HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/14/01 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
NOVEMBER '14, 200'1
1. PRE-COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 4:45 - 5:30 P.M.
A. 15-Minute Executive Session to "Review Labor Negotiations"
B. General Council Business
2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M,
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation
3. CONSENT AGENDA - There are no Consent Agenda Items this week
4. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
5. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
6. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
7. MAYOR'S REPORT
8. LEGISLATIVE REPORT
9. PUBLIC RECOGNITION - (Comments limited to 3-minutes)
10. NEW BUSINESS
A. Appointment of Shaun A. Moshay to the Public Access Citizens Advisory Committee
(#AB01-261 )
B. Cooperative Purchasing Agreement for Police Records Management System (#AB01-262)
C. Professional Services Agreement for Ed Faulk, Greens Superintendent at Gold Mountain
Golf Complex (#AB01-263)
D. Issuance of HOME Fund Loan to Low Income Housing Institute (#AB01-236)
11. PUBLIC HEARINGS & ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance No. 4781 (Second Reading) Levying Property Taxes for Collection in 2002
(#AB01-258)
B. Ordinance (First Reading) Reducing the Tax on Garbage Collection (#AB01-264)
12. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: FOR AGENDA OF: November 14, 2001
Appointment to the Public Access Citizens ORIGINATING DEPT: Executive
Advisory Committee ORIGINATOR: Mayor Horton
DATE SUBMITTED: November 8, 2001
2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS
Application for Appointmem
ENDORSEMENT ~ INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUI',J,~.-'IL P~kI~EJ¢-~FOR SUBM~.TTAL:
MAYOR~,.~,c~ '~r~/-~__ COUNCIL PRESIDE~~..~.,~(_~-''~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
There is a vacancy on the Public Access Citizens Advisory Committee in the position of youth representative. It is
recommended Shaun A. Moshay be appointed to fill the position of youth representative on this committee.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Move to confirm the appointment of Shaun A. Moshay on the Public Access Citizens Advisory Committee.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE DATE:~
ll. AGENDA BILL NO: C~'! - ,-~ [
I
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
7. RESEARCH SOURCES
AGENDABL
APPLICATION FOR CITY BOARDS/COMMISSIONS/COMMITTEE
OTE: As an applicant for a City Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and
telephone number will be available to the press and public. You will be contacted before
any action is taken on your appointment.
'lease type or print clearly) DATE: -//~0
I I
OME ADDRESS: ~r~_r~ STATE ~ ZIP CODE
CCUPATION: ~ ~ EMPLOYER: ~ )~
fORK PHONE: ~ E-MAIL: ~/~ FAX:
~SINESS ADDRESS: ~[~
3CAL REFERENCES (name & phone number):
~,M INTERESTED IN SERVING ON (please check one or more):
Disability Action Committee ( ) Planning Commission (18 yrs. & older)
Civil Service Commission(18 yrs. & older) ( ) Parks & Recreation Commission
Urban Forest Committee ( ) Ethics Commission
~, Public Access Citizens Advisory Committee ( ) Parking Advisory Board
Community Development Block Grant ( ) Solid Waste Management
Advisory Committee ( ) Bremerton Housing Authority
Youth Council ( ) Board of Appeals, Housing/Building Codes
Safe Streets Steering Committee ( ) Mayor's Select Committee on Law
Citizen's Commission on Council Salaries Enforcement
this an application for reappointment? /~
yes, how many years have you served on this commission/committee?
WHY ARE YOU APPLYING FOR THIS APOINTMENT7
· ~'l ~ ~
y , /
WHICH OF YOUR PERSONAL AND/OR PROFESSIONAL INTERESTS PROMPTED YOU TO APPLY FOR
THIS APPOINTMENT:
/
7
HAVE YOU SERVED ON ANY OTHER BREMERTON BOARD, COMMISSION, COMMITTEE OR TASK
FORCE? IF YES, PLEASE LIST:
PLEASE LIST YOUR QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS APPOINTMENT (INCLUDE SKILLS, ACTIVITIES,
TRAINING, EDUCATION):
WHAT ARE YOUR COMMUNITY INTERESTS (COMMITTEES, ORGANIZATIONS, SPECIAL
ACTIVITIES)?
, ~-,, , ~ .
'in 'm ~J~-b,. ol~ mmno~ckn~ ~r ; ~b
l'-g f / / ~s I
We welcome your willingness serve Bremerton. Please return t completed form to:
Mayor's Office (360) 478-5266
239 4'" Street (360) 478-5883 FAX
Bremerton, WA 98337 E-mail: mayor@ci.bremerton.wa.us
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: Cooperative Purchasing FOR AGENDA OF: November, 14, 2001
Agreement for Police Records Management ORIGINATING DEPT: BPD
System ORIGINATOR: Rob Forbes '
DATE SUBMITFED: October 29, 2001
2. CLEARANC:,ES: (comment on back 3. EXHIBITS:
:~necessary)
/A~,_.n~A ey ' -- ' ~ Agreement
/ ,'~ ,. ~--, ¢ z.. ,/- ' ....
/reasurer
ENDORSEMENT X INFORMATION
APPROVED BY COUNCIL P~_,SIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
With this Agreement the City of Bremerton will join the other three cities and Kitsap County in a
common police records management system. We have exceeded capacity of our current system.
Our buy-in costs will be based on the number of seats we purchase, therefore the acquisition and
implementation costs will be less than if we were negotiating separately. We will be shadng a
larger and more meaningful database countywide. Hardware and software maintenance and
administration costs will be shared proportionally by the agencies participating. This item was.
part of the computer acquisitions approved by the council on June 27, 2001.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
MOVE TO APPROVE CONTRACT ~/ITH KITSAP COUNTY FOR POLICE RECORDS HANAGEMENT
SYSTEM AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO I~XECUTE THE SAME..
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
'
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED
Date:
1 1. AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS (CONT.):
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (CONT.):
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
City runs the dsk of current system failure. Lack of integration with Countyand other cities in
Kitsap County.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES
$81,369 capital costs
$31,211 annual maintenance
7. REsEARcH SOURCES:
Cooperative Purchasing Agreement for Intergraph Public Safety (IPS) Police Records Management System (RMS)
Summary
Bremerton Police Department Quote 32 workstations
9/18/2001
Buy-In:
Schedule A - Public Agency Buy-In to RMS $76,607
Schedule C - Public Agency Network Infrastructure $4,762
Total Buy-In $81,369
Annual:
Schedule B - Public Agency Annual Maintenance for RMS $26,809
Schedule D - Public Agency Annual Maintenance for Network Infrastructure $4,402
Total Annual $31,211
$112,580
Trainin.q Plan: The city has 83 in the police department. There will be one 3-day class to cover all aspects of the
system for the Records staff of 10. There will be two other 1/2 day classes to cover system inquiry functions,
accommodating up to 20 students. The rest of the staff will be trained internally by the city. All classes will be
during normal business hours at the Courthouse. The Sheriff's Office will absorb the cost of the training.
Cooperative Purchasing Agreement for Intergraph Public Safety (IPS) Police Records Management System (RMS)
Schedule A - Public Agency Buy-In to RMS
Bremerton Police Department Quote
9/18/2001
(32 workstations)
Description Price Quantity Extension
Windows NT server client software licenses $40 32 $1,280
Oracle server client software licenses (@ 1:2 ratio) $295 16.0 $4,720
IPS RMS client software licenses (@ 1:2 ratio) $1,500 .16.0 $24,000
Contribution toward purchase of base RMS $160,212 29.09% '$46,607
(16/55)
Total Cost to Agency Payable to Kitsap County $76,607
Cooperative Purchasing Agreement for Intergraph Public Safety (IPS) Police Records Management System (RMS)
Schedule B - Public Agency Annual Maintenance for RMS
Bremerton Police Department Quote
9/18/2OO 1
(32 workstations)
Description Price Quantity Extension
Contribution toward IPS maintenance of base RMS $30,060 29.09% $8,745
Kitsap County Technical Services Staff Support (per PC) $500 32 $16,000
Kitsap County Applications Services Staff Support(est 24 hrs/yr) $86 24 $2,064
Total Annual Cost to Agency Payable to Kitsap County $26,809
Cooperative Purchasing Agreement for Intergraph Public Safety (IPS) Police Records Management System (RMS)
Schedule C - Public Agency Network Infrastructure
Bremerton Police Department Quote
9/18/2OO 1
Plan: Remove the current Frame Relay circuit between the Courthouse & Bremerton City Hall and
replace with two point to point T-1 circuits. The city has a router on their end that should
accommodate two circuits (per Kevin Matthews). We would need to upgrade the Router on our end.
The existing fiber/leased T1 (redundant) connection between City Hall & Car Town precinct should be
OK for a PC or two.
Description Price Quantity Extension
US West DS-l/T-1 installation $695 2 $1,390
City Cisco Router (currently in place) $0
Kitsap Cisco Router upgrade (2 Pt to Pt Serial) 2995 1 $2,995
Subtotal $4,385
Sales Tax @ 8.6% $377
Total Cost to Agency Payable to Kitsap County $4,762
Cooperative Purchasing Agreement for Intergraph Public Safety (IPS) Police Records Management System (RMS)
Schedule D - Public Agency Annual Maintenance for Network Infrastructure
Brernerton Police Department Quote
9/18/2001
Description Price Quantity Extension
US West DS-l/T-1 Monthly (2) 310 12 $3,720
Kitsap Router Maintenance (5 yr. Contract - $377/yr) 377 1 $377
Sales Tax @ 8.6% $305
Total Annual Cost to Agency Payable to Kitsap County $4,402
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT
FOR POLICE RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
This inteflocal agreement is entered into pursuant to chapter 39.34 RCW and other provisions of law, between
Kitsap County, hereinafter called "Kitsap County" and the following named public entity or political subdivision of
the State of Washington: City of Bremerton, herein called the "Public Entity", hereby agree to cooperative
governmental purchasing upon the following terms and conditions
1. Kitsap County, in contracting for the purchase of goods and services for itself agrees to seek the same or
s/milar terms for the Public Entity, where appropriate m Kitsap County's sole discretion, to the extent
permitted by law.
2. This agreement provides the Public Entity full access and use of the police Records Management System
(RMS), licensed to Kitsap County by Intergraph Public Safety, Inc. (IPS), to the extent legally permitted by
the Kitsap County contractual agreement of 2/1/99, contract #KC-057-99. Kitsap County will also purchase,
independently of the aforementioned contract, the database server necessary for running the I~MS.
This agreement also provides that Kitsap County will purchase or contract for Wide Area Network (WAN)
infrastructure eqmpment and telecommunications services necessary for providing the Public Entity remote
TI-level access to the RMS.
3. The following schedules are incorporated herein, precedence being in the order that they appear:
Schedule A: Public Agency Buy-In to RMS
Schedule B: Public Agency Annual Maintenance for RMS
Schedule C: Public Agency Network Infrastructure
Schedule D: Public Agency Annual Maintenance for Network Infrastructure
4. Kitsap County may enter into any future contractual agreement with IPS or any supplier of computer
hardware, software or services, without the consent of the Public Entity, however the Public Entity will be
notified of any upgrades or changes to the RMS end-user workstation configuration. Kitsap County will
notify the Public Entity within thirty days of having definitive information concerning such upgrades or
changes.
5. The level of access to records maintained within this system will be the responsibility of each participating
agency. At a m/nimum read-only access to names and criminal history information will be granted
electronically to users with legal and appropriate authorization.
6. The Public Entity and Kitsap County agree to provide each other an electronic mailing address for the
purpose of exchanging informal communications regarding day-to-day system operations. The electronic mail
system must be provided by either Kitsap County's or the Public Entity's own m-house server, a requirement
of the Washington State Intergovernmental Network (IGN).
7. The Public Entity agrees to provide its own end-user workstations meeting the minimum requirements
established by IPS: Pentium III 233mhz or above, 128mb memory, 10gb disk storage, SVGA resolution of
800x600, T-1 net~vork connection.
The workstations must run either Windows 2000 or Windows-NT Version 4.0 or greater client operating
system. The Public Entity agrees to upgrade its workstations to meet any furore IPS requirements. The Public
Entity agrees to set up and maintain all end-user workstations accessing the RMS, except that Kitsap County
agrees to perform all software and hardware installation related specifically to the end-user access of the
RMS.
8. Kitsap County tests and verifies the proper functiomng of the RMS system prior to installation on the Public
Entity's end-user workstations.
Kitsap County will not be responsible for any impact in functionality or performance to any software running
on the Public Entity's end-user workstations arising from its installation of the RMS and related client
software, and/or connection to the Kitsap County WAN.
9. Kitsap County agrees to purchase sufficient concurrent chent software licenses to ensure that the Public
Entity will not be denied access to the RMS due to the lack thereof. For the purpose of this paragraph, access
will be def'med as the ability of every licensed work station for the Public Entity to be able to log on to the
RMS 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to the extent that th/s level of access is under the control of Kitsap
County.
l 0. Kitsap County agrees to use its best efforts, to the extent that it is under its control, to provide the Public
Entity uninterrupted access to the RMS, at a level of performance acceptable in common business computer
applications. The Pubhc Entity acknowledges and accepts that there will be occasions where the RMS will
not be available, for reasons such as but not limited to, hardware and software maintenance, and telephone
company service outages. Kitsap County assures the Public Entity that it will inform it of planned down time
in advance. Kitsap County will provide a minimum of 24 hours written advanced notice of planned down time
to the Pubhc Entity's system administrator. Electronic mail satisfies the written requirement for the purpose
of this paragraph.
11. Kitsap County agrees to provide the Public Entity telephone response within six hours of a request for
technical support, and on-site response within 24 hours of the request, if required.
12. Kitsap County agrees to perform a daily tape backup of the RMS system each Kitsap County business work
day. In the unlikely event of a major system failure that requires a system reload from tape, the Public Entity
acknowledges that data would be restored from the most recent daily backup, and that any additions,
modifications or deletions performed by the Public Entity after the backup would have been lost and would
have to be re-entered.
13. The Public Entity will pay Kitsap County, on contract signing, 50% of the 'Total Cost to Agency Payable to
Kitsap County' on Schedule A. The Pubhc Entity will pay the remaining 50% fourteen days after the Public
Entity goes 'live' in production mode.
For future additional IPS client RMS licenses, beyond the number of workstations specified in Schedule A,
thePublic Entity will also pay Kitsap County:
a. The then current vendor software client license costs; and
b. 1.75% of the base RMS costs specified in Schedule A.
The Public Entity will maintain a 2:1 ratio of the number of end-user workstations accessing the RMS to the
number of IPS client licenses for RMS.
The recouping of the initial buy-in costs will continue until the total number of licenses utilized by Kitsap
County, City of Bremerton, City of Port Orchard, and City of Poulsbo reaches the initial purchase level of 55
I_PS client RMS licenses.
14. The Public Entity will pay Kitsap County, on contract sigmng, the 'Total Cost to Agency Payable to Kitsap
County' on Schedule C.
15. The Public Entity will pay Kitsap County the 'Total Annual Cost to Agency Payable to Kitsap County'
specified m Schedule B, in quarterly payments, due beginning on the date of the Public Entity's live cutover
to production.
The charges for 'Kitsap County Technical Services Staff Support' w/il be based on the actual number of
workstations accessing the RMS at the beginning of each quarter. The 'Contribution toward EPS maintenance
of the base RMS' will be increased by 1.75% of the base RMS maintenance cost specified in Schedule B for
each additional RMS client license, beyond the number of client licenses specified in Schedule A
The Public Entity will maintain a 2:1 ratio of the number of end-user workstat/ons accessing the RMS to the
number oflPS client 1/censes for RMS.
Kitsap County reserves the right to annually review its cost to provide the goods and services to the Public
Entity, and to establish a revised Schedule B, begmmng five years after the date of the Public Entity's live
cutover to production. After year five, this rate will not increase more than 10% per year for Kitsap County
staff support. Any increase in costs due to network infrastructure or EPS Services will not be greater than the
percentage of increase to Kitsap County.
16. The Public Entity will pay Kitsap County the 'Total Annual Cost to Agency Payable to Kitsap County'
specified in Schedule D, in quarterly payments, due beginning on contract signing.
17. Kitsap County accepts no responsibility for the performance or suitability of any good or service to be
provided by the vendors.
18. This agreement shall remain in force until canceled by either party with 90 day written notice. Upon the
cancellation of the agreement, the Public Entity will be provided with a backup tape of all the entity's RMS
data, current through the date of notification, within five working days of the date of notification. The Public
Entity will be provided a second tape of the entity's RMS data that is current through the last day of the 90
day notification time. The second backup tape will be provided within 24 hours of the termination of service.
19. Each party shall be liable and responsible for the consequences of any sole negligent or wrongful act on the
part of itself and its employees. Neither party assumes responsibility to the other party for the consequences
of any act or omission of any person, fn-m or corporation not a party to this agreement. Thee Public Entity
agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County, its officers, agents or employees from any claims,
costs and/or demands arising out of or related to this agreement.
20. Kitsap County will contract for the purchase of goods and services according to the laws and regulations
governing purchases by and on behalf of Kitsap County. The Public Entity accepts responsibility for
compliance with and any additional or varying laws and regulations governing purchases by or on behalf of
the Public Entity in question.
Chris Endresen, Chair Date
Jan Angel, Commissioner Date
Tim Botldn, Commissioner Date
Mayor, City of Bremerton Date
City Clerk, City of Bremerton Date
City Attorney, City of Bremerton Date
ATTEST:
Holly Anderson Date
Clerk of the Board
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: Professional Services FOR AGENDA OF: 11-14-01
Agreement Ed Faulk, Greens Superintendent ORIGINATING DEPT: Parks & Recreation
Gold Mountain Golf Complex ORIGINATOR: Jim Spencer, Director
DATE SUBMITTED: 11-7-0 1
2. CLEARANCES: 3. EXHIBITS: Professional services Agreement for Greens
(Comment on back if necessary) Superintendent at the Gold Mountain Golf Complex
City Treasurer: ~___~_2~_~
Fiscal & Budget
· /?
Operanons Committee:
EN~ORS~,M~rr
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
Mr. Ed Faulk has been the Greens Superintendent at the Gold Mountain Golf Complex since 1 October 1996.
During this time the course conditions have been so exceptional that they have attracted national attention for their
playability. Mr. Faulk brings over 24 years of greens experience to this position, including 13 years as the assistant
superintendent in addition to his over 5 years as the Greens Superintendent. The Compensation level is consistent with
the averages for similar positions in the western region of the United States.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
~.oApprov~ of the attached Professional Service Agreement for Mr. Ed Faulk.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Jim Spencer
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Jim Spencer
EXPIRATION DATE: 12-31-01
REVIEW DATE: 11-7-01
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL
CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
The Gold Mountain Golf Complex would not be maintained to the standards as set by the Gold Mountain Board of
Director and the Bremcrton City Council.
6. ,IMPACT ON STAFFIN, G~ BUDGETS~ FAC1LITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The compensation values identified in the Professional Services Agreement are consistent with the financial model
associated with the Gold Mountain Golf Complex budget.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Greens Superintendent
THIS AGREEMENT is between the City of Bremerton, a municipal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City") and Edward G.
Faulk, (hereinafter referred to as "Superintendent").
W I T N E S S E T H:
1. Duties: The City hereby agrees to retain the
Superintendent to maintain and improve the Gold Mountain Golf
Complex grounds, to include clubhouse grounds and surrounding
areas, and through his efforts to have the condition of the Gold
Mountain Golf Complex in as good condition as possible, subject to
budgetary and environmental limitations within which the
Superintendent must perform this work. The Superintendent does
agree to conform to the generally accepted standards and practices
of similar golf courses in the Western Washington region.
It is understood that the Superintendent will be a member of
the Golf Course Superintendent's Association of America, the
Western Washington Golf Course Superintendent's Association and the
Northwest Turf Grass Association and membership fees will be paid
by the City at City expense. The City also agrees to cover all
related and reasonable costs associated with the Superintendent's
attendance at the annual meetings and conferences of these three
organizations.
2. TEP~: This Agreement will commence on January 1, 2002 and
terminate on December 31, 2004.
This Agreement will automatically renew itself for one {I)
year, unless written notice to the contrary is given by either
party at least sixty (60) days prior to December 31, 2004.
3. COMPENSATION: Beginning January 1, 2002, the
Superintendent will be paid eighty-two Thousand Dollars
($82,000.00) annually with an annual increase of 2.0%.
The City will reimburse salaries and employee contributions
for employees of the Superintendent under paragraph 12, training
costs, association membership dues, and operating expenses all as
approved by the Department through the City purchasing procedure.
City will also pay the cost of medical insurance premiums for
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT --1-
GREENS1 · PSA - 10-23-01
Superintendent and dependents.
4. P~RC~ING: The Superintendent agrees to stay within the
annual maintenance budget recommended by the Board of Directors and
approved by the City Council. The Superintendent agrees that this
budget will be utilized for the purpose of employing the
Superintendent's personnel, purchase of liability insurance, and
purchase of supplies and materials necessary to maintain the Gold
Mountain Golf Complex. The Superintendent will comply with all
auditing and accounting requirements set forth by the City of
Bremerton. The Superintendent's books and records will be open to
inspection at any time during normal business hours.
It is agreed by the Superintendent that he will operate
through the Office of the Director of Parks and Recreation of the
City of Bremerton for all purchasing requests. Ail supplies,
capital and equipment expenditures will be the responsibility of
the Parks and Recreation Department.
$. FACILITIES ~ EQUiPmenT: The Superintendent will have
the use of the owner's maintenance complex at Gold Mountain for the
duration of this Agreement, at no cost to the Superintendent. The
Superintendent agrees to keep the building in a clean and orderly
condition throughout the term of this Agreement. The
Superintendent agrees to make necessary minor repairs to the
maintenance building. In the event of major damage or destruction
to the maintenance building that is not the responsibility of the
Superintendent, the City agrees to repair or replace said building.
City will indemnify and Hold Harmless Superintendent for any
liability for work violations resulting from inadequate building
facilities. Superintendent will promptly notify Parks and
Recreation Department of any building defects.
The golf course equipment including, but not limited to, the
irrigation system, drainage and lighting systems, benches, trash
receptacles, flag sticks, ball washers and maintenance equipment
shall be provided by the City and be maintained in good working
condition by the Superintendent, and remains the property of the
City. The Superintendent agrees to maintain the irrigation system
in good working condition.
It is understood and agreed that the Superintendent shall not
be responsible for or required to repair any major loss, damage, or
destruction to the landscaping, building or equipment not resulting
from the negligent acts or omissions of the Superintendent or any
person acting through the Superintendent. Major damage or
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -2-
GREENS1.PSA - 10-23-01
destruction shall mean any damage or destruction which shall cost
more than One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) to repair. Nothing
contained in this Agreement shall be construed to impose a duty
upon the City to repair or rebuild unless specifically provided
herein.
Unless specifically provided otherwise herein, all equipment
for maintaining the golf complex, as specified in this Agreement,
shall be provided by the City. The City will provide a vehicle to
the Superintendent for course maintenance and commuting which may
include incidental personal stops.
6. STATUS: The Superintendent is an independent contractor
and neither the Superintendent, nor the City, shall have the right
to act for or on behalf of the other or to incur debts binding on
the other for any purpose. The Superintendent shall supervise and
direct the work as provided for in this Agreement, using his best
skills and attention. From the perspective of grounds safety and
turf condition, the Superintendent shall have the sole authority to
declare when the courses are open for golf play and when golf carts
will be allowed on the courses. Any maintenance practices or
renovation projects that would disrupt play will be mutually agreed
upon by the Superintendent, Golf Professional and Director of Parks
and Recreation. The Superintendent and Professional shall mutually
agree upon the open and start of play daily. The Superintendent
shall be solely responsible for the means, methods, techniques,
sequences and procedures for coordinating all portions of the work
contemplated by this Agreement.
7. INSURANCE: Superintendent agrees to purchase, out of his
annual operating budget as defined above, a policy of insurance
which shall protect him and his employees from any loss caused by
property damage or personal injury at the golf complex. Said
insurance policy shall be in the amount of One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00} for each occurrence. The Superintendent agrees
that said insurance shall name the City of Bremerton as an
additional insured. A copy of the certificate shall be required to
be kept on file with the City Risk Manager.
8. SUPERVISION: Superintendent shall report directly to the
Parks and Recreation Director and shall cooperate and work closely
with the Golf Professional. In those situations where conflict of
interests arise, the situation will be brought immediately before
the Parks and Recreation Director for resolution.
9. COMMITMENT: Superintendent shall devote his time,
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -3-
GREENS1. PSA - 10-23-01
attention and energies to performance of his duties for the City
during the term of this Agreement on a full time basis.
10. LIENS AND INSOLVENCY: The Superintendent shall not allow
any property of the City to become encumbered with liens of any
sort by reason of his action or omission.
11. INDEMNITE: The Superintendent agrees to defend, indemnify
and save harmless the City, its appointed and elected officers and
employees, from and against any and all liability, loss, costs,
damage and expense, including costs and attorney fees in defense
thereof because of actions, claims or lawsuits for damages
resulting from personal or bodily injury, including death at any
time resulting therefrom, sustained or alleged to have been
sustained by any person or persons and on account of damage to
property, arising or alleged to have arisen directly or indirectly
out of or in consequence of or the performance of this Agreement,
whether such injuries to persons or damage to property is due to
the negligence of Superintendent, his subcontractors, agents,
successors or assigns. This provision shall be inapplicable to the
extent that the City is judicially found solely negligent for such
damage or injury.
12. EMPLOYEES: It is agreed and understood that the
Superintendent shall be the only person responsible for the hiring
and firing of his employees. The City shall reimburse for payroll,
payroll taxes, FICA, federal taxes, workers compensation, Labor &
Industry and medical insurance premiums.
13. NONDISCRIMINATION: Superintendent shall not discriminate
in the employment or services to the public on the basis of race,
color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status or
disability, except employment actions based on a bona fide
occupational qualification.
14. TERMINATION: This Agreement will terminate upon the
happening of any of the following events:
a. Upon its normal termination if not renewed.
b. Upon the death of the Superintendent.
c. Upon twenty (20) days written notice by the City of
termination for good and sufficient cause, including, but not
limited to, the following:
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -4-
GREENS1.PSA - 10-23-01
i. The physical disability of the Superintendent which
substantially prevents the Superintendent from
performing his duties for a continuous period of
one (1) month or for an aggregate of three (3)
months during each calendar year.
ii. Continuing inattention or neglect of duties.
iii. Suspension from those associations listed under
paragraph 1 for more than thirty (30) days.
iv. Conviction of a gross misdemeanor or felony.
v. Major damage or destruction of the golf complex
property, structures or equipment that is the
subject of this Agreement, when the City decides
not to rebuild, and that damage or destruction will
prevent Superintendent from substantially
performing his obligations under this Agreement.
In the event of termination of this Agreement by reason of
death or disability, the Superintendent's estate shall be paid his
compensation to and including the month of death or, in the event
of disability, the Superintendent shall be paid to the last day of
the month in which termination occurs.
15. BREACH: In the event that either party claims that the
other is guilty of a substantial breach of any of the provisions of
this Agreement a conference will be called between the parties and
every reasonable effort shall be made to reach an amicable
solution. At said conference, either party shall be entitled to
have representatives present.
Either party shall have thirty (30) days after notice within
which to correct any activity or conduct claimed by the other to
have constituted a substantial breach of the Agreement.
In the event that either party shall, within said thirty (30)
day period, fail to either correct the activity claimed to
constitute a substantial breach of this Agreement or notify the
other party in writing of their denial of said substantial breach
of this Agreement, then, in such event, this Agreement shall cease
and terminate as of the expiration of said thirty (30) day period.
16. NOTICE: Any notice required or permitted to be given
under this Agreement shall be sufficient if in writing and sent by
registered or certified mail. In the case of the Superintendent,
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -5-
GREENS1. PSA - 10-23-01
it shall be sent to his residence at: 104 NE Buckeye Lane,
Bremerton, Washington 98311, and in the case of the City:
Bremerton City Clerk, 239 Fourth Street, Bremerton, Washington
98337.
17. APPLIC~m?~ LAW: This Agreement shall be controlled by the
laws of the State of Washington. Superintendent shall perform and
comply with all applicable laws of the United States and the State
of Washington; the Charter, Municipal Code and Ordinances of the
City of Bremerton; and rules, regulations, order and directives of
their administrative agencies and the officers thereof.
18. SERVILITY: The invalidity or unforceability of any
provision hereof shall, in no way, affect the validity or
enforceability of any other provision.
19. ~tIVER: Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any
terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall not be
deemed a waiver of such, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of
such right or power at any time be taken to be a waiver of any
other breach.
20. MODIFICATION: Any waiver, alteration or modification of
any of the provisions of this Agreement or cancellation or
replacement of this Agreement shall not be valid unless in writing
and signed by the parties.
21. ENTIRETY: This Agreement, including the exhibits attached
hereto and forming a part hereof, if any, are all of the covenants,
promises, agreements and conditions, either oral or written,
between the parties.
22. RE~.~IES: Rights under this Agreement are cumulative; the
failure to exercise on any occasion any right shall not operate to
forfeit such right on another occasion. The use of one remedy
shall not be taken to exclude or waive the right to use another.
23. LICENSES: Superintendent shall secure and maintain, in
full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, all
required licenses, permits and similar legal authorizations and
comply with all requirements thereof.
24. USE OF FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT: The Superintendent and
his employees shall use the facilities herein described for those
purposes and only for those purposes enumerated herein and other
complex related maintenance items, and for no personal uses.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -6-
GREENS1.PSA - 10-23-01
25. FIDELITY BO~D: Superintendent shall enter into an honesty
and fidelity bond in the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00 ,
naming the City as the insured thereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement the date and year indicated.
DATE EDWARD G. FAULK
CITY OF BREMERTON
BY:
Date LYNN HORTON, Mayor
DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL:
Jim Spencer, Director Parks and Recreation
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Loren Combs, Interim City Attorney
RECEIVED FOR FILING:
Kathleen McCluskey, City Clerk
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -7-
GREENS1.PSA - 10-23-01
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: LOArAJ,"/"o FOR AGENDA OF: NOVEMBER 14, 2001
HOME Recommendation- L--~~ ~' I
~.~ ~ ORIGINATING DEPT.: DED
ORIGINATOR: Deborah Peavler-Stewart ~)~~
~oo$~ 3t~'l~$nt~'q'o~Ctn~o DATE SUBMITTED: October 1, 2001
2. CLEARANCES: 3. EXHIBITS:
Options for the Development of 704 Chester
City Attorn~..
Fiscal and Budget Committ~" ' pl ~ 10/10/01
OperaUons Commatee ~ c/~ 10/10/01
HEARD AT SIIUDY SESSION 1 1/O7/O1
ENDORSEMENT X INFORMATION__APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDER SUBMITTAL:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
As a member of the Kitsap County HOME Consortium, the City of Bremerton receives an annual
allocation of HOME funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to expand
the supply of safe, sanitary and affordable housing for low income persons.
The Low Income Housing Institute (LIHI) is requesting a deferred loan of $592,850 in HOME funds to
purchase the property at 704 Chester to develop as affordable family housing and $33,000 to make
immediate repairs after acquisition. LIHI will subsequently pursue a financing plan to obtain over
$5,800,000 to complete a major renovation of the property to provide 57 units of affordable housing.
The City Council approved a HOME grant to LIHI in January to determine the feasibility of
purchasing the property. The feasibility study has been completed and two options, 1) rehabilitation of
the existing structure as affordable family housing and 2) demolition and reconstruction of new units
as senior housing, were considered. The option with demolition has a funding gap of approximately
$1,300,000 which makes it infeasible.
Affordable safe family housing is needed in Bremerton. The City's HOME policy allows for projects
that promote rehabilitation and renovation of existing buildings. LIHI has the demonstrated ability to
develop the project. We recommend approval of the funds.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
~ove to allocate $625,850 from the HOME program to LIHI to acquire the property at 704 Chester
make xmmedmte repairs and,~evelop into safe affordable family housing.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIA L:
EXPIRATION DATE:
i0
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
AGENDA BILL NO C [ ~ ,~ ~,
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
None
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Project will not be developed
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
None
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
r~M:~lOIIITy ~ i'L.J cly
Chester Manor
OPTION- MAJOR BUILDING RENOVATION:
Building Interior
This option would entail extensive reconfiguration of all floors. Removal of many of the non-
I~earing inferior partitions, the interior finishes and fixtures will allow better design of the'
apartment layouts, with a mix of one bedroom and studio units approaching the existing
number of units. Each renovated unit would have a full kitchenette and bathroom, with closets
in the bedrooms (and off living rooms of studio units). This extensive demolition will allow for
plumbing, electrical and fire sprinkler upgrades. Proposed structural upgrades will not replace
elements of the existing structural systems, but would add plywood sheathing to roofs, walls and
floors, and concrete or masonry infill walls between selected columns supporting the east wing,
which are in addition to the existing structure.
Mechanical and electrical services would be consolidated on the basement level in current
spaces, as well as spaces not suitable for habitable rooms. The remainder of the usable
basement area will be devoted to temporary storage related to the residences.
Circulation/Life Safety
The existing building will be upgraded to Type V One-hour rated construction, instead of the
current Type V-N. Interior corridors will be one-hour rated. An area separation wall will be
required to divide the building into two parts to meet the maximum area restrictions of the code.
Existing stairs will be retained in the eas~ wing and middle of the building. However, the east
wing stairs will be enclosed to the ground level, instead of being open below the 1st floor as at
present. The stairs at the north end (original building/will be replaced entirely with a new stair
and enclosure which will exit af the first floor level to 8th Street.
Laundry rooms would be provided at three main floors.
Building Exterior
The existing wall finishes and windows will be retained. The exterior of the building would be
repaired and receive new paint and composition shingle roofing (single ply roofing at fiat roofs).
The'existing entry canopy would be replaced with a more aesthetically attractive entryway. The
new canopy could not extend beyond the current setback requirements.
Building systems
New ventilation systems (bath and kitchen exhaust, as well as common areasl, plumbing system,
fire sprinkler system, electrical system and telephone system would be provided. The existing hot
water heating system would be repaired and upgraded. Cable TV or data connections will not
be included, nor will air-conditioning (cooling/ systems.
Site
The existing site would remain without new improvements except as needed for utility upgrades,
as required.
Feasibilih/Study
Summary
This option will provide an significant upgrade fo the building, with a more compatible and more
cohesive exterior appearance. The size and configuration of the resuJting residential units will be
more efficient. There would be about 47 one-bedroom apartments of between 450-550 square
feet each and 9 studio apartments of about 320 square feet each, and one 900 square foot
Nv.o-bedroom manager's apartment and adjacent office near the Chester Avenue entry. The
interior finishes and fixtures would be entireJy upgraded.
Anticipated Cost of Full Renovation $3.8 million
Hard Cost per Apartment Unit $67,000
DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
Project: 57 Units
Sources of Funds
Total Cost Private State City of Funding
Acquisition Costs: Lender OCD Bremerton LIHTC FHLB Gap
Purchase Pdce $600,000
· Closing, Tire & ReCording Costs 82,850
SUB-~O'~,~, S~02,~50 I SOl SOl SOl SOl SO[ SO
Construction
Basic Construction Contract 83,772,008
Hazardous Abate. & Monitoring $61,770
Construction Contingency ( 10%) 8383,378
Sales Taxes $314,370
S~B-~O'~ $4,53,,52~ I SOl sol sol Sol sol SO
Development Costs: Professional
Appraisal/Market Study 87,000
Architect/Engineer 8339,481
Environmental Assessment $19,000
Surveys 86,400
Legal $20,000
Developer Fee $495,000
Consultant Fees
Other: Contingency for soft costs (5%) $18,664
SUB~-O-~ 8905,545 I sol sol SOl sol Sol SO
Other Development Costs
Real Estate Taxes 85,613
Insurance 89,430
Bidding Costs $3,852
Peri. its, Fees & Hookups $47,150
Impact/Mitigation Fees
Relocation Costs 897,500
Development Period Utilities 85,950
Construction Loan Fees $17.500
Construction Interest 876,125
Loan Origination Fees $21,250
Tax Credit Fees $48,316
Accounting/Audit $12,000
Marketing/Leasing Expenses $4,000
Carrying Costs at Rent up 820.000
Operating Reserves $40,000
Other:
s~o~. 84o8,686 1 $01 sol sol sol sol $o
Total Development Cost: I $6,448,607 I $860,000 J $950.000 I $602,850 J $3,59t,000 I $398,943 J $45.814
Feasibility Study
New Construction Options
Further options for new construction are outlined below.
Option 2a - Construct 15 units of senior housing: 1 bedroom single story units at
600 square feet each. Each unit would have its own laundry facility. '
Anticipated construction cost, including site development and demolition and
abatement of the existing facilities, is $1.53 million.
Option 2b - Construct 25 units of senior housing: Units as described above.
Anticipated construction cost, including site development is $2.11 million.
Option 2c - Construct 40 units of housing: 30 single bedroom units at 600 square
feet each and ten 2-bedroom units at 850 square feet. Units would be in a two
or three story building, with parking as required. Anticipated construction cost,
including site development is $3.21 million.
Site and common area costs for these examples remained the same as the
estimated costs for the townhouse unit option. Square footage costs for building
construction in all three options was estimated at $96 per square foot.
Feas~DilJty Study
Chester Manor
NEW CONSTRUCTION OPTION
New Buildings:
This option would entail completion demolition of the existing building and foundations, and
regrading of the entire site. Current zoning requirements would permit t 5 units on the site, with
the maximum building size being a triplex. Five buildings of three units each are planned, with a
manager's office/storage. No community room will be provided due to the small number of
units and limited site area. Each unit would have its own laundry facilities. Each unit would
consist of a two-story townhouse with three bedrooms, for approximately 1160 square feet each.
One of the units would be an accessible unit.
Site:
The site would be regraded and buildings located toward the middle of the site to reduce
retaining walls to a minimum. The property consists of ten existing parcels, which would be
grouped into five to accommodate each building. A play area with play equipment would be
located on site. Parking would be provided at the rate of five spaces per building, to
accommodate the requirement for 1.5 spaces per three bedroom unit. Parking spaces would
be accessed off the alley. Most of the site would be planted in lawn with some planting beds.
Under current regulations, a stormwater system would not be required, since the amount of
impervious area would actually be less than the existing.
Please note: If the new DOE stormwater regulations go into effect and are adopted, a
sizable detention system would be required, and would require costly underground piping,
since there would be insufficient space on site for a detention pond.
Summary:
This option would provide new buildings in keeping with the current zoning requirements, and in
scale with the surrounding residential neighborhood. This would significantly reduce the number
of units available to rent from the current 57 to 15. Three bedroom units would provide the most
square footage on the site of the standard choice of unit types.
Anticipated Cost of New Construction $2.7 million
Hard Cost per Apartment Unit $180,000
Additional Contingencies:
Storm detention system (future regulations) $t00,000
Addition of fire hydrants $20,000
DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
Project: 15 Units New Construction
Sources of Funds
Total Cost Private State Fund
Acquisition Costs: Lender CCD City LIHTC FHLB Gap
Purchase Price $600,000
CIosing, Title & Recording Costs $2,850
SU~TOT^, 8602,850 I Sol SOl Sol sol sol So
Construction
Basic Construction Contract $1,471,962
Hazardous Abate. & Monitoring $61,770
Construction Contingency ( 10%) $153,373
Sales Taxes $125,766
SUBTOTAL $1,812,871 I sol sol sot $ot sol so
Development Costs: Professional
Appraisal'Market Study $7,000
Architect/Engineer $132,477
Environmental Assessment $19,000
Surveys $6,400
Legal $20,000
Developer Fee $270,000
Consultant Fees
Other:. Contingency for soft costs (5%) 88,294
SUBTOTAL $463,170I SOI $0t SOI $0I $0I SO
Other Development Costs
Real Estate Taxes $5,613
insurance $3,680
Bidding Costs $2,850
Permits, Fees & Hookups $18,400
Impact/Mitigation Fees
Relocation Costs $247,500
Development Pedod Utilities 84,250
Construction Loan Fees $11,000
Construction interest $41,250
Loan Origination Fees $5,600 . ..
Tax Credit Fees $13,616
Accounting/Audit $8,500
Marketing/Leasing Expenses 83,000
Carrying Costs at Rent up $10,000
Operating Reserves 825,000
Other.
SUBTOTAL 8400,259I sot sol sol sol sol so ~
Total Development Cost: I 83,279,150 [ I I 8602'850 I $945,000 [ $104,985I I
No Section 8 Project Based Contract $290,000 $1,336,315 =
Section Proiect Based Contract S475,000 S 1,151,315
DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
Project: 25 Units New Construction
Sources of Funds
Total Cost Private State "' F~nd
Acquisition Costs: Lender OCD City LIHTC FHLO Gap
Purchase Price $600,000
Ck~sing, Title & Recording Costs $2,850
SUBTOTAL s6o2,e5oI soI soI so J So J SoI so
Construction
Basic Construction Contract $2,047,962
Hazardous Abate, & Monitoring $61,770
Construction Contingency ( 10%) $210,973
Sales Taxes $172,998
SUBTOTAL $2,493,703
Development Costs: Professional
Appraisal/Market Study $7,000
Architect/Engineer $184,317
Environmental Assessment $19,000 r'"
Surveys $6,400
Legal $20,000
Developer Fee $329,259
Consultant Fees
Other:. Contingency for soft costs (5%) $10,886
SU ,TOTAL $576,86
Other Development Costs
Real Estate Taxes $5,613
Insurance $5,120
Bidding Costs $2,850
Permits, Fees & Hookups $25,600
Impact/Mitigation Fees
Relocation Costs $247,50~)
Development Pedod Utilities $4,250
Construction Loan Fees $13,000
Construction Interest $48,750
Loan Origination Fees $12,400
Tax Credit Fees $21,878
Accounting/Audit $8,500
Marketing/Leasing Expenses $5,500
Carrying Costs at Rent up $15,000
Ooerating Reserves $30,000 ......
Other.
SUBTOTAL $445,96 I $01 S01
Total Development Cost:
NO Section 8 Project Based Contract $505,000 51,341,550
Section 8 Project Based Contract $820,000 $946,550
DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
Project: 40 Units New Construction
Sources of Funds
Total Cost Private State Fund
Acquisition Costs: Lender OCD Cib/ LIHTC FHLB Gap
Purchase Price $600,000
Closing, ~tle & Recording Costs $2,850
S,,~OTAL $602.850 I S01 S01 S01 S01 S01 S0
Construction
Basic Construction Contract $3,151,962
Haza~ous Abate. & Monitoring $61,770
Construction Contingency ( 10%) $321,373
Sales Taxes $263,526
SU.TOT^L 83.798.63~ I S01 S01 S01 S01 S01 S0
Development Costs: Professional
Appraisal/Market Study $7,000
Architect/Engineer $283,677
Environmental Assessment $19,000
Surveys $6,400
Legal $20,000
Developer Fee 8437,139
Consultant Fees
Other:. Contingency for soft costs (5%) $15,854
SUBTOTAL $789.070I S01 $01 $01 S01 S01
Other Development Costs
Real Estate Taxes $5,613
Insurance $7,880
Bidding Costs $2,850
Permits, Fees & Hookups $39,400
Impact/Mitigation Fees
Relocation Costs $247,500
Development Period Utilities $4,250
Construction Loan Fees $15,000
Construction Interest $56,250
Loan Origination Fees $15,600
Tax Credit Fees $34,271
Accounting/Audit $8,500
Marketing/Leasing Expenses $7,500
Carrying Costs at Rent up $25,000
Operating Reserves $40,000
Other:.
SUBTOTA, $509.e~4 I $01 S01 S01 $01 S01 S0
Tot, I Development Cost: I $5.700.~64 I i I $e02.850 t 82.520.000 I$279,960 t
No Section 8 Project Based Contract $905,000 $1,392,354
_S. ection Project Based Contract $1,425,000 S872,354
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
(2qESI'ER MANOR APARTMENTS
7~4 (2'{EgI'ER AVENUE
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
8.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
ATC Associates Inc. has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment with aSbestos and lead
sampling of the Project Site located at 205 East Main Street, in Auburn, Washington. The purpose of this
Phase I ESA was to identify and document the current and historical environmental conditions of the site
and the presence of substances which indicate an existing, past or potential adverse impact to the air, soil,
groundwater, or surface water aS a result of operations on the site and adjacent and surrounding
properties, and which may indicate that further investigation may be necessary to evaluate the potential
environmental liabilities associated with the site.
The Phase I ESA included asbestos and lead sampling; a review of environmental agency databases and
historical documents; visual observations of the Project Site and neighboring properties.
A summary of the findings is listed below:
Hazardous Materials Storage, Handling and Disposal
Based on observations no recognized environmental conditions were observed of the current activities
at the Project Site.
Storage Tanks
· An Underground Storage Tank (us'r) fillport was observed at the project site on the east side of the
building, located at the southwest end of the basketball court and confirmed to be present through an
interview with Craig Coons, the building owner. The status of the UST is unknown. The presence of
an UST is a potential environmental condition. Prior to any redevelopment that impacts the area of
the UST including its aSsociated piping, a subsurface (soils) assessment may be necessary to
determine if a release of petroleum had occurred.
Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM)
· Asbestos-containing materiah (ACMs) were identified at the Project Site. ATC recommends that an
Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Program should be implemented to manage the ACMs and any
presumed ACMs. The 0&M Program should remain in effect until the ACMs are removed from thc
facility. Prior to any renovation/remodel or demolition work, a comprehensive "Good Faith" survey of
the ACMs or presumed ACMs should be conducted to determine if other suspect materials are present
within areas scheduled to be impacted.
Lead in paint was identified at the Project Site. All the samples were analyzed and found to contain
lead included brown paint, yellow paint, green paint, cream paint, gray paint, blue paint, silver paint
and beige paint. The lead paint survey was not comprehensive and was not intended to be used for
construction and/or demolition purposes. Further testing for lead paint may be necessary to inform
contractors of substrate that may be impacted by future renovation work. Furthermore, if Federal
HUD funding is secured for this Project Site, Icad abatement of the building system may be necessary
to be in compliance with HUD guidelines.
In the meantime, ATC recommends that adequate worker safety and general public safety measures
I ATC Associates Inc. 16 Project No. 76.09190.1o_31`
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
CHESrER MANOR APARTMENTS
704 CHESTER AVENUE
BREMERTON, ~'ASHINGTON
be performed during the disturbance of paint containing regulated levels of lead. Disturbance of lead
paint should be conducted in accordance with the Department of Labor and Industries' requirements.
· Non-labeled electrical light fixture ballasts are presumed to contain PCBs. These light ballasts should
be consolidated and removed/disposed as ha?ardous waste or transferred to a recycling station.
l~i.~torical Use Research
Prior uses of the Project Site have included a hospital, nursing home and Chester Manor Apartment. ATC
found no evidence that the past or present use of the Project Site has caused actual or potential adverse
impacts to the environmental q~mlity of the Project Site with the exception of the presence of an UST.
Environmental Agency Database Review
· No past or current tenants at the Project Site were listed.
· No immediate adjacent facilities were listed by various regulatory agencies. Several facilities in the
general vicinity are listed but do not appear to have direct impact to the Project Site. Most of these
facilities have either undergone or are undergoing Independent Remedial Actions. Based on the
reviewed information concerning listed facilities, these properties currently do not represent an
environmental concern to the Project Site.
I ATC Associates Inc. 17 Project No. 76.09190.1231'
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
,. g_ '_7 zFt_. .ov.
~~ ~~ ORIGINATING DEPT: Treasure~~
Levying Properly Taxes for Collection in 2002
DATE SUBMITTED: O~. ~001
2. CL~NCES: Comment of back if necessa~) 3. EXHIBITS:
Dir. Admin. Se~ices~
City A~omey ~ Schedule of 2001 and 2002 Levies
Fiscal and Budget~, ,~ ~'~
Operations
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACT~
The City's prope~y taxes are levied on an annual basis through passage of an o~inance. The proposed o~inance
will implement a general prope~y tax levy and a voted EMS levy at the ~atuto~ rate limit as well as a bond
redemption levy at a rate adequate to provide funds necessa~ to meet debt sewice obligations. The language of the
o~inan~ has been stm~ured in order to comply with the provisions of Referendum 47. If Initiative 747 is passed by
the voters, the parentage increase in se~ions 1. and 2. of the ordinance will be changed from 1.89% to 1% as
provided in the initiative.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
I move to pass on second reading Ordinance No. ~<~ i levying property taxes for collection in 2002.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Treasurer
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor
EXPIRATION DATE: 12/31/2002
REVIEW DATE: N/A
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
COUNcILPULLED __DiRECTivE:TABLED __ APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED 11. AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The City will not levy property taxes in FY 2002 and will forego approximately $6 million of revenue in the General
Fund and Bond Fund.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
As presented in the 2001 - 2002 Biennial Budget and mid-biennium review.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Title 84 RCW and Kitsap County Assessor.
ORDINANCE NO. 4781
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Bremerton levying Municipal
Taxes on all the taxable property within the City limits of
Bremerton for the year 2001 to be collected in the year 2002.
WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Bremerton attest that the population of the
City of Bremerton is more than ten thousand; and
WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Bremerton has properly given notice of the
public heating held on November 7, 2001, to consider the City's revenue sources for the City's
General Fund budget; and
WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Bremerton after hearing and duly considering
all relevant evidence and testimony presented, has determined that the City of Bremerton
requires an increase in property tax revenue from the previous year, in addition to that resulting
from the addition of new construction and improvements to property and any increase in the
value of state-assessed property and all allowable levies in order to discharge the expected
expenses and obligations of the City, now, therefore
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. That an increase in the regular property tax levy, in addition to the increase
resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property and any increase
in the value of state-assessed property, is hereby authorized for the 2001 levy in the amount of
$48,681 which is a percentage increase of 1.0% from the previous year.
Section 2. That an increase in the EMS property tax levy, in addition to the increase
resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property and any increase
in the value of state-assessed property, is hereby authorized for the 2001 levy in the amount of
$7,320, which is a percentage increase of 1.0% from the previous year.
Section 3. That a property tax levy for debt redemption, as previously authorized by the
voters, at a rate sufficient to provide $222,848 needed to meet debt service obligations in 2002, is
hereby authorized for the 2001 levy.
Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days from passage and
publication.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton on the day of
., 2001.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton on the day of
., 2001.
JOHN LAW, Council Presidem
APPROVED this day of ,2001
LYNN S. HORTON, Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
23-Oct-01 file=taxcomp
CITY OF BREMERTON
COMPARISON OF PROPERTY TAX LEVIES
2001 vs 2002
CHANGE
2001 2002 % $$
ASSESSED VALUATION:
REGULAR 1,482,231,297 1,499,305,449 1.15% 17,074,152
BOND 1,456,545,574 1,473,323,846 1.15% 16,778,272
TAX RATE ($$/1,000):
O & M 3.2908 3.3444 1.63% 0.0536
EMS 0.4949 0.5000 1.03% 0.0051
FIRE BOND 0.1552 0.1513 -2.54% -0.0039
TOTAL 3.9409 3.9957 1.39% 0.0548
TAX REVENUE:
O & M 4,877,727 5,014,303 2.80% 136,576
EMS 733,556 749,653 2.80% 16,096
FIRE BOND 226,056 222,848 -1.42% (3,208)
TOTAL 5,837,339 5,986,804 2.56% 149,465
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: FOR AGENDA OF: November~ 2001
ORIGINATING DEPT: Admin Srvs.
Ordinance No. ORIGINATOR: K. McCluskey
Reducing the tax on Garbage Collection DATE SUBMITTED: 10/30/01
2. C L EARAN~:. ~ 3. EXHIBITS:
Attorney ~.j~zLx~DD~j/ Ordinance
~Operations /-~ ~-~
~'Fiscal & Budget'~~c~z~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ~TION:
The City has annually reduced the tax on garbage by 1% for the past
several years. This reduces the tax by 2%, from 13% to 11%.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to approve Ordinance reducing the tax on garbage collection to 11%.
Motion to pass Ordinance No. __.OK~¢OV~ ~X~,
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Admin.
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Admin
EXPIRATION DATE:N/A
REVIEW DATE: N/A
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
Date:
A ENDA NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS (cont.):
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (cont.):
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Tax will remain at 13%.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE relating to occupation tax for the garbage/refuse
business, and amending Chapter 5.02 of the Bremerton Municipal Code.
THE CITY OF BRENIERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. Amendment. Section 5.02.070 of the Bremerton Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
5.02.070 OCCUPATION TAX - RATES - WHO MUST PAY - UTILITIES. There is
hereby levied upon and there shall be collected from every person as hereinafter provided for
the act or privilege of engaging in business activities within the City, whether his office or place
of business be within and/or without the City, an occupation tax, sometimes herein referred to
as the "tax", in amounts to be determined by application of the rates given against the value of
products, including byproducts, gross proceeds of sales or gross income of the business, as the
case may be, as follows:
(p) Upon every person, firm, or corporation engaged in the business of collecting
garbage, refuse, hazardous materials or other waste within the corporate limits of the City an
annual tax of eleven percent (11%) of the total gross income rendered within the City, effective
January 1, 2002.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days from
passage and publication.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this ~ day of December,
2001.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this ~ day of December,
2001.
JOHN LAW, Council President
APPROVED this ~ day of ,2001.
LYNN HORTON, Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk