HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/11/01 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
JULY 11,200'1
1. PRE-COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M.
A. General Council Business
2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M.
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation _~
3. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes of Meeting - June 27, 2001 (#AB01-150)
B. Minutes of Meeting - July 2, 2001 (#AB01-151) U
4. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
5. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
6. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
7. MAYOR'S REPORT
8. LEGISLATIVE REPORT
9. PUBLIC RECOGNITION - (Comments limited to 3-minutes)
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS - RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 2821, Regarding Recovery of Fees for Securing the Buildings on the
Property located at 1421 & 1425 17th Street (#AB01-152)
B. Resolution No. 2822, Regarding Recovery of Fees for the Abatement of Garbage & Debris
on the Property located at 1111 9th Street (#AB01-153)
C. Resolution No. 2823, to consider a Special Use Permit application for Olympic College to
construct and utilize a satellite parking facility on two residential-sized parcels located on
the west side of Lincoln Avenue, north of 13th Street (#AB01-154) - Quasi-Judicial Hearing
11. PUBLIC HEARINGS - ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance No. 4766 (Second Reading), Amending Bremerton Municipal Code 15.06
Setting Utility Assessments, Fees, and Charges effective January 1, 2002 (#AB01-145)
B. Ordinance (First Reading), Amending the Official Zoning Map from Residential Medium
Density (MF) and General Business (BG) to Mixed Use (MU) for properties along the east
frontage of Park Avenue from 6t~ Street to 11th Street exclusive of the parcel at the NE
corner of Park & 6th (#AB01-155)
AGENDA CONTINUED ON BA CK...
C. Ordinance (First Reading), Amending the Zoning Code Text by revising the definition of
"Community Center" to reflect purposes and activities expected & commonly experienced
in contemporary community center settings (#AB01-156)
D. Ordinance (First Reading), Amending the Zoning Code Text by revising the setback
standards for the Parks & Schools (PS) zone classification to reflect the reasonable and
planned expansion of parks and schools facilities to meet growing demands (#AB01-157)
E. Ordinance (First Reading), Amending the Official Zoning Map from Medium Density
Residential (CBR) to Parks & Schools for properties northwest of the intersection of
Chester Avenue and 13th Street, and two parcels along the west frontage of Lincoln
Avenue north of 13th (#AB01-158) - Quasi-Judicial Hearing
12. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE REGULAR MEETING, COUNCIL WILL RECONVENE IN THE
CONFERENCE ROOM FOR A STUDY SESSION TO DISCUSS "SMART GROWTH" AND THE
"ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT"
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 11, 2001
SPEAKERS LIST
If you have a question that may require a written response, please provide your mailing address.
Thank you.
N~VIE TELEPHONE TOPIC
7.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Reminder: The next Council Meeting will be on Wednesday, July 18th
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:43:18 -0700
From: "Eychaner, Jim" <JimE@IAC.WA.GOV>
To: "~Larson, Donald L* <dolarson@krl.org>
Subject: RE: BIG Grant Program ($32 million) For Transient Boat Facilities
Thank you for your e-mail. To "get the word out" on BIG and our own boating
grant program, we work with the NW Marine Trade Association, Washington
Public Ports Association marina committee, the Recreational Boating
Association of Washington (RBAW), State Parks, and many local agencies. For
federal fiscal years 2000-2001, we sent a notice to well over 125 people
associated with boating facilities and organizations state wide.
We were notified by US Fish and Wildlife Service that 2000-2001 Tier One
projects have been approved for the Port of Shelton, Des Moines Marina, and
our agency (we hope to upgrade our Internet page http://boat.iac.wa.gov with
transient facility information). A Tier One grant to La Conner for
transient moorage is pending -- the sponsor needs to submit paperwork on
salmon issues.
We have forwarded two Tier Two proposals, from Ilwaco Marina and Des Moines
Marina, to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and expect to hear back in
September.
I will be reporting to our agency's board on the progress of the BIG program
in July. The board meets in Wenatchee. All board meetings are open to the
public, and your comments would be welcome.
We appreciate your interest.
Mr. Jim Eychaner
Assistant Manager Planning Services
Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation
P.O. Box 40917
Olympia, Washington 98504
360-902-3011
FAX 360-902-3026
jime@IAC.WA.gov
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Eychaner, Jim wrote:
> Thank you for a copy of your e-mail. Our agency is currently accepting
> applications for Boating Infrastructure Grant (BIG) Program funding for
> federal fiscal year 2002. We have two application deadline dates: July 2
> for "Tier One" applications, and August 2 for Tier Two applications. The
> State of Washington has $95~000 available under Tier One, and there is no
> set amount available for Tier Two.
>
> Please let us know if you have questions or need further information about
> the program.
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: 'FOR AGENDA OF: ~u~,~: 2, 20ol
ORIGINATING DEPT.: CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF MEETING-- ~]~ 27, 2001 ORIGINATOR: JOHN E. LAW, PRESIDENT
DATE SUBMITTED: ~L~]~ 28, 2001
2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
ENDORSEMENT [] INFORMATION ['I APPROVED BY COUNCIL ~R..F/_SIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
8, RECOMMENDATION:
9, RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED [')TABLED 1"1 APPROVED r l DISAPPROVED ['1 AMENDED ['1 DATE:--5
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO.:
(OVER)
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (CONTINUED):
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
7. RESEARCHSOURCES:
UNAPRRQVED DBAFT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
June 27, 2001
The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City
Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, June 27, 2001, at 5:30 P.M.,
with Council President John Law presiding. Council members present were Jim Reed, Conrad Esser,
Carol Arends, Eric Younger, Ed Rollman, and Cecil McConnell. Council members Wayne Olsen and
Mike Shepherd were absent. Aisc present were Assistant City Attorney David St. Pierre; Deputy City
Clerk Paula Johnston; and Legislative Assistant Lori Smith.
The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council Member Cecil McConnell,
followed by the invocation given by Reverend Richard Stone of Bremerton Unity Church.
President Law made the following announcements:
1) A Pre-Council session was held to discuss general Council business;
2) Council will be holding the next regular business meeting on Monday, July 2nd due to the 4th of
July holiday falling on a Wednesday;
3) Item 12A, the first reading of an "Ordinance Amendinq Bremerton Municipal Code 15.06,
Setting7 Utility Assessments, Fees & Char.qes" would be pulled from the Agenda tonight; and
4) A 10-minute Executive Session will be held immediately following the Council Meeting to discuss
"Real Estate Acquisition"; followed by two Study Sessions to discuss an "Update of City's Legal
Services", and "City of Bremerton & Port Orchard Water".
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes of Meeting - May 29, 2001 (#AB01-135)
B. Minutes of Meeting - June 6, 2001 (#AB01-136)
C. Minutes of Meeting - June 13, 2001 (#AB01-137)
D. Minutes of Meeting - June 20, 2001 (#AB01-138)
#0055 M/S/C/U (McConnell/Arends) Move to approve Consent Agenda as presented.
CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those
expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090 have been recorded on a
listing that had been made available to the Council.
#0080 M/S/C/U (Esser/Rollman) On June 27, 2001, the Council does approve for payment those
vouchers included and further described as follows: Checks 253342 through 253344; and 253358
through 253361 in the amount of $1,580,382.10; and Regular Payroll in the amount of $802,874.18
for the period ending June 15, 2001.
COUNCIL. MEMBER REPORTS
Cecil McConnell agreed with the comments made by Mr. Darrell McDorman during previous Council
meetings regarding the problems with the ingress/egress off of Wheaton Way at the new Walgreen.
Ed Rollman reminded citizens about the El Carnaval Latino event on Saturday, July 7 in downtown
Bremerton; that assistance was still available from FEMA (1-800-462-9029) for earthquake damage;
and lastly he commended the Block Watch Captain in the 600 block of Highland Avenue for alerting
the police and thwarting an attempted burglary.
Carol Arends noted she had a pleasant weekend attending a church retreat; and donations for
Peruvian earthquake victims are being accepted at Los Andes Import shop on Pacific.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
June 27, 2001
Page 2 of 5
Conrad Esser encouraged citizens to call the Council office to voice their opinion about the possibility
of a mini casino in the City of Bremerton, which may determine the topic of his next district meeting.
John Law announced there would be no District 3 meeting for the months of July and August.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS:
Cecil McCor~nell discussed his attendance at the Golf Course Board of Directors meeting, which
included a tour of the new clubhouse, and the State Route 303 Bremerton to Silverdale
Transportation Corridor Study;, and Carol Arends would be attending the PSRC Operations and
Executive Committee meetings tomorrow in Seattle.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Horton presented a plaque in recognition of the contributions made towards "Making a
Difference in the Anderson Cove Communi¥' to Lee Fabricators. Inc. (Darrell Lee, Dennis Turner, &
Brad Hanson) which was accepted on their behalf by Jeanni Johnson of the Planning Department.
LEGISLATIVE REPORT - There was no report this evening.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
Tina Vlasatyr, a Commercial Loan Officer with Cascadia Revolving Fund, a nonprofit community
development financial institution, informed the public that her company provides financial assistance
to small companies, and can be reached at 206-447-9226 ext. 112, or www.cascadiafund.org.
Don Larson presented a sign that was made for the Edmonds Underwater Park, designating it a
marine conservation area. He reiterated his desire for Bremerton develop a similar park next to the
Turner Joy, and discussed several grants that are currently available to possibly assist with funding.
Lauralee Hanson discussed her attendance at a Countywide meeting on gambling, provided packets
of information on the subject to each of the Council members. She further expressed her opinion that
mini casinos in the City of Bremerton would have a negative effect, but requested that the Council
host a Citywide meeting to determine what the rest of the citizens would support.
Betty Pilling, Board President of the AGAPE Program, which provides outpatient treatment relating
to addictions, also expressed her opinion about the negative effects of gambling, and asked the City
to participate with other cities in the community to support a moratorium on gambling activities.
Kathy Michael agreed with the previous comments, and also encouraged the City Council and the
City of Bremerton to organize a public meeting to discuss the impact of gambling and mini casinos.
10A- RE, SOLUTION NO, 2817 ADOPTING INTERIM PARKS & RECREATION COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN UPDATE (#AB01-139): Jodi Wroblewski, Acting Director of Parks & Recreation Department,
stated that the Department has prepared an interim Parks & Recreation Comprehensive Plan Update
to the 1995 Parks & Recreation Comprehensive Plan. The proposed interim plan gives an overview
of City of Bremerton parks, recreation, and open space planning; identifies regional, community and
neighborhood parks classification systems and standards; proposes urban and regional Parks &
Recreation goals and objectives; identifies potential funding sources; and identifies and interim 2 year
implementation plan. The plan will promote the development, operation, and maintenance of a
comprehensive park, recreation, and open space system throughout City of Bremerton that will
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
June 27, 2001
Page 3 of 5
provide for a wide range of personal, social, economic, and environmental benefits to the citizens of
the City of Bremerton. The interim plan will be further considered through the Growth Management
comprehensive land use planning process during the development and adoption of the City of
Bremerton's City Comprehensive Plan to be accomplished in 2002.
~ encouraged the Parks & Recreation Department to "expand".
Cecil McGonnell asked what types of restrictions are in place to be eligible for the grant. Mayor
Horton responded that "local match" dollars would probably be required. Ms. Wroblewski added
that an "information booklet" by the Washington State Recreation & Parks Association was available
in her office.
#1295 M/S/C/U (Arends/McConnell) Move to adopt Resolution No. 2817, Interim Parks & Recreation
Comprehensive Plan Update.
10B - RESOLUTION NO. 2818. AUTHORIZING AN INTER-FUND LOAN FROM THE EQUIPMENT
RENTAL FUND TO THE GENERAL FUND: AND BUDGET ADJUSTMENT NO. 01-12 (#AB01-140):
Kathleen McCluskey, Administrative Services Director, reported that the proposed resolution would
provide a portion of the funding for improvements to several City computer systems. The borrowing
authority will be used on an "as needed basis" and will be dependent on the timing of the several
components of the systems improvement project. The proposed budget adjustment will provide
expenditure authority necessary to issue the loan and for the use of the loan proceeds on the
computer systems project.
There were no comments from the public.
#1570 M/S/C/U (Reed/Arends) Move to approve Resolution No. 2818 authorizing the inter-fund loan
from the Equipment Rental Fund to the General Fund.
#1590 M/S/C/U (Arends/Esser) Move to approve Budget Adjustment No. 2001-12.
11A - CONTRACT FOR UPGRADE OF FINANCIAL SOFTWARE WITH SUNGARD
PENTAMATION. INC (#AB01-141): Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, pointed out that the City has been
using its current financial software since 1988. In order to be more productive and to take advantage
of the capabilities of current computer technology, the Department is proposing to upgrade these
systems. This proposed upgrade will allow greater access to financial information in departments
throughout the City, and will provide much better reporting and analysis capabilities than those which
currently exist.
There were no comments from the public.
#1797 M/S/C/U (Younger/Arends) Move to approve the contract with SunGard Pentamation Inc. for
upgrade of computer software and authorize the Mayor to execute the same.
11B - PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND LOAN AGREEMENT NO. PW-01-691-007 FOR PARTIAl
FUNDING OF THE MANETTE CSO TREATMENT PLANT (#AB01-142): Tom Knuckey, Utilities
Engineer, announced that the City has been awarded a Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) Loan for
$3,000,000. This loan provides partial funding for construction of the Manette Combined Sewer
Overflow Treatment Plant. The request before the City Council is to approve the PWTF Construction
Loan Agreement No. PW-01-691-007.
There were no comments from the public.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
June 27, 2001
Page 4 of 5
#1862 M/S/C/U (Reed/McConnell) Move to approve Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) Loan
Construction Loan Agreement No. PW-01-691-007 for partial funding of the Manette CSO Treatment
Plant, in an amount of $3,000,000, and authorize the Mayor to execute the same.
11C - INTER-DEPARTMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR REVENUE SHARING (#AB01-143):
J~,~9~~, City Treasurer, summarized that the proposed agreement will define a system of
sharing incremental tax revenue from the commercial property located between Oyster Bay Avenue,
State Route 3, the Wastewater Treatment Plant and Werner Road. The intention is to share this
incremental revenue between the Wastewater Fund and the General Fund until wastewater has
recovered its expenditures from converting the property from residential to commercial use.
There were no comments from the public.
#2044 M/S/C/U (Reed/Younger) Move to approve the attached interdepartmental agreement for
revenue sharing.
11D - EXTENSION OF BANKING SERVICES CONTRACT WITH BANK OF AMERICA (#AB01 ,,
144): Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, stated that at his request, Bank of America has submitted the
attached offer to extend the current contract for banking services through June 2003. The proposal
contains a revised pricing schedule for banking services, which is expected to increase the cost of
services by approximately 1.5% from our current rates. Also included in the proposal is an offer to
refine the range of banking services to better meet the financial needs and security of the City.
There were no comments from the public.
#2245 M/S/C/U (Esser/Arends) Move to approve extension of the contract with Bank of America for
banking services and authorize the Mayor to execute the same.
4~A __ *"~DI'~IklANI/'~r' {EID~T DEAI'~IlqJ~k Al~Bl:::kll~lkl*'~_ 12DEUCDT/"tkl It/Il Ilkllt'q'll~AI /'~"qtl"t~" 4,~,~y~
~r~*l"l'lkl~ I ITII I'l'V* AQ~I=~I[JlEKITQ I,-ff~ AMI't /'q'I. IAD~'~ [2~EE/'q'TI%II'' ,~lAkll IADV 4
~,~: This item was postponed until the next meeting on Monday, July 2, 2001.
12B - PUBLIC HEARING ON YEAR 2002 CDBGIHOME POLICY PLAN (#AB01-146): Debbie
Pearler-Stewart, Economic Development, pointed out that the draft 2002 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan
was initially presented to City Council on May 23, 2001. The plan identifies the CDBG rules and
regulations, as well as the City's allocation process. A letter announcing availability of the plan was
sent to all persons and organizations who have indicated an interest in the CDBG and HOME
programs and a notice that the plan is available was placed in the 'Bremerton Sun'. A copy of the
plan has been sent to those requesting it. A public meeting to discuss the plan was held on June 13,
2001, where no recommendations were made. According to the proposed schedule, staff will hold a
technical assistance meeting on July 11, and applications will be accepted until August 22.
There were no comments from the public.
#2368 M/S/C/U (Younger/Arends) Move for approval of the draft 2002 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan.
The Council reconvened in the Council Conference room for a 10-minute Executive Session from
6:45 to 6:55 P.M. to discuss "Real Estate Acquisition". With no further business, the regular Council
meeting was adjourned at 7:00 P.M.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
June 27, 2001
Page 5 of 5
Council again reconvened in the Council Conference Room for two Study Sessions to discuss an
"Update on City's Legal Services" and a discussion on "City of Bremerton and Port Orchard Water'.
Prepared and Submitted by:
LORI SMITH, Legislative Assistant
Attest:
PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk
JOHN LAW, City Council President
City of Bremerton
JL/PJ/Is/cge
c: Normal Distribution
File
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: 'FORAGENDA OF: JULY 11, 2001
ORIGINATING DEPT.: CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF MEETING-- jt~Y 2, 2001 ORIGINATOR: JOHN E. LAW, PRESIDENT
DATE SUBMI'I-I'ED: JtJ~Y 3. 2001
2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
ENDORSEMENT I'l INFORMATION ['J APPROVED BY COUNCIL?RI/ESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
~,. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
:~ULLED ~ TABLED ~ APPROVED ~ DISAPPROVED 1'1 AMENDED ~ DATE:
~,OUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO.:
(OVER)
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (CONTINUED):
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Monday - July 2, 2001
The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City
Council Chambers, 239 4~ Street, Bremerton, Washington, Monday, July 2, 2001, at 5:30 P.M., with
Council President John Law presiding. Council members present were Conrad Esser, Carol Arends,
Eric Younger, Mike Shepherd, Ed Rollman, Cecil McConnell, and Wayne OIsen. Council member Jim
Reed was absent. Also present were Assistant City Attorney David St. Pierre; Acting Deputy City
Clerk Rich Hanna; and Legislative Assistant Lori Smith.
The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council Member Cecil McConnell,
followed by the invocation given by Chaplain Conrad Dodd of Kitsap Lake Baptist Church.
President Law made the following announcements:
1) A Pre-Council session was held to discuss general Council business;
2) The Monthly Study Session will be held immediately following the Council Meeting to discuss
"Procedures & Format of Weekly Council Meetings". The topic on "Downtown Redevelopment &
Urban Renewal" will be postponed; and
3) A Study Session will be held immediately following the Council meeting on July 11, 2001 to
discuss "Smart Growth" and the "Endangered Species Act".
CONSENT AGENDA - There are no Consent Agenda items to be heard at this meeting
CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those
expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090 have been recorded on a
listing that had been made available to the Council.
#0065 M/S/C/U (Esser/Olsen) On July 2, 2001, the Council does approve for payment those
vouchers included and further described as follows: Checks EFT 6574, 253572, 253573, 253603
through 253643, and 253646 through 253782 in the amount of $581,959.60.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Carol Arends was concerned at the number of bike riders she has seen after dark and encouraged
the use of reflectors and the use of bike helmets.
Mike Shepherd reminded the public about the first "El Carnaval Latino" in downtown Bremerton on
Saturday, July 7 from 10:00 A.M. to 12:00 midnight; and the 3r~ Annual District 5 Neighborhood Picnic
at Evergreen Rotary Park on Saturday, July 14.
Ed Rollman reiterated information regarding the "El Carnaval Latino", and encouraged visitor to take
a look at the Bremerton Centennial Photo Exhibit while downtown; he also wished everyone a happy
and safe 4r" of July holiday.
Cecil McConnell encouraged the public to attend the State Route 303 Bremerton to Silverdale
Transportation Corridor Study Open House on Thursday, July 12 from 5:00 to 7:00 P.M. at the
Kitsap County Fair & Parks Office at the Eagle's Nest Conference Center.
Wayne Olsen was happy to be back after vacationing for 3-1/2 weeks.
John Law asked the public to please be considerate and respectful of their neighbors when using
fireworks to celebrate the holiday.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS:
10
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Monday - July 2, 2001
Page 2 of 4
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS:
Mike She.Dherd reported that he attended a "Smart Growth Management' meeting last Wednesday,
and would be providing a detailed report a Study Session after Council on July 11th; and Carol
Arends reported on her attendance at the "Kitsap Transit Board'.
MAYOR'S REPORT - There was no report this evening due to the absence of the Mayor.
LEGISLATIVE REPORT - There was no report this evening.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
Carol Atkinson announced the 13th Annual Concerts on the Boardwalk series beginning Friday, July
6 from 6:00 to 8:00 P.M. with Jr. Cadillac, and that due to the concert, the First Friday Art Walk would
extend their hours.
Kelly Everett announced a second Open House event for the Bremerton Patriot on Friday, July 6,
from 5:00 to 7:00 P.M.
Jodi Wroblewski reminded citizens that fireworks are NOT allowed in City Parks.
10A- SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC, FOR EASTSlDE CSO REDUCTION FACILITY (#AB01-
147): Gene Sampley, Director of Public Works & Utilities, stated that the Camp Dresser & McKee
(CDM) is currently under a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for the design of the Pine Road
CSO Reduction Facility (Eastside CSO Treatment Plant). The design is complete and construction of
the facility was awarded June 6. Construction management services was included in the original
scope of services for this project, however, no budget appropriation was included at that time. The
attached Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to the PSA has been negotiated for CDM's continued
professional service for management of this construction. Additionally, adjustments in the original
design scope and budget have been included to incorporate necessary, unforeseen changes
resulting from Department of Ecology review, and process and capacity adjustments.
There were no comments from the public.
#0624 M/S/C (Arends/Rollman) Move to approve Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to the Professional
Services Agreement with Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. in the amount of $345,640 to a total contract
amount of $1,076,640, and authorize the Mayor to do the same.
Voted in favor of Motion: Esser, Arends, Younger, Shepherd, Rollman, McConnell, and Law
Abstained: Olsen
Motion carried: 7-Yes; 1-Abstention
11A- RESOLUTION NO. 2819, AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FUNDING ASSISTANCE TO
THE INTERAGENCY FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION FOR ACQUISITION OF PARK PROPERTY
(#AB01-148): Jodi Wroblewski, Acting Parks & Recreation Director, reported that Kitsap Transit,
Washington State Ferries, and the City of Bremerton have collaborated to build a new Transportation
Center connecting passengers with various forms of transportation. Additionally, the City of
Bremerton has embarked upon a downtown master plan process that envisions a pedestrian oriented
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Monday - July 2, 2001
Page 3 of 4
There were no comments from the public.
80780 M/S/C (Esser/Younger) Move to adopt Resolution No. 2819 authorizing the application for
funding assistance to the Interagency for Outdoor Recreation for acquisition of park property.
Voted in favor of Motion: Arends, Younger, Shepherd, Rollman, McConnell, Esser and Law
Abstained: OIsen
Motion carried: 7~Yes; 1-Abstention
11B - RESOLUTION NO. 2820, SUPPORTING APPLICATION TO PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT
FOR CONFERENCE CENTER (8AB01-149): Information was provided by Mayor Lynn Horton to
inform the Council that the Kitsap Public Facilities District was taking applications for projects to
construct or rehabilitate convention, conference, or special event facilities in Kitsap County. The
capital project funding would come for a partial refund of the state's portion of local sales tax, without
increasing local taxes. The requirements are that it must be a regional center; government
investment including the PFD funding must be at least $10 million dollars; the local match of cash,
land or in-kind contributions must equal one-third of the funding to be provided by the PFD (or $2.5
million dollars for government entities). The City of Bremerton proposal is to build a conference
center on the Bremerton waterfront and include public and private partnerships. It was pointed out
that this grant requires a matching amount from the City either in cash or property, and it was clarified
that there would be no tax increase.
There were no comments from the public.
80925 M/S/C (Arends/Younger) Move to adopt Resolution No. 2820 authorizing application to the
Public Facilities District for funding for construction of a regional conference center.
Voted in favor of Motion: Younger, Shepherd, Rollman, McConnell, Esser, Arends and Law
Abstained: Olsen
Motion carried: 7-Yes; 1-Abstention
12A - ORDINANCE (FIRST READING) AMENDING BREMERTON MUNICIPAL CODE 15.06
SETTING UTILITY ASSESSMENTS, FEES, AND CHARGES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
(8AB01-145): Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, said that the proposed ordinance will allow the City's
utility assessments, fees and charges to be adjusted to compensate for the effects of inflation. This
adjustment, which will increase water rate revenue by 5% and wastewater rate revenue by 3%, will
take effect January 1,2002. These adjustments are necessary to allow the utilities to meet the costs
of operations and maintenance, and to implement the capital improvements that are mandated to
meet environmental and water quality regulations.
There were no comments from the public.
Mr. McConnell stated that although he agreed that yearly increases in utility rates were necessary,
he did not support this action at this time.
81058 M/S/C (Younger/Arends) Move to approve ordinance on first reading, adjusting utility
assessments, fees and charges.
Voted in favor of Motion: Younger, Shepherd, Esser, Arends and Law
Voted opposed to Motion: McConnell and Rollman
Abstained: OIsen
Motion carried: 5-Yes; 1-No; 1-Abstention
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Monday - July 2, 2001
Page 4 of 4
With no further business, the regular Council meeting was adjourned at 6:10 P.M.
Council then reconvened in the Council Conference room for a Monthly Study Session to discuss
"Procedures and Format of Weekly Council Meetings".
Prepared and Submitted by:
LORI SMITH, Legislative Assistant
Attest:
PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk
JOHN LAW, City Council President
City of Bremerton
JL/PJ/Is/cge
c: Normal Distribution
File
I$
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: Public Hearing FOR AGENDA OF: July lit 2001
Resolution # '~%~,~\ , regarding recovery of fees for ORIGINATING DEPT.: Fire Dept.
the securing the buildings on the property located at ORIGINATOR: Al Duke
1421/1425 - 17th Street. DATE SUBMITTED:
2. CLEARANCES; (Commga~ 0n back if 3. EXHIBITS:
/q I \
Fire Chief: ~. 1. Resolution # ~ o% i
Comm. Dev.~ir.: ~b 2. Clerk Repo~
CiWClerk: [¥, ~ ~ ~ 3. Photos
A st. At :
E~O~E~ ~ ~O~TION__ ~PRO~D BY CO~C~ P~S~E~OR S~TT~:
MAYOR'~ ~ ~~ COUNCILP~SIDE~~:-7~x/ ~_Q
4. S~MMAg~ STATtMtNT AN~ ~QU~MtNT Fo~OUN m ACTION:
On May 22, 2001, Public Wor~ secured both houses located on the prope~ addressed as 1421
and 1425 - 1~ Street, after it was discovered that water se~ice had been disconnected to both structures
and the houses were inhabited by vagrants. All attempts to contact the owner, Duane Oliphant, have
failed. The cost of the work, including the administrative fee, totaled $1,699.83. Council must now
d~ide if the fees are just and reasonable and how they should be collected.
RECOMMENDATION:
I move that Council, by Resolution g ~ ~ , order that the fees incurred for securing the houses
located at 1421 & 1425 - 17ta Street be collected as reasonable abatement costs and become a lien against
the prope~.
9. ~SPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: A! Duke
ENFORCEMENT OFFIC~L: Al Duke
EXPIATION DATE: N/A
~EW DATE: N/A
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AME~dE~A
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO.:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
The City would forfeit the costs incurred for this action.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The City's revolving abatement fund would suffer the deficit of not collecting these funds.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
N/A
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION reviewing charges for securing both houses on the
property at 1421 & 1425 - 17ta Street and determining means of collection.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton incurred costs for securing the houses on the property located at
1421 & 1425 - 17th Street; and
WltEREAS, the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, as adopted by the
Bremerton Mtmicipal Code, allows the City to recoup these costs either by personal judgment against the
property owner or as a lien against the property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is charged with determining whether the fees are just, and how they
should be collected; and has considered the report of charges filed by the Building Official and any protests or
objection filed; and
Yql:IEREAS, the Building Official of the City of Bremerton recommends the fees be collected as a lien
against the property located at 1421 & 1425 - 17th Street, now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Bremerton:
1. That the abatemem charges included in the report of the Building Official in the amount of $1,699.83
for the property located at 1421 & 1425 - 17th Street, Bremerton, attached hereto, are just and reasonable.
2. That the City of Bremerton will exercise its right to recapture abatement fees by filing a lien against
the property.
PASSED, by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of .,
20
JOHN LAW
Council President
BREMERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT
817 Pacific Avenue · Bremerton, WA 98337 · (360) 478-5380 · FAX (360) 478-7257
June 12, 2001
Memo
To: Paula Johnston, Deputy City Clerk
From: Janet Lunceford, BDS II -.-~'---'
R~.. 142t & 1425 - 17th Street
On May 22, 2001, Public Works boarded up the houses located on the property addressed as
1421 & 1425 - 17th Street after the owner, Duane Oliphant, failed to do so as ordered. The
houses were inhabited by vagrants and water service had been disconnected fiom both houses.
The cost of the board up, including administrative fees, totaled $1,699.83 (see attached interftmd
transfer). I have scheduled a public heating for July 11, 2001 for Council to decide how to
collect the fees.
17
INTERFUND TRANSFER
COm'LETE rm~ FOmU r~ rm~uCA~ AND ~m,r TO
Fke Dep~e~[~d 1085 ..... ~"
TO PWO-S~ET DI~SION FROM Abatemen~mo~fio~
(~V~ DEPOSIT) (~~ D~P~~)
DESCRIPTION TOTAL
Charges per attached summary for: May 2001 BLAB
LABOR $2,792.69
EQUIPMENT $800.50
MATERIALS $1,044.48
SALES TAX $0.00
TOTAL $ 4, 637.67
ACCOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT AMOUNT
42-349.3900 $4,637.67 ,..~--,D..".-~, Q>O/.~q ---~--~l Iq -- 000~ ~0 I. ~
11:25:12 AM CITY OF BREMERTON PWO-STREET DIVISION
Order #: SD510033 Title: BLAB-Board up 1421 & 1425 17th Street. Status: S Labor Hours Estimate: 0
Project #: N4014280 Ancillary Operations Materials Estimate: $0
BLAB Fire Deparm~ent (Fund 108) Abatements/Demolitions Equipment Estimate: $0
Type: AO ANCILLARY OPERATIONS Date Entered: 05/17/2001 12:00:00 AM
Supervisor: 0524 Colen Corey Date Updated: 06/06/2001 06:59:55 AM
0524 Colen Corey Date Targeted: 07/06/2001
Priority: 1
Date Assigned: 05/17/2001
Location ID: 1 Unspecified Location Date Started: 05/22/1901
History #: 1 Unspecified Equipment Date Finished: 05/30/1901
Work Description
Board up all entrances to 1421 & 1425 17 th street, notify Janet before entering, Police need to be on site may have squatters living
there. Use all screws to attach wood no nails!
osam~o~ N4oms0 Blab Board up 1421 & 1425 17 th Street
511296 No BLAB
0909 Brian Brewer 3.50 hr $115.50
0524 Colen Corey 3.50 hr $115.50
1712 John Corey IV 3.50 hr $115.50
0583 Mark A. Thompson 3.50 hr $115.50
2279 Oliver Purjue 3.50 hr $34.48
3078 '95 1-TON CHEVY 3.50 hr $31.50
CDX Kitsap Lumber-4'xS'xl/2" CDX & nails 21.00 ea $269.85
o5/30/10Ol N4Ol428o Blab Re-Boardup 1421 & 1425 17th Street.
511336 No BLAB
1712 John Corey IV .50 hr $16.50
3025 '93 GMC I-TON DUMP .50 hr $4.00
0583 Mark A. Thompson .50 hr $16.50
18.50 hr 0.00 hr $834.83
SUMMARY FOR WORKORDER: SD510033
Labor: $529.48 Total Regular Labor Hours: 18.50
Benefits: $0.00 Total Overtime Labor Hours: 0.00
Equipment: $35.50 Total Labor Hours: 18.50
Materials: $269.85
Sales Tax: . $0.00 Total Regular Equipment Hours: 4.00
Total Overtime Equipment Hours: 0.00
Total: $834.83
Total Equipment Hours: 4.00
/?
SD510033 Page I
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: Public Hearing FOR AGENDA OF: July 11~ 2001
Resolution # gfi~ ~-~- , regarding recovery of fees for ORIGINATING DEPT.: Fire Dept.
the abatement of garbage and debris on the property ORIGINATOR: Al Duke
located at 1111 -9th Street. DATE SUBMITTED:
2. CLEARANCES: (Comus. ut on back if 3. EXHIBITS:
necessa~) / . /"~ ii
~~~ 1. Resolution ~ .~ ~ .2 ~-
Fire
Chiefi
Comm. Dev.~,r,: ?~b 2. Clerk Repo~
CiW Clerk: ~' ~ ~C,.~ c~ ~ .~ 3. Photos
~st. Ci~ At~:' ~%~~
E~ORSE~ X ~O~TION ~PRO~D BY CO~CIL P~S~E~ FOR S~~AL:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
On May 8, 2001, Public Wor~ removed garbage and debris from the prope~ located at 1111 -
9th Street, after the ownem, Micheal and Jenel Rosenquist, failed to do so as ordered. The cost of the
work, including the administrative fees, totaled $935.23. Council must now decide if the fees are just and
reasonable and how they ~hould be collected.
RECOMMENDATION:
I move that Council, by Resolution ~ ~ ¢,¢~order that the fee~ incurred for the abatement of
garbage and debris located at 1111 -9th Street be collected as reasonable abatement costs and become a
lien against the prope~.
9. ~SPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: A! Duke
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: A! Duke
EXPIATION DATE: N/A
~EW DATE: N/A
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED ~ APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDtO
COUNC][L DIRECTIVE: DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO.:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
The City would forfeit the costs incurred for this action.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The City's revolving abatement fund would suffer the deficit of not collecting these funds.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
N/A
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION reviewing charges for the abatement of garbage and debris
on the property at 1111 - 9th Street and determining means of collection.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton incurred costs for removal of garbage and debris on the property
located at 1111 - 9th Street; and
WltEREAS, the Bremerton Municipal Code allows the City to recoup these costs either by personal
judgment against the property owner or as a lien against the property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is charged with determining whether the fees are just, and how they
should be collected; and has considered the report of charges filed by the Building Official and any protests or
objection filed; and
WHEREAS, the Building Official of the Cky of Bremerton recommends the fees be collected as a lien
against the property located at 1111 - 9th Street, now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Bremerton:
1. That the abatement charges included in the report of the Building Official in the amount of $935.23
for the property located at 1111 - 9th Street, Bremerton, attached hereto, are just and reasonable.
2. That the City of Bremerton will exercise its right to recapture abatement fees by filing a lien against
the property.
PASSED, by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of
20 "
JOHN LAW
Council President
<.,¢ OF B/i,~
BREMERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT
817 Pacific Avenue · Bremerton, WA 98337 · (360) 478-5380 · FAX (360) 478-7257
June 12,2001
Memo
To: Paula Johnston, Deputy City Clerk
From: Janet Lunceford, BDS II ~'(
Re: 1111 - 9¢' Street
On May 8, 2001, Public Works removed garbage and debris from the yard and carport of the
property located at 1111 - 9th Street after the owners of record, Micheal and Jenel Rosenquist,
failed to do so as ordered. The costs incurred, per the attached interfund transfer and including
the administrative fee, totaled $935.23. I have scheduled a public hearing for July 11, 2001 for
Council to decide how the fees should be collected.
CITY OF BREMERTON
INTERFUND TRANSFER
CI~ DEP~mENTS ONLY DATE 06/06/2001
CO~LETE THIS FO~ ~ D~LICA~ A~ ~~ TO ACC~~p~~ Fke Dep~ent (F~d 108)
TO PWO-ST~ET DIVISION FROM Abatemen~emolifions
(~VE~E DEPAR~ENT) (E~E~I~ DEPARTMENT)
DESCRIPTION TOTAL
Charges per attached summary for: May 2001 BLAB
LABOR $2,792.69
EQUIPMENT $800.50
MATERIALS $1,044.48
SALES TAX $0.00
TOTAL $4,637.67
ACCOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT AMOUNT
42-349.3900 $4,637.67 ~--,.,~. ~', 1~0 (~q ----~--~[ l tc] -- 000~ ~0 i. ~
~.~o~-~l~ -00~ t ~ 7. o
[XP[ND TURE D[P TMENT
R ARTMEN R c~¢ "" ! ,'
Wrk Order History
V06/06/2001 I1:25:11 AM ci:r~'6F i~I~E~,~6~ '6 i - 5 i5i i6fi
Work Order #: SD510029 Title: BLAB- 1111 9th remove debris in carport. Status: S Labor Hours Estimate: 0
Project #: N4014280 Ancillary Operations Materials Estimate: $0
Customer: BLAB Fire Department (Fund 108) Abatements/Demolitions Equipment Estimate: $0
Work Type: At ANCILLARY OPERATIONS Date Entered: 05/03/2001 12:00:00 AM
Supervisor: 0524 Colen Corey Date Updated: 06/06/2001 06:59:55 AM
Lead Employee: 0524 Colen Corey Date Targeted: 07/06/2001
Priority: 1 Date Assigned: 05/03/2001
Location ID: 1 Unspecified Location Date Started: 05/08/1901
History #: 1 Unspecified Equipment Date Finished: 05/08/1901
Work Description
Remove Debris & garage in carport
0~o~no~t n4oms0 BLAB-1111 9th remove debris in carport.
$11218 No BLAB
0909 Brian Brewer 2.00 hr $66.00
0524 Colen Corey 1.00 hr $33.00
3013 '92 GMC 1-TON P/U 1.00 hr $9.00
1712 John Corey IV 2.00 hr $66.00
3024 '93 GMC 1-TON DUMP 2.00 hr $18.00
0583 Mark A. Thompson 2.50 hr $82.50
3078 '95 1-TON CHEVY 2.50 hr $22.50
2279 Oliver Puxjue 1.00 hr $9.85
DUMPIN Dump Fees - Oly. View Sanitary Landfill 1.00 yd $10.38
8.50 hr 0.00 hr $317.23
SUMMARY FOR WORKORDER: SD$10029
Labor: $257.35 Total Regular Labor Hours: 8.50
Benefits: $0.00 Total Overtime Labor Hours: 0.00
Equipment: $49.50 Total Labor Hours: 8.50
Materials: $10.38
Sales Tax: $0.00 Total Regular Equipment Hours: 5.50
Total Overtime Equipment Hours: 0.00
Total: $317.23
Total Equipment Hours: 5.50
SD510029 Page 1
AGENDA-BIEI:
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
I. SUBJECT: Public Hearinq & R -/~' ,::).L ~;~-- ~
esolution to consi%r FOR AGENDA OF: July 11, 2001
a Special Use Permit application for Olympic College to construct DEPT. OF ORIGIN' P&B - Land Use
and utilize a satellite parking facility on two residential sized ORIGINATOR: Chris Huqo, Director
parcels located on the west side of Lincoln avenue, north of 13th.DATE SUBMITTED: July, 2 2001
2. CLEA~NCES: (Comment on back if necessa~) 3. EXHIBITS:
P&B Director: ~AE~ o PC Resolution ~2001-01
City Attorney: ~ ~~~ o PC Minutes June 19, 2001
City Clerk: ~ ~'N% t ,~, , - o Staff Repod
Fiscal & Budget Council Comm.~-~ ~ ~7 o Resolution
uperauons uomm.: P~:~ ~ ~,~ o Written comments
Olympic Golleoo has presonted an application for a Special Use ~ermit to construct a Satellite ~arkin~ Area on
resi0ontial propedies, owne0 ~y Olympic College, on the west side of kincola Avenue, and no~h of a 3~" Street,
into a ~ 0 spaco su~ace parkin~ lot to fulfill off-street parkin~ requiremeats for the Olympic Gollo~e ~hysical ~lant
Buildin~ to be constructe~ east of aad across Uncoln ~venue.
Tho ~lannin~ Commission has reviewod this proposal, conducte0 a public headn~ and adopte0 ~C ~esolution
~o. 200~-0~, at their 0une ~ ~, 200~ meeting, which recommende~ Gity Gouncil approval, with conditions. The
Council must coaduct a public hearin~ pdor to its final decision and actioa on the propose0 Gouncil Resolution.
Move to pass the attached Reso,ution ~ ~
6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Christopher R. Hugo
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
7. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED~ TABLED APPROVED~ DISAPPROVED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
8. AGENDA BILL NO.:
9. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
10. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
If the special use permit application is denied, the development of the new physical plant for
Olympic College cannot proceed, as the plant project will not meet the minimum parking
requirement specified in the Zoning Code.
11. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The proposed amendment will create no operational changes for the city.
12. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Ordinance
File
Site Visits
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO..~t~),3 _
A CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION DENYING/APPROVING THE
OLYMPIC COLLEGE
APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE PARKING FACILITY SPECIAL USE PERMIT
(SUP01-0038)
WHEREAS, Olympic College has presented an application for a Special Use Permit to
construct a Satellite Parking Area on residential properties, owned by Olympic College, on the
west side of Lincoln Avenue, and north of 13th Street, into a 16 space surface parking lot to fulfill
off-street parking requirements for the Olympic College Physical Plant Building to be
constructed east of and across Lincoln Avenue.
WHEREAS, the Bremerton Planning Commission, following the public hearing on May 15,
2001, voted unanimously to recommend that the Special Use Permit application presented by
Olympic College for a Satellite Parking facility, subject to the following conditions of approval, be
forwarded to the City Council for approval; and
1. The parking facility will be utilized by staff only during normal school day hours and
will be open for both student and staff parking use during evening and weekend
school hours.
2. Lighting will be designed to illuminate the parking area while preventing the direct
illumination of adjacent properties.
3. Pursuant to the landscaping requirements of BMC 21.02.610, the satellite parking
area will be screened from the view of contiguous residential properties by a six-
foot (6') solid wood fence with the smooth side of the fence facing the adjoining
residential properties.
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on July 11, 2001, during which
it received oral and written comments pertaining to the Special Use Permit application;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council concurs with the Bremerton
Planning Commission's findings in support of the Special Use Permit application (SUP01-0038)
and affirms that the proposed use does meet the necessary tests and criteria required for
approval of a Special Use Permit;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Bremerton City Council does hereby approve the
Olympic College Special Use Permit application SUP01-0038.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of, 2001.
JOHN LAW
City Council President
APPROVED this ~ day of, 2001.
LYNN S. HORTON
Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY
City Clerk
CITY OF BREMERTON
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & PLANNING
CURRENT LAND USE STAFF REPORT
REGARDING:
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
for
Olympic College
(Lincoln Avenue Satellite Parking Area - File #: PL00-0047)
May 11, 2001 (Revised May 16, 2001)
SUMMARY
1. Applicant: Olympic College
1600 Chester Avenue
Bremerton, WA 98337
2. Location: 1309 Lincoln Avenue
3. Tax Assessor's Lot No's. 3797-005-004-0006 & 3797-005-005-0005
4. Attachments: - - Special Use Permit Application for Satellite Parking Area
- Site Plan
5. Comprehensive Plan: Schools (S)
6. Zoning: The existing zoning classification is Residential Medium Density (CBR),
and, is currently under consideration for a rezone classification change to Schools (PS).
FINDINGS
1. Property & Development:
Proposal is to develop two existing single-family residential properties, owned by
Olympic College, on the west side of Lincoln Avenue, and north of 13th Street, into a 16
space surface parking lot to fulfill off-street parking requirements for Olympic College
Plant Building to be constructed east of and across Lincoln Avenue.
The proposed use is not listed specifically as an allowable use in the current CBR zone,
however, some uses that are not listed in the Land Use Tables may be approved by the
Planning Commission through the Special Use Permit (SUP) process.
A portion of Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) Section 21.02.070, Definitions includes
under the definition for "Use, Special (SUP), "Uses that are not listed at all in the Land
Z
Use Tables may also be considered for approval through the SUP process. Additionally,
the definition for "Use, Accessory" contains this language: "A use which is incidental and
subordinate to a principal use, which is customarily found in conjunction with the
principal use ........ "Satellite Parking Areas are considered as Accessory Uses to, and
in conjunction with, principal uses.
2. Surrounding Land Uses:
Relation to Subject Current Zoning Comprehensive Plan Designation
Property
North Parks & Schools (PS) Schools (S)
South Parks and Schools (PS) and Medium-density Residential (MDR)
Residential- Medium Density (CBR)
East Parks & Schools (PS) Schools (S)
West Parks and Schools (PS) and Residential Schools (S)
- Medium Density (CBR)
3. Special Use:
Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) Section 21.02.640, Satellite Parking Areas states that off-
street parking requirements may be partially or totally satisfied with the approval of satellite
parking areas through the Special Use Permit process.
4. Comment Survey:
The application was routed to various City Departments for review and comment. There were
no comments.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Section 21.02.640 SATELLITE PARKING AREAS.
Off-street parking requirements may be partially or totally satisfied with the approval of
satellite parking areas through the Special Use Permit process in those zones that allow them.
(a) A Special Use Permit may be granted for a satellite parking area in accordance with
the procedures of section 21.02.905 and if the following requirements are adequately met:
(1) Evidence shall be provided that sufficient property is available on the
satellite site for the purpose intended.
Response: The site plan prepared and submitted as attached appears to meet design
standards for off-street parking.
(2) Unless the proposal is voluntary and not required as a development
requirement, a binding agreement shall be executed to the benefit of the City by the owner of
2
the satellite property. That agreement shall include covenants running with the land to ensure
that the requirements of the Special Use Permit are observed and remain effective until there is
a substantial change to the original conditions that made satellite parking necessary. The
agreement shall contain:
i. A covenant stating that the title to and right to use the satellite lot will be
subservient to the title to the premises upon which the primary structure or improvement is to be
erected or made; and
ii. Warrant that lots are not and will not be made subject to any other covenant
or contract for such or other use without the prior written approval of the City.
Response: The intent of this proposal is to provide a parking area to meet the off-street parking
requirements for the permitting and development of the proposed college maintenance facility.
A condition of approval for this Special Use Permit shall include the above mentioned
requirement for a binding agreement with requisite covenants and warrants.
(3) The agreement shall be filed with the County Auditor following approval by
the City Attorney.
Response: A condition for approval of this special Use Permit shall include the provision for
recordation of the binding agreement.
(b) The satellite parking area shall meet all other provisions of this Chapter, unless
specifically altered by the conditions of a Special Use Permit.
Response: The proposed satellite parking area meets all other provisions of the Chapter, and is
altered only by the conditions of approval as included.
(c) A limit on the time of day that the satellite parking area may be used may be
placed as a condition of its approval if deemed necessary by the Director for the
protection of adjoining areas.
Response: The use of this proposed Satellite Parking Area shall only occur during normal work
schedules and shall be used only for parking needs of personnel directly associated with the
proposed maintenance facility.
(d) Satellite parking areas, depending on their location and purpose, may be approved
as a Class "A", "B", or "C" lot, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
Response: This Satellite parking area shall be approved as a Class "A" parking facility and shall
comply with all other applicable regulations pertaining to Class "A" parking.
Bremerton Zonin.q Ordinance 21.02.905 SPECIAL USE PERMITS, [d]
"Criteria for Special Use Permits" states that approval of a Special Use Permit
may be granted only if all of the following are true:
1. Is the proposal substantively consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and either
desi.qnated "SUP" in the Zoninq Ordinance, or is bein,q processed as an "Unlisted Use"?
3
YES. A satellite parking use is substantially consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan. As this proposal is not designated as "SUP" in the Zoning Ordiannce,this
project is being processed as an Unlisted Use. The Plan encourages a variety of
compatible uses within this area. Satellite Parkjng facilities are allowable
accessory uses.
2. Will the proposal be consistent with all applicable development standards and
requirements, includin.q the availability of all needed utilities and services?
YES. The proposal for an accessory use, satellite parking facility, appears to be
consistent with requirements for non-residential uses and must comply with all
applicable development standards and codes.
3. Will the proposal, alon.q with any mitigation measures or other conditions of approval,
avoid siqnificant adverse environmental consequences?
YES. Compliance with all environmental regulatory measures pertaining to
development and construction of this proposal will avoid significant adverse
environmental consequences. A Determination of Non-Significance, which
included reference to this proposal, was issued for other non-project items
associated with this project, in accordance with the SEPA requirements of WAC
197-11, on January 26, 2001.
4. Will the proposal be compatible with adiacent uses and surrounding neighborhood?
YES. A satellite parking facility is considered as an accessory use to a principal
land use requiring off-street parking. With the proposed location in close
proximity to other major land use components of the college campus it can be
considered as compatible with the adjacent uses, and the surrounding
neighborhood development.
5. Does the proposal comply with all other criteria or desi.qn .quidelines that are applicable
to the specific use or type of development?
YES. Development of this Satellite parking facility to satisfy off-street parking
requirements for the proposed college maintenance facility demonstrates
compliance with other associated and applicable criteria and design guidelines
for structures and their related parking requirements. The application, as
submitted, is consistent with the development regulations as detailed and
described.
CONCLUSIONS:
Based on the above analysis, staff concludes that:
1. As the college campus is growing and a current proposal is being considered to
rezone the small area, to bring it into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan
designation for the area (Schools), this special use would have little, if any,
future adverse impact in this small residential area.
2. The use is needed in the vicinity of the college community and is in the public
interest.
3. The application meets all criteria necessary for approval of a Special Use Permit.
DECISION:
Upon review of the findings and conclusions, I, the duly appointed Land Use Official, hereby
APPROVE this request for an Special Use Permit for the referenced Olympic College Satellite
Parking as indicated on the site plan and as conditioned elsewhere in this staff report.
Christopher R. Hugo Date
Director of Building and Planning
NOTE: This decision of the Land Use Official is final unless appealed to the Bremerton City
Council within fourteen (14) calendar days of the posting of this decision.
If an Administrative Zoning Ordinance Special Use Permit is not acted upon by the
applicant within one (1) year of approval, it shall expire.
5
1315 Lincoln Ave ~ [-~ {~ [---~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Bremerton, WA 98337
360-792-1279 JAN 3 0 2001
January 30, 2001
BREMERTON
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Building and Planning Department
286 4th Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
Re: Olympic College Special Use Permit for a Satellite Parking Lot on Lincoln Ave.
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is in response to the notification I received in the mail in regards to the
Olympic Colleges application for a special use permit to use the two pieces of property
on Lincoln Avenue for a Satellite Parking Lot. I am a resident and homeowner on 1315
Lincoln Avenue, and the proposed parking lot would be meeting my property line on the
south side.
This proposal gives me some concerns, since it will affect my property and my life in the
following areas:
Cars pulling in and out of the parking lot will increase the noise and traffic next to my
home. The increase in exhaust will have an impact on my family's health and our
surrounding environment. It could also increases the crime rate in our area due to the
increased activity.
· This parking lot will also take away our privacy. The lot adjacent to our property line
is 100.5 feet long and people getting in and out of their vehicles would be looking
directly into my back and front yard, which would make it non-usable for my family.
· The lighting that would be in the parking lot would disturb our life. We have
windows facing the property; thus light would constantly be shining into our windows
and back yard. All of these factors will effect the value of my property.
If a special use permit for the parking lot is granted I would like to request that the
following proposals be considered: that the College or City install a 6-foot cedar fence
that would run the entire length of my property (approx. 100.5 feet). That the smooth side
of this fence would face my property. That a green belt would run along side of the fence
on the parking lot side with trees or shrubs to act as a noise buffer, and a filter for some
of the additional exhaust. And, that the lighting in the parking lot be placed with
minimum impact on my property.
Please contact me to schedule a meeting date to further discuss these issues.
S4n,cerely,
: Ariane Shanley /
3¢
BREMERTON PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION #2001 - 01
A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE OLYMPIC
COLLEGE APPLICATION FOR A SATELLITE PARKING AREA SPECIAL USE PERMIT
(SUP01-0038).
WHEREAS, Olympic College has presented an application for a Special Use Permit to
construct a Satellite Parking Area on residential properties, owned by Olympic College, on the
west side of Lincoln Avenue, and north of 13th Street, into a 16 space surface parking lot to fulfill
off-street parking requirements for the Olympic College Physical Plant Building to be constructed
east of and across Lincoln Avenue..
The Bremerton Planning Commission makes the following findings:
WHEREAS, the proposed use is not listed specifically as an allowable use in the current
CBR zone, however, some uses that are not listed in the Land Use Tables may be recommended
for approval by the Planning Commission through the Special Use Permit (SUP) process; and
WHEREAS, Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) Section 21.02.070, Definitions includes
under the definition for "Use, Special (SUP), "Uses that are not listed at all in the Land Use Tables
may also be considered for approval through the SUP process; and
WHEREAS, the definition for "Use, Accessory" contains this language: "A use which is
incidental and subordinate to a principal use, which is customarily found in conjunction with the
principal use ...." Satellite Parking Areas are considered as Accessory Uses to, and in
conjunction with, principal uses, and
WHEREAS, Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) Section 21.02.640, Satellite Parking Areas,
states that off-street parking requirements may be partially or totally satisfied with the approval of
satellite parking areas through the Special Use Permit process, and
WHEREAS, the Special Use Permit procedural requirements as outlined in Section
21.02.905 have been found to be adequately met, and
2'7
WHEREAS, the Bremerton Planning Commission, following the public hearing on May 15,
2001, voted unanimously to recommend that the Special Use Permit application presented by
Olympic College for a satellite parking facility be forwarded to the City Council for approval; now;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bremerton Planning Commission recommends
approval, by the Bremerton City Council, of the Special Use Permit (SUP01-0038) application
presented by Olympic College for a Satellite Parking facility located at 1309 Lincoln Avenue,
subject to the following conditions of approval:
1. The parking facility will be utilized by staff only during normal school day hours and will be
open for both student and staff parking use during evening and weekend school hours.
2. Lighting will be designed to illuminate the parking area while preventing the direct
illumination of adjacent properties.
3. Pursuant to the landscaping requirements of BMC 21.02.610, the satellite parking area will
be screened from the view of contiguous residential properties by a six foot (6') solid wood
fence with the smooth side of the fence facing the adjoining residential properties.
PASSED by the Planning Commission of the City of Bremerton,
This /~ day of ~, 2001.
And/y Kos//~ ko
Chair
ATTEST:
C111~stopher {~r'~-Iugo ' ' / -
Secretary
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ....
1. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. '~"~'
/~ (-~ FOR AGENDA OF: July 11,2001
ORIGINATING DEPT: Treasurer
Amending BMC 15.06 Setting Utility Assessments, Fees ORIGINATOR: Rich
and Charges Effective Jan. 1, 2002. DATE SUBMITTED: Nov. 28, 2d00
2. CLEARANCES: Comn~n,~ back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
/
D~r. Public Works ~~,2/ Proposed Ordinance
Operations ~~
ENDORSEMENTS ~ INFORMATION., APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FgR SUBMITTAL:
,
4. ~UMMARY ~TATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR ~OUN~IL AcT~N':
The proposed ordi~an~ will allow the City's utility assessments, fees and cha~es te ~ adjured to ~mpensate for
the effects of inflation. This adjustment, which will increase water rate revenue by 5% and wa~ewater rate revenue
by 3% will take effe~ Janua~ 1, 2002. These adju~ments are necessa~ to allow the utilities to meet the costs of
operations & maintenance and to implement the capital improvements which are mandated to meet environmental
and water quality regulations.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
--J~;~~~ fi~ ~=udin~ th="ordinan ~ " , ~afges~.
Motion to pass on second reading Ordinance No. J~7~(¢ adjus[ing utility assessments, fees and charges.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Treasurer
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor
EXPIRATION DATE: N/A
REVIEW DATE: N/A
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDE£~~- A
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO: 01'" 1~.~%"
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Current water and wastewater rates will remain in effect. This will result in a shortage of revenues to the utilities.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
Included in the 2001 - 2002 budget.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Capital Improvement Plan and utility comprehensive plans. Rate analysis by staff.
ORDINANCE NO. ~ 7(~ ~'
AN ORDINANCE amending assessments, rates, fees and charges for
municipal water, wastewater and stormwater services and amending
Chapter 15.06 of the Bremerton Municipal Code and Ordinance 4675.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Amendment. Section 15.06.015 is hereby amended to read as follows:
15.06.015 INCORPORATION AND CPI ADJUSTMENT.
Assessments, rates, fees and charges attached hereto as Appendix A and incorporated
herein by this reference are hereby adopted.
In addition to such other changes as may be approved by City Council, commencing
January 1, 2003 and in January of each successive year thereafter, the fees, rates and charges
in this section shall automatically be adjusted based upon the Consumer Price Index for all
Urban Consumers (CPI-U), U.S. City Average, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
for the year ending June 30 of the previous year.
Section 2. Amendment. Section 15.06.040 is hereby amended to read as follows:
15.06.040 RATES - WASTEWATER.
(a) Retail Wastewater Rates. A general retail wastewater rate shall be assessed of
all users of the Utility wastewater system. The retail rate shall be calculated on a periodic billing
with a minimum service charge ba=e~ cn mete; =!-"e and a commodity charge computed to the
nearest HCF.
The retail rate shall be based on flow and strength of sewage discharged by the user of
the system.
Flow shall be determined by the metered amount of domestic water usage.
Flows for summer usage for Single Family and Duplex residential customers shall be
determined based on the previous six-month average winter domestic water usage by the
customer, provided the account was active for at least two billing periods of the preceding six
months. The calculation period shall be determined by the Department based on usage and
billing cycles. In no case shall this calculation for summer usa,qe result in a volume less than
2.5 HCF per month.
In the event the customer is not connected to a public water supply that utilizes domestic
water meter, the flow shall be determined by the Department based on the average flow of the
like customer class.
Strength shall be determined by the loadings discharged by the customer and shall be
segregated into like customer classes based on their respective sewage strengths.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton on the day of
,20
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton on the day of
,20
Rates - Wastewater.ord
Page I
JOHN LAW, Council President
APPROVED this day of ,20__
LYNN S. HORTON, Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
Rates - Wastewater.ord
Page 2
Chapter 15.06
Appendix A
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within, City Limits Outside City Limits
2001 2002 2001 2002
GENERAL FACILITY FEES
Water (Per ERLD $195.00 $205.00 $292.50 $310.00
Wastewater (Per ERU) $195.00 $205.00 $292.50 $310.00
FRONT FOOTAGE FEES
Water
Per Frotu Foot $10.50 $11.05 $15.75 $16.55
Off Road Rate $520.00 $545.00 $780.00 $820.00
Wastewater
Per Front Foot $10.50 $11.05 $15.75 $16.55
Off Road Rate $520.00 $545.OO $780.00 $820.O0
Properties not included in ULID #327 $68.15 $71.55
Fronting the sewer main in Nortltlake Way.
Installed as part of the Kitsap Lake Sewer Extension Project.
CONNECTION/INSPECTION FEES
Water
3/4" $830.00 $985.00 $1,245.00 $1,477.50
1" $890.00 $1,045.00 $1,335.00 $1,567.00
1 1/2" $1,600.00 $1,755.00 $2,400.00 $2,632.00
2" $1,800.00 $1,955.00 $2,700.00 $2,932.00
Greater than 2" Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials
Field Inspection Fees
Water main extensions (Per Foot) $0.75 $0.80 $1.125 $1.18
But not less than: $300.00 $315.00 $450.00 $472.50
Pump Station $500.00 $525.00 $750.00 $787.50
Miscellaneous (Per Hour) $40.00 $42.00 $60.00 $63.00
Wastewater
Lateral Connection at P/L $40.00 $42.00 $60.00 $63.00
Lateral Connection at Main $250.00 $262.50 $375.00 $393.75
Conveyance Facility Ext. (Per Foot) $1.25 $1.30 $1.90 $2.00
But Not Less Than: $300.00 $315.00 $450.00 $472.50
Pump Station $500.00 $525.00 $750.00 $787.50
Utility Plant Inspection $40.00 $42.00 $60.00 $63.00
(Sewer Cap)
Miscellaneous (Per Hour) $40.00 $42.00 $60.00 $63.00
Chapter 15.06
Appeudix A
~SSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES A~l) CHARGES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within City Limits Outside Cit~ Limits
2001 2002 2001 2002
RETAIL WATER SERVICE RATES
General Service - Monthly Service Charge
Meter Size
5/8 x 3/4 inches $3.50 $4.05 $5.25 $6.05
I inch $4.00 $4.60 $6.00 $6.90
1 1/2 inch $5.70 $6.55 $8.55 $9.85
2 inch $7.65 $8.80 $11.50 $13.25
3 inch $14.50 $16.70 $21.75 $25.00
4 inch $27.05 $31.10 $40.60 $46.70
6 inch $95.90 $110.30 $143.85 $165.45
8 inch $350.10 $402.60 $525.15 $603.90
10 inch $1,249.90 $1,437.40 $1,874.85 $2,156.10
12 inch $4,700.00 $5,405.00 $7,050.00 $8,107.50
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $0.75 $0.75 $1.125 $i. 125
Fire Protection - Monthly Service Charge
Service Size
2 inch $13.55 $15.60 $20.35 $23.40
3 inch $14.95 $17.20 $22.45 $25.80
4 inch $16.30 $18.75 $24.45 $28.10
6 inch $20.35 $23.40 $30.55 $35.15
8 inch $27.10 $31.15 $40.65 $46.75
10 inch $38.00 $43.70 $57.00 $65.55
12 inch $54.30 $62.45 $81.45 $93.65
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $1.50 $2.25
- For Useage Other Than Firefighting
Low-Income Senior and Low-Income Disabled Citizen Rates - Monthly Service Charge
Meter Size 5/8 x 3/4"
Base Charge (Per Account) $3.50 $4.05 $5.25 $6.05
Commodity Charge
0 - 10 HCF/Billing No charge No charge No charge No charge
Over 10 HCF/Billing (Per HCF) $0.75 0.75 $1.125 $ 1.125
2
Chapter 15.06
Appendix A
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2001 2002 2001 2002
Temporary/Construction Meter
1" Meter
Deposit $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00
Base Fee (Per Month) $35.30 $4.60 $52.95 $6.90
Set Up Fee - $40.00 $60.00
Hydrant meter
Deposit $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00
Base Fee (Per Month) $70.60 $14.50 $105,90 $21.75
Set Up Fee $40.00 - $60.00
Equipment Loss/Damage Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $0.75 $0.75 $1.125 $1.125
RETAIL WASTEWATER SERVICE RATES
Monthly Service Charge
Single Family
Base Charge (Per Account) $9.00 $10.45 $10.35 $12.00
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $3.70 $3.60 $4.25 $4.15
Duplex on 1 Meter or 2 Bldgs.
On 1 Meter
Base Charge (Per Unit) $7.15 $8.30 $8.20 $9.55
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $3.70 $3.60 $4.25 $4.15
Multiple Family
Base Charge (Per Unit) $7.15 $8.30 $8.20 $9.55
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $3.70 $3.60 $4.25 $4.15
Commercial I
Base Charge (Per Account) $10.35 $12.00 $ ! 1.90 $13.80
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $3.70 $3.70 $4.25 $4.25
Commercial II
Base Charge (Per Account) $10.50 $12.20 $12.05 $14.05
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $5.80 $5.80 $6.67 $6.67
Low-Income Senior and Low-Income Disabled Citizen Rates - Monthly Service Charge
Base Charge (Per Account) $3.20 $6.50 $3.70 $7.50
Commodity Charge (Per HCF)
0 - 5 HCF/Month No charge No charge No charge No charge
Over 5 HCF/Month $3.70 $3.60 $4.25 $4.15
Septage Disposal
(Per Gallon of Tank Capacity) $0.13 $0.13 $0.13 $0.13
3
Chapter 15.06
Appendix A
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
200,1 2002 2001 2002
RETAIL STORMWATER RATES
Monthly Service Charge
Single Family / Duplex
Base Charge (Per Account) $4.00 $4.00 N/A N/A
Exception: Duplex
W/2 Meters (Per Account) $2.00 $2.00 N/A N/A
Multiple Family
Base Charge (Per ISU) $4.00 $4.00 N/A N/A
Commercial
Base Charge (Per ISU) $4.00 $4.00 N/A N/A
Public School Districts (Per Acer) $4.00 $4.00 N/A N/A
Low Income Senior
and Low Income
Disabled Citizen Rate (Per Acct) $2.50 $2.50 N/A N/A
Multiple Family & Commercial Rate Adjustment
Water Quality (Per ISU) ($0.50) ($0.50) N/A N/A
Water Quantity (Per ISLD ($1.50) ($1.50) N/A N/A
Stormwater Penalty for new
Multiple Family & Commercial
development without on-site
detention. (Per ISU') $0.50 $0.50 N/A N/A
MISCELLANEOUS FEES AND CHARGES
Park Reservation Fee $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00
(non-refundable)
Office Services
Account Maintenance $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00
Past Due Notice $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50
ACH Credit ($1.00) $0.00 ($1.00) $0.00
Lien Recovery Charge $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00
Duplicate Bill Charge $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1 .t33
Chapter 15.06
ApEe_E~i~_~
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within City Limits Outside Cit~z Limits
2001 2002 2001 2002
Field Services
Pavement Restoration Charge (refundable, if assessed and not required)
Asphalt $500.00 $525.00 $750.00 $787.50
Concrete $600.00 $630.00 $900.00 $945.00
County Road Permit N/A N/A Cost Cost
Wet Tapping (Water Main Only)
8" and smaller - tap only $1,440.00 $2,160.00
8" and smaller - to Property Line $2,300.00 $2,415.00 $3,450.00 $3,622.50
Greater than 8" Time & Materials Time & Materials
(Does Not Include Pavement Restoration Charge)
FireHydrant Installation $3,350.00 $3,517.50 $5,025.00 $5,276.25
(Does Not Include Pavement Restoration Charge)
Water Meter Reinstallation $40.00 $40.00
3/4" & 1" - $58.00 $58.00
11/2" & 2" - $75.00 $75.00
3" and greater - Time & Materials Time & Material
Water Meter Reactivation - $40.00 $40.00
Water Meter Tampering
Tampering Removal $130.00 $130.00
Tampering Reinstallation Time & Materials Time & Material
Cross-Connection Control
Inspection $40.00 $42.00 $40.00 $42.00
Fire Service - Detector, Meter & MXU $310.00 $310.00
Storz Adapter $200.00 $200.00
Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on
(Customer Request)
Regular Hours No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge
After Hours $100.00 $105.00 $100.00 $105.00
Delinquency Notice $10.00 $10.50 $10.00 $10.50
Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on
(Delinquent Accounts)
Regular Hours $40.00 $42.00 $40.00 $42.00
After Hours $100.00 $105.00 $100.00 $105.00
Flow and Pressure Test (Uncertified)
3/4" & 1" meters only $40.00 $42.00 $40.00 $42.00
1 1/2" & 2" meters only $80.00 $84.00 $80.00 $84.00
Chapter 15.06
Appendix A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2001 2002 2001 2002
Utility Ham Locates
Regular Hours N/C N/C N/C N/C
After Hours $100.00 $105.00 $100.00 $105.00
Emergency N/C N/C N/C N/C
Meter Test Fee Schedule
Size
3/4" & 1" $72.00 $80.00 $72.00 $80.00
1 1/2" & 2" $100.00 $150.00 $100.00 $150.00
3" or greater (w/Test Port) $130.00 $136.50 $130.00 $136.50
3" or greater (w/o Test Port) Time & Materials Time & Materials
Engineerin~ Services
Plan Check Fees
Main Extensions (Per Foot but $0.10 $0.11 $0.15 $0.16
not less than:) $100.00 $105.00 $150.00 $157.50
(Includes hydrants and appurtenances
and connection to water system)
Pump Stations $500.00 $525.00 $750.00 $787.50
Fireline Extension $70.00 $73.50 $105.00 $110.25
Irrigation Systems $70.00 $73.50 $105.00 $110.25
System Connections $70.00 $73.50 $105.00 $110.25
Miscellaneous (Per Hour) $40.00 $42.00 $60.00 $63.00
Storm Drainage Plan Review Fees**
Preliminary Drainage Plans
Residential Development $325.00 $325.00 N/A N/A
Non-Residential Development $225.00 $225.00 N/A N/A
(Plus Per ISU) $10.00 $10.00
Final Detailed Drainage Plans
Residential Development (per Lot)
0 - 20 Lots $35.00 $35.00 N/A N/A
21 - 50 Lots $25.00 $25.00 N/A N/A
51 - 100 Lots $22.50 $22.50 N/A N/A
100+ Lots $20.00 $20.00 N/A N/A
Minimum Charge $250.00 $250.00 N/A N/A
Non-Residential Development
(Per ISU) $10,00 $10.00 N/A N/A
Minimum Charge $150.00 $150.00 N/A N/A
Resubmitml Fees
First Resubmittal No Charge No Charge N/A N/A
Subsequent Resubmittal $250.00 $250.00 N/A N/A
Chapter 15.06
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within Cit,v Limits Outside Cit~ Limits
2001 2002 2001 2002
Storm Drainage Inspection Fees**
Residential Development (Per Lot) $15.00 $15.00 N/A N/A
Non-Residential Development (Per ISU $10.00 $10.00 N/A N/A
Minimum Charge $100.00 $100.00 N/A N/A
Conveyance Fac. Ext. (Per Foot) $0.75 $0.75 NIA N/A
With Minimum Charge $300.00 $300.00 N/A N/A
Unscheduled Inspections $40.00 $40.00 N/A N/A
(Per Site Visit)
(Unscheduled inspections shall be tracked through the course of a project and billed after the final
site inspection. Fees for unscheduled inspections shall be paid prior to final occupancy approval.)
** Does not apply to single family residence or duplex construction on an existing established lot.
7
AGENDA-BILE
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
I. SUBJECT: Public Hearinq &Ordinance to amend FOR AGENDA OF: July 11, 2001
the Official Zoning Map from Residential Medium Density (MF) DEPT. OF ORIGIN: P&B - Land Use
and General Business (CB) to Mixed Use (MU) for properties ORIGINATOR: Chris Hu.qo, .Director
along the east frontage of Park Avenue from 6th Street to 11th DATE SUBMITTED: July, 2 2001
Street exclusive of the parcel at the NE corner of Park & 6th'
2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
P&B Director: ("'/~/~ o PC Findings & Conclusions
City Attorney: /' .~ o PC Minutes June 19,-2001
City Clerk: ~ \~"\,%..~(...C.~._.-,.-~ ~ ,.~ o Staff Repod
F~scal & Budget Councll.,~omm.: ~'~L~-,-~~-~ O Ordinance to amend Zoning Map
Operations Comm.:
ENDORSEMENT ,X INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The City of Bremerton Rezone Application PL01-0007, proposes to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of
Bremerton for a portion of the east side of Park Avenue, exclusive of the parcel at the northeast corner of Park
and 6th,by changing the zoning classification to Mixed Use (MX) to reflect the current Comprehensive Plan Map,
Mixed Use (MU), designation for this same area.
It is in the public interest to approve this rezone request, as it would bring the Zoning designation into consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan designation, as required by the State Growth Management Act.
The Planning Commission has reviewed this proposal, conducted a public hearing and adopted Findings &
Conclusions at their June 19, 2001 meeting, and recommends City Council approval. The Council must conduct
a public hearing pdor to its final decision and action on the proposed Ordinance.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
Move to approve the attached Ordinance # on first reading.
Move to pass the attached Ordinance # on second readinq.
6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Christopher R. Hugo
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
7. NOTICE OF ACTION ..~
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED A~N
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
8. AGENDA BILL NO.:
9. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
10. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
If the proposed area-wide zoning amendment is denied, proposed development in the vicinity
will be hampered by development standards that are inconsistent with the planned
environment reflected in the Comprehensive Plan. Further, a denial could potentially subject
the city to challenges that it did not enact zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as
mandated by State law.
11. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The proposed amendment will create no operational changes for the city.
12. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Ordinance
File
Site Visits
51
Exhibit A
July, 2001
The City of Bremerton Rezone Appli~.ation PL01-0007, proposes to amend the Official Zoning Map of the
City of Bremerton for a portion of the east side of Park Avenue, exclusive of the parcel at the northeast
corner of Park and 6th,by changing the zoning classification from Residential (MF) and General Business
(GB) to Mixed Use (MX) to reflect the current Comprehensive Plan Map designation, Mixed Use (MU), for
this same area.
- PROPOSED AMENDMENT ~ EXISTING ZONING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONS
BREMERTON PLANNING COMMISSION
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
PL00-0007 PARK AVE. AREA-WIDE REZONE, MF AND GB TO MX
FINDINGS
1. The Central Bremerton Land Use Plan map of the 1995 Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan designates properties along the east frontage of Park
Avenue from 6th Street to 11th Street, exclusive of the parcel at the northeast
corner of Park and 6th, 8S MU Mixed Use.
2. The Official Zoning Map designates properties along the east frontage of Park
Avenue from 6th Street to 11th Street, exclusive of the parcel at the northeast
corner of Park and 6th, as MF Residential Medium Density and GB General
Business.
3. The Washington State Growth Management Act stipulates that cities adopt
development regulations that are consistent with adopted comprehensive plans.
The City of Bremerton enacted revised Zoning Ordinance 21.02 of the Bremerton
Municipal Code on April 14, 1997, to satisfy the statutory requirement for
regulatory consistency.
4. Figure 090 of the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance BMC 21.02 lists the primary zone
classifications that "are considered to be consistent with their related
Comprehensive Plan designations." The MX zone is listed as the primary zone to
implement the MU designation of the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The Land Use Plan map designates the area along 6th Street and to the south as
CBD Central Business District. This is the city's most intensive land use district
and is intended for a wide range of commercial, higher density residential, and
other downtown land uses. The current zoning for this district is BC Business
Core.
6. The current MF zone requires that adjacent properties in more intensive zones
provide a side yard setback. The proposed MX zone to implement the MU
planned environment requires no setback of uses in adjacent, more intensive
zones.
CONCLUSIONS
1. According to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and Figure 090
of BMC 21.02, the appropriate primary zone designation to meet regulatory
consistency for properties along the east frontages of Park Avenue between 6th
52-
and 1 1th Streets, exclusive of the northeast corner of 6th Street and Park Avenue,
is MX Mixed Use.
2. Pending development in the BC Business Core zone to the south of the subject
zone district is impacted by the requirement to provide a side yard setback. The
planned MU environment along Park Avenue has a more intensive development
character, and, implemented by the MX zone appropriately requires no side yard
setback in the adjacent BC zone.
3. The proposed area-wide rezone of those east frontages of Park Avenue between
6th and 11th Streets that are currently zoned MF to the MU zone is appropriate to
achieve regulatory consistency and to promote compatible, intensive
neighborhood development as specified in the Land Use Plan.
Approved by the Bremerton Planning Commission on f'///F~, /~'.
Attest:
Andy I~osu~, ,,,," ~ Chris Hugo
Chair , Secretary
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
for
Park Avenue - 6th to 11th - (P&BD File #: PL01-0007)
February 17, 2001
Applicant: City of Bremerton, Building & Planning Department
286 4th Street
Bremerton, Wash. 98337
Location: This proposal involves that area on the east side of Park Avenue from 6th Street to 11ti' Street,
between the east side of Park Avenue and the alley immediately east of Park Avenue.
Description: This application consists of a proposal to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of
Bremerton for that area on the east side of Park Avenue from 6~' Street to 11th Street
(between Park Avenue and the alley immediately east of Park Avenue). The area is
currently zoned General Business (GB) on the north end, Business Core (BC) on the
south end and Residential Medium-Density (MF) for the remainder of the narrow "strip"
of lots fronting Park Avenue between. The proposal would amend the Official Zoning
Map by changing the zoning classification to Mixed Use (MX) to reflect the current
Comprehensive Plan Map, Mixed Use (MU) designation.
Proposal: The City of Bremerton Rezone Application PL01-0007, proposes to amend the Official
Zoning Map of the City of Bremerton for a portion of the east side of Park Avenue by
changing the zoning classification to Mixed Use (MX) to reflect the current
Comprehensive Plan Map, Mixed Use (MU), designation for this same proposal area.
FINDINGS
1. Surrounding Land Uses:
A land use inventory was conducted of the subject area. The narrow strip of Park Avenue
frontage parcels currently exhibit mixed land uses including approximately ten (10) older single-
family homes, Windermere Realty office, the Kitsap County Resources office building, a church,
I.A.M. Union Local Lodge 282 Office, Discount Tire and Wheel, Salvation Army, and an
assorted mix of parking and vacant lots. The parcels on the east side of the alley inmaediately
behind the parcels fronting on Park Avenue appear to be older, single-family residential
structures exclusively. The area on the west side of Park Avenue is a mix of co~xmaercial,
industrial and residential parcels including the Darigold facilities, a vacant, remodeled, 2-story
office building, parking lots and vacant parcels with a few older single-family residential
structures. Land uses surrounding the subject proposal are as follows:
Relation to
Subject Current Zoning Comprehensive Plan Designation
Property
North Central Bremerton Residential High-Density Residential
(CBR) (HI)R)
South Business Core (BC) Central Business District (CBD)
East Central Bremerton Residential Low-Density Residential
(CBR) (LDR)
West Mixed Use (MX) Mixed Use/PUD (MU)
2. Proposal:
The applicant's request is for an Official Zoning Map amendment. The end result will be to
designate the properties involved in the amendment request from General Business (GB) on the
north end, Business Core (BC) on the south end and Residential Medium-Density (MF) for the
remainder of the narrow "strip" of lots fronting Park Avenue between classification to Mixed
Use (MX) to reflect the current Comprehensive Plan Map, Mixed Use (MU), designation for this
same proposal area.
3. SEPA Determination:
The rezone proposal to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Bremerton for that area on
the east side of Park Avenue is more specifically described as that area on the east side of Park
Avenue from 6th Street to 11th Street (between Park Avenue and the alley immediately east of
Park Avenue), and is currently zoned General Business (GB) on the north end, Business Core
(BC) on the south end and Residential Medium-Density (MF) for the remainder of the narrow
"strip" of lots fronting Park Avenue between. The west side of Park Avenue is currently
designated with a Mixed Use (MU) zone classification.
Zoning Map Amendment application requests are considered non-project actions which do not
propose specific development projects. Throughout the year, applications for zoning map
amendments can be submitted. Those zoning map amendments recommended for approval as a
result of the Public Hearing process conducted by the Bremerton Planning Commission are
adopted by City Council Ordinance.
A SEPA review check list has been reviewed for this non-project zoning map amendment
proposal. Further development of property, effected by this specific zoning map amendment that
is not categorically exempt pursuant to WAC Chapter 197-11-800, and, which will require
issuance of a City license or perrnit, will be subject to future review under SEPA.
A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for this non-prqject action in accordance with
WAC 197-11 on February 16, 2001.
2
4. Rezone / Ordinance & Oflicial Map Amendments
The procedures to be followed for Zoning Ordinance or Official Zoning Map changes are those
found in Section 21.02.920 "REZONE" of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) and Section
21.02.090 "PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY".
The City Council may approve a change in zoning classification of property within the City
limits by passage of an ordinance, following a public hearing, provided the new zone is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and adopted approval criteria. Approval of a
Rezone results in a change to the Official Zoning Map.
The Bremerton Municipal Code, Section 21.02.920(d) Criteria for Approval: A Rezone may be
approved if all of the following can be answered "YES":
(1) Is the proposed rezone consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? (See Section
21.02.090 "Plan/Zoning Consistency" of this code.)
Response: The proposed Mixed Use (MX) zone classification is consistent with the existing Mixed
Use (MU) Comprehensive Plan designation for the proposal area.
The Bremerton Comprehensive Plan, Section C~3: Park Avenue Corridor, discusses plan policies specific
to the development pf Park Avenue and includes a Development Concept Policy (a), "A mixed-use
concentration of development shall occur along both sides of Park Avenue between Burwell and
Eleventh", and an Implementation Policy, No. 1: "The development concept will be implemented through
the Comprehensive Plan policies, mixed-use zoning, development guidelines or incentives to encourage
creative design, and with the possible use of public/private partnerships." The City's Comprehensive
Plan currently identifies this proposal area as Mixed Use (MX). This (MX) concept was included in the
Environmental Impact Statement adopted in 1995 along with the Comprehensive Plan Ordinance.
(2) Is the rezone justified for one or more of the following reasons?
It is in the public interest to approve the Rezone to acco~zmodate needed changes within
the immediate vicinity or neighborhood.
It will correct a zone class~cation or boundary that was inappropriate when
established.
It is a planned step in a phasing process to gradually bring zoning into consistency with
the 20-year Comprehensive Plan when appropriate
It will place or move an overlay zoning designation without affecting the underlying
zolle.
Response: It is in the public interest to consider approval of this rezone request as it would bring the
Zoning Code classification into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan designations and will further
con'ect a zone classification that now appears inappropriate when it was established.
3
(3) Is there a public need for the proposed Rezone that will clearly benefit the local
neighborhood and/or the community of Bremerton?
Response: As the area proposed for rezone already exhibits considerable legal non-conforming
"mixed land use" the rezone of the area to Mixed Use (MX) will bring the area into compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan designation of Mixed Use (MU) and provide for continued realization of the
Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives.
(4) Are all essential public facilities and services available and adequate, or can be
made available, to serve the types and levels of development permitted in the
requested zone?
Response: The entire utility infrastructure required to support further mixed-use development of
this proposal exists in the area. If there are any deficiencies in the existing infrastructure, whether for
roads, water, sewer or storm sewer, the application process for further development of any new projects
proposed as a result of this zone classification compliance effort will be required to pay for or participate
in the expenses required to upgrade the utility or road service systems.
(5) Will the area being proposed for rezoning become part of a larger zoning district or
form a new district which will not be considered an isolated "spot zone?"
Response: This request for an Official Zoning Map amendment (Rezone) will bring the Official
Zoning Map classification for this area into compliance with the larger Mixed Use area (a larger zoning
district) as depicted in the Comprehensive Plan, and will not form a new district, nor constitute a "spot
zorle".
The Bremerton Municipal Code, Section 21.02.090 "PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY" states:
Regulations used ~o implement the Comprehensive Plan, including zoning, must be consistent with the
Plan. Figure 090, PRIMARY ZONE CONSISTENCY depicts the relationships between each Plan
designation and the primary zones.
Response: The current Comprehensive Plan designation of the proposal parcels is Mixed Use (MU),
and includes the_proposed Mixed Use (MX) zone as the primary zone. Application and reclassification
of the current MU zone to MX will achieve consistency between the Comprehensive Plan and the
Official Zoning Map, as required by the State's Growth Management Act.
RECOMMENDATION:
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE MADE UPON FURTHER EVALUATION
OF PUBLIC TESTIMONY AND ANY OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED. ADDITIONALLY, AT
SOME NEAR FUTURE TIME THIS PROPOSAL WILL BE CONSIDERED AS A SINGULAR NON
PROJECT ACTION ALONG WITH OTHER SIMILAR PROJECTS IN ORDER TO ASSESS THE
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS FOR PURPOSES OF ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT PROCESS AND ASSOCIATED REZONES.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the Bremerton City Council amending the Official Zoning
Map of the City of Bremerton, Washington, from Residential Medium Density (MF) and
General Business (GB) to Mixed Use (MU) for properties along the east frontage of
Park Avenue from 6th Street to 11th Street, exclusive of the parcel at the northeast
corner of Park and 6th'
The City Council of Bremerton makes the following findings:
WHEREAS, The Central Bremerton Land Use Plan map of the 1995 Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan designates properties along the east frontage of Park Avenue
from 6th Street to 11th Street, exclusive of the parcel at the northeast corner of Park and
6~, as MU Mixed Use; and
WHEREAS, The Official Zoning Map designates properties along the east
frontage of Park Avenue from 6th Street to 11t" Street, exclusive of the parcel at the
northeast corner of Park and 6th, as MF Residential Medium Density and GB General
Business; and
WHEREAS, The Washington State Growth Management Act stipulates that
cities adopt development regulations that are consistent with adopted comprehensive
plans. The City of Bremerton enacted revised Zoning Ordinance 21.02 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code on April 14, 1997, to satisfy the statutory requirement for
regulatory consistency; and
WHEREAS, Figure 090 of the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance BMC 21.02 lists the
primary zone classifications that "are considered to be consistent with their related
Comprehensive Plan designations", wherein the MX zone is listed as the primary zone
to implement the MU designation of the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, The Land Use Plan map designates the area along 6th Street and
to the south as CBD Central Business District. This is the city's most intensive land use
district and is intended for a wide range of commercial, higher density residential, and
other downtown land uses. The current zoning for this district is BC Business Core;
and
WHEREAS The current MF zone requires that adjacent properties in more
intensive zones provide a side yard setback. The proposed MX zone to implement the
MU planned environment requires no setback of uses in adjacent, more intensive
zones; and
WHEREAS; According to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and
Figure 090 of BMC 21.02, the appropriate primary zone designation to meet regulatory
consistency for properties along the east frontages of Park Avenue between 6th and
11th Streets, exclusive of the northeast corner of 6th Street and Park Avenue, is Mixed
Use (MX); and
WHEREAS, The proposed area-wide rezone of those east frontages of Park
Avenue between 6th and 11th Streets that are currently zoned MF to the MU zone is
appropriate to achieve regulatory consistency and to promote compatible, intensive
neighborhood development as specified in the Land Use Plan; now therefore:
WHEREAS; the Bremerton Planning Commission, following a public hearing on
June 19, 2001, determined that this request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and with the City's Rezone criteria, contained in BMC 21.02.920, and has submitted its
and Conclusions in support of its recommendation to approve this Development
Regulation Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on July 18,
2001 to accept public comments pertaining to the proposed Rezone to consider the
Planning Commission's recommendation; now therefore:
2
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN THE FOLLOWING
Section 1: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Bremerton is hereby
amended to change the zoning classification for the properties along the east frontage
of Park Avenue from 6th Street to 11th Street, exclusive of the parcel at the northeast
corner of Park and 6th, as Residential Medium Density (MF) & General Business (GB)
to Mixed Use (MX) as further depicted in attached Exhibit "A".
Section 2'. This effective date of this Ordinance shall be ten (10) days from the
date of passage and publication by the Mayor and City Council.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this ~ day of ,2001.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __ day of 2001.
JOHN LAW
City Council President
APPROVED this ~ day of ,2001.
LYNN S. HORTON
Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY
City Clerk
3
.AGEN DABIL~L
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
I. SUBJECT: Public Hearinq &Ordinance to amend FOR AGENDA OF: .July 11, 2001
the Zoning Code Text by revising the definition of "Community DEPT. OF ORIGIN: P&B~ Land Use
Center" to reflect purposes and activities expected & commonly ORIGINATOR: Chris Huqo, Director
experienced in contemporary community center settings. DATE SUBMITTED: July, 2 2001
2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. ,EXHIBITS:
P&B Director: .4¢'/,"~'~ o PC Findings & Conclusions
City Attorney~ / o PC Minutes June 19, 2001
City Clerk: ~.~%~.~c_~_~,~.~' - ~~ o Staff Report
Fiscal & Budget Council Comm.~ ,_. o Ordinance to amend Zoning Map
Operations Comm. : ~.' ~ ~ ..... '.
ENDORSEMENT ~ INFORMATION__ APPROVED BY COUN~]~ESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION'
The City of Breme~on Zoning Code Te~ Amendment Application PLOl-O012, proposes to amend the Zoning
Code te~ by revising the definition of "Community Center" to reflect purposes and activities expected and
commonly experienced in contempora~ community center settings.
The Planning Commission has reviewed this proposal, conducted a public hearing and adopted Findings &
Conclusions at their June 19, 2001 meeting, and recommends City Council approval. The Council must conduct
a public hearing prior to its final decision and action on the proposed Ordinance.
5. RECOMMENDATION'
Move to approve the attached Ordinance # on first readinc~.
Move to pass the attached Ordinance # on second reading.
6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Christopher R. Hugo
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED ~ AM
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
8. AGENDA BILL NO.:
9. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
10. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
If the proposed ordinance amendment is not approved, the city will lose the foundation upon
which special permit applications for community centers can be reviewed in the context of
typical center functions and community expectations for service delivery.
11. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The proposed amendment will create no operational changes for the city.
12. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Ordinance
File
Site Visits
BREMERTON PLANNING COMMISSION
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
PL01-0012 PROPOSED REVISION OF ZONING CODE DEFINITION OF
COMMUNITY CENTER (CITY OF BREMERTON)
FINDINGS
1. Section 21.02.070 of the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance provides definitions
for terms commonly used in the City of Bremerton land use planning,
permitting, and development.
2. The definition for Community Center in BMC 21.02.070 was not updated to
reflect the purposes and activities expected and commonly experienced in
contemporary community center settings when the Code was reviewed for
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan in 1997.
3. The services and functions offered in community centers in 2001 reflect
many of the community's needed services to Iow income and other
segments of the population to improve individuals' life skills and economic
independence.
4. Community centers are developed within the city by a special use permit
application process. The range of uses that may be allowed in the
consideration of a special use permit must fall within the definition of a
center. Therefore, it is critical to the review of permits for center applications
that the definition reflect those activities and functions that are appropriates
services for a center and compatible with the settings in which centers exist.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The current definition of Community Center is not adequate to guide
development of centers to meet the full range of services needed by the
Bremerton community.
2. The proposed revised definition of Community Center that includes the
provision of services to improve individuals' life skills and economic
independence is consistent with community needs.
3. The proposed updated definition provides a foundation upon which
applications for special use permits for centers can be considered in the
current context of community interests.
!
Approved by the Bremerton Planning Commission on C//f,/~
Attest:
~daiYr K°~usk~// Secretary Chris Hugo
Ci i'FY' OF BREMERTON
Memo
To: Plan Commission
From: Chris Hugo, Director
Date: June 20, 2001
Re.' Zoning Code Text Amendment - Definition of Community Center
During a review of an application to amend a special use permit, I reviewed the
Zoning Code definition of "Center, Community or Neighborhood." I recognized that
the definition in the code did not reflect the range of activities that are typical in
current community center operations. I have initiated this revision of the definition to
provide more complete and descriptive language in the code.
The definition currently in the code is
"A facility provided for social gatherings, special events, dinners, dances,
meetings, lectures, games, limited recreation, and other functions of interest to
persons of afl ages in a particular neighborhood or the community and
generally owned and operated by a public agency or public non-pro£rt
organization."
The proposed new definition is
"A facility operated by a public agency or non-profit organization for social
gatherings; learning; recreation; programs to promote economic independence;
and similar functions to improve life skills and increase socioeconomic
opportunities for neighborhood or community residents of all ages."
The primary difference in the two statements above is the proposed new definition's
inclusion of programs to improve individuals' life skills and economic independence.
In many City neighborhood's this is the most vital need to afford residents' access to
new opportunities.
This proposed change is not a significant change to the uses allowed under the
Zoning Code. It does, however, provide a more complete description of current
program development in community centers in response to community needs. As
such, it is more an editorial than a substantive change.
1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the Bremerton City Council amending the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 21.02
of the Bremerton Municipal Code, with the revision of the definition for:
C~I~ITFR; COMMUNITY OR
The City Council of Bremerton makes the following findings:
WHEREAS, Section 21.02.070 of the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance provides definitions for terms
commonly used in the City of Bremerton land use planning, permitting, and development; and
WHEREAS, The definition for Community Center in BMC 21.02.070 was not updated to reflect
the purposes and activities expected and commonly experienced in contemporary community center
settings when the Code was reviewed for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan in 1997; and
WHEREAS, The services and functions offered in community centers in 2001 reflect many of the
community's needed services to Iow income and other segments of the population to improve
individuals' life skills and economic independence; and
WHEREAS, Community centers are developed within the city by a special use permit application
process. The range of uses that may be allowed in the consideration of a special use permit must fall
within the definition of a center. Therefore, it is critical to the review of permits for center applications
that the definition reflect those activities and functions that are appropriates services for a center and
compatible with the settings in which centers exist; and
WHEREAS, The current definition of Community Center is not adequate to guide development
of centers to meet the full range of services needed by the Bremerton community; and
WHEREAS, The proposed revised definition of Community Center that includes the provision of
services to improve individuals' life skills and economic independence is consistent with community
needs; and
WHEREAS; The proposed updated definition provides a foundation upon which applications for
special use permits for centers can be considered in the current context of community interests; and
WHEREAS; the Bremerton Planning Commission, following a public hearing on June 19, 2001,
determined that this request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and with the City's Development
Regulation Amendment criteria, contained in BMC 21.02.925, and has submitted its Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law in support of its recommendation to approve this Development Regulation
Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on July 18, 2001 to accept
public comments pertaining to the proposed Development Regulation Amendment to consider the
Planning Commission's recommendation; now therefore:
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN THE FOLLOWING
Section 1: That the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC)I Chapter 21.02, Zoning, Section
21.02.070, Definitions, CENTER; C(3MMIINITY C)~ I~II=I~HRORHOC)i3 be amended to read as follows:
ility .......................... "~
ClFNTIFR_. E:OMMIINITY OR I~II=IGHBORHOC)D. A fac ~,,,v,u~,~ ,,,, o,,,.,o, uo,,,~,,,,~o,
non-profit organization for social g~therings; learning; recreation7 programs to promote economic,
independ~nc~1 and similar flmctions to improve life skills ~nd increase socio-economic op~dunities for
neighborhood or community residents of all ages.
Section 2: This effective date of this Ordinance shall be ten (10) days from the date of
passage and publication by the Mayor and City Council.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremedon this ~ day of 2001.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this ~ day of ,2001.
JOHN LAW
City Council President
APPROVED this ~ day of ,2001.
ATTEST: LYNN S. HORTON
Mayor
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY
City Clerk
2
AGENDA-Bll::E.
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
I. SUBJECT: Public Hearinq & Ordinance to amend FOR AGENDA OF: July 11, 2001
the Zoning Code Text by revising the setback standards for the DEPT. OF ORIGIN' P&B - Land Use
Parks & Schools (PS) zone classification to reflect the reasonableORIGINATOR: Chris Huqo, Director
and planned expansion of parks and schools facilities to meet DATE SUBMITTED: July, 2 2001
growing demands.
2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
P&B Director: C,"~-~,~/~./'~ o PC Findings & Conclusions
C~ty Attorney: 7 o PC Minutes June 19, 2001
Fiscal & Budget Council.~omm.: ~. o Ordinance to amend Zoning Map
ENDORSEMENT~ INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The City of Breme~on Zoning Code Te~ Amendment Application PL01-0020, proposes to amend the Zoning
Code te~ by revising the setback standards for the Parks & Schools (PS) zone classification to reflect the
intensity of the prima~ use and the urban conte~ in which it sits in order to increase densities, reduce urban
sprawl, and utilize available lands in a more efficient and effe~ive manner.
The Planning Commission has reviewed this proposal, conducted a public hearing and adopted Findings &
Conclusions at their June 19, 2001 meeting, and recommends City Council approval. The Council must conduct
a public hearing prior to its final decision and action on the proposed Ordinance.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
Move to approve the attached Ordinance ~ on first reading.
Move to pass the attached Ordinance ~ on second reading.
6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Christopher R. Hugo
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AM Et
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
8. AGENDA BILLNO.' 0~ - /~7
9. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
10. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
If the proposed ordinance amendment is denied, planned expansion and development of uses
allowed in the PS zone that sit in more intensive city environments will be hampered by
setback requirements that are intended primarily for Iow density residential districts. The
community will lose the benefits of the new educational facilities that could be developed with
the more efficient use of land that this amendment allows.
11. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The proposed amendment will create no operational changes for the city.
12. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Ordinance
File
Site Visits
BREMERTON PLANNING COMMISSION
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
PL0t-0020 AREA-WiDE ZONING TEXT (DEVELOPMENT REGULATION)
AMENDMENT TO REVISE SETBACK STANDARDS IN THE PARKS
AND SCHOOLS (PS) ZONING CLASSIFICATION
,FINDINGS
1. The parcels and areas located throughout the City designated with the Parks &
Schools (PS) zone classification are located essentially adjacent to all other zone
classifications available in the city. Consequently, those park and school uses
allowed in the PS zone are located adjacent to a very broad range of land uses,
from Iow-density residential to high intensity industrial and commercial land uses.
2. The current PS zone setback requirements for the highest intensity school uses,
such as Olympic college, are the same as those for lowest intensity schools.
3. The current PS zone setback requirements for a use allowed in the PS zone are
the same whether the school facilities are in a Iow-density neighborhood or in the
center of the Central Business District.
4. The Capital Facilities Plan element of the 1995 Comprehensive Plan states: "It is
the intent of the City of Bremerton to provide public facilities and services that are
equitably distributed throughout the community; that are located and designed to
be safe and convenient to the people they serve; that provide flexibility of use
and maximum efficiency; and that are compatible with adjacent uses and the
environment. Education Goals of the 1995 Comprehensive Plan speak to the
importance of schools in the community and to allow for the reasonable and
planned expansion of those facilities to meet the growing education demands".
5. The ability of some uses allowed in the PS zone to expand in the more intensive
urban environments is hampered by cost inefficiencies created by setback
requirements that are specified to insure compatibility with Iow intensity
residential environments.
6. Bremerton Municipal Code, Section 21.02.925(d) Criteria for Approval: directs
that the City Council may approve a development regulation amendment if
certain procedural requirements and regulatory criteria for approval can be found
to be adequately met.
CONCLUSIONS
1. Setbacks standards for the Parks and Schools (PS) zone classification that
reflect the intensity of the primary use and the urban context in which it sits are
needed to increase densities, reduce urban sprawl, and utilize available lands in
a more efficient and effective manner.
2. The proposed zoning text amendment provides an appropriate zoning
mechanism to insure that setbacks are appropriate for the intensity of the allowed
use and compatible with adjacent uses.
3. The proposal to amend the text of Bremerton Municipal Code, Title 21, Land
Use, Chapter 21.02, Zoning Code, to amend front, side and rear yard set back
requirements in the Parks & Schools (PS) zone classification to reflect the
setbacks of the adjacent zones is consistent with the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Approved by the Bremerton Planning Commission on C/,.',4~ /~ 2.~,~ I
Attest: ~/ ---~ ~¢~~
An cl'y~o~ Chris Hugo
Chair / Secretary
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
ZONING TEXT (DEVELOPMENT REGULATION)
AMENDMENT
for
City of Bremerton/City-wide (P&BD File #: PL01-0020)
April 23, 2001 (Revised June 20, 2001)
Applicant: City of Bremerton, Department of Building & Planning
286 4~h Street
Bremerton, Wash. 98337
Location: This Zoning Code Text amendment proposal to reduce setback standards involves all
areas within the City currently designated with Parks and Schools (PS) zoning
classification.
Description: This application consists of a proposal to amend the applicable text and Figures of
Bremerton Municipal Code Title 21, Land Use, Chapter 21.02, Zoning Code, to revise
front, side and rear yard set back requirements in the Parks and Schools (PS) zone
classification.
FINDINGS
1. Surrounding Land Uses:
The parcels and areas located throughout the City designated ~vith the Parks & Schools (PS) zone
classification are located essentially adjacent to all other zone classifications available in the
development standards and regulations. Consequently, the City's Parks and Schools are located
practically adjacent to all conceivable land uses from low-density residential to high intensity
industrial and commercial land uses..
2. Proposal:
The applicant's request is for Official Zoning Code Text amendment in the form of a
Development Regulation Amendment appli.cation. This zoning code text amendment proposal, if
approved, would be implemented on a city-x(,ide basis. The proposed end result will be to
amend the text and applicable tables of Bremerton Municipal Code Title 21, Land Use, Chapter
21.02, Zoning Code, to reduce the current front, side and rear yard set back requirements in the
Parks and Schools (PS) zone classification to reflect the setback requirements of the adjacent
zorles.
When a proposed school facility or park structure, located in a PS zone, is adjacent to and/or
abuts a Low-density residential zone, the structure shall observe the current setbacks of the
adjacent residential lo,v-density zone. For example, structural development proposed in the PS
(2) Will the proposed change be consistent with all other provisions of the affected code
and avoid conflicts with other codes.'?
Response: Assorted parcels utilized for Parks and Schools are scattered throughout the Ci~' of
Bremerton are currently classified as Parks & Schools (PS). Al1 of these parcels are adjacent to parcels
designated with virtually all other zoning densities and intensities of use classifications available for land
use designation through the Development Regulations.
In efforts to increase densities and reduce urban sprawl and utilize available lands in more efficient and
effective manner, more effective development standards for setbacks for the Parks and Schools (PS) zone
classification are proposed.
~ the absence of the capabilities (such as a development standard mechanism to average setback
structure lines) it appears that the proposal to amend the text of Bremerton Municipal Code Title 21,
Land Use, Chapter 21.02, Zoning Code, to reduce front, side and rear yard set back requirements in the
Parks and Schools (PS) zone classification to reflect the setbacks of the adjacent zones is consistent with
all other provisions of the affected code and avoids conflicts with other codes.
It appears that ali parcels currently classified as PS are under some form of public entity ownership.
Should one of those public entities, with jurisdictional control of contiguous parcels within a PS zone,
wish to change or modify the existing setback regulations for the PS zone classification (30'- front, side
and rear) for a particular development proposal, then other development regulatory standards are
available such as Boundary Line Adjustments, Lot Combinations, Special Use Permit, and/or through
approval of a Planned Unit Development.
RECOMMENDATION:
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE MADE UPON FURTHER EVALUATION
OF PUBLIC TESTIMONY AND ANY OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED. ADDITIONALLY, AT
SOME NEAR FUTURE TI/vIE THIS PROPOSAL WILL BE CONSIDERED AS A SINGULAR NON
PROJECT ACTION ALONG WITH OTHER SI1MIIJAR PROJECTS IN ORDER TO ASSESS THE
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS FOR PURPOSES OF ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT PROCESS AND ASSOCIATED REZONES AND/OR DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENTS.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the Bremerton City Council to amend the text and applicable tables of Bremerton
Municipal Code Title 21, Land Use, Chapter 21.02, Zoning Code, revising front, side and rear yard set back
requirements in the Parks and Schools (PS) zone classification.
The City Council of Bremerton makes the following findings:
WHEREAS, This application consists of a proposal to amend the applicable text and Figures of Bremerton
Municipal Code Title 21, Land Use, Chapter 21.02, Zoning Code, to revise front, side and rear yard set back
requirements in the Parks and Schools (PS) zone classification to reflect the setback requirements of the adjacent
zones; and
WHEREAS, The proposed Zoning Code Text amendment to reduce setback standards involves all areas
within the City currently designated with Parks and Schools (PS) zoning classification; and
WHEREAS, The parcels and areas located throughout the City designated with the Parks & Schools (PS)
zone classification are located essentially adjacent to all other zone classifications available in the development
standards and regulations. Consequently, the City's Parks and Schools are located practically adjacent to all
conceivable land uses from low-density residential to high intensity industrial and commercial land uses; and
WHEREAS, The procedures to be followed for Zoning Ordinance text amendment or changes are those
found in Section 21.02.925 "DEVELOPMENT REGULATION AMENDMENT" of the Bremerton Municipal Code
(BMC). The authority is given to the City Council to approve by passage of an ordinance, a change to the text or
Figure of any City of Bremerton development regulation including the Zoning Ordinance. This is a Type IV legislative
decision and is exempt from the processing, timing, and other requirements for quasi-judicial permits; and
WHEREAS, Bremerton Municipal Code, Section 21.02.925(d) Criteria for Approval: directs that the City
Council may approve a development regulation amendment if certain procedural requirements and regulatory criteria
for approval can be found to be adequately met; and
WHEREAS; The Capital Facilities Plan element of the 1995 Comprehensive Plan reflects that "It is the
intent of the City of Bremerton to provide public facilities and services that are equitably distributed throughput the
community; that are located and designed to be safe and convenient to the people they serve; that provide flexibility
of use and maximum efficiency; and that are compatible with adjacent uses and the environment. Education Goals
of the 1995 Comprehensive Plan speak to the importance of schools in the community and to allow for the
reasonable and planned expansion of those facilities to meet the growing education demands"; and
WHEREAS, In efforts to increase densities and reduce urban sprawl and utilize available lands in more
efficient and effective manner, more effective development standards for setbacks for the Parks and Schools (PS)
zone classification are proposed; and
WHEREAS; the Bremerton Planning Commission, following a public hearing on June 19, 2001, determined
that this request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and with the City's Development Regulation Amendment
criteria, contained in BMC 21.02.925, and has submitted its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in support of its
recommendation to approve this Development Regulation Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on July 18, 2001 to accept public
comments pertaining to the proposed Development Regulation Amendment to consider the Planning Commission's
recommendation; now therefore:
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN THE FOLLOWING
Section 1: That the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC), Chapter 21.02, Zoning Code Appendix, Figure
120, Zone Summary, and Figure 130, Lot Requirements, are hereby amended as further depicted in attached Exhibits A
and Exhibit B, respectively.
Section 2: This effective date of this Ordinance shall be ten (10) days from the date of passage and
publication by the Mayor and City Council.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __ day of 2001.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __ day of ~ 2001.
JOHN LAW
City Council President
APPROVED this __ day of 2001.
ATTEST:
LYNN S. HORTON
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY Mayor
City Clerk
75
Figure 120 EXHIBIT A
ZONE SUMMARY Page 1 of 10
Revised July. 2001. PS Zone Setback Standards
ZONES I Description/Intent I Min. Standards
SE-l Land uses in this large-lot zone are limited primar/ly to Base Density: 1-3 DU/ac.
single unit dwellings and related accessory uses (e.g., Min. Lot Size: 13,000 s.f.
Residential social, religious, cultural, or educational) commonly Max. Coverage: 25%
Low-density found in such neighborhoods. This zone is intended Min. Lot Width: 60 ft.
Max. Bldg. Ht: 30 ft.
for areas in which very low urban densities are
SETBACKS:
necessary or desirable for such reasons as severe Front: 20 ft.
environmental problems such as topography or soil Side: 10 ft.
stability, or due to limited access, unique views or Rear: 15 ft.
other ame~fities, tfistoric character, or lack of essential
urban services.
SE-2 ms zone allows pr/rnarily single unit dwellings and Base Density: I-8 DU/ac.
related accessory uses and its locarional factors are Min. Lot Size: 9,000 s.f.
Residential similar to those of the SF-1 zone. The primary Max. Coverage: 30%
Low-density difference is that the SF-2 zone allows a smaller Min. Lot Width: 50 ft.
Max. Bldg. Hr: 30 f~.
mirfimum lot size and a kigher development density SETBACKS:
than does SF-1 and is suitable for areas served by Front: 20 ft.
public utilities, particularly sewer. Side: 10 ft.
Rear: 15 ft.
SF-3 this zone accommodates single-mt homes in the Base Density: 3-8 DU/ac.
typical urban subdivision at an average density Min. Lot Size: 5,000 s.f.
Residential (without bonuses) of up to eight un/ts per acre. It Max. Coverage: 40%
Low-density offers a smaller minimum lot size to enhance Min. Lot Width: 40 ft.
Max. Bldg. Ht: 30 ft.
affordability and encourage higher densities through SETBACKS:
creative site planning and various zomng and density Front: 15 ft. (20 to garage)
bonus incentives. This 8 DU/acre density is Side: 5 ft.
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's LDR Rear: 15 ft.
designation.
DR TUs zone is applied to, and intended to maintain, Base Density: 3-8 DU/ac.
neighborhoods of predominantly single- and two-unit Min. Lot Size: 4,000 sf- I DU
Residential structures as well as areas suitable for a mixture of 6,000 sf- Duplex
Low-density these dwelling types. The same related accessory uses Max. Coverage: 40% ~
Min. Lot Width: 40 ft.
that are allowed in the other zones are permitted in this
Max. Bldg. Ht: 30 ft.
zone and the allowed density is the same as the SF-3 SETBACKS:
zone but with a smaller minimum lot size for single Front: 15 ft. (20 to garage)
units and duplexes. Side: 5 ft.
Rear: 15 ft.
MF This zone is designed to maintain existing areas of Base Density: 8-18 D U/ac.
multiple-unit dwellings and to provide for new Min. Lot Size: 3,000 s.f.
Residential development of needed housing within the medium- Max. Coverage: 40%
Min. Lot Width: 30 ft.
Medium density density (8-18 DU/Acre) level. Such development may
Max. Bldg. Hr: 40 ft.
include small-lot single-unit clustered housing, garden SETBACKS:
and larger apartment complexes, condominiums, and Front: 10 ft. (20 to garage)
other housing alternatives, along with the/r customary Side: 5 ft.
related or accessory uses. Rear: 20 ft.
Title 21 Appendix: Page 1
7¢
ZONES Description/Intent Min. Standards
CD The intent of this zone is to strengthen the business Min. Lot Size: None
district of the Charleston neighborhood by providing a Max. Coverage: 100%
Charleston compatible combination of allowed uses, along with Min. Lot Width: None
District development standards that reflect the historical Max. Bldg. Ht: 60 ft.
SETBACKS:
character and design limitations of the district. The
Front: No min. setbacks.
"CD" zone encourages compact and mixed use [ 0 ft. max. to Callow Ave.
development, pedestrian activities, and retail and between Burwell & I l th
service businesses. It includes most of the uses Side: l0 ft. from resid, zones.
allowed in the "CB" and "PO" zones, but without some None from non-resid, zones
of the larger disruptive auto-related businesses that Rear: 10 ft. from resid, zones
often locate along highways. None from non-res, zones.
SC This zone is intended to accommodate clusters of retail Min. Lot Size: None*
activity, personal services, entertainment, and office Max. Coverage: None*
Shopping Center uses in accessible, well-designed, and pedestrian- Min. Lot Width: None*
oriented shopping centers. These centers should Max. Bldg. Ht: None*
provide more desirable alternatives to strip-commercial * Shopping Center development
development. These centers will be larger than
requires a master plan consistent with
neighborhood business centers in scale and use, and City PUD standards and approved
will usually be anchored by a junior department store, through the PUD process.
variety store, major supermarket, or may consist of a
combination of smaller stores and offices.
mc This zone was originally designed for Bremerton's Min. Lot Size: None
Central Business District and intended to promote the Max. Coverage: 100%
Business Core CBD as the city's primary high-intensity commercial Min. Lot Width: None
and financial center. That purpose continues, but in Max. Bldg. Ht: 120 ft.
SETBACKS:
combination with other special purpose zones and more
Front: None.
specific master plans. Pedestrian-oriented day and Side: None abutting non-res, zone.
nighttime activities are encouraged, as are public transit 10 ft. (abutting R zone only)
and linkages to the multi-modal terminal, overwater Rear: 10 ft.
park, PSNS, and other pedestrian-accessible facilities.
Long-term parking and other automobile related uses
are discouraged in the CBD. Residential uses are
highly encouraged, particularly on upper floors and
around the periphery of the district, but should not
displace sidewalk level storefronts along key
downtown streets.
BP ,his zone provides opportunities for the development Min. Lot Size: None
Business Park of low-intensity commercial, office and/or Max. Coverage: 50%
manufacturing businesses that are clean, quiet, low- Min. Lot Width: None
traffic generators, and that will be compatible with Max. Bldg. Ht: 30 ft.
SETBACKS:
adjacent or nearby residential neighborhoods and other
Front: 20 ft.
sensitive uses. Business park development should be Side: None abutting non-res, zone.
designed as an attractive, well-landscaped, campus-like I0 ~. (abutting R zone only)
environment that will be an asset to its neighborhood as Rear: 10 ft. (abutting R zone only)
well as the community.
Title 21 Appendix: Page 3
77
ZONES Description/Intent Min. Standards
Hr The intent of this zone is to protect and strengthen the
medical center to ensure that it remains strong and
Health Care viable and to provide for medical center expansion.
This zone was based on the following objectives:
~- Establish a Health Care campus of related and
compatible uses.
> Preferred uses will be medical, along with their
related support activities.
> Provide areas for new growth and expansion.
> Improve internal access and circulation.
> Minimize land use conflicts.
SI~IU The purpose of this zone is to establish a mixed use Base density: None
district that responds to the constraints and special
Shoreline opportunities of high bluff areas and to the following Min. Lot Size: None
Mixed Use primary objectives: Max. Coverage: 50%
Min. Lot Width: None
> Maximize the potential of bluff-top areas. Max. Bldg. Ht: 40 ft.
> Promote a mix of water-oriented commercial, office
SETBACKS:
and residential uses. Front: 10 ft.
> Ensure that new development is designed and sited Bluff-top: 25 ft. *
to take advantage of high bluffviews while enhancing Side: 5 ft. **
the unique qualities of the shoreline location. Rear: 10 tr.
~' Discourage development that endangers the stability * Unless a geo-technical report
or function of the bluff, supports a lesser setback.
> Provide for public access as required by the City's ** Side yards are also subject to view
Shoreline Master Program. corridor requirements.
PS The purpose of this zone is to protect and preserve lands that Min. Lot Size: None.
are currently developed, used, suited for, or planned for Max. Coverage: 25%
Parks & Schools public and/or private park, recreation, or open space uses, as Min. Lot Width: None.
well as lands needed for recreational and educational Max. Bldg. Hr: 40 ft.
facilities of long-term value and benefit to the community SETBACKS:
and region. Front: 30 ft.
Permitted Uses: Side: 30 ft.
I. Passive parks including, but not limited to, open Rear: 30 ft.
landscaped or natural areas; recreational trails systems; Note: The above 30 ft. setback
picnicking areas; gardens; arboretum; viewpoints and standards are required only wit, tin the
related structures. PS zone classification (abutting PS
2. Active Parks including, but not limited to, hard and soft
zoned parcels). Modification will be
surface play areas: playground equipment; sports courts;
lighted fields; community buildings; and swimming pools, considered only through other
3. Public and private schools, including trades, arts, pre- development retlulatorv standards or
schools and colleges. Special Use Permit.
4. Library, museum, and similar facilities. All other setback requirements of the
5. Recreation-related non-profit group activities. PS zone shall reflect the setback
6. Concessions -- approved by City Council.
7. Access. uses customarily associated w/parks and schools, requirements of the adiacent zone,
Uses Requiring a Special Use Permit: except if a proposed structure is
1. Golf course, higher than two (2) stories or is higher
2. Boat launching and related facilities, than thirty (30') (whichever is higher)
3. Rifle and pistol ranges, the requisite setback of the adjacent
4. Maintenance and service yards, zone shall be doubled when abutting
5. Bus and other vehicle and equipment maintenance & any Iow-density residential zone (SF-I~
storage facilities. SF-2~ SF-3, and DR).
6. Admin. offices related to the facilities.
7. Bldgs and structures for nonprofit groups on public lands.
Title 21 Appendix: Page 5
78
ZONES [ Description/Intent ]Min. Standards
UeD The adopted document entitled "Downtown Waterfront Specific controls and development
Urban Renewal Plan" (DWURP) constitutes the requirements for this zone are contained
Urban Renewal entirety of this zone. The plan provides conceptual as in the Downtown Waterfront Urban
District well as technical guidance and standards for planning Renewal Plan.
and building within the do~vntown waterfront district,
which extends fi.om PSNS north to Fifth Street and
includes all properties bet~veen Washington Avenue
and the shoreline. The Land/Water Use Plan of the
DWURP is divided into several components for land
use and development purposes, and into seven areas for
the purpose of building height standards.
DRO This "overlay" zone is related to implementation of the Specific design standards for this zone
Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan. The are contained in the Downtown
Design Review DRO establishes a specific area within which formal Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan. tn
Overlay Design Review shall take place (DWURP, Exhibit addition to the Site Plan Review. process,
"G") to ensure that the design policies and standards of "Design Review" may be necessary for
any project that alters or has a significant
the plan are carried out. effect on the visual appearance,
character, function, or other sensory
component of the area enclosed by the
DRO boundary. Such changes may be as
major as the construction of a new
building, or as simple as a new sign,
awning or paint.
gPO This zone provides for the development of commercial and commuter Std: Must meet City's adopted
parking lots in areas tbund to be suitable lbr those uses, but not parking lot development
Limited Parking permitted by the underlying zone. standards.
Application:
Overlay the provisions of this district are limited to areas shown on the
Bremerton Zoning Map as "Limited Parking Overlay" and are Special Use Permit required for all lots.
intended to supplement the provisions of the underlying zone.
Permitted Uses: Allowed Lots:
1. Surface parking lots tbr off-street parking.
2. Accessory t~cilities necessary tbr the proper function or design of Class "A" lot (Special Use Permit)
the lot, including parking meters, instructional/directional signing, Class "C" lots may also be approved
fencing, and landscaping.
Development Standards: by SUP, subject to additional criteria and
a time limit of no longer than five years
1. Lots shall be only for the parking of vehicles in daily use and shall
not include commercial vehicles, impound lots, or other storage, from date of approval. Applica~.t then
2. Lots must be developed in accordance with the City's Class "A" has the option to:
parking lot standards, unless approved as a "commuter parking
lot". (a) Apply for time extension as
3. A Class "C" commuter lot may be approved if: an amendment to the SUP;
(a) It is provided for long-term commuter parking by visitors, (b) Apply for a SUP for a
employees, ferry commuters, or similar commuters.
(b) tt will not be used for customer or client parking or other permanent Class "C" paved lot;
non-parking land use. or
(c) Parking tees will be charged by the day, week, month or (c) Cease the use and remove
other period which, in no case, may be shorter than 8 hours all improvements from the site.
.(d) It will be fenced or otherwise secured.
4. A Class "C" lot may be approved with a gravel or similar surface
only if:
(a) The need is temporary and for a period not longer than five
years; and/or
(b) The proposed s~te is in a transitional area and will likely be
needed for new development or a different use within 5 years.
Title 21 Appendix: Page 7
Figure 130 EXHIBIT B
LOT-RE-QUIREMENTS Re~;ised
ALLOWED 2 3 MIN. MIN.
ZONES RESID. ~ FRONT SIDE REAR LOT LOT MAX. MAX.
DENSITY Setback Setback Setback SIZE WIDTH HEIGHT COVER. AGE
SF-1 1-3 DU/Ac. 20 ft. 10 ft. 15 ft. 13,000 s.f. 60 ft. 30 ft.. 25 %
SF2 1-8 DU/Ac. 20 ft. 10 ft. 15 ft. 9,000 s.f. 50 ft. 30 ft. 30 %
SF-3 3-8 DU/Ac. 15 ft. 2 5 ft. 15 ft. 5,000 s.f. 40 ft. 30 It. 40 %
DR 3-8 DU/Ac. 15 ft. 2 5ft. 15ft. 4,000 s.f. 40ft. 30ft. 40%
MF 8-18 DU/Ac. 10 ft. 2 5 It. 20 ft. 3,000 s.f. 30 ft. 40 ft. 50 %
CBR 8-18 DU/Ac. 10 ft. 2 5 ft. 15 ft. 3,000 s.f. 30 ft. 30 ft. 50
MR 8-44 DU/Ac. 10 ft. 2 5 ft. 3 10 ft. 5,000 s.f. 40 ft. 120 ft. 60
PO ....... 10 ft ........
NB 7 ....... 10 ft ........ s 20 ft ............... 30 ft. 50 %
GB ....... 20 ft. - ...... 5 ....... 5 .............. 60 ft. 100 %
SC 6 .............. 4
....... 4 ....... 4 ....... 6 ....... 6 ....... 6 ....... 6
BC ..................... s ....... s .............. 120 ft. 100 %
CD .............. 8
.......
BP ....... 20 ff ........ 5 ....... 5 .............. 30 ft. 50 %
IP ....... 20 ft ........
IG ....... 20 ft ........ 5 ....... 5 .............. 40 ft. 100
MX 8-44 DU/Ac. 10 ft ........ 5 ....... s 3,000 s.f. 30 ft. 30 ft. 50 %
Per Devel Per Dev Per Dev Per Dev Per Dev Per Dev Per Dev Per Dev
MXD
Agreement Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree
SMU ....... 10 ft. 5 ft. 10 ft ............... 40 ft. 50 %
HC ....... 10 ft ........ 5 ....... 5 .............. 60 ft. 60 %
PS ....... 30 ft.--_9 30 ft.--_9 30 ft--_9 .............. 40 ft. 25 %
I Base density ranges do not include additional incentive "bonus" densities that may be offered.
2 All garages and carports shall maintain a Front setback of 20 feet.
3 Zero Lot Line development shall add the nom~ally-required side yard to the opposite side of the lot. ZLL development along a rear
property line may be approved only through the PUD process.
4 Development is subject to the same setback that is required on the residential side of the lot 1/ne for any development abutting a
residential zone. Structures higher than two stories or 30 lt. (whichever is higher) shall double the setback when abutting
any other residential zone.
5 A 10 fl. setback is required ~¥om any residential zone.
6 Development within this zone shall be consistent with a master plan approved through the PUD process.
7 An individual building may not exceed 5,000 sq.fl, in this zone.
8 Maximum setback of 10 ft. from Callow fi'ontage between Burwell and Eleventh Streets.
9 The 30 ft. setback standards are required onh' within the PS zone classification {abutting PS zoned parcels). Modification will be
considered only tbroullh other development r~ulatorv standards o,' Special [;se Permit. All other setback requirements of the
PS zone shall reflect the setback requirements of the adiacent zone. except, if a proposed structure is higher than two (2) stories or is
higher than thirty (30') (whichever is higher) the requisite setback of the adiacent zone shall be doubled when abutti,~g any Iow-density
residential zone (SF-I~ SF-2, SF-3, and DR).
Title 21 Appendix: Page 1
8o
AC=ENBA-BtEL
BREMERTON CiTY COUNCIL
I. SUBJECT: Public Hearinq & Ordinance to amend FOR AGENDA OF: July 11, 2001
the Official Zoning Map from Medium Density Residential (CBR) DEPT. OF ORIGIN' P&B - Land Use
to Parks & Schools (PS) for properties northwest of the ORIGINATOR: Chris Huqo, Director
intersection of Chester Avenue and 13th Street and two parcels DATE SUBMITTED: July, 2 2001
along the west frontage of Lincoln Avenue north of 13th.
2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
P&B Director: ,,".,~.-.~¢,O o PC Findings & Conclusions
City Attorney: - / o PC Minutes June 19, 2001
City Clerk: ~ ,~N~_ ~' C..~--~-~'---~ ..... , ,~ ., o Staff Report
Fiscal & Budget Council-Comm.: ~ .~~',/~ o Ordinance to amend Zoning Map
Operations Comm.: /_:~..¢~-, ¢~-,~__.~-
ENDORSEMENT ~" INFORMATION ~ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
MAYOR '-.~ .... 59
"
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The City of Bremerton Rezone Application PL00-0047, proposes to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of
Bremerton for properties northwest of the intersection of Chester Avenue and 13t~ Street and two parcels along
the west frontage of Lincoln Avenue north of 13th by changing the zoning classification to Parks & Schools (PS)
to reflect the current Comprehensive Plan Map, Schools (S) designation for this same area.
It is in the public interest to approve this rezone request, as it would bring the Zoning designation into consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan designation, as required by the State Growth Management Act.
The Planning Commission has reviewed this proposal, conducted a public hearing and adopted Findings &
Conclusions at their June 19, 2001 meeting, and recommends City Council approval. The Council must conduct
a public hearing prior to its final decision and action on the proposed Ordinance.
5, RECOMMENDATION:
Move to approve the attached Ordinance # on first readinq.
Move to pass the attached Ordinance # on second reading.
6, RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Christopher R. Hugo
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
7. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AM
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
8. AGENDA BILL NO.:
9. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
10. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
If the proposed zone change is denied, the city would not achieve the planned expansion of
the Olympic College facilities as designated in the Comprehensive Plan. Further, a denial
could potentially subject the city to challenges that it did not enact zoning consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan as mandated by State law.
11. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The proposed amendment will create no operational changes for the city.
12. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Ordinance
File
Site Visits
Exhibit A
July, 2001
The City of Bremerton Rezone Application PL00-0047, proposes to amend the Official Zoning Map of the
City of Bremerton for properties northwest of the intersection of Chester Avenue and 13th Street and two
parcels along the west frontage of Lincoln Avenue north of 13th by changing the zoning classification to
Parks & Schools (PS) to reflect the current Comprehensive Plan Map designation, Schools (S), for this
same area.
SF-3
PS PS ~'
PS PS PS PS ~<
--I ~:
I
AMENDMENT~ EXISTING ZONING
S ~e
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONS
BREMERTON PLANNING COMMISSION
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
PL00-0047 OLYMPIC COLLEGE REZONE, CBR TO PS
FINDINGS
1. The Central Bremerton Land Use Plan map of the '/995 Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan designates properties northwest of the intersection of
Warren Avenue and 13th Street west to High Avenue as S Schools.
2. The Official Zoning Map designates properties northwest of the intersection of
Warren Avenue and 13th Street west to High Avenue as CBR Medium Density
Residential.
3. The Washington State Growth Management Act stipulates that cities adopt
development regulations, including zoning designations that are consistent with
adopted comprehensive plans. The City of Bremerton enacted revised Zoning
Ordinance 21.02 of the Bremerton Municipal Code on April 14, 1997, to satisfy
the statutory requirement for regulatory consistency.
4. Figure 090 of the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance BMC 21.02 lists the primary zone
classifications that "are considered to be consistent with their related
Comprehensive Plan designations." The PS zone is listed as the primary zone to
implement the School designation of the Comprehensive Plan.
5. Olympic College has purchased the subject properties to expand the college
facilities as projected in the Campus Master Plan. The Master Plan includes the
eventual purchase and expansion to the full block north of 13th between Lincoln
and Ohio Avenues.
6. The seven parcels fronting on 13th Street are projected to receive additional
structural college facilities and the two parcel portion of the proposal, fronting on
Lincoln Avenue will be utilized for additional parking capacity.
7. Recent City Council action has completed the vacation of parts of the street
rights-of-way for Chester Avenue, north of 13th Street and east of and adjacent to
the proposed structural facilities to be located on the seven parcel portion of the
proposal.
8. The Staff Report for this rezone application addresses the decision criteria that
must be satisfied to approve the proposal.
CONCLUSIONS
1. According to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and Figure 090
of BMC 21.02, the appropriate primary zone designation to implement the
Schools designation of the Land Use Plan is PS Schools.
2. The intention to continue the applicant's development of school facilities in the
proposed locations is clearly indicated in the Comprehensive Plan and on the
applicant's Campus Master Plan.
3. The proposed rezone is appropriate to achieve regulatory consistency and to
promote compatible development of the Olympic College district as specified in
the Land Use Plan.
Approved by the Bremerton Planning Commission on
Attest: z
~ha~i, K-o~ko Chris Hugo
Secretary
CITY OF BREMERTON
BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
for
Olympic College (P&BD File #: PL00-0047)
January 25, 2001
Applicant: Olympic College
1600 Chester Avenue
Bremerton, Wash. 98337-1699
Location: This proposal involves nine (9) parcels of land, aggregating approximately one (1) acre,
containing empty and condemned housing units. A portion of the proposal (two parcels) are
located on the west side of Lincoln Avenue approximately mid block and the remainder
portion of the proposal (seven parcels) are located south of and adjacent to the Olympic
College Campus, at 1213 13th Street, on the north side of 13th Street between Lincoln Avenue
and Chester Avenue. Specifically, the proposal parcels are identified with Tax parcel
numbers: 3797-005-005-0005, 3797-005-004-0006, 3797-006-005-0003, 3797-006-006-0002,
3797-006-008-0000, 3797-008-009-0009, 3797-006-010-0105, 3797-006-010-0204, and
3797-006-013-0003.
Description: Olympic College has purchased these properties to expand the college facilities as
projected in the Campus Master Plan. Currently the nine parcels contain vacated
housing units waiting for demolition with subsequent substantial regrading and
excavation to level the properties and bring them to the surrounding street grades. The
seven parcels fronting on 13th Street are projected to receive additional structural college
facilities and the two parcel portion of the proposal, fronting on Lincoln Avenue will be
utilized for additional parking capacity. Recent City Council action has completed the
vacation of parts of the street rights-of-way for Chester Avenue, north of 13th Street and
east of and adjacent to the proposed structural facilities to be located on the seven parcel
portion of the proposal. The Campus Master Plan includes the eventual purchase and
expansion to the full block north of 13th between Lincoln and Ohio Avenues.
Proposal: The applicant's request is for Official Zoning Map amendment in the form of a Rezone
application. The proposed end result will be to amend the Official Zoning Map of the
City of Bremerton to reflect the current Comprehensive Plan and Map designation of
Schools (S) by changing the zoning classification for the same parcels of land from
Residential Medium-Density (CBR) to Schools (PS).
FINDINGS
1. Surrounding Land Uses:
A land use inventory ~vas conducted of the area surrounding the subject property. The College
Campus occupies the areas immediately to the east and north of the proposal. Two churches are
located in the immediate vicinity .One immediately south of the proposal across 13th Street.
Bremerton High School is located one block to the west. The block immediately to the west
contains several older stock residential housing units. Additional older stock housing is located
to the southwest and southeast of the proposed rezone proposal.
Relation to
Subject Current Zoning Comprehensive Plan Designation
Property
North Parks and Schools (PS) Schools (S)
South Parks and Schools (PS) and Residential-Medium Density (MDR)
Residential-Medium Density (CBR)
East Parks and Schools (PS) Schools (S)
West Parks and Schools (PS) and Schools (S)
Residential-Medium Density (CBR)
2. Proposal:
The applicant's request is for an Official Zoning Map amendments. The end result will be to
designate the properties involved in the amendment request from single family medium density
residential to schools. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan Map will not be changed as the
existing land use designation is Schools(S). The official Zoning Map would be amended to
change the zoning from Residential Medium-Density (CBR) to Schools (PS).
3. SEPA Determination:
The City of Bremerton annually proposes to amend its Comprehensive Plan and Optimum Land
Use Map through city and public initiated amendment applications which will be applied city
wide as well as property specific. The Growth Management Act allows amendments to
Comprehensive Plans only once a year with few exceptions. Comprehensive Plan Amendments
and Rezone application requests are considered non project actions which do not propose
specific development projects. Throughout the year, applications for Plan amendments are
received (often accompanied by related rezones to maintain consistency between the City's Plan
and Zoning maps) and collectively placed on a docket for processing in order to assess the
"cumulative effects". Those amendments and rezones recommended for approval as a result of
the Public Hearing process conducted by the Bremerton Planning Commission are adopted by
City Council Ordinance. There is no proposal application for use and development of the
property at this time. Further development of approved property specific zone classification
amendments that are not categorically exempt pursuant to WAC Chapter 197-11-800, which will
require issuance of a City license or permit, will be subject to future review under SEPA
A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for this non project action in accordance with
WAC 197-11 on January 26, 2001.
2
8. Rezone / Ordinance & Official Map Amendments
The procedures to be followed for Zoning Ordinance or Official Zoning Map changes are those
found in Section 21.02.920 "REZONE" of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC)and Section
21.02.090 "PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY" and Section 21.02.100 "SECONDARY ZONES"
of the BMC:
The City Council may approve a change in zoning classification of property within the City
limits by passage of an ordinance, following a public hearing, provided the new zone is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and adopted approval criteria. Approval of a
Rezone results in a change to the Official Zoning Map.
The Bremerton Municipal Code, Section 21.02.920(d) Criteria for Approval: A Rezone may be
approved if all of the following can be answered "YES":
(1) Is the proposed Rezone consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? (See Section
21.02.090 "Plan/Zoning Consistency" of this code.)
Response: The proposed rezone is consistent with the existing Schools (S) plan classification for
the proposal, and additionally for the "island" of property which includes the two blocks of property to
the west of the proposal adjoining Bremerton High School, and the block of land extending to the south
from 13th as far as 1 lth Avenue (currently developed as accessory campus parking) between Lincoln and
Ohio Avenues.
(2) Is the Rezone justified for one or more of the following reasons?
It is in the public interest to approve the Rezone to accom~nodate needed changes within
the immediate vicinity or neighborhood.
It will correct a zone classification or boundary that was inappropriate when
established.
It is a planned step in a phasing process to gradually bring zoning into consistency with
the 20-year Comprehensive Plan when appropriate
It will place or move an overlay zoning designation without affecting the underlying
zone.
Response: It is in the public interest to consider approval of this rezone request as it would bring the
Zoning Code classification into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan designations and will further
correct a zone classification that now appears inappropriate when it was established.
Certainly, there would be an argument to be made, that in 1997, when the official Zoning Map was
readopted the subject property should have been included in the School land use designations at that
time. The college development and growth progression in the intervening years since 1995 indicates
there is a need for increasing schools zoning in this area of the City.
(3) Is there a public need for the proposed Rezone that will clearly benefit the local
neighborhood and/or the community of Bremerton?
3
Response: As basically the singular institute of higher learning available in the regional area, and
~vhen coupled with the College's Ambitious Master Plan to maintain that status it is clearly in the best
interest of the neighborhood and the larger community of Bremerton and the surrounding "area of
influence" to support those efforts to continue provisions for quality, higher, learning opportunities
through an aggressive growth program.
(4) Are all essential public facilities and services available and adequate, or can be
made available, to serve the types and levels of development permitted in the
requested zone?
Response: All of thc utility infrastructure required to support development of this property exists in
the area. If there are any deficiencies in the existing infrastructure, whether for roads, water, sewer or
storm sewer, the application process for further development of campus facilities will be required to pay
for or participate in the expenses required to upgrade the utility or road service systems.
(5) Will the area being proposed for rezoning become part of a larger zoning district or
form a new district which will not be considered an isolated "spot zone?"
Response: The Olympic College request for an Official Zoning Map amendment (Rezone) would
continue a land use pattern which would become an extension of the existing schools zoning
classification and woulf further bring the zoning classification into the schools designation projected on
the 1995 Comprehensive Plan.
The Bremerton Municipal Code, Section 21.02.090 "PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY" states:
Regulations used to implement the Comprehensive Plan, including zoning, must be consistent with the
Plan. Figure 090, PRIMARY ZONE CONSISTENCY depicts the relationships between each Plan
designation and the primary zones.
Response: The current Comprehensive Plan designation of the parcel, Schools (S) includes the
proposed Parks and Schools (PS) zone as the primary zone. Application and reclassification of the
current zone to Parks and Schools (PS) will achieve consistency between the Comprehensive Plan and
the Official Zoning Map, as required by the State's Growth Management Act.
RECOMMENDATION::
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE MADE UPON FURTHER EVALUATION
OF PUBLIC TESTIMONY AND ANY OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED. ADDITIONALLY, AT
SOME NEAR FUTURE TIME THIS PROPOSAL WILL BE CONSIDERED AS A SINGULAR NON
PROJECT ACTION ALONG WITH OTHER SIMILAR PROJECTS IN ORDER TO ASSESS THE
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS FOR PURPOSES OF ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT PROCESS AND ASSOCIATED REZONES.
4
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the Bremerton City Council amending the Official Zoning Map
of the City of Bremerton, Washington, from Medium Density Residential (CBR) to Parks
& Schools (PS) for properties northwest of the intersection of Chester Avenue and 13th
Street and two parcels along the west frontage of Lincoln Avenue north of 13th.
The City Council of Bremerton makes the following findings:
WHEREAS, The Central Bremerton Land Use Plan map of the 1995 Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan designates properties northwest of the intersection of Warren
Avenue and 13th Street west to High Avenue as Schools (S); and
WHEREAS, The Official Zoning Map designates properties northwest of the
intersection of Warren Avenue and 13th Street west to High Avenue as CBR Medium
Density Residential; and
WHEREAS, The Washington State Growth Management Act stipulates that
cities adopt development regulations that are consistent with adopted comprehensive
plans. The City of Bremerton enacted revised Zoning Ordinance 21.02 of the Bremerton
Municipal Code on April 14, 1997, to satisfy the statutory requirement for regulatory
consistency; and
WHEREAS, Figure 090 of the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance BMC 21.02 lists the
primary zone classifications that "are considered to be consistent with their related
Comprehensive Plan designations." The PS zone is listed as the primary zone to
implement the School designation of the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, Olympic College has purchased the subject properties to expand
the college facilities as projected in the Campus Master Plan. The Master Plan
includes the eventual purchase and expansion to the full block north of 13th between
Lincoln and Ohio Avenues; and
WHEREAS The seven parcels fronting on 13th Street are projected to receive
additional structural college facilities and the two parcel portion of the proposal, fronting
on Lincoln Avenue will be utilized for additional parking capacity; and
WHEREAS; According to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and
Figure 090 of BMC 21.02, the appropriate primary zone designation to implement the
Schools designation of the Land Use Plan is PS Schools; and
WHEREAS, The intention to continue the applicant's development of school
facilities in the proposed locations is clearly indicated in the Comprehensive Plan and
on the applicant's Campus Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, The proposed rezone is appropriate to achieve regulatory
consistency and to promote compatible development of the Olympic College district as
specified in the Land Use Plan.: now therefore:
WHEREAS; the Bremerton Planning Commission, following a public hearing on
June 19, 2001, determined that this request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and with the City's Rezone criteria, contained in BMC 21.02.920, and has submitted its
Findings and Conclusions in support of its recommendation to approve this rezone
request; and
WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on July 18,
2001 to accept public comments pertaining to the proposed rezone to consider the
Planning Commission's recommendation; now therefore:
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN THE FOLLOWING
Section 1: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Bremerton is hereby amended
to change the zoning classification from Medium Density Residential (CBR) to Parks &
Schools (PS) for properties northwest of the intersection of Chester Avenue and 13th
Street and two parcels along the west frontage of Lincoln Avenue north of 13th, as
further depicted in attached Exhibit "A".
Section 2: This effective date of this Ordinance shall be ten (10) days from the
date of passage and publication by the Mayor and City Council.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this ~ day of ,2001.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this __ day of ,2001.
JOHN LAW
City Council President
APPROVED this ~ day of ,2001.
LYNN S. HORTON
Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY
City Clerk