HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/16/03 AGENDA FILE
239 4th Street · Brernerton, WA 98337 · Phone (360) 478-5280 ° Fax (360) 478-5251
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY - DECEMBER 16, 2003
1. PRE-COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M. in Council Conference Room
A. General Council Business
2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. in Council Chambers
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation .~_,
3. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Contract Award to MACHINISTS, INC. for Howell Bunger Valve Repair Project (#AB03-232) J
4. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
5. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
6. MAYOR'S REPORT
7. PUBLIC RECOGNITION - Comments limited to 3-minutes
8. NEW BUSINESS 3
A. Professional Service Agreement with URs CORPORATION for West 580 Pressure Zone
Upgrades (#AB03-233)
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS - ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
,A. Resolution No. 2913, ratifying Countywide Planning Policies as adopted by the Kitsap ~) O
County Board of Commissioners (#AB03-234)
. Ordinance [First Reading] adopting the 2004 Annual Budget; repealing BMC Chapters 3.10 ~ [
and 3.38; and amending BMC Chapter 3.36 (#AB03-227)
· Ordinance [First Reading] updating BMC Chapter 3.01 Rate & Fees (#AB03-228) ~:~ C)
Ordinance [First Reading] amending BMC Chapter 3.50 Utility Taxes (#AB03-229) ~ O
Ordinance [First Reading] amending BMC Chapter 3.82 Commercial Parking Tax (#AB03-230) c~ q
Ordinance [First Reading] setting Rates and Fees for Water, Wastewater, and Storm Water ~ '7
Utilities and Amending BMC Chapter 15.06 (#AB03-231)
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. A 20-minute Executive Session will be held to "REVIEW LABOR NEGOTIATIONS" per RCW
42.30.140(4)(b)
11. ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
E-mail: citycouncil@ci.bremerton.wo.us · Web: www.ci.bremerton.wa.us
DATE SUBMITTED: November 20, 2003
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Award Contract for the Howell Committee Meeting Date: 12/9/03
Bunger Valve Repair Project COUNCIL MEETING Date: 12/1~03
Department: PW&U Engineering.
Presenter: Michael Mecham
Phone: 360-473-5288
SUMMARY: Sealed bids for the Howell Bunger Valve Repair Project were opened on November
13, 2003. One proposal was received for this project. Machinists Inc. was the lowest responsive,
responsible bidder with a bid of $20,267.80 (including sales tax).
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Bid Tabulation
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The project is funded by a $127,500 DWSRF loan
and is included in the 2003 budget.
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: .~.-~ /-~ .........
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DI1LECTOR:
OPERATIONS:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to award a contract In the amount of $20,267.80 with
Machinists Inc. for construction of the project titled "Howell Bunger Valve Repair" and authorize the
Mayor to finalize and execute the necessary contact documents.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
ab, Agenda Bills 2003, Contract Award }lB Valve Repair, 12-03 I
0z
D::O 1
LU -..I Z
n,' *'-~ ,,,
fl..
r~
--
w ~ ~
DATE SUBMITTED: BILL
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: West 580 Pressure Zone Committee Meeting Date: 12/9/03
Upgrades - Professional Services Agreement COUNCIL MEETING Date: 12/1~/03
for URS Corporation Department: PW&U Engineering
Presenter: Michael Mecham
Phone: 360-473-5288
SUMMARY: Based on an evaluation of qualified consultants, the City has selected URS
Corporation to provide consulting engineering services for the West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades.
The project includes construction of a new pump station to serve the new West 580 Pressure Zone and
construction of a water transmisssion main between the new pump station location and Old Clifton
Road. The not-to-exceed mount of the agreement is $190,459.00.
ATTACHMENTS: Professional Services Agreement
FISCAL IMpACTs (Include Budgeted Amount): The project is included in the 2003 capital budget.
APPROVALS: ~/~,~~
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: .
CITY ATTORNEY: _~~___.~-~----~
FINANCE DIRECTOR: ' ~._k~ ~. '"
FISCAL/BUDGET: ['~'~' ~~ CONSENT AGENDA [-]
OPERATIONS: ~---~0-~ -
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve a professional services agreement with URS
Corporation to provide consulting engineering services for the West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
project, in an amount not to exceed $190,459.00, and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the
necessary contract documents for the agreement.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
ab, Agenda Bills 2003, PSA U'KS - W580 Pressure Zone Upgrades, 12-03 3
From: Gene Sampley
To: City Council
Date: 12/16/03 4:43PM
Subject: West 580 Zone Development
Tonight City Coundl w~ll consider the pmfess~)nal se;vices agreement wP.h URS Consulting for
completion of the design of the West 580 Pressure Zone for the Water Utility. When this item was
p~sented to Council Committees, i~ wa~ suggested by one or more Council members thai the City
should not develop the West 580 Ixessure zone; that it was a waste of money. Roger Lubov~ch
suggested that I mee~ with Nm and Chds Hugo and provide bac~mund information on this matter, I met
w~th both Roger and Chris on this matter.
The attached provides such background infommtion regarding the zone development and va~ous
ag~ements that previously have been approved by the Council on this matte~. I will be available to
address any questions you may have.
CC: Chds Hugo; Roger Lubovich
WEST 580 ZONE DEVELOPMENT
OVERVIEW
The following provides an overview of the planning and various agreements associated
with development of the West 580 Pressure Zone for the Bremerton Water Utility.
Although there is much information relative to annexation and zoning of properties in
this service area, the following is primarily for the water system.
· Development of the West 540 (now 580) Water Pressure Zone was included in
the 1993 Water System Comprehensive Plan.
· City Council approved a professional services agreement with KCM, Inc. related
to design and construction of the West 540 (580) Zone in February 1997. Al~er
completion of the Engineering report, work was suspended and the contract was
terminated.
· Development of the West 540 (580) Water Pressure Zone is included in the 1999
Water System Comprehensive Plan.
· The Northwest Corporate Campus (NWCC) Development Agreement was
approved by City Council November 5, 1999 and subsequently filed with the
Kitsap County Auditor.
· On June 5, 2003 NWCC was notified that it was in default and given thirty days
to cure pursuant to paragraph 9.12.2 of the development agreement for not
complying with paragraph 6.4 of the agreement requiring NWCC to submit a
report to City Council every three years outlining its progress, infi'astructure
improvements completed during the preceding three years, and general conditions
at the Project. NWCC responded by letter dated July 2, 2003, followed by
telephone conversation on July 22; the default was considered cured and was
confirmed by letter dated July 24, 2003 by the City Attorney.
· In August 2000, the City Council approved a second professional services
agreement with KCM, Inc. to complete design and construction of the West 540
(580) Zone.
· An agreement between Northwest Corporate Campus and the City regarding
construction of water transmission and distribution system improvements was
approved by City Council May 16, 2001.
· A Letter of Intent for Bremerton and Port Orchard Water System Improvements
was approved by the Bremerton City Council September 26, 2001 and approved
by Port Orchard City Council in October of that year.
· An Interlocal Agreement for Cooperative Water System Development in the Port
Orchard 580 ZonegBremerton 580 Zone was approved by Bremerton City Council
December 26, 2001. Note: City Administration was praised by City Council for
working out an agreement that provided mutual benefit to the parties saving each
substantial initial investment.
· In September 2002, KCM terminated with thirty days notice the professional
~ervice~contract for design and construction of the West 580 Zone Water System
· After several attempts to negotiate a settlement with KCM, in May 2003, City
Council approved initiation ora lawsuit against KCM for recovery of damages
suffered by the City as a result of the termination of the professional services
agreement.
· On June 2, 2003 the City filed a summons and complaint against KCM for
recovery of damages for its breach of contract for completion of design services
of the West 580 and West 650 Zones.
In summary, the West 580 Zone is in the service area of the City's Water Utility. Portions
of this zone are within the City of Bremerton, and Development of this zone is in the
City's comprehensive plan, the Water System Comprehensive Plan, the Capital
Improvement Plan, and the adopted budgets since 1997. This matter has been before the
Council in various forms mentioned above and on numerous other occasions since
Micron Technologies of Boise, Idaho proposed a facility for this area in 1994.
Comprehensive plans for the City of Bremerton, City of Port Orchard, and Kitsap County
have been developed with Bremerton's commitment to provide water to this area.
pROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
URS - West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades / 487
The City of Bremerton ("City") and URS Corporation America ("Consultant"), referred
to collectively as the "Parties," enter into the following Agreement for professional services:
I. Scope: The Consultant agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the
Scope of Work, dated November 24, 2003, including any attachments thereto, attached hereto as
Exhibit A, which is incorporated by reference herein. The Scope of Work may be modified only
pursuant to Section VII.H. of this Agreement. If the Scope of Work provides for unspecified
additional services such services shall only be performed upon the express written request of the
City. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be
performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time such
services are performed.
II. Term: The City and the Consultant agree that work will begin on the tasks described in
Exhibit A immediately upon execution of this Agreement. The parties agree that the work is to
be completed as provided for in the work schedule included in Exhibit A; provided however, that
additional time shall be granted by the City for excusable delays or extra work as provided for in
section IX (A) of this agreement.
III. Compensation: In consideration of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, the
City shall pay Consultant in an mount not to exceed One Hundred Ninety Thousand Four
Hundred Fifty Nine dollars ($190,459.00). Consultant's charges and bills shall conform to the
fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference.
The Consultant shall submit regular billing statements detailing work performed and
amount charged on each task or portion thereof. The descriptions shall conform to and fall
within the categories set out in the Scope of Work and/or Fee Schedule. Upon receipt of a
conforming billing statement, the City shall promptly process payment. PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, the City reserves the right to prioritize scoped work and accelerate and/or delay
work tasks under the time frame set forth in Section II herein. The Consultant's labor rates and
billing fees shall be as delineated in Exhibit B.
Consultant shall not perform work beyond the Scope of Work, nor shall be compensated
for such work, unless the Scope of Work or amount of compensation is modified pursuant to this
Agreement. Consultant shall only be compensated for additional services if requested pursuant
to Section I and, if not otherwise provided, such compensation shall be in accordance with
Exhibit B.
If a billing statement does not conform to this Agreement, the City may withhold
payment until the statement is brought into compliance. Such withholding does not relieve
Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement.
Bremerton/URS
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Page 1 of 7
IV. Relationship of Parties: Consultant represents that it is skilled in the matters addressed
in the Scope of Work and is performing independent functions and responsibilities within its
field of expertise. Consultant and its personnel are independent Consultants and not employees
of the City. Consultant and its personnel have no authority to bind the City or to control the
City's employees and other Consultants. None of the benefits provided by the City to its
employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance
are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-Consultants of the
Consultant. Consultant will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of
Consultant's agents, employees, representatives and sub-Consultants during the performance of
this Agreement. The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent
Consultants to perform the same or similar work.
As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for its own management. The
City's administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall not be deemed an exercise of
managerial control over Consultant or its personnel.
As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for payment of all taxes and
licensing fees necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement. These taxes and fees
include but are not limited to State industrial insurance, Business & Occupation, State
professional licensing, and City business licensing. If any taxes or fees due the City have been
declared delinquent, the City may withhold the delinquent amount, plus any additional charges
arising from the delinquency, fi:om any payments due Consultant.
V. Indemnification: Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers,
officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages,
losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the
performance of this Agreement to the extent of Consultant's negligence or other legal liability
and, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's sole negligence.
The City's review or acceptance of any of the work when completed shall not be grounds
to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to
RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons
or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant
and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability
hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence.
IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE
INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S
WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER
ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER.
The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
Bremerton/URS
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Page 2 of 7
VI. Insurance: The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in
connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, employees, sub-consultants or sub-Consultants.
Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Consultant shall
provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing:
1. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single
limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and
2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no
less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and general aggregate for
personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be
limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations/broad form property
damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCU) if applicable; and employer's
liability; and
3. Excess Liability insurance with limits not less than 1,000,000 limit per occurrence and
aggregate.
4. Professional Liability. insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 limit per
occurrence/claim.
Any payment of deductible or self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the
Consultant.
All required policies shall be provided on an "occurrence" basis except professional
liability insurance (if required), which may be provided on a "claims-made" basis.
The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability
insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and a copy of an
endorsement that is acceptable to the City, which names the City as an additional insured shall be
attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of
all the required insurance policies and endorsements. The City further reserves the right to reject
any unacceptable policies and/or endorsements.
The Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating
that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is
brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability.
The Consultant's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and the City
shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of
any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage.
VII. General Conditions:
BremertorffURS
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Page 3 of 7
A. Reports and Information: When requested by the City, Consultant shall furnish
periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement. The reports and
documents shall be furnished in the time and form requested. Consultant shall maintain
accounting records in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to
substantiate all billed amounts.
B. Ownership and Use of Records and Documents: Original documents, drawings,
designs and reports, including those in electronic format, developed under this Agreement are the
property of the City. All written information submitted by the City to the Consultant in
connection with the services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be
safeguarded by the Consultant to at least the same extent as the Consultant safeguards like
information relating to its own business. If such information is publicly available or is already in
Consultant's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Consultant from third
parties, Consultant shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise.
All data, documents and files created by Consultant under this Agreement may be stored
at Consultant's office in Seattle, Washington. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and
files available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing,
modifying and updating as necessary until such time as the City is capable of storing such
information in the City's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the
City upon its request, and at reasonable cost.
All original documents, including all reports, drawings, specifications, computer software
or other items prepared or furnished by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, are instruments
of service with respect to the project and are the property of the City. Any reuse by the City for
other than the specific purpose intended will be at City's sole risk.
C. Consultant to Maintain Records to Support Independent Consultant Status: On the
effective date of this Agreement (or shortly thereafter), Consultant shall:
1. File a schedule of expenses with the Internal Revenue Service for the type of
business Consultant conducts;
2. Establish an account with the Washington State Department of Revenue and other
necessary state agencies for the payment of all state taxes normally paid by
employers, register to receive a unified business identifier number from the State
of Washington; and
3. Maintain a separate set of books and records that reflect all items of income and
expenses of Consultant's business, all as described in the Revised Code of
Washington (RCW) Section 51.08.195, as required to show that the services
performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall not give rise to an employer-
employee relationship between the parties which is subject to RCW Title 51,
Industrial Insurance.
D. Work Performed at Consultant's Risk: Consultant shall take alt precautions necessary
and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and sub consultants in the
performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose.
BremertorffURS
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Page 4 of 7
All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss
of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the
E. Place of Work: The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this
Agreement at its offices in Seattle, Washington. Meetings with the City staff as described in
Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices, or at locations mutually agreed
upon by the parties.
F. Entire Agreement: This Agreement and its Exhibits constitutes the entire agreement
between the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or
oral, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement.
G. Severabilit¥: Should any part of this Agreement be found void, the balance of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
H. Modification: This Agreement may only be modified by written instrument signed by
both Parties.
I. Written Notices: All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the
parties at the addresses listed below by registered or 1st class mail, or by personal service, and
shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement
or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing.
City Address Consultant Address
W. Eugene Sampley, Director Mike Rosenfeld, Vice President
Department of Public Works and Utilities URS Corporation
3027 Olympus Drive 1501 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1400
Bremerton, WA 98310 Seattle, WA 98101-1616
J. Waiver: Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a
waiver of that provision. Waiver of any right or power arising out of this Agreement shall not be
deemed waiver of any other right or power.
K. Non-Waiver of Breach: The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of
any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein confen'ed
in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said
covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect.
L. Compliance with Laws: Consultant shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and
local laws in performing its obligations under this Agreement.
M. Choice of Law and Venue: This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the taws
of the State of Washington. Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement
shall be brought in Kitsap County Superior Court.
Bremerton/URS
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Page 5 of 7 ~
N. Attorneys' Fees: In the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or provisions
herein, each party shall pay all its own costs and attorney's fees.
O. Assignment: Any assignment of this agreement by the Contractor without the written
consent of the City shall be void.
VIII. Nondiscrimination: Consultant shall not discriminate in employment or services to the
public on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, or disability,
except for employment actions based on bona fide occupational qualification.
IX. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated, at will, by either Party upon sixty (60)
days notice to the other Party. This Agreement may be immediately terminated for cause by a
Party if the other Party substantially fails to perform through no fault of the terminating Party,
and the non-performing Party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within
thirty (30) days of the terminating Party's sending notice to the non-performing Party. Notice by
Consultant shall include a report showing the status of all items listed in the Scope of Work
current through the termination date.
If the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in
Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is
cancelled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the
completion of the work, the City may summarily terminate this Agreement. Termination shall be
effective ten calendar days after Consultant's receipt of the written notice by certified mail.
A. Excusable Delays: The right of Consultant to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall
Consultant be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due
to: 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials,
equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other national emergency; 2)
any acts of the City, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay; and 3) causes
not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are
beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not
restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity. PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, that the Consultant must promptly notify the City within ten (10) calendar days in
writing of the cause of the delay. If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement,
the delay is properly excusable, the City shall, in writing, extend the time for completing the
work for a period of time commensurate with the period of excusable delay.
B. Rights Upon Termination: In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all
services performed by the Consultant to the effective date of termination, as described on a final
invoice submitted to the City. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and
data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City
without restriction. Any such use not related to the project which Consultant was contracted to
perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant.
Bremerton/LrRS
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Page 6 of 7
CITY OF BREMERTON CONSULTANT
By: Cary Bozeman By:
its: Mayor its:
Date: Date:
Approved as to form: Attest:
Bremerton City Attorney City Clerk
ab, Agenda Bills 2003, PSA UPS - W580 Pressure Zone Upgrades, 12-03, PSA
Bremerton/URS
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Page 7 of 7
CITY OF BREMERTON
Design and Construction Management Services
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Scope of Services
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this contract is to provide project management services, review and finalize
design and construction documents, review supporting assumptions, documentation and
calculations, and provide limited construction phase services for the planned West 580
Pressure Zone for the City of Bremerton.
The contract includes performing the following projects:
· Task 100: Project Management
· Task 200: Data collection and review of existing documents and calculations
· Task 300: Completion of the West 580 Pressure Zone Pre-Design Report
· Task 400: Completion of the Department of Health Project Approval Report
· Task 500: Pump Station No. ?.A- Design and Construction Services
· Task 600: Transmission Water Main - Design and Construction Services
· Task 700: Intertie & Meter Connection between City of Port Orchard and City of
Bremerton
· Task 800: Additional services
Owner Contacts:
City of Bremerton
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, WA 98310
Michael C. Mecham, PE, City Engineer Ned Lever, PE, Managing Engineer
Phone (360) 473-5288 Phone (360) 473-2398
Fax (360) 473-5398 Fax (360) 473-5398
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
URS proposes to provide the scope of services detailed herein to perform the required
professional services. We propose to include the following tasks as discussed with the City
on October 14, 2003, and in follow-up phone and e-mail correspondence. Assumptions used
in the preparation of this scope of services are presented in Section 3.0.
TASK 100: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. URS proposes to include an overall project management task to include preliminary
review and project coordination, management of the subtasks, kick-off workshop,
coordination of consultants, and contract management.
City of Bremerton Page 2
West 580 Pressure Zone - Scope of Services
November 24 2003
2. Invoicing Requirements
a. Provide invoices for professional services to City at least monthly, with charges
under this authorization itemized separately and organized by project task.
b. Provide a brief, narrative status report that addresses each project task and
percent complete, to the City with each invoice. Each invoice will show the dollar
amount previously billed, amount being billed for that period, and total billed to
date.
c. Correspond on a regular basis with the City's project manager by telephone, e-
mail, or in person until all work is completed and accepted by the City.
3. Completion Schedule
a. The City and URS will agree upon a milestone completion schedule for all work
herein authorized after completing detailed review of the existing design
documents.
b. See Section 4.0 for proposed project deliverable schedule
B. Deliverable Products: 1. Monthly invoices for professional services.
2. Monthly reports.
3. Milestone Completion Schedule, when authorized.
TASK 200: DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW OF EXISTING DOCUMENTS AND
CALCULATIONS
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. Review documents identified in Attachment 1 and prepare a memo to the City of
Bremerton identifying any additional information needed and any additional work
needed to be able to proceed with design outlined in the following tasks.
2. Perform Site visit to verify current Pump Station 2A site conditions and ascertain
existing conditions for the transmission line alignment.
3. Conduct necessary interviews with key agency personnel or agency representatives
associated with the interlocal agreement, such as, engineering design firms,
McCormick Woods, City of Port Orchard, South Kitsap School District, etc.
B. Deliverable Products:
1. Data collection and review memo identifying data gaps and any additional resources
needed to proceed with the design.
TASK 300: COMPLETION OF THE WEST 580 PRESSURE ZONE PRE-DESIGN REPORT
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. Complete and finalize the Pre-Design Report. The draft final Pre-Design Report was
developed by URS under a separate contract. Finalizing the report will include
incorporating applicable City comments from the draft final Pre-Design Report review.
2. The Pre-Designed Report will include the requirements of the interlocal agreement and
cooperative plan (Phases t-5). The report will focus on two conditions, the West 580
pressure zone under a built-out scenario and work being addressed under this initial
phase. The report will concentrate on the agreement and not on presenting
alternatives and inter-zone scenarios. A transient analysis, using Surge2000 by KY
Pipe, will be conducted on the transmission main and the results included in the report.
City of Bremerton Page 3
West 580 Pressure Zone - Scope of Services
November 24 2003
B. City of Bremerton Responsibilities
1, The City has completed preliminary hydraulic modeling to the Port Orchard reservoir
using WaterCad. The City shall update and validate the hydraulic model as required
for the projects.
2.URS and the City will establish modeling scenarios and parameters.
C. Deliverable Products:
1. Six bound and an electronic (Microsoft Word) copy of the Final Pre-Design report.
TASK 400: COMPLETION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PROJECT APPROVAL
REPORT
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. Complete and finalize the Department of Health Project Approval Report. The draft
final Project Approval Report was developed by URS under a separate contract.
Finalizing the report will include incorporating applicable City comments from the draft
final Project Approval Report review. This report will be based on information provided
by the City of Bremerton and the Pre-design Report. The report will include the three
design components (Pump Station 2A, transmission main, and the intertie at Clifton
Road and Northwest Campus Parkway) under the initial construction phase.
B. Deliverable Products:
1. Three stapled copies and an electronic (Microsoft Word) copy of the Final Project
Approval Report.
TASK 500: PUMP STATION No, 2A - DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Task 510: Desiqn Completion
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. Accept full responsibility as the professional Engineer of Record for final bidding &
construction documents for Pump Station No. 2A, excluding instrumentation and
controls.
2. Incorporate the information obtained in Task 200 Data collection and review of project
requirements including design assumptions, documentation and calculations prepared
by other firms for this project. URS will use the existing engineering design, including
preliminary construction documents, supporting calculations and documentation
prepared by Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. as of April 2002.
3. Validate, adjust, and complete existing building & foundation structure, pump selection,
piping and electrical designs to a final state of completion.
4. Revise Drawings and Specifications as required by jurisdictional authorities to obtain
building and electrical construction permits. Preparation of surface water Technical
Information Report (TLR) is not included; however, storm water from the pump station
site will be addressed as per the City of Bremerton's direction.
5. Prepare specifications for Pump Station 2A in CSI format.
6. Coordinate its electrical power, lighting and grounding designs, and validation of
existing designs with Technical Systems, Incorporated (TSI), which shall be the
Engineer of Record for instrumentation and controls.
City of Bremerton Page 4
West 580 Pressure Zone - Scope of Services
November 24 2003
B. City of Bremerton Responsibilities:
1. Provide Survey and topographic information for the pump station site and pipe line
alignment to the connection to the existing system and to the connection with the
transmission line (see task 600 below).
2. Provide the most recent versions electronic versions of existing preliminary
construction documents (drawings and specifications) for Pump Station 2A.
C. Deliverable Products:
1. 90% Design & Construction Drawings for review and 100% Design & Construction
Drawings in a final state of completion. URS will provide four half size drawing sets for
the 90% submittal. URS will provide one full size and one half size reproducible set of
drawings at 100% complete. At the final submittal URS will also provide an electronic
(AutoCAD) copy on CD of the final Construction Drawings.
2. 90% Construction Project Manual (project specifications) for review and 100%
specifications in a final state of completion. URS will provide four specification copies
at 90% review and one unbound copy of the project manual at 100% complete. At the
final submittal URS will also provide an electronic (Microsoft Word) copy on CD of the
Construction Specifications.
3. Design calculations, notes and supporting materials as may be necessary, or
requested by the City for issuance of permits and approvals for construction.
4. Engineers Construction Cost Estimate at the 90% and 100% submittals.
Task 520: Biddinq Assistance
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. Provide assistance to the City during the bid period for addenda issues, preparation for
and attendance at pre-bid meeting, responding to bidders questions, review and
evaluation of bidders proposal, and assistance with contract award processing, as
requested by the City.
B. Deliverable Products:
1. Addendum preparation, as needed.
Task 530: Construction Support
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. Attend pre-construction conference and up to 5 job progress meetings with the
Contractor and City of Bremerton representatives.
2. Conduct up to 5 site visits, when requested by the City. Provide copies of field reports
to the City.
3. Review selected Contractor submittals and shop drawings as requested by the City for
quality and compliance with design intent. The City will track all submittals that are
reviewed, and will maintain a log of submittals to i. nclude dates received.
4. Review and respond in writing to Contractor's Requests for Information (RFI), as
requested by the City. To the extent feasible, RFI responses will be provided within 48
hours of receipt.
5. Assist with the preparation of contract change orders as requested by the City.
6. Assist with commissioning activities during project acceptance. Conduct final
inspection with City staff to establish final punch list. Verify submittal of specified
City of Bremerton Page 5
West 580 Pressure Zone - Scope of Services
November 24 2003
warranties and coordinate warranty issues with the Contractor until transfer of this task
to operations staff.
B. Deliverable Products: 1. Field Repods - 1 copy for each site visit conducted.
2. RFI Reponses - 1 copy.
TASK 600: TRANSMISSION WATER MAIN - DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Task 610: Desi.qn Completion
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. Accept full responsibility, as the professional Engineer of Record for final bidding &
construction documents for West 580 Pressure Zone Improvements - Transmission
Mains.
2. Incorporate the information obtained in Task 200 Data collection and review of project
requirements including design assumptions, documentation and calculations prepared
by other firms for this project. URS will use the existing engineering design, including
preliminary construction documents, supporting calculations and documentation
prepared by Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc., as of April 2002.
3. Validate, adjust, and complete existing transmission piping to a final state of
completion.
4. Prepare specifications for the transmission line in APWA/WSDOT format.
5. Include maintenance road over the pipeline route designed to grade from Pump
Station 2A to Campus Parkway, approximately Station 33+00.
B. City of Bremerton Responsibilities:
1. Provide the most recent versions electronic versions of the existing preliminary
construction documents (drawings and specifications) for the Transmission Line.
2. Provide Survey and topographic information for the pipeline alignment to the
connection with the pump station piping (see task 500 above). City will conduct a
centerline grade survey along the transmission main.
3. Provide Northwest Corporate Campus roadway drawings prepared by APEX
Engineering showing existing surface alignment and natural ground topography for the
transmission line along Campus Parkway to Campus Lane.
4. Provide the design for the section of water line from Old Clifton Road along Campus
Parkway to Campus Lane (by others).
C. Deliverable Products:
1. 90% Design & Construction Drawings for review and 100% Design & Construction
Drawings in a final state of completion. URS will provide four half size drawing sets for
the 90% submittal. URS will provide one full size and one half size reproducible set of
drawings at 100% complete. At the final submittal URS will also provide an electronic
(AutoCAD) copy on CD of the final Construction Drawings.
2. 90% Construction Project Manual (project specifications) for review and 100%
specifications in a final state of completion. URS will provide four specification copies
at 90% review and one unbound copy of the project manual at 100% complete. At the
final submittal URS will also provide an electronic (Microsoft Word) copy on CD of the
Construction Specifications.
15'
City of Bremerton Page 6
West 580 Pressure Zone o Scope of Services
November 24 2003
3. Design calculations, notes and supporting materials as may be necessary, or
requested by the City for issuance of permits and approvals for construction.
4. Engineers Construction Cost Estimate at the 90% and 100% submittals.
Task 620: Biddin.q Assistance
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. Provide assistance to the City during the bid period for addenda issues, preparation for
and attendance at pre-bid meeting, responding to bidders questions, review and
evaluation of bidders, and assistance with contract award processing, as requested by
the City.
B. Deliverable Products;
1. Addendum preparation, as needed.
Task 630: Construction Support
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. Attend pre-construction conference and up to 3 job progress meetings with the
Contractor and City of Bremerton representatives.
2. Conduct up to 3 site visits, when requested by the City. Provide copies of field reports
to the City.
3. Review selected Contractor submittals and shop drawings as requested by the City for
quality and compliance with design intent. The City will track all submittals that are
reviewed, and will maintain a log of submittals to include dates received.
4. Review and respond in wdting to Contractor's Requests for Information (RFI), as
requested by the City. To the extent feasible, RFI responses will be provided within 48
hours of receipt.
5. Assist with the preparation of contract change orders as requested by the City.
6. Assist with commissioning activities during project acceptance. Conduct final
inspection with City staff to establish final punch list. Verify submittal of specified
warranties and coordinate warranty issues with the Contractor until transfer of this task
to operations staff.
B. Deliverable Products: 1. Field Reports - 1 copy for each site visit conducted.
2. RFI Reponses- 1 copy.
TASK 700: INTERTIE & METER CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PORT ORCHARD AND CITY
OF BREMERTON - DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Task 7'10: Desi.qn Completion
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. Accept full responsibility as the professional Engineer of Record, for final bidding &
construction documents for the Intertie and Meter, excluding instrumentation and
City of Bremerton Page 7
West 580 Pressure Zone - Scope of Services
November 24 2003
controls. The intertie and meter connection will be incorporated into the Task 610
construction documents.
2. Incorporate the information obtained in Task 200 Data collection and review of project
requirements including design assumptions, documentation and calculations prepared
by other firms for this project.
3. Coordinate its electrical power and grounding designs, and validation of existing
designs with Technical Systems, Incorporated (TSl), which shall be the Engineer of
Record for instrumentation and controls.
B. City of Bremerton Responsibilities:
1. Provide Transmission Line design for section along Campus Parkway from Campus
Lane to Old Clifton Road (by others). This will be used to coordinate connection on
the City of Bremerton side of the Intertie.
2. Provide survey of the connection location for the intertie at Old Clifton Road and at
Campus Parkway. The survey shall include location of the City of Port Orchard
existing water line including size, material, and elevation.
3. Locate and provide pole number for the nearest power source for the intertie and
meter.
C. Deliverable Products:
1. Incidental to Task 610.
Task 720: Biddin.q Assistance
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. Incidental to Task 620.
B. Deliverable Products:
1. Incidental to Task 620.
Task 730: Construction Support
A. URS Responsibilities:
1. Incidental to Task 630.
B. Deliverable Products:
1. Incidental to Task 630.
TASK 800: ADDITIONAL SERVICES
This task will be used if additional design or construction services are required that are not
described in Tasks 500, 600, and 700 above.
3.0 PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS
The following assumptions are incorporated into the scope of services as presented by the
City of Bremerton in our discussed with the City on October 14, 2003, and in follow-up phone
and e-mail correspondence.
1, The term "final state of completion", used in relation to completion of designs and final
bidding and construction documents, shall mean: A state of completion acceptable to
City of Bremerton Page 8
West 580 Pressure Zone - Scope of Services
November 24 2003
the City, sealed and signed by a professional engineer registered in the State of
Washington, suitable for project approval by the Washington State Department of
Health, and suitable for bidding and construction as a public work.
2. The City shall provide all available existing engineering drawings to URS in both digital
and plotted formats; all other available documentation and calculations shall be
provided to URS in the form currently available.
3. URS shall accept and use as-is the following documents that have been completed,
sealed and signed by other professional engineers:
a. Geotechnical Report, West 580 Pressure Zone, Bremerton Water System,
Bremerton, Washinqton, HWA Proiect 97102, as Revised October 3, 2002;
HWA Geosciences, Inc.
b. West 580 Pressure Zone Improvements, Pump Station 8, Structural
Calculations, October 2001, Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc.
c. West 580 Pressure Zone Improvements Final Route and Site
Recommendation, January 1999, Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc.
d. Such other directly related work products as may be provided by the City,
which have been completed and certified by other professional engineers or
land surveyors.
4. The City has completed the SEPA process and has received a Determination of Non-
significance for all three components of this project.
5. A surface water Technical Information Report (TLR) is not included in the scope of
work. We understand a TlR is not required by the City of Bremerton for these projects.
URS will include storm water provisions in the pump station design as per the City of
Bremerton's direction. URS shall prepare Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation
Control (TESC) drawings and specifications for Pump Station 2A and the Transmission
Line.
6. Construction staking and surveying will be provided by the City.
7. Special inspections including but not limited to geotechnical testing, soils compaction,
concrete and asphalt testing, and structural testing including weld inspections are not
included in this proposal.
8. This Scope does not include temporary or permanent easement descriptions or
acquisitions.
9. URS shall prepare separate project manuals for Pump Station 2A and the
Transmission Main Projects. The City of Bremerton shall provide Divisions 0 and 1
information including necessary documents, standard forms, and special provisions for
bidding purposes.
10. Existing transmission main plan/profile drawings from Pump Station 2A to the
proposed West 580 reservoir will be used in the Pre-Design Report. The drawings will
come from the KCM draft final Pre-Design Report, KCM's Transmission Main drawing
file and Apex Engineering's plan/profile's for the Corporate Campus Parkway
transmission main installation.
City of Bremerton Page 9
West 580 Pressure Zone - Scope of Services
November 24 2003
11. Water demand to the West 580 Pressure Zone will be supplied by the City of Port
Orchard during the initial zone development. Pump Station 2A will only provide
supplemental water (350 gpm) to the City of Port Orchard.
12. The meters at the intertie will be a radio read meter and not part of a SCADA system.
4.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
The design schedule for water improvements in the West 580 Pressure Zone is presented
below. The dates shown are delivery dates to the City by close of business.
· Final West 580 Pressure Zone Pre-design Report and D.O.H. Project Approval Report-
Submit on January 23, 2004. Submittal date is based on URS receiving all draft final
comments no later than January 7, 2004.
· Transmission Main and Intertie/Meter - 90% Review Set (Drawings and Specifications):
Submit on March 4, 2004. This date assumes the hydraulic analysis, can be completed by
this date. Bid-Ready 100% complete drawings and specifications will be submitted on
April 1, 2004.
· Pump Station 2A- 90% Review Set (Drawings and Specifications): Submit on March 18,
2004. Bid-Ready 100% complete drawings and specifications will be submitted on April
16, 2004.
Attachment 1
List of documents provided to URS Corporation by the City of Bremerton
· 50% Engineers Cost Estimate, West Pressure Zone improvements, Pump Station No. 2,
Aug, 31,2001
· City of Bremerton, Department of Community Development, Determination of
Nonsignificance, July 30, 2002.
· Contract Document for West 540 Pressure Zone Improvements SW Clifton Road
Transmission and Distribution Mains, Project R6235102.
1. Biological Assessment for West 580 Pressure Zone Improvements, Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc.,
July 12, 2002.
2. Biological Assessment for West 580 Pressure Zone Improvements, Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc.,
July 5, 2002. RCE review comments included.
3. West 580 Pressure Zone Improvements Transmission Main - P.S. 2A to Campus Lane,
90% submittal Contract Documents, Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. April 2002.
4. West 580 Pressure Zone Improvements Transmission Main - P.S. 2A, 90% submittal
Contract Documents - Div. 16 & 17 Only, Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc., January 2002
5. West 580 Pressure Zone Improvements Pump Station 2A, 90% submittal Contract
Documents, Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc., December 2002.
6. West 580 Pressure Zone Predesign Report and Final Route and Site Recommendation
Final Draft Report, Tetra Tech/KCM, inc., inc., December 2002.
7. Geotechnical Report West 580 Pressure Zone, Bremerton, Water System, HWA
Geosciences, Inc. Feb. 9, 2001.
City of Bremerton Page 10
West 580 Pressure Zone - Scope of Services
November 24 2003
8. City of Bremerton 1999 Water System Plan Update, Economic & Engineering Services,
Inc., Feb. 15, 2001.
9. Interlocal Agreement for Cooperative water system Development in the Port Orchard 580
Zone/Bremerton 580 Zone and Plan, January 30, 2002.
12. West 580 Pressure Zone Improvements Pump Station 2A, Structural Calculations, Tetra
Tech/KCM, Inc., October 2001.
13. West 580 Pump Station 2A, Heat Loss, Ventilation & Pump Station Headloss
Calculations, Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc., June 2001.
14. Tech Memo, Electrical Assumptions, No Author, No date.
15. Cla-Val Pressure Relief & Surge Anticipator Valve cut sheet.
16. Apco Swing Check Valve cut sheet.
17. LUH Horizontal Blower Heater cut sheet.
18. Greenheck Sidewall Propeller Fan cut sheet.
19. Electrical Panel, Conduit, equipment cut sheets.
20. Campus Parkway Vault notes.
21. Cla-Val Pressure Reducing Valve cut sheet.
22. Fantech FX' series Fan cut sheet.
23. Electrical Panel, Conduit, equipment cut sheets.
24. Memo, QA review - West 580 Pressure Zone - Pump Station 2A, Allen Bellew, Tetra
Tech/KCM, Inc., February 18, 2002.
25. West 580 Pump Station 2A, Heat Loss, Ventilation & Pump Station Headloss
Calculations, Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc., June 2001.
26. Memo, QA review - West 580 Pressure Zone - Pump Station 2A, Chris Schumacher,
Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc., February 5, 2002.
27. Chromalox LUH Horizontal Blower Heater Quote & cut sheet.
28. US Pipe & Foundry, Ductile Iron Pipe & Fittings estimating prices, July 11, 2001.
29. GO systems, Inc., Cla-Val estimating prices & cut sheets.
30. GA Industries, Inc., Surge Anticipation Valve, estimate, to KCM, June 12, 1998.
31. Flow serve Corporation, Byron Jackson pump estimate & cut sheet, Jan. 13, 1998.
34. Site Map of PS 2
38. Meeting Minutes, Design Criteria Meeting, 540 & 650 Pump Station Layout & Piping, City
of Bremerton & KCM, Dec. 18, 1997.
39. Memo, Pump Station Description, Alien Bellew, KCM, Jan. 21, 1998.
40. Memo, Pump Station Questions, Allen Bellew, KCM, Jan. 7, 1998.
41. Water Specialties Corp., Water meter Quotes, Jan. 15, 1998.
42. Notes on Tetra Tech Engr. Pad, Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc., Dec. 13, 2000.
43. Electric Motor Heat Gain Table, 26.10, 1993 Fundamentals Handbook.
44. Memo, Pump Station Description, Allen Bellew, KCM, Jan. 21, 1998.
45. Memo, Pump Station Changes, Allen Bellew, KCM, Nov. 3, 1998.
46. Water Specialties, Model ML-04 cut sheets, May 5, 1999.
47. Water Specialties, Model ML-08 cut sheets, May 5, 1999.
48. Byron Jackson Pump Outline Dimensions cut sheet.
49. Water Specialties, Water meter spec sheets, May 20, 1999.
50. West 540 Pump Curves for Byron Jackson Pumps, Jan. 7, 1998.
51. Cla-Val Sizing Guide, Air & Vac. Release Valve.
52. Cla-Val Pressure Relief & Surge Anticipation Valve cut sheet.
53. Memo, Pump Station Description, Allen Bellew, KCM, Jan. 21, 1998.
City of Bremerton Page 11
West 580 Pressure Zone - Scope of Services
November 24 2003
55. KCM 60% design drawings (4) 650 Pressure Zone.
56. BW/IP International, Inc., Type MQ Deepwell Bowl Assemblies.
57. BW/IP International, Inc., 12 MQL Vert. Pump Curves.
58. Water Specialties Corporation, Estimate 150 psi Option, Jan. 15, 1998
59. KCM, Pump Cooling Ventilation Air Calculation, Jan. 13, 1998
60. KCM, Heating Calculation, Jan. 21, 1998
61. 609.8 Low Pressure Cutoff Required Booster Pumps for Water Distribution System
62. Flowserve Corporation, Pump Information, Jan. 13, 1998
63. Memo, Pump Station Description, Allen Bellew, KCM, Jan. 21, 1998.
64. Construction Cost Estimate, Jan. 12, 1999
65. KCM, West 650 Pressure Zone Development, Pump Station No. 8, Pump Cost Estimate,
Jan 11,1998.
66. GC Systems, Inc., Valve Cut Sheets, Jan. 23,1998
67. Memo, Bremerton 540 and 650 Pump Station Changes, Allen Bellew, KCM, Nov. 3, 1998.
68. BW/IP International, Inc., 11"-Type MQ "L" Pump Curve
69. Equipment Table 1, Ventilation.
70. Info Memm on Pump Station Flowmetering and Soft Start, Tom Baker, Dec. 22, 1997
71. KCM Telephone Conversation Record, Mike D, 650 and 540 Zone
72. Technical Systems Incorporated, Propeller Meter Info Sheets, Jan. 14, 1998
73. KCM, 650 zone Booster Pump Station Plan (2) copies.
74. KCM Budget pricing, Jan, 22, 1998, Jarett.
75. KCM Budget pricing, Jan, 22, 1998, Allen Bellows.
76. KCM Telephone Conversation Record, Jack Boyde of GE Systems, 8" PVC, Allan B.
77. KCM, 540 zone Booster Pump Station Plan.
78. Water Specialties Corporation, Estimate 300 psi Version of Quote for the City of
Bremerton, Jan. 15, 1998.
79. Memo, Pump Station Questions, Allen Bellew, KCM, Jan. 07, 1998.
80. Meeting Minutes, Meeting on Design Criteria - Pump Station Layout and Piping, Dec. 18,
1997.
81. Montgomery Watson, Corrosion Control and Fluorination Facility, Oct. 1997.
82. Meeting Minutes: Design Criteria Meeting, Instrumentation Controls, City of Bremerton,
KCM & EISI, Dec. 11, 1997
83. Engineered Fluids, Inc., Past Projects and References.
84. Engineered Fluids, Inc., Water Booster Pump Station & Below Ground Controlled
Environment Vaults cut sheet.
85. ANSI-ISO-IEC Catalog, May 26, 1999.
86. Sketch of booster pump system, Jan. 16, 1998.
87. Part of Chapter 7 of a Preliminary Design Report on Pump Station.
88. ASME/ANSl B16.1-1989, Cast Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings.
89. CLA-Val, Flange Dimensions and End Details, Jun. 1, 1999.
90. KCM Telephone Conversation Record with GC System, May 27, 1999.
91. U.S. Pipe and Foundry Company, Information on Flange Ratings, May 26, 1999.
92. KCM Telephone Conversation Record with U.S. Pipe and Foundry Company, May 26,
1999.
93. Flowserve, Model 11 MQL Vert cut sheet, May 24, 1999.
94. Flowserve, Commercial VLT Outline Dimensions Style SH & Type MQ Deepwell Bowl
Assemblies cut sheet, May 24, 1999.
95. ANSI/AWWA C151/A21.51-91, Ductile-Iron Pipe, Centrifugally Cast, for Water or other
Liquids, ANSI/AWWA C153/A21.53-94, Ductile-Iron Compact Fittings 3 in. through 24 in. (76
mm. through 610 mm.) and 54 in. through 64 in. (1400 mm. Through 1600 mm.), for Water
Service, ANSI/AVVVVA Cl15/A21.15-94, Flange Ductile-Iron Pipe with Ductile-Iron or Gray-
City of Bremerton Page 12
West 580 Pressure Zone - Scope of Services
November 24 2003
Iron Threaded Flanges, ANSI/AWW Cl10/A21.10-93, Ductile Iron and Gray-Iron Fittings, 3 in.
through 48 in. (75 mm. through 1200 mm.), for Water and Other Liquids.
96. U.S. Pipe and Foundry Company, B16.1 vs B16.42 Flanges, May 26, 1999.
97. FIowserve, Model 11 MQL Vert cut sheet, Commercial VLT Outline Dimensions Style SH
& Type MQ Deepwell Bowl Assemblies cut sheet, May 24, 1999.
98. BW/IP International, Inc, Vertical Process Pumps brochure.
99. GC Systems Incorporated, True Pre-Assembled Pre-Tested Packaged Systems brochure.
100. Record of Conversation with U.S. Pipe and Foundry Company, Class 125 price change.
City of Bremerton COST SUMMARY
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Design and Construction Management Services
Total Direct Labor Total Other Total
Task Description Hours Labor Multiplier Labor Direct Cost Cost
Preliminary Review and Project
Management 80 $ 3,040 2.8 $ 8,512 $ 90 $ 8,602
TOTAL TASK100 80 $ 3,040 $ 8,512 $ 90 $ 8,602
Data Collection and Review 80 $ 2,140 2.8 $ 5,992 $ $ 5,992
TOTAL TASK200 80 $ 2,140 $ 5,992 $ $ 5,992
Report Completion 110 $ 3,620 2.8 $ 10,136 $ 200 $ 10,336
TOTAL TASK 300 110 $ 3,620 $ 10,136 $ 200 $ 10,336
Report Completion 31 $ 1,112 2.8 $ 3,114 $ 100 $ 3,214
TOTAL TASK 400 31 $ 1,112 $ 3,114 $ 100 $ 3,214
510 Design Completion 756 $ 23,918 2.8 $ 66,970 $ 200 $ 67,170
520 Bidding Assistance 30 $ 1,104 2.8 $ 3,091 $ 30 $ 3,121
530 Construction Support 242 $ 8,678 2.8 $ 24,298 $ 400 $ 24,698
TOTAL TASK S00 1028 $ 33,700 $ 94,360 $ 630 $ 94,990
610 Design Completion 234 $ 7,320 2.8 $ 20,496 $ 200 $ 20,696
620 Bidding Assistance 22 $ 800 2.8 $ 2,240 $ 30 $ 2,270
630 Construction Support 136 $ 5,148 2.8 $ 14,414 $ 210 $ 14,624
TOTAL TASK 600 392 $ 13,268 $ 37,150 $ 440 $ 37,590
710 Design Completion 150 $ 5,216 2.8 $ 14,605 $ 130 $ 14,735
720 Bidding Assistance
730 Construction support
TOTAL TASK 700 150 $ 5,216 $ 14,605 $ 130 $ 14,735
Additional Services $ 15,000
TOTAL TASK 800 $ 15,000
12/2/2003 ~,,_~ URS CORPORATION
!SUMMARY
Total Direct Labor Total Other Total
Task Description Hours Labor Multiplier Labor Direct Cost Cost
Task 100 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 80 $ 3,040 2.8 $ 8,512 $ 90 $ 8,602
Tack200 DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW 80 $ 2,140 2.8 $ 5,992 $ $ 5,992
OF PROJECT CALCS AND
DOCUMENTS
Task300 COMPLETtON OF THE WEST 580 110 $ 3,620 2.8 $ 10,136 $ 200 $ 10,336
PRESSURE ZONE PRE-DESIGN
REPORT
Task400 COMPLETION OF THE 31 $ 1,112 2.8 $ 3,114 $ 100 $ 3,214
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
PROJECT APPROVAL REPORT
Task 500 PUMP STATION No. 2A* DESIGN 1028 $ 33,700 2.8 $ 94,360 $ 630 $ 94,990
AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Task 600 TRANSMISSION WATER MAIN - 392 $ 13,268 2.8 $ 37,150 $ 440 $ 37,590
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES
Task 700 INTERTIE & MASTER METER 150 $ 5,216 2.8 $ 14,605 $ 130 $ 14,735
BETWEEN PORT ORCHARD AND
CITY OF BREMERTON
Task 800 ADDITIONALSERVlCES - $ 15,000
TOTAL 1871 $ 62,096 $ 173,869 $ 1,590 $ 190,459
PM Total $ 8,602
Tasks 200/300/400 $ 19,542
Design Total $ 102,601
Bidding Total $ 5,391
Construction Total $ 39,323
Additional Services $ 15,000
TOTAL $ 190,459
12/2/2003 ~ URS COF:PORATION
City of Bremerton TASKS 100, 200, 300 & 400
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Completion of Pre-Design and DOH Project Approval Reports
~ ~ ~ w w -~ -~-~ ° w
.- ~ .~ ~ =
= o o o ~
c~ a. 03 03 -~ co ,-, 03 < ~ 03 o ~ Subtotals
Task No. Description ;38.00 3;8.00 42.00 36.50 25.00 3t.50 23.50 45,00 38.00 45.50 36.00 25.00 16.00 DirectRate
Project Management 8 8
Hours 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Direct Labor Cos~ 304 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 304
Data Collection and Ra¥iew 16 8 3 24 13 8 S0
Hours 0 t6 8 8 24 0 0 16 S 0 0 0 0 80
DirsctkaborCos~ 0 608 336 292 600 0 0 304 0 0 0 0 $ 2,140
Respond to Comments 4 S 2 14
Conduct Transient ^nalysis 40 40
Hnaliza Report Drawings 16 18
Finaliza Report {incl. aA) 4 4 24 S 40
Hour~ 4 8 32 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 16 10 110
DirectkaborCoa~ 152 304 ~344 0 0 1260 0 0 0 0 400 160 $ 3,620
O.D.C.'$ (reproduction] $ 200
Respond to Commants 4 I 5
Finalize Report 24 2 26
Hours 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 31
Direct Labor Cost 0 1064 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 $ 1,t12
O.D.C.s (reproduction) $ 100
SUMMARY
Task 100 $ 304
Task 200 $ 2,140
Task 300 $ 3,620
Task 400 $ 1,112
TOTAL - DIRECT LABOR $ 7,176
TOTAL O.D.C.'S $ 300
12/2/2003 ~ URS CORPORATION
City of Bremerton TASKS 100 AND 500
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Design and Construction Management Services for Pump Station 2A
~ ~ ~ w w
Project Management 28 28
Kick off workshop 8
Meetings at Ci~ (2 to~l) 16 18
Hours 28 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52
Dire~LaborCosl 1064 912 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 1,978
O.D.C.'s (traveF~ $ 90
5~0 Design Completion
Drawing ~mpletion to 100% 24 56 16 32 20 52 40 48 216 504
Specifi~tions 16 4 16 8 8 16 8 40 16 13;
C~t Estimate 8 4 4 8 4 2~
QNQC Review 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2~
Prepare Final Bid Documents 24 24 16 ~
Hours 4 28 84 28 48 36 ~ ' 68 ~ ~ 240 32 75(
DirectLa~r~st 152 10~ 3528 1022 1200 11~ 1410 2584 2880 2304 ~00 ~0 $ 23,918
O.D.C.'s (reproduction) $ 200
520 Bidding ~istance
Attend Pre-Bid Conferen~ 8 8
Pre.re 2 Addenda 16 2 18
Bid Review/Award ~sis~n~ 4 4
Hours 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 30
Direct ~r Cost 0 10~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40~ $ 1,104
O.D.C.'S (travel) ' $ 30
530 Construction Suppo~
Pre-Construction Conferen~ 8 8
Site Visi~ (5 ea) 8 8 8 8 8 40
Proje~ M~tings (5 ea) 40 40
Respond to RFIs (10 ea} 2 2 2 2 2 10
Submit~i/Shop Dwg. Review 24 16 16 8 ~
Change Order Assistance 16 8 8 32
Prepare Re.rd Drawings 24 24
Commissioning Support 16 8 24
Hours 0 72 10 34 8 42 0 26 26 0 24 ~ 242
Direct Labor C~t 0 2736 420 1241 200 1323 0 988 1170 0 600 C $ 8,678
O.D.C.'s (travel} $ 400
SUMMARY
Task 100 $ 1,976
Task 500 $ 33,700
Sub-Task 510 $ 23,918
Sub-Task 520 $ 1,104
Sub-Task 530 $ 8,678
TOTAL - PUMP STATION NO. 2A - DIRECT LABOR $ 35,676
TOTAL O.D.C.'S $ 7:20
12,2/2003 ~ URS CORPORATION
City of Bremerton TASKS 100 AND 600
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Design and Construction Management Services for Transmission Water Main
o~ . w w ~ ~
.- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[L a. co co ~ co -~ ~: ,'~ u~ o ~ Subtotals
Task No. Description 38.00 38.00 42.00 36.50 25.00 31.50 23.50 38.00 45.00 36.00 25.00 20.0¢ Direct Rate
Project Management 12 12
Hours 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O! 12
Direct Labor Cost 456 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 $ 456
610 Design CompIstion
Drawing completion to 100% 40 108 146
Specifications 18 24 12 62
Cost Estimate 8 8
QNQC Review 2 8 10
Prepare Final Bid Documents 8 8 16
Hours 2 8 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 108 20 234
Direct Labor Cost 76 304 2688 0 0 0 0 0 0 1152 2700 400 $ 7,320
O.D.C.'s (reproduction) $ 200
620 Bidding Assistance
Attend Pre-Bid Conference 8 8
Prepare Two Addenda 12 2 14
Hours 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22
Direct Labor Cost 0 760 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 $ 800
O.D.C.'s (travel) $ 30
630 Construction Support
Pre-Construction Conference 8 8
Site Visits (3 ea.) 16 8 24
Project Meetings (3 ea.) 16 8 24
Respond to RFIs (10) 20 2(3
Submittal/Shop Dwg. Review 24 24
Prepare Record Drawings 20
Change Order Assistance 16 16
Hours 0 56 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 136
Direct Labor Cost 0 2128 2520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 0 $ 5,148
O.D.C.'s (travel) $ 210
SUMMARY
Task 100 $ 456
Task 600 $ 13,268
Sub-Task 610 $ 7,320
Sub-Task 620 $ 800
Sub-Task 630 $ 5,148
TOTAL - TRANSMISSION WATER MAIN - DIRECT LABOR $ 13,724
TOTAL O.D,C.'s $ 440
1 2003 uRs coRPo T O
City of Bremerton TASKS 100 AND 700
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Design and Construction Management Services for the Intertie and Master Meter
r~ 03 W UJ
= = ~ LU UJ -~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < · ~ 0 ~ Subtotals
Task No, DescHption 38.00 38.00 42.00 36,50 25.00 31,50 23.50 38.00 45,00 36.00 25.00 20.0~ Direct Rate
Project Management 8 8
Hours 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Direct Labor ~sl 304 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ $ 304
7~0 ~l~n Compl~tion
~mwin~ mmptotion to ~ 00% 32 ~ ~ ~0 ~ Og
Site Visit 8
Spec~cations 4 8 8 4 24
~st Estimate 4 4
~QC Review 2 4 6
Prepare Final Bid Documents 0
Hours 2 4 40 0 0 0 0 0 32 8 60 4 150
Direct LaborCosl 76 152 1680 0 0 0 0 0 1440 288 1500 8~ $ 5,216
O.D.C,'s (repodu~ion and travel $ 130
720 Bidding ~slstance Included under Sub-Task 620
730 Construction SuppoA Included under Sub-Task 630
SUMMARY
Task 100 $ 304
Task 700 $ 5,216
TOTAL - INTERTIE AND MASTER METER - DIRECT LABOR $ 5,520
TOTAL O.D.C. S $ 130
12/2/2003 ~¢ URS CORPORATION
City of Bremerton TASK 800'
West 580 Pressure Zone Upgrades
Additional Services
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( · m ~ Subtotals
Task No. Des~ipfion 38.00 38.00 42.00 36.50 25.00 31.50 23.~ 38.00 45.00 36.00 25.00 20.0~ Direct Rate
Additional Se~ices $15,000
SUMM~Y
Task 800 $ ~5,000
12/2/2003 ~)~ URS CORPORATION
DATE SUBMITTED: BILL #
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON q
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: mesotuuon to rat~Iy
men&ents to Count~ide Plying CO~CIL MEET~G Date: December l~2003
Policies as adopted by the Kitsap County Dep~ment: Comm. Development
Board of Commissioners Presenter: C~s Hugo
Phone: 473-5243
SUMMARY: The Kitsap Co~t~ide Plying Policies (CPPs) were originally adopted and ratified
by all Kitsap County local gove~ents in 1992 pursuant to RCW 36.70A.210. ~ August, 2001, the
CPPs were subsequently amended according to proced~es of the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council. The 2003 amendments were developed over the past two yems to address the remaining
policy issues that were not considered in the 2001 amen~ents. This proposal is the result of
considerable work of the ~CC Policy Bored and its supposing tec~ical committees. Following
public he~ng, the Kitsap Co~ty Commissioners made a preliminary approval of the ~CC
proposed amendments on Nov. 24, 2003, with minor revisions. Under ~CC procedures, rmification
of the amendments is required of all pa~icipating jurisdictions. Representatives of the Breme~on City
Council and the Mayor p~icipated in the long ~d extensive deliberations that produced these
proposes amendments.
ATTACHMENTS: Kitsap Count~ide Plying Policies with proposed amen~ents as fo~mded
by ~CC to the Kitsap County Bo~d of Commissioners for focal adoption by ordinmce, scheduled
on December 15th, 2003.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted ~ount): The proposed men~ents to Count~ide
Planning policies have no shog-te~ fiscal impacts on City operations but offer long-te~ prospects
for the City's fiscal improvement
APPROVALS:
DEP~TMENT D~CTOR:
CITY ATTO~Y: ~ ~:~~
F~ANCE DI~CTOR:
FISCAL/BUDGET: /'-~
-
OPE~TIONS:
~COMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve Resolution ~ ~ ~ I ~ to ratify the Kitsap
Co~t~ide Plying Policies with 2003 mendments as adopted by the ~tsap County Bo~d of
Commissioners on D~cemb¢r 15, 2003.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
3o
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, approving and ratifying the adoption of
the 2003 proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning
Policies as recommended by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council and adopted by the Kitsap County Board of
Commissioners.
WHEREAS, under provisions of the Growth Management Act of the State of
Washington, specifically RCW 36.70A.210, the legislative authority of a county planning under
RCW 36.70A.040 shall adopt a county-wide planning policy in cooperation with the cities
located in whole or in part within the county; and
WHEREAS, a "county-wide planning policy" is a written policy statement or
statements used solely for establishing a county-wide framework from which county and city
comprehensive plans are developed and adopted; and
WHEREAS, by interlocal agreement among Kitsap County and the incorporated
cities within the county, the Kitsap Regional Planning Council (KRPC) was convened for the
purpose of establishing a collaborative process to provide a framework for the adoption of a
county-wide planning policy pursuant to RCW 36.70A.210 (2) (a); and
WHEREAS, in 1992 the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners adopted
Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) upon the recommendation of KRPC; and
WHEREAS, in August, 2001, the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners
adopted the first amendments to the CPPs as recommended by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council (KRCC); and
WHEREAS, for over two years since August, 2001, the member jurisdictions of
KRCC worked collaboratively to address the remaining policy issues that were not addressed in
the 2001 amendments; and
WHEREAS, 2003 proposed amendments to the CPPs were developed through a
collaborative, multi-jurisdictional process through KRCC, including review by elected officials
and staff from Kitsap County, the Cities of Bremerton, Bainbridge Island, Port Orchard and
Poulsbo, the Suquamish and Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribes, the US Navy, the Port of Bremerton,
and Kitsap Transit; written public comment was solicited and received by KRCC from April 8
through May 31, 2003; and KRCC held well-attended public hearings on May 6 and May 22,
2003; and
WHEREAS, a set of 2003 CPP amendments were recommended through the
KRCC process in a series of actions between June 3 and October 7, 2003; and
Countywide Planning Policies
WHEREAS, the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners with appropriate SEPA
review made a preliminary adoption of the KRCC recommendations with two minor revisions on
November, 24, 2003; and
WHEREAS, at the KRCC meeting of December 2, 2003, the Board of County
Commissioners withdrew one of the minor revisions and the Policy Board concurred with the
second; and
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners
adopted the 2003 proposed amendments to CPPs as recommended by final action of KRCC on
December 2nd; and
WHEREAS, it is in the City's interest for quality urban growth to approve and
ratify the 2003 amendments as adopted by the Board of Commissioners; NOW THEREFORE;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION1. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.210, the City Council hereby approves
and ratifies the adoption of the 2003 proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies
as recommended by the KRCC and adopted by the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners.
SECTION2. Severabilit~. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this __
day of ,2003.
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk
R:\LEGALXResolutions\Countywide Planning Policies.doc
2
3~- Countywide Planning Policies
Adopted Revisions to Kitsap Count3~vide Planning Policy - October 7, 2003
Attached are revisions to update the Kitsap Cotmtywide Planning Policies adopted by the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council in a series of actions between June 3 and October 7, 2003. These revisions were adopted
by the FLitsap County Board of Commissioners on November 24, 2003, and will be an ordinance December 8,
2003. These revisions are now forwarded To the City and Tribal Councils for ratification.
It is also expected that six other elements will be (further) revised at the first January 2004 meeting of the
KRCC Policy Board:
Introduction will be amended to clarify the ratification and update processes for the
Countywide Planning Policy.
Element A: Urban Growth Areas may be divided into two sections:
Element A: Countywide Growth Patterns
Element B: Urban Growth Areas
Element A, Sections 9 & 10: Master Planned Resorts and Fully Contained Communities may be
combined and amended to highlight policies that are in addition to the State Growth Management Act.
Element I: Economic Development may be amended to include strategies to measure the effectiveness
of economic development efforts.
Element F: Public Capital Facilities may be amended to clarify the types of essential capital facilities
that require a formal facility siting process.
Element J: Fiscal Impact may be amended to make the analysis of fiscal impact discretionary or the
element may be eliminated.
The chart on the following page shows the actual and anticipated dates of adoption by the KRCC with subsequent
adoption and ratification by the County and Cities and Tribes (respectively).
The Kitsap Countywide Plann~g Policies are the fi~amework for growth management in Kitsap CoLmty. Under the
Growth Management Act, the Puget Sound Region is defined as King, Kitsap, Snohomish and Pierce Counties.
The Puget Sound Regional Council is responsible for developing the four-county regional transportation and land
use vision. The Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies tailor the Puget Sound Regional Council's regional growth
management guidelines to Kitsap County and are the policy fiamework for the County's and the Cities'
comprehensive plans. The Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies address 15 separate elements, ranging fiom urban
growth areas to affordable housing.
Countywide Planning Policies are required by the Growth Management Act and may be appealed (only) by
Cities and the Governor of Washington. The policy revisions (attached) were developed through a multi-
jurisdictional collaboration sponsored by KRCC among: Kitsap County, the Cities of Bremerton, Bainbridge
Island, Port Orchard & Poulsbo, the Suquamish & Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribes, the Navy, the Port of
Bremerton, and Kitsap Transit. Kitsap County is lead agency for its environmental review.
Written public comment was solicited and received fxom April 8 through May 31, 2003. KRCC held a well-
attended public hearing on May 6, continued to May 22 in the evening. Revisions to the document as presented
for public comment were coordinated by KRCC.
Please direct additional questions to Mary McClure, Executive Director, Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
at (360) 377-4900.
Proposed Revisions:
Countywide Planning Policies
Proposed KRCC
Proposed Revisions to Element: Revision Status: Adoption by
(New) Overview On hold Kitsap County
Introduction Clarify ratification process 2/03/04
CPP 5 year update cycle
~ Countywide Growth Pattern 2/03/04
A: UGA's Section 1: Process and Criteria for Establishing, Expanding & ~¢am~jn~
Adjustin~ UGA's ~ g~ ~ ~:
A: UGA's Section 2: Coordinated Growth Management in UGA's
A: UGA's Section 3: Poj~lation Distribution
A: UGA's Section 4: Master Planned Resorts & Fully Contained 2/03/04
Communities
1
B: Centers Re-worked; designate Silverdale
& SKIA ~
C: Rural Land Uses & Development Kitsap Transit reviews transit
Patterns LOS; Clarify "transportation
hubs" ~ ~'~ ~
D: Open Space, Resource Protection, & No change ....
Critical Areas
E: Contiguous & Orderly Development Add broadband for long range
F: Public Capital Facilities Clarification of_~EL 2/03/04
Add safe school walking routes;
G: Transportation PSRC to review transportation I~
_plans, not KRCC
Add consideration of Navy
H: Affordable Housing housing
I: Coordination of Planning Delete entire section: redundant
~ I: Economic Development Add broadband consideration 2/03/04
t4 J: Fiscal Impact Shall -> may 2/03/04
g K: Coordinate with Tribal Condense and clarify.
Governments
L: Coordinate with Fed Government Added coordinated planning with ,
M: Roles & Resp_._~nsibilities KRCC role clarified
Appendix A: Revenue Sharing [LA Adopted December, 2001 ....
(New) Appendix B: UGA Management Elements of UGAMA's
Agreements :
2
Element B: CENTERS OF GROWTH
Cemers are intended to be compact and centralized working, shopping and/or activity areas linked to other Centers
by transit. Centers and their boundaries shall be locally determined by the County and the Cities where a
community-wide focal point can be provided, significant population and/or employment growth can be located, and
the increased use of transit, walking and bicycling can be supported. Designated Centers define the pattern of
future residential and commercial/industrial growth in Kitsap County. In decisions relating to population growth
and resource allocation supi~orting growth, Centers have a high priority.
1. The Puget Sound Regional Council has defined several types of Regional Centers within Urban
Growth Areas in the four-county planning region, with planning guidelines (Vision 2020, Appendix
1). In Kitsap County, the following centers are applicable:
a. Regional Centers of Growth:
i. Metropolitan Center: Bremerton including the Bremerton Naval complex. "Metropolitan Centers
function as anchors within the region for a high density mix of business, residential, public, cultural
and recreational uses, and day and night activity. They are characterized by their historic role as the
central business districts of the major cities within the central Puget Sound region, providing
services for and easily accessible to a population well beyond their city limits. Metro Centers may
also serve national or international roles." (Vision 2020)
ii. Urban Center: Silverdale Urban Core. In Kitsap County, Urban Centers are areas with the
comprehensive planning to support a wide range of commercial, housing, and cultural choices. All
areas of the Urban Center are serviced by transit throughout the day and much of the area is within
walking or bicycling distance. Significant at in-fill opportunities exist with the highest residential,
commercial, and employment densities expected.
b. RegionalManufacturing/IndustrialCenters: South Kitsap industrial Area. "Regional
Manufacturing/Industrial Centers are major, existing regional employment areas of intensive,
concentrated manufacturing and industrial land uses which cannot be easily mixed at higher densities
with other uses. To preserve land at these centers for manufacturing, industry and related uses, large
retail uses or non-related offices are discouraged. Provision of adequate public facilities and services,
including good access to the region's transportation system, is very important to the success of
manufacturing/industrial centers." (Vision 2020)
2. The following are other types of centers within Kitsap County:
a. Town or City Centers are usually the existing downtown core ora city or Urban Growth Area. There is
an abundant mix of shopping, service, employment, and cultural opportunities. Multifamily housing
may be intermixed and single family housing may be within walking or bicycling distance. Infill should
include mixed use and higher densities surrounding the Town Center.
b. Mixed Use Centers are a generic category that can be described in terms of neighborhoods or districts.
The designation represents a commitment to plarming for Center development, with a planned mix of
housing, commercial, and employment opportunities. Most shopping and commercial uses are within a
short walking or bicycling distance of housing. There is a higher proportion of multi-family housing at
relatively high densities. Navy facilities could be considered for this designation.
3
c. Activity and Employment Centers are areas of concentrated employment and are a magnet for
significant numbers of people usually during daytime hours because of business and/or manufacturing
activities. They may be located outside of Urban Growth Areas, consistent with the Growth
Management Act. Industrial and business parks and Navy employment centers are in this category.
Within Urban Growth Areas, the opportunity to include a proportional residential element should be
determined on a case-by-case basis, considering the unique geography and economics of the area.
d. Transportation Hubs aro locations of regional inter~modal connection that may be located outside of
Urban Growth Areas. Examples are ferry terminals, the Bremerton National Airport, or certain transit
stations.
3. For purposes of distributing countywide transportation funding, a process and criteria should be
developed and coordinated through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council. The following should
be incladed:
Current or programmed transportation resources (including roads, transit,
bicycle, pedestrian)
Balance of employment opportunities with residential
Proximity and connectivity among jobs, housing, retail services
Types and density of residential uses
Inclusion of affordable housing
Provision of community gathering space, parks, and cultural opportunities
Element C. RURAL LAND USES AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
Rural areas of Kitsap County are characterized as having a variety of parcel sizes, with a diversity of land use
activities. These areas also contain significant amounts of complex natural systems. It is a high priority to
preserve and enhance the rural character of these areas. Counties are responsible for designating and regulating
rural areas through the comprehensive planning process. However, rural preservation is a regional issue and it
is important to coordinate these planning objectives with the Cities.
1. The following policies relate to preserving rural character and enhancing the natural environment.
a. Preserve the character of identified rural areas by protecting and enhancing the natural environment,
open space and recreational opportunities, and scenic and historic areas; supporting small-scale farming
and forestry uses; and permitting low-density residential living and cluster development maintained by
rural levels of service. Support Rural Communities as locations for a mix of housing types, rural levels
of service, cultural activities, and employment that serves the needs of rural areas.
b. This policy is not intended to preclude the future designation of Urban Growth Areas.
2. The following policies relate to preserving rural land use and development patterns:
a. Rural Communities are already-existing residential and commercial areas of more intensive rural
development designated in the Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan under RCW 36.70A.070.5.In-fill is
expected. Rural Communities should be serviced by transportation providers and other services
consistent with the Levels_ of Service adopted by Kitsap County for roads and by Kitsap Transit for
transit upon their designation as an area of more intensive rural development.
b. Transportation Hubs may be located within existing areas of more intensive development. Walking,
bicycling, and transit are the major forms of travel. Transportation Hubs are locations of regional
intermodal connection Examples are ferry terminals and transit stations with convenience services.
c. The County shall develop criteria consistent with the Growth Management Act for designating future
industrial and commercial development outside of Urban Growth Areas that protect rural character
while encouraging vehicle trip reduction. The criteria should allow for industrial resource-based land use
and recreation and for convenience commercial that is scaled to serve the daily needs of rural residents.
3. The following policies relate to establishing and maintaining rural levels of service:
a. Rural level-of-service standards shall address sewage disposal, water, transportation and other
appropriate services. The standards shall be developed based upon levels of service typically delivered
in rural areas consistent with RCW 36.70A.030 (16).
b. For purpose of trip reduction, develop a range of alternative modes of transportation consistent with
rural levels of service to connect Rural Communities with urban Centers.
c. When sewers need to be extended to solve isolated health, environmental, and sanitation problems, they
shall be designed for limited access so as not to increase the development potential of the surrounding
rural area.
5
4. The following policies relate to conserving small-scale natural resource use in rural areas:
a. Rural land use designations in the County's Comprehensive Plan should support rural uses such as fanning,
forestry, mining, recreation, and other rural activities, and permit a variety of low-density residential uses
which preserve rural character, and can be sustained by rural service levels.
b. The County's Comprehensive Plan policies shall promote clustering residential development and other
techniques to protect and enhance sigrtificant open spaces, natural resources, and critical areas for more
efficient use of thc land. Clustering should not increase residential housing units in the overall area
designated as rural, consistent with designated rural densities. Development clusters shall be designed,
scaled and sited in a manner consistem with rural character and thc provision of rural levels of sendcc.
c. The County's Comprehensive Plan policies shall support Rural Communities as locations of employnaent, a
mix of housing types, and cultural activities for rural areas that primarily function as locations for service
~eeds such as grocery stores, shopping, and community services, and small-scale cottage industries for the
surrounding rural area.
6
Element E. CONTIGUOUS AND ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT
Upon designation of Urban Growth Areas, the County and Cities will need to develop consistent implementation
measures to ensure that development occurs in an orderly and contiguous manner. The intent of the following
coantywide planning policies is to minimize differences in urban development regulations and standards between
the County and the Cities and to facilitate the economical provision of urban services to development.
1. The following policies relate to the encouragement of cooperative inter-jurisdictional planning by
federal, tribal, state, local, and special purpose government:
a. inter_jurisdictional discussion, information exchange, and coordination of proposals shall be initiated as
early and expeditiously as possible by the responsible agencies.
b. Initial inventories and analyses of utilities and public services information are critical to the plarming
process and shall be made available as early and expeditiously as possible by the responsible agencies.
c. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council may establish or designate on-going technical committee(s)
comprised of representatives from utilities and service providers to investigate long-range regional needs
for various facilities and services, including but not limited to those for transportation, sewer and storm
drainage, availability and delivery of potable water, solid waste, broadband, parks and recreation, and
open space.
d. The Countywide Planning Policy will further the implementation of Vision 2020 and Destination 2030
as adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council.
2. The following policies relate to inter-regional coordination of land use and transportation planning:
a. The Connty and the Cities shall participate in the Puget Sound Regional Council and the Peninsula
Regional Transportation Planning Organization.
b. Locally-generated data shall be provided to the Puget Sound Regional Council and the Peninsula
Regional Transportation Planning Organization for use in their coordination of population forecasts,
land use, and transportation.
c. The planning proposals of these regional organizations shall be monitored and adjustments
recommended to ensure that they accurately reflect local needs and plans.
3. The following policies relate to fiscal disparities:
a. It is recognized that fiscal disparities exist as a result of growth and changes in municipal boundaries.
The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall monitor the Revenue Sharing Inter-local Agreement
among the County and Cities (shown as Appendix A) and seek additional_ways to address fiscal
disparities as they relate to promoting coordinated development and the implementation of the Growth
Management Act.
b. The County and the Cities shall work together to insure that all fees associated with development
approval are based upon the real cost of service and act to encourage development within designated
Urban Growth Areas.
c. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating_Council shall sponsor on-going regional discussion on revenue
disparity issues.
7
Element G. TRANSPORTATION
The Growth Management Act requires that transportation planning be coordinated among local and state
jurisdictions. The Growth Management Act further requires that transportation planning be coordinated with
the land use elements of local comprehensive plans. Coordination of land use and transportation plans will
allow Kitsap County and the Kitsap Cities to meet three inter-related transportation goals:
Serve Designated Centers to.reduce sprawl, conserve land and make more efficient tlse of
infrastructure,
o Preserve the natural environment, including water and air quality,
o Provide a balanced system for the efficient, safe movement of people, goods and services among
Designated Centers within Kitsap County and the larger Puget Sound region.
The intent of the following policies is to define appropriate methods and strategies to achieve these goals
through inter-regional and intra-regional coordination among transportation and land use planning agencies.
1. The following policies relate to strategies to optimize and manage the use of transportation facilities
and services:
a. The County and the Cities shall each emphasize the maintenance and preservation of their existing
transportation network.
b. Through an annual review of the Transportation Element of their Comprehensive Plan, the County and
the Cities shall each identify and prioritize operational and safety deficits.
c. The County and the Cities shall utilize Transportation System Management strategies such as right turn
channelization, parking restrictions, traffic signal coordination, and non-motorized transportation
facilities.
d. The County and the Cities should consider access management regulations that provide standards for
driveway spacing and delineation and encourage the joint use of access points where practical.
e. The County and the Cities shall actively seek opportunities to share facilities, expertise, and
transportation resources, such as multiple use park & ride/parking lots or shared traffic signal
maintenance responsibility.
2. Since 1980, the total number of vehicle miles traveled in the Puget Sound Region has grown twice as
fast as employment and four times as fast as population. While it has been fueled by a number of
factors, trying to meet this escalating demand for vehicle travel would require financial resources far
beyond existing funding sources, with substantial negative environmental impacts. The shift of travel
trips from single occupant (SOV) to high occupant vehicles (HOV) and from vehicles to non-
motorized modes will benefit air quality and the level of traffic congestion. The following policies
relate to reducing the rate of growth in auto traffic, including the number of vehicle trips, the number
of miles traveled, and the length of vehicle trips taken, for both commute and non-commute trips:
a. The County and the Cities shall provide both infrastructure and policy incentives to increase the use of
non-SOV modes of travel.
8
b. The range of infrastructure incentives to encourage the use ofnon-SOV modes of travel could include
the following:
i. Provide public transit, including preferential treatments for transit, such as queue by-pass lanes,
traffic signal modifications (Opticom), and safe, properly designed transit stops.
ii. Provide integrated transfer points to facilitate seamless trips between transit and other modes of
travel, particularly at ferry terminals, including park & ride lots, carpool/vanpool .facilities, and
transit advantages in ease of ingress/egress and proximity to actual connection points, and innovative
transit-oriented retail service clusters.
iii. Provide non-recreational bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including safe neighborhood walking and
biking routes to school.
iv. During the development of all state, county, and city highway capacity improvement projects,
consider the market for non-SOV travel, and the addition of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes,
park & ride lots, appropriate infrastructure for both bicycling and walking, and telecommunications
infrastructure.
c. The range of policy incentives to encourage the use of non-SOV modes of travel could include the
following:
i. Increased emphasis on the Commute Trip Reduction Program already in place (including ridesharing
incentives), with Kitsap Transit designated as the lead agency, including program promotion and
monitoring.
ii. Managed parking demand at ferry terminals, employment, and retail centers to discourage SOV use
through privileged parking for HOV users, fee structure and parking space allocations.
iii. Encouraging telecommuting as a viable work alternative.
iv. Encouraging the shift of work and non-work trips to off-peak travel hours.
v. Congestion pricing.
vi. Auto-restricted zones.
vii. Promotion of driver awareness through educational efforts.
d. The County and the Cities shall develop standards that address appropriate bicycle and pedestrian
facilities for development of new streets and reconstruction of existing streets in=Designated Centers and
Rural Communities.
e. Ln Designated Centers, the jurisdictions should complete missing vehicular and n°n-m°t°rized links
between key arterials to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle facilities, without compromising safety
standards.
f. The County and the Cities shall develop coordinated bicycle and pedestrian systems or plans, which
should be consistent across jurisdictional boundaries with particular consideration to providing safe
routes for children to walk and to bike to school.
9
g. in cases of substantial residential or commercial development, Kitsap Transit shall review and comment
on development proposals to facilitate convenient use and operation of appropriate transit services.
3. The following policies relate to the environmental impacts of transportation policies:
a. Transportation improvements shall be located and constructed so as to discourage/minimize adverse
impacts on water quality and other environmental features.
b. The County, the Cities, and Kitsap Transit shall consider pro~amming capital improvements and
transportation facilities that alleviate and mitigate impacts of land use on air quality and energy
consumption, such as: high-occupancy vehicle lanes; public transit; vanpool/carpool facilities; electric
and other low emission vehicles including buses; bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are designed for
functional transportation.
c. The County and the Cities shall ensure environmental protection, water quality, and conformance with
ESA requirements through best management practices throughout the life of the transportation facilities,
including:
i. Facility design, and in particular collection and treatment of storm water and surface run-off,
ii. Avoiding construction during the rainy season.
iii. Regular and routine maintenance of systems.
d. The County, the Cities, and Kitsap Transit shall provide public education about anti-pollution measures,
such as turning offcar engines while waiting at ferry terminals and parking lots; voluntary emission
checks.
4. Recognizing that the County and the Cities each encompass a range of development and density
patterns, each jurisdiction shall designate its Centers, consistent with the criteria set forth in Element
B of the Countywide Planning Policies. The following policies relate to design standards to support
transit and pedestrian travel appropriate to each type of urban and rural development or re-
development:
a. The County and the Cities shall each develop design standards for their Designated Centers that will
include specific strategies to encourage neighborhood connectivity such as residential clustering,
encouraging or requiring mixed use development; use of through streets or multiple entrances; bike and
pedestrian connections between neighborhoods.
b. In Urban Growth Areas, design standards shall require pedestrian- and transit-oriented design that
includes convenient access and safety amenities, such as lighting, landscaping, sidewalks, and ease of
access for physically challenged individuals.
c. Rural Communities outside Urban Growth Areas shall accommodate appropriate pedestrian/bicycle
connections and transit service and facilities consistent with rural levels of service in order to minimize
vehicle trips·
10
5. The following policies relate to transportation linkages between designated local and regional
Centers:
a. Regional corridors shall be designated for vehicle, transit, HOV facilities, rail, bicycle, and pedestrian
travel between centers as part of the countywide transportation plan.
b. The transportation system linking Designated Centers within urban areas and Rural Communities within
the county shall be transit-oriented and pedestrian and bicycle friendly.
6. The following policies relate to freight transportation:
a. Preferred routes for the movement of freight shall be identified as part of the countywide transportation
plan.
b. The County and the Cities shall work to ensure that compatible land uses are applied along designated
freight corridors.
c. The County and the Cities shall use appropriate roadway standards for designated freight corridors.
7. The following policies relate to transportation relationships with the Puget Sound Regional Council
and the Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization:
a. The Countywide Planning Policy shall further the implementation of Vision 2020 and Destination 2030
as adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council.
b. The County and the Cities shall actively participate in the Puget Sound Regional Council and the
Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO) to assure that transportation planning
in the two regions is consistent and accurately reflects local needs related to identified regional system
components.
c. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall serve as the point of coordination to assure Puget
Sound Regional Council and Peninsula RTPO planning programs are consistent and mutually beneficial
to jurisdictions within Kitsap County.
d. The Transportation Improvement Program (T~) for Kitsap County shall continue to be a part of the
regional TI1~ adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council. Local review, comment and recommendafion~
shall be coordinated through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council.
8. The following policies relate to the identification of needed transportation related facilities and
services within Kitsap County:
a. The Puget Sound Regional Council and the Peninsula RTPO shall identify regional system components
and related improvements within Kitsap County with the concurrence of the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council.
b. A countywide transportation plan developed by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall be
prepared pursuant to the Growth Management Act to identify countywide transportation facility and
service needs. A technical conunittee including transit and local, regional, and state transportation
providers shall be used in this process.
11
9, The following policies relate to the coordination of intra-county transportation planning efforts:
a. The Puget Sound Regional Council reviews Cities' and the County's Comprehensive plans for
consistency of land use and transportation elements.
b. The County and the Cities shall address compatibility between land use and transportation facilities by:
i. Not using new road improvements to justify land use intensification.
ii. Managing access on new transportation facilities outside Urban Growth Areas;
iii. Allowing phased development of improvements including acquiring right of way;
iv. Using comprehensive plans and development regulations to ensure that development does not create
demands exceeding the capacity of the transportation system, such as: density limits in areas outside
of Urban Growth Areas; concurrency management and adequate public facility regulation; integrated
multi-modal and non-motorized networks;
c. The County and the Cities shall work together in a coordinated, iterative process to periodically reassess
whether regional land use and transportation goals can realistically be met. If transportation adequacy
and concurrency cannot be met, the following actions should be considered:
i. Adjust land use and/or level of service (LOS) standards;
ii. Make full use of all feasible local option transportation revenues authorized but not yet
implemented; and
iii. Work with Washington State Department of Transportation (including Washington State Ferries),
Kitsap Transit, and the private sector to seek additional State transportation revenues, state and
federal grants for infrastructure improvements, and local options to make system improvements
necessary to accommodate projected population growth.
d. Adjacent jurisdictions in Kitsap County shall develop consistent street classification system and street
standards.
e. Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council may establish a process for evaluating development impacts
including those that may affect neighboring jurisdictions within the county.
f. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall function to ensure that transportation planning, system
management and improvements at local, regional, and state levels are coordinated, complementary, and
consistent with adopted comprehensive land use plans.
10. The following policies relate to coordinated and consistent level of service (LOS) standards:
a. The County and the Cities should develop comparable level of service standards among the County,
Cities and the State of Washington for identified regional system components.
b. The County and the Cities shall adopt roadway LOS standards. Urban growth management agreements
shall designate level of service standards.
c. The County and the Cities shall adopt transit LOS in the form of "Service Standards" adopted by the
Kitsap Transit Board of Commissioners. The standards shall consider both frequency of service and bus
capacity.
12
d. The County and the Cities shall coordinate with the WSDOT through the Puget Sound Regional Council
and the Peninsula RTPO in setting LOS standards for highways and facilities of statewide significance,
including the Washington State Ferries routes designated as such.
e. For highways and facilities of regional significance, including the Southworth ferry route, the County
and the Cities shall jointly set LOS with WSDOT through the Puget Sound Regional Council and the
Peninsula RTPO.
f. The County and the Cities shall each identify capacity deficiencies and either address them in terms of
identified funding or adjust the LOS standard on a temporary basis.
g. New development should not cause LOS to degrade to a level lower than the adopted standard,
consistent with state law.
13
Element H. AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The Growth Management Act requires cities and counties to encourage the availability of housing that is
affordable for all income levels at a variety of housing densities. Local jurisdictions are also encouraged to
preserve existing housing resources in their communities.
1. The following definitions relate to the Countywide Planning Policy:
a. Below Market Rat~ Housing shall mean housing intended for low-to-middle income households.
These income levels are further defined as follows (WAC 365.195):
i. Extremely low-income shall mean those households that have incomes that are at or below 30% of
the countywide median.
ii. Very low-income shall mean those households that have incomes that are within the range of 31 -
50% of the countywide median.
iii. Low-income shall mean those households that have incomes that are within the range of 51 - 80% of
the countywide median.
iv. Moderate-income shall mean those households that have incomes that are within the range 81-95%
of the countywide median.
v. Middle-income shall mean those households that have incomes that are within the range of 96-
120% of the countywide median.
b. Market Rate Housing shall mean housing intended for households with incomes that are greater than
120% of the countywide median.
2. The following policies relate to a coordinated process among Connty, Cities, and housing agencies for
determining and fulfilling housing needs, and the equitable distribution of below market rate housing
in Kitsap County:
a. The County and the Cities should inventory the existing housing stock consistent with the Growth
Management Act following each decennial census review, and con'elate with current population and
economic conditions, past trends, and ten year population and employment forecasts, to deterrnine short
and long range housing needs, including rental and home ownership. Navy personnel housing policy
should also be considered.
b. Recognizing the percentage share of the existing and forecasted countywide population and the
distribution of existing below market rate housing, the County and the Cities should develop strategies
to equitably disperse projected countywide below market rate housing needs throughout Kitsap County
in the Urban Growth Areas and, where they are specifically found to be appropriate in consideration of
existing development patterns and densities, in designated Rural Communities.
c. Local housing inventories, projections, and equitable distribution strategies should be compiled and
updated under the coordination of the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council to identify countywide
conditions and projected needs.
d. The County and the Cities should each identify specific policies and implementation strategies in their
Comprehensive Plans and should enact implementing regulations to provide a mix of housing types and
costs to achieve identified goals for both market rate and below market rate housing.
14
3. Recognizing that the market place makes adequate provision for those in the upper economic
brackets, some combination of appropriately zoned land, regulatory incentives, financial subsidies,
and innovative planning techniques will be necessary to make adequate provisions for the needs of
middle and lower income persons. (WAC 365.195-070.6) The following policies relate to the provision
of below market rate housing:
a. Local comprehensive plan policies and development regulations shall encourage and not exclude below
market rate housing.
b. Below market rate housing strategies should include:
i. preservation, rehabilitation and redevelopment of existing neighborhoods as appropriate, including
programs to rehabilitate substandard housing;
ii. provision for a range of housing types such as multi-family, single family, accessory dwelling units,
cooperative housing, and manufactured housing on individual lots and in manufactured housing
parks;
iii. housing design and siting compatible with surrounding neighborhoods;
iv. mechanisms to help people purchase their own housing, such as low interest loan programs, "self-
help" housing, and consumer education.
c. Each jurisdiction shall promote the development of below market rate housing in a dispersed pattern so
as not to concentrate or geographically isolate low-income housing in a specific area or community.
d. Below market rate housing should be located throughout Kitsap County in a manner to provide easy
access to transportation, employment, and other services. Designated Centers should include below
market rate housing. Rural self- help housing programs should be encouraged either in or outside of
designated Rural Communities.
e. Housing policies and programs shall address the provision of diverse housing opportunities to
accommodate the homeless, the elderly, physically or mentally challenged, and other segments of the
population that have special needs.
f. Innovative regulatory strategies shall be developed and implemented to provide incentives for the
development of below market rate housing within Designated Centers. Jur/sdictions shall develop
strategies which provide a wide range of opportunities for promoting the production of below market
rate housing through means such as: reducing housing cost by subsidizing utility hook-up fees and rates,
impact fees, and permit processing fees; density incentives; smaller lot sizes; zero lot line designs;
inclusionary zoning techniques, such as requir/ng below-market rate housing in new residential
developments; transfers of development rights and/or a priority permit review and approval process.
g. Policies and regulations shall encourage the production of below market rate housing. The County and
the Cities shall incorporate a regular review of public health and safety regulations pertaining to housing
implementation strategies to assure that protection of the public health and safety remains the primary
purpose for housing standards.
h. The County and the Cities shall participate with housing authorities established to facilitate the
production of below market rate housing. The County and the Cities shall also recognize and support
other public and private not-for-profit housing agencies. Supporting housing agencies is encouraged
through public land donations, guarantees, suitable design standards, tax incentives, fee waivers,
providing access to funding sources and support for funding applications, or other provisions as
appropriate.
15
Element. K. COORDINATION WITH TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS
The Suquamish Tribe, the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, and other federally recognized Indian tribes have
reservations and/or trust resources within Kitsap County, Washington. These tribes are parties to treaties with
the United States Government through which certain rights and privileges both on and off reservation were
articulated and remain in effect. These tribes have authorities, responsibilities, interests and treaty rights within
their respective resei'vation boundaries and Usual and Accustomed Areas. Since future growth and land use
decisions in Kitsap County affect all governmental entities, governmental agencies must be well informed and
continuously involved in regional and local planning.
1. Meaningful and substantial opportunities for early and continuous tribal government participation shall be
incorporated into regional and local planning activities.
2. Local jurisdictions should work with the tribes to develop agreements that provide for discussion on
comprehensive planning issues among govern_ments and ensure that the tribes are consulted on issues within
their interest. The parties will jointly determine the appropriate contents of the agreements and a schedule
for completing them.
3. Tribal governments, federal agencies, and county and local govm-aments are encouraged to coordinate plans
among and between governments and agencies to address substantive areas of mutual interest especially
where geographical areas overlay and promote complementary and cooperative efforts.
4. City and County governments are encouraged to include Tribal governments in joint comprehensive
planning and development activities for areas within the Tribes' Usual and Accustomed areas. Activities
include but are not limited to the establishment and revision of urban growth boundaries, distribution of
forecasted population; regional transportation, capital facility, housing and utility plans; and policies that
may affect natural and/or cultural resources.
5. All County, City, and Tribal government agencies shall be included in the normal public notice and
comment procedures of other agencies and kept informed of matters of interest to them.
6. The County, the Cities, and Tribal governmental agencies are encouraged to keep one another informed
about matters of local and regional interest by mutually agreeable means and schedule.
16
Element L. COORDINATION WITH FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
INCLUDING NAVY
The federal government has unique authorities, responsibilities, interests affecting land nse and other activities. Sim
the impacts of future growth and development in Kitsap County affect all governmental entities, govermmental
agencies must be well informed and continuously involved in regional and local planning.
1. Meaningful and substantial opportunities for early and continuous federal government participation shall be
incorporated into. regional and local planning activities.
2. It is recognized that constitutional and statutory provisions may constrain federal government agencies from
entering into local agreements and processes. However, when possible, the County, the Cities, and federal
governments should establish intergovernmental cooperative agreements promoting coordination and involveme
in activities that are of mutual interest.
3. Federal agencies and county and local governments are encouraged to coordinate plans among and between
governments and agencies to make plans as consistent and compatible as possible for properties over which they
have authority or activities they authorize and the adjacent areas affected.
4. Federal government agencies are encouraged to participate in City, County, and joint comprehensive planning ax
development activities that may affect them, including the establishment and revision of urban growth areas
encompassing, adjacent to or within federally-owned lands; distribution of forecasted population; regional
transportation, capital facility, housing and utility plans; and policies that may affect natural and/or cultural
resources of interest.
5. The following policies relate to promoting coordination among the Cities, County, and the federal government
including the Navy:
a. All jurisdictions should promote planning that considers the impact of new growth to avoid the potential for
encroachment on military readiness activities as described below when developing zoning ordinances or
designating land uses affecting military facilities. Each jurisdiction and the Navy should coordinate to identil
the types of development and areas of interest to the Navy, method of notice, and opportunities for comment
b. "Military readiness activities" mean all of the following:
i. Training, support, and operations that prepare the men and women of the military and Naval ships
and submarines for combat.
ii. Operation, maintenance, and security of any military installation.
iii. Testing of military equipment, vehicles, weapons, and sensors for proper operation or suitability fo~
combat use.
c. "Impacts" include but are not limited to:
i. Aircraft, boat, and rail traffic.
ii. Incompatible adjacent land uses.
d. Through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council, jurisdictions should monitor issues that arise in
implementing these policies, and should identify areas for improved coordination.
6. All County, City, and federal goverrm~ental agencies shall be included in the normal public notice and comment
procedures of other agencies and kept informed of matters of interest to them.
7. The County, the Cities, and federal governmental agencies are encouraged to keep one another informed of
matters of local and regional interest by mutually agreeable means and schedule.
Element M. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The County, Cities, Tribal governments, and special districts are all involved/n planning activities related to their
statutory authority and responsibility. In addition to the responsibilities defined in previous countywide planning
policies, this section further clarifies the planning roles and responsibilities of the KRCC and member agencies.
1. The KITSAP REGIONAL COORDINATING COUNCIL was established by interlocal agreement to
assure coordination, consensus, consistency, and compliance in the implementation of the Growth
Management Act and comprehensive planning by County, city and tribal governments within-Kitsap
County. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council also provides a voice for all jurisdictions and
opportunity for citizens and stakeholders to provide input to planning policies to be applied
countywide. The interlocal agreement adopted by the County, the Cities and the Tribal governments
declared that the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council is necessary to maintain a regular
intergovernmental communication network for all local and tribal governments within the county,
facilitate compliance with the coordination and consistency requirements of the Growth Management
Act, provide an effective vehicle to resolve conflict among and/or between jurisdictions with respect to
urban growth boundaries or comprehensive plan consistency, and to build consensus on planning
solutions for countywide growth management issues. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
shall:
a. submit agreed_upon recommendations on behalf of member jurisdictions to multi-county regional
agencies and State government on proposed changes to multi-county regional plans, State plans, and
laws;
b. provide a forum, as necessary, for achieving coordination in the development of local plans and
resolving planning and plan implementation issues that are common among jurisdictior~_;
c. promote coordination and consistency among local plans and between local plans and the Countywide
Planning Policy and the Growth Management Act to the extent necessary to achieve regional policies
and objectives. Through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council forum, jurisdictions should establish
a process to monitor and review individual comprehensive plans and associated implementation
mechanisms To determine consistency with the Countywide Planning Policy. Further, issues related to
consistency may be brought to the attention of the Regional Council by one or more members;
d. serve as a forum_for resolving disputes locally. The process shall not preclude appeals to the Central
Puget Sound Growth Planning Heatings Board if the local process has been exhausted without
resolution of the dispute
e. promote_coordination of educational programs and the dissemination of plarming-related inf°rmati°n °f
regional interest;
f. coordinate the review, revision and monitoring_of the Countywide Planning Policy;
g. apply for grants and administer contracts relative to regional tasks and plans;
h. conduct the region wide growth management planning consistent with Element A. Countywide Growth
Patterns~
i. initiate and coordinate the development of other regional planning policies and implementation
mechanisms that may improve the effectiveness of the comprehensive planning process.
j. define and implement procedures that assure opportunities for early and continuous public involvement
in Y,.P~CC policF discussions facilitated by KRCC.
18
DATE SUBMITTED: 11/20/03 BILL #
AGENDA BILL q
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance Committee Meeting Date: ~O&-ic- ~'~SI OIx~
Adopting the 2004 Annual Budget, COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Repealing BMC Chps 2, 3.10 and 3.38 Department: 'Pinance
and Amending BMC Chp 3.36 Presenter: Michael Wilson
Phone: 473-5590
SUMMARY: This ordinance adopts the City of Bremerton's 2004 Annual Budget at the Fund level
as described in the Mayor's Proposed 2004 Budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
FISCAL/BUDGET: 12/15/03
CONSENT AGENDA []
OPERATIONS: 12/15/03
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve an Ordinance adopting the City of Bremerton's 2004 Annual Budget on first
reading.
Move to pass Ordinance # on second reading.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
5t
Option A
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of thc City of
Bremcrton, Washington, approving and adopting the financial
budget for the several funds of the City of Brcmerton for the fiscal
year 2004, and appropriating the amounts set forth in each budget
to each fund in accordance with RCW 35.33.075; repealing
Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 3.10 entitled "Conference
Center Fund" and Chapter 3.38 entitled "Discretionary Reserve
Fund;" and amending Brcmerton Municipal Code Chapter 3.36.020
relating to the source of funds for the Contingency Reserve Fund.
WHEREAS, State law, Chapter 35.33 RCW requires the City to adopt an annual
budget and provides procedures for the filing of estimates, a preliminary budget, deliberations,
public heatings, and final fixing of the budget; and
WHEREAS, a preliminary budget for the fiscal year 2004 has been prepared and
filed in the Office of the City Clerk for the City of Bremerton; public hearings have been held for
the purposes of fixing the final City Budget; and the City Council has deliberated and has made
adjustments and changes deemed necessary and proper; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHiNGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAiN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION1. That the 2004 Budget for the City of Bremerton, Washington, on
file in the office of the City Clerk, covering the period from January 1, 2004 through December
31, 2004, with regular revenues and unencumbered fund balances of $142,992,232 and
expenditures and ending fund balances of $142,992,232 is hereby approved and adopted, and the
respective amounts provided for in said budget for the several funds of the City of Bremerton are
hereby fixed and adopted as follows:
ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE YEAR 2004
General Fund
Executive ~/~t/~ $ 290,834
Q, Administrative Services/Fince~~ty~-P' 1,038,348
Human Resources 289,421
Community Development 936,407
Legal 525,202
Municipal Court 791,632
Law Enfomement 7,824,047
Fire/Emergency Medical 5,374,836
General Parks 2,376,891
1
5~' 2004 Budget
Option A
City Auditor 106,879
Engineering 287,647
General Facilities 508,040
Economic Development 148,106
Non-Departmental 4,873,948
Ending Fund Balance 1,269,392
Total General Fund $ 26,851,032
Arterial Street (102) 9,698,270
Street (101) 2,391,809
Contingency Reserve (103) 910,000
Civic Improvement (104) 437,000
Parking System (105) 1,747,509
Community Development Block Grant (106) 4,027,788
Abatement Revolving (108) 197,100
Police Special Projects (110) 255,000
Public Access Television (113) 267,420
Gift & Donations Fund (114) 112,658
Discretionary Reserve (115) 1,020,000
Bond Fund (201) 1,958,780
LID Guaranty (202) 169,800
Conference Center (401) 13,770,809
Park Facilities Construction (310) 928,606
Public Safety Bond (302) 9,950,998
Maritime Park (303) 1,000,000
ULID 2002-01 (403) 963,654
Government Center (305) 7,862,956
General Government Capital Improvement (308) 766,000
Pedestrian/BTC Access (309) 5,700,000
Water Utility (401 ) 13,002,591
Gold Mountain Golf Complex (407) 4,195,728
Conference Center Operating (410) 865,000
Wastewater Utility (451 ) 21,976,127
Stormwater Utility (481 ) 1,190,804
Risk Management (503) 2,306,071
Equipment Rental Reserve (510) 5,859,141
Information Services (511) 756,440
Police & Fire Pension (601) 1,853,141
Total All Funds $142,992,232
SECTION 2. That the totals for the funds noted in Section 1 above as set forth in
the official "City of Bremerton 2004 Annual Budget" adopted herein, are hereby appropriated for
the fiscal year 2004.
2004 Budget
Option A
SECTION3. Chapter 3.10 of the Bremerton Municipal Code, entitled
"Conference Center Fund", is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION4. Chapter 3.38 of the Bremerton Municipal Code, entitled
"Discretionary Reserve Fund" is hereby repealed in its entirety effective February 1, 2004.
SECTION& Section 3.36.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to the
"Contingency Reserve Fund", is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.36.020 ............. SOURCE OF FUND
The proceeds of sale of all general fund real property shall be deposited to the
Contingency Reserve Fund."
SECTION 6. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to require the City of
Bremerton or its officers to fill any vacancy in any of the positions established by this ordinance
resulting from the discharge, resignation or retirement of such employee. Nothing herein
contained shall require the City of Bremerton or its officers to pay the maximum amount
budgeted for any position shown therein.
SECTION 7. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION& E_[fective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003
PASSED by the City Council the day of _, 2003
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
Approved this day of ., 2003
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
2004 Budget
Option A
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the day of ., 2003
EFFECTIVE the day of ,2003
ORDINANCE NO.
R:\LEGAL\Ordinances~Finance~2004 budget ordinancel Option A.doc
2004 Budget
Option B
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, approving and adopting the financial
budget for the several funds of the City of Bremerton for the fiscal
year 2004, and appropriating the amounts set forth in each budget
to each fund in accordance with RCW 35.33.075; repealing
Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 3.10 entitled "Conference
Center Fund" and Chapter 3.38 entitled "Discretionary Reserve
Fund;" and amending Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 3.36.020
relating to the source of funds for the Contingency Reserve Fund.
WHEREAS, State law, Chapter 35.33 RCW requires the City to adopt an annual
budget and provides procedures for the filing of estimates, a preliminary budget, deliberations,
public hearings, and final fixing of the budget; and
WHEREAS, a preliminary budget for the fiscal year 2004 has been prepared and
filed in the Office of the City Clerk for the City of Bremerton; public heatings have been held for
the purposes of fixing the final City Budget; and the City Council has deliberated and has made
adjustments and changes deemed necessary and proper; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the 2004 Budget for the City of Bremerton, Washington, on
file in the office of the City Clerk, covering the period from January 1, 2004 through December
31, 2004, with regular revenues and unencumbered fund balances of $143,902,232 and
expenditures and ending fund balances of $143,902,232 is hereby approved and adopted, and the
respective amounts provided for in said budget for the several funds of the City of Bremerton are
hereby fixed and adopted as follows:
ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE YEAR 2004
General Fund
Executive $ 341,848
City Council 210,139
Administrative Services/Finance 1,029,800
Human Resources 290,435
Community Development 941,292
Legal 526,953
Municipal Court 795,135
Law Enforcement 7,852,530
Fire/Emergency Medical 5,341,695
General Parks 2,383,620
1
5 & 2004 Budget
Option B
City Auditor 106,879
Engineering 287,647
General Facilities 508,040
Economic Development 149,120
Non-Departmental 4,808,257
Ending Fund Balance 2,187642
Total General Fund $ 27,761,032
Arterial Street (102) 9,698,270
Street (101) 2,391,809
Contingency Reserve ( 103 ) 910,000
Civic Improvement (104) 437,000
Parking System (105) 1,747,509
Community Development Block Grant (106) 4,027,788
Abatement Revolving (108) 197,100
Police Special Projects (110) 255,000
Public Access Television (113) 267,420
Gift & Donations Fund (114) 112,658
Discretionary Reserve (115) 1,020,000
Bond Fund (201) 1,958,780
LID Guaranty (202) 169,800
Conference Center (401) 13,770,809
Park Facilities Construction (310) 928,606
Public Safety Bond (302) 9,950,998
Maritime Park (303) 1,000,000
ULID 2002-01 (403) 963,654
Government Center (305) 7,862,956
General Government Capital Improvement (308) 766,000
Pedestrian/BTC Access (309) 5,700,000
Water Utility (401) 13,002,591
Gold Mountain Golf Complex (407) 4,195,728
Conference Center Operating (410) 865,000
Wastewater Utility (451) 21,976,127
Stormwater Utility (481) 1,190,804
Risk Management (503) 2,306,071
Equipment Rental Reserve (510) 5,859,141
Information Services (511) 756,440
Police & Fire Pension (601) 1,853,14l
Total All Funds $143,902,232
SECTION2. That the totals for the funds noted in Section 1 above as set forth in
the official "City of Bremerton 2004 Annual Budget" adopted herein, are hereby appropriated for
the fiscal year 2004.
2004 Budget
Option B
SECTION 3. Chapter 3.10 of the Bremerton Municipal Code, entitled
"Conference Center Fund", is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION4. Chapter 3.38 of the Bremerton Municipal Code, entitled
"Discretionary Reserve Fund" is hereby repealed in its entirety effective February 1, 2004.
SECTION 5. Section 3.36.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to the
"Contingency Reserve Fund", is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.36.020 A~,~I'~kTT~rI~ ~r~ SOURCE OF FUND
The proceeds of sale of all general fund real property shall be deposited to the
Contingency Reserve Fund."
SECTION 6. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to require the City of
Bremerton or its officers to fill any vacancy in any of the positions established by this ordinance
resulting from the discharge, resignation or retirement of such employee. Nothing herein
contained shall require the City of Bremerton or its officers to pay the maximum amount
budgeted for any position shown therein.
SECTION 7. Severabilitv. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003
PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2003
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
Approved this day of 2003
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
2004 Budget
Option B
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the day of _, 2003
EFFECTIVE the day of _, 2003
ORDiNANCE NO.
R:\LEGAL\Ordinances~Finance~2004 budget ordinancel Option B.doc
2004 Budget
DATE SUBMITTED: 11/20/03 BILL # C
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance Committee Meeting Date:
Updating BMC Chapter 3.01 Rate and Fees COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department: Finance /,,~ -.~
Presenter: Michael Wilson
Phone: 473-5590
SUMMARY: The proposed ordinance updates the rates and fees for certain City departmems.
ATTACHMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
APPROVALS: / /
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
FISCAL/BUDGET: 12/15/03
CONSENT AGENDA []
OPERATIONS: 12/15/03
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve an Ordinance amending BMC Chapter 3.01 Rates and Fees.
Move to pass Ordinance #__ on second reading.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
6, o
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending Chapter 3.01 of the Brcmerton
Municipal Code updating rates and fees for 2004.
WHEP,~AS, the City Council desires to update the rates and fees for the year
2004; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION1. Chapter 3.01 of the Bmmerton Municipal Code entitled "Rates and
Fees" is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.01.010 INCORPORATION OF RATE TABLES.
The following Rate Tables A-G attached hereto are incorporated herein by this reference
and hereby adopted.
Where the City has adopted State codes pursuant to Chapters 17.04 and 18.02 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code, State rates listed for the Uniform Building, Plumbing, Mechanical
and Fire Codes are adopted as city rates as listed in Tables C and E and are subject to uniform
rate changes made by the State.
3.01.020 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - RATE TABLE A.
Regulatory License Fees
Business License Fees
Parking Fees
Utility/Lien Search Fees
Document Reproduction
Check Handling Fee
3.01.030 MUNICIPAL COURT - RATE TABLE B.
Hearing Examiner Appeal
Parking Fines
3.01.040 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - RATE TABLE C.
Cam~rehensivc Plan
Subdivisions
Shoreline Master Program
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
Site Plan Review
Appeal
Abatements
Building Permits
Mechanical Permits
Plumbing Permits
1
(0 { 2004 Rates
Zoning
Comprehensive Plan
3.01.050 POLICE DEPARTMENT - RATE TABLE D.
Traffic Accident Reports
Fingerprints
Criminal History Check
Verification Letter for Lost or Stolen Property
Photo Prints
Licenses for Dogs and Cats
Alarm Compliance Fee
Service Fee for Anti-Harassment Order
Service of Arrest Warrants and Subpoenas
3.01.060 FIRE DEPARTMENT - RATE TABLE E.
Ambulance Transport Fee
Fire Rescue Boat Response
Hazard Materials Response
Stand-By Time
Active Firefighting
False Alarm Fee
Sprinkler/Fire Alarm Plans
3.01.070 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT - RATE TABLES F
Fl.
Facility Use Rental Rates
Sheridan Community Center
Bremerton Sr. Citizens Center
Jarstad Aquatic Center
Evergreen Park Shelters
Athletic Field
Blueberry Park - Pea Patch
Program Fees and Charges
Jarstad Aquatic Center
Athletic Programs
Bremerton Sr. Citizens Center/Recreation
Programs
Ivy Green Cemetery
Gold Mountain Golf Complex
3.01.080 PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES - RATE TABLE G.
Right-of-Way Permits
Right-of-Way Vacation
Telecom Master Permit Fee
Telecom License Fee
Utility/Lien Search Fee
2
(~ ~_ 2004 Rates
3.01.100 NON-RESIDENTIAL USE OF CITY SERVICES.
Non-city residents shall pay the rates shown on Rate Table F multiplied by 120% with
the exception of daily admission fees and merchandise for sale.
SECTION2. Rate Tables Amended. Rate Tables A, B, C, D, E, F, and G of
Chapter 3.01 of the Bremerton Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as set forth in
Exhibit A of this Ordinance.
SECTIONS. Rate Tables Repealed and Amended. Rate Table F1 is hereby
repealed in its entirety and the fees listed in Rate Table F1 are hereby incorporated into Rate
Table F. The 2004 rates established in Rate Table F1 remain the same upon incorporation into
Rate Table F.
SECTION4. Severabilit¥. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003
PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2003
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
2004 Rates
Approved this day of 2003
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the day of _, 2003
EFFECTIVE the .day of ,2003
ORDINANCE NO.
RSLEGAL\Ordinances~Administration~2004 Rate Tables\3.01 rate changes ordinance.doc
2004 Rates
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - RATE TABLE A
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
A. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
1. REGULATORY LICENSE FEES 2003 RATE
BMC 18.06 Ambulance Services
Ambulance Inspections $60/veh
BMC 5.17 Charitable Solicitation
Non-Profit $25/60 days
Professional Fundraiser $675/60 days
BMC 5.22 Dance/Public $265/yr or $70/30 days
BMC 5.96 Erotic Dance Studios $700/yr
Dancers $100/yr
BMC 9.48 Fireworks Stands $100/stand/yr
BMC 10.24 Housemoving/Oversize Loads $600+$65/mile to .10
of a mile
BMC 5.16 Mobile Food Vendor $150/veh/yr
BMC 5.16 Peddlers $75/yr or $25/30days
BMC 5.04 Petshops $150/yr
Grooming Parlors $50/yr
Animal Welfare Facilities $50/yr
BMC 5.36 Special Events:
Profit $675/event
Non-Profit $70/event
BMC 5,20 Street/Sidewalk Vendors $250/yr
BMC 5.16 Temporary Merchant $400/30 days
2. BUSINESS LICENSE FEE 2003 RATE
BMC 5.02 $=~65/yr
3. PARKING
On-Street Locations Not to Exceed $20/3
hrs
$30/10 hrs
Off-Street Location Not to Exceed $20/3
hrs
$30/10 hrs
Table A-A1 ~'
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - RATE TABLE A
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
RATE
Parking Garage Not to Exceed
$!00140/mo
4. UTILITY/LIEN SEARCH FEES ~
Per Parcel $30/search per parcel
5. DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION FEES 2gO34;IAT~
Per Page $.15/pg
Audio or Video Tapes Cost of Tape +$8.50
Computer Disks $8.50
Certification $3.50
Blue Prints- Aerial Photos, Drawings, Maps $8/pg
Documents:
Medical Records $19/1st 5 pages
$.83/Pgs 6-31
$.63/Pgs 31 +
Fire Reports $. 15/pg
Budget $25
Annual Report $25
6. CHECK HANDLING FEE $40
APPL!C.n. TION ON APP'-AL
Table A - A2
MUNICIPAL COURT - RATE TABLE B
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
B. MUNICIPAL COURT
2003 RATE
1. HEARING EXAMINER APPEAL $65
2. PARKING FINES
Overtime or Non-Payment in Collection Devices:
1~ Violation in 30 Days $25
2® Violation in 30 Days $32
3r~ Violation in 30 Days $56
Loading Zones $17
No Parking $45
Wrong Way $45
Parked on Sidewalk $56
Fire Hydrant $45
12" From Curb $10
Physically Disabled (Public and Private) $250
Counterfeiting or User of Counterfeit Permits, $500
Tokens or Script
Unauthorized Use of Permits $150
All Other Infractions Not Specified Above $27
Replacement of parking permit $10
Blocked Driveway $45
Expired Tabs $45
30 Foot to Stop Sign $45
Double Parked $45
No Stopping/No Standing $45
Parking Capacity Survey $250
Table B - B1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - RATE TABLE C
All Rates Listed are "Not To Exceed" Fees
C. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
~ 0!/0!/0! 0!/0!/02
RAT-E-S RAT-ES RATES
~ ¢7nn nn $729.00 $7A0 90
D ..... ~.~,~ ^,-.--.-.~,.,~.,,~-~ e?nn nn $720.00 SvAO O0
~ $500.00 + $*S-1,.8¢;~2~- $530.00
3.01 -C1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - RATE TABLE C
Alt Rates Listed are "Not To Exceed" Fees
~Z/,Mb1999 01!01!01 01!01/02
R.~ES RAT-ES RATES
1.SUBDIVISIONS
'"'" ~ ..... d lot) '"~
.... lot) "~ '""
I0t)$1000
plus $150
per lot
Long Plat e?ne t~t~ ~ $7")7 0O ''['
-I-~ !0 !crc + for 1~9 for
.... ~"'~ -I~$2500
..... 0 plus 9150
per lot
Final Plat $300.00 ~ $3!2.00315
2. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM
Substantial Development Permit w.v~.¢REt7 ..~nEt '*'----~- ~ ¢ ~ O t::; net $8~~, .00650
Conditional Use Permit ~.~,~:~Et7.vvnn ~,~-~.vvca'~ net $~d.001750
Shoreline Variance ,~.~¢~n7..~nn ,.,~-v.~¢~ or:; Etn $Pe44~1750
Permit Revision ,~,~ ~. ¢ ,.~ n7 .~nn .+.~¢:'~4.~.~t:; net $325.4~
Shoreline Exemption $200
3. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
(SEPA)
Checklist ¢oEtEt nn ~-3n~ nEt $2!2 00320
Environmental Impact Statement $~07.00 + $E2§.00 + $~d~..00650
Review/Adoption "-~'~;"'"""~ """* ~'~;*;"""~ + additional
ef-exgertise ccst cf cost of
exgergse expertise
4. SITE PLAN REVIEW
.... ~ ......... · .................. our or Less N/C N/C N/C$250
Residential Units
Others ¢,lEtEt nn ~,ln,~ Etn $ ...... 500
5. APPEAL
T~ Ol.'~nn;nn t~mm;e.e.l~,. ~4OEt nn ¢4'3.4 ,',Et $!32 00
To Hearinq Examiner 9175
6. ABATEMENTS
Dangerous Building $8-1.0.00 -'- $885.00 + $8go:og900
~ Dire~ + Direct
""~ e ....~" SeP,4ee-a,qd Service and
r.,,o, e .... k, r.,,o, Supply Cost
Garbage & Weed ...~..~ ~¢~nn nn ~ ~..-¢~'~.~.-~c~ nn ~ $ ......640
~ Dir-ec:,t + Direct
""~ ~ .... ~" ~""'~"" ...d Service and
r-,-,,., ~.~.~..., ~ost Supply Cost
(off 3.0 - c:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - RATE TABLE C
All Rates Listed are "Not To Exceed" Fees
· 2434hll}90 01!01!01 0!!0!!02
RAT-ES RP~TES RATES
7. BUILDING PERMIT FEES - UBC Rates - Refer to Exhibit 1
8. MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES - UBC Rates - Refer to Exhibit 2
9. PLUMBING PERMIT FEES - UBC Rates - Refer to Exhibit 3
10. ZONING ORDINANCE
Ordinance Amendments
Text $740
Rezone (Map Amendment) $740
Variance
Administrative $325
Public Hearinq/Sinqle Family $500
Public Hearin.q/Other $1750
Planned Unit Development
Residential Only $1500 +
$100/DU
Industrial, Commercial, Mixed Use or $2500 +
Other $100/DU +
$100/acre
Development A.qreements $1600
Special Use Permit
Administrative (No public hearinq) $350
Hearinq Examiner/SF Residential $500
Hearin.q Examiner/Other $1750
Non-Conforminq Use Determination $275
Director's Code Interpretation $175
Zoning Verification Letter $125
11. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Text or Map Amendment $1500
Combined Text and Map Amendment $2500
3.01 -C3
TJLB~ C
E~IIBIT 2
TABLE 1.A 1997 UNI~t~VI FECHANICAL C~3E AS A~)ED 1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE
TABLE 1-A~MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES
[!nil Fee Schedule
I. Furnaces
F',r xhc installation or relocation of each boiler or comprer,.qnr ~vcr three h0r~epower (ltl 6 kW)to and including 15 hr,re=power (~;2 7 t~i ..... t4.7I}
.r ~ ch absorplion sys cm vet 10fl.OU0 Blu/h (29.3 kW) Io and including 5O0.{R}O Btu& (146 6 kW) ................ 27.15
F.r Ih¢ installation or rel0calion of each boiler or compr~sor over 15 horsepower (52.7 kW) to and including 30 horsepower ( 105.5' kW),
"r each absorption system owr 500,01111Btu/h (!46.6 kW) to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h (293.1 kW) ................................... 37.2,
F.r Ih= installation r,r relocation of each boiler ~)r compressor over 30 horsepower (105.5 kW) to and including 5Il horsepower ( 176 kW).
.r c~ch absorption sTstem over l,flO0,000 Btu/h (293.1 kW) to and including 1.750,000 Btu/h (512.9 kW) .................................. 55.45
1.75U.D00 Btu/h (512.9 kW) ..................................................................
5. Air Handlers ............................. 92.65
absorption unit for which a permit is required }~sewhere in he M,chon cai Code.
Fnr each ~*ntilation fan connected to a single ddcl ..................................... ' ............ . · . ......... 7.25
For the installation of each hood which is served by mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for
For Ihe installation or rein=alien of tach domastic-lype incinerlkior .............................................. ~ ................... 18~20
U. Miscellaneous ............................................... ...... 14.50
........................................................ ' 10.65
3. Inspections for which no I'ce is specifically indicated, per hour (minimum charge--one-halt hour) ....................................... I;49.5B*
4. Additional plan review r~quired by chang=s, additions or revisions Io plans or to plans for which an initial review has been completed
Imlnimum charge, one-half hoe0 ........................................................................................ $49.50'
-9 Miseel 1 ~neous
For each gas piping system ~f 1-5 Outlets $6.25
For each additional gas piping system outlet, per outlet $1.25
3.01-C4
TABLE C
EXHIBIT 3
Table 1-1 199"/ UN'I,B~ PLf_IVI3I[~ OZDE AS _AA'~ED UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE
TABLE 1-1
Plumbing Permit Fees
Permit Issuance
1. For issuing each permit ..................................................................................................... $20.00
2 For issuing each supplemental permi[ ........................................................................................... $ ! 0.O0
Unit.Fee Schedule (in addition to items 1 and 2 above)
I ~dor each plumbing lixture on one trap or a set of fixtures on one trap (including water,
drainage piping and backflow protection therefor) ............................................................. : ................ $7.00-
2. For e~ch building s'ewer and each trailer park sewer ........................................................................ $15.00
3 Rainwater systems- per drain (inside building) .................................................................................. $7.00
4. For each cesspool (where permitted) ................................ ~ ............................................................... $25.00
5. For each private sewage disposal system .............. : ............................................ : ............................ $40.00
6. For each water heater and/or vent ...................................................................................................... $7.00
7, For each gas-piping system of one to five outlets ...............................................................
8. For each additional gas piping system outlet, per outlet ..................................................................... $1.00
§. For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor including its trap and vent,
except kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps ................................................ 2.$7.00
10. For each installation, alteration or repair of water piping and/or water treating equipment, each ....... $7.00
11. For each repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture .................................................. $7.00
12. For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter including backfiow protection devices therefor _..$7.00
13. For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not included in item 12:
1 to 5 ....................... . ............. : ....................... : ......................... ~ ..................................................... $5.00
over 5, each ................................. , ................................................................................................ $1.00
14. For each backflow protective device other than atmospheric type vacuum breakers:
2 inch (51 mm) diameter and smaller .......................................................................................... $7100
over 2 inch (51 mm) diameter ............ , ........................................................................................ $15.00
15. For each graywater system .. .............................; ............................. ; .................................... .-. ........... $40.00
16. For initial installation and testing for a reclaimed water system ........................................................ $30.00'
17. For each annual cross-connection testing of a reclaimed water system (excluding initial test) ........ $30.00'
18. For each medical gas piping system serving one to five inlet(s)/outlet(s) for a specific gas ............. $50.00
19. For each additional medical gas inlet(s)/out[et(s) ..................................................... ; ........................ $5.00
Other Inspections and Fees
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours .................................................................................. $30.00'
2. Reinspection.fee ................................................................................................................................ $30.00
3. I~spections for which no fee is specifically indicated ........................................................................ $30.00'
4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or
revisions to approved plans (minimum charge - one-half hour) ....................................................... $30.00*
'Per hour Ior each hour worked or the total houdy cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is greater. This cost shall
include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of all the employees involved.
3.01-C5
'73
POLICE DEPARTMENT - RATE TABLE D
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
D. POLICE DEPARTMENT
2003 RATE
1. TRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORTS $7.00
2. FINGERPRINTS - 1st Card $8.00
Each Additional Card $8.00
3. CRIMINAL HISTORY CHECK $8.00
4. VERIFICATION LETTER FOR LOST OR STOLEN PROPERTY $8.00
5. PHOTO PRINTS Actual Cost
of
(Per Set When in Possession of the Dept.) Processing
6. LICENSES FOR DOGS AND CATS
For Each Cat Spayed or Neutered $6.507.50
(Upon Proof of Spaying or Neutering)
For Each Dog Spayed or Neutered $! ! .0012.00
(Upon Proof of Spaying or Neutering)
For Each Cat Not Spayed or Neutered $35.0036~00
For Each Dog Not Spayed or Neutered $35.0036,00
7. ALARM COMPLIANCE FEE
1st False Alarm in any 1 Quarter $40.00
2nd False Alarm in the same Quarter $80.00
3rd False Alarm in the same Quarter $160.00
or Subsequent Alarms in a Calendar Quarter
8. SERVICE FEE FOR ANTI-HARASSMENT ORDER $40.00
9. SERVICE OF ARREST WARRANTS AND SUBPOENAS
Arrest Warrant $15.00 plus
mileage
Subpoena $6.00 plus
mileage
Preparation of return of service $5.00
Mileage (for each mile actually and necessarily traveled by a $0.25 per
member of the Police Department in going to or returning from mile
any place of service, or attempted service)
Table D- D1 ~
FIRE DEPARTMENT - RATE TABLE E
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
E. FIRE DEPARTMENT
2003 RATE
1. AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE
ALS Residents $375425
ALS Non-Residents $-!-!, 0~90
BLS Residents $3 !0360
BLS Non-Residents $370420
Mileage $5/mile
2. EMS SERVICE CALL TO ASSISTED LIVING, LONG TERM CARE $100 After
AND ADULT CARE FACILITIES first
response
per quarter
3. FIRE RESCUE BOAT RESPONSE
Resident $115
Non-Residents $200
4. HAZARD MATERIALS RESPONSE
Rice Hull Ash Actual Cost
per Bag
Absorbent Pads Actual Cost
per Bag
5. STAND-BY-TIME
Per crew of 3 $98/hour
Fire Engine - Crew of 4 $115/hour
6. ACTIVE FIREFIGHTING
Fire Engine $121/hour
Aerial Ladder $200/hour
7. FALSE ALARM FEE $120 for
second
$225 for 3
or more per
quarter
8. SPRINKLER/FIRE ALARM PLANS UBC or ICC
Rates*
*Uniform Building Code as~nendedor International Fire Code
Table E- E1 7~'
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
F. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
NON-RESIDENT FEE - BASE FEE PLUS 20%
1.FACILITY USE RENTAL RATES
Facility use policies apply.
Appropriate taxes are included in rates unless otherwise noted.
(a) SHERIDAN COMMUNITY CENTER - ROOM RENTAL RATER 2003 RATE
(Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rate~
Recreation and/or educational purposes only.
Per hour, two (2) hour minimum
Daytime (Monday- Friday: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM)
Lounge $6.25
Room A, B, C, or Conference Room $5.00
Gym $15.00
Eveninqs (Monday - Friday: 5:00 PM to 10:00 PM)/Saturday and Sunday
Lounge $12.50
Room A, B, C $7.50
Conference Room $10.00
Gym $20.00
Party Packa.qe (Lounqe & Gym) $25.00
Entire building - Up to eight (8) hours $400.00
Additional staff (per hour) $10.75
(Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rat~---
Recreational and/or educational purposes only.
Per hour, two (2) hour minimum
Daytime (Monday - Friday: 7:30 AM to 5:30 PM)
Lounge $25.00
Room A, B, C $15.00
Conference Room $20.00
Gym $40.00
Party Packaqe (Lounqe & Gym) $50.00
Entire Building - Up to eight (8) hours $800.00
Additional Staff (per hour) $10.75
Table F- F1 .~,
PARKS RECREATION DEPT- RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
3003 RATE
(b) BREMERTON SR. CITIZENS CENTER - ROOM RENTAL RATER
(Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
Room Rental Fees - per hour, two (2) hour minimum
Cardmom/Meeting Room $15.00
Main Room $25.00
Kitchen $10.00
Additional staffing per hour $10.75
Entire Facility up to eight (8) hours $200.00
(Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
Room Rental Fees - per hour, (two) 2 hour minimum
Cardroom/Meeting Room $30.00
Main Room $50.00
Kitchen $20.00
Additional staffing per hour $16.25
Entire Facility - Up to eight (8) hours $400.00
(c) JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER
(Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
Private - Non-Profit
Up to 50 participants Per hr $52.0055.00
Staffing each added hour $10.00
51 - 100 Per hr $62.0065.00
101-150+ Per hr $72.0075.00
Gallery $5.00
Team
Deep Lanes Per hr per lane $3.003.25
Shallow Lanes Per hr per lane $2.002.25
Table F~ F2
PARKS RECREATION DEPT- RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
Staffing Per hr as needed $15.00
School Lessons
Up to 35 students $52.0055.00
36 - 45 students $69.0955.00
46 - 55 students $72.0075.00
(Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
Commercial Per hr $~0.0066.00
Deep Lanes Per hr per lane $6.006.60
Shallow Lanes Per hr per lane $4.004.40
Staffing Per hr as needed $15.00
2003 RATE
(d) EVERGREEN PARK SHELTERS - RESERVATION FEES
Four (4) hour sessions per reservation unless noted.
Note: Shelter #4 is not reservable. Use of shelter fl4 is on a first come/first
served basis.
Parties who have reserved the other Evergreen Park shelters may not use
this shelter at the same time.
(Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
Shelter 1 $30.00
Shelter 2, 3, 5, or 6f $15.00
Shelter 4 (not reservable) no charge
Upper NAD $15.00
Lent Landing $15.00
(Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
Shelter 1 $60.00
Shelter 2, 3, 5, or 6 $30.00
Shelter 4 (not reservable) no charge
Upper NAD $30.00
Lent Landing $30.00
Table F- F3 7~
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
(e) PARK RESERVATION PROCESSING FEES
Ail Parks except Upper NAD and Lent Landing $10.00
20O3-RAT-E
(f) ATHLETIC FIELD - RESERVATIONS
Per hour unless noted
(Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates $12.0013.00
(Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates $22.0024.00
Game Fee - Softball $22.0024.00
Game Fee - Soccer $35.0040.00
(.q) BLUEBERRY PARK - PEA PATCH ANNUAL RATE
Recreational purposes only. $34.00
RATE
2. PROGRAM FEES & CHARGES 2-O4;)3-RA-T~
not to
(a) NEW PROGRAMS exceed cost
plus 25%
(b) GLENN JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER
ADMISSIONS
Youth (0-3 yrs.) NC
Youth (4-17 yrs.) $2.252.50
Adult (18-54 yrs.) $3.00
Seniors (55 & up) $2.252.50
Disabled $2.252.50
Adult Fitness $3.00
Senior Fitness $2.252.50
Disabled Fitness $2.252.50
Special Public $1,00
PUNCH CARDS
Table F - F4 -~ ~
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
Youth 10 ~unch $!2.0020.00
Youth 20 ~unch $3~.00-!0.00
Adult 10 ~unch $24.00
Adult 20 ;unch $48.00
Senior/Disabled 10 ~unch $!9.0020.00
SeniodDisabled 20 ~unch $36.00~9.00
Fitness/Lesson 10 ~unch $24.00
Fitness/Lesson 20 ~unch $48.00
SeniodDisabled Fitness 10 ~unch $?..,9020.00
SeniodDisabled Fitness 20 ~unch $36~9040.00
PASSES
Youth 6 months $ ! 00.00108.00
Youth 12 months $-1-80~O207.00
Adult 6 months $ ! 35.00132.00
Adult 12 months $250.00253.00
SeniodDisabled 6 months $ !09.00108.00
SeniodDisabled 12 months $ ! 90.00207.00
SWIMMING LESSONS
Youth/Adult 30 min. $3.253.50
Private 30 min. $ !2.0013.00
Semi-Private 30 min. $!2.0020.00
Parent Tot $3.00
Family Lessons 4 lessons $65.0058.00
ITEMS FOR SALE
Basic goggles $5.005.50
Deluxe goggles $ !2.0013.00
Latex cap $3.003.50
Ear plug $2.002.25
Nose plug $2.002.25
New items
(includes Washington not to exceed
State Sales Tax) cost plus 75%
2003 RATE
(c) ATHLETIC PROGRAM FEES
VOLLEYBALL
Co-ed (Fall & Winter) per team $200.09210.00
Men and Women (Spring) per team $200.00210.00
Men and Co-ed Sand (Summer) per team $110.00
Open Gym (Oct. - June) per person $2.00
Table F - F5 ~ O
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
2003 RATE
SOCCER
Player's fee per player $37.90d0.00
BASKETBALL
Men's League (Fall & Winter) per team $~,00.00425.00
Boy's League (Winter) per team $225.00
Girl's (Fall) per player $5~.0055.00
Blacktop League (Summer) no charge
SOFTBALL
Men's League (Spring) per team $44g~gg450.00
Men's League - Players fee
(Spg) per player $ !~.0017.00
Sunday Co-ed (Spring) per team $ ......330.00
Sunday Co-ed - Players fee
(Spg) per player $! ! .0012.00
Co-ed League (Fall) per team $350.00360.00
Co-ed - Players fee (Fall) per player $!2.0013.00
Men's League (Fall) per team $350.00360.00
Men's League - Players fee
(Fall) per player $!2.0013.00
TOURNAMENTS (SOFTBALL AND SOCCER
- INVITATIONAL TOURNAMENTS
Lions - One Day $220.00
Lions - Two Day $350.00
Lions - Three Day $460.00
Pendergast - One Day $290.00
Pendergast - Two Day $485.00
Pendergast - Three Day $615.00
-- STATE TOURNAMENTS
Lions - One Day $270.00
Lions - Two Day $400.00
Lions - Three Day $510.00
Pendergast - One Day $390.00
Pendergast - Two Day $580.00
Pendergast - Three Day $710.00
Table F - F6 ~
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
2003 RATE
-- Regional and National Tournaments
will pay no less than State fees, but rates
will be negotiated
3. SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER AND RECREATION DIVISION PROGRAMS
(a) PROGRAM FEE FORMULA~_ Except for the Sr. Citizens Trip program, participant fees for
activities (programs, classes, events, etc.) promoted by the Sr. Citizen Center and the
Recreation Division are established by the following formulas:
A. Activities when the instructor is on the payroll.
[(Total class hours including preparation) x (Instructor's hourly wage) x (1.2 Administration factor)] divided
by(minimum # of students per activity)] + (the cost of group supplies divided by minimum # of students) +
Cost of individual class supplies, if applicable = Student class fee for City of Bremerton Resident.
B. Activities when the instructor is on contract.
[(Price per student required by the Instructor less class supply fees) x (1.2 Administration factor)]+
Class supply fees = Student class fee for City of Bremerton Resident.
C. Non-Resident Fees
For recreation classes, programs, swim passes and rentals - ranging from:
$5.00 to $25.00 add on 20%
$25.01 to $50.00 add a flat $5.00
$50.01 to $100.00 add a flat $10.00
$100.01 to $200.00 add a flat $20.00
$200.01 + add a flat $40.00
For Sr. Center activities, participants pay an annual membership fee of $65.50 (resident) or
$-1~11.00 (non resident) in lieu of the 20% non-resident rate.
2003 RATE
actual costs
{b) SENIOR CENTER TRIPS plus 5%8%
4, IVY GREEN CEMETERY - FEES AND CHARGES
3003 RATE 2003 RATE
RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT
(a) ADULT BURIAL
Grave Site $700.00840.00 $~.0,001,008.00
Opening/Closing $~.00,00480,00 $~,80.00576.00
Liner $~, 15,00498.00 $498~g.597.60
Oversize Liner (if required) $~22.00746.40 $7~.~,00595.68
Grave Side Service Preparation (optional) $!22.00146.40 $!d~.00175.68
(b) VETERANS PLOT
Table F- F7 ~-'
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
2003 RATE 2003-RATE
RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT
Opening/Closing $~00.00480.00 $~0.00576.00
Liner ?.15.00498.00 ,~597.60
Oversize Liner (if required) $522.00746.40 $7-!.~_.00895.68
Grave Side Service Preparation (optional) $!22.09146.40 $! d~_.00175.68
Stone Marker Setting $7~.0088.80 $89~106.56
Bronze Marker Setting $58.0079.20 ~95.04.
(c) INFANT BURIAL
Infant Plot in Babyland $171.00205.20 $205.00246.24
Opening/Closing $255.09319.20 $,=3-:19~383.04
Liner $!87.00224.40 $22~- ..00269.28
Grave Side Service Preparation (optional) $!22.00146.40 $ .~!~.00175.68
(d) DISINTERNMENT
Removal & opening of new site $94~,~;~1,098.00 ~1,317.60
Site Purchase $537.00840.00 $~.~..901,008.00
Liner $,!. ! 5.00~-98.00 $49~(~597.60
Removal (only) $~!0.00722.00 $7.32,00878.40
Cremaining $!'!8.00175.20 $~75.00210.24
(e) ADDITIONAL BURIAL COSTS
2 hr. max. $!22.00146.40 $!'1.8.00175.68
4 hour max. $2'!-!.00292.80 $29,:%(~351.36
(f) LINERS
Adult $-!, 15.00498.0q $498~597.60
Infant $! 37.00224.40 $22'!..00269.28
Cremation Vault (2 piece) $100.00120.00 $!20.00144.00
Oversize Liner (if required) $822.00746.40 $7-!.8.00895.68
{q) OPENING AND CLOSING
Adult $'!.90.00'1-80.00 $'!.30.00576.00
Infant (Babyland) $288.00319,20 $,3.,t9.~383.04
Urn Interment (per urn) $73.0097.60 $88.00105.12
(h) BURIAL SITES
Adult $700.00840.00 $3'!.0.001,008.00
Table F- F8 00.~
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
2003 RATE 2003 RATE
RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT
Infant (Babyland) $! 7! .00205.20 $205.00246.24
Infant (any site not in Babyland) $700.00840.00 $8~,0.001,008.00
(i) INURNMENT
Cement Vault $!00.00120.00 $!20.00144.00
Opening/Closing $73.0087.60 $88.00105.12
Grave Side Service Preparation (optional) $!22.00146.40 $!d~.00175.68
Second Right of Inurnment $150.00180.00 $!89.00216.00
{i) DISURNMENTS
Urn $!d~.00175.20 $!75.09210.24
(k) RAISE GRAVE $98.00117.60 $!!8.00141.12
{I) MARKERS
5" x 8" bronze )lus tax $55.0056.00 $5~.0079.20
4" x 12" x 2" x 3" )lus tax $50.0072.00 $72.0086.40
8" x 16" x 2" x 3" )lus tax $85.0078.00 $78.0093.60
10" x 20" x 2" x 3" )lus tax $70.9084.00 $8~,.00100.80
12" x 24" x 2" x 3" )lus tax $75.0090.00 $90.00108.00
12" x 24" bronze )lus tax $75.9090.00 $99.00108.00
12" x 36" x 2" x 3" )lus tax $! !0.00132.00 $!32.00158.40
14" x 36" x 2" x 3" )lus tax $! !0.90132.00 $! 32.00158.40
5. GOLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COMPLEX
(a) CASCADE COURSE RATE
Weekday 18 Holes * 27.00
Weekend/Holiday 18 Holes (3) 36,00
Weekday 9 Holes * 19.00
Weekend/Holiday 9 Holes 22.00
Weekday 9 Hole Continue* 8.00
Weekend/Holiday 9 Hole Continue 14.00
Twiliqht Weekday* 19.00
Twiliqht Weekend/Holiday 22.00
Leaque Rate** 18.00
Senior 18 Holes* 21.00
Junior 18 Holes* 11.00
Junior Twiliqht Weekend/Holiday 13.00
Annual Pass Sinqle 1.400.00
Table F-F9
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
Annual Pass Couple 2,200.00
Annual Pass Sr. Sin.qle** 900.00
Annual Pass Sr. Couple** 1,400.00
Semi Annual Sin.qle 700/750
Semi Annual Couple 1,100/1,150
Semi Annual Sr. Sinqle** 450/500
Semi Annual Sr. Couple** 800/850
Senior Punch Card** (2) 190.00
Reqular 20 Rnd Punch Card 450.00
Re~lular 10 Rnd Punch Card 245.00
Low Income Sr. Punch Card** **** (2) 80.00
Corporate Pass-Non Taxable .... (2) 2,200.00
Corporate Pass-Taxable* *** (2) 2,200.00
Daily Private Cart 16.00
Shotf:lun Tournament (Not To Exceed) 18
Hole Green Fee 45.00
* Mondaythrouqh Thursday
** Not for Saturday, Sunday or Holiday
*** Beqinninq 1/1/02 the Jots are reduced to 100 rounds
**** Aqe 62 & up with household income < $18,000. RCW 71.38.070
1. A reduced rate, not less than the current twi-liqht rate, may be offered with the approval
of the Director of Parks & Recreation
2. May be used for twilight any day of the week includinq Holidays
3. Saturday, Sunday or Holiday (May - September Not to Exceed Rate)
(b) OLYMPIC COURSE RATE
Weekday 18 Holes* 37.00
Weekend/Holiday 18 Holes (2) 54.00
Weekday 9 Holes* 21.00
Weekend/Holiday 9 Holes 30.00
Weekday 9 Hole Continue* 16.00
Weekend/Holiday 9 Hole Continue 24.00
Twiliqht Weekday* 20.00
Twiliqht Weekend/Holiday 24.00
Leaque Rate** 18.00
Senior 18 Holes* 30.00
Junior 18 Holes* 20.00
Cascade Passes And Punch Cards 10.00
Shot.qun Tournament (Not To Exceed 18
Hole Green Fee) (2) 65.00
* Mondaythrouqh Thursday
** Not for Saturday, Sunday or Holiday
.... Aqe 62 & up with household income < $18,000. RCW 71.38.070
Table F - Fl0
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
1. A reduced rate, not less than the current twi-liqht rate, may be offered with the approval
of the Parks & Recreation Director.
2. Saturday, Sunday or Holiday (May - September Not to Exceed Rate)
Table F-Fll ~
GREENS FEES RATE T^S' = FI
EFFECTIVE E-FFE-CT4VE
~ 11113002 !!!.;2003
~ 25.00 2~.00 27.09
~t4~5~-Ne~ 17.09 !8.00
T,,,;I;~h+ IM~b~AIM~I;~,, on nn 21 O0 22 O0
' * 19.00 2n.nn
~ ' * ~ 4 n nn
~ o nnn nn 2,200 09 o ann nn
A ..... I D~ e. ~ .... I~** 4 onnnn ~ annnn 4 d00~unn
~ ~SO~OO 700~50 7OO.~EO
~ ...... e~ D~ ~1.~ T~v~hl ..... IO~ q nnn nn ~.~O,l~n~nn o ann nn
~ d!.OO 43.00 dS.OO
· *** ~"" ~2 & ...... ~*~ h ..... ~ ~ ...... $!~ OOO ~m~/71 38 070
thc D?cctcr ~* °~'~s & o .....
Table F1 - F1-1
EFFECTIVE ~ E-FFE4DT-IVE
~ ~" ~ ~ ~ 37 09
........ ~ C ~ ............. ,~ ~ ·
Twilight Weekday* ~,~° . nn ~ -~ on , nn ~ -°n ~ . nn ~
~ ~ on nn on nn
Shc+ ....~ ......... + (Hat Tc c ....~ ! ~
Table F1 - F1-2
PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES - RATE TABLE G
Ail Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
G. PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
2003 RATE
1. RIGHT-OF WAY USE PERMITS FEES
Type A (Short Term Use) Regular $140
Type B (Disturbance of ROW)
Sidewalk Repairs $50
Driveway, Transverse Street Patch $140
and
Spot Patches
New Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Longitudinal $1/ft with a $140 minimum
Street Patch
New Street $3/ft with a $600 minimum
Water & Sewer Mains & Laterals ROW $50
Permit
Type C (Long Term Use)
Application and Processing $100
Use longer than one year 1/10 adjoining land value set in the
County Assessor's records per
square foot of impacted ROW
annually with a $100 minimum.
Use shorter than one year 1/50 adjoining land value set in the
County Assessor's records per
square foot of impacted ROW
monthly with a $100 minimum.
Type D Regular (Franchised Utility Routine $100
Maintenance)
Plan Reviews $0.10/feet of improvement with $100
minimum
Additional Work $40/hour + equipment charges
2. RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION $547
3. TELECOM MASTER PERMIT FEE $500/one time
4. TELECOM LICENSE FEE $200/one time
Table G- G1 ~
DATE SUBMiTTED: 11/20/03 BILL # c. ~ - :<¥
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON q ~
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance Committee Meeting Date: f~0c~-- ,~35/
Amending BMC Chapter 3.50 Utility Taxes COUNCIL MEETING Date: /~a~ --?_~ '~ ¥ /~~~O ~
Department: Finance .2 ~
Presemer: Michael Wilson
Phone: 473-5590
SUMMARY: The proposed ordinance increases the utility tax rate for Water, Wastewater, Storm
Water and Cable utilities from 7% to 8.5%.
ATTACHMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
FISCAL/BUDGET: 12/15/03
CONSENT AGENDA []
OPERATIONS: 12/i 5/03
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve an Ordinance amending BMC Chapter 3.50 Utility Taxes.
Move to pass Ordinance #__ on second reading.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Avvrove [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending Chapter 3.50 relating to utility
taxes for 2004 increasing the tax for water, wastewater, stormwater
and cable utilities.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to increase the taxes for the year 2004 for
water, wastewater, stormwater and cable utilities; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHiNGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTIONL Section 3.50.050 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Persons Subject to Tax - Amount" relating to utility taxes is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.50.050 PERSONS SUBJECT TO TAX - AMOUNT.
In addition to other taxes or fees that may be imposed or levied by the City, there is
hereby levied upon all persons (including the City) engaging in business within the City, a fee or
tax to be collected as follows:
(a) Gas. Upon every person engaging in the business of transmitting, distributing or
the selling of manufactured or natural gas, a fee or tax equal to six (6) percent of the total gross
income from such business conducted within the City.
(b) Water. Upon every person engaging in the business of providing water utility
service, a fee or tax equal to sevea-4-7-)eight and one-half (8.5) percent of the total gross income
from such business conducted within the City. The total gross income from the business of
providing water utility service includes the "gross income from timber sales" of the utility as that
term is defined in this chapter.
(c) Wastewater. Upon every person engaging in the business of providing wastewater
utility service, a fee or tax equal to ~c;':n (7)eight and one-half (8.5) percent of the total gross
income from such business conducted within the City.
(d) Stormwater. Upon every person engaging in the business of providing stormwater
utility service, a fee or tax equal to sevca-(g)eight and one-half (8.5) percent of the total gross
income from such business conducted within the City.
(e) Cable. Upon every person engaging in the business of transmitting television
signals by means of a cable distribution system commonly known as television cable service, a
fee or tax equal to sevcm-(C)eight and one-half (8.5) percent of the total gross income from such
business conducted within the City.
(f) Solid waste. Upon every person engaging in the business of providing solid waste
collection service, a fee or tax equal eleven (11) percent of the total gross income from such
business conducted within the City.
1
ct 2004 Utility Taxes
I
-I
(g) Electricity. Upon every person engaging in the business of producing,
transmitting, distributing or selling electricity, a fee or tax equal to six (6) percent of the total
gross income from such business conducted within the City.
(h) Telephone. Upon every person engaged in carrying on a telephone business for
hire or for sale of a commodity or a service within or partly within the corporate limits of the
City, a tax for the privilege of so doing business a tax equal to six percent (6%) of the total gross
income rendered within the City.
(1) "Deductions" In computing the telephone tax, there shall be deducted from
the gross operating revenues the following items:
(i) Amounts derived from transactions in interstate or foreign
commerce or from any business which the City is prohibited from taxing under the Constitutions
of the United States or the State of Washington.
(ii) Amounts derived from that portion of network telephone service,
as defined in RCW 82.04.065, which represents charges to another telecommunications
company, as defined in RCW 80.04.010, for connecting fees, switching charges or cartier access
charges relating to intrastate toll telephone services, or for access to, or charges for, interstate
services or charges for network telephone service that is purchased for the purpose of resale.
(iii) Adjustments made to a billing or to a customer account or to a
telecommunications company accrual account in order to reverse a billing or charge that had
been made as a result of third-party fraud or other crime and was not properly a debt of a
customer.
(iv) A complete deduction from gross income shall be allowed for
credit losses, only to cellular telephone service companies which keep their regular books of
account on an accrual basis, for cash discounts and credit losses actually sustained by a taxpayer
as a result of telephone service business.
(2) Allocation of Income - Cellular Telephone Service.
(i) Service address: Payments by a customer for the telephone service
from telephones without a fixed location shall be allocated among taxing jurisdictions to the
location of the customer's principal service address during the period for which the tax applies.
(ii) Roaming phones: When the service is provided while a subscriber
is roaming outside the subscriber's normal cellular network area, the gross income shall be
assigned consistent with the taxpayer's accounting system to the location of the originating cell
site of the call, or to the location of the main cellular switching office that switched the call.
SECTION2. Referendum Procedure. Pursuant to RCW 35.21.706, the tax
increase set forth in this ordinance is subject to a referendum procedure to apply to an ordinance
increasing the rate of the tax. A referendum petition may be filed within seven days of passage of
the ordinance with the City Clerk. Within ten days, the City Clerk shall confer with the petitioner
concerning form and style of the petition, issue the petition an identification number, and secure
an accurate, concise, and positive ballot title from the designated local official. The petitioner
shall have thirty days in which to secure the signatures of not less than fifteen percent of the
registered voters of the city, as of the last municipal general election, upon petition forms which
contain the ballot title and the full text of the measure to be referred. The City Clerk shall verify
the sufficiency of the signatures on the petition and, if sufficient valid signatures are properly
2004 Utility Taxes
submitted, shall certify the referendum measure to the next election ballot within the city or at a
special election ballot as provided pursuant to RCW 35.17.260(2).
This referendum procedure shall be exclusive in all instances for any city ordinance
imposing a business and occupation tax or increasing the rate of the tax and shall supersede the
procedures provided under chapters 35.17 and 35A. 11 RCW and all other statutory or charter
provisions for initiative or referendum which might otherwise apply.
SECTION3. Severabilit~. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003
PASSED by the City Council the day of ., 2003
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
Approved this day of ., 2003
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the day of ., 2003
EFFECTIVE the day of ., 2003
ORDINANCE NO.
R:~LEGAL\Ordinances~AdministrationX2004 Rate TablesX3.50 utility tax changes.doc
2004 utitity taxes
DATE SUBMITTED: 11/20/03 BILL #
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance Committee Meeting Date:
Amending BMC Chapter 3.82 Commercial COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Parking Tax Department: Finance ~-~
Presenter: Michael Wilson
Phone: 473-5590
SUMMARY: The proposed ordinance increases the commercial parking tax rate from 8% to 10%.
ATTACHMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
APPROVALS: ~,~ [& ~_~
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: //~
FINANCE DIRECTOR: _ f-
FISCAL/BUDGET: 12/15/o3
CONSENT AGENDA []
OPERATIONS: 1 2/15/03
COUNCIL PRESIDENT: ~r_~ /~'~-~-~'~:-~
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve an Ordinance amending BMC Chapter 3.82 Commercial Parking Tax.
Move to pass Ordinance #__ on second reading.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Aonrove [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending Chapter 3.82 relating to
commercial parking taxes for 2004.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to increase commercial parking taxes for the
year 2004; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION1. Section 3.82.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Tax
Rate - Who Must Pay" relating to commercial parking tax is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.82.020 TAX RATE - WHO MUST PAY.
There is levied upon and shall be collected from every person engaged in a commercial
parking business within the City a commercial parking tax in an amount equal to eigh-t-per~-~4
(8%)ten percent (10%) of the gross proceeds of the commercial parking business.
SECTION2. Referendum Procedure. The tax adopted in this ordinance as
authorized under RCW 82.80.030 is subject to a referendum. A referendum petition must be
filed with the City Clerk within seven days of passage of the ordinance. Within ten days, the City
Clerk shall confer with the petitioner concerning form and style of the petition, issue an
identification number for the petition, and write a ballot title for the measure. The ballot title
shall be posed as a question so that an affirmative answer to the question and an affirmative vote
on the measure results in the tax or fee being imposed and a negative answer to the question and
a negative vote on the measure results in the tax or fee not being imposed. The petitioner shall be
notified of the identification number and ballot title within this ten-day period.
After this notification, the petitioner has thirty days in which to secure on petition forms
the signatures of not less than fifteen percent of the registered voters of the county for county
measures, or not less than fifteen percent of the registered voters of the city for city measures,
and to file the signed petitions with the City Clerk. Each petition form must contain the ballot
title and the full text of the measure to be referred. The City Clerk shall verify the sufficiency of
the signatures on the petitions. If sufficient valid signatures are properly submitted, the City
Clerk shall submit the referendum measure to the county or city voters at a general or special
election held on one of the dates provided in RCW 29A.04.320 as determined by the county or
city legislative authority, which election shall not take place later than one hundred twenty days
after the signed petition has been filed with the filing officer.
The referendum procedure provided in this section is the exclusive method for subjecting
any county or city ordinance imposing a tax or fee under RCW 82.80.030 to a referendum vote.
2004 Commercial Parking Taxes
SECTION3. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in
force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the day of _, 2003
PASSED by the City Council the day of _, 2003
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
Approved this day of ,2003
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the day of ,2003
EFFECTIVE the day of ,2003
ORDINANCE NO.
R:\LEGAL\OrdinancesXAdministration~2004 Rate Tablesk3.82 parking tax changes.doc
2004 Commercial Parking Taxes
DATE SUBMITTED: 11/20/03 BILL it L ~ --
AGENDA BILL q
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance Committee Meeting Date:
Setting Rates and Fees for Water, COUNCIL MEETING Date: ~ ,~l~--O 3 <~ /~~.l~[~-d
Wastewater and Storm Water Utilities and Departmem: Finance
amending Chapter 15.06 of the BMC Presemer: Michael Wilson
Phone: 473-5590
SUMMARY: An increase in assessments, rates, fees and charges is required in order to meet the
ongoing maintenance, operation, capital and debt service needs of the City's Water, Wastewater,
Storm Water Utilities. This ordinance establishes new rates for all categories to incorporate a 2.1%
CPI adjustment from the year 2003 rotes to year 2004 rates.
ATTACHMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: ..........
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR: .
MAYOR:
FISCAL/BUDGET: 12/15/03 CONSENT AGENDA []
OPERATIONS: 12/15/03
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve an Ordinance establishing new rates for all categories of assessments, fees,
rates and charges for Water, Wastewater and Storm Water Utilities for 2004 on first reading.
Move to pass Ordinance # on second reading.
COUNCIL ACTION: [] Al>prove [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE amending Appendix A of Section 15.06.015 of
the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to assessments, rates, fees
and charges for municipal water, wastewater and stormwater
services establishing new rates for all categories to incorporate a
2.1% CPI adjustment from the year 2003 rates to year 2004 rates.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the rates, fees and charges set
forth in Appendix A of Section 15.06.015 of the Bremerton Municipal Code in order to make the
automatic Consumer Price Index adjustment as provided in Section 15.06.015 BMC;
WHEREAS, no other rate adjustments are proposed for Appendix A of Section
15.06.015 BMC; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Appendix A of Section 15.06.015 of the Bremerton Municipal
Code is hereby repealed in its entirety, and there is hereby created a new Appendix A attached
hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference establishing new rates for all categories
to incorporate a 2.1% CPI adjustment from the year 2003 rates to year 2004 rates.
SECTION2. Section 1 of this Ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2004. The
rates currently in effect as set forth in Appendix A of Section 15.06.015 on the date of adoption
of this Ordinance shall remain in effect until January 1, 2004.
SECTION 3. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the _ day of ., 2003
PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2003
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
2004 Assessments
Approved this day of _, 2003
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attomey
PUBLISHED the day of ,2002
EFFECTIVE the day of ,2002
ORDINANCE NO.
R:\LEGAL\Ordinances\Public Works & Utilities~.004 CPI Rates 15.06.doc
2004 Assessments
Appendix A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2004
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2004 2004
GENERAL FACILITY FEES
Water (per ER.U) $ 249.12 $ 376.75
Wastewater (per EP-,U) $ 249.12 $ 376.75
FRONT FOOTAGE FEES
Water
Per Front Foot $ 20.42 $ 30.63
OffRoad R,ate $ 1.021.00 $ 1,531.50
Wastewater
Per Front Foot $ 25.53 $ 38.29
OffRoadRate $ 1,27&25 $ 1,914.38
Properties not included in ULID #327 $ 73.05
Fronting the sewer main in Northlake Way.
Installed as part of the Kitsap Lake Sewer Extension Project.
CONNECTION/INSPECTION FEES
Water
3/4" $ 1,527.42 $ 2,291.12
1" $ 1,531.50 $ 2,297.25
1 1/2" $ 2,374.85 $ 3,562.27
2" $ 2,477.97 $ 3,716.44
Greater than 2" Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials
Field Inspection Fees
Water main extensions (per foot) $ 1.02 $ 1.53
but not less than: $ 408.40 $ 612.60
Pump Station $ 536.03 $ 804.04
Miscellaneous (per hour) $ 42.88 $ 64.32
Wastewater
Lateral Connection at P/L $ 42.88 $ 64.32
Lateral Connection at Main $ 268.01 $ 402.02
Conveyance Facility Ext. (Per Foot) $ 1.33 $ 1.99
but not less than: $ 321.62 $ 482.42
Pump Station $ 536.03 $ 804.04
Miscellaneous (per hour) $ 42.88 $ 64.32
1 of 7
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2004 2004
RETAIL WATER SERVICE RATES
General Service - Monthly Service Charge
Meter Size
5/8 x 3/4 inches $ 5.31 $ 7.96
1 inch $ 6.07 $ 9.09
1 1/2 inch $ 8.63 $ 12.97
2 inch $ 11.59 $ 17.46
3 inch $ 22.00 $ 32.93
4 inch $ 40.94 $ 61.52
6 inch $ 145.29 $ 217.93
8 inch $ 530.26 $ 795.41
10inch $ 1,893.19 $ 2,839.76
12inch $ 7,118.87 $ 10,678.33
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 0.77 $ 1.15
Fire Protection - Monthly Service Charge
Service Size
1 inch $ 10.52 $ 15.83
1 1/2 inch $ 15.83 $ 23.69
2 inch $ 20.57 $ 30.83
3 inch $ 22.67 $ 34.00
4 inch $ 24.71 $ 37.01
6 inch $ 30.83 $ 46.30
8 inch $ 41.04 $ 61.57
10 inch $ 57.53 $ 86.33
12 inch $ 82.24 $ 123.34
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 1.53 $ 2.30
- For Useage Other Than Firefighting
Low-Income Senior and Low-Income Disabled Citizen - Monthly Service Charge
Meter Size 5/8 x 3/4"
Base Charge (per account) $ 5.31 $ 7.96
Commodity Charge
0 - 10 HCF/Billing No Charge No Charge
Over 10 HCF/Billing (per HCF) $ 0.77 $ 1.15
Temporary/Construction Meter
1" Meter
Deposit $ 102.10 $ 102.10
Base Fee (per month) $ 6.07 $ 9.09
Set Up Fee $ 79.64 $ 119.46
Hydrant meter
Deposit $ 510.50 $ 510.50
Base Fee (per month) $ 19.09 $ 28.64
Set Up Fee $ 79.64 $ 119.46
Equipment Loss/Damage Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 0.77 $ 1.15
2of7
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2004 20O4
RETAIL WASTEWATER SERVICE RATES
Monthly Service Charge
Single Family
Base Charge (per accoun0 $ 11.84 $ 13.58
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 3.68 $ 4.24
Duplex on 1 Meter or 2 Bldgs on 1 Meter
Base Charge (per unit) $ 9.39 $ 10.82
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 3.68 $ 4.24
Multiple Family
Base Charge (per unit) $ 9.39 $ 10.82
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 3.68 $ 4.24
Commercial I
Base Charge (per account) $ 17.51 $ 20.16
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 3.78 $ 4.34
Commercial II
Base Charge (per accoun0 $ 17.82 $ 20.52
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 5.92 $ 6.81
Commercial III
Base Charge (per account) $ 17.66 $ 20.32
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 4.85 $ 5.57
Low-Income Senior and Low-Income Disabled Citizen
Base Charge (per account) $ 7.35 $ 8.47
Commodity Charge (per HCF)
0 - 5 HCF/Month No charge No charge
Over 5 HCF/Month $ 3.68 $ 4.24
Septa~e Disposal
(Per Gallon of Tank Capacity) $ 0.13 $ 0.13
3of7
I
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2004 2004
RETAIL STORMWATER RATES
Monthly Service Charge
Single Farmly / Duplex
Base Charge (per account) $ 4.59 N/A
Exception: Duplex
w/2 Meters (per account) $ 2.55 N/A
Multiple Family
Base Charge (per ISU) $ 4.59 N/A
Commercial
Base Charge (per ISU) $ 4.59 N/A
Public School Districts (per account) $ 4.59 N/A
Low-Income Senior and Low-Income Disabled Citizen
Base Charge (per account) $ 2.81 N/A
Multiple Family & Commercial Rate Adjustment
Water Quality (per ISU) $ (0,51) N/A
Water Quantity (per ISU) $ (1.53) N/A
Stormwater Penalty
New Multiple Family & Commercial
development without on-site detention
Charge (per ISU) $ 1.02 N/A
IMPROPER STORMWATER INFLOW RATES
The following rates are established for Improper Stormwater Inflow, based upon the storrawatar ISU
for each lot and adjusted annually on the following schedule:
EFFECTIVE DATE RATE
May 1, 2002 25% Stormwater Fee for Property
May 1, 2003 50% Stormwater Fee for Property
May 1, 2004 75% Stormwater Fee for Property
May 1, 2005 100% Stormwater Fee for Property
After May 1, 2005, the Improper Stormwater Inflow Rate wil! remain at 100% of the Stormwater Fee for a property
unless otherwise modified by the City Council. The fees shall be deposited in the Wastewater Fund (# 451).
40f7
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2004 2004
MISCELLANEOUS FEES AND CHARGES
Park Reservation Fee $ 30.63 $ 30.63
(non-refundable)
Office Services
New Account (includes water rum-on) $ 20.00 $ 20.00
Account Maintenance $ 5.11 $ 5.11
Past Due Notice $ 2.55 $ 2.55
Lien Recovery Charge $ 102.10 $ 102.10
Duplicate Bill Charge $ 1.02 $ 1.02
Close Account/Meter Read/Water Service Tum-
off $ 25.00 $ 25.00
Field Services
Pavement Restoration Charge
(refundable, if assessed and not required)
Asphalt $ 816.80 $ 1,225.20
Concrete $ 2,348.30 $ 3,522.45
County Road Permit N/A Cost
Wet Tapping (Water Main Only)*
8" and smaller - incl excavation & backfill $ 1,995.03 $ 2,992.55
8" and smaller - service to property line $ 3,586.77 $ 5,379.65
8" and smaller - tap only $ 490.08 $ 735.12
Greater than 8" Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials
*Does Not Include Pavement Restoration Charge
Fire Hydrant Installation* $ 4,087.06 $ 6,131.11
*Does Not Include Pavement Restoration Charge
Water Meter Reinstallation
3/4" & 1" $ 60.24 $ 60.24
1-1/2" & 2" $ 94.95 $ 94.95
3" and greater Time &Materials Time & Materials
Water Meter Reactivation $ 42.88 $ 42.88
Water Meter Tampering
Tampering Removal $ 134.77 $ 134.77
Tampering Reinstallation Time & Materials Time & Materials
Cross-Connection Control
Inspection $ 42.88 $ 42.88
Fire Service - Detector, Meter & MXU $ 316.51 $ 316.51
Storz Adapter $ 231.77 $ 231.77
5of7
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2004 2004
MISCELLANEOUS (cont'd)
Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on
(Customer Request)
Regular Hours $ 20.00 $ 20.00
After Hours $ 107.21 $ 107.21
Delinquency Notice $ 10.72 $ 10.72
Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on
(Delinquent Accounts)
Regular Hours $ 42.88 $ 42.88
After Hours $ 107.21 $ 107.21
Flow and Pressure Test (Uncertified)
3/4" & 1" meters only $ 42.88 $ 42.88
1-1/2" & 2" meters only $ 85.76 $ 85.76
Larger than 2" Time & Materials Time & Materials
Utility Plant Locates
Regular Hours N/C N/C
After Hours $ 107.21 $ 107.21
Emergency N/C N/C
Meter Test Fee (based on meter size)
3/4" & 1" $ 94.95 $ 94.95
1-1/2" & 2" $ 153.15 $ 153.15
3" or greater Time & Materials Time & Materials
Engineering Services*
Plan Check Fees
Main Extensions: per foot $ 0.22 $ 0.34
BUT not less than $ 214.4l $ 321.62
(Includes hydrants and appurtenances
and connection to water system)
Pump Stations $ 536.03 $ 804.04
Fireline Extension $ 85.76 $ 128.65
Irrigation Systems $ 85.76 $ 128.65
System Connections $ 85.76 $ 128.65
Miscellaneous (per hour) $ 42,88 $ 64.32
* Fees include original review and one resubmittal review.
Additional reviews will be charged at miscellaneous hourly rate (above).
6of7
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2004 2004
MISCELLANEOUS (cont'd}
Storm Drainage Plan Review Fees **
Preliminary Drainage Plans
Residential Development $ 331.83 N/A
Non-Residential Development $ 229.73 N/A
Plus per ISU $ 10.21
Final Detailed Drainage Plans
Residential Development (per lot)
0 - 20 Lots $ 35.74 N/A
21 - 50 Lots $ 25.53 N/A
51 - 100 Lots $ 22.97 N/A
100+ Lots $ 20.42 N/A
Minimum Charge $ 255.25 N/A
Non-Residential Development
per ISU $ 20.42 N/A
Minimum Charge $ 306.30 N/A
Resubmittal Fees
First Resubmittal No Charge N/A
Subsequent Resubmittal $ 255.25 N/A
Storm Drainage Inspection Fees **
Residential Development (per lot) $ 15.32 N/A
Non-Residential Development (per ISU) $ 15.32 N/A
Minimum Charge $ 153.15 N/A
Conveyance Fac. Ext. (per foot) $ 0.77 N/A
Minimum Charge $ 306.30 N/A
Unscheduled Inspections* (per site visit) $ 42.88 N/A
*(Unscheduled inspections shall be tzacked through the course of a project and billed after the final site
inspection. Fees for unscheduled inspections shall be paid prior to fmal occupancy approval.)
** Does not apply to single family residence or duplex constxuction on an existing established lot.
Utility/Lien Searc¥ Fee (Manual)* $ 30.00 $ 30.00
*Search per parcel
7 of 7