HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/20/00 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 20, 2000
1. PRE-COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M.
A. General Council Business
2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M.
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation
3. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes of Meeting - September 6, 2000 (#AB00-213)
4. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
5. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
6. MAYOR'S REPORT
7. LEGISLATIVE REPORT
8. PUBLIC RECOGNITION - (Comments limited to 3-minutes)
9. NEW BUSINESS
A. Appointment of Trisha Rule to a One-Year Term as the Youth Representative on the
BKAT Advisory Committee (#AB00-214)
B. Appointment of Gregg A. McClellan to the Public Access Citizens Advisory Committee I
(#AB00-215)
C. Formal Appointment of Committees to Draft Statements For and Against Proposed /
Charter Provisions (#AB00-216)
10. ORDINANCE & PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Ordinance No. 4721 (Second Reading) Vacating Harkins Place Right-of-Way (#AB00-
211)
B. Ordinance No. 4722 (Second Reading), Adopting Port Blakely Sub-Area Plan; Three-Party
Agreement; and Comprehensive Plan Amendments (#AB00-202)
C. Ordinance No. 4723 (Second Reading) Adopting Mixed Use District (MXD) Zoning
Classification (#AB00-203)
11. RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 2774, Updating the "Bremerton City Council Rules & Procedures" (#AB00- J'~l
217)
12. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, during the early days of World War I, a Blue Star was used on banners to represent
each person, man or woman in the Military Service of the United States and as the war progressed, and
some were killed in combat, others wounded and died of their wounds or disease, a groundswell
movement began in Chicago to ease the sense of personal loss, the idea of a Gold Star was adopted to
convey the feelings of respect and symbolize the Honor and Glory accorded the person for their sacrifice;
and
WHEREAS, in May 1918, President Woodrow Wilson approved the change of using the Gold Star
and it was during this time the service flag was adopted. In the summer of 1928, a group of twenty-five
women who had lost a son or daughter in World War I, joined together to form the organization later
known as the American Gold Star Mothers, and opened their ranks to all who lost children to hostile
actions while serving their country including the allies of the United States; and
WHEREAS, during the Military involvement of the United States in World War II, the service
banners were proudly displayed in windows of families throughout the United States and the
continuation of involvement of military forces saw our servicemen and women in Korea, Vietnam,
Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, Central America, Europe, the Mediterranean, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Iraq,
and Bosnia which continued to take a heavy toll on our sons and daughters who elected to serve their
country and our allies;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Lynn S. Horton, Mayor of the City of Bremerton, do hereby proclaim
September 23, 2000 as
GOLD STAR PARENTS AND GOLD STAR WIVES & SISTERS REMEMBRANCE DAY
and encourage all of the citizens of this City, County, State and Nation to pause a moment in reverence,
and honor the sacred memory of the sons and daughters of these parents who sustained a great loss, but
persevered knowing that their sons and daughters made the supreme sacrifice for the preservation of
Peace and Freedom for all mankind.
SIGNED, this 20th day of September 2000.
Lynn S. Horton, Mayor
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. ~: FOR AGENDA OF: SEPTEHBER 20, 2000
ORIGINATING' DEFT: C I'fY COIJNC I L
MINUTES' OFMEETING- SEPTEHBER 6, 2000 ORIGINATOR: CAROL AREND5 ~ PRESl DENT
DATE SUBMi'FI'ED: SEPTEHBER 11, 2000
2. ~,~.E.,~~: (comment on back if necessary) 3. F_.,,XHIBITS:
ENDORSEMENT INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
MAYOR: COUNCIL PRESIDENT: ~ ~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT. AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
8. RECOMMENDATION:
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED TABLED APPROVED __ DISAPPROVED AMENDED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO: ~) ~ - ~'~
2. CI ~ARANCE COMMENTS:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (continued):
5. IMPACT ON NQN-PASSAGE:
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
TAPE #1721 UNAPPROVED DRAFT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
September 6, 2000
The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City
Council Chambers, 239 4t~ Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, September 6, 2000, at 5:30
P.M., with Council President Carol Arends presiding. Council members present were Jim Reed,
Conrad Esser, David Farr, Mike Shepherd, Ed Rollman, John Law, Cecil McConnell, and Wayne
Olsen. Also present were City Attorney Glenna Malanca, Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston, and
Legislative Assistant Lod Smith.
The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council Member Cecil McConnell, followed
by the invocation given by Reverend William Wambsganss of West Side Baptist Church.
President Arends made the following announcements:
(1) Council held a 30-Minute Study Session to discuss "City Department Re-Organization" in the
Council Conference Room; followed by a Pre-Council Session to discuss general Council
business; and
(2) City Council will again adjourn to the Council Conference Room immediately following the regular
meeting tonight for a Monthly Study Session to discuss the "Procedures for Amending the
Bremerton City. Charter".
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Emergency Purchase of a Submersible Dry Pit Pump for OB-1 (#AB00-204)
#0032 M/S/C/U (McConnell/Olsen) Move to approve Consent Agenda as presented.
CLAIMS/CHECK REGI ,STERS
Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those
expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090 have been recorded on a
listing that had been made available to the Council.
#0055 M/S/C/U (Law/McConnell) On September 6, 2000, the Council does approve for payment
those vouchers included and further described as follows: 244750 through 244890 in the amount of
$814,127.16; and Regular Payroll for the pay period ending August 31, 2000 in the amount of
$989,021.51.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
John Law reminded his district that the next District 3 meeting would be held Tuesday, September
19, 2000, beginning at 7:00 P.M. at the Senior Center located at East 13th Street & Nipsic Avenue.
Ed Rollman thanked Carol Atkinson of the Bremerton Main Street Association, Mike Momany, and all
the many volunteers for organizing a great and well-attended 11th annual Blackberry Festival.
Mike Shepherd announced two events for Saturday, September 16t~, the Sinclair Inlet Clean-Up
Event beginning at 10:00 A.M. at Bremerton's Over-Water Park; and the annual Kitsap Habitat for
Humanity Gala Dinner & Auction beginning at 5:30 P.M. at the Admiral Theater (citizens may call
479-3853 for more information). He also enjoyed the Blackberry Festival and 5K Fun Run.
TAPE #1721
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
September 6, 2000
Page 2 of 3
David Farr wished his daughter a "happy birthday".
Jim Reed particularly enjoyed the Melody Lane BBQ salmon at the Blackberry Festival.
President Arends also thoroughly enjoyed the Blackberry Festival this year.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Horton discussed the Artist's Loft Summit hosted by the City of Bremerton on Friday,
September 29 beginning at 10:15 A.M. at the Amy Burnett Gallery located at 412 Pacific Avenue. It
is anticipated that local people and people from around the region will come to see the opportunities
available downtown for artists, art galleries, artist living quarters, and rental properties.
M~yor Horton proclaimed September I - October 15, 2000 as "Water Weeks 2000" in the State of
Washington, and announced several upcoming activities planned to celebrate the event. Don
Larson, President of Kitsap Diving Association, elaborated further on the planned events, as well as
distributed an adventure guide titled "Washington Water Week~ 2000" containing additional details.
LEGISLATIVE REPORT - There was no report this evening.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
The following citizens expressed their views and opinions in SUPPORT for a change in the City's
form of government to be placed on the Ballot for the voters to decide:
Del Knauss; Gary Gartin; John Becker; and Paul Drnjevic.
Louis Mentor felt a Committee should be formed to study this issue further.
Paul Stanbery_ expressed his views opposing a "City-Manager & Council" form of government.
Elizabeth Buell summarized that more information needs to be provided to the citizens to explain the
differences between the different forms of government to be considered.
John W. Burch concurred that citizens need to be informed before they vote for a change in the form
of the City's government. He then reiterated his request for the graffiti to be removed from the east-
end of the Manette Bridge, and the backside of the building of the R.K. Mart. Aisc, he did not feel
that the gray paint used to cover the graffiti on the red brick of the City's pump station was adequate.
Ida Mae Cooper voiced her concerns over the lack of communication from the City regarding the
reported plans for the new "Vintage at Bremerton" apartment development that will replace the Kona
Village Apartments, and the fact that local residents were unaware that an appeal deadline for this
project expired June 2, 2000.
Susan Brown was not aware that the Council recently held a Study Session to discuss an update to
the City Council Rules & Procedures, and ascertained the best way for the public to stay informed of
upcoming meetings and Study Sessions of the Council was to contact the City Council office directly
at 478-5280. She further expressed concern that a process was not included for a citizen to complain
about an official or employee of the City.
Larry Dickerson provided a "tongue-in cheek" view of the latest happenings in his neighborhood.
TAPE #1721
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
September 6, 2000
Page 3 of 3
9A - RESOLUTION NO. 2772. AMENDING MEMBERSHIP OF THE LODGING TAX ADVISORY
COMMITTEE. (#AB00-205): Conrad Esser, Council Member and Committee Chairman, pointed out
that Council may review the membership of the committee on an annual basis as allowed by
Resolution No. 2666. The attached resolution amends the membership of the committee this year.
These changes include the appointment of Conrad Esser as the "Elected Official of the City"; Carol
Atkinson from Bremerton Main Street Association as a "Person Involved in Activities Authorized to be
Funded"; and Dorry Platt, Manager of Illahee Manor as a "Representative of a Business Required to
Collect the Tax". Carol Arends stipulated that it was the will of the Council that the Committee
rotates their representatives each year.
There were no questions or comments from the public.
#1495 M/S/C/U (Reed/McConnell) Move to approve Resolution No. 2772 and confirm the
appointments to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee.
With no further business, meeting concluded at 6:17 P.M.
City Council then adjourned to the Council Conference Room for a Monthly Study Session to discuss
the "Procedures for Amending the Bremerton City Charter".
PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk
CAROL ARENDS, City Council President
City of Bremerton
PJ/CA/Is/cg
c: Normal Distribution
File
A~ENDA BiLL
BI~EMERTON CIT~ COUNCIL
!. SUBJECT: FOR AGENDA OF: September 27, 2000
ORIGINATING DPT. Executive
Appointment of Youth Representative OIGINATOR: Mayor Horton
To BKAT Advisory Committee DATE SUBMITTED: September 13, 200
2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back 3. EXHIBITS:
if necessary)
Letter from Trisha Rule
ENDORSEMENT ~ INFORMATIQN APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
MAYOR ~ J. ~ ~ ~ COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The BKAT Advisory Committee has one youth member approved by both the county and the city.
Last years youth representative was from Bremerton High School. This year the committee is
recommending a one-year term for Trisha Rule a Central Kitsap High School Senior.
Trisha has lived in Silverdale for 13 years. She participates in numerous extracurricular
activities such as ASB, Honor Society, Key Club and Teen Suicide Task Prevention. She is
interested in a broadcasting career after completion of college.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
1. Motion to approve appointment of Trisha Rule to a one year term as the Younh
Representative on the BKAT Advisory Committee commencing September 2000 and
terminating August 2001.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mayor.
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor
REVIEW DATE: N/A
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED __ DISAPPROVED AMENDED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS (cont.):
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (cont.):
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE
Lack of Youth input to committee.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES
None.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
I ~ McCluskey - Tdsh Rule ~age 1 I
Subject: It's all about Trish
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:55:20 EDT
From: Tdshtdsh01@cs.com
To: judym@silvedink.net
Greetings! I apologize for the lateness of this email. It has bcc,~ a
very busy weekend. I hope you find this helpful in efforts of getting to
know me better, t
I have been living in Siiverdale for the past 13 years so I pretty much
have a good idea of the county. Among my favorite things are
shopping,
traveling, watching movies, hanging out with my friends, listening to
music, and just boating. Exploring and trying new things each and
everyday
are my goals in life along with traveling around the wodd. I tend to
keep
active by participating in numerous extracurricular activities like ASB,
Honor Society, Key Club, and 'Teen Suicide Task Prevention.
As far as influences are concerned I consider my parents and God
very
important aspects in my life along with my future aspiration of
becoming broadcaster for a television network. One of the reasons
why I have a desire being a broadcaster is the interaction with people.
I love talking to and meeting new people which is goes hand in hand
with my aspiration of being a broadcast joumalist.
Ever since I was little I have never wanted to be anything else other
than a broadcaster. I guess you can say that from then on
broadcasting has been one of my passions. I plan to pursue a degree
from a four-year college and eventually attend Northwestern University
for my Masters. As far as my high school broadcasting career, I have
been doing moming announcements for the past three years now and
was featured on our KUGR telecasts.
In addition, I also consider education another important aspect in my
life. In addition to being involved with extracurricular activities I also
take part in Advanced Placement classes in the subjects of history,
computer
science, and mathematics. Dedication and motivation is are important
values which I continue to stress both in and out of the classroom.
All in ail, I have found all my experiences very rewarding and I look
forward to a BKAT youth representative position.
Thanks Again,
Trisha Rule
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: FOR AGENDA OF: September 20, 2000
Appointment to the Public Access ORIGINATING DEPT: Executive
Citizen's Advisory Committee ORIGINATOR: Mayor Horton
DATE SUBMITTED: September 14, 2000
2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS
Application for Appointmem
ENDORSE._.ME~T ~ ~IF. ~~/TION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT F~_~:
MAYOR ~ COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
There is a vacancy on the Public Access Citizen's Advisory Committee in the "user" position. It is recommended
Gregg A. McClellan fill the vacancy.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to confirm the appointment of Gregg A. McClellan to the Public Access Citizens Advisow Committee.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO: 00-t>~] S
Regional Media Center
~,~g~¢o~u~ '>' ~/olunteer Application for
~d.ctio. Appointment to a Board,
c~o,~P~~co.~ ..o~- ~) ~-~8 ommi~ion, Commi~ee or JUL 0 6 ~000
B~g..ll F~ (~3) 589-5876
_ . ....... the selection proems. Please help us in getting to know you.
.Occupation ~]/Eb~ ~oc[~c
I would like to be considered for
~y ~e you applying for this appoin~ent?
· ~ ~ /
Which of your personal and/or professional interests prompted you to apply for this appointment?
Have you served on any other Kitsap County board, commission, committee, council or task force? If yes,
please list:
(complete the back of this form too)
Please turn page
Please list your qualifications for this appointment (include skills, activities, training, education)
,2o ,,-5 . .,-,,
!
What are your community interests (committees, organizations, special activities)? .,_~o~ ,~- ~
Personal References:
*Please provide the names of two non-relative references
Relation~p ~gg
Ab~'¢-,~&9'- 6-~'?~ (~J
[elationship (Je - ~,-~.r
I give my permission for the named references* to be contacted either verbally or in writing. All the
information on this application is true to the best of my knowledge.
We welcome your willingness to serve Kitsap County. Please return this completed form to: Jan Koske, Kitsap County Volunteer
Services Coordinator, Administrative Services, Kitsap County Courthouse,
614 Division Street MS7, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (360) 337-4650, Email jkoske~co.kitsap.wa.us
V-13 DAS Jan Forms 7/29/99
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: FOR AGENDA OF: September 20, 2000
Formal Appointment of Committees ORIGINATING DEPT: Legal .
to Draft Statements For and Against ORIGINATOR: Glenna Malan(~~
Proposed Charter Provisions DATE SUBMITTED: September ~14, 2000..
2. C,E;E.,ARANCES: (~ment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
~len~na IVfal-anc~, City Attorney
ENDORSEMENT~NFORMA.TION [] APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
4, SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
Committees to draft statements For and Against the proposed Charter Revisions scheduled for a
November 7 vote. Must be formally appointed by the City Council for the Voter's Pamphlet.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Record Motion:
Move to appoint (names to be inserted) on the Committee to draft statements in Support of the proposed
Charter Revisions.
Move to appoint (names to be inserted) on the Committee to draft statements in Opposition of the
proposed Charter Revisions.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED [] TABLED [] APPROVED [] DISAPPROVED [] AMENDED [] DATE:
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO.:
$. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
The County Auditor will appoint individuals to the necessary committees.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
None
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
RCW's and Kitsap County information Voter's Pamphlet.
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE# X~'-ZQ.] FOR AGENDA OF: September ~, 2000
.5~ 0.~ v'xd ~ R ¢o~vx~ ORIGINATING DEPT: PW&U Engineering Div.
VACATING HARKINS PLACE ORIGINATOR: Randy Witt, City Engirlee~
~^.~stm~nvrm: S~pt~m~e~ 5, 2000
2. CLEARANCES: (comment o9/back if nece .s,sary~"~ 3. EXHIBITS
Director, ~uU~ Work~,~¢s,~- ,~'~..~F~.~ ,, A. Orainance # 4-7 ;;Z I
City ^ttorn~y / (~,/;P/,~/~.~~-h,,~_~B. Vicinity~ap.
City Treasurer ~ - ~ C. StaffReport.
Director, Community Development O~-J~ .
Council Budget & Finance Committe~/~ .
op~o~ Commi~
- - APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRI3SIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL3
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
City staffhas received a petition to vacate Harkins Place. A heating date of September 13, 2000 was set by City
Council on August 16, 2000 to hear this request for vacation. This fight-of-way consists of a short street section
with a cul-de-sac at the end. All properties abutting the fight-of-way are owned by a single entity, therefore there
is no need for public access. The right-of-way is being requested to be vacated to facihtate a new commercial
development. Posting of the hearing notices and ma/lings to the adjacent property owner have been completed in
accordance with State law and the Bremerton Municipal Code. Specific items for City Council consideration are
outlined in the Staff Report. The request before the City Council is to approve, disapprove, or modify this vacation
of Harkins Place.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
B. MoVe. to pass Ordinance # 47~t , vacating Harkins Place fight-of-way, on ~eco,xd eeaa~;v,.3.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: City Engineer
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: N/A
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED A~E~D~_._
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE DATE
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The street will remain right-of-way, which will restrict development of the area into a commercial
enterprise.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER
RESOURCES:
Staffing: No impact.
Budget: No impact
Facilities/Equipment: No impact
7. RESEARCH SOURCES "~
BMC 11.20 Vacation of Public Rights-of-Way
RCW 35.79 Streets
Filed for Record at Request of:
When Recorded Return to:
Name: Bremerton City. Clerk
Address: 239 Fourth Street
Bremerton. WA 98357
Document Title: Ordinance No.
Reference Number of Document Assigned or Released: Not Applicable
Grantor's Name: City of Bremerton
Grantee's Name: Not Applicable
Tax Parcel #: Not Applicable.
Abbreviated Legal Description: THAT PORTION OF BLOCK A, REPLAT OF
PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 1 AND 4 AND ALL OF
BLOCK 5 AND 6, OLYMPIC MANOR, AS PER
PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS,
PAGE 69, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, SITUATE IN SE1/4, SE1/4, SEC 2
T24N., R.1E., W.M.
#
AN ORDINANCE Vacating approximately 13,250 square
feet of right-of-way known as Harkins Place.
WHEREAS, Powell Development has petitioned to vacate this right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, notice has been posted and published according to law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the portion of the right-of-way set forth
herein is not needed for present or future use and should be vacated to allow the
abutting property owners to maintain the parcel, now therefore,
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. Vacation. The following right-of-way is hereby vacated to the
adjoining property owners.
THAT PORTION OF BLOCK A, REPLAT OF PORTIONS OF BLOCKS I AND 4
AND ALL OF BLOCK 5 AND 6, OLYMPIC MANOR, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN
VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 69, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
SITUATE IN SEl/4, SEll4, SEC 2 T24N., R.1E., W.M.
Section 2. Reservation of Easements. This vacation shall have no affect on
public utility easements or pdvate easements which have been established within the
rights-of-way subject to this vacation ordinance.
Section 3. Effective date. This vacation shall become effective ten (10) days
from passage and publication.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of
,2000.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of
,2000.
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
APPROVED this day of ,2000.
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
/~M uole~qM
!)JJe/-j/,j 'OAV' uoJjeH l
'o^V O!lOS
->>, ~ 'o^V u!qo~
STREET VACATION REQUEST
HARKINS PLACE
ENGINEERING STAFF REPORT
CiTY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: September 13, 2000
PREPARED BY: Paul Wandling
SUMMARY
A. Applicants: Powell Development
737 Market Street
Kirkland, WA 98033
Location: Harkins Place
B. Attachment: Application for right-of-way vacation.
Picture
Location Map
BACKGROUND
The applicants have petitioned the City of Bremerton to vacate the Right-of-Way known
as Harkins Place (approximately 13,250 sf). Currently, this Right-of-Way is abutted on
all sides by property owned by Powell Development. This street is currently paved and
is utilized as access to these properties.
The owner is proposing a commercial development which requires demolition of the
existing residential structures and vacation of the right-of-way to create a developable
site. See the attached application for a sketch of the subject area.
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONDITIONS
· Functional Classification Local Access
· Existing R-O-W Width 60 feet
· Proposed R-O-W Width N/A
· Pavement Width 38 feet
· Surface Type Asphalt
, Curb and Gutter Approx. 390 LF
· Sidewalks Approx. 1950 SF
July 18, 2000
Harkins Place Vacation
Page 1 of 4
HEARING CONSIDERATIONS
BMC 11.20.120 sets forth issues that the City Council needs to determine at the
conclusion of the Vacation Hearing. These issues and the staff position are:
1. Whether the street, alley or portion thereof is no longer required for public
use and vacation of the described portion will better serve the public good.
Staff Position:
In conjuction with the applicant's proposed development, the right-of-way known
as Harkins Place will no longer be required for public use. Given the existing
infrastructure, it is unlikely that Harkins Place will be utilized for any other
purpose.
2. Whether the vacation is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Position:
The proposed vacation does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Whether continued use of the proposed vacation as a public way is not of
such public benefit as to justify the costs of maintenance.
Staff Position:
Continued use and maintenance of the proposed vacation has no public benefit.
4. Whether substitution of a new and different thoroughfare would be more
useful to the public.
Staff Position:
Substitution of a new and different thoroughfare would not be useful to the public.
5. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater
public use or need than presently exists.
Staff Position:
There is no anticipated future public use.
6. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of
private property abutting the same.
Staff Position:
There are no objections. The applicant is the only property owner abutting the
proposed vacation.
July 18, 2000
Harkins Place Vacation
Page2 of 4 ,~ ¢¢~'~
SHORELINE ACCESS
This portion of right-of-way does not provide shoreline access.
UTILITIES
All private utility companies have been contacted. There are no existing utilities located
within this portion of the right-of-way.
SUFFICIENCY OF SIGNATURES
The request for the vacation was made by more than two thirds (on a front footage
basis) of the property owners abutting the property to be vacated.
COMPENSATION
This is a Class II right-of-way as defined in Ordinance 4664. This type of right-of-way is
limited to a public easement or dght of use which has substantial public improvements
in any portion of the right-of-way. The City shall be compensated for 50 percent of the
assessed value per square foot of the adjacent properties. Compensation amounts to
$16,126.29.
STAFF COMMENTS
Police Department staff stated that no problems where identified with this vacation.
Fire Department staff had no comment. This vacation will not adversely impact the
current ability of the Fire Department to access this property or adjacent lots.
Department of Community Development supports this vacation.
Staff recommends that this Street Vacation be approved as requested without
modification.
° July 18, 2000
Page 3 of 4
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT.· Public Hearing ano~x~.ading of FOR AGENDA OF:
Ordin~~~arding adoption o! Por~ Blakdy ORIGINATING DEPT.:
Sub-Area Hah, Three-Party Agreement *nd Comp. Plan ORIGINATOR: Lee A. Wyatt
Amendments. DATE SUB~: Augnst 24, 2000
2. CLEARANCES: (f4~mme~ on back if 3. EXHIBITS:
[,. ,s,: ..s! cc Ordi,, # ""'C'..-- .==:':
Comm. Dev. Dir.: ~/~~~ Comp. Phm Amandme~
Nolic~ of Public Hearing .
City Cle~r.~..~ ~'4~'~i'~J='~m"a'5'?'~'~/~{~=" g'~'~-ilIZ}~t{~_. _
~NDORSEMENT .~ INFORMATION ~ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRF..SID~ FOR SUBMITTAL:
MAYOR ~ ~' ~--'~ COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The City of Bremerton, Kitsap County and Port Blakely Communities (land owner/developer) have cooperatively
prepared a Sub-Area Plan for a large parcel of land (approximately 440 acres) located to the west of Kitsap Lake and outside
the City limits for future annexation to the City. Currently, the City's 1995 Comprehensive Plan does not provide the
mechanism to process the proposed annexation. Consequently, the City must amend its Comprehensive Plan to facilitate
implementation of the provisions contnined in the Sub-Area Plan and the Three-Party Agre~memt which will subs~ucnfly
enable the proposed application for annexation to be submitted. The objective of the Port Blak~ly {oint Planning Area Sub-
Area Plan is to facilitate, encourage and support proposed mixed usc development which will further thc goal of regional
~:onomic growth. The Bremerton Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing process on the pmpos~ _
amendments to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and have unnnmlusly recommended that ~ NO. -~~
Ordinance adopting (1) th~ Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan and amendment of the Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan under the Growth Management Act and as a comprehensive plan for the Port Blakely pro~rty upon
annexation pursuant to RCW 35.13.177 and. 178, and (2) Three-Party Agreement between tl~ City, IGtsap County and Port
Blakely Communities be adopted.
I move to pqs~ Ordinance No. r ~ ~"~n Ordinance adopting (1) the Pb-rt Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area
Plan and amendment of the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan under the Growth Management Act and as a comprehensive plan
for the Port Blakely property upon annexation pursuant to RCW 35.13.177 and. 17g, and (2) Three-Party Agreement between
the City, Kitsap County and Port Blakely Conununities~aa IT/'~ ~ ~ ~ ~,'bE~ ,fgeftO,~ ~.
6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Director DCD
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE: N/A
REVIEW DATE: N/A
7. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED
It O
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
9. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
10. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
Failur~ toapprove the Ordimm~ would result in the inability of the proponents (City of Bremexton Kitsap County, Port
Blakely Communities) to proceed with the proposed mixed use development through annexation.
11. IMPACT ON STAFFING~, BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMKNT OR OTHER RI~OURCF-q:
Additional staff resources will be required to continue tl~ review and development of the propo~d =mur~ation application,
Master Plan, gl~A preparation, and D~Aopment Agreement
12. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Pon Blakely Joint Plnnning Area Sub-Area Plan
B~eaicxton Zoning Ordinance Volunm I, ~ July 26, 2000
Kilsap County Comprehensive Plan Volume IL dal~d March 31, 2000
Kitsap County Zoning Ordinance Three-Party Agreement between City ~fBremerton, Kitsap
RCW 35.13.177 and. 178 County, and the land owner - Port Blakely
RCW 36.70A. 10 Communities
File
NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE BETWEEN FIRST A_ND SECOND READING OF
SECTION 8 OF THE THR~F.-PARTY AG~
The version of the Thr-,,c~-Party agreement passed on first reading by the Bremerton City
Council on August 29, 2000, contained the following Section 8:
8. Cooperation for Economic Development. All parties will work
diligently to attract job-producing firms to locate with the Property as soon
as feasible. City and County officials will participate in meeting with
prospective firms when requested by Port Blakely.
By agreement ofK. itsap County Commissioners (adopted on 9/11/00), Port Blakely
Communities, and the City of Bremerton staff; the following change to Section 8 is
incorporated in~ tho final version of the Three-Party Agreement and it is recommended
that the City Council approve the Three-Party Agl'eement on second reading with the
following amended Section 8:
8. Cooperation for Economic Development. All parties will work
diligently to attract job-producing firms to locate with the Property as soon
as feasible. City and County officials will participate in meeting with
prospective firms when requested by Port Blakely. Until 500 pioneering
jobs have been created, Port Blakely will make annual reports to the
Executive Committee on the actions being taken to prepare and market the
employment sites within the project, and the Executive committee will
discuss actions which each party to this agreement should take to facilitate
the creation of jobs at the project.
The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting ~f August 1, 2000 were approved as
pre~ented and signed at the August 15, 2000 meeting.
Reepectfully submitted b~.
Pattie Haas, r, ecording Secretary
Dra~ lVlinutes for Approval
Planning Commis~on
Meet g
August 1, 2000
I. Roll Call
Those present were: Chairman Griggs, Commissioner Boyd, Commissioner Dingjield,
Commissioner Kosusko and Commissioner Moshay. Quorum certified.
IL C~ll to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Gdggs at 5:40 p.m.
IlL Approval of Agenda
The agenda was approved as presented, with the following change. Item IV - 1. Proposed
Amendments to Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) Chapter 21.02 will be continued to the August
15, 2000 meeting. A revised agenda was approved.
IV. Public Meeting
A. Call to the Public (public comments on any item not on tonight's agenda):
Mr. Paul Seheyer, 2111 Madrona Point Dr., asked that the Special Exception granted for the
Coutts project on Shore Drive be rescinded, based on the overlay zone ordinance that was
approved at the July Planning Commission meeting.
B. Hearing
1. Proposed amendments to City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan to accommodate
adoption of the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan. Such amendments
will modify most Elements of the Comprehensive Plan including, but not limited to,
Elements A, C, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K.
Commissioner Dingfieid asked if there would be wording added to accommodate light industrial
and mixed use recognition of the county map. She assumed that those changes would be ora
generic variety that would stay. She noted that the county has done a transition zone. She also
asked if the area specific items that identify Port Blakely only would go away if Port Biakely
Communities was not involved in the project at some point.
Mr. Wyatt responded that if Port Blakely withdrew their proposed development of the 440 acres,
~ sections that reference the Port Biakely mb-area plan will drop out as a sunset clause.
There are other areas that will remain for the opporttmity of some other developer to bring another
piec~ of property in or to rezone or annex a piece of property under the proposed zoning that is
being presented. They ar~ not going to close the door on anyone else should Port Blakely drop
out. They would like to have an open door for anyone to come in and give the City an economic
development boost.
Commi,~ioner l)i~gfidd comm~w_ted that as an example, th~ dra~ ordinance 7.28, page 5 talks
about economic development. It added the phrase, "fight industrial or t~hnological development,
including mixed uses with r~idential." She would like to keep this phrase in tl~re to ensure the
door is kept open.
Mr. Wyatt noted that the intent is that if the Port Biak~y proje~ did not oc.~ur, there might be a
smaller parcel that could be ann~x~xl. There could ~ be the possibility of an Urban Renewal
project that could come in and r~one the area, produ~n8 light industrial, m~g,
electronic, wireless, 4¢.
Mr. Palmer said that the oc~,~sion for the amendments is during the sub-area plan and that the
amendments are pertinent to the sub-area plan more so that any other aspect of a comprehensive
plan. In eff~t, they can not really do some of thes~ amendments this year if it were not for the sub-
area plan.
Mr. Wyatt noted that there are items (i.e., Capital Fa~liti~s) that can be amended. The effect of
Capital Facilities, as visualiz~ without a master plan that is approved through an additional
Development Agreement, cannot be fores~n. Without knowing the size of a pipe to carry water or
sewer, at a point in time when these facts are known, the comp plan will be revised to reflect this in
the annual revision. This is a vehicle to be able to ame~i the comp plan
Com~i~ioner Dingfidd stated that in the ordinanc~ they are r~o~izing the thr~ party
agreement. She asked if they were taking action on that or is it merely the comp plan amendments?
Mr. Wyatt said that they are dealing on the Planning Commission level with the comp plan and
zoning code amendments. The thr~ party agr~ment itself is one of the re~ns why this has been
res~hedule so many times, because the parties involved could not come to a conclusion in regards
to what they all wanted. They are now at a point where they are pretty close to being able to sig~
off and move forward.
Commi~sioaer I)ingfieid asked if they would be taking a~tion on the two separate ordinances
tog~er or separately?
Mr. Palmer stated that the Planning Commission should take separate action on each ordinance.
~'lannintJ Comrni.~ion nfr~J Autju~l; 1. 2000 ffa~ 2 of ~
Commissioner Dingfield felt that the Commission might require more information on the Mixed
Use District ordinance that on the other.
Mr. Wyatt said that the staff had gone through ail sectiom and asked themselves if this effected
the annexation, and does it effect the comp plan in regards to the Port Blakely project? What will
it do in regards to any kind of zoning amendments? How is each section (housing capital
facilities, utilities, etc.) going to be effected if the plan is adopted. If any item was effected, it is
reflected in the document that the Commissioners were provided. He stated that the more specific
the answer to equations are based on after the property is annexed and the master plan has a
complete environmental review, development agreements are in place to start developing the
actual construction on the project. At that point in time the elements (Capital Facilities Plan,
utilities, wastewater, etc.) that are more hard-lined figures, will be brought before the Planning
Commission on a one time a year basis. The reason that they have been able to come before thc
Commissioners now (out of the annual schedule) is because the state law allows the opportunity to
amend the comp plan if it is in the initial adoption ora sub-arm plan through a joint planning
effort through the county and the city.
Mr. Wyatt indicated that there are certain sections under utilities, etc., that refer to very specific
areas in the sub-area plan itself that state there is no reason to reiterate because they have referred
right back to the version 2.3 dated 8-26-00. This is a negotiated posture that they have with the
owner and their various attorneys, including City staff.
Commissioner Kosusko asked if the sub-area plan becomes part of the comp plan or is it an
appendix to it?
Mr. Wyatt said that it becomes a part of the comp plan, and that there are certain pieces in it that
will act as an appendix. The implementing tools will be the change in the zoning, creating a zone
to be able to facilitate the mixed use development (which is now being called a mixed use district).
The development seemed to be a bit confusing with some of the other terminology, so it was
determined to call it a mixed use district that could be placed just about anywhere in the zoning
map, pending certain satisfactory criteria. The sub-area plan then becomes part of the comp plan.
At a point in time where they actually go through the comprehensive revision, which is required
every five years, they will incorporate the Port Blakely sub-area plan as an appendix at that point.
Certain language will be taken out of it and put fight into the language of the comp plan. There
will be certain parts of the language that will be right in the comp plan that could be lifted for other
developers to come in and utilize the same comp plan and zoning amendments.
Commissioner Kosusko asked if the Commissioners accept this ordinance and pass it on to the
City Council, in the future if someone calls and asks for a copy of the comp plan, will they get a
copy of the sub-area plan also?
Mr. Wyatt indicated that the sub-area plan would be included with copies of the comp plan as a
full packet. This is all public record.
?lannin~j F. ommio~ion rn~ Au~ju~r. 1. 2000 ?a~j, 3 of b
Mr. Palmer added that this would be similar to the Harrison District Plan that was completed a
few years ago. That has been enfolded into the comp plan and is essentially a complete document
that is reproduced when the comp plan is given out. Eventually they will consolidate ali of these
and integrate them to produce one package.
Commissioner Dingfield asked which volume of the sub-ama plan is the official draft?
Mr. Wyatt indicated that the Commissioners have the latest version. The July 26~ date is the
most current. Volume I has been changed extensively, while Volume II remains the same as an
appendix of various letters/correspondence, etc.
Commissioner Kosusko asked if Mr. Wyatt could discuss the population allocation.
Mr. Wyatt stated that early on in the comp plan and the GM/k, the City demonstrated to the
county and the state that they had a certain capacity of growth over the next 20 years, which was
20,000 people. This was in addition to the 38,000 estimate at that time. The comp plan had been
passed with the county's plan, which had gone through the whole GMA heatings board. In that
plan there were certain populations that were allocated within various zones within the City.
There had been a project in the downtown area allocating a certain population grown in the Central
Business District (CBD). As a result of market trends and the economic development that did not
occur, several players saw an opportunity to develop a piece of property which had already been
designated as an urban reserve (future or current allocations). To facilitate the transfer of a
certain population from one area to another, there has been a allocation proposed to take a certain
amount out of the four major areas of the City of Bremerton and reallocate this population to the
Port Blakely community. There has been quite a bit of negotiation over that. He believes that the
County also has additional allocation which have not been appropriated to the various Urban
Growth Areas of Kingston, Bainbridge Island, Port Orchard, Silverdale and Bremerton. To
facilitate moving forward, they reallocated certain numbers of population that were basically
distributed to our areas to the Port Blakely area and reduced by 84% (3,500 people) of the
population that was allocated for the downtown area (to the Port Blakely sub-area plan).
Mr. Palmer explained that this population was originally scheduled to go into the CBD area.
There were a number of different things that did not happen that caused us to be in a position
where they could reallocate that population. Sinclair Landing did not happen, they have gone
through a number of abatement projects to get rid of housing stock that was deteriorated, and also
the Gateway project took out quite a few homes. They came up with a number of 3,500 population
which is the equivalent of what would be required to support between 900 and 1,200 housing units
in the Port Blakely development. The County also had the option to allocate population (out of the
year 2014 forecast) out of pool of 60,000 unallocated population forecast numbers to Port Blakely.
There was an additional process to go through with the Sub-Regional Council in order to have an
allocation from the County. It was more expeditious to reallocate the units within the City of
Bremerton.
Mr. Wyatt stated that they believe that il' Port Biakely Communities is thc impetus to drive
interest in the downtown corridor again, they feel that the avenue exists for them to go back to the
Fla..in~jCommi~io~,mr~^uous~.l. 2OOO?ao~4o~g, <~~
Growth Management Board and the County to request additional allocation out of the reserve
fund. They strongly believe this exists.
Mr. Palmer noted that the population forecast is an important issue. Heather Ballash, Department
of Community Trade and Economic Development (CTED) had raised that concern back in March.
They have remained consistent in their concerns about population reallocation. The City hired
Shapiro and Associates to look at the population capacity analysis in 1993. It was their
recommendation that they take out of the Central area and move it to Port Blakely.
Commissioner Dingfield asked if the Commission would be dealing with the two ordinances
separately and making separate decisions. She also asked if they would be taking public comment
on both?
Mr. Palmer recommended that the Commission take public comment first on the Comp Plan, and
then a presentation will be made on the zoning changes with public comments. He added that he
had a comment from the Suquamish Tribe and the issue of how much residential development
should occur in thesub-area plan. When this is reconciled with the City Council and the Board of
County Commissioners, that number will be reflected in the comp plan and the population
assessment.
Mr. Wyatt summarized that the Commission has the culmination of many hours of negotiation to
move this project forward in the interest of economic development for the City of Bremerton.
Call to the Public - None.
Mr. David St. Pierre, Assistant City Attorney, provided an e-mail letter sent to the legal
department from the Suquamish Tribe, describing their concerns for this project.
Mr. Palmer stated that he discussed the zoning ordinance notice with Mr. St. Pierre. They do not
feel that the notice was clear and specific. This matter will be advertised for the August 15, 2000
meeting, which will still be in time for the City Council to consider the Commission's
recommendation.
Closed to the Public
Chairman Griggs asked what authority the Suquamish Tribe has regarding this development?
Mr. St. Pierre stated that the Growth Management Act requires local government to coordinate
and bring in all interested parties and stakeholders in the deliberation. The local government is the
jurisdiction that has the authority to make the final decision. The public process requirements of
the RCW require that you give notice and allow them to comment at that point. The only
requirement that the City of Bremerton and the Planning Commission must follow. They have
been given adequate notice. If they disagree with the decision, that is up to them and they can take
that through other avenues. As long as the City has done what it is required to do undcr thc RCW,
the Tribe or any other interested individual or stakeholder, has no authority. It is only the
Planning Commission and the City Council that has the authority.
Mr. Palmer added that the Tribe was involved in the joint planning for the Port Blakely sub-area
so they are vested. The Chico Basin area is, in the Tribe's opinion, the premier salmon producing
area. They are vitally concerned about what type of development goes on there. The early
negotiations with the Tribe got the City/County to the point where they were satisfied that 300 of
the 440 acres could be developed for industrial purposes. The Tribe became concerned when it
went from a pure industrial development to mixed-use. They began raising concerns, as reflected
in their letter dated June 9, 2000.
Mr. Wyatt pointed out that the letter was written in June. He asked if Port Biakely Communities
has withdrawn their boundary to make some assurances in the Dickerson Creek area?
Mr. Palmer stated that Port Blakely took everything out of the Dickerson Creek area to get to the
300 acres so there is no impact. That is why the Tribe was originally supportive of the project as a
total industrial facility. The Tribe started raising concem about residential in an industrially
developed area~
Mr. Wyatt again stated that this letter is dated June 9~ and that Port Blakely Communities has
made concessions to this letter. They had talked about increasing the stormwater management
program for Kitsap Lake as well.
A motion was made by Commissioner Dingfield to adopt the draft ordinance as outlined in
the 7.28 (Final) draft and seconded by Commissioner Moshay.
Commissioner Dingfield stated that she appreciated what the Tribe was saying in their letter. She
was interested in finding out where developers hit their critical mass.
Mr. Wyatt stated that Bremerton is unchartered waters and you would have to have a crystal ball.
Mr. Palmer said that often times the mixed use is based on a model that a developer has seen
developed elsewhere. One of the models that Port Blakely has in mind is the Intel Campus in the
Dupont, Washington area. They also have experience in the Issaquah Highlands area with mixed
use development. There needs to be a synergistic development where residential, commercial and
industrial can all co-exist.
Commissioner Boyd felt that it was interesting that the addition of residences seems to bring
opposition.
Commissioner Kosusko stated that industry is highly regulated, and single family residences are
not.
Chairman Griggs asked for a vote. Commissioner Boyd, yes; Commissioner Dingfieid, yes;
Commissioner Kosusko, yes; Commissioner Moshay, yes; Chairman Griggs, yes. Motion
passes.
Flannln0 Commio*ion rnr. xj Auou'~r.;. 1, 2000 ?ao, 0 o~:/5
Commissioner Dinglield stated that she would like the project, as it annexes into the City of
Bremerton, to have their name changed to reflect more of a "Bremerton or Kitsap Lake"
identificmJon, it would help residences to steer away from the "Central Kitsap" concept.
Mr. Wyatt noted that Port Blakely Community has already raised this concern at a meeting last
week. The Planning staff and the legal office has also raised this concern. They had to develop one
name. It has been referred to as the Port Blakely joint planning area sab-area plan. Once they get a
project for the sub-area plan, they can call it whatever they want.
Mr. P~imer had provided material to the Commissioners that is introducing a new zone, MXD.
When the zone is introduced, it has a ripple effect in the other parts of the zoning ordinance. Mr.
Wyatt has shown them where the ripples are and how the new zone integrates into the rest of the
Bremerton Municipal Code.
Mr. St, Pierre stated that the Commissioners could hear the following information, but he
recommended that they should not take action on it, as it had not been noticed to the public.
Mr. Wyatt indicated that once the City Council, the County and Port Blakely finalize all the
documents pertaining to the comp plan and adoption of the sub-area plan, there are certain
provisions in the amendments that, in order to implement, you have to make amendments to the
zoning code. They looked at the various sections in the zoning code and the implications that the
passage of the amendments to the comp plan and the adoption ofthe sub-area plan would have.
There was not a singular zone in the existing code that allowed them to do a mixed use
development. They tried to create a logical zone. They expanded the language to enable the
visions of the Port Blakely sub-area plan to come to some kind of fruition in terms of the
development of the project itself. This zone enables them to do that.
C. Meeting: None.
D. Study Session: None.
V. Business Meeting
A. Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the July 18, 2000 meeting were approved as
presented.
B. Director's Report: Mr. Palmer passed out a revised "Project: Zoning Ordinance Rewrite
- Schedule of Events." The Mayor had talked with him regarding priorities. They would like to
see the zoning code more "user friendly." He feels the code is not in good organizational
condition. It is an ambitious undertaking to rewrite the zoning code, and it is not simple and not
done quickly. He recommended a panel committee to dral~ the ordinance. The work will be
done in DCD, with assistance from the legal office. He would like to have representatives from
City Council, Planning Commission, the technical community, the public at large, planning and
lesal staff. He foresees 9-10 members on the committee. He received one volunteer from the last
meeting and one possibility. He asked again if anyone else was interested in joining the committee.
~ Mr. Palmer would like to begin the committees on August 15"', then meeting every
other week. He stated that hopefully by February it would be put together to take to public
meetings (possibly later than February). He also has been working with a consultant for the
downtown area in regards to the City/County building.
Chairman Griggs indicated that he would be interested in being on the Committee.
Commissioner Kosusko stated that he could not commit to being full time on the committee, but
would act as a back-up. He also asked if Mr. Palmer had spoken to Mr. Hecker about being on
the committee.
Commissioner Dingfieid recommended contacting Mr. Bill Robinson, a former Planning
Commissioner member.
Mr. Palmer said that he has been in contact with an engineer. He would also like to contact
someone from the real estate field. This would be a great opportunity to see the code go together
and se~ what type of a community it could make.
C. Old Business:
D. New Business: None
VI. Adjournment
The meeting was adjoumed at 7:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Approved by:
F'lannin0 Commieeion rnt~j Au~3ue'C 1, 2000 ?a0e ~' of/5
ORDINANCE NO. 4722
AN ORDINANCE of the Bremerton City Council adopting (1) the Kitsap County Sub-
Area Plan, Port Blakely Joint Planning Area as a sub-area plan and amendment of the
Bremerton Comprehensive Plan under the Growth Management Act and as a comprehensive
plan for the Port Blakely property upon annexation pursuant to RCW 35.13.177 and .178, and
(2) Three-Party Agreement between the City, Kitsap County and Port Blakely Communities.
The City Council of Bremerton makes the following findings:
WHEREAS, Bremerton's Comprehensive Plan adopted under the Growth Management
Act, dated April 1995, calls for the City to participate in the planning for areas outside City
boundaries but within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) to ensure that City and County
Comprehensive Plans and related implementation policies and ordinances are compatible; and
WHEREAS, Kitsap County's Comprehensive Plan adopted under the Growth
Management Act, dated May 1998, calls for a joint planning effort between the City of
Bremerton and Kitsap County to determine the appropriateness of the Port Blakely property
described in the Sub-Area Plan ("Property") as part of the City's Urban Growth Area, to
consider annexation by the City of Bremerton and to provide specific guidance on future land
uses on the Property; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton and Kitsap County entered into a Memorandum of
Agreement in August 1998 to conduct a joint planning effort for the Port Blakely Property; and
WHEREAS, The City of Bremerton and Kitsap County developed a strategy to identify
issues and concerns that were to be addressed early on in the development of the Sub-Area
Plan for the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area (JPA), and a Three-Party Agreement, and agreed
to work in close consultation with the owners of the Property through Port Blakely
Communities, the Suquamish Tdbe and the Kitsap County Economic Development Council in
order to encourage participation of diverse interests; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton and Kitsap County have jointly provided
opportunities for public participation on the development of the Sub-Area Plan and Three-Party
Agreement for the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area and encouraged citizen involvement
1
Meetings and hearings have been conducted that have been publicized through two
newspapers, public postings and mailers distributed to all residents within a one-mile radius of
the site; and
WHEREAS, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review was facilitated by Kitsap
County, resulting in a threshold Determination of Significance which was revised by Kitsap
County and subsequently adopted and issued by the City of Bremerton on June 7, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan has been reviewed for
compliance with the Growth Management Act and the Goals and Policies stated in both the
City of Bremerton's and Kitsap County's Comprehensive Plans, and for compliance with
elements of a land use plan in advance of annexation under RCW 35.13.177; and
WHEREAS, the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan proposes the Port
Blakely Property be included in the City of Bremerton's Urban Growth Area; and
WHEREAS, the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan proposes mixed land
uses, including commercial, business, light industrial/manufacturing, retail, and residential, and
contains goals, policies and performance standards, and proposes annexation; and
WHEREAS, the Three-Party Agreement is an intedocal and development agreement
dealing with transportation, environmental requirements, and other implementation of the Port
Blakely JPA Sub-Area Plan and provides for the Port Blakely property to be annexed to the
City of Bremerton; and
WHEREAS, Kitsap County has prepared amendments to the Kitsap County
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance to implement the provisions contained in the Port
Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan; and
WHEREAS, Kitsap County will rezone the Port Btakely property outlined in the Port
Biakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan from the current County designation of "Urban
Reserve" to a "Transitional Zone", and which zoning will remain in effect until such a time as
the Port Blakely property is annexed into the City of Bremerton; as provided in the Three-Party
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of Kitsap County's Transition Zoning Classification developed
for the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area is to regulate development in an area
subject to annexation proceedings by the City of Bremerton on an interim basis until such time
as the area is within the City's jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, Kitsap County will amend the Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan to
include the Port Blakely property, outlined in the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Ama
Plan, within the Urban Growth Area for the City of Bremerton; and
WHEREAS, upon adoption of the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan, the
City of Bremerton will also adopt amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan to include the
Port Blakely property outlined in the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan within its
Urban Growth Area; and
WHEREAS, both the Bremerton Planning Commission and the Kitsap County Planning
Commission participated in a series of joint public study sessions and joint public hearings,
during which they considered the information provided in the staff reports and by interested
citizens, before formulating mutually agreeable recommendations for approval and adoption of
the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan at their joint meeting on April 11, 2000;
and
WHEREAS, both the City of Bremerton City Council and the Kitsap County Board of
Commissioners have conducted joint public hearings in which to consider oral and wdtten
testimony on the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan, which proposes a 440-acre
mixed-use project located in portions of Sections 7, 18, and 19, all within Township 24 North,
Range 1 East, Willamette Meridian, west of Kitsap Lake and east of Dickerson Creek in
Central Kitsap County; as well as proposed amendments to both the Kitsap County
Comprehensive Plan and Kitsap County zoning Ordinance necessary to implement the
provisions of the Plan and the Three-Party Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act (GMA) allows a city to amend its
comprehensive plan more often than once a year when the amendments involve the initial
adoption of a sub-area plan and the proposed adoption herein of the Port Blakely Joint
Planning Area Sub-Ama Plan is an initial adoption of a sub-area plan and, therefore, allowed
by the GMA; and
3
WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council, following the joint public hearing with the
Kitsap County Board of Commissioners, on August 29, 2000, voted to adopt the Port Blakely
Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan, and the Three-Party Agreement, now therefore:
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN THE FOLLOWING
Section 1. A. Sub-Area Plan. The Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan
Version 2.4, as approved by Kitsap County Commissioners on September 11, 2000, (Volumes
I and II), attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, is adopted as
a Sub-Area Plan and an amendment of the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the
Growth Management Act and also is adopted as a comprehensive plan for the Port Blakely
property upon annexation pursuant to the annexation provisions of RCW 35.13.177 and .178.
The Sub-Area Plan constitutes an amendment and supplementation of the applicable
elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the land use element, housing element,
capital facilities plan, utilities element and transportation element. The City's adopted Capital
Facilities Plan is modified to incorporate the capital facilities provisions of the Sub-Area Plan.
Furthermore, because the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan amends and is
incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan, the goals, policies, performance standards or other
provisions stated in the Sub-Area Plan, as the more recent and more specific plan for the area,
shall govern over any conflicting provisions of other portions of the Comprehensive Plan as it
applies to the Property.
B. Three-Party Agreement. The Three-Party Agreement between the
City, Kitsap County and Port Blakely Communities is approved and the Mayor is authorized to
sign an Agreement in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit B.
Section 2. To implement the provisions in the Sub-Area Plan for the Port Blakely
Joint Planning Area the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Bremer~on is hereby amended as
follows:
t (S~-ike-o~ is deleted text F3n~hl~_ ,,ndP_diqe iS additional text~
ELEMENT A, INTRODUCTION TO THE PLAN,
Within: 5. PERIODIC RFVIFW AND AMENDMENT
Text on Introduction - Page 6 is herein amended to read:
Following adoption of the Revised Comprehensive Plan and related
development regulations, the City shall continually monitor their effectiveness
and document needed amendments. A major review of the Plan will be
conducted at five-year intervals and annual amendments will be considered in
accordance with the process established in Element "K' (Implementation,
Consistency, and Concurrency Element). Am~nctm~nt.~ m~v h~_ m'tn_~iH~_r~_cl
mnr~_ fn~nll~_ntlv ~ ind~r ~.nm'd=al cJrm ~m.~t~nc~_~ n, ~tlin~.d in R~..W ~R 7n& I
ELEMENT C, PLANNING GOALS
Within: ~I3AL~tl IlRRAN ~ROWTH; C
Text on Planning Goals - Page I is herein amended to read:
Co Approve only those annexation requests that are for lands within the
designated Urban Growth Area,
C:.nmnr~h~_n.~iv~_ Plan I Rnrt I1~_ M~n that can be effectively served by ail
needed public facilities, and that will result in long-term benefits to the
community.
Within: ~C)AL ~'1 IIRRAN ~RC)WTH~ C
Text on Planning Goals - Page 2 is herein amended to add Paragraph E:
int~_n_r~tinn nf resirtentiR!_ c_.nmm~_rc, in! .n,.n.d in.d~ ~trinl
Within: ~c)A[~ FI~C)NOMIC 13FVFI CJPMI=NT: R.
Text on Planning Goals - Page 3 is herein amended to read:
B. Accent the roles of small businesses, lin_hr incfl,~trinl nr t~nhnnlnnicnl
d~_v~lnnrn~_nt (inc. h. ..Iclinn_ rniy~d ,m~ .... with r~_.~icl~_nfi~13.., tourism, health
services, education, and social and cultural activities in diversifying
Bremerton's economy.
ELEMENT E, LAND USE, CONTENTS (no page number)
Within: 11. SPECIFIC AREA PLANS
Text is herein amended to add, directly under "W-5PENDERGAST SPORTS COMPLEX":
W-R I::~RT RI AKI=:I Y .IOINT 131ANNIN~ ARICA ~11R..ARI:::A [31 AN 7R_~
ELEMENT E, LAND USE, MAPS & TABLES (no page number)
Within: SPECIFIC AREA PLANS
Text is herein amended to add, directly under 34/-5 PENDERGAST SPORTS COMPLEX"
W-Fi I::~RT RI AK'I=I Y .IOINT PI ANNNIN~ ARI::A RI IR-ARF:A PI AhJ 7R.~
ELEMENT E, LAND USE, SECTION 3. GOALS, POLICIES & THE VISION
FOR BREMERTON
Within: A PLANNING GOAl.C; nnd CITY POI ICIFR, Rfafe ~oal ~1_' IIRRAN
~ Ru.n.nnrfinn_ Pnlicie_~-
Text on Land Use - Page 2 is herein amended to add Policy (6)
/~ I=n.~r~_ that mndific_ntinn~ t.n th~_ cl~._~ionnt~_.d' I lrhnn ~rn~vth Ar~_n n.r
.n..nn~ynfinn ren. i~__~t~ are ha~=rt nn n~_~cl far ndclifinnnl Innd hq{1
nrnnn_~cl ~i~n
Within: A_ PLANNING GOAl .c:; and CITY POI ICIFR; Rtnte ~nal ltl2'_ RFI31JCF
~ Ru.n.nnrfin~_ Pnlici~_~-
Text on Land Use - Page 3 is herein amended to read:
(3) Assist Kitsap County in designating the Urban Growth Area large enough to
accommodate our J~,AI3;~,l;t~i~s=expected growth, but not so large that it will
allow inefficient Iow-density urban sprawl development.
(4) Work with Kitsap County to develop an Urban Growth Management
Agreement (UGMA), as required by the Countywide Planning Policies, to
better govern all lands within the Urban Growth Area nnd fh~ I lrhnn
Within: A_ PLANNING GOAl R and CITY POI ICII=R: Rtate ~nal ~fi_' I~OONOMIC
DFVFI CiPMI=NT: Ru.npnrting Palici~;'
Text on Land Use- Page 5 is herein amended to add Policy (8) and Policy (9).
(8) P:n~,~l~r~n_~_ fh~_ d~.v~_lnnm~_nt nf _~l~h-nr~_~ nl~n.~ fnr I lrh~n .Inint
Pl~nninn Am~_~ h~l' nn nmnn~d H~ ~v~il~hiliN nf
~i~ nd~ i~ ~n~nn~nn fn~lifi~ nnd n, lhli~ h~nfif
(~}) ~.nnn~_rnt~. wifh m_ninnnl n_nv~.mm~nf_~ nnd .~lt,J~ In~,nl nn~.n~.i~_~ n~ th~
l=r'~nnmic I'l~_v~_lnnm~nf I".m,nnil nf Kif_~nn ~nHnh~ (l=r'l~K~l tn
id~_nfifv !nncl i~_~. nmarl_~ nnci ~_mnlnvm~nf fr~_ntt~ fn ~.n.~r~_ n ~f~hl~
Within: c_ C:~NRI~TFNC:Y WITH RF:~I~N&I PLANR,
Text on Land Use - Page 7, top of page, is herein amended to include:
The primary regional guide to Bremerton's Comprehensive Plan is the Vision
2020 plan developed by the Puget Sound Regional Council. The Transportation
Element discusses that plan and the City's role as a "metropolitan center".
The "regional vision" is also embodied in the Multicounty Planning Policies,
which "Kitsap County shares with Pierce, King and Snohomish Counties. In
ndclifinn fh~_ ~ify_ nf Rr~_m~_rtnn will c..n.n~id~r r~_n~!.nnnl ~.c. nnnmi~, fnra~'.~_~t~ nncl
_~ttJdi~__~ _~llr. h ~_~ f..h.~ !.nclH_~tH~l I ~ncl ..M.a~-t An~l_v_$L~ .nr~=.nnr~_rl h_v th~. I:::c.nnnmi¢.
I~_v~_lnnm~_nt ~n, lnc!! Of I~it_~nn ~..nlln,.t~_ in .d.~.t~_rrninin_n Inncl I~_~_q r~_n. itir~_d tn
~.n_~l ~r~_ fhnf fh~. ~ifv nf Rr~rn~_rfnn nrnvid~__~ ndPm int~ nr~ng fnr nnfit-_innfc~d Innrt
(1) Concentrate development in urban areas to conserve resources.
(2) Promote urban growth in compact well-defined "centers" that are
connected by an efficient multimodal high capacity transportation
system.
(3) Create lively people-oriented areas with bicycle and pedestrian access.
(4) Allocate population and employment in a manner consistent with the
adopted regional vision.
(5) Strive for City-County cooperation in the annexation process to ensure
orderly growth of the City and coordination of utilities, roads and other
services.
(6) Support a countywide or regional siting process for essential public
facilities, as well as local regulations that can accommodate them.
(7) Phase public facilities and services to achieve the adopted vision.
?
(8) Promote fair and equal access to housing for all persons.
(9) Frame and. separate central places and urban growth areas by ¢reatign
F,,l;aatJ~;t networks of permanent urban and rural open spaces that may
include parks, recreation areas, critical areas and resource lands.
Ru.m.m~rfin_~ Pnlin.v_- Bremerton agfees-wi~ _~.ppnr~_~ the overall intent and
direclion of the Vision 2020 Plan and the Multicounty Planning Police~
R~_n_inn~l Fr'~nnmin Fnr~_r'.~_~t nmnnmd hv fha Fnnnnmirt. r3~v~.ln.nm~_rlt ~n,~nr'Jl
nf Kif_e.~n ~nHn.~.,~.~ and will continue to support regional planning and consistency
of plans and programs.
Within: F_ 13~Pl Ii ATI~N ~R(")WTI4.
Text on Land Use - Page 10, below ~4. Ahili~. fo Accept New ~rowfh;'; is herein amended to
add:
Pnrf Rlnk~_ly ._lnint Plnnn.!.n_n Ar~_n R,~h-Ar~.n Plnn'
Th~. Pnrf Rlnk~_l? .Ininf Pl~nnin_n Amn Rl~h-Ar~_n Plnn nrnnn~ t..hnt th.=.
r~__~id~ntinl c. nmnnn~nt nf fh~_ nrnnn_~t miy~d-ll~ d~v~lnnm~nf will
nnntnin .qnn _~innl _~-fnmilv ~_nuivnl~_nt ~nit_~ (i ~_ ~n tn I ?iql3 m~llti-fnmiiv nr
mn_~t !!k~_ly .for
nnnlllnfinn fnr fh~ port Rink,.Iv ~l~h-Ar~_n nf n.n.nrnyimnf~lv ? 724 .n~_n.nl.,~
~.l~.m~_nt _n.f fhm 1.q.qR C'.ifv nf Rr~m~.rtnn ~nmnr~_h~n.~iv~ Plnn~ Thi.~
~yi~fin? .nnm~lnfinn nllnr-~tinn nf ?13 nnn .n.~_n.nl~. r3~_fnil~ nnd mfinnnl~_ fnr
fbi; r~_nllnr;finn' ~m .fmind !_n pnrnn_rn.nh~ 1. .4 ~nd 4 R_ Rn(;~ nf fh~_ P.nd
The map on ~Land Use - Page 20", Proposed URBAN GROVVTH AREA, is herein amended to
include new wording in the Map title block:
I~_vi~_d' A~ ,n~ mt ?C}~)~
The map on "Land Use - Page 20", Proposed URBAN GROWTH AREA, is herein amended to
depict the Urban Growth Area boundary to encompass the area proposed within the Port
Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan (attached as Exhibit C - Proposed Urban Growth
Area Map).
ELEMENT E, LAND USE, 6. LAND USE RATIOS & DENSITIES
Within: A. NATICJNWIDF LAND lieF ~IIRVFY: (8) Cench~.~inn~: (e)
$
Text on I_and Use - Page 26, i~ hereby amended to read:
(8) CONCLLI~ION~
(e) If we use the current acres of land use per 1,000 population as a guide, it's
clear that we will need vast amounts of new commercial and industrial land
area to accommodate 20,000 more people. In fact, at a rate of 10 acres per
1,000, we would need 400 acres of new commercial and industrial
development - in addition to the 200 or more acres of new parkland. Th~
ndnntinn nf =t .nrn.nn_~=tl -~-h ~.~ th~. 4413 ;~c.r~. Pnrt Rl~k~lv .Ininf Plnnninn
.Am~ RHh-Amn Plnn (~uhir'J-t incJHri~__~ nnnmYJmnt~.lv 2(lf1 nrtr~_~ rlerli~,-~t~l t~
linhf r_nmm~.rr'Jnl :and ind~ L~frinilmnm ~r~h ~rinn ~.~__~1 nnd _~ ,h~m~ ,m~t I i~A
hn~,ndnr~ ~nnncinn nnd nnn~ynfinn ~n, dd nnrtinl'lv _~nfi_~fv th~ r~'ni~.d
n~=~ r~mm~mJnl nnd ind,,~frinl d~vmlnnm~nf innd ,~m ~nd nn~_~ihlv ~nnn~
~ddifinnnl nnrklnnd n~_~l_~ hn~m'i mn th~ ~hnv~ fnrm~ dn
ELEMENT E, LAND USE, 9. WEST BREMERTON PLAN,
Within: A_ W/F=RT RRI=MIFRTCIN ~I=(~TCJR DI=R~RIPTIC~N
Text on Land Use - Page 40-41 is herein amended to read:
The West Bremerton sector (nnt in. nh,clin, n~ th~_ pnrt Rlnk~ly .Inint Plnnninn_ Ar_p.n
.c:hJh-Ar~.n Plnn nrnnn.~nl~ is, by far, the largest of the three with 11,122 acres, or
about 76 percent of the City's total area. The urbanized portion accounts for
about one-fifth of the sector and includes all areas west of National Avenue and
Oyster Bay, the West Park and Jackson Park communities, the Naval Hospital,
NAD Park, the developing Pendergast Sports Complex, Kitsap Lake, the City's
sewage treatment plant, SR-3, and other points of interest. On the urban fringe
are operating gravel extraction operations and undeveloped hills.
The non-urbanized 4/5 of the West Sector consists mostly of City Utility-owned
forest lands, the City's Union River Watershed, Gold Mountain Golf Course, and
some smaller facilities. Also included in this sector, but physically separated, is
the Anderson Creek utility lands east of Gorst and south of Sinclair Inlet. In
December 1994, a portion of the Anderson Creek area (approximately 340
acres) was declared to be surplus utility land and has been designated for
industrial use on the Comprehensive Plan.
Ali lands were inventoried and existing uses and residential densities were
determined. Only lands within the City limits or in City ownership will be
addressed, with the understanding that Kitsap County will produce a
consistent and coordinated land use plan for all unincorporated areas.
Th~_ ndn.ntinn, nf .n n, ~h-nr~.n nlnn c. nnstit~ st~..~ .n..n nm~_ndm~_nt hq{1
_~,~.n.nl~.m~_ntntinn nf th~- I AND) I1~1:: FI F:MF:NT .n.f t..h!_~ c__nrn.nr~_h~n.~ive plnn In
th~_ C_~_~. nf fhe Pnrf Rinl(~ly .In!.n.t_ Plnnnin_q Ar~-n R~h-.ArR_R. p!~n. th~_ I ANI'3 I ISF
9
FI ;::MFNT i_~ aHrlm~ReH nrim:~rilv in .c1~tinn 4 '1 nf that R~lh-~rea nlan alnnn_ with
nthar nnrfinn.~ nffha Riih-Amn ~l~n Rllr"J'i ~l_~ .Clar'.finng I 2 I R ~nH I 4
[~llrinn fha ~nHr~ nf the anm,~l r-nmnmhlanRive nl~n mvi~w fnlln~nn ~nnfinn
nf ~v ~ll~m~ nl~n ~e nnnl~ t~ nmhi~ m~n~ ~tn fnlind h~min
Within: R_ OTHI=R I AND IJRI:: IRRiIFR
Text on Land Use - Page 44 is herein amended to add:
(3) pnrt RI;k;iv .Ininf Plannin_n Ama .cliJh-Am~ Pl;n' A
tleveln.nmm~r i.~ nmm,~R~'! fnr ~ I::~H Rlakelv Trna I=~m nmrmrtv
adjacent tn the nnrfhwa_~f I~.i~ l imif~ nf iqnamartnn The
inr'J~da.~ ner-~R_~arv and RJ~nna_et~d ;amenrlm.,antR tn fha C:nmnrehan_eive
Plain and imnlemenfinn davelnnmant renidatinn_~ inrJ~ lrtinn fa1 ~dnnfinn
tmn_eitinnal ~,n_.ninn_ h_v fha ~nl.!.n, fv_ fnr fha nmnia_riv. _ within fha
=and fh~ =lnnmvinn a thre- _~_-n~rtv ~nreemenf hetween KitR~in i'~.n~ntv the
~.ihr_ n.f Rram. artnn ant1 Pnrt Rl~ikal_v C:.nmm~mifia_~ The fhra~-n~rf_v_
pn_ream.,enf iR .a..n. intarlnc~! anti clevelnnmant ~n_raemanf dta_alinn_ with
nnne~rafin.n., tr~nRnnrf~finn a.n. yirnnment~l ram dramant.~ and
im.nlem.,la, ntatinn r~_nlfir~m~nf~ nf the .nrn.nn_~d_ RtJh-Area Plan The
~lake!y .Inin. t. .P.!~nnin_n Area .~h-Area Plan nrnnnRa_~ ~
h~t.qine~ nncl linht indl~Rtrial/mant ~f=ictt ~rinn hark r-.r'~nc, ent anrt rla. Ridenti~l
~miYecl-ilRe .nrcl__i_~_r~f wart nf .K_it.R~? I nke nnrt an~t nf ~iekar~nn C'..reak. !.n
C:.anfrR_l_ t(ifRn.n_. Th~_ .nrnnertv i.~ Inr~t~_cl in l lninr-nrnrqr~teH I~itRan C:nHntv
;nd de$in_n~tad ;-~ ~ ".lnint Plgnnin_n Ara~" (..IPA./ The ~llh-Area Pl;n
~.~t,m~_R f.h:af fh~..nrn.n~_rt~_ will h~. incl~;rleci in the I lri3;n ~rnwth Are~
(! I~A~ fnr fh~_ ~.itv nf Rr~_mertnn C)nr.e ;nnrnverl the nrnnertv
!!k~l_v he .nrn.._nn~erl fnr nnn~yntin.n. !.nth th~ l~.itv nf Rramertn.n...fnllnwi.nn_
~dn.nfinn of fha .c:;~h-Ar~=a Plnn fnr fha Pnrf Rl~k~ly .Ininf Plannin_n
ELEMENT E, LAND USE, 9. WEST BREMERTON PLAN,
Within: H. .¢;pFc~lFIC: ARI=A PLAN.el
Text on Land Use - Page 44 is herein amended to add, below "(W-5) Pendergast Sports
Complex":
(VV-R.). Port Rl~ke!_v .Inint Pl~nnin_n Ar~.~ .~l,h-Ar~.~ P!~n
ELEMENT E, LAND USE, 11. SPECIFIC AREA PLANS
iO
Within: B. ARFAR IN~! llnF:l~
Text on Land Use - Page 49 is herein amended to add, be/ow '(W-5) Pendergast Sports
Complex":
Pnrf Rhakalv .In!.nt Pl~nninn Am=a .c:hJh-Arma plnn
Within: Fi_ AFtFA_Ci INCLIlflFfl
SecSon is herein amended to add a new page, Land Use- Page 75a, with graphic
(attached as Exhibit D - W-6 Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-area Plan Vicinity
Map) and the following text:
W-R- Pt~RT RI AI4'I::I Y .ICIlNT PI ANNIki~ ARI::A ~11R..ARI:A PI AN
The nrnnn_ead ~am~ fnr fl ~t, ;m ~nnav~tinn tn Tha ~i~ nf Rmma~nn i~ ennfio~ ~n, )s
tn ~a N~w~t~m jL~Rdi~inn~l cJ~ li~f~ nf Rmma~nn ~nd i~ n~namllv -
Ink. fad ~a~f nf KitRnn I nka anef n/~i~amnn ~raak enllfh nf ~anhnc~
Hinhwnv nnd nn~ nf HainR I nka in fha ~anfml Kif~nn ~nl~n~ nmn nnd iR
In;~f~d~n nn~inn~ nf ~a~innR T; 1R and 1~ ~ wifhin T0wn~hi~ D4 Nn~h
Rnnna I ~a~t Willnmaff~ Ma~dinn in Kif~nn
Th~_ nr~_n nnn_~i_~f~ nf n.n.nrnzimnt~lv zt~{3 ~lnci~._v~_ln.n~d ~r~ i ~nd~r ~inou~r
n~hin ~nntrnl T~ prni~ ~mn hn~ ~nm~fim~ b~n mf~d tn
Kif~n I nk~ Ind~t~l P~ Prnnn~l ~nd ~l~n n~ fh~ ~ntml Kif~nn
Pn~ Pmnn~nl Th~ nm~ i~ ~rn~o~d fnr miy~d-~ d~v~lnnm~nt. . cnnf~inin0
Ii,hr cnmm~rci~l ~nd indH~fd~l/mnm ~fn~H~O ~ ~lnn~ ~fh m~id~nfinl
An ~n~iv~ ]ninf ~Rnnino ~ffnff cnnd~d Ry Kit~ ~n~nt~ ~itv nf
Rmmmffnn Kif~nn ~n, inty P~nnnmic ~evelnpm~n~ Co~,nnil Rl~n,~Rmi~h THh~
nnd t.~a DrnD~y n~r pn~ Rlnkalv ~q~lnifiaR hn~ nnnfHhi,t~d f0 th~
d~v~lnnm~nt nf fh~ PnH Rl~k~l~ .Inlet p!Rnni~o AmR ~h-Amn Plan
~. ~11~g~T ~T6TI I~.
Th~ Pn~ Risk. Iv .Inint Plnnnin~ Am~ R~,h-AmR p~R~ ~nd th~ ~ff~nd~nt
I1~ ~i~fH~ 7nniq~ cl~ific~tinn W~r~ ~dnnt~d ~ ~m~ndm~n~ fn th~
~nmnm~p~iv~ Plan ~nd ~ ~RR 7nniq~ ~nH~ (nm~nd~d fn ndd th~ M~
7nn~). m~n~cfiv~l~ in nmn~mfinn fnr ~nn~ynfinn nf fh~ Pn~ Rlnk~ly
Af ~nn~nfinn the UXR 7nne will ~ ~pli~d tO th~ Pm~ ~nd fh~ init!hi
~v~lnnm~nf A~m~m~nt fnr th~ Prn~ will h~ ~dnnt~d cnn~i~f~n~ with th~
R~h-Ar~n Plan After ~nn~z~tinn ~ M~ter Plan ~d~v~ln~e~f ~c~n~rio) with
~ccnm~n~in~ ~m~ndm~nt tn th~ R~v~ln~m~nt ~F~nt will h~ ~hmiU~d
r~vi~w h~ inf~m~f~d ~nHi~ ~ ~rnV~ded i~ th~ Thre~ P~ Aor~me~t~ ~nd fnr
nnnrnv~l hv th~ ~Jtv
ELEMENT E, I.AND USE, West Bremerton LAND USE PLAN
The Map Graphic (with no page number), located after Land Use - Page 76, depicting the
West BremeFton LAND USE PLAN is herein amended to include th~ wnrdinn h~/n.._.____.__.__.__~.w in the
Legend portion of the page, between INDUSTRIAL ;nd pi lRI I{".
I::A~II ITIl=~
RPFC. IAI PI IRPOfiF'
Mxrl MIXI::I3 I IRF 131RTI~I~..T
The Map Graphic (with no page number), located after Land Use - Page 76, depicting the
West Brarnerton LAND USE PLAN is herein amended to include on the Map Graphic porb'on of
the page, the proposed boundary of the Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan, and
the letters MXD superimposed on the area thereon depicted [~fl~c-h~d ~-~ l=~hihit I=_
Rr~_rn~rfnn I ANI') I1.~;I= PI AN m~.n.).
ELEMENT F, TRAN~PriRTATIC)N_ 1_ INTROIDIII~TION_
Within: R_ RTI InY AREA
Text on Transportation - Page I is herein amended to read:
The Transportation Element covers all areas of the City limits of Bremerton.
When if the city's Comprehensive Plan is expanded to include areas beyond the
city limits, such as a smaller Urban Growth Area of Mutual concern, ~
Pl~r~ninn Ar~.~ ~nh ~_~ th~_ Pnrl' Rl~k.e!_v R,~h-Am~ the Transportation Element
will be expanded to ensure adequate services to those areas as well. Some
aspects of this element will deal with transportation services that connect us
with other areas, but are not fully within the City, such as ferry and transit
services. Figure 1 shows the study area for the Transportation Element.
Th~. nclnnfinn n.f ~ .c:,,h. nr~.n .nigh. c0.n..~tih~t~ nn nm~_nHm~_nt
_~l~.n.n.!~_m~nfnfinn nf fha. TR. ANRP_CI.RT.A.T!('3N I::1 F:MI:NT nf thi_~ c. nmnr~_h~_n_~iv~_
nlnn In fha_ r'~_ n__f th~- pn.H. _Rlnk~_ly .Inint Plnnninn_ Ar~_n RHh-Ar~_n Plnn th~
:TRAN~PC3RTATICiN I::1 I:: .MF:NT ix nddr~__~_~d in R~ntinn .4 R nnd Tnhl~_ 1~ Of
thor. ~ ~h-~r~ nl~n
F)HHnn th~. ~'_n,,r~ nf th~ ~nnm~l c. nmnr~h~_n~iv~ nl~n r~vi~_uv fnllnwinn
nf ~n._v _~mh-~r~ nl~n th~ ~nnlic~hl~_.. t.~vt nr~nhi~'~ rn~n~ ~_tc. fn~mncl h~rpin
.~hnll h~ ~ncl~t~cl tn_ r~-fl~-c-ted_ f..h.~ ~dn.nt~_ri-'rR'ANRPCiR:I'ATIF3N' I:1 I::MI:NT !n
f_h~f $~ ~h-nr~.~ .nl~n
W'rb~in: D. ~oAI .~ pt'ti I(~IFR ANI~ THF VI~I~N I::~R RI~I=MF:RTON, (~) R~h~finn~hin
tO F:xi~Nnn Plans & Pnlini~_~
Text on Transportation - Page 7 is herein amended to include
I:)nrt Ricks_iv .Inint Pl~nnin? Am~ _~h-Am~ Pl~q
ELEMENT G, HnttRtN~ t_ INTRnl311CTI{'3N
Text on HOUSING - Page I and 2 is herein amended to read:
This Housing Element has been developed in accordance with the Growth
management Act (GMA) to address the housing needs of the City of Bremerton. It
represents the community's policy plan for the next 20 years. The GMA requires:
A housing element recognizing the vitality and character of established
residential neighborhoods that:
(a) Includes an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing
needs;
(b) Includes a statement of goals, policies and objectives for the
preservation, improvement, and development of housing;
(c) Identifies sufficient land for housing, including, but not limited to,
govemment-assisted housing, housing for Iow-income families,
manufactured housing, multifamily housing, and group homes and foster
care facilities; and
(d) Makes adequate provisions for existing and projected needs of
economic segments of the community.
The Housing Element has also been developed in accordance with adopted Kitsap
County-wide Planning Policy, and has been integrated with all other planning elements
to ensure consistency throughout the comprehensive plan.
The Housing Element specifically considers the condition of the existing housing stock;
the cause, scope, and nature of any housing problems; and the provision of a variety of
housing types to match the lifestyles and economic needs of the community. This
element examines special housing needs, such as Iow-and moderate-income family
housing, foster care facilities, group homes, manufactured homes, government-
supported housing, and historically significant housing.
The Housing Element includes the following sections:
¥?
1. INTRODUCTION
2. GOALS, POLICIES, AND STRATEGIES
3. EXISTING HOUSING CONDITIONS
4. FUTURE HOUSING NEEDS
Additional background information is compiled in Appendix G of the Comprehensive
P~an.
The City's development regulations (zoning, building codes, etc.) establish how the
development and construction of housing and other development will take place. The
Housing Element establishes both the long-term and short-term policies to meet the
community's housing needs and achieve community goals. The Housing Plan in this
element will guide decision making to achieve community goals as articulated in the
Vision for Bremerton (Element B).
ThA ~Hnnfinn nf ~ .~l ih-~r~_~ nl~n t-z3n~fih mf~_~ ~n ~mn~lm~_nf ~ncl _~m mnni~_mAnf~finn nf fha_
HI~Jl I~11~'~ FI FMFNT nf fhi_~ ~nmnmh~_n.{iv~_ nlnn In fh~_ t-~_~_ nf f~ Pnrf Rlnk~tv .tnint
Pl~nninn Ar~ ~l~h-Am~ PI=an fha. HCII IRIN~ FI FMI=NT i_~ ~clrlmc=~_d in R~cfinn.~ I ~
~llrin? ~n~ nnHr~ nf th~ .~nn~lnl nnmnr~_h~n_~iv~_ ninn r~vil~..~ fn|lnwinn~ nrln.nfinn nf
ELEMENT G, H
Within: D. ~ND AVAI~BILI~ (3) Addifinnnl Re~id~ntinl l nnd ll~e N~d~
Te~ on Housing - Page 41 is a~nded heroin to mad:
T~e ~i~ hn~ d~i~nnf~d n pnHinn nf it~ ~MA pnm~lntinn nllncnfinn fnr miy~d-
,l~ hn, i~inn ~0 fO~t~r nnd ~Hp~O~ inh nr~nfinn nnH ~opnmi~ d~v~nnm~nf In
th~ I~R ~nmnr~h~n~iv~ Plan fnllr cnmm~rninl nr~n~ wmr~ H~i0n~in~ fnr
~iy~H-H~ hnu~in~ H~v~r pr~di~d ~llnnnfinn~ fnr thi~ ~n~ nf jnh-
m~nnn~ hmminn nr~ nnf h~inn ~nti~d hv mn~f Hnmnnd A~ H~Hh~H in
r~ionnl mn~f ~yi~f~ fnr InnH ~v~np~nf prnj-~, th~f inchiHn miyR~
r~i~nfi~l cnmm~rcJnl nnd linhf indl~nl/mnm Erich ~Hnn InnH ~l~c d~inn~
~ifhin
~0inn
nnly hnl~f~m Intel ffnnnnmi~ ~fh
~nn0 t~m ~c~nnmin h~n~fif~ ,n~ n re~lf nf nffm~fin~ h~l~in~ ~n~
~mnlnv~ d~ir~ fn
tn nrnmnf~ ~cnnnmin H~v~ln~m~nt hy nff~Hnn miy~H-,m~ d~v~lnn~nt~ Iwhic~
l~nH will h~ ~vnh~nt~H frnm fim~ fn time ~q fi. drill th~ n~d for miy~H-u~e ~nt~inn
tn nrnmnt~_ nnd _~ll.n.nnrf ~_~.nnnrni~_' d~_v~lnnm~nt
mn.erst nl=wm~l nainhhnrhnnd.~ t-_nnf~ininn =. ra=.~nn=.hla mir nf r.nmrnami=.l =,pa
linht ind~ld~llm~m'rfar~h trinn t ~_~__~ and hm ~_~inn R~mtth miYm'l~,¢:a rfla~u~lnnm~_nt
i.~ ~flnnflcwt'in the Pnfl Rickey .Inint Pl~n~nn
in ~n~ ~ R I 4 ~nd Afl ~fl (~1 nf fhnf ~m~r~ nlan
~m~m,m~ mm~ m~ =mmm~m~m~mmmmm~ a~m~ mmi~m~ma~mmmm~ u~mlt=, sho~
~ m~ufa=r~ home developme~ n~ds by 48 uni~is ne~ ~n be
~t undm zoning o~inan~ provisions whi~ a)mow manufa~red home
deve~pmen~ in four residenUal zones as Planned Un~ Developments (PUDs).
~able ~19)
ELEMENT H, C::APlTAL I=A~II ITIF~: P~rt I nf ? -- C:leifal Pacilitie_s plan;
1. INTerim I~:TICiN: H_ I~FVI=I CjPMI=NT ANI'J AMI=NDMI=NT PROCFR-~
Text on Capital Facilities Plan- Page 8 and 9 is herein amended to include:
The CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT was developed by the City of Bremerton
Department of Community Development staff with the assistance of numerous
citizens and city staff. A parks and Recreation Capital Facilities Plan
Subcommittee, consisting 'of Planning Commission and Parks and recreation
Commission members, along with Parks & Recreation Department staff, helped
develop parks-related material in Spdng 1993. The Bremerton Planning
Commission and City Council held several study sessions and public hearings
before the Comprehensive Plan was finally adopted in Apdi 1995.
The Capital Facilities Plan should be periodically reviewed concerning its
content. Changing conditions and needs may result in amendments. Proposed
amendments may include modification, additions or deletions to the policies or
implementation strategies.
Proposed amendments to the plan will receive detailed review by the Planning
Commission, and public hearing(s) will be held to solicit public comment. The
Commission will consider any such comments and make a formal
recommendation to the City Council. The Council will further review the
proposal, hold a public hearing for public comments, make modifications if
necessary, and adopt the proposed amendments as part of the Capital Facilities
Plan. Revisions to the Capital FaciTities Plan may occur, at most, once a year;
e_~rt~.nt fh=.t ~m~nclm~_nt.~ ma_v h~ r-_nn~icl~r~_cl rnnr~_ fr~_n.H~_n, tl_v ~,nd~.r th.~ ~n~i~l
c. ircHm_~tnnr'-~__~ ~m~m~_rlt~_d Jn Rr.W RR7nA 'l_'~n and must be considered
concurrently with any other amendments proposed to the Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan. '
Th. ~rlnntinn nf n ~,,h-~r~_a nl~n c. nn_~tit, u.?._~ nn ~rn~.ndrn~.nt ~ncl
$..n.nl~.m~_.nt~tinn of t_h_~_ ~APlTAI FA~II ITIF:.c:; PI AN J=l FMF=NT .n.f thi~
c_nm.nr~_h~_n_~iv~ .nigh !n th~_ c~_~. of t.h.~ Port RI~.k~.I_v ._l_ni~t_ p!~nninn_ Arvn
5'/
Ar~a PI=an th~_ CAPITAl F.A~.II ITIF:R PI A~ I::1 I:MI:NT i_~ =adrtr~_~_~H in R~r:fi.np
.=i 13 nf fl'mt _~,h-~am=a nhan
r31~rin_n fha m~m~ nf fh~ ~annH=at r'~nmnr~.hm-t~iv~, nl~n r~vie?_ fnllnu~inn =aclnnfinn
nf ~nv ~ui'~am=a hi=an th~ =annli~'_,~hl~ t~t nmnhk'_~ m~a_n_~ ~f~ fm~nd h~r~.in
.e, hail ~a t~r~i~a=~! tn mfl~f th~.: ~.APITAI FA~Ii iTII:R PI AN i:1 I::MI::NT ~a~lnnfp. d
in that eJ ~h-~r~:a ?bari
Within: 3. ~AIR ANI~ PCIIlC:IFR I~_ AnF:i::}IIATF: PlIRI I~ I=AC:I[ITII=.C: AND
Text on Capital Facilities Plan - Page 16 is herein amended to read:
7. ~ Foster orderly, desirable growth in appropriate locations at
a rate consistent with nrnia~,~ted band H_~ neacl~ n_e ~ ra_~dt nf =a~lnnfinn nf
R~h-Am~a Pl~an_.~.~__._~ citizen desires and the provisions of adequate services
and facilities..
ELEMENT H, CAPITAL FACILITII=R, Part 2 of 2: Capital Facilities Program (CFP),
1. INTRODUCTION
Within: ~_ I~VI~LC)PM~NT ANI:) AMFNI::}MFNT
Text on Capital Facilities Program (CFP) - Page 7 is herein amended to read and include:
The CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT was developed by the City of Bremerton
Department of Community Development staff with the assistance of numerous
citizens and city staff. A parks and Recreation Capital Facilities Plan
Subcommittee, consisting of Planning Commission and Parks and recreation
Commission members, along with Parks & Recreation Department staff, helped
develop parks-related matedal in Spdng 1993. The Bremerton Planning
Commission Citizen Advisory Committee worked on the draft element during
1994. Finally, the Planning-Commission and City Council held several study
sessions and public hearings before the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in
April 1995.
The Capital Facilities Program will be reviewed at least biennially concerning its
content. The objectives and tasks wilt be reviewed to determine what has been
accomplished, and the strategies and activities of the Capital Facilities Plan and
Utility Element will be reviewed to determine what future objectives should be
undertaken. Tasks will then be formulated for the chosen objectives.
Proposed amendments to the program will receive detailed review by the
Planning Commission, and public hearing(s) will be held to solicit public
comment. The Commission will consider any such comments and make a
formal recommendation to the City Council. The Council will further review the
proposal, hold a public headng for public comments, make modifications if
necessary, and adopt the proposed amendments as part of the Capital Facilities
Program. Revisions to the CFP may occur, at most, once a year;.e~,~,aL.tj~
:~mendrrm~f~ m~v h~ r'~n_~ider~ mmv_ fr~t~nflv
r'Jm~mm~n_r~__~ m'~l~m~_r~! in R~W '.~713A 'IRI~ and must be considered
concurrently with any other amendments proposed to the Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan.
The ~'tnnfinn nf =a ~ ~h-:are:~ nl~n ~'.nn~fih tree ::In ..'lmendme~'lf nnd
~mnrmhaneive nl~n In the r-~ea nf ~ ~Hh-em~ nl~n
.Inint Pbanninn Ama R,h-Am~ Plan the ~API~'AI FA~II ITIF:R
F:I I=MF:NT i_e addre_~_~ed in Rm~finn fi [1 nf that _~,h-~na_~ .nl~q
rJ, rin? ~ r~Hr~e.nf the ~nn~l c~mnreh~n.~ive ni~n revi~ fnlln~nn adnnfinn
nf ~nv mmh-~na~ nl~n the annli~hle f~_-zt nr~nhie_~ m~n_~ et~. fro,nd h~na_in
.~h~ll ~ ~nd~tm.i tn refle~f th~'C:APlTAI FAI~.II ITII=R PI AN FI F:blI=KIT ~cinnf~.d
in thaf _~Hh-are~ nl~n
ELEMENT I, UTILITIES, 1. INTRODUCTION
Text on UTILITIES - Page I and 2 is herein amended to read:
This Utilities Element has been developed in accordance with Section
36.70A.070 of the Growth Management Act (GMA) to address the utility services
in the City of Bremerton and adjacent urban growth area.
The GMA requires:
A ub'lities element consisting of the general location, proposed location,
and capacity of all existing and proposed utilities, including, but not
limited to, electrical lines, telecommunication lines, and natural gas lines.
The' Utilities Element represents the community's policy plan for growth over the
next 20 years. The element describes how the goals in the other plan elements
will be implemented through utility policies and regulations, and is an important
element in implementing the comprehensive plan.
The Utilities Element has also been developed in accordance with adopted
Kitsap County-wide Planning Policy, and has been .integrated-with all other
planning elements to ensure consistency throughout the comprehensive plan.
The Utilities Element specifically considers the general location, proposed
location, and capacity of all existing and proposed utilities. The element also
identifies general utility corridors.
The Utilities Element Includes:
· INTRODUCTION
· GOALS AND POLICIES
· INVENTORY, ANALYSIS AND FUTURE NEEDS
The Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundary was selected in order to ensure that
urban services will be available to'all development. This includes the provision
of utility facilities. The City recognizes that planning for utilities is the primary
responsibility of the utility providers. However, the City will incorporate plans
prepared by the providers into its comprehensive planning efforts in order to
identify ways of improving the quality and delivery of services provided in the
City and its designated urban growth area boundary. All development requiring
urban services will be located in the UGA, and will have these services
extended to them in a timely and financially feasible manner. The Utility Plan in
this element will guide decision making to achieve the community goals as
articulated in the Vision forBremerton (Element B).
Th~_ :=~lnnfinn nf n ~lsh-nre. R nlnn r'~n_~tifi ~f~ nn ~mandm~nt nr~rl
_eHnnl~manf"~finn nf fha I ITII ITII:=.c: I::i I:=UI=NT nf thi_~ nnmnmhan.~iv~, nlnn In th.~.
r'~.~a nf fha Pnrf Rlnk~iv .Inint Plnnninn Aran Rllh-Aran I~l~n fh~_ IITII ITII::R
r)Hrin_n fh~. ~.n~r_~_ nf th~ nnnllnl c. nm.nr~h~n.~iva .nlnn r~vi~_w fnlln~inn nclnnfinn
_~h:~il ha Hnrl~f_erl tn r~_fl~_rff fha_ IJTII ITII=R ~ F=MF::NT nd~nf~_cl in fh~t ~,h-~rRn
nlnn
ELEMENT J, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Within: ~_ F::NIFR~Y I~ONRFRVATION ~OAI ~ AN[~ PC)LI~IF:~ ~
~, A-l,
Text on Environmental Mgmt. - Page 14 is herein amended to read:
A-1 Encourage integration of housing and commercial/office uses in the
Central Business District, the Manette Business District, the Charleston
Business District, fha Pnrf Rl~ka!~v .Inint pl~nnin, n_ Ar~ .¢::h~h-Ar~.~ and
other locations' determined to be suitable for mixed Jand use
Text on Environmental Mgmt. - Page 14 is herein amended to read:
A-3 Adopt mixed use distdcLzoning c.l~_~ific, ntin~ that will encourage a mix of
residential, commercial, and/or office uses, li_nht in_d.u_~tri~l and li_n. ht- m~nt~f~ct.H_n.n__ in .nrn.nn~d
R~_Tnna.~. ~ ~h-Ar~_~ Pl~n_~ nr ~nnexat.!nn.$ }f1-k~J-loca~3t~s.
ELEMENT K, IMPLEMENTATION, CONSISTENCY & CONCURRENCY
VVithJn: 2. AMFNI~IN~ I'HI= CI~MPRI~HFNRIVF PLAN:.B_ Timing nf gmentlmenf~;
Text on Implementation- Page 1, Paragraph(I) is herein amended to read:
(1) The Comprehensive Plan shall be amended no more frequently than
once per calendar year ~.Yt-~nf. thief nm~_n~lm~nt~ mmv_ h~_
mnm fremJ~ntlv tinder _~nm~.i=al ~,~irmlm_~t~nc.~_~ m'~llmer~tm, I irt I~W
.-~ '/n,~ ~ ~n. That process shall be scheduled so that any changes that
have financial implications can be included Jn the CJbj's fall buclget
process. The amendment process shall generally conform to the
following schedule:
W'f[hin: 2. AMI=NI31N~ THI= I~t'3MPRI=HI=N~IVF*Pl AN. B- Timing_ ~f anl~_nttment~_'
Text on Implementation - Page 2, Paragraph (2) is herein amended to read:
(2) All amendment proposals shall be considered concurrently (in a
package) L!.nl~¢= nn ~m~ndm~nf nrnnn.~nl i_~ _~hmiff~cl ~ncl~r ~n~_c. inl
~.ir~J~m~t~nc~__~ ~_n~m~_r:~f~d in I~W AR 713A 1RI3 by the Planning
Commission and the City Council so that their cumulative effects can be
ascertained.
Within: 2_ AMI=NI31N~ THF ~OMRI=HI=NRIVF~ PI AN, R_ Timinn_ nf ~rrtendm~_nf_~'.
Text on Implemehtation - Page 2 is herein amended to add Paragraph (4):
(4) Am~nclm~_nt .nrn.nn_~:~l_~ m~_v h~..~,hmiff~_d ~snci~_r _~.n~_~i~l ~-irc-~mst_g_n_c_P.$
~_m~m~.r~t~d in I~W .'~R 71'!A 'IRI3 inch~rfin_n'
(.a) The initial acln.ntinn nf
(h~ Adcmfinn nr nrn~ndrn~nf nf ~ ~hnr~lin~_ rn~t~r nigh'
~ .Am~_ndm~.nf elf fha_ ~..n.nifnl F.nc. iliti~_.~ Fl~_m~nf nf ~ ~nrnnr~h~n~iv~_
Plan fhnt ncc.~ ~r~ c. nnm ~rr~.ntl_v with th~ ~cln.ntinn nr ~rn~_ndrn~_nt nf th~
Within: 3. IMPl i=MI=NTATI~N
Text is on bottom of Implementation- Page 3 is herein amended to add Policy (4) & Policy (5):
whit-J~ will h~ irnnl~_m~nf~cl hv the r)~_v~lnnm~nt Anr~_~rn~_nt nrnvi~inn_~ nf
RMC'. 21 CI?.c:IcICI ~ncl which will inc. h~d~_ nrnvi~inn_~ fnr rni~_cl
cl~_v~_ln.nrn~nt incJHrfinn_ r~..~idanfi~l c. nmm~_rc.i~l_ light inH~,.~frinl n.n_d__
mnmsf~c.f, ~rinn I~nct
If ~nnnx~finn rlnn.~ nnt n~-~ulr nf i_~ nn~tnnn~_d fnr _~nm~_ ne_rind nf tim~ th~_
nm~ nmr~i f~r ~nnn~rnfinn uuill mmnin ~uifhin th~ i~rL~dirffinnnl r'J~nfrnl
nf th~ Rm ~ntv'.~ ~,nninn r~n_~_cifi~J~tinn
Within: 4. IIRRAN ~R~I~VTH P~LI~IF~: D_.ANNF~XATI~N PC)I I~.IFR_ Ann~_x=tinn
Text on Implementation - Page 10 is herein amended to read:
It is the policy of the City of Bremerton to promote planned community
growth through annexation within our Urban Growth Area l;;l[..1~aJD..al3
~adnnha~d. Ininf Pl~nninn Amn inHi ir'fl=r'! ~uifhin th~ I Irhnn ('4m,u~'h Ar~,
Section 3. The territory described and further depicted in the Port Blakely Joint
Planning Area Sub-Area Plan, Version .... dated ,2000, as Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated by reference herein, shall be and constitute a part of the Urban
Growth Area of the City of Bremerton and is ir~cluded as such in the City's Comprehensive
Plan as hereby amended.
Section4. This ordinance shall take effect ten days following passage and
publication. The City Clerk shall certify--this adoption ordinance to the Kitsap County
Commissioners upon the ordinance effective date.
APPROVED by the City Council on the first reading this ~ day of ,2000.
PASSED by the City Council of Bmmerton this ~ day of ,2000.
Carol Arends, Council President
APPROVED this __ day of ,2000.
Lynn S. Horton, Mayor
2O
ATTEST:
Kalhleen McCiuskey, City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 4722
LIST OF ITS
Exhibit A The Kitsap County Sub-Area Plan, Port Blakely Joint Planning Area
Volume I, Version 2.4
(as approved by Kitsap County Commissioners on September 11, 2000)
Volume 1I, Version 2.4
(as approved by Kitsap County Commissioners on September 11, 2000)
Exhibit B THREE-PARTY AGREF~MENT
Version date: September 12, 2000
Exhibit C Proposed Urban Growth Area Map
Amended to reflect Port Blakely Joint Planning Area Sub-Area Plan
Exhibit D Proposed additional page: Land Use - Page 75a, entitled:
W-6: PORT BLAKELY JOINT PLANNING AREA SUB-AREA PLAN
Exhibit E West Bremerton LAND USE PLAN Map
Amended to reflect UGA boundary revision depicting Port Blakely Joint
Planning Area Sub-Area.Plan as a MXD zone classification, and
amending the Legend to include a SPECIAL PURPOSE classification
with a MXD - MIXED USE DISTRICT zone.