HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/02/01 AGENDA~ OF ~ ~
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
MONDAY - JULY 2, 2001
1. PRE-COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M.
A. General Council Business
2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M.
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation
3. CONSENT AGENDA
4. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTE~RS
5. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
6. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
7. MAYOR'S REPORT
8. LEGISLATIVE REPORT
9. PUBLIC RECOGNITION - (Comments limited to 3-minutes)
10. NEW BUSINESS
A. Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp
Dresser & McKee, Inc. for Eastside CSO Reduction Facility (#AB01-147)
11. PUBLIC HEARINGS - RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 2819, Authorizing Application for Funding Assistance to the Interagency for ~-"7
Outdoor Recreation for Acquisition of Park Property (#AB01-148)
B. Resolution No. 2820, Supporting Application to Public Facilities District for Conference
Center (#AB01-149)
12. PUBLIC HEARINGS - ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance (First Reading) Amending Bremerton Municipal Code 15.06 Setting Utility
Assessments, Fees, and Charges effective January 1, 2002 (#AB01-145)
13. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
IMMEDIA TEL Y FOLLOWING THE REGULAR MEETING, COUNCIL WILL RECONVENE IN THE
CONFERENCE ROOM FOR THEIR "MONTHLY STUDY SESSION"...
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR AGENDA OF: July ~ 2001
NO. 1, CDM - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works & Utilities
AGREEMENT FOR EASTSIDE CSO ORIGINATOR: Gene Sampley, Director
REDUCTION FACILITY DATE SUBMITTED: June 21, 2001
2._ CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXltlI~ITS:
-x~4~)~ ~ ~,, 1. SupplementalAgreement No. 1-PSA CDM
^sst.¥cit9
City ,reasure.r _~_ ~ ~__~
C~dget Committee
Council Operations Committee
ENDORSEMENT ~K] INFORMATION [ ] APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR
SUBMITTAL:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR (~M~C~I, .~TION:
Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM) is currently under a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for the design of
the Pine Road CSO Reduction Facility 0Eastside CSO Treatment Plant). The design is complete and construction
of the facility was awarded June 6. Construction management services was included in the original scope of
services for this project; however, no budget appropriation was included at that time. The attached Supplemental
Agreement No. 1 to the PSA has been negotiated for CDM's continued professional service for management of
this construction. Additionally, adjustments in the original design scope and budget have been included to
incorporate necessary, unforeseen changes resulting from Ecology review, and process and capacity adjustments.
(Continued on Page 2)
5. RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council approve Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp
Dresser & McKee, Inc. in the amount of $345,640 to a total contract amount of $1,076,640 and authorize the
Mayor to execute the same.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Director Pub Wks & Util
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Director Pub Wks & Util
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED[] TABLED[] A
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (Continued)
The action before the City Council is approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. in the amount of $345,640 to a total contract amount of
$1,076,640.
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Adequate construction management for the Eastside CSO Treatment Plant will not be available and the
consultant will not be fairly compensated for unforeseen changes required during design of the facility.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT AND OTHER RESOURCES:
Staffing: Qualified City staff are not available for construction management of this project. Utilizing
consultant services will provide necessary project support.
Budget: This project is funded by a Public Works Trust Fund loan and included in the 2001 budget.
Facilities/Equipment: No impact.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES: Current professional services agreement.
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1
Project No.: V0268206
Agency: City of Bremerton
Name of Project: Pine Road Basin CSO Reduction Facility
City Contract No.: 4083
The City of Bremerton (City) and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) desire to
supplement the standard Professional Services Agreement executed on May 1, 2000 and
identified as City Contract No. 4083 (Agreement).
All provisions in the Agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this
Supplemental Agreement as follows:
Section 1, SCOPE, is hereby amended, as shown in Exhibits "A" and "B", to
adjust the scope of facility design services and incorporate construction
management services.
Section 3, COMPENSATION, is hereby amended to increase total fees under
this agreement from Seven Hundred Thirty One Thousand Dollars ($731,000) by
Three Hundred Forty Five Thousand Six Hundred Forty Dollars ($345,640) to a
not-to-exceed amount of One Million Seventy Six Thousand Six Hundred Forty
Dollars ($1,076,640) including Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) Budget for
Additional Services subject to prior authorization by the CITY. The amounts for
individual tasks may vary provided the total is within the not-to-exceed amount of
this Agreement.
Delete the first sentence of the second paragraph and replace with the following:
The Contractor shall submit regular billing statements describing services
rendered and the amount charged for each service consistent with the level of
detail provided in Table A-4.
Concurrence with this Supplemental Agreement to the changes as stated above is
indicated by signature below.
Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. City of Bremerton
Paul F. Meyerhofer, Sr. Vice President Lynn S. Horton, Mayor
DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL
W. Eugene Sampley, PE
Director of Public Works & Utilities
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Assistant City Attorney
Attest:
Kathleen McCluskey, City Clerk
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
For
Pine Road Basin CSO Reduction Facility
(Amended June 26, 2001)
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this contract is to facilitate the construction of the Pine Road Basin
Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Treatment Facility at the Manette Treatment Plant site
adjacent to Lions Community Park. The new facility will treat approximately 10 mgd peak
CSO flow utilizing short term storage, high rate clarification, ultraviolet disinfection and
discharge through an existing outfall. The scope of this work includes program planning
and permitting, engineering report, plans and specifications and assistance during
construction. The scope also includes support for the environmental review, grant and loan
applications, and operator training. The principal deliverables are the engineering report; 50
and 90 percent construction documents; and biddable plans and specifications. The scope of
work includes office engineering and support during construction. Field engineering and
inspection can be performed by the CDM at the option of the City but is not part of the basic
services.
ENGINEERING REPORT
Task 1.1 Program Planning/Project Management
The task will begin with a focused review of the design criteria, CSO planning and objectives
of the new facility. The objective of this task is to prepare for a workshop with City and
Consultant to address critical design and success factors for the new. The task will produce
preliminary layouts, identify operations and treatment issues, develop a master project
schedule and identify critical project information needs. The City will provide including
reports, plans of existing site utilities and ouffalls
Deliverables: A workshop package will be distributed to the City team one week ahead of the
workshop. A project work plan will be produced from the workshop. The task also includes bi-weekly
progress meetings and monthly progress reports throughout the term of the Agreement.
Task 1.2 Surveys
After the predesign workshop, Symonds Engineers, Inc., a subconsultant, will develop site
information and background for plan and profile sheets. The subconsultant will locate
pipelines, culverts, electrical facilities, and old treatment. The survey will verify the
elevation of critical existing facilities such as CSO diversion structure weirs and interceptor
sewer inverts.
Deliverables: Topographic and site information will be delivered to the Contractor prior to
completion of the Engineering Report.
Task 1.3 Geotechnical Investigation
The purpose of the proposed geotechnical study is to evaluate the subsurface conditions at
the site and, based on conditions encountered, provide recommendations pertaining to
geotechnical aspects of the proposed CSO treatment facility. The investigation will be
conducted by AGI Technologies, a CDM Company.
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 2
The Contractor will address these issues by conducting a geotechnical investigation that
includes the following items:
· Collect and review readily available geotechnical and geologic data for the old Manette
Plant site to gain an overview of project conditions and to aid in identifying any
geotechnical factors that might have an impact on the proposed improvements.
· Perform a site reconnaissance to observe the existing facilities and site layout.
· Plan and prepare the field exploration program, coordinate the field activities with the
project team, and request the appropriate utility clearances. The City will provide access
to the site
· Conduct a subsurface investigation to provide information relative to soil, groundwater,
and other geologic conditions in the vicinity of the proposed improvements. The
Contractor anticipates performing four exploratory borings to maximum depths of about
30 feet at the location of the proposed CSO facilities. Two of these borings will be
completed as open-pipe piezometers, to enable future measurement of groundwater
levels. We also plan to advance two borings to maximum depths of 15 feet each to
explore subgrade soil conditions in driveway/parking areas. The borings will be
monitored and logged under the full-time observation of engineer or geologist. Soil
samples from the borings will be obtained at selected intervals. The Contractor assumes
the boring locations can be accessed using conventional truck-mounted drilling
equipment. Additional costs would be incurred if track-mounted or other limited-access
drilling equipment is needed.
· Conduct field and laboratory testing in general accordance with appropriate American
Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) standards, including Standard Penetration Testing
(SPT) and determination of natural moisture content and dry density, gram size
distribution, Atterberg Limits, and direct shear strength characteristics.
· Using an outside laboratory, test selected soil samples to evaluate corrosion of site soils
anticipated to be in contact with below-grade structural elements. Tests completed may
include laboratory pH, resistivity, sulfate or chloride content.
· Perform engineering analysis and evaluation of data derived from the subsurface
investigation and laboratory-testing program, with respect to the items listed under the
paragraph below.
· Prepare a draft report containing the results of the geotechnical investigation, including
descriptions of surface and subsurface conditions, and a site plan showing borehole
locations and other pertinent features. Summary boring logs, charts and graphs
indicating field and laboratory test results will also be included. The results of our
engineering evaluation and geotechnical engineering recommendations pertaining to the
following items will be presented:
- Presence and effect of existing fill and/or other existing compressible soils;
- Site preparation and remedial grading, if required;
- Type, depth, allowable bearing capacities, bearing elevations, and anticipated
settlements of appropriate foundation elements;
- Seismic design parameters for use with UBC or similar methodology;
- Stability and recommended maximum inclination of cut slopes and temporary
excavations during construction;
- Design and construction recommendations for temporary shoring and dewatering;
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 3
- General excavation characteristics of site soils and suitability of on-site soils for use as
trench and structure backfill;
- Pipe and below-grade structure bedding and backfill requirements;
- Lateral earth pressures for use in design of the proposed below-grade structures;
- Corrosion potential of on-site soils anticipated to be in contact with the proposed
below-grade structures;
- Subgrade soil preparation and pavement section thickness recommendations for
driveway and parking areas; and
- General drainage and groundwater considerations, including geotechnical
parameters for use in design against hydrostatic uplift, if necessary
· Respond to comments on the draft geotechnical investigation and provide a final report.
· Provide consultation during final design with respect to geotechnical issues, and review
geotechnical aspects of project plans and specifications.
Deliverables: The Contractor shall provide drilling logs, laboratory testing of selected samples,
geologic hazard evaluation, assessment of corrosion potential, draft and final engineering analysis
report.
Task 1.4 Engineering Report
The consultant shall prepare the engineering report for the Pine Road Basin CSO Treatment
Facility. The facility is anticipated to have 100,000 gallons of short-term storage, screening,
high rate clarification and support facilities, and UV disinfection and gravity flow to the old
Manette Plant Outfall. No improvements to the outfall in the water are anticipated as part of
this scope. The engineering report as defined in WAC 173-240-020(6) will include:
Section I Executive Summary
· Introduction
Existing System and Design CSO Event
· Recommended Alternative for CSO Reduction
· Implementation
Section 2 Treatment Alternatives
· Solids Removal Process Alternatives
· High Rate Clarification
· Disinfection Alternatives
Comparison of Hypochlorite/Bisulfite and UV
Expansion of a UV System
Operation and Maintenance
Power Supply
Summary of Comparison
Section 3 Recommendations
· General Process Description
· Design Criteria
· Site Plan
· Hydraulic Profile
· OutfalI Mixing Zone
7
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 4
· Process Flow
· Disinfection
Anticipated Effluent Quality Prior to Discharge
UV System Equipment
· Power Supply
Standby Power and Reliability
Approach
Reliability
Equipment Sizing and Electrical Distribution
Recommendation
· SCADA System
· Chemical Systems
Coagulant Aid
Floccutant Aid
· Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
· Odor Control
· Operations Plan
Initiate Operations
UV Systems Operations
· Project Costs
· Implementation Schedule
Appendices
· Appendix A Mixing Zone Study
· Appendix B Demonstration Studies
US F ilter/Kru ger/Acti flo
IDI Densedeg 4D
San Francisco Side-by-Side
· Appendix C Process and Instrumentation
· Appendix D Geotechnicat Investigation
Subtask 1.4.1 Engineering Report Workshop
The Consultant will host a one day workshop to address the following three critical issues:
X Disinfection approach
X Permitting
X Startup and shutdown of the treatment facility
X SCADA
This workshop will become a key element of the Engineering Report.
Deliverables: Decisions made at the workshop will be documented in a technical memorandum due
to the City one-week after the workshop.
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 5
1.4.2 Engineering Report - 50 Percent Submittal
Deliverables: The Contractor will submit five copies of the 50 percent report to the City for review.
This submittal wilt include the Background, Discharge Conditions and the Alternatives sections of
the report.
1.4.3 Engineering Report - 100 Percent Submittal
Deliverables: The Contractor will prepare ten copies of a draft Engineering Report for City and
Department of Ecology (DOE) review before starl~'ng Task 2 - Detailed Design. The final report will
address the City and DOE's comments and concerns.
Task 1.5 Support for Permitting, Grants and Environmental Review
The Contractor will provide technical support for NPDES Permitting and SERP for this new
facility. The City will pursue funding alternatives other than local financing. The Consultant
will be expected to assist in this area. Work under this task will proceed under individual
work orders as the need develops. Deliverables will be defined with each work order. The
key subtasks relative to permitting the proposed wastewater discharge are:
· Mixing zone study to assess compliance with water quality standards
· Identify any additional effluent treatment required to meet standards
· Assess adequacy of the existing Manette outfall and diffuser
· Identify potential implications of discharge with Sinclair Inlet TMDL
· Mitigation for shellfish closure zone due to reactivation of Manette outfall
This scope of work is based on our anticipation of the following:
· The Manette outfall and diffuser do not need to be modified other than maintenance
activities; therefore Corps and HPA permits will not be necessary.
· The aquatic lands lease from DNR has expired, which will trigger the shellfish closure
zone evaluation for the Department of Health.
Subtask 1.5.1 Mixing Zone Study and Effluent Limits
This task would update the mixing study by HDR dated 2/10/00 for the revised effluent
flow criteria. Oceanographic data for the site will come from the shellfish closure zone
evaluation. The results of the dilution modeling will be used to document the need for water
quality-based effluent limits or outfall modifications. These data will be furnished to
Ecology as an appendix to the Engineering Report for development of the NPDES permit.
This will satisfy the requirements of WAC 173-240-060 (d), (e) and (1).
DETAILED DESIGN
The scope of the detailed design will be broken into two projects.
· Task 2.1 Construction Documents - Short Term Storage
· Task 2.2 Construction Documents - Treatment
It is the City's objective to have significant progress made on construction of storage before
the end of 2000.
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 6
Task 2.1 Construction Documents for Short Term Storage
The Contractor shall prepare specifications for the facilities described on the sheet list in
Table A-1. Plans shall be prepared in AutoCAD Version 14. The drawings will be bound into
the specifications. Specifications will be developed in MS Word.
Deliverables:
X Subtask 2.1.1 - Four hard copies of 50 percent specifications for City Review.
X Subtask 2.1.2 - Four hard copies of 90 percent plans specificafi'ons City Review.
X One set of reproducible specifications ready for bidding and one set of the project disks.
Table A-1
Sheet List
No. Title Comments
1 Storage Basin- Site Paving, grading and
yard piping
2
Stoxage Basin - Civil details
3
Standard Civil Details
4 General Notes and Standard Structural
Details
Structural Plans Sections and Details
6 Mechanical Plans, sections and Details
7 Standard Mechanical Details
Task 2.1.3 Short Term Storage Bidding Support
The Consultant will assist the City in advertising, obtaining and evaluating bids for the
construction contract. The services will include:
X Attend pre-bid conference
X Assist in issuing addenda
X Consult with the City as to the acceptability of subcontractors and supphers
X Attend Bid Opening
The City will collect document deposits, produce meeting minutes, and track plan holders
and issue addenda.
Task 2.2 Construction Documents for Treatment
The contractor shall prepare drawings and specifications for the facilities described on the
sheet l/st in Table A-2. Plans shall be prepared in AutoCAD Version 14. Specifications will
be developed in MS Word.
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 7
Deliverables:
X Subtask 2.2.1 - Four hard copies of 30 percent plans for City Review.
X Subtask 2.2.2- Four hard copies of 60 percent plans for City Review.
X Subtask 2.2.3 - Four hard copies oflO0 percent plans for City.
X One set of. full size reproducible drawings and specifications ready for bidding and one set of the
project disks.
Table A-2
Sheet List
No. Title Comments
1 Title Sheet and Project Location Map
2 Legend and Drawing List
3 Treatment Area and Site Plan Includes Building
4 Process Flow Schematic & Hydraulic Profile
5 Yard Piping Plans and Profiles
6 Yard Piping and Ouffall Connection Details
7 Paving, Grading and Irrigation Plan
8 Additional Civil Drawings
9 Additional Civil Drawings
10 Additional Civil Drawings
11 Mechanical Plans Only pumping required for startup and dean up
12 Mechanical Plans
13 Mechanical Sections & Details
14 Mechanical Sections & Details
15 Standby Power Facilities
16 Chemical Storage Facilities
17 Disinfection System Details
18 Additional Mechanical Plans & Details
19 Additional Mechanical Plans & DetaiLs
20 Additional Mechanical Plans & Details
21 Additional Mechanical Plans & Details
22 Structural Top and Bottom Plan
23 Structural Sections
24 Structural Sections
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 8
No. Title Comments
25 Structure Plans & Sections
26 Misc. Structural Details
27 Misc. Structural Details
28 Misc. Structural Plans, Sections & Details
29 Misc. Structural Plans, Sections & Details
30 Misc. Structural Plans, Sections & Details
31 Misc. Structural Plans, Sections & Details
32 HVA C
33 HVA C
34 HVA C
35 Electrical Site Plan
36 Symbols and Abbreviations
37 Conduit and Wire Schedules
38 MCC's and Oneline Diagrams
39 One_line Diagrams
40 One_line Diagrams
41 Plans and Details
42 Plans and Details
43 Panel Schedules
44 Standby Power
45 Lighting Plan and Details
44 Additional Electrical Details
47 P&ID's
48 P&ID's
49 Controls System Details
50 Controls System Details
51 Misc. Electrical Details
52 Additional Instrumentation Details
53 Additional Instrumentation Details
(2.
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 9
Subtask 2.2.4 Bidding
The Consultant will assist the City in advertising, obtaining and evaluating bids for the
construction contract. The services will include:
X Attend pre-bid conference
X Assist in issuing addenda
X Consult with the City as to the acceptability of subcontractors and suppliers'
X Attend Bid Opening
The City will collect document deposits, produce meeting minutes, and track plan holders
and issue addenda.
Task 2.3 SCADA Configuration (Optional)
If requested by the City, the Contractor will configure and install the CSO Treatment
controls software on the City's existing SCADA platform, One single programming effort is
included in this scope of work. The SCADA work will be limited to the new facilities in this
project, and will exclude controls or monitoring work on existing CSO facilities or their
support equipment. There will be two PLC's associated with the HRC and UV supplier
packages. This task will complete the programming of the main PLC that coordinates
activities of the two main process elements. The scope includes:
· PLC Design and development
· In-house factory testing
· O&M Documentation development
· . General Code documentation
· Client Meetings on site (4)
· Field Testing
A budget of $41,000 has been established for this Task 2.3.
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
During the Construction Phase:
Wherever used in this Exhibit, SectiOns 3.1 through 3.2, the following terms have the
meanings indicated which are applicable to both the singular and plural thereof:
Construction Contractor
Construction Contractor means the person or entity with whom the City enters into a
written agreement covering construction work to be performed or furnished with respect to
the Project.
ENGINEER
ENGINEER means Contractor as defined in the Professional Services Agreement dated May
1, 2000.
Resident Project Representative
Resident Project Representative means the authorized representative of the ENGINEER who
will be assigned to assist ENGINEER at the site during the Construction Phase. The
13
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 10
Resident Project Representative will be ENGINEER's employee and under ENGINEER's
supervision. As used herein, the term Resident Project Representative includes any
assistants of the Resident Project Representative agreed to by the City. The duties and
responsibilities of the Resident Project Representative are set forth in Exhibit A-l, "Duties,
Responsibilities and !.imitations of Authority of the Resident Project Representative"
(Exhibit A-l).
OWNER
OWNER means City as defined in the Professional Services Agreement dated May 1, 2000.
Duration of Construction Phase - The Construction Phase will commence with the execution
of the construction contract for the Project or any part thereof and will terminate upon
written recommendation by ENGINEER of final payment. The duties and responsibilities of
ENGINEER during the Construction Phase as set forth in this Exhibit A are amended and
supplemented as indicated in Exhibit B.
Task 3.1. General Administration Contract
ENGINEER shall consult with and advise OWNER and act as Owner's representative as
provided in the Standard General Conditions of the Construction Contractor's Contract.
The extent and limitations of the duties, responsibilities and authority of ENGINEER as
assigned in said Standard General Conditions shall not be modified, except to the extent
provided in Exhibit A and except as ENGINEER may otherwise agree in writing. All of
Owner's instructions to Contractor will be issued through ENGINEER who shall have
authority to act on behalf of OWNER in dealings with Contractor to the extent provided in
this Agreement and said Standard General Conditions except as otherwise provided in
writing.
Defective Work - During site visits (See Task 3.2 below) and on the basis of such
observations, ENGINEER shall have authority to disapprove of or reject Construction
Contractor's work while it is in progress if ENGINEER believes that such work will not
produce a completed Project that conforms generally to the Contract Documents or that it
will prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning
whole as indicated in the Contract Documents.
Clarifications and interpretations; Field Orders - ENGINEER shall issue necessary
clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents as appropriate to the orderly
completion of the work. Such clarifications and interpretations will be consistent with the
intent of and reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents. ENGINEER may issue
Field Orders authorizing minor variations from the requirements of the Contract
Documents.
Change Orders and Work Change Directives - ENGINEER shall recommend Change Orders
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 11
and Work Change Directives to OWNER as appropriate, and shall prepare Change Orders
and Work Change Directives as required.
Shop Drawings - ENGINEER shall review and approve (or take other appropriate action in
respect of) Shop Drawings and Samples and other data which Construction Contractor is
required to submit, but only for conformance with the information given in the Contract
Documents and compatibility with the design concept of the completed Project as a
functioning whole as indicated in the Contract Documents. Such reviews and approvals or
other action will not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of
construction or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto.
Substitutes - ENGINEER shall evaluate and determine the acceptability of substitute or "or-
equal" materials and equipment proposed by Construction Contractor, but subject to the
provisions of Task 3.2.
Inspections and Tests - ENGINEER may require special inspections or tests of the work, and
shall receive and review all certificates of inspections, tests and approvals required by laws,
rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, orders or the Contract Documents. ENGINEER's
review of such certificates will be for the purpose of determining that the results certified
indicate compliance with the Contract Documents and will not constitute an independent
evaluation that the content or procedures of such inspections, tests or approvals comply
with the requirements of the Contract Documents. ENGINEER shall be entitled to rely on
the results of such tests.
Disagreements between OWNER and Construction Contractor - ENGINEER shall render the
initial decisions on all claims of OWNER and Construction Contractor relating to the
acceptability of the work or the interpretation of the requirements of the Contract
Documents pertaining to the execution and progress of the work. In rendering such
decisions, ENGINEER shall be fair and not show partiality to OWNER or Construction
Contractor and shall not be liable in connection with any decision rendered in good faith in
such capadty.
Applications for Payment - Based on ENGINEER's on-site observations as an experienced
and qualified design professional and on review of Applications for Payment and the
accompanying data and schedules.
ENGINEER shall determine the amounts that ENGINEER recommends Construction
Contractor be paid. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will
constitute ENGINEER's representation to OWNER, based on such observations and review,
that, to the best of ENGINEER's knowledge, information and belief, the work has progressed
to the point indicated, the quality of such work is generally in accordance with the Contract
Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning whole prior to or upon
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 12
Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Contract
Documents and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation), and the
conditions precedent to Contractor's being entitled to such payment appear to have been
fulfilled in so far as it is ENGINEER's responsibility to observe the work. In the case of unit
price work, ENGINEER's recommendations of payment will include final determinations of
quantities and classifications of such work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed
by the Contract Documents). The responsibilities of ENGINEER contained in this
paragraph are expressly subject to the limitations set forth below and other express or
general limitations in this Agreement and elsewhere.
By recommending any payment ENGINEER shall not thereby be deemed to have
represented that on-site observations made by ENGINEER to check the quality or quantity
of Construction Contractor's work as it is performed and furnished have been exhaustive,
extended to every aspect of the work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the
work beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in this Agreement and
the Contract Documents. Neither ENGINEER's review of Construction Contractor's work
for the purposes of recommending payments nor ENGINEER's recommendation of any
payment (including final payment) will impose on ENGINEER responsibility to supervise,
direct or control such work or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures
of construction or safety precautions or programs inddent thereto, or Construction
Contractor's compliance with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders
applicable to Construction Contractor's furnishing and performing the work. It will also not
impose responsibility on ENGINEER to make any examination to ascertain how or for what
purposes Contractor has used the moneys paid on account of the Contract Price, or to
determine that title to any of the work, materials or equipment has passed to OWNER free
and dear of any liens, claims, security interests or encumbrances, or that there may not be
other matters at issue between OWNER and Construction Contractor that might affect the
amount that should be paid.
Contractor's Completion Documents - ENGINEER shall receive, review and transmit to
OWNER with written comments maintenance and operating instructions, schedules,
guarantees, Bonds, certificates or other evidence of insurance required by the Contract
Documents, certificates of inspection, tests and approvals, and marked-up record
documents (including Shop Drawings, Samples and other data approved as provided under
"Shop Drawings" paragraph above and marked-up record Drawings) which are to be
assembled by Contractor in accordance with the Contract Documents to obtain final
payment. ENGINEER's review of such documents will only be to determine generally that
their content complies with the requirements of, and in the case of certificates of
inspections, tests and approvals that the results certified indicate compliance with, the
Contract Documents.
Substantial Completion - Following notice from Construction Contractor that Construction
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 13
Contractor considers the entire work ready for its intended use, ENGINEER and OWNER,
accompanied by Construction Contractor, shall conduct an inspection to determine if the
work is substantially complete. If after considering any objections of OWNER, ENGINEER
considers the work substantially complete, ENGINEER shall deliver a certificate of
Substantial Completion to OWNER and Construction Contractor.
Final Notice of Acceptability of the Work - ENGINEER shall conduct a final inspection to
determine if the completed work of Construction Contractor is acceptable so that
ENGINEER may recommend, in writing, final payment to Construction Contractor.
Accompanying the recommendation for final payment, ENGINEER shall indicate that the
work is acceptable (subject to the provisions of "Applications for Payment" paragraph
above) to the best of ENGINEER's knowledge, information and belief and based on the
extent of the services performed and furnished by ENGINEER under this Agreement.
Limitation of Responsibilities - ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions
of any Construction Contractor, or of any subcontractor, any supplier, or of any other person
or organization performing or furnishing any of the work, except for its own subcontractor
under ENGINEER's direct control. ENGINEER shall not, in the performance of its services
hereunder, supervise, direct or have control over Contractor(s) work nor shall ENGINEER
have authority over or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or
procedures of construction selected by Construction Contractor(s), for safety precautions
and programs incident to the work of Construction Contractor(s) or for any failure of
Construction Contractor(s) to comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or
orders applicable to Contractor(s) furnishing and performing their work. Accordingly,
ENGINEER shall not be responsible for Construction Contractor's failure to perform or
furnish the work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
Task 3.2. Field Services
The ENGINEER shall provide the resident project representative, specialty inspection,
material testing and field surveying to establish project base lines
Subtask 3.2.1 Resident Project Representative - The duties and responsibilities of the
Resident Project Representative are defined in Exhibit B.
Subtask 3.2.1 Specialty Inspectors and other Field Assistance - The ENGINEER shall
provide inspectors and field clerical support for the Resident Project Representative. The
ENGINEER shall make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of
construction as ENGINEER deems necessary in order to observe as an experienced and
qualified design professional the progress and quality of the various aspects of Construction
Contractor's work. In addition, ENGINEER shall provide the services of a Resident Project
Representative at the site to assist ENGINEER and to provide more continuous observations
of such work. The furnishing of such Resident Project Representative services will not
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 14
extend ENGINEER's responsibilities or authority beyond the specific limits set forth
elsewhere in this agreement. Such visits and observations by ENGINEER and the Resident
Project Representative are not intended to be exhaustive or to extend to every aspect of the
work in progress, or to involve detailed inspections of the work beyond the responsibilities
specifically assigned to ENGINEER in this Agreement and the Contract Documents, but
rather are to be limited to spot checking, selective sampling and similar methods of general
observation of the work based on ENGINEER's exercise of professional judgment as assisted
by the Resident Project Representative. Based on information obtained during such visits
and such observations, ENGINEER shall endeavor to determine in general if such work is
proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents and ENGINEER shall keep OWNER
informed of the progress of the work.
The purpose of ENGINEER's visits to and representation by the Resident Project
Representative at the site will be to enable ENGINEER to better carry out the duties and
responsibilities assigned to and undertaken by ENGINEER during the Construction Phase,
and, in addition, by the exercise of ENGINEER's efforts as an experienced and qualified
design professional, to provide for OWNER a greater degree of confidence that the
completed work of Construction Contractor will conform in general to the Contract
Documents and that the integrity of the design concept of the completed Project as a
functioning whole as indicated in the Contract Documents has been implemented and
preserved by Construction Contractor. On the other hand, ENGINEER shall not, during
such visits or as a result of such observations of Construction Contractor's work in progress,
supervise, direct or have control over Construction Contractor's work nor shall ENGINEER
have authority over or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or
procedures of construction selected by Construction Contractor, for safety precautions and
programs incident to the work of Construction Contractor or for any failure of Construction
Contractor to comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to
Construction Contractor's furnishing and performing the work. Accordingly, ENGINEER
neither guarantees the performance of any Construction Contractor nor assumes
responsibility for any Construction Contractor's failure to furnish and perform its work in
accordance with the Contract Documents.
COMPENSATION
The fees will be paid for these services in Table A-3. These fees include compensation for ail
staffing and materials called for in this Scope of Work. Hourly rates for work outside the
scope of this agreement is in Table A-4. Compensation for Optional Services will be agreed
on between the City and the Contractor before any work begins on these tasks.
SCHEDULE
/$
Exhibit A
Avr~ 13, 200~
Page 15
The schedule of deliverables is shown in Figure A-1. The Contractor with each monthly
progress report will update this schedule.
/?
Exhibit A
April 13, 2001
Page 16
Table A-3 (Revised)
Compensation
Task Estlm_ated Amount
En~rineering Report
1.1 Program Planning/Project Mgrnt $40,000
1.2 Surveys 16,000
1.3 Geotechnical Investigation 14,000
1.4.1 Engineering Report Workshop 20,000
1.4.2 Engineering Report - 50 % 30,000
1.4.3 Engineering Report - 100 % 40,000
Subtotal - Engineering Report $160,000
1.5 Support for Permittin_~ Grants and Environmental Review
1.5.1 Mixing Zone Study and Effluent Limits 6,000
Subtotal - Permitting, Grants and Environmental Review $6,000
Detailed Design
2.1 Construction Documents-Short Term Storage
2.1.1 50% Review 15,000
2.1.2 100% Completion 44,640
2.1.3 Bidding 6,000
2.1.4 Construction Support 20,000
Subtotal - Short Term Storage Design $85,640
2.2 Construction Documents for Treatment
2.2.1 30% Review 94,500
2.2.2 60% Review 81,000
2.2.3 100% Review 162,500
22..4 Bidding 8,000
Subtotal- Treatment Facility Design $346,000
SC_ADA Configuration
2.3 SCADA Configuration (Optional)
Construction Management -Treatment
3.1 General Contract Administration 165,000
3.2 Construction Observation 264,000
Subtotal- CM $429,000
Grand Total - Basic Services $1,026,640
Additional Services Budget $50,000
Table A-4 Camp Dresser & McKee inc.
Rate Schedu e Billing Rate Schedule
Effective January 1,2000
PROFESSIONAL AND SUPPORT SERVICES HOURLY RATES
Vice President/Senior Vice President $55.00 - 65.00
Principal, Associate & Engineer/Scientist Grade 7 & 8) 45.00 - 60.00
5¢rdor En~neer/Scienti~t (Grade 6) 38.00 - 48.00
Engineer/Scientist (Grade 4 & 5) 30.00 - 40.00
Construction Resident Inspector 30.00 - 38.00
Construction Resident Engineer 28.00 - 43.00
Staff En~Lneer/Scientist (Grade 2, & 3) 22.00 - 30.00
Draftsperson/Desig-ner 18.00 - 33.00
Contract Administrator 18.00 - 26.00
Technical Editor 15.00 - 26.00
Secretary/Word Processor 12.00 - 23.00
Administrative Assistant 13.00 - 25.00
Technician/Clerk 8.00- 16.00
Houriv rates will be multiplied by 3.20 for billing purposes.
7"ne above are based on reg~ular rates current at the time of execution of this Agreement. tf the
regular rates of the employee are increased during the life of this Agreement, billing and
payment will be at the increased regnlar rates for the applicable period of time.
Other Direct Costs
Other reLmbursable direct costs shall be billed at 1.1 tLmes ac~al cost to cover the cost of general
admLvLtstrative expenses and handling. These reimbursable costs incIude, but are no't ]_iznited to:
Travel: Air Fare, Auto Rental, Local Mileage ($0.325/mile)
Subsistence: Lodging and Meals
Communications: Long Distance and CeLlular Telephone, Fax, Postage, and Courier Services
Printing: Internal Reproduction ($0.08/sheet Black & White, $1.00/sheet CoIor); Outside
Printing Services
Word Processing Computer Charges at $10.00 per hour
CADD Computer Charges at $18.00 per hour
Consultant and Subcontracted Services
Equipment Rental
APPROVED:~~~ ~'~'~",-~
~'x_,/Paul Meyerhof~I
Senior Vice Pre,:tent ~
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee W:\PROJECTS~IATES00A.0OC
Figure A-1 Pine Road CSO Reduction Progress Schedule
I~1 12oo2
Task Name May I J.n I Ju~ I ^u~ I Sap I Oct I Nov I Dec Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr I Ma)' I Jun I Jul I Aup I Sap I Oa I Nov I Dec Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr I May
Task 1 Engineering Report
,~[i il illl] [11 llll i]] ii H ii ii]1 ir i[i ii iii illlll illllill iji ] [1111 i1{ ~1111 iii illll iliilllll{llllll i]i ~lllll illlll iii p~l~
1 ~3 Geotachnical Investigation
,.,,ns,..,ng R,.e. 100%
1.4.1 Engineering Report Workshop ~ %
1.4.3 Engineering Roped - 100 % ~
,.5 Support tot Parmit~in§, Grants and Envtronmentsl Review I~ ~ ~ 100%
Task 2 DETAILED DESIGN ~
77%
2.1 Construction Documonts. Short Term Storage ~ ~ 100~
2.1.3 Bidding/
¢,. 2.1.4 Construction Support ~100%
_,~ 2.2 Construction Documents for Treatment
,~ 107%
2.2.1 30% Review ' i~"T0~
2.2.2 60% Review~
2.2,4 Bidding
2.3 SCADA Configuration
2.31 Mobilization i i '~ i ~ 0%
2.3.3 Factory Test
2.3.4 Field Installation
23.5 Final Acceptance
0%
Task 3 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-Treatment
3.1 General Contract Administratio~
3.2 FIELD SERVICES
Resident Project Representative ,///.~/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////~/////////////~ N°/
Inspectors
6/25/01 Page 1
EXHIBIT B TO SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1
BETWEEN
CITY OF BREMERTON AND CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE, INC.
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DURING
BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION
DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY
OF THE RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE
This is an Exhibit attached to, made a part of and incorporated by reference with the Supplemental Agreement No. 1
made on , 2001 between CITY OF BREMERTON (OWNER) and CAMP DRESSER &
MCKEE, Inc. (ENGINEER) providing for professional engineering services.
ENGINEER shall furnish a Residem Project Representative ("RPR"), assistants and other field staff to assist
ENGINEER in observing progress and quality of the work of Contractor.
Through more extensive on-site observations of the work in progress and field checks of materials and equipmem by
the RPR and assistants, ENGINEER shall endeavor to provide further protection for OWNER against defects and
deficiencies in the work of Contractor. However, ENGINEER shall not, during such visits or as a result of such
observations of Contractor's work in progress, supervise, direct, or have control over Contractor's work nor shall
ENGINEER have authority over or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures
selected by Contractor, for safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor, for any failure of
Contractor to comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to Contractor's performing
and furnishing the work, or responsibility of construction for Contractor's failure to furnish and perform the Work in
accordance with the Contract Documents.
The duties and responsibilities of the RPR are limited to those of ENGINEER in ENGINEER's agreement with the
OWNER and in the construction Contract Documents, and are further limited and described as follows:
A. General
RPR is ENGINEER's agent at the site, will act as directed by and under the supervision of ENGINEER, and will
confer with ENGINEER regarding RPR's actions. RPR's dealings in matters pertaining to the on-site work shall in
general be with ENGINEER and Contractor, keeping OWNER advised as necessary. RPR's dealings with
subcontractors shall only be through or with the full knowledge and approval of Contractor. RPR shall generally
communicate with OWNER with the knowledge of and under the direction of ENGINEER.
B. Duties and Responsibilities of RPR
1. Schedules: Review the progress schedule, schedule of Shop Drawing submittals and schedule of values
prepared by Contractor and consult with ENGINEER concerning acceptability.
2. Conferences and Meetings: Attend meetings with Contractor, such as preconstruction conferences,
progress meetings, job conferences and other project-related meetings, and prepare and circulate copies of
minutes thereof.
Page 1
ExhibitA- 1 6/2001
3. Liaison:
a. Serve as ENGINEER's liaison with Contractor, working principally through Contractor's superinten-
dent and assist in understanding the intent of Contract Documents; and assist ENGINEER in serving
as OWNER's liaison with Contractor when Contractor's operations affect OWNER's on-site operations.
b. Assist in obtaining from OWNER additional details or information, when required for proper
execution of the Work
4. Shop Drawings and Samples:
a. Record date of receipt of Shop Drawings and Samples.
b. Receive Samples which are furnished at the site by Contractor, and notify ENGINEER of availability
of Samples for examination.
c. Advise ENGINEER and Contractor of the commencement of any Work requiring a Shop Drawing or
Sample if the submittal has not been approved by ENGINEER.
5. Review of Work, Rejection of Defective Work, Inspections and Tests:
a. Conduct on-site observations of the Work in progress to assist ENGINEER in determining if the Work
is in general proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents.
b. Report to ENGINEER whenever RPR believes that any Work will not produce a completed Project
that conforms generally to the Contract Documems or will prejudice the integrity of the design concept
of the completed Project as a functioning whole as indicated in the Contract Documents, or has been
damaged, or does not meet the requirements of any inspection, test or approval required to be made;
and advise ENGINEER of Work that RPR believes should be corrected or rejected or should be
uncovered for observation,, or requires special testing, inspection or approval.
c. Verify that tests, equipment and systems start-ups and operating and maintenance training are
conducted in the presence of appropriate personnel, and that Contractor maintains adequate records
thereof; and observe, record and report to ENGINEER appropriate details relative to the test
procedures and start-ups.
d. Accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other agencies having jurisdiction over the
Project, record the results of these inspections and report to ENGINEER.
6. Interpretation of Contract Documents: Report to ENGINEER when clarifications and interpretations of the
Contract Documems are needed and transmit to Conlxactor clarifications and interpretations as issued by
ENGINEER.
7. Modifications: Consider and evaluate Contractor's suggestions for modifications in Drawings or
Specifications and report with RPR's recommendations to ENGINEER. Transmit to Contractor in wriling
decisions as issued by ENGINEER.
Page 2
ExhibitA-16/2001 hq
8. Records:
a. Maintain at the job site orderly files for correspondence, reports of job conferences, Shop Drawings
and Samples, reproductions of original Contract Documents including all Work Change, Addenda,
Change Orders, Field Orders, additional Drawings issued subsequent to the execution of the Contract,
ENGINEER's clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents, progress reports, Shop
Drawing submittals received from and delivered to Contractor and other Project related documents.
b. Prepare a daily report or keep a diary or log book, recording Contractor's hours on the job site, weather
conditions, data relative to questions of Work Change Directives, Change Orders or changed
conditions, list of job site visitors, daily activities, decisions, observations in general, and specific
observations in more detail as in the case of observing test procedures; and send copies to ENGINEER.
c. Record names, addresses and telephone numbers of all Contractors, subcontractors and major suppliers
of materials and equipment.
9. Reports:
a. Furnish to ENGINEER periodic reports as required of progress of the Work and of Contractor's
compliance with the progress schedule and schedule of Shop Drawing and Sample submittals.
b. Consult with ENGINEER in advance of scheduled major tests, inspections or start of important phases
of the Work.
c. Draft proposed Change Orders and Work Change Directives, obtaining backup material from
Contractor and recommend to ENGINEER Change Orders, Work Change Directives, and Field
Orders.
d. Report immediately to ENGINEER and OWNER the occurrence of any accident.
10. Payment Requests: Review Applications for Payment with Contractor for compliance with the established
procedure for their submission and forward with recommendations to ENGINEER, noting particularly the
relationship of the payment requested to the schedule of values, Work completed and materials and
equipment delivered at the site but not incorporated in the Work.
11. Certificates, Maintenance and Operation Manuals: During the course of the Work, verify that certificates,
maintenance and operation manuals and other data required to be assembled and famished by Contractor
are applicable to the items actually installed and in accordance with the Contract Documents, and have this
material delivered to ENGINEER for review and forwarding to OWNER prior to final payment for the
Work.
12. Completion:
a. Before ENGINEER issues a Certificate of Substantial Completion, submit to Contractor a list of
observed items requiring completion or correction.
b. Observe whether Contractor has had performed inspections required by laws, rules, regulations,
ordinances, codes, or orders applicable to the work, including but not limited to those to be performed
by public agencies having jurisdiction over the work.
c. Conduct a final inspection in the company of ENGINEER, OWNER and Contractor and prepare a final
list of items to be completed or corrected.
Page 3
Exhibit A- 1 6/2001
d. Observe whether all items on final list have been completed or corrected and make recommendations
to ENGINEER concerning acceptance and issuance of the Notice of Acceptability of the Work.
C. Limitations of Authority by RPR
Resident Project Representative:
1. Shall not authorize any deviation from the Contract Documents or substitution of materials or equipment
(including "or-equal" items), unless authorized by ENGINEER_
2. Shall not exceed limitations of ENGINEER's authority as set forth in the Agreement or the Contract
Documents.
3. Shall not undertake any of the responsibilities of Contractor, Subcontractors, Suppliers, or Contractor's
superintendent.
4. Shall not advise on, issue directions relative to or assume control over any aspect of the means, methods,
techniques, sequences or procedures of construction unless such advice or directions are specifically
required by the Contract Documents.
5. Shall not advise on, issue directions regarding or assume control over safety precautions and programs in
connection with the Work.
6. Shall not accept Shop Drawing or Sample submittals from anyone other than Contractor.
7. Shall not authorize OWNER to occupy the Project in whole or in part
8. Shall not participate in specialized field or laboratory tests or inspections conducted by others except as
specifically authorized by ENGINEEIL
Page 4
ExhibitA-1 6/2001
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: Resoldtion - Authorizing FOR AGENDA OF: July 2. , 2001
Application for Funding Assistance to the ORIGINATING DEPT: Parks & Recreation
Interagency for Outdoor Recreation for ORIGINATOR: J. Wroblewski, Acting Director
Acquisition of Park Property DATE SUBMITTED: June 27, 2001
2. CLEARANCES: (-~ 3. EXHIBITS:
(Comment on back ifnecessa~
Treasurer:" .., ~_.~, * 1AC Grant Application
Fiscal & Budget Committee:
Operations Committee: 7 - -
ENDORSEMENT /~ INFORMATION
__ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT F_~R SUBMITTAL:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
Kitsap Transit, Washington State Ferries and the City have collaborated to build a new Transportation Center
connecting passengers with various forms of transportation. Additionally the City of Bremerton has embarked upon
a downtown master plan process that envisions a pedestrian oriented landscape. Open space is a critical component
in achieving this vision.
This project will acquire 4 lots, located opposite the Bremerton Transportation Center, needed to build on this
vision. This entryway into Bremerton will be an attractive open space, acting as a respite f~om the asphalt and hard
urban core of the city, inviting visitors and community members to sit and spend a quiet moment.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to adopt Resolution No. ~)-~ [ q , authorizing the application for funding assistance to the
Imeragency for Outdoor Recreation for acquisition of park property.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: JoAnne Wroblewski
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: JoAnne Wroblewski
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED~
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL #:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION (continued):
5. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
The City will not qualify for current grant opportunities.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS: FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER
RESOURCES:
Addition of a small park in the area will not impact the Parks & Recreation Department's maintenance
and operations budget significantly.
7. RESEAR,CI!, SOURCES:
RESOLUTION# ~ ~1 c~,
Organization Name City of Bremerton Resolution No . ~ ~, \ q
Project Name(s): Portal Park
A resolution authorizing application for funding assistance for a Washington Wildlife and Recreation
Program (WWRP) project to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation (IAC) as provided in
Chapter 79A. 15 RCW, Acquisition of Habitat Conservation and Outdoor Recreation Lands.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has approved a comprehensive plan that includes this project area;
and
WHEREAS, under the provisions of WWRP, state funding assistance is requested to aid in financing
the cost of land acquisition and/or facility development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton considers it in the best public interest to complete the land
acquisition, and/or development project desen'bed in the application;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that:
1. The Mayor of Bremerton be authorized to make formal application to IAC for fianding assistance;
2. Any fund assistance received be used for implementation of the project referenced above;
3. The City of Bremerton hereby certifies that its share ofproject fimding is committed and will be
derived from City Park Capital Funds and Real Estate Excise Tax Fund.
4. We acknowledge that we are respons~le for supporting all non-cash commitments to the sponsor
share should they not materjaliTe;
5. We acknowledge that any property acquired or facility developed with IAC financial aid must be
placed in use as an outdoor recreation facility and be retained in such use in perpetuity unless
otherwise provided and agreed to by our organization and IAC;
6. This resolution becomes part of a formal application to IAC; and
7. We provided appropriate opportunity for public comment on this application.
This resolution was adopted by our organization during the meeting held:
Location: City Council Chambers, 239 - 4"' Street, Bremerton, WA 98337 Date:
Signed and approved by the following authorized representative:
Signed
Title Bremerton City_ Council Date
RESOLUTION # ~ ~/' ~
Organi?mionName City_ of Bremerton Resolution No. ~g/~
Project Name(s): Portal Park
A resolution authorizing application for funding assistance for a Washington Wildlife and Recreation
Program (WWRP) project to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation (LAC) as provided in
Chapter 79A. 15 RCW, Acquisition of Habitat Conservation and Outdoor Recreation Lands.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has approved a comprehensive plan that includes this project area;
WHEREAS, under the provisions of WWRP, state funding assistance is requested to aid in financing
the cost of land acqttisition and/or facility development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton considers it in the best public interest to complete the land
acquisition, and/or development project descn'bed in the application;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that:
1. The Mayor of Bremerton be authorized to make formal application to IAC for funding assistance;
2. Any fund assistance received be used for implementation of the project referenced above;
3. The City of Bremerton hereby certifies that its share ofproject funding is committed and will be
derived fi:om City Park Capital Funds and Real Estate Excise Tax Fund.
4. We acknowledge that we are responsible for supporting all non-cash commitments to the sponsor
share should they not materialize;
5. We acknowledge that any property acquired or facility developed with IAC financial aid must be
placed in use as an outdoor recreation facility and be retained in such use in perpetu/ty unless
otherwise provided and agreed to by our organization and IAC;
6. This resolution becomes part ora formal application to IAC; and
7. We provided appropriate oppommity for public comment on this application.
This resolution was adopted by our organization during the meeting held:
Location: CiW Council Chambers, 239 - 4t~ Street, Bremertom WA 98337 Date:
Signed and approved by the following authorized representative:
Signed
Title Bremerton City Council Date
~ inreragqncy
.i Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program
t ' .IOUlIJUlJHi iiiECRE[tTiON Local Parks Category
Application Project Summary
TITLE: Portal Park NUMBER: 01-1173A (Acquisition)
STATUS: Application Submitted
APPLICANT: Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept CONTACT: Jodi Wroblewski
(360) 478-5305
COSTS: SPONSOR MATCH:
lAC $275,000 46 % Appropriation \ Cash $326,560
Local $326,560 54 %
Total $601,560 '160 %
DESCRIPTION:
Kitsap Transit, Washington State Ferries and the City have collaborated to build a new Transportation Center
connecting passengers with vadous forms of transportation. Additionally, the City of Bremerton has embarked upon
a downtown master plan process that envisions a pedestrian oriented landscape. Open space is a critical component
in achieving this vision.
This project will acquire 4 lots, located opposite the Bremerton Transportation Center, needed to build on this vision.
This entryway into Bremerton will be an attractive open space, acting as a respite from the asphalt and hard urban
core of the city, inviting visitors and community members to sit and spend a quiet moment.
LOCATION INFORMATION: downtown Bremerton
COUNTY: Kitsap
SCOPE (ELEMENTS):
Allowable land costs Incidentals
PERMITS ANTICIPATED:
Building Permit Shoreline Permit
LAND CHARACTERISTICS:
ANTICIPATED Existing Acres Acres Acres
ACREAGE TYPE Acres To Acq To Dev To Renov Total
Uplands .16 .16
LAND COMMENTS:
The four lots are located in the Central Business District of Bremerton. They currently house a fast food business, a
tavern and two other small businesses. They are on the opposite corner from the Kitsap Transportation Center and
FerrY holding area.
May 7, 2001 I DATE PRINTED: May 7,
LAST
UPDATED:
2001
1APSUM1.RPT 3[
Portal Park
Acquisition Cost Details
Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept
Portal Park
Detailed Property Information
Property Name: Portal Park Lot 21
Acreage Purchased: 0.02
Date to be Acquired: 12/1/03
Value Determination: Estimate of Value
Purchase Type: Fee ownership
Acquistion Cost Estimate for Portal Park Lot 21 Property
Allowable land costs
Land 291,000.00
Sub-Total 291,000,00
Incidentals
Appraisal and review 1,200.00
Closing 1,000.00
Recording fees 20.00
Title reports/insurance 300.00
Sub-Total 2,520.00
293,520.00
1AFCOSTD.RPT May 7, 2001 ~)~i~ Page: 1
Comrni~ree J~r
RECREliTION Acquisition Cost Details
Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept
Portal Park
Detailed Property Information
Property Name: Portal Park Lot 22
Acreage Purchased: 0.07
Date to be Acquired: 12/1/03
Value Determination: Estimate of Value
Purchase Type: Fee ownership
Acquistion Cost Estimate for Portal Park Lot 22 Property
Allowable land costs
Land 124,500.00
Sub-Total 124,500.00
Incidentals
Appraisal and review 1,200.00
Closing 1,000.00
Recording fees 20.00
Title reports/insurance 300.00
Sub-Total 2,520.00
127,020.00
Imeragen~7
OUTDOOR
RECRERTION Acquisition Cost Details
Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept
Portal Park
Detailed Property Information
Property Name: Portal Park Lots 19 & 20
Acreage Purchased: 0.07
Date to be Acquired: 12/1/03
Value Determination: Estimate of Value
Purchase Type: Fee ownership
Acquistion Cost Estimate for Portal Park Lots 19 & 20 Property
Allowable land costs
Land 178,500.00
:_~ Sub-Total 178,500.00
Incidentals
Appraisal and review 1,200.00
Closing 1,000.00
Recording fees 20.00
Title reports/insurance 300.00
Sub-Total 2,520.00
181,020.00
1AFCOSTD.RPT May 7, 2001 3~ Page: 3
~/ ~ Inte~ ag.ency
co==~.,Or Acquisition Cost Summary
OUTDOOR
I IRECRERTION
Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept 01-1173 A
Portal Park WWRP - Local Parks
Summary Property Information
Acres to Cost Acq
Property Name be Acq Estimate Date Value Determination Purchase Type
Portal Park Lot 21 0.02 293,520.00 12/01/03 Estimate of Value Fee ownership
Portal Park Lot 22 0.07 127,020,00 12/01/03 Estimate of Value Fee ownership
Portal Park Lots 19 & 20 0.07 181,020,00 12101/03 Estimate of Value Fee ownership
Total 0.16 601,560.00
Summary Cost Information for all Properties
Allowable land costs
Land 594,000.00
Sub-Total 594,000
Incidentals
Appraisal and review 3,600.00
Closing 3,000.00
Recording fees 60.00
Title reports/insurance 900.00
Sub-Total 7,560
Property Totals 601,560
0
Total Acquisition Cost Estimate 601,560
1AFCOSTS.RPT May 7.~2~.~ 1 01-1173 A
Description and Funding Information
Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept 01-1173 A
Portal Park WWRP -Local Parks
Description of Project
Kitsap Transit, Washington State Ferries and the City have collaborated to build a new Transportation Center connecting
passengers with various forms of transportation. Additionally, the City of Bremerton has embarked upon a downtown
master p{an process that envisions a pedestrian oriented landscape. Open space is a critical component in achieving
this vision.
This project will acquire 4 lots, located opposite the Bremerton Transportation Center, needed to build on this vision.
This entryway into Bremerton will be an attractive open space, acting as a respite from the asphalt and hard urban core
of the city, inviting visitors and community members to sit and spend a quiet moment.
Driving Directions
As you disembark the Bremerton Ferry, you will pass the property (200 1st Street) that houses the fast food business
and two other small businesses on the corner of 1st street and Washington Street. The other property, 204 1st Street
(tavern) is next door on 1st Street.
lAC Program Request
WWRP - Local Parks 275,000.00
Applicant Participation Amount
Appropriation \ Cash 326,560.00
Total for Applicant 326,560.00
lAC and Applicant Amount 601,560.00
Project Cost Estimate
Acquistion Cost Estimate 601,560.00
Development Cost Estimate 0.00
Project Total 601,560.00
1AFDESC.RPT May 7, 2001 01-1173 A
Interagmcy
Commirtie )3r
OUTJ]OOR Applicant Information
RECRERTION
Bremerton Parks & Rec Oept 01-1173 A
Portal Park WWRP - Local Parks
Organization Information
Name: Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept
Type: City-Parks Department
Organization Address: Biiling Address:
Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept
680 Lebo Bird 680 Lebo Bird
':': Bremerton, WA 98310 Bremerton, WA 98310
i~ Phone Numbers: Internet Address:
· Phone - work jwroblewki@ci.bremerton.wa.gov
Fax - work (360) 478-5882
Applicant Contact Information
Name: Contact Type:
" Ms. Jodi Wroblewski Project Manager
Assistant Director
Business Address: Second Address:
680 Lebo Blvd.
Bremerton, WA 98310
Phone Number:
F. ax - work (360) 478-5882
Phone - work (360) 478-5305
Internet Address:
jwroblewski@ci.brem erton.wa.us
1AFAPPIN.RPT May 7, 2001 01-1173 A
.~nteragency
]]£g][I]ll01{ Project Worksite Information
Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept 01-1173 A
Portal Park WWRP - Local Parks
Driving Directions
As you disembark the Bremerton Ferry, you will pass the property (200 1st Street) that houses the fast food
business and two other small businesses on the corner of 1st street and Washington Street. The other
property, 204 1st Street (tavern) is next door on 1st Street.
General Area of Project
downtown Bremerton
Current Landowners
1. McDonalds Bremerton Express, 10605 NE 68th Ste 200, Kirkland, WA 98033
2. Block Marion, 2565 Dexter Ave N ¢#t02, Seattle, WA 98109
3. Maeda Edwin, c/o EM International, 1542 Young St, Ste. 207, Honolulu, HI 96826
Worksite: #1 - Lot 21
Description: acquire Lot 21 in downtown Bremerton, at 1st Street and Washington Ave
Landowner Type: Private
Coordinates: (Lat) 47 33 48 (Long) -122 37 32
Geographic Areas:
County Kitsap
Cong District 06
Leg District 26
City Bremerton
Recreation/Habitat Areas:
Water:
Main Stream: River Mile:
WaterbodyAKA: LLID:
Stream#:
1AFSITE.RPT May 7, 2001 01-1173 A
Interagency
Cornr~ itrle J~r
01~00R Land Characteristics
R£CRERTIOH
Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept 01-1173 A
Portal Park V~NRP -Local Parks
Project Acreage Type Exisiting Acres to Acres to be Acres to be Total
'Acres be Acq Dev Renov Acres
Uplands 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.16
Total: 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.16
Land Comments
The four lots are located in the~Central Business District of Bremerton. They currently house a fast food business, a
tavern and two other small businesses. They are on the opposite corner from the Kitsap Transportation Center and
Ferry holding area.
Trail Information
Trail Miles Trail Miles to be Acq Trail Miles to be Dev Trail Miles to be Renov
Trail Miles 0.00 0.00 0.00
IA'CLAND.RPT May 7, 2001 01-1173 A
Committee
~[[~E~II[II{ Miscellaneous Information
Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept 01-1173 A
Portal Park WWRP - Local Parks
Permits Required
Building Permit
1AFMISC.RPT May 7, 2001 01-1173 A
~rnteragency
Cornmime fbr
I]~l[l~ Application Questionnaire
RECRERTION
Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept 01-1173 A
Portal Park WWRP - Local Parks
1 of 20 Who will be responsible foradministration, design, and/orimplementation ofthisproject (i.e.
in-house staff, paid consultants, contractors, volunteers, other agency staff,, etc.)? Explain:
City staff, paid consultants, contractors.
2 of 20 What type of landowner currently owns the property? Federal, Local, Private, State or Tribal
Private
3 of 20 Does the applicant have title to the site? If yes, explain:
No
4 of 20 Does the applicant hold a lease, easement, or legal use agreement on the site that permits the
proposed use? ff yes, when will it expire? Explain.
No
5 of 20 Is there, or will there be, any significant public access or use restrictions? If yes, explain:
No
6 of 20 Is the work site(s) located within a park, wildlife refuge, natural area preserve, or other recreation or
habitat site? If yes, name the area.
No
7 of 20 /s the work site on a stream and/or other waterbody?/lyes, name the stream and/or waterbody. /f
the stream is a tributary of a larger stream, a/so name the larger stream. If you know the fiver mi/e,
list it here.
No
8 of 20 What are the geographic coordinates of the work site(s) [in degrees, minutes and seconds].
Describe where and how they were taken. /f you do not have them, you may leave this question
blank.
(Blank) .
9 of 20 What is the township/range/section of the work site(s)? [If you do not have them, you may leave this
question blank]
(Blank)
10 of 20 In what county(s) is the work site(s) located? In what city, if applicable?
Kitsap County
City of Bremerton
11 of 20 Does this application contain state, federal or other grants as part of the "sponsor match'? If "yes",
name the grant(s) and the date grant will be available.
No
12 of 20 Government agency applicants only: Does this application contain elements required as part of a
mitigation plan? If yes, explain:
No
13 of 20 Local agencies only. Does the sponsor's share involve bonds or Local Improvement District(s) (LIDs)? If yes, give date bonds or LID will be available and explain.
2oo A
Commit~e dBr
~EI~,~i{ Application Questionnaire
Bremerton Parks & Rec Dept 01-'1173 A
Portal Park WWRP -Local Parks
14 of 20 Has this project been submitted to lAC before and not funded? If yes, what lAC project number was
assigned?
No
15 of 20 Has the applicant requested and/or received a "waiver of retroactivity" from the/AC for the property
in question? frye& what was the date requested, approved date & the waiver number?
No
16 of 20 Do plans exist for interim non-public use of the project site? If yes, explain the interim non-public use
and whether or not income will be derived through that use:
No
:'i
" 17 of 20 Are encumbrances to recreational use proposed for the site (i.e. lease back; life estate;
sharecropping agreement; or other)? If yes, explain:
No
18 of 20 Does the applicant hold an option agreement on the property? If yes, what date will it expire?
No
19 of 20 Will this acquisition project cause the displacement of individuals, families, businesses, or farms ? If
yes, explain:
Yes. Two businesses (a fast food restaurant and a travern) currently exist on these properties.
20 of 20 Will clean-up of hazardous materials be required? (See lAC Manual 3, Acquiring Land).
No
1AFAPPQU.RPT May 7, 2001 01-1173 A
L oq4~ oo '~
3 00~00 3
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: FOR AGENDA OF: July 2,2001
Resolution No. ~O ORIGINATING DEPT: Executive
Supporting Application to Public ORIGINATOR: Lynn Horton
Facilities District for Conference Center ATE SUBMITTED: June 28 2001
2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back 3. EXHIBITS if necessary)
Resolution
ENDORSEMENT___~ INFORMATION__ APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESjLDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The Kitsap Public Facilities District is taking applications for projects
to construct or rehabilitate convention, conference or special event
facilities in Kitsap County. The capital project funding would come from a
partial refund of the state's portion of local sales tax, without
increasing local taxes.
The requirements are that it must be a regional center; government
investment including the PFD funding must be at least $10 million dollars;
the local match of cash, land or in-kind contributions must equal one-
third of the funding to be provided by the PFD (or $2.5 million for
government entities.)
The City of Bremerton proposal is to build a conference center on the
Bremerton waterfront and include public and private partnerships.
8. RECOMMENDATION.: ~/~o~/e '-{'o C~.O~fr~- f~M_.50 ~o~ ~, 'Z~ ~ O ~~,~"
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTIONB
PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED E
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL NO:__Ol--iqq.
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS (cont.):
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT (cont.):
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
We will not apply for PFD funding and loose the opportunity to develop the
waterfront through the PFD process.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES
City contribution to project.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION authorizing application to the Public
Facilities District for funding for construction of a regional
conference center.
WHEREAS, a percentage of local sales tax revenues are currently available to the Kitsap
Public Facilities District (PFD) for construction or rehabilitation of convention, conference or
special event facilities in Kitsap County. This capital project funding would come l~om a partial
refund of the state's portion of local sales tax, without increasing local taxes.
WHEREAS, the PFD Board is requesting proposals from interested parties for
convention, conference or special event facilities that may be eligible for funding.
WHEREAS, the criteria for application require that it must be a "regional Center'
designated to serve a regional population; government investment, including PFD funding, must
be at least $10 million; public or private sources must provide a local match of cash, land, or in-
kind contributions equal to at least one-third of the funding to be provided by the PFD ($2.5
million for local governments); and the project must be able to commence construction by
January 1, 2003.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the City Council of the City of Bremerton
supports the application to the Public Facilities District for a conference/convention site to be
located on city owned property located on the Bremerton waterfront adjacent to the Bremerton
Transportation Center. Further, the council supports public and private partnerships as a part of
this application.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this day of
., 2001.
JOHN LAW, Council President
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. FOR AGENDA OF: July 11,2001
ORIGINATING DEPT: ---'~ ~'~a'~'~'~
Amending BMC 15.06 Setting Utility Assessments, Fees ORIGINATOR: ' Rich.Handbag'-c-/'"--
and Charges Effective Jan. 1, 2002. DATE SUBMITTED: Nov. 28, 2d00
2. CLEARANCES: /C.o~/~f ~b~ackif necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
Dir. Public Works ~' ' ~'~_~- Proposed Ordinance
j~/Clty Attorney ~- ,, ~
Fiscal&Budget
Operations ~ ~
ENDORSEMENTS ~ INFORMATION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT~R SUBMI~..,~AL:
MAYORL,--.~~-.~ ~- ~ COUNCIL PRESIDE~ .~'"~.
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FoR COUNCIL ACTID'-N~':
The proposed ordinance will allow the City's utility assessments, fees and charges to be adjusted to compensate for
the effects of inflation. This adjustment, which will increase water rate revenue by 5% and wastewater rate revenue
by 3% will take effect January 1, 2002. These adjustments are necessary to allow the utilities to meet the costs of
operations & maintenance and to implement the capital improvements which are mandated to meet environmental
and water quality regulations.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to approve on first reading the ordinance adjusting utility assessments, fees and charges.
Motion to pass on second reading Ordinance No. __ adjusting utility assessments, fees and charges.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Treasurer
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor
EXPIRATION DATE: N/A
REVIEW DATE: N/A
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
11. AGENDA BILL "O:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Current water and wastewater rates will remain in effect. This will result in a shortage of revenues to the utilities.
6., IMPACT. ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
Included in the 2001 - 2002 budget.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Capital Improvement Plan and utility comprehensive plans. Rate analysis by staff.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE amending assessments, rates, fees and charges for
municipal water, wastewater and stormwater services and amending
Chapter 15.06 of the Bremerton Municipal Code and Ordinance 4675.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Amendment. Section 15.06.015 is hereby amended to read as follows:
15.06.015 INCORPORATION AND CPI ADJUSTMENT.
Assessments, rates, fees and charges attached hereto as Appendix A and incorporated
herein by this reference are hereby adopted.
In addition to such other changes as may be approved by City Council, commencing
January 1, 2003 and in January of each successive year thereafter, the fees, rates and charges
in this section shall automatically be adjusted based upon the Consumer Pdce Index for all
Urban Consumers (CPI-U), U.S. City Average, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
for the year ending June 30 of the previous year.
Section 2. Amendment. Section 15.06.040 is hereby amended to read as follows:
'15.06.040 RATES - WASTEWATER.
(a) Retail Wastewater Rates. A general retail wastewater rate shall be assessed of
all users of the Utility wastewater system. The retail rate shall be calculated on a periodic billing
with a minimum service charge ba==d cn re=t=: °~"e and a commodity charge computed to the
nearest HCF.
The retail rate shall be based on flow and strength of sewage discharged by the user of
the system.
Flow shall be determined by the metered amount of domestic water usage.
Flows for summer usage for Single Family and Duplex residential customers shall be
determined based on the previous six-month average winter domestic water usage by the
customer, provided the account was active for at least two billing periods of the preceding six
months. The calculation period shall be determined by the Department based on usage and
billing cycles. In no case shall this calculation for summer usa.qe result in a volume less than
2.5 HCF per month.
In the event the customer is not connected to a public water supply that utilizes domestic
water meter, the flow shall be determined by the Department based on the average flow of the
like customer class.
Strength shall be determined by the loadings discharged by the customer and shall be
segregated into like customer classes based on their respective sewage strengths.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton on the day of
,20
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton on the day of
,20
Rates - Wastewater.ord
Page I
5"o
JOHN LAW, Council President
APPROVED this day of ,20
LYNN S. HORTON, Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
Rates - Wastewater. ord
Page 2
Chapter 15.06
Appendix A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within City Limits Outside,City Limits
2001 2002 2001 2002
GENERAL FACILITY FEES
Water (Per ERLO $195.00 $205.00 $292.50 $310.00
Wastewater (Per ERU) $195.00 $205.00 $292.50 $310.00
FRONT FOOTAGE FEES
Water
Per Front Foot $10.50 $11.05 $15.75 $16.55
Off Road Rate $520.00 $545.00 $780.00 $820.00
Wastewater
Per Front Foot $10.50 $11.05 $15.75 $16.55
Off Road Rate $520.00 $545.00 $780.00 $820.00
Properties not included in ULID//327 $68.15 $71.55
Fronting the Sewer main in Northlake Way.
Installed as part of the Kitsap Lake Sewer Extension Project.
CONNECTIONfINSPECTION FEES
Water
3/4" $830.00 $985.00 $1,245.00 $1,477.50
1" $890.00 $1,045.00 $1,335.00 $1,567.00
1 1/2" $1,600.00 $1,755.00 $2,400.00 $2,632.00
2" $1,800.00 $1,955.00 $2,700.00 $2,932.00
Greater than 2" Actual Time 8: Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials
Field Inspection Fees
Water main extensions (Per Foot) $0.75 $0.80 $1.125 $1.18
But not less than: $300.00 $315.00 $450.00 $472.50
Pump Station $500.00 $525.00 $750.00 $787.50
Miscellaneous (Per Hour) $40.00 $42.00 $60.00 $63.00
Wastewater
Lateral Connection at P/L $40.00 $42.00 $60.00 $63.00
Lateral Connection at Main $250.00 $262.50 $375.00 $393.75
Conveyance Facility Ext. (Per Foot) $1.25 $1.30 $1.90 $2.00
But Not Less Than: $300.00 $315.00 $450.00 $472.50
Pump Station $500.00 $525.00 $750.00 $787.50
Utility Plant Inspection $40.00 $42.00 $60.00 $63.00
(Sewer Cap)
Miscellaneous (Per Hour) $40.00 $42.00 $60.00 $63.00
Chapter 15.06
Appendix A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within Cit~ Limits Outside City Limits
2001 2002 2001 2002
RETAIL WATER SERVICE RATES
General Service - Monthly Service Charge
Meter Size
5/8 x 3/4 inches $3.50 $4.05 $5.25 $6.05
1 inch $4.00 $4.60 $6.00 $6.90
1 1/2 inch $5.70 $6.55 $8.55 $9.85
2 inch $7.65 $8.80 $11.50 $13.25
3 inch $14.50 $16.70 $21.75 $25.00
4 inch $27.05 $31.10 $40.60 $46.70
6 inch $95.90 $110.30 $143.85 $165.45
8 inch $350.10 $402.60 $525.15 $603.90
10 inch $1,249.90 $1,437.40 $1,874.85 $2,156.10
12 inch $4,700.00 $5,405.00 $7,050.00 $8,107.50
' Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $0.75 $0.75 $1.125 $1.125
Fire Protection - Monthly Service Charge
Service Size
2 inch $13.55 $15.60 $20.35 $23.40
3 inch $14.95 $17.20 $22.45 $25.80
4 inch $16.30 $18.75 $24.45 $28.10
6 inch $20.35 $23.40 $30.55 $35.15
8 inch $27.10 $31.15 $40.65 $46.75
10 inch $38.00 $43.70 $57.00 $65.55
12 inch $54.30 $62.45 $81.45 $93.65
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $1.50 $2.25
- For Useage Other Than Firefighting
Low4ncome Senior and Low-Income Disabled Citizen Rates - Monthly Service Charge Meter Size 5/8 x 3/4"
Base Charge (Per .account) $3.50 $4.05 $5.25 $6.05
Commodity Charge
0 - 10 HCF/Billing No charge No charge No charge No charge
Over 10 HCF/Billing (Per HCF) $0.75 0.75 $1.125 $ 1.125
2
Chapter 15.06
Appendix A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2001 2002.. 20,0x. 2092
Temporary/Construction Meter
1" Meter
Deposit $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00
Base Fee (Per Month) $35.30 $4.60 $52.95 $6.90
Set Up Fee $40.00 - $60.00
Hydrant meter
Deposit $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00
Base Fee (Per Month) $70.60 $14.50 $105.90 $21.75
Set Up Fee - $40.00 $60.00
Equipment Loss/Damage Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $0.75 $0.75 $1.125 $1.125
RETAIL WASTEWATER SERVICE RATES
Monthly Service Charge
Single Family
Base Charge (per Account) $9.00 $10.45 $10.35 $12.00
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $3.70 $3.60 $4.25 $4.15
Duplex on 1 Meter or 2 Bldgs.
On 1 Meter
Base Charge (per Unit) $7.15 $8.30 $8.20 $9.55
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $3.70 $3.60 $4.25 $4.15
Multiple Family
Base Charge (Per Unit) $7.15 $8.30 $8.20 $9.55
Commodity Charge (Per HCF) $3.70 $3.60 $4.25 $4.15
Commercial I
Base Charge (Per Account) $10.35 $12.00 $11.90 $13.80
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $3.70 $3.70 $4.25 $4.25
Commercial II
Base Charge (per Account) $10.50 $12.20 $12.05 $14.05
commodity Charge (Per HCF) $5.80 $5.80 $6.67 $6.67
Low-Income Senior and Low-Income Disabled Citizen Rates - Monthly Service Charge
Base Charge (Per Account) $3.20 $6.50 $3.70 $7.50
Commodity Charge (Per HCF)
0 - 5 HCF/Month No charge No charge No charge No charge
Over 5 HCF/Month $ 3.70 $3.60 $4.25 $4.15
Septa~e Dimosal
(Per Gallon of Tank Capacity) $0.13 $0.13 $0.13 $0.13
Chapter 15.06
Appendix A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
200~ 2002 2001 200~
RETAIL STORMWATER RATES
Monthly Service Charge
Single Family / Duplex
Base Charge (Per Account) $4.00 $4.00 N/A N/A
Exception: Duplex
W/2 Meters (Per Account) $2.00 $2.00 N/A N/A
Multiple Family
Base Charge (Per ISU) $4.00 $4.00 N/A N/A
Commercial
Base Charge (Per ISU) $4.00 $4.00 N/A N/A
Public School Districts (per Acco $4.00 $4.00 N/A N/A
Low Income Senior
and Low Income
Disabled Citizen Rate (Per Acct) $2.50 $2.50 N/A N/A
Multiple Family & Commercial Rate Adjustment
Water Quality (Per ISU) ($0.50) ($0.50) N/A N/A
Water Quantity (Per ISLD ($1.50) ($1.50) N/A N/A
Stormwater Penalty for new
Multiple Family & Commercial
development without on-site
detention. (Per ISU) $0.50 $0.50 N/A N/A
MISCEI.LANEOUS FEES AND CHARGES
Park Reservation Fee $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00
(non-refundable)
Office Services
Account Maintenance $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00
Past Due Notice $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50
ACH Credit ($1.00) $0.00 ($1.00) $0.00
Lien Recovery Charge $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00
Duplicate Bill Charge $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
4
Chapter 15.06
Appendix A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
20.0! 2002 2001 2002
Field Services
Pavement Restoration Charge (refundable, if assessed and not required)
Asphalt $500.00 $525.00 $750.00 $787.50
Concrete $600.00 $630.00 $ 900.00 $945.00
County Road Permit N/A N/A Cost Cost
Wet Tapping (Water Main Only)
8" and smaller - tap only $1,440.00 - $2,160.00
8" and smaller - to Property Line $2,300.00 $2,415.00 $3,450.00 $3,622.50
Greater than 8" Time & Materials Time & Materials
(Does Not Include Pavement Restoration Charge)
Fire Hydrant Installation $3,350.00 $3,517.50 $5,025.00 $5,276.25
(Does Not Include Pavement Restoration Charge)
Water Meter Reinstallation $40.00 $40.00
3/4" & 1" - $58.00 $58.00
11/2" & 2" - $75.00 $75.00
3" and greater - Time & Materials Time & Material
Water Meter Reactivation - $40.00 $40.00
Water Meter Tampering
Tampering Removal - $130.00 $130.00
Tampering Reinstallation Time & Materials Time & Material
Cross-Connection Control
Inspection $40.00 $42.00 $40.00 $42.00
Fire Service - Detector, Meter & MXU $310.00 - $310.00
Storz Adapter $200.00 - $200.00
Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on
(Customer Request)
Regular Hours No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge
After Hours $100.00 $105.00 $100.00 $105.00
Delinquency Notice $10.00 $10.50 $10.00 $10.50
Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on
(Delinquent Accounts)
Regular Hours $40.00 $42.00 $40.00 $42.00
After Hours $I00.00 $105.00 $100.00 $105.00
Flow and Pressure Test (Uncerfified)
3/4" & 1" meters only $40.00 $42.00 $40.00 $42.00
1 1/2" & 2" meters only $80.00 $84.00 $80.00 $84.00
5
Chapter 15.06
Appendix A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within City Limits Outside City Limits
2001 2002 2001 2002
Utility Plant Locates
Regular Hours N/C N/C N/C N/C
After Hours $100.00 $105.00 $100.00 $105.00
Emergency N/C N/C N/C N/C
Meter Test Fee Schedule
Size
3/4" & 1" $72.00 $80.00 $72.00 $80.00
1 1/2" & 2" $100.00 $150.00 $100.00 $150,00
3" or greater (w/Test Port) $130.00 $136.50 $130.00 $136.50
3" or greater (w/o Test Port) Time & Materials Time & Materials
Engineering Services
Plan Check Fees
Mare Extensions (Per Foot but $0.10 $0.11 $0.15 $0.16
not less than:) $100.00 $105.00 $150.00 $157.50
(Includes hydrants and appurtenances
and connection to water system)
Pump Stations $500.00 $525.00 $750.00 $787.50
Fireline Extension $70.00 $73.50 $105.00 $110.25
Irrigation Systems $70.00 $73.50 $105.00 $110.25
System Connections $70.00 $73.50 $105.00 $110.25
Miscellaneous (Per Hour) $40.00 $42.00 $60.00 $63.00
Storm Drainage Plan Review Fees**
Preliminary Drainage Plans
Residential Development $325.00 $325.00 N/A N/A
Non-Residential Development $225.00 $225.00 N/A N/A
(Plus Per ISLO $10.00 $10.00
Final Detailed Drainage Plans
Residential Development (Per Lot)
0 - 20 Lots $35.00 $35.00 N/A N/A
21 - 50 Lots $25.00 $25.00 N/A N/A
51 - 100 Lots $22.50 $22.50 N/A N/A
100+ Lots $20.00 $20.00 N/A N/A
Minimum Charge $250.00 $250.00 N/A N/A
Non-Residential Development
(Per ISU) $ I0.00 $10.00 N/A N/A
Minimum Charge $150.00 $150.00 N/A N/A
Resubmittal Fees
First Resubmittal No Charge No Charge N/A N/A
Subsequent Resubmittal $250,00 $250,00 N/A N/A
Chapter 15.06
Appendix A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Within City Limits Outside Cit}~ Limits
2~1, 2002 2001 2002
Storm Drainage Inspection Fees**
Residential Development (Per Lot) $15.00 $15.00 N/A N/A
Non-Residential Development (Per ISU $10.00 $10.00 N/A N/A
Minimum Charge $100.00 $100.00 N/A N/A
Conveyance Fac. Ext. (per Foot) $0.75 $0.75 N/A N/A
With Minimum Charge $300.00 $300.00 N/A N/A
Unscheduled Inspections $40.00 $40.00 N/A N/A
(Per Site Visit)
(Unscheduled inspections shall be tracked through the course of a project and billed after the final
site inspection. Fees for unscheduled inspections shall be paid prior to final occupancy approval.)
** Does not apply to single family residence or duplex construction on an existing established lot.
7