Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/26/00 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA APRIL 26, 2000 1. CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M. A. General Council Business 2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Invocation ~. 3. CONSENT AGENDA There are no Consent Agenda items this week. 4. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS 5. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS 6. MAYOR'S REPORT 7. LEGISLATIVE REPORT 6. PUBLIC RECOGNITION - (Comments limited to 3-minutes) 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Professional Services Agreement for Combined Sewer Overflow Treatment Facility (#AB00-103) 10. ORDINANCES A. Ordinance No. 4702 (Second Reading) Amending Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 2.76.500 Regarding Contract Amendments and Change Orders (#AB00-101) 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6:00 P,M. OR LATER A. Public Hearing and Ordinance (First Reading), amending the 1999 Comprehensive Plan (#AB00-104) 12. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING AGENDA BII BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SLrlM-ECT: FOR AGENDA OF: April 26, 2000 Professional Services Agreemem for Combined Sewer ~ow ORIGINATING DEtrr: Public Works and Utilities Tre~mt Facility ORIGINATOP< Wastew~___~ Manal~ DATE SUBMrrTED: April 18~ 2000 Director, Public Works/Utilities' t/~~~,~. ~ l~r ~ ~. ~ Services Agreeme~ City Treasurer Council Budget & Finance Commieae .... " ENDORS _EMI~NT. '~_ . ~IF~ORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMrYrAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The comprehensive combined sewer overflow (CSO) reductien plan for East Bremerton includes a CSO treatmem ihcility. The CSO treatmem option is the most cost-effective recommen&a!q_'on based on a pilot test completed in December 1999. In addition, the CSO trea~,nent facility will improve Port Washington Narrows water quality, provide emergency backup treatm~t potential for maintenance and repair ofpump stations and collection system infiast~. CSO treatment is an element ofthe CSO control measures for the Pine Road Basra that must be completed in 2000 per the PSA Consent Decree. The Department of Public Works and Lkilifies seeks approval from the City Council for a Professional Services Agreement for design and consm:cticn management services for the CTF with Camp Dresser and McKee Inc. (CDM) in an amount not to exceed $731,000. CDM was selected as the 8. RECOMMENDATION: ~e.'*~_~_ C~, Ce,,,o;1 ~pprove ~e Pro~si~l Se~ ~~ ~ ~e C~ of Br~e~ ~d C~ ~r McK~ Mc. for ~i~ ~d ~~ ~~ se~ ~r a CSO T~ii~ Fa~ ~ ~ ~o~ n~ m ex~ $731,000 ~d a~om &e ~yor to ex~ &e ~e. 9. ~SPONS~LE O~IC~: D~r PW~U ~ORCE~ O~C~: N/A E~~ON DA~: ~~ DA~: 10. NO~ OFA~ON P~LED T~LED ~PRO~D DIS~PRO~D CO~C~ D~C~ DA~: 11. AG~A B~L NO: ~0 - ~ 0~ 1 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: ~ implementation of the CSO Reduction Plan and compliance with the PSA ~ Increase liability of City should CSOs discharge to Puget Sound and violate water quality standards for Port Washington Narrows. Delay loan applications for CSO reduction funding 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITgF~q~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHF. R RF-qOURCF~;: STAFFING- Mahrumance requh-ements will rea-~ain tho same for the next two years and increase with age. BUDGET- The Pine Road CSO reduction project is included in the 2000 budge~ Financing is provided by a Public Works Trust Fund loan. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES CSO Treatment (ballasted sedimentation) pilot test conducted in December 1999. AGENDABL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Pine Road CSO Reduction Facility The City of Bremerton ("City") and Camp Dresser & McKee Incorporated ("Contractor"), referred to collectively as the "Parties," enter into the following Agreement for professional services: I. Scope: The Contractor will perform the services set out in the Scope of Work, which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference. The Scope of Work may be modified only pursuant to Section VI. D. of this Agreement. If the Scope of Work provides for unspecified additional services the City may request, such services shall only be performed upon the express, written request of the City. II. Term: This Agreement commences May 1, 2000 and terminates on December 31, 2001 unless another date is substituted pursuant to Sections VI. D. or VIII. III. Compensation: In consideration of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, the City shall pay Contractor in an amount not to exceed $731,000. Contractor's charges and bills shall conform to the fee schedule attached and incorporated herein by this reference. The Contractor shall submit regular billing statements describing services rendered and the amount charged for each service. The descriptions shall conform to and fall within the categories set out in the Scope of Work. Upon receipt of a conforming billing statement, the City shall promptly process payment. Contractor shall not perform work beyond the Scope of Work, nor shall be compensated for such work, unless the Scope of Work or amount of compensation is modified pursuant to this Agreement. Additional services shall be compensated for only if requested pursuant to Section I and shall be compensated as set out in the request or, if the request does not so provide, as set out in the attached fee schedule. If a billing statement does not conform to this Agreement, the City may withhold payment until the statement is brought into compliance. Such withholding does not relieve Contractor of its obligations under this Agreement. IV. Relationship of Parties: Contractor is skilled in the matters addressed in the Scope of Work and is performing independent functions and responsibilities within its field of expertise. Contractor and its personnel are independent contractors and not employees of the City. Contractor and its personnel have no authority to bind the City or to control the City's employees and other contractors. As an independent contractor, Contractor is responsible for its own management. The City's administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall not be deemed an exercise of managerial control over Contractor or its personnel. Bremerton/[Consultant] [Project Name] Page[ ]of[ ] ~.~ As an independent contractor, Contractor is responsible for payment of all taxes and licensing fees necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement. These taxes and fees include but are not limited to State industrial insurance, B&O, State professional licensing, and City business licensing. If any taxes or fees due the City have been declared delinquent, the City may withhold the delinquent amount, plus any additional charges arising from the delinquency, fi:om any payments due Contractor. V. Insurance and Hold Harmless: Prior to the commencement date of this Agreemem, Contractor shall provide Certificates of Insurance to the City's Risk Manager verifying the following coverage: 1) a professional liability policy ("E&O") providing coverage of $1,000,000 for errors and omissions committed by Contractor while performing its obligations under this Agreement, and 2) a comprehensive general liability ("CGL") policy providing coverage of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and including bodily injury and property damage, if applicable. The CGL shall name the City as an additional insured. Both policies shall remain in full force and effect, and provide coverage for the full term of this Agreement. The City Risk Manager may authorize, in writing, a lesser amount of insurance. Inferrer shall provide the Risk Manager with 30 days' written notice of any cancellation or change of coverage of either policy. Contractor shall be solely responsible for its personnel subcontractors and agents in the performance of work under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials and employees fi:om and against all liability, loss, damages, and expenses, including costs and attorneys' fees, resulting fi:om actions, claims, and lawsuits to the extent arising or alleged to have arisen, in whole or in part, out of or in consequence of the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Contractor, its employees, its subcontractors, its agents, or its assigns in the performance of this Agreemem. The City and Contractor have specifically negotiated Comractor's waiver of its immunity under Title 51 RCW, which is hereby waived for purposes of Contractor's indemnification and hold harmless of the City, including the duty to defend. This provision shall be inapplicable to the extem such action, claim, or lawsuit is judicially found to arise from the acts or failures to act of the City. VI. General Conditions: A. Reports and Information: When requested by the City, Contractor shall furnish periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement. The repons and documents shall be furnished in the time and form requested. Contractor shall maintain accounting records in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to substantiate all billed amounts. B. Emire Agreement: This Agreemem and its Exhibits constitutes the entire agreemem between the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or omi, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement. C. Severability: Should any part of this Agreement be found void, the balance of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Bremerton/[Consultant] [Project Name] Page [ ] of[ D. Modification: This Agreement may only be modified by written instrmnent signed by both Parties. E. Notices: Notices shall be in writing and delivered to the following addresses: City Address Contractor Address City of Bremerton Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 239 4th Street 11811 NE 1~t Street Suite 201 Bremerton, Wa 98337 Bellevue, Washington 98005 F. Waiver: Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of that provision. Waiver of any right or power arising out of this Agreement shall not be deemed waiver of any other right or power. G. Compliance with Laws: Contractor shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws in performing its obligations under this Agreement. H. Choice of Law and Venue: This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Washington. Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Kitsap County Superior Court. I. Attorneys' Fees: The substantially prevailing Party in any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs. VII. Nondiscrimination: Contractor shall not discriminate in employment or services to the public on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, or disability, except for employment actions based on bona fide occupational qualification. VIII. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated, at will, by either Party upon 30 days' notice to the other Party. This Agreement may be immediately terminated for cause by a Party if the other Party substantially fails to perform through no fault of the terminating Party, and the non-performing Party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within five days of the terminating Party's sending notice to the non-performing Party. Upon termination the City will be entitled to reports showing the status of all items listed in the Scope of Work current through the termination date. CITY OF BREMERTON CONTRACTOR By: By: its: its: Approved as to form: By: Bremerton/[Consultant] [Project Name] Page[ ]of[ ] 5 Exhibit A SCOPE OF WORK For Pine Road Basin CSO Reduction Facility OBJECTIVES The objective of this contract is to facilitate the construction of the Pine Road Basin Combined Sewer Overflow (C_SO) Treatment Facility at the Manette Treatment Plant site adjacent to Lions Community Park. The new facility will treat approximately 10 mgd peak CSO flow utilizing short term storage, high rate clarification, ultraviolet disinfection and discharge through an existing ouffall. The scope of this work includes program planning and permitting, engineering report, plans and specifications and assistance during construction. The scope also includes support for the environmental review, grant and loan applications, and operator training. The principal deliverables are the engineering report; 50 and 90 percent construction documents; and biddable plans and specifications. The scope of work includes office engineering and support during construction. Field engineering and inspection can be performed by the CDM at the option of the City but is not part of the basic services. ENGINEERING REPORT Task 1.1 Program Planning/Project Management The task will begin with a focused review of the design criteria, CSO planning and objectives of the new facility. The objective of this task is to prepare for a workshop with City and Consultant to address critical design and success factors for the new. The task will produce preliminary layouts, identify operations and treatment issues, develop a master project schedule and identify critical project information needs. The City will provide including reports, plans of existing site utilities and outfalls Deliverables: A workshop package will be distributed to the City team one week ahead of the workshop. A project work plan will be produced from the workshop. The task also includes bi-weekly progress meetings and monthly progress reports throughout the term of the Agreement. Task 1.2 Surveys After the predesign workshop, Symonds Engineers, Inc., a subconsultant, will develop site information and background for plan and profile sheets. The subconsultant will locate pipelines, culverts, electrical facilities, and old treatment. The survey will verify the elevation of critical existing facilities such as CSO diversion structure weirs and interceptor sewer inverts. Deliverables: Topographic and site information will be delivered to the Contractor prior to completion of the Engineering Report. Task 1.3 Geotechnical Investigation The purpose of the proposed geotechnical study is to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the site and, based on conditions encountered, provide recommendations pertaining to geotechnical aspects of the proposed CSO treatment facility. The investigation will be conducted by AGI Technologies, a CDM Company. Exhibit A April 16, 2000 Page 2 The Contractor will address these issues by conducting a geotechnical investigation that includes the following items: · Collect and review readily available geotechnical and geologic data for the old Manette Plant site to gain an overview of project conditions and to aid in identifying any geotechnical factors that might have an impact on the proposed improvements. · Perform a site reconnaissance to observe the existing facilities and site layout_ Plan and prepare the field exploration program, coordinate the field activities with the project team, and request the appropriate utility clearances. The City will provide access to the site · Conduct a subsurface investigation to provide information relative to soil, groundwater, and other geologic conditions in the vicinity of the proposed improvements. The Contractor anticipates performing four exploratory borings to maximum depths of about 30 feet at the location of the proposed CSO facilities. Two of these borings will be completed as open-pipe piezometers, to enable future measurement of groundwater levels. We also plan to advance two borings to maximum depths of 15 feet each to explore subgrade soil conditions in driveway/parking areas. The borings will be monitored and logged under the full-time observation of engineer or geologist. Soil samples from the borings will be obtained at selected intervals. The Contractor assumes the boring locations can be accessed using conventional truck-mounted drilling equipment. Additional costs would be incurred if track-mounted or other limited-access drilling equipment is needed. · Conduct field and laboratory testing in general accordance with appropriate American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) standards, including Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) and determination of natural moisture content and dry density, grain size distribution, Atterberg ! Jimits, and direct shear strength characteristics. · Using an outside laboratory, test selected soil samples to evaluate corrosion of site soils anticipated to be in contact with below-grade structural elements. Tests completed may include laboratory pH, resistivity, sulfate or chloride content. · Perform engineering analysis and evaluation of data derived from the subsurface investigation and laboratory-testing program, with respect to the items listed under the paragraph below. · Prepare a draft report containing the results of the geotechnical investigation, including descriptions of surface and subsurface conditions, and a site plan showing borehole locations and other pertinent features. Summary boring logs, charts and graphs indicating field and laboratory test results will also be included. The results of our engineering evaluation and geotechnical engineering recommendations pertaining to the following items will be presented: - Presence and effect of existing fill and/or other existing compressible soils; - Site preparation and remedial grading, if required; - Type, depth, allowable bearing capacities, bearing elevations, and anticipated settlements of appropriate foundation elements; - Seismic design parameters for use with UBC or similar methodology; - Stability and recommended maximum inclination of cut slopes and temporary excavations during construction; - Design and construction recommendations for temporary shoring and dewatering; Exhibit A April 16, 2000 Page 3 - General excavation characteristics of site soils and suitability of on-site soils for use as trench and structure backfill; - Pipe and below-grade structure bedding and backfill requirements; - Lateral earth pressures for use in design of the proposed below-grade structures; - Corrosion potential of on-site soils anticipated to be in contact with the proposed below-grade structures; - Subgrade soil preparation and pavement section thickness recommendations for driveway and parking areas; and - General drainage and groundwater considerations, including geotechnical parameters for use in design against hydrostatic uplift, if necessary · Respond to comments on the draft geotechnical investigation and provide a final report. · Provide consultation during final design with respect to geotechnical issues, and review geotechnical aspects of project plans and specifications. Deliverables: The Contractor shall provide drilling logs, laboratory testing of selected samples, geologic hazard evaluation, assessment of corrosion potential, draft and final engineering analysis report. Task 1.4 Engineering Report The consultant shall prepare the engineering report for the Pine Road Basin CSO Treatment Facility. The facility is anticipated to have 100,000 gallons of short-term storage, screening, high rate clarification and support facilities, and UV disinfection and gravity flow to the old Manette Plant Outfall. No improvements to the outfall in the water are anticipated as part of this scope. The engineering report as defined in WAC 173-240-020(6) will include: Executive S~ · Site Description · Problem Identification · Description of Discharge Standards · Description of Recommended Facilities · Implementation Strategy Background Information · Current CSO Plan · CSO Contribution to this Site · Estimated Flows and Loads · Frequency of Peak Flow Events · Ouffall Description · Surrounding Facilities Discharge Conditions · Ouffall Performance and Capacity · Receiving Water Quality · Discharge Limits · Environment Without the Project Alternatives Summary of alternatives developed by others in the Pine Road CSO Exhibit A April 16, 2000 Page 4 Reduction Facility Plan Recommended Plan Layout · Flow and Control Schematics · Sizing/Design Criteria · Standby Power · O&M/Staffing Needs · Environmental Mitigation Measures · Implementation Strategy · Schedule Appendixes · SCADA System Improvements (Process and Instrumentation Diagrams) · Equipment Sheets · Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation · Demonstration Testing Results · Performance Specifications for HRC Facilities · Performance Specifications for UV Disinfection Subtask 1.4.1 Engineering Report Workshop The Consultant will host a one day workshop to address the following three critical issues: X Disinfection approach X Permitting X Startup and shutdown of the treatment facility X SCADA This workshop will become a key element of the Engineering Report. Deliverables: Decisions made at the workshop will be documented in a technical memorandum due to the City one-week after the workshop. 1.4.2 Engineering Report - 50 Percent Submittal Deliverables: The Contractor will submit five copies of the 50 percent report to the City,for review. This submittal will include the Background, Discharge Conditions and the Alternatives sections of the report 1.4.3 Engineering Report - 100 Percent Submittal Deliverables: The Contractor will prepare ten copies ora draft Engineering Report for City and Department of Ecology (DOE) review before starting Task 2 - Detailed Design. The final report will address the City and DOE's comments and concerns. Task 1.5 Support for Permitting, Grants and Environmental Review The Contractor will provide technical support for NPDES Permitting and SERP for this new facility. The City will pursue funding alternatives other than local financing. The Consultant will be expected to assist in this area. Work under this task will proceed under individual q Exhibit A April 10, 2000 Page 5 work orders as the need develops. Deliverables will be defined with each work order. The key subtasks relative to permitting the proposed wastewater discharge are: · Mixing zone study to assess compliance with water quality standards · Identify any additional effluent treatment required to meet standards · Assess adequacy of the existing Manette outfall and diffuser · Identify potential implications of discharge with Sinclair Inlet TMDL Mitigation for shellfish closure zone due to reactivation of Manette outfaI1 This scope of work is based on our anticipation of the following: · The Manette outfall and diffuser do not need to be modified other than maintenance activities; therefore Corps and HPA permits will not be necessary. · The aquatic lands lease from DNR has expired, which will trigger the shellfish closure zone evaluation for the Department of Health. Subtask 1.5.1 Mixing Zone Study and Effluent !.im~its This task would update the mixing study by HDR dated 2/10/00 for the revised effluent flow criteria. Oceanographic data for the site will come from the shellfish closure zone evaluation. The results of the dilution modeling will be used to document the need for water quality-based effluent limits or outfalI modifications. These data will be furnished to Ecology as an appendix to the Engineering Report for development of the NPDES permit. This will satisfy the requirements of WAC 173-240-060 (d), (e) and (1). Subtask 1.5.2 TMDL Support The Navy under Ecology oversight is developing the Sinclair Inlet TMDL. There is a potential that the TMDL would require effluent treatment beyond the proposed HRC and disinfection. Cosmopolitan Engineering Group will support the CDM by reviewing the project data and model formulation to date. An assessment will be made of the probable implications of the upcoming TMDL on the proposed CSO control facility. Subtask 1.5.3 Shellfish Closure Zone Assessment A shellfish harvest closure zone assessment will be prepared according to Department of Health guidelines with the model CORMIX2. The data requirements and analysis will be coordinated with the City. The City will be responsible for coordinating with DOH. The expected fecal coliform concentration for this analysis will be based on existing data for CSO effluent. Ambient oceanographic data will be based on a one-day drogue and CTD study conducted according to Ecology Orange Book protocol. The closure zone assessment will be submitted to Health for approval and then to DNR for renewal of the aquatic lands lease. These activities can occur on a parallel or delayed track from Ecology approval of the Engineering Report and acquisition of the NPDES permit. Subtask 1.5.4 SEPA Compliance (Optional) Exhibit A April 10, 2000 Page 6 It is anticipated that SEPA compliance will be required prior to construction of the treatment facility, and the City will prepare a SEPA Checklist consistent with WAC 197-11, as amended. The City will disclose and describe, at an appropriate level of detail, impacts that are reasonably anticipated from the proposed project that would result in more than a moderate adverse impact on environmental quality, if any. If the SEPA Checklist must be expanded, the Contractor will assist with emphasis placed on key elements of the environment identified as being of potential risk. Following completion of the conceptual design of the treatment facility, the Contractor will assess the potential impacts that would adversely affect on-shore resources within the project area. Direct, indirect and cumulative impacts will be identified. Mitigation requirements will then be evaluated and developed at a conceptual level and incorporated into the design and construction approach to avoid or minimize anticipated impacts. The Contractor subject to prior approval would develop where it would facilitate SEPA compliance and the permitting strategy, more detailed mitigation plans beyond that included in this scope of work by the City. If a Draft Expanded SEPA Checklist is needed, the Contractor will prepare for and attend one consultation meeting with agendes with key permitting authority. The objective of this meeting will be to identify regulatory constraints, design guidelines, and process issues that could have a bearing on the design, approach to SEPA compliance, and permitting strategy. An overview of the general nature and extent of anticipated impacts related to the proposed project will be presented to determine, from the agendes' perspective, the adequacy of antidpated mitigation approaches. Subsequent to the meeting, the Consultant will prepare a summary of key findings for incorporation into the design, and approach of the Expanded SEPA Checklist and permitting. In preparing the Expanded SEPA Checklist, the objective will be development of a complete yet concise documentation of the nature and extent of anticipated impacts and proposed measures to mitigate such impacts. The Consultant will prepare a Draft Expanded SEPA Checklist based on the design and environmental information assembled by the project team. Upon completion of this Checklist, the Consultant will submit the Draft Checklist to the City for review and comment. Upon review of the City's comments, the Consultant will prepare a Final Expanded SEPA Checklist. Following an agency review period, the Consultant will assist the City in responding to potential agency comments or requests for additional information. Finally, the Consultant will provide support to the City following City's threshold determination. DETAILED DESIGN The scope of the detailed design will be broken into two projects. · Task 2.1 Construction Documents - Short Term Storage · Task 2.2 Construction Documents - Treatment It is the City's objective to have significant progress made on construction of storage before the end of 2000. Exhibit A April 10, 2000 Page 7 Task 2.1 Construction Documents for Short Term Storage The Contractor shall prepare specifications for the facilities described on the sheet list in Table A-1. Plans shall be prepared in AutoCAD Version 14. The drawings will be bound into the specifications. Specifications will be developed in MS Word. Deliverables: X Subtask 2.1.1 - Four hard copies of 50 percent specifications for City Review. X Subtask 2.1.2 - Four hard copies of 90 percent plans specifications City Review. X One set of reproducible specifications ready for bidding and one set of the project disks. Table A-1 Sheet List No. Title Cuum,ents 1 Title Sheet and Project Location Map 2 Site Plan and Piping Plan 3 Structural Bottom and Top Plan 4 Structural Sections 5 Standard Structural Details Task 2.1.3 Short Term Storage Bidding Support - To be defined. Task 2.1.4 Short Term Storage Construction Support - To be defined. Task 2.2 Construction Documents for Treatment The contractor shall prepare drawings and specifications for the facilities described on the sheet list in Attachment A-1. Plans shall be prepared in AutoCAD Version 14. Specifications will be developed in MS Word. Deliverables: X Subtask 2.2.1 - Four hard copies of 30 percent plans for City Review. X Subtask 2.2.2- Four hard copies of 600 percent plans for City Review. X Subtask 2.2.3 - Four hard copies oflO0 percent plans for City. X One set of full size reproducible drawings and specifications ready for bidding and one set of the project disks. Table A-1 Sheet List Exhibit A April 10, 2000 Page 8 l~lo. Title Comments 1 Title Sheet and Project Location Map 2 Legend and Drawing List 3 Treatment Area and Site Plan Includes Building 4 Process Flow Schematic & Hydraulic Profile 5 Yard Piping Plans and Profiles 6 Yard Piping and Ouffall Connection Details 7 Paving; Grading and In-igation Plan 8 Mechanical Plans Only pumtMng required for startup and dean up 9 Mechanical Plans 10 Mechanical Sections & Derails 11 Mechanical Sections & Details 12 Standby Power Facilities 13 Chemical St~-a~ Facilities 14 Disinfection System Details 15 Structural Top and Bottom Plan 16 Struchna] Sections 17 Structural Sections 18 Siwucture Plans & Sections 19 Misc. Structural Details 20 Misc. Structural Details 21 Architectural Elevations 22 Architectural Plans and Details 23 Architectural Plans and Details 24 Landscape Plan and Details 25 Electrical Site Plan 26 Symbols and Abbreviations 27 Conduit and Wire Schedules 28 MCC's and Oneline Diagrams 29 Onellne Diagrams 30 Oneline Diagrams 31 Plans and Details Exhibit A April 10, 2000 Page 9 No. Title Comments 32 Plans and Detail~ 33 Panel Schedules 34 Standby Power 35 ~gh~g P~an aha Details 36 P&IEYs 37 P&IEYs 39 Controls System Details 41 ~ Electrical Details Subtask 2.2.4 Bidding The Consultant will assist the City in advertising, obtaining and evaluating bids for the construction contract. The services will include: X Attend prebid conference X Assist in issuing addenda X Consult with the City as to the acceptability of subcontractors and suppliers X Attend bid opening The City will collect document deposits, produce meeting minutes, and track plan holders and issue addenda. Task 3.2 SCADA Configuration (Optional) The Consultant will configure and install the CSO Treatment controls software on the City's existing SCADA platform, using the City's established WWTP SCADA protocols which exist at the time construction begins, or the Consultant's normal protocol in the event that the District has adopted no standard by that time. One single programming effort is included in this scope of work. The SCADA work will be limited to the new facilities in this project, and will exclude and controls or monitoring work on existing CSO facilities or their support equipment. Task 2.4 O&M Manual (Optional) The Consultant will prepare an electronic O&M Manual for the operation and maintenance of the CSO Facility and its support systems. The manual will be developed for access via the Microsoft Internet Explorer web browser, software that is distributed by Microsoft at no charge. Photos will be delivered by the Consultant in GIF or JPEG format. The electronic file format for all other converted materials shall be Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF). PDF files can be easily accessed via a viewer who is distributed free of charge by Exhibit A April 10, 2000 Page 10 Adobe. All text files will be delivered in HTML format. The Consultant will develop a manual organization and framework to be used in the manual. The draft framework will be included in the 99 percent design submittal. The Consultant will scan (or otherwise convert to electronic format) up to 500 pages of manufacturer O&M information, and up to 20 photos related to the CSO facility. The manual will be prepared in four sections dealing with startup, normal operation, shutdown and mothballing for dry weather periods. Each section will be developed using the Consultant's standard six-point format of the following categories: · General · Description · Operation · Control · Maintenance · Safety The final screens and the links to manufacturer's literature, parts lists, startup and shutdown procedures, and record drawings will be submitted within three months after approval of the screening, high rate clarification, chemical handling, pumping, and instrumentation shop drawings. Functions for moving about the manual, queries, printing, making notations, as well as (secure) editing, will be the Consultant's standard. This scope of work is based on the Consultant providing 10 screens adapted from the Consultant's standard O&M Manual screens and 15 screens custom to the new CSO facilities. The consultant will create up to 150 hyperlinks to connect related information by way of a mouse click. Examples of such links include references to drawings from within text that immediately bring up the drawing referred to, and portions of photos or graphics that takes the user to more specific information. Other features will consist of lists in which each item is linked to other files or sections of the Manual. This scope of work includes the following assumptions: · The framework and the manual are limited to the new CSO facility. However, the manual configuration will be adaptable to future expansion to address main plant, pumping, and other CSO facilities and systems. · The manual and all supporting files will be delivered on CD-ROM, in 5 copies. No hard copies of the manual will be provided, although they may be readily printed from the electronic version, whenever desired. Task 3.3 Electronic O&M Manual CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT This scope of work is base upon the City providing the resident project representative and Exhibit A April 10, 2000 Page 11 day to day inspection of the construction project. In that role, the City will be responsible for the duties of the Engineer as defined in the General Conditions of the Construction Contract Documents. A shift of that responsibility to the Consultant will require an amendment to this Scope of Work. The City is responsible for direct communications with the Contractors project management staff, all field testing, surveying, processing progress payments, notifications of defective work, acceptance of work, document clarification, field orders, and notifying the consultant that site visits and specialty inspections are needed. The City's field staff is responsible for startup and monitoring performance testing. Task 3.1 Partnering Conference The consultant will assemble and facilitate a partnering workshop prior to the start of construction. The workshop will direct the stakeholders to develop and attain their common project goals A one-day workshop will be scheduled with the City and ContractorEJs staff. Task 3.2 General Administration of the Construction Contract Site Visits - The Consultant will make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction as requested by the City. These visits are intended to assist the City, s resident project representative in carrying out the City=s duties and responsibilities of overseeing construction. The Consultant shall provide specialty inspection of structural, electrical, and instrumentation as requested by the City=s onsite representative. Deliverables: The scope of this task is based on two visits per month over a twelve-month construction contract. Clarifications and Interpretation - The Consull~mt will issue necessary clarifications and interpretations of the contract documents as requested by the City. Deliverables: These clarifications will be issued through the City~ onsite representative. Change Orders - The Consultant will review change orders and work directives as appropriate and as prepared by the City=s onsite representative. Deliverables: The change orders will be issued through the City's onsite representative. Shop Drawing Review - The Consultant will review and approve (or take other appropriate action) shop drawings, samples, and other data which the contractor is required to submit. The review will access conformance with the information given in the construction contract documents. This review will not extend to means, methods, techniques or procedures: Deliverables: Shop Drawings will be transmitted to the Consultant directly from the contractor. Approved copies will be transmitted to the field engineering staff. : Substitutions - The Consultant will evaluate and determine the acceptability of substitute or Aor equa~ materials and equipment proposed by the contractor. Deliverables: Substitution reviews will be transmitted to the field engineering staff. Exhibit A April 10, 2000 Page 12 Contractors Completion Documents - The consultant will receive, review and transmit to the City with written comments maintenance and operating instructions, schedules, guarantees, test results, samples and other data which are assembled by the contractor to obtain final payment. Deliverables: Completion document reviews will be transmitted to the field engineering staff. : Disagreements and Disputes - The Consultant will assist the City in rendering claims of the City and the contractor relating to the acceptability of the work or the interpretation of the contract documents. OTHER OYI'IONAL SERVICES Task 4.1 Resident Project Representative The Consultant will provide a resident project representative for the City who will be assigned to assist the City at the site during the construction. The duties and responsibilities of the resident project representative will be defined by amendment to this Agreement if the City decides to exercise this Agreement option. The Resident Project Representative will be provided at the hourly rate shown in Table 3 Task 4.2 Inspector The Consultant will provide inspectors for the City who will be assigned to assist the City at the site during the construction. The duties and responsibilities of the inspectors will be defined by amendment to this Agreement if the City decides to exercise this Agreement option. The inspectors will be provided at the hourly rate shown in Table A-4. COMPENSATION The fees will be paid for these services in Table A-3. These fees include compensation for all staffing and materials called for in this Scope of Work. Hourly rates for work outside the scope of this agreement is in Table A-4. Compensation for Optional Services will be agreed on between the City and the Contractor before any work begins on these tasks. SCHEDULE The schedule of deliverables is shown in Figure A-1. The Contractor with each monthly progress report will update this schedule. Exhibit A April 10, 2000 Page 13 Table A-3 Compensation Task Lump Sum Amount Engineering Report 1.1 Program Planning/Project Mgmt $40,000 1.2 Surveys 16,000 1.3 Geotechnical Investigation 14,000 1.4.1 Engineering Report Workshop 20,000 1.4.2 Engineering Report - 50 % 30,000 1.4.3 Engineering Report- 100 % 40,000 Subtotal- Engineering Report $160,000 1.5 Support for Permitting, Grants and Environmental Review 1.5.1 Mixing Zone Study and Effluent l.irrrits 6,000 1.5.2 TMDL Support 5,000 1.5.3 Shellfish Closure Zone Assessment 9,000 1.5.4 SEPA Compliance (Optional) 0 Subtotal - Permitting, Grants and Environmental. Review $20,000 Detailed Design 2.1 Construction Documents-Short Term Storage 2.1.1 50% Review 15,000 2.1.2 100% Completion 15,000 2.1.3 Bidding 6,000 2.1.4 Construction Support 20,000 Subtotal - Short Term Storage Design $56,000 2.2 Construction Documents for Treatment 2.2.1 30% Review 94,500 2.2.2 60% Review 81,000 2.2.3 100% Review 94,500 2.2.4 Bidding 8,000 Subtotal - Treatment Facility Design $278,000 2.3 SCADA Configuration (Optional) 2.40&M Manual (Optional) Subtotal - O&M Manual & Training 0 Construction Management -Treatment 3.1 Partnering Conference 7,000 3.2 General Contract Administration 210,000 Subtotal - Construction Management $217,000 OTHER OPTIONAL SERVICES 4.1 Resident Project Representative 0 4.2 Inspector 0 Subtotal - Optional CM 0 Grand Total - Basic $731,000 Services AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE # 4~ ~ , FOR AGENDA OF: April 19, 2000 CONTRACT AMENDMENTS AND CHANGE ORIGINATING DEPT: PW&U Engineering Div. ORDERS (BMC 2.76.500) ORIGINATOR: Randy Witt, City Eng~e~x D^T~ SUB~nTT~D: April3, 2000 2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back ~ ~ ~ 3. EXHIBITS Director, Public Works/Utilities ,,-/q/_~.6fT~~~ ? A. Ordinance # City Attorney Administrative Services ~~ ~ Council Budget & Finance Committe~ Operations Committee F. NDORSE~,mm'~__X_ n~ p~SqON'~ ~PRO~D BY ¢Ot.rNCIL P~SIDENX FOR SUB~4~Tr.32:, MAYOR ~ ~. ~ COUNCIL PR~.SmENT ~ ~ 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REOUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: Chapter 2.76.500 of the Bremerton Municipal Code sets forth rules and regulations regarding amendments and change orders to City contracts. This chapter establishes an administrative authority for the Mayor to approve change orders without prior approval by the City Council. This authority is inadequate on larger capital projects. Additionally, the existing ordinance does not provide for changes in the work to be approved in the field prior to inclusion into a change order. The proposed revisions allow change order authority more proportionate to the scope of the project and address on- site project management needs by providing a graduated increase to the Mayor's change authority on construction contracts with a ceiling of $250,000.00, establishing a work change directive process that allows changes to construction contracts to be aggregated for subsequent inclusion in a change order, and allowing emergency conditions to be addressed in a timely fashion to be subsequently included in a change order. Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance. 8. RECOMMENDATION: fl ,JL ..... d ........... '.-"-""-".~" ".-.".~'".°, '-'~'-',, £-~'- B. ~4otio~ to pass Ordinance #~"/e&~ending Bremenon M~cipal Code, Chapter 2.~6.S00, '~-'~endments and Change Orders, upon second reading. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Administrative Services Director. ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Purchasing Director EXPIRATION DATE: N/A REVIEW DATE: N/A 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED ~i2~D/~i COUNCIL DIRECTIVE DA 11. AGENDA BILL NO: Q.(~ -- i (~ ~ 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Thc existing change order authority of 20% of the contract price or $30,000.00, whichever is less, will continue to be in effect. Contract change orders that go beyond these limits will require City Council approval prior to execution of thc change order possibly delaying the contractor's work and giving right to a delay claim. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: Staff will be able to manage construction projects in a more efficient and effective manner. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES AGENDABL AN ORDINANCE relating to Contract Amendments and Change Orders and amending Bremerton Municipal Code, Chapter 2.76.500. Whereas, the existing administrative change order authority of the Mayor is inadequate for many projects; and Whereas, a work change directive (or field order) process is needed to allow changes in construction contracts to be aggregated for subsequent inclusion in a change order or to allow emergency conditions to be addressed in a timely fashion and subsequently included in a change order. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. Amendment. Chapter 2.75.500 (Amendments and Change Orders) is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.76.500 AMENDMENTS, CHANGE ORDERS AND WORK CHANGE DIRECTIVES. (a) Amendments or change orders to contracts requiring City Council approval under this chapter may be administratively approved by the Mayor if the changes are: (1) Within the scope of the project; (2) Consistent with an initial bid process, if any; (3) Executed in writing; and (4) An ~ ........ ~ ~o~_ ~ ,~ .... +.~..+ ...~ .... ¢~ ~n nn ,,,~.~ ..... ~ !css.An increase of the contract award amount (CAA) as follows: Contract Award Percentacje Limits Amount Increase in CAA (the greater of) Less than $100,000 30% or minimum Min $ 0 Max $ 30,000 $100,000 to $500,000 20% or minimum Min $ 30,000 Max $100,000 Greater than $500,000 10% or minimum ~ Min $100,000 Max $ 250,000 Contract Amendments and Change Orders Page 1 (b) The value of all change orders will be aggregated. When any single change Order, or combined change orders on the same project or single purchase exceeds the value limit, the change must be approved by City Council, except in the following instances: (1) On service contracts used to accomplish an ongoing City program as opposed to completing a shod term project or purchase, change order rules, including the aggregate rule, shall be applied on an annual basis. (2) Where the size of the contract and the exhausting of change order authority make further change order authorization impractical, the City Council may, upon recommendation of the Mayor, extend the aggregate limits of subsection (a) (4) for specific contracts. (c) A work change directive may be used to: (1) Authorize and direct work that will result in an increase in contract price within the administrative authority of the Mayor as provided in subsection (a) for specific contracts. Work change directives that affect the contract price shall be incorporated into a change order. (2) Authorize and direct work that will result in an increase in contract price in excess of the administrative authority of the Mayor as provided in subsection (a) where unforeseen conditions necessitate an immediate change to avoid a contractor's claim against the City for delays. The work change directive shall be incorporated into a change order and presented to the City Council as soon thereafter as practicable. (3) Authorize and direct emergency work that may result in an increase in contract price in excess of the administrative authority of the Mayor as provided in subsection (a) where public health, safety and welfare are endangered. The work change directive shall be incorporated into a change order and presented to the City Council as soon thereafter as practicable. The City Council will be notified of work change directives issued in excess of the administrative authority of the mayor as soon as practicable. Contract Amendments and Change Orders Page 2 Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective ten days after passage and publication. APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of ,2000. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of ,2000. CAROL ARENDS, Council President APPROVED this day of . ,2000. LYNN HORTON, Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk Contract Amendments and Change Orders Page 3 AGENDA BH~L BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: Public Hearing and First Reading of FOR AGENDA OF: April 26~ 2000 Ordinanc~regarding 1999 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ORIGINATING DEPT.: DCD and accompanying zones. ORIGINATOR: Bill Palmer DATE SUBMITTED: April 18, 2000 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if 3. EXHIBITS: necessary) ~ ~ CC R~olution # 2702 Comm. Dev. Din:~ Notice of Public Heating PC Resolutions City Attorney: Staff Report with Relevant Attachments Operations: ~'~EXHI[31T$ WILL BE AVAILABLE ON Fiscal & Budget: ~10ND^¥, APRIL 24, 2000 City Clerk: ENDORSEMENT__ INFO~TION __ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: MAYOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The 1999 Comprehensive Plan Ameudmmt includes four Map redesi~ion requests for Plan and Capital Facilities Updates. Also included are Zoning Map redesignafions for each of the four Plan IVlap changes. 5. RECOMMENDATION: I move to approve on fu'st reading an ordinance regarding the 1999 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, I move to pass Ordinance # on second ~eliag regarding the 1999 amendment to the Comtgehensive Pla~ I move to approve on first reading an ordinance regarding the Map Rezolle5 that a~ompally the 1999 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, I move to pass Ordinance # on second reading regarding the Map Rezones that accompany the 1999 amendment to the Comprehensive Plato 6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: N/A REVIEW DATE: N/A 7. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE: s. AGENDA BILL NO.: I move to approve on First reading an ordinance regarding the 1999 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Map by approving · ~(. The David and Roxanna J~nes Amendment, which changes a portion of the Official Zoning Map from "Medium and High Density Residential" (M/HDR) to "Business Park" (GB). Said Map Amendment affects property situated between Wheaton V/ay and Hemlock Street north of Callahan Drive. Specifically the property involved lies in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12, Township 24 North, Rarxge 01 East, W.M. and includes C/~ parcels found in the Plat of First Addition To Sheridan Park - Plat Number 3965, Block 000, lots 158-00, 159-00 and 160-00. Said Comprehensive Plan Map amendment is depicted in Exhibit B titled '~ones-2711 Wheaton Way, I move to approve on First reading an ordinance regarding the 1999 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Map by approving- The Ghodtat and Lila Aflatooni Amendment, which of changes a portion the Comprehensive Plan Map from "Medium and High Density Residential" (MF) to "Health Care Center" 0-ICC). Said Map Amendment affects the property situated'in the northeast comer of Hemlock Street and Callahan Drive. Specifically, the property involved lies in the Northwest 1/, of Section 12, Township 24 North, Range 01 East, W.M., and is described as Lot 164-00, Block 000, of the Plat of the First Addition To Sheridan Park, Plat Number 3965. Said Comprehensive Plan Map amendment is depicted in Exhibit C rifled "Aflatooni-804 Callahan Drive & 2802 Hemlock Street (Duplex at NE Comer),'~' _5 ' I move to approve on First reading an ordinance regarding the 1999 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Map by approving' [(k The Merit Company Amendment, which changes a portion of the Comprehensive Plan Map from "Medium Density Residential" (MDR) to "General Business" (GB). Said Map Amendment affects property lying adjacent to Wheaton Way, Riddell Road and Almira Drive. Specifically, the property involved lies in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 1, Township 24 North, Range 01 East, W.M. and involves the north thirteen (13) acres of Tax Parcel Number 154 which is situated in the southwest comer of the intersection of Riddell Road and Almira Drive. Said Comprehensive Plan Map amendment is depicted in Exhibit D rifled "Merit Company-Riddell Road, West of Almira Drive, 4220 Wheaton Way," I move to approve on First reading an ordinance regarding the 1999 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Map by approving· The Capital Facilities Element &~..~- '.~g as set out in Exhibit E rifled "Revisions, 1999 Bremerton Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Element~ ' VOTING RECORDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: VOTE ON MOTION: NAME YES NO ABSTAIN OLSEN L.~ McCONNELL ~ ~ LAW ~$HEPHE.RD REED 'V~ ~ ARENDS (COUNCIL PRESIDENT) ~,/ VOTING RECORDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ~~~-~ AGENDA ITEM: I ~) VOTE ON MOTION: NAME YES NO ABSTAIN OLSEN McCONNELL ,.~ LAW ~ I I ! ROLLMAN / i I ' ARENDS (COUNCIL PRESIDENT) VOTING RECORDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: VOTE ON MOTION: NAME YES I NO i ABSTAIN McCONNELL [/~,L LAW i REED I ARENDS (COUNCIL PRESIDENT) VOTING RECORDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ~~ VOTE ON MOTION: NAME YES NO ABSTAIN ROLLMAN ~ REED ~A/~. ~,~ ARENDS (COUNCIL PRESIDENT) L~ VOTING RECORDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: ~ VOTE ON MOTION' ,,. ~L.~' NAME YES NO ! ABSTAIN o,sE~ V,,/" I ROLLMAN ~// ARENDS (COUNCIL PRESIDENT) VOTING RECORDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: VOTE ON MOTION: NAME YES NO ABSTAIN OLSEN t.~ McCONNELL L// LAW X,. / ROLLMAN / ~/// REED ARENDS (COUNCIL PRESIDENT) VOTING RECORDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: VOTE ON MOTION: NAME YES NO ABSTAIN OLSEN <:~ McCONNELL LAW ROLLMAN ARENDS (COUNCIL PRESIDENT) I move to approve on first reading an ordinance regarding the Official Zoning Map rezones that accompany the ! 999 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change a potedon of the Map from "Multi-Family Residential" (MF) to "General Business" (GB). Said Map Amendment affects property situated b~tween Wheaton Way and Hemlock Street north of Callahaxx Drive_ Specifically the property, involved lies in the Northwest V, of Section 12, Township 24 North, Range 01 East, W.M~ and includes parcels found in the Plat of First Addition To Sheridan Park - Plat Nurabet 3965, Block 000, lots 158-00, 159-00 and 160-00. Said map amendment is depicted in F.-h~it B tided "Jones-2711 Wheaton Way, 2828 & 3221 Hemlock Street," - I.move to approve on first reading an ordinance regarding the Official Zoning l~lap re. zones that accompany the 1999 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to ~ change a poaion of the Map: fxom '~[ulti-Farmly Residential" (Mb-) to "General Business" (GB). Said Map Amendment affects the property situated in the northeast comer of Hemlock Street and Callahan Drive. Specifically, the property involved lies in the Northwest ¼ of Section 12, Township 24 North, Range 01 ~.a~t, W.M_, and is described as Lot 164430, Block 000, of the Plat of the First Addition To Sheridan Park, Plat Number 3965. Said map amendment is depicted in Exhibit C dried "Aflatooni-804 Callahan Drive & 2802 Hemlock Street (Duplex at NE Comer3." move to approve on first reading an ordinance regarding the Official Zoning Map rezones that accompany the 1999 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to _ ~ change a portion of the Map from "Shopping Center" (~C) to "General Business" (GB) and "Multi-Family" (MF) to "General Business" (GB). Said Map Amendment affects property lying adjacent to Wheaton Way, Riddell Road and Almira Drive. Spedfically, the property involved lies in the Northwest 1/4 of Section Township 24 North, Range 01 East, W.M. and involves tax parcel 122 which lies in the southeast comet of the intersection of Wheaton Way and Riddell Road and the north thirteen (13) acres of tax parcel number 154 which is situated in the southwest comer of the intersection of Riddell Road and Alrnira Drive. Said map amendment is depicted in Exhibit D dried "Merit Company- Ridder Road, West of AlrnJra Drive, 4220 Wheaton Way," - 9, c, e_nt-. .. 43~o mt~p Sandy VerheIst v~ (360) ~. 1~ (360) Bremerton City Council Re: Proposed commercial rezoning of parcels at Kitsap Way and We, sion Place C o uncfl Members, I strongly urge you to consider acompromim to zoning the parcels extending from Kitsap Way to Oyster Bay to all co,,,,;~rcial for a combination of reasons. Having lived on Oyster Bay for near to 17 years I, as many, enjoy and support the flavor of its shorelines remaining residential. There are developed commercial properties touching the shorelines thus distracting from this serenity. Suspecting the intention of developing this land is to build a boater's paradise, I feel it would be too risky. With paved parking and boat ramps all the way to waters edge, whatever is washed off.will go onto the shoreline and into the bay. That will include petroleums and hazardous materials, more than likely unintentionally released, but released nonetheless. Native soils have a way of naturally remediating most petroleum substances. Retaining the residential zoning at waters edge would reduce the contamination risks. Without these buffers the delicate ecosystem will undoubtedly be impacted, perhaps irreversibly. One can look at the impact to the shoreline as the result of the Oyster Bay Estates. From the first rainy season the runoff from that development has damaged the shoreline. There are now deep cuts in the beach fiom the volume of water rushing off.the new streets. With heavy rain, and we do get that here, a muddy plume was seen fi'om that outflow area into the water. Also, stormwater from Kitsap Way is routed through large piping into the bay between the Oyster Bay Inn and our home. At the end of this piping is a huge mound of sediment. I see it at low tides and when the rains are heavy. Another sign of impact - without a doubt containing petroleum pollutants washed fi-om the Kitsap Way which on which 44,000+ cars travel per day. Our little bay is at a disadvantage because it does not have full flushing capability- the water and everything else pretty much stays where it is. So how does it have an oppommity to cleanse itself?. It doesn't. While'the. City ofBremerton-is in-desperate, neectofincreasing revenue, the future of it's uniqueness withthe, m~es of city shorelines~and lifein the. wateris atri.~k_ Please, do not' be so-shortsighted: Howmanytlmes has~nmnkin&~,looked~back ~ said "t lint was a mistake;: can:it' I~. :fixed?" Prevention; preservafion:and:protectiorr shoulc[ be ofupmost in,,,~)rtance in' all decisionsinvolving: out~. shoreline~and~o~~: Council mm in most situations ~ compromi.~ can bereached as I feel it can with thi.q one. By compromi.qng and allowing commercial development along Kitsap Way only - not all the way to the shoreline- the City of Bremerton, the residents, and 'Snhabitants" of Oyster Bay could be satisfied. Please consider thi.q. APR ~6 20~,0 April 25, 2000 BREMERTON To The Bremerton City Council BUILDING DEPARTMENT Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezone of properties located on Kitsap Way/ Weslon Place As residents of Oyster Bay, the bay whose waters touch the above rezone we strongly object to the above rezone and urge that the city council reject it for the many reasons. Oyster Bay is basically a residential area, one of the gems of the city. It is a fragile bay because it is virtually land locked and the water exchange is slow. It already fights to survive as a healthy body of water in part fi-om previous city actions such as sewer overflows from the pumping station and storm water run off. The bay is home to many people, it is also the home of many species of wildlife, seagulls, eagles, ducks, egrets, herons, otters, raccoons, struggling oysters beds, dams and mussels to name a few. Over the years the fish population has dwindled dramatically, as it has all over the sound. The bay is known to have smelt beds,, salmon and other fish. Protection of water quality for the survival of many of the above species has been mandated by the state. The city for a number of years has been involved in an ongoing law suit because of water quality degradation and previous actions taken by the city that have had devastating effects on the quality of local waters. Millions of dollars have been spent to remedy past mistakes. The city to this day and on into the foreseeable future will continue to be compelled to spend large sums of money to correct those mistakes. To rezone a large piece of residential waterfront, on a fragile bay is in direct opposition to all the lessons that should have been learned from past mistakes and flies in the face of all current thinking of knowledgeable biologists. We adamantly oppose this rezone for many reasons. We will be prepared to offer more testimony at the hearing on Wednesday, April 26th. Signed, NAME ADDRESS /~ Signatures to deny Kitsap Way/Weslon Place Rezone Page 2 NAME ADDRESS OCT 0 8 1999 James Coombes, RA BREMERTON Department of Community Development BUILDING DEPAR'r~ENT 286 4~ Street Bremertom WA 98337 Dear Mr. Coombes, RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT We are writing to state our opposition to the proposed rezone of the properties as requested by Roger and Jennifer Nance. We live at 928 Weslon Place, Lot ¢ff)30 that is next to the proposed commercial zoning request. My husband and I found this piece of property in 1990 and decided to have a waterfront home built on Oyster Bay, as this is where I water-skied as a youth. I have lived in Bremerton since 1951 and have seen all the changes happening to Kitsap Way and this West Bremerton area. Why wasn't the entire neighborhood inlbrmed of this proposed commercial rezone issue when it was first filed? Yes. we received a brief letter, and believe me, it did not tell the ~11 extent of this proposal. This neighborhood as been ripped asunder by this entire issue, and once-friendly families have had to take sides and oppose one another on a proposal on such magnitude that this neighborhood will never recover. Once vou destroy a neighborhood and a natural area such as this, you w/Il not be able to return it to its natural setting, even it you do try, in [he future. It was our understanding that cities TRY TO PROTECT ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOODS FROM BEING VICTIMIZED BY THIS SORT OF GROWTH. Oyster Bay is full of sea Iilb and nature. There is not a day that goes by without one of my family commenting on something we've seen or heard happening with respect to Oyster Bay. The bay is ever changing and the wildlife is abundant. The most majestic sights that are observed on a daily basis are the Great Blue Heron and the American Bald Eagle. The Great Blue Heron nest and raise their young on Oyster Bay. The American Bald Eagle feed both themselves and their young on fish and var/ous types of game on Oyster Bay. Isn't the Great Blue Heron on the endangered species list? Add to this the playful frolicking family of otters swimming and feeding on Oyster Bay and see how much you, too, would feel protective of the environment here. Canadian Geese n~-a~e~ to Oyster Bay each year to lay their eggs, raise their young, and return to their wi~_J I~ ]l~ homes. Birds like the Kingfisher dart into the water at breakneck speed while fish[leg for''' food. Nearly twenty types of birds have been observed by my family and this fact- - inspired our ten-year old grandson, that lives with us, to write a report on the American Goldfinch, which he feeds daily. BREMERTON I ~ BUILDING The submitted SEPA questionnaire is full of evasive and incomplete an~qwers and should have, no doubt, been written by a current resident that is familiar with Oyster Bay. Many of the questions were answered by simply inserting a "N/A" or a "NO" when individual questions should have been researched and each given a detailed answer. We would h3ce to address a few o f these issues. · Land and Shoreline Use We, as current residents, have a right to know what the "current comprehensive plan designation" of the proposed site will be. This question was left unanswered by Jennifer Nance. Jennifer Nance's answer of"NO" in regard to the "environmentally sensitive" area was not correct. What about the Eagles and Herons? Also, we need to know how many people would reside or work in the proposed commercial area, as Jennifer Nance only entered "N/A". We have a fight to know! Furthermore, Jennifer Nance's statement that the "proposed measure is currently co ,mpatible with existing land use" cannot be further from the truth. How can that be poss~le when current residents, including waterfront property owners, will suffer? None of the'waterfront property owners are paying waterfront taxes to have someone come in and threaten to build businesses virmalty on our doorsteps. * Plants Within the SEPA questionnaire, Jennifer Nance answered that no amount of any vegetation would be removed or altered. How can this be possible? It is difficult to imagine trees not being removed and the vegetation remaining the same on this street within the proposed rezoning. The soil is rich. and flowers, shrubs and trees flourish. As to ~adin~ftlling on the above property.. even I can see the need for them to do this, and yet in the SEPA questionnaire there was to be NO Ct4_ANGE. Recreation In regard to Jennifer Nance's answer to the question of "what designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?" she stated only "meals. spirits and lodging". Does that mean water sports, fishing and pure enjoyment of the water does not count? Boats of various sizes, canoes. kayaks, sculls, water skiers, knee boarders, scuba divers and swimmers enjoy Oyster Bay on a reg~flar basis. Boaters do not limit their use of Oyster Bay to any particular time of year. We have a definite concern that if the proposal goes through, the homes on the waterfront will be unable to limit trespassers that will converge onto private beaches. This exact situation presents itself from time to time, currently, and would greatly increase with this proposal. · Water/Sewer/Noise At the foot of Weslon Place is a storm drain that has had many problems in the past, as it was incorrectly designed and installed. The city is well aware of this and we have pictures showing some the current problems. Mr. Gawenka and myself have to constantly keep an eye on the water flow and all obstructions, as an overflow could happen at any time, JEOPARDISING THE INTRIGITY OF OUR WATERFRONT BANK. We have pictures of the overflow problem showing it from catch basin to the beach. This drain could not handle any extra water flow of any kind. The existing sewer line on Weslon Place is able to handle residential housing only. The sewer line, in the past, was not properly maintained and backed-up into our basement. This city is aware ofthi.~, as they paid for the clean up. The established businesses along Kits,ap Way akeady generate enough noise. When the Nances cleared the trees on their property, particularly the ones bordering Kitsap Way, the noise level increased tremendously. It was no problem for people that don't live on Weslon Place, but WE DO. Cars, garbage and bottle dumping and patrons returning to their cars late at night are problems we currently have. The ua/fie congestion on Kitsap Way makes it extremely difficult to exit Weslon Place at peak hours. Currently, there are many cars that use our street as a U-turn spot or proceed to the bottom of the hill and mm around in the Gawenka's or our driveways. With regard to the SEPA question "will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters", Jennifer Nance an~qwered "NO". OYSTER BAY LIES EXACTLY 149 FEET FROM THE PROPOSED REZONING BOUNDARY. In conclusion, the one thing that upsets us the most about this entire issue, is the total disregard to the impact this will have on Oyster Bay and it's surrounding area. Sincerely, F°ibes David Forbes Octobez 5, 1999 James Coombes, DepOt of Community. Development 286 4th Street B£emerto~ WA. 98337 Dear 3~ Coombe% I am wri6ng to state my opposi6on to the proposed rezone of. the prolx~'ties as ~ques~-d by Rog: and Jenmfer Nance- My fatuity and [ [f~ ar 9~19 Wesion, ~ot ~ xu~aich is next to the propo.~d co~ zoning reques~ We pu~h:,~ed the house in April of 1999 and had no idea of the proposed request zoning ch~,~.. I have revi~ the approwal ~ii=tia a~ suhmitmd and have £oRox~ing comm~mm numbc~M ~ their ~.tm~n-s ~m: I do not ~ thm~ the Ci~z is looking for moz~ com~u~x~ml ~ hox~-'v~ I cio not s~ any rhi,g in the Compmh~n._-dv~ Plan that calls for the ai~-,~,rfi,g of an cxisdng resici~dal ncighbonhood to accommodate this. Und~ El~-~t E, Land Use, S~tc Goal ~4: encourages the p~do~ of ¢~sting housing s~ock.. It goes on under Supporting Polices Protect neighborhoods from incompatible devr. lol:nme~g noise giare, odor., ri,,~t, .bypass traffic, and other ~ intrusions r/mt might mdverse/v ~ect their comfort and tivabilirr. Und~ the proposal my ,~mitv will h~v~ commercial direcr/v m front o£ our home and dkz-c~ to thc south. ! shudder :o think of rc~ding the for sale ad from the absentee o~¢r o~ the ~c-.i dizccdv ~c south of mr home. ' .... ' bciong m my rcsidenuat ncighbor~hoo& Commcezi~ usc is incom=~tifui~ ~ri~h ou~ m:s~d~i Thc applicant aiso noms undo.- =~ mat the--c is a meagc.- inventory o£ .7% commerC=i T?ms rnisle-~ding as thc area includes 3t.7% ~tr-.-shcd and 44.6% udiitv lan& Thc ~idc-nuai is oniv which is mcngc: also. 2. Thc applicanm does not feel chat this ac-zion will have any/mD~ct on sen$iuve axeas, f disagree. ,~unoff from the properties on Wcslon goes straight into Oyster Bay. Inc~ased traf~c on Wcslon Place will increase pollution in Oyster bay. They state ".Mthough chang~ will occur or~ ~t :csidenccs ~c beiicv~ based on thc C/rv's Commrchcnsive Plan, these changes w/il be m ~¢ betterment of aiL" Ho~ c~n they bchev~ dm[ surrounding :nv home and f~mi}v with businesses is to the bettermcm~ of A~-; It's Only CO the berL~-'m~t of their own b:nk account. 3. Thc sewc: is no~ c~pabi¢ of handling commercial b~gincs~ It b~ hewn knowa co hack u~ in~o base'mc"at of' my neighbor at 928 Wcslon. Storm is not sdc .qua:e to handle any more Lmpcrvious surfaces and pollutan~ It has becm knox~n to casc-~de ov~ the ~trfu b=~in at thc c-nd of Wcslon and ¢~odc the bm~.k down to Ovstc~ B~v. My nc/ghbor~ ~ Forbes l'ms photos o£ This 4. "Thc proposal ~ help implement thc go~/s ~nd polices of the Brc:ner~on Comp~hensivc Plan." The applicams answ~ "YES" ~nd refer to Sec 9 aga~ Thc~ is nothing in Sec 9 dmt aIlo~s for incompatible dev~lopmenn Once ~ I r~f~ b~k co Supporting Policies on page 4 of thc Brcrncr~on Comprehensive Pbm that states '"Protect neighborhood~ f~om inommvatible development, noise, g,t~re, odor, dust, byp~s traffic, and od~cr darn.q~ng inu-usions that might adversely a~ff¢ct their comfort and liv'ability.. 919 WESLON PL, BREMERTON, WA. 98312 BREA4ERTON BU)LDING DEPARTMENT I~ls: 10/6/99 To: James Coombes lmm: Ri~ Pope RE: Nance Application for rezone Attached you will find my letter opposing the proposed rezone. You will also be getting letters ~-om Mark and Many Rowell of 913 Weslon. Mike and Maxine Gaw~im of 929 Weslon, David aha Joanne Forbes of 928 Weslon and Marian and Wes C~oper of 930 Weslom All ave opposed to the action requeme~ These axe tong time residents of Weslon Place. Two have been here since the earily · 50's and two have been here since the late 60's. I will be adding a supplemental letter addressing the SEPA checklist as it is incomplete, inaeem~te and misleading. I have arranged a meeting wi~a an expert in this area for Thursday, and wilt have my supplement to your office by Friday. October 8, I999. Once aEain; thaxflc you for your help. Attachments nC7 0 8 1999 October 8, 1999 BREMERTON BUILDING DEPARTMENT Michael and Maxine Gawenka 929 Wesion Place Bremerton, Washington 98312 James Coombes, RA Department of Community Development 286 4'" Street Bremerton, Washington 98337 Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Kitsap Way Dear Mr. Coombes: We have lived on Weslon Place for over a quarter of a century. The proposal to amend the zoning on Kitsap Way along Weslon Place is not acceptable to us for the following reasons: 1. Stormwater coming from Kitsap Way to the beach area carries oil and other contaminants in addition to small branches and leaves. This causes the drain at the bottom of Weslon Place to clog. If this problem increases, it would damage our property. 2. The sewer line runs along the beach and the line is rather small.' A sewer backup would overload the line and cause problems in the home. 3. Our property value would decrease in value as a result of the rezoning. It would no longer be a quiet and desirable place to live. 4. Parking for business use could present a problem. If the spaces provided are insufficient, cars would be parking in other places along Weslon Place. This would be detrimental to the residential area. 5. The rezoning would encourage people to trespass on our property to gain access to the beach. 6. It would impact our standard of living. James Coombes, RA October 8, 1999 Page - 2 7. We received no prior information regarding the proposal to make this zoning change. We believe that this is an illegal, very poor and inconsiderate way to operate. MAXIRE' GAWENKA April 26, 2000 BREMERTON, WA 98337 ~.Pl~ g 6 ~13l~Po FROM: GEORGE AND HELEN MI1J,ER et al P. O. BOX 788 BREMERTON BREMERTON, WA 98337 BUILDEiG DEPARTMENT The following is submitted FOR INCLUSION INTO THE OFFICIAL RECORD OF THIS 26 APRIL 2000 BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL HEARING OF THE WESLON PLACE .'APPLICATION FOR A REZONE AND AMENDMENT TO THE C O1VIPREI-I~NSIVE PLAN. Before proceeding let the record show that: At a City Council meeting in May, 1999 - In reaction to my, and other ei~zens, parti_'_d~ation in several actions which were appearing, or had appeared before the Council ~ all of which challenged irreguIarities on the part of the Cio, /DCD - The official record of that meeting contains the fact that: SEVERAL COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE REPORTED AS I-[4VING STATED THAT THEY, ,4S C0[..5¥CIL 34E34BERS. WOE%D kOTE .4 GAINST ,4_\~}' ,4 CTIO.V IN [t,"HICH [. OR SE! ~ER,4L OTHER CO:\:CEtLN'ED (_VTIZEA'S. lt,'ER £ LV! 'O L I 7~D. BY SUCH EXPRESSED - they have x.5olated the APPE,41%4zVCE OF F,4I]LVESS DOCTRINE and denied me /us PROCEDUtL4L DUE PROCESS..¥either the 31a. l'or no/' the City' Attorney have responded to these expressed denims of common citizen rights, nor acknowledged the cloud which the Couneibnen's statements have cast over the expected completeness and impartiali_~, of the Council's deliberations. In light of such open and notoriously expressed prejudice - it is doubtful that my / our remarks here will reeeive fair and impartial hearing, nor an impartial evaluation or judgement. Be further advised that a judicial / lmv revie,v bl, the Superior Court is the most ?robabO; remedy. NOTE: THERE ARE RU%IORS CIRCULATING TI-L~T AT LEAST SEVEtL~L OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNATORIES TO ~ REZONE APPLICATION BEFORE YOU TODAY NL&Y I-L4VE CHANGED THEIR MINq)S DURING QUrlET CONTEN[PLATION REGARDING THEIR SUPPORT OF THIS ACTION; ONCE FREE FROM THE PRESSURES OF THE 'SALES PITCH'. It MIGHT BE INFORMATIVE FOR THE COUNCIL TO REQUEST A REAFFIRMATION OF THE POSITION'S OF THE SICNX ORIES - BEFORE PROCEE]) C TO A FIN DECISION IN THIS .raTTER. AFTER ALL- THERE ARE A LOT OF F,%MILY HO\lES AT STAKE. As residents of this predominantly single family residential communitw surrounding Oyster Bay, many of us object to the proposed action to rezone "Weslon Place"and to amend the Comprehensive Plan: WE .~DDITIONALLY OBJECT TO THE CITY COU~'CIL IKEARING TI-frS APPLICATION AT THIS TIME; DUE TO WtL4T SHOUI~D BE DISQUALIFYING ERRORS .kND OMISSIONS LN THE APPLICATION .&NI) ITS PROCESSING BY DCD. #1.. The Growth Management Act frowns upon the rezoning of established residential neighborhoods. According to Kitsap County Court rulin~ there is no presumption in favor of rezoning. Rezoning proponents rnust prove that con~ons have substantially changed since the original z. oning; and the rezone mud have a substantial relationship to the public heal~, safety, morals, or welfare. In view of the above FACTS, the applicant's stated reasons for a rezone are inappropriate. The page: "Explanation of Criteria for Approval" for example stretches the imagination and the semantics of the English langmsge .... it presents a Real Estate Developers jargon - and a fallacious justification for rezone. Their rational for the proposed rezone is NOT consistent with the intent of the Growth Management Act. Treat this page with caution~ #2. Nothing in the application conveyed to the decision making authorities that the property. identified for Rezone action ex'tends to the waters edge on Oyster Bay. Evidently this fact was also overlooked by the DCD in preparing their Staff Reports for the Planning Commission and the Council despite transitory and mundane mention of a questionable DNS action. THE COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC SHOULD BE VERY AWARE OF THE FACT TI-L~T Properties within 200 feet of the shoreline come under the Shorelines Management Act re=malations as implemented by the Bremerton SNfP..~Ls such zoning reclassification shall not be approved until such requests are made to be consistent ,[ith the 3,[aster Program. To the fullest extent possible requests for approval for zoning changes should be made simultaneous ,~ith necessa~. Shoreline Permits to enable the City' to closely coordinate and correlate the two procedures. Tiffs avoids the distortions associated w/th "Piecemeal Permitting" In view of these FACTS the application for rezonmg is gossly incomplete, misleadin~ and should therefore NOT be considered at this time. #3. Should this property be rezoned as requested - THE PU33LIC SHOULD BE MADE THAT WATERFRONT, ZONED CO~MERCIAL, AUTOM~-kTICALLY OPENS THE DOOR OF P.~NDORA'S BOX - INVITLNG FURTHER WATERWAa~D DEVELOPMENTS - SUCH AS MARINAS (ALONG WITH THEIR ATTENDANT PROBLEMS WITH SEWAGE AND FL~L SPI~ J .S, NOISE, POLLUTION, ADDITIONAL WATER TRAFFIC AND WATER S.~-~ETY NAVIGATION PROBLEMS) - WHICH CA~RRIES THE UNACCEPTABLE RISK OF DEVALUING BREMERTON'S MOST VALUABLE RESOURCE - IT'S WATERFRONT. Consider: that Oyster Bay is an extremely shallow body of water with a VERY SLOW water flushing rate - and it is therefore sensitive to any additional pollution burdens placed upon it - especially in addition to the apparently continuing sewage overflow and accidental discharge problems. In view of the above facts, all Ci~ Review and Approval organizations should proceed in a judiciously deliberate manner to assure that their eventual decision protects the interests and rights of the Public; and that THE PUBLIC INTERESTS ARE CONSIDERED BEFORE THE POTENTL~,L FOR PERSONAL GAINS FOR THE APPLICANTS / DEVELOPERS. Ladies and Gentlemen be also advised: - We are not lawyers - but have seen fit to bring the following items to the attention of the Mayor and City. Attorney, to refresh their memories. A.) IN 1992 THE WASI-I~GTON STATE SUPREME COURT MADE A DECISION placing the responsibility, upon the local officials to protect the procedural right of those who appear at a Quasi Judicial Hearing. LACK OF PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS IN LAND USE DECISIONS are no longer excused or tolerated bv the Washington State Supreme Court. Most land use decisions in Washington state are made at the local level, the Washington Courts had until recently given broad discretion to local government when making these decisions. If the court found an error the local body had to reconsider. Local governments rarely were required to pay monetary damages for land use decisions. In 1992 a Washington state-Supreme Court Decision changed things si_~nificantl¥; with a local bodybeing'ordered to pa_¥ damages for failure to follow the required procedural due process steps when reviewing a Land Use Permit Request The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal - the decision of the Washington court was upheld. Bremerton, it would appear, still has not received the word and insists upon following it's capricious course - attempting to disfranchise the citizens and squelching their voice in all matters which are in opposition to an as yet arcane CiG purpose. If the local official fails to protect Due Process rights at these proceeding - the City or even local officials may. have to pay monetary damages to the one harmed. B.) A recent court decision provides: One of the purposes of the Environmental Policy Act of 1971 is to ensure that environmental_factors are considered at the earliest possible stage, thereby allowing decisions to be based on complete disclosure of environmental consequences It is apparent that the existing Zoning Change application is incomplete as far as defining the long range probable consequences of that action The same court decision also ~ves us: The necessiO,_for pre_t~arine~ an E~¥~'IRON3~fE:VT.4£ I.¥IPA CT ST4 TE31ENT (costl.~9 does not depend on the present existence of specific proposals to develop the land in question or a certainty o fa immediate land use changes that ~[ill result from the action. C.) Another recent court case reversed a Land Use Permit decision and remanded the matter back to the cig for further consideration due to improper Public Notice being promulgated, Be ad~/sed that in the matter before you today the Bremerton DCD has apparently issued and published more than one improper Public Notice Sincerely: ~ -~ Ge~ge Miller Helen Miller 3 ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE adopting the 1999 amendment to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Plan Map pursuant to RC~V 36.70A. WHEll~A_S~ the City of Bremerton has adopted its revised Comprehensive Plan by Ordinance No. 4545 in February 1996; and WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton amended it's revised Comprehensive Plan and Map by Ordinance No. 4606 in September, 1997 and by Resolution No. 2702 in August, 1999; and WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 36.70A permits the City's Comprehensive Plan and Map to be amended no more than once per year; and WHEREAS, the City has received the following Comprehensive Plan Map amendment applications: 1. The Roger and Jennifer Nance Amendment, which changes a portion of the ~ Comprehensive Plan Map from "Low Density Residential" (LDR) to p2ct "General Business" (GB) as set out/n Exhibit A rifled "Nance-Kitsap Way/WesSon Place;" and 2. The David and Roxarma Jones Amendment, which changes a portion of the Official Zoning Map from "Medium and High Density Residential" (M/HDR) to "Business Park" (GB) as set out in Exhibit B titled '~ones- 2711 Weaton Way, 2828 & 3231 Hemlock Street;" and 3. The Ghodrat and Lila Aflatooni Amendment, which changes a portion of the Comprehensive Plan Map from "Medium and High Density Residential" (Mb') to "Health Care Center" (I-ICC) as set out in Exhibit C tifled "Aflatooni-804 Callahan Drive & 2802 Hemlock Street (Duplex at NE Comer);" and 4. The Merit Company Amendment, which changes a portion of the Comprehensive Plan Map from "Medium Density Residential" (MDR) to "General Business" (GB) as set out in Exhibit D tided "Merit Company- Riddell Road, West of Almira Drive, 4220 Wheaton Way;" and Page WHEREAS, the City seeks to amend:'t2h~=~;~{kl Facilities Element within the Comprehensive Plan as set out in Exhibit E dried "Revisions, 1999 Bremerton Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Element"; and WHEREAS, Comprehensive Plan amendments must be adopted by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Bremerton Planning Comrrhssion held public study sessions and meetings in January, and February 2000, and after considering the staff report and the public comments received, recommended adoption of the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, the City, Council has received the report of the Plann/ng Commission and additional public comments in open session; and WHEREAS, based on the reports and comments, the City Council £mds the following-. 1. The amendments are consistent with RCW Chapter 36.70A and will not result in Comprehensive Plan or regulation conflicts; and 2. Any changes in development or use potential effected by the amendments will not create significant adverse impacts on e~sting sensitive land. uses, businesses or residences; and 3. The amendments can be accommodated by all applicable public services and facilities, including transportation; and 4. The amendments w/il help implement the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; and 5. The amendments xvill have no substantive impacts beyond the City limits; and 6. The amendments will have no cumulative adverse impact; and WHEREAS, the City Council is concurrently passing, by separate ordinance, Official Zoning Map amendments consistent xvith these Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Plan Map amendments; now therefore THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Resolution No. 2702 is adopted by reference in so far as it is not inconsistent with the amendments below. Section 2. The Comprehensive Plan Map is amended to change said Map as Follows: Page 5 A. The Roger and Jennifer Nance Amendment, which changes a portion of the Comprehensive Plan Map from "Low Densi~ Residential" (LDR) to "General Business" (GB). Said Map Amendment affects property, located on the north side of IGtsap Way approximately 350 feet on either side of Welson Place. Specifically the property involved lies in the Southeast quarter of Section 16, Township 24 North, Range 01 East, W.M. and indudes tax parcels numbered 017, 022, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 030, 031, 032, 033, 034, 035, 036, and 075. Said Comprehensive Plan Map amendment is depicted in Exhibit A rifled "Nance-IGtsap Way / Weston Place," attached and incorporated herein; and B. The David and Roxanna Jones Amendment, which changes a portion of the Official Zoning Map from "Medium and High Density Residential" (M/HDR) to "Business Park" (CB). Said Map Amendment affects property situated between Wheaton Way and Hemlock Street north of Callahan Drive. Specifically the property involved lies in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12, Township 24 North, Range 01 East, W.M. and includes parcels found in the Plat of First Addition To Sheridan Park - Plat Number 3965, Block 000, lots 158-00, 159-00 and 160-00. Said Comprehensive Plan Map amendment is depicted in Exhibit B tided '~Jones-2711 Wheaton Way, 2828 & 3221 Hemlock Street," attached and incorporated herein; and C. The Ghodrat and l.{la Aflatooni Amendment, which changes a portion of the Comprehensive Plan Map from "Medium and High Density Residential" 0VIF) to "Health Care Center" (HCC). Said Map Amendment affects the property situated in the northeast comer of Hemlock Street and Callahan Drive. Specifically, the property involved lies in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12, Township 24 North, Range 01 East, W.M., and is described as Lot 164-00, Block 000, of the Plat of the First Addition To Sheridan Park, Plat Number 3965. Said Comprehensive Plan Map amendment is depicted in Exhibit C titled "Aflatooni-804 Callahan Drive & 2802 Hemlock Street (Duplex at NE Comer)," attached ,and incorporated herein; and D. The Merit Company Amendment, which changes a pordon of the Comprehensive Plan Map from "Medium Density Residential" (MDR) to "General Business" (GB). Said Map Amendment affects property,, lying adjacent to Wheaton Way, Riddell Road and Almira Drive. Specifically, the propert3~ involved lies in the Northwest 1/4 of Section t, Toxvnship 24 North, Range 01 East, W.M. and involves the north thirteen (13) acres of Tax Parcel Number 154 which is situated in the southwest comer of the intersection of Riddell Road and Almira Drive. Said Comprehensive Plan Map amendment is depicted in Exhibit D titled "Merit Company-Riddell Page ? P~oad, West of Almira Drive, 4220:~ay," attached and incorporated herein; and Section 3. The Capital Facilities Element is amended as set out in F_,xhibit E titled "Revisions, 1999 Bremerton Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities FAement," attached md incorporated herein. Section 4. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be ten (10) days from the date this ordinance is approved by the Mayor and City Council. APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of .... 2000. Passed by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of ~ 2000. CAROL ARENDS City Council President APPROVED this day of ,2000 LYNN HORTON Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY City Clerk CC .,~ 8O ~ ', ~ ~ ,~ '~L I '~, '~'~ ,~4~ :.~ "',d,.-, ,-.o"'-:~'~ "' t.,f"" - I ~: "~""' .~ J'~'"" .~1 v-': i \ ,, ....~.~" ~ ,.t~*:?-''; :' '~'"~""'~ .t,..-" ~ /"' ,, ' ~ .'-.j \ :i' '~.~' .,~. ,~.¢¢~...., . "'-- * '~"" ' \' E-O, ' ' IJ'~ ,:7.9¢ ~-00~ .,'~, " 14 :.. _ . ,, , EXHIBIT B. ~.,/' 'N?~-?~x~ JONES--- 2711 wHEAToN WAY, 2828 & 3231 HEMLOCK STREET ---- I ; ' I '/ ,- '-- ~ - .:. ~- ;__,.. ~__ .., _: J · 0 I, ~!- ~ ...",, ~.~: ....2_. ~ ~ ~o~ :"~ ~ " '~- ~ .~ ~: '. ~-. t : ; : ~ ~, I (~. , ' , '" -~; s~EET x k~ ~ · ::.:. ~ ' ~ ~ ~: , ,,~ ~. ,, - . ~" ~'~' I ~ ) ;%. ...... j - -- , "' ,. q, :Vs- : HOt L I S ~ SFRE[T ~ . · ...... EXHIBIT D. MERIT OOMPANY --- RIDDELL ROAD, WEST OF ALMIRA DRIVE, 4220 WHEATON WAY ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE mending the Official Zoning Map of the City. of Bremerton to conform to the 1999 amendment to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and Map. WHEREAS, the City. of Bremerton has adopted Ordinance No. ., containing the 1999 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Map; and WHEREAS, the 1999 amendment changes the Comprehensive Plan Map designations for several parcels as set forth in this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 36.70A requires that development regulations be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Map; and WHEREAS, the City has received Zoning Map amendment applications that will conform to and implement the Comprehensive Plan and which are described as follows: WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map designations are permitted outright under the new Comprehensive Plan designations for the subject properties; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map designations will accommodate needed changes in the vicinity, and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning map designations will benefit the Cid- of Bremerton; and WHEREAS, all essential public facilities are available and adequate; and WHEREAS, the rezoning will not create spot zones, now therefore, THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN: Section 1: That the Offidal Zoning Map be amended to change a portion of the Map from "Single Family Residential" (SF-3) to "General Business" (GB). Said Map Amendment affects property located on the north side of Kitsap Way approximately 350 feet on either side of Welson Place. Specifically the property involved lies in the Southeast quarter of Section 16, Toxvnship 24 Page 2. Nomhj Range 01 East, W.M. and incl~ff~rcels numbered 017, 022, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 030, 031,032, 033, 034, 035, 036, and 075. Said map amendment is depicted in Exhibit A titled "Nance-Kitsap Way / Weston Place," attached and incorporated herein; and Section 2: that the Official Zoning Map be amended to change a portion of the Map from "Multi-Family Residential" (MF) to "General Bus/ness" (GB). Said Map Amendment affects property situated between Wheaton Way and Hemlock Street north of Callahan Drive. Specifically the property involved lies in the Northwest 1/, of Section 12, Township 24 North, Range 01 East, W.M. and includes parcels found in the Plat of First Addition To Sheridan Park - Plat Number 3965, Block 000, lots 158-00, 159-00 and 160-00. Said map amendment is depicted in V,~rhibit B rifled '~ones-27t 1 Wheaton Way, 2828 & 3221 Hemlock Street," attached and incorporated herein; and Section 3: that the Official Zoning Map be amended to change a portion of the Map from "Multi-Family Residential" (MF) to "General Business" (GB). Said Map Pmaendment affects the property situated in the northeast comer of Hemlock Street and Callahan Drive. Specifically, the property involved lies in the Northwest 1/, of Section 12, Township 24 North, Range 0t East, W.M., and is described as Lot 164-00, Block 000, of the Plat of the First Addition To Sheridan Park, Plat Number 3965. Said map amendment is depicted in Exhibit C rifled "Aflatooni-804 Callahan Drive & 2802 Hemlock Street (Duplex at NE Comer)," attached and incorporated herein; and Section 4: that the Official Zoning Map be amended to change a portion of the Map from "Shopping Center" (SC) to "General Business" (GB) and "Multi-Family" (MF) to "General Business" (GB). Said Map Amendment affects property lying adjacent to Wheaton Way, Riddell Road and Almira Drive. Specifically, the property involved lies in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 1, Toxvnship 24 North, Range 01 East, W.M. and involves tax parcel 122 which lies in the southeast comer of the intersection of Wheaton Way and Riddell Road and the north thirteen (13) acres of tax parcel number 154 which is situated in the southwest comer of the intersection of Riddell Road and Almira Drive. Said map amendment is depicted in Exhibit D tided "Merit Company- Riddell Road, West of Almira Drive, 4220 Wheaton Way," attached and 'incorporated herein; and Section 5: The effective date of this Ordinance sh,xll be ten (10) days from the date this ordinance is approved by the Mayor and City Council. Page 5 APPROVED by the City Council of the City o£Bremerton this day of ,2000. Passed by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of ., 2000. CAROL ARENDS City Council President APPROVED this day of ,2000 LYNN HORTON Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY City Clerk JONES --- 27~ WHEATON WAY, 2828 & 323~ HEMLOCK STREET "!':':~"~' ~ '- ~ '1 I1 t~ [-:, ....... !-~ ...... ~-~-"-o'~-, ................ -'°~':~ ~N ~' .~ ',, - ~ .:, .:~---.. :.~. .~. ~ ~., .~ S9~ OOZ ' · ~ .~ ~'-' .q. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ~ E~HIBIT C} I/" AF~TOONi --- 804 CAL~HAN DRIVE & 2802 HEMLOCK STREET (DUPLEX __ i , , -. ~ - CL EMEN5 ,~,~ , . , I1' Ijr, ~[~F~I ~ ~ . ~ . ,~. l, r~i ~.C'-I _.. I-=z .... ~ ~ , '~ , ~,, . . ~ J~ ~ , ~ .~ , '~ ~ ,~ ~ ~.~ · ~ "' ~ ' '~"~' '~ " ~ . a-.;';.c- i=-*.*. ~ - , " . ' ' ~ m ' '4 ~Z~ ,'?;; j~,.,,.~ ' ~ ......... -'~ T ............ ~ .......... ~I~ ..... ~; - _ ~ ~ '" ,_. ~- ~ "~ ~ EXHIBIT D. MERIT COMPANY --- RIDDELL ROAD, WEST OF ALMIRA DRIVE, 4220 WHEATON WAY CITY COLTNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2702 A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, regarding the adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 98-0001 W1TEREAS, the State of Washington required that the City of Bremerton prepare a Comprehensive Plan consistent with the requirements of WAC 365-195, The Growth Management Act (OMA); and WWEREAS, the City adopted a Comprehensive Plan in April 1995 after completing environmental review consistent with the requirements of the WAC 197-11 the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), holding noticed public heatings, and taking comment from the public, other jurisdictions and agencies; and WlTEREAS, following an appeal and related corrections, the Comprehensive Plan was readopted by ordinance No. 4545 on February 21, 1956; and WITEREAS the GMA requires that Comprehensive Plans be amended no more than once per year, excepting those amendments which are necessary to implement the plan, or to address an emergency; and WWEREAS the Comprehensive Plan contains Element K - Implementation, Consistency and Concurrency, which provides procedures and review criteria associated with mending the plan; and Wl:rEREAS Element K requires that the all amendment proposals be considered' concurrently (in a package) by the Planning Commission and the City Council so that their cumulative effects can be ascertained; and W1TEREAS. throughout the year, applications for Plan Amendments have been collected and placed on a docket for processing together after April 1 consistent with the schedule contained within Element K.; and WHEREAS. six (6) applications for revisions to the Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan's Land Use and/or the Official Zoning Map were received on or before the deadline for receipt of applications; and W1TEREAS the City has proposed amendments to the Land Use, Transportation, and Capital Facilities Elements of the Comprehensive Plan; and WH'EREAS, the City-initiated amendments have been included in the docket, and will be reviewed concurrent w/th the other applications for amendment; and Wl:I-EREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A. 106(3), the proposed amendment has been reviewed by the State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development 60 days before final action on the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, environmental review consistent with the requirements of SEPA (WAC 197-t 1) was initiated by the City, and resulted in the issuance of a Determination of Non-significance 0DNS) on September 2nd, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the docket in workshop session on May 19th and August 25th 1998; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on September 15th, 1998 for the purpose of receiving and considering testimony concerning the proposed docket; and WHEREAS, the meeting was properly noticed and open to the public; and WHEREAS, the Suquamish Tribe filed an appeal on the Determination of Nonsignificance and has subsequently withdrawn its appeal; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on August 18, 1999, for the purpose of receiving, and considering testimony concerning the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and appeal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council considered each application in order to evaluate consistency with the approval criteria contained in Element K; NOW THER.EI~'ORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Bremerton finds the Determination of Nonsignificance adequate and that the proposed amendment: 1. Is consistent with the GMA and not result in conflicts between the plan and regulations; 2. Will not create significant adverse impacts on existing sensitive land uses, businesses or residents; 3. Can be accommodated by all applicable public services and facilities including transportation; 4. Help implement the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; and 5. Has been sent to State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development and Kitsap County for review and comment. BE IT FURTIt-ER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Bremerton adopts Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 98-0001 with attendant amendments to the Official Zoning Map of the City of Bremerton, subject to the removal of any reference to floride within the text of the Capital Facility Element as shown in Exhibit A. ~ ~1 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this /,~,~ day of -" J/MIXE~~IJ~KD, Council President ATTEST: ICa. TI-lI.h-'~Xl McCLUSKEY, City CIe/k NOTICE OF PUBLIC ltEARING Bremerton City Council The Bremerton City Council will conduct a public hearing on the following item during its regular meeting on Wednesday, April 26, 2000, which will be~n at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chambers of the Bremerton City Hall, 239 4*~ Street, Bremerton, WA. PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-0001 A. Kitsap Wav/Weslon Place: Roger & Jmanifer Nance, as applicant~, request Map Amo~arlrne~t and Map Rezone of properties on or adjacent to Kitsap Way and Weslon Place - proposed change from Plan Map desi~,nation "Low-Density residental (LDR) to Genea~al & Highway Commercial (C-G)" and Zoning Map desiotmation change from "Single-Family Residential (SF-3) to General Business (GB)? B. Wheaton Way and Hemlock Street: David & Roxanna Jones, as applicant.q, request Map Amlmdmea~t and Map Rezone of properties at 2711 Wheaton Way, 2828 & 3231 Heaulock St- proposed change from Plan Map designation ~Medium and High I)emity Rl~idonfial (M_/HDR) to Bnsiness Park (BP)" and Rezone lvlap change from ~vlulfi-Family Residential {MF)" to "General B-~ness (GB)." C. NE Comer of Callahan Drive and Hemlock Street: Ghodrat (Allen) Aflatooni/Lila Aflatooni, as applicants, request Plan's Map Lamt Use designation for the property shown on the applicant's site plan be mended from "Medium and High-Density Residential (Ivl/t-IDR)" to ~Health Care Center (HCC)." Furthermore, the applicant requests rezoning the property f~om "Multi-Family Residential (lvlF)" to "Health Care (I-IC)." D. SW Comer of Riddell Road & Almina Drive: Merit Company, as applicant, Plan's Map Land Use designation for thirteen acre north portion of a twenty acre property at Riddell and Almira be mended from "Medium-Density Residential (lVlDR)" to "General & Highway Commercial (C- G)." Furthermore, the applicant requests rezoning this property from ~Medium-Density Residential (MF)" to "General Business (GB)' and also the propeaW at 4220 Wheaton Way be rezoned from "Shopping Center (SC) to General Business (GB)." E. Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Update: City of Bremerton as applicant, is proposing mLqcellaneous changes to the CFP to bring it up-to-date. All interested persons may appear and provide testimon.~ on the matter. The Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 286 4~' Street, Bremerton, WA 98337, will receive written comments and other exhibits on the above item up to 5:00 PM on the day of hearing. Written comments and other exhibits may also be submitted to the council prior to the close of the public hearing. Staff reports and copies of pertinent materials can be obtained from the DCD. Call James Coombes at (360) 478-5845 for additional information. PLANNING COM]VHSSION RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION of the Planning Commission of the City of Bremerton, Washington, regarding the adoption of the 1999 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. WHEREAS, the City of Brcmerton adopted its revised Comprehensive Plan by Ordinance No. 4545 in February 1996; and WHEREAS, requested and proposed aracndmcmz to thc Plan were docket in acco~ce with an adopted procedure for amending the Plan once per year, were processed through thc Planning Commission public hcaxings on January 44 and February 15t~ 2000; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission of the City of Bremerton hereby finds after review of the following sections of the 1999 Comprehensive Plan Amendment: A. Wa¥/W~zlgn PI,~?~: Roger & J~tmifer Nancy, as applicants, am rextuesting a Map Amendment and Map Rezone of propg~es on or adjacent to Kitsap Way and Wesion Place - proposed change fi.om Plan Map designation "Low- D~sity residential (LDR) to General & Highway Commercial (C-G)" and Zoning Map designation change fi.om "Single-Family Residential (SF-3) to General Business (GB).' B. Wheaten Way and H~tiock Street: David & Roxanna Jones, as applicants, am r~uesting a Map Amendment and Map Re, zone of propc-rties at 2711 Wheaten Way, 2828 & 3231 Heanlock St - proposed change from Plan Map designation "Medium and High Density Residevti~! (M/HDR) to Business Park (BP)" and R~zone Map designation change from "Multi-Family Residential (MF)' to "General Business (GB)." C. NE Comer of Cellahan Drive and Hemlock Street: Ghodrat (Allen) Aflatooni/Lil. a Aflatooni, as applicants, request that the Plan's Map Land Use designation for the properties shown on the applicant's site plan be amended from "Mextium and High-Density Residential (M/HDR)" to "Health Care Center CHCC).' Furthermore, ' the applicant request~ that the zoning designation for these properties be changed fi.om "Multi-Family Residential (MF)" to ''H~alth Care (HC)." D. SW Comer of Ridd¢ll Road & Almira Drive: Merit Company, as applicant, r~uests that the Plan's Map Land Use desi,~m'~ntion for the ten acm north portion of the property at Ridd¢ll and Almira be amended from "Medium- Density Residential (MDR)" to "General 8: Highway Commercial (C-G)" with no access to Almira Drive. Furthermore, the applicant requests that the zoning designation for this property bc changed from "Medium- Density R~sidential (MF)' to "General Business (GB)" and that the property at 4220 Wheaten Way be rezoned fi.om "Shopping Center (SC) to General Business (GB)." E. Capi -i iliti= Plan tc r6 p t : City of Bremeao. as appli t, is proposing =soena eous nen e. to BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Planning Commission of the City of Bremerton does hereby recommend APPROVAL. JOAN DINGFI'F..LD ~.) Date Chair PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION # ffD~9~9 -- O,~ A RESOLUTION of the Planning Commission of the City of Bremerton, Washington, regarding the adoption of the 1999 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton adopted its revised Comprehensive Plan by Ordinance No. 4545 in February 1996; and WHEREAS, requested and proposed amendments to the Plan were docket in accordance with an adopted procedure for arncnding thc Plan once per year, were processed through thc Planning Commission public hearings on January 4th and February 15~ 2000; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission of the City of Bremcrton hereby finds after review of the following sex. ions of the 1999 Comprehensive A. Place: Roger & Jennifer Nance, as are reque~ing a Map Amendment and Map Rezone of on or adjacent to Kit.sap Way - proposed change from Plan Map designation "Low- maidential (LDR) to General (C-G)" and Zoning Map designation change from Residential (SF-3) (GB)." B. Hemlock StreW: as applicants, are requesting a Map Amendment and Map Rezone at 2711 Way, 2828 & 3231 Hemlock St - proposed change from Plan Map designation m and High ' Residential (M/HDR) to Business Park (BP)" and Rezone Map desi ~ Residential (MF)" to "General Business (GB)." C. NE Hemlock Street: Ghodrat (Allen) Aflatooni/Lila Aflatooni, as applicants, request that the Plan's Land Use designation for the properties shown on the applicant's site plan be amended r Residential (M/HDR)' to "Health Care Center (HCC)." Furthermore, the applicant that the . designation for these properties be changed from "Multi-Family Residential (MB"to D. SW Come~fRiddell Road Merit Company, as applicant, requests that the Plan's Map Land Use desij~fiation for the ten ,a,,cre ,n, orth of the property at Riddell and Almira be amended from "Medium- Densi~rResidential (MDR) ' to 'Gen Highway Commercial (C-G)" with no access to Almira Drive. Furt)(ermore, the applicant requests that the : designation for this property be changed from "Medium- Dj~6sity Residential 0V[F)" to "General ] f' and that the property at 4220 Wheaton Way be rezoned ~ffom "Shopping Center (SC) to General -rh~3~ ~'~c~ ~,e~,~: ,~.??,~oO~ a.t- E. Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Update: City of Bremerton as applicant, is proposing miscellaneous amendments to the CFP to bring it up-to-date. BE IT FLIRTItER RESOLVED, the Planning Commission of the City of Bremerton does hereby recommend JOAN DINGFIELD ,.~ Date Chair The 1~99 docket of Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests includes: EXHIBIT A. Kitsap Wav/Weslon Place: Roger & Jennifer Nance, as applicants, request a Map Amendment and Map Rezone of properties on or adjacent to Kitsap Way and Weslon Place - proposed Plan Map redesignation from "Low-Density Residential (LDR) to General & Highway Commercial (C-G)" and Zoning Map change from "Single-Family Residential (SF-3) to General Business (GB)." EXHIBIT B. Wheaton Way and Hemlock Street: David & Roxanna Jones, as applicants, request a Plan Map Amendment and Map Rezone of properties at 2711 Wheaton Way, 2828 & 3231 Hemlock St - from Plan Map designation "Medium and High Density Residential (M/HDR)" to "Business Park (BP)" and Zoning Map change from "Multi-Family Residential 0VIF)" to "General Business (GB)." EXHIBIT C. NE Comer of Callahan Drive and Hemlock Street: Ghodrat (Allen) Aflatooni/ Lfla Aflatooni, as applicants, request Plan Map Amendment from "Medium and . High-Density Residential (M/HDR)" to "Health Care Center (HCC)" and Zoning Map change from ~Vlulti-Family Residential (MF)" to "Health Care (HC)." EXHIBIT D. SW Comer of Riddell Road & Almira Drive: Merit Company, as applicant, requests Plan Map Amendment to redesi~tmate thirteen acre north portion of a twenty acre property at Riddell and Almira from "Medium-Density Residemial (MI)R)" to "General & Highway Commercial (C-G)" and Zoning Map change from "Medium-Density Residential (IV[F)" to "General Business (GB)" Furthermore, the applicant requests Zoning Map change for the property at 4220 Wheaton Way from "Shopping Center (SC)" to "General Business (GB)." EXHIBIT E. Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Update: City of Bremerton as applicant, is proposing miscellaneous changes to the CFP to bring it up-to-date. Each component of the 1999 Comprehensive Plan Amendment must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for City council approval. These criteria will be addressed specifically in the description of each proposed amendment. 1. The proposal is consistent with the provisions of the Growth Management Act and will not result in Plan or regulation conflicts; and 2. The proposal will change the development or use potential of a site or area without creating significant adverse impacts on existing sensitive land uses, businesses, or residents, and 3. The proposed amendment can be accommodated by all applicable public services and facilities, including transportation; and 4. The proposal will help implement the goals and polices of the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan; and 5. If the proposal could have substantive impacts beyond the City limits, it has been sent to Kitsap County for review and comment. [NOTE: All proposed amendments are sent to affected or interested jurisdictions and state agencies for a 60-day review.] Staff RePort: ~-=~ EXHiBiT Ao NANCE --- X~TSAP WAY/WE/~L©N PLACE File: PL99-0011 Applicant: Roger and Jennifer Nance P.O. Box 3161 Silverdale, WA 98383 Contact: Victor Targett Phone: (360) 731-5550 Location: Kitsap Way/Weslon Place Description: The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is a non-project specific amendment and does not include specific development plans. The current application proposes a map amendment to 17 lots that total approximately 6.5 acres. Five of the lots front Kitsap Way. The remaining lots lie immediately north of the Kitsap Way lots along Weslon Place. Approval of the subject application does not constitute approval of any development proposals. Individual development proposals for this parcel will require separate applications and review pursuant to WAC 197-11 and, where appropriate, WAC 173-27, and consistency with all applicable critical area and land use/zoning standards. In addition, the review process will include public comment periods on the proposals. PropOsal: The applicant requests that the Plan's Map Land Use designation for the properties shown on the applicant's site plan be amended from "Low-Density Residential (LDK)" to "General & Highway-Commercial (C-G)." Furthermore, the applicant requests that the zoning designation for these properties be changed from "Low-density Residential SF-3" to "General Business (GB)." Approval Criteria: 7_~ Ail proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan amendment must meet the five criteria listed. This proposal meets criteria as follows: 1. Consistent with GlVIA and regulations: This proposal does not conflict with any of the GMA or City planning goals and is especially consistent with goals dealing with urban growth, reducing sprawl, encouraging economic development, etc. 2. No significant adverse effects: Twelve (12) of the seventeen (17) lots currently have single-family residences located on them. The other five lots are currently vacant. The properties slope toward Oyster Bay. Most of the lots are within 200 feet of the shoreline. The Shoreline Permit and/or SEPA process will help disclose any potential impacts fi.om a specific new development proposal. Bremerton's Critical Lands Ordinance would also ensure that potential development impacts related to any critical slope, geological baTards and wetland conditions will be mitigated. 3. Can be accommodated by all services, facilities and transportation: The site has been served with all services, facilities, and utilities for several decades and fronts on a major arterial. No significant conflict is anticipated here. 4. Will help implement the goals and policies of the Comp. Plan: Encouraging new economic development, finding new sites for commercial development, and attracting new businesses to the City are local policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. This proposal is consistent with those polices and objectives. 5. Impacts beyond the City limits: This map area is within the City of Bremerton and not near unincorporated areas of Kitsap County. The site is expected at some future point to accommodate new commercial development that might otherwise locate outside the City. It is not expected that the new development will adversely impact areas beyond the City limits but could reduce traffic somewhat by providing new shopping and employment opportunities within the City, within walking distance of the residential neighborhood, and in an area served by public transit. Additional Discussion: The proposed amendment presents several issues for consideration: Land Use: The conversion of properties within the area of consideration that fronts on Kitsap Way appears appropriate. Kitsap Way is a major arterial carrying between 33,19 l (at Oyster Bay Avenue) to 34,883 (at State Route 3) average daily trips. This amount of traffic is considered of a sufficient level to create commercial development opportunities. Such a conversion would bridge a current "ga!6~=~rcially planned land uses that currently exists along Kitsap Way and the change would represent a logical extension of commercial uses along the road. Further, a commercial strip of development along Kitsap Way would provide a buffer between residential properties along Oyster Bay and noise and air qualky impacts caused by traffic along Kitsap Way. Staff recognizes that certain commercial land uses could also create noise and possibly other impacts on the nearby residences. But through appropriate site planning and design, these impacts could be minimized. However, this proposed component of the amendment includes properties that extend beyond the frontage of Kitsap Way to Oyster Bay. As a result, several homes would be converted to commercial uses over time if this component is approved as proposed. In addition, there would remain two smaller single family residential areas lying west and east of the area in question. Over time, the development of commercial uses may place pressure to convert these two smaller areas (particularly the area to the west) to commercial uses. Thus, the approval of the component may lead to conversion of an existing small, residential neighborhood to nonresidential uses. This situation, while promoting the economic goals and policies of the comprehensive plan, may not carry out Housing Policy 5. of Housing Element Goal 4, which states: "Promote safe, attractive, livable neighborhoods that will attract homeowners." As a result of the above discussion, it appears that there is no technical reason to deny the component as proposed. However, there is a potential policy issue for Commission consideration as to how much of the area should be redesignated from residential to commercial uses. Should the entire area be redesignated keeping in mind that a majority of property owners in the area support this amendment. Further, any change will likely occur over long period of time. Conversely, should the City promote the conversion ora viable neighborhood to nonresidential uses? If the Commission chooses to limit the amendment to the area along Kitsap Way, then it should include enough properties to provide sufficient depth from the street to allow for commercial development to occur (a minimum of approximately 120 feet). Traffic and Circulation: The intersection of Weslon Place and Kitsap Way is not a signalized intersection, but may need to be as a result of commercial development. Also, Weslon Place is currently a narrow street not designed for commercial development. According to the Public Works Department, a traffic signal may or may not be required depending on the type of commercial activities that develop in the area. Services and Facilities: According to the Public Works Department, storm conveyance piping will likely need to be extended into Oyster Bay to adequately serve new commercial development. As a result of the above situation, commercial development will need to participate in providing the required road, drainage and any other needed improvements. Planning Goal 12. B. of the Comprehensive Plan supports this notion by specifying that new development-be required to pay a fair share costs~ervices and facilities. To fulfill this goal, the amendment should be linked to an implementation program to determine the extent of improvements needed to accommodate commercial development and a method for development to provide those needed improvements. Recommendation: Staff supports APPROVAL of this component of the amendment recognizing that the Commission may wish to consider an area less than proposed to help preserve the existing residential neighborhood in the area. Regardless of the amount of commercial area included in the amendment, staff also recommends that an implementation program be approved by the City prior to the development of any commercial uses. Staff RepOrt: EXHIBI? Bo JONE~ --- 271 HEMLOCK File: PL99-0015 Applicant: David and Roxaima Jones 2711 Wheaton Way Bremerton, WA 98310 Contact: David Jones Phone: (360) 698-5150 Location: Wheaton Way, south of Sheridan Road and east of'Hemlock Street. CC. .% I '~\ ~ ,:~..t~_5~) :~'~ . . .:, ~,3k:.~. ,' ~I ~ ~ X .~ ' ' ..~ ., ~.~ '-- -~,/' .... mA ~ '~ '~. ~- .~ . . ~ ; ., - --,~ .._--._ ...... - , ~, EXHIBIT B. ~,/.. ~~,,. . JONES --- 27~1 WHEATON WAY, 2828 & 3231 HEMLOCK STREET -~ Description: ~-~ The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is a non-project specific amendment and does not include specific development plans. The current application proposes a map amendment to change the designation of three lots that total approximately one acre. All three lots front Wheaton Way. The two northern lots are through-lots that also have frontage on Hemlock Street. Approval of the subject application does not constitute approval of any development proposals. Individual development proposals for this parcel will require separate applications and review pursuant to WAC 197-11 and consistency with all applicable critical area and land use/zoning standards. In addition, the review process will include public comment periods on the proposal. Proposal: The applicant requests that the Plan's Map Land Use designation for the properties shown on the applicant's site plan be amended from "Medium and High-Density Residential (M/HDR)" to "Business Park (BP)." Furthermore, the applicant requests that the zoning designation for these properties be changed from "Medium-Density Residential (MF)" to "General Business (GB)." Approval Criteria: All proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan amendment must meet the five criteria listed. This proposal meets criteria as follows: 1. Consistent with GMA and regulations: This proposal does not conflict with any of the GMA or City planning goals and is especially consistent with goals dealing with urban growth, reducing sprawl, encouraging economic development, etc. 2. No significant adverse effects: Two of the three lots currently have single-family residences located on them. The other lot is vacant of structures. The lots lie between Wheaton Way and Hemlock Street. No further development is proposed at this time, though, the house at 2711 Wheaton Way is planned to convert to a law office for the applicant. No critical land issues apply. 3. Can be accommodated by all services, facilities and transportation: The site has been served with all services, facilities, and utilities for several decades and all three lots have frontage on Wheaton Way. No significant conflict is anticipated here. 4. Will help implement the goals and policies of the Comp. Plan: Encouraging new economic development, finding new sites for commercial development, and attracting new businesses to the City are local policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. This proposal is consistent with those polices and objectives. 5. Impacts beyond the City limits: This map area is within the City of Bremerton and not near unincorporated areas of Kitsap County. The site is expected at some future point to accommodate new commercial development that might otherwise locate outside the City. It is not expected that the new development will adversely impact areas beyond the City limits but could reduce traffic somewhat by providing new business and employment opportunities within the City, within walking distance of the residential neighborhood, and in an area served by public transit. Additional Discussion: The proposed amendment presents several issues for consideration: Land Use: Prior to the adoption of the Harrison District Plan and the Comp Plan Amendment of 1997, these properties and those in the surrounding area were zoned "Professional Office." The Harrison Plan redesignated the area between Warren Avenue and Wheaton Way/Clare Street to "Multifamily Residential" and effectively creating a "wall" of residential between the high traffic volume of Warren Avenue and Harrison Hospital: Further, this residential area is isolated4~m~yther residential neighborhoods in the area. As a result, staffviews that as the influence of Harrison Hospital expands and more medical clinics/offices are sought for the area, this multifamily area is the logical extension for health care facilities and other professional offices. Aside from the broader issues discussed above, the proposed changes in the comprehensive plan and zoning for the site appears appropriate. The propogal is immediately adjacent to the proposed Olympic Business Park shown in the Harrison Plan. Further, access can be obtained from Wheaton Way, which between Sheridan Road and Callahan Drive, carries traffic moving to and from Harrison Hospital. This would avoid bringing traffic for the offices from Hemlock Street which serves the residential area. Another consideration is that such a conversion would reduce a current "gap" of commercial land uses that currently exists along Wheaton Way. A commercial strip of development along Wheaton Way would provide a buffer between residential properties on Hemlock Street and noise and air quality impacts caused by traffic along Wheaton Way. Staff recognizes that certain commercial land uses could also create noise and possibly other impacts on the nearby residences. But through appropriate site planning and design, these impacts could be minimized. Traffic and Circulation: Wheaton Way traffic between Sheridan and Callahan carries 2789 vehicles in the southbound lane and 399 vehicles in the northbound lane. Traffic from the redesignation of these three lots would not add significantly to the current number of vehicles. Relocation of Wheaton Way: The Harrison District Plan proposes for the relocation of Wheaton Way between Callahan Drive and Sheridan Road to a more north/south route. Depending on the design of the road and development of the Olympic Business Park, access to the subject site could still be attained from Wheaton Way. However, the proposed realignment of Wheaton Way may not occur for a number of years. As a result, further amendments such as the companion component ()dlatooni) may redesignate the entire area between Hemlock Street and Wheaton Way to a nonresidential use and thus making Hemlock more appropriate for access to this area. Services and Facilities: According to the Public Works Department, adequate services for this redesignation exist in the Wheaton Way right-of-way. Recommendation: Staff supports APPROVAL of this component of the amendment. Staff Report: EXHIBIT Co AFLATO©N][ --- HEMLOCK STREET (DUPLEX AT NE CORNER) File: PL99-00§7 Applicant: Ghodrat (Allen) Aflatooni/Lila Aflatooni P.O. Box 1550 Silverdale, WA 98383 Contact: Ghodrat (Allen) Aflatooni Phone: (360) 377-9744 Location: NE comer of Callahan Drive and Hemlock Street ...... ~&~ -~ ---- -- --~- -- ~ z .............. ~' fiB.P/c_ ~ ' :~ ~-~ %, :' ~,~-.~.L "},, I " -- ' - - ,: ~ Ji-~- -L~ '~ ,' ~ EXHIBII O~ ' .... I," AF~TOONI--- 804 CALLAHAN DRIVE & 2802 HEMLOCK STREET (DUPLEX -_ Description The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is a non-project specific amendment and does not include specific development plans. The current application proposes a map amendment to change the designation of an approximately 10,000 SF lot (0.23 acres) at the northeast comer of Callahan Drive and Hemlock Street. Approval of the subject application does not constitute approval of any development proposals. Individual development proposals for this lot will require separate applications and review pursuant to WAC 197-11 and consistency with all applicable critical area and land use/zoning standards. In addition, the review process will include public comment periods on the proposal. Proposal: The applicant requests that the Plan's Map Land Use designation for the properties shown on the applicant's site plan be amended fi.om "Medium and High-Density Residential (M/HI)K)" to "Health Care Center (I-ICC)." Furthermore, the applicant requests that the zoning designation for these properties be changed fi-om "Medium-Density Residential (IvlF)" to "Health Care (HC)." Approval Criteria: All proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan amendment must meet the five criteria listed. This proposal meets criteria as follows: 1. Consistent with GMA and regulations: This proposal does not conflict with any of the GMA or City planning goals and is especially consistent with goals dealing with urban ~owth, reducing sprawl, encouraging economic development, etc. 2. No significant adverse effects: The lot currently has a duplex residential structure on the property. No further development is proposed at this time, though, the property is planned to be remodeled into medical offices in the future. No critical land issues apply. 3. Can be accommodated by all services, facilities and transportation: The site has been served with all services, facilities, and utilities for many years and the lot has frontage on Callahan Drive. No significant conflict is anticipated here. 4. Will help implement the goals and policies of the Comp. Plan: Encouraging new economic development, finding new sites for commercial development, and attracting new businesses to the City are local policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. This proposal is consistent with those polices and objectives. 5. Impacts beyond the City limits: This map area is within the City of Bremerton and not near unincorporated areas of Ydtsap County. The site is expected at some future point to accommodate new commercial development that might otherwise locate outside the City. It is not expected that the new development will adversely impact areas beyond the City limits but could reduce traffic somewhat by providing new business and employment opportunities within the City, within walking distance of the residential neighborhood, and in an area served by public transit. Additional Discussion: The proposed amendment presents several issues for consideration: Land Use: The applicant is proposing a change to the comp plan from "Medium and High Density Residential" to "Heath Care Center" and to rezone the site from "Multifamily Residential" to "Professional Office". Staff has no technical concerns with the comp plan amendment since it is adjacent to an existing area designated "Health Care Center". However, the proposed rezoning would result in a potential spot zone which would raise potential legal issues. Thus, staff is recommending that the proposed rezone should be to "Health Care" which is an existing district to the south of the site. This change would still allow the applicant to procee~el.inic which is the purpose of the request. Prior to the adoption of the Harrison District Plan and the Comp Plan Amendment of 1997, these properties and those in the surrounding area were zoned "Professional Office." The Harrison Plan redesignated the area between Warren Avenue and Wheaton Way/Clare Street to "Multifamily Residential" and effectively creating a "wall" of residential between the high traffic volume of Warren Avenue and Harrison Hospital. Further, this residential area is isolated from other residential neighborhoods in the area. As a result, staffviews that as the influence of Harrison Hospital expands and more medical clinics/offices are sought for the area, this multifamily area is the logical extension for heakh care facilities and other professional offices. Aside from the broader issues discussed above, the proposed changes in the comprehensive plan and zoning for the site appears appropriate. The proposal is immediately north of the existing Health Care Center shown in the Harrison Plan and the designation of the site represents a logical extension. Further, access should not be an issue since Callahan Drive is a major roadway and the site would not "bring in" traffic too far on Hemlock Street north of Callahan since the site is at the comer of the intersection of the streets. Another consideration is that such a conversion would reduce a current "gap" of commercial land uses that currently exists along Wheaton Way. A commercial strip of development along Wheaton Way would provide a buffer between residential properties on Hemlock Street and noise and air quality impacts caused by traffic along Wheaton Way. Staff recognizes that certain commercial land uses could also create noise and possibly other impacts on the nearby residences. But through appropriate site planning and design, these impacts could be minimized. Services and Facilities: According to the Public Works Department, adequate services for this redesignation exist in the Wheaton Way right-of-way. Recommendation: Staff supports APPROVAL of this component of the amendment. Involvement Program; Environmental Manage~jae,t~3nd Implementation, Consistency & Concurrency. The following discussion summarizes specific impacts of the plan on the Harrison District. Land Use Element Promotes Mix of Uses The Land Use Element of the City's new comprehensive plan designates areas where various land uses will be allowed. In the Harrison distdct the plan provides for a mix of uses ranging from "Low Density Residential' to "General and Professional Offices" to 'Parks" to 'Hospital'. The plan doesn't call for any major changes in land use in the neighborhood, since it is almost fully developed,s (See Figure 3-1) Harrison District PLAN DESIGNATIONS I.~R Low DemiVy Residential MDR Medium Density Residential HDR High Density Residential C-G General & Highway Commercial C-P General & Profe~ional Offices OS Open Space P Park facilities H Hospital Figure 3-1 Adopted Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Map Objectives The Land Use Element identifies the need for a "specific area plan" for the 'Harrison Health Services District". (See Appendix B) The element sets forth seven objectives to form a minimum framework for the area plan: 1. To build on past health services and commercial investments. 2. To improve access to the service providers, as well as circulation within the distdct. 3. To maintain and strengthen the professional relationships between Harrison Hospital and surrounding physicians' offices and related medical services. Hamson Distdct Plan 3 - 3 Harrison Distn'ct ~.~-..~,-'~ ZONES DR Duplex Residential MR Mixed Residential GB General Business _J [. 2~.~ st. , PO Professional Office ~,~m~, ,a. ~\ MR PS Parks and Schools PS MF PS Figure 3-2 Bmmerton Zoning Map /rl~--~ L-- I { ~ ~1 '7 Harrison District Plan 3 - 7 AN ORDINANCE adopffn~ ~e Harrison Dist~ct Plan ~ an Amendment ~o ~e Bremer~on ComprehensiYe Plan. WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton adopted a revised Comprehensiv.e Plan by resolution in April 1995 and readopted the Plan by Ordinance Ne. 4545 in February 1996 to include amendments ordered by the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board; and WHE. REAS, an area plan for the Harrison District has since been prepared to identify and address the concerns of the people who live, work or own property in the vicinity of Harrison Hospital and its adjacent business district; and WI:IEREAS, comprehensive sub-area plans ~re exempt from statutes that limit other amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plans to once per year; and WI~REAS, the preparation of the Harrison District Plan included public involvement at neighborhood meetings, Planning Commission study sessions, public hearings on May 21 and June 25, and culminating in a recommendation for City Council adoption; and WHF~REAS, the Plan was submitted for a mandatory 60-day review by state agencies in 3uno, 1996, during which no comments were received from any State agency; and WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on these proposed amendments on September 18, 1996 to accept additional public comments and to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission; now therefore THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN Section 1. The Harrison District Plan, attached hereto as Exkibit "A", is hereby adopted as an amendment to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan. APPROVED by the City CoUncil on the fn~t reading this / ff~/tv day o£ ~ ~_go-rc/~g/~ , 1996. / PASSED by the Bremerton City Council this ~~ . , , day of Bremerton City Council APPROVED this \ day of C~-k--~c~,~.~ , 1996. L OaTO , Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk ORDINANCE A_N OI~LD[NANCE ~mend~$ the Bremerton Zon~g Ordk~a~¢e and Zoning Map to add the new "Health Care (~C)" and "Shoreline Mixed Use (SMU~" zone& WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council adopted the Harrison District Plan as an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan in September, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Harrison Plan included a number of proposals and recommendations aimed at strengthening this district as a health care center, business, and residential center; and WI:IEREAS, those recommendations included two new zones, the "Health Care (HC)" zone to be applied to Harrison Hospital and its surrounding health-related business district, and the "Shoreline Mixed Use (SMU)' zone which was to be applied to a narrow corridor south of Campbell Way and Wheaton Way and along the existing high bluff; and WHEREAS, public hearings were conducted by the Bremerton Planning Commission in 1996 prior to adoption of the Harrison Plan, and a public hearing was conducted on December 17, 1996, to consider the proposed zoning amendments, followed by a recommendation for City. Council adoption of those amendments; and WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on February. 26, t 997, to accept public comments pertaining to the proposed zoning amendments and considered the Plarming Commission's recommendation; now, therefore THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN Section 1. The Bremerton Zoning Ordinance (BMC 21.02) is amended as follows: (a) Figure 080 Zones (table), is amended to add the the following to the "Special Purpose" category: "HC Health Care" "SMU Shoreline Ivlixed Use" LYNN HORToN, Mayor ATTEST: KATH~EEN City Clerk l 3-C'zma-5-96.ord ---~ Eastpark Harrison Hospital Community Business Sheridan Community Center Sheridan Park (expanded) Community Theater Shoreline Mixed Use District Shoreline/Bluff Open Space Low Density Residential Medium & High Density. Residential Olympic View Business Park (expanded) -"-....--' Trails& Pathways · Future Acquisition for Park Expansion Figure 6-1 Harrison District Land Use Plan Map Hamson D/strict Plan 6 - 8 MR MF HC / EA~TPARK NAVAL PARK HC AREA Harrison District ~ ZONING DR Duplex Residential MF Multi-family Residential MR Mixed Residential PO Professional Office GB General Business HC Health Care SMU Shoreline Mixed Use PS Parks & Schools - Figure 7-1 Proposed Zoning Harrison District Plan 7' - 7 Staff RepOrt: :~;'-"~'"-- EXH][B][T Do MERIT COMPANY --- RIDDELL ROAD, WBIST OF AL,MIRA DRFVE, 4220 WHEA?©N WAY File: PL99-0088 Applicant: Merit Company 3020 So. 96~ Street Lakewood, WA 98499 Contact: Carl Zarelli Phone: (253) 588-9100 Location: Thirteen acres at southwest corner of Riddell Road & Almira Drive NOTE: The original proposal reviewed by the Planning Commission requested a ten-acre change. Three acres has been added to the proposal since Planning Commission Review. MERIT COMPANY ~' ~':::'-""~'"- APR 1 T Z'~f. 3 G E N E.R A L C O N T R A C T O R BREMERTON BUILDING DEPARTMENT April 14, 2000 Mr. Bill Palmer City of Bremerton Planning Director 286 4th Street Bremerton, WA 98337 Re: Southwest Comer of Riddell Road and Almira Drive, Bremerton, WA Dear Bill: Merit Company is requesting that prior to adoption, the City of Bremerton adjust the southerly boundary between commercial and multi-family residential on the referenced property. The increased amount of commercial property required is three (3) acres. This is requested so as to provide additional commercial area to support Lowes development plans at this site. If you have questions regarding this letter, please call. Sincerely, MelSi Company , cc: File Leonard Zarelli Barbara LaSalle 3020 South 961'h St- Lakewood, WA 98499 TEL 253-588-9100- FAX 253-588-9186 Description:' ':-~~ Recently, Lowes Home Improvement purchased Eagle Electric. The present Eagle store is approximately 105,000 square feet in size and is one of the leading sales tax generators in the City. Due to the small size of the existing store, Lowes is looking for a site to allow for the construction of a 135,000 to 150,000 square foot store. They are currently negotiating for an approximately 12 acre site located within the County further north on State Route 303. In an attempt to retain the store in Bremerton, Merit Company, which owns the land where the existing Eagle store is located, has filed an application to redesignate thirteen acres from multifamily residential to commercial to allow for an expansion to accommodate the larger store. The current store is zoned "Shopping Center" and staff is recommending that this area as well as the expansion area be rezoned to "General Business". This would allow a more expeditious permit processing for any expansion. The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is a non-project specific amendment and does not include specific development plans. The lot area borders Riddell Road to the north, Almira Drive to the east, and the Eagle store and adjacent retail space at 4220 Wheaton Way. Approval of the subject application does not constitute approval of any development proposals. Individual development proposals for this parcel will require separate applications and review pursuant to all applicable land use/zoning standards. Proposal: The applicant requests that the Plan Map designation for thirteen acre north portion of the property at Riddell and Almira be amended from "Medium-Density Residential (MDK)" to "General & Highway Commercial (C-G)." Furthermore, the applicant requests that the Zoning Map designation for this property be changed from "Medium-Density Residential 0VlF)" to "General Business (GB)" and that the property at 4220 Wheaton Way zoning designation be changed from "Shopping Center (SC)" to "General Business (GB)." Approval Criteria: All proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan amendment must meet the five criteria listed. This proposal meets criteria as follows: 1. Consistent with GMA and regulations: This proposal does not conflict with any of the GMA or City planning goals and is especially consistent with goals dealing with urban growth, reducing sprawl, encouraging economic development, etc. 2. No significant adverse effects: This current twenty (20) acre lot is vacant and wooded. This proposal includes only the northernmost thirteen (13) acres of the site. The lot lies south of Riddell Road and west of Almira Drive. No further development is proposed at this time, though, a Comp Plan redesignation and rezone to commercial will most likely result in expansion of the existing retail business use which is adjacent and west of this property. Buffering will be required pursuant to the Bremerton Municipal Code between the commercial area and residential area to the east. Further, any expansion would be oriented towards Wheaton Way and Riddell Road and away from the residential area east of Almira Drive. To further provide protection, no access from the commercial area should be allowed to Almira Drive when a specific development plan is reviewed. No critical land issues apply. 3. Can be accommodated by all services, facilities and transportation: The site is served with all services, facilities, and utilities for'the lot along the Riddell Road and Wheaton Way frontage. No significant conflict is anticipated here. 4. Will help implement the goals and policies of the Comp. Plan: Encouraging new economic development, finding new sites for commercial development, and attracting new businesses to the City are local policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. This proposal is consistent with those polices and objectives. 5. Impacts beyond the City limits: This map area is within the City of Bremerton and near unincorporated areas of Kitsap County to the north. The site is expected at some future point to accommodate new commercial development that might otherwise locate outside the City. It is not expected that the new development will adversely impact areas beyond the City limits but could reduce traffic somewhat by providing new business and employment opportunities within the City, within walking distance of the residential neighborhood, and in an area served by public transit. Additional Discussion: The proposed amendment presents several issues for consideration: Land Use: The conversion of the northernmost thirteen acres of this property fronting Riddell Road appears appropriate. Such a change would represent a logical extension of commercial uses along the road. Staff recognizes that certain commercial land uses could also create noise and possibly other impacts on the nearby residences. But, through appropriate site planning and design, these impacts could be minimized. Traffic and Circulation: Wheaton Way traffic at the Riddell Road intersection carries 46,059 vehicles in the southbound lane and 45,421 vehicles in the northbound lane. Traffic from the redesignation of the northernmost ten acres of this lot would not add significantly to the current number of vehicles. However, traffic on Riddell Road might increase as a remit of a retail business use development on the site. Staff recommends that access to Almira Drive not be allowed from this ten-acre site to avoid impacts on the adjacent residential area to the east. Services and Facilities: According to the Public Works Department, adequate services for this redesignation exist in the Wheaton Way right-of-way. Recommendation: Staff supports APPROVAL of this component of the amendment. REVISIONS 1999 Brcmcrton Comprehensive Plan EXHIBIT E. CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT - Capital Facilities Program Sanitary. Sewer Stormwater Transportation Water F. Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer facilities are provided by the Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities. A complete inventory, analysis of need, and capital improvements program are provided in the adopted Wastewater Comprehensive Plan (a.k.a. the "Wastewater Plan"). 1. Service Area The Wastewater Comprehensive Plan identifies a service area consisting of territory currently served by the Wastewater Utility, as well as areas adjacent to the city limits that are not now serviced but which could logically be served based on natural topography. The service area covers 13 drainage basins, of which five extend beyond the city limits into unincorporated county areas: K. itsap Lake, Tracyton Beach, Trenton Avenue, Sinclair Park, and Oyster Bay. The Utility provides sewage treatment to the sewered areas in the service area through direct service and through specific contractual agreements with the U.S. Navy and Kitsap County Sewer District No. 1 (Navy Yard City). (Figure CF-4 Bremerton Wastewater System Service Area) The Port of Bremerton operates a public wastewater facility located in Olympic View Industrial Park (OVIP) on State Route 3 west of Gorst. The Port is exploring alternatives to provide this area with high level municipal sewer. The Port District has contacted Sewer Bistrict #5, Kitsap County Public Works, and the City of Bremerton for improved sewer service and has no formally contracted sewer service. Preliminary Port discussions indicate they will seek service from Port Orchard/Sewer District #5. 2. Inventory of Existinq Facilities The City sewerage system consists of sewage collection, transmission, treatment, and bio-solids utilization facilities. Included are more than 188 miles of gravity sewers, approximately 16 miles of pressure lines, and 33 pump stations. These facilities convey sewage to a secondary wastewater treatment plant located just south of West Hills, at the ir~tersection of S. R3 and SR304. Addlt!cnc!!y Currently, there are -1-6 15 active combined sewer overflow (CSO) sites located within the sewer collection system. One CSO site (QF-t797) was abandoned in July of 1999. Another site (OF-15) is.anticipated to be abandoned in September of 1999: reducing the number of active CS(;:) sites to 14, Approximately 60 percent of the system is composed of combined sanitary and stormwater sewers. (Table SS-l) ~CFP 1 12223/99 Sanitar~ Sewer Bremerton Wastewater Treatment Plant (1) 1600 Oyster Bay Ave W (3) 10.1 mgd Collection System: Pipe vadous 2-04 miles Wastewater Lift stations various 33 350 Forest Enhancement Sites One & Two (2) Near Gold Mtn. Golf Course 600 acres (~) City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan, December 1995. (2) City of Bremerton 1993 Biosolids Report to Bremerton-Kitsap County Health District. (3) Average flow for maximum month per NPDES permit. (a) Wastewater Treatment Plant The existing wastewater treatment plant was designed to have a peak hydraulic capacity of 29.5 million gallons per day (mgd). Peak flows in excess of 25 mgd are typical dudng wet months. Normal dry weather peak flow capacity without stormwater inflow is estimated at 8 4,5 mgd. Current annual average and maximum monthly flows to the wastewater treatment plant are about 89 65 percent of the average annual and maximum monthly flows for which it was designed. It is estimated that 21 percent of the annual average flow and 44 percent of the maximum month flow is stormwater inflow. Once stormwater inflow is reduced, the treatment plant will have the capacity to serve approximately 58,000 people. Source: City. of Bremerton Wastewater Utility.: 8/98. ~ CFP 2 '/2/23~9 Sanitary Sewer (b) Forest Enhancement Pro,qram.-,-~~. Utilization The wastewater treatment plant produces approximately '-"~["-'-'~,,,,,, ,., 1 .... .9 million dry oounds of anaerobically digested biosolids each year. Because biosolids have fertilizer and soil amendment value the City began an active land application program several years ago to utilize the benefits of this wastewater process by-product. Biosolids are used to enhance tree growth and, although the permitted area is substantially greater, biosolids are currently applied to 689 350 acres of Utility-owned forest land. Since June 1992, 100 percent of the biosolids produced at the treatment plant have been utilized in this beneficial manner. The objective of the City's forest enhancement program is to develop an environmentally sound method of using the resource value of biosolids in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations. 3. Future Needs a. Existincl Demand The Wastewater Plan estimates the 1990 population of the service area at 45,210, of which 38,140 were within the city limits and 7,070 outside the city. The plan estimates that approximately 37,000 persons within the service area were connected to the sewer system, leaving an unsewered population of 8,210.2 KJtsap County estimates that the total 1994 service area population was 46,928.3 The City estimates that the 1996 population is approximately 52,762.4 The average annual daily flow, including stormwater inflow, is approximately 6.0 mgd. As CSO separation occurs, the average flow will be reduced accordingly. 5 However= other storm s.vstem work is_anticipat...ed te i0crease flow to the Wastewater Treatment Plant, Minimum peak flow (peak flows occurring without storm water inflow) is estimated at 8 mgd. While the U.S. Navy is allocated 3.8 mgd, it is currently discharging only 1 mgd -- roughly equivalent to 10,000 population. (Table SS-2) 2 Source: Table 1., City ofBremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan, December 1995, p. A-2 (Estimate prepared in 1992). 3Source: Table SS-2. Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan Sewer Facilities - 20-Year Population Allocation - CSF #1, Draft Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, Part II, April 1996, PG. 3-87. The County population estimate is for the total service area, and does not include an estimate of the sewered or unsewered populations. 4 The City population estimate is based on the Kitsap County population estimate for the unincorporated part of the sewer service area, along with the City estimate within the city limits. (See page CFP-9) 5Source: Table SS-2. Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan Sewer Facilities - 20-Year Population Allocation - CSF #1, Draft Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, Part II, April 1996, PG. 3-87. The County population estimate is for the total service area, and does not include an estimate of the sewered or unsewered populations. ~ CFP 3 ¢2/23/99 Sanitan/Sewer b. Level of Service (LOS) The capacity of existing sewer facilities to serve future needs is determined by comparing the gallons of effluent per day now approved by the State, the number of existing connections, and the number of new people to be served. The number of new people is converted into the number of new residential connections based on assumptions of the number of persons per household, and the number of gallons of effluent generated per capita per day (gpcd). The capacity can also be estimated based on an existing and planned LOS for sewer service. The calculation of the current LOS excludes stormwater inflow. ~N4heugh the City's system experiences seine infiltration. In the past it ~s was not considered a major component of the flow. This is currently bein(3 reevaluated as part of the CSO Reduction Plan Update and C0rnorehensive Sewer Plan Uodate to be completed in 2000.~ The proposed LOS is the existing county-wide average. · Current LOS = 97 gallons per capita per day (gpcd)6 · Proposed LOS = 100 gpcd c. Future Demand The May 1996 draft Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan estimates that a total of 66,096 persons within the sewer service area will require sanitary sewer service by year 2012, an increase of 19,168 persons from 1992. The County plan estimates that this increase includes 1,111 persons that were not connected to the sewer system in 1992. (Table SS-2) Total Population 46,321 46,928 54,370 66,096 29.92% 19,168 - Sewered 45,210 NE NE 66,096 - Unsewered 1,111 NE NE 0 Source: Table SS-2, Draft Kitsap County Capital Facilitfes Plan, May 1996, pg. 3-87. The County allocation addresses years 1994 and 2000 (rather than years 1996- 2001) in order to comply with a Puget Sound Growth Hearings Board order. S"Executive Summary", City of Bremerton Sewer Comprehensive Plan, October 1991, p. 10. ~ CFP 4 ~ 2/'23/99 Sanitar7 Sewer T-herefore, the City has projected seP~iem~r-population figures for years 1996 and 2001 based on the County forecast. (-I'able SS-3) ~ CFP 5 ¢2/23/99 Sanitary Sewer 1996 Service Area Population 52,762 58,000 5.28 1997-2001 New Population 2,128 3,110 0.21 Total 2001 Sewered 54,890 3,110 5.49 Population = 2001-2012 New Population (4) 11,206 (8,096) 1.12 Total 2012 Sewered Population 72,077 (14,077') 7.21 Total 1996-2012 Increase = 19,315 (4,986) 1.93 Notes: For the purposes of this projection, it is assumed that all persons within the service area will connect to the sewer system by year 2001. d. Need for Capital Facility Improvements The Wastewater Plan was developed for an ultimate service area population of 80,610. Therefore, planned improvements will be adequate to serve the projected 72,077 sewered population, provided there are no major industrial hookups. The City has participated in a feasibility study to sewer Gorst and the industrial properties in the vicinity of the Port of Bremerton and Anderson Creek. Sewedng all or a portion of these areas utilizing Bremerton's treatment facility are included as options. The results of this study may affect the need and timing for treatment plant expansion. The City has reviewed potential demands on the wastewater system from the light industrial/business park development of the Port Blakely property located westedy of Kitsap Lake. In performing this review, the City converted the anticipated demand of the light industrial/business park to its functional population equivalent. The population equivalent was added to anticipated demand for both the six and twenty year hodzon. Adequate reserve capacity was found to be available (with anticipated system improvements) to accommodate the project. e. Plans of Other Providers The Kitsap County Public Works Department Wastewater Division is in the process of preparing a County-Wide Wastewater Facility Plan. The draft plan ~ CFP 6 12/23/99 Water Distribution Pipin[l System Sub-Total -- ~m~4-,gLal~O Total Piping System = ,,, ~-~..~,~,~'~-~, .~nn 2. Forecast of Future Needs (a) Existing Demand The average daily water system demand varies depending on weather conditions, but averages about 8.1 8.2 million gallons per day (MGD). Year Avera.qe Day Demand (MGD) 1990 9.35 1991 8.71 1992 8.48 1993 7.73 1994 8.29 1995 7.89 1996 7.43 1997 7.42 7.63 1998 8,20 Approximately 33 percent of the average daily demand comes from the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, the largest single water user. Approximately 78 percent of the water demand is "in-City" demand, and 22 percent is outside the city limits. Average day demand is affected by the year's rain pattems and other factors -- for example, 1993 was a wet summer, resulting in less outside water use. However, the highest peak day ever recorded was during unusually Iow temperatures in December 1990 when pipes broke and customers ran water to prevent pipes from freezing. In 1992, Seattle's drought response media campaign affected Bremerton customers' water use, even though our reservoir was not experiencing a drought. (b) Level of Service (LOS) Standard City ~ ...... ; ...... +~,4 +,., reduce ,4 ....... ,.,+;,-,,~ I~,, +k ...... ")~t'l~ +,-, 4 nfl ~._Dt-'r~ Domestic unit demands are then expected to remain constant through the year 2014. · 1990 LOS = 106 gallons per capita per day (GPCD) 100 · Current LOS = !03 GPCD ~ CFP 7 12/23/99 Water (c) Future Demand The 1992 Bremerton Water Plan identifies needs for a 20 year planning period from 1990 to 2010. Dudng that time it is expected that supply capacity to meet typical maximum day demands (MDD) will increase 26.99 mgd by year 2010. (Table WA-2) The 1999 Update to the Water System Comprehensive Plan will update the Water System Plan demand projections. Existing Sources 9.1 -23.7 13,460- 16,565 Potential Sources 11.0 - 12.2 7,470 Total Sources 20.1 - 35.9 20,930 - 24,035 Source: Bremerton Water System Comprehensive Plan Table 8-7 The 1992 Water System Plan It is projects that if pending water dghts certificates are secured, then no additional sources will be needed to meet the total demand through the next six years. However, future water sources will need to be secured to meet anticipated demands beyond year 2000. (Table WA-3) 1994 * 56,701 9.04 1995-2000 (new) 9,686 4.20 Total as of 2000 * 66,387 13.24 2000-2012 11,764 4.38 Total as of 2012 78,151 12.17 Sources: Bremerton Water System Comprehensive Plan, updated by Bremerton Water Utility · 1994 & 2000 demand - from Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, December 23, 1996 Assumptions: 2000: Pop. X 103 gallons/capita + 3.2 MG for PSNS 2014: Pop. X 100 gallons/capita + 3.2 MG for PSNS ~ CFP 8 12/23/99 Water 3. Proposed Facility Improvements The Bremerton Water Plan recommends that ~,~_~,.,v,,'--~'~i*~'--'~l, r~.,~, mgd ^~, ...... ~,v~,,~..~,~,'~ .... ~-'- ..... ~" ~'"' '~'~ ~"~ '~ .... ~"""'~ ~"' ~ ~5 ~"'~ a total of 1.4 mgd should be developed by year 2000. ('Table WA-2) The City has two :dd!t!c,-,=l wells drilled and awaiting water dghts. Current regulatory and legal uncertainty at the State level precludes processing of water rights applications except under emergency conditions. The Water Plan concludes that existing distribution system is capable of meeting typical system demands, improvements in transmission and distribution mains are necessary to' improve flows and pressures in certain areas and to replace undersized or sub-standard facilities. (a) Water Quality Meeting strict Federal and State water quality standards is a primary objective of the City. Drinking water is regularly tested at the sources and in the distribution system. To continue to use the unfiltered Union River source, the City should continue to pursue either acquisition or controlling agreements over remaining pdvate lands within the watershed, and should vigorously implement the Watershed Control Plan. Responsible operation of the entire water system is critical to maintaining compliance with the non-filtration status of the surface water treatment regulations. Even with these precautions, a drastic change in source quality or changes in regulations could require the City to provide fi!tmticn further treatmerlt such as ozonation or filtration. The City has reviewed and evaluated potential water treatment plant sites in the City's system. A site has been located near Reservoir No. 4 on Washington State Military Department property. The City has begun discussions with the State Military Department regarding acquisition of the property. Groundwater wells water quality will be ensured through a Wellhead Protection Program, implemented in 1996. (b) Stora,qe Storage needs include the E398 zone and the Industrial Park and Airport area, no additional storage is needed to meet current demand. By year 2010 a total of 22.5 million gallons (MG) of system wide storage is expected to be required. The system currently has 34.3_ MG of storage available, primarily in the lower elevation zones in the developed parts of the city. In 1996 the City f~.rmally took over....the Port of Bremerton Reservoir. Two additional pressure zones (W540, and 650) are currently being designed. Construction on the W650 zone is scheduled to begin in 1999, with the W540 zone scheduled to begin in 2001. Both zones include pump stations and reservoirs. Pdor to year 2010, additional storage will be required north of the East Bremerton city limits. ~ CFP 9 12/23/99 Water (c) Distribution System West Bremerton industrial/commercial areas have good fire flow capacity. Toward Jackson Park, fire flow capacity meets Kitsap County guidelines but is less than ISO recommendations for multi-family residential housing. Several improvements are needed to improve fire flow capacity in the East 398 Zone, west of the Brownsville Highway. Pump station capacity will need to be added to serve new west zones south of Kitsap Lake and south of Gorst. The Utility should continue to routinely replace small sub-standard water mains. Initial replacement projects should concentrate on mitigating Iow-pressure problems in the Sherman Heights area. The existing telemetry and control system will require upgrading and maintenance so the Utility continue to improve control the water system. (d) Plans of Other Providers There are no other providers of potable water within the City. However, there are several nearby water districts, public utility districts and municipalities that may have interests in local surface and groundwater resources. These include: Silverdale Water District No. 16; North Perry Avenue Water District; Edand Point Water District; Sunnyslope Water District and City of Port Orchard Water District. ~^/**'+~'" Util!~j ""'~ +k~ =.~....~ ~..;..+ ~^~..,~,, r~;,-+~,..+,.~,.,,;,.~ ..... Unclaimed service areas =!sc exist south, east and west of the Utility's watershed. The Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), a regional water supply, transmission, and storage plan, was developed by the Water Utility Coordinating Committee (WUCC) to comply with state law. The plan assesses water supply needs in KJtsap County and presents a program to provide water supply and service to users. The plan provides a process and strategy for existing water utilities to define their role in a program consistent with adopted land use policies and projected growth strategy. The Water Utility Coordinatin(3 Council has beaun_ tO C!ty ,~;* ~.=,,,,,,,.~~"--.;",-;,-,- +,',~ plan ¢"-,_, +~'~'.,,. update t-e the CWSP. fe~ Seismic Improvements A Water System Earthquake Vulnerability Assessment was comoleted in March 1997, which looked at the system vulnerability due to seismic events. The study recommended several improvements to the storage reservoirs: pump stations, transmission mains and the Casad Dam intake structure. Imolementation of these improvements will be done on a programmatic nature with a funding allowance on an annual basis, A detailed listing of the projects anticipated to be developed in the next six years is shown in the attached Caoital rnprovement Plan sheets, 4. Six-Year Financial Plan Under the proposed LOS it is projected that no additional water sources will be needed to meet the total demand through the next six years, providing water rights are secured on two wells which have already been drilled. The City pays for capital facilities through charges for service, but also through Timber Sales and ~IJ~CFP 1 0 12/23/99 Water other non-revenue receipts. The six-year financial '~_.~~r facilities is included in Section 3 of this Capital Facilities Program. CFP Water 1998.doc 1 1 12/23/99 Sanitan/Sewer integrates the individual wastewateE:p~~ the county, and includes recommendations for expanding county facilities to serve projected needs. f. Proposed Facilities The City's 1996 Wastewater Plan recommends four types of improvements at the treatment plant to accommodate projected sewage flows at ultimate plan service area development and to solve some current and anticipated operational problems: · CSO treatment capacity- a high rate clarification process is proposed to treat peak hydraulic flows dudng storfr~ conditions. This will provide heeded treatment capacity for the plant as a CSO treatment facility: · Infrastructure improvements - repairs or replacements of existing sewer system facilities to restore structural integrity; · Regulatory requirements - improvements needed as a result of new or modified codes, guidelines, or laws initiated from federal, state, and local government; · Growth and system extensions - improvements resulting from new development or system extensions; · Other system improvements - recommendations that contribute to the improved operation or function of the system but are not a result of infrastructure needs, regulations, or system growth. The Utility has acquired properties in the vicinity of the wastewater treatment facility for future plant expansion and buffer for odor management. The City ~s ccnductl,qg completed a study for reuse of wastewater treatment plant effluent in September, 1998. The purpose of the study is to determine the feasibility of reusing effluent for industrial use or land application, lC-feasible The altematives for reuse are being evaluated for 1,4""*I¢'",4, the r-~,, ..... ........... ~.,.j .... j pursue th~s~ ..~,.,.,...,; .... , ...... ,4 implementation. The CSO reduction pan will identify additional improvements necessary to meet the regulatory requirements. The plan will show implementation of the improvements in accordance with the schedule dictated by the Department of Ecology consent decree and the court order. The City is actively pursuing grant and loan funding for these projects. The City's ability to obtain funding resources may affect its ability to implement the schedule. The Combined Sewer overflow Reduction Program will continue until the year 2007, specific projects will be developed and constructed in accordance with the attached schedule. Smaller projects will be undedaken throughout the system to reduce the combined sewer overflows as they are identified. These projects may include pipe rerouting, combined stormwater and sewer storage, overflow reduction modifications, pump station improvements, overflow structure modifications and increasing flow to the Wastewater Treatment Pl~,nt. ~ CFP 7 12/'23~ 9 Sanitary Sewer Detailed listings of the anticipated c.~_p~ts to.be developed in the next six years are in the attached Capital Improvement program sheets. 4. Six-Year Financial Plan It is estimated that the existing sanitary sewer system has a total capacity of million gallons per day (mgd), with approximately 3 mgd available capacity, which is sufficient to meet the total need of,~ through the next six years, provided there are no major new industrial demands. (This assumes provisions for peak stormwater treatment for wet weather flows through high rate clarification rcmcv:! cf th= .... ' ....... ~' ....~ *, ....... ., ,,,,,' ...... ~.,._ under the City's CSO Reduction Plan.) The six-year financial plan for sanitary sewer facilities is included in Section K of this CFP. It is a summary of the City's Six Year (-1-gg6-20g-1- 1999-2004) Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan, Improvements are shown to be pdmadly Utility financed through Eeimbursable loans through 2002 2004, assuming P~ limited grants will be available. Of the Non-Utility financed projects, most of the growth-related improvements are anticipated to be financed by special utility local improvement districts (ULIDs) or by developers directly. It is anticipated that roughly 20 percent of the expenditures beyond 2000 will be funded by non-utility sources of revenue. CFP Sewer 19g~.doc ~ CFP 8 12/23/99 H. Stormwater Stormwater facilities are provided by the Bremerton Department of Public Works & Utilities. The Stormwater Utility was formed by ordinance in 1994 as a funding source for the stormwater program mandated by the Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan. The mission of the Program is to control flooding, enhance water quality, and protect sensitive habitat areas and local aquifers. ,~ drnff. ~+ ....... +~- Monagement m~ .............. ,4 during ~oo~ ~ ~oo~ ..~.,~ ;~ expected +,, ~,. ..,4....+~,4 ~.. 4 ~-7 The City adooted its Stormwater Manaaement Plan in 1996, The City's stormwater service area is the City limits. There are 14 drainage basins located within the developed portions of Bremerton. These drainage basins closely conform to the limits of the sewer basins identified in the City's Wastewater Comprehensive Plan. Additional drainage basins within the Utility Owned Lands are also within the service area. 1. Inventory of Existinq Facilities With the e.xception of a few more recent developments, the existing drainage system within the City can be characterized as a conveyance system of surface drainage swales and a sedes of pipes which collect and route drainage away from homes and businesses as shown Exhibit 4-1. The City has a storm drainage system with partial sewage separation, or a combined sewer system. Because the City's storm drainage system is integral to its sewer system in areas: work on one system may effect the other. The City. is aggressively pursuina a program to reduce combined sewer stormwater from the sewer system or improvina oumoina transmission and treatment capabilities for stormwater at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. The maiodty of this work is shown in the Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO3 reduction Plan and the sanitary sewer system planning documents. The City's adopted Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Reduction Plan will separ2te ~'+ ...... *"- *-"'"' *~'" existing .......... syst-em-a¢~ limit CSOs to no more than one per year per outfall. A number of natural drainage facilities exist in the Bremerton drainage system. These natural systems include swales, channels, creeks, ravines, and natural drainage ways that discharge directly to marine waters. The City is responsible for maintaining three detention facilities. These facilities are located near Loxie Eagans Blvd. & Arsenal Way, Oyster Bay Avenue & Loxie Eagans, and Ridgetop Circle & Monticola Ddve (Holly Terrace West Addition). In addition~ the City will accept responsibility for maintenance of the Vortechnics Filter (swid filteo in the ferry, terminal parking lot constructed as part of the Bremerton Transportation Center project in late 1999. This filter serves the Pacific Avenue basin. In 1999 the City initiated a program of annual inspections of private and City stormwater detention facilities. The City's stormwater conveyance system consists of approximately 52 miles of pipes ranging for 8" to 54" 84" in diameter. An estimated 60% 45% of the sanitary sewer system is composed of combined sewers which carry sanitary and stormwater flows. Bremerton currently has 14 developed drainage basins. The basins include those areas outside of the City limits that drain into the City and contribute runoff to some of the City's localized drainage problems. The City's stormwater basin area is approximately 8,564 acres feet:. The majodty of undeveloped Utility Owned Land is not included in this inventory. (Table SW-~) ~ CFP 1 12/23199 Stormwater 1. Anderson Avenue N. shores of W. Brem. - Port Wn. Narrows 400 2. Callow Avenue Central W. Brem. - Sinclair Inlet 650 3. Cherry Avenue E. Brem. NE of Warren Ave. Bridge - Port Wn. Narrows 250 4. East Park E. Brem. S of Sylvan Way - Port Wn. Narrows 330 5. Kitsap Lake W. Brem surrounding Kitsap Lake - Chico Bay 1,550 6. Oyster Bay NW part of W. Brem - Oyster Bay & Ostdch Bay 1,57,5 7. Pacific Avenue SE part of W. Brem incl. Ferry Terminal - Sinclair Inlet 150 8. Phinney Bay N central part of W. Brem - Phinney Bay 225__ 9. Pine Road W part of E. Brem...r Port Wn. Narrows 680 10. Sinclair Park SW portion of W. Brem - 1,40.0 11. Stevens Canyon E. Brem. in vicinity of Wheaton/Sylvan - Port Wn. 350 Narrows 12. Tracyton Beach Along W. edge of city limits in E. Brem - Port Wn. 60 Narrows 13. Trenton Avenue E part of E. Brem - Port Wn. Narrows & Port Orchard Bay. 670 14. Warren Avenue Downtown Bremerton - Port Wn. Narrows 275 Total = 8,565 Source: City of Bremerton Draft Stormwater Management Plan. 2. Forecast of Future Needs a. Existing Demand Water Quality -- The City of Bremerton established a policy requiring detention facilities on development projects in 1980. The guidelines for sizing these facilities limited the runoff rate to 0.2 CFS/acre based on a 25-year storm event. Since 1994, the City has required all development to meet the requirements of the "Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. Conveyance -- A complete analysis has not been performed on the City's existing storm drainage system to determine the capacity of the components. This analysis will be conducted over the next five years as part of the proposed drainage basin assessments. ~ CFP 2 12/23/99 Stormwater b. Level of Service (LOS) Water Quality - Development projects must meet the requirements of the "Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin", "or other technically equivalent manual adopted by the City of Bremer~on, which includes providing water quality enhancement for 6-month, 24-hour storm and stream bank erosion control by releasing one-half of the predeveloped 2-year/24-hour duration rate during a 2- year/24-hour duration event, and matching predeveloped 10-year and 100-year/24 -hour duration runoff rates. Construction sites are also required to provide erosion and sedimentation controls for up to the 2-year storm event. The Ci~ anticipates adopting all or most of the Kitsa? County. Storrnwater Manual (as a technically equivalent manual) in late 1999: or early 2000. This will allow the Ci~ to meet the Department of Ecology requirements while providing_ consistency within the County. Conveyance -- Storm systems constructed as part of the City's CSO Reduction Plan will be designed to handle a 25-year storm. The City will be conducting drainage basin assessments as part of the storm water program. These assessments will include the identification of storm drainage conveyance system capacities. Based on the outcome of these assessments, a recommended level of service will be determined for existing systems. The drainage problems identified in the storm water capital program are based on conditions observed in the field and represent conveyance problems that occur annually. c. Future Demand Water Quality -- Development will be required to meet the Level of Service requirements defined above. Regional water quality facilities maybe identified in future drainage basin assessments. Conveyance -- The impact of additional impervious surfaces from development on the conveyance system will be mitigated by the limitations to the runoff rate to 0.2CFS/acre based on a 25-year storm. d. Need for Capital Facility Improvements The City's COO Reduction Plan identifies construction of separate stormwater conveyance systems in the majodty of the City's drainage basins. These improvements will address most of the drainage problems identified. The City's Stormwater Management Plan identified three capital projects, not included in the CSO Reduction Plan, necessary to improve conveyance system capacity. These projects '"I" ~'" ~,.,-~,,,4~,,~ I,. +~,,. ~,~ ,,..,4.,~,~ +.. ~.,. r-~,~ ...,4,,,.+~,.., plan. The stormwater management plan also identified areas for further analysis that may result in additional future projects: as will discovery, of new problem areas, e. Plans of Other Providers The City and Kitsap County share responsibility for a number of drainage basins. The water quality standards of the City and Kitsap County are consistent. Coordination between the City and Kitsap County will required regarding the downstream conveyance systems within these basins. f. Separation of Private Storm Connections to Sewer System ~ CFP 3 12/23/99 Stormwater in many areas roof, ddveway, basement: foundation, and parking lot drains are directly connected to the sanitary, or combined sewer system. This contributes to CSO events. In order to meet the CSO Reduction Program reauirements, the City. will initiate a prooram to seoarate these connections from the sewer system so they are routed to a stormwater only conveyance facility or infiltration area. The C, itv will be working to adopt an ordinance in late 1999 or ead.v 2000, to encourage property owners to disconnect their private storm connections from the sewer system: and allow provisions for City assistance in that effort. a. Endanoered Soecies Act and NPDES II Considerations In 1999~ several salmon species were added to the Endanaered Species listinas as a threatened or endangered species. In addition= NPDES III will require Brej.merton to aet a Stormwater Discharge Permit. With these issues it is anticipated that water quality standards will become more stringent. This may require modifications to the ordinances and oractices of the City when the new standards are known. . . 3. Proposed Facilities Improvements The. Stormwater Plan identifies eleven existing flooding problems and recommends solutions to alleviate these problems. Many of these drainage problems will be reduced or eliminated by CSO sewer separation projects. A few will be addressed dudng annual maintenance. Because of the need to meet the PSA Consent Decree and Ecoloav Order ~n Consent regarding combined sewer overflow reductions, stormwater capital funding !s allocated to those proiects, which meet those needs. Projects that address stormwater issues only are being deferred unless other factors (such as flood damage to property or g?ant fundina oooortunities) provide sufficient justification to address a specific issue. Sinclair Park Upgrade piping and detention at Kean and Rogers St. 1,000,000 ClP ¢Y2 Stevens Piping improvements at Robin and Dibb Streets 180,000 Canyon 170,000 ClP ¢3 J Pacific Piping improvements along Park Avenue, 5th St to 290,000 Avenue Burwell 250,000 Total = 1,470,000 Source: Draft Stormwater Management Plan The Storrnwater Plan identifies a number of small capital projects that need to be performed on an annual basis. The Plan recommends that the City needs to implement a series of storm drainage improvements over a multi-year planning period, and develop an effective City-wide e~Jr CFP 4 12/23199 Stormwater inspection and maintenance program, tCT~J~'-~W~_~:~Fuctb~-r the City needs to develoo a model and perform a detailed analysis of the ,storm drainage s.vstem in several basins. This effort should identify additional future pro!ects. A detailed listing of the pro!ects anticipated to be developed in the next six years is shown in the attached Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan. 4, Six-Year Financial Plan The six-year financial plan for stormwater facilities is included in Section K. CFP Stormwater 1998.doc ~ CFP 5 12/23/99 I. Transportation This section is a summary of information contained in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 1. Inventory of Existinq Facilities Bremerton's transportation system generally consists of streets, highways, sidewalks, ferries, and public transit· The Transportation Element includes the following information on existing facilities: ~.."~ ?-'~:':~i ~:~.~.:~:~i~i~ ....':.'.. : ::::: .-'.. -~.'. :..'.-:~:..:~:::~.'-.'..'.-~.:~::::::~.': .-.~.~:'i::..:--~;+ :?~!.¥.:F-'..'-~.',~ ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~.~:.~:~: ...... :.....:-..:..'.:... -:.:..:.:.:.:~ ::..-.~:~.~ :.~::.::::; ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: -.'-:-:.,-.:.:-.::..::. ,~:... · ...::::..::::::..-...:-:.:-:-:- · :::,': .-.-.:,:.:::::::::...... ::..:.'~;:~:~:::,::::-: ============================================================================ ::::::::::::::::::::: ::-:::+:.:o>~:+.:-:.~ ~,:~i~.~.::':~,.~'~:':~"'-:~?::':-::::~:::::.<:~:~:-~:.~::.'-:.-'-~.-...'.~:~:~.:-:-.-.'- ...... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :~::~-~::~:.'.-.-~:: :::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Streets and Highways · Principal Arterials (See Transportation Element Table ~) · Minor Arterials (See Transportation Element Table · Collector Arterials (See Transportation Element Table ~) · Residential Streets (Not inventoried) Mass Transit · Kitsap Transit (See Transportation Element pg. 20) · Washington State Ferries: Bremerton- (See Transportation Element pg. 20) Seattle · Horluck Transportation Co.: Bremerton-Port (See Transportation Element pg. 20) Orchard Source: Transportation Element "F" 2. Forecast of Future Needs -- Level of Service (LOS) Standard Levels of Service (LOS) is an estimate of the quality and performance of transportation facility operations in a community. The Transportation Element measures LOS by calculating the volume to capacity ratio (V/C) of the midblock of a roadway, using a range from A (free flow) to F (stop-and-go traffic). Capital Facilities Program 1 12/23/99 Transportation (a) Current Level of Service The following existing roadway sections exceed or are close to exceeding a Level of Service D (Volume/Capacity Ratio .90) threshold during the PM peak hour: Burwell Street Warren to Naval 0.77 D Cambrian Avenue Preble to Farragut 0.73 C Kitsap Way Callow to SR3 0.87 D Manette Bddge 0.89 D Warren Avenue 11th to Bddge 0.80 D Warren 0Nheaton) Bridge to Callahan Ddve 0.99 E Source: 1999 Field Measurements by Engineering Division (b) Recommended Level of Service (LOS) The Transportation Element establishes the following level of service standards: · Wheaton/Warren Corridor -- LOS F with V/C threshold of 1.06 Capital Facilities Program 2 12/23/99 Transportation · Kitsap Way Corridor -- LOS E ~/C less than or equal to 1.00 · Manette Bddge -- LOS E or better (V/C less than or equal to 1.00) · All Other Artedal Streets -- LOS D or better (v/c less than or equal to 0.9) (c) Existing and Anticipated Deficiencies Existing transportation deficiencies that have been identified from the level of service standards, as well as operational safety and other improvements include SR304 (Cambrian Avenue, Farragut Street, Callow Avenue, Burwell Street and the ferry terminal area); SR303 (Warren Avenue and Wheaton Way); SR310 (Kitsap Way); the Manette Bddge; the Sheddan Road, Sylavan Way and Riddelt Road approaches to Wheaton Way; the Wemer road area from Union Avenue to SR3; a southbound off-ramp from the Warren Avenue Bddge to Callahan Ddve and other miscellaneous channelization or traffic control improvements as warranted. Source: 1995 Bremerton Transportation Element. Subsequent to prepartion of the 1995 Transportation Element, additional deficiencies are anticipated to develop or become more problematic: 1. Arsenal Way/Patton Avenue from Lafayette Avenue to Loxie Eagans Boulevard - with improved connections from the Farragut Avenue intersection on SR304 to Rogers Street and Lafayette Avenue (part of the SR304 Transportation Improvement Project), an increased level of traffic is anticipated to use this access to the neighborhoods and SR3. This in combination with the existing land uses in the area (especially the schools adjacent to the corridor) and the potential for development in the area, an evaluation and project development of this corridor is appropriate. 2. Auto Center Way widening, Bruen Avenue to SR3 southbound on-ramp - this will extend a second southbound lane from Bruen Avenue to the SR3 southbound on-ramp to facilitate merging movements of Auto Center Way traffic from the Kitsap Way turn and turn lane storage from southbound SR3 on-ramp traffic. 3. State Street pedestrian concems regarding Puget Sound Naval Shipyard personnel using the State Street gate and crossing Burwell Street at State Street have increased. City staff will evaluate this location for signal warrants. 4. Traffic calming measures - the City has initiated a program of providing traffic calming devices (speed humps, traffic circles, bulb outs, chicanes, etc.) throughout the city. To date this has been largely funded through CDBG funds, limiting its application to Iow income eligible areas. Expansion of this program throughout the city, as wee as use of other traffic calming devices (such as a radar speed trailer) are desirable. 5. Non-motorized improvements -non-motorized improvements are envisioned to by projects which facilitate pedestrian or bicycle access through the city. These include completion of the Burwell Hill Climb project (from Callow Avenue to Forrest Ridge Park) and other pedestrian access routes (such as 6th Street from Cambrian Avenue to Meade Avenue, and 19th Street off of Wycoff Avenue). Other program needs include continuation of the American With Disabilities Act (ADA) Curb Cut Program, coordination with the County's Bike Ways Program and improvements to the City's bike system. 6. Preservation and miscellaneous - provide for funding of projects which improve the safety, operations, preservation and TDM aspects of the City ~11~.. Capital Facilities Program 3 12/23/99 Transportation _ arterial system. This may also iQclud~rt of street operations on the - local and collector system, as w~ as---'5[her non-routine issues that may arise. 3. Proposed System Improvements 1. SR303 (Warren Avenue/Wheaton Way) - the City has allocated $200,000 of its county wide TEA-21 funding to the Washington State Department of Transportation to perform a Major Investment Study of this corridor from Burwell Street to SR3. This study will focus on existing and anticipated deficiencies, land use impacts and development of a plan that can provide guidance for development in the corridor, as well as projects to improve and maintain capacity of the corridor. 2. SR304 (Cambrian Avenue, Farragut Street, Callow Avenue, Burwell Street and the ferry terminal area) - In 1999 the City was successful in securing approximately 15 million dollars in federal and state grants, for a total project fund (including asked development and construction costs) of approximately 39 million dollars. It is anticipated this funding will be sufficient to complete the SR304 portion of the project for which the City is responsible. Uncertainties in the effects of the salmon listings in accordance with ESA and actual right-of-way costs may modify the total construction estimate. The City is going forward with design and construction in 2000-2001, the Navy Yard Highway phase anticipated in 2001-2002, and the ferry terminal area improvements in coordination with the Bremerton Transportation Center project and anticipated redevelopment of that area. 3. SR310 (Kitsap Way) - improvements to Kitsap Way in the vicinity of St3 were completed in 1999. No further improvements are anticipated until the level of service or operational problems occur. 4. Manette Bddge replacement- the City and State concluded a public evaluation of altematives for the Manette Bridge replacements. The Manette Bddge will be placed south of its existing structure with connections at the existing termini. No additional right-of-way is anticipated. The State is expected to fund construction of the bddge in the 2001-2003 biennium. 5. Widening of Sheddan Road, Sylvan Way and Riddell Road at their approaches to Wheaton Way - widening is not forecasted to started within the next six years. The City will continue to monitor these intersections for degradation of the level of service. These intersections will be included in the SR303 Corridor Study. 6. Wemer Road area improvements - the City has been successful in receiving grants from the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) and the Federal Economic Development Administration (for stormwater improvements) and county wide TEA funds, as well as developer and property owner contributions for construction of improvements in this area. It is anticipated that construction will occur in 2000. 7. Warren Avenue southbound off-ramp to Callahan Drive - this project lost the old Federal Aide Urban (FAU) funding which had been allocated to it. The funding was insufficient to complete the project. This project does not compete well for grants under the current cdteda for transportation funding. City staff will continue to pursue grant opportunities for this project and will include it in the SR303 Corridor Study. 8. Arsenal Way/Patton Avenue (from Lafayette Avenue to Loxie Eagans Boulevard) - the City is preparing to make grant applications for this project. Construction of this project is dependent upon receipt of grant funding. Capital Facilities Program 4 12/23/99 Transportation 9. Auto Center Way widening (Bruen-Av~ SR3 southbound off-ramp) - the City is developing a conceptual p~an o-n-~[~'~i~ improvement and anticipates making grant application funding for this work. Improvements will not occur without grant funding. 10. Preservation - as the City street network deteriorates, preservation improvements are becoming more necessary. A mixture of local and state funds will be pursued to maximize preservation of the existing system. 11. Non-motorized, traffic calming and miscellaneous improvements - these improvements will be funded to the extent possible with City or outside funding. Detailed listings of the anticipated capital projects to be developed in the next six years are shown in the affached Capital Improvement Program sheets. 4. Six-year Financial Plan The six-year financial plan for transportation facilities is included in Section J of this Capital Facilities Program. CFP Transportation 1998.doc Capital Facilities Program 5 12/23/99 J. Water- The City of Bremerton Water Utility provides potable water for Bremerton and the surrounding area. A complete inventory, analysis of need, and capital facilities program is provided in the 1992 City of Bremerton Water System Comprehensive Plan (also known as the Bremerton Water Plan) adopted by the Washington State Department of Health in 1993 and the Bremerton City Council in 1994. -r~. .... ,, ,p.4..,....¢ ,~.,. ,~ .... '4"" ~/"*'~* ~"" ;* required ~',, ~ c~ Uodate for the Water System Comprehensive Plan is currently underway and will be completed by the end of 1999. 1. Inventory of Existinq Facilities (a) Service Area The Utility services approximately 58,000 residents in Bremerton (38,000) and portions of Kitsap County (20,000), including the Gorst area and the western portion of the Manette Peninsula. The service area includes the Olympic View Industrial Park and the Bremerton National Airport. The Utility e4se.4s~ has contracted to provide water with__._9oD_erations and maintenance services to the Tracyton and Rocky Point Water Districts. In addition, the Utility contracts to supply water to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS) and to the City of Port Orchard. The current service area includes approximately 5,300 acres within the Bremerton City limits, and approximately 6,800 acres within unincorporated Kitsap County. (See Figure CF-8 "Bremerton Water Plan Service Map".) The Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan contains an Intedocal Agreement for Establishing Water Utility Service Area Boundaries, and in addition, the City has service area agreements with North Perry, Silverdale, Sunnyslope, Rocky Point, and Tracyton water districts. In 1999, the City and the Port of Bremerton entered into an agreement to have the City own and operate the Port water system. (b) Facilities/Water Ricjhts The City of Bremerton Water Utility supply system consists of Union River Reservoir behind the Casad Dam, 12 production wells, 204 miles of water pipe, fourteen pressure reducing stations, 16 water storage reservoirs, and 14 pump and booster stations. (Table WA-l) Approximately 6~ 65 percent of the supply comes from the 2,764 acre Union River watershed, which is 98 percent owned and controlled by the City. Wells in several local aquifers supply groundwater to the system. Current average daily demand is approximately 8 million gallons per day (MGD). There are six pressure zones in the system: East (E) 240, E 398 E 490, West (VV) 256, W 440, and W 517. These zones are designated by the overflow elevations in Utility reservoirs. Two additional pressure zones (W540 and 650) are currently being designed. Construction on the W650 zone is scheduled to begin in ~ 2000, with the W540 zone scheduled to begin in 2001. Both zones include pump ~ CFP 1 12/23/99 stations and reservoirs. Bremerton's water supplies consist of 10,689 pdmary acre-feet (1,408 supplementary acre-feet) of groundwater and a firm yield from the Union River of 3.8 MGD. Instantaneous dghts include 40 cubic feet per second (cfs) (17,952 gallons per minute-gpm) on the Union River watershed and 6350 gpm groundwater. All water in use by the City has been propedy appropriated through certificates of water fights or claims. Historically-used surface water claims are maintained for potential emergency and future use pending required treatment. Bremerton's Union River surface source is of such excellent quality that the City is currently approved by the State Department of Health to remain unfiltered. Sources are disinfected with chlorine. The water system control and alarm is provided through a telemetry system. Updates to the telemetry system are planned for 1997-99, including conversion to radio telemetry. Operation staff are state certified, and the system is operated in compliance with all federal and state regulations. (Table WA-l) For comolian_____ce with the EPA Lead and Coooer rule. the City has constructed a Corrosion Control Facility that iniects caustic,soda (NaOH) into the water entedna the water system at Reservoir N'o.4, This facility beoan ooeration in March of 1999. Fluoridation of'the water system,, was considered as part of this oroject: but by a vote of the oeoole, was not imolernented. For ccmplianc~ ,,,;~,...,...,..~+~'" ~_~,,,4 ~..~'",4 r,~_,~.~, ..... Rul=. the City ~- -'ccnst:-~!ng a Thc C!t¥ ;';ill =Jsc begin fiucdd=t!cn cf thc water system. Fluc,dd=tlcn is scheduled and "'"" ~+ ~ ........,, ..;.~ ..... ~;...~ ;,,,.~,,.4,, ~^/~,,.. 9, 13, 14, ""'~ ,,,,4 ..... Thc fiucdd=ticn "~-~m;'''-~ ..,4,4,.,4 ,.. ,~ ..... , ....... '., -'* R~sc,";clr "'" ~ will ~'~ u,,,4...~ .... ;~;,.;..,^";'4,~,~/u_~;=_~ Scdium =" ,.,,4,4~/,,,.='~ ;. t?,~ '"~'~'"'>'"", ,~ ,,~, which will ~c~ Fire Flows The Utility is generally capable of meeting ~itsap County Ordinance fire flows, wl~ich are considered to be minimums for new construction. However the Bremerton WaterPlan recommends that fire flows be designed to meet the significantly higher Insurance Services (ISO) Standards. Under peak houdy flow conditions, a minimum of 30 psi (new mains) residual system pressure without fire flows in water mains should be maintained to meet State Department of Health standards. (d) Capacity The current capacity of the water system on an annual average is 12 million gallons per day (MGD). The daily capacity of the system with groundwater sources only is 8.7, while the capacity with groundwater and surface sources at current hydraulic capability is 21.5 MGD. ~ CFP 2 12123/99 Water The capacity vades because the Union River is used to supply the average day demands of the system. The surfa~:s-~ be varied between zero and 15.5 MGD as long as annual average firm yield of 3.8 MGD and water quality limits are not exceeded. Note that not all sources can be used to maximum capacity at the same time, due to limited hydraulic capacity of the Union River transmission mains or water dght conditions. ~ CFP 3 12J23/99 Water ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::;8::::::: :~::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: i i~:~:E:.::i:~:~:: ;¢ I Union River ~ Watershed 15.5 Sudace Water Subtotal: 15.50 I 1. ~-R - Anderson Creek Well 2380 Anderson Hill Rd SW [ 800 2. ¢3 - Anderson Creek Well 2380 Anderson Hill Rd SW { 400 3. ¢7- Anderson Creek Well 2731 State Highway 16 450 4. ~- Anderson Creek Well 2651 State HiChway 16 650 5. ¢9 - Bridle Ridge Well 3!.8 NW Fi~a~ Lane 230 6. ¢13 - Vena Well 50 NE Vena Avenue 600 7. ¢14 - East Zone 240 Well 5853 Central Valley Road NE 270 8. ¢15 - Pistol Range Well 6581 W. Old Belfair Highway 150 9. ¢17 - Pistol Range Well 6581 W. Old Belfair Highway 760 10. ¢18 - Twin Lakes Well 8301 W. Old Belfair Highway 370 11. ¢19 - Golf Course Well 7061 W. Old Belfair Highway 300 12. ~0 - Twin Lakes Well 8301 W. Old Belfair HiChway 1,100 13. ~1 - Silverdale Mobile Home Estates 903 NE Saturn Lane (500) Well (pending application) ~ Future produmion = 14. Gomt Well (pending application) Old Beifair Highway (400) ~ Future production = Current Groundwater SubTotal (~pm) = 6,080.00 Current Groundwater SubTotal (MGD) = 8.70 15. PS ¢1 - Gorst Creek (emergency supply Belfair Valley Road - Go~t Creek N/A only) 16. PS ¢2 -Ande~on Creek 2380 Anderson Hill Road 2,250 17. PS ¢3 (emergency use only) 7061 Belfair Valley Road 400 18. PS ~ 1335 Jones St. ~est Brem.) 800 19. PS ¢11 844 Callahan Drive 1,400 20. PS ¢12 3029 Olympus Drive 950 ~ CFP 4 1~23/99 Water 2'I. PS #~3 2929 Olympus Drive 500 22. PS #14 2101 Schley Blvd 825 23. PS #16 50 NE Vena Ave 1,250 24. PS #17 Old Belfair Hwy 1,500 Pump Station Sub-Total = 9,875 25. ~"""+~' ~*~+~" ~ r~,....~. ..... ,.,~ 329! ~;v+~. ~+.~.+ .................. \ ...... I'" .... ,TI 25. Werner Booster Station ~8 5881 Wemer 50 26. Booster.Station #3 3000 17th Street 300 28. Booster Station #5 589 Lebo Bird ! 29. Hawthorne Booster Station #8 4490 Hawthorne Ave West 120 30. Booster Station #7 1527 Cook Rd SW 60 Booster Station #10 !5785 Imperial Way SW 3.695 Booster Pump Stations Sub-Total 15.100! Pump Stations Total = 29. Union River Reservoir (behind Casad Union River Watershed 1,350 Dam) 31. Res. ~r22 McKenna Falls Head Tank 0.1 Reservoirs (Raw Water) Total = 1,350.10 :i:i:i: ::i:i:::i:i:i:i :: :::::: ::::::;:;: :: :::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :i:i: :i:i:i :i :::::::::::::::::::::: :i:i:::~:i:: :i :i:::i:i:i:i :i:::: :::i:i:i :::::~. :::::::::::::::::::::::: i:i:::::i:i :i:i-i:::: 34. Reservoir ~ 480'1 Roosevelt Bird 11.0 35. Reservoir #5 (2_..T__a~) 3200 First Street (Forest Ridge 3.0 Park) 36. Reservoir #8 5144 Francis Street ~ Eden Road 0.15 ~ CFP 5 12/23199 Water [ ::::: ~:: :::::::::::.:::~:.~:::::::~::~::.::.~::~::::.::::~i:!:!:~:E:~:~::~:~:~:!:.::!:!::.:!:!:.:::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::!:!:~:~:!::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::!::::.!:~:::~:::::::::!::::::::::::::::::::::::::!:::::~ ::::::i¢:::::::::::.'~ :::::::::::::::::::: ~:::::~-¢::::::!:::E3~::~M:E:~:~:~:~:~:~!:!~i: 37. Reservoir ¢~ 7300 Werner Road 2.54 38. Reservoir #10 (2_T_aQ~) 5785 Impedal Way SW, Pt. 0.21 Orchard - Port of Brem. Industrial Park 39. Reservoir #11 844 Callahan Drive 1.58 40. Reservoir #12 3029 Olympus Ddve 2.0 41. Reservoir #13 2929 Olympus Ddve 0.80 42. Reservoir #14 1628 Hayward Avenue ~ E. 17th 2.0 43. Reservoir #15 1925 Cheryl Street ~ Forest Ddve 1.0 44. Reservoir #16 260 Sugarpine - Tracyton 1.0 Watershed 45. Reservoir #17 400 Ridge Lane NE ~ Sandra 1.0 Lane 46. Reservoir #18 1925 NE Cheryl Street @ Forest 1.0 Dr. 47. Reservoir#19 I 2628 Ash Street ~ Cherry Ave 2.0 48. Reservoir g20 400 Ridge Lane NE ~ Sanc~ra 1.0 Lane 49. Reservoir ¢¢21 2132 Lakehurst Drive - NAD Park 3.0 Distribution Reservoir Total = 33.28 i:.::!~i~iiiiiiiiiii:iii.:i..1~i:iiiii~¢..1...ii~iiiii~.;.:i~ii~i~ii!i!iiii~i.:iiiii~ii~iii:.:i~i~i:ii~i~iiiii.:i.:i:;i:ii!~:~:i:i:M:i:.::~i....:i.:i~i~....:i:.:~i:i!i:i:i:~i:i~i:i:i:i~i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:::i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:!:i:~ 12" - 36" Water Mains Vadous Il Transmission Main Pipin = ...... g 201,!48.00 2" - 12" Water Mains Vadous 1,211,729 45~701 10" Water Mains Various 8" Water Mains Vadous 387,816 7" Water Mains Vadous 70.3 6" Water Mains Vadous 4" Water Mains Various ~ c~ ~'~ 3" Water Mains Various 2" Water Mains Various 6 12/23199 APR.~5.~OE~ 10:09AM BREMERTOH JR HIGH M0.570 P.~ ~ ~00 'E~I' ~0~ - ~Br~ ]~ 9~ gO ~ 60-~7~- 5025 - ~a~ ,~imon - ~Pdndl~aI April 25, 2000 Br,m~on Ci~ 239 4' Bremen, WA 98337 RB: Needed crossing at Wlxeaton Way School Dear Bremc-rton City Council Members: For the pazt four years I have observed th, extremely clangorous crosziag of Wheaten Way by jr. kigh sohool and elementary school students before mci aflex school. As the building principal I have tried various m,~ods to rectify this problem including conztaat reminders to the smdent~ ia newsletters, d~ly bulletins, individual class talks, etc. We have attranpted supervision of the stre,t on occasion by teach,rs, administrators, campus sccuri~ and even thc local police. For the most pm't these ,from have failed. We continue to receive a constant stream of phone calls from angry citizem about near misses of students by traffic aa these young people dart across the street The crosswalks that are located at Sheridan and Sylvan Way are simply not used, mainly because of their location at the far ends of both the jr. high and the elementary school campuses. A crossw~l~ with., ~ thc very lcaat, a caution light located somewhere between the two schools would create a much safer situation for students and drivers. I would urge you to support Mr, Dick$on Dorr in any way possible to help fimmee this important community and school need. This crosswalk could help avert a possible tragedy that no amount of money wmlld be able to compensate. Sin rely, cmry B, Simon ,e APR.26.~ 2:41PH VIEW RIDGE ELEM N0.52~ P. 1/1 April 25, 2000 bear City Council, ]: am writing this letter in support of the proposal to place a Pedestrian Activated Crosswalk at bibb Street. Even though there are intersections with lights at Sheridan and Sylvan, the reality is that children have a tendency to take the path that is most convenient to them, We have done what we can as ~ school district including fencing off the campus to promote safe traffic patterns. My concern is that a ch/Id will get impatient, try to run in front of cars crossing at bibb, and be injured. Please consider this proposal. :t may save a child's life. Sincerely, ,SUE ANN SHIPL~Y PRI~¢I~AL 32,50 SPRUCE STREET, BREMERTON, WA, 98310 (206i 4.78-5075 agency, inc. "Insurance for the moment of truth' 3105-A Wheaton Way Bremerton, Wash. 98310 phone 377-7645 April 19, 2000 Bremerton City Council City Hall Bremerton, WA 98337 RE: Crosswalk @ Wheaton Way & Dibb or 31st St. Dear Council Members: I am sure you will agree that the safety of children should be a top priority. Cn numerous occasions we have witnessed near misses as children from Bremerton Junior High School attempt to cross Wheaton Way with its ever-increasing traffic. We strongly support the proposal brought before you tonight regarding the installation of a pedestrian activated crosswalk at either the Dibb Street or 31st Street intersection. Alternatively, the area could use a painted crosswalk with a flashing crosswalk sign. Thank you for your consideration of this proposal. Yours truly, TH: ph To whom it may concern, We at Flowers To Go, located by Bremerton Junior High, have notice the students crossing Wheaton Way in the middle of the block without the benefit of a crosswalk, this putting them at great danger. We feel it would provide greater safety if a crosswalk was placed in the middle of the block between Sheridan and Sylvan Way. · Respectfully your~~ ager.~ Olympic Peninsula Travel 3029 Wheaton Way Bremerton, WA 98310 Honorc~t~lc Council McrnlpcF~ : activated c~s~walM ~t *ift~r Ditch ~t. or at +r~ ~1~ ~t. intcr~tion bc ide<~l. Your fi~voroblc ~:tbn r¢~ardi~ ft~i~ proposal wiu I~ ~'~ra~l/ apprec,'~r¢ci.