The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/10/02 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA APRIL 10, 2002 1. PRE-COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00-5:30 P.M. A. General Council Business 2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Invocation 3. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of Meeting - March 27, 2002 (#AB02-063) B. Minutes of Meeting - April 3, 2002 (#AB02-064) C. Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement with ! ~._ Montgomery Watson Harza for WB-6 Pump Station Project (#AB02-065) 4. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS 5. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS 6. MAYOR'S REPORT 7. PUBLIC RECOGNITION - (Comments Limited to 3 Minutes) 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Reappointments to Bremerton Kitsap Access Television Citizen Advisory Committee (#AB02-066) B. Intergovernmental Purchasing Agreement with Smith Tractor and Equipment To Replace a Backhoe (#AB02-067) C. Amendment to 2002 Budget to Properly Implement the Management/Professional Compensation/Classification Study to Reflect the Final Pay Band Recommendations of the Consultant (#AB02-068) (CONTINUED ON BACK...) 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES A. Public Hearing and Ordinance (First Reading) Amending Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 15.06 Setting Fees for Improper Stormwater Inflows (#AB02-069) B. Public Hearing and Ordinance (First Reading) Amending Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 21.02 by Providing the Regulatory Measures for Automobile Dealership Group Signs, Subject to Certain Conditions (#AB02-070) C. Public Hearing and Ordinance (First Reading)Amending Bremerton ~,.~ Municipal Code Chapter 21.02 by Providing the Regulatory Measures to Promote Adaptive Reuse of Public and Semi-Public Buildings (#AB02-071) 10. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 10, 2002 SPEAKERS LIST /f you wish to make an announcement, inform the Council of an issue, or ~sk a genera/question...Please provide information be/ow so staff will be able to contact you. Thank you. NAME ADDRES S/TELEPHONE TOPIC 1. o o Reminder: The next Council Meeting will be on Wednesday, April 17 Moyor Cory Bozemon ~.YOR'S OFF'IC£/ADMINISTBATION WORK/PBOJ£CT PBOG~ STATUS R£PORT April 10, 2002 Proiect Manager 1. Conference Center Hotel *Gary Sexton J' RFP Due by March 15th Chris Hugo J' Interviews to fottow Roger Lubovich J' Bonds to be sotd by County £ PFD Intertocat agreement signed by March 28th 2. Pubtic Safety Bond Issue - September 17, 2002 Al Duke · For equipment/capitat *Kathy McC[uskey · Devetoping request Rob Forbes 3. Shipyard/Navy New Parking Garage *Gary Sexton · Looking for downtown tocation Chris Hugo · Working with Norm Dicks for additional funding · Goat is it wilt support a movie complex 4. Setting Library to Rice/Fergus Architects *Kathy McCtuskey · Library wilt be in new Government Center · Trying to find interim space to facilitate sate 5. Naval Museum *Kathy McCtuskey · Moving tointedm location · Need $900,000 to renovate Building 50 6. Bremerton Government Center Gary Sexton · Working drawings to start Kathy McCtuskey · Acquisition of property *Kitsap Consolidated · Final Decision on sq. ft. and tenants Housing Authority, Norm McLoughlin 7. Maritime Park *Gary Sexton · Clearing Phase I Jim Spencer · Design has begun Chris Hugo · Seeking funding · Working with Kitsap Transit on circulation issues 8. Water Transportation Research Institute *Art Anderson Assoc. · Art Anderson Assoc. meetin~ with Sen. Murray Kitsap Transit · Dick Hayes, Kitsap Transit, workin~ with Anderson Cary Bozeman · Budget request for one million to Senator Murray · Solution to passenger ferry wake issue - ~oat 9. Public Safety Buildin~ *Kathy McCluskey · Devetopin~ strategy with Po[ice and Court Rob Forbes · Lookin~ for site/building/or remodel 10. East Park Gary Sexton · Workin~ on transfer of title from Navy *Chris Hugo · Wilt proceed with master plan · Partner with Kitsap Housin~ Authority · Public process wilt be developed 11. Westpark Redevelopment · City supports redevelopment *Bremerton Housin~ · Possible Retail on site Authority · Replace current 700 units 12. Bremerton Marina · Needed for conference center *Port of Bremerton · Workin~ with Port to Proceed · Expand from 50 to 200 slips More please - To the Editor:. An open letter to city of Br~ merton officials: ! have requested that the city of Bremerton plant more trees along major streets'with a suggestion of obtaining native trees fi*om local. sources with restoration grant money. There are numerous power poles and NO TREES in existing boulevards, such as Montgomery Avenue (100 block), as one exam- ple. Warren Avenue has four lanes of pavement, sidewalks and power poles, with NO TI~EES lining the street. The city of Snohomish, by com- parison, has recognized that trees . help beautify the entrances to the · city and the city park. Street trees ranging from seedlings to over 100 years old provide functional and aesthetic valUe in the millions .,of dollars. Why doesn't.Bremerton have · °tlher cities that were developed in How long before Bremerton starts correcting past environmen- tal mistakes and starts adding trees along streets Where there are few to none now?. The Gateway to Bremerton Pro- i ject was an improvement-- can i we please continue improving?. ~ D onal~ L I. amon i Bremerton Subject: Volunteer Opportunity on April 6 in Redmond Peter. s Creek at the Sammamish River Planting April 6, 10:00 am - 2:00 pm Come make the Sammamish River Trail a more beautiful place and help urban wildlife. The City of Redmond will be kicking off Earthday celebrations early with a planting of trees and shrubs at a site between the 90th Street Bridge Restoration Project and Peters Creek. The restoration site is found approximately 100 feet. down stream from the 90th Street Bridge on the west bank. Parking is available at the Sammamish River Business Park at 15500 NE 90th Street, and next door at 8950 154th Ave NE. Dress for the weather, wear work cloths, and bring work gloves if you have them (we also have several pairs that can be borrowed.) CONTACT: Peter Holte, Stewardship Coordinator, 425-556-2822 or pholte @ ci.redmond, wa. us <mailto :pholte @ ci .redmond. wa. us>. Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:43:25 -0800 From: "Dunagan, Christopher" <CDunagan @ thesunlink.com> To: "Larson, Donald L" <dolarson @krl.org> Subject: RE: SHAPING Bremerton-Beautification Project-Flowers & Trees P art s/Attachments: 1 Shown 223 lines Text 2 7 KB Application ..-: ~ Portland and other "tree cities" have a volunteer coordinator who gets a neighborhood together and gets commitments for planting and caring for the trees. A guy down the block could water a tree for a neighbor who doesn't want to participate. The property-ownership issue is a red herring. If the city doesn't own the property - and it owns lots of right of way around town - then you just get permission from the property owner. I can't imagine that many people would object to a free tree being planted in their yard under the guidance of a professional. I can hear someone raising issues of liability, but these things are more fear than a serious obstacle, chris. / r thc nvironmcnt J Lowland Western Washington NATIVE TREES The Central Puget Sound region is home' to some of the most magnificent trees found anywhere. Before development, forests covered ~nuch of the region's land, .and even now trees are a very noticeable part of the natural lan.dscape. It is easy to take the trees for granted, but they provide in'~aluable resources to the r)eople, wildlife, and natural ecosystems of our region. We find out just how important trees are to the local environment when we remove them. One typical Douglas-fir can absorb 250 gallons of water a day. When the tree is gone, that water may become a problem as increased runoff. Trees also improve air-quality by 'filtering pollutants and adding oxygen and mQisture to the air. One acre of trees can remove about thirteen tons of dust and carbon dioxide each year. Even a single tree has a big impact. If alt of the needles are added up on a mature Douglas-fir, there is one acre of leaf surface area that filters and adds oxygen to the air. WHY PLANT TREES IN URBAN LANDSCAPES? · Filter air pollutants and increase oxygen · Slow down and reduce surface mn-off · Feed and shelter birds and other wildlife · Cool down streams for healthier fish · Soften noise from traffic and equipment * Add moisture to the air · Create forest areas for children to explore · Hold soil on steep slopes and streambanks · Bring shade to hot city streets *' Create a refuge away from urban stresses Tips for Selecting Trees · Plant iocal trees for regional character. What seems common here is unusual elsewhere and reflects our unique natural history and ecosystems. · Plant native tree species instead of ornamental varieties. Birds and wildlife prefer native trees and can benefit more from their flowers and seeds. · Trees that evolved in th'is region are better suited to our climate of wet winters and dry summers and to our soils that are often rocky, acidic, and low in nutrients. · Consider the final size of the tree to make sure there is ~learance above and around the tree as it grows. Often trees are smaller in cultivation but many of our native trees can still get quite tall. · Consider the water and sun preferences. Some trees can grow in either sun or shade but require more water when grown in full sun. Plant drought-tolerant trees where they won't get watered by sprinklers. · Some trees are more susceptible to disease in certain conditions. For example, over-watering can incre~.se the risk of disease for madronas and dogwoods. · Make sure the trees were grown from seed or cuttings and not removed from a natural area {uhless they were legally salvaged). Trees grow back slowly and are a precious part of the natural ecosystem. A Washington Native Plant Society Publication * Central Puget Sound Chapter * LIFE 2000-1 Evergreen Conifers Height Sun/Shade Water/Soil Grand Fir (Abies grandis) 60-300 ft. Sun or shade Dry to moist Large, stately tree. Glossy, .thick, green needles grow fiat along branches. Large, upright, light green cones near top. Smooth, gray bark with*resin bubbles. Slow-growing. Widespread but not usually a dominant tree in dry lowland forests. WILDLIFE: Shelter for birds and mammals. Food and forage sites for many birds inc]uding grouse, nuthatches, chickadees, grosbeaks, finches, crossbills, sapsuckers, and woodpeckers. Foliage used by butterfly larvae. Sitka Spruce (piCea sitchensis) 100-250 ft. Sun to part shade Moist to wet Tall, wide tree. Branches long *and horizontal. Bark thin, scaly and gray to reddish-brown. Needles stiff and sharp. Light brown cones with papery scales. Coastal areas and floodplains. Best in coo], moist sites. Too large for small gardens and susceptible to a variety of pests. Excellent for large open spaces. WILDLIFE: Nesting, roosting and shelter for birds and mammals. Food and forage sites for grouse, nuthatches, grosbeaks, finches, Chickadees, siskins, goldfinches, crossbills, sparrows, sapsuckers, woodpeckers, and squirrels. Shore Pine (Pinus contorta var. contorta) 20-50 ft. Full sun Dry to wet Small with contorted trUnk, rounded crown on coast; more upright and taller inland. Bark thick, dark brown to grayish-black. Densely foliaged. Needles deep green, short and stiff, in bundles of two, mostly at ends of branches. Cones slightly lopsided with a sharp point on each scale, persist on tree. Tolerates low-nutrient conditions, salt-spray. WILDLIFE: Food and forage sites for grouse, crossbills, grosbeaks, chickadees, hand-tailed pigeons, quail, mourning doves, jays, nuthatches, finches, siskins, squirrels, chipmunks, bushtits, kinglets, woodpeckers. Nest sites for songbirds. Foliage used by pine white butterfly larvae. Western White Pine (Pinus monticola) 40-100 ft. Sun to part shade Dry to wet Symmetrical, narrow tree with open crown. Widely spaced, spreading branches appear to be in whorlg around trunk. Bluish- green needles long, slender, in bundles of 5. Bark initially smooth, becoming dark and scaly with cinnamon underneath. Pendant cones long and slender. Vulnerable to white pin? blister rust. Shorter in cultivation. Dry forests to bogs. WILDLIFE: Food and forage sites for grouse, crossbills, grosbeaks, chickadees, band-tailed pigeons, quail, mourning doves, jays, nuthatches, finches, siskins, squirrels, chipmunks, bushtits, king]ets, woodpeckers. Nest sites for songbirds. Foliage used by pine white butterfly larvae. Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesi0 70-250 ft. Best in full sun Dry to moist Tall, straight, pyramidal tree. Full and broad in open sites. Numerous hanging reddish-brown cones. Bottle brUsh arrays of short, dark green needles with conspicuous light green growth in the spring. Bark thick, dark and furrowed. Small branches tend to fall off in windstorms. Relatively fast-growing. Common and widespread. Prefers well-drained soils. WILDLIFE: Food and forage sites for grouse, crossbills, siskins, squirrels, chipmunks, chicl~adees, nuthatches, brown creepers, and woodpeckers. Foliage catch by moth and butterfly larvae. Pacific Yew (Taxus brevifolia) 15-50 ft. Shade-tolerant Moist forest soil Small tree with loose, open growth form. Branches drooping, trunk sometimes contorted. Bark thin with purplish scales covering reddish inner bark. Needles soft, short, dark yellow-green. Scarlet, berry-like arils (poisonous). Occasional under- story tree. Can be shrubby in form. Excellent erosion control on streamsides and slopes. Western Red-cedar (Thuja plicata) 60-200 ft. Shade tolerant Moist to wet Medium-sized tre~ in cultivation with graceful spreading branches, trunk wide and buttressed at base, bark thin, reddish- brown, ridged lengthwise and easily pulled off in long, fibrous strips. Leaves are scale-like and cover stems, sweet-smelling when crushed. Numerous, small reddish-brown ova] cones. Common in moist, shady forests and river valleys; also in drier forests where soil is rich. Stands up well to ~vind, doesn't shed branches. WILDLIFE: Cover and nesting sites for grosbeaks,_ waxwings, juncos; jays, warblers and tree squirrels. Food and forage site~ for kinglets, brown creepers, nuthatches, chickadees, juncos, sparrows, and siski~s. Western Hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) 50-200 ft. Shade tolerant Dry to moist State tree of Washington. Graceful with narrow crown and slender, drooping top, down-sweeping, spraylike branches with feathery foliage. Short, flat green needles with white lines on lower surface. Numerous small brown cones. Bark rough, reddish-brown. Very common forest tree. Grows well in humus-rich soil and decaying wood. Shorter-lived in dry urban areas. WILDLIFE: Winter cover for birds; food for juncos, siskins, chickadees, grouse, finches, crossbills, chipmunks and squirrels. Deer browse foliage. Flowering Broadleaf Trees ~ ,fi,~/~ Height SunlShade Water/Soil Vine Maple (Acer circinatum) 15-30 ft. Full to part shade Moist to dry Elegant multi-stemmed tree. Bark,smooth, reddish green. Showy clusters of small white flowers with wine-colored sepals April to May. Leaves have 7 to 9 lobes. In-shade, leaves form horizontal layers. In fall, leaves turn vivid red in the sun to golden in the shade. Attractive ornamental by itself or in groups. In forest undcrstory, often grows as a large tangled thicket. WILDLIFE: Seeds eaten by grosbeaks, woodpeckers, nuthatches, finches, quail and grouse. Larvae plant for moths. Nectar source for bees. Bigleaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum) 60,100 ft. Sun to. part shade Dry to moist Thick trunk with spreading limbs. Young bark smooth and green, becoming gray-brown and often covered with lichens, mosses and ferns. Huge, dark green leaves have $ deeply cut lobes, turn yellow in the fall. Creamy yellow flowers in long cylindrical clusters when leaves are just emerging. Shallow roots are large and can cause problems with sidewalks, trees can lose large limbs, avoid planting near buildings. Good shade tree for large site. Excellent erosion control: WILDLIFE: Seeds eate~ by squirrels, finches, and gi-osbeaks. Also habitat for woodpeckers, grouse, kinglets, siskins, vireos, warblers, sapsuckers, nuthatches, song sparrows and quail. Good nectar source for bees. Red Alder (Alnus rubra) 35-80 ft. Sun to part shade Dry to wet Bark thin, gray and smooth with white patches-of lichens. Leaves are oval, doubly-toothed like a saw, pointed' at tip, dull- green on top and hairy below. Produces small, brown cones that persist over winter. Fast-growing, relatively short-lived. Attractive when grown by itself in full sun, useful as pan of quick-growing woods. Adds nitrogen to soil. WILDLIFE:.. Seeds feed many birds including grouse, pine siskins, chickadees, and kinglets. Insects in trees feed flycatchers, kinglets, wrens, vireos, warblers, bushtits, mallards, and widgeons. Nest tree for great blue herons, warblers, bushtits, and sparrows. Good cover for fish in streams. Leaves eaten by swallowtail and other butterfly larvae and tent caterp!llars. Pacific Madrone (Arbutus menziesit) 30-75 ft. Best in full sun Dry/well-drained Dramatic flowering evergreen with glossy green leaves. Bark satiny smooth, green on young branches and deep red and peeling on mature growth. Bell-shaped flowers in drooping clusters followed by orange-red berries in fall. Sheds bark and leaves year round. May get fungal diseases. Needs lots of sun, fast drainage and no root disturbance. Rocky bluffs and forest edges. Trunk often bends or leans as it matures. Tolerant of poor soil. WILDLIFE: Fruit is eaten by band-tailed pigeons, quail, flickers, varied thrushes, waxwings, grosbeaks, mourning doves, robins and some mammals. Flowers attract spring azure butterflies arid bees. Larval food for ceanothus silk moth and brown elfin butterfly. Pacific Dogwood (Cornus nuttallit) 20-70 ft. sun to part shade Moist, well drained Rounded form, often multi-stemmed. Bark smooth, blackish-brown. Leaves with distinct parallel veins. Large, creamy-white bracts surround small clusters of tiny flowers. Blooms profusely from April to June, sometimes again in early fall. Leaves turn pinkish-purple in fall and berries turn bright red and persist. Found in moist woods and forest edges. Prefers 'sun with shade on the trunk. No summer water after it is established. May get fungal disease Avoid trunk and root disturbance. WILDLIFE: Spring azure butterfly larvae eat flower parts. Fruit eaten by sapsuckers, woodpeckers, bluebirds, tree swalIDws, vireos, thrushes, evening grosbeaks, white-crowned sparrows, song sparrows, towhees, grouse, jays and house finches. Black Hawthorn (CrataegUs douglasit} 15-30 ft. Full sun Moist to dry Multi-stemmed, slow-growing sturdy small tree or tall shrub. Branches have long thorns, bark is light brown, rough and scaly. Flower clusters are white. Produces edible, blackish-purple berries in August. Dark fall color. Moist open areas, hedges, sunny s~reamsides. Forms thickets and has good Soil stability. WILDLIFE: Berries eaten by solitaires, robins, waxwings, grosbeaks, thrushes, woodpeckers, band-tailed pigeons, wood ducks, grouse, pheasants, turkeys, black bear, coyotes and foxes. Rabbits and deer browse leaves. Leaves are food for swallowtail butterfly larvae. Fruit persists on tree as autumn and early winter food. Oregon Ash (Fraxinus latifolia) 30-80 ft. Part shade Fertile, moist soil Bark rough, grayish. Wide crown. Leaves are in 5 to 7 light green leaflets. Tiny flowers in crowded clusters come out with the leaves. Dense clusters of winged, maple-like fruits hang down in fall and leaves turn bright yellow. Tolerant of standing water in winter and early in growing season, drought in summer. Floodplains, streamsides and wetlands. WILDLIFE: Cover and nesting for cavity-nesting birds. Seeds eaten by grosbeaks, wood ducks, finches, grouse. Sapsuckers feed in trunks. Used by beavers, deer and elk. Leaves eaten by butterfly larvae and other insects. Flowering Broadleaf Trees Continued Pacific Crabapple (Malus fusca) 10-40 ft. - Sun to part shade Moist to wet Wide, gnarled growth form with rounded crowns. Sharp, spur shoots. Leaves pointed at the tip, usually have small lobes at base. Fragran. t, showy white to pink flowers in flat-topped clusters in the spring. Tiny, hard, red to yellow apples in the late summer. Leaves turn red or yellow-orange in fall. Found in moist woods and swamps. WILDLIFE: Fruit eaten by Stellar's jays, cedar waxwings, American robins, grosbeaks, towhees, sapsuckers, woodpeckers, grouse, squirrels, coyotes and fox~s: Habitat for spring azure butterfly. Black Cottonwood 60-180 ft. Sun Moist soil (Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa) Tall, fast-growing tree with thick trunk. Leaves are broad, shiny, and egg-shaped; sticky and sweet-smelling, especially when young. Fruit is in long, hanging clusters with large volumes of seeds in fluffy white clusters. Don't plant near drains or foundations. Tends to rot in the center and may be a hazard near buildings. Great for flood plains and open moist areas. The northwest's largest broadleaf species. WILDLIFE: Roosting and nesting sites for great blue herons, hawks, eagles, osprey, and owls. Insects in trees feed flycatchers, kinglets, wrens, vireos, and warblers. Food source for beaver, mountain beaver, deer, and elk. Leaves eaten by larvae of Lorquin's admiral, mourning cloak, swallowtail butterflies and several moth species. Bitter Cherry (Prunus emarginata var; mollis) 20-70 ft. Sun to part shade Dry to moist Narrow trunk with horizontal rows on shiny, reddish-brown bark. Leaves small, oval, rounded at ends, finely toothed on edges with fine hairs on the undersurface. Flowers white or pinkish in flat-topped clusters. Cherries are small and red-black, edible to birds. Fast-growing, relatively short-lived tree. Forest openings and edges. WILDLIFE: Fruit eaten by many birds including grouse, band-tailed pigeons, flickers, jays, robins, bluebirds, waxwings, tanagers, orioles, grosbeaks, finches, mourning doves, towhees. Also eaten by many mammals. Deer and elk browse leaves. Attracts many butterflies including sara orangetip, silvery blue, swallowtail, Lorquin's admiral and spring azur~ Garry Oak (Quercus garryana) 30-90 ft. Full sun . Dry, well-drained Striking, heavy-limbed tree often with crooked trunk and broad crown. Bark is brown-gray, scaly and furrowed. Leaves are oak-shape with rounded lobes, become thick and dark green as they mature, turn yellow or reddish-brown in fall. Deep, non- aggressive roots. Produces smooth brown acorns. Slow-growing, tolerant of poor, dry soil. On bluffs and rocky soil. WILDLIFE: Acorns eaten by wood ducks, mallards, turkeys, band4ailed pigeons, quails, grouse, woodpeckers, nuthatches, thrushes, towhees, jays, Clark's nutcrackers, black bear, deer, muskrats, raccoons, squirrels, gophers and mice. Butterfly larvae eat the leaves. Pacific Willow (Salix lucida ssp. lasiandra) 20-40 ft. Sun to part shade Moist to wet soil Small tree or tall slender shrub with long, narrow leaves with tapered tips. Bark becomes fissured and yellow-brown on older trunks, new twigs are glossy. Leaves and catkins open at the same time. Tolerates seasonal flooding. One of the largest native willows in this area. Invasive roots, hard to garden around. Excellent erosion control oh slopes and streamsides. WILDLIFE: Forage and cover for wildlife, including fish when planted next to water. Insects in trees feed bushtits, flycatchers, kinglets, wrens, vireos, warblers, and sapsuckers. Buds feed grouse and grosbeaks. Nectar in early spring for honeybees. Nest sites for bushtits. Used by beavers, hares, deer, elk, and porcupines. Nectar used by brown elfin, Sara orangetip, mourning cloak, Milbert's tortoiseshell and other adult butterflies. Leaves are used by many butterfly larvae. Note: Wildlife information was excerpted from Russell Link's Landscaping for Wildlife in the Pacific Northwest. WASHINGTON NATIVE 'PLANT SOCIETY 7400 Sand Point Way NE Seattle WA 98115 t Phone (206) 527-3210 Website www.wnps.org E-mail wnpsC~wnps.org USDA is an equal opportunity provider, and employer .... - .... Text and layout by Sasha Shaw. May 2001. AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: FOR AGENDA OF: ^PRIL I0, 2002 ORIGINATING DEPT: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF MEETING- gARCH 27, 20O2 ORIGINATOR: CA3~OL ARENDS, PRESIDENT DATE SUBMITTED: ^PR IL 3, 2002 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: ENDORSEMENT ~ INFORMATION [] APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL BY C OL~?CIL PRESIDENT: MAYOR: ~'-5~ ~ ~;~'~z~c"~_z_~~ ' 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: 5. RECOMMENDATION: 6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEgV DATE: 7. NOTICE OF ACTION: PULLED ,~]~,t TABLED [--] APPROVED ~ DISAPPROVED ~_2 AMENDED ~__ DATE: COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: ,q. XGENDA BILL ',~0.: ' ..,k- ' ~- ', 9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: 10. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: 11. RESEARCH SOURCES: TAPE #1825 UNAPPROVED DRAFT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 27, 2002 The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 5:30 P.M., with Council President Carol Arends presiding. Council members present were Mike Short, Will Maupin, Eric Younger, Mike Shepherd, Ed Rollman, Daren Nygren, Cecil McConnell, and Wayne Olsen. Also present were City Attorney Roger Lubovich; Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston; and Council Assistant Christine Grenier Ellingson. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council Member Cecil McConnell, followed by the invocation provided by Pastor Rick Bodrie of Calvary Chapel. President Arends made the following announcements: (1) The regular Pre-Council Session, which is open to the public, was held in the Council Conference Room to discuss general Council business from 5:00 to 5:30 P.M; and (2) There will be a Study Session in the Council Conference Room following the Council meeting to hear a presentation from City Treasurer Rich Hanna on the "2003 AND 2004 BUDGET AND ClP FINANCIAL FORECAST". CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of Meeting - March 20, 2002 (#AB02-053) B. Fee Agreement with Jane Ryan Koler, PLLC (#AB02-054) C. Fee Agreement with Keating Bucklin & McCormack, Inc., P.S. (#AB02-055) D. Fee Agreement with Carol A. Morris, PC (#AB02-056) #0050 M/S/C/U (McConnell/Olsen) Move to approve Consent Agenda as presented. CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090 have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the Council. #0085 M/S/C/U (Younger/McConnell) On March 27, 2002, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: Check numbers 269398 through 269577 in the amount of $1,108,746.72; and Regular Payroll in the amount of $869,582.14 for the period ending March 15, 2002; and Retiree Payroll in the amount of $135,590.53 for the period ending March 3'1, 2002. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mike Short was pleased with attendance at the combined District 8 & 9 meeting held last week. He encouraged the public to attend other district meetings that will address nuisance issues; and commented on Smart Growth meetings he had attended recently. Will Maupin also commented on the combined District 8 & 9 neighborhood meeting held last Thursday; and reported on the Kitsap Smart Growth Coalition forum as well as the West Park Board Meeting held on Monday. Eric Younger announced the District 6 and 7 Meeting will be held on Thursday, April 11th starting at 6:30 P.M. at the Public Works and Utilities building located at 100 Oyster Bay Avenue in the Conference Room. The topic will be "Problem Properties and Code Enforcement". He also asked that if citizens can not attend, to please consider attending any of the other district meetings in the TAPE #1825 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes March 20, 2002 Page 2 of 5 near future. Mike Shepherd announced that on April 1st the Metropolitan Gallery will hold a Masquerade Ball; and thanked citizens for participating in a meeting that began discussion on the future of Smith Cove. Ed Rollman commended the citizens of District 5 for being involved in the planning process in improving Smith Cove; announced that on March 30th from 5:00 to 7:00 P.M. author Freddi Perry will be providing a lecture at Amy Burnett's Gallery and selling her recently released book on the history of Bremerton; and added that his next district meeting on Monday, April 8th at the Washington Mutual Building located at 500 Pacific Avenue from 6:30 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. to discuss "Problem Properties and Code Enforcement". Daren Nycjren thanked citizens for attending his district meeting held last night during which the comp plan was discussed; and invited citizens to call the council office to be added to the district mailing list. Cecil McConnell announced the District 1 and 2 Meeting that will be held on Tuesday, April 9th from 7:00 to 9:00 P.M. at the Parks Community Center located on Lebo Boulevard. The topic will also be "Problem Properties and Code Enforcement". Wayne Olsen pointed out that people should attend the various meetings covering the nuisance issues since codes will be amended in the future. Carol Arend$ reiterated that the combined District 6 and 7 Meeting will be held at the Public Works and Facilities building at 100 Oyster Bay Avenue not the usually scheduled School District Administration Building located at 134 Marion Avenue; discussed the 2002 Vision Award Dinner as part of the Puget Sound Regional Coordinating Council she attended last week; district meeting; and added that Kitsap Transit also received a Vision 2020 award. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Bozeman Read a proclamation declaring April 2, 2002 as "USS Kameakamea Day" and was accepted by Council Member Daren Nygren; announced that he would like to compile a citizen email directory and asked for Council's assistance by developin§ a form for citizens. This directory would substantially decrease mailin§ costs regardin§ flyers and notices; Jim Spencer, Parks and Recreation Director presented the PSRC Vision 2020 Award to the City of Bremerton which was previously accepted by Council President Arends; added that Interviews of potential developers will be takin§ place next week; announced that the Kitsap Consolidated Housin9 Authority is in the process of choosin§ a developer; encoura§ed port officials to pursue marina improvements; brou§ht up the ice skating rink issue and stated that Bremerton may be considered as a potential location. PUBLIC RECOGNITION Don Larson encoura§ed the City to create a marine protected area near the USS Turner Joy and to make improvements to the downtown area by plantin§ trees. 8A - APPOINTMENT OF CLARENCE NELSON AND B. SCOTT BUCKINGHAM TO THF PLANNING COMMISSION (#AB02-057): Sherill Huff-Menees, Deputy Mayor, announced that two vacancies on the Plannin§ Commission are available and recommended that those vacancies be filled by Clarence Nelson and B. Scott Buckingham. There were no comments from the public. TAPE #1825 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes March 20, 2002 Page 3 of 5 #1455 M/S/C/U (Olsen/McConnell) Move to confirm the appointment of Clarence Nelson and B. Scott Buckingham to the Planning Commission. 8B -APPOINTMENT OF DAVID GRINDSTAFF, JOANNE MORRIS, JAN HILLMAN, ALAN STRANGE. MARIWYN TINSLEY TO THE BREMERTON CITIZEN'S COMMISSION ON COUNCIl SALARIES (#AB02-058): Sherril Huff-Menees, Deputy Mayor, pointed out that the City Charter creates the Bremerton Citizen's Commission on Council Salaries. All prior appointments have expired. She recommended that the following citizens be appointed to the commission: David Grindstaff Joanne Morris Jan Hillman Alan Strange Mariwyn Tinsley She added that the commission would be convened to address PERS retirement issues solely. There were no comments from the public. #1705 M/S/C/U (Short/Olsen) Move to confirm the appointment of David Grindstaff, Joanne Morris, Jan Hillman, Alan Strange, and Mariwyn Tinsley to the Bremerton Citizen's Commission on Council Salaries. Mike Shepherd left the meeting at 6:28 PM... 8C - CONTRACT AWARD FOR THE WB-6 PUMP STATION PROJECT TO STAN PALMER CONSTRUCTION (#BA02-059): Tom Knuckey, Utilities Engineer, summarized that bids were opened for the WB-6 Pump Station project on March 1, 2002. There were six bids recei~/ed for this project. Stan Palmer Construction was the lowest responsive bidder with a bid of $1,534,190 including sales tax. The Engineer's estimate for the project is $1,833,279. This project is funded in part by an EPA grant. The EPA requires approval of the Iow bid prior to contract award. EPA approval is anticipated by April 5, 2002. The requested action before the City Council is approval of the contract with Stan Palmer Construction contingent upon EPA approval. He added that the station would be located at the corner of Callow Avenue and Rodgers Street. There were no comments from the public. Mr. Olsen suggested that Stan Palmer Construction be a "good neighbor" during the duration of this project. #1825 M/S/C/U (Maupin/Younger) Move to approve award of the WB-6 Pump Station project to Stan Palmer Construction contingent upon EPA approval, for the amount of $1,534, 190 including sales tax, and authorize the Mayor to execute the same. Mike Shepherd was not available for this vote. 8D - CONTRACT AWARD FOR THE LANDSCAPING OF THE NEW EASTSIDE CSt) TREATMENT FACILITY TO VARICK LANDSCAPING (#AB02-060): Pat Coxon, Wastewater Treatment Plan Manager, stated that the Department of Public Works and Utilities seeks approval of the attached bid from Varick Landscaping, to purchase and install shrubbery, trees, grasses, and irrigation at the newly constructed Eastside CSO Treatment Facility. The submitted bid price was TAPE #1825 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes March 20, 2002 Page 4 of 5 $24,955.00. There were no comments from the pubfic. #1900 M/S/C/U (Short/Olsen) Move to approve the submitted bid price for the landscaping of the Eastside CSO Treatment Facility, at a cost of $24,955.00. Mike Shepherd was not available for this vote. 8E - INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING FUNDING, DEVELOPMENT, AND OPERATION OF THE KITSAP REGIONAL CONFERENCE CENTER (#AB02-061): Consultant Gary Sexton said that the Interlocal Agreement between Kitsap County Public Facilities District, Kitsap County and the City of Bremerton provides the basic elements and processing for funding the $6.9 million contribution by the Public Facilities District (PFD) during the design and construction phases. He emphasized that this agreement has been thoroughly reviewed by attorneys and parties involved. Cris Gears, Kitsap County Parks and Recreation, fully supported this agreement and wished to recognize the efforts of the many individuals involved with focus on previous Mayor Lynn Horton, Mayor Cary Bozeman, Gary Sexton, Barry Cook, the PFD, Housing Authority, and Kitsap Transit. Barry_ Cook thanked Mayor Bozeman and Gary Sexton for their efforts in bringing this agreement forward and hopefully making positive changes downtown. Mr. Olsen acknowledged Cris Gears, Gary Sexton, and Barry Cook for their involvement. Mike Shepherd returned to the meeting at 6:45 PI~ Mr. Nygren thanked Mr. Gears for his'role in this agreement. Ms. Arends recalled the numerous meetings held with respect to the PFD and thanked Mr. Cook for his hard work. Mr. Rollman also thanked previous Mayor Lynn Horton and Mr. Cook on bringing a vital project downtown. He asked Mr. Sexton if profit sharing would be available in 20 years. Mr. Sexton responded that the profit sharing would relate only to PFD parking revenue. Mr. Shepherd asked how the project would impact parking space availability. Mr. Sexton answered that the cost allocation for parking spaces has yet to be negotiated. Mr. Maupin pointed out that smart growth means revitalization of urban areas and was pleased with the agreement going forward. Mr. Lubovich clarified that a segment had been inadvertently removed from the original agreement. That segment has been reinserted and does not affect the body of the document. #2705 M/S/C/U (Maupin/Short) Move to authorize the Mayor, on behalf of the City of Bremerton, to enter into and sign the Interlocal Agreement regarding funding, development, and operation of the Kitsap Regional Conference Center. 8F - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENT FOR GARY H. SEXTON (#AB02-062): Mayor Cary Bozeman stated that the City entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Mr. Sexton in January 2002 to perform services related to the Hotel/Conference Center Project and other projects as directed by the mayor. He requested that Section III Compensation be amended not to exceed $50,000. Mr. Younger suggested that alternative means for offering compensation be considered by TAPE #1825 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes March 20, 2002 Page 5 of 5 administration since the recommended budget adjustment will not go very far given the volume of work the consultant is performing. Mayor Bozeman responded that an alternative will be provided to Council soon and research is being done on the possibility of funding an Economic Project Manager. Mr. Olsen stated that Mr. Sexton has represented other areas and that he is familiar with developer language provided in agreements. Mr. Rollman pointed out that this position deals with project negotiation not construction project management. #3115 M/S/C/U (McConnell/Rollman) Move to approve amendment to Section II! Compensation, of the Professional Services Contract with Gary H. Sexton. #3150 M/S/C/U (McConnell/Nygren) Move to approve Budget Adjustment in the amount of $15,000 for those services not related to the Hotel/Conference Center. 9A - PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDINANCE NO. 4793 (SECOND READING) AMENDING CHAPTER 2.06 OF THE BMC RELATING TO THE CITY ATTORNEY (#AB02-052): The first reading of the ordinance was heard on Wednesday, March 20, 2002. There were no comments from the public. #3220 M/S/C/U (McConnell/Nygren) Move to pass Ordinance No. 4793 on second reading, amending Chapter 2.06 of the Breme. rton Municipal Code relating to the resignation of City Attorney and the acceptance of the resignation by the Mayor. With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 7:03 P.M. The Council reconvened in the Council Conference Room for a Study Session which was open to the public to discuss "2003 AND 2004 BUDGET AND CIP FINANCIAL FORECAST". Prepared and Submitted by: CHRISTINE GRENIER ELLINGSON Council Assistant Attest: PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk CAROL ARENDS, City Council President City of Bremerton CA/PJ/cge c: Normal Distribution File 7 AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: FOR AGENDA OF: A?RIk 10, 2002 ORIGINATING DEPT: CITY- COUNCIL MINUTES OF MEETING- APR I L 3, 2002 ORIGINATOR: CAROL ARENDS, PP,_ESIDENT DATE SUBMITTED: APRIL S, 2002 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: ENDORSEMENT ~ INFOtLMATION [] APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL. BT C OUi'fl.,CIL PRESIDENT: MAYOR: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: $. RECOMMENDATION: 6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 7. NOTICE OF ACTION: PULLED ~] TABLED [-] APPROVED [] DISAPPROVED ~ AMENDED ~ DATE: COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 3t3 S. XGENDA BILL NO.:_ 9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: 10. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: 11. RESEARCH SOURCES: TAPE #1826 UNAPPROVED DRAFT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 3, 2002 The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, April 3, 2002, at 5:30 P.M., with Council President Carol Arends presiding. Council members present were Mike Short, Mike Shepherd, Ed Rollman, Daren Nygren, Cecil McConnell, and Wayne Olsen. Council Members Eric Younger and Will Maupin were absent. Aisc present were City Attorney Roger Lubovich; Deputy City Clerk Paula Johnston; and Council Assistant Christine Grenier Ellingson. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council Member Cecil McConnell, followed by the invocation provided by Chaplain Conrad Dodd of Kitsap Lake Baptist Church. President Arends made the following announcements: (1) The regular Pre-Council Session, which is open to the public, was held in the Council Conference Room to discuss general Council business from 5:15-5:30 P.M.; and (2) There will be a 15-Minute Executive Session immediately following the Regular Council Meeting in the Council Conference Room to discuss "Potential Litigation" per RCW 42.30.110 (1) (i) and a 2- Hour Monthly Study Session in the Council Conference Room to discuss "WATER RESOURCES DIVISION UPDATE" AND "NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES". CONSENT AGENDA - There were no Consent Agenda Items this week CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090 have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the Council. #0035 M/S/C/U (McConnell/Rollman) On April 3, 2002, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: Check numbers 269579 through 269762 in the amount of $403,867.03. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Wayne Olsen announced that the next District 1 and 2 Meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 9th starting at 7:00 P.M. at Sheridan Park Recreation Center located at the corner of Clare Avenue and Lebo Boulevard. The topic will be "Problem Properties and Code Enforcement". Ed Rollman stated that his next district meeting will be on Monday, April 8th at the Washington Mutual Building located at 500 Pacific Avenue from 6:30 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. to discuss "Problem Properties and Code Enforcement". Mike Shepherd announced that his next District Meeting will be held on Thursday, April 25th. Carol Arends reiterated that the combined District 6 and 7 Meeting will be held at the Public Works and Facilities building at 100 Oyster Bay Avenue not the usually scheduled School District Administration Building located at 134 Marion Avenue MAYOR'S REPORT - There was no report provided by the Mayor this week PUBLIC RECOGNITION Don Larson announced that on April 20th beginning at 11:00 AM there will be a semi-annual Sinclair Inlet Clean-Up. T-shirts will be given to the first 50 volunteers and those interested can meet at the boardwalk. TAPE #1826 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 3, 2002 Page 2 of 2 Rainey Stolp of Parks and Recreation, announced that the Arbor Day Celebration will be held on Wednesday, April 10th at Evergreen Park. With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 5:43 P.M. The Council reconvened in the Council Conference Room for a 15-Minute Executive Session to discuss "POTENTIAL LITIGATION "which was closed to the public and a 2-Hour Monthly Study Session which was open to the public to discuss "WATER RESOURCES DIVISION UPDATE" and "NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES". Prepared and Submitted by: CHRISTINE GRENIER ELLINGSON Council Assistant Attest: PAULA JOHNSTON, Deputy City Clerk CAROL ARENDS, City Council President City of Bremerton CA/PJ/cge c: Normal Distribution .: File '' .' /( AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: WB-6 PUMP STATION FOR AGENDA OF: April~, 2002 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works & Utils MONTGOMERY WATSON HARZA ORIGINATOR: W. E. Sampley, Director PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Public Works & Utilities DATE SUBMITTED: March 20, 2002 2. CLEIARA~C,E~:/(Comment on back 3. EXHIBITS: //~;ag~~/~,~.~ J 1. Amendment No. 1 to Professional Dir-eetor'6 fP ~3~.k, s4~ffU~ti~ Services Agreement 2. Professional Services Agreement Cit Jyorn / C~cil FisCal & Bu~t Committee ~ Louncll uperauons bommlttee tN.OaS , A.eaOV . COUNCIL earS,.tNT FOa SU.n TTan: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: Based on an evaluation of qualified consultants, the City executed a Professional Services Agreement with Montgomery Watson Harza to provide design services for the WB-6 Pump Station project. This amendment to the professional services agreement adds scope and budget to provide construction support services for the project. The requested action before the City Council is approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Montgomery Watson Harza. 5. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the professional services agreement with Montgomery Watson Harza, Inc., for $134,667, and authorize the Mayor to execute the same. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Director Pub Wks & Util ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Director Pub Wks & Util EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED [1 TABLED [l APPROVED [1 DISAPPROVED Il AMENDED 11 COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 3 ~ (OVER) 11. AGENDA BILL NO.: L ,> - ~'.~ ~c ~ 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 3. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION - Continuation 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: The City would not have the design support necessary during construction of the project. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT AND OTHER RESOURCES: Staffing: No impact. Budget: The WB-6 Pump Station project is funded by a Public Works Trust Fund loan and EPA grant funding. Both projects are included in the 2002 budget. Facilities/Equipment: No impact. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES The City of Bremerton, Washington, (the "City"), and Montgomery Watson Harza, ("Consultant") have entered into a PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, hereinafter referred to as AGREEMENT for a project described as the Callow Avenue CSO Pump Station. This AMENDMENT NO. 1 modifies the Scope of Work and Budget set forth in the AGREEMENT dated April 2, 2001, as follows: The Scope of Work shall be modified to add additional scope items as outlined in the attached Amendment No. 1, Exhibits E and F. The Compensation for services shall be increased by $134,667 and the total fees under this Agreement shall not exceed Three Hundred Ninety Nine Thousand Two Hundred Eighty dollars ($399,280.). Except as herein modified, the terms of the AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect. In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the AMENDMENT NO. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement the date and year indicated. For Montgomery Watson Harza, dated this day of ,2002. By: For the City of Bremerton, dated this __ day of ,2002. By: Cary Bozeman, Mayor DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL: W. Eugene Sampley, Director of Public Works and Utilities ~~----S'f~T~ FORM: _ ~--:--.. ~ ~ Cltyx{ttorney ~ RECEIVED FOR FILING: Kathleen McCluskey, City Clerk AMENDMENT NO.1 EXHIBIT E SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF BREMERTON WB-6 PUMP STATION CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES BACKGROUND AND GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION Montgomery Watson Harza (Consultant) has designed the WB-6 Pump Station, a 7,500 gpm CSO pump station involving wet-pit submersible pumps, a hydropneumatic surge control tank, a standby engine generator, electrical enclosure, and associated appurtenances. The City of Bremerton (City) plans to construct the project during calendar year 2002 under a single lump sum construction contract. The anticipated duration of construction is 6 months, all-inclusive. The City will provide all construction contract administration, day-to-day inspection of the work, and interface with the construction contractor and other entities involved in the construction process. The City has requested that the Consultant provide limited construction support services, consisting of office engineering and periodic field assistance to support the City's construction management effort. Services described herein will be performed by Montgomery Watson Harza, with the exception of electrical and instrumentation work (performed by Casne Engineering, Inc.), and geotechnical support (provided by GeoEngineers). In addition to construction support services, this Scope of Work includes additional work performed during final design of the WB-6 Pump Station, as described under Task 6.1. A. SCOPE OF WORK TASK 1: OFFICE ENGINEERING Task 1.1 - Shop Drawing Submittal Reviews Consultant will review shop drawing submittals for major civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, and instrumentation items. A list of anticipated submittals is included as Exhibit 1. Submittals not included in Table 1 but required under the contract will be reviewed by the City. The budget estimate assumes that shop drawings will be approved in no more than two submittal events (i.e., one original submittal and one subsequent resubmittal). Shop drawings requiring more than two submittal events may necessitate an adjustment of the Consultant's budget. Work Pro&~ct: Shop drawing submittal reviews, prepared on City's standard shop drawing submittal review form included in the construction documents. Consultant shall receive six copies of each submittal from the City. Four copies of each submittal will be returned to the City complete with accompanying submittal review form, and clarifying "red-line" marks on submittal as required. Task 1.2 - Technical Support for Document Interpretations and Change Orders Consultant will respond to City-furnished requests tbr clarification or interpretation of the construction documents, and will provide support for change order-related items on an as-needed basis. The level of effort tbr this task is difficult to predict; a budget allowance of 72 hours (6 months x 12 hours per month) of engineering staff time is established each for Montgomery Watson Harza and Casne Engineering, Inc. Amendment No. I Exhibit E. City of Bremerton WB-o Pump Station Construction Support Page E - i Construction contractor's Requests for Information shall be prepared on standard City forms included in the construction documents. A budget allowance of 32 hours of geotechnical staff time is established for GeoEngineers for technical support services related to geotechnical work, to be used on tasks determined at the discretion and direction of the City. Work Prodttct: Written plan clarifications and supporting sketches, prepared on City's Request for Information form included in the construction documents.. TASK 2: FIELD SUPPORT Task 2.1 - Periodic Meetings and Construction Site Visits Consultant shall attend the Preconstruction Conference and shall perform construction site visits at times requested by the City. Montgomery Watson Harza shall provide up to 6 site visits and Casne Engineering, Inc. up to 8 site visits. Visits are anticipated to require 6 hours total duration. Work Product: Notes from periodic site visits describing action items and presenting their resolution. Task 2.2 - Startup Assistance Consultant shall provide on-site startup assistance to assist the City with validation of pump station operation, and control and alarm systems. Startup assistance shall include 40 hours of on-site time by Montgomery Watson Harza, 40 hours of on-site time by Casne Engineering, Inc, and 16 hours of shop testing of control panelwork/PLC system by Casne Engineering, Inc. Work Product: Field notes from startup activities, including suggested items for punch list. Tabulation of alarm and control point testing/validation activities, noting initial setpoints for control and alarm systems. TASK 3: O&M MANUAL PREPARATION Task 3.1 - Prepare Draft O&M Manual Consultant will prepare a draft O&M Manual for the WB-6 Pump Station which meets the requirements of WAC 173-240-080. The O&M Manual will utilize text, photographs, and drawings to describe the following aspects of the pump station: Design criteria and pumping capacities; relationship with upstream gravity conveyance and the Cross Town Pipeline; and the general theory of pump station operation; pumping system operation; surge control system operation; equipment inspection and maintenance schedule; facility operation during maintenance; emergency procedures; safety; and record- keeping logs and forms. Vendor-furnished O&M data submitted under Section 01300 of the construction documents shall be used in combination with the O&M Manual prepared by the Consultant. For example, equipment-specific maintenance procedures/requirements [WAC 173-240-080 (4) (i)] and spare parts/supplier/warranty/catalog data [WAC 173-240-080 (4) (k)] shall be contained in the vendor- furnished O&M data, but not repeated in the O&M Manual. Six copies of the draft O&M Manual will be submitted to the City for review during the fifth month of construction, two of which will be ~brwarded to the Department of Ecology for review. Work Prod~ct: Draft O&M Manual. Amendment No. [ Exhibi! E. City o1' Bremcrton WB-o Pump Station Construction Support Page E - 2 Task 3.2 - Prepare Final O&M Manual Within 30 days of receipt of City and Department of Ecology comments on the draft O&M Manual, Consultant will prepare a final O&M Manual. Six copies of the final O&M Manual will be furnished to the City. Work Product: Final O&M Manual. TASK 4: PROJECT MANAGEMENT Task 4.1 - Project Management Consultant will prepare up to seven monthly invoices for services performed. Invoices will include a brief summary of major work activities performed during invoice per/od and a budget summary by task noting amount expended and amount remaining. Work Pro~htct: Monthly invoices. TASK 5: CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT CONTINGENCY Task 5.1 - Construction Support Contingency Allowance This task is intended to provide a reserved budget for unanticipated construction support activities. It is understood that the Consultant must obtain prior authorization to utilize the contingency budget. Scope of services and budget for contingency tasks will be defined when authorization is requested. A budget allowance of $5,000 is established for this task. Work Product: To be defined if contingency work is required. TASK 6: ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES Task 6.1 - Additional Design Services This task addresses engineering activities performed during final design of the WB-6 Pump Station which the City agrees are beyond the Scope of Work for design. Specific items include: a) Modification of civil and electrical site plan drawings to accommodate revisions required by Kitsap Transit. b) Specifications for provision of a pre-engineered metal building to house electrical panelwork. c) Electric/panelwork revisions. d) Electrical and control-related design work for the surge control system. Work Product: Design drawings and specifications, as reflected in the January 2002 Drawings and Specifications for the WB-6 Pump Station. C. SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY 1. Construction contract award, construction contract administration, day-to-day inspection of construction work, punch list preparation, project closeout, and warranty-related service administration. Amendment No. I Exhibit E. City or' Bremerlon WB-O Pump Station Construction Support })age 2. Transmittal of shop drawing submittals (6 copies) for review by Consultant, sent by overnight delivery within 24 hours of receipt whenever possible. Where subnfittals require review by Casne Engineering, [nc., 2 copies shall be sent directly to Casne, ~vith 4 copies to Montgomery Watson Harza. 3. Transmittal of construction contractor's Requests for Information sent via e-mail or facsimile, within 24 hours of receipt. 4. Access to construction site and staff accompaniment during site visits. 5. Establishment and maintenance of logs to track the disposition of shop drawing submittals, Contractor Requests for Information, and similar priority paperwork. City will provide Consultant with weekly updates of said logs. 6. Conduct construction-related meetings, including preparation of agendas and preparation/distribution of meeting notes. 7. Construction materials testing (geotechnical/soils, concrete, welding, etc.). 8. Payment of fees for construction-related permits and approvals. 9. Maintenance of record drawings at the construction site, including regular review of construction contractor's record drawings for completeness and accuracy. 10. Construction progress photographs. 11. Review of vendor O&M submittals D. SCHEDULE Services are anticipated to begin during April 2002 and conclude no later than January 1, 2003. .Mncndment No. t Exhibit E. City of Bremerton WB-o Pump Station Construcnon Support Page E - 4 TABLE 1 CITY OF BREMERTON CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT FOR PUMP STATION WB-6 ANTICIPATED LIST OF SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALS Division 01 - General Requirements 01300 List of submittals 01311 Construction schedule (anticipate one odginal submittal and one update) 01660 Testing and star[up plan Division 02 - Sitework 02140 Construction dewatering plan 02160 Excavation support (shoring) systems 02556 RCP pipe, ASTM C-76 Division 03 - Concrete 03100 Concrete formwork (for cast-in-place wet well) 03200 Reinforcing steel (for cast-in-place wet well) 03290 PVC waterstop 03290 Construction joint sealant 03300 Concrete mix designs 03315 G rout Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection 07920 Sealants and caulking Division 09 - Protective Coatings 09800 Protective coatings Division 11 - Equipment 11148 Submersible non-clog pumps 11149 Sump pumps Division 13 - Special Construction 13202 Surge control system (surge tank, complete and including compressor and controls)) 13251 Activated carbon canister Division 15 - Equipment 15000 Vault and wet well piping layout 15000 Yard piping layout 15000 Cross Town Pipeline Hot Tap Connection 15000 Sleeve-type couplings 15006 Pipe support configurations Amendment No. 1 Exhibit E, City of Bremmgon WB-o Pump Station Construcuon Support Page 15006 Pipe support location drawings Division 15 - Equipment (continued) 15081 Magnetic flow meter 15201 Valve actuators 15203 Swing check valves 15206 Resilient seated gate valves 15230 Air-vacuum and air-release valves 15850 In-line exhaust fan Division 16- Electrical (Casne Engineering, Inc.) 16010-16180 Basic electrical materials 16200 Engine generator 16400 Service and metering 16460 Transformers 16471 Panelboards 16740 Telephone service 16850 Electrical heat tracing 16910 Variable frequency drives 16920 Motor control centers 16922 Power and control panel 16922 PLC program (program developed by others) 16950 Pre-engineered metal electrical building Amendment No. [ Exhibit IE, City of Brcmerton WB-6 Pump Station Construcnon Support Page AMMEND. NO.'I EXHIBIT F ESTIMATE OF COSTS CI'FY OF BREMERTON WB-6 PUMP STATION CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES MONTGOMERY WATSON HARZA Principal SupecvicingAssociateSenior Sl~uclur al Adminisb'ator Word Cterk Travel + CAD Engineer Engineer Engineer Designer Engineer P~ocessor ODCs Computer APC Subconsultants Di~ect Salad/Cos~ $4600 $39,00 $2 t,00 $32,00 $3800 $28.00 $2000 $13.00 MWH Casne Geo Cost DilectSatary x 294 $135 $115 $62 $94 $112 $82 $59 $.38 $15.00 $691 Cost Engineers Engineers Totals TASK 1: OFFICE ENGINEERING 1 1 ~ arawing submittal reviews 8 24 54 8 20 $200 $1,016 $10,042 $11,977 $22,019 1 2 inical support 12 60 $50 $642 $9,194 $8,623 $4,009 $21,827 TASK 2: FJEL D SUPPORT 2 1 .~d~c meetirlgs/construct~on sile visits6 36 8 $350 $446 $6,040 J $5,749 $11,789 2 2 Startup assistance 16 24 $250 $356 $5,522 $6,707 $12,229 TASK 3: O&M MANUAL 3 1 : O&M Manuai 16 80 24 $300 $360 $1,069 $15,324 $4,348 i $19,672 3 2 ;O&M Ma~ual 4 16 4 16 $600 $60 $356 $4,709 $1,437 $6,146 TASK 4: PROJECT MANAGEMENT 4 1 !ct management 14 21 $312 $3,646 $4,822 $8,468 TASK 5: CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT CONTINGENCY 5 1 ~ngency allowance 40 $57 $356 $5,000 $5,000 ]ASK 6: ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES 6 1 L~or~al desig~ services 16 8 $214 $2,801 $17,243 $20,044 Total_s__ _ 62 310 54 36 8 21 16 28 $1,807 $420$ 4,767 $62,278 $60,907 $4,009 $127,194 Fixed Fee at 12% MWH Cost: $7.473 TOTAL $134,667 AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: Reappointments to the FOR AGENDA OF: April 10, 2002 Bremerton Kitsap Access Television ORIGINATING DEPT: Executive Citizen Advisory Committee ORIGINATOR: Mayor Bozeman DATE SUBMITTED: March 21, 2002 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: Applications for Appointment ~~ ~~.~_~_ APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL BY .... CO .U~CIL PRESIDENT: / MAYOR: c527--~ ~__. d~,'~/c_w~ 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The terms have expired for two members of the Bremerton Kitsap Access Television Citizen Advisory Committee: Gregg McClellan and Gary Smith. It recommended both be approved for reappointment. 5. RECOMMENDATION: Move to confirm the reappointments of Gregg McClellan and Gary Smith to the Bremerton Kitsap Access Television Citizen Advisory Committee. 6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 7. NOTICE OF ACTION: PULLED [--] TABLED [] APPROVED [] DISAPPROVED ~] AMENDED [~ DATE: COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 8. AGENDA BILL NO.: 9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: 10. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: 11. RESEARCH SOURCES: BREMERTON I(ITSAP FEI 8 ' ACCESS TELEVISION!;.- 7266 Tibardis Road NW, Bremerton, WA 98311 (360) 308-0139 F FAX: (360) 308-0239 bkat@telebyte.com Mayor Cary Bozeman City of Bremerton 239 4th Street Bremerton, WA 98337 February 5, 2002 Dear Mayor Bozeman, I am writing to you on behalf of the Bremerton Kitsap Access Television (BKAT) Citizen Advisory Committee. It has recently come to the committee's attention that two of our members, Gregg McClellan and Gary Smith, have expired terms. Both gentlemen are tremendous assets to our advisory committee, with Gregg McClellan now sitting as our chairman. Both Gregg and Gary are interested in being reappointed for another term on our committee. The entire committee gives our highest recommendation, and hope that they will both be reappointed for another term. Thank you for your consideration in this matter, we look tbrward to positive resolution. With kind regards, Rinda Picard Secretary BKAT Citizen Advisory Committee Cc: BKAT CAC Public, Education and Govenm~ent Access Televismn TCI and Falcon Cable City of Bremerton and Kitsap County Regional Media Center GreggMcCiellan '/ Volunteer Application for ~ E C F_ i V Proa,,ct~o. Appointment to a Board, Clover Park Technical College PHONE (253) 589-5878 ommission, Committee or JUL 0 Bldg..11 FAX (253) 589-5876 44~ Steilac~m Blvd. SW CELL (253) 905-994t CO~Ci] ~ew~, WA 984~-4~2 gmcclel~co.pierce.wa.us )EPT. ADMIN. _ _ ....... the selection process. Please help us in getting to know you. Name: z'))~/~//~ ~>,~3-/ Homephone~.~-257~7 (l~h firsg middl~ initi~) Mailing Address: ~ 5 5- ) /YJ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~%v ~ ~ ~ ~ City. /~}qe ~ ~ State ~ Zip Code ~2/~ 0ccupation /'/6/eo ?~oc{&c~'tO~ Employer.. ~ ?~c e Work phone ~ 2 S'-3- b-~P- 5'8?0E-mail ~mc c/eld'co .fl,~.~ce . o~= ~ ~-~ _ S'85-~8 '~ Education: /3,~,- ~5~o,~ (~/~:- . ~r,,c<./<, s~ ~~~,'c,~.,, I would like to be considered for ~h:: ~//O,5o.~-/ C~,.~ ~y ~e you applying for this appointment? ~ ~, ~ / ~ ~'5 e s/~cF /,q Which of your personal and/or professional interests prompted you to apply for this appointment? Have you served on any other Kitsap County board, commission, committee, council or task force? If yes, please list: f - (complete the back of this form too) Please turn page Please list your qualifications for this appointment (include skills, activities, training, education) What are your community interests (committees, organizations, special activities)?~c~'o~ ,- ~ Personal References: *Please provide the names of two non-relative references I. Name /~/~,"c /'~ Relations~p Address Relationship I give my permission for the named references* to be contacted either verbally or itt writing. All the information on this application is true to the best of my knowledge. Signature ~--)~////~/~r ~..~~~ Date 7 We welcome your willingness to serve Kitsap County. Please return this completed form to: Jan Koske, Kitsap County Volunteer Services Coordinator, Administrative Services, Kitsap County Courthouse, 614 Division Street MS7, Port Orchard, WA 98366 (360) 337-4650, Email jkoske~co.kitsap.wa, us V-13 DAS J~m Forms 7129/99 ~. 4. 1998 3: ~?PM BREMERTON HIGH SCH 360 478 5061 ~0,501 ~. Z/Z CITY OF_BREMERTON APPLICATION FOR CITY BOARDS/COMMISSIONS/COMMrr'TEE NOTE: As an applicant for a City Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and telephone number will be available to the press and public. You will be cortactsd before any action is taken on your appointment. {Pl~a:e Wpa or print clearly) DATE: /¢:~ '" ~ ' ~ OCCUPATION: ~ C ~-~ EDUCATION: f-.~ZZ ~ PRO FESSIONALiCOM MUI~IITY ACTIVITIES: LOCAL REFERENCES (name & phone number}: I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON (please check one or more): ( ! Disability ADrien Committee ( ) Planning Commissiol3 (18 yrs, ,t older) ( ) Civil Service Commission{18 yrs, & older) ( ) Parks & Recreation Commission ( ) Urban Forest Committee ( ) Ethics Commission {~} Cable Communications Advisory Committee ( ) Parking Advisory Board ( ) Community Development Block Gra~t ( ) Solid Waste Management _-- Advisory Committee ( ) Bremerton Housing Authority ( ) Youth Council ( ) Board of Appeals, Housing/Building Codes ( I Safe Streets Steering Committee ( ) Mayor's Select Ca'mmlttee on I.aw ( ) Citizen's Commission on Council Salaries Enforcement Is this an apl31ication fo~ reappointment? /[/~ ~ If yes, how many years have you served on this commission/committee7 PLEASE RETURN TO: Mayor's Office 239 4th Street Sl'gnaturE'- Bremerton, WA 98337 Applications be reviewed periodically to determine continued availability. Additional perlinent information may be put on back. AGENDA BZLL BREMERTON CI'TY COUNC:[L 1. SUB3ECT: Intergovernmental Purchasing agreement FOR AGENDA OF: April 10, 2002 ORZGZNATZNG DEPT: PW&U EQuipment Services[~, ORZGZNATOR: Jim Orton, Fleet Manaqer ~/' DATE SUBMITI'ED: April 3. 2002 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on ba, ck/~, 3. EXH]:BZT: :[nter-Local Agreement If n _eees_~ry) /,d, ,/' Director, PW~& Utilities / - ~, Purchasincr~~ City Treas~u re r ~---~'~-~ ~ Fin & Budget Com~'"~' ~"~-~" ,-~-~:'"~-~~:'' Operations Corem ~,.. ¢:, ,, :~'i :- ..... ,, / ENDORSEMENT [] :[~~ APPROVED BY COUNC]:L PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITrAL: SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQU]:REMENT FOR COUNC]:L ACTION) The Qb/of Bremerton Public Works is repladng a backhoe, which no longer fits the prerequisite for service in the fleet. Last year we "piggy backed" on an accepted bid from the Cib/of Everett (see exhibit). Smith Tractor and Equipment has agreed to accept the same bid this year. We have an Inteflocal agreement with the City of Everett t~ use this bid. Pursuant RCW chapter 39 and City of Bremerton purchasing polides Qb/Coundl's approval to purchase said backhoe from the City of Everett bid is req~;"~sted. Total oost of this backhoe will be $56,940.80. (ContinuaUon of Page 2) 5. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the purchase of a backhoe from bid #200-312 and an Inteflocai agreement with the Qb/of Everett. 9. RESPONS]:BLE OFF]:CZAL: Director of Public Works and Utilities ENFORCEMENT OFF]:CZAL: E0uioment Services Division M~naqer EXP]:RAT:][QN DATE: REV];EW DATE: 10. NOT]:~:E OF ACT]:ON PULLED [] TABLED [] APPROVED [] DZSAPPROVED [] AMENDED [] ~~ COUNC/L DTRECTZVE: 11. AGENDA B]:LL NO.: f~.~ .~ ~ ~' 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 3. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL A(;:TION - Continuation 6. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: Non-passage would mean re-bidding a backhoe. This would lengthen the time and assuredly the cost of the backhoe due to purchasing at 200:[ costs. 7. IMPACT ON STAFFINGw BUDGETS, FACILZTZES~ EQUIPMENT AND OTHER RESOURCES: The Immediate impact would be the costs associated with researching, writing, and distributing a new bid. Also we would be paying 2002 pricing 8. RESEARCH SOURCES: City of Bremerton purchasing policies and procedures, RCW chapter 39, and City of Everett purchasing policies INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT Pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW and to other applicable laws, CITY OF BREMERTON and, THE CITY OF EVERETT, both political subdivisions of the State of Washington, hereby agree to cooperative governmental purchasing upon the following terms an~i conditions: 1. This Agreement pertains to bids and contracts for supplies, mater/al, equipment, or services that may be required from time to time both by CITY OF BREMERTON and the City. of Everett. 2. Each of the parties from time to time goes. out to public bid and contracts to purchase supplies, material, equipment, and services. Each of the parties hereby agrees to extend to the other party, the right to purchase pursuant to such bids and contracts to the extent permitted by law, and to the extent agreed upon between each party and the bidder, contractor, vendor, supplier, or service provider. 3. Each of the parties shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations governing its own .. purchases. 4. Each of the parties shall contract directly with the bidder, contractor, vendor, supplier, or service provider, and pay directly in accordance with its own pa~vraent procedures for its own purchases. Each party will indemnify and hold the other party harmless as to any claim arising out of its participation in this Agreement. 5. Any purchase made pursuant to this Agreement is not a purchase from either of the parties. This Agreement shall create no obligation to either of the parties to purchase any particular good or service, nor create to either of the parties any assurance, warrant, or other obligation from the other party with respect to purchasing or supplying any good or service. 6. No separate legal or administrative entity, is intended to be created pursuant to this Agreement. No obligation, except as stated herein, shall be created between the parties or between the parties and any applicable bidder or contractor. 7. The FINANCE DIRECTOR of CITY OF BREMERTON and the Purchasing Manager of the City of Everett shall be representatives of the entities for carrying out the terms of this Agreement. 8. This Agreement shall continue in force until canceled by either party,, which cancellation may be effected upon receipt by one of the parties of the written notice of cancellation of the other party.. iNTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT (Cont.) APPROVED this ~day of APPROVED this /5z~ day of "~(~2 ~ .&./ ,20..O_1_. ~eJoz~ .. ,2001 CITY OF BREMERTON CITY Off/EVERETT BY: ~ -"-'/, '~ ~ BY.'~~~U'/~c'~ - S. Horton ~E~D.I~ ....... ~ .... Mayor Subscribed ~d sworn to~ day o eM "." ~ '~ ' '-..--," :., ,-., 7 ...... .," Sot~ Pu~ic in ~4 for ~e Star'of Not~ P~b}i~dn ad for ~ State of Washington, residing at Wa~nEon, residing at My co=ission expires ~. My co=ission expires .~-~g'd Z. APPROVED AS TO FORM: AP~O FOR2M: Title: ]~ .< ~ i C:t--... ~./t.~.g~, City Attorney A~~ _~ ATTE*ST: --, Na~ne:='' /:::)a,~/~ ~ ']n ~o ~ Sh~on M~ks AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 1. SUBJECT: FOR AGENDA OF: 4/10/02 Amendment to 2002 Budget to properly implement the ORIGINATING DEPT: Human Resources Management/Professional Compensation &Classification ORIGINATOR: Human Resources study to reflect the final pay band recommendations of the DATE SUBMITTED: 4/2/01 Consultant. 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: Amended Pay Plan Rich Hanna, Treasurer~'~'~,. Roger Lubovich, City Attorney~f - X,J - ~. ? ¢ /~... ~.~.~'~ //APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL BY Fiscal and Budget Chairm~.~'ff~//~~r_:e...c ~,~Cr/(/' COUNCIL PRESIDENT: Operations Chgirlfi~ ~~~~-----~_ MAYOR: ~ 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of this 2002 Budget Amendment will amend the Management/Professional Pay Plan to reflect the recommendations of the consultant in order to maintain the integrity of the study. Employees who were proposed to receive salary increases pursuant to the study would be reclassified and paid in accordance with the study or their current reclassification, whichever is higher. All increases would be retroactive to January 1, 2002. The amount required to fund th{s amendment is $52,6.04. 5. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to amend the 2002 budget in the amount of $52,604 to reflect the recommendations of the consultant for the Management/Professional positions in order to maintain the integrity of the study. Employees who were proposed to receive ~allary increases pursuant to the study would be reclassified and paid in accordance with the study or their current cia .~lification, whichever is higher. 6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Human Resources ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: H R EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 7. NOTICE OF ACTION: PULLED [] TABLED [] APPROVED [] DISAPPROVED [] AMENDED [] DATE: COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 8. AGENDA BILL NO.: CITY OF BREMERTON MANAGEMENT SALARY PLAN - 2002 Proposed Amendment for Council action on 4-10-02 APPENDIX A PAY SALARY BAND TITLE BASE RATE 1 RATE 2 RATE 3 RATE 4 RATE 5 RATE 6 RATE 7 RATE 8 22 Dir. Of Public Works & Utilities APPROX MO 7,100 7,460 7,646 7,838 8,034 8,234 8,440 8,651 City Attorney ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 3,550.19 3,729.97 3,823.22 3,918.80 4,016.77 4,117.19 4,220.12 4,325.63 IANNUAL 85,204.56 89,519.28 91,757.28 94,051.20 96,402.48 98,812.56 101,282.88 103,815.12 21 Fire Chief APPROX MO 6,758 7,100 7,278 7,460 7,646 7,838 8,034 8,234 Police Chief ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 3,379.14 3,550.19 3,638.95 3,729.97 3,823.22 3,918.80 4,016.77 4,117.19 ANNUAL 81,099.36 85,204.56 87,334.80; 89,519.28 91,757,28i 94,051.20 96,402.48 98,812.56 20 Dir Of Admin Sew/City Clerk APPROX MO 6,433 6,758 6,927 7,100 7,278 7,460 7,646 7,838 Dir. Of Building & Planning ACTUAL SEMi-MO. 3,216.32 3,379.14 3,463.62 3,550.19 3,638.95 3,729.97 3,823.22 3,918.80 ANNUAL 77,191.68 81,099.361 83,126.88 85,204.56 87,334.80 89,519.28 ' 91,757.28 94,051.20 19 Dir. Of Parks & Recreation APPROX MO 6,123 6,433 6,593 6,758 6,927 7,100 7,278 7,460 Dir. Of Human Resources ACTUAL SEMI-MO 3,061.33 3,216.32 3,296.70 3,379.14 3,463.62 3,550.19 3,638.95 3,729.97 City Engineer ANNUAL 73,471.92 77,191.68 79,120.80 81,099.36 83,126.88 85,204.56 87,334.80 89,519.28 18 Assistant Fire Chief APPROX MO 5,828 6,123 6,276 6,433 6,593 6,758 6,927 7,100 City Treasurer ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,913.84 3,061.33 3,137.89 3,216.32 3,296.70 3,379.14 3,463.62 3,550.19 ANNUAL 69,932.16 73,471.92 75,309.36 77,191.68 79,120.80 8t,099.36 83,126.88 85,204.56 17 Assistant City Attorney APPROX MO 5,547 5,828 5,973 6,123 6,276 6,433 6,593 6,758 City Auditor ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,773.42 2,913.84 2,986.68 3,061.33 3,137.89 3,216.32 3,296.70 3,379.14 ANNUAL 66,562.08 69,932.16 71,680.32 73,471.92 75,309.36 77,191.68 79,120.80 81,099.36 16 Public Works Operations Manager APPROX MO 5,280 5,547 5,686 5,828 5,973 6,123 6,276 6,433 Risk Manager ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,639.78 2,773.42 2,842.75 2,913.84 2,986.68 3,061.33 3,137.89 3,216.32 ANNUAL 63,354.72 66,562.08 68,226.00 69,932.16 71,680.32 73,471.92 75,309.36 77,191.68 15 !Forestry Manager APPROX MO 5,025 5,280 5,412 5,547 5,686 5,828 5,973 6,123 'Planning Manager ACTUAL SEMI-MO 2,512.59 2,639.78 2,705.78 2,773.42 2,842.75 2,913.84 2,986.68 3,061.33 Utility Operations Manager ANNUAL 60,302.16 63,354.72 64,938.72 66,562.08 68,226.00 69,932.16 71,680.32 73,471.92 Managing Engineer (was Sr. Engineer) Project Manager (was Proj. Engineer) Wastewater Manager Information Systems Manager Water Resources Manager 14 Assistant Treasurer APPROX MO 4,783 5,025 5,151 5,280 5,412 5,547 5,686 5,828 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,391.50 2,512.59 2,575.40 2,639.78 2,705.78 2,773.42 2,842.75 2,913.84 ANNUAL 57,396.00 60,302.16 61,809.60 63,354.72 64,938.72 66,562.08 68,226.00 69,932.16 13 WWTP Manager APPROX MO 4,553 4,783 4,903 5,025 5,151 5,280 5,412 5,547 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,276.29 2,391.50 2,451.30 2,512.59 2,575.40 2,639.78 2,705.78 2,773.42 ANNUAL 54,630.96 57,396.00 58,831.20 60,302.16 61,809.60 63,354.72 64,938.72 66,562.08 12 Fleet Manager APPROX MO 4,333 4,553 4,666 4,783 4,903 5,025 5,151 5,280 Court SenAces Manager ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,166.60 2,276.29 2,333.19 2,391.50 2,451.30 2,512.59 2,575.40 2,63978 Deputy City Clerk ANNUAL 51,998.40 54,630.96 55,996.56 57,396.00 58,831.20 60,302.16 61,809.60 63,354.72 11 Parks Maintenance Manager APPROX MO 4,124 4,333 4,442 4,553 4,666 4,783 4,903 5.025 Public Wks. & Util Financial Mgr. ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,062.19 2,166.60 2,220.76 2,276.29 2,333.19 2,391.50 2,451.30 2,512.59 was Finan.Analyst/moved to mgmt) ANNUAL 49,492.56 51,998.40 53,298.24 54,530.96i 55,996.551 57,396.00 58,831.20 60,302.16 Municipal Services Coordinator 10 APPROX MO 3,926 4,124 4,228 4,333 4,442 4,553 4,666 4.783 ACTUAL SEMI-MQ, 1,962.82 2,062.19 2,113.75 2,166.60 2,220.76 2,276.29 2,333.19 2,391.50 ANNUAL 47,107.68 49,492.56 50,730.00 51,998.40 53,298.24 54,630.96 55,996.56 57,396.00 R:\Treas\02Bud'~4-10-02 AMENDED MGMT & PROF BANDS PER COUNCIL 2002 Mgmt amended 4/4/2002 9:52 AM CITY OF BREMERTON MANAGEMENT SALARY PLAN - 2002 Proposed Amendment for Council action on 4-10-02 APPENDIX A PAY SALARY BAND TITLE BASE RATE '1 RATE 2 RATE 3 RATE 4 RATE 5 RATE 6 RATE 7 RATE 8 9 Athletics/Aquatics Manager APPROX MO 3,736 3,926 4,024 4,124 4,228 4,333 4,442 4,553 Recreation Manager ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,868.24 1,962.82 2,011.90 2,062.19 21113.75 2,166.60 2,220.76 2,276.29 Public Access Manager ANNUAL 44,837.76 47,107.68 48,285.60 49,492.56 50,730.00 51,998.40 53,288.24 54,630.96 8 APPROX MO 3,556 3,736 3,630 3,926 4,024 4,124 4,228 4,333 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,778.21 1,868.24 1,914.95 1,962.82 2,011.90 2,062.19 2,113.75 2,166.60 ANNUAL 42,677.04 . 44,837.76 45,958.80 47,107.68 48,285.60 49,492.56 50,730.00 51,996.40 7 APPROX MO 3,385 3,556 3,645 3,736 3,830 3,926 4,024 4,124 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,692.55 1,778.21 1,822.68 1,868.24 1,914.95 1,962.82 2,011.90 2,062.19 ANNUAL 40,621.20 42,677.04 43,744.32 44,837.76 45,958.80 47,107.68 48,285.60 49,492.56 6 APPROX MO 3,222 3,385 3,470 3,556 3,645 3,736 3,830 3,926 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,611.04 1,692.55 1,734.86 1,776.21 1,622.66 1,668.24 1,914.95 1,962.82 5 APPROX MO 3,067 3,222 3,303 3,385 3,470 3,556 3,645 3,736 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,533.45 1,611.04 1,651.31 1,692.55 1,734.86 1,778.21 1,822.68 1,868.24 4 APPROX MO 2,919 3,067 3,144 3,222 3,303 3,385 3,470 3,556 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,459.61 1,533.45 1,571.78 1,611.04 1,651.31 1,692.55 1,734.86 1,778.21 3 APPROX MO 2,779 ,. 2,919 2,992 3,067 3,144 3,222 3,303 3,385 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,389.31 1,459.61 1,496.09 1,533.45 1,571.78 1,611.04 1,651.31 1,692.55 2 APPROX MO 2,645 2,779 2,848 2,919 2,992 3,067 3,144 3,222 ACTUAL SEMI-MO 1,322.39 1,389.31 1,424.06 1,459.61 1,496.09 1,533.45 1,571.78 1,611.04 1 APPROX MO 2,517 2,645 2,711 2,779 2,848 2,919 2,992 3,067 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,258.69 1,322.39 1,355.45 1,389.31 1,424.06 1,459.61 1,496.09 1,533.45 This revision reflects tile follov, ing changes recommended by tile Appeals Reviexv Board and Administration: I. Managing Engineer moved from Professional Pay Plan to Management Pay Plan and Pay Range upgraded from Band 14 to Band 15 (~mckey & Korpi) 2. Project Engineer moved from Professional Band 15 to Management Pay Plan Band 15 and retitlcd PROJECT MANAGER, no pay increase involved (Price & Earl) 3. Financial Analyst moved from Professional Band I I to Management Pay Plan Band 11 and retitled PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES FINANCIAl. MANAGER, no pay increase involved (Vellegas) F~:\Treas\02Bud\4-10-02 AMENDED MGMT & PROF BANDS PER COUNCIL 2002 Mgmt amended 4/4/2002 9:52 AM CITY OF BREMERTON PROFESSIONAL, CONFIDENTIAL & FIDUCIARY PAY PLAN - 2002 Proposed Amendment for Council action on 4-10-02 APPENDIX A PAY SALARY BAND TITLE BASE RATE 1 RATE 2 RATE 3 RATE 4 RATE $ RATE 6 RATE 7 RATE 8 22 APPROX MO 7,100 7,460 7,646 7,838 8,034 8,234 8,440 8,651 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 3,550.19 3,729.97 3,823.22 3,918.80 4,016.77 4,117.19 4,220.12 4,325.63 ANNUAL 85,204.56 89,519.28 91,757.28 94,051.20 96,402.48 98,812.56 101,282.88 t03,815.12 21 APPROX MO 6,758 7,100 7,278 7,460 7,646 7,838 8,034 8,234 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 3,379.14 3,550.19 3,638.95 3,729.97 3,823.22 3,91880 4,016.77 4,117.19 ANNUAL 81,099.36 85,204.56 87,334.80 89,519.28 91,757.28 94,051.201 96,402.48 98,812.56 20 APPROX MO 6,433 6,758 6,927 7.100 7,278 7,460 7,646 7,838 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 3,216.32 3,379.14 3,463.62 3,550.19 3,638.95 3,729.97 3,823.22 3,918.80 ANNUAL 77,191.681 81,099.36 83,126.88 85,204.56 87,334.80 89,519.28 91,757.28 94,051.20 19 APPROX MO 6,123 6,433 6,593 6,758 6,927 7,100 7,278 7,460 ACTUAL SEMi-MO. 3,06%33 3,216.32 3,296.70 3,379.14 3,463.62 3,550.19 3,638.95 3,72997 ANNUAL 73,471.921 77,191.68 79,120.80 81,099.36 83,126.88 85,204.56 87,334.801 89,519.28 18 APPROX MO 5,828 6,123 6,276 6,433 6,593 6,758 6,927 7,100 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,91384 3,061.33 3,137.89 3,216.32 3,296.70 3,379.14 3,463.62 3,550.19 ANNUAL 69,932.16 73,471.92 75,309.36 77,191.68 79,120.80 81,099.36 83,126.88 85,204.56 17 APPROX MO 5,547 5,828 5,973 6,123 6,276 6,433 6,593 6,758 ACTUAL SEMI-MO 2,773.42 2,913.84 2,986.68 3,061.33 3,137.89 3,216.32 3,296.70 3,379.14 ANNUAL 66,562.08 69,932.16 71,680.32 73,471.92 75,309.36 77,191.68 79,120.80 81,099.36 16~ APPROX MO 5,280 5,547 5,686 5,828 5,973 6,123 6,276 6,433 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,639.78 2,773.42 2,842.75 2,91384 2,986.68 3,061.33 3,137.89 3,216.32 ANNUAL 63,354.72 66,562.08 68,226.00 69,932.16 71,680.32 73,471.92 75,309.36 77,191 68 15 Project Engineer APPROX MO 5,025 5,280 5,412 5,547 5,686 5,828 5,973 6,123 (Move to Mgmt & retitle to Project Mg ACTUAL SEMI-MC 2,512.59 2,639.78 2,705.78 2,773.42 2,842.75 2,913.84 2,986.68 3,061.33 ANNUAL 60,302.16 63,354.72 64,938.72 66,562.08 68,226.00 69,932,16 71,680.32 73,47'1.92 14 APPROX MO 4,783 5.025 5,151 5,280 5,412 5,547 5,686 5,828 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,391.50 2,512.59 2,575.40 2,639.78 2,705.78 2,773.42 2,842.75 2,913 84 ANNUAL 57,396.00 60,302.16 61,809.60 63,354.72 64,938.72 66,562.08 68,226.00 69,932.16 I 13 APPROX MO 4,553 4,783 4,903 5,025 5,151 5,280 5,412 5,547 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,276.29 2,391.50 2,451.30 2,512.59 2,575.40 2,639.78 2,705.78 2,773.42 ANNUAL 54,630.96 57,396.00 58,831.20 60,302.16 61,809.60 63,354.72 64,938.72 66,562.08 12 Economic Development Specialist APPROX MO 4,333 4,553 4,866 4,783 4,903 5,025 5,151 5,280 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,166.60 2,276.29 2,333.19 2,391.50 2,451.30 2,512.59 2,575.40 2,639.78 ANNUAL 51,998.40 54,630.96 55,996.56 57,396.00 58,831.20 60,302.16 61,809.60 63,354.72 11 Civil Service Officer/HR Specialist APPROX MO 4,124 4,333 4,442 4,553 4,666 4,783 4,903 5,025 Administrative Analyst ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 2,062.19 2,166.60 2,220.76 2,276.29 2,333.19 2,391.50 2,451.30 2,512.59 :inancial Analyst (retitle/move to mgr ANNUAL 49,492.56 51,998.40 53,298.24 54,630.96 55,996.56 57,396.00 58,831.20 60,302.16 Municipal Services Coordinator 10 Budget Analyst APPROX MO 3,926 4,124 4,228 4,333 4,442 4,553 4,666 4,783 ACTUAL SEMI-MO 1,962.82 2,062.19 2,113.75 2,166.60 2,220.76 2,276.29 2,333.19 2,391.50 ANNUAL 4~,107.68 49,492.56 50,730.00 51,998.40 53,298.24 54,630.96 55,996.56 57,396,00 9 Contract Administrator, Parks APPROX MO 3,736 3,926 4,024 4,124 4,228 4,333 4,442 4,553 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1'868.24 1,962.82 2,011.90 2,062.19 2,113.75 2,166.60 2,220.76 2,276.29 ANNUAL 44,837.76 47,107.68 48,285.60 49,492.56 50,730.00 51,998.40 53,298.24 54,630.96 [~',HR\02AMENDBudGET\4-10-02 AMENDED MGMT & PROF BANDS PER COUNCIL 2002 Professional amended 4/4/2002 9:46 AM CITY OF BREMERTON PROFESSIONAL, CONFIDENTIAL & FIDUCIARY PAY PLAN - 2002 Proposed Amendment for Council action on 4-10-02 APPENDIX A PAY SALARY , BAND TITLE BASE RATE 1 RATE 2 RATE 3 RATE 4 RATE 5 RATE 6 RATE 7 RATE 8 8 Executive Assistant APPROX MO 3,556 3,736 3,830 3,926 4,024 4,124 4,228 4,337 Council Liaison ACTUAL SEMI-MO 1,778.21 1,868.24 1,914.95 1,962.82 2,011.90 2,062.19 2,113.75 2,16660 ANNUAL 42,677.04 44,837,76 45,958.80 47,107.68 48,285.60 49,492.56 50,730.00 51,998.40 7 Human Resources Generalist APPROX MO 3,385 3,556 3,645 3,736 3,830 3,926 4,024 4,124 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,692.55 1,778.21 1,822.68 1,868.24 1,914.95 1,962.82 2,011.90 2,062.19 ANNUAL 40,621.20 42,677.04 43,744.32 44,837.76 45,958.80 47,107.68 48,285.60 49,492.56 6 Legal Assistant APPROX MO 3,222 3,385 3,470 3,556 3,645 3,736 3,830 3,926 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,611.04 1,692.55 1,734.86 1,778.21 1,82268 1,868.24 1,914.95 1,962.82 ANNUAL 38,664.96 40,621.20 41,636.64 42,677.04 43,744.32 44,837.76 45,958.80 47,107.68 5 Leg/Internal Audit Asst. (PT) APPROX MO 3,067 3,222 3,303 3,385 3,470 3,556 3,645 3,736 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,533.45 1,611.04 1,651.31 1,692.55 11734.86 1,778.21 1,82268 1,868.24 ANNUAL 36,802.80 38,664.96 39,631,44 40,621.20 4t ,636.64 42,677,04 43,744,32 44,837.76 4 APPROX MO 2,919 3,067 3,144 3,222 3,303 3,385 3,470 3,556 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,459.61 1,533.45 1,571.78 1,611.04 1,651.31 1,692.55 1,734.86 1,778.21 3 APPROX MO 2,779 2,919 2,992 3,067 3,144 3,222 3,303 3,385 !ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,389.31 1,459.81 1,496.09 1,533.45 1,571.78 1,611.04 1,651.31 1,692.55 2 APPROX MO 2,645 2,779 2,848 2,919 2,992 3,067 3,144 3,222 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,322.39 1,389.31 1,424.06 1,459.61 1,496.09 1,533.45 1,571.78 1,611.04 1 APPROX MO 2,517 2,645 2,711 2,779 2,848 2,919 2,992 3,067 ACTUAL SEMI-MO. 1,258.69 1,322.39 1,355.45 1,389.31 1,424.06 1,459.61 1,496.09 1,533.45 This revision reflects tile following revisions recommended by thc Appeals Review Board and Administration: I Project Engineer moved to Management Pay Plan and retitled Project Manager, no pay increase revolved. 2 Financial Analyst moved to Management Pay Plan and rctiflcd Public Works & Utilities Financial Manager, no pay increase involved R\HR\02AMENDBudGET\4-10-02 AMENDED MGMT & PROF BANDS PER COUNCIL 2002 Professional amended 4/4/2002 9:46 AM AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL APRIL 10, 2_o02_ /" 1. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. ORIGINATINGFOR AGENDA OF:DEPT: APR11~ Amending BMC 15.06 Setting Fees for Improper ORIGINATOR: Ric6 Hanna Stormwater Inflows. DATE SUBMITTED: 03/12/2002 2. CLEARANCES: 7~,,~_~ necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: Dir. Public¢~/~-3~----%-.:-~.~,~ ~.,z._~, Proposed Ordinance City Atto : . ~"-'~--"'" Operations MAYOR (.,,....-'~-'t..-~ ~ COUNCIL PRESIDENT 4. ~UMMARY ~TATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR GOUNGIL ACTION: When the City's utility rates were amended by ordinance in July of 2001 for the rate change to be implemented Janua~ 1,2002, the fees for improper stormwater discharges to the sanita~ sewer system which had been set by prior o~inance to become effective Feb~a~ 1, 2002 were inadvedently deleted from the rate stru~ure. The proposed ordinance will remedy this error and will set the improper sto~water discharge rates to take effect as of May 1, 2002. 8. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve on first reading the ordinance setting for improper stormwater discharge. Motion to pass on second reading Ordinance No. setting fees for improper stormwater discharges. 9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Dir. PAN ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor EXPIRATION DATE: N/A REVIEW DATE: N/A 10. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENDED COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: 11. AGENDA BILL NO: ~',~.- 2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE: The proposed fees for improper discharge of stormwater to the sanitary sewer system will not be implemented. This will result in a nominal loss of revenue to the wastewater utility. 6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: Nominal increase in wastewater revenues if approved. 7. RESEARCH SOURCES: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington amending Appendix A of Chapter 15.06 of the Bremerton Municipal Code as amended by Ordinance Number 4766, re-establishing rates for Inappropriate Stormwater Inflow to the Wastewater System and deferring the assessment of the same to a date later than as originally established. WHEREAS, Bremerton Municipal Code, Chapter 15.06.050, requires that a schedule be adopted by the City Council for rates associated with Improper Stormwater Inflow; WHEREAS, the City Council established Improper Stormwater Inflow rates in 1999 pursuant to Ordinance Number 4685, as reaffirmed by Ordinance Number 4735, which were added to and set forth in Appendix A of Chapter 15.06 of the Bremerton Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Ordinance Number 4766, while amending Appendix A of Chapter 15.06 of the Bremerton Municipal Code, inadvertently deleted the Improper Stormwater Inflow rates that were established in Ordinance Number 4685, as reaffirmed by Ordinance Number 4735, from said appendix and therefore Appen.d'1:~ A of Chapter 15.06, does not currently provide' for rates associated with Improper Stormwater Inflow; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to re-establish rates relating to Improper Stormwater Inflow and defer assessment of the same from the date originally established to May 1, 2002; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Section of Chapter 15.06, Appendix A of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "RETAIL STORMWATER RATES" is hereby amended to read as follows: RETAIL STORMWATER RATES Within City Limits Outside City Limits Monthly Service Charge Single Family Base Charge (per account) $4.00 N/A Inappropriate Stormwater [nllow.ord [>age I Exception: Duplex W/2 Meters (per account) $2.00 N/A Multiple Family Base Charge (per ISU) $4.00 N/A Commercial Base Charge (per ISU) $4.00 N/A Public School Districts (per account) $4.00 N/A Low Income Senior and Low Income Disabled Citizen Rate (per account) $2.50 N/A Multiple Family & Commercial Rate Adjustment Water Quality (per ISU) $(0.50) N/A Water Quantity (per ISU) $(1.50) N/A Stormwater Penalty for new Multiple Family & Commercial development without on-site detention (per ISU) $.50 N/A IMPROPER STORMWATER INFLOW RATES. The following rates are established for Improper Stormwater Inflow, based upon the stormwater ISU for each lot and adjusted annually on the following schedule: EFFECTIVE DATE RATE May 1, 2002 25% Stormwater Fee for Property May 1, 2003 50% Stormwater Fee for Property May 1, 2004 75% Stormwater Fee for Property May 1, 2005 100% Stormwater Fee for Property After Mayl, 2005, the Improper Stol'mwater Inflow Rate will remain at 100% of the Stormwater Fee for a property unless otherwise modified by the City Council. The fees shall be deposited in the Wastewater Fund (No. 451). SECTION 2. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. lnappropnate Stormwater lnflow.ord [)age 2 qo SECTION 3. E_f_fective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2002 PASSED by the City Council the day of ., 2002 CAROL ARENDS, Council President Approved this day of ., 2002 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: '" 'KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney . . PUBLISHED the day of ., 2002 EFFECTIVE the day of ,2002 ORDINANCE NO. R:\LEGA L\Ordinances\Stormwater Intlow.ord.doc Inappropriate Stormwater lnI'io,,v.ord AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL I. SUBJECT: Public Hearinq &Ordinance to amend FOR AGENDA OF: April 10, 2002 BMC Chapter 21.02 (the Zoning Code) by providing the DEPT. OF ORIGIN: DCD .,~ / Regulatory measures for automobile dealership group signs, ORIGINATOR: Chris Hu,qo, DirectOr/ Subject to certain conditions. DATE SUBMITTED: March 21, 2002 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: DCD Director:~ , o PC Findings & Conclusions City Attorney:(,, -/J.~.~--. -~. ' : ---,- o PC Minutes January 15, 2002 City Clerk: "~-~C~ Staff Report Fiscal & Budget Council i~o .m. ~_'~.~~,.~ ,.,.~/ o o Ordinance to amend Zoning Text Operations Comm.: ,:-'~' ~,~','* ..... / ENDOR~T~FO~TION- APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: This request for Zoning Te~ Amendment was submitted by the Haselwood Auto Group. The amendment will allow placement of a sign to identify an automobile dealership group, subject to ce~ain conditions. The amendment would apply only to a limited area that currently contains a majority of the dealemhips in Breme~on. The Planning Commission has reviewed this proposal, conducted a public hearing and adopted Findings & Conclusions at their Janua~ 15, 2002 meeting, and recommends City Council approval. The Council must conduct a public hearing prior to its final decision and action on the proposed Ordinance. 5. RECOMMENDATION: Move to approve the attached Ordinance # on first readinq. Move to pass the attached Ordinance # on second reading. 6, RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Christopher R. Hu,qo ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Christopher R. Hu,qo EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 7. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AMENI~_~~ COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE: 8. AGENDA BILL NO.: ~. '~ --~i [~ 9. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 10. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: The community would lose the benefit of consolidating some currently allowed signage on one sign structure and controlling all signage through a master sign plan process. 11. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: The proposed amendment will create no operational changes for the city, with the possible exception of increasing vehicle sales and tax revenue to the city. 12. RESEARCH SOURCES: Comprehensive Plan Zoning Ordinance File Site Visits AGBillHazSignMar15 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the Bremerton City Council amending the Zoning Code, Chapter 21.02.330(k) (Sign Provisions) of the Bremerton Municipal Code, by adding a new section to create an automobile dealership sign district and to create a provision for automobile dealership group identification signs pursuant to certain conditions including an approved signage master plan. WHEREAS, The Haselwood Auto Group has filed an application for Zoning Text Amendment requesting an amendment to the zoning text that would allow signage to identify multiple auto dealership groups; and WHEREAS, existing sign regulations encourage multiple signs directing attention to multiple vehicle dealerships, creating uncoordinated individual signs and visual clutter; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to encourage coordination of signage for dealerships pursuant to a master plan approach; and WHEREAS, a majority ofBrem,, erton's auto dealerships are located in the area located west of SR 3, south of Kitsap Way, and north of SR 3/304, making it feasible to create an "Automobile Dealership Sign District; and ~ WHEREAS, allowing owners of two or more dealership franchises within tha~ district to have a single sign to identify the dealership group, subject to certain conditions including limitations on total sign area, sign orientation, and a requirement for a Signage Master Plan is likely to result in improved coordination and reduced proliferation of signs; and WHEREAS, such coordination and control of signage is supported by the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, The Bremerton Planning Commission, during their regularly scheduled meeting on January 15, 2002, determined that this amendment request was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and with the City's Development Regulations Amendment criteria, which is contained in BMC 21.02.925, adopted Findings and Conclusions in support of its recommendation to approve this Development Regulations Amendment; and WHEREAS, The Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on April 10, 2002 to accept public comments pertaining to the proposed Development Regulation Amendment to consider the Planning Commission recommendation; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Bremerton Municipal Code Section 21.02.330(k) is hereby amended by adding a new sub-section to read as follows: (3) Automobile Dealership Sign Provisions. i. This subsection designates the area bounded by Kitsap Way on the north, SR 3 on the east, Harlow Drive/Auto Center Boulevard/Union Avenue/3~d Street on the west, and the intersection ofSR 3 and SR 304 on the south as the Automobile Dealership Sign District. ii. No regulation in the Automobile Dealership Sign District shall be interpreted to obviate any of the other provisions of the Bremerton Zoning Code, Chapter 21.02 BMC, that are applicable to a given property or proposal. iii. Automobile dealers in the district listed in (i) above may erect one sign identifying the dealership group and the brands of vehicles sold in the group, subject to the following provisions: a. Two or more franchises under common ownership constitute a dealership group. b. The total area ora group identification sign shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet for each dealer franchise in the group. c. No group identification sign shall be more than one hundred fifty (150) square feet if mounted on a pole, or two hundred (200) square feet if mounted on the ground. d. The square footage of any group identification sign shall be deducted from the total signage allotment of the parcel upon which the sign is placed. e. Group identification signs shall front on an arterial street. All dealers shall be required to submit a signage master plan for all dealerships in a dealership group prior to the approval of a group identification sign. SECTION 2. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2002. PASSED by the City Council the day of ., 2002 CAROL ARENDS, Council President Approved this day of ,2002 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of ,2002 EFFECTIVE the day of ,2002 ORDINANCE NO. R:~LEGAL\Ordinances~Zoning Ordinance 3-02.doc are trying to accomplish here. 1~ agree with Joan that we need to return it to the Planning Department. The last time we actually worked on this, we had some suggestions (wording), and I don't see that those suggestions were implemented because it was unclear the last time. The staff has to help us on this and get it clearer. I think that if everybody understands the intent and can take the language and apply it if they are looking at a map and can understand what this could do for our neighborhoods and infill - they would be a lot more comfortable with it. The intent, again and the lanaua~e are not meeting. Commissioner Kosusko stated that he agreed. The zoning code is a technical document that people in the planning, development and building profession need to be able to understand. The general public, of course, should also be able to understand it. Just as with legal documents, sometimes we go to a lawyer if we cannot understand a legal document. I don't want to be self preserving here, but if you don't understand the zoning or development codes, maybe you go to Planning staff or an architect or a builder that works with those thing. I can understand this document because I work in the field, but there are vague qualities to it that I think need to be looked at. The two exceptions at the end are mutually exclusive of each other (and should not be used in the language). In other parts of the zoning code there are pictorial examples of how something might apply. This is certainly a case where that would be helpful. I would encourage the department to come up with a couple of examples. Commissioner Kennedy, stated that, "I think it has to be spelled out that it relates to the road frontage and not shoreline or back-yards or alley ways." Commissioner Kosusko stated that this exists in the zoning code - so it applies to zoning. It does not apply to shoreline, that is a separate code. He further explained that perhaps the word front-yard should be further modified to be-"clear that you are talking about zoning front yards and not shoreline front yard. " Commissioner Cockburn added that if it is city-wide it doesn't always even pertain to shoreline. There was a short discussion about whether to continue this item completely (including public testimony), or return it to the Planning Department. Commissioner Kosusko decided after this discussion and input from staff to re-opened public testimony and entertain a motion to continue the item until the next regularly schedule meeting. A motion was made by Commissioner Moshay to continue this item, with public hearing to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Comimssioner Wood. Called for a vote: Cockburn: yes; Dingfield: yes; Kennedy: yes: Moshay. ?'es: Wood: yes; and Kosusko: yes. The motion carded. 4. PL02-0002 - Proposed Zoning Text Amendment. City of Bremerton proposal to amend BMC 21.02.330 for all parcels zoned for automobile dealerships and related uses in that area generally bordered by Kitsap Way in the north. State Highway 3 in the east. Harlow Dave/Auto Center Boulevard/Union'Avenue/3''d Street in the west. and the intersection or' State Highways 3 and 304 in the south. Proposal is to create an automobile dealership sign district and to create a provision for automobile dealership Planning Commission Meeting January [5. 2002 Page 14 of I6 groups to establish auto group identification signs pursuant to an approved signage master plan. Commissioner Cockburn excused himself from this item due to a conflict of interest since he works for an auto dealer. Laura Freed presented the staff report to the commission. She stated, "I am here to discuss the proposed amendment to the sign code. Particularly this proposal would created a provision in the code for automobile dealership groups. A dealership group is defined as two or more franchises under common ownership. Allow dealerships to put up an identification sign of the dealership group rather than just one brand of car. The details are: 1. The total area of a group identification sign will not exceed 50 square feet for each dealer franchise in the group 2. No group identification sign shall be more than 150 square feet if mounted on a pole or 250 square feet if mounted on the ground. 3. The square footage of any group identification sign shall be deducted from the total signage allotment of the parcel where the sign is placed. 4. Group identification signs shall front on an arterial street. 5. All automobile dealerships will be required to submit a master plan for signage for all dealerships in their group prior to the approval of such a group identification sign. Nothing in this particular district should be understood to obviate any other parts of the sign code. There was no public comment. [NOTE: From this poini forward, the tape of the meeting was unintelligible.] A motion was made by Commissioner Moshay to approve the proposed zoning text amendment (PL02-0002) adding a provision in the sign code for automobile dealership identification signs. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Dingfield. Called for a vote: Cockbum: abstained; Dingfield: yes; Kennedy: yes; Moshay: yes: Wood: yes; and Kosusko: yes. The motion camed. VI. Business Meeting A. Chair Report: I. There was no report from the chairman. B. Director's Report 1. Mr. Hugo was unavailable. Nls. Dri Ralph gave the Director's Report. She reported that the mayor has applications for Planning Commission. This is a priority for the mayor. C. Study: None. Planning Commission Meeting January [5. 2002 Page [5 of [0 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2002 Zoning Text Amendment STAFF REPORT with FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS PROPOSAL: Proposed Zoning Code text amendment to add a new section to BMC 21.02.330 (Signs) to create an automobile dealership sign district and to create a provision for automobile dealership group identification signs pursuant to an approved signage master plan. DATE OF REPORT: January 10, 2002 APPLICANT OR PROPONENT (FILE NUMBER): Haselwood Auto Group 500 Union Avenue Bremerton, WA CONTACT: Jerry Powers 360-405-6208 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: This proposal applies to all parcels zoned for automobile dealerships and related uses in that area generally bordered by Kitsap Way in the north, State Highway 3 in the east, Harlow Drive/Auto Center Boulevard/Union Avenue/3rd Street in the west, and the intersection of State Highways 3 and 304 in the south. BACKGROUND: Automobile dealers have in the past placed signs to advei'tise their brand as a mandate of the automobile manufacturer who~e car they sell. In addition, auto dealers have wanted to place additional signs for advertising proposes and to direct buyers to their showrooms. This has resulted in a piecemeal installation process for signage at car dealers. This presents difficulties for staff in that permitting one more sign means that the total allotment of signage space already on site must be reviewed each time there is an application for a new sign. The sign code limits the number and size of both pole or monuments signs, as well as building signage. The limit on the number of pole and monument signs has, in some cases, precluded the placement of a dealership group sign. PROPOSED ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT: Amend BMC 21.02.330, Subsections K and L, by adding a new section that reads as follows: "(3) Automobile Dealership Sign Provisions. i. This subsection designates the area bounded by Kitsap Way in the north, State Highway 3 in the east, Hadow Drive/Auto Center Boulevard/Union Avenue/3ra Street in the xvest, and the intersection of Stare Highways 3 and 304 in the south as the Automobile Dealership Sign District. ii. No regulation in the Automobile Dealership Sign District shall be interpreted to obviate any of the other provisions of the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance that are applicable to a given property or proposal. iii. Automobile dealers in the district listed in (1) above may erect one sign identifying the dealership group and the brands of autos sold in the group. a. Two or more franchises under common ownership constitute a dealership group. b. The total area of a group identification sign shall not exceed 50 square feet for each dealer franchise in the group. c. No group identification sign shall be more than one hundred fifty (150) square feet if mounted on a pole, or two hundred (200) square feet if mounted on the ground. d. The square footage of any group identification sign shall be deducted from the total signage allotment of the parcel upon which the sign is placed. e. Group identification signs shall front on an arterial street. f. All automobile dealers shall be required to submit a signage master plan for all dealerships in a dealership group prior to the approval of a group identification sign. SEPASTATUS: SEPA revie~v for this proposal is pending. DECISION CRITERIA: In order to approve a zoning text amendment, it must be found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the amendment must be internally consistent with the balance of the zoning code. The following findings of fact are pertinent to the subject code amendment: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan is largely silent on the issue of urban design, and as such provides no guidance or vision for signage in the community. However, there are two planning goals that address the need for high quality, attractive signage. Goal #14 - Community Image calls for "identifiable, livable neighborhoods that provide a variety of residential opportunities complimented [sic] by recreational, shopping and social support services" (Planning Goals p. 6). This suggests that proper signage that directs patrons to the businesses they want and need to visit is a suitable addition to Bremerton's built environment. Goal #5 - Economic Development encourages economic development that is consistent with adopted Comprehensive Plans. 2. The proposed text is consistent with the rest of the City of Bremerton Zoning Ordinance. There is nothing in the proposed text that affects the other provisions of the sign code. This amendment is designed to provide more flexibility for auto dealership groups while protecting Bremerton from visual clutter associated with signs that are too big, too bright, and too many. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed zoning text amendment will allow signage that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the rest of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed text amendment promotes the public interest and poses no adverse impacts to the community. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the background, findings of fact, and conclusions articulated above, it is recommended that the subject zoning text amendment be approved. Approved by the Bremerton Planning Commission on ': i ~ ~ Attest: :/ / A~idy Kosusk-'6 /" Chris Hug Chair f Secretary 53 AGENDA BILL BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL I. SUBJECT: Public Hearinq &Ordinance to amend FOR AGENDA OF: April 10, 2002 BMC Chapter 21.02 (the Zoning Code) by providing the DEPT. OF ORIGIN: DCD / regulatory measures to promote the adaptive reuse of public ORIGINATOR: Chris Huqo, Direc~.~'~v and semi-public buildings. DATE SUBMITTED: March 21, 2002 2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS: DCD Director: ~ _ . o PC Findings & Conclusions City Attorne~i.~----,~--~- ---'--~ o PC Minutes 3/20/01 & 7/17/01 City Clerk: .~,~_'t~_' .. f _ . ~ ....... ~. // o Staff Report Fiscal & Budget Council C, Dm, ~,_~/~%~[.,~;~;Z~,~.,Y/// o Ordinance to amend Zoning Text Operations Comm.: ~.{*' '"' --~,'& ~-,,~ . ENDORS~'I~T- i/bLr'~~ON- APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL: MAYOR ~ ~ ~"0N-~L PRESIDENT .~,.2~....¢_~.,,. 4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The Bremerton School District has initiated Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments intended to promote the reuse of public and semi-public buildings that are no longer needed to serve their original primary purpose, provided that a new use is compatible with the surrounding planned environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed this proposal, conducted public hearings, adopted Findings & Conclusions at their July 17, 2001 meeting, and recommended City Council approval. The Council approved the related Comprehensive Plan Amendment on August 1,2001. The Council must conduct a public hearing prior to its final decision and action on the ~roposed Ordinance in order to implement the zoning text amendment. It should be noted that the attached zoning text indicated as "revised" has been refined at the suggestion of the City Attorney to better address the compatibility issue. It is recommended that the revised text be approved. 5. RECOMMENDATION: Move to approve the attached Ordinance # on first readinq. Move to pass the attached Ordinance # on second readinq. 6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Christopher R. Huqo ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Christopher R. Huqo EXPIRATION DATE: REVIEW DATE: 7. NOTICE OF ACTION PULLED TABLED APPROVED DISAPPROVED AM ENII~.__~ COUNCIL DIRECTIVE: DATE: 8. AGENDA BILL NO.: ~a.~-' ~. ,' 9. CLEARANCE COMMENTS: 10. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE: If the proposed ordinance is not approved, the city will lose the capability of allowing obsolete public buildings to be utilized for activities that are compatible with their surroundings, resulting in vacant structures, demolition of substantial buildings, and a lack of revenue- generating opportunities for tax-supported entities such as the Bremerton School District. 11. !MPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES: The proposed amendment will create no operational changes for the city. 12. RESEARCH SOURCES: Comprehensive Plan Zoning Ordinance File Site Visits " ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of' the City Council of' the City of' Bremerton, Washington, amending the Zoning Code, Chapter 21.02 of` the Breme~ton Municipal Code, by adding a new section, Section 21.02.155 entitled "Adaptive Reuse of' Public and Semi- Public Buildings" to allow certain uses in surplus public and semi- public buildings, subject to approval of' a Special Use Permit that demonstrates compatibility of` uses with the surrounding area. WHEREAS, the Bremerton School District has initiated Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments that would allow the reuse of' surplus public and semi-public buildings for certain uses, provided that those uses would be proven compatible with the surrounding area and subject to a Special Use Permit; and WHEt~AS, fire stations, libraries, churches, and park buildings, in addition to schools are common to residential neighborhood settings and occasionally become surplus; and WHEREAS, such buildings are often substantial structures that became an integral part of' a neighborhood setting and can be put to useful purposes after they are declared surplus for their originally intended use; and WHEREAS, the absence of. a provision in the Zoning Code allowing for adaptive reuse would be likely to result in the demolition of' such buildings when and if. they were declared surplus; and WH~P, EAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Text amendments on March 20, 200 l, continued the hearing, and on July 17, 2002 adopted Findings and Conclusions in support of. its recommendation to approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment (File # PLO 1-0010) and Zoning Code Text Amendment (File # PLO 1-0011); and WHEI~AS, the City Council approved the Comprehensive Plan amendment on August 1, 2001, but not the Zoning Text Amendment, which was apparently withdrawn to allow for refinement of. language; and WHEREAS, a SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for both the Comprehensive Plan amendment and Zoning Code amendment on March 17, 2001; and 1 WHEREAS, The Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on April 10, 2002 to accept the public comments pertaining to the proposed Development Regulation Amendment to consider the Planning Commission recommendation; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHiNGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A new section is hereby added to Bremerton Municipal Code, Chapter 21.02 to read as follows: 21.02.155 ADAPTIVE REUSE OF PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC BUILDiNGS. (a) When the need for a certain public or semi-public building in any zone no longer exists, the building use may be converted to those uses listed in the zone in which it is located, except that when it is located in any residential zone, it may be changed by special permit to a use allowed in Figure 140, Professional Office (PO) Zone, Categories 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and the following listed uses of Category 11: consultants, computer assistance and training (but not repair), office/business assistance services, and general offices. To qualify for the special use permit, the public or semi-public facility musrhave been constructed for the stated public or semi-public use and operated as such use for a minimum of five years. (b) The special use permit shall not be granted unless the applicant establishes that the proposed use, when appropriately conditioned, will be compatible with the surrounding residential uses. The Administrative Hearing Examiner may impose conditions to ensure compatibility. The conditions may include, but are not limited to, restrictions on hours of operation, location and amount of parking, types, size, density and location of landscaping buffers and berms, and restrictions and/or conditions for noise attenuation. SECTION 2. Seven. biffS. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED by the City Council the day of ,2002 PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2002 CAROL ARENDS, Council President Approved this day of ,2002 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of ,2002 EFFECTIVE the day of ,2002 ORDINANCE NO. R:XLEOoAL\Ordinances~Z, oning Ordinance 3-22.doc 3 BREMERTON PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS PL01-0011: Proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment to provide the regulatory measures for the adaptive reuse of public and semi-public buildings. FINDINGS: 1. A proposed new Comprehensive Plan policy for adaptive re-use of public and semi-public buildings expresses the community's interest in extending the economic life of these buildings. 2. The pending new policy states an appropriate balance among the community's interests in economic activity, resource conservation, and neighborhood preservation. 3. The pending policy provides adequate guidance for the regulation of public and semi-pub, lic ~uildings that are proposed for adaptive re-use in neighbor, hood settings. 4. The proposed zoning text amendment provides that adaptive re-use of public and semi-public buildings will be allowed only by special use permit to insure that new occupancy does not create undue operational impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. 5. The proposed zoning text amendment limits new uses to those residential and non-residential uses that are considered to be the most compatible with residential neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed zoning text amendment will directly implement the pending new Comprehensive Plan policy to encourage adaptive re-use of public and semi-public buildings that is compatible with existing neighborhoods. 2. The proposed amendment meets the consistency requirement of the Growth Management Act. 3. The proposed amendment's reliance on the special use permit process, including public hearings, is an appropriate method to insure that community interests in compatible development are satisfied. Approved by the Bremerton Planning Commission on 1 ~, ~f Attest: (J U ' Andy Kosusko Chair Sec~tary own judgment and come up with a decision. David St. Pierre, Assistant City Attorney indicated for clarification to the public that these are legislative matters. The fact that they have closed in the past and possible decided that they needed additional information is allowed with legislative actions as often as they wish. They could hear this matter every planning commission for the next 10 years if they wish. This is a legislative matter and not a matter that affects an individual project so by opening the meeting for additional testimony today they have in fact cured any defects that the same petitioner had indicated had occurred before. Should they decide to close now, that would be it. Mr. Coombes noted that any development that occurs on the site regardless of the zone would be subject to storm water control, erosion control, buffers to adjacent residential zones and those would all be considered at the time of development. Open to the Public (Comment_s_ofa__neut_r_a_l. n_at..u_re)- none Testimony on this item was closed. They will be deliberating on this item on April 10 or 17. 9. PL010010 Regarding the Bremerton School District Comprehensive Plan Policy Text Amendment Application to amend the land use sections of the comprehensive plan. Commissioner Dingfield rescued herself from this issue. Ron Carpenter, Bremerton School District asked if Chairman Kosusko would rescue himself from this issue due to prior statements regarding this issue that implied his mind was made up. Chairman Kosusko stated he would rescue himself from this issue. Commissioner Kennedy took over the meeting - a quorum still exists. Mr. Coombes showed a copy of the amended text on the overhead projector which reads "adapting the use of public and semipublic buildings. Promote the reuse of public and semipublic buildings that are no longer needed to serve their original primary purpose providing that any new use is consistent with the surrounding planned environment". Commissioner Boyd asked ifa motion to approve was necessary. Mr. St. Pierre said that this was just like everything else on the agenda tonight. Vice Chairman Kennedy stated they were just taking testimony. Ron Carpenter, Bremerton School District Facilities Director stated this is being submitted by the city planning staff for the Bremerton School District stated this is needed to accommodate use of many public and semipublic buildings in the community. The Bremerton School District would like to work with the community to use its viable buildings when they are done with them. Planning Commission Meeting - March 20. 201) 1 Page 15 of 21) Open to the Public (Public in Favor of this project) - Terry Kesner, 3408 Forest Dr. NE, Bremerton indicated that this building is part of the fabric of Manette. It would be terrible to see it torn down. The building has a great future ahead of it. The Navy and Bremerton School District have maintained it nicely. It fits into the neighborhood and the building should be given a second chance. We should keep what we've got and keep this building. Open to the Public (Public Opposed to this project) - none Mr. Coombes clarified that this is not site specific but is city wide. John Dickinson asked if the schools or other public buildings would be eligible for HUD money for improvement so that a regional recreational complex could be generated. To him, he thinks this would be a better utilization of the properties. Ron Carpenter stated that underneath the existing state laws, the school board cannot just hang onto surplus property but must sell it to someone. Property cannot be given away to the citizenship. Testimony was closed. Deliberation would be scheduled for April 17. Commissioner Dingfield and Chairman Kosusko returned to the meeting. 10. Regarding the City of Bremerton Park Ave. Zoning Map Amendment Application. PL01-007 : Mr. Coombes indicated this is being done to bring the zfning in line with the comprehensive plan designation. The comprehensive plan designatiOn is MU which is Mixed Use and the area is the East side of Park. It's one lot deep and there is an alley behind it from the comer of Pacific between 6th and Park. The Northeast comer of 6th and 11th is already zoned commercial and the southeast comer of 11th and Park is already zoned commercial as well. This is brining in line the other areas designated in the comprehensive plan as MU to a mixed use zone. Open to the Public (Public in Favor of this project) - none Open to the Public (Public Opposed to this project) - none Testimony closed. Deliberation will be April l0 or 11. Regarding the Olympic College campus zoning map amendment application. PL00-0047. Mr. Coombes indicated the comp plan designates this as school, and they want to bring the zoning in line with that. There are 5-6 parcels between Lincoln and the Chester right of way which was vacated to the college north of 13a'. There is one additional parcel on the west side of Lincoln in the middle of the block between 13th and 14th. The comp plan states that that whole block west of Lincoln would eventually conform in zoning as is proposed tbr these specific sites. Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2001 Page 16 of 20 ¢3 Planning Commission Meeting Mav 1,2001 I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chairman Kosusko at 5:43 p.m. II. Roll Call Those present were: Chairman Kosusko, Commissioner Berkowitz, Con-u'nissioner Boyd, Commissioner Coburn, Commissioner Dingfield, Commissioner Kennedy. Quorum certified. NOTE: Commissioner Moshav entered the meeting at 6:07pm III. Approval of Agenda Mr. Hugo asked that item 7 be deferred PL00-0047, Special Use Permit Application l:br Olympic College until May 15th. A motion was made by Commissioner Berko~vitz and seconded by Commissioner Kennedy to approve the agenda with the recommended revision that item 7 be deferred until May 15. Called for a vote: Berkowitz: yes; Boy& yes; Coburn: yes; Dingfield: yes; Kennedy: yes; Moshay: yes; Kosusko: yes. Agenda approved. IV. Approval of Minutes Two sets of minutes were presented. The February, 20 minutes on page 5, Commissioner Dingfield's comments and Commissioner Kosusko's comments have been contused. There is still an item that says one of the commissioners which should be Commissioner Dingfield. At the top of the page Chairman Kosusko asked if consisted" should be "consistent"Pt The same thing happened on the next quote fi-om Mr. Hugo. Commissioner Kennedy moved that the February 20 minutes be approved as revised and the minutes of the April 17 meeting be approved. Commissioner Kosusko seconded the motion. Called for a vote: Bev& yes, Berkowitz: yes: Cobum: yes, Dingfield: yes: Kosusko: yes. Kennedy: yes. Coburn: yes. Minutes approved. V. Public Meeting I. Call to the Public (public comments on any item not on tonight's agendai: Chairman Kosusko described hoxv the public l:earing pot-tion of the meeting would be conducted. 2. Heating: Chairman Kosusko noted that the first two items are continued items where testimony has been previously closed. Mr. Hugo asked that testimony on these two items be reopened. The request will be to set the public hearing for the next regular meeting and to allow testimony tonight it' there is any present in response to the advertised notice. Commissioner Dingfield excused hersett: Chairman Kosusko indicated that he would stay until they started hearing testimony and will then excuse himself also. Mr. Hugo stated that there is a proposal by' the Bremerton School District to sell the Manette School to another owner for another use. The initial proposal is essentially a change co the comprehensive plan land use map. This presented difficulties as it had the appearance of being a spot zone but the School District had been advised by the department staffthat this was the way to go before Mr. Hugo's arrival. Mr. Hugo advised a proposed policy and zoning code text amendment as another solution which would allow reuse of public and semipublic buildings. According to Growth Management, there must be a policy in support of regulatory actions. The last para~aph of the staff report indicates that the 95 Comp Plan includes no policies to support adaptive reuse. The proposed policy addition is intended to provide an initial foundation for,the zoning code text amendment to allow adaptive reuse under the conditions proposed including the requirement for a Special Use Permit pursuant to a public hearing process to ensure that issues of compatible use and development are addressed. The policy language proposed is to promote the reuse of public and semipublic buildings that are no longer needed to serve their original primary,, purpose provided that any new use is consistent with the surrounding planned environment. We propose to add that to Element E, Land Use under section 3A in the Comp Plan. The policy has relevance to several ~owth management act goals including goal 1 - urban ~owth, goal 2 - reduce sprawl, goal 3 - transportation. 4 - housing, 5- economic development, and t.3 - historic preservation. The proposed zoning code amendment proposes to add a new section to the Bremerton Municipal Code. 21.02315 that limits the range of uses that these buildings could be used for and indicates that the special permit could only be approved by public hearing and a finding that the building is suitable tbr the proposed use. A Determination of Non-Significance ~vas issued for this on March 17, 200l. The criteria t'or revision of comprehensive plan amendments were pointed out - only the first criteria seems to apply in this instance. This regulation also proposes to meet the consistency rule tbr the zoning amendments. Chairman Kosusko asked rbr clarification of some of the allowed uses. Mr. Hugo indicated that the pub{ic could comment on the suggested uses and ~he commissioners could make suggestions to expand them or narrow [hem as they see fit. Chairman Kosusko indicated that public testimony' on rite item would be reopened and be sought on May 15 at the regularly scheduled meeting. No one ~vas present who wished to give testimony on this item at this time. Commissioner Kennedy moved that testimony on items 1 and 2 be reopened and be taken on May 15, 2001. Commissioner Boyd seconded the motion. Call tbr vote: Berkowitz: yes; Boyd: yes; Coburn: yes, Dingfield: excused; Kennedy: yes; Kosusko: yes. Commissioner Dingfield re-entered the meeting. 3. PL00-061 Loveless Brook Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment Application. Chairman Kosusko indicated that this item is to change the Comprehensive Plan Map designation from VG w/th a concurrent zoning map change to GB, General Business, for the eastern 600 feet of the property into MU Mixed Use with current zoning map change to Mixed Use tbr the remaining Portion of the property. Commissioner Moshay entered the meeting at 6:07. Lee Wyatt, Planning Dept. Senior Planner, indicated the applicant has requested amending the original application that they had in from General and Highway Commercial to CG with a time current zoning map amendment to general business for the eastern 600 feet of the property and Mixed Use with concurrent zoning map change to MX tbr the remaining portion of the property. The project is a little under 10 acres which is currently low density residential on the back haig the front portion of the property is general commercial highway. In the original request, there was no verbiage addressing'the front 600 feet of the property and the applicant's amended request is tbr a concurrent comprehensive plan map and official zoning map amendment. The proposed comp plan amendment would extend the G-C classification by 400 feet to approximately 600 feet xvest of Wheaton Wav which would be an additional 200 feet past the portion that is already designated commercial general highway. The back or' the property would then be changed from low density residential desig-nation to mixed use. The concurrent official zoning map amendment would rezone the ~¥ont 600 feet of the property from single t'amily residential to General Business and like the comprehensive plan amendment, the west portion of the property would then be rezoned from single thmily residential to mixed use. There is one single family residence in approximately the middle of the property. It's fairly heavy tbrested around the perimeter. Commissioner Boyd asked if this would mean the all of the first 600 feet along Wheaton Way would be business. Mr. Wyatt stated that was correct but it would only' apply' to this parcel. Chairman Kosusko indicated testimony would be limited to 3 minutes each. William Palmer, Land Use Planning Consultant. representing rl-~e Loveless Brook applicants. Asked the commissioners to turn their attention to page l i) of the staff report. The conclusion is that the proposed discovered that other directors have had the same issue on other projects. It's been a standing issue in the community for some time so this project did not initiate this discussion in the City of Bremerton. Public Testimony on this item was closed. Commissioner Kennedy stated she is pleased to see that the staff has brought this issue fopa'ard and they have done a great job in cleaning this up. Commissioner Kennedy moved that the commission approve the Planning And Building Department 2001 text amendment PL01-001? regarding required buffers and yard setbacks. Commissioner Boyd seconded the motion. Chairman Kosusko stated he was confident that this is a separate item which has been a problem that has existed within the code for some while. Call for the vote. Berko~vitz: yes; Boyd: yes; Coburn: yes; Dingfield: abstain; Kennedy: yes; Moshay: yes; Kosusko: yes. 4. PL010010 Bremerton School District Comprehensive Plan policy text amendment application to the land use section of the comprehensive plan to facilitate adaptive reuse of existing outsource public and semi-public buildings city wide. Commissioner Dingfield recused herself. Mr. Hugo indicated the staff had made a full staff report previously, and they have nothing new to add on the policy proposal. ; Rod Carpenter, Bremerton School District Facilities Director indicated that this has appeared, before the council before. There are many public and semipublic buildings in the city that have some life left to them and this will allow an opportunity' for these buildings to be used in a compatible situation if they are located in a residential district. This was brought to the forefront because of the Manette school building which was used by the Navy for many years as an office building and is still a viable building. Testimony Open to the Public. Open to the Public (Public in Favor or' this project) - none. Open to the Public (Comment that are neutral in nature) - none. Testimony was closed to the public. Commissioner Berkowitz moved that the application PL 01-0010 for policy text amendment bv the Bremerton School District be approved, Commissioner Bovd seconded it. Chairman Kosusko indicated that he ~elt this ~vas the appropr:ate avenue for public buildings. Planning Commission meeting May i5, 2001 P:~ge 9 ~f 17 Commissioner Kennedy indicated she was in favor of the amendment as consistent with guidelines of GMA, this takes existing buildings and put them into reuse which encourages in-fill development in the existing urban areas without destroying or tearing down something and also allows reuse of a building no longer suitable for its original purpose. Chairman Kosusko indicated the items discussed by Commissioner Kennedy were under goals 1 and 2 and goal 3 transportation, measures to promote in-fill development through adaptive reuse and urban revitalization, housing as well and further goal 5 - economic development -increasing the city's economic base by attracting in-fill development so over and over the GMA talks about in-fill development. Also, historic preservation, goal 13. Call for vote. Berkowitz: yes; Boyd: yes; Coburn: yes; Kennedy: yes; Moshay: yes: Kosusko: yes. 5. PL01-0011 Bremerton School District zoning code Text Amendment Application to provide for regulatory measures for the adaptive reuse of public and semipublic buildings city-wide. Commissioner Dingfield recused herself. Mr. Hugo indicated the staff had made a complete report at the last hearing. Ron Carpenter, Bremerton School District Facilities Director indicated that most of this text has been recommended by Mr. Hugo so he would defer discussion on that to Nfl. Hugo. Open to the Public (Public in Favor of this project) Terry Pessner, 3408 Forest Dr., Bremerton stated that one of the areas they are 1.ooking at is day care for 12 or fewer kids. There is no private sector that can turn that around as it is too few children. He asked that they consider the 1.2 or fewer kids limitation on that. Open to the Public (Comment that are neutral in nature) none. Open to the Public (Public opposed to this pro.ject) - none. Testimony closed to the public. Chairman Kosusko asked what determined what uses were allowed and not allowed. Mr. Hugo stated that he looked at the types of uses within the zones and looked at each one in terms oi-' traffic it might generate and when traffic would primarily occur. He took out things that looked like thev would generate traffic throughout the dav. Chairman Kosusko asked about the day care requirement issue which was raised. Planning Commission meeting May i5. 2001 Page !0 of 17 Someone stated that a special use permit would be required for 13 or more children. Mr. Hugo stated that since this is all done by Special Use Permit maybe the question of number can be addressed at the time of public consideration. Commissioner Boyd moved that PL01-0011 zoning code text amendment be approved which will implement the policy which was just approved for adaptive reuse. Commissioner Moshay seconded the motion. Call for vote. Berkowitz: yes; Boy& yes; Cobum: yes; Kennedy: yes; Moshay: yes; Kosusko: yes. Commissioner Dingfield returned to the meeting. 6. PL010024 City of Bremerton downtown development policies. Mr. Hugo indicated that the staff has made presentations on this prior. No staff report has been prepared yet, so they request that it be removed/:'rom the agenda. Chairman Kosusko indicated that the public could speak on this if they would like to, but this will be continued to a future meeting. There has been a request by the staff for a special meeting on June 5. Commissioner Kennedy moved that a special &eeting be held to deal with downtown Bremerton goals and policies and other agenda items as requested by the planning director. The motion was seconded by a commissioner. , Chairman Kosusko indicated the meeting would be on June 5 in this chamber at 5:30. Call for vote: Berkowitz: yes; Boyd: yes; Coburn: yes; Dingfield; yes: Kennedy: yes; Moshay: yes; Kosusko: yes. A five-minute break was taken and the meeting was reconvened at 7:25. 6. PL00-0061 Loveless Brook Inc. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment Application at 3915 Wheaton Way; Mr. Hugo indicated that the staff reporting on this is concluded. Chairman Kosusko stated that this item has been closed to public testimony. Commissioner Cockburn asked t:or clarification on the Mixed Use zone Chairman Kosusko indicated that Mixed Use zone does not allow the extensive commercial development that general commercial does. Planning Commission meeting Ma5, [5. 2001 Page Government Center decision for the County. They have to make sure that parking has been addressed. Commissioner Dingfield had major concerns about the foot ferry passengers. There was a lengthy discussion about the walk-on ferry passengers and "kiss and ride" areas. She stated that we (City of Bremerton) will become a walk-on ferry destination and that our terminal is unfriendly. The group decided that the best way to address this issue was to modify General Policy #3 by changing it to read, "Parking implies including both on street and off street facilities should be managed to emphasis short term use over long term use ensuring an adequate supply for shoppers, visitors and ferry passenger pick-up and drop off." A motion was made by Commissioner Kennedy to approve PL01-0024 as revised and seconded by Commissioner Ding, field. Called for a vote: Cockburn: yes; Dingfield: yes; Kennedy: yes~ Moshay: yes; and Kosusko: yes. Motion carried. VI. Business Meeting In the interest of time, Chairman Kosusko moved to the Business Meeting portion of the agenda, directly to Old Business - Adoption of written findings. Mr. Hugo made a statement reminding the public that the Commission made decisions to recommend all of these items to the City Council for approval. These items are now reviews of draft findings and conclusions in support of those actions. The commission received these facts and conclusions last in an effort to expedite the editorial changes. D. Old Business: a. PL01-0010 - School District, Adaptive Reuse Policy, Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Mr. Hugo read the facts and conclusions directly from the draf~ Findihgs and Conclusions Report. He then asked if there were any questions. There was no questions or discussion. Commissioner Moshay made a motion that the Commission adopt the findings and conclusions for PL01-0010 as written. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion. Called for a vote: Cockburn: yes; Dingfield: abstained; Kennedy: yes; Moshay: yes; and Kosusko: yes. Amendment adopted. b. PL01-0011 - School District, Adaptive Reuse, Zoning Text Amendment. Mr. Hugo read the facts and conclusions directly from the draft Findings and Conclusions Report. He then asked if there were any questions. There was no questions or discussion. Commissioner Kennedy made a motion that the Commission adopt the findings and conclusions for PL01-0010 as written. Commissioner Moshay seconded the motion. Called for a vote: Cockburn: yes; Dingfield: abstained; Kennedy: yes; Moshay: yes; and Kosusko: yes. Amendment adopted. c. PL01-0008 - Parking Ratio, Zoning Text Amendment. Mr. Hugo read the facts and conclusions directly from the draft Findings and Conclusions. He then asked if there were any questions. There was no questions or discussion. Commissioner Moshay made a motion that the Commission adopt the findings and conclusions for PL01- 0010 as written. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion. Called for a vote: Cockburn: yes; Dingfield: abstained; Kennedy: yes; Moshay: yes; and Kosusko: yes. Amendment adopted. Planning Commission Meeting Julv l 7. 2001 Page 5 of 7 PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2000 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT STAFF REPORT PROPOSALS: Policy to allow adaptive reuse of public and semi-public buildings. Zoning Code text amendment to provide the regulatory measures for adaptive reuse. DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 23,2001 APPUCANT OR PROPONENT (FILE NUMBERS): Bremerton School Distdct (PL01-0010; PL01-0011) CONTACT: Chris Hugo, Director- Planning and Building Department; Phone: 3601478-5243 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: This proposal will apply to the entire city. BACXGROUND: Every community has an array of buildings that exist to serve specialized community functions. Many Of these are public and semi- public buildings that are located in residential neighborhoods to provide local access to services and activities - schools, fire stations, libraries, churches, and park buildings are common to neighborhood settings in almost every city. The existence of these facilities is recognized as an inherent part of ~e neighborhood fabric, but changes in urban growth, the emergence of new technology, and changes in community needs and expectations can make these buildings obsolete for their use or no longer viable for service in their location. In most cases, these public or semi-public buildings were built to high construction standards with very durable materials such as bdck, concrete, stone and steel. As such, they represent a valuable structural resource to adapt to new uses that still serve community needs, either public or private. Cities that recognize the value that these buildings represent in terms of remaining economic life and conservation of construction materials find ways to give the buildings a new life by allowing uses not otherwise permitted in those locations. These new uses are limited to activities that 7/ pose minimal environmental and operational impacts on the surrounding areas. Such adaptive reuses are becoming increasingly popular as a strategy to support the revitalization of older urban areas. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan includes no policies to support adaptive reuse. The proposed policy addition is intended to provide an initial foundation for the Zoning Code text amendment to allow adaptive reuse under the conditions proposed, including the requirement for a special use permit pursuant to a public headng process to insure that issues of compatible use and development are addressed. PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENT: The following new policy is proposed to add to Element E. Land Use, Section 3.A.: Promote the reuse of public and semi-public buildings that are no longer needed to serve their original primary purpose, provided that any new use is consistent with the surrounding planned environment. PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT: Proposed new section, BMC 21.02.315- When the need for a certain public or semi-public building in any zone no longer exists, the building may be converted to those uses listed in the zone in which it is located, except that when it is, located in any residential zone, it may be changed by special permit to a use allowed in Figure 140, PO zone, Sections 1., 2., 3., 4., 6., and the following listed uses of Section 11: Consultants, Computer assistance and training (but not repair), Office/Business Assistance Services, and General Offices. The special permit may only be approved after public heanng and a finding that the existing building is suitable for the proposed use and that the proposed use is not unduly detrimental to the surrounding properties. To qualify for the special permit hearing, the public or semi-public facility must have been constructed for the stated public or semi-public use and operated as such use for a minimum of five years. COMPLIANCE WITH GMA GOALS: The proposed policy has relevance to the following GMA goals: Goal 1. Urban Growth; Goal 2. Reduce Sprawl: This proposed policy encourages infill development in the serviced urban area by allowing reuse of public and semi-public buildings that no longer are suitable for their odginat purpose. Goal 3. Transportation: Measures to promote infill development through adaptive reuse and urban revitalization also help promote efficient transportation systems. Goal 4. Housing: Adaptive reuse of schools and other public and semi-public buildings for housing adds to the availability and affordability of housing. Goal 5. Economic Development: Increasing the city's economic base by attracting infill development through adaptive reuse adds market opportunity for new economic enterprise. Goal 13. Historic Preservation: Adaptive reuse is a cost-effective mechanism to preserve histodc buildings by providing new economic opportunities for the structures. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (SEPA): A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for this non-project action in accordance with WAC 197-11 on March 17, 2001. DECISION CRITERIA: The Comprehensive Plan specifies the procedures and conditions under which amendments to the Plan may be approved. Section 2. D. of Plan Element K. states that 'Each component of a Plan amendment package shall be reviewed and approved only if it meets the [following] criteria:" (- the five cdteria are listed on page 2. of Element K. -). The criteda as presented are pdmanly relevant to map amendments, not policy amendments - only the first criterion seems to apply to this policy amendment and is addressed in the discussion of GMA compliance above. However, the published criteda are the only ones adopted to apply to decisions of this type. ZONING CONSISTENCY: The approval criteda for amendments to the Zoning Code text relate to internal consistency. The proposed zoning text amendment is intended to implement the proposed adaptive reuse policy and maintain regulatory consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment must also be found to be consistent with all other provisions of the Zoning Code.