Rate Dollars
01 Senior Hanager / Specialist 152 x $48.26 = $7,335.52
02 Senior Supervisor / Specialist 692 x $39.83 = $27,562.36
03 Supervisor/Specialist 859 x $34.28 = $29,446.52
04 Senior Design Engineer / Tech EqL 730 x $28.32 = $20,673.60
05 Design Engineer / Tech Equiv 90 x $23.41 = $2,106.90
06 Intermediate Engineer / Technicial 0 x $19.79 = $0.00
07 .lunior Engineer / Technician 0 x $16.32 = $0.00
08 Senior Drafter / Technician 1267 x $20.93 = $26,518.31
09 Intermediate Drafter / Technician 0 x $17.21 = $0.00
10 .lunior Drafter / Technician 0 x $12.65 = $0.00
11 Support Staff 288 x $11.57 = $3,332.16
To~al Hours 4078
Total DSC = $116,975.37
% Increase % of Work
Escalation for '04 5 60 $3,509.26
Escalation for '05 5 5 = $584.88
Escalated Total DSC $121,069.51
Overhead (OH Cost -- including Salary Additives)
OH Rate x DSC of 100.00% x 121,069.51 = $121,069.51
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x (DSC) of 30.00% x 121,069.51 = $36,320.85
Reimbursables
Itamizqd QuanUty Units Rata
Trips to Washington State 10 trips $150.00 = $1,500.00
Plans - Plotting / Repro 0 each @ $0.00 = $0.00
Mapping/Photos/Surveys 0 each @ $0.00 = $0.00
Reproduction and Printing 0 copies @ $0.00 = $0.00
Field Equipment Rental 0 each $0.00 = $0.00
Postage and Supplies 4,100 hours @ $1.00 = $4,100.00
Reimbursables Total $5,6OO,00
Grand Total $284,059.87
7/10/03
Exhibit G-1
Subconsultant Fee Determination - Summary Sheet
Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton Transportation
Center Access ][mprovementa Start Data 3une 1, 2003
City of Bremerton
Task Description: Geotachnical End Data April 1, 2006
Subconsultont Fee Determination
Subconsultant~. Shannon & Wilson Project # 0324
Classification
Hours Rate Dollars
Principal ~[n Charge 64 x $64.00 = $4,096.00
Project I~lanager 209 x $43.00 = $8,987.00
Senior Engineer/Geologist 272 x $33.00 = $8,976.00
Staff Engineer/G-eologist 528 x $24.00 = $12,672,00
Clerical/Dra~ng 110 x $17.00 = $1,870.00
Total Hours 1,183
Total DSC $36,601.00
% Increase % of Wok
Escalation for '04 4 50 $732.02
Escalation for '05 4 10 $146.40
$37~479.42
Overhead (OH Cost - including Salary Additives)
OH Rate x DSC of 194.60% x 37,479.42 $72,934.96
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 30.00% x 37,479.42 = $11,244.00
Reimbursables
t'tomized Quantity Units Rate
Mileage (at .36 per mile) and Ferry Costs 20 day @ $20.00 = $400.00
Drilling Subcontract 1 each @ $17,662.73 = $17,663.00
AnalyUcal Testing Subcontract i each @ $3,100.00 = $3,100.00
Reproduction and Pdnting 2,000 copies @ $0.10 = $200.00
Field Equipment Rental i each @ $670.00 = $670.00
EDR and Aerial Photos i Est @ $220.00 = $220.00
Instrumentation survey subcontractor i Est @ $15,000.00 = $15,000.00
Inclinometer Casing 4 each @ $375.00 = $1,500.00
Strain Gages 16 each @ $250.00 = $4,000.00
Crack Gages 5 each @ $20.00 = $100.00
Rent Water Level & Strain Gage Readouts 32 days @ $40.00 = $1,280.00
Rent Inclinometer 16 days @ $7S.00 = $1,200.00
Reimbursables Total $45,333.00
Grand Total $168~991.38
Prepared By: Monique Nykamp, Scott Gaulke, and .lim Wu Date: 3une 26, 2003
7/10/03
Exhibit G- 1
Subconsultant Fee Determination - Summary Sheet
Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton Transportation
Center Access Improvements State Date June 1, 2003
City of Bremerton
Task Description: Public Tnformation/Tnvoivement Plan End Date April 1, 2006
Subconsultant Fee Determination
Subconsultant: The Demich Group Project # 0324
ClassificaUon Labor Direct Labor
Hours Rate Dollars
Project Manager 0 x $100.00 = $0.00
Strategist 249 x $100.00 = $24,900.00
Project Coordinator 94 x $100.00 = $9,400.00
Writer/Editor 284 x $80.00 = $22,720.00
Total Hours 627
Total DSC = $57,020.00
% Increase % of Work
EscalaUon for '04 5 30 = $855.30
EscalaUon for '05 5 30 $1,710.60
Escalated Total DSC = $59,585.90
Overhead (OH Cost -- including Salary Additives)
OH Rate x DSC of 0.0% x $59,585.90 = $0.00
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 0.00% x $59,585.90 = $0.00
Reimbursables
Itemizq~ QuanUty Units Rate
Meals and Lodging = $0.00
Mileage 2,124 each @ $0.36 = $764.64
Outside Graphic Design Services each @ $0.00 = $500.00
Reproduction and Printing 0 copies @ $0.00 = $3,130.00
Advertising 0 = $0.00
Postage and Supplies 0 Est @ $0.00 = ~1r050.00
Reimbursables Total $S,444.64
Grand Total $65,030.54
Prepared By: Leslie S. Demich Date: ]une 26, 2003
Exhibit G-1
Subconsultent Fee Determination - Summary Sheet
Downtown Pedestrian/Bremerton Transportation
Center Access Zmprovements Start Date 3une 1, 2003
City of Bremerten
Task Description: Environmental through Construction End Date April 1, 2006
Subconsultant Fee Determination
Subconsultent: Art Anderson Project # 0324
Classification
Hours Rate Dollars
Project Manager 133 x $45.81 = $6,093.00
Sr. Engr/Arch 430 x $35.05 = $15,072.00
Engr/Sr Designer 96 x $26.22 = $2,517.00
Designer/Drafter 312 x $22.79 = $7,110.00
Oerieal 84 x $16.75 = $1,407.00
Sr. Architect 278 x $35.05 = $9,744.00
Arch/St Designer 420 x $26.22 = $11,012.00
Arch Designer/Drafter 152 x $22.79 = $3,464.00
Total Hours 1,905
Total DSC = $56,419.00
% Increase % of Work
Escalation for '04 0 50 = $0.00
EscalaUon for '05 3 10 = $169.26
Escalated Total = $56,58~.26
Ov~ (OH Cost -induding Salary Additives)
OH Rate x DSC of 157.40% x 56,588.26 = $89,089.92
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 30.00% x 56,588.26 = $16,976.48
Reimbursables
~ I]uanUty Units Rate
Meals and Lodging 0 day @ $200.00 : $0.00
Mileage at .36 per mile 0 mile @ $350.00 = -~A),00
Mapping/Photos/Surveys 0 each @ $100.00 = $0.00
Reproduction and Printing 1 copies @ $500.00 = $500.00
Field Equipment Rental 0 each @ $0.00 = $0.00
Postage and Supplies 0 est. @ $150.00 = ~.00
Reimbursables Total $500,00
Grand Total $163,134,65
Art Anderson Date: June 26, 2003
July 10, 2003
Mr. W. Eugene Sampley
Public Works & Utilities Director
City of Bremerton
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, WA 98310
Mr. Santosh Kuruvilla, PE
Exeltech
2627A Parkmont Lane SW
Olympia, Washington 98502
Re: Bremerton Tunnel Negotiated Rates
Gentlemen:
This letter confirms Demich Consulting's hourly rates for the Downtown
Pedestrian/ BremertonTransportationCenterlmprovementscontract. My rate
schedule is enclosed. This hourly rate is all-inclusive of direct salary, overhead
and fee, and is the lowest rate charged to my preferred clients.
In addition to the identified hourly rate, Demich Consulting will invoice additional
direct non-salary costs. Reimbursable direct non-salary costs will be invoiced
without markup.
For all travel costs, Demich Consulting will comply with the Washington State
Department of Transportation Accounting Manual M 13-82, Chapter 10, Travel,
and its updates.
Demich Consulting reserves the right to make cost-of-living adjustments to its
hourly billing rates on an annual basis.
Sincerely,
Principal
Enclosure
Exhibit G-~.
Hourly Rate Schedule for 2003
Demich Consulting
Gary F. Demich $125/hour
State Mileage Rate $0.345/mile
Expenses (Authorized) Cost without Markup
Subconsultants (Authorized) Cost without Markup
Exhibit G-2
Breakdown of Subconsultant Overhead Cost
David Evans and AssoGiates, Inc.
2003 Provisional Overhead Rate **
Iv~m~le.~v~ O~h~ In.me (275,0~2) (254,133) (21,958)
f~eame l'a~s 210.785 ~,~.~ ~17~
Rate Calculations
JUL 89 'OS OS:SOPM D~VID EV~HS ~ ~SSOC P.9
Exhibit G-2
Breakdown of Subconeultant Overhead Cost
H. W. Lochner, Inc.
FYE April 30, 2002
(includes CADD Costs)
A fiocation To
DescrlpUon Costs per Lochner WSDOT Accepted % Field Home
G/I. Adj. Adj. Costs Office Office
Direct Labor Base $8,797,857 -$60,42~9 $8,737,428 $1,563,231 $7,174,197
Notes:
(1) indirect labor and fringe benefits are allocated to field office by a ratio of field office direct labor to total direc~ labor.
(2) All other accounts are allocated to the field office by a ratio of field office indirect labor to home office direct labor plus
July 7, 2003
Mr. Sant~h Kuruvilla. PE
Exeltech
2627A Parkmont Lane SW
Olympia, Washington 98502
Re: Brem~ Ttmnel
N,gotiated Rate~ Letter
~ letter e, onfim~ Michael Minor & A~ociatca hourly me~ for the Downtown
Pedes~ri~ / I~remerton Transportation Center ImlorOvements contra~t. Our ra~e schedule
is encio~l. 'fllese hourly ratea ~'e all-inclusive of direcl salary, overhead and f~e, and
are the lowest rates charged to our preferred clionta.
In addition to the above hourly rate, Michael Minor & Azso~iatca will invoic~ the
additional direct mn-salary coats listed on the enclosed se. hedule.
Reimbursable direct non-~mlnry costs will be invoiced to the City of [~'emerto~ ~ithout
murk .
For all travel co~ts, M/chael Minor & A~ociatez will comply with the Wn~hln~n~t~Oll Stsl~
Deparlmont of Transportation Accounting M~ual M 13-$2, Chapter 10, Travel, ~td its
Michel Minor
P~idmt
En~lo~n~: Exlfibit G-I: 200~ Rat* Sel~dul¢
Dale 7/10/2003 Time: 4:1604 PM F~a§e 3 of 5
Exhibit G-I
Hourly Rate Sehednle for 2003
Michael Minor & Associates
Michael Minor $80.00/hom'
State Mileage Rate $0.345/mile
Expms~ (Authorized) Cost without Markup
Subconsuitants (Authorized) Co~ without Marl~
Michael Minor & Associates F. quipment Costs: N/A for this project
July 7, 2003
]Mr. Sentc~t Kuruvilla, PE
2627A Parkmont Lane SW
Olympia, Washington 98502
Re: Bremerton Tunnel
Negotiated Rates Letter
Dear Mr. Kuruvilla:
This letter confirms Databridge N-W hourly rates for the Downtown Pedesuian /
Bremerton Transpofation C. ente~ Improvements conUacc Our rote schedule is en¢lo~d.
The~e hourly rates are all-inclusive of direct salary, overhead and fee, and a'e the lowest
rates charged to our prefa[~ clients.
In a,ld~tion to the above hourly rate, Datsbridge NW will Invoic~ th~ additional direct
non-salary ¢ost~ listed on the enclo~d sched~e.
Reimbursable direct non-salary costs will be invoiced to the City of Bremerton witho~-t
martup.
For all travel costs, Databfidge N'W will comply with the Wa~ Stnto Depm'tment
of Tran~on Accounting Manual M 13-82, Chapter 10, Travel, and its upa.~.
Sincerely,
~ Cour~ain
~.~¢io~: Exhibit G-I: 200~ Ra~ $¢1~du1¢
Exhibit G-I
Hourly Rate Schedule for 2003
Databridge NW
~ Counam $50,00/~our
Stato Mileage Rate $0.345/mile
Expenses (Authorized) Cost without Mart'~
SubconsulUnt~ (Authorized) Cost without Madcap
Databridg¢ N'W Equipment Costs: N/A
N~t: B~nmse CarI BIoorn ia on Vacation, tke taslt lead for Noise, F'tbration and dir.
Michael M~nor/Mlehaei Minor ~oc~te~, mbo ~u~ wo~l~d w~ Carl Bloom
~aensively, is submitting this information for hint Carl Bloom and Micha~l Mi~or have
a 5 year teaming history, ~nelud~ng ~everai ~XtYOTprojwts where tb~s same inforn~a~n
was requested. ~l~e also believe tkat this ~nformation is on file at i~DOT for otker .~ate
tramlmrtation peojects. ~ will s~rntt a formal ~ of this ~t wlum Carl
returns from vacation the week of July 14, 2003.
l~anks for Your ~nti~rstanding in this n~tter
ExMbit G-I
Hourly Rate Schedule for 2003
Environalysis
Carl Bloom $75.00/hottr
State Milease Rate $0.345/mile
Expenses (Authorized) Cost without Markup
Sulx:omultants (Authodzed) Cost wifi~out Madmp
EXHIBIT G-2
Breakdown of Subconsultants Overhead Cost
Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc.
Overhead Schedule December 31, 2001
WSDOT Audited and Approved
Proposed Accepted
Category Amount Adjust Ref. Amount %
Direct Labor Base $ 577,747 $ 173,592 A $ 404,155
Fringe Benefits
Medical Insurance $ 18,268 $ 18,268 4.52
FICA 44,198 44,198 10.94
FUTA 1,717 1,717 0.42
Worker Compensation 1,711 1,711 0.42
State Unemployment 16,295 16,295 4.03
SIMPLE IRA Employer Contribution 10,665 10,665 2.64
Total Fringe Benefits $ 92,854 $ 92,854 22.98
General Overhead Expenses
Indirect Salaries $ 173,592 A $ 173,592 42.95
Auto and Travel $ 993 993 0.25
City & State Taxes 10,441 10,441 2.58
Dues, Subscriptions, Permits 869 B 869 0.22
Insurance 9,673 9,673 2.39
Interest 2,037 (2,037) B 0
Maintenance, Repair, Recycle 3,730 3,730 0.92
Meals 3,710 B 3,710 0.92
Office Supplies, Expenses 9,562 B 9,562 2.37
Outside Services, Professional 15,251 (8,250) B,D 7,001 1.73
Rent 30,880 30,880 7.64
Supplies & Equipment Rental 10,115 B 10, I 15 2.5
Telephone 8,882 8,882 2.2
Training 2,841 2,841 0.7
Travel & Lodging Expense 2,283 B 2,283 0.56
Total General Overhead Expenses $ 111,267 $ 163,305 $ 274,572 67.93
Total Overhead Expenses $ 204,121 $ 163,305 $ 367,426 90.91%
Overhead Rate 90.91%
Refs:
A - FAR 48-31.202 Direct and indirect labor are co-mingled and shown as one total
B - FAR 48-31.202 Direct costs voluntarily identified and excluded.
C - FAR 48-31.205-20 Interest is an unallowable cost
D - Disallowed tax preparation over $250 per WSDOT Policy and 48 CFR 31.205-41(b)(1)
Exhibit G-2
Breakdown of Subconsultant Overhead Cost
Firm: Sandwell £ngineers Corp _Completed by: Howard M. Lam Date: 07/10/0~
Account Title $ Be§inning Total % of Direct Labor
Direct Labor $ 5,694,414 100
Overhead Expenses:
FICA 472,636 8.3
Unemployment 5,694 0.1
Health/Accident Insurance 267,637 4.7
Medical Aid & Industrial Insurance 51,250 0.9
HolidayNacafion/Sick Leave 632,080 l 1.1
Commission/Bones/Pension 261,943 4.6
Total Fringe Benefits 1,691,241 29.7
General Overhead:
State B&O Taxes
Insurance 335,970 5.9
Administration & Time Not Assignable 2,881,373 50.6
Printing, Stationery & Supplies 85,416 1.5
Professional Services 233,471 4.1
Travel Not Assignable 216,388 3.8
Telephone & Telegraph Not Assignable 142,360 2.5
Fees, Dues & Professional Meetings 28,472 0.5
Utilities & Maintenance 85,416 1.5
Professional Development l 19,583 2.1
Rent 689,024 12.1
Equipment Support 159,444 2.8
Office, Miscellaneous & Postage 210,693 3.7
Total General Overhead 5,187,611 91.1
Total Overhead (General + Fringe) 6,878,852 120.8
Overhead Rate (Total Overhead / Direct Labor) 1.208 1.208
Exhibit G-2
Breakdown of Subconsultant Overhead Cost
Firm: Shannon & Wilson. Inc. Completed by: ' ' Date: 7/10/0~
Account Title $ Beginning Total % of Direct Labor
Direct Labor 5,821,034
Overhead Expenses:
FICA 793,430 13.6
Unemployment 282,188 4.8
Health/Accident Insurance 1,031,038 17.7
Medical Aid & Industrial Insurance 90,653 1.6
HolidayNecatioh/Sick Leave l, 149,226 19.7
Commission/Bonus/Pension 25,155 .5
Total Fringe Benefits 3,371,690 57.9
General Overhead:
State B&O Taxes 233,751 4.0
Insurance 326,733 5.6
Administration & Time Not Assignable 3,930,848 67.5
Printing, Stationery & Supplies 192,667 3.3
Professional Services 209,535 3.6
Travel Not Assignable 144,902 2.5
Telephone & Telegraph Not Assignable 482,818 8.3
Fees, Dues & Professional Meetings 176,633 3.1
Utilities & Maintenance 348,712 6.0
Professional Development 208,020 3.6
Rent 749,334 12.9
Equipment Support 170,540 2.9
Office, Miscellaneous & Postage 782,532 13.4
Total General Overhead 7,957,025 136.7
Total Overhead (General + Fdnge) 11,328,715 194.6
Overhead Rate (Total Overhead / Direct Labor) 194.6
lD mich
2122 State Avenue NJ, S~lite B
OIympi,~, WA
360/0~,3/05
Fax 360./05,2262
mailOdem4thq/oup.con~
July 7, 2003
Mr. Santosh Kuruvilla, PE
Exeltech
2627A Parkmont Lane SW
Olympia, Washington 98502
Re: Bremerton Tunnel
Negotiated Rates Letter
Dear Mr. Kuruvilla:
This letter confirms The Demich Group's hourly rates for the Downtown Pedestrian /
Bremerton Transportation Center Improvements contract. My rate schedule is enclosed.
These hourly rates are all-inclusive of direct salary, overhead and fee, and are the lowest
rates charged to our preferred clients. The Demich Group reserves the right to review
and make cost-of-living adjustments to its hourly billing rate effective August 1 of each
year the contract is open.
In addition to the above hourly rate, The Demich Group will invoice the additional direct
non-salary costs listed on the enclosed schedule.
Reimbursable direct non-salary costs will be invoiced to the City of Bremerton without
markup.
For all travel costs, The Demich Group will comply with the Washington State
Department of Transportation Accounting Manual M 13-82, Chapter 10, Travel, and its
updates.
Principal
enclosure: Exhibit G-l: 2003 Rate Schedule
Exhibit G-1
Hourly Rate Schedule for 2003
The Demich Group
Public Outreach Strategist $100.00/hour
Public Outreach Coordinator $100.00/hour
Writer/Editor $80.00/hour
State Mileage Rate $0.345/mile
Expenses (Authorized) Cost without Markup
Subconsultants (Authorized) Cost without Markup
Exhibit G-2
Breakdown of Subconsultants Overhead Cost
Firm: Art Anderson Associates Irl¢; Completed by: Simon Ngu Date: 7/9/03
Account Title $ Be§inning Total % of Direct Labor
Direct Labor $553,950
Overhead Expenses:
FICA (All Payroll Taxes) 73,163 13.21
Unemployment 0
Health/Accident Insurance 32,090 5.79
Medical Aid & Industrial Insurance 1,984 .36
HolidayNacation/Sick Leave 83,077 15.00
Profit Shadng/401K/Transit Subsides 20,00 ! 3.6 ]
Total Fringe Benefits 210,315 37.97
General Overhead:
State B&O Taxes 38,768 7.00
Insurance 27,587 4.98
Administration & Time Not Assignable 282,964 51.08
Printing, Stationery & Supplies 19,193 3.46
Professional Services 21,859 3.95
Travel Not Assignable 2,157 .39
Telephone & Telegraph Not Assignable 17,319 3.13
Fees, Dues & ProfeSSional Meetings 6,187 1.12
Utilities & Maintenance 16,169 2.92
Professional Development 22,024 3.98
Rent 26,653 4.81
Equipment Support 86,290 15.58
Office, Miscellaneous & Postage 94,389 17.04
Total General Overhead 661,559 119.43
Total Overhead (General + Fringe) 871,874
Overhead Rate (Total Overhead / Direct Labor) 157.40%
DATE SUBMITTED: /' 1 -, (-3 BILL # /_/!~ /~
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON i~ J[
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON Committee Meeting Date: July 22, 2003
ORDINANCE SETTING THE MAYOR'S COUNCIL MEETING Date: Juty-30 and Aug. 13,
COMPENSATION THROUGH A 2003
SEPARATE ORDINANCE Department: City Attorney's Office
5~ ~Ea.~{t~t~.,~ j~)~J{t"LO, F~C~,, d-~ ~,q Presenter: RogerA. Lubovich
........... Phone: 473-2345
SUMMARY: Section 2 of Ordinance No. 4357 established the Mayor's compensation through the
budget. The proposed ordinance repeals section 2 of Ordinance No. 4357 and establishes the Mayor's
salary and benefits by ordinance outside of the annual budget process. The ordinance does not change
the current salary.
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None, the Mayor's current salary is the same as
established in the proposed ordinance.
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
FISGA~B~GET:
OPE~TIONS:
CO~CIL P~SIDENT: ~.~.~ ~~.
~COMMENDED MOTION:
1. ' tmove~ ~m~h~
2. I move to pass ~dinance No. q~ on second reading.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, repealing Section 2 of Ordinance No.
4357, which established the Mayor's compensation through the
budget and further setting the Mayor's compensation by separate
ordinance and codifying the same as a new chapter of the
Bremerton Municipal Code.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the City Charter, the Mayor's salary is set by ordinance;
and
WHEREAS, Section 2 of Ordinance No. 4357 provides that the Mayor's salary is
established by the budget; and
WHEREAS, the current salary for the Mayor for fiscal year 2003 was established
pursuant to Budget Ordinance No. 4839 establishing the 2003 fiscal year budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to repeal Section 2 of Ordinance No. 4357
and set the Mayor's compensation by separate ordinance and codifying the same as a new chapter
of the Bremerton Municipal Code rather than setting the compensation through the budget;
NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 4357 establishing the Mayor's salary
through the budget is hereby repealed. All compensation paid to the Mayor pursuant to and
consistent with Section 2 of Ordinance No 4357 is hereby ratified.
SECTION 2. There is hereby created a new chapter, Chapter 2.03 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code, entitled "Mayor" to read as follows:
CHAPTER 2.03
MAYOR
2.03.010. Compensation. Beginning January 1, 2003, the Mayor of the City shall
receive a base salary of Eighty Two Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety Six dollars ($82,796) per
year plus benefits and annual cost of living increases, if any, as provided to the ..... ,,~:c~
,,~ ........................ City. management and professional employees of the City pursuant to
Chapter 2.50 BMC.
Mayor's Salary
SECTION& Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
fome and effect.
SECTION4. Effective Date. While this ordinance shall take effect and be in
force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law, the
Mayor shall begin receiving the salary set forth in this ordinance effective January 1, 2003.
APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003
PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2003
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
Approved this day of ,2003
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the day of ,2003
EFFECTIVE the _day of ,2003
ORDINANCE NO.
R:\LEGAL\Ordinances~xExecutive\M ayor's Salary.doc
Mayor's Salary
AGENDA BILL
· . , .BREMERTON CITY COU, NCIL
1. SUBJECT: Approving /Amendment to FOR AGENDA OF:
Ordinance No. 485q relating to the ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance Dept.
City of Bremerton Fiscal Year ORIGINATOR: Michael R. Wilson
~_. 2003 Budget ~ . . DATE SUBMITTED: June 16, 2003
2. CLEARANCES. (comment on back if necess~_9~ar3) 3.. E~HIBITS:
Director, Finance ' ~.l;/,~_,~t~ fJ3~.*'"
Budget Finance Committee ~ (~ --'
Operations Committee ~
ENDORSEMENT INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
MAYO COUNCIL PRESIDENT
The City Council of the City of Bremerton passed Ordinance 4837 on December 4, 2002, authorizing the
formation of Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) No. 2002-01. The City Council passed the Fiscal Year
(FY) 2003 City Budget Ordinance (Ordinance No. 4839) on December 11, 2002. The FY 2003 City Budget
authorized the establishment ora Public Safety Bond Fund to account for and fund the various Public Safety
capital projects and vehicle acquisitions. The City Council approved on January 29, 2003, the issu~mce of
revenue bonds to finance the construction of the Conference Center Parking facility and Hotel Plaza capital
improvement projects. The City of Bremerton is required to maintain separate accounting for the City's parking
system as a condition of the issuance of revenues for financing the construction of the Conference Center
Parking facility. Upon the formation of locai improvement districts, the City is required to maintain sufficient
revenues within an LID guaranty fund to cover bond covenants for the financing of the LID capital project
improvements. The City Council approved on February 26, 2003, documents relating to the City's participation
in the construction and purchase of ownership interest in the Bremerton Government Center. tt is a significant
objective of the City of Bremerton to perform certain downtown pedestrian and BTC ingress and egress capital
improvements. The Parks Development Fund has received grant fundjn~g in 2003 to perform two Parks c_ap.ital
improvement projects resulting in the need for a budget amendment. .
~ Each of these actions has an impact on the City of Bremerton's FY
2003 City Budget resulting in the need to amend the Fiscal Year 2003 City Budget document.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
I "2~. ~ to al)pxuye tile a-aene~l ornmanae on ill~[ f~auH~, ~l~Cnu~ng Or{llnance No. ~ Y~latlll~ tv ~l~
Z~Y~on ' f~ 3 7
B. I move to pass Ordinance No. second reading, amending Ordinance No. 4,8~6 relating to the City
of Bremerton Fiscal Year 2003 Budget.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS (cont.):
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (cont.):
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
This budget amendment is required to comply with the financial and budgetary provisions of previously
adopted ordinances. These previous Council actions, through the adoptions of other ordinances, require the
establishment of funds and appropriation of future funding, thus, necessitating the City Council to amend its
Fiscal Year 2003 City Budget. Failure to not pass this ordinance would result in non-compliance of earlier
approved Council mandates and not allow the City to move forward on the expenditure of funds for certain
capital projects and programs.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES
7. RESEARCH SOURCES
Revised July 16, 2003
I. Ordinance No. 4839 - Amending City Budget Ordinance
Action Item Council Action
Public Safety Bond Fund/Budget (302): Project administration Proposed budget amount - $0
services funding within proposed budget (removes all funding
project administration and management services including $74,750
for services provided by interim Capital Projects Director for 2003)
· Option 1: Fund all project management services including Amend line item to $178,875
interim Capital Projects Director for entire year (proposed
by Finance Department)
· Option 2: Fund all project management services including Amend line item to $141,500
interim Capital Projects Director for the last six months of
the year ($37,375)
· Option 3 Provide no funding for project management No action to amend line item
services from the Public Safety Bond fund placing financial
obligation on the General Fund
ORDINANCE NO. '~ ~
AN ORDINANCE of thc City Council of the City of Bremerton,
Washington, amending Ordinance No. 4839 relating to the City of
Bremerton Fiscal Year 2003 Budget.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Bremerton passed Ordinance 4837 on
December 4, 2002, authorizing the formation of Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) No.
2002-01; and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed the Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 City Budget Ordinance
(Ordinance No. 4839) on December 11, 2002;
WHEREAS, the FY 2003 City Budget authorized the establishment ora Public Safety
Bond Fund to account for and fund various Public Safety capital projects and vehicle acquisitions;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved on January 29, 2003, the issuance of revenue
bonds to finance the construction of the Conference Center Parking facility and Hotel Plaza
capital improvement projects; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton is required to maintain separate accounting for the
City's parking system as a condition of the issuance of revenues for financing the construction of
the Conference Center Parking facility; and
WHEREAS, upon the formation of local improvement districts, the City is required to
maintain sufficient revenues within an LID guaranty fund to cover bond covenants for the
financing of the LID capital project improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved on February 26, 2003, documents relating to the
City's participation in the construction and purchase of ownership interest in the Bremerton
Government Center; and
WHEREAS, it is a significant objective of the City of Bremerton to perform certain
downtown pedestrian and BTC ingress and egress capital improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Parks Development Fund has received grant funding in 2003 to perform
two Parks capital improvement projects resulting in the need for a budget amendment; and
WHEREAS, the General Fund needs budget adjustments within the Department of
Economic Development to reflect the restructuring of project management services and funding
support for the Department's operations, and an adjustment within the Fire Department's budget
to fund a new regular staffposition that is currently being funded out of overtime pay; and
WHEREAS, there are two Managing Engineer positions within the Public Works
Department that currently have salary bands that were not appropriately adjusted during the FY
2003 Budget process and one WWTP Maintenance position that was to have been changed fi~om
a contract position to a budgeted employee in the FY 2003 Budget, and
WHEREAS, each of these actions has an impact on the City of Bremerton's FY 2003 City
Budget resulting in the need to amend this Budget document;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Ordinance 4839 establishin4g the City of Bremerton's FY 2003 Budget
passed by the City Council on December 11, 2002, is hereby amended as follows:
1) The Real Estate Tax Fund (Fund 109) was established to account for the accumulation of
real estate excise taxes and to fund qualified capital improvement projects, and this Fund is
amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments:
REAL ESTATE EXCISE FUND {FUND 109)
Fiscal Year 2003
Current 2003 Amended 2003
REVENUES Budget Budget
Beginning Fund Balance 1,750,000 1,750,000
Taxes 480,000 480,000
Misc. Revenues 60,000 60,000
Total Revenues 2,290,000 2,290,000
EXPENDITURES
Capital Outlay 50,000 50,000
Operating Transfer Out (Fund 301) 900,000
Operating Transfer Out (Fund 305) 1,035,600
Ending Fund Balance 2.240.000 304,400
Total Expenditures 2,290,000 2,290,000
2) The Bond Fund (Fund 201) was established to account for the accumulation of resources
for and the payment of principal and interest on the bonds issued to fund various City capital
projects, and this Fund is amended to reflect the principal and interest payments for the new debt
financing obligation for the construction of the new Conference Center Parking facility capital
improvement project as provided below:
BOND ~
Fiscal Year 2003
Current 2003 Amended 2003
REVENUES Budget Budget
Beginning Fund Balance 250,000 250,000
Taxes 1,124,324 1,124,324
Operating Transfer In (Fund 301) 0 251,878
Operating Transfer In 286,337 286,337
Misc. Revenues 55,200 55,200
Total Revenues 1,715,861 1,967,739
2
EXPENDITURES
Debt Service 1,465,861 1,465,86 I
Debt Service - Parking Garage 251,878
Ending Fund Balance 48,800 250,000
Total Expenditures 1~514,661 1,967,739
3) The Local Improvement District Guaranty Fund (Fund 202) was established to account
for the accumulation of resources for providing additional guaranty ofpaymems of bonds issued
by the City to finance local improvement districts, and this Fund is amended to reflect payment
obligation from the Local Improvement District No. 2002-01 Capital Project Fund (Fund 308) to
the guaranty fund as provided below:
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT GUARANTY FUND (FUND 202}
Fiscal Year 2003
Current 2003 Amended 2003
REVENUES Budget Budget
Beginning Fund Balance 37,800 37,800
Operating Transfer In (Fund 308) 0 117,700
Other Financing Sources 10,000 10,000
Misc. Financing Sources 1,000 1,000
Total Revenues 48,800 226,500
EXPENDITURES
I Debt Service 0 0
Ending Fund Balance 48,800 226,500
Total Expenditures 48~800 226,500 i
4) The Conference Center Parking Facility Capital project fund (Fund 301) was established
to account for and Fund the construction oftbe Conference Center Parking facility capital project,
and this fund is amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments:
CONFERENCE CENTER/PARKING FACILITY CAPITAL BUDGET (FUND 301)
FY 2003
Current 2003 Amended 2003
REVENUES Budget Budget
Operating Transfer In (Fund 201 ) Bond Proceeds 10,100,000
Real Estate Excise Tax 900,000
Public Facilities District 6,975,000
Kitsap Transit 4,000,000
Pad Sale 250,000
Arterial Street 103,462
Intergovernmental 6,000,000
Other Financing Sources 6,000,000
Interest Earnings _0_ 0_
Total Revenues 12,000,000 22,328,462
3
EXPENDITURES
Administration: Project/Financial 21 t ,413
Admin. Expenses 27,090
Prof. Services: Arch. Services (Conf. Center, Parking Garage) 1,946,270
Consultant studies 85,000
Capitalized Expenditures
Other Construction 56,216
Demolition 130,130
Dump Fees 139,880
Environmental 153,340
Port of Bremerton Pad Purchase 90,000
Street Improvements 103,462
Plaza/offsite landscaping 0
Parking Garage Construction 10,671,952
Conference Center Construction 5,547,389
Park Plaza Construction 2,740,266
Capital Outlay 12,000,000
Debt Service: Transfer Out (Fund 201) 251,878
Ending Fund Balance 0_ 174,176
Total Expenditures 12,000,000 22,328,462
5) The Public Safety Capital Projects Fund (Fund 302) was established to account for and
fund the costs for constructing public safety capital facilities and acquisition of public safety
vehicles, and this Fund is amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments:
PUBLIC SAFETY BOND/CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND (Fund 302)
FY 2003
Current 2003 Amended 2003
~ Budget Budget
Beginning Cash/Bnnd Proceeds 12,979,000 12,979,000
Interfiand loan 800,000
Interest Earnings 333,289
Misc. Revenues 170,000 0~
Total Revenues 13,149,000 14,112,289
EXPENDITURES
Administration: Financial 10,000
Professional Administration:
Architect Serv - Police/Court, SOG, Fire Bldgs 611,750
Project administration ! 7~,~75 0
Appraisal - Police/Court Building 2,000
Land
Bank Purchase 1,198,000
Fire Station Land Purchase 800,000
Construction
Police/Cour~ Building 3,510,000
Police SOG Building Construction 225,000
Fire Station 3,420,000
Equipmem
4
Police Equipment 500,000
Police Vehicles - 5 new vehicles 225,000
Fire Trucks - 3 fire trucks, new ladder truck 2,250,000
Fire Equipment 829,000
Bond Debt Service/Issuance Costs 10,000
Capital Outlay 13,149,000
Ending Fund Balance 0_ ~-~664.521,539
Total Expenditures 13,149,000 14,112,289
6) A new fund entitled "Government Center Capital Project Fund" (Fund 305) is hereby
established to account for and fund the City of Bremerton's proportionate share of the capital
costs for the construction of the Bremerton Government Center with the following amounts
appropriated:
GOVERNMENT CENTER CAPITAL BUDGET (FUND 305)
Fiscal Year 2003
Amended 2003
REVENUES Budget
Operating Transfer In (Fund 109, Real Estate Excise Tax) 1,035,600
Sale of Proparty (City Hall and DCD properties) 0
Debt Financing 6,470,356
Total Revenues 7,505,956
Administrative/finance expenses 50,000
Professional Services: architect (space planning) 25,000
Capital Expense- City Hall facility 6,470,356
Capital Expense - Kitsap Health Dept. 250,000
Capital Expense - furniture, moving expenses 300,000
Additional Tenent Improvements ($25/sfx 16,424 sf) 410,600
Ending Fund Balance
Total Expenditures 7,505,956
7) A new fund entitled "ULID 2002-01 Capital Project Fund" (Fund 308) is hereby
established to account for and fund the construction of the water system capital improvements
that are to provide special benefit to property owners within the boundaries of ULID No. 2002-01
with the following amounts appropriated:
ULID 2002-01 CAPITAL PROJECT (FUND 308)
Fiscal Year 2003
Amended 2003
REVENUES Budaet
Intergovernmental Revenue - Water Utility Fund (40 ] ) ! 20,716
Loan 1,056,384
Tota I Revenues 1,177,100
EXPENDITURES
Capitalized Expenditures
Salaries/Benefits 10,000 i
5
Professional Services - engineering 72,000
Professional Services - management/inspection 31,000
Land Purchase - ROW acquisition 8,400
Construction 903,000
Debt Financing Expenses 35,000
Operating Transfer Out - LID Guarantee Fund ! 17,700
Total Expenditures i,177,100
8) A new fund entitled "Downtown Pedestrian / BTC Access Capital Project Fund" (Fund
309) is hereby established to account for and fund the administration, planning, design and
construction of a downtown pedestrian/BTC ingress and egress capital improvements with the
following amounts appropriated:
DOWNTOWN PEDESTRIAN / ETC ACCESS CAPITAL FUND (FUND 309)
Fiscal Year 2003
Amended 2003
REVENUES Budget
Beginning Fund Balance
Federal Grant 1,500,00~
Total Revenues
~ 1,5oo,ooo
Professional Services
Engineering Services 1,355,000
rransfer Out - (Fund 101, Arterial Streets)
105,000I
EndingTransferFundOUt Balance- (Fund 00 l, General Fund) 40,0000
Total Expenditures 1,500,0~
9) A new fund entitled "Conference Center Operating Fund" (Fund 410) is hereby established
to account for and fund the operation, maintenance and capital improvements to the Conference
Center facility with the following amounts appropriated:
CONFERENCE CENTER OPERATING FUND (FUND 410)
Fiscal Year 2003
~ Amended 2003
Beginning Fund Balance Budget
Debt Financing: 0
Loan - !k':z ~f c~dlt 300,000
Total Revenues 300,000
EXPENDITURES
Professional Services:
Management/Concessionaire services 300,000
Ending Fund Balance 0
Total Expenditures 300,000
10) A new fund entitled "Parking System Operating Fund" (Fund 105) is hereby established to
account for and fund the operation, maintenance and capital improvements to the Conference
Center Parking facility and the City's parking operation with the following amounts appropriated:
6
PARKING SYSTEM OPERATING FUND (FUND 105)
Fiscal Year 2003
Amended 2003
REVENUES Budget
Beginning Fund Balance 0
Off-Street Parking (Daily) - Roosevelt Lots 83,000
On-Street parking 140,000
City Garage 200,000
Off-Street Parking (Daily) - City parking 230,000
Parking Infi'actions 215,000
Conference Center Parking Garage 0_
Total Revenues 868,000
EXPENDITURI~S
Parking System Operating Expense 273,000
Transfer Out - (Fund 102, Streets) 330,000
Transfer Out - (Fund 001, General Fund) 182,000
Transfer Out - (Fund 112, Park Development) 83,000
Ending Fund Balance 0_
Total Expenditures 868~000
11) The Parks Developmem Fund (Ftmd 112) is hereby amended to reflect the following
appropriation adjustments:
PARKS DEVELOPMENT FUND {FUND 112)
Fiscal Year 2003
Current 2003 Amended 2003
REVENUES Budget Budaet
Beginning Cash 630,857 630,857
Intergovernmental 31,000 31,000
Misc. Revenue 83,000 83,000
Operating Transfer In 150,000 150,000
CTED Grant 0 495,750
UPARR Grant 0 182,280
CDB~Allocation 0 78,120
Total Revenues 894,857 1,651,007
EXPENDITURES
Ending Cash 302,259 302,259
Supplies & Services 238,800 238,800
Capital Outlay 300,000 300,000
Debt Service 53,798 53,798
Capital - Boardwalk cathodic protection/pife wrap 0 495,750
Capital - Jarstand Rehabilitaton/HVAC project 0_ 260,400
Total Expenditures 894,857 1,651,007
7
12) The authorized staffing and salary bands for the Departmem of Public Works are hereby
amended to reflect the following personnel adjustments:
PUBLIC WORKS AUTltORIZED STAFFING Current 2003 Amended 2003
Budget Budeet
WWTP Maintenance Technician contract position I FIE
Salary Band 12
$3,299 - $3,882
Managing Engineer (2) Salary Band 15 Salary Band 16
$5,151-$6,276 $5,412- $6,593
13) The General Fund (Fund 001) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation
adjustments:
GENERAL FUND (FUND 001)
Fiscal Year 2003
Current 2003 Amended 2003
REVENUES Budget Budget
Transfer in - (Fund 309, Downtown Ped. Capital Fund) 0_ _40,000
Revenues 40,000
EXPENDITURES
Department: Economic Development (Fund: General 001-62)
Personnel 59,812 59,812
Extra Help 5,600
Supplies & Services 5,365 39,765
Expenditures 65,177 105,177
Department: Fire Department (Fund: General 001-25)
Rescue and Emergency Aid: Personnel 2,216,000 2,234,000
Overtime 101,026 83,026
Expenditures 2,317,026 2,317,026
SECTION 2. Severabilitv. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of
this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10)
days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003
PASSED by the City Council the day of ., 2003
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
Approved this day of ,2003
8
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the day of _, 2003
EFFECTIVE the day of ,2003
ORDINANCE NO.
9
DATE SUBMITTED: July 9, 2003 BILL # iL ~ - I '5
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON ~ G
CITY COUNCIL
2q
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON Committee Meeting Date: July ~ 2003
ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF COUNCIL MEETING Date: ~- I?'~/3
THE BMC RELATING TO RESTRICTED Department: City Attorney's Office
PARKING ZONES Presenter: Simon Stocker
Phone: 473-2345
SUMMARY: The City currently allows residents to petition for parking restrictions to be imposed in
their neighborhoods. The proposed ordinance will expand the options available to residents to deal
with external factors that impact parking availability in neighborhoods. Specifically, it allows four
parking options on their street: 1) no restriction, 2) one hour parking, 3) two hour parking, or 4)
residential parking only. Also, this ordinance allows for a three year parking permit renewal program
to reduce administrative costs and offer more convenience to residents. It is also being proposed that
certain parking penalties be increased to encourage parking code compliance in neighborhoods.
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): N/A
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
FISCAL/BUDGET:
CONSENT AGENDA []
OPERATIONS: .,., ....
COUNCIL PRESIDENT: ,' ~ .. <~ ?: ~ ~,~:.:- '
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I. I move to approve the proposed ordinance on first reading.
2. I move to pass Ordinance No. on second reading.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bromcrton, Washington, repealing Chapters 10.08 and 10.09 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code; repealing and replacing Chapter 10.10
of the Brcmerton Municipal Code; amending Chapter 10.11 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code all relating parking and enforcement
within the City of Brcmenon; and further amending Rate Table B
of Chapter 3.01 to update the rates relating to parking within the
City of Bremerton.
WHEREAS, the current provisions of Chapters 10.08, 10.09 10.10, and 10.11 of
the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to parking and enforcement within the City of Bremerton
are insufficiently flexible to deal with the various parking problems that affect the various areas
throughout the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there are areas of the City of Bremerton
that suffer a disproportionate impact from commuter parking that is not adequately addressed by
the Current provisions of Chapters 10.08, 10.09 10.10, and 10.11 of the Bremerton Municipal
Code relating to parking and enforcement; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there are areas of the City which can be
immediately identified as having such severe parking problems that allowing for parking by
permit only should be immediately allowed (see Historically Impacted Areas on Appendix
Figure 060); and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to repeal and replace and amend the
provisions relating to parking in the City of Bremerton and enfomement in order to provide the
residents of the City with more control over the methods used to deal with parking problems
afflicting their neighborhoods; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION1. Chapter 10.08 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Parking
Zones" is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION2. Chapter 10.09 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Residential Parking Permits" is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION3. Chapter 10.10 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Handicapped Parking" is hereby repealed in its entirety and a new Chapter 10.10 entitled
"Restricted Parking Zones" is hereby created to read as follows:
Restricted Parking Zones
Chapter 10.10
RESTRICTED PARKING ZONES
10.10.010 PURPOSE.
This Chapter is intended to mitigate the impact of commuter parking in impacted areas,
to preserve thc character of residential districts, to improve handicapped access and reduce
traffic. Residential parking permits are established as an exemption to posted restrictions in
restricted parking zones where neighborhoods have been impacted by commuter parking and arc
meant to ease parking congestion.
10.10.020 DEFINITIONS.
For thc purpose of this chapter, the words and phrases set forth in this section are defined
as follows:
(a) "Block" means the area comprised of properties along each side of a street
between two intersections. [See Appendix Figure 020]
(b) "Commuter vehicle" means a motor vehicle parked in a residential area by a
person not a resident thereof.
(c) "Department" means Department of Public Works and Utilities, or designee.
(d) "Director" means Director of Public Works and Utilities, or designee.
(c) "Downtown no re-park zone" means a vicinity where the following restrictions
apply:
1) On-street parking is restricted to either one (1) or two (2) hours, and
2) vehicles may not be moved fi.om one parking space to another parking
space within the zone in order to extend parking time beyond the maximum for the zone.
(f) "Historically Impacted Areas" are those areas within the City that have been
identified by the City Council as having traditionally suffered severe parking shortages due to
commuter parking.
(g) "One (1) hour parking zone" means a prescribed residential area where on-street
parking is limited to one (1) hour, except for the residents of the prescribed vicinity, their visitors
holding a permit, and clearly marked delivery and service vehicles.
(h) "Parking Generator" means anything that significantly increases commuter
parking demand. Examples include, but are not limited to: Ferry terminal, schools, hospitals,
business districts, and the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard.
(i) "Passenger load only zone" means a parking space reserved for passenger loading
only. These spaces will be marked with the time restriction applicable to them.
(j) "Peak parking hours" means those hours in a day where a particular vicinity
experiences the greatest demand for parking.
(k) "Resident" as used in this chapter refers to an individual living in a dwelling unit
or a business owner operating a business on property owned or leased by the business owner.
(1) "Resident vehicle" means a motor vehicle parked in a prescribed residential area
by a resident of the area.
(m) "Residential area" means a contiguous area containing public streets and
highways or paris thereof primarily abutted by residential property or residential and non-
business property.
Restricted Parking Zones
(n) "Permit only zone" means a prescribed area where on-street parking is reserved
for the exclusive use of the permit holders in the prescribed vicinity, their visitors holding a
permit, and clearly marked delivery and service vehicles.
(o) "Restricted parking permit" means a permit issued by the City that exempts the
permit holder, when displayed properly, from the parking restrictions in effect in the permit
holder's Restricted parking permit area.
(p) "Restricted parking permit area" or "Residential parking permit area" means an
area designated as provided in this chapter wherein resident vehicles displaying a valid permit as
described in this chapter shall be exempt from posted parking restrictions.
(q) "Restricted Parking Zone" means an area of the City subject to one of the
restrictions contained in this chapter.
(r) "Two (2) hour parking zone" means a prescribed area where on-street parking is
limited to two (2) hours, except for the residents of the prescribed vicinity, their visitors holding
a permit, and clearly marked delivery and service vehicles.
(s) "Visitor vehicle" means a motor vehicle parked by a person who is visiting a
resident within a restricted parking permit area.
10.10.030 RESTRICTED PARKING ZONES.
The Director shall, in a manner consistent with this chapter, establish, locate and post
various restricted parking zones within the City rights-of-way where required to regulate
parking.
10.10.040 PARKING ADMINISTRATION.
Collection of parking fees, maintenance of parking meters or other collection devices,
and the issuance of parking permits shall be administered by the Department of Administrative
Services, which shall promulgate procedures to administer permits as authorized in this chapter,
including processes for establishing proof of residency; vehicle ownership, use or control; and
for the revocation of permits for misuse. Appropriate parking fee schedules and permit fees shall
be set by the City Council and are set forth in Chapter 3.01. Fees may be collected by the use of
parking meters, pay boxes or other devices and through the issuance of parking permits
authorized by this title.
10.10.050 RESTRICTED PARKING ZONE DESIGNATION ~ PROCESS.
(a) Creation, deletion or boundary changes of restricted parking zones may be
initiated either:
(1) By a verified petition of the residents as provided for in BMC 10.10.060
or BMC 10.10.070; or
(2) By the decision of the Director following a finding that the change is in
the best interest of the community and will improve the health, safety or welfare of the
community; or
(3) By resolution of the City Council.
(b) Right to Appeal. The right to appeal a creation, deletion or boundary change
exists only when such creation, deletion or boundary change was completed under BMC
10.10.050 (a) (1) or under BMC 10.10.050 (a) (2) when the change is to a Two (2) hour parking
zone, One (1) hour parking zone or a Permit only zone. If such creation, deletion or boundary
change is subject to appeal, the City Clerk shall post notice in the particular residential area
3
! ~ Restricted Parking Zones
advising the residents of the future location and boundaries of the residential parking area and of
the right to appeal the designation within ten (10) days. A timely appeal to the Heatings
Examiner, filed with the City Clerk, by a resident or business owner within the designated permit
area will stay the action until the Heatings Examiner's review and decision in accordance with
BMC Chapter 2.13. The Hearing Examiner shall be authorized to deny the creation, deletion or
boundary change if he/she determines that significant errors were made in the process that
created a substantial likelihood that the creation, deletion or boundary change would have failed
had proper procedures been followed or if he/she determines that the creation, deletion or
boundary change is not in the best interest of the community. The change shall be enforceable
following the expiration of the appeal period or at such time as any appeal filed is denied. Until
such time, the parking restriction previously in place, if any, shall continue.
(c) Posting.
(1) If the creation, deletion or boundary change is subject to appeal under
BMC 10.10.050 (b), the creation, deletion or boundary change shall become effective at such
time as notice is posted in the effected area of the location and boundaries of the restricted
parking area, and either:
(i) The ten (10) day appeal period has expired without an appeal being
filed, or:
(ii) At such time as a decision of the Hearing Examiner is issued on an
appeal filed under BMC 10.10.050 (b).
(2) If the creation, deletion or boundary change is not subject to appeal under
BMC 10.10.050(b), the creation, deletion or boundary change shall become effective upon
posting notice in the particular residential area of the location and boundaries of the residential
parking area.
10.10.060 RESTRICTED PARKING ZONE PETITIONS IN NON-
HISTORICALLY IMPACTED AREAS
Residents may seek to create, delete or change the boundary of a restricted parking area
by petitioning in accordance with the process delineated in this section. The process and
prerequisites for such modification depend on the type of restriction being sought (Two (2) Hour
Zone, One (1) Hour Zone, or Resident Only Zone). Residents may not seek to create, delete or
change the boundary of a restricted parking area for a period of one year following a successful
petition. [The Historically Impacted Areas and Non-historically impacted Areas are shown on
the map, See Appendix Figure 060.]
(a) Two (2) Hour Zone If the residents of a block wish to have their area restricted to
Two (2) Hour Parking, they must:
(1) Submit a verified petition of at least two-thirds of the residents of the
block indicating support for the change to a Two (2) Hour Zone; and
(2) The Director must make a finding that:
(i) There is an identifiable parking generator;
(ii) It appears that 75% or more of the parking spaces located on the
petitioning block are being used at peak parking hours; and
(iii) The conditions described in (i) and (ii) exists on a least Three (3)
contiguous blocks.
4
Restricted Parking Zones
(b) One (1) Hour Zone If the residents of a block wish to have their area restricted to
One (1) hour parking, they must:
(1) Submit a verified petition of at least two-thirds of the residents of the
block indicating support for the change to a One (1) Hour Zone; and
(2) Show evidence that the affected block has been restricted to Two (2) hour
parking or Permit Only Parking for at least the last 12 months.
(c) Permit Only Zone If the residents of a block wish to have their block restricted to
Permit only parking, they must:
(1) Submit a verified petition of at least Eighty percent (80%) of the residents
of the block indicating support for the change to a Permit only zone; and
(2) Show evidence that the affected block has been restricted to One (1) hour
parking or Two (2) hour parking for at least 24 combined months, however the 12 months
immediately preceding the submission of the petition must have been spent as a One (1) hour
parking zone.
(3) Show evidence that the affected block has been given one of the following
zoning designations: SF-1, SF-2, SF-3, DR, MF, CBR, or MR.
(4) Pay the City, in accordance with BMC 3.01, Rate Table B, for a parking
capacity survey to be conducted to determine if the petition area is disproportionately impacted
by non-resident parking. The Director is authorized to set the criteria for this determination.
Such criteria must be based on the percentage of parking spaces occupied at peak parking hours
and on the percentage of occupied spaces, at peak parking hours, that are occupied by non-
residents.
(i) If the results of the Survey conclude that the petition area is
disproportionably impacted by non-resident parking, then the Director of Public Works shall
designate the petition area a Permit Only Zone and the designation shall become effective
following the appeal period and upon posting as provided for in BMC Section 10.10.050.
(ii) If the results of the Survey conclude that the petition area is not
disproportionably impacted by non-resident parking, then the petition shall fail and the residents
shall not be entitled to submit a new petition for a period of One (1) year.
10.10.070 RESTRICTED PARKING ZONE PETITIONS IN HISTORICALLY
IMPACTED AREAS
The residents of a Historically Impacted Area may have their area restricted to either Two
(2) hour parking, One (1) hour parking or Permit Only parking by submitting a verified petition
of at least two-thirds of the residents of the block indicating support for the change to either Two
(2) hour parking, One (1) Hour parking or to Permit Only parking respectively. No other steps
are necessary. The change shall become effective following the appeal period and posting as
required under BMC Section 10.10.050. Residents of the affected area may only petition for a
change once every 12 months. [The Historically Impacted Areas and Non-historically impacted
Areas are shown on the map, See Appendix Figure 060.]
10.10.080 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR PERMIT.
Residential parking permits may be issued for motor vehicles not in excess of ten
thousand pounds only upon application of the following persons:
(a) A legal resident of the restricted parking permit area who has a motor vehicle
registered in his name, or who has a motor vehicle for his exclusive use and under his control.
5
Restricted Parking Zones
/57
(b) A person who owns or leases commercial property and actively engages in
business activity within a restricted parking permit area.
There shall be a limit of two (2) residential parking permits issued per dwelling unit /
business location, unless parking availability allows a greater number not to exceed four (4)
permits per dwelling unit as determined by the Director in his or her sole discretion.
10.10.090 PERMIT - ISSUANCE - DISPLAY.
Parking permits shall state thereon the particular residential parking permit area, the
license number of the motor vehicle for which it is issued and the expiration date. Permits shall
be displayed so as to be clearly visible through the rear window of the vehicle on the left side
thereof. A residential parking permit shall not guarantee or reserve to the holder thereof an on-
street parking space within the designated residential parking area.
10.10.100 PERMIT - RENEWAL - DURATION.
Each resident parking permit issued shall be valid for the remainder of the calendar year
of issuance plus two calendar years. Except resident parking permits issued in the year 2003,
which shall expire on December 30, 2006. Permits may be renewed upon expiration.
10.10.110 PERMIT - VISITOR.
Visitor parking permits are authorized for residents of a residential parking permit area
for bona fide transient use. No dwelling unit or place of business located in a restricted parking
permit area shall be issued more than one visitor permit. It shall be the responsibility of the
resident to control the use of the permit. Bona fide transient uses include: visiting guests,
babysitters, repair persons and other similar visitors. The following is prohibited:
(a) Parking in excess of seven (7) days within any thirty (30) day period unless
approved administratively prior to such use; or
(b) Parking more than one block from the permitted residence.
10.10.120 PERMIT - LANDLORD.
Landlords can qualify for a Two (2) month visitor permit for building improvements if
the residence is vacant. Upon request a One (1) month extension will be granted. Any extension
beyond the automatic one month extension must be accompanied by a detailed timeline for
completing the building improvement as well as any required permits from the Department of
Community Development.
10.10.130 SERVICE VEHICLES.
(a) Clearly marked service or delivery vehicles are exempt from the time zone
requirements while providing service or making deliveries to dwellings within a restricted
parking permit area. Service vehicles shall comply with time limits for parking in commercial
zones.
(b) Individuals working in a home service industry (Home health care, etc.) may
apply for an occupational permit to park in a restricted parking permit area. The City may
require proof of ongoing continuous work as a condition to maintain a valid permit.
Restricted Parking Zones
10.10.140 DISABLED PARKING.
(a) Indication of parking space for disabled person. RCW 46.61.581 is hereby adopted by
reference.
(b) Physically disabled zones. On-street parking spaces reserved for physically
disabled persons shall be for time periods posted.
(c) Free parking by disabled person. Any person who meets the criteria for special
parking privileges under RCW 46.16.381 shall be allowed free of charge to park a vehicle being
used to transport that person for unlimited periods of time in parking zones or areas with parking
meters which are otherwise restricted as to the length of time parking is permitted, except as
provided in RCW 46.90.103. This section does not apply to those zones or areas in which the
stopping, parking, or standing of all vehicles is prohibited, which are reserved for special types
of vehicles, or which are reserved for physically disabled persons. The person shall obtain and
display a special card, decal, or license plate under RCW 46.16.381 to be eligible for the
privileges under this section.
(d) Special plate, card or decal issued by another jurisdiction. RCW 46.61.583 is
hereby adopted by reference.
SECTION& Section 10.11.010 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Additional Violations" relating to parking enforcement is hereby amended to read as follows:
10.11.010 ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS.
In addition to those statutes adopted by reference in BMC 10.04.010 restricting standing,
stopping and parking of vehicles, it shall be unlawful and punishable as a civil infraction for any
person to commit any of the following actions:
(a) Parking in Time Limit and No Repark Zones.
(1) Downtown Core - Where a time limit and no repark is established by official
signs, no vehicle may be reparked on either side of the same street in order to extend the vehicle's
parking time beyond the time limits established. For proposes of this section, a vehicle shall be
deemed to be reparked and in violation of this section despite any movement of the vehicle unless the
vehicle is moved to another street with a different street name than the street the vehicle was originally
parked upon.
(2) Residential - Where posted, it is unlawful for a vehicle to remain parked, or to
be reparked within fottr blocks of original parking location within a residential parking permit area, if
the parking time or combined parking time for the vehicle exceeds the time limitations of the parking
zone. Vehicles issued permits under BMC Chapter 10.09 and 10.10 shall be exempt from posted time
limits according to the terms of the permit.
(b) Counterfeit Permits. It is unlawful for any person to copy, reproduce, or otherwise
counterfeit a parking permit or to possess any counterfeit copy or facsimile of a City parking permit.
(c) Unauthorized Use of Permit. It is unlawful for any person issued a parking permit by
the City to:
(1) Lend, sell or assign said permit to another;
(2) Display any permit issued to another; or
(3) Display any permit issued when the recipient of the permit is no longer
eligible pursuant to BMC Chapter 10.1 O! 0.09.050.
(d) Counterfeit tokens, permits or script. It is unlawful to manufacture, use or possess any
counterfeit of an official token, parking permit or script distributed by the City for use in any fee
collection device.
7
/ ~ Restricted Parking Zones
(e) Tampering With Parking Meters or Collection Devices. No person shall deface, injure,
tamper with, open, or willfully break, destroy, or impair the usefulness of any parking meter or
collection device.
(f) Unauthorized Handicapped Parking. It is a traffic infraction for any person to park a
vehicle in a public place provided on private property without charge or on public property reserved
for physically disabled persons without a special license place, card or decal as provided for in RCW
46.16.381 (1) and (2). If a person is charged with a violation, the person shall not be determined to
have committed an infi'action if the person produces in court or before the court appearance the special
license plate, card, or decal required under this section or demonstrates that the person was entitled to
the special license plate, card or decal.
(g) Expired Registration. It is unlawful to park any vehicle in a public right-of-way or on
public property without a current vehicle license registration tab displayed according to law.
(h) Unlawful Parking in City Lot. In addition to other enforcement remedies, it is
unlawful to park any vehicle in a City owned parking lot or structure without paying the posted fee or
parking in excess of posted time limits or in violation of use restrictions.
(i) Obliterating Tire Markings. It is unlawful to conceal, obliterate, or erase markings on
vehicle tires made by a parking enforcement officer for the purpose of recording parking time.
(j) False Application. It is unlawful for any person to intentionally provide false or
misleading information on any application for a parking permit.
(k) Failure to Surrender Permit. The Director of Administrative Services is authorized to
revoke the residential parking permit of any person found to be in violation of its intended use. Upon
written notification of permit revocation by the Director of Administrative Services, it shall be
unlawful for any person to fail to surrender a parking permit as directed.
(1) Storage of Vehicles within Right-of-Way. Parking in excess of seventy-two (72)
consecutive hours, of non-motorized conveyances or motor vehicles in a public right-of~way shall be
unlawful without a fight-of-way use permit. During continued consecutive hours of parking, after the
initial seventy-two (72) hour period, relocation of the conveyance or motor vehicle within five
hundred (500) feet, and still within a public right-of-way, shall be considered to be the same location
within the right-of-way. Motor vehicles or non-motorized conveyances exceeding ten thousand
pounds (10,000 lbs.) gross vehicle weight or twenty-two (22) feet in length, may not repark in excess
of one hundred twenty (120) hours within any consecutive thirty (30) day period.
(m) Parking fee - Non-payment. It is unlawful to park a vehicle in any parking space
monitored by a parking fee collection device, including parking meters, without payment as indicated
on the collection device.
(n) Parking fee - Time permitted. It is unlawful to park a vehicle in any parking space
monitored by a collection device, including parking meters, for a consecutive period of time longer
than that limited period of time for which parking is lawfully permitted in the time zone, irrespective
of the amount of money deposited in such collection device.
(o) Unauthorized Use of Recreational Vehicle. It is unlawful for any person to use a
recreational vehicle as defined in the Bremerton Zoning Code, for habitation on any street, alley or
highway, or other public place that is not officially designated for that use. Violation of this section
shall constitute a civil infraction. Habitation shall mean occupation of the vehicle for 4 hours or more
between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
Restricted Parking Zones
SECTION 5. Rate Table B of Chapter 3.01 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled "Municipal Court - Rate Table B" is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A of
this Ordinance.
SECTION 6. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the day of ., 2003
PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2003
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
Approved this day of ., 2003
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the day of ., 2003
EFFECTIVE the _day of ., 2003
ORDINANCE NO.
R:kLEGAL\Ordinances\AdministrationkRestricted Parking Zonesl ,doc
Restricted Parking Zones
Appendix Figure 020
One Block
MUNICIPAL COURT - RATE TABLE B
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
Municipal Court 2003 RATE
HEARING EXAMINER APPEAL $65
PARKING FINES
Overtime or Non-Payment in Collection Devices:
1st Violation in 30 Days $~z25
2"d Violation in 30 Days $2732
3~ Violation in 30 Days $56 --
Loading Zones $17
No Parking $2245
Wrong Way $17d 5
Parked on Sidewalk $56
Fire Hydrant $2745
12" From Curb $10
Physically Disabled (Public and Private) $250
Counterfeiting or User of Counterfeit Permits, $500
Tokens or Script
Unauthorized Use of Permits $150
All Other Infractions Not Specified Above $27
Replacement of parkinq permit $10
Blocked Driveway $45
Expired Tabs $45
30 Foot to Stop Siqn $45
Double Parked $45
No Stoppinq/No Standin,q $45
Parkinq Capacity Survey ~250
Table B - B12 EXHIBIT A
AGENDA BILL q D
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: Authorizing an Interfund FOR AGENDA OF:
Loan from the Equipment Rental ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance Dept.
Reserve Fund to ULID No. 2002-01 ORIGINATOR: Michael R. Wilson
Fund DATE SUBMITTED: June 16, 2003
2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back if necessary)3. EXHIBITS:
City Attorney Interfund Loan Resolution
Director, Finance
Budget Finance Committee
Operations Committee
ENDORSEMENT INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
MAYOR~ ~.~ ~,_~,~ ~NCIL PRESIDENT
//
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The City Council approved Ordinance 4837 on December 4, 2002, authorizing the formation of Utility Local
Improvement District (ULID) No. 2002-01. The ULID No. 2002-01 Fund needs interim financial resources in
order to fund the construction of the water system capital improvements that are to provide special benefit to
property owners within the boundaries of ULID No. 2002-01. It is proposed that the Council authorize the
Director of Finance to make an interfund loan from the Equipment Rental Reserve Fund (Fund 510) to the
ULID No. 2002-01 Fund (Fund 308) in the amount not to exceed $1,056,384 to cover the expenses for the
ULID capital development and administration. This loan shall bear interest at a rate based on the monthly
average yield from the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool, and shall be repaid to the
Equipment Rental Reserve Fund from ULID No. 2002-01 Fund on or before March 1,2004.
8. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council move to approve Resolution No. ,~c/~
authorizing the Director of Finance to make an interfund loan from the Equipment Rental Reserve Fund (Ftmd
510) to the ULID No. 2002-01 Capital Project Fund (Fund 308) in the amount not to exceed $1,056,384.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO: ~'~ - ~ I
it 5'
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS (cont.):
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (cont.):
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES
7. RESEARCH SOURCES
RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~i
A RESOLUTION of the City of Bremerton, Washington, authorizing an interfund
loan to the ULID No. 2002-01 Fund from the Equipment Rental Reserve Fund.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 4837 on December 4, 2002, authoriz-
ing the formation of Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) No. 2002-01; and
WHEREAS, the ULID No. 2002-01 Fund needs interim financial resources in order to
fund the construction of the water system capital improvements that are to provide special benefit
to property owners within the boundaries of ULID No. 2002-01; and
WHEREAS, such interim funding is needed within the ULID No. 2002-01 until the
capital improvement has been completed, final assessment roll established and revenue bonds
issued; and
WHEREAS, reserve cash in an amount sufficient to meet the interim funding needs of
ULID No. 2002-01 is presently on hand within the Equipment Rental/Reserve Fund;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City of Bremerton's Director of Finance is hereby authorized and
directed to make an interfund loan from the Equipment Rental Reserve Fund (Fund 510) to the
ULID No. 2002-01 Fund (Fund 308) in the amount not to exceed $1,056,384 to cover the
expenses for the ULID capital development and administration. This loan shall bear interest at a
rate based on the monthly average yield from the Washington State Local Government
Investment Pool, and shall be repaid to the Equipment Rental Reserve Fund from UL1D No.
2002-01 Fund on or before March 1, 2004.
SECTION 2. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this
Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, on this __ day of
2003.
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER LUBOVICH, City Attorney
DATE SUBMITTED: August 6, 2003 BILL #
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Closed record hearing for Solid Committee Meeting Date: NA
Seven Construction application for "Rainer COUNCIL MEETING Date: August 13, 2003
Vista" Preliminary Plat &,ll~ ?,a~,~.I~ Department: DCD
.3_~d~c~o.\..c..) Presenter: Robert Gmmbach
Phone: 473-5379
SUMMARY: Hearing Examiner recommendation on a preliminary plat (file No. PL03-0017) to
divide two lots into four lots. The recommendation includes six (6) conditions to be imposed for final
plat approval.
ATTACHMENTS: (1) Procedure for Closed Record Heating. (2) Hearing Examiner
Recommendation. (3) StaffReport. (4) Plat Map. (5) Vicinity Map. (6) Comprehensive Plan Map.
(7) SEPA. (8) Conditional Water and Sewer Availability Letter. (9) Short Plat PL01-0014 Recorded
Improvement Agreement. (10) Comments from property owners in the area. (11) Proposed resolution
on Heating Examiner's recommendation.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None anticipated.
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY: _ , ,
MAYoR:FINANCE DIRECTOR: ~___~
FISCAL/BUDGET: ~/~ CONSENT AGENDA []
OPERATIONS:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass ~solution~'~o~ng and adopting the Findings,
Conclusions and Recommendation of the Administrative Heating Examiner and approve the
preliminary plat for "Rainer Vista" subject to the proposed conditions.
IbP
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
PROCEDURE FOR CLOSED RECORD HEARING ON
HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION
I. STAFF REPORT AND PRESENTATION
1. After the Appearance of Fairness inquiry, Council President asks staff to
present Hearing Examiner Recommendation.
2. Pursuant to Council policies, no public comment permitted.
3. Council may ask questions of staff and applicant (discussion limited to the
record).
II. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
The Council may approve and adopt the hearing examiner's recommendation
unless one of the following conditions exists:
1. Proceedings were materially affected by irregularities in procedure.
2. Recommendation is outside the authority of the heating examiner.
3. Recommendation is based on an erroneous interpretation of law.
4. Recommendation is not supported by substantial evidence.
5. Recommendation is based on clearly erroneous application of law to facts.
III. DECISION
The Council may take any of the following actions:
1. Approve and adopt the hearing examiner's findings and recommendation.
2. Modify and approve the findings and recommendation.
3. Reject and deny the hearing examiner's findings and recommendation on
the proposal as originally submitted based upon councilfindings.
4. Continue the closed record hearing and remand to the hearing examiner
for clarification on issues of record (no public testimony).
RSLEGAL~Departments-Geneml\City Coua¢il\City Council Procedure re heating exam recom.doc
RESOI VT ON NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Brernerton, Washington, approving the preliminary plat (file No.
PL03-0017) for "Rainer Vista."
WHEREAS, the City has received a Preliminary Plat application for
"Rainer Vista" from Solid Seven Construction; and
WHEREAS, On July 8, 2003 the City Administrative Hearing Examiner
held a Open Public Hearing on the application pursuant to BMC 21.02.855; and
WHEREAS, the City's Administrative Heatings Examiner has submitted
recommended findings to the City Council; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approve and adopts the findings,
conclusions and recommendation of the Administrative Hearings Examiner attached as Exhibit
"A" and approves the preliminary plat for "Rainer Vista" (file No. PL03-0017) subject to the
proposed conditions contained in Exhibit "A."
SECTION 2. E[?Cective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this __
day of ,20__
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk
R:~LEGAL~Resolutions~kesolution form.doc
1
Document Reference
BEFORE THE HEARINGS EXAMINER
FOR THE CITY OF BREMERTON JUL c
8REMERq ~1~I
DUI[DING DEPARTMENT
In the Matter of the Application of ) NO. PL03-0017
) Rainer Vista
Bill Bakker )
) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS
For Approval of a Preliminary Plat. ) AND RECOMMENDATION
)
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION
The Hearings Examiner recommends to the Bremerton City Council that the request for approval
of a Preliminary Plat to subdivide .96 acres of land into four single-family residential lots be
GRANTED, with conditions.
SUMMARY OF RECORD
Request
Bill Bakker of Solid Seven Construction (Applicant) requests approval of a Preliminary Plat to
subdivide two lots totaling .96 acres into four single-family residential lots.1 The subject
property is located on the south side of East 31 ~t Street, 100-feet west of Pawnee Drive in
Bremerton, Washington. The parcels are recorded as Tax Account Numbers 12401-2-181-2006
and t 12401-2-151-2007.
Hearing Date
The Hearings Examiner for the City of Bremerton held an open record hearing on the matter on
July 8, 2003. During the course of the hearing, the Applicant testified that the subject property
contained a marsh-like area. He stated that he did not know whether the marsh-like area was a
wetland because he had not had the subject property inspected for that purpose. Because the
existence of a wetland can trigger additional environmental review, the Heatings Examiner left
the record open so that the Applicant could have the subject property evaluated. A wetland
evaluation and report was submitted to the Hearing Examiner on July 18.
Testimony
The following individuals presented testimony under oath at the open record hearing:
1. Mr. Robert Grumbach, City of Bremerton Planner
2. Bill Bakker, Applicant
Exhibits
The following exhibits were admitted into the record at the open record hearing:
Exhibit 1: StaffRepott dated July 8, 2003
Appendix A: Application received April 10, 2003
1 The Ciq¢ approved a short plat subdivision for the subject property on October 18,2001, which created the existing
two lots. Exhibit 1, Appendix D.
Appendix B: SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance and Environmental Checklist
issued June 12, 2003
Appendix C: Zoning Map
Appendix D: Prior Plat Approval dated October 18, 2001
Appendix E: Certificate of Water Availability dated July 1, 2003
Appendix F: Engineering Review dated October 2, 2001
Appendix G: Improvements Agreement dated April 28, 2002
Appendix H: Affidavits of Notice
Appendix I: Department Comments
Appendix J: Public Comments (2 letters)
Exhibit 2: Wetland Evaluation and Report by Wiltermood Associated, Inc. dated July 17, 2003
Upon consideration of the testimony and exhibits admitted at the open record hearing, the
Hearings Examiner enters the following Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation:
FINDINGS
1. The Applicant requested approval ora Preliminary Plat to subdivide two lots totaling .96
acres into four single-family residential lots. The subject property is located on the south
side of East 31 st Street, 100-feet west of Pawnee Drive in Bremerton, Washington. The
parcels are recorded as Tax Account Numbers 12401-2-181-2006 and 112401-2-151 ~2007.
Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 1; Appendix A, Application.
2. The City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan designation of the site is Low Density
Residential. Comprehensive Plan goals and policies applicable to the proposal include the
following:
· Encouraging development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services
exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. Urban Growth No. 1.
· Accommodate new development with care so that Bremerton will continue to be a
well-balanced "most livable city." &~pporting Policy No. 3.
· Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the
population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and
encourage preservation of existing housing stock. Housing Goal No. 4.
· Provide a variety of housing types and densities to meet changing needs of Bremerton
residents. New Housing Development Goal D(2).
· Stimulate the production of new housing for all income, age, family type and ethnic
groups. Supporting Policy No. 3.
3. The subject property is zoned Residential Low Density (SF-3), which is consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan designation of the site. Exhibit 1, Staff Report. page 1. The SF-
Findings, Concl~tsions & Recom~nendation
Hearings Exami~er for the CiO of Bremerto~
Rainier Izista, No. PL03-0017
Page 2 of 6 [ '] ~)...
3 zone accommodates single-unit homes in urban subdivisions at a maximum density of
eight units per acre. The zone offers smaller minimum lot sizes to enhance affordability
and encourage higher densities through creative site plmming. The zone requires a
minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 40 feet. The SR-3
zone allows a base density of 3-8 units per acre and a maximum height of 30 feet. Bg'IC
2I. 02.120, Figure 120.
4. The proposed subdivision will contain four lots ranging in area from 7,987 square feet to
12,825 square feet. Lot widths will range from 80 feet to 100 feet. Exhibit 1, Appendix A,
Application. The Applicant proposes to construct three middle income units on Lots 2, 3
and 4 and preserve an existing residence on Lot 1. Exhibit 1, Appendix B, Environmental
Checklist; Exhibit 1, Appendix A, Site Plan.
5. The Applicant reported that the subject property contains deciduous and evergreen trees,
shrubs, and grass. He reported that he would remove some existing vegetation for
driveway and new home construction. The Applicant submitted that he would take
erosion control measures prior to clearing and construction and that he would landscape
disturbed areas to mitigate potential erosion. Exhibit 1, Appendix B, Environmental
Checklist.
6. The subject property is currently served with electricity, natural gas, refuse service,
telephone, water and sanitary sewer. Exhibit 1, Appendix B, Environmental Checklist.
Appendix E, Certificate of WaterAvailabili~. The Applicant created a five-foot sewer
easement across Lots 2 and 3 to provide service to Lots 3 and 4. Exhibit 1, Appendix A.
Site Plan.
7. As a condition of the 2001 short plat approval (PL01~0014), the Applicant and City
entered into an Improvements Agreement for on April 28, 2002. The agreement
addressed frontage improvements to East 31st Street including street lighting, curbs,
gutters, sidewalks and storm water conveyance piping. The agreement gave the City
authority to form a local improvement district to construct the improvements or, in the
event that the City chooses otherwise, the agreement gave the City authority to delegate
the construction work to the Applicant. If the Applicant failed to construct the
improvements within six months, the agreement gave the City authority to construct the
improvements and allocate the cost to the Applicant. Exhibit 1, Appendix G.
8. The Applicant testified at the July 14, 2003 hearing that the subject property contained a
marsh-type area, however he did not know whether it satisfied the City's criteria for a
wetland. The Hearing Examiner requested the Applicant to obtain information about the
marsh-type area and left the record open until July 18, 2003 so that the Applicant could
respond. The Applicant obtained the services of Wiltennood Associates, Inc. to conduct
a site view and determine whether the subject property contained a wetland. Wiltermood
Associates, Inc. tested three areas on the subject property and concluded in a letter dated
July 17, 2003 (Exhibit 2), "there were no wetlands identified on the parcel." The City did
not challenge this determination. Exhibit 2, Wetland Evaluation and Report, page 3.
Findings, Conclusions & Recommendation
Hearings Examiner for the C? p{Bremerton
Rainier Fista, ,¥o. PL03-OO] 7
Page 3 p£6
9. The City of Bremerton Department of Community Development submitted the proposal
to city agencies for review and comment. The Bremerton Fire Department returned
comments that addressed access, turn-around requirements, hydrant availability, and
street numbers. The City Transportation Department received notice of the application,
however did not comment on the proposal. Exhibit 1, Appendix I, Staff Comments.
10. Two citizens submitted comment letters to the City in response to the request for
comments issued by the City. The letters expressed concerns relating to view
obstruction, traffic impact and drainage control. Exhibit 1, Appendix J, Citizen
Comments.
11. The City of Bremerton was designated lead agency for review of environmental impacts
caused by the proposal. The City considered the comments of citizens prior to issuance
of its threshold determination. The City Responsible Official determined that the
proposal would not have probable significant enviromnental impacts and issued a
Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS) on June 12, 2003. Exhibit 1, Appendix B,
SEPA DNS.
12. Notice of the open record hearing was posted on site on June 23, 2003, mailed to
adjoining property owners on June 19, 2003 and published in The Sun on June 24, 2003
in accordance with City of Bremerton notice requirements (BMC 2t.02.895). Exhibit l,
Appendix IL.
CONCLUSIONS
Jurisdiction
Pursuant to Sections 2.13.070, 2.13.080 and 21.02.855 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
(BMC), the Hearings Examiner of the City of Bremerton has jurisdiction to hold open record
pre-decision heatings on Preliminary Plat applications and recommend action to the City
Council. The recommendation may be to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the
application. BMC 2.13.110.
Criteria for Review
To recommend approval of a Preliminary Plat, the Hearing Examiner must find that the
application satisfies the criteria for a Preliminary Plat; is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan; and conforms to all applicable City development regulations, minimum standards, and
design guidelines. BMC 21.02.885. The criteria for approval of a Preliminary Plat are found in
Chapter 58.17 of the Revised Code of Washington. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.110(2), a
Preliminary Plat application may not be approved unless:
(a) appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and
for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways,
transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including
sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for
students who only walk to and from school; and
Findings, Conclusions & Recommendation
Hearings Examiner for the CiO, ~f Bremerton
Ra&ier I%'~a. No. PL03-OO] 7
Page 4 qf 6
(b) the public use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision and
dedication.
Conclusion Based on Findings
1. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal will provide
affordable housing for the City of Bremerton. Lot sizes will range in size, which will
accommodate various home sizes. The proposal will incorporate and preserve an existing
residence. Urban services are available to the subject property. Findings of Facts Nos. 1,
~ 3,4,6,7.
2. The proposal is consistent with identified zoning standards. The proposed
subdivision will create four lots ranging from 7,987 square feet to 12,825 square feet in
area. Lot widths will vary from 80 to 100 feet. The completed project will yield four
residential units on approximately one acre. View obstruction will be minimized by a
City housing height restriction of 30 feet.2 Findings of Facts Nos. 3, 4.
3. With conditions, appropriate provision will be made for the public health, safety
and general welfare and for all other relevant facts. The proposaI will create four lots
for residential development. The Applicant will construct each lot and associated single-
family unit in accordance with City of Bremerton zoning requirements including
setbacks, lots size, and density standards. Conditions of approval will mitigate traffic
impact by requiring frontage improvements. The City Fire Department has set forth
safety requirements, which the Applicant will satisfy with conditions of approval. Thc
City conducted environmental review of the proposal and determined that it would not
result in significant adverse environmental impacts. Water, sewer, garbage service,
natural gas, electricity and telephone are available to each of the four lots. The Applicant
will preserve existing vegetation where possible and will take measures prior to clearing
and construction that will mitigate erosion. Conditions of approval are necessary to
ensure adequate fire flow, future frontage improvements and protection from erosion
during clearing and construction. Findings of Facts Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10.
4. The public use and interest will be served by the creation of four single-family
residential lots complying with City of Bremerton zoning standards. The proposed
plat will provide increased housing opportunities for residents of Bremerton in a manner
consistent with the criteria for approval of preliminary plats. Findings of Fact Nos. 1-8,
10.
2 The Hearing Examiner notes that there is no right to a view across other properties in
Washington State unless provided by covenant between property owners. See Pierce Id. Sewer &
Water District, 69 Wu. App. 76 (I 993).
Hearings Examiner for the CiO' ef Yremerton
Rainier ~5'sta, No. PL03-OO] 7
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the preceding Findings and Conclusions, the Hearings Examiner recommends
approval of a Preliminary Plat to subdivide two lots totaling .96 acres into four single-family
residential lots, as depicted on the Preliminary Plat Map (Exhibit 1, Appendix A), subject to the
following conditions.
1. The subdivision shall comply with all conditions specified in the conditional water and sewer
availability letter from the City of Bremerton Public Works and Utilities Department.
2. The Applicant shall comply with all City Fire Department recommendations (Exhibit l,
Appendix I). The Applicant will provide fire flow and hydrant if not available.
3. The applicant shall provide a signed improvement agreement for future frontage
improvements for this approval, as required by the City of Bremerton Municipal Utilities.
4. The applicant will obtain addresses from Public Works, which will be indicated on the final
plat.
5. The Applicant shall install erosion control prior to clearing and construction. The Applicant
shall install permanent stormwater drainage and take erosion control measures that will
prevent increased runoff to existing homes located below the proposed subdivision, along
Pawnee Drive.
6. A final plat meeting applicable development standards and conditions shall be submitted to
the City for approval within five years of the date of preliminary plat approval.
Decided this~2~ day of July 2003.
Theodore Paul Hunter
Hearings Examiner for the City of Bremerton
Findings, Conclusions & Recommenclation
Hearings Examiner for &e Cio of Bremerton
Rainier Vista, No. PL03-O017
CITY OF BREMERTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STAFF REPORT, CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS
Rearing Examiner Public Hearing July 08, 2003
Requested Action: Am~md short plat No. PL01-0014 to divide 2 lots into 4 lots. (See
Appendix A for application.)
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Land Use Action: Preliminary Approval of a Subdivision
2. File Number: PL03-0017
3. Applicant: Solid Seven Construction
4. Location: Tax Number 112401-2-151-2006 md 112401-2-151-2007 (two lots south
side ofE. 31st Street, 100 feet west of Pawnee Drive
5. Assessor AeeountNumber: 112401-2-151-2006 and i12401-2-151-2007
PROJECT SUMMARY
1. Current Zone Classification: Residential Low-density (SF-3)
2. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Low Density Residential
3. Shoreline Environmental Designation: None
4. Critical Areas Designations: None identified
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
SEPA Threshold Determination: Determination of Nonsigaificance (See Appendix B
for SEPA Checklist and DNS)
SITE DESCRIPTION
1. Legal Description: Lots A and B, City of Bremerton Shore Plat No. PL 01-0014,
recorded in volume 16, Page 247, under Auditor's file No. 200204260001, being a
portion of Government Lot 1, Section 11, Township 24 North, Range 1 East, W.M.,
in Kitsap County, Washington.
2. Lot Size: Approximately 0.96 acres
3. Surrounding Land Uses:
North Residential Single Family Residential
Medium-density
South Residential Low- Vacant land and Single Family Residential
density (SF-3)
East Residential Low- Single Family Residential
density (SF-3)
West Residential Low- Single Family Residential
density (SF-3)
4. Topography: The land is generally flat with the steepest slopes approximately 7
percent on the site. The property is vegetated with grass, trees and shrubs.
5. Development: A house is located on Lot A.
6. Access: The ingress/egress are provided from E 31st Street.
7. Utilities: The site is served by public water and sanitary sewer services.
COMPREHI~,NSIVE PLAN
SEE APPENDIX C for map of Comprehensive Plan Designation.
PLANNING GOALS: The Comprehensive Plan goals help define the vision for Bremerton's
future. The following Planning Goals are consistent with the rezone application.
· Goal # 1 Urban Growth: "Encourage development in urban areas where adequate
public facilities and services exist or can be l~rovided in an efficient manner."
Supporting Policy (3): Accommodate new development with care so that
Bremerton will continue to be a well-balanced "most livable city."
· Goal # 4 Honsin~: "Encourage the availability of affordable housing to a]! economic
segments of the t~ot~ulation of this state, l~romote a variety of residentia! densitiex and
housing types, and eacourage preservation of existing housing stock.
Goal D (2) New Housing Development: "Provide a variety of housing types and
densities to meet changing needs of Bremerton residents."
Supporting Policy (3): Stimulate the production of new housing for all income,
age, family type and ethnic groups.
LAND USE ELEMENT: The property is located in the East Bremerton Plan (Element E, 7,
(page 27)). There are no policies specified under this plan applicable to this
development.
CITY OF BREMERTON APPROVAL OF SUBDMSIONS
City of Bremerton does not have a subdivision ordinance. The requirements for
approving a subdivision are set forth in RCW Chapter 58.17 (Plats-Subdivision-
Dedications). Bremerton Municipal Code 21.02.855 establishes preliminary subdivision
approval as a Type IV City Council Decision after an open-record hearing and
recommendation by the Administrative Hearing Examiner. Brernerton Municipal Code
21.02.850 establishes final approval of a subdivision as a Type III Administrative
Hearing Examiner Decision.
ANALYSIS:
1. The two lots being divided were created by a short plat that was approved by the City
of Bremerton Department of Community Development in October 2001 (File No.
PL01-0014). Conditions of approval included future frontage improvement
agreement. (See Appendix D for decision to approve Short Plat No. PL01-0014.)
2. Bremerton Municipal Code Section 20.04.110 (Re-subdivision) states that "land in
short subdivisions may not be further divided in any manner within a period of five
years without the filing of a final plat." Applicant is requesting to re-subdivide a
short plat within 5 years, which requires a subdivision process instead of a short
subdivision process.
3. The subdivision is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies.
4. Minimum Lot Size in the Residential Low-density (SF-3) is 5,000 square feet.
5. Applicant is requesting approval to divide two (2) adjacent parcels of land containing
approximately into four (4) separate lots as follows:
Lot 1 = 7,987 square feet
Lot 2 = 8,808 square feet
Lot 3 = 12,208 square feet
Lot 4 = 12,825 square feet
6. Minimum flag lot size in a SF-3 zone is 7,500 square feet (150% X 5,000) per
BMC 21.02.200.
7. Bremerton Municipal Code Section 21.02.070 (definitions) defines a flag lot as "a
with access to its street by way of a narrow strip of land having a minimum width of
twenty (20) feet. A flag lot consists of two parts. 1. The "flag" or main body of the
lot; and 2. the "panhandle" or narrow access way connecting the body of the lot to the
street." Lot 3 and Lot 4 meet tkis definition.
8. Maximum density is 8 dwelling units / acre. The subdivision meets the density
requirements. Four single-family dwelling unit lots require 21,780 square feet of area
(5,445 square feet p~r dwelling unit) and the plat contains 41,814 square feet.
9. Development standards are as follows: Minimum Lot Width: 40 feet. Setbacks:
Front Yard = 15 feet (20 feet for garage). Side Yard = 5 feet. Rear Yard = 15 feet.
Maximum lot coverage is 40 percent.
10. The proposed rmYfimum lot widths are:
Lot 1:80 feet Lot 2:85 feet
Lot3:85 feet Lot4:100 feet
11. Lots must provide a minimum street frontage of 20 feet. Each lot in the proposed
subdivision has a minimum of 20 feet of street frontage.
12. The subject property is located within the City's utility service area. A letter of
conditional Water and Sewer Availability is included in the 51e. (See Appendix E.)
13. A 5-foot sewer easement was granted across Lot B to provide service to Lot A under
conditions of approval for short plat PL01-0014. (See Appendix F Technical review
requiring easement.)
14. Applicant will need to submit for site plan review for building permits.
15. An improvement agreement was recorded under the conditions of approval for short
plat PL01-0014. (See Appendix G for recorded improvement agreement.)
16. A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued June 12, 2003. Notification was sent
to individual property owners and published in the Sun newspaper. No comments
were received or appeals filed regarding the decision.
17. Notices were sent to properties within a 300-foot radius of the subject property (See
Appendix H). Notification was provided as follows:
Determination of Completeness May 5, 2003
Notice of Application May 16, 2003
Corrected Notice of Application May 21, 2003
DNS published June 12, 2003
Notice of Hearing June 24, 2003
4 180
COMMENTS
COMMENTS (SEE APPENDIX I):
Building No comment
Engineering De'pm hnent · See engineering requirements for the
original Short Plat PL01-0014
· Improvement agreement identified in
PL01-0014 will apply to any
additional lots
Fire · Provide fire flow and hydrant if not
available
· Provide Fire Department access with
turnaround if over 150 feet in length
· Provide all weather 20 foot wide road
tract, 18 feet paved
· Provide address numbers
Cross Connection Control No concerns
I Traffic No concerns
Depm'tuient of Community, Trade None
and Economic Development
Puget Sound Water Quality Action None
Team
Suquamish Tribe None
Department offish & Wildlife None
Department of Transportation None
Department of Natural Resources None
Department of Transportation None
Olympic Region Developer Services
Department of Ecology None
Kitsap Transit None
Bremerton - Kitsap County Health None
District
Kitsap County Depmhnent of None
Community Development
PUBLIC COMMZNTS RECEIVED (SEE .~PPENDIX J):
Robert & Suzarme Hubert Concerned about development
3015 Pawnee Drive bloc~ng their views
Bremerton, WA 98310
Mr. & Mrs. Leo C. Maki Opposed to the subdivision
3011 Pawnee Drive because:
Brernerton, WA 98310 1. impact of increased traffic
drainage/run off problems
~i Obstruction of view
FINDINGS:
The City of Bremerton Department of Community Development makes the following
findings in support of a recommendation.
1. A re-division of land within five (5) years inside the boundaries of an approved short
plat requires the filing of a plat.
2. The proposed preliminary plat complies with the applicable development standards in
a SF-3 (Residential Low-density) zone, the land use map and the Comprehensive
Plan, designation LDR (Low Density Residential), and furthers the knplementation of
several goals and policies within said plan.
3. The site (Lot A) current contains a dwelling unit that will continue to meet applicable
development standards.
4. The subject property is located in an area suitable for development, as addressed by
the commenting agencies and city staff, and conditioned below.
5. The subdivision is adequately serviced by public utilities as referenced in the letter of
conditional water and sewer availability.
6. The public health, safety and general welfare of the City of Bremerton have been
served in that comments from agencies and the public have been considered and
addressed in relation to this apphcation.
7. The Notice of Application was published on May 21, 2003 in the Sun newspaper,
notification was sent to property owners within 300 feet and the property was posted
on May 21, 2003. Public comments were received.
8. Notice of Hearing was published on June 23, 2003 in the Sun newspaper, notification
was sent to property owners within 300 feet and the property was posted on June 23,
2003.
9. A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued June 12, 2003.
CONCLUSION
If approved, the preliminary plat would comply with the City of Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan and applicable Bremerton Municipal Code development regulations
subject to the following conditions.
1. The subdivision shall comply with all conditions specified in the conditional water
and sewer ava/lability letter fi.om the City of Bremerton Public Works and Utilities
Department.
2. The applicant will provide fire flow and hydrant if not available.
3. The applicant shall provide a signed improvement agreement for future frontage
improvements as required by the City of Bremerton Municipal Utilities (See
Appendix H for improvement agreement under PL01-0014).
4. The applicant will obtain addresses fi.om Public Works, which will be indicated on
the final plat.
5. A final plat meeting applicable development standards and conditions shall be
submitted to the City for approval within five years of the date of preliminary plat
approval.
SIGNATLrR~ OF STAFF pREPARING REPORT:
Robert J. Grumbach
City of Bremerton Department of Community Development
Current Planner
HDR
C-GI
LDR
[] LDR LDR
MDR
MDR
MDR
S
'LDR
LDR
'1
:LDR MDR
P MDR
City of Bremerton
Department of Community Development
I DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE I
PROPOSAL: Amend short plat No. PL01-0014 to divide 2 lots into 4 lots
FILE NUMBER: PL03-0017
LOCATION: Tax Number 112401-2-151-2006 and 112401-2-151-2007 (two lots south side
of E. 31 ~t Street, 100 feet west of Pawnee Drive)
PROPONENT: Solid Seven Construction inc.
LEAD AGENCY: Department of Community Development
The SEPA Responsible Official of the City of Bremerton hereby makes the following Findings and
Conclusions based upon a review of the Environmental Checklist, comments received in
response to the Notice of Application issued on May 21, 2003, other information on file with the
City of Bremerton, and the policies, plans and regulations designated by the City of Bremerton as
a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.060.
CONCLUSIONS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
The Responsible Official concludes that the proposal does not have a probable significant impact
on the environment, and an Environmental impact Statement is not required pursuant to RCW
43.21.C.030(2)(c). This decision is made after a review of the completed Environmental
Checklist, other information in the file with the City of Bremerton, and existing regulations. This
information is available to the public upon request.
This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued after using the optional DNS process in
WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Christopher R. Hugo, Director
Department of Community Development
City of Bremerton
286 Fourth Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
STAFF CONTACT: Robert Grumbach, (360) 473-5379
DATE OF ISSUE: June 12, 2003
DATE OF PUBLICATION: June 12, 2003
ri~{ophar ~. ~Jgo, R~esponsible Official
APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.075 and City of Bremerton environmental regulations (BMC
Chapter 21.12.210), decisions of the Responsible Official may be appealed. Appeals must be
filed by a person with standing with the appropriate fees at the Department of Community
Development located at the Bremerton Permit Center, 286 Fourth Street, Bremerton, 98337.
Appeals must be filed by the date indicated above as "Appeal Deadline." If you appeal, you
should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
NOTE: The issuance of this DNS does not constitute project approval. The applicant must
comply with all other applicable requirements of the City of Bremerton and the State of
Washington.
KITSAP COUNTY
OFFICE OF PLANNING
ENV~O~NTAL CHECKLIST
To the Applicant:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. This environmental
checktist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Agencies use this
checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,
requiring preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (ELS). Please answer each question
accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to
answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire
experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,
write "do not know" or "does not apply"_ Complete answers to the questions now may avoid
unnecessary delays later.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a
period of time or on different parcels of land_ Attach any additional information that will help
descn~be your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this
checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably
related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
1
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable.
Rainier Vista (Long Plat)
2. Name of applicant:
Bill Bakker
Solid Seven Construction
PO Box 2788
Bremerton, Wa 98310
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Contact: Steve Ottua~r (360) 692-6400
AES Consultants Inc.
PO Box 930
S~verdale, Wa 98383
4. Date checklist prepared:
April, 2003
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Br~merton Department of Community Developmem
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Construction on lots as soon as possible after approval.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, ex"pi
No
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been
prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to ~hi~ proposal.
None
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for government approvals
or other proposals dkectly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If
yes, explain.
No
10. List any applications for permits or authorizations which have been, or will
be, submitted to local, state or federal agencies for the project or project area.
Approval of Long plat from the City of Bremerton
2
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed
uses and the size of the project and ske. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this
form to includ~ additional specific information on project description.)
Plat 2 existing lots into 4
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to
understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street
address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. Ifa proposal would
occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s).
Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with
any permit applications related to this checklist.
See Site Plan
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENWIRONMJENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description o£the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Approximately 7%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify
them and note any prime farmland.
Loamy Sand
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? if so, describe.
No
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantifies of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Small cut/fill for new home construction
£ Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
3
Yes. Cleared areas could erode during heavy raim
g_ About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
23%
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
Installing erosion conlxol measures prior to clearing and construction. Furore
landscaping of disturbed arms.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate
quarrtities if known.
Construction dust and exhaust and long term auto and chimney
exhaust.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally deaz~ribe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,
if any:
None
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity o£the
site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into_
No
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200
feet) the described waters? If yes, please desc-dbe and attach available
plans.
No
4
3) Estimate the mount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in
or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
None
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No
5) Does the proposal lie within a 10C-year floodplain? If so note location
on the site plan_
No
6) Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
No
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if
known.
No
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground water
from septic tank~ or other sources, if any (for example._ domestic
sewerage; industrial, containing the follow'rog chemicals...: agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems,
the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of auimal$
or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None
c. Water Kuuoff 0nclurtlng storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? Il'so, describe.
Storm water runoff will be handled per City standards
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so generally
describe.
No
5
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
None
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
X~ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
X shrubs
X~ grass
pasture
__ crop or gram
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, slmnk cabbage,
~ water plants: water l~y, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Typical amounts for driveway and new home construction.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site, if any
None.
5. Animals
a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the
site or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: hawk. heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:.
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Future landscaping of disturbed areas
6
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be
used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Electricity. Mostly for heating and lights
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans o£this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if
any.
None
7. Environmental ltealth
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire or explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur
as a result of this proposal? If so descn'be.
No
1) Describe emergency services that may be required.
None
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,
if any:
None
b. Noise
1) What types of noises exist in the area which may affect your project
(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
none
2) V~hat lypes and l~v¢ls of noise would be created by or associated v~th
the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example~ ~rafc,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
Short term construction noise and long term traffic noise.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Kesidential
7
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Small existing residence
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
SF3
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Urban
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the ske been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
No
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the
contemplated project?
3 new families
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
None
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any.
None
9. ]lousing
a. Approximately how many ~mits would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
3 middle income units
b. Approximately how m~ny units, [f any, would be elkminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or tow-income housing.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if auy:
None
8
10. Aesthetics
a What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed7
30' with wood and brick
b. What views in the mediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
None
11. Light and Glare
a. What types of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
Kesidenfial landscape lighting and vehicle head lights
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere
with views?
No
c. What existing off-site light sources of light or glare may affect your
proposal?
None
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any':
None
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
None
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreational opportunities to be provided by the project applicant, if'any:
None.
13. ltistoric and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state,
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
No
9
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site_
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None.
14. Transportation
a. Idemify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on the site plans, if any.
See site plan
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
Not known
c. How many parking spaces would the completed projezt have? How many
would the project elimixnate?
8+/-
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No
e. W~dl the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or
air transportation? Ifsogenerally describe.
No
£. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
Approximately 10-20 per dayby residents.
g. Proposed measure to reduce or control transportation impacts, i~any:
None
1~. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so
generally describe.
Slight increase due to 3 new homes
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,
if any:
None
10
16. Utifities
a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electriciW, natural gas,
water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other (storm
sewer).
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing
the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the
immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Already existing
17. SIGNATURE
The above a~swers are tree and complete to the best of my knowledge. I
understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its de0.sion
Date Submitted:
1L
3ul O1 03 03:3Sp En~ineerin~ Division 3~0-478-5398 p.2
July l, 2003
Solid Seven Construction Inc.
Attn: Bill Bakker
P.O. Box 2788
Bremerton, WA 98310
CONDITIONAL WATER AND SEWER AVA[LABILITY
TAX LOT #112401-2-151~2006 and 112401-2-151-2007
In response to your application for utility services, the City of Bremerton is pleased to advise you
that your project is situated within the City's Utility service area. The Utility ha~ facilities and
adequate capacity and supply to provide sewer and water service to your proposed project. The
requested services are conditionally available to this project as follows:
Permitted Land Use
Service is requested for four (4) single family residences. Availability of utility services is subject
to conformance to the City Comprehensive Land Plan and zoning ordinance. Please contact the
Department of Community Development at 478-5275 for specific land use information. The
proposed project is located in the SE quarter of Section 11, Township 24 N., Range 1 E.,
Willamette Meridian; Tax Assessor's Lot Number i 12401-2-151-2006 and 112401-2-151-2007 at
3Isth Street in Bremerton, Washington. Any change in this designated land use or property
description will reqff~re a new application and render this notice of conditional utility availability
null and void.
City Water & Sewer Availability
Page 1
3ul O! 03 03:36p En~ineerin~ Dsvision 3S0-$78-5398 p.3
Water Service
Water service is conditionally available within the 31st Street right-of-way and consists of an 6-inch
A. C main located along the north side of this proposed development. The water system pressure
is estimated to be 90 pounds per square inch.
Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC 15.02.070) reads: "In the event local conditions result in high
pressure (exceeding 80 psi), a pressure reducing valve [a.k.a. pressure regulator] may be required
and installed at the expense of the owner. The pressure reducing valve shall remain the property
of the property owner who will be solely responsible for its maintenance and operation.
(Ord. 4309 {}2 (in part), 1991)"
.Wastewater Service
Wastewater (sewer) service is conditionally available in the NE comer of this development To
access the City of Bremerton's sewer system one stick of sewer pipe is required to be connected
into the manhole located at the NE comer of this development. Each pressurized private lateral can
access this main by a gravity connection and a clean out at the transition fi:om pressure to gravity
within the existing easement area. This wastewater system is located in the Pine Road Basin.
Submit plans and specifications of the sewer main extension stamped by a professional engineer to
City Engineering for review and comment. The City will issue a Public Works Project P~,,~it
before commencing construction. .........
Storm Management
The City ofBremerton Stormwater Management Program is dedicated to modifying the flow rate to
prevent flooding, and improving the quality of stormwater that flows into Puget Sound. City
Ordinance requires adherence to the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin.
Temporary emsion and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be enacted on
all building sites.
Land Use and Development Standards Compliance
Availability of utility services shall be subject to compliance with the following: City of Bremerton
Comprehensive Land Use Plan; and the City's development, city street, and subdivision standards.
Water and Sewer Hook-up
Development of the proposed project and connection to the Utility System shall be completed m
accordance with the Department of Utilities Development and Construction Standards,
APWA/DOT Specifications, AWWA Standards, and Title 15 of the Bremerton Murdcipal Code.
City Water & Sewer AvaitabSty
Page 2
Jul O1 03 03:36p Engineerin~ Division 360-4?8-5398
Payment of Assessments and Fees
Payment of applicable assessments and connection fees will be requixed pursuant to Title 15 and the
formalization of a Utility Service Agreement will be required prior to construction.
Utility services for the conditions stated herein shall be limited to 180 days fi.om date of approval
unless a Utility Service Agreement with the City is executed prior to that time.
Should you have any questions, please contact this office at 478-2325 for assistance. We look
forward to working with you in providing these services for your project.
Very truly yours, APPROVED:
r Paul Wandling
Engineering Technician 1V Civil Engineer II
THIS LETTER IS NOT BINDING UNTIL ALL CONDITIONS ARE MET AND
ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF BREMERTON.
~151E31 sm~tAV'Ldoe
City Water & Sewer Availabili[y
Page 3
94754/2882 93:58P
BREMERTON CITY OF AgMT $18.99 Kit~ap Co,
Filed for Record at Request of:
~ ~co~d~d ~t~ to:
N~e: CiW Clerk
Ad.ess: 239 Fo~h Sweet
Breme~on, WA 98337
Document Title: Improvements Agreement (without bond)
Project Name: Churchman Short Plat
Developer Name: Morris Churchman
Location: 205 E 31 st Street
Tax Parcel #: 112401-2-120-2005
Abbreviated Legal A portion of the NW ¼ in Section 11, Township 24 North, Range 1 East
Description: Government Lot 1 Lot B of short Plat NO. 6513 as recorded in vol. 10
page135 of Short Plats, Auditor's File NO 9402110149, records of Kitsap
County, WA.
IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT
WHEREAS the City of Bremerton requires certain land developments to include public
and private improvements including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street
lights, street widening and stormwater improvements, as a condition for plat, P.U.D., or building
permit; approval; and
WHEREAS the undersigned, as owner of real property within the City of Bremerton,
described in Exhibit "A" and attached hereto by reference herein, (hereinafter "Premises") has
made application for Short Plat which requires a Frontage Improvement Agreement for furore
fi-ontage improvements according to PS00-0028.
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned owner (hereinafter "Owner") and the City of
Bremerton (hereinafter "City"), in consideration of the City's approval of Owner's project and
the mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties do hereby promise and agree as follows:
1. Local Improvement District. Owners, by signing below, grant to the City of
Bremerton a Limited Power of Attorney to include this Agreement as Owner's consent to tile
formation of a Local Improvement District under RCW Ch. 35.43 for the construction of
improvements on or abutting said property as described in Exhibit "B" encompassing all or part
of the property described in Exhibit "A", as part of any Notice of Petition or Resolution
presented to or by the City, for the purpose of performing any of said improvements.
Owner agrees not to sign any petition to defeat a Local Improvement District formed by
the use of this Limited Power of Attorney, except the Owner may protest the special benefit to
the Premises.
This Limited Power of Attorney is irrevocable.
2. Construction of Improvements. Upon the City's decision to have the
improvements subject to this agreement constructed by the Owner rather than through a Local
Improvement District, or the City's inability to form a Local Improvement ~istrict, the Owner
shall construct those improvements, described in Exhibit "B", as directed by the City within six
(6) months of notification by the City to construct said improvements, unless an alternative time
has been mutually agreed upon. If the Owner fails to construct said improvements within the
time described above, the City shall have the authority to construct said improvements and the
costs of construction shall be assessed against the Owner and filed and recorded as a lien on the
Premises under procedures for a mechanic and materialman's liens.
3. Covenant. The undersigned further agrees that this Agreement and the promises
made herein constitute a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon the
undersigned and their heirs, successors, and assigns, and that this Agreement shall be filed for
record in the office of the Kitsap County Auditor.
4. Standards. Owner agrees to construct said improvements in compliance with
City standards in effect at time of construction.
BREMF-RTON CITY OF 8G~T $13.88 Kitsap Co, W8
5. Permits. Owner shall obtain a Right-of-Way permit from the City for all work
performed within the City Right-of-Way. Owner shall also obtain all other permits required to
complete the improvements.
OWNER(S):
Lillian Churchman ^
Morris Churchman
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
: SS.
COUNTY OF KITSAP )
/~ O,n this ,day l~ersonally appeared before me ~t'///~/q t~.~Ol'-~/9OO,.qlO and
t)Fr-I~/'I~)0~/'])DO~IO , to me known to' 'be-tl{e ~m~ividua~(s)* de~ribed in and
who executed the within' foregoing instnunent, and acknowledged that they signed the same as
their flee and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN an~j~/~.~i/.cial seal this~q day of A/~N~0( .2002.
'/Ill)IIIIIIIIlU~ii%'~ : No{tary Publlc in ~and for t~lo~tate of/
Washington, residing at:~/~
My appointment expires:
CITY OF BREMERTON
ACC~
W. EUGENE SAMPLEY, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES
BREtiERTON CITY OF RGtlT $1B.O(~ Kktsap Co, aR
EXHIBIT A
Lot B of Short Plat NO. 6513 as recorded in volume 10 page 135 of Short Plats, Auditor's File
NO. 9402110149/0150. Being a portion of Government Lot 1 in the northwest quarter of the
northwest quarter, Section 11, Township 24 North, Range 1 East, W.M., Kitsap Cotmty,
Washington. Together with easements as depicted on the short plat. Except for that conveyed to
the City of Bremerton for right of way under Auditor's File NO. 200111300531, records of
Kitsap County, Washington, described as follows: the north 30 feet of the east 123.63 feet of
above described Lot B, Short Plat NO. 6513.
8R£MERTOH CITY OF A6M? $13.88 Ki%sap Co, WA
EXHIBIT B
Frontage Improvements to include street lighting, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and associated .storm
conveyance piping,
BR£M£RTO~I CITY OF AGMT $13.8B Kitsap Co, WA
96065~LIDNOBND
JUN 0 ~ ' '-" ibI,! Leo & Margaret Maki
-- 3011 Pawnee Drive
B~,_TCCIE ~i L~¢; Bremerton, WA 98310-6813
June 5, 2003
Department of Community Development
ATTN: Robert Grumbach, Current Planner
286 4"~ Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
To Whom It May Concern:
RE: Amend short plat No. PI01-0014 to divide 2 lots into 4 lots
205 and 211 East 31st Street, 100 feet west of Pawnee Drive
Solid Seven Construction, Inc.
This letter is concerning the proposed application involving the above property
development. Because our property is within 300 feet of the property indicated above,
we do have some concerns regarding any future development and/or changes and we
are opposed to dividing the 2 lots into 4 lots.
Our concerns include:
I tmpact of increased density/traffic. Our street, which connects directly to E. 31st
Street, is already greatly affected by traffic which not only includes that of property
owners off 31st, but also from traffic "cutting through" from Tracyton Btvd., up 31~t,
down Pawnee, and visa verse. We are concerned that an additional 4 more
homes in this area will add to the ever~increasing traffic through our area.
Considering the fact that 31~t is a one-lane road, any additional traffic would be a
nuisance. Already cars travel too fast up and down Pawnee Drive. Safety should
be considered - there are several children who ride bikes, etc. on E. 30th Street -
and cars traveling too fast down Pawnee must make a sharp turn onto E. 30m
We do not believe that widening E. 31st to 2 lanes is the answer to this problem.
2) Drainage/run off problems. Our home is situated on one of the lower tots on
Pawnee. We always have had quite a lot of run off water from higher lots. Each
time there is new construction or development changes above the lower lots, it
does seem to create run off differences.
3) Obstruction of view. We have enjoyed a 180-degree view from our property that
includes a great view of the Olympics. This feature adds immeasurable value to
our lot. Any obstruction of this view by new homes, even though they would be
quality homes, would potentially create a large impact on selling our lot/home in the
future. This is quite a concern to us - we do not want to lose the luxury of our view
as it now stands. Any development that impedes this view would be detrimental
not only to us but also to several adjacent property owners.
-continued-
Page 2
Leo & Margaret Maki
3011 Pawnee Drive
E~remerton, WA 98310-6813
June 5, 2003
While we certainly understand and expect changes will occur with each new property
owner, we believe the concerns we have listed are important and deserve to be
considered in detail. We "cannot stop progress*, so to speak, but we certainly hope
that the integrity of our existing community and neighborhood of homes will be
maintained with the lowest impact possible to existing homes and property owners,
which is only fair and equitable. We strongly feel that over-development and too many
subdivisions of lots are a detriment to value and not favorable to the quality and future
of either our city or county.
While we realize we missed the first "deadline" for comments, we have been made
aware that there will be a public hearing conceming the proposed subdivision
application and public concerns will be addressed. Therefore, this letter is being
submitted for consideration in the above-named proposal
Sincerely,
Margaret L. Maki
¢? +~ Page 1 !
~umbach PL03 0017
From: "Robert Hubert" <mikeyhl@earthlink.net>
To: <rgrumbach@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Date: 6/1/03 7:26PM
Subject: PL03-0017
Dear Mr. Grumbach,
RE: Notice of a Land Use Action PL03-0017
My wife and I are concerned about the desire of Solid Seven Construction, Inc. to amend short plat No.
PL01-0014 to divide two lots into four lots.
We bought our home about 20 months ago. Among those characteristics we found desirable, and for
which we were willing to pay the asking price was the views of the Olympics.
Anytime you buy a home, you need to recognize that adjacent property may be developed. We hold no
issue with Solid Seven Construction being able to do such. Our issue is that by permitting the division of
the plat into four instead of two building sites, increasing the buitding density on the plat, it is more likely
that we will lose our view. We believe that such a loss would reduce our property value and therefore
believe that granting an amendment would be a violation of the intent of the city to provide a just system
by which our community is developed. Our house represents our primary asset and investment as well as
that immeasurable value, "home." Reducing or eliminating our view would harm all three.
We urge the city to thoughtfully consider the integrity of the relationship between the current homeowners
adjacent to PL01-0014 and the city of Bremerton to protect our properties.
If assurances can be made that four homes will have no greater risk of harming our view than the two that
the plat is currently approved to hold, we would accept the inevitability of a landowner to develop their
property in balance with the impact on the rights of those around him/her seeking to avoid harm to their
own.
For your consideration.
Robert & Suzanne Hubert
3015 Pawnee Drive
Bremerton, WA 98310