Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/10/03 AGENDA FILE 239 4th Street · Bremerton, WA 98337 · Phone (360) 478-5280 ° Fax (360) 478-5251 *** AMENDED*** CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 10, 2003 1. PRE-COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M. in Council Conference Room A. General Council Business 2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. in Council Chambers A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Invocation 3. CONSENT AGENDA ~ A. Minutes of Meeting - November 25, 2003 (#AB03-223) B. Contract between the City of Bremerton and Bremerton Housing Authority for Supplemental Police Services (#AB03-224) 4. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS 5. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS 6. MAYOR'S REPORT 7. PUBLIC RECOGNITION - Comments limited to 3-minutes 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Professional Service Agreement with ROBINSON & NOBLE, INC. for Anderson Creek Well Field Improvements (#AB03-225) 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS - ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. Ordinance No. 4877 [Second Reading] creating B.M.C. Chapter 2.01 relating to PERS Eligibility (#AB03-222) B. Ordinance [First Reading] approving amendment to Ordinance No. 4826, relating to the FY 2003 Budget (#AB03-226) -,..~ '~ '~...,-,~ .... ,~,,,., ~Ar- r'~...,,+,,. '~ '~ (#A-?.O3 227) Items postponed (AGENDA CONTINUED ON BACK...) E-mail: citycouncil@ci.bremerton.wa.us · Web: www. d.bremerton.wa.us 10. INTRODUCTION OF NEW BUSINESS ITEMS [No Council action will be taken at this time] · Purchase of Property Insurance - Peggy Lesser, Risk Management · HOME Fund Allocation to Kitsap Community Resources - Michelle Eichorn, Community Development · Purchase of Backhoe Loader- Jim Orton, Fleet Manager · Resolution setting a Hearing Date for Street Vacation - Michael Mecham, City Engineer · Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement with Kitsap County - Michael Wilson, Finance Director · Kitsap County Jail Contract for Prisoner Housing - Michael Wilson, Finance Director 11. ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 10, 2003 SPEAKERS LIST /f you wish to make an announcement, inform the Council of an issue, or ask a general question...Please provide information below so staff will be able to contact you. Thank you. NAME ADDRES S/TELEPHONE TOPIC o o o CITIZENS PETITION The council office has been receiving phone calls about an article in The SUN newspaper regarding a citizen petition relating to a downtown tunnel. Based on these calls, there seems to be some confusion about the source of the petition and when council will consider the tunnel or its alternatives. Contrary to what may be inferred by the petition, the petition did not originate, nor is it being circulated by the city. It was prepared and is being circulated by a citizens group opposed to a runnel. Additionally, the matter has not been scheduled by the city council for its consideration and it will not be scheduled for consideration by the council this year. As of this date, there is no recommendation on any of the two tunnel or 4 surface alternatives under consideration. DATE SUBMITTED: November 26, 2003 BILL # ', '?,' AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON 3 A CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Minutes of Meeting - Committee Meeting Date: N/A November 25, 2003 COUNCIL MEETING Date: December 10, 2003 Department: City Council Presenter: Carol Arends Phone: (360) 473-5280 SUMMARY: Attached are the minutes for the Council Meeting held Tuesday, November 25, 2003. ATTACHMENTS: Minutes for Tuesday, November 25, 2003 FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): 0 APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MAYOR: FISCAL/BUDGET: CONSENT AGENDA [] OPERATIONS: COUNCIL PRESIDENT: ~/_~/. ~/~?./~/_.~ RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass the Consent Agenda as presented. COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action TAPE #1923 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, November 25, 2003 The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was celled to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Tuesday, November 25, 2003, at 5:30 P.M., with Council President Carol Arends presiding. Council members present were Mike Short, Will Maupin, Eric Younger, Mike Shepherd, Ed Rollman, Daren Nygren, Cecil McConnell, and Brad Gehring. Aisc present were City Attorney Roger Lubovich; Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston; and Legislative Assistant Lori Smith. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council Member Cecil McConnell, followed by the invocation provided by Council Member Daren Nyqren. President Arends made the following announcements: 1. The Pre-Council session was held in the Council Conference Room from 5:00 to 5:30 PM to discuss updates to the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of Meeting - November 12, 2003 (#AB03-218) B. Minutes of Meeting - November 19, 2003 (#AB03-219) C. Hiring of Jonna Koehn for Municipal Court Services Manager Position (#AB03-220) #0025 MISIClU (McConnell/Rollman) Move to approve Consent Agenda as presented. CLAIMS & CHECK REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by ROW 42.24.090 have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the Council. #0025 MIS/CIU (Younger/McConnell) On November 25, 2003, the Council approved payment for Check Numbers 285874 through 286140; 286142 through 286259; and EFT-7935 through EFT-7948 in the total amount $3,826,944.34; and Regular Payroll in the amount of $885,804.18 for the period ending November 15, 2003. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mike Short announced that crews will be performing routine maintenance and installing lights on the Hood Canal Bridge on Tuesday, December 2® from 9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. Will Maupin wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving and encouraged everyone to drive safely. Eric Youn.qer welcomed Brad Gehring to the Council. Mike Shepherd discussed the financial issues facing the City; announced the next District 5 neighborhood meeting would be held on Thursday, December 18 beginning at 6:30 P.M. at Memorial Lutheran Church located at 10th & Veneta; reported he would be running in the Seattle Half-Marathon on Sunday, November 30th; and wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. Ed Rollman was pleased to see the progress being made on the Government Center; welcomed Brad Gehring to the City Council; and also wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. Daren Ny,qren announced the closure of the Manette Bridge next week from 9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M; and also looks forward to working with Brad Gehring. TAPE #1923 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes Tuesday, November 25, 2003 Page 2 of 3 Cecil McConnell welcomed Brad Gehring to the City Council. Brad Gehrin.q thanked everyone for their warm welcome, and thanked his wife Patsy for her support and all those who voted for him in the election. Carol Arend$ indicated the Council has been busy working on the FY Z004 Budget. MAYOR'S REPORT - Mayor Bozeman... · Provided a "Key to the City" to welcome Brad GehrinR; · Introduced Gary Tusber.q from the Kitsap County Consolidated Housing Authority who provided the Council a briefing on their intention to apply for a Brownfields Grant to assist in the removal of contaminated soil on the condominium building site; · Reported that Chaffey Homes has withdrawn their proposal for development of Eastpark, but that discussions are currently being held with other developers; · Indicated that he and Richard Hayes of Kitsap Transit have continued to pursue a vendor for passenger-only ferry service; · Reiterated information on the closure of the Manette Bridge; and · Commented on the FY 2004 Budget he presented to the Council, and thanked everyone for the time and attention they are committing to this process. PUBLIC RECOGNITION - There were no comments from the public tonight. 8A- CONTRACT RENEWAL FOR PARKING ENFORCEMENT WITH DIAMOND PARKING SERVICES (#AB03-221): Michael Wilson., Finance Director, stated that the City has contracted with DIAMOND PARKING SERVICES for on-street and off-street parking enforcement for the past five years. It is being proposed to continue contracting with DIAMOND PARKING SERVICES for these services. The hours of enforcement and overall scope of services remain the same except security services for the parking garage and lots have been removed along with the associated cost. The City will be managing security issues directly. The proposed renewal contract is for $16,418 per month for 609 hours of enfomement with a 1% increase for year two. Bob DuPrie of DIAMOND PARKING SERVICES and Lt. Gre,q Rawlins of the BREMERTON POLICE DEPARTMENT were available to answer questions. There were no comments from the public. Mr. McConnell disclosed that he has a relative who works for DIAMOND PARKING, but in no way would that influence his vote. #0715 M/S/C/U (Shepherd/Short) Move to approve the professional services agreement with DIAMOND PARKING SERVICES for parking enforcement; and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement in substantially the same form as approved. 9A - ORDINANCE rFIRST READING] CREATING CHAPTER 2.01 TO THE BREMERTON MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO "PERS" ELIGIBILITY (#AB03-222): Roqer Lubovich, City Attorney, explained that by Council action on May 21, 1997, the City Council exercised its discretion authorized under RCW 41.40.023 and WAC 415-108-550, to pay the employer's contribution, plus interest on that contribution, toward the PERS accounts of elected officials establishing membership in the system. Former Mayor Lynn Horton, prior to leaving office, established retroactive service credit for previous terms, and has requested reimbursement of TAPE #1923 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes Tuesday, November 25, 2003 Page 3 of 3 the employer's contribution, plus interest. To date, a formal policy has not been established regarding this exercise of discretion. The proposed ordinance formalizes the City Council's action in 1997 exercising its discretion to pay the employer's contribution, plus interest on that contribution, toward the PI:RS accounts of elected officials. There were no comments from the public. Mr. Rollman asked if this ordinance would give the City a formal written policy for future employees or only past employees. Mr. Lubovich responded that this applies to both past and future employees, but applicants would also need to meet WAC and RCW guidelines. Mr. McConnell asked if Council would need to take any further action based on this ordinance. Mr. Lubovich answered that Council would not need to take any further action. When an application comes into the Human Resources Department, it would be determined at that time if the request meets WAC and RCW provisions in order to be processed. #0910 M/S/C/U (Younger/McConnell) Move to approve the proposed ordinance on first reading. The meeting of the City Council was adjourned at 6:00 P.M. Prepared and Submitted by: LORI SMITH Legislative Assistant Attest: PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk CAROL ARENDS, City Council President City of Bremerton CNP J/Is/cge DATE SUBMITTED: October 28, 2003 BILL # ~- '~ ' .-,~.~,,~-[~ AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON 3 ~ CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Bremerton Housing Authority Committee Meeting Date: 11-24-2003 Contract for Supplemental Police Services COUNCIL MEETING Date: 12-10-2003 with the City of Bremerton Police Department: Police Department Presenter: Lt. Tim Lopez Phone: 473-5277 SUMMARY: The City of Bremerton Police Department has a contract with the Bremerton Housing Authority to provide police service for the Westpark housing development. The contract was rewritten and updated to meet BHA grant and community policing requirements. The contract identifies staffing levels, financial terms and specific services. The contract is for one year. ATTACHMENTS: Contract for Supplemental Police Services FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The Bremerton Police Department dedicates one Patrol officer to support the contract for one year. The BHA funds the full-time officer and services according to the contract. APPROVALS: ~' . DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: ~~.~_ MAYOR: FISCAL/BUDGET: CONSENT AGENDA OPERATIONS: COUNCIL PRESIDENT: RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the service contract with the Bmmerton Housing Authority to support community policing in Westpark Housing and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the contract with substantially the same terms and conditions as contained in the proposed agreement. COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action CONTRACT FOR SUPPLEMENTAL POLICE SERVICES The Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton ("BHA") and the City of Bremerton ("City"), referred to collectively as the "Parties," enter into the following Agreement for professional services: I. Scope: The City agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is incorporated by reference herein. The Scope of Work may be modified only pursuant to Section IX.G. of this Agreement. If BHA desires services not specified in the Scope of Work, then the parties, by letter agreement signed by both parties, may add the additional services to the Scope of Work, and adjust the compensation, if appropriate. II. Term: This Agreement commences on November 1, 2003, and terminates on September 30, 2004 unless another date is substituted pursuant to Sections IX.G. or VIII. III. Compensation: In consideration of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, BHA shall pay City $57,172.50 ($4,764.38 x 12 months). City shall submit monthly billing statements. Upon receipt of a conforming monthly billing statement, the BHA shall promptly process payment. City shall not perform work beyond the Scope of Work, nor shall be compensated for such work, unless the Scope of Work or amount of compensation is modified pursuant to this Agreement. City shall only be compensated for additional services if requested pursuant to Section I and, if not otherwise provided, such compensation shall be adjusted, if appropriate, and specified by letter agreement signed by both parties. If a billing statement does not conform to this Agreement, the BHA may withhold payment until the statement is reconciled. Such withholding does not relieve City of its obligations under this Agreement. IV. Relationship of Parties: City represents that it is skilled in the matters addressed in the Scope of Work and is performing independent functions and responsibilities within its field of expertise. City and its personnel are independent contractors and not employees of BHA. City and its personnel have no authority to bind the BHA or to control the BHA's employees and other Consultants. None of the benefits provided by BHA to its employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available from BHA to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-Consultants of the City. City will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of City's agents, employees, representatives, and sub-Consultants during the performance of this Agreement. BHA shall have the right, with reasonable cause, to have a different officer assigned to the position. Reasonable cause shall be the failure to provide the level of service BHA reasonably expects on all categories in the Scope of Work. Page 1 of 11 ~ As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for its own management. The BHA's administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall not be deemed an exercise of managerial control over City or its personnel. As an independent contractor, City is responsible for payment of all taxes and licensing fees necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement. These taxes and fees include but are not limited to State industrial insurance, Business & Occupation, State professional licensing, and City business licensing. Failure of the contractor to fully comply with tax and licensing requirements will be considered a material breach of contract and at the option of BHA will be cause for such action as may be available by law including termination of the contract. V. Indemnification: BHA shall protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, and agents, from any and all claims, demands, suits, penalties, losses, damages, judgments, attorneys' fees, and/or costs of any kind whatsoever, arising out of or in any way resulting from acts or omissions of the BHA, its officers, employees, agents, and/or subcontractors. The City shall protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless BHA, its officers, officials, employees, and agents, from any and all claims, demands, suits, penalties, losses, damages, judgments, attorneys' fees, and/or costs of any kind whatsoever, arising out of or in any way resulting from acts or omissions of the City, its officers, employees, agents, and/or subcontractors. If a claim is made that both parties are responsible for all or a portion of damages alleged to have been sustained as a result of acts or omissions of the parties hereto, then the above referenced indemnity and hold harmless provisions shall apply only to the extent of the proportion of liability attributable to the indemnifying party. If liability is not or cannot be apportioned, then the parties shall be responsible for their own costs and attorneys fees incurred in the matter and shall indemnify and hold the other party harmless for one half of any amount awarded by the Court or other decision making body with jurisdiction as a result of the alleged acts or omissions. Except for damages caused by the sole negligence of the City, the provisions of the proceeding paragraph not withstanding, BHA's obligation under this section shall include, but not be limited to, the duty to promptly accept tenders of defense and provide defense to the City at BHA's expense. VI. Insurance: Prior to the commencement date of this Agreement, City shall provide Certificates of Insurance to the BHA's Risk Manager verifying the following coverage: 1) a professional liability policy ("E&O") providing coverage of $2,000,000 per occurrence for errors and omissions committed by City while performing its obligations under this Agreement, and 2) a comprehensive general liability ("CGL") policy providing coverage of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence and including bodily injury and property damage. Both policies shall remain in full force and effect, and provide coverage for the full term of this Agreement. Insurer shall provide the Risk Manager with 30 days' written notice of any cancellation or change of coverage of either policy. Page 2 of 11 7 VII. Nondiscrimination: City shall not discriminate in employment or services to the public on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, or disability, except for employment actions based on bona fide occupational qualification. VIII. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated, at will, by either Party upon sixty (60) days notice to the other Party. This Agreement may be immediately terminated for cause by a Party if the other Party substantially fails to perform through no fault of the terminating Party, and the non-performing Party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within thirty (30) days of the terminating Party's sending notice to the non-performing Party. Notice by BHA shall include a report showing the status of all items listed in the Scope of Work current through the termination date. If BHA receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is canceled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the completion of the work, BHA may summarily terminate this Agreement. Termination shall be effective ten calendar days after City's receipt of the written notice by certified mail. A. Excusable Delays: The right of City to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall City be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due to: 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials, equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other national emergency; 2) any acts of BHA, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay; and 3) causes not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the City, including, but not restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the City must promptly notify BHA within ten (10) calendar days in writing of the cause of the delay. If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement, the delay is properly excusable, BHA shall, in writing, extend the time for completing the work for a period of time commensurate with the period of excusable delay. B. Rights Upon Termination: In the event of termination, BHA shall pay for all services performed by the City to the effective date of termination, as described on a final invoice submitted to BHA. After termination, BHA may take possession of all records and data within the City's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by BI-IA without restriction. Any such use not related to the project which City was contracted to perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the City. IX. General Conditions: A. Reports and Information: When requested by BHA, City shall furnish periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement. The reports and documents shall be furnished in the time and form requested. City shall maintain accounting records in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to substantiate all billed amounts. Page 3 of 11 ~ B. Ownership and Use of Records and Documents: Original documents, drawings, designs and reports, including those in electronic format, developed under this Agreement are the property of BHA. All written information submitted by BHA to the City in connection with the services performed by the City under this Agreement will be safeguarded by the City to at least the same extent as the City safeguards like information relating to its own business. If such information is publicly available or is already in City's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the City from third parties, City shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise. All data, documents, and files created by City under this Agreement may be stored at City's office in Bremerton, Washington. City shall make such data, documents, and files available to BHA upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing, modifying and updating as necessary until such time as BHA is capable of storing such information in the BHA's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to BHA upon its request, and at reasonable cost. All documents, including all reports, drawings, specifications, computer software or other items prepared or furnished by City pursuant to this Agreement, are instmments of service with respect to the project and are the property of BHA. Any muse by BHA for other than the specific purpose intended will be at BHA's sole risk. C. City to Maintain Records to Support Independent Consultant Status: On the effective date of this Agreement (or shortly thereafter), City shall: 1. File a schedule of expenses with the Internal Revenue Service for the type of business City conducts; 2. Establish an account with the Washington State Department of Revenue and other necessary state agencies for the payment of all state taxes normally paid by employers, register to receive a unified business identifier number from the State of Washington; and 3. Maintain a separate set of books and records that reflect all items of income and expenses of City's business, all as described in the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Section 51.08.195, as required to show that the services performed by City under this Agreement shall not give rise to an employer-employee relationship between the parties which is subject to RCW Title 51, Industrial Insurance. D. Work Performed at City's Risk: City shall take all precautions necessary and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subconsultants in the performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at City's own risk, and City shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. E. Place of Work: The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this Agreement at its office in the Westpark Community Center, 76 Russell Road, Bremerton, Washington. Meetings with the City staff as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take Page 4 of 11 c} place at the Westpark Community Center office, or at locations mutually agreed upon by the parties. F. Severability: Should any part of this Agreement be found void, the balance of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. G. Modification: This Agreement may only be modified by written instrument signed by both Parties. H. Written Notices: All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed below by registered or 1st class mail, or by persona service, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. BHA Address City Address Bremerton Housing Authority City of Bremerton 110 Russell Road Police Department Bremerton, WA 98312 239 Fourth Street Bremerton, WA 98337 I. Waver: Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of that provision. Waiver of any right or power arising out of this Agreement shall not be deemed waver of any other right or power. J. Non-Waver of Breach: The failure of BHA to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waver or relinquishment of said covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. K. Compliance with Laws: City shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws in performing its obligations under this Agreement. L. Choice of Law and Venue: This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Washington. Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Kitsap County Superior Court. M. Attorneys' Fees: In the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or provisions herein, each party shall pay all its own costs and attorney's fees. N. Assignment: Any assignment of this agreement by City without the written consent of BHA shall be void. O. Entire Agreement: This Agreement and its Exhibits constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement. Page 5 of 11 IO HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF BREMERTON THE CITY OF BREMERTON By:. By: its: its: Date: Date: Approved as to form: Attest: Bremerton City Attorney City Clerk R:~LEGAL\Contracts~Police~B PD Westpark Contract 10.31.03.doc Page 6 of 11 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK To enforce the law and assure that unlawful activity, including drug-related crimes in and around housing owned or managed by BHA is identified, reported, monitored, and tracked. To support the goals and objectives of the BHA and the residents of the Westpark Housing development in the prevention of crime and the elimination of drag-related criminal activity. SUMMARY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY BPD 1. Provide a commissioned and qualified Police Officer to the Westpark Housing development to deliver supplemental law enforcement services for a period of one (1) year. 2. Provide information required to compile data for criminal analysis and statistical reports for the City of Bremerton and Westpark specific. 3. Cooperate to the fullest extent possible with other law enforcement and governmental agencies and the BHA to achieve the goals and meet the objectives as stated in the Scope of Work. 4. All of the above will occur in addition to the baseline services already afforded to the residents of the City of Bremerton as outlined in Attachment A: "BPD Baseline Services." ILLUSTRATIVE TASKS 1. Liaison with BHA and residents of the Westpark Housing Development. a. Attend and participate in meetings when required. b. Document and forward all reports of criminal activity in Westpark to the BHA in a timely manner. c. Keep the Director of Housing or his/her representative informed of all investigations as appropriate. d. Maintain a filing system for confidential documentation in strict compliance with local, state, and federal laws. e. Periodically inspect building exterior and fencing for physical security and safety in Westpark and prepare a report of all findings. f. Participate in the Washington Law Enforcement Exploring Advisors (WLEEA) program as a mentor to participants and promote the program within the community. Page 7 of 11 2. Program Reporting. a. Prepare and provide progress reports to BHA. b. Monitor and track all expenditures and accomplishments of supplemental activities. c. Provide crime statistics and other related data for program reporting purposes. 3. Supplemental Services. a. Address the following activities: i. Drugs and Gangs ii. Criminal Prosecution iii. Organized Crime iv. Domestic Violence b. Develop Scope of Work for all supplemental activities needed. c. Obtain appropriate authorization and approval from BHA. d. Monitor performance of supplemental activities to ensure goals are being achieved. e. Review and approve monthly payment requests. f. Negotiate contracts for additional services. g. Respond to calls if patrol officer is not available. The patrol officer is to be the primary point of contact for calls; responding to calls is not the sole responsibility of the contracted Westpark officer. 4. Investigations, a. Investigate all reports of unlawful activity, including all calls taken outside of the hours at the Westpark Community Center. b. Prepare comprehensive detailed reports on all investigations. c. Maintain detailed files on investigations. d. Maintain monitoring and tracking logs of all investigations. e. Perform special inspection of public housing units when reports of illegal activity have been reported or suspected. 5. Hearings. a. Attend all hearings to present Housing Authority findings, Page 8 of 11 6. Evictions. a. Serve Summons and Complaints for Unlawful Detainers on tenants. b. Represent Housing Authority interests in court. c. Coordinate all physical evictions with Sheriffs Department. 7. Resident Education. a. Circulate information to residents about security and safety. b. Coordinate and attend resident safety and block watch meetings. 8. Miscellaneous Functions. a. Special projects as assigned by BHA and agreed to by BPD. 9. Service Objective - Responsibilities to the Public. a. Courteous and respectful. b. Responsive to requests. 10. Organization Improvement. a. Commitment to a philosophy of quality. b. Display initiative to resolve problems. c. Cost-effective use of the organizations resources. BHA, in its efforts to support and promote a good working relationship with BPD will provide the following support: 1. Provide office space and meeting rooms as required for the implementation of this enforcement effort. 2. Cooperate to the fullest extent possible with BPD and other judicial, governmental, and law enforcement agencies. PROGRAM EVALUATION City and BHA will jointly develop and utilize an effective assessment tool for evaluating contract compliance and overall performance. A performance assessment and compliance review will be conducted quarterly by both BHA and City or as may be necessary, to identify areas of concern. Page 9 of 11 ATTACHMENT A BPD BASELINE Baseline Services to Public Housing U.S. Department of Housing Residents by Local Law Enforcement and Urban Development Agencies Current law enforcement baseline police services are defined, but may not be limited to, as the ordinary and routine police services provided to the residents of public housing developments as a result of the overall, city/county-wide deployment of police resources to respond to crime and other public safety incidents, including 911 communications, processing of calls for services, routine patrol, police officer response to calls for service, and investigative follow-up of criminal activity. The actual or estimated time spent on supporting basic patrol and investigative services by administrative and technical personnel may be included in baseline services. The Westpark Officer will not be involved in baseline services unless available to assist the area unit that provides the baseline services. The Westpark Officer will respond to Priority One and Two calls (defined below) with the area unit and will assist in Priority Three, Four, and Five calls when available. Current and Supplemental Law Enforcement Services for Public Housing Residents Police Services Provided to Current Hours Proposed Hours Above Public Housing Residents (Baseline Services) Baseline Patrol Services 1700 1490 Criminal Investigations 400 0 Specialized Units 200 361 Traffic (if applicable) 400 400 Arrests & Processing 1100 1194 Court Time 100 100 Dispatch Support 288 0 Records Support 150 0 Hiring & Training 100 0 Administrative Time 520 0 Other 200 0 Total Time 5158 3545 PRIORITY 1: IMMEDIATE LIFE THREAT Precedence is usually assigned when speed of arrival may be a matter of life or death. To aid chances for suspect apprehension, it will also be assigned to felony crimes or violent crimes involving a weapon that have occurred within the past five minutes. It is not assigned lightly because in most cases, the Page 10 of 11 responding field personnel are placing their lives in jeopardy in an emergency lights-and-sirens run through the streets. It should be emphasized that the decision to use lights-and-sirens shall be the responsibility of the responding Public Safety Agency. PRIORITY 2: POTENTIAL DANGER TO LIFE Precedence usually includes those calls which demand immediate service, but may not be sufficiently urgent to require emergency lights-and-sirens response. A Priority 2 incident is often an incident that could become a Priority 1 if not dealt with promptly. PRIORITY 3: PROPERTY THREAT / NO LIFE THREAT Precedence includes those calls that do not require a lights-and-siren response. An expeditious response to this type of call could involve apprehending a suspect of a less violent type of crime. This type of call does not put a life in jeopardy but has the potential to damage property. PRIORITY 4: INVESTIGATION / HARASSMENT Ail other calls and radio transmissions relative to Public Safety Agencies. It should be understood that the dispatch may be delayed. PRIORITY 5: ROUTINE / CITIZEN All other calls, other than Priority 1, 2, 3 or 4 are routine / citizen. It is understood that a citizen request dispatch may be delayed. The person receiving the call will make the original priority assignment as he/she is closest to the source of available information. The person taking the call has the best opportunity to assess the tone of the call. The original priority may be changed as new information and circumstances become known. Such changes will be signed and justified in the comments section of the event. Page 11 of 11 DATE SUBMITTED: November 20, 2003 BILL AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Anderson Creek Wellfield Committee Meeting Date: 12/2/03 Improvements - Professional Services COUNCIL MEETING Date: 12/10/03 Agreement for Robinson & Noble, Inc. Department: PW&U Engineering. Presenter: Ned Lever Phone: 360-473-2398 SUMMARY: Based on an evaluation of qualified consultants, the City selected Robinson & Noble, Inc. to provide geological consulting services for the Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements. The project includes drilling three wells, rehabilitation of several wells, well abandonment and other additional services. The not-to-exceed amount of the agreement is $131,000.00. ATTACHMENTS: Professional Services Agreement FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The project is included in the 2003 Capital Budget and is funded by a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Loan. APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MAYOR: COUNCIL PRESIDENT:<::7~ "/! t'k-X'~ q"w"""~ ?~¢~t~ RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve a professional services agreement with Robinson & Noble, Inc. to provide consulting services for the Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements project, in an amount not to exceed $131,000.00, and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the Professional Services Agreement. COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action ab, Agenda Bills 2003, PSA for Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements, 124)3 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ANDERSON CREEK WELLFIELD IMPROVEMENTS Project Number R0241102 The City of Bremerton ("City") and Robinson & Noble, Inc. ("Consultant"), referred to collectively as the "Parties," enter into the following Agreement for professional services: I. Scope: The Consultant agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the Scope of Work, including any attachments thereto , attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is incorporated by reference herein. The Scope of Work may be modified only pursuant to Section VII.H. of this Agreement. If the Scope of Work provides for unspecified additional services such services shall only be performed upon the express written request of the City. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time such services are performed. Il. Term: The City and the Consultant agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Exhibit A immediately upon execution of this Agreement. The parties agree that the work described in Exhibit A is to be completed as provided for in the work schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B; provided however, that additional time shall be granted by the City for excusable delays or extra work as provided for in section IX (A) of this agreement. III. Compensation: In consideration of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, the City shall pay Consultant in an amount not to exceed $131,000.00. Consultant's charges and bills shall conform to the fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. The Consultant shall submit regular billing statements detailing work performed and amount charged on each task or portion thereof. The descriptions shall conform to and fall within the categories set out in the Scope of Work and/or Fee Schedule. Upon receipt of a conforming billing statement, the City shall promptly process payment. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, the City reserves the right to prioritize scoped work and accelerate and/or delay work tasks under the time frame set forth in Section II herein. The Consultant's labor rates and billing fees shall be as delineated in Exhibit C. Consultant shall not perform work beyond the Scope of Work, nor shall be compensated for such work, unless the Scope of Work or amount of compensation is modified pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall only be compensated for additional services if requested pursuant to Section I and, if not otherwise provided, such compensation shall be in accordance with Exhibit C. If a billing statement does not conform to this Agreement, the City may withhold payment until the statement is brought into compliance. Such withholding does not relieve Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement. Bremerton/Robinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Page 1 of 7 IV. Relationship of Parties: Consultant represents that it is skilled in the matters addressed in the Scope of Work and is performing independent functions and responsibilities within its field of expertise. Consultant and its personnel are independent Consultants and not employees of the City. Consultant and its personnel have no authority to bind the City or to control the City's employees and other Consultants. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-Consultants of the Consultant. Consultant will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Consultant's agents, employees, representatives and sub-Consultants during the performance of this Agreement. The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent Consultants to perform the same or similar work. As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for its own management. The City's administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall not be deemed an exercise of managerial control over Consultant or its personnel. As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for payment of all taxes and licensing fees necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement. These taxes and fees include but are not limited to State industrial insurance, Business & Occupation, State professional licensing, and City business licensing. If any taxes or fees due the City have been declared delinquent, the City may withhold the delinquent amount, plus any additional charges arising from the delinquency, from any payments due Consultant. V. Indemnification: Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's sole negligence. The City's review or acceptance of any of the work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants ofindenmification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAWER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE., TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Bremerton/Robinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Page 2 of 7 VI. Insurance: The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, sub-consultants or sub-Consultants. Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing: 1. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and 2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and general aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations/broad form property damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCU) if applicable; and employer's liability; and 3. Professional Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 limit per occurrence/claim. Any payment of deductible or self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant. All required policies shall be provided on an "occurrence" basis except professional liability insurance (if required), which may be provided on a "claims-made" basis. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and a copy of an endorsement that is acceptable to the City, which names the City as an additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies and endorsements. The City further reserves the right to reject any unacceptable policies and/or endorsements. The Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability. The City shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage. The City also reserves its unqualified right to require at any time and for any reason, proof of coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements as evidence of coverage. BremertonfRobinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Page 3 of 7 VII. General Conditions: A. Reports and Information: When requested by the City, Consultant shall fumish periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement. The reports and documents shall be furnished in the time and form requested. Consultant shall maintain accounting records in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP to substantiate all billed amounts. B. Ownership and Use of Records and Documents: Original documents, drawings, designs and reports, including those in electronic format, developed under this Agreement are the property of the City. All written information submitted by the City to the Consultant in connection with the services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be safeguarded by the Consultant to at least the same extent as the Consultant safeguards like information relating to its own business. If such information is publicly available or is already in Consultant's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Consultant from third parties, Consultant shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise. All data, documents and files created by Consultant under this Agreement may be stored at Consultant's office in Tacoma, Washington. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing, modifying and updating as necessary until such time as the City is capable of storing such information in the City's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the City upon its request, and at reasonable cost. All documents, including all reports, drawings, specifications, computer software or other items prepared or furnished by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, are instruments of service with respect to the project and are the property of the City. Any reuse by the City for other than the specific purpose intended will be at City's sole risk. C. Consultant to Maintain Records to Support Independent Consultant Status: On the effective date of this Agreement (or shortly thereafter), Consultant shall: 1. File a schedule of expenses with the Internal Revenue Service for the type of business Consultant conducts; 2. Establish an account with the Washington State Department of Revenue and other necessary state agencies for the payment of all state taxes normally paid by employers, register to receive a unified business identifier number from the State of Washington; and 3. Maintain a separate set of books and records that reflect all items of income and expenses of Consultant's business, all as described in the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Section 51.08.195, as required to show that the services performed by Consultant under th/s Agreement shall not give r/se to an employer- employee relationship between the parties which is subject to RCW Title 51, Industrial Insurance. Bremerton/Robinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Page 4 of 7 D. Work Performed at Consultant's Risk: Consultant shall take all precautions necessary and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and sub consultants in the performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. E. Place of Work: The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this Agreement at its offices in Tacoma, Washington. Meetings with the City staff as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices, or at locations mutually agreed upon by the parties. F. Entire Agreement: This Agreement and its Exhibits constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement. G. Severability: Should any part of this Agreement be found void, the balance of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. H. Modification: This Agreement may only be modified by written instrument signed by both Parties. I. Written Notices: All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed below by registered or 1st class mail, or by personal service, and shall be deemed sufficiently g/yen if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. City Address Consultant Address City of Bremerton Robinson & Noble, Inc. City Clerk 5320 Orchard Street West 239 Fourth St. Tacoma, WA 98467 Bremerton, WA 98337 Attention: Mr. Doug Dow J. Waiver: Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of that provision. Waiver of any right or power arising out of this Agreement shall not be deemed waiver of any other right or power. K. Non-Waiver of Breach: The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exemise any option herein conferred in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. L. Compliance with Laws: Consultant shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws in performing its obligations under this Agreement. Bremerton/Robinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Page 5 of 7 ~,~._. M. Choice of Law and Venue: This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Washington. Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Kitsap County Superior Court. N. Attorneys' Fees: In the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or provisions herein, each party shall pay all its own costs and attorney's fees. O. Assignment: Any assignment of this agreement by the Contractor without the written consent of the City shall be void. VIII. Nondiscrimination: Consultant shall not discriminate in employment or services to the public on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, or disability, except for employment actions based on bona fide occupational qualification. IX. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated, at will, by either Party upon sixty (60) days notice to the other Party. This Agreement may be immediately terminated for cause by a Party if the other Party substantially fails to perform through no fault of the terminating Party, and the non-performing Party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within thirty (30) days of the terminating Party's sending notice to the non-performing Party. Notice by Consultant shall include a report showing the status of all items listed in the Scope of Work current through the termination date. If the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is cancelled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the completion of the work, the City may summarily terminate this Agreement. Termination shall be effective ten calendar days after Consultant's receipt of the written notice by certified mail. A. Excusable Delays: The right of Consultant to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall Consultant be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due to: 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials, equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other national emergency; 2) any acts of the City, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay; and 3) causes not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Consultant must promptly notify the City within ten (10) calendar days in writing of the cause of the delay. If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement, the delay is properly excusable, the City shall, in wr/ting, extend the time for completing the work for a period of time commensurate with the period of excusable delay. B. Rights Upon Termination: In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all services performed by the Consultant to the effective date of termination, as described on a final invoice submitted to the City. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City BremertordRobinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Page 6 of 7 without restriction. Any such use not related to the project which Consultant was contracted to perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. CITY OF BREMERTON CONSULTANT By: Cary Bozeman By: Mayor its: Date: Date: Approved as to form: Attest: Bremerton City Attorney City Clerk Bremerton/Robinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Page 7 of 7 Exhibit A Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Scope of Work November 13, 2003 Robinson & Noble, Inc. proposes the following scope of work for the City of Bremerton's (City) Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Project. As a result of our meeting on October 7tn, we understand the City has the goal of being able to distribute a minimum of 3,000 gallons per minute (gpm) from the Anderson Creek Wellfield. Presently, the wellfield is able to produce about 2,250 gpm. We have reviewed our files from past work in the wellfield and believe this goal can be attained. Robinson & Noble typically provides general professional services as detailed below for each new, reconstructed, rehabilitated, or abandoned well. Specific requirements will vary for each Task. Administer Project Robinson & Noble will provide for the administrative needs of the project. After the pre-design report is approved, we will prepare well drilling, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and decommissioning technical specifications and bid documents to be included with the City's boiler-plate bid package. Technical specifications will be put together by Robinson & Noble with pertinent sections provided by the City for insert into the document. Robinson & Noble will provide draft documents for 70 and 100-percent review by the City. When requested, we will meet with your representative and provide periodic verbal progress reports. We will also review the selected drilling contractor's invoices for accuracy. Robinson & Noble invoices will include a summary sheet which itemizes the previous billings to date, the current billing, and the total amount billed by task as outlined in this document. Included with each invoice will be a written project status report showing the percent complete for each task. Observe Well Construction, Rehabilitation and Abandonment A qualified hydrogeologist will observe new well construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or abandonment and keep the City informed of the Contractor's progress. Proper design and complete development are the keys to a successful well. Our hydrogeologist will be onsite during all critical phases of construction, completion, and development for each new, reconstructed, or rehabilitated well. We will also observe the critical phases of the well abandonment process. Provide Well Screen Design Our hydrogeologist will collect aquifer samples during new well construction and perform sieve analysis of the samples in our soils laboratory. We will also conduct appropriate geophysical logs, if needed, to help determine screen placement in the aquifer. Our proposed screen design for each new or reconstructed well will be submitted for City approval before completion materials are purchased and installed by the Contractor. Conduct 24-hour Pumping Tests The Department of Health requires all new sources to be tested for a minimum of 24-hours and the test results evaluated by a licensed hydrogeologist. We will install automatic water level sensing devices in the pumping well and observation wells {if available and accessible) prior to conducting 24-hour well tests. We may request some labor assistance from the City to back-up the automatic data with manual measurements at appropriate intervals. At the end of each 24-hour test, we will collect any required water quality samples for transport to a certified laboratory and pay all lab fees. Prepare Reports Robinson & Noble will prepare a technical report for each new well. These reports will include all information and analysis required by Ecology and Health. This will consist of a location map, lithologic and geophysical logs, well completion details, and graphic analysis of the well tests along with all test data, water quality results, and 6-month, 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year wellhead protection area delineations. Wellhead protection area delineations shall be established using the USEPA analytical model GPTRAC or similar method. Other reports, not required by regulators, will be tailored to fit the needs of the City. This scope of work is divided into six sections that describe the proposed work to be done followed by cost estimates for our professional services. Pre-design Evaluation and Report Task 1. Pre-design Evaluation and Report Once the final scope of work is determined we will visit the wellfield, conduct a pre-design evaluation, select new well sites, and prepare a detailed pre-design report. Professional services estimate: $10,000 New Wells we propose construction of the following new wells categorized as direct replacements or additional points of withdrawal. Replacement Wells Task 2. Well iR Water right claim number 116705 for 800 gpm and 1,000 acre feet per year (af/yr). In 1940, Well 1 was completed at a depth of 261 feet below ground surface (bgs) in the Shallow Artesian Aquifer (SAA). Replacement Well iR should be located approximately 50 feet from Well 1 and drilled to a depth of 300 feet to take advantage of the thickness of the aquifer found in Wells 2R and 3. Although Wells 2R and 3 were tested at rates over 1,000 910m, they produce significant interference (30 ft plus or minus) between each other and other SAA wells. Consequently, we estimate the sustainable pumping rate from Well iR (with other SAA wells operating) will be between 400 and 600 9pm. Professional services Estimate: $15,000 Task 3. Well 6R Water right claim number 116700 for 600 gpm and 700 af/yr in 1944. Well 6 is completed at 535 feet bgs in the Deep Artesian Aquifer (DAA). It originally produced 320 ~pm. Replacement Well 6R should be located approximately 50 feet from Wells 5 and 6 and drilled to a depth between 550 and 600 feet to take advantage of the thickness of the aquifer found in Wells 7 and 8. Wells 5 and 6 originally produced 400 and 320 9pm respectively. With more aquifer thickness and modern completion methods, we estimate the sustainable yield will be between 500 and 600 gpm from Well 6R. Professional services estimate: $20,000 Additional Point of Withdrawal Task 4. Well 3R Water right claim number 116703 for 1,200 gpm and 1,500 af/yr in 1943. Well 3 is completed in the SAA at a depth of 316 feet. It was originally tested at rates up to 1,500 gpm but now produces 350 to 400 9pm with some sand at the higher rate. Since Well 3 is still operational and should be able to provide 200 ~pm of free-flow water during the winter and 200 9pm or more sand-free, pumped water during summer peak periods, Well 3R would be categorized as an additional point of withdrawal under the same water right claim. Well 3R is proposed as a SAA well to be drilled to a depth of about 320 feet. It will be completed using modern methods similar to the construction of Well 2R. It should have the same sustainable yield as Well 2R, which is about 800 gpm. Professional services estimate: $15,000 Reconstruction We believe Wells 7 and N-2 can be reconstructed to provide sand- free water from Well 7 and about 500 ~pm of new water from N-2. Task 5. Well 7 Water right certificate number G1-05570C (3728) 450 ~pm and 700 af/yr in 1960. Well 7 is completed in the DAA at a depth of 629 feet. It was originally tested at a pumping rate of 1,080 ~pm in 1945 and had a free flow of 450 ~pm. It was producing 530 gpm in 1984 and was rated for 500 gpm after reconstruction in 1990. Legally, it should not be pumped at rates over 450 gpm without being designated as an additional point of withdrawal under another water right claim or certificate. The well has a sanding problem on startup and must be discharged to waste for several hours before the sand content diminishes to an acceptable level. Robinson & Noble recommends installation of an 8-inch well screen inside the 16-inch perforated casing and filling the annulus with correctly sized filter sand. This reconstruction would allow use of sand-free water on startup. After reconstruction, we expect Well 7 will be capable of producing 450 gpm of sand-free water with a few more feet of drawdown. Professional services estimate: $8,000 Task 6. Well 4R (Well N-2) Well N-2 was originally drilled into the DAA as Well 9R but did not produce an adequate quantity of water (50 gpm) and was not put into service. The original Well 9 (N-I) was completed in the SAA between depths of 282 and 330 feet bgs but produced less than 300 gpm of questionable quality water. An unsuccessful attempt was made to salvage the well screen and drill deeper. Some of the tools used to attempt salvage of the screen were lost in the well and were not recovered. The drilling contractor moved over and drilled a new well (N-2) to a depth of 876 feet bgs in 1986. Neither well was ever used and the Well 9 designation was transferred to a well constructed outside of the Anderson Creek Wellfield. A review of our files indicated there were numerous problems during the completion phase of the Well 9R (N-2) project. The well as constructed is completed with a 10-inch pipe size screen welded to the bottom of 10-inch well casing at 876 feet extending up into the 16-inch well casing to a depth of 477 feet. Figure 2 in our 2001, In-Depth Analysis of Anderson Creek Wellfield, report to the City erroneously showed the 10-inch well casing extending to the surface. Our file offered a completion design for the SAA that was not approved by the City in 1986. We recommend that design, calling for abandonment of the lower portion of the well and installation of a well screen between 210 and 260 feet bgs, be completed under this project. Our hydrogeologist's field notes indicate a very permeable section of gravel and sand in the SAA that was not logged or recognized in the original Well 9 (N-i) drilled by the City's own drilling contractor. We estimate the sustainable yield from this new source will be at least 500 gpm. We propose calling this Well 4R. It would be designated as the replacement for Well 4 under the 1944 water right claim number 116702 for 500 gpm and 650 af/yr. Professional services estimate: $10,000 Rehabilitation Wells that have lost yield over time can usually be redeveloped to increase their efficiency to allow pumping rates close to their original well yields. Robinson & Noble's hydrogeologist will observe the cable-tool drill redevelop these wells using surge and bail techniques. The hydrogeologist will consult with the City if more exotic and costly redevelopment using chemicals or high-pressure jetting is required. The hydrogeologist will determine when development is complete and will conduct short pumping tests to determine well efficiency (specific capacity) for comparison with previous test data. Task 7. Well 2R Water right claim number 116704 for 1,200 gpm and 1,500 af/yr in 1941. Well 2R was drilled into the SAA and completed with a modern, filter-sand completion design at a depth of 275 feet bgs in 1989. Originally tested by our hydrogeologist at rates up to 1,000 gpm and rated for 800 gpm, Well 2R is now reported to produce between 600 and 800 gpm and free flow between 100 and 400 gpm during the non-pumping winter months. Although Well 2R currently produces nearly 800 gpm, its loss of efficiency has caused a deeper pumping water level to reach that level of production. Redevelopment will increase well efficiency and reduce the drawdow// at the same pumping rate. This is important because it will minimize the interference impacts from the other SA3~ wells and reduce production costs. Discussion with the City's well operations supervisor indicated that the original Well 2 still is capable of free-flowing several hundred gpm during the winter months. We recommend that this flow be encouraged and used by the City when possible. Well 2R should be designated as an additional point of withdrawal under the Well 2 water right claim. Professional services estimate: $5,000 Task 8. Well 8 Water right certificate G1-22932C for 600 ~pm and 960 af/yr in 1977 supplemental to the City's existing water rights (Report of Examination for Well 8). This supplemental water right does not add to the City's water rights including claims. As a supplemental source it can be used up to the certificated amounts when other City sources cannot meet their claimed or certificated withdrawal amounts. It can not be used to expand the City's rights. Well 8 was completed in 1978 at a depth of 578 feet in the DAA. It was originally tested at a pumping rate of 750 9pm with a free flow of 160 gpm. Currently producing 500 ~pm it should be rehabilitated to increase well efficiency. Since it has the capability of producing more that it's authorized amount of 600 gpm, the City could try to designate any additional production from Well 8 as from an additional point of withdrawal under the 1944 Well 5 water right claim 116701 for 800 gpm and 1,000 af/yr. Professional services estimate: $5,000 Abandonment Wells should be decommissioned (abandoned) when they are no longer useful as producing sources or aquifer monitoring points. They should also be abandoned if they interconnect different aquifers or are potential conduits for contaminants. The following wells are proposed for abandonment if budgets allow. However, if these sources can produce sufficient free flowing water of good quality, they should be used whenever possible. Task 9. Well 1 Wells 1 and 4 are completed in the SA3% and, pending evaluation as free-flowing sources, are not needed for aquifer monitoring. They should be abandoned according to WAC 173-160-381 which calls for perforation of the well casing to within five feet of the surface and pressure grouting with cement. Care must be taken 30 to ensure a seal is made to an aquitard outside of the well casing. Uncontrolled flow around the outside of the casing may not be correctable. Professional services estimate: $3,000 Task 10. Well 4 Professional services estimate: $4,000 Task 11. Well 6 Well 6 is completed at a depth of 535 feet in the DAA. However, it may also be open to the SAA. Interconnection of aquifers is not allowed under current law. However, Well 6 is located on the east side of Anderson Creek and new access may have to be constructed before it can be abandoned. It should also be evaluated as a potential source of free-flowing water during the winter months. Professional services estimate: $4,000 Other Services Robinson & Noble will perform other professional services as directed and authorized by the City. Some of those potential services were discussed at the meeting and may include the following. Task 12. Wellfield Evaluation Report We were asked to include an updated wellfield evaluation report at the end of the project. This report would be in addition to the individual well reports for work under this project and may include: · Brief history of each well. · Table of well completion details. · Graphic as-built for each well. · Individual well pumping rates. Wellfield operation recommendations. · Recommendations for additional work. · Water rights table. · Copies of Form RCW 90.44.100(3) for all replacement wells and additional points of withdrawal. · Well free-flow evaluation with recommendations. · Other recommendations. Professional services estimate: $6,000 Task 13. Well Testing Other City wells not specifically designated as part of this project may need to be tested as part of the wellfield evaluation. Robinson & Noble hydrogeologist's would provide water level monitoring equipment, conduct testing, and prepare reports as requested by the City. Part of the wellfield evaluation should be determining the combined production rate for wellfield. This will include pumping as many wells as possible at the same time to determine the wellfield's maximum sustainable yield. However, this test may be limited by the capability of the City's pump station. Professional services estimate: $8,000 14. Coordination with Regulators Robinson & Noble will provide professional support to the City as requested for answering questions by; preparation of documents, exhibits, reports for; and attendance at meetings with State and County regulators, for example the Departments of Ecology and Health. Professional services estimate: $6,000 15. Other Authorized Services (Contingency) Robinson & Noble will provide other professional services as authorized in writing by the City. Professional services estimate: $12,000 (10% of total services) Project Estimate Number Professional Sez-vices 1 $10,000 2 $15,000 3 $20,000 4 $15,000 5 $ 8,000 6 $10,000 7 $ 5,000 8 $ 5,000 9 $ 3,o0o 10 $ 4,000 11 $ 4,000 12 $ 6,000 13 $ 8,000 14 $ 6,000 15 $12,000 Estimate $131,000 Service Agreement Robinson & Noble works on a time-and-expense basis according to the attached General Fee Schedule, Exhibit B. We estimate the total cost of our services for the scope of work described above to be $131,000 based on our understanding of the project and the conditions outlined in this scope. Project costs will be tracked closely, and any foreseeable changes affecting cost will be discussed with the City at the earliest opportunity. We have reviewed the City's modified Professional Services Agreement (PSA) and find it acceptable. If the City accepts this proposal after reviewing it, please forward to us your PSA for our signature. Upon our receipt and acceptance of the signed agreement, we will commence work on the project. City of Bremerton Pre-Design Repor~ Preliminary Robinson & Noble Cost Estimate October 27, 2003 9ub PRIN ASSOC SENIOR PROJECT I MISC tASK task Task Description HGEO HGEO HGEO HGEOIDRAFT ADMIN COSTS .~OST 1.A Project management I 4 $76( I.B Project coordination $20( 1,C Task Tot= $960 2.A Review well completion reports $20( 2.B Review production dala $20[ 2.C Discuss operational history $20( 2.0 2.E $( Task Tot= $600 3,A Visit each well site $10( $90( 3.B Discuss access to well sites $10( 3.C Discuss City responsibilities $10( 3.D $( Task Tot= $11100 4.A Discuss test procedure $20( 4,B Set up flow measurement 2 $36( 4.C Conduct test 8 $64( 4. D Evaluate test results 2 1 $56( Task Tot= $1~760 5.A Review test data $2C $22( 5.B Discuss known well problems $10( 5.C Determine well specific capacity 8 $74( Task Tot= $1~060 6.A Discuss existing problems $20( 0.B Determine City needs $200i 6.C Meet at City $200! Task Tot= $600 7.A Ccordinatewith City $10( 7.B Meet with City and Health at site $30( 7.C Answer ques6ons $10( 7. D $( 7. E $( Task Tot= $500 8.A Draft repot[ 1~ 8 2 $2,57( 8.B Final report 2 2 2 $76( 8.C Answer quesgons Ii $10( Task Tot-- $31430 TOTAL HOURS 3 61 0 30 9 RATE PER HOUR $120 $10C $90 $80 $7~ $60 TOTAL COST $360 $6,10C $0 $2,400 $49(3 $540 $120 $10]010 Cost Estimate = $10,010 10% Contigency -- $1,001 TOTAL ESTIMATE = $11,011 EXHIBIT C - COST ESTIMATE Preliminary Robinson & Noble Cost Estimate October 27, 2003 gub PRIN ASSOC SENIOR PROJECT MISC FASK task Task Description HGEO HGEO HGEO HGEO DRAFT ADMIN COSTS ;OST 1,A Project management 2 6 4 $1,080 1.B Review of background matedals 1 $100 1,C Project coordination 2 $200 1.D Review contractors invoices 0.5 $50 1.E Coordinate meetings (Assume 2) 4 $5( 450 rask Tot= $11880 2.A Prepare drilling plan I 0.5 $130 2.B Prepare proposed well design 0.5 1 $120 2.C Prepare technical specifications 0.~' 4 2 $580 2.D Answer Contractors questions 1 $100 2.E Assist City with bid process 1 $100 Task Tot= $1 ~030 3.A Observe drilling 3 4( $10¢ $3.600 3.B Compare hydrogeclogy 0.5 $50 3.C Verbal progress reports 1 $100 3.D Determine completion depth 0.5 $50 Task Tot= ~3T800 4.A Collsct aquifer samples $160 4.8 Conduct sieve analysis $320 4.C Conduct geophysical Jogging $320 4. D Prepare well sc, men design 1 2 $320 Task Tot=- $¥20 5.A Observe completion $20 $660 5. B Check dimensions with design $80 5.C Confirm placement depths $80 6,A Determine deve~3prnect toothed li $100 6.B Observe development progress 1 IE $3¢ $1,310 6.C Determine when complete $100 Task Tot= $1~510 7.A Coordinate testing with City 0.~ $50 7.B Determine test pump size 0.~ $50 7.C Provide and install data loggers $100 $740 7.D Make manual measurements 12 $20 $980 7.E Collect water quality samples $I.00C $1,080 Task Tot= $2~900 8.A Draft report 2 $1,370 8.B Final report 2 $500 8.C ~,nswer questions $100 Task Tot= $1T970 TOTAL HOURS 3.5 3~ 0 108 10.5 RATE PER HOUR $120 $100 $90 $80 $7C $60 TOTAL COST $420 $3,600 $0 $8~640 $420 $630 $1r320 $t5~030 Cost Estimate = $15,030 10% Contigency = $1,503 TOTAL ESTIMATE = $16,533 EXHIBIT C - COST ESTIMATE Preliminary Robinson & Noble Cost Estimate October 27, 2003 Sub PRiN ASSOC .~ENIOR PROJECT MISC TASK ]'ask Task Description HGEO HGEO HGEO HGEO DRAFT ADMIN COSTS COST 1.A Project management 6 4 $1,08£ I.B Review of background materials $20( I.C Project coordination $40( 1.D ~eview contractors invoices $10~ 1.E 3oordinate meetings (Assume 2) $50 45( Task Tot= $2~230 2,A ~repare ddlling plan 1 $26( 2.B ~repare proposed well design $17[ 2.C 3repare technical specifications 2 $64( 2.D ~nswer Contractors questions $20( 2.E ~Assist City with bid process $20[ 3.A Observe drilling 60 $100 $5,20( 3.B Compare hydrogeology $10( 3.C Verbal progress reports 2 $26( 3.D Determine comptetion depth $10( Task Tot= $51660 4.A Collect aquifer samples 2 $1 4.B Conduct sieve analysis 6 $48( 4.C Conduct geophysical logging 4 $32( 4.D Prepare well screen design 2 2 $40( Task Tot= $1,360 5.A Observe completion 16 $20 $1,30( 5. B Check dimensions with design 1 §.C Confirm placement depths t $80 Task Tot= $1 r460 6.A Determine development method $1 0( 6.B Observe development progress 24 $30 $1,95(; 6.C Determine when complete $1 0( Task Tot=- $21150 7,A Coordinate testing with City 0.5 $5~ 7. B Determine test pump size 0.5 $50 7. C Provide and install data loggers 8 $100 $740 7.D Make manual measurements 16 $20 $1,300 7.E Collect water qualgy samples 2 $1,000 $1,160 Task Tot= $31300 8.A Draft repod 6 8 3 2 $1,570 8.B Final report 2 2 1 2 $690 8.C Answer questions $100 Task Tot= $2T360 TOTAL HOURS 5 46 154 7 11 RATE PER HOUR $120 $100 $90 $80 $70 $60 TOTAL COST $600 $4r600 $0 St 2~320 $490 $660 $1~320 $19~990 Cost Estimate = $19,990 10% Contigency = $1,999 TOTAL ESTIMATE = $21,989 EXHIBIT C - COST ESTIMATE Preliminary Robinson & Noble Cost Estimate October 27, 2003 Sub PRIN ASSOC ~ENIOR PROJECT ',,ILS C TASK Task Task Description HGEO HGEO ~GEO HGEO DRAFT ADMIN 3OSTS COST 1.A Project management 2 $1,08( 1.B Review of background materials $10( 1 .C Pmj6ct coordination $20( I.D Review contractors invoices 0.5 $5( 1 .E Coordinate meetings (Assume 2) $50 45( rask Tot= $11880 2.A Prepare drilling plan 0.~ $13( 2.B Prepare proposed well design 0.5 $12C 2.C ~repare technical specifications 0.5 4 $58( 2.D ~,nswer Contractors questions $10£ 2.E ~,ssist City with bid process $10£ rask Tot= $1~030 3.A 3bserve drilling 3 40 $I0( $3,60C 3.B Compare hydrogeology 0.5 $5£ 3.C Verba~ progress reports $10£ 3,D Determine completion depth 0.5 $5C task Tot= $31800 4.A Collect aquifer samples 2 $16C 4.B Conduct sieve analysis 4 $32(; 4.C Conduct geophysical logging 4 $32(; 4.D Prepare well screen design 1 2 $32(; !Task Tot= $tr120 5.A Observe completion $2£ $660 5.B Check dimensions with design $8(~ 5.C Confirm placement depths $8(; Task Tot= $820 6.A Determine development method 1 $106 6.B Observe development progress 1( $3C $1,316 6.C Determine when complete 1 $100 Task Tot= $Ii510 7.A Coordinate testing with City 0.5 $50 7.8 Determine test pump size 0.5 $50 7.C Provide and instalJdata loggers $10C $740 7.D Make manual measurements 12 $2C $980 7.E Collect water quality samples $1,00C $t,080 Task Tot= $2~900 8.A Draft report 4 3 2 $1,370 8.8 Final report I 2 $500 8.C Answer questions 1 $100 Task Tot= $1,970 TOTAL HOURS 3.5 36 0 108 6 10.5 RATE PER HOUR $12~ St00 $90 $80 $70 $60 TOTAL COST $420 $3~600 $0 $8m640 $420 $630 $1~320 $151030 Cost Estimate = $15,030 10% Contigency = $1,503 TOTAL ESTIMATE = $16,533 ~0 ;!;i;:o o o o IO Z ::::::~- :.:.: 121 G :~:~: · :::::: ~:~: ~::~: ~:~:~: ~: ... ~ :::::: .:. ::~: ~ · ~ 0~0 a 0 Exhibit C General Fee Schedule October 1, 2003 Professional Typical Fee Position Duties Per Hour Principal Hydrogeologist/ Service requiring the scientific expertise of Environmental Scientist company principals. Includes top-level project $80 - $120 review and control, client liaison, and hydrogeologic analysis. Associate Hydrogeologist/ Associate-level project management, client Environmental Scientist liaison, fietd services, project analysis, and $80 - $100 report writing. Senior Hydrogeologist/ Senior4evel project management, client liaison, Environmental Scientist field services, data interpretation and analysis, $70 - $90 and report writing. Project Geologist/ Field services; data collection, reduction, Hydrogeologist/ $70 - $80 Environmental Scientist interpretation and analysis; and report writing. Draftsperson/Technician Technical illustration/CADD, production layout, technical aide. $60 - $70 Service Typical Fee Category Duties Per Hour Legal support/testimony Expert witness services, t25% of above rates Administrative Services Contracts, technical specifications, $60 administrative tasks., grammatical editiing Typist/Clerical Support Word processing, report preparation, general $40 - $60 office tasks. Subcontracts Professional Services Negotiated Outside Lab Services 12% Construction Subcontracts 12% Other Costs Travel (Auto) $0.35/mile Travel (Other) Cost + 5% Direct Other Expenses Cost + 5% Equipment Rental See following page This fee schedule is subject to change according to contract or Professional Services Agreement conditions. Hydrogeologic Equipment Rental Schedule January l, 2003 Equipment Unit Rate Water level transducer First five days $25 and data logger Each day thereafter $25 Electric water level sounder(s) Flat fee per project $25 Gamma Ray Probe Per day $25 Electrical Resistivity Logger Per day $35 2-inch Centrifugal Pump Per day $35 Submersible pump Per day $100 Generator Per day $60 Other Equipment Negotiated Negotiated This fee schedule is subject to change according to contract or Professional Services Agreement conditions. Environmental Equipment Rental Schedule January 1,2003 Equipment Unit Rate Water level transducer and data logger Per day $50 Electric water level sounder Per day $25 Purge Pump Per day $25 Purge/Sampling tubing Each 10 feet $2.50 Peristaltic Pump Per day $40 Peristaltic tubing Each 10 feet $5 2-inch Centrifugal Pump Per day $75 Submersible pump Per day $100 Generator Per day $60 Photoionization Detector Per day $100 Combustible Gas Indicator Per day $50 Water Quality Meters (pH, DO, Turbidity, Conductivity) Per meter per day $40 Water sample bailer Each $10 Bailer Rope/String Each 10 feet $2.50 Soil Sampling Equipment (hand) Per day $30 Soil Sampling Equipment (power) Per day $40 Personal Protection Equipment Per day per person $50 Other Equipment Negotiated Negotiated This fee schedule is subject to change according to contract or Professional Services Agreement conditions. DATE SUBMITTED: November 13, 2003 BILL # AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON Committee Meeting Date: November 18, 2003 ORDINANCE CREATiNG BMC CH. 2.01 COUNCIL MEETING Date: Nov. 25 & Dec. 10, 2003 RELATING TO PERS ELIGIBILITY Department: City Attorney's Office f);t4/~r~, ~,¢ fi,)'~ ~/r, / 7 Presenter: Rolger A. Lubovich Phone: 473-2346 SUMMARY: By Council action on May 21, 1997, the City Council exercised its discretion authorized under RCW 41.40.023 and WAC 415-108-550, to pay the employer's contribution, plus interest on that contribution, toward the PERS accounts of elected officials establishing membership in the system. Former Mayor Lynn Horton, prior to leaving office, established retroactive service credit for previous terms and has requested reimbursement of the employer's contribution, plus interest. To date, a formal policy has not been established regarding this exercise of discretion. The proposed ordinance formalizes the City Council's action in 1997 exercising its discretion to pay the employer's contribution, plus interest on that contribution, toward the PERS accounts of elected officials. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Memorandum to City Council 2. Proposed Ordinance 3. Request from Former Mayor Lynn Horton regarding reimbursement of PERS employer contribution, plus interest FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Reimbursement in the amount of $5,479.18 will be paid to Former Mayor Lynn Horton APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: ';~5~f- _ ~-~- FINANCE DIRECTOR: ~' ~ FISCAL/B~OET' ' oP XiO S: CO~CIL P~SIDENT: ~COMMENDED MOTION: 2. I move to pass Ordinance No. '~ ~ 7~ on second reading ~d ~her to approve the request of Foyer Mayor L~n Ho~on to reimburse her the employer's contribution, plus interest tow~ds her PERS account. COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action 50- ora iN. CS No. ¥ 7 ? AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, creating a new chapter, Chapter 2.01 of the Bremerton Municipal Code providing for the City of Bremerton's exercise of its discretion in making employee contribution and interest payments to the state of Washington Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) on behalf of City elected officials who have applied for membership and who, while serving in office, have elected to establish service credit for previous elected term or terms of office. WHEREAS, in 1994, the state adopted WAC 415-108-550, under the authority of RCW 41.40.023 and RCW 41.50.050, providing for the inclusion of certain elected officials in the State Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), and authorizing elected officials who, while serving in office, have elected to buy back service credits in the system to the first day of previous terms served and, further authorizing the employer, to exemise its discretion to pay the employer contribution plus interest in lieu of the elected official making the required payment; and WHEREAS, by Council action on May 21, 1997, the City Council exercised its discretion authorized under RCW 41.40.023 and WAC 415-108-550, to pay the employer's contribution, plus interest on that contribution, toward the PERS accounts of elected officials establishing membership in the system and directed that a formal policy to this effect be established; and WHEREAS, to date a formal policy has not been established, therefore the City Council desires to formalize by ordinance its action in 1997 exemising its discretion to pay the employer's contribution, plus interest on that contribution, toward the PERS accounts of elected officials pursuant to RCW 41.40.023 and WAC 415-108-550; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHiNGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAiN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A new chapter, Chapter 2.01 entitled "Elected Officials - PERS" is hereby added to the Bremerton Municipal Code to read as follows: CHAPTER 2.01 ELECTED OFFICIALS - PERS 2.01.010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM-ELECTED OFFICIALS. The City Council hereby exercises its discretion, as authorized pursuant to RCW 41.40.023 and WAC 415-108-550 to pay employer contributions and interest thereon on established Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) accounts of qualified City elected Elected Officials- PERS officials. A qualified City elected official making application for and having established membership in PERS during his or her term of office, and having elected to establish service credit retroactive to the first day of any previous elected term or terms of office, shall be entitled to employer contributions, plus interest, payable by the City, pursuant to RCW 41.40.023 and WAC 415-108-550 as currently enacted and as hereafter amended. The Department of Human Resources is authorized to process applications for reimbursement consistent with this Section. SECTION 2. SeverabilitF. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTIONS. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003 PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2003 CAROL ARENDS, Council President Approved this day of ., 2003 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of _, 2003 EFFECTIVE the day of _, 2003 ORDINANCE NO. R:\LEGAL\Ordinances~fuman Resources\Elected Officials - PERS.doc 2 Elected Officials - PERS Office of the City Attorney Roger A. Lubovich, City Attorney Memorandum T0-' City Council [~['~B-' Roger A LuboVich City Attom(e¢ //< ~ ,:___~:~2-~ ~_~Z~ Account~..~' ~ ' ~:'~ ~-- 1~9: Elected Personnel PERS ~> ~tO: November 13, 2003 ~/' ~ Municipal elected officials are eligible for membership in the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS). Applying this role has led to consistent confusion regarding when officials are eligible, and when the City is responsible to pay the employer contribution. 1. May the mayor and council members obtain membership in PERS without violating the State Constitution which prohibits increases in compensation mid-term? Yes. The Washington State Constitution~ prohibits increases in compensation during a term of office for those who fix their own compensation. But PERS is a statutory right established by the legislature, and therefore not compensation. A 1975 letter opinion by the Attorney General2 states that PERS does not constitute compensation, but is deferred compensation. And there is a further distinction between compensation set by the Council, and benefits provided by the legislature3. By joining PERS a councilmember is not setting his/her salary, but exercising a statutory right granted by the legislature. 2. Who is eligible to participate in PERS? The Mayor and Council members are eligible to participate in PERS Plan 2 or PERS Plan 3 while in office if: · They are a PERS Plan 2, TRS Plan 2, TRS Plan 3, or LEOFF Plan 2 member when elected to office, or · They are a former PERS Plan 2 or PERS Plan 3, TRS Plan 2, TRS Plan 3, or LEOFF Plan 2 member, or · They have never been a member of retirement plan administered by the State of Washington. Washington State Constitution, Articles XI, Section 8, XXX, Section 1. 2AGO 1975 No. 51 RCW 41.40.120 MEMORANDUM: PERS November 13, 2003 Page: 2 3. If eligible, when can an elected official apply for membership? During the initial term: Elected officials may apply for membership at any time during their first term in office. If entering membership after their first term has begun, the official must retroactively pay employee contributions plus interest dating back to the first day of the initial term. During a following term: If the official does not apply for membership during their first term in office, they may apply for membership during a following term. Membership will be granted retroactively to the first day of the term in which the official applied for membership. Again, employee contributions plus interest dating back to the first day of the term in which you apply for membership must be paid retroactively. Once membership is established for a current term, an official may have the option to purchase credit for any previous term or terms of office during which they did not choose to apply for membership. Credit for past elective service is addressed below. 4. Credit for Past Elective Service After an elected official establishes membership for a current term they are entitled to purchase service credit for any previous elected term or terms of office during which they did not choose to apply for membership. To receive service credit the official must pay the required employee and employer contributions for the previous term or terms of elected service with interest, as determined by DRS. All consecutive service with a single employer must be purchased. If the official has held multiple terms with different employers, they may purchase credit for service with either employer. The City may, but is not required to, elect to pay the required employer contributions. 5. What is the City's policy regarding contributing the discretionary employer contribution? On May 21, 1997, the City Council approved the payment of the employer's contribution, plus interest, by action reflected on Agenda Bill no. 97-106. This action also directed that a formal policy to this effect be established. It is my understanding that at least once in the recent the past, when sitting council members have sought membership in PERS, in line with Agenda Bill no. 97-106, the City has paid the discretionary employer contributions. But no official policy has been published nor has an ordinance been passed as directed by the May 21, 1997 Agenda Bill action. MEMORANDUM: PERS November 13, 2003 Page: 3 On April 4, 2001 an ordinance formalizing the City 1997 determination to exercise its discretion to make employer contributions and interest payments upon PERS membership was approved on first reading at a City Council Meeting. It is my understanding that the above referenced proposed ordinance was "pulled" from a subsequent counsel agenda, and was never presented at second reading for passage. The reason(s) for pulling the ordinance from the agenda were never documented, and are simply the subject of speculation. Conclusion Elected officials have a statutory right to participate in the PERS system. The City's policy direction in the past has been to pay discretionary employer contributions for past elected service. This policy has never been formalized in an ordinance, and until this policy is formalized in an ordinance the issues addressed in this memorandum will most likely occur in the future. We recommend the City Council formalize a policy to pay the discretionary employer contribution through ordinance, or formalize a policy to the contrary. If you have any further questions regarding these issues, please let me know. 57 2028 Taft Avenue Bremerton, WA 98312 September 2, 2003 Mayor Cary Bozeman J t !;J~ ....... :" ' ' City of Bremerton ~ SEP 8 L;~03 239 4th Street Bremerton, WA 98337 t.[ --~ Dear Mayor Bozeman: I am writing in order to ask your assistance in a personal matter. During my tenure as a Bremerton City Council Member it was determined by the Attorney's Office that city council members were not entitled to participate in the state retirement system. Subsequent to that additional research was done that indicated council members were, in fact, eligible. In 1997 the City Council approved paying the past contribution and interest for Council Member Al Colvin. At that time they indicated they wanted a policy written for future requests but such a policy was evidently never wdtten nor approved. Before leaving the Mayor's Office, I bought back both my share and the City's share of retirement contribution. The City portion was $2543.50 plus $2935.68 in interest for a total of $5479.18. Although I made an initial request for compensation some time ago, I didn't realize that the policy hadn't been adopted and, as such, I am requesting that this issue be placed on the Council agenda for their deliberation at your earliest convenience. I believe there is precedent for such action. Attached you will find the document from the State Department of Retirement and the minutes from the Council meeting approving Council Member Colvin's contribution. Should you need further background information, City Auditor Michael Stephenson, can probably give you greater details. I appreciate your assistance in this matter. Please contact me at 373-6322 if you need something additional from me. Sincerely, Lynn Horton CC: Council President Carol Arends TAPE #1465 city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes May 21, 1997 Page 4 of 10 the Armed forces Festival. As elected officials, Council members have the option of participating in the Public Employees Retirement System. Members may elect to join for their current term by paying past employee contributions, plus interest, with the city paying the employer's contributions. Council members may also elect to establish membership and service credit from the beginning of any previous term served. The employer's contribution for these previous terms may be paid by the City. To date, the Council has not exercised its discretion on paying the employer's contribution for prior terms. The motion approves City payment for years of service prior to the current term of office and directs the Council President to approve a written policy to this affect. Ian Sievers, City Attorney, stated, as expressed by several Council members, there has been some confusion on this topic in the past. The documentation provided in the Agenda packet included a copy Of the Washington Administrative Code that sets out the procedures and requirements for Council's participation in the retirement system. The City Council has a discretionary decision to make, and he proposed that it be a uniformed policy from this point forward rather than making it an individual decision as each individual applies for a retirement system membership. Public comment - none. Mr. Winters asked why this issue was not brought to the City council's attention in the past? Mr. Sievers stated it may have been in part due to some miscommunication by the Personnel Department during new Council members' orientation. The Council's salary level is right at the edge of c/ualification and in fact qualifies as the minimum amount of salary to join the retirement system. Mr. Winters asked who was responsible for letting Council know they had the option to enroll in the retirement system? Mayor Horton stated she was not sure who was responslble: however from the time she became a city Council member it was her impression that Council members were not eligible. She noted Jim Heith, Human Resources Manager, did look into the matter and confirmed that Council members would be eligible. Mr. winters questioned if it was a Human Resources responsiblity 16 years ago? Mayor Hort~n stated yes. Mr. Winters pointed out this proposal could have a financial impact on the City's budget covering back payments for current and past Council members. Mayor Horton stated she did not know if it would apply to past Council members, who were no longer seated. If all of the current Council members signed up for the retirement plan, there may be the option to break it up into two segments: (1) TAPE #1465 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes May 21, 1997 Page 5 of 10 to utilize funds out of the 1997 to cover the Council seats that would be up for re-election or election in 1997; (2) to utilize the 1998 budget to cover such costs for the remaining Council member seats. Mr. Oversen complimented Mr. Sievers, Mr. Meith and Mayor Herren for addressing this issue and supports what is being proposed. However, he does not intend, at this point, to take advantage of the opportunity to participate in the retirement plan. Mr. Mcdonnell asked if this proposal is approved, would it become automatic for people coming onto the Council or would someone have the option to not participate? Mr. Sievers emphasized nothing is automatic, and a Council member would have to apply for membership. Any Council member who elects to enroll would be responsible for their share, and the City would be obligated to pay the employer's share. Once this policy decision is made, the employer will also pick up any previous terms that is made after the first term. ~r. McConnell asked if money paid into the retirement system by a Council member that served only one term, would be refundable to the individual. Mr. sieVers stated he believed standard PERS rules apply as for a regular employee, i.e. the employee's contribution ~ould be refunded plus any interest earned because not enough years were vested in the system. Mayor Hortom pointed out if someone was a Prior.PERS member and drew their funds out, they would have an opportunity to payback those past funds and reinstate that requirement credit. Mr. Montqome~-F asked if anyone has calculated the amount needed to pay into the retirement fund on a $6,000 salary? ~ stated he did not have an exact figure; however Mr. Colvin's enrollment into the PERS system was used as an example in the Agenda Packet data. Mr. Winters asked why is it the responsiblity of Councilman Colvin to come up with an amount of money that he could have opted to pay at little increments throughout the years, since 1986, rather than to pay in excess of $5,000 all at once? He asked Mayor Horton if she planned to enroll in PERS? M~¥or Herren stated she may take the option since she is a PERS I employee, from past employment with several State agencies. Mr. winters stated again, that he felt it was unfair for them to have to retroactively find the funds. He believes the City should be responsible for the entire amount due to the lack of communication from the Human Resources Department. Br. Ovsrson clarified that Council is being asked to address the policy this evening, not the direct expenditure of funds at this point. Ma¥0r Horton stated Mr. C01vin and Mr. Overson would be the two Council members most affected by this policy, since they have served on City Council the longest. She further stated if all nine members an~ herself chose to join the ~0 TAPE #1465 city Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes May 21, 1997 Page 6 of 10 system, it would cost the City approximately $30,000. Mr. Colvin and Mr. Overson would be on the high end, about $5,000 each, and it would go down from there. She reiterated that this amount would probably be split over two fiscal years. Mr. Overso~ pointed out that WAC has defined that previous payments by the employee are the emPloYee's responsibility. #1622 M/S/c/~(M~tgOmery/Over$on) to of ~oyer's 7B - BUDGET~DJUETMENTANDCONTP~%CTAMBNDM~NTG FOR STATE PERP GRANT TO PREPARE DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR¢~L%RLESTON COMMUNITY PL~No 9AB97- 108 The City has a PERF Grant from the State Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development (CTED) to produce the Charleston Community Plan. The draft Plan recommends that Design Guidelines be developed for the business district. CTED is now offering the City an additional $10,000 to prepare draft Design Guidelines. The work products must by completed by June 30, 1997. The consulting firms of Kato and Warren, with Hewitt Isley, are already under contract to produce the Environmental Impact Statement, a brochure, and a videotape for the Charleston Plan. These firms have agreed to sign a contract amendment committing them to develop the required work products within the contract deadline. To accept this grant extension, the City Council needs to approve an amendment to the City's PERF Grant contract. Don Pratt, Community Development Director, stated it was an honor to be offered this $10,000 from the State, which would bring the total of State funds to $50,000. That money was matched with $37,000 of local funds to continue work in the Charleston District. Public comment - none. r. o o commented that anytime the State wants to offer the City money, we should take it! He also complimented Mr. Hough and Mrs. Wilson for their fine work. Mr. Overson questioned if the Department may be taking on too much at once? Mr. Pratt reassured Council that most of the work would be done by the consultant, and the work by the staff was all preliminary. ~ asked if the development of this plan is similar to what Council heard previously? Mr. Pratt stated he was not at the · DEC-28-0t FRI 03:21 PM DRS/PERS/SER$ FAX:36066'~936 PAGE 2 Page: 1 Document Name: Robyn S 12/28/01 DEPARTMENT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS MIXP081~ 13:17:17 MAINTAIN OPTIONAL SERVICE Vet 3.10 MIXM08 · Action: R (C,R,U,D,E) Verified By: TERRY SAMMONS 0PTSER On: 12/28/2001 · MEMBER SSN: ~ *SYS/PLAN: P1 > MORTON, LYiN-N S · OPT SERVICE ID: 00273283 · Opt Service Type: ELOB ELECTED OFFICIALS (MBR PAYS ER POR) + Date Requested: 12 28 2001 Contact Person: ROBYN STROZINSKy Date Document,n Rcv: 12 28 2001 Total Service Credit: ~72.00 Mos .......... Optional Bill Info .......... Member Contrib,n or Present Val: 2160.00 ===> Recovery Iht: 2542.8~ Employer Contrlb,n & EXpense Amt: _~.!~S0 ==~ Recovery Iht: _ 2935.6~ Billing Address: ~ Iht Calc'd thru: 12 3I 2001 Statutory Deadline Date: ...... Bill Issued Date: Print Bill Overnigh=: y Optional Details: > Command: Enter-PFi~--PF2-~'PF3---PF4---PFS---PF6---ppT~.~PFB"~[_pFg___PF10__PFll~.PF12 .. Help Retrn MainM Quit Cnfrm 'Review of Optional Service successful Lo~ Da~e: 12/28/2001 Time: 1:2S:25 PM ~--~ ' - ........ ' ..................... DATE SUBMITTED: BILL # C ~ ,fl-~ AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ~ SUBJECT: Approving Amendment to Committee Meeting Date: December 2, 2003 Ordinance No. 4826 relating to the City of COUNCIL MEETING Date: December 10, 2003 Bremerton Fiscal Year 200o~Budget Department: Finance Presenter: Michael R. Wilson Phone: 473-5590 SUMMARY: The City Council passed Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 City Budget ordinance (Ordinance No. 4839) on December 11, 2002. Certain programs have been implemented and actions taken during the year resulting in the need to amend revenues and expenditures within the 2003 City Budget ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): This budget amendment is required to comply with the financial and budgetary provisions of previously-approved measures by the City Council or due to unforeseen expenses. The fiscal impacts are identified within the Amending Budget Ordinance. APPROVALS: / FINANCE DIRECTOR: FISCAL/BUDGET: ~ * - CONSENT AGENDA [] OPERATIONS: COUNCIL PRESIDENT: RECOMMENDED MOTION: A. I move to approved the attached ordinance on first reading, amending Ordinacne No. 4826 relating to the City of Bremerton FY 2003 Budget. B. I move to pass Ordinance No. __ on second reading, amending Ordinance No. 4826 relating to the City of Bremerton FY 2003 Budget. Department of i:inance 239 Fourth Street, Bremerton, WA 98337 Telephone: 360-478-5590 Fax: 360-478-5200 mwilson@ci, bremerton, wa. us Michael R. Wilson, Director of Finance TO: Carol Arends, Council President FROM: Michael R. Wilson~.~ SUBJECT: 2003 Amending Budget Ordinance DATE: December 5, 2003 On Tuesday, we introduced and reviewed with the Council Committee the Ordinance amending the 2003 City Budget. Please note that we have added to the Conference Center Capital budget (Section 5 of the Ordinance) the funding and appropriation adjustment for the fountain project. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of thc City Council of the City of Bremcrton, Washington, amending Ordinance No. 4839 relating to the City of Bremerton Fiscal Year 2003 Budget. WHEREAS, the City Council passed the Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 City Budget Ordinance (Ordinance No. 4839) on December 11, 2002; WHEREAS, the General Fund (Fund 001) needs budget adjustments within Human Resources to fund the remaining 50% of the Civil Service Officer in the 2003 budget; Municipal Court budget to fund retirement benefits for the Court Administrator; Police/Fire Pension budget for increased pension benefits; Law Enforcement to account for receipt of grant revenues for funding overtime and supply expenses and transfers to fund labor agreement settlement from Non-departmental set-aside funds and Cencom services; Parks Department to fund benefits for part time employees, receipt of revenue and matching expenditures for Recjam program, Senior Center trip program and Playground Express program; and Intergovernmental Services for increase in funding for the Kitsap Regional Council broadband network masterplan; and WHEREAS, proceeds from property sold in 2002 were deposited into the Contingency Reserve Fund (Fund 103) and replacement Parks property purchased in 2003 and the balance of funds to be transferred to the Parks Development Fund (Fund 112); and WHEREAS, an adjustment needs to be made to the Public Safety Capital Bond Fund (Fund 302) to reflect a shifting of funds from the fund balance to capital/professional services to bring the total project costs to the original bond total of $12,979,000; and WHEREAS, the Police Special Projects Fund (Fund 110) requires a shifting of $15,000 of funding from Capital to Supplies/Services for equipment for SOG; and WHEREAS, the Gift and Donations Fund (Fund 114) requires a shifting of $5,500 of funding from Capital to Supplies/Services for radio equipment for the Police Department; and WHEREAS, the City has applied and received a state grant for funding of a fountain project for the Conference Center and an interfund loan in the amount of $500,000 was issued to the Conference Center/Parking Garage Capital Project (Fund 301) in FY 2002 to provide interim funding into this fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved a comprehensive rate study to be conducted for the Stormwater (Fund 481), Water (Fund 401) and Wastewater (Fund 451) utilities resulting in the need to amend the utility budgets to fund this study, and a shift in the Wastewater utility to personnel from professional services to fund a Wastewater technician to a regular position; and 2003 Budget Amendment WHEREAS, each of these actions has an impact on the City of Bremerton's FY 2003 City Budget resulting in the need to amend this Budget document; NOW, THEREFORE, THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Ordinance 4839 establishing the City of Bremerton's FY 2003 Budget passed by the City Council on December 11, 2002, is hereby amended as follows: 1) The General Fund (Fund 001) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments: GENERAL FUND {Fund 001) FY 2003 Current Amended REVENUES 2003 Budqet 2003 Budqet Difference State Grants - Law Enforcement 110,000 110,000 Charges for Services - Parks 30,000 30,000 Transfers from Fund 106 - CDBG Grant _- 9,000 9,000 Total Revenues 149,000 149,000 EXPENDITURES Department: Human Resources (001-15) Personnel - salaries 158,689 170,689 12,000 Department: Municipal Court (001~17) Personnel - salaries 429,642 434.642 5,000 Department: Law Enforcement (001-20) Personnel-salaries 5,661,978 5,848,278 186,300 Supplies & Services 102,000 102,000 Department: Police/Fire Pension (001-29) Personnel 1,887,193 1,962,193 75,000 Department: Parks (001-51) Personnel 1,646,625 1,671,725 25,100 Supplies & Services 646,468 676,068 29,600 Department: Intergovernmental Services (001-72) Supplies & Services 17,975 21,975 4,000 Department: Non-Depart. - Nego./Salaries (001-73) Personnel set aside 309,774 19,774 -290,000 Total Expenditures 10,758,344 10,907,344 149,060 2003 Budget Amendment 2) The Gifts and Donations Fund (Fund 114) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments: POLICE DONATIONS FUND (Fund 114) FY 2003 Current Amended EXPENDITURES 2003 Budqet 2003 Budqet Ending Fund Balance 32,569 32,569 Personnel 750 750 Supplies/Services - Pumhase radio equipment 38,281 43,781 Capital Outlay 15,000 9,500 Total Expenditures 86,600 86,600 3) The Parks Development Fund (Fund 112) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments: PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND (Fund 112) FY 2003 Current Amended REVENUES 2003 Budqet ~ Beginning Fund Balance/Bond Proceeds 630,857 630,857 Intergovernmental 31,000 31,000 Misc. Revenues 83,000 83,000 Operating Transfers In - additional transfer from Contingency Reserve 150,000 .153,000 Total Revenues 894,857 897,857 EXPENDITURES Supplies/Services 238,800 238,800 Capital Outlay 300,000 300,000 Debt Service 53,798 53,798 Ending Fund Balance 302,259 305,259 Total Expenditures 894,857 897,857 4) The Police Special Projects Fund (Fund 110) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments: POLICE SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND ~Fund 110) FY 2003 Current Amended EXPENDITURES 2003 Budqet 2003 Budget Ending Fund Balance 178,000 178,000 Supplies/Services - Equipment for SOG 76,000 91,000 Capital Outlay 64,000 49,000 Total Expenditures 318,000 318,000 2003 Budget Amendment 5) The Conference Center/Parking Garage Capital Fund (Fund 301) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments: CONFERENCE CENTER/PARKGING GARAGE CAPITAL FUND (Fund 301) FY 2003 Current Amended REVENUES 2003 Budqet 2003 Bud(let Beginning Fund Balance 500,000 State Grant - Fountain _0 987,500 Other Revenue - Fountain _0 450,000 Total Revenues 0 1,937,500 EXPENDITURES Debt Payment - interfund loan 500,000 Capital Outlay - Fountain construction/design _0 1,437,500 Total Expenditures 0 1,937,500 6) The Public Safety Capital Project Fund (Fund 302) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments: PUBLIC SAFETY CAPITAL PROJECT FUND (Fund 302) FY 2003 Current Amended REVENUES 2003 Budqet 2003 Budqet Beginning Fund Balance/Bond Proceeds 12,979,000 12,979,000 Interfund Loan 800,000 800,000 Interest Earnings 333,289 333,289 Total Revenues 14,112,289 14,112,289 EXPENDITURES Administration 10,000 10,000 Professional Services 613,750 777,000 Land 1,998,000 1,998,000 Construction 7,155,000 7,155,000 Equipment 3,804,000 3,829,000 Bond Debt Service 10,000 10,000 Ending Fund Balance 521,539 333,289 Total Expenditures 14,112~289 14,112,289 2003 Budget Amendment 7) The Contingency Reserve Fund (Fund 103) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments: CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND (Fund 103) FY 2003 Current Amended REVENUES 2003 Budget 2003 Budqet Beginning Fund Balance 854,000 854,000 Miscellaneous Revenue 50,000 50,000 Total Revenues 964,000 904,000 EXPENDITURES Ending Cash 854,000 803,000 Capital Outlay - purchase of Park Property 48,000 Operating Transfers 50,000 ~3,000 Total Expenditures 904,000 904,000 8) The Water Utility Fund (Fund 401) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments: WATER FUND (Fund 401) FY 2003 Current Amended EXPENDITURES 2003 Budget 2003 Budqet Other Expenditures 12,191,027 12,191,027 Supplies & Services - Rate Study 2,616,248 2,660,948 Ending Fund Balance 704,475 659,775 Total Expenditures 15,511,750 15,511,750 9) The Wastewater Utility Fund (Fund 451) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments: WASTEWATER FUND (Fund 451) FY 2003 Current Amended EXPENDITURES 2003 Budqet 2003 Budqet Personnel - fund WW Tech from professional services 2,012,723 2,071,035 Other Expenditures 13,730,608 13,730,808 Supplies & Services - fund rate study, shift funds to personnel 3,219,186 3,190,674 Ending Fund Balance 266,863 237,063 Total Expenditures 19,229,380 19,229,380 2003 Budget Amendment 10) The Stormwater Utility Fund (Fund 481) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation adjustments: STORMWATER FUND {Fund 481) FY 2003 Current Amended EXPENDITURES 2003 Budqet 2003 Budqet Other Expenditures 1,189,168 1,189,168 Supplies & Services - fund rate study 437,189 467,089 Ending Fund Balance 33,150 3,250 Total Expenditures 1,659,507 1,659,507 SECTION 2. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003 PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2003 CAROL ARENDS, Council President Approved this day of ,2003 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of ,2003 EFFECTIVE the day of ,2003 ORDINANCE NO. R:'~LEGAL\OrdinancesLginance\03 amending budget ordinance 2.doc 2003 Budget Amendment DATE SUBMITTED: 11/20/03 BILL # i' AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL q~ SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance Committee Meeting Date: Ig~ Oda~,-ff ~Sl'olx~ Adopting the 2004 Annual Budget, COUNCIL MEETING Date: ~,~ --/t~-- O~ ~- I,~-I Repealing BMC Chps 3.02, 3.10 and 3.38 Department: Finance and Amending BMC Chp 3.36 Presenter: Michael Wilson Phone: 473-5590 SUMMARY: This ordinance adopts the City of Bremerton's 2004 Annual Budget at the Fund level as described in the Mayor's Proposed 2004 Budget. ATTACHMENTS: FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: __~ _ ,. CITY ATTORNEY: . FINANCE DIRECTOR: MAYOR: FISCAL/BUDGET: CONSENT AGENDA [] OPERATIONS: COUNCIL PRESIDENT: ,"~r.c.~(~. ~/~d~5~--' RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve an Ordinance adopting the City of Bremerton's 2004 Annual Budget on first reading. Move to pass Ordinance # on second reading. COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action Option A ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Brcmerton, Washington, approving and adopting the financial budget for the several funds of thc City of Brcmcrton for the fiscal year 2004, and appropriating thc amounts set forth in each budget to each fund in accordance with RCW 35.33.075; repealing Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 3.10 entitled "Conference Center Fund" and Chapter 3.38 entitled "Discretionary Reserve Fund;" and amending Brcmcrton Municipal Code Chapter 3.36.020 relating to the source of funds for the Contingency Reserve Fund. WHEREAS, State law, Chapter 35.33 RCW requires the City to adopt an annual budget and provides procedures for the filing of estimates, a preliminary budget, deliberations, public hearings, and final fixing of the budget; and WHEREAS, a preliminary budget for the fiscal year 2004 has been prepared and filed in the Office of the City Clerk for the City of Bremerton; public hearings have been held for the purposes of fixing the final City Budget; and the City Council has deliberated and has made adjustments and changes deemed necessary and proper; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNC1L OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTIONI. That the 2004 Budget for the City of Bremerton, Washington, on file in the office of the City Clerk, covering the period from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, with regular revenues and unencumbered fund balances of $142,992,232 and expenditures and ending fund balances of $142,992,232 is hereby approved and adopted, and the respective amounts provided for in said budget for the several funds of the City of Bremerton are hereby fixed and adopted as follows: ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE YEAR 2004 General Fund Executive $ 290 834 City Council 209 402 Administrative Services 393 282 Finance 645 066 Human Resources 289 421 Community Development 936 407 Legal 525 202 Municipal Court 791 632 Law Enforcement 7,824 047 Fire/Emergency Medical 5,374,836 1 2004 Budget Option A General Parks 2,376,891 City Auditor 106,879 Engineering 287,647 General Facilities 508,040 Economic Development 148,106 Non-Departmental 5,918,000 Ending Fund Balance 225,340 Total General Fund $ 26,851,032 Arterial Street (102) 9,698,270 Street (101) 2,391,809 Contingency Reserve (103) 910,000 Civic Improvement (104) 437,000 Parking System (105) 1,747,509 Community Development Block Grant (106) 4,027,788 Abatement Revolving (108) 197,100 Police Special Projects (110) 255,000 Public Access Television (113) 267,420 Gift & Donations Fund (114) 112,658 Discretionary Reserve (115) 1,020,000 Bond Fund (201) 1,958,780 LID Guaranty (202) 169,800 Conference Center (401 ) 13,770,809 Park Facilities Construction (310) 928,606 Public Safety Bond (302) 9,950,998 Maritime Park (303) ! ,000,000 ULID 2002-01 (403) 963,654 Government Center (305) 7,862,956 General Government Capital Improvement (308) 766,000 Pedestrian/BTC Access (309) 5,700,000 Water Utility (401) 13,002,591 Gold Mountain Golf Complex (407) 4,195,728 Conference Center Operating (410) 865,000 Wastewater Utility (451) 21,976,127 Stormwater Utility (481) 1,190,804 Risk Management (503) 2,306,071 Equipment Rental Reserve (510) 5,859,141 Information Services (51 I) 756,440 Police & Fire Pension (601) 1,853,141 Total All Funds $142,992,232 SECTION2. That the totals for the funds noted in Section 1 above as set forth in the official "City of Bremerton 2004 Annual Budget" adopted herein, are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2004. 2004 Budget Option A SECTIONS. Chapter 3.10 of the Bremerton Municipal Code, entitled "Conference Center Fund", is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION4. Chapter 3.38 of the Bremerton Municipal Code, entitled "Discretionary Reserve Fund" is hereby repealed in its entirety effective February 1, 2004. SECTION 5. Section 3.36.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to the "Contingency Reserve Fund", is hereby amended to read as follows: 3.36.020 A ~/~r,~.,~- ............... SOURCE OF FUND The proceeds of sale of all general fund real property shall be deposited to the Contingency Reserve Fund." SECTION 6. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to require the City of Bremerton or its officers to fill any vacancy in any of the positions established by this ordinance resulting from the discharge, resignation or retirement of such employee. Nothing herein contained shall require the City of Bremerton or its officers to pay the maximum amount budgeted for any position shown therein. SECTION 7. Severabilit¥. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (I0) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003 PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2003 CAROL ARENDS, Council President Approved this day of 2003 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor 3 --] ~ 2004Budget Option A ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of ,2003 EFFECTIVE the day of ,2003 ORDINANCE NO. R:\LEGAL\Ordinances\FinanceX2004 budget ordinance I Option A.doc 2004 Budget Option B ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, approving and adopting the financial budget for the several funds of the City of Bremerton for the fiscal year 2004, and appropriating the amounts set forth in each budget to each fund in accordance with RCW 35.33.075; repealing Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 3.10 entitled "Conference Center Fund" and Chapter 3.38 entitled "Discretionary Reserve Fund;" and amending Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 3.36.020 relating to the source of funds for the Contingency Reserve Fund. WHEREAS, State law, Chapter 35.33 RCW requires the City to adopt an aunual budget and provides procedures for the filing of estimates, a preliminary budget, deliberations, public hearings, and final fixing of the budget; and WHEREAS, a preliminary budget for the fiscal year 2004 has been prepared and filed in the Office of the City Clerk for the City of Bremerton; public hearings have been held for the purposes of fixing the final City Budget; and the City Council has deliberated and has made adjustments and changes deemed necessary and proper; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHiNGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAiN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the 2004 Budget for the City of Bremerton, Washington, on file in the office of the City Clerk, covering the period from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, with regular revenues and unencumbered fund balances of $143,902,232 and expenditures and ending fund balances of $143,902,232 is hereby approved and adopted, and the respective amounts provided for in said budget for the several funds of the City of Bremerton are hereby fixed and adopted as follows: ESTEMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE YEAR 2004 General Fund Executive $ 341,848 City Council 210,139 Administrative Services 396,508 Finance 633,292 Human Resources 290,435 Community Development 941,292 Legal 526,953 Municipal Court 795,135 Law Enforcement 7,852,530 Fire/Emergency Medical 5,341,695 1 -7 ~o 2004 Budget Option B General Parks 2,383,620 City Auditor 106,879 Engineering 287,647 General Facilities 508,040 Economic Development 149,120 Non-Departmental 6,762,309 Ending Fund Balance 233,590 Total General Fund $ 27,761,032 Arterial Street (102) 9,698,270 Street (101) 2,391,809 Contingency Reserve (103) 910,000 Civic Improvement (104) 437,000 Parking System (105) 1,747,509 Community Development Block Grant (106) 4,027,788 Abatement Revolving (108) 197,100 Police Special Projects (110) 255,000 Public Access Television (113) 267,420 Girl & Donations Fund (114) 112,658 Discretionary Reserve (115) 1,020,000 Bond Fund (201) 1,958,780 LID Guaranty (202) 169,800 Conference Center (401) 13,770,809 Park Facilities Construction (310) 928,606 Public Safety Bond (302) 9,950,998 Maritime Park (303) 1,000,000 ULID 2002-01 (403) 963,654 Government Center (305) 7,862,956 General Government Capital Improvement (308) 766,000 Pedestrian/BTC Access (309) 5,700,000 Water Utility (401) 13,002,591 Gold Mountain Golf Complex (407) 4,195,728 Conference Center Operating (410) 865,000 Wastewater Utility (451) 21,976,127 Stormwater Utility (481) 1,190,804 Risk Management (503) 2,306,071 Equipment Rental Reserve (510) 5,859,141 Information Services (511) 756,440 Police & Fire Pension (601) 1,853,141 Total All Funds $143,902,232 SECTION2. That the totals for the funds noted in Section 1 above as set forth in the official "City of Bremerton 2004 Annual Budget" adopted herein, are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2004. 2004 Budget Option B SECTION 3.: Chapter 3.10 of the Bremerton Municipal Code, entitled "Conference Center Fund", is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 4. Chapter 3.38 of the Bremerton Municipal Code, entitled "Discretionary Reserve Fund" is hereby repealed in its entirety effective February 1, 2004. SECTION 5. Section 3.36.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to the "Contingency Reserve Fund", is hereby amended to read as follows: 3.36.020...,.v.~.,.AlXlt~II~'P .=.,~A l~.Tr~ SOURCE OF FUND The proceeds of sale of all general fund real property shall be deposited to the Contingency Reserve Fund." SECTION 6. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to require the City of Bremerton or its officers to fill any vacancy in any of the positions established by this ordinance resulting from the discharge, resignation or retirement of such employee. Nothing herein contained shall require the City of Bremerton or its officers to pay the maximum amount budgeted for any position shown therein. SECTION 7. Severabilitv. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003 PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2003 CAROL ARENDS, Council President Approved this day of ,2003 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor 2004 Budget Option B ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of ,2003 EFFECTIVE the day of ., 2003 ORDINANCE NO. R:\LEGAL\OrdinancesWinancek2004 budget ordinancel Option B.doc 4 2004 Budget DATE SUBMITTED: 11/20/03 BILL AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance Committee Meeting Date: /r~ocYq,~'~ 5e~,~/'ol, c5' Updating BMC Chapter 3.01 Rate and Fees COUNCIL MEETING Date: /~--~0--O ~ Department: Finance Presenter: Michael Wilson Phone: 473-5590 SUMMARY: The proposed ordinance updates the rates and fees for certain City departments. ATTACHMENTS: FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): APPROVALS: L / DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: FISCAL/BUDGET: CONSENT AGENDA [] OPERATIONS: COUNCIL PRESIDENT: RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve an Ordinance amending BMC Chapter 3.01 Rates and Fees. Move to pass Ordinance #__ on second reading. COUNCIL ACTION: [] Aoorove [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, amending Chapter 3.01 of the Bremerton Municipal Code updating rates and fees for 2004. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the rates and fees for the year 2004; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION1. Chapter 3.01 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Rates and Fees" is hereby amended to read as follows: 3.01.010 INCORPORATION OF RATE TABLES. The following Rate Tables A-G attached hereto are incorporated herein by this reference and hereby adopted. Where the City has adopted State codes pursuant to Chapters 17.04 and 18.02 of the Bremerton Municipal Code, State rates listed for the Uniform Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes are adopted as city rates as listed in Tables C and E and are subject to uniform rate changes made by the State. 3.01.020 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - RATE TABLE A. Regulatory License Fees Business License Fees Parking Fees Utility/Lien Search Fees Document Reproduction Check Handling Fee 3.01.030 MUNICIPAL COURT - RATE TABLE B. Hearing Examiner Appeal Parking Fines 3.01.040 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - RATE TABLE C. Zon:.ng Comprehensive Plan Subdivisions Shoreline Master Program State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Site Plan Review Appeal Abatements Building Permits Mechanical Permits Plumbing Permits 1 ~ I 2004 Rates Zoning Comprehensive Plan 3.01.050 POLICE DEPARTMENT - RATE TABLE D. Traffic Accident Reports Fingerprints Criminal History Check Verification Letter for Lost or Stolen Property Photo Prints Licenses for Dogs and Cats Alarm Compliance Fee Service Fee for Anti-Harassment Order Service of Arrest Warrants and Subpoenas 3.01.060 FIRE DEPARTMENT - RATE TABLE E. Ambulance Transport Fee Fire Rescue Boat Response Hazard Materials Response Stand-By Time Active Firefighting False Alarm Fee Sprinkler/Fire Alarm Plans 3.01.070 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT - RATE TABLES F Facility Use Rental Rates Sheridan Community Center Bremerton Sr. Citizens Center Jarstad Aquatic Center Evergreen Park Shelters Athletic Field Blueberry Park ~ Pea Patch Program Fees and Charges Jarstad Aquatic Center Athletic Programs Bremerton Sr. Citizens Center/Recreation Programs Ivy Green Cemetery Gold Mountain Golf Complex 3.01.080 PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES - RATE TABLE G. Right-of-Way Permits Right-of-Way Vacation Telecom Master Permit Fee Telecom License Fee Utility/Lien Search Fee 2004 Rates ..................................... : ....2 ........... r ............................ or all 3.01.100 NON-RESIDENTIAL USE OF CITY SERVICES. Non-city residents shall pay the rates shown on Rate Table F multiplied by 120% with the exception of daily admission fees and merchandise for sale. SECTION2. Rate Tables Amended. Rate Tables A, B, C, D, E, F, and G of Chapter 3.01 of the Bremerton Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A of this Ordinance. SECTION3. Rate Tables Repealed and Amended. Rate Table F1 is hereby repealed in its entirety and the fees listed in Rate Table F1 are hereby incorporated into Rate Table F. The 2004 rates established in Rate Table F1 remain the same upon incorporation into Rate Table F. SECTION4. Severabilit¥. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED by the City Council the day of 2003 PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2003 CAROL ARENDS, Council President 2004 Rates Approved this day of _, 2003 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attomey PUBLISHED the day of _, 2003 EFFECTIVE the .day of ,2003 ORDINANCE NO. R:\LEGAL\OrdinancesXAdministration~2004 Rate TablesX3.01 rate changes ordinance.doc 2004 Rates ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - RATE TABLE A All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees A. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1. REGULATORY LICENSE FEES 2003 RATE BMC 18.06 Ambulance Services Ambulance Inspections $60/veh BMC 5.17 Charitable Solicitation Non-Profit $25/60 days Professional Fundraiser $675/60 days BMC 5.22 Dance/Public $265/yr or $70/30 days BMC 5.96 Erotic Dance Studios $700/yr Dancers $100/yr BMC 9.48 Fireworks Stands $100/stand/yr BMC 10.24 Housemoving/Oversize Loads $600+$65/mile to. 10 of a mile BMC 5.16 Mobile Food Vendor $150/veh/yr BMC 5.16 Peddlers $75/yr or $25/30days BMC 5.04 Petshops $150/yr Grooming Parlors $50/yr Animal Welfare Facilities $50/yr BMC 5.36 Special Events: Profit $675/event Non-Profit $70/event BMC 5.20 StreeFSidewalk Vendors $250/yr BMC 5.16 Temporary Merchant $400/30 days 2. BUSINESS LICENSE FEE 2003 RATE BMC 5.02 $,~65/yr 3. PARKING I On-Street Locations Not to Exceed $20/3 hfs $30/10 hrs Off-Street Location Not to Exceed $20/3 hrs $30/10 hrs Table A- A1 ~'- ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - RATE TABLE A All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees RATE Parking Garage Not to Exceed $!00140/mo 4. UTILITY/LIEN SEARCH FEE~ L:~Ig.I-RATE- Per Parcel $30/search per parcel 5. DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION FEE~ 2OO,I-RA-T-E Per Page $.15/pg Audio or Video Tapes Cost of Tape +$8.50 Computer Disks $8.50 Certification $3.50 Blue Prints -Aerial Photos, Drawings, Maps $8/pg Documents: Medical Records $19/lSt 5 pages $.83/Pgs 6-31 $.63/Pgs 31+ Fire Reports $.15/pg Budget $25 Annual Report $25 6. CHECK HANDLING FEE $40 ~PPL!C.~.TIOH O.~! Table A - A2 ~' MUNICIPAL COURT - RATE TABLE B All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees B. MUNICIPAL COURT 2003 RATE 1. HEARING EXAMINER APPEAL $65 2. PARKING FINES Overtime or Non-Payment in Collection Devices: 1st Violation in 30 Days $25 2nd Violation in 30 Days $32 3ra Violation in 30 Days $56 Loading Zones $17 No Parking $45 Wrong Way $45 Parked on Sidewalk $56 Fire Hydrant $45 12" From Curb $10 Physically Disabled (Public and Private) $250 Counterfeiting or User of Counterfeit Permits, $500 Tokens or Script Unauthorized Use of Permits $150 All Other Infractions Not Specified Above $27 Replacement of parking permit $10 Blocked Driveway $45 Expired Tabs $45 30 Foot to Stop Sign $45 Double Parked $45 No Stopping/No Standing $45 Parking Capacity Survey $250 Table B - B1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - RATE TABLE C All Rates Listed are "Not To Exceed" Fees C. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RAT-E-S ~ RATES ........................ ntc T~v+ ~'~n nn ~'~on ~n $7d0 O0 A~;~;~+~+;,,~ ~onv nn ~3!5 O0 $325 O0 ..... O0 ~ n .... ~ ......... ~ ............. ~ ..... 0 $~ ~O.O0 ..... O0 .......... {~g ~ ............ ~ .......................................... 0 { $~?~.00 ~ $~30.00 ~'~- e~ ~/~...~,,~ ~ =/~,.,~.. $ ! 5,/dwc~g ...... . .......... ng .......... ~ng ...... . ......... = .......... s $! ,500.00 $! ,545.00 .................. O0 .......... ~ ............... ~ ............. O ~ Se3e. O0 .................... h on nnn ¢~ ¢, ~¢ on nnn ~ ft on nnn .. ft COMPREHEHS!VE PLAN ........... . ............... t $~ ,~"5 O0 3.01 - C1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT- RATE TABLE C All Rates Listed are "Not To Exceed" Fees RATES, RAT-ES RATES 1. SUBDIVISIONS Short ~.. nn/.-...-,. !0[ ¢~aa nn (por ¢:~n,~ nn ~.... '"~'~ ~"*~ o~ '^"'~ !ct) of ,,,,,4 ~ot)$1oo0 plus $250 Eer lot Long Plat ?0~ 00 ' $727.00 ~ <b';Aa nn · to~ nn/I.~* ~-.~. ¢~tqo nn/I $t. 32 ......... ct O0/Iot -1- ...... ~ h~l-" 10 for 1~ !0 btc ~"* ...... 10 $33/!0t for .... ~"*" c:'c.' =ny !otc -1-g$2500 cvcr 10 plus $250 per lot Final Plat $300.00 ~ $3!2.00315 2. .SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Substantial Development Permit e~n'~ nn e~o~ n ............. 0 $6dq.00650 Conditional Use Permit $~07.00 $525.00 $64-1.002500 Shoreline Variance $~07.00 $825.00 $84.~..002500 Permit Revision e,~n-, ,~ $3! 5.00 ...... 0 $325.q3~ Shoreline Exemption $200 3. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) Checklist $200.00 $206.00 $2!2.00320 Environmental Impact Statement ~,~-,{~n'7.vvnn .' $6-'3~.00 I $8~'~..00650 Review/Adoption ..,~.4~,;..,... ~ ....,., ~,4~m.-... ........................ al + additional ..... ,- .......... cost of ~ expertise 4. SITE PLAN REVIEW .... ~ ......... ~ ................. Four or Less N/C N/C N/C$250 Residential Units Others .~'~ n,q. v~.~nn $103.00 $106.00500 5. APPEAL To o,....,.;..., r-~.~....,..~.; $!?,.00 $!32.00 .......... ~ ............ on To Hearinq Examiner $175 6. ABATEMENTS Dangerous Building -,-~:~'m.~.~nn .' $888 .00 ~ $8,gg~Dg900 n~....., o.....~..., n;.....* Direct =~d ~.,.ply ~""'""" ~nd Service and '-'"~'*~' ~-r-.~ .... "'Coct Supply Cost Garbage & Weed ~nn n ...... 0 n;...,., o..,.,;,.., n~....., Direct ""'~ ~ .... "' ~"'~"" cnd Service and ...... ~.,.,~ -cst Supply Cost 3.01 -C2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - RATE TABLE C All Rates Listed are "Not To Exceed" Fees RAT-ES RATES RATES 7. BUILDING PERMIT FEES - UBC Rates - Refer to Exhibit 1 8. MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES - UBC Rates - Refer to Exhibit 2 9. PLUMBING PERMIT FEES - UBC Rates - Refer to Exhibit 3 10. ZONING ORDINANCE Ordinance Amendments Text $740 Rezone (Map Amendment) $740 Variance Administrative $325 Public Hearinq/Sinqle Family $500 Public Hearinq/Other $2500 Planned Unit Development Residential Only $1500 + $100/DU Industrial, Commercial, Mixed Use or $2500 + Other. $100/DU + $100/acre Development Aqreements $1600 Special Use Permit Administrative (No public hearinq) $350 Hearinq Examiner/SF Residential $500 Hearin.q Examiner/Other $2500 Non-Conformin.q Use Determination $275 Director's Code Interpretation $175 Zoninq Verification Letter $125 11. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Text or Map Amendment $1500 Combined Text and Map Amendment $2500 q 0 3.o] - c3 TABLE C EX[EIB I T 2 TABLE 1-A 1997 [,'~IEC~ [V]F.,C~I~[{~ (~E ~ .fi~/~]~D 1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE TABLE 1-A--MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES 3. Repairs or Additions ...... ' ................... 7.25 F,r [he inslalladon or relocation of each boiler or comp{es.so{ ~ver th{cc h0r,~cpower (Ill.6 kW) tn and including I5 bomepower (52.7 kW) i4.71) ,r each absorption system over IOfi.{~Ot) Blu/h (29.3 kW) to and inc ud ng 500 ~00 B u/h (146.6 kW) ..................................... F r e n~tallatioo or relocation nfcach boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower (52.7 kW) to and including 30 horsepower { 105.5 kW), 27.15 ,,r each absorption syslem over 500,000 Btu~l 146.6 kW) lo and nc ud ng i 000 000 B u/h (29.3.1 kW) ............................... 37 F,r fbe installation or relocation of each boiler 'or compressor over 30 horsepower (105,$ kW) to and including $i) horsepower ( 176 kW), 1.750.000 Btu/h ($12.9 kW) ......................................... 5. Air Handlers ...................................................... 92.65 For each air-handling unit to and including ]0,000 cubic feet per mnu e (cfm) (47lD L/s), inclu~iMg duels altacbed thereto .............. For each air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm (4719 Lis) .................. For the iaslallalion of each hood which is served by mechanical exhaus, ncluding the ducts for such hood ........ ............................................................................................ ~. nc hera ors 10.65 no other fee is listed in thc table ' - - -. Rcinspccdon fees assessed under provisions of Section 116.6, per nspection ................................................... $49,50: 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated, per hoot (m nlmum charge--one-half hour) ....................................... $49.$0 4. Additional plan review required bv changes, addi ohs or revisions to plans nr to plans for which an inilial review ' {minimum charge--one-ha ~ has been corn e ed _ f hour, . ........ p *Or (he Inlet hourly cosl to the jurisdiction, whichever is the grea cs, Th s cos shall include supervision overhead e ' hourly wages and fringe benefits of thc employccs~involved. ~ · , qutpmenL Mi see I I aneous For each gas piping system ~f 1-5 Outlets $6.25 For eaoh additional gas piping system outlet, per outlet $1.25 3.01-C4 TAB.CE C KXI-IIB I T 3 Table I-t 1997 UNIFCE~] PLLIV~ING OEI)E AS AIV~NDED UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE TABLE 1-1 Plumbing Permil Fees Permit Issuance 1. For issuing each permit ..................................................................................................$20.OO 2 For issulnf~ each supplemental permit ............................................................................................ St0.OO Unit Fee Schedule (in addilion to items 1 and 2 above) 7. F~or each plumbing fixture on one trap or a set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping and backflow protection therelor) ......................................................... , .................... $7.00- 2. For each building s'ewer and each trailer park sewer ........................................................................ $15.O0 3 Rainwater systems - per drain (inside building) .................................................................................. $7.00 4. For each cesspool (where permitted) ................................ ; ............................................................... $25.00 5. For each private sewage disposal system .............. : ......................................................................... $40.00 6. For each water heater and/or vent ...................................................................................................... $7.00 7. For each gas-piping system of one to five outlets ............................................................... 8. For each additional gas piping system outlet, per outlet ..................................................................... $1.OO 9. For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor including its trap and vent, except kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps ................................................ :.,$7.00 70. For each installation, alteration or repair of water piping and/or water treating equipment, each ....... $7.00 11. For each repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture .................................................. $7.00 12. For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter including backflow protection devices therefor .,..$7.00 13. For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not included in item 12: 1 to 5 .............................................................. ......................... : ..................................................... $5.00 over 5, each ........................ ~ ........ .. ................................................................................................ $1.00 14. For each backflow protective device other than atmospheric type vacuum breakers: 2 inch (51 mm) diameter and smaller ......... ~ ................................................................................ $7100 over2 inch (51 mm) diameter ............ : ........................................................................................ $15.00 15. For each graywater system .~ .............................: ............................. : .............................. ......... ........... $40,00 16. For initial installation.and testing for a reclaimed water system ........................................................ $30.00* 17. For each annual cross-connection testing of a reclaimed water system (excluding initial test) ........ $30.00" 19, For each medical gas piping system serving one to five inlet(s)/outlet(s) [ora specific gas ............. $50.00 19. For each additional medical gas inlet(s)/outlet(s) ..................................................... ~ ........................ $5.00 Other Inspections and Fees 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours ................................................................. , ................ $30.00' 2. Reinspection. fee ................................................................................................................................ $30.00 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated ........................................................................ $30.00' 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans (minimum charge - one-half hour) ....................................................... $30.00' 'Per hour for each hour worked or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is greater. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of all the employees involved. 3.01-C5 POLICE DEPARTMENT - RATE TABLE D All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees D. POLICE DEPARTMENT 2003 RATE 1. TRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORTS $7.00 2. FINGERPRINTS - 1st Card $8.00 Each Additional Card $8.00 3. CRIMINAL HISTORY CHECK $8.00 4. VERIFICATION LETTER FOR LOST OR STOLEN PROPERTY $8.00 5. PHOTO PRINTS Actual Cost of (Per Set When in Possession of the Dept.) Processing 6. LICENSES FOR DOGS AND CATS For Each Cat Spayed or Neutered $~.507.50 (Upon Proof of Spaying or Neutering) For Each Dog Spayed or Neutered $ ! ! .0012.00 (Upon Proof of Spaying or Neutering) For Each Cat Not Spayed or Neutered $35.003--6,00 For Each Dog Not Spayed or Neutered $35.0036.00 7. ALARM COMPLIANCE FEE 1st False Alarm in any 1 Quarter $40.00 2nd False Alarm in the same Quarter $80.00 3rd False Alarm in the same Quarter $160.00 or Subsequent Alarms in a Calendar Quarter 8. SERVICE FEE FOR ANTI-HARASSMENT ORDER $40.00 9. SERVICE OF ARREST WARRANTS AND SUBPOENAS Arrest Warrant $15.00 plus mileage Subpoena $6.00 plus mileage Preparation of return of service $5.00 Mileage (for each mile actually and necessarily traveled by a $0.25 per member of the Police Department in going to or returning from mile any place of service, or attempted service) Table D - D1 FIRE DEPARTMENT - RATE TABLE E All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees E. FIRE DEPARTMENT 2003 RATE 1. AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE ALS Residents $375425 ALS Non-Residents $449490 BLS Residents $310360 BLS Non-Residents $370420 Mileage $5/mile 2. EMS SERVICE CALL TO ASSISTED LIVING, LONG TERM CARE $100 After AND ADULT CARE FACILITIES first response per quarter 3. FIRE RESCUE BOAT RESPONSE Resident $115 Non-Residents $200 4. HAZARD MATERIALS RESPONSE Rice Hull Ash Actual Cost per Bag Absorbent Pads Actual Cost 5. STAND-BY-TIME per Bag Per crew of 3 $98/hour Fire Engine - Crew of 4 $115/hour 6. ACTIVE FIREFIGHTING Fire Engine $121/hour Aerial Ladder $200/hour 7. FALSE ALARM FEE $120 for second $225 for 3 or more per quarter 8. SPRINKLER/FIRE ALARM PLANS UBC or iCC Rates* *Uniform Building Code as-amem4e~r International Fire Code Table E - E1 PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F Ail Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees F. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NON-RESiDENT FEE - BASE FEE PLUS 20% 1.FACILITY USE RENTAL RATES Facility use policies apply. Appropriate taxes are included in rates unless otherwise noted. (a) SHERIDAN COMMUNITY CENTER - ROOM RENTAL RATES 2003 RATE (Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates Recreation and/or educational purposes only. Per hour, two (2) hour minimum Daytime (Monday - Friday: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM) Lounge $6.25 Room A, B, C, or Conference Room $5.00 Gym $15.00 Evenin.qs (Monday - Friday: 5:00 PM to 10:00 PM)/Saturday and Sunday Lounge $12.50 Room A, B, C $7.50 Conference Room $10.00 Gym $20.00 Party Packaqe (Loun.qe & Gym) $25.00 Entire building - Up to eight (8) hours $400.00 Additional staff (per hour) $10.75 (Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates Recreational and/or educational purposes only. Per hour, two (2) hour minimum Daytime (Monday - Friday: 7:30 AM to 5:30 PM) Lounge $25.00 Room A, B, C $15.00 Conference Room $20.00 Gym $40.00 Party Packaqe (Lounqe & Gym) $50.00 Entire Building - Up to eight (8) hours $800,00 Additional Staff (per hour) $10.75 Table F- F1 cl~ PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees 2003 RATE (b) BREMERTON SR. CITIZENS CENTER - ROOM RENTAL RATES (Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates Room Rental Fees - per hour, two (2) hour minimum Cardroom/Meeting Room $15.00 Main Room $25.00 Kitchen $10.00 Additional staffing per hour $10.75 Entire Facility up to eight (8) hours $200.00 (Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates Room Rental Fees - per hour, (two) 2 hour minimum Cardroom/Meeting Room $30.00 Main Room $50.00 Kitchen $20.00 Additional staffing per hour $16.25 Entire Facility - Up to eight (8) hours $400.00 200,1-RAT-E (c) JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER (Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates Private - Non-Profit Up to 50 participants Per hr $52.0055.00 Staffing each added hour $10.00 51 - 100 Per hr $~2.0065.00 101-150+ Per hr $72.0075.00 Gallery $5.00 Team Deep Lanes Per hr per lane $3.003.25 Shallow Lanes Per hr per lane $2.002.25 Table F - F2 PARKS RECREATION DEPT- RATE TABLE F All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees Staffing Per hr as needed $15.00 School Lessons Up to 35 students $52.0055.00 36 - 45 students $60.0065.00 46 - 55 students $72.0075.00 (Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates Commercial Per hr $60.00§6.00 Deep Lanes Per hr per lane $5.00(~.60 Shallow Lanes Per hr per lane $4.00-!,.40 Staffing Per hr as needed $16.00 2003 RATE (d) EVERGREEN PARK SHELTERS - RESERVATION FEES Four (4) hour sessions per reservation unless noted. Note: Shelter fl4 is not reservable. Use of shelter fl4 is on a first come/first served basis. Parties who have reserved the other Evergreen Park shelters may not use this shelter at the same time. (Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates Shelter 1 $30.00 Shelter 2, 3, 5, or 6f $15.00 Shelter 4 (not reservable) no charge Upper NAD $15.00 Lent Landing $15.00 (Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates Shelter 1 $60.00 Shelter 2, 3, 5, or 6 $30.00 Shelter 4 (not reservable) no charge Upper NAD $30.00 Lent Landing $30.00 Table F- F3 ~ PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees 2OO,TRATE (e) PARK RESERVATION PROCESSING FEES All Parks except Upper NAD and Lent Landing $10.00 (t') ATHLETIC FIELD - RESERVATION,~ Per hour unless noted (Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates $!2.0013.00 (Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates $22.0024.00 Game Fee - Softball $22.0024.00 Game Fee - Soccer $35.0040.00 (q) BLUEBERRY PARK - PEA PATCH ANNUAL RATF Recreational purposes only. $34.00 RATE 2. PROGRAM FEES & CHARGES 200,1-RATE (a) NEW PROGRAMS not to exceed cost plus 25% (b) GLENN JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER ADMISSIONS Youth (0-3 yrs.) NC Youth (4-17 yrs.) $2.252.50 Adult (18-54 yrs.) $3.00 Seniors (55 & up) $2.252.50 Disabled $2.252.50 Adult Fitness $3.00 Senior Fitness $2.252.50 Disabled Fitness $2.252.50 Special Public $1.00 PUNCH CARDS Table F - F4 cj ,~ PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees Youth 10 punch $ !8.0020.00 Youth 20 punch $3~.00~,0.00 Adult 10 punch $24.00 Adult 20 punch $48.00 Senior/Disabled 10 3unch $!8.9020.00 SeniodDisabled 20 ~unch $3~.9040.00 Fitness/Lesson 10 3unch $24.00 Fitness/Lesson 20 ~unch $48.00 Senior/Disabled Fitness 10 ~unch $I~.0020.00 Senior/Disabled Fitness 20 ~unch $,~ ...... r~nA9.00~ PASSES Youth 6 months $ ! 00.00108.00 Youth 12 months $-19~g~207.00 Adult 6 months $ ! 35.00132.00 Adult 12 months $250.00253,00 Senior/Disabled 6 months $ ! 00.00108.00 Senior/Disabled 12 months $~207.00 SWIMMING LESSONS Youth/Adult 30 min. $3.253.50 Private 30 min. $ !2.0013.00 Semi-Private 30 min. $!8.0020.00 Parent Tot $3.00 Family Lessons 4 lessons $65.00§8.00 ITEMS FOR SALE Basic goggles $5,005.50 Deluxe goggles $!2.0013.00 Latex cap $3.903.50 Ear plug $2.002.25 Nose plug $2.002.25 New items (includes Washington not to exceed State Sales Tax) cost plus 75% 2003 RATE (c) ATHLETIC PROGRAM FEES VOLLEYBALL Co-ed (Fall & Winter) per team $200.00210.00 Men and Women (Spring) per team $200.00210.00 Men and Co-ed Sand (Summer) per team $110.00 Open Gym (Oct. - June) per person $2.00 Table F - F5 PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees 2003 RATE SOCCER Player's fee per player $37.00d0.00 BASKETBALL Men's League (Fall & Winter) per team $~.00.00425,00 ~ ~ $~.o.~o Boy's League (Winter) per team $225.00 Girl's (Fall) per player $?,.0055.00 Blacktop League (Summer) no charge SOFTBALL Men's League (Spring) per team $-!. -!, 0,00,150,00 Men's League - Players fee (Spg) per player $! 5.0017.00 Sunday Co-ed (Spring) per team $ ......330.00 Sunday Co-ed - Players fee (Spg) per player $! !.0012.00 Co-ed League (Fall) per team $350.90360.00 Co-ed - Players fee (Fall) per player $ !2.0013.00 Men's League (Fall) per team $350.00360.00 Men's League - Players fee (Fall) per player $!2.0013,00 TOURNAMENTS (SOFTBALL AND SOCCER) -- INVITATIONAL TOURNAMENTS Lions - One Day $220,00 Lions - Two Day $350.00 Lions - Three Day $460.00 Pendergast - One Day $290.00 Pendergast - Two Day $485.00 Pendergast - Three Day $615.00 -- STATE TOURNAMENTS Lions - One Day $270.00 Lions - Two Day $400.00 Lions - Three Day $510.00 Pendergast - One Day $390.00 Pendergast - Two Day $580.00 Pendergast - Three Day $710.00 Table F- F6 I b I PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees 2003 RATE -- Regional and National Tournaments will pay no less than State fees, but rates will be negotiated 3. SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER AND RECREATION DIVISION PROGRAMS la) PROGRAM FEE FORMULAS. Except for the Sr. Citizens Trip program, participant fees for activities (programs, classes, events, etc.) promoted by the Sr. Citizen Center and the Recreation Division are established by the following formulas: A. Activities when the instructor is on the payroll. [(Total class hours including preparation) x (Instructor's hourly wage) x (1.2 Administration factor)] divided by(minimum # of students per act[vity)] + (the cost of group supplies divided by minimum # of students) + Cost of individual class supplies, if applicable = Student class fee for City of Bremerton Resident. B. Activities when the instructor is on contract. [(Price per student required by the Instructor less class supply fees) x (1.2 Administration factor)] + Class supply fees = Student class fee for City of Bremerton Resident. C. Non-Resident Fees For recreation classes, programs, swim passes and rentals - ranging from: $5.00 to $25.00 add on 20% $25.01 to $50.00 add a flat $5.00 $50.01 to $100.00 add a flat $10.00 $100.01 to $200.00 add a flat $20.00 $200.01 + add a fiat $40.00 For Sr. Center activities, participants pay an annual membership fee of $§5.50 (resident) or $-1011.00 (non resident) in lieu of the 20% non-resident rate. 2003 RATE actual costs lb) SENIOR CENTER TRIPS plus 5%8% 4. IVY GREEN CEMETERY - FEES AND CHARGES 2003 ,RATE 2003 .RATE RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT la) ADULT BURIAL Grave Site $700.00840.00 $840.001,008.00 Opening/Closing $-!,09.00480.00 $480.00576.00 Liner $-!.!5.00498.00 $498.00597.60 Oversize Liner (if required) $822.00746.40 $746.90985.68 Grave Side Service Preparation (optional) $!22.00146.40 $!d6.00175.68 lb) VETERANS PLOT Table F- F7 t 0,~.-.- PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees 3003 RATE 2003 RATE RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT Opening/Closing $-!90.00480.00 $480.00576.00 Liner $-!.!5.00498.00 $44~i~;;~597.60 Oversize Liner (if required) $622.00746.40 $746.00895.68 Grave Side Service Preparation (optional) $!22.00146.40 $!-!.6.00175.68 Stone Marker Setting $74.0088.80 $89~;~106.56 Bronze Marker Setting $66.0079.20 $74M;~95.04 (c) INFANT BURIAL Infant Plot in Babyland $! 7! .00205.20 $205.00246.24 Opening/Closing $266.00319.20 $349~O~383.04 Liner $!87.00224.40 $22'!..00269.28 Grave Side Service Preparation (optional) $!22.00146.40 $!-!6.00175.68 (d) DISINTERNMENT Removal & opening of new site $9!5.001,098.00 $!,09~.001,317.60 Site Purchase $537.00840.00 $64-%001,008.00 Liner $-!, ! 5.00498.00 $498~597.60 Removal (only) $6!9.00722.00 $732.09878.40 Cremaining $!46.00175.20 $!75.00210.24 (e) ADDITIONAL BURIAL COSTS 2 hr. max. $!22.00146.40 $!46.00175.68 4 hour max. $24-!..00292.80 $~351.36 (f) LINERS Adult $4!.!5.004!.98.00 $488~597.60 Infant $!87.00224.40 $22-I..00269.28 Cremation Vault (2 piece) $!00.00120.00 $120.00144.00 Oversize Liner (if required) $622.00746.40 $746.00895.68 (_q) OPENING AND CLOSING Adult $-!.09.00480.00 $-!.80.00576.00 Infant (Babyland) $266.00319.20 $3~4M~384.04 Urn Interment (per urn) $73.0097.60 $88.00105.12 (h) BURIAL SITES Adult $700.00840.00 $840.001,008.00 Table F- F8 I0~ PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees 2003 RATE 2003 RATE RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT Infant (Babyland) $! 7! .00205.20 $205.90246.24 Infant (any site not in Babyland) $700.90840.00 $8~,0.001,008.00 (i) INURNMENT Cement Vault $!00.00120.00 $!20.00144.00 Opening/Closing $73.0087.60 $88.00105.12 Grave Side Service Preparation (optional) $!22.00146.40 $!'!6.00175.68 Second Right of Inurnment $!50.00180.00 $!80.00216.00 (i) DISURNMENTS Urn $!d~.00175.20 $!75.00210.24 (k) RAISE GRAVE $98.00117.60 $!!8.00141.12 (I) MARKERS 5" x 8" bronze ~lus tax $55.0066.00 $~5.0079.20 4" x 12" x 2" x 3" ~lus tax $60.0072.00 $72.0086.40 8" x 16" x 2" x 3" ~lus tax $~5.0078.00 $7~.0093.60 10" x 20" x 2" x 3" ~lus tax $70.0084.00 $8d.00100.80 12" x 24" x 2" x 3" ~lus tax $75.0090.00 $~108.00 12" x 24" bronze ~lus tax $75.0090.00 $9(~108.00 12" x 36" x 2" x 3" ~lus tax $! !0.00132.00 $!32.00158.40 14" x 36" x 2" x 3" ~lus tax $! !0.00132.00 $!32.00158.40 5. GOLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COMPLEX (a) CASCADE COURSE RATE Weekday 18 Holes * 27.00 Weekend/Holiday 18 Holes (3) 36.00 Weekday 9 Holes * 19.00 Weekend/Holiday 9 Holes 22.00 Weekday 9 Hole Continue* 8.00 Weekend/Holiday 9 Hole Continue 14.00 Twiliqht Weekday* 19.00 Twiliqht Weekend/Holiday 22.00 Leaque Rate** 18.00 Senior 18 Holes* 21.00 Junior 18 Holes* 11.00 Junior Twili.qht Weekend/Holiday 13.00 Annual Pass Sinqle 1,400.00 Table F-F9 PARKS RECREATION DEPT- RATE TABLE F All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees Annual Pass Couple 2,200.00 Annual Pass Sr. Sinqte** 900.00 Annual Pass Sr. Couple** 1,400.00 Semi Annual Sinqle 700/750 Semi Annual Couple 1,100/1,150 Semi Annual Sr. Sinqle** 450/500 Semi Annual Sr. Couple** 800/850 Senior Punch Card** (2) 190.00 Re(lular 20 Rnd Punch Card 450.00 Reqular 10 Rnd Punch Card 245.00 Low Income Sr. Punch Card** **** (2) 80.00 Corporate Pass-Non Taxable* *** (2) 2,200.00 Corporate Pass-Taxable* *** (2) 2,200.00 Daily Private Cart 16.00 Shotqun Tournament (Not To Exceed) 18 Hole Green Fee 45.00 * Mondaythrouqh Thursday ** Not for Saturday, Sunday or Holiday *** Beqinnin.q 1/1/02 the lots are reduced to 100 rounds **** Aqe 62 & up with household income < $18,000. RCW 71.38.070 1. A reduced rate, not less than the current twi-liqht rate, may be offered with the approval of the Director of Parks & Recreation 2. May be used for twiliqht any day of the week includinq Holidays 3. Saturday, Sunday or Holiday (May - September Not to Exceed Rate) (b) OLYMPIC COURSE RATE Weekday 18 Holes* 37.00 Weekend/Holiday 18 Holes (2) 54.00 Weekday 9 Holes* 21.00 Weekend/Holiday 9 Holes 30.00 Weekday 9 Hole Continue* 16.00 Weekend/Holiday 9 Hole Continue 24.00 Twill(iht Weekday* 20.00 Twiliqht Weekend/Holiday 24.00 Leaque Rate** 18.00 Senior 18 Holes* 30.00 Junior 18 Holes* 20.00 Cascade Passes And Punch Cards 10.00 Shot.qun Tournament (Not To Exceed 18 Hole Green Fee) (2) 65.00 * Mondaythrouqh Thursday ** Not for Saturday, Sunday or Holiday **** Aqe 62 & up with household income < $18,000. RCW 71.38.070 Table F- FlO I0~' PARKS RECREATION DEPT- RATE TABLE F All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees 1. A reduced rate, not less than the current twi-liqht rate, may be offered with the approval of the Parks & Recreation Director. 2. Saturday, Sunday or Holiday (May - September Not to Exceed Rate) Table F- Fll EFFECT!V£ EFFEC-T4VE EFFECTIVE C~.~C~-~IR~ !/!/3002 I/I/2003 !/!/-,?.OO4 ~'""~" 9 Hc!c m~"+~"ua* o nn o n0 o nn Tw~!~ght Wcckdcy* ~, ~. .~nn ' * ~ 20,00 2!.00 ~ n nn ~ t ~nn nn ~ ..... I~_ ~...~ .... I~** ~ annnn t,~0000 ~,~n000 ~; ~ ..... I qi.~l~ ~n~nn ?nn~0 709/750 .................. ~,~ ...................... u ............... Scn[cr Punch Cord** (2} 170.00 !90.00 ~ .... ~ ..... ~' PM~ ~'d ...... (9) 70 00 on nn on nn ~ ...... ~ D~. kl~ T~kl~* *** Iq~ o nnn nn o t nn nn 2 200 00 · * k,~, ~. ~....~,. ~..~ ..... .... A.. ~ & ...... ;*~ ~ ..... ~"~; ...... $~9 OOO RCTM 7! 3~ 070 Table F1 - F1-1 ~_~,____r~...~"n' .,,v^,~,__.. ..... . GO'- -.c COMPLEX ~-Dcc~,o_ .- ----. .-- FECS- ..n°^TE v^a,...___= Fl ~ ~./!/2002 !!!/2003 ~ ................. 52.00 ~A nn ~..lu~,~.. n u~ Ccnfinuo 22.00 23.00 2~ n0 Twilight Weekday* !~.00 on AA On nn ...... ~ .................... ¢ 22.00 23.00 ~ ~ ~ 30.00 ~ J'Jn~cr ! 8 He,cc* ~ 20.00 ~ 1 ..... ~ ................. ~ ............ ~ u ~4 nn ~3.00 6 .... Table F1 - F1-2 PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES - RATE TABLE G All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees G. PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 2003 RATE 1. RIGHT-OF WAY USE PERMITS FEES Type A (Short Term Use) Regular $140 Type B (Disturbance of ROW) Sidewalk Repairs $50 Driveway, Transverse Street Patch $140 and Spot Patches New Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Longitudinal $1/ft with a $140 minimum Street Patch New Street $3/ft with a $600 minimum Water & Sewer Mains & Laterals ROW $50 Permit Type C (Long Term Use) Application and Processing $100 Use longer than one year 1/10 adjoining land value set in the County Assessor's records per square foot of impacted ROW annually with a $100 minimum. Use shorter than one year 1/50 adjoining land value set in the County Assessor's records per square foot of impacted ROW monthly with a $100 minimum. Type D Regular (Franchised Utility Routine $100 Maintenance) Plan Reviews $0.10/feet of improvement with $100 minimum Additional Work $40/hour + equipment charges 2. RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION $547 3. TELECOM MASTER PERMIT FEE $500/one time 4. TELECOM LICENSE FEE $200/one time Table G~ G1 1~ DATE SUBMITTED: 11/20/03 BILL # AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance Committee Meeting Date: {~Oc~q2'~_ Amending BMC Chapter 3.50 Utility Taxes COUNCIL MEETING Date: /,~_;dO~o~( Department: Finance Presenter: Michael Wilson Phone: 473-5590 SUMMARY: The proposed ordinance increases the utility tax rate for Water, Wastewater, Storm Water and Cable utilities fi.om 7% to 8.5%. ATTACHMENTS: FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MAYOR: FISCAL/BUDGET: CONSENT AGENDA [] OPERATIONS: COUNCIL PRESIDENT: RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve an Ordinance amending BMC Chapter 3.50 Utility Taxes. Move to pass Ordinance #__ on second reading. COUNCIL ACTION: [] Apvrove [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, amending Chapter 3.50 relating to utility taxes for 2004 increasing the tax for water, wastewater, stormwater and cable utilities. WHEPd~AS, the City Council desires to increase the taxes for the year 2004 for water, wastewater, stormwater and cable utilities; NOW THEPd~FORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION1. Section 3.50.050 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Persons Subject to Tax - Amount" relating to utility taxes is hereby amended to read as follows: 3.50.050 PERSONS SUBJECT TO TAX - AMOUNT. In addition to other taxes or fees that may be imposed or levied by the City, there is hereby levied upon all persons (including the City) engaging in business within the City, a fee or tax to be collected as follows: (a) Gas. Upon every person engaging in the business of transmitting, distributing or the selling of manufactured or natural gas, a fee or tax equal to six (6) pement of the total gross income from such business conducted within the City. (b) Water. Upon every person engaging in the business of providing water utility service, a fee or tax equal to seYea-4-7-)eight and one-half (8.5) percent of the total gross income from such business conducted within the City. The total gross income from the business of providing water utility service includes the "gross income from timber sales" of the utility as that term is defined in this chapter. (c) Wastewater. Upon every person engaging in the business of providing wastewater utility service, a fee or tax equal to se~m-(g)eight and one-half(8.5) percent of the total gross income from such business conducted within the City. (d) Stormwater. Upon every person engaging in the business of providing stormwater utility service, a fee or tax equal to se~qm-(C)eight and one-half (8.5) pement of the total gross income from such business conducted within the City. (e) Cable. Upon every person engaging in the business of transmitting television signals by means of a cable distribution system commonly known as television cable service, a fee or tax equal to sevea-(g)eight and one-half (8.5) percent of the total gross income from such business conducted within the City. (f) Solid waste. Upon every person engaging in the business of providing solid waste collection service, a fee or tax equal eleven (11) percent of the total gross income from such business conducted within the City. I 2004 Utility Taxes (g) Electricity. Upon every person engaging in the business of producing, transmitting, distributing or selling electricity, a fee or tax equal to six (6) percent of the total gross income from such business conducted within the City. (h) Telephone. Upon every person engaged in carrying on a telephone business for hire or for sale of a commodity or a service within or partly within the corporate limits of the City, a tax for the privilege of so doing business a tax equal to six percent (6%) of the total gross income rendered within the City. (1) "Deductions" In computing the telephone tax, there shall be deducted from the gross operating revenues the following items: (i) Amounts derived from transactions in interstate or foreign commeme or from any business which the City is prohibited from taxing under the Constitutions of the United States or the State of Washington. (ii) Amounts derived from that portion of network telephone service, as defined in RCW 82.04.065, which represents charges to another telecommunications company, as defined in RCW 80.04.010, for connecting fees, switching charges or carrier access charges relating to intrastate toll telephone services, or for access to, or charges for, interstate services or charges for network telephone service that is purchased for the purpose of resale. (iii) Adjustments made to a billing or to a customer account or to a telecommunications company accrual account in order to reverse a billing or charge that had been made as a result of third-party fraud or other crime and was not properly a debt of a customer. (iv) A complete deduction from gross income shall be allowed for credit losses, only to cellular telephone service companies which keep their regular books of account on an accrual basis, for cash discounts and credit losses actually sustained by a taxpayer as a result of telephone service business. (2) Allocation of Income - Cellular Telephone Service. (i) Service address: Payments by a customer for the telephone service from telephones without a fixed location shall be allocated among taxing jurisdictions to the location of the customer's principal service address during the period for which the tax applies. (ii) Roaming phones: When the service is provided while a subscriber is roaming outside the subscriber's normal cellular network area, the gross income shall be assigned consistent with the taxpayer's accounting system to the location of the originating cell site of the call, or to the location of the main cellular switching office that switched the call. SECTION2. Referendum Procedure. Pursuant to RCW 35.21.706, the tax increase set forth in this ordinance is subject to a referendum procedure to apply to an ordinance increasing the rate of the tax. A referendum petition may be filed within seven days of passage of the ordinance with the City Clerk. Within ten days, the City Clerk shall confer with the petitioner concerning form and style of the petition, issue the petition an identification number, and secure an accurate, concise, and positive ballot title from the designated local official. The petitioner shall have thirty days in which to secure the signatures of not less than fifteen percent of the registered voters of the city, as of the last municipal general election, upon petition forms which contain the ballot title and the full text of the measure to be referred. The City Clerk shall verify the sufficiency of the signatures on the petition and, if sufficient valid signatures are properly 2004 Utility Taxes submitted, shall certify the referendum measure to the next election ballot within the city or at a special election ballot as provided pursuant to RCW 35.17.260(2). This referendum procedure shall be exclusive in all instances for any city ordinance imposing a business and occupation tax or increasing the rate of the tax and shall supersede the procedures provided under chapters 35.17 and 35A. 11 RCW and all other statutory or charter provisions for initiative or referendum which might otherwise apply. SECTION3. Severabilit¥. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003 PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2003 CAROL ARENDS, Council President Approved this day of ,2003 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of _, 2003 EFFECTIVE the day of _, 2003 ORDiNANCE NO. R:\[EGAL\Ordinances~Administration~2004 Rate Tables\3.50 utility tax changes.doc 2004 Utility Taxes DATE SUBMITTED: 11/20/03 BILL # C. ;~ ' AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance Committee Meeting Date: ~ ~ Amending BMC Chapter 3.82 Commercial COUNCIL MEETING Date: /,~--/"O--D.':5 ~c/,~_ Parking Tax Department: Finance Presenter: Michael Wilson Phone: 473-5590 SUMMARY: The proposed ordinance increases the commercial parking tax rate ~om 8% to 10%. ATTACHMENTS: FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: i' :::5~ ~ :: ~ '~i:-'::7~-~ .... MAYOR: FISCAL/BUDGET: OPERATIONS: CONSENT AGENDA [] COUNCIL PRESIDENT: RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve an Ordinance amending BMC Chapter 3.82 Commercial Parking Tax. Move to pass Ordinance #__ on second reading. COUNCIL ACTION: [] Approve [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, amending Chapter 3.82 relating to commercial parking taxes for 2004. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to increase commercial parking taxes for the year 2004; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 3.82.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Tax Rate - Who Must Pay" relating to commercial parking tax is hereby amended to read as follows: 3.82.020 TAX RATE - WHO MUST PAY. There is levied upon and shall be collected from every person engaged in a commercial parking business within the City a commercial parking tax in an amount equal to right-pete-em (?/~)ten percent (10%) of the gross proceeds of the commercial parking business. SECTION 2. Referendum Procedure. The tax adopted in this ordinance as authorized under RCW 82.80.030 is subject to a referendum. A referendum petition must be filed with the City Clerk within seven days of passage of the ordinance. Within ten days, the City Clerk shall confer with the petitioner concerning form and style of the petition, issue an identification number for the petition, and write a ballot title for the measure. The ballot title shall be posed as a question so that an affirmative answer to the question and an affirmative vote on the measure results in the tax or fee being imposed and a negative answer to the question and a negative vote on the measure results in the tax or fee not being imposed. The petitioner shall be notified of the identification number and ballot title within this ten-day period. After this notification, the petitioner has thirty days in which to secure on petition forms the signatures of not less than fifteen percent of the registered voters of the county for county measures, or not less than fifteen percent of the registered voters of the city for city measures, and to file the signed petitions with the City Clerk. Each petition form must contain the ballot title and the full text of the measure to be referred. The City Clerk shall verify the sufficiency of the signatures on the petitions. If sufficient valid signatures are properly submitted, the City Clerk shall submit the referendum measure to the county or city voters at a general or special election held on one of the dates provided in RCW 29A.04.320 as determined by the county or city legislative authority, which election shall not take place later than one hundred twenty days after the signed petition has been filed with the filing officer. The referendum procedure provided in this section is the exclusive method for subjecting any county or city ordinance imposing a tax or fee under RCW 82.80.030 to a referendum vote. 2004 Commercial Parking Taxes SECTION3. Severabilit¥. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full fome and effect. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003 PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2003 CAROL ARENDS, Council President Approved this day of ,2003 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of ,2003 EFFECTiVE the day of 2003 ORDiNANCE NO. R:\LEGAL\Ordinanccs~AdministrationX2004 Rate Tablesk3.82 parking tax changes.doc 2 2004 Commercial Parking Taxes DATE SUBMITTED: 11/20/03 BILL # AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance Committee Meeting Date: F)O4~4' Setting Rates and Fees for Water, COUNCIL MEETING Date: la~'/O-O~ Wastewater and Storm Water Utilities and Department: Finance amending Chapter 15.06 of the BMC Presenter: Michael Wilson Phone: 473-5590 SUMMARY: An increase in assessments, rates, fees and charges is required in order to meet the ongoing maintenance, operation, capital and debt service needs of the City's Water, Wastewater, Storm Water Utilities. This ordinance establishes new rates for all categories to incorporate a 2.1% CPI adjustment from the year 2003 rates to year 2004 rates. ATTACHMENTS: FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): APPROVALS: / ...... ~_~ DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: ........ FINANCE DIRECTOR: FISCAL/BUDGET: CONSENT AGENDA [] OPERATIONS: COUNCIL PRESIDENT: RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve an Ordinance establishing new rates for all categories of assessments, fees, r~tes and charges for Water, Wastewater and Storm Water Utilities for 2004 on first reading. Move to pass Ordinance # on second reading. COUNCIL ACTION: [] A0orove [] Deny [] Table [] Continue [] No Action ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE amending Appendix A of Section 15.06.015 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to assessments, rates, fees and charges for municipal water, wastewater and stormwatcr services establishing new rates for all categories to incorporate a 2.1% CPI adjustment from the year 2003 rates to year 2004 rates. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the rates, fees and charges set forth in Appendix A of Section 15.06.015 of the Bremerton Municipal Code in order to make the automatic Consumer Price Index adjustment as provided in Section 15.06.015 BMC; WHEREAS, no other rate adjustments are proposed for Appendix A of Section 15.06.015 BMC; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION1. Appendix A of Section 15.06.015 of the Bremerton Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety, and there is hereby created a new Appendix A attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference establishing new rates for all categories to incorporate a 2.1% CPI adjustment from the year 2003 rates to year 2004 rates. SECTION2. Section 1 of this Ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2004. The rates currently in effect as set forth in Appendix A of Section 15.06.015 on the date of adoption of this Ordinance shall remain in effect until January 1, 2004. SECTION3. Severabilitg. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2003 PASSED by the City Council the day of ., 2003 CAROL ARENDS, Council President 1 2004 Assessments Approved this day of 2003 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of ., 2002 EFFECTIVE the day of ,2002 ORDINANCE NO. R:\LEGAL\OrdinanceskPublic Works & UtilitiesX2004 CPI Rates 15.06.doc 2004 Assessments Appendix A ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2004 Within City Limits Outside City Limits 2004 2004 GENERAL FACILITY FEES Water (per ERU) $ 249.12 $ 376.75 Wastewater (per ERU) $ 249.12 $ 376.75 FRONT FOOTAGE FEES Water Per Front Foot $ 20.42 $ 30.63 Off Road Rate $ 1,021.00 $ 1,531.50 Wastewater Per Front Foot $ 25.53 $ 38.29 OffP, oadRate $ 1,276.25 $ 1,914.38 Properties not included m ULID #327 $ 73.05 Fronting the sewer main in Northlake Way. Installed as part of the Kitsap Lake Sewer Extension Project. CONNECTION/INSPECTION FEES Water 3/4" $ 1,527.42 $ 2,291.12 1" $ 1,531.50 $ 2,297.25 1 1/2" $ 2,374.85 $ 3,562.27 2" $ 2,477.97 $ 3,716.44 Greater than 2" Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials Field Inspection Fees Water main extensions (per foot) $ 1.02 $ 1.53 but not less than: $ 408.40 $ 612.60 Pump Station $ 536.03 $ 804.04 Miscellaneous (per hour) $ 42.88 $ 64.32 Wastewater Lateral Connection at P/L $ 42.88 $ 64.32 Lateral Connection at Main $ 268.01 $ 402.02 Conveyance Facility Ext. (Per Foot) $ 1.33 $ 1.99 but not less than: $ 321.62 $ 482.42 Pump Station $ 536.03 $ 804.04 Miscellaneous (per hour) $ 42.88 $ 64.32 1 of 7 Within City Limits Outside City Limits 2004 2004 RETAIL WATER SERVICE RATES General Service - Monthly Service Charge Meter Size 5/8 x 3/4 inches $ 5.31 $ 7.96 1 inch $ 6.07 $ 9.09 1 1/2 inch $ 8.63 $ 12.97 2 inch $ 11.59 $ 17.46 3 inch $ 22.00 $ 32.93 4 inch $ 40.94 $ 61.52 6 inch $ 145.29 $ 217.93 8 inch $ 530.26 $ 795.41 10inch $ 1,893.19 $ 2,839.76 12 inch $ 7,118.87 $ 10,678.33 Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 0.77 $ 1.15 Fire Protection - Monthly Service Charge Service Size 1 inch $ 10.52 $ 15.83 1 1/2 inch $ 15.83 $ 23.69 2 inch $ 20.57 $ 30.83 3 inch $ 22.67 $ 34.00 4 inch $ 24.71 $ 37.01 6 inch $ 30.83 $ 46.30 8 inch $ 41.04 $ 61.57 10 inch $ 57.53 $ 86.33 12 inch $ 82.24 $ 123.34 Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 1.53 $ 2.30 - For Useage Other Than Firefighting Low-Income Senior and Low-Income Disabled Citizen - Monthly Service Charge Meter Size 5/8 x 3/4" Base Charge (per account) $ 5.31 $ 7.96 Commodity Charge 0 - 10 HCF/Billing No Charge No Charge Over 10 HCF/Billing (per HCF) $ 0.77 $ 1.15 Temporary/Construction Meter 1" Meter Deposit $ 102.10 $ 102.10 Base Fee (per month) $ 6.07 $ 9.09 Set Up Fee $ 79.64 $ 1 I9.46 Hydrant meter Deposit $ 510.50 $ 510.50 Base Fee (per month) $ 19.09 $ 28.64 Set Up Fee $ 79.64 $ 119.46 Equipment Loss/Damage Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 0.77 $ I. 15 2of7 Within City Limits Outside City Limits 2004 2004 RETAIL WASTEWATER SERVICE RATES Monthly Service Charge Single Family Base Charge (per account) $ 11.84 $ 13.58 Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 3.68 $ 4.24 Duplex on 1 Meter or 2 Bldgs on 1 Meter Base Charge (per unit) $ 9.39 $ 10.82 Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 3.68 $ 4.24 Multiple Family Base Charge (per unit) $ 9.39 $ 10.82 Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 3.68 $ 4.24 Commercial I Base Charge (per account) $ 17.51 $ 20.16 Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 3.78 $ 4.34 Commercial II Base Charge (per accoun0 $ 17.82 $ 20.52 Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 5.92 $ 6.81 Commercial III Base Charge (per account) $ 17.66 $ 20.32 Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 4.85 $ 5.57 Low-Income Senior and Low-Income Disabled Citizen Base Charge (per account) $ 7.35 $ 8.47 Commodity Charge (per HCF) 0 - 5 HCF/Month No charge No charge Over 5 HCF/Month $ 3.68 $ 4.24 Septage Disposal (Per Gallon of Tank Capacity) $ 0.13 $ 0.13 3of7 Within City Limits Outside City Limits 2004 2004 RETAIL STORMWATER RATES Monthly Service Charge Single Family / Duplex Base Charge (per account) $ 4.59 N/A Exception: Duplex ~v/2 Meters (per account) $ 2.55 N/A Multiple Family Base Charge (per ISU) $ 4.59 N/A Commercial Base Charge (per ISU) $ 4.59 N/A Public School Districts (per account) $ 4.59 N/A Low-Income Senior and Low-Income Disabled Citizen Base Charge (per accoun0 $ 2.81 N/A Multiple Family & Commercial Rate Adjustment Water Quality (per ISU) $ (0.51) N/A Water Quantity (per ISU) $ (1.53) N/A Stormwater Penalty New Multiple Family & Commercial development without on-site detention Charge (per ISU) $ 1.02 N/A IMPROPER STORMWATER INFLOW RATES The following rates are established for Improper Stormwater Inflow, based upon the stormwater ISU for each tot and adjusted annually on the following schedule: EFFECTIVE DATE RATE May 1, 2002 25% Stormwater Fee for Property May 1, 2003 50% Stormwater Fee for Properly May 1, 2004 75% Stormwater Fee for Property May 1, 2005 100% Stormwater Fee for Property After May 1, 2005, the Improper Stormwater Inflow Rate will remain at 100% of the Stormwater Fee for a property unless otherwise modified by the City Council. The fees shall be deposited in the Wastewater Fund (# 451). 4of7 Within City Limits Outside City Limits 2004 2004 MISCELLANEOUS FEES AND CHARGES Park Reservation Fee $ 30.63 $ 30.63 (non-refimdable) Office Services New Account (includes water turn-on) $ 20.00 $ 20.00 Account Maintenance $ 5.11 $ 5.11 Past Due Notice $ 2.55 $ 2.55 Lien Recovery Charge $ 102.10 $ 102.10 Duplicate Bill Charge $ 1.02 $ 1.02 Close Account/Meter ReadfWater Service Turn- off $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Field Services Pavement Restoration Charge (refundable, if assessed and not required) Asphalt $ 816.80 $ 1,225.20 Concrete $ 2,348.30 $ 3,522.45 County Road Permit N/A Cost Wet Tapping (Water Main Only)* 8" and smaller - incl excavation & backfill $ 1,995.03 $ 2,992.55 8" and smaller - service to property line $ 3,586.77 $ 5,379.65 8" and smaller - tap only $ 490.08 $ 735.12 Greater than 8" Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials *Does Not Include Pavement Restoration Charge Fire Hydrant Installation* $ 4,087.06 $ 6,131.11 *Does Not Include Pavement Restoration Charge Water Meter Reinstallation 3/4" & 1" $ 60.24 $ 60.24 1-1/2" & 2" $ 94.95 $ 94.95 3" and greater Time & Materials Time & Materials Water Meter Reactivation $ 42.88 $ 42.88 Water Meter Tampering Tampering Removal $ 134.77 $ 134.77 Tampering Reinstallation Time & Materials Time & Materials Cross-Connection Control Inspection $ 42.88 $ 42.88 Fire Service - Detector, Meter & MXU $ 316.51 $ 316.51 Storz Adapter $ 231.77 $ 231.77 5of7 Within City Limits Outside City Limits 2004 2004 MISCELLANEOUS (cont'd) Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on (Customer Request) Regular Hours $ 20.00 $ 20.00 After Hours $ 107.21 $ 107.21 Delinquency Notice $ 10.72 $ 10.72 Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on (Delinquent Accounts) Regular Hours $ 42.88 $ 42.88 After Hours $ 107.21 $ 107.2! Flow and Pressure Test (Uncertified) 3/4" & 1" meters only $ 42.88 $ 42.88 1-1/2" & 2" meters only $ 85.76 $ 85.76 Larger than 2" Time & Materials Time & Materials Utility Plant Locates Regular Hours N/C N/C After Hours $ 107.21 $ 107.21 Emergency N/C N/C Meter Test Fee (based on meter size) 3/4" & 1" $ 94,95 $ 94.95 1-1/2" & 2" $ 153.15 $ 153.15 3" or greater Time & Materials Time & Materials Engineering Services* Plan Check Fees Main Extensions: per foot $ 0.22 $ 0.34 BUT not less than $ 214.41 $ 321.62 (Includes hydrants and appurtenances and connection to water system) Pump Stations $ 536.03 $ 804.04 Fireline Extension $ 85.76 $ 128.65 Irrigation Systems $ 85.76 $ 128.65 System Connections $ 85.76 $ 128.65 Miscellaneous (per hour) $ 42.88 $ 64.32 * Fees include original review and one resubmittal review. Additional reviews will be charged at miscellaneous hourly rate (above). 6of7 Within City Limits Outside City Limits 2004 2004 MISCELLANEOUS (cont'd} Storm Drainage Plan Review Fees ** Preliminary Drainage Plans Residential Development $ 331.83 N/A Non-Residential Development $ 229.73 N/A Plus per ISU $ 10,21 Final Detailed Drainage Plans Residential Development (per lot) 0 - 20 Lots $ 35.74 N/A 21 - 50 Lots $ 25.53 N/A 51 - 100 Lots $ 22.97 N/A 100+ Lots $ 20.42 N/A Minimum Charge $ 255,25 N/A Non-Residential Development per ISU $ 20.42 N/A Minimum Charge $ 306.30 N/A Resubmittal Fees First Resubmittal No Charge N/A Subsequent Resubmittal $ 255.25 N/A Storm Drainage Inspection Fees ** Residential Development (per lot) $ 15.32 N/A Non-Residential Development (per ISU) $ 15.32 N/A Minimum Charge $ 153.15 N/A Conveyance Fac. Ext. (per foot) $ 0.77 N/A Minimum Charge $ 306.30 N/A Unscheduled Inspections* (per site visit) $ 42.88 N/A *(Unscheduled inspections shall be tracked through the course of a project and billed after the final site inspection. Fees for unscheduled inspections shall be paid prior to final occupancy approval.) ** Does not apply to single family residence or duplex construction on an existing established lot. Utility/Lien Searc¥ Fee (Manual)* $ 30.00 $ 30.00 *Search per parcel 7of7