HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/20/02 AGENDACITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
NOVEMBER 20, 2002
FiLE
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10.
239 4th Street · Bremerton, WA 98337 · Phone (360) 478-5280 · Fax (360} 478-5251
PRE-COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M.
A. General Council Business
CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M.
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation
CONSENT AGENDA - Them am no Consent Agenda items this week
CLAIMS/CHECK REGISTERS
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
MAYOR'S REPORT
NEwPUBLICBusINEssRECOGNITION - Comments limited to 3-minutes FA~")~
A. Confirmation of Michael R. Wilson as Director of Finance (#AB02-224) /
B. Appointment of Lynn Horton to the Bremerton Housing Authority (#AB02-225) /
C. Washington State Traffic Safety Commission Grant for Motorcycles (#AB02-226) ~ !
D. Lease Agreement Renewal with Bremerton Community Theater (#AB02-227)
E. Contract Award for Sewage Pump Station EB-2 (#AB02-228)
F. Amendment to Transportation Comprehensive Plan Professional Services Agreement with
Parametrix, Inc. (#AB02-229)
PUBLIC HEARINGS - RESOLUTIONS & ORDINANCES
A. Resolution No. 2879 setting a Hearing Date for December 11, 2002 for Vacating a Portion of
Second Street, East of Washington Avenue (#AB02-230)
B. Ordinance No. 4828 [Second Reading] repealing the Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan;
and amending the Zoning Code establishing the Downtown Distdct (#AB02-219)
C. Ordinance No. 4829 [Second Reading] amending the Shoreline Master Program relating to
Downtown Development Regulations (#AB02-220)
D. Ordinance No. 4830 [Second Reading] reaffirming Designated Blighted Areas; re-designating the,~
~ Project Area; and creating a new Community Renewal Plan for the Project Area (#AB02-221)
E. Ordinance No. 4831 [Second Reading] authorizing the Issue of General Obligation Bonds to
Finance the Public Safety Facilities (#AB02-222)
F. Ordinance [First Reading] establishing the Public Safety Projects Fund (#AB02-231)
G. Ordinance [First Reading] establishing the Discretionary Reserve Fund (#AB02-232)
H. Ordinance [First Reading[ relating to LID Assessments ~AB02-233) /0
iOrdinance [First Reading] amending Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 3.01 Rates a~id Fees /0'7
Table for 2003 (#AB02-234)
Ordinance [First Reading] relating to Headng Examiner Applications and Appeals (#AB02-235)
· Public Hearing regarding the 2003 Budget (#AB02-236) /
ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
E-mail: citycouncil@ci.bremerton.wa.us · Web: w-ww. ci.bremerton.wa.us
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 20, 2002
SPEAKERS LIST
If you wish to make an announcement, inform the Council of an issue, or ask a general question... Please
provide information below so staff will be able to contact you.
Thank you.
NAME
ADD.RESS/TEI.EPHONE
TOPIC
o
o
My name is Everett D. Clark; I am an active duty member of the United
States Navy, attached to the USS Michigan Blue, Subase Bangor.
I'm here this evening because while I was out to sea; my wife, (who has
put her career on hold because of being married to me, yet has remained
active by working for MWR, and out of our home as a paralegal and
organizer of a direct marketing incubator) has decided that when I
retire in 2006, we would like to make Bremerton, WA our home.
We currently have been pre-qualified on a property located at 615/619
4~h Street, in Bremerton, WA. When we went to sign our loan committee
letter, we were told that we may not be able to secure VA approval for
this property because it is currently zoned as, "mixed use" and VA will
only approve loans for, "residences".
Recently, my wife became active with the Bremerton Chapter of the
NAACP, and as a result helped them to put on an Informational Seminar,
which the Mayor participated in. After helping the NAACP put on the
seminar, my wife became convinced that if she were able to purchase a
property, that we could live in, as well as run her businesses out of,
until I retire in 2006; we would be able to earn a decent living by
living off my pension check and working out of our home in downtown
BremerEon.
At this time, we are hoping that there is someone in this room who can
help us convince the VA appraiser that the property we are trying to
purchase is primarily, "a residence", which my wife will run a home
based business out of until I retire 2006. The current owners have been
residing in the building as their primary residence without conducting
business from for a while.
My wife couldn't be here today, because she graduates from WA Cash this
evening. For those of you who might not know what WA Cash is, it's a
business training class, in which participants prepare a feasibility
study; at the end of the class participants will receive a certificate
of completion, and a $500 business start up loan (to bad the loan isn't
for $3t~,!-i$0
Thank you for your time, and again if there is anyone in this room whom
can be of assistance, and/or knows of someone who can assist my wife in
our endeavors please use this information to assist us, or pass this
information along to someone who can. We need Ehe area rezoned as
residential/art district, and/or banks/investors who can help us secure
the property on/or before December 5, 2002 when our Earnest Agreement
on the property expires.
Eve~ett D. Clark & R. Hill, Esq.
PO Box 6022
Siiverdale, WA 98315
(360) 779-6800
eclarkrhill~worldnet.att.net
.,CREDIT UNION
EVERETT D CLARK
REGINA C HILL
4117D MICHIGAN DR
SILVERDALE, WA 98315
~A
12238 Buckltn Hill Re
Suite 100
Silverdale, WA 9831
MORTGAGE LOAN PRICE COMMITMENT AGREEMENT
,MORTGAGE LOAN NO.
, 801022601Q
20MMITMENT DATE
LOAN TERMS
Thank you for your application for a mortgage loan with Navy Federal Credit Union. If credit, employment,
assets, property valuation, property condition and title conditions meet lending guidelines, you will be approve(
mortgage loan with the following terms:
Loan Program:
I-I VA Date of Application: 10/28/2002
~] Fixed Rate Conventional vc Loan Amount: $253,750. oo
~] Monthly Payments Term: 3 6o m
~ Biweekly Payments Interest Rate: 6 .soo%
[~] Adjustable Rate Conventional Discount Points: 1.5oo% ***
[~ 1/1 Plan Origination Fee:
.ooo%
[~] 3/1 Plan Loan to Value (LTV): lOl .5oo%
[21 7 Year Balloon
*** DISCOUNT POINTS UP TO 1.5% CAN BE FINANCED.
ProperW Address: TO BE DETERMINED AMOUNT OVER 1.5% MUST BE PAID IN CASH AT CL(
Silverdale, WA 98315
B PRICE COMMITMENT OPTION ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Lock in Loan Terms - You have chosen to "lock-in" the loan terms shown above. By choosing this optk
loan will not close at an interest rate and/or discount points lower'than those locked, even if market intere:
and/or discount points decline.
ffi Float to Lock - You have elected to allow the interest rate and/or discount po/nts to float with the mark~
may lock in your interest rate and/or discount points up to the date the loan documents are sent to the s~
agent. By selecting this option, Navy Federal does not guarantee a specific interest rate and/or discount poinl
[] Freedom Lock - This option allows you to re-lock your interest rate and/or discount points, should they cl
one (1) time during your price commitment period. You can exercise this option up to the date that yot
documents are sent to your settlement agent or the expiration of' this Price Commitment Agreement, whi
occurs first. The origination fee, shown above, represents an increase of ¼ of 1% for the Freedom Lock 12
This fee is non-refundable. It is your responsibility to monitor the movement of interest rates and discount
for your loan program and exercise the re-lock option.
You carmot change the Price Commitment Option or the loan program you selected at the time of application.
C COMMITMENT EXPIRATION POLICY
Your interest rate and discount points shall be determined by the Price Commitment Option you elected above, pro,
settlement oocurs by the expiration of this Price Commitment Agreement, N/A . If the loan does not clc
or before the expiration date, you will be offered a new price commitment at the original rate and discount points
Navy Federal's prevailing interest rate and discount points for your loan program, whichever is higher.
If you have selected the Lock or Freedom Lock options in a previous Price Commitment, you will not be able to sel~
Float to Lock option in a subsequent commitment to take advantage of lower interest rates and/or discount points. I
selected the Freedom Lock option previously and wish to do so in a subsequent Price Commitment, you will be req
to pay another ½ of 1% fee.
If your application is cancelled or withdrawn for any reason, you will not be able
DRAFT VISION STATEMENT, June 9, 2002
Environment Committee
Bremerton values its superior natural environment. Bremerton will protect its
lakes, streams, shorelines, wildlife, wetlands, watersheds and natural vegetation
through encouraging sustainable growth. New development and redevelopment
will contribute to preserving and enhancing the natural environment. Bremerton
will encourage environmental education, energy and water conservation,
recycling, brownfield redevelopment, and acquisition of environmentally sensitive
lands. Particular attention will be paid to incorporating native vegetation in
developed areas, managing stormwater, encouraging natural bulkheads along
the shorelines, and preserving endangered species habitat. Bremerton will be a
walkable city where people have access to openspace, water, and mountain
views to increase the overall health of the community.
ERT
ENVIRONMENT L/
1. SUBJECT:
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE FOR AGENDA: November 20, 2002
ORIGINATING DEPT: Executive
ORIGINATOR: Mayor Bozeman
DATE SUBMITTED:
2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary)
CAROL CONLEY, Hum~--~esources Oirec'}0r
A. LUBO-VICH, City At~rney
HEARD AT COMMITTEES 11/12J02
3. EXHIBITS:
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
JOB DESCRIPTION
RESUME - MICHAEL R. WILSON
FISCAL & BUDGET CHAIRMAN
HEARD AT COMMITTEES 11/12/02
OPERATIONS CHAIRMAN
MAYOR
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
Pursuant to Chapter 2.05, section 2.05.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code, Mayoral appointments of
department directors are subject to confirmation by the City Council. The Mayor desires to formally appoint
Mr. Michael R. Wilson as Director of Finance with an employment start date of December 2, 2002.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to approve the appointment of Michael R. Wilson as Director of Finance for the City of Bremerton
effective as of December 2, 2002 and authorize the Mayor to execute an employment contract in substantially
the same and conditions as the proposed contract.
7. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED [~] TABLED []
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
APPROVED []
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mayor Bozeman
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Mayor Bozeman
EXPIRATION DATE: n/a
REVIEW DATE: n/a
DISAPPROVED [-]
AMENDE~~
8. AGENDA BILL NO.: 00)- a,~C~q
9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
10. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
11. RESEARCH SOURCES:
mayor Cary Bozeman
Organization Proposal
1. Mike appointed Director of Finance/Treasurer effective December 1, 2002
Kathy assigned by Mayor as Director of Administrative Services to special
projects effective December 1, 2002.
o
After the first of the year Mike and the Mayor propose a revised organization
that will:
a. Eliminate the position of Director of Finance/Treasurer
b. Add the position of Director of Finance and Administration (or some other
title)
c. Add the position of Treasurer (or some other title)
d. Add HR
e. Possibly move some of the functional areas around
Kathy continues assignment as Director of Administrative Services to special
projects. Position of Administrative Services Director eliminated when
assignment ends.
o
The 2003 budget includes new Fund #302 for the Public Safety Bond issue.
Kathy's salary and benefits will come from that fund. There is also about
$16,000 to $20,000 left in the general fund in 2003 (difference between
Director of Finance, Treasurer and Director of Administrative Services
Salaries) that should be applied to pay for part of Kathy's salary for the
general fund portion of her work.
The above change is revenue and expenditure neutral. The city gains another person
focused on economic development projects and Admin/Finance area is returned to full
staffing at no additional cost.
Cory Bozeman
PUBLIC SAFETY BOND ISSUE
JOB FUNCTION
POLICE
· Negotiate purchase of US Bank Building
· Prepare and issue RFQ for Architectural Services
· Select architects, negotiate design contracts
· Coordinate design meetings with police, courts, architects
· Issue bid for construction
· Select construction company and finalize contracts
· Select and order furniture and fixtures
· Prepare design for SOG building remodel with police & designers
· Issue bid for construction
· Select contractor and finalize contracts
· Select and order furniture, fixtures
· Order Patrol vehicles
FIRE
· Negotiate purchase of land for new fire station
· Prepare and issue RFQ for Architectural Services
· Select architects, negotiate design contracts
· Coordinate design meetings with fire, architects
· Issue bid for construction
· Select construction company and finalize contracts
· Select and order furniture and fixtures
· Assist with purchase of three new fire trucks and one ladder truck. Coordinate
bids, contracting, interlocal agreement etc.
· Assist in determining fire storage building needs to replace building being
remodeled for SOG purposes
· Assist in itemizing and prioritizing the "Upgrade of Fire Department Equipment"
portion of the bond issue. Select appropriate methods of purchase.
OTHER
· Prepare project status flow charts and provide council with project status
information and assure that appropriate contracts are forwarded to city
attorney for review and city council for approval.
· Manage budget and cash flow for projects
· Prepare State and Federal Capital Budget requests for funding for economic
development projects, assist with lobbying efforts
· Focus increased efforts on grants for economic development projects
· Continue work with Bremerton Naval Museum, working towards move,
remodel of Building 50 and long term M&O funding
· Work with Arts Community regarding their interest in projects
· Continue work on regional Telecommunications issues in particular as they
affect economic development.
· Work with staff on space planning for Govemment center and Library issues
· Work on franchises (PSE, Cascade Gas)
· Finalize surplus and sale of excess city properties
Employment Contract'
Michael R. Wilson, Director of Finance
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
Director of Finance
This Employment Contract is entered into this 2nd day of December, 2002 by and
between the City of Bremerton, a chartered first class municipal corporation organized under the
laws of the State of Washington, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Michael R. Wilson
(hereinafter referred to as "Mr. Wilson").
WHEREAS, the City desires to employ the service of Mr. Wilson as Director of Finance
for the City of Bremerton, as provided by Chapter 2.50 of the Bremerton Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Mayor and the City to provide certain benefits, estab}ish
certain conditions of employment, and set working conditions for such employment; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City to: 1) secure and retain the services of Mr. Wilson
and provide inducement for him to remain in such employment, 2) ensure Mr. Wilson's future
security in order to promote his peace of mind and long-term successful performance with the
City of Bremerton; 3) act as a deterrent against malfeasance or dishonesty for personal gain on
the part of Mr. Wilson; and 4) promote Mr. Wilson's adherence to the highest level of ethical
standards; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Wilson desires to accept employment as Director of Finance for the City
of Bremerton, Washington,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits and promises herein
contained, the parties agree as follows:
1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES: Mr. Wilson agrees to furnish full time services as
defined in the job description for the Director of Finance which is attached and hereby
incorporated as a part of this Agreement, which may be amended by the mutual agreement of the
City and Mr. Wilson.
2. SUPERVISION:
independent functions and
The parties understand and agree that Mr. Wilson shall perform
responsibilities in the exercise of his field of work. In the
performance of these duties Mr. Wilson shall work under the direction of the Mayor.
Employment Contract
Michael R. Wilson, Director of Finance
3. TERM: The Director of Finance shall serve at the pleasure of the Mayor commencing
December 2, 2002, and continuing until termination or removal by terms of this Agreement
Nothing in this agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of Mr. Wilson
to resign at any time from his position with the City, subject only to the provisions set forth in
this agreement. Mr. Wilson shall be pe~-xifitted to perform other work (such as teaching,
consulting or other services performed on employee's time off), Provided it does not conflict or
interfere with his employment with the City, does not exceed more than 10 hours per week, and
the Mayor is notified and approves in advance of such work.
4. COMPENSATION: Mr. Wilson and the City agree that compensation for services
rendered under this agreement shall begin at Band 19, Rate 8, three thousand seven hundred
twenty-nine dollars and ninety-seven cents ($3,729.97) semi-monthly, with a monthly rate of
approximately seven thousand four hundred sixty dollars and no cents ($7,460.00).
It is understood that the compensation level is currently at the maximum of the pay band.
If, however, this should change, Mr. Wilson shall then be eligible for a pay rate adjustment upon
completion of twelve months at each rate in the salary band provided that he receives a "Meets
Expectations" (or equivalent) on his work performance evaluation, together with annual cost-of-
living increases based on the amount provided to exempt city employees.
Said compensation shall be paid on the City's regular payroll system. It is expressly
understood by and between the parties that the Director of Finance is an exempt position
pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act.
5. BENEFITS: All benefits shall be afforded as provided for in this Agreement
pursuant to the Bremerton Municipal Code, specifically, Chapter 2.50, Management &
Professional Staff Compensation Program, and as provided under the laws of the State of
Washington relevant to the position of Director of Finance, unless specifically provided
otherwise in this agreement. Vacation is set at 25 days per year. For the year 2002 vacation
leave shall be pro-rated based upon date of hire. Subsequent years shall follow the established
increases in vacation leave based on years of service pursuant to 20.50.040 (c) of the BMC as
applicable. Mr. Wilson shall initially be credited with 12 days of sick leave. After one year of
employment, Mr. Wilson shall be provided with one day of sick leave per month of employment.
6. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS: Performance reviews shall be conducted in
compliance with applicable Human Resources Policies, and shall utilize review standards and
2
Employment Contract
Michael R. Wilson, Director of Finance
forms approved by the Human Resources Department.
7. RETIREMENT: The City shall pay the employer's contribution toward Mr. Wils0n's
federal social security benefits. Mr. Wilson understands that the position of Director of Finance
is a PERS eligible position, and that he will be required to make the required contributions
towards the State Retirement System. The City shall also make their required contribution into
the State Retirement System.
8. EXCLUSION FROM COLLECTIVE BARGAINING: Mr. Wilson acknowledges,
understands and agrees that the position he is accepting with the City is not included in the City's
Civil Service system, is exempt from Union Membership, and is a managerial/professional
employee as defined under BMC 2.50.
9. TERMINATION OF SERVICES: The Director of Finance is an "at will" employee
and the City may terminate him without cause, at any time, with thirty (30) days notice required or
30 days pay in lieu of notice. Mr. Wilson's severance pay shall be set at ninety (90) days.
In the event that the Director of Finance terminates his employment with the City, he agrees that
he shall provide the City not less than thirty (30) days prior notice of the effective date of said
termination in order to afford the City a reasonable opportunity to find a replacement. The parties
further agree that in the event a replacement is found who is able to commence employment prior to
the expiration of thirty (30) days notice, that they may, in good faith, negotiate an earlier
termination date.
This Agreement may be terminated for cause, without notice, and employee understands, agrees
and accepts that no severance pay shall be paid. "Cause" shall be defined as including but not
limited to any reason for which a regular employee may be dismissed under the Bremerton Civil
Service Rules, specifically Rule 19.
10. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, TRAVEL AND DUES: The City agrees to budget
and pay for the professional dues of Mr. Wilson necessary for this full participation as a member
of the Washington City/County Management Association and the International City/County
Management Association. The City hereby agrees to budget and pay the travel and subsistence
expenses of Mr. Wilson for short courses, seminars, professional and official travel, meetings
and occasions adequate to continue the professional development of Mr. Wilson and to
adequately pursue necessary official and other functions of the City, including attendance at the
Washington City/County Management Association and Intemational City/County Management
3
Employment Contract
Michael 1L Wilson, Director of Finance
Association conferences. Attendance at such conferences shall be at the convenience of City and
only as time and budgets permit and when authorized by the Mayor.
12. GENERAL PROVISIONS:
A. Mr. Wilson agrees that his position is a managerial position and acknowledges that he
will occupy a position of confidentiality involving personnel, labor relations and legal matters.
B. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and both parties
acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been fully set forth
in the text of this Agreement.
C. The parties hereby further agree that this Agreement cannot be amended or modified
without the written concurrence of both parties.
D. Any notices required to be given shall be in writing and delivered to the following
parties at the following addresses:
Human Resources Department
239 - 4t~ Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
Michael R. Wilson
c/o City Hall
239 4th Street
Bremerton, WA. 98337
E. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the
State of Washington. In the event of a dispute, such dispute shall be litigated in the Superior
Court of Kitsap County, Washington.
F. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision hereof shall, in no way, affect the
validity or enforceability of any other provision.
G. Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any terms, covenants, or conditions of
this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of
such right or power at any time be taken to be a waiver of any other breach.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
MICHAEL R. WILSON
Director of Finance
4
Employment Contract
Michael R. Wilson, Director of Finance
REVIEWED BY:
CITY OF BREMERTON:
CAROL S. CONLEY
Director of Human Resources
BY:
CARY E. BOZEMAN
Mayor
RECEIVED FOR FILING:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY
City Clerk
ROGER LUBOVICH,
City Attomey
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
JOB CLASSIFICATION
GENERAL FUNCTION
Under general direction of the Mayor, performs as the Chief Financial Officer of the City. Plan,
organize, control and direct the financial operations of the City including budget, accounting,
financial reporting, debt issue and management, cash and investment management, capital
improvement program, utility rate making, financial analysis and modeling of current and
potential City activities and projects.
REPRESENTATIVE ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (Note - This list is
intended only to illustrate the various types of work that may be performed. The omission of
specific statements does not exclude them from the position.)
Provide policy advice and guidance to the Mayor, City Council and all departments of the
City. Demonstrate the effects of alternative decision options using financial modeling,
studies and analysis.
· Supervise and direct preparation and monitoring of the City's biennial budget.
· Supervise, direct and assist in the preparation of the City's internal and published
financial reports.
· Supervise and direct preparation of the City's capital improvement program, CIP.
· Manage the investment and cash position of all City funds to ensure that investment
returns are maximized to the extent consistent with acceptable levels of risk and liquidity.
· Plan and direct the analysis necessary for rate setting in the City's utilities and implement
rates through the public and political process.
· Hire, supervise, evaluate and direct the work of department employees
Other
·
·
Duties
Regular attendance is an essential requirement
Performs related work as assigned and/or required
KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES (Entry Requirements)
Knowledge of:
State and federal laws regulating the financial activities of Washington municipalities.
Generally accepted accounting principles as they apply to local government.
The bond market and forces affecting the price of fixed income securities.
Ability to:
Description/format
Analyze complex financial information and to draw appropriate conclusions.
Purchase and sell fixed income securities to maximize the City's financial
acceptable levels of risk and liquidity.
Communicate effectively both verbally and in writing.
Conduct effective public presentations on complex and controversial subjects.
Manage multiple complex projects and to allocate resources effectively.
Skill in:
Proficiency with PC and financial systems application software.
QUALIFYING EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE (Minimum Requirements)
return within
Four year degree in business, accounting, finance or closely related field and six years
increasingly responsible work experience with five years in a supervisory or administrative
capacity. MBA, MPA or CPA highly desireable. Any combination of education and experience
equivalent to
Special Requirements
PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS
Work requires frequent sitting and standing, the ability to operate office machines including
telephone, fax, computer terminal and copy machine and occasional lifting over 50 pounds.
Occasional presentations require public speaking ability and the use of audio visual equipment.
Frequent automobile and occasional air travel are required.
WORKING CONDITIONS
Work is primarily perfomed in an office environment.
Occasional public presentations of complex and sometimes controversial information
required.
Frequent evening and occasional weekend meetings are required.
Frequent local travel and occasional in state and out of state travel is required.
are
LEGAL and REGULATORY EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS
Representation: The classification is exempt from collective bargaining.
Civil Service: The classification is not included in the City's Civil Service System.
Appointment and Removal Authority: This position is appointed by the Mayor and confirmed
by the City Council. The Finance Director may be removed by the Mayor.
Description/format
This classification specification does not constitute an employment agreement between the City
and employee. It is subject to change by the City, with approval by the Civil Service
Commission, as the needs of the City and requirements change.
Description/format
/0
MICHAEL R. WILSON
ADDRESS:
5816 - 18th Street Court NW
Gig Harbor, WA 98335
MARITAL STATUS:
TELEPHONE:
Married
Home: 253-265-6709
Work: 360-414-5570
...................................................... EDUCATION .......................................................
Western State University College of Law, San Diego, CA (1972-1975)
Juris Doctorate degree (J.D.). Major courses taken: administrative law, consumer law
legal research and analysis, contracts, real property
Washington State University, Pullman, WA (1968-1972)
B.A. degree in Political SCience. Major courses taken: English (minor), political science,
economies, business administration, accounting
World Campus Afloat, Chapman College, Orange, CA (Spring 1970)
Spring semester studying around the world learning foreign cultures and political
systems
CONTINUING EDUCATION:
ICMA and Washington City/County Management Association (1981-present)
Continuous training and education on various municipal administrative, financing,
budgeting, personnel and economic development issues
University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (February 1982)
Basic government risk management (certificate)
University of Puget Sound, Olympia Campus (Fall 1978)
Graduate course in managerial decision-making (MPA program)
........................................................ EXPERIENCE ......................................................
5/2001
to
present
Cowlitz CoUnty
207 N. Fourth Avenue
Kelso, WA 98626
Chief Administrative Officer
Provide oversight for the Departments of Public Works, Office of Financial Management,
Personnel, Central Services, Risk Management, Facilities Maintenance, CommUnity
Development, and Visitors and Community Services, Fair/Expo Center, Tourism, Parks/
Recreation, and Museum for Cowlitz County (population of 95,000, 585 employees, and
FY 2002-03 biennial budget in excess of $300 million); assist in the development of the
county budget and presents a balanced budget; implement and administer policies and
procedures adopted by the Board; serve as staff liaison for the Board with elected officials
and department heads; negotiate agreements and administer various assigned projects.
Achievements: 1) coordinated the preparation of the County's first biennial program
budget; 2) reorganized the Administrative Services department; 3) prepared County's
financial management policieS; 4) negotiated new agreement with Sewer Operating Board
to refinance $40 million revenue bonds; 5) secured successful LTGO bond rating and
sewer revenue bond rating, 6) initiated preparation of business plans for Hoffstadt Bluff
Center, Fair/Expo Center and planning for new "regional center"; 7) initiated the
development of new administrative procedures, personnel policies/procedures, supervisor's
manual; and 8) facilitated a solid waste management planning effort.
11/1999
to
1/2001
City of Sammamish
704 228th Avenue NE, PMB 491
Sammamish, WA 98074
City Manager
Responsible for managing the daY-to-day administrative affairs of the City of Sammamish
(city of 35,000 population and FY 2001-02 biennial budget in excess of $137 million).
Work entailed hiring and supervising personnel, overseeing activities of all departments;
prepared the city's biennial budget; administered the planning and financing of capital
projects; developed and negotiated city contracts; administered financing of capital
improvements; planned and coOrdinated capital improvements and growth management
planning and capital projects; advised the City Council on municipal 'matters/issues and
assisted the Council in the formulation of legislative and administrative policy; interfaced
with citizens on customer service problems; and coordinated with media to report city
events and promote positive public relations.
Achievements: 1) assembled a superb professional city staff; 2) prepared the city's first
biennial budget; '3) assisted in securing $ ! 3.5 million in grants and loans for capital
programs; 4) negotiated the purchase of 1 85 acres of parks property; 5) negotiated a
regional fire service agreement with Issaquah, Redmond and adjoining fire districts;
6) coordinated law enforcement services with King County; 7) implemented the
"neighborhood connections" program.; 8) coordinated the development of a parks plan
and process for examining construction of a new city hall and community/recreation
center; and 9) developed financial and investment policies and an administrative manual
4/1995
to
12/1999
City of Sumner
1104 Maple Street
Sumner, WA 98390
City Administrator
Responsible for managing the City of Sumner (full service city of approximately 8,600
residents, annual budget in excess of $48 million, and 106 employees). Work involved
hiring and supervising city staff; overseeing activities of all city departments; Prepared
city budget, administered financing of capital improvements; developed and negotiated
city contracts; supervised accounting, reporting, and billing functions for ~ewer, water,
storm and garbage, utilities; planned and coordinated economic development, capital
improvements and growth management planning and capital projects. Advised Mayor
and Council on municipal problems and assisted in the development of legislative policy.
Achievements: 1) developed a cohesive team attitude and relatiOnship between City
Council, Mayor and staff; 2) revised the budget process and received national "GFOA"
/0-
award for exceptional budgeting; 3) secured "A" ratings from Standard and Poors for
$8,000;000 and $11,000,000 bond financing, 4) developed financial and investment
Policies; 5) coordinated regional Puyallup River Basin planning with sewer utilities;
6) prepared financing, for $7.7 million ULID and $8 million LID for northend road and
sewer infrastructure projects; 7) managed remodel of city hall and construction of a new
senior center; 8) managed the final construction and funding for the new Sumner Golf
Course; 9) negotiated settlement agreement with City of Pacific; 10) worked on planning/
development of utility and street projects; and 11) developed a partnership with Sumner
School District for various community services.
1/1992
to
12/1995
Municipal Management Services
5816 - 18th Street Court NW
Gig Harbor, WA 98335
Municipal Management Pro/ect Manager and Consultant
Provided varied project and municipal management services, including interfacing with
cities and counties on numerous development projects. Developed a sewer utility plan
and negotiated an agreement for the City of Fircrest to convert its sewer treatment service
to Pierce County.. Conducted extensive planning for the development of new school
'facilities throughout the Peninsula School District; coordinated the implementation of
local improvement districts for the construction of streets and utilities; planned for the
development of a number of sewer utility projects; project manager for three retirement
community projects and an industrial park; reviewed city labor agreements; and worked on
annexation proposals.
1/1993
to
6/1993
City of SeaTac
19215 - 28th Avenue S.
SeaTac, WA 98188
Interim City Manager
Responsible for managing the operations and personnel for the City of SeaTac for nearly
six months (city of approximately 26,000 residents, annual budget in excess of $28 million
and 140 employees). Worked on a major property acquisition and street vacation/property
exchange with the Port of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport; federal correctional facilities planning
and siting with the Federal Bureau of Prisons; implemented a parking tax to generate
$1.5 - $2 million for road projects; worked on the planning and siting for a new city hall;
conducted a City Council retreat for goal setting and evaluating roles; conducted
performance evaluations of staff; and selected a new police chief for the city:
7/1985
to
1/1992
City of Gig Harbor
3105 JUdson Street
Gig Harbor, WA 98335
City Administrator
Responsible for managing the operations and personnel of the City of Gig Harbor.
Work involved hiring and supervising .city staff; overseeing activities of all city
departments; prepared city budget, administered the financing of capital improvements,
pursuing debt financing and financial planning, seeking alternative funding sources, and
processing grant applications; developed and negotiated city contracts and labor
agreements; administered risk management operation; supervised accounting, reporting,
and billing functions. Advised Mayor and Council on municipal problems and assisted
in development of administrative policy and policy related to future direction of city
government; worked with business community, state and federal agencies, and local
municipalities on the planning and coordination of economic development, capital
improvements, annexations and growth management planning and projects; and developed
a partnership with Peninsula School District.
Achievements: !) revised city budgeting process; 2) initiated management program
planni, ng process; '3) implemented new performance evaluation system; 4) administered
refinancing of old sewer and water utility bonds, ULID, GO, and revenue bonds;
5) consolidated, eliminated, and reorganized the city's funds and accounts; 6) developed an
investment policy; 7) initiated city's consolidation to' fire district and library district;
8) acquired Pierce County's sewer customer base on Peninsula; 9) obtained sewer
Referendum 39 $800,000 grant and IAC $150,000 grant; 10) executed Urban Area
planning agreement and annexation agreement with Pierce County (defined future city
boundaries); 11) created numerous reserve funds. (risk management, utilities, and
general government capital assets); 12) hired and retained quality staff members;
13) planned and'managed expansion of city hall; 14) initiated bicycle patrol and Drug
Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program with Police Chief; 15) started a city-wide
beautification project; and 16) drafted new personnel policy manual.
9/1981
to
7/1985
Clallam County Commissioner's Office
Clallam County
223 East Fourth Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
County Administrator
Responsible for administrative matters for the Board of County Commissioners and
County. Liaison between the Board, county departments, and thepublic; exercised
independent judgment on matters affecting the daily administration of county
government; served as budget director, risk manager,, and chief labor negotiator
for county of 60,000 residents and 315 county employees; participated in policy
development and policy decisions. Coordinated reports, programs, and detailed plans
with county departments; participated in hiring and termination of department heads;
evaluated performance of departments; supervised an office staff of administrative
support and clerical employees; drafted documents, resolutions, ordinances;
negotiated and drafted contracts; administered various general' government
construction projects; participated in community activities, speaking engagements.
Achievements: 1) revised budgeting process; 2) drafted and negotiated new labor
agreements, implemented personnel policy improvements; 3) initiated management
by objectives program; 4) revised county comprehensive insurance package and
established a risk management fund/program; 5) created worker's compensation
self-insurance program; 6) developed self-funded county medical benefit plan and
healthcare program; 7) brought office automation to the county; 8) developed a new
Department of Community Development; 9) administered various capital projects
(courthouse basement, Juvenile Detention Center, and Day Treatment Center
construction); and 10) reorganized County Commissioner's office.
I 0/1977
to
9/1981
Department of General Administration
State of Washington
218 General Administration Building
Olympia, WA 98504
Special Assistant to the Director/Legislative Affairs Administrator
Coordinated special programs and organizational activities for the Director and
occasionally for the Governor. Analyzed departmental policy issues (approximately.
650 employees); prepared and drafted project reports, documents, and correspondence;
drafted legislation, executive orders, administrative regulations; consulted with
legislators and testified before legislati'~e committees. Handled various administrative
functions; coordinated the development of department's goals and objectiveS; aSsisted
in the preparation of the budget; involved in property disposition, public works
development, grant applications, contract drafting, forms preparation, and administrative
regulation preparation. Each division director (purchasing, real property, engineering and
architecture, motor vehicles, personnel, data processing, risk management, banking;
savings and loan, archives, buildings and grounds, telecommunications comprised of
approximatelY 680 employees) was accountable to me for goals and objectives setting,
annual reports, legislation, lobbying,, and administrative regulations.
Achievements: 1) developed a comprehensive plan for the purchase and utilization of
McNeil Island by the State of Washington (chaired McNeil Island Task Force comprised
of all major state agencies); 2) coordinated and redeveloped a management by objectives
program; 3) developed a departmental,code of conduct; 4) developed legislation to sunset
boards/commissions and selection process for engineers/architects; and 5) administered
the Washington State Legislative artwork program including the selection of artwork for
the House and Senate chambers; prepared a ten-year artwork acquisition plan_for the
State Capitol Building; and chaired the Ad Hoc Legislative Artwork Committee.
4/1976
to
10/1977
Attorney General's Office
Consumer Protection Division
620 Perkins Building
1 lth Avenue and "A" Street
Tacoma,.WA 98403
Legal Investigator
Consulted with consumers and businesses involved in legal.altercations as to pr~tctical
and legal remedies available in resolving conflicts; processed complaints, assessed legal
principles involved, and assisted in developing solutions; investigated businesses for
violations of State Consumer Protection Act; assisted in preparation and initiation of
legal actions; counseled and made speeches at civic groups and schools.
Achievements: 1) aSsisted in the reorganization, relocation, and expansion of the Tacoma
Consumer Protection office and 2) assisted in the reorganization of the Olympia Consumer
Protection Office's service area, and briefly managed the Olympia office.
............................................. PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ...................................
Board of Directors, Municipal Research and Services Center (1998-present)
Washington State City/County Management Association, President (1990-1991 )
Washington State City/County Management Association (1981-present)
International City/County Management ASSociation (1981-present)
Association of Washington Cities Board of Directors (1990-1992)
.................................................... ~REFERENCES ...... :- ................................... . .............
Bill Lehning
Cowlitz County Commissioner
207 N. Fourth Ave.
Kelso, WA' 98626
Telephone: (360) 577-3020
Barbara Skinner
Mayor, City of Sumner
1104 Maple Street
Sumer~ WA 98390
Telephone: (253) 863-8300
Alan Granberg
(former Vice President of Seattle NW Securities)
Vice President, EuroConsult. Inc.
230 Park Avenue, 24th-Floor
New York, NY 10169
Telephone: (212) 972-4303
Dan Held
City Attorney, CityOf Auburn
25 W. Main St.
AubUrn, WA 98001
Telephone: (253) 931-3030
Denny Richards
Former City Manager, City of Fircrest
206 Island Blvd.
Fox Island, WA 98333
Telephone: (253) 549-2228
Ben Yazici
City'Manager, City of Sammamish
704 228th Ave. NE, PMB 491 -
Sammamish, WA 98074
Telephone: (425) 898-0660
/¢
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Appointment to Bremerton
Housing Authority Board
FOR AGENDA OF: November 20, 2002
ORIGINATING DEPT: Mayor's Office
ORIGINATOR: Mayor Bozeman
DATE SUBMITTED: 11 - 01-02
2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
Application of Lynn Horton for appointment to
Bremerton Housing Authority Board.
MAYOR:
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL BY
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
4. SUMMARY STATEMFNT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The term of a current board member expires November 30, 2002. The Mayor recommends the vacancy
be filed by Lynn Horton.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
Confirmation of appointment of Lynn Horton to the Bremerton Housing Authority Board effective
November 30, 2002.
7. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED ~.] TABLED [-']
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE,:
APPROVED
6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
DISAPPROVED n-] AMENDED r-] DATE:
17
9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
10. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
11. RESEARCH SOURCES:
/$
APPLICATION FOR CITY BOARDS/COMMISSIONS/COMMITTEE
NOTE:
As an applicant for a City Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and
telephone number will be available to the press and public. You will be contaCted before
any action is taken on your appointment.
(Please type or print clearly)
NAME: T,YNN HORTON
HOME ADDRESS: 2028 TAFT AVENUE BREMERTON
DATE: 10/28/02
HOME PHONE: (360) 373- 6322
STATE WA ZIP CODE 98 312
OCCUPATION: SEMI RETIRED
WORK PHONE:
BUSINESS ADDRESS:
EMPLOYER:
E-MAIL: FAX:
EDUCATION: SEATTLE UNIVERSITY - 3 YRS./University of Washington - 1½ YRS.
LOCAL REFERENCES (name & phone number):
DAVID FARR - 377-5268
~D~v D~m ~9 ~502
I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON (please check one
()
()
()
{)
()
()
()
()
Disability Action Committee
Civil Service Commission(18 yrs. & older)
Urban Forest Committee
Public Access Citizens Advisory Committee
Community DeveloPment Block Grant
Advisory Committee
Youth Council
Safe Streets Steering Committee
Citizen's Commission on Council Salaries
Is this an application for reappointment? NO
()
or more):
Planning Commission (18 yrs. & older)
Parks & Recreation Commission
Ethics Commission
Parking Advisory Board
Solid Waste Management
Bremerton Housing Authority
Board of Appeals, Housing/Building Codes
Mayor's Select Committee on Law
Enforcement
Other
If yes, how many years have you served on this commission/committee?
/ ~' Please turn page
WHY ARE YOU APPLYING FOR THIS APOINTMENT?
The Bremerton Housing Authority can play an important role not only in improving the housing stock in the City (~ f____
Bremerton. but also in the community's revitalization efforts. I would like to continue to be a part .of that effort
working in concert with Mayor Bozeman and the City Council and I believe my experienc~ and skills would be an asset
to the Board
WHICH OF YOUR PERSONAL AND/OR PROFESSIONAL INTERESTS PROMPTED YOU TO APPLY FOR
THIS APPOINTMENT:
Years ago I became involved in the City as a community activist because I wonted to see Bremert0n revitolized. Aflc
having served as an elected official for several years, I still have a desire to see Bremerton reach its full potential
HAVE YOU SERVED ON ANY OTHER BREMERTON BOARD, COMMISSION, COMMITTEE OR TASK
FORCE? IF YES, PLEASE LIST:
No, but l'served on the City Council for six years and as mayor for eight.
PLEASE LIST YOUR QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS APPOINTMENT (INCLUDE SKILLS, ACTIVITIES,
TRAINING, EDUCATION):
My experience as an elected offi~:ial gives me an in depth knowledge of local government and the City's housing
including those owned and managed by the Bremerton H0u$ing Authority. I am well versed in budgetary, trod funding_
issues as well as State and Federal legislative and funding processes. Additionally, I have a good rapport with othe~
governmental organizofions ired officials.
WHAT ARE YOUR COMMUNITY INTERESTS (COMMITTEES, ORGANIZATIONS, sPEcIAL
ACTIVITIES)?
Currently I am helping a group of parents and guardians of adult children with disabilities establish a year,round da3~
c~amp with educational activities.
We welcome your willingness to serve Bremerton.
Mayor's Office
239 4= Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
Please return this complete~l torm to:
(360) 478-5266
(360) 478-5883 FAX
E-mail: mayor@ci.bremerton.wa.us
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: Washington Traffic Safety
Commission Grant for Motorcycles
1 ~ i~necessary)
2. CLEARANCF~Sld~ %n back
Finan~~ ~
Legal '"-.. I~~
Risk Manger ,~~ .....
Operations Committed Chair~
Fiscal and Bud~t Com~ttee Ch~ff~'~
Police Chief~~/~ . ~
FOR AGENDA: 11-20-2002
ORIGINATING DEPT: Police
ORIGINATOR: Lt. Tim Lopez
DATE SUBMITTED: 11-1-2002
2. EXHIBITS:
Grant Notification Application
WTSC Grant Project Agreement
Supporting Documentation
ENDORSEME/~ [---]
MAYOR:
//~~ATION [~]
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL BY
COUNCIL PRESIDENT'
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION: The Washington
Traffic Safety Commission grant provides funding ($8,248.44) to lease two motorcycles that would be used to
reduce traffic-related collisions, injuries and deaths. The Department provides 516 officer hours which will be
directed in school zone enforcement and the Gateway Corridor Project to meet in-kind match requirements.
5. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the Council approve accepting this Washington Traffic Safety
Commission Grant for $8,248.44, and comply with the special conditions according to grant administration.
7. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED [-'] TABLED [--]
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
APPROVED ["-]
6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Chief Forbes
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Lt. Lopez
EXPIRATION DATE: 9-30-2003
REVIEW DATE:
DISAPPROVED [~] AMENDED []]] DATE:
8. AGENDA BILL NO.:
9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
The City of Bremerton will not use the State funding.
10. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS, FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
The funds are used towards the lease of two police-equipped motorcycles. No overtime pay will be expended.
11. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Bremerton Police Department Archives
Washington Traffic Safety Commission
Washington State Patrol
Kitsap County Sheriff's Office
Port Orchard Police Department
Los Angeles Police Department Motorcycle Study
Harley-Davidson Dealerships
BMW and Kawasaki Dealerships
GRANT APPLICATION NOTIFICATION
[FOR GRANTS REQUIRING MA TCHING FUNDS OF $20K OR MORE]
Depa~ment Submitting Applicatio~: City of Bremerton Police Department
Grant Award Amount: Matching Funds Required: Amount of Matching Funds:
$ 8,248.44 [] Yes [] No $ In-Kind SerVice
Type of Grant · Duration of Grant- Granting Agency:
State One Year Washington Traffic Safety
Commission
Summ~ of G~-~n~. , The ~rant provides funding to lease motorcycles that
would be used to reduce traffic-related collisions, injuries and deaths.
The Department provides 516 officer hours which will be directed in school
zone enforcement and the Gateway Corridor Project to meet in-kind match
requirements.
Fiscal and Budget Committee
Operations Committee
~"'~ ~Fgnature _~ Date
Signature Date
ol3
Attachment B
Safety CommissiOn.
1000 South Cherry Street
PO Box 40944
_Olympia, Washington 98504-0944
Phone (360) 753-6197
Fax (360) 586-6489
www.wa.gov/wtsc
Section 1
Authorization
Rev. 2/07/02
Project Title: __School Zone Enforcement/Cl~cK It Or Ticke~ Enforcement Project__xx__
Type of Application: Initial _XX_ Revision: WTSC Tracking Number
WTSC use onlY
Dwn_ers_~ip _o~_~faci!ities~..oL_e. quiP_m._e.o~t,_a~qu_i_r_e~__t.~h._ro__u_gh this fuodi__ng,.__s.h_pl_[ be vested with the ap_o_licant age_n_c;y, not the state, of
Washington. However, facilities or equipment acquired through this agreement shall, be utilized and retained in highway saf_ety
operations during the useful existence of such equipment or facilities. Costs incurred for maintenance, repairs o[ support of such
equipment or facilities shall be borne by the applicant agency. Further, it is understOod and agreed that the activity covered by this
project, as more particularly described in sections 2 and 3 attached thereto and made a part hereof, is undertaken under authority of Title
23, United States Code and is subject to the administrative regulations established by federal guidelines and the Washington State Traffic
Safety Commission. ~
APplicant Agency/Organization Bremerton Police Department
Project Director Information:
Name_Lieutenant Tim. Lopez Address 239 4th street Bremerton Wa. 98337
TitLe Lieutenant. * . 3~tdress__same as above.
Signatg~¢~~--~ ~ ~~City, State, Zip same as above
,- ,'/) - ;/;;, -- -- _
E-mail Address_tlopeZ~ 6i.i~emerton.tn~:6s Area-Code (360) Phone___ 478-5237
Applicant Agency Authorizing ~)fficial (person with contracting authority)if different from above:
Organization
Name Address
Title ' Address
Signature' City, State, Zip
. .~ Area Code
Phone
WTSC Program Manager
?lanned Project Duration: From:
~,pproved by: "
~'ame:
.WTSCUseOnly:
October 15, 200:2
['itle: Director, WTSC ~ . .~-~
To: . February 28, 2003
Federal (lISP) Project Number:
Federal Funds (obligated)$
CFDA Number
Certifications and Assurances .
It. is. hereby understood that this application and attachments hereto, when approved and signed b~ ~'a'll 'concerned parties, as. indicate~" shall constitute ar~
agreement by and between the applicant organization to perform, in accordance' with the terms of this application and attachments, taken as a whole.. This
agreement is based &-n guidelines found in the Common-Rule, OMB Circular A-102, in order to standardize and simplify federal grants. The signature below of an
authorized representative of the applicant agenc~ certifies and assures that all the following conditions will be met:
1) Reports - The Contractor shall submit qua'rtedy reports, a final report at end of project, and submit special reports as outlined Project Agreement, Addendum
A, Billing and Report Requirements.
2) Copyriqhts, Publications, and Patents - Where activities supported by this project produce, original copyright ,material, the Contractor may' COpyright such, but
the WTSC reserves nonexclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, and use such materials and to authorize others to do so. The Contractor
may publish, at its own expense, the results of project activities without prior review by the WTSC provided that any publications (written, visual, or sound)
contain acknowledgment of the National Highway Traffic Safety A-dministration (NHTSA) and the WTSC support. Any discovery or inventioh derived' from
work performed under this project shall be referred to the WTSC, who will determine through NHTS/~ whether or not patent protections will be sought, how
any dghts will be administered, and other action required to prote~::t the public interest.
3) Termination - This project agreement may be terminated or fund payments discontinued or reduced by WTSC at any time upon written notice to the
Contractor due to non-availability of funds, failure of the Contractor to accomplish any of the terms herein, or from any change in the scope or timing of the
project.
4) Fiscal Records - Complete and detailed accounting records will be maintained by the Contractor of all costs' incurred on this project, including documentation
of all purchases of supplies, equipment, and services; travel expenses; payrolls; and time records of any person employed part-time on this project. Federal,
state, or WTSC auditors shall have access to any records of the Contractor. These records shall be retained for three years after the final audit is completed
and all questions resolved.
5) Fundin.q - The Contractor will utilize funds provided therein to supplement and not to supplant state and local funds otherwise available for these purposes.
Funds are to be expended only for purposes and activities approved herein. Reimburs-ement will be made periodically by WTSC for'its share based on
...... approved, cost reports=~-T, he-Contractor-will-expend-from nonfederal sources the required matching amounts, which shall be. expended not.-later.than.30 days---
following the completion of the projects.
6) Cost Principles and Grant Manaqement ? The allowability of costs incurred and the management of this pi'oject shall be determined in accordance With the
Office of Manage~nent and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87 and 49CFR, Part 18 ~or state and local agencies, OMB Circulars A-21' and A-110 for educational
institutions, and OMB Circular A-122 for nonprofit entities. ·
7) Obli.qation Funds - Federal funds may not be obligated prior to the effective date or subsequent to the termination date of this project period. Obligations
outstanding as the termination date shall be' liquidated within 30 days.
8) Chanqes - The Contractor must obtain prior written approval from the WTSC for major project changes, including: changes of substance in project objectives,
evaluation, activities, the project manager, key personnel, or project budget.
9) Income - Income earned by the Contractor with respect to the conduct of the project (sale of publications, registration fees, service charges, etc.) must be
accounted for and income applied to project purposes or in reduction of project costs.
10) Purchases - Purchase of equipment or services must comply with state or local regulations. After the end of the project period, equipment will continue to be
utilized for highway safety purposes or will not be disposed of without written approval of the WTSC. The Contractor shall make and maintain Jan inventory of'
equipment to include descriptions, serial humbers, locations, costs or other identifying information, and submit a copy to the WTSC.
1 I) Third Party Participants - No contracts or agreements may be entered into by the Contractor related to this project, which are not Incorporated herein and
approved in ~dvance by the WTSC. The Contractor will retain ultimate control and responsibility for the project. W'I'SC shall be provided with a copy of all
such contracts and agreements entered into by Contractors. Any contract or agreement must allow for the greatest competition practicable and evidence of
such competition or justification for a negotiated contract or agreement shall be provided to the WTSC.
12) Participation by Disadvantaqed Business Enterprises - The contractor agrees to take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with Title 49, CFR,
Subtitle A, Part 26 to ensure that minority business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform contracts. Recipients and their
contractors shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any subcontracts financed in whole or in
part with Federal funds.
13) Americans with Disabilities Ac~ - In the performance of this agreement, the Contractor shall comply with the provisions of-Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964
42 USC 200d, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 29 USC 794 Chapter 49.60 RCW, and Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act 42 USC 1211-
12117 as now or hereafter amended. The Contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, marital status, age,
creed, Vietnam-Era and Disabled Veterans status, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical handicap_in any terms and 'COnditions of employment_
-to include f~aking affirmative action-necessary-to accomplish the_objectives_.of_thispart and-denying an. individual.the opportunity.to participate.in_any program-__.
provided by this agreement through the provisions of services, or otherwise afforded others.
14) Political Activities - No funds, materials, equipment, or services pro,~ided herein shall be used for any partisan political activity or to further the election of.
defeat of any candidate for public office or to PaY any person to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of congress, or an employee of a
member of congress, an officer or employee of congress in connection With the awarding of any federal loan Or the entering in of any cooperative
agreements.
15) Sinqle Audit - State and local governments that receive federal assistance are subject to the audit requirements of the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Circular A-128. An institution of higher education or a nonprofit entity must comply with audit requirements in OMB Circular A-133. An independent
audit of the financial operations, including compliance with provisions of federal law and regulations of all funds expended, must be arranged for by the
contractor. A copy of the completed audit must be submitted to the WTSC.
16) Seat Belt Policy - No funds, materials, property, or services-will be provided to any political subdivision that does not have a concurrent and actively enforced
policy-requiring the use of seat belts.
17) Dru.q Free Workplace - In accordance with the Anti-Drug Act of 1988 41 USC 702-707 and Drug-Free Workplace, 42 USC 12644, the VV'FSC has the
responsibility to ensure that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance by any employees, grantees, and/or
sub-grantee of the Agency and/or any .~'~ch activity ~s prohibited in the workplace...
18) Debarment and Suspension - The applicant agency certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it or its principals is presently debarred, suspended,
proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency.
Commission."*
Section 2
DescriPtion of Activity
In this section; the following five elements should be defined in narrative form: (1) Problem
Identification, (2)Project Goal(s), (3) Project Activities and Tasks, (4) Project Evaluation and (5)-
' Budget (explain how funds will be used and details bf any matching funds.).
Please clearly label 'each element using the titles listed above, and limit Section 2 to three
single-sided pages u~ing nothing smaller than a 12-point font.
Problem Identification and Project GoaiS.~
The City of Bremerton POlice Department plans on conducting a School Zorie Enforcement Program on
city roads in the months of October 2002 through February 2003 and then opening back up from M~rch
reason for the break in time is due to 6 month shift bids for officers per union contract. The time frame of
this contract will be one year. This project Will be funded by the Bremerton Police Department in
manpower hours with over 516 hours directed to this project. This program is to support the WTSC .'
project .in targeting drivers of vehicles that fail to follow the speed limit, in school zones, Playground
Summer Zones, DUI Task Force, Gateway Corridor Project, Pedestrian, Bicycles and all other traffic
violation projects. The Bremerton Police Department is requesting from the WTSC financial support for a
Motorcycle Unit Program that we would like to restart and two motorcycle helmets (Setcom) and. the radio
equipment that would ¢o with them, and motorcycle boots for each officer for safety purposes. A copy of
the paperwork costs on this equipment is attached to this request. BPD currently has two 1985 Harley-
Davidson Police Motorcycles that'we have just recently placed back into use but they are outdated
equipment that will soon need to be replaced..We are asking for assistance in the funding for a one year
lease on two Harley-Davidson Road King Police Motorcycles and the equipment that would be used.on
them to make them police service worthy. Copies of the bids for these leased motorcycles are attached to.
this request. The total costs for the two leased Motorcycles will be $14,363.44 (this includes all police
equipment on. the MC which will become BPD's after the lease) and the helmets and equipment is a total
of $2688.00. BPD will use our two current motorcycles for trade in ($8000.00) which will reduce the cost
down to around $8248.44, and we are asking for $8248.44 to cover this and the tax. BPD is also willing to
do all we can if necessary to reduce the request for needed, funding with the VVTSC.
The Bremerton Police Department.believes tha~ these enforcement actions eliminate loss o~.life~ and
inju~des-~tha-t~ccur~he.ndr-i~r`s~-~Ep-a-s.~enge~r-s~-d~.~.~D9t-~w~a.~Lt~ej[~eatbe~ts and when drivers fail to follow
the set speed limit in school zones. The goal of this project is to reduce these fatalities and injuries .
through education and enforcement activities in our community. BPD believes that MC Units are.a
valuable tool in reducing traffic related issues such as School Zone/DUI/and all other traffic related
enforcement. Lieutenant Tim Lopez will compile the statistics from these operations to provide them'to
the WTSC. It is projected that based on the above hours of 516 that the officers will write between 1032-
1548 Speeding in School Zone NOl's and other citations.
Media adVisement has been done extensively by the VVTSC. The Bremerton'Police Department has also
conducted BKAT public advisement ads on these enforcement actions and has placed newspaper
advisement of these actions in the local paper in the recent past and' we feel that the public is well aware
of the enforcement projects being done b..y Washington Law Enforcement. ..
Each person stopped for a violation will be given a brochure explaining the seatbelt and school zone
laws. There will be zero tolerance for those not wearing their seatbelts and for those speeding in school
zones. Officers Fisher and Prante will be directed to have 2-3 activities per hour with the preferred '
activities of Speeding in School Zone Infractions. Other citations may be performed during the time frame
and will be documented. It is also recognized that one activity may take more than a short period and thi
will also be documented.
The Bremerton Police Department will condUct numerous tasks related to Speeding:in School Zone .-. .....
Enforcement. These tasks will total 516 hours and the officers will either be working strictly in the school
zones enforcing the school zone laws and or the officers will be dedicated to the Gateway Corridor
Project enforcing speeding or other related traffic laws. BPD will also work in conjunction with other
enforcement activities sponsored byWTSC in regards to the Gateway Corridor Project~ BPD Traffic
Officers will also begin.a Seatbelt/Speeding Course Curriculum to Conduct with Bremerton High School
and other school in the area that request some of the training for Driver's Education Beginning Courses..
Education has been corfducted with Bremerton Municipal Court and it Judge James Doctor in regards to
the necessity of this enforcement action and he and the c(surt is.supportive of the program.
The time frame for the turn around of receiving'the MC's from when they are ordered is up to months
according to the dealers.
Traffic Officers Peter Fisher and Brent Prante will be-the designated officers that will be conducting these
projects. The hours and dates they will be dedicated to these activities alone are listed below: This list is
subject to change or dates and times may be added.
Proposed Project ~Activitiesand: Tasks.~ (these' are tentative-dates 'and may change~as--needed) ..................
Officer Brent Prante hours dedicated strictly to school zone areas enforcemeht and seatbelt enforcement:
1) November 13, 2002-0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2. hours)
2) November 14, 2002- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2. hours)
3) November 19-23, 2002- the whole week Officer Prante will work 0630-1430 hours on Speeding in
School Zone and Click it or Ticket Enforcement at local city schools (40 hours)
4) December 6, 2002- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2. hours)
5) December 7, 2002- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2 hours)
6) December 11, 2002- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2. hours)
7) December 12, 2002- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2. hours)
8)~- ~"JanUarY 2~'~2003~-0530-0800 hOUrs dti~spbe'dif-ig'~ih Sch'0~I Zor~e~and'Clibk"it'or Tick-et~'
Enforcement at. local city schools (2. hours)
9) January 3, 2003- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2 hours)
10) January 4, 2003- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2 hours)
11) January 8, 2003- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2 hours)
12) January 9, 2003- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2. hours)
13) January 10, :2003- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at.local city schools (2 hours) ..
14) January 14, 2003- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2 hours)
15) January 17, 2003- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and 'Click it or Ticket
Enforcement.at local city schools (2 hours)
16) January 18, 2003- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2 hours)
17)
18)
19)
January 21-25, 2003- the whole week Officer Prante willwork 0630-'1430 hours on Speeding in
School'Zone and Click. it or Ticket Enforcement at local city schools (40 hours)~
January 28=February' 1., 2003- the whole Week Offic~r-Prante' will work' 0630-t438 I~ours on'
Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket Enforcement at' local city schools (40 hours) '~"
February 18-22, 2003- the whole week Officer Pronto will work 0630-1430 hours on Speeding in
School Zone and Click-it or TiCket Enforcement at local city .schools (40 hours)
February 26, 2003- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it Or Ticket
20)
Enforcement at local city schools (2. hours)
21) February 27, 2003- 0530-0800 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Clickit or'Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (2 hours)
.22) February 28, 2003- 0530-0800 hours Un Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforceme, nt at local city schools (2. hours)
Total hours by Officer Prante 196 ' '
Officer Peter.F sher hours dedicated strictly to school zone areas enforcement and seatbelt er~forcement
1) November 19-23, 2002- 0730-1530 the whole week Officer Fisher will work 0730,-1530 hours on
~ ..................... ~Speeding in.SchoohZone and. Click it or-Ticket Enforcementat local-city-.schools-(40-hours-) ............. -~-. ....... ~--
2) November 29, 2002- 0730-1530 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at Ioca! city schools (8 hours)
3) November 3_0, 2002- 0730-1530 hours on Speeding' in School Zone and Click it or Ticket'
Enforcement at local city schools (8 hours)
4) December 10, 2002- 0730-1530 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (8 hours)
5) December 11, 2002- 0730-1530 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (8 hours)
6) December 31, 2002- January 4, 2003 - 0730-1530 the whole week Officer Fisher will work 0730-
1530 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket Enforcement at local city schools .
(40 hours)
7) January 7-10, 2003- 0730-1530'hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (32 hours)
8) January 14-18, 2003- 0730-1530 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (40 hours)
9) January 21-24, 2003~ 0730-1530 hours on Speeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (32 hours) ·
_10) January 28-31, 2003- 0730-1530 hours on Speeding in SchoOl Zone and Click it. or Ticket _.
Enforcement-at-local-city-schools-(32-hours)- ..
11) February 18-22, 2003- 0730-1530 hours onjSpeeding in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (40 hours)
12) February 25-28, 2003- 0730-1530 hours on Speeding'in School Zone and Click it or Ticket
Enforcement at local city schools (32 hours)
Total hours by Officer Fisher 320.
A quarterly report will be 8ompleted by Lt. Lopez in the format set by the WTSC. At minimum it will include
a breakdown of the activities, hours of enforcement, spebific NOl's and dollar amounts, and other related
citations. ,
Bud.qe.t Information:
Total man power hours are 516.The estimated overtime hourly rate for Officers Fisher and Prante is
$40.33 for a total of $20,815.44.
. Requested amount from WTSC is $8248.44.
Point of Contact:
Lieutenant Tim Lopez, Operations Lisutenant Bremerton Police Department
239 4th Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
(360) 478-5237
Plann in.q Committee;
Phone Numbers:
Lieutenant Tim Lopez
(360) 478-5237
Section 3
BUdget Summary
Budget:
1. Salaries and WageS:·
WTSC Costs
(If applicable)
Applicant· Matching/'
Contributing Cost
$ 20,815.44
2. Employeb' Benefits:
3. Travel and Subsistence:
4. Contractual Services:
5. Equipment:
$ 8248.44
6. Goods and Services:
7. Total lines1-6 (Amount Requested from WTSC)
8. Total lines 1-6 (Amount provided, by applicant)
$8248.44
$ 20,815.44
Total Project Cost (Add lines 7 & 8):
$29,063.88
,cost. sharing ,
(Washingtoh Traffic safe~ COmmission· use only)
Sham: : Amount
Fe~al; $
State: $ '-
,Politi~al~Subdiv Sion: .$'
~Fotal EStimated' COst: $"~
WTSC Use Only
Percent
I
I
I AB~li~s To;:
Matching Share:`
WSP Field Salaries Fy
Addendum A.
Bi.lling and Reporting Requirements
Billings
Invoice vouchers for payment must be prepared monthly and must be received by the Washington Traffic Safety
Commission by the 10~ of the month following the billing period.
Reporting Frequency and Format
The Washingto~ Traffic Safety Commission requires three types of reports in conjunction with traffic safety projects:
1. Quad_edy reports dudng the life bf a project;
2. A final report at the conclusion of a project. This is to include training and consultant reportsl if applicable; and
3. Special reports as required.
._P~r0je_ ct reports of every kind provide th e_W_ashi_n_g_to~n _T..r~_c. __S _a_fe~y__C_0__m. ~_i_ss_~.n_fA~gt]~q~at ~ used~
str~r~h-e-~ ;~-s{a-t~"~ ~'~i~i"t~;~'~a-~ty ~rogram. Tl~es~ r~rt~-k~p-'t~e ~.~mmission infor~n'~d of a
progress, explain any difficulties encountered, provide a background of information that can be passed on to others,
suggest ways in which the commission can assist with the project and aid in distribution'of state fund~,. Therefore,
comprehensive reports are a must for continued improvement in the state's traffic safety operations.
Quarterly Reports
These are to be submitted quarterly and are due in the Traffic Safety Commission's office within fifteen (15) calendar
days after the end of the reporting calendar quarter as follows:
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
October- December Report-due January 15
January - March Report due April 15
April - June Report due July 15
July- September Report due October 15
- The Traffic Safety Project Report Forn~s are to be used when compiling these reports. All sections are to be filled in
as completely as possible. (Use additional sheets, as necessary). If no action has been taken, .please so indicate.
Any original or innovative ideas or methods employed in your project should be incorporated into your reports.
Final Report
Final reports, in duplicate, are to' be more informative and must .describe whether the. project objectives were
accomplished, if technical and fiscal problems were encountered,, and what improvements in.traffic safety have ..
statistical data generated in project execution. These final reports should discuss the following:
1. Accomplishments compared to the original project objectives; '
2. Were all activities of the project completed as scheduled? Include dates and milestones when studies were
completed; equipment acquired, installed and operated;
3. Any unanticipated proceedings that affected the projected;
4. Funding and costs for completion of the project in relationship to original estimates; and
5. Third party performance if consultant was employed. Two copies of consultant reports are to be included with
the project director's reports.
Special Reporting
Special reporting procedures may be required for special interest projects. If so, report format and frequency will be
outlined on the reverse side of this form.
Robert D. Forbes
I'forb~J.bmflmrton.wa.ul
Fiscal nnd Budget Committee Members and Operations Committee Members
Today's traffic unit is comprised of three uniformed officers and a uniformed sergeant. The
unit utilizes only marked patrol vehicles equipped with radar. The traffic unit is responsible
for all major collision investigations and collisions that result in death. The officers are a
supplemental unit for the Patrol division and only operate as independent traffic.officers on
shifts when there are sufficient numbers of available essential personnel. The traffic unit is
available for emphasis enforcement at least once monthly. During that time, they focus on
roadways within the city limits that are high collision locations, and areas were speeders or
other issues occur.
A traffic officer, while working in a marked patrol vehicle as a traffic enforcement officer, is
able to easily work any area and able to issue between five and seven infractions a day. When
a traffic Officer is assigned to supplement Patrol, the officer is then only able to issue between
one to five infractions a day,
The current members of the traffic unit are committed to making the sweets of Bremerton as
safe as possible for its citizens and motoring public. The traffic officers are more than ever
committed to the goal of reducing deaths, injuries, and property damage as a result of motor
............ Whi~ li~ 'C-611isionS 'in the -City' limiti-6'f B~em~i-t-0n.
In the past, the Bremerton Police Department had four uniformed officers and a uniformed
sergeant in the traffic unit. In 1984, the traffic unit was re-established to the Same goal and
was solely dedicated to work only traffic related activity. The traffic unit embarked on a
highly visible and rigorous traffic enforcement program using marked and unmarked patrol
vehicles, and motorcycles; all were equipped with radar.
The currem traffic unit researched the use of motorcycles as an enforcement tool and a
community oriented policing tool. The motorcycle has the value, efficiency, and practicality
to accomplish the goal of reducing traffic deaths and injuries.
The traffic unit embarked on a project to revitalize and re-introduce the motorcycle unit to
successfully support the traffic goal. Two uniformed officers of the traffic unit (Officers
Peter Fisher and Brent Prante) volunteered to become motor officers. Both officers received
their motorcycle endorsements from the Department of Licensing and attended the 80'-hour
· P~e2
November 1; 2002
Basic Police Motomycle' Operations Course offered through the Washington State Criminal
Justice Training Academy.-
To support the project and move closer to reducing traffic related deaths and injuries, the
traffic unit conducted research fi'om August 9 through September 1, 2002. The Port Orchard
Police Department loaned two motorcycles to Bremerton. The purpose was to familiarize
officers Fisher and Prante with handling .motorcycles prior to starting the basic operator
course; and also to help the Department understand the operational effectiveness of motor
officers 'While working as traffic units (on motorcycles) and as a supplement to Patrol (on
motorcycles). As mentioned above while working as a lone traffic officer on a Patrol shift,
thc officer is-ablc~towrite-betwcen-five-.-to seven infractions a day..-Officers Fisher and Prante
were directed to ride the two motorcycles on their designated shifts and on emphasis dates to
determine the difference in enforcement ability~
The motor officers were able to average between twelve to seventeen 'infractions a day while
working as traffic officers, mad between ten to fourteen infractions while supplementing
Patrol. This is an average increase of seven to twelve infractions a day while working as a
traffic unit; and an average increase of five to seven infractions a day while Working as a
Supplement to Patrol. The value to this operation is the enforcement education to the
motoring public and the heightened awareness to the motoring public that traffic laws are
enforced within city limits to reduce and .eliminate traffic collisions and associated traffic
deaths. A secondary benefit is the revenue generated by this unit. On average the City
receives about 56 percent of each infraction written by an officer. The average infraction at
this time is $86.00. The City could receive approximately $48.16 from each infraction.
Using the lowest number of five infractions a day and multiplying it by five days a week and
40 weeks in a year (less 12 weeks for winter), the dollar figure of the revenue for one year
could be $48,160.00.
Motorcycle_.units. also have .other_benefits ~ for_the. Department_and_the_community. _Motor .__
officers respond quicker and easier through busy streets to vehicle collisions or other 911
calls for service than thc traditional police vehicle, The motor officer is less conspicuous
than the regular Patrol vehicle and is able to engage in radar patrol in areas where there may
be a number of collisions or speeders, It is difficult for a regular Patrol vehicle to work that
area because it is easily seen; or a response is dclayccl because traffic congestion hinders thc
vehicle when entering traffic, Motor officers arc also able to work red light running districts
(areas where there arc a high' number of red light runners or collisions caused by this
violation).
With the highly charged and vis,lc civic events that the Bremerton Police Department is
called upon to coordinate and participate in (Blackberry Festival, Armed Forces Day Parade,
special events like the Special. Olympics T0reh Run, and other truffle control events),
motorcycle use has become a crucial tool for the Department. Only motorcycles can
facilitate the needed ability to move among pedestrians and around traffic barricades, a
necessity to ensure orderly and problem free events. (This year only one motorcycle was
· Page 3
November 1, 2002
operational for the coordination and participation in the Armed Forces Day Parade). In
community oriented policing, the motor officers can be a' bonus for public relations.
Motorcycles are a specialized tool; they are able to raise public awareness levels. They are
more approachable to the public. This creates natural questions among the general public
and officers. These contacts develop a positive trust between the police and public and may
lead to information exchanges pertaining to known and unknown problems. The ability to
conceal motorcycles makes them highly effective for traffic enforcement purposes in the
areas of neighborhoods, school zones and high collision areas. In addition, these officers will
be able to provide more traffic education in schools and at community events.
Currently3--the. Police--Department has a fleet-of three -Harley-Davidson motorcycles, -1972,
1984 and 1985 models with police equipment packages t}om those years. Two of the three
motorcycles work. With the substantial increase in the recent use of the two working
motorcycles, current maintenance has become cost prohibitive. The. age of the equipment
and its exhausted service life are the reasons. The Depmhaent is at a decision point to
upgrade to newer, more efficient, and dependable motorcycles, or to continue spending large
sums of money on the present equipment; whose reliability and dependability are suspect.
With the given problems currently affecting the existing motorcycles, 'it is believed that the
City would benefit most by disposing of the units now, while they have a high resale value
and excellent exterior condition.
Locally, the Washington State Patrol, Kitsap County Sheriff's Department, and the Port
Orchard Police Department Utilize motorcycles for traffic enforcement. This is an indication
that there is a reemergence towards the increase use of p°lice motorcycles because of their
maneuverability in and out of traffic, and their access~ility/approachability to the public.
The police motorcycle is most desirable for its maneuverability and concealment in traffic
enforcement. According to the Los Angeles Police Department Feasibility Study, the
.... unequaled_ maneuverability of motorcycle_officers_is_the_ single most_, essential_factor
contributing to their effectiveness. While investigating traffic collisions is a part of motor
officer's duties, the primary function of the motor officer is the detection and apprehension of
traffic violators.
The Los Angeles Police Motorcycle Study also cited several other key supporting factors:
1) Motor officers issued nearly 50 percent more traffic citations than traffic enforcement
officers in cars.
2) Injury and .fatality traffic collisions increased at a disproportionate rate in areas
deployin[, onl3 police automobiles.
3) Preventable officer-involved traffic collisions were significantly higher for officers in
automobiles.
4) Motorcycle officers were more active in investigating non-related crimes.
3q
· Pa~e 4
November 1, 2002
The 2003 Harley-Davison FLI-IP-1 motorcycle is presently in use by many police agencies.
Harley-Davidson motorcycles have been a mainstay of police motorcycle operations for
many years. The Harley-Davidson meets or exceeds all specifications, and would adequately
suit the needs of the Bremerton Police Depa, hnent.
The acquisition of new police motorcycles by the Bremerton Police'Department would result
in literally zero maintenance costs during the lease except for oil changes. The Bremerton
Police Department selected to lease a Harley-Davidson motorcycle because it has an
ergonomically designed body system for maximum rider comfort, as well as an adjustable
seat, adjustable windshield and heated hand grips.
· Grant Annlieation and Washington Traffic, Sate~Y Commission Project:
'The Bremerton Police Department is applying to the Washington Traffic Safety Commission
for a grant to financially support restarting the motorcycle unit program. The grant will fund
all equipment for the two new leased Harley-Davidson motorcycles over one year. The
Police Department plans on conducting a School Zone Enforcement Program in the City for
the duration of one year during different times and dates to meet the requirements of the
grant. November 2002 is the expected start date. The project includes numerous tasks
related to speeding in School Zone Enforcement. These tasks will total 516 officer hours.
Officers will either be working strictly in the school zones enforcing the school zone laws, or
the. officers wilt be dedicated to the Gateway Corridor Project, enforcing speeding and other
related traffic laws.
Fundi~m Information:
The Department is recommending a one year lease for two Harley-Davidson Road King
Police Motorcycles and the equipment that would be used on them to make them police
service _worthy. _Copies~_of _the _bids_ for_ these~ leased _motorcycles _..are_'_ attached _to_~ this
information memorandum. The total costs for the two leased motorcycles will be
$14,363,44. This includes all police equipment on the cycles which, will become the
Department's. The helmets and police equipment costs are a total of $1,888.00. The
Department will use the two current motorcycles for trade-in ($8,000.00) which will reduce
the cost to $8,251.44. After the one year lease expires, the Department will turn in the two
motorcycles removing all the special police equipment. At that time, the Department will be
provided two new Harley-Davidson motorcycles for the following year, with a lease price of
$1,250.00 each.
According to the dealer, the ordering-receipt time is three months.
The Department will dedicate manpower hours only to the Washington Traffic Safety
Commission funded project. Total manpower hours are 516. The hourly rate for Officers
Fisher and prante is $26.89 for a total of $13,445.00.
35
· Page'5 November 1, 2002
Requested amount from WTSC is $8,251.44 with the poss~ility of the-grant being extended
another year. Although the hourly wage output is higher than the grant amount, there is n° '
immediate funding needed from the City. Also if the WTSC does not pick up the lease, the
Department will still be able to lease for the next year at $1,250.00 rote for each motorcycle.
Bid Prices for Purchasing:
The bids depict the expense of out right motorcycle purchasing. These dollar amounts
would prohibit restart of the motorcycle program regardless of grant supported funding. ·
The following price information was-collected.to obtain proposals fi.om interesteddealers, ' '
Beaudry Motor Sports
1- BMW 2002 R1150RTP
$16,606.83
Under WSP State Bid- This is a fully loaded police package with a three-year unlimited
mileage limited warranty
(208) 777-2453
Destination Harley
1- 2003 Harley-Davidson FLHP-I $ 21,087.46
Tacoma- This includes a pre-paid maintenance package including tires
(253)922-3700
Burbank Kawasaki
1- 2002 Kawasaki KZ1000- (P19) $11,099.00
(818)848-6627
In-summary;-the PoliceDepartment can meet its goal to-reduoe traffic-related-deaths;-injuries-
and property damage through deploying safe and new Harley-Davidson motorcycles using
state-of-the-art ,equipment and technology. The new motorcycles can be funded through a
grant from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission at no expense to the City. Request
most favorable consideration for this progrmn'and associated grant project.
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Lease Agreement Renewal with
Bremerton Community Theater
FOR AGENDA OF: November 20, 2002
ORIGINATING DEPT: Parks & Recreation
ORIGINATOR: Jim Spencer, Director
DATE SUBMITTED: November 12, 2002
2. CLEARANCES: ....... --, 3. EXHIBITS:
(Comment on back if necessa[ry)~,
City Attorney: Lease Agreement
Fiscal & Budget Committee:
Operations Committee:
ENDORSEME_..~T~ I~J~N APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
4. SUM~RY STATEMENT ~D ~QUI~MENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The current ten year lease with Breme~on Communi~ Theater (BCT) expires December 31, 2002. The
existing lease has been reviewed and updated. ~is new lease d~at runs though 2012 is provided as an
exhibit and allows the Ci~ of Breme~on use of the hcili~, on a non-interference basis, with adequate
notice. BCT assumes full responsibiliW for hcili~ expenses and is required to ca~ a ~o million dollar
liabili~ insurance policy.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to have Council approve a ten year renewal of the BCT lease with the Bremerton Parks and
Recreation Department.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Jim Spencer
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Jim Spencer
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
DATE:
11. AGENDA BILL #: 02-
3'7
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION (continued):
IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
BCT would be forced to find a new location and structure in which to conduct community
theater programs.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER
RESOURCES:
The BCT lease agreement has limited impact to Bremerton Parks and Recreation Department staffing
or resources, and benefits by having access to the facility for specialty programs such as Children's
Theater camps, senior center productions, etc.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
LEASE AGREEMENT
Community Theatre
THIS AGREEMENT, is made this ~)/ffday of ~)67~/~' ,2002, between the CITY
OF BREMERTON, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Landlord"), and
COMMUNITY THEATRE, INC., a non-profit corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Tenant").
WITNESSETH:
1. Premises: That the Landlord does, by these presence, lease to the Tenant a
time share in the following described premises:
The BREMERTON COMMUNITY THEATRE BUILDING and
adjoining parking lots, located at 599 Lebo Boulevard, Bremerton,
Washington, located on Municipal Area Number One, and
Recreational Area Number One north of the Warren Avenue
Bridge right-of-way according to the map attached as Exhibit "A";
(hereinafter called "Premises"). The Premises consist of approximately 13,000 square feet of
floor area.
Tenant shall have priority use of the Premises needed for meetings, staging, rehearsal and
theatrical or artistic performances, as well as use of the Premises needed to conduct the Tenant's
corporate activities. The Parks Director or designee shall participate with the Tenant in
coordinating scheduling of Parks programming or other community use. Unscheduled times
shall be available for either the Tenant or the Parks Department use upon notice to the other
party.
2. Term: The Premises are rented for ten (10) years, commencing on the 1 st
day of January 2003.
3. Rent: In addition to other consideration of this Lease, including
maintenance, janitorial service, insurance, utilities and associated storm water costs for the
Premises, Tenant agrees to make the facility available to the City at no cost on a non-interference
basis for City business and programs.
4. Utilities: Tenant agrees to provide and pay all charges for heat, electricity,
gas, water, sewer and for all other public utilities which shall be used in the Premises during the
1
Community Theatre, Inc.
~,~ ? Lease Agreement
full term of this Lease; provided, however, that Tenant shall not be responsible for failure of
provision of these services if due to causes beyond its control and provided, further, that
Landlord shall pay for any such charges as Landlord, in its reasonable discretion, may determine
are the consequence of special equipment employed by or special requirements of Landlord.
5. Sublet: Tenant shall not assign this Lease or sublet the whole or any
portion of the Premises without first obtaining Landlord's written consent. If consent is once
given by Landlord to the assignment of the Lease, or any interest therein, Landlord shall not be
barred from afterward refusing to consent to any further assignment.
6. Use of Premises: Tenant shall not use said Premises or any part thereof
for any illegal purpose. Tenant agrees to conform to municipal, county, and state codes, statutes,
ordinances, and regulations concerning the use and occupation of said Premises. Tenant shall
maintain the Premises in substantial conformance with all applicable provisions of municipal,
county, and state codes, statutes, ordinances, and regulations governing maintenance or operation
of such Premises. The premises may only be used for the purposes stated in Section #1 of this
agreement. No other use shall be allowed without the express written consent of the City.
7. Repairs and Maintenance: Premises have been inspected and are accepted
by Tenant in their present condition, and Tenant will at all times keep Premises neat, clean and in
a sanitary condition. Tenant agrees to furnish competent janitorial service for Premises.
Tenant shall maintain at its sole expense the building, including the roof, foundations,
exterior walls, structural members, gutters, downspouts, concealed and underground plumbing
and concealed and underground utilities of the Premises in good condition and repair, except that
Tenant shall not be responsible for repair of any damage resulting from the negligence of
Landlord and Tenant shall not be required to redecorate the Premises at any time. Tenant agrees
that at the expiration or sooner termination of this Lease, unless a new lease has been executed,
Tenant will quit and surrender the Premises in a neat and clean condition, and will deliver all
keys belonging to Premises to Landlord or Landlord's agent.
8. Accidents and Indemnity: Tenant will save and hold Landlord harmless
from all loss damage, liability or expense resulting from any injury to any person or any loss of
or damage to any property caused by or resulting from any act or mission of Tenant or any
officer, agent, employee, guest, invitee or visitor of Tenant in or about the Premises or the
Building, but the foregoing provision shall not be construed to make Tenant responsible for
2
Community Theatre, Inc.
L~0 Lease Agreement
injuries to third parties caused by the negligence of Landlord or any officer, agent, employee,
guest, invitee or visitor of Landlord. Landlord shall not be liable for any loss or damage to
person or property sustained by Tenant, or other persons, which may be caused by theft or any
act of neglect of any tenant or occupant of the building, or of any other person, or by any other
cause, unless caused by the negligence of Landlord or its officers, licensees, agents, employees,
guests, invitees or visitors.
9. Liens: Tenant shall keep Premises and the property in which Premises are
situate, free from any liens arising out of any work performed, materials furnished or obligations
incurred by Tenant.
10. Access: Tenant will allow Landlord or Landlord's agent free access at all
reasonable times to Premises for the purpose of inspection, or of making repairs, additions or
alterations to Premises or any property owned by or under the control of Landlord, but this right
shall not be construed as an agreement on the part of Landlord to make any repairs other than
those repairs for which Landlord is responsible pursuant to the terms hereof. Landlord shall have
the right to place and maintain "For Rent" signs in a conspicuous place on Premises, for ninety
(90) days prior to the expiration of this Lease. Landlord shall have the right to show the interior
of Premises to interested parties for ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of this Lease.
11. Fire and Hazard Insurance: The Tenant agrees to maintain a standard
form fire and hazard insurance policy on the reasonable value of the building and improvements
and deposit the same with the City Clerk of the City of Bremerton.
12. Liability Insurance: Tenant, at its own expense, shall provide and keep in
force with companies acceptable to Landlord comprehensive general liability insurance in the
amount of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury and
property damage. Tenant shall furnish Landlord with a certificate of such policy within thirty
(30) days of the commencement date of this Lease and whenever required shall satisfy Landlord
that such policy is in full force and effect. Such policy shall name Landlord as an additional
insured and shall be primary and noncontributing with any insurance carried by Landlord. The
policy shall further provide that it shall not be canceled or altered without twenty (20) days prior
written notice to Landlord.
13. Notices: All notices under this Lease shall be in writing and delivered in
person or sent by registered or certified mail to Landlord in care of Bremerton City Clerk, 239
3
Community Theatre, inc.
~ ( Lease Agreement
Fourth Street, Bremerton, Washington 98337, and to Tenant at 599 Lebo Boulevard, Bremerton,
Washington 98310, effective as of the postmark time and date, or to such other place as may
hereafter be designated by either party in writing.
14. Alterations: Tenant shall not make any alterations, additions or
improvements in Premises without first obtaining the consent of Landlord in writing, and all
alterations, additions and improvements which shall be made, shall be at the sole cost and
expense of Tenant, and shall remain in and be surrendered with Premises as'a part thereof at the
termination of this Lease. If Tenant shall perform work with the consent of Landlord, as
provided above, Tenant agrees to comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of the
City of Bremerton and any other authorized public authority. Tenant further agrees that
workmanship will ~be of a reasonable commercial quality, in color schemes, in accordance with
current building standards, and free of mechanics liens. Tenant further agrees to save Landlord
free and harmless from damage, loss or expense arising out of such work.
15. Costs and Attorney Fees: If, by reason of any default or breach on the part
of either party in the performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement, a legal action is
instituted, the losing party agrees to pay all reasonable costs and attorney fees in connection
therewith. It is agreed that the venue of any legal action brought under the terms shall be in the
county in which the Premises are situated.
16. Amendments: The parties hereto expressly reserve the right to renegotiate
the provisions hereof, including the term of this lease, from time to time as may be necessary and
to amend this lease accordingly; provided, however, that no alteration or modification of the
terms or conditions hereof shall be valid and binding unless made in writing and signed by the
authorized representatives of the parties hereto.
17. Re-Entry: In case of violation of this Lease by Tenant, the Landlord shall
notify Tenant in writing of such violation and demand that the terms of the Lease be complied
with by the Tenant within a period of thirty (30) days following the delivery of said notice. In
the event of the failure of the Tenant to remedy any default or violation of the covenants,
agreements, or conditions herein contained within thirty (30) days from the receipt of said notice,
this Lease and all rights of Tenant hereunder shall be canceled and the Landlord shall have the
right to enter upon the Premises and re-take possession thereof.
4
Community Theatre, Inc.
Lease Agreement
18. '. Insolvency: In the event that the Tenant shall become insolvent or go into
bankruptcy, this Lease may be canceled at the option of the Landlord without notice, and the
Landlord may take immediate possession of the said premises and the whole thereof and the
same shall not become an asset in bankruptcy.
19. Nondiscrimination: Tenant shall not discriminate in employment or
services to the public on the basis of sex, race, color, creed, national origin, age, marital status,
physical, mental or sensory handicap except an employment action based on a bona fide
occupational qualification.
20. Waiver of Default: No waiver of default by either party of any of the
terms, covenants and conditions hereof to be performed, kept and observed by the other party
shall be construed as, or operate as, a waiver of any subsequent default of any of the terms,
covenants and conditions herein contained, to be performed, kept and observed by the other
party.
21. Adjudication: This Lease shall be construed under all of the applicable
laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations of the United States, the State of Washington,
County of Kitsap, and the City of Bremerton. In the case of a dispute between the parties, venue
over such dispute shall be with the Superior Court of Kitsap County, Washington.
22. Binding Effect: This Lease shall be binding upon the heirs, successors,
assigns and all other parties legally empowered with signatory fights of any or all of the parties
hereto.
23. Invalidity of Provisions: Should any term, provision, condition or other
portion of this Lease be held inoperative, invalid or void, the same shall not affect any other
term, provision, condition or other portion of this Lease; and the remainder of this Lease shall be
effective as if such term, provision, condition or portion had not been contained herein.
24. Previous Agreements Superseded: The terms and conditions of this Lease
supersede the terms, obligations and conditions of any existing or prior agreement between the
parties regarding the subject matter of this Lease.
25. Entire Agreement: This Lease, including the exhibits and addenda
attached hereto and forming a part hereof (if any), are all of the covenants, promises, agreements,
and conditions, either oral or written, between the parties.
Community Theatre, Inc.
Lease Agreement
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Tenant and Landlord each hereunto set their respective
hands.
LANDLORD: TENANT:
CITY OF BREMERTON COMMUNITY THEATRE, INC.
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
Its:
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
Notaries appear on next page.
6
Community Theatre, It~c.
Lease Agreement
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS.
COUNTY OF KITSAP )
On this day, before me appeared, Cary Bozeman, Mayor of the City of Bremerton, the
municipal corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument
to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes
therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument on behalf
of the municipal corporation.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this
day of ,2002.
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at
My appointment expires:
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF KITSAP )
On this day, before me appeared,
of Community Theatre, Inc., the non-profit corporation that
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and
voluntary act and deed of said non-profit corporation, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that she/he was authorized to execute the instrument on behalf of
the non-profit corporation.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this
day of ., 2002.
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at
My appointment expires:
R:\LEGAL\Contracts\Community Theatre Lease Agreement.doc
Community Theatre, Inc.
Lease Agreement
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: CONTRACT AWARD FOR
SEWAGE PUMP STATION EB-2.
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
November 20, 2002
PW&U Engineering Division
W. Eugene SamplCy, Direc~
November 7, 2002
2. CLEAP~NCES: (comment on back ifnecessary)~, J/:/ /x3. ~EXHIBITS
Director, Pubhc Works~tilities ~ff'/~Y~A. Bid Tabulation Form
City Attorney ~ ~-'~'" -' -- ~ B. Site Map
Purchasing Manager '
Council Budget & Finance Committee tx
Council Operations Committee
ENDOR ION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
q
MAYO /rjr> COUNCIL PR SIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
Modifications to Sewage Pump Station EB-2 are required for the Trenton/Cherry CSO reduction improvements set
forth in the City's CSO Reduction Plan and required for compliance with the PSA Consent Decree. Bids were
opened for the Sewage Pump Station EB-2 2002 Modifications project on November 8, 2002. There were 2 bids
received for this project. Stun Palmer Construction was the lowest responsive bidder with a bid of $1,674,242.50.
The Engineer's estimate for the project was a range of $1,600,000 to $1,900,000, including applicable taxes. The
requested action before the City Council is approval of the contract with Stun Palmer Construction for construction
of the Sewage Pump Station EB-2 2002 Modifications project.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council approve award of the Sewage Pump Station EB-2 2002 Modifications project to Stun Palmer
Construction, for the amount of $1,674,242.50, including applicable taxes and authorize the Mayor to execute the
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
City, Engineer
N/A
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTWE
10. NOTICE OFACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
11. AGENDA BII.L NO: 0.~ - g~-8
6. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Construction of the Sewage Pump Station EB-2 2002 Modifications project will be delayed, and the City
will be in violation of its Federal Court order.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS, FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
Staffing: No Impacts
Budget: The Sewage Pump Station EB-2 2002 Modifications project is funded by a combination of a
Public Works Trust Fund loan and a State Revolving Fund loan. The project is included in the
2002 Budget and is carried over in the proposed 2003 Budget.
Facilities/Equipment: No Impacts
7. RESEARCH SOURCES
City CSO Reduction Plan Update and Federal Consent Decree.
ab, Agenda Bills 2002, EB-2 Contract Award, 11-02
Z
0
0
0
n~
Z
0
Z
~=
0
I ~ '
/ -~ r ~'~ ~. ~ p. -
, .., ,
.... M~ . .: ~ ~ ~ .. : ........ ~ ~ 'q,
k ~/ ~ , p .~r ....... " '-~ ~ ~ ; ~, :~.~ ~.~ ~.~
....... ~: x~' ~ :" Tq ....... ,' ~ " ~ ~ 4 ....
', ~ " '~ I ' , .. ' ~ ~ .... '
, N--i" -'~ I -~ ~-.-.,=:q L~ , . ~!~ ~ ~ / i,
" ........ i ~: ~ ..2:'..2 .... ZZ---;J E..3L._J k_J_.j L_[JL j'
___¥
~ ~ :'~'~ ,~ ,: ,~.~ '~,
,,k
,, -
-- ~ -- i ' ~ ' ~ '~ ~ Ii ~ /i : ~'
NARROWS
' ~ ' ' ~i ~'~ , ~ ~" -~ : l ''
. ~. ~ . · : .: . : ~ I,
AND LOWER
~o.. o.,v. 'I,, ,>~ _' :, :~,, ,~
/ ," I' PORT
..~....j-:~ 4~ :: ', ! :.. -
],~'," .~./ O R C H A R D
-,L'___., .... ~-~$~'
BAY
SiTE
x,
N.T.S.
CITY OF BREMERTON
SEWAGE PUMP STATION EB-2 2002
MODIFICATIONS
NOVEMBER ZeOZ
SITE PLAN
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. S~CT: AMENDMENT TO THE
TRANSPORTATION COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH PARAMETRIX, 1NC.
FOR AGENDA OF: November 20, 2002
ORIGINATING DEPT: PW&U Engineerin~ Division
ORIGINATOR: Michael C. Mech,~n, CiyEngine~.]/ff
DATE SUBMITTED: November 5, 2002
2. CLEARANCES: (comment on back ifnecessary~//,~ .-~ 3- , EXHIBITS
Director, Public Works/Utilities ~'~_~ ~/"~~ A-~ ~---'~nt to Professional Services
City Attomey x~. _" ~ ' _ - Agreement with Parametrix, Inc.
Administrative Serdees Director
Budget & Finance Committee
Operations Committee
ENDORSE~_..__~ ION APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
MAYOR~t.~ /c ~Tr:> ~'~ --., COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT ~ REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The Department of Public Works and Utilities has negotiated an amendment to the Transportation Comprehensive
Plan Professional Services Agreement with Parmnetfix, Inc. The ~nt scope of work consists of a study of
traffic circulation options in downtown Bremertor~ The study will consider the effects of relocating exiting ferry tragic
t?om Washington Avenue to Pacific Avenue, with and without the Bremerton tunnel project. Downtown
redevelopment projects will be considered in the study. The ~nt adds $58,183 to the 0.xi~ $98,935 contract,
for a revised contract amount of $157,118. The request before the City Council is approval of an'aamendment to the
Professional Services Agreement with Pavarnetrix, Inc.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Move to approve an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Parametrix, Inc. to conduct a tratfic
circulation study of downtown Bremerton in an amount of $58,183, for a total contract amount of $157,118, and
authorize the Mayor to execute the same.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: City Engineer
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: N/A
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
11. AGENDA BILL NO: 0~- a~_c']
CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
Evaluation of traffic circulation in downtown
redevelopment projects would be delayed.
Bremerton would not occur. Implementation of downtown
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACHJTW~S~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
Staffing: No impacts.
Budget: The project is included in the 2002 and 2003 Budget.
Facilities: No impacts.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES
ab, Agenda Bills, 2002, Amendment to Tramp Cow~o Plan PSA with Paramea~ Inc.
CONTRACT MODIFICATION AGREEMENT NO. 1
BETWEEN THE CITY OF BREMERTON
AND PARAMETRIX, INC.
PROJECT: Transportation Comprehensive Plan
CONSULTANT: Parametrix~ Inc.
DATE: November 5~ 2002
THIS CONTRACT MODIFICATION AGREEMENT SPECIFICALLY AMENDS THE
Professional Services Agreement to provide engineering services for the Transportation
Comprehensive Plan (the "Contract") entered into between the City of Bremerton and
Parametrix~ Inc. on April 9~ 2001.
All provisions in the Contract shall remain in full force and effect except as expressly modified by
this document.
Whereas additional work items were requested the City of Bremerton, Parametrix, Inc. desires to
modify the contract as further described in Exhibit A-1.
For valuable consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, the modifications to the Contract
are as follows:
I.
Section 1. Scope , is modified as follows:
The contract is supplemented to include the additional work items contained in the "Scope
of Work - Downtown Circulation Study" attached as Exhibit A-1. The schedule for work
contained in Exhibit A-1 is attached as Exhibit C-1.
· Section
2. Term , is modified as follows:
The contract will terminate on December 31, 2003, unless otherwise extended by the City.
The original contract amount was ninety-eight thousand nine hundred thirty-five Dollars
($98~935.00). The City shall pay the Consultant for the additional work described above, based on
time and materials, an amount not to exceed fifty-eight thousand one hundred eighty
three Dollars (~;58,183.00) for a total amended contract amount of one hundred fifty.seven
thousand one hundred eighteen Dollars ($157~118.00), including this Contract Modification.
Charges for the additional work items contained in Exhibit A-1 shall conform to the fee schedule
attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B-1.
II.
Consultant accepts all requirements of this Contract Modification by endorsing below.
Consultant further agrees that this Contract Modification constitutes full and final settlement
CONTRACT MODIFICATION NO.I
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
TRANSPORTATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
November 5, 2002
of all claims for contract time and for all costs of any kind, including costs of delays, related to
any work either covered or affected by this Contract Modification.
The parties whose names appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are
authorized to enter into a contract modification that is binding on the parties of this contract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Contract Modification on the day
and year first written above.
Project Manager approved to process
City Engineer approved to process
Director, Department of Public
Works and Utilities approved to process
Initials and Date
Initials'an~d l~a~
CONSULTANT
By Cary Bozeman
Its Mayor
DATE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
Bremerton City Attorney
City Clerk
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
Mr. Luke Korpi
Managing Engineer
Bremerton Dept. of Public Works & Utilities
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, WA 98310
Phone/Fax: 360-478-5342/360-478-5398
CONTRACT MODIFICATION NO. I
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
TRANSPORTATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
2
November 5, 2002
Exhibit A-1
Scope of Work
Downtown Bremerton Circulation Study
The purpose of the Downtown Bremerton Circulation Study is to evaluate alternatives to improve
transit, pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle circulation in Downtown Bremerton. The study will
consider the effects of all short-term planned improvement projects in the area including:
· Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS) parking garage
· Bremerton Conference Center/Hotel
· Government Center Complex
· Pacific Avenue Park and Museum
Three different circulation concepts will be considered in the analysis:
· No Build Option - This will assume no changes to the existing street and intersection
configurations in Downtown Bremerton
· Tunnel Option - This will assume construction of a new two-lane tunnel to accommodate
exiting ferry traffic between the ferry terminal and Burwell Street.
· Surface Option - This option would relocate the primary ferry terminal exit route from
Washington to lSt/Pacific/Burwell consistent with the "modified Pacific Gateway" option, the
preferred alternative from the BTC EA.
For each option, roadway and intersection improvements needed to accommodate exiting ferry
traffic will be identified.
The Tunnel and Surface Options will emphasize pedestrian and transit improvements on
Washington Avenue between the ferry terminal and the Manette Bridge. This will potentially
include extending the one-way northbound configuration of Washington Avenue further north.
The study area for the analysis will extend from 11th Street to the north, PSNS and the Bremerton
ferry terminal to the south, Sinclair Inlet to the east, and Warren Ave. to the west.
The Circulation Study will take into consideration past efforts addressing Downtown Bremerton
circulation issues including the SR 304 Bremerton-Gorst Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and Bremerton Transportation Center (BTC) Environmental Assessment (EA). Subsequent
phases of the Circulation Study will include the preparation of environmental documentation to
supplement or amend one of these documents, since the potential circulation improvements have
a strong relationship to either effort. One end of the study area addressed in the SR 304 EIS is
Downtown Bremerton including the ferry terminal and the BTC EA also addressed a similar
study area.
Task 1 - Data Collection and Existing Travel Patterns
Objective: To quantify existing traffic flows and directional travel patterns in Downtown
Bremerton during PM peak conditions.
Discussion: PM peak hour traffic intersection turning movement counts will be conducted at up
to nine downtown intersections to obtain existing turning movement volumes. Data from the
peak 10-15 minute time period following a car ferry arrival will be used to estimate outbound
travel patterns. AM peak hour counts will be obtained at three of the nine intersections to
quantify the difference between AM and PM peak volumes. It is anticipated that PM peak
volumes will be higher than AM peak volumes at all intersections. Therefore, the LOS analysis
described in Task 2 will be completed for the PM peak hour only.
Assumptions:
Intersection turning movement volumes from the Bremerton Parking Study will be used to
summarize and compare to the adjusted 10-15 minute peak volumes.
Deliverable: A summary of existing turning movement volumes and travel patterns in Downtown
Bremerton for the average one-hour period and for the peak 10-15 minute time period.
Task 2 - Prepare Future Base Traffic Volume and Level of Service (LOS) Estimates
Objective: To estimate future downtown traffic volumes with planned projects
Discussion: Future traffic volume forecasts will be prepared for one future horizon year (2005 or
2010). The future volumes will include traffic generated from the four short-term planned
projects mentioned in the introduction and estimated background growth from other traffic
sources (such as the ferry terminal) This will include coordination at one meeting with the
consultants preparing the traffic impact study for the PSNS parking garage.
LOS for existing and future base conditions will be calculated using Synchro software based on
the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Existing intersection lane configurations will be used for
initial LOS calculations. The Synchro software will provide the LOS analysis results as well as
visual simulation capabilities to demonstrate the performance of each alternative.
Assumption: The LOS analysis will be conducted for the peak 15-minute period after a ferry
arrival during the PM peak hour. LOS analysis for the AM peak period will not be conducted as
part of this effort.
Deliverable: Future year traffic volume forecasts at study area intersections
Task 3 - Determine Intersection Lane Needs for Tunnel and Surface Options
Objective: To establish the number of lanes needed at study area intersections for the tunnel and
surface options
Discussion: For both the tunnel and surface options, intersection LOS analysis will be conducted
to establish lane requirements to achieve LOS D/E conditions or better at all intersections. The
number of intersection lanes will be tested using an iterative process to maximize the overall
traffic flow efficiency while minimizing the number of lanes.
The tunnel and surface option plans will also address the location of kiss-n-ride activity at the
BTC, vehicle/truck access to particular businesses and facilities in the BTC vicinity, and the lane
requirements and other physical space needs at the ferry terminal.
Assumptions:
· The initial configuration of Washington Ave. will include a minimum of two northbound
travel lanes (one transit-only lane and one lane for traffic destined to the Manette bridge
only). The analysis results based on this initial configuration of Washington Ave. will be
reviewed to determine whether adjustments to the number of lanes or lane designations are
warranted.
All other outbound ferry terminal traffic (except transit and local Manette neighborhood
traffic) will be directed to the SR 304 (Burwell Street) and SR 303 (Warren Avenue)
corridors
The Bremerton Transportation Center (BTC) bus deck will not be proposed for kiss-n-ride
activity
Deliverables:
· Schematic drawings showing the number of lanes required at study area intersections for the
tunnel and surface options
· Tabular summary of LOS analysis results for each option
Task 4 - Develop Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Circulation Elements
Objective: To develop pedestrian, bicycle, and transit circulation elements of the tunnel and
surface circulation options
Discussion: The pedestrian, bicycle, and transit circulation elements will be developed for both
the surface and tunnel options. With the tunnel option, the grade-separated ferry terminal egress
route will improve the environment for walkers and bicyclists on the surface. For both options,
transit circulation will be improved with the addition of an outbound transit only lane on
Washington Ave. or other transit-priority treatments. The resulting transit level of service (LOS)
and operations will be qualitatively described for each of the options.
Deliverable: Maps showing a graphical depiction of the pedestrian, bicycle and transit circulation
elements of the tunnel and surface street improvement options.
Task 5- Prepare Traffic Impact Study for the Bremerton Conference Center/Hotel
Objective: To prepare a stand-alone traffic impact study document for the Bremerton Conference
Center using information from Tasks 14 above.
Discussion: A traffic impact study for the Bremerton Conference Center/Hotel will be prepared.
The traffic impact analysis will address the impacts from the project at the nine study area
intersections during the PM peak hour. Site access requirements for the project will also be
evaluated.
Assumptions:
· The future horizon year for this traffic impact study will be the same as the future horizon
year for the Downtown Circulation Study.
The traffic impact study is assumed to be 10-15 pages long and will contain the following
sections:
~' Existing Conditions - A summary of existing traffic volumes, LOS and street and
intersection characteristics in the study area.
Future Conditions Without the Project - A summary of future intersection LOS at the
nine study area intersections for the future horizon year without the project.
Future Conditions With the Project - A summary of trip generation, distribution and
assignment of new traffic from the conference center during the PM peak hour, and
LOS analysis with the project at study area and site access intersections.
Improvements Needed to Mitigate Project Impacts - A summary of street or
intersection improvements needed to mitigate project impacts.
· Comments on the draft report are assumed to be editorial in nature and would not require
additional LOS analysis.
· Five copies of the draft and final traffic impact study documents would be provided.
Deliverable: Draft and final traffic impact study documents for the Bremerton Transportation
Center/Hotel
Task 6 -Final Report Preparation and Agency Coordination
Objective: To prepare a final report summarizing the work completed in Tasks 1-4 above.
Discussion: A final report documenting the technical work in the above tasks 1-4 will be
prepared. This will include recommended lane configurations and intersection traffic control at
all study area intersections. The final report will become part of the environmental
documentation for the Downtown Bremerton Tunnel project.
Assumptions:
· We will respond to one-round of comments on the draft report from City of Bremerton
and Kitsap Transit staff.
We have assumed attendance at three meetings with Kitsap Transit and City of
Bremerton staff during the study process.
Deliverables: Draft and Final reports (10 copies of each report plus an electronic version of the
final report will be provided)
57
Exhibit C-1
Schedule
Downtown Bremerton Circulation Study
· Work described in Exhibit A-1, Task 5 will be completed by November 21, 2002
· Work described in Exhibit A-1 Tasks 1-4 and Task 6 will be completed by March
1, 2003.
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: RESOLUTION # 2'~,'/~ ,
SETTING A HEARING DATE OF DECEMBER 11,
2002, FOR VACATING A PORTION OF
SECOND STREET, EAST OF WASHINGTON
AVENUE.
FOR AGENDA OF: November 20, 2002
ORIGINATING DEPT: PW&U Engineering Division/;,
ORIGINATOR Michael C Mecham, Cie Engineer,~2~
DATE SUBMITTED: November 7, 2002
City Attomey
Director, Community Development
Council Budget & Finance Committee
Operations Committee
ENDORSE~
MAYOR ~
(,
back
2. CLEARANCES:(comme.to Exm ITS
Director, Public Works/Utilities ~_R. esolution
te Map.
N APPROVED BY CO ,UI~.CIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITT.
~.,--- COUNCIL PRESIDENT
SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The City initiated the vacation of a portion of Second Street east of Washington Avenue. The vacated area will be
incorporated into the abutting City owned property to provide a site compatible with usage for downtown
redevelopment. Functionality of Second Street as a transportation facility will not be significantly affected.
Access to the waterfront will not be impeded with this vacation. This is a Class II right-of-way and compensation
is not required in accordance with BMC 11.20.080. The City Council is being requested to establish a heating date
of December 11, 2002, to consider the proposed vacation. Staff recommends passage of the proposed Resolution.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council pass Resolution # ~ ~"/4,
portion of Second Street east of Washington Avenue.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
setting a hearing date of December 11, 2002, for vacating a
City Engineer
N/A
PULLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE
TABLED
10. NOTICE OFACTION ~ ~
APPROVED y~qD __
DISAPPROVED ED
DAT
11. AGENDA BILL NO: 0b-
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The hearing on the fight-of-way vacation will not occur, and thc right-of-way will not bc considered for vacation.
This will result in a modification of downtown redevelopment plans.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
Staffing: No impact.
Budget: No impact
Facilities/Equipment: No impact
7. RESEARCH SOURCES
BMC ] ]. 20 Vacation of Public Rights-of- Way
RCW 35. 79 Streets
ab\Vacations~City 2nd Street\Agenda Bill and Resolution for Hearing Date
RESOLUTION NO. &U~
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, establishing a hearing date for the
proposed vacation of a portion of Second Street east of
Washington Avenue.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City has initiated the vacation of a portion of Second Street
east of Washington Avenue.
SECTION2. A public hearing will be held on December 11, 2002, at 5:30 p.m.
or later at the Bremerton City Hall, 239 Fourth Street, Bremerton, Washington, to take public
comment or consider written objections to the vacation.
SECTION 3. If fifty percent or more of the property owners abutting said right-
of-way file written objections to this action prior to the time set for public hearing herein, the
hearing shall be canceled and there shall be no further proceedings under this resolution.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
day of
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this __
,2002.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
ATTEST:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attomey
R:\LEGAL\Resolutions\Hcaring re 2nd Street Vacation.doc
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk
1
Hearing re 2nd Street Vacation
0
-.T. r,U =
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON
ORDINANCE REPEALING THE DOWNTOWN
WATERFRONT URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AND
AMENDING THE ZONING CODE
ESTABLISHING THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT
2. CLEjARANCES: (Commenfon back if necessary) 3. EXHIBITS:
C~.HR4STYIUOO,~I..o£C~!Imla~ Development --' PROPOSED ORDINANCE
'~oG~ER 5 LUBO~¥ICH, City Att%mey ~/
FOR AGENDA:..-..~oJ,u,-i.a~a~ Nov. 20, 2002
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Attorney's Office
ORIGINATOR: Roger A. Lubovich
DATE SUBMITTED: Oct. 22, 2002
FISCAL & BUDGET CHAIRMAN
6PE ,ATi-O' qg Cn^IRMAN
ENDORSff~T [-'] ~IF~I, MATION
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The current provisions of the Zoning Code set forth in Chapter 21.02 BMC provide that downtown
development standards be regulated by the Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan (DWURP), which is
outdated and not conducive to development of the Downtown District. The proposed ordinance repeals
DWURP and adds a new section to the Zoning Code relating to the Downtown District.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
Move to approve t.h.e preposed A_~,: ......... .
Move to pass Ordinance No. t~.2~ on second reading.
7. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED [~ TABLED []
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Director of Community Development
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Director of Community Development
EXPIRATION DATE: n/a
REVIEW DATE: n/a
APPROVED [] DISAPPROVED
AMENDg~
8. AGENDA BILL NO.: CD - & Iq
9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
10. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
11. RESEARCH SOURCES:
ORDINANCE NO. 4828
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, repealing the Downtown Urban Renewal
Plan (DWURP) as adopted in Ordinance No. 4187; amending
Chapter 21 of the Bremerton Municipal Code by adding a new
section, Section 21.02.152, entitled "Downtown District";
amending Section 21.02 Appendix, Figure 120 relating to the
downtown Urban Renewal District and design review; amending
the Zoning Map and the Appendix to Chapter 21.02 BMC by
establishing the Downtown Core (DC) and Downtown Waterfront
(DW) zones and designating the same Appendix Figure 152(a);
and further mending the Appendix to Chapter 21.02 by adding a
Height Map as Appendix Figure 152(b).
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 1730, the City Council declared
that area generally described as from the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard north to 6th Street
and from Warren Avenue east to the shoreline of the Washington Narrows in the City of
Bremerton to be a blighted area; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, in 1986, passed Resolution No. 2117
confirming and reaffirming Resolution No. 1730 and directed the Mayor and his staff to
prepare an urban renewal plan and project for that area bound by Washington Street on
the west, the Outer Harbor line on Sinclair Inlet on the east, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard
on the south, and the northerly line of Fifth Street extended easterly as a "Blighted Area"
as described in RCW Chapter 35.80; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 4187, the City Council adopted
Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan (DWURP) based upon findings in a report
by William B. Reems, C.C.I.M., C.R.B., C.R.S., Senior Certified Appraiser, that the
downtown waterfront area west of Washington Avenue between the Puget Sound Naval
Shipyard and the Manette Bridge to be in a state of blight; and
WHEREAS, the current provisions of the zoning code set forth in Chapter
21.02 BMC provides that downtown development standards be regulated by the
Downtown District
Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan (DWURP) as adopted by Ordinance No.
4187; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to repeal the Downtown Waterfront Urban
Renewal Plan and amend the Zoning Code to allow development of the Downtown District in
accordance with new development standards and regulations; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated as if set forth
herein in full.
SECTION 2. The Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan (DWURP) as
adopted in Ordinance No. 4187 and as currently in effect is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION 3. There is hereby created a new section, Section 21.02.152 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "DoWntown District" to read as follows:
21.02.152 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT.
(a) Zones. (See Map of Zone Districts, Figure 152(a))
(1) Downtown Core (DC).
(i) Purpose: To focus commercial, entertainment, cultural, civic uses
and urban residential into an intense, compact, walkable area served by public transit.
(ii) Allowable Uses:
g.
h.
i.
commercial, financial, retail
eating and drinking establishments
general offices
entertainment, museum, and cultural
government and education
residential and hotel
religious institutions
parks and open space
structured parking
2
Downtown District
(iii)
Prohibited Uses:
ao
industrial uses
drive-through uses
motor vehicle sales, service, repair or washing
storage of equipment and materials
adult entertainment
work release facilities
commercial surface parking lots, not serving a permitted
use
(2) Downtown Waterfront (DW).
(i) Purpose: To provide for an array of uses related to the water,
multi-modal transportation facilities, view corridors, public access and residential.
(ii) Allowable Uses:
retail, including marine retail
eating and drinking establishments
hotel
residential
transportation facilities
parks and open spaces
structured commercial parking with other permitted use
General offices comprising no more than 25% of the total
gross floor area of a mixed use development.
(iii)
Prohibited Uses:
same as downtown core, plus
boat sales, storage and repair
stand alone commercial parking not serving a permitted use
(b) Development Standards-Table.
District Floor Area Ratio
(FAR) = (Floor area/Lot area)
Base Maximum Maximum Parking View
W/Amenities Building Height (stalls/lc gsf) Corridor
Non- Res
Non- Res Min Max
Res
Res
DC 1 2 3 6 See Figure 152(b) 1 4 N/A
DW .5 1 1 2 See Figure 152(b) 1 3 See Table
3.2 of the
Shoreline
Master
Program
3
Downtown District
Notes:
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is the amount of floor area within a building as a multiple of the lot
area. Floor area is measured to the inside face of the exterior building walls. Calculation of
FAR can exclude the following:
ao
spaces below grade.
space devoted to parking.
mechanical spaces.
elevator and stair shafts.
space used for retail uses or restaurants that front the sidewalk.
space devoted to Special Amenities.
exterior decks open to the air.
o
The FAR for non-residential uses and residential uses within a given development are
individually calculated for each use and may be added together for a combined maximum,
provided that the maximum allowable FAR for each use is not exceeded.
(Example: A project that includes Special Amenities may have a total FAR of 6, with 2 in
commercial use and 4 in residential use.)
3. For the Downtown Core district, new development shall have a minimum FAR of 1.
Maximum Building Height excludes:
a. parapets.
b. mechanical penthouses and elevator overruns and machine rooms.
c. roof forms and decorative elements not intended for occupancy.
5. The first 3,000 sf of ground floor retail uses are exempted from parking requirements.
6. For residential uses, the minimum parking requirement is .5 spaces per 1000 sf.
7. For purposes of this code, hotels shall be considered residential uses.
(c) Design Standards Applicable to All Development within Downtown.
(1) All roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened by either a high
parapet or a stepped or sloped roof form that is a part of the architecture of the building and is at
least as high as the equipment being screened. Fencing is not acceptable.
(2) Street trees shall be provided with no fewer than 3 trees per 100 linear feet
of frontage. Tree grates shall be used to cover the planting pits. Where existing areaways or
vaults prevent this form of planting, trees shall be planted in planters equipped with irrigation.
All trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2 V2" at the time of planting.
4
Downtown District
(3) Surface parking lots, if they abut public sidewalks, shall provide a
perimeter landscaping strip containing a combination of trees (with no fewer than 3 trees per 100
linear feet of frontage), and shrubs. Masonry walls no lower than 15" and no higher than 30"
may be substituted for shrubs.
(4) For parking lots containing more than 20 stalls, at least 15% of the interior
area shall be planted with trees and shrubs. All trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2 ½" at the
time of planting. Pedestrian walkways from adjacent sidewalks shall be provided.
(5) The street-facing, ground-lex, el facades of parking garages shall be
designed to screen the view of parked cars. Where commercial or residential space is not
provided to accomplish this, features such as planters, decorative grilles, or works of art shall be
used.
(6) Any sidewalk level faqade that faces any downtown street shall have at
least 35% of the faqade area in transparent glass windows.
(7) Any faqade facing a public sidewalk shall incorporate more refined
materials such as stone or brick and details such as pilasters, plinths, brackets, or belt courses on
at least the first floor.
(8) Buildings taller than four stories shall display a distinctive design
for the top of the building which can be achieved by various means including a change in
materials, architectural detail, color, or step backs at the top floor, a prominent projecting
cornice, or a roof with a form such as a curve, slope, or peak.
(9) All development along any Primary Pedestrian Street (First, Second,
Burwell, Fourth, Fifth, Pacific, and Park) shall meet the following standards:
(i) Building facades shall abut the sidewalk. However, entrance areas
may be recessed. Furthermore, buildings may be set back to accommodate Exterior Public
Spaces conforming to the provisions in Section 21.02.152(d)(1).
(ii) At least 50% of the linear, sidewalk level frontage of any structure
shall consist of, or are adaptable to, retail, restaurants, cultural or entertainment uses, financial
institutes, office, indoor public spaces, or art galleries.
(iii) At least 75% of the frontage shall include weather protection in the
form of a flat or' sloped canopy, projecting at least 5 feet over the sidewalk.
Downtown D~strict
(d) Amenities required to achieve the Maximum Floor Area Ratio. In order for
a development to achieve the maximum allowable Floor Area Ratios set forth in the
Development Standards table in Section 21.02.152(b), Special Amenities must be provided. In
return for incorporating any one of the three special amenity features on the following list, the
maximum FAR shall be allowed. The design of each feature will be reviewed to ensure that it is
appropriate for the proposed location and provides for a public benefit.
Exterior Public Space that is at least 10% of the site area and includes the
(1)
following features:
seating in the amount of one sitting space for each 100 sf of area.
trees and other plantings.
art or water feature.
solar exposure during the summer.
access and visibility from the nearest sidewalk.
(2)
Public
a.
b.
C.
d.
Benefit Use consisting of at least one of the following:
meeting room(s) available to the public.
day care.
museum.
performing arts theatre.
(3) Work of Art or Water Feature in a location that is visible to the public at
all times. There may be more than one artwork or water feature, so long as the cost of the
item(s) is equivalent to at least 1% of the building permit value for the project including site
improvements. A work of art consists of an original, artist-produced creation such as:
a. murals.
b. sculptures.
c. paintings.
e. inlays.
f. friezes.
g. mosaics.
h. tile work.
SECTION 4. Bremerton Municipal Code Section 21.02 Appendix Figure 120
relating to Urban Renewal District and Design Review Overlay as set forth in Title 21 Appendix 15-
18 is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and by reference incorporated
herein.
Downtown District
SECTION 5. The zoning map of the City of Bremerton and the Appendix to
Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 21.02 BMC are hereby amended by establishing the
Downtown Core (DC) and the Downtown Waterfront (DW) zones designated as Appendix Figure
152(a) as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and by reference in incorporated herein.
SECTION 6. The Appendix to Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 21.02 is
hereby amended by adding a Height Map designated as Appendix Figure 152(b) as set forth in
Exhibit C attached hereto and by this reference incorporate herein.
SECTION 7. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION & Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the
PASSED by the City Council the
day of ,2002
day of ,2002
Approved this day of
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
· 2002
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
Downtown District
PUBLISHED the
EFFECTIVE the
ORDINANCE NO.
day of
day of
R:\LEGAL\Ordinances\Community Development'd)owntown District.doc
,2002
,2002
8
Downtown District
LandPT/atcr t j;: Plan of the DWUP. P ia divided into
k..;,a:..~_..~...~ height stand.ds.
DC s~ific controls and developmen~
requirements for this zone are
Downtown cont~ned in Section 21.02.152 emitled
Core "Downtown District."
~ The DRO establishes a apeci~c =es within which Waterfrant Urban Rcnc-a'-2 Plan. In
ct~gr aanaao' component cf thc area
UW Specific controls ~d development
requirements for this zone are
Downtown contained in Section 21.02.152 entitled
Waterfront "Downtown District."
LEO This zone provides for the development of Std: Must meet City's adopted
co~emi~ ~d commuter p~ng Iota in ~e~ found to ~ paring lot development
Li~ted P~king suit~le for tho~ uses, but not ~miued by the underling zone. stand.ds.
Overlay Applimtion: Speci~ Use Pe~t required for all lots.
The provisions of ~is disffict ~e li~ted to ~ shown on ~e
Bmme~on ~ning Map ~ "Limited P~ng Overlay" ~d ~e ~low~ Lots:
intend~ to supplement the provisions of ~e underlying zone.
Pe~tted Us~: CI~ "A" lot (Speci~ Use Pemt)
1. Surface p~ng lots for off-street p~k~g.
2. Accesso~ hcilities necess~ for the pro~r ~nction or desi~ Cla~ "C" !o~ may also be approved
of the lot, including pghng ~te~, instmction~direcfionM by SUP, subject to addifion~ cfit~a
signing, fencing, ~d l~d~aping, and a time li~t of no longer than five
Development Standards: years from date of approval. Applic~t
1. ~ts shall ~ only for the pghng of vehicles in daily use and then has the option to:
shall not include commerci~ vehicles, impound lots, or other
storage.
2, ~u must ~ developed in accor~ce with the City's Cl~s (a) Apply for time exten~on
"A" p~ng lot stand.s, unless approved ~ a "co~uter as ~ amendment to the S~;
p~king lot". (b) Apply for a SUP for a
3. A Class "C" commuter lot may be approved if: pe~anent Class "C" paved
(a) It is provided for long-tern commuter p~ng by visitor, lot; or
employees, fe~ commutem, or si~l~ co--uteri. (c) Cease the use and remove
(b) It will not be used for custo~r or client p~hng or o~er all improvements from the site.
non-~hng I~d use.
(c) Parhng f~s will be chgged by the day, week, month or
other ~dod which, in no case, may be sho~er than 8 hours
.(d) It will be fenced or othe~ise secured.
4. A Class "C" lot may ~ approved with a gravel or simil~
surface only if:
(a) The n~d is tempora~ and for a Ffiod not longer than five
Downtown District - Exhibit A
ZONES [Description/Intent I Min. Standards
years; and/or
(b) The proposed site is in a transitional area and will likely be
needed for new development or a different use within 5 years.
Title 21 Appendix: Page 15-18
Downtown District - Exhibit A
Downtown District Zonin
EXHIBIT B
Ordinance #
Appendix Figure 152(a)
PUGET SOUND
NAVAL SHIPYARD
Legend
I DC: Downtown Core
Zoning Code Designations
~DW: Downtown Waterfront
Downtown District Building Heights
EXHIBIT C
Ordinance #
Appendix Figure 152(b)
6TH STI
5TH
4TH
2ND STREET
PUGET SOUND
NAVAL SHIPYARD
Legend
DAREA A: 100 Foot Height Limitation
DAREA B: 70 Foot Height Limitation
DAREAC: 70 Foot Height Limitation, Special Considerations (see footnotel
~e overall height limit is 70 feet as measured pursuant to Bremerton
ided that in no case at any point shall a structure be more than five stories
site's front property line (edge of right-of-way). The added height of an
Definitions, Hei
five feet above th
shall
and WAC 173-27-030 (9),
of Washington Avem
the height determi~
Minutes
Planning Commission Special Meeting
September 17, 2002
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Kosusko at 5:35 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Those present were: Chairman Kosusko, Commissioner Buckingham, Commissioner Cockburn,
Commissioner Dingfield, Commissioner Kennedy, Commissioner Nelson and Commissioner Wood.
Quorum certified.
Co
PL02-0056 - Proposed ordinance mending Chapter 21 of the BMC by adding a new
section, Section 21.02.152, entitled "Downtown District"; amending Section 21.02
Appendix, Figure 120 relating to the downtown Urban Renewal District and design
review; amending the Zoning Map by designating the Downtown Core (DC) and
Downtown Waterfront (DW) zones; designating and reaffirming blighted areas as set
forth in Resolutions No. 1730 and No. 2117 and Ordinance No. 4187 and repealing
the Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan (DWURP) as adopted in Ordinance
No. 4187.
Commissioner Kosusko introduced this item and then deferred to staff for
presentation.
Mr. Hugo explained that this ordinance is the other half of our disassembling the
historical linkages. The first thing that this accomplishes is on page two, section two
- where the DWURP is rescinded. There are other parts of the original action to
adopt the DWURP and section one, those features are retained because they relate to
the designations of blight that will enable us to conduct other downtown
redevelopment activities.
This ordinance has more substance that PL02-0055 because it proposes a whole new
section of the zoning ordinance- Section 21.02.152 "Downtown District". The way
our zoning code is constructed is a little unusual in that it does everything in a table at
the back of the code. Normally, each zone district has a title, purpose and a listing of
Planning Commission Meeting
September 17, 2002
Page 22 of 30
the allowed uses which are written into the text of the code. Note that there are two
tables: Figure 120 which describes the zone districts, it's purpose and some of the
minimum development standards and Figure 140 (not attached), which has a couple
of use districts and a matrix that lists all the allowed uses.
He then referred the group to Exhibit A, page 15, and explained that the old version
had two districts: 1) Urban Renewal District and 2) Design Review Overlay that are
being replaced with two new designations: 1) Downtown Core [DC] and 2)
Downtown Waterfront [DWI. In both cases, in the table under minimum standards
just references you back to Section 21.02.152. We will have one part of our zoning
code that is more like the codes he's familiar with where right in the text of the code
you describe the uses and the development standards and all references to those
things in the tables are gone.
He then referred the group back to the draft ordinance, page three, which is the new
Section 21.02.152. There is a list of uses for the Downtown Core (DC) zone. He
distributed a height district map. He explained from the map that everything between
Washington and the waterfront ("C" on the map) is the Downtown Waterfront zone.
Everything from Washington west to those properties fronting the west side of Pacific
and up to 6th Street ("B" on the map) is the Downtown Core zone. Section 21.02.152
lists all the allowed uses and prohibited uses. This is also unusual because the way
Mark Hinshaw's committee constructed this - it state very specifically the activities
we WANT to happen and also list the type of things we DON'T want to happen in
these districts. Normally, you list what is allowed and everything else is
automatically excluded. It is a point of emphasis which provides clarity. Normally,
this would be included in the [comprehensive] plan. This made its way into the
regulations. Mr. Hugo stated that he left it the way it came out of the process instead
of trying to go back and provide a different regulatory philosophy.
He then referred to page four of the draft ordinance - development standards. He had
everyone change their copy to reflect the 70/50 on the table - DW zone, under
maximum building heights. He said that there will be a footnote stating that this will
read, "70 feet as measured by the Shoreline Master Program, no more than 50 feet
above street grade." OR "as determined in the Shoreline Master Program."
He explained that Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is also treated in this table. FAR is the
relationship between total building square footage and site area.
EXAMPLE:
Site of 10,000 square feet and you cover the whole site in
one story with a 10,000 square foot building - that would
be an FAR of 1. Your floor area and your site area are the
saBle.
Planning Commission Meeting
Site of 10,000 square feet and your covered the site with a
four story building - that would be an FAR of 4. Your floor
area would be four times your site area.
Site of 10,000 square feet and your building only covered half
the site and it was four stories - that would be an FAR of 2.
September 17, 2002
Page 23 of 30
Your floor area would be half of four floors or equivalent to
two floors on the site.
This ordinance allows an FAR of two in the Downtown Waterfront district. In some
cases they exclude parking. Also, maximum building height excludes parapets - we
might have to look at that. I don't think the Shoreline Master Program has such an
exclusion, that could actually work fine in the Downtown Core. Another interesting
feature is that for the Downtown Core district it states that new developments should
have and FAR of one. That means that you don't get suburban style buildings that
are one story and only cover part of the site. You would have to at least have a
building that is equivalent to a one story building covering the entire site or a two
story building covering half the site. When you do this the development economics
ensure that you get more urban buildings - you cannot have something so "un-
intense" like a partially covered site with a one story building. That is a nice feature.
Commissioner Kosusko asked if an FAR of one enough.
Mr. Hugo stated that maybe over time that could be revisited. He shared several
examples of what could happen without this type of language. He said that this
proposal would preclude some of the most serious violations. Mr. Hugo explained
that Mark Hinshaw is regarded as an expert in urban development.
Commissioner Kosusko asked if this was the same text that we've already adopted.
Mr. Hugo stated that the commission had seen this text before in a study session.
When they saw it before there was substance but not the ordinance. This is much
more formal than it was before.
Mr. Hugo, referring to Downtown Core zone (page 3 - (iii) g.) explained that
commercial surface parking lots, not serving a permitted use are prohibited. So a
downtown building could not be demolished to create a diamond parking lot. He said
that this could be controversial.
Commissioner Dingfield asked if it would be legal to prohibit work release facilities,
wouldn't it also be legal to prohibit SCTFs.
Mr. Hugo replied affirmative. And since this location is such a small geographic
area, this would not be an issue.
Commissioner Dingfield said to put it in there.
There was a short discussion about the Downtown Core zone and some of the sta~e
regulations that make downtown unlikely for an SCTF.
Mr. Hugo referred the group back to the draft ordinance, page three (iv. c.) -
prohibited used in the Downtown Waterfront zone. Stand alone commercial parking
that is not serving a permitted use is prohibited. There might be an issue with this
one. Our civic project, with the 550 parking spaces - some of those parking spaces
are designed as commuter spaces. He said that he could not identify a permitted use
there. That could be a problem. The commission may consider this in their
Planning Commission Meeting
September 17, 2002 Page 24 of 30
recommendation to council and either make note that if this is inconsistent with the
conference center project that you recommend deleting or rewording this provision.
He gave several suggestions for rewording: 1) Not serving a permitted use unless it is
a publicly accessible parking lot, etc.). 2) Stand alone commercial parking, not
serving a permitted use except that parking incorporated as a larger mixed use project.
The intent is to disallow a parking structures on the waterfront. Even though we do
have a parking structure on the waterfront it is in a mixed use project with lots of on-
site uses. Not all of this structure serves a permitted use. - some of it is
specifically being provided by Kitsap Transit for the use of ferry commuters.
Mr. Hugo suggested that we give this issued further scrutiny between now and the
council review of this ordinance.
Mr. Hugo further explained that normally you make the association that you have a
permitted use and then there is a parking requirement that generates a certain
obligation of spaces. He said that he wasn't sure that just because there is commuter
retail on the site that that would count. Maybe it does - he said he would ask the city
attorney.
Commissioner Dingfield suggest that on page 3, under Downtown Waterfront
allowed uses (ii. e), we change it to read, "e. transportation facilities and related
parking."
Mr. Hugo said that we need to work on this issue. Certainly someone could propose
a parking garage next door and also say it's linked to the ferry. We don't want that.
The intent is to keep structured parking off the waterfront because of the visual
impact.
Commissioner Dingfield had another question regarding the prohibited uses (page
four). She said she understands where we're going with item (iv) b., the boat sales,
storage and repair - because knows exactly what we don't want there. She said she is
concerned about saying there is no boat repair available when you are going to be
doubling or tripling the size of your marina. She said she was worried about limiting
a business type.
Mr. Hugo said he thought it would be the same thing for boat sales. It is appropriate
for there to be boat sales - commercial marina activity, not as some private enterprise.
The same thing as repair, but it might be out of the water repair. Water repairs would
be prohibited.
Commissioner Cockburn said that he understands that we don't Olympic Boat Sales
down there but Lake Union has some yacht sales that seem to be working fine.
Mixing the yacht sales because there are only so many slips to handle that will handle
a 110 foot boat and you have to have one for marketing purposes.
Mr. Hugo said that some of the adjacent residential properties near the conference
center may have some retail bays in them. One between 4th and 5th they sell retail
down on the water side. He said he was thinking about what that would be. It could
be a yacht broker. There was a short discussion about like businesses in the Seattle
area.
Planning Commission Meeting
September 17, 2002
Page 25 of 30
Commissioner Dingfield stated that the point is these businesses you are discussing
are NOT in the downtown Seattle waterfront. They are in other areas of the city, not
in the downtown Seattle core stretch, which is the same kind of hub we're trying to
create here. They are in accessible, nearby location but not right downtown. Here in
Bremerton they could be allowed in other areas.
Commissioner Cockburn said that on the other hand, they want marine retail. So,
what does that mean?
Mr. Hugo said that a boat sales office is probably okay. We just wouldn't want the
small boats stored up on a parking lot.
Commissioner Cockburn stated that he wasn't sure that these kinds of business
could afford that either. This is why he doesn't have a problem with motor vehicle
sales being prohibited in the downtown core because it's just not economically
feasible. He then mentioned the prohibition of drive-through uses (page 3 (iii) b.). He
said he believes the drive-through uses are all inclusive and it's part of the financial
process that banks have a drive-through segment. He was concerned about loosing
more of the banks from the downtown area.
Mr. Hugo asked the commission to look at the area we are talking about right now -
many of these things can exist in downtown, just outside of this core district. The BC
Zone (Business Core Zone) is another part of downtown that extends off the map.
This applies to a much larger area than what we're talking about. [Banks and drive-
through uses are allowed in the BC Zone, so it won't take banks out of downtown.]
Drive-up uses are taken out of the equivalent of 6-8 city blocks of the core pedestrian
area of downtown. The idea is to de-emphasize the presence of thc automobile, as is
the $25,000,000.00 ferry-exit tunnel project. All of that is to try and de-emphasize
the automobile downtown without closing streets. We are not trying to take cars off
the streets - we are trying to de-emphasize the convenience trips into the core. Trips
with no intent to park and enjoy downtown.
Commissioner Dingfield asked if the absence of drive-through uses also prohibited a
transit or ferry kiss-and-ride situation.
Mr. Hugo said that we will have to look at that because transportation problems are
an issue. He said that a transit/ferry kiss-and-ride may not be a "use" but it is a
transportation facility, not unlike the large loading area for the ferry. It is very auto-
dominate. He made a note to revisit the issue.
Mr. Hugo directed the group to look at the height map. The purpose of the map
break out the two use districts: 1) Everything between Washington and the water; 2)
Everything west of Washington. There are three proposed height districts: C) The
Waterfront - Allow four (maybe five) story buildings along Washington. He then
referred to the gentleman that spoke of breaks in codes and cost of development by
building types, etc. - this proposal doesn't push those ideas. At 50 feet you could
build stick-built over first story concrete. As you go over the hill you may be able to
get over 60 feet. Somewhere around 60-65 feet, you get into different development
code and safety code issues. Seventy feet is almost artificial. Fifty feet is really the
operative limit, in terms of the view shed. It establishes a plane off of Washington for
Planning Commission Meeting
September 17, 2002
Page 26 of 30
the depth of the property (maybe 100 feet or so). Anyone above that plane in
elevation will see over it and see to the water and the far shoreline.
In the B Zone (referring to the map), it just saying a straight 70 feet. Seventy feet is
about the height of the building next to us and not too far offthe height of the
Washington Mutual Building (70-80 feet). There was a short discussion about the
building next to City Hall and the buildings in the downtown area that are 60-70 feet
in height. He read from the draft ordinance, "An occupant of the core of
downtown..." That means that everything would be at least as big as this building
next to us. For Bremerton, that is a substantial downtown. It is that high to
accommodate everything you can do under the building/safety code issues we were
just talking about. You could build as high a ground floor as you would want for a
comfortable commercial, almost atrium commercial space and then stick frame on top
of that. He asked if we change our building codes, we could get four over one - or
five over one?
Commissioner Kosusko answered that Seattle has added and extra floor to allow five
over one. He said that the regular building code is four over one.
Mr. Itugo said that if we adopt the Seattle model, that would allow five over one for
six stories - 70 feet. This would be all the way from 1st Street, on the west side of
Pacific - all the way across the heart of downtown, except for district A, breaks as
you are going up between 5th and 6th.
District A is 100 feet - which means that if there is a market for residential using
concrete construction, you could go up about nine stories. This would allow a view
of all of downtown, the waterfront and Mt. Rainier with the Olympics in the opposite
direction. What that area includes is both sides Pacific - which would make those
three blocks of Pacific pretty grand. People in one direction would be looking toward
the Olympics and the other direction they would be looking toward Mt. Rainier and
the water.
In the top right comer (of the A district on the map) is the Government Building site.
The Government Building is about 95 feet above grade.
Commissioner Kosusko asked how deep off Pacific the line is - Is it 1 O0 feet back?
Mr. Hugo estimated that it was about 150 feet back. There was a short discussion
about the distance required for the parking lot, etc. Mr. Hugo said that his goal was to
make it at least 100 feet and closer to 150 feet. He explained that the lines are drawn
along parcel lines except for the line between districts B and C. At the south end of
"C", that line goes right through the conference center site. On the north side it is a
50 foot limit because there is a hotel there that isn't 50 feet above Washington. On
the south side of the line the conference center and office buildings break 50 feet by
one foot.
Mr. Hugo stated that the codes need to accommodate the plans that we've made. He
explained that it is a little bit backward but he is comfortable. We have known the
direction we want to go and now we want to have codes that direct development to
achieve our vision.
Planning Commission Meeting
September 17, 2002
Page 27 of 30
Commissioner Kennedy asked about maximum building height in DC Zone as 120
feet.
Mr. Hugo explained that column that mentions the maximum building height
(mentioned on page 4), should be taken out. Instead there will be a reference to the
map and there will be a new exhibit in the ordinance. The map will be included in the
zoning code. There will be a new Figure 152 in the back of the code which identifies
this map.
Commissioner Dingfield asked about page 5, item 4. Are we coming up with an
approved list of trees and shrubs that are of urban height, not rural height? There was
a short discussion about trees, shrubs, and landscaping.
Mr. Hugo explained that issues surrounding character and quality of landscaping/
building materials, should be outlined in a design guideline book.
Ms. Ralph stated that this is an existing Recommended Trees List for the City of
Bremerton.
Mr. Hugo further explained that most of these issues will be included in design
review for the most important places in the City like designated centers in downtown.
In order to get the right kind of character or ambiance you need some design
guidelines and urban design standards and a design review process. The City Council
is agreeable with that. This ordinance represents step one, there is more work to be
done.
Commissioner Dingfield asked about page 6, item 8. Visually distinctive roof
design - does the new Government Building meet this standard.
Mr. Hugo stated that the new Government Building is not over four stories.
Commissioner Dingfield asked about page 6, item (iii) (3) - work of art. She wants
to add the phrase "but not limited to" prior to the list at the top of page 7 (murals,
sculptures, paintings, inlays, friezes, mosaics, and tile work). She said that we don't
know where art will go in the future - this would then no limit the artwork. There
was a short discussion.
Mr. Hugo stated that that phrase will be added.
Commissioner Kosusko asked if the figures at the end just added the three zones and
the tables.
Mr. Hugo concurred. There was then some discussion of final changes - Figure 140
(not included in tonight's materials). Because we are showing the allowed uses in the
text, not in the matrix - nothing is left out, except the table should have a footnote or
something. There will have to be a provision somewhere in the text that says that the
uses are as listed in this provision and not shown in Table 140 OR we can add
something on Table 140 which refers to Section 152 for allowed uses.
Planning Commission Meeting
September 17, 2002
Page 28 of 30
Commissioner Wood expressed her concem about the height - what it would be like
walk into downtown with eight to nine stories. She wondered if any of the other
commissioners had any concerns about that.
Commissioner Kosusko briefly discussed the small residential neighborhood located
downtown (Highland and Pleasant). This spurred a short discussion. The group
concluded that even though there is some residential downtown, the whole look of
downtown area will change. Commissioner Wood is uncomfortable with the 1 O0 foot
height in the downtown area.
Mr. Hugo asked for clarification. He explained that, in the matter of height (referring
to the FAR table in the draft ordinance), the FAR for residential is six. This means
that to get to a nine story building, you could only occupy 2/3 of the site, which
would create some openness. If you are not residential, the FAR is three - which
makes it uneconomical to go to nine stores because you could only occupy 1/3 of the
site. The FAR pushes the 100 foot to residential projects. This is the intent. It is not
to accommodate office development - it is to accommodate mixed use projects, some
retail on the first couple of floors and the rest would be residential towers above the
midpoint and allow a view.
Commissioner Dingfield stated that her assumption was that it is up to 100 feet, but
is not required to be that tall.
Commissioner Kosusko stated that residential buildings generally have more
articulation than commercial buildings would.
Commissioner Kosusko asked if there was a need to vote on this ordinance today?
Mr. Hugo explained that we are getting into some issues with the downtown projects.
If the commission couldn't act today - he would request a special meeting in two
weeks.
~ A motion was made by Commissioner Nelson and seconded by Commissioner Wood
to approve PL02-0056, amending Chapter 21 of the BMC adding Section 21.02.152
entitled "Downtown District" including the proposed amendments and adding .the
Height Map. Called for a vote: Bucla'ngham: yes; Cockburn: yes; Dingtqeld: yes; 1
: · .. · .. .. . .
d. Update on Comprehensive Plan - Staff updated the Planning Commission on
progress of the "Shaping Bremerton" Comprehensive Plan update process.
Mr. Rogerson provided update products including goals and policies from each
working committee as reviewed for consistency by the coordinating council. Staff
also provided an overview of future process and approximate timing of the next steps
in the Shaping Bremerton process. He stated that the commission (Coordinating
Council) will be receiving 3-ring binders with the first draft of the comprehensive
plan.
Planning Commission Meeting
September 17, 2002 Page 29 of 30
AGENDA BILL (~
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON FOR AGENDA: ~ Nov. 20, 2002
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SHORELINE ORIGINATING DEPT: City Attorney's Office
MASTER PROGRAM RELATING TO ORIGINATOR: Roger A. Lubovich
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS DATE SUBMITTED: Oct. 22, 2002
2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary)
CHP~S ~UGC~, l~ii:ecl~i' of Community Development
FISCAL & BUDGET CHA~AN
E NDORSE~..~
3. EXHIBITS:
PROPOSED ORDIN^NCE
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:
PP S [m
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The current provisions of the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program provide that downtown waterfront site
development standards be regulated by the Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan. A companion
ordinance the Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan. The proposed ordinance amends the Shoreline
Master Program to allow development of the downtown waterfront in accordance with new development
standards and regulations.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
~ve to ~lpprnve the Dr,,,.^~n - ,'
Move to pass Ordinance No. ~Q~ on second reading.
7. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED [--] TABLED [-']
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
APPROVED
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Director of Community Development
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Director of Community Development
EXPIRATION DATE: n/a
REVIEW DATE: n/a
DISAPPROVED [--] AMEN?CE:
8. AGENDA BILL NO.:
02.- ,2ao
9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
10. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
11. RESEARCH SOURCES:
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON
ORDINANCE REAFFIRMING DESIGNATED
BLIGHTED AREAS, REDESIGNATING THE
PROJECT AREA, AND CREATiNG A NEW
COMMUNITY RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE
PROJECT AREA.
FOR AGENDA: Nc-.'. 13 and Nov. 20, 2002
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Attorney's Office
ORIGINATOR: Roger A. Lubovich
DATE SUBMITTED: Oct. 22, 2002
2. CLE~ARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary)
. if ,
Cr~~~ve~l..~ 'r tor ofCommu ' Development
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attomoy
FISCAL & BUDGET CHAIRMAN
OPERATIONS CHAIRMAN
3. EXHIBITS:
PROPOSED ORDINANCE -
Afo. q83o
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The proposed ordinance reaffirms the blighted areas as designated and reaffirmed in Resolution Nos. 1730 and
2117, creates a new Community Renewal Area for Community Renewal Projects re-designating the same as the
"Project Area," and creates a new Community Renewal Plan for the Project Area.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
'5~ ~, vc 4mtinance on first-reading.
Move to pass Ordinance No. 1-l-t~30 on second reading.
7. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED [--] TABLED [--]
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
e
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Director of Community Development
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Director of Community Development
EXPIRATION DATE: n/a
REVIEW DATE:
APPROVED F~ DISAPPROVED
AMENDqb:
8. AGENDA BILL NO.:
9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
10. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
11. RESEARCH SOURCES:
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT:
ORDINANCE NO. ~)_~i
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
November 30. 2002
Finance
Authorizing the Issue of General Obligation Bonds to
Finance the Public Safety Facilities approved by the voters
on September 17, 2002 and Accepting the Pur~l~ase Offer
of Bank of America. ~.,.~
//
2. CLEARANCES: Cornmen.t.O~,~ if/ec~ssary) . 3. EXHIBITS:
Finance Director ~'~B°nd: ' ---/1[,), ~-~iOrdinance -
City Attorney ~'~,~ ~:_:----: ~, _
Fiscal & Budge~ 5
Operations ~--e(~L'"- -' -
Dick Saunders
November 7, 2002
! /',.,,/
Purchase Offer (At Second Reading)
Will be Distributed the night of November 20.
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
This ordinance will authorize the financing necessary to acquire additional police vehicles, fire trucks, apparatus and
equipment: and to acquire land, construct, remodel and equip new fire, police and court facilities. This project has
been reviewed by Council in the context of the 2002 - 2007 CIP and is included in the 2003 preliminary budget. The
bond issue proposed is a 25 year, Unlimited Tax General Obligation with level debt service. VVhile the debt will be a
general obligation of the City, it is expected that repayment will be made from annual property tax levies upon
property in the City as approved by the voters on September 17, 2002.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
-~O',.'C, tc, c,~.."o\.e nn first reading the ordin~nn~ _°'_'ther!z!ng the bend !ccuc fc.r thc, ~,cq;:s',t~or, of F'ub;;c Sai'eiy
Move to pass on second reading Ordinance No.~3{authorizing the bond issue for the acquisition of Public Safety
Equipment and Facilities and to accept the purchase offer of Bank of America.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
Finance Director
Mayor
Dec. 1,2027
N/A
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
AMENDED
?/
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The City will not have the funding necessary to pay for the Equipment or facilities authorized by the voters.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
This project and financing are included in the 2003 preliminary Budget.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Bank of America. City's bond counsel.
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO.
Establishing the Public Safety Projects Fund
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
Nov. 20, 2002
Finance
Dick Saunders
Nov. 7, 2002
2. CLEARANCES: Comme
ifnecessary)
3. EXHIBITS:
Att 0
Finan~i ~irector
Fiscal & ~~'
Budget
Operations
ENDORSEME~~~,~
MAYOR
Proposed Ordinance
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
C'-OONCIL PRESIDENT ~/~t~ ~/~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
If approved, the proposed ordinance will create a new fund to be called the Public Safety Projects Fund. This fund is
intended to provide for the budget and accounting associated with acquisition of the Public Safety equipment and
facilities approved by the voters on September 17, 2002.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to approve on first reading the ordinance creating the Public Safety Projects Fund.
Motion to pass on second reading Ordinance No.~
creating the Public Safety Projects Fund.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
Finance
, Mayor
N/A
N/A
PULLED TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED ~ DISAPPROVED
AMFNDEDgF
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
The new fund will not be created.
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
Budget is included in the 2003 Preliminary Budget.
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
Staff analysis.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, establishing the Public Safety Projects
Fund and providing for the source and use of the fund.
WHEREAS, On September 17, 2002 the citizens of the City of Bremerton
approved Proposition 1, Public Safety Facilities Bond, authorizing the City to acquire additional
police vehicles, fire trucks, apparatus and equipment; to acquire land, construct, remodel and
equip new fire, police and court facilities; to incur indebtedness and issue no more than
$12,979,000 of general obligation bonds maturing within 25 years to pay the costs thereof; and
to levy annual excess property taxes to pay such bonds.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a public safety projects fund in
order to facilitate the tracking of funds obtained through the sale of bonds authorized by the
voters on September 17,2002; and
WHEREAS, in order to avoid the improper co-mingling of City funds; NOW
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Public Safety Projects Fund Established. The Finance Director of
the City of Bremerton is hereby authorized and directed to establish a special fund to be known
as the "Public Safety Projects Fund" to be used for the purchase of equipment and land and the
construction of facilities as authorized by the voters on September 17, 2002.
SECTION 2. Source O_fFunds. The Finance Director is authorized and directed
to deposit to this fund any and all moneys received by the City from the proceeds of the sale of
General Obligation Bonds authorized by the voters and any interest accrued on those proceeds.
SECTION 3. Use Of Funds. Moneys of this fund shall be expended for all
lawful purposes related to the acquisition of additional police vehicles, fire trucks, apparatus and
equipment; and the acquisition of land, construction, remodeling and equipping of new fire,
police and court facilities; all costs related to the sale and issuance of the bonds; and all
incidental project management and administrative costs allowed by law.
SECTION 4. Termination of Fund. The Finance Director is authorized to
terminate this fund after all proceeds deposited into the fund, under the authority of Section 2 of
this Ordinance, have been expended and the Finance Director has determined that the fund is no
longer needed.
Public Safety Project Fund
SECTION 5. Severabilitv. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the
day of ,2002
PASSED by the City Council the
day of ,2002
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
Approved this day of ,2002
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attomey
PUBLISHED the
EFFECTIVE the
ORDINANCE NO.
day of ,2002
day of .,2002
R:\LEGAL\Ordinances~FinanceXPublic Safety Project Fund.doc
Public Safety Project Fund
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON
ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE
DISCRETIONARY RESERVE FUND
2. CLE~F~: (Comment on back if necessary)
RfCH~M~.I~~qDE~, Interim Ein.~_~ce Director
- ~'&~'/A. LUBOVIC~
F~T CHAIRMAN
O"ffEitXTIONS CHAIRMAN
ENDORSE~__ _ [~
MAYOR ~~ ~~'"'""~
FOR AGENDA: Nov. 20 and Nov. 26, 2002
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Attorney's Office
ORIGINATOR: Roger A. Lubovich
DATE SUBMITTED: November 7, 2002
3. EXHIBITS:
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT L~C~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The proposed ordinance adds a new chapter 3.38, entitled "Discretionary Reserve Fund" to the BMC, which
establishes the discretionary reserve · as previously approved by City Council on August 14, 2002.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
Move to approve the proposed ordinance on first reading.
Move to pass Ordinance No.
on second reading.
7. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED [-"] TABLED [-"]
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
APPROVED [~]
6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Finance Director
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Finance Director
EXPIRATION DATE: n/a
REVIEW DATE: n/a
DISAPPROVED ['-]
8. AGENDA BILL NO.:
9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
10. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS~ FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
11. RESEARCH SOURCES:
??
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, adding a new chapter, Chapter 3.38,
establishing the Discretionary Reserve Fund for the purpose of
funding non-recurring expenditures approved by the City Council.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the formation of a Discretionary Reserve
on August 14, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a new chapter of the Bremerton
Municipal Code, Chapter 3.38 entitled "Discretionary Reserve Fund" to fund non-recurring
expenditures, NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. A new chapter, Chapter 3.38 entitled "Discretionary Reserve
Fund" is hereby added to the Bremerton Municipal Code to read as follows:
CHAPTER 3.38
DISCRETIONARY RESERVE FUND
3.38.010 Established.
There is hereby established a special revenue fund to be called the "Discretionary
Reserve Fund." The fund is established to fund non-recurring expenditures approved by the City
Council. Separate accounts shall be created to hold funding for General Fund purposes and
restricted use funding sources.
3.38.020 Source of Funds.
Funds identified as excess to City's operating needs may be used to fund the
Discretionary Reserve Fund.
3.38.030 Administration and Expenditure.
The Discretionary Reserve Fund shall be operated as a special revenue fund administered
by the Finance Director and the Mayor. All monies received by the fund, together with
investment earnings thereon, may be expended only in the following manner:
(a) The City Council may authorize, by majority vote, use of the funds to pay non-
recurring expenditures.
(b) Expenditure requests shall be funded only from the account in which any use
restrictions are consistent with the stated purpose of the expenditure.
1
/oo
Discretionary Reserve Fund
SECTION 2. Severabilit¥. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the
PASSED by the City Council the
day of ,2002
day of ,2002
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
Approved this day of ,2002
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the
EFFECTIVE the
ORDINANCE NO.
day of ,2002
day of ., 2002
R:\LEGAL\Ordinances~inanceXDiscretionary Reserve Fund.doc
2
Discretionary Reserve Fund
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON
ORDINANCE RELATING TO LID ASSESSMENTS
2. CLE~~Comment on back if necessary)
R fC'~iS~RD~S ~- DEI~S~ Interim F~ance Di~ctor
ROGfl~R A. LU~OVICH, ~y Attorney
FI~;HAmM~
OPERATIONS CHA~M~
ION [--]
FOR AGENDA: Nov. 20 and Nov. 26, 2002
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Attorney's Office
ORIGINATOR: Roger A. Lubovich
DATE SUBMITTED: November 7, 2002
3. EXHIBITS:
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The proposed ordinance amends Section 11.04.040 of the Bremerton Municipal Code to clarify the definition of
local improvement districts and adds a new section, Section 11.04.050, entitled "Delinquent Assessments" to
provide for the acceleration of the entire assessment for purposes of collection and foreclosure when installment
payments become delinquent.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
Move to approve the proposed ordinance on first reading
Move to pass Ordinance No. on second reading
7. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED [-'] TABLED [--]
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
APPROVED ]--]
e
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Finance Director
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: Finance Director
EXPIRATION DATE: n/a
REVIEW DATE: n/a
DISAPPROVED []
AMENDg/~I:
8. AGENDA BILL NO.:
9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
10. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EOUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
11. RESEARCH SOURCES:
/03
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, relating to local improvement districts
and 'delinquent assessments amending Chapter 11.04 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code by amending Section 11.04.010 to
clarify the definition of local improvement district and adding a
new section, Section 11.04.050, entitled "Delinquent Assessments"
providing for the acceleration of the entire assessment for purposes
of collection and foreclosure when installment payments become
delinquent.
WHEREAS, the current provisions of Chapter 11.04 of the Bremerton Municipal
Code do not provide an adequate definition of a local improvement district; and
WHEREAS, the current provisions of Chapter 11.04 of the Bremerton Municipal
Code do not allow for acceleration of the entire assessment of a local improvement district
assessment for purposes of collection and foreclosure when installment payments become
delinquent; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Bremerton Municipal Code to
clarify the definition of a local improvement district and allow for acceleration of assessments in
order to assist in the collection and foreclosure of assessments once they become delinquent;
NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 11.04.010 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"RCW Adopted" is hereby amended to read as follows:
11.04.010 RCW Adopted.
RCW 35.43 and 35.44 are herby adopted insofar as the same may be applicable to the
creation of local improvement districts, assessments, reassessments, and financing thereof in the
city. For the purposes of this chapter, the term "local improvement district" also means "utility
local improvement district".
SECTION 2. A new section, Section 11.04.050, entitled "Delinquent
Assessments" is hereby added to Chapter 11.04 of the Bremerton Municipal Code to read as
follows:
1
Delinquent LID Assessments
11.04.050 Delinquent Assessments.
Whenever any local improvement district assessment shall have been made payable in
installments and, if on the first day of January in any year, two or more installments are
delinquent, or if the final installment has been delinquent for more than one year, then, as
authorized pursuant to RCW 35.50.040, the entire assessment shall be due and payable and the
collection thereof shall be enforced in the manner prescribed by the laws of the State of
Washington. Proceedings brought to foreclose such delinquent assessments shall be commenced
on or before December 1 of that year, but not before the City Treasurer has notified by certified
mail, pursuant to RCW 35.50.030 as enacted and thereafter amended, the persons whose names
appear on the assessment roll as owning the property charged with the assessments or
installments which are delinquent at the address last known to the Treasurer, a notice 30 days
before the commencement of the proceedings. This section shall apply to all local improvement
districts formed pursuant to RCW 35.43 after the effective date of the ordinance creating this
section.
SECTION 3. Severabili~. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the
PASSED by the City Council the
day of ,2002
day of ., 2002
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
Approved this day of ,2002
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
2
Delinquent LID Assessments
PUBLISHED the
EFFECTIVE the
ORDINANCE NO.
day of
day of
,2002
,2002
R :\LEGAL\OrdinancesLginancekDelinquent Assessments.doc
3
I
Delinquent LID Assessments
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUB~IECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON FOR AGENDA: Nov. 20 and Nov. 26, 2002
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3.01 RATE ORIGINATING DEPT: City Attorney's Office
TABLES FOR 2003 ORIGINATOR: Roger A. Lubovich
DATE SUBMITTED: November 7, 2002
2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary)
KATHLEEN McCLUSKI~Y, Administrative Services
Directo~--~'~.
RO4Eg A. LUBOVICH~rney
FISdAL & B¥~)GE~" CHAIRMAN
OPERATIONS CHAIRMAN
3. EXHIBITS:
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT ~.~-/~'--O-(~
ENDORS~
MAYOR~ ~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The proposed ordinance updates the rates and fees for certain City departments for 2003.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
Move to approve the proposed ordinance on first reading.
Move to pass Ordinance No. __
on second reading.
7. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED ["-[ TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
APPROVED [-"]
6. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
Administrative Services Director
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
Administrative Services Director
EXPIRATION DATE: n/a
REVIEW DATE: n/a
DISAPPROVED ['"] AMENDED~ DA~
8. AGENDA BILL NO.:
9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
10. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES~ EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
11. RESEARCH SOURCES:
ORDINANCENO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending Section 3.01.070 and Rate
Tables A and F of Chapter 3.01 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
and repealing and replacing Rate Tables B, E, and G of the Chapter
3.01 relating to 2003 rate adjustments for various City
departments.
WHEREAS, the current provisions of Chapter 3.01 of the Bremerton Municipal
Code contain rates and fees for various programs and functions of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the rates and fees for certain City
departments for 2003; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 3.01.070 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Parks
and Recreation Department - Rate Tables F and Fl" is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.01.070 Parks and Recreation Department - Rate Tables F and Fl.
Facility Use Rental Rates
Sheridan Community Center
Bremerton Sr. Citizens Center
Jarstad Aquatic Center
Evergreen Park Shelters
Athletic Field
Blueberry Park - Pea Patch
Program Fees and Charges
Jarstad Aquatic Center
Athletic Programs
Bremerton Sr. Citizens Center/Recreation Programs
Ivy Green Cemetery
Gold Mountain Golf Complex
SECTION 2. Rate Table A of Chapter 3.01 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled "Administrative Services - Rate Table A" is hereby amended to read as set forth in
Exhibit A of this Ordinance.
2003 Rate Tables
SECTION 3. Rate Table B of Chapter 3.01 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled "Municipal Court - Rate Table B" is hereby repealed in its entirety and a new Rate Table
B is hereby created as set forth in Exhibit B of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4. Rate Table E of Chapter 3.01 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled "Fire Department - Rate Table E" is hereby repealed in its entirety and a new Rate Table
E is hereby created as set forth in Exhibit C of this Ordinance.
SECTION 5. Rate Table F of Chapter 3.01 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled "Parks Recreation Dept - Rate Table F" is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit
D of this Ordinance.
SECTION 6. Rate Table G of Chapter 3.01 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled "Public Works and Utilities - Rate Table G" is hereby repealed in its entirety and a new
Rate Table G is hereby created as set forth in Exhibit E of this Ordinance.
SECTION 7. The rate tables amended and repealed and replaced by this
Ordinance shall not be subject to the CPI Adjustment for the year 2003 as provided for in BMC
3.01.095.
SECTION & Severabili~_. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the
day of ,2002
PASSED by the City Council the
day of ,2002
Approved this day of
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
,2002
ATTEST:
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
2
2003 Rate Tables
PUBLISHED the
EFFECTIVE the
ORDINANCE NO.
day of
day of
,2002
,2002
R:\LEGAL\OrdinancesLa. dministrationX2003 Title 3 rate changes.doc
3
2003 Rate Tables
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - RATE TABLE A
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
REGULATORY LICENSE FEES
BMC 5.76 Advertising
BMC 5.50 Ambulance Co.
Ambulance Inspections
BMC 5.17 Charitable Solicitation
Non-Profit
Professional Fundraiser
BMC 5.25 Christmas Tree Lots
BMC 5.22 Dance/Public
BMC 5.96 Erotic Dance Studios
Dancers
BMC 5.30 Farmers Market
BMC 9.48 Fireworks Stands
BMC 5.42 Hotel/Motel
BMC 10.24 Housemoving/Oversize Loads
BMC 5.98 Limousine Service
BMC 5.16 Mobile Food Vendor
BMC 5.10 Pawnbroker
BMC 5.16 Peddlers
BMC 5.04
Petshops
Grooming Parlors
Animal Welfare Facilities
BMC 5.10 Secondhand Dealer
BMC 5.98 Shuttlebus
20032002
RATE
$200492/yr or
$4950/30 days
$~7-60/veh/semi
-annual
$! 225.__/60 days
$~d5~75/60
days
$~570/Iot/yr
$25d265/yr or
$6670/30 days
$646700/yr
$6~ O0/yr
$4G9500/yr
$100/stand/yr
$3'!, r$235+$3/r
m
$5 ! 7600+$65/
mile to .10 of a
mile
$! 3! 150/veh/yr
$! 3! 150/veh/yr
$6'!,5675/yr
$6~75/yr or
$-!-225/30days
$150/yr
$50/yr
S50/yr
$13!135/yr
$I 3! 135/veh/yr
Table A - A1
EXHIBIT A
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - RATE TABLE A
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
REGULATORY LICENSE FEES
BMC 5.36 Special Events:
Profit
Non-Profit
BMC 5.20 Street/Sidewalk Vendors
BMC 5.54 Taxicabs
Taxi Drivers
BMC 5.16 Temporary Merchant
BMC 5.38 Theatre
RATE
$646675/event
$6370/event
$-1-96250/yr
$300315/veh/yr
$6,567/yr
$300400/30
days
$2~0275/yr
BUSINESS LICENSE FEE
BMC 5.02
20032003
RATE
$6055/yr
PARKING
One-Street Locations
Off-Street Location
Parking Garage
20022003
RATE
Not to Exceed
$20/3 hrs
$30/10 hrs
Not to Exceed
$20/3 hrs
$30/10 hrs
Not to Exceed
$100/mo
DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION FEES
Per Page
Audio or Video Tapes
Computer Disks
20022003
RATE
$.15/pg
Cost ~ Tape
+$8.50
$8.50
Table A - A2
EXHIBIT A
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - RATE TABLE A
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION FEES
Certification
Blue Prints- Aerial Photos, Drawings, Maps
Documents:
Medical Records
Fire Reports
Budget
Annual Report
20022003
RATE
$33.50
$-7-8/pg
$19/1st 5 pages
$.83/Pgs 6-31
$.63/Pgs 31+
$.15/pg
$25
$25
CHECK HANDLING FEE
$4O
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING EXAMINER
APPLICATION OR APPEAL
$150
Table A - A3
EXHIBIT A
MUNICIPAL COURT - RATE TABLE B
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
Municipal Court
HEARING EXAMINER APPEAL
PARKING FINES
Overtime or Non-Payment in Collection Devices:
lS~ Violation in 30 Days
2® Violation in 30 Days
3r~ Violation in 30 Days
Loading Zones
No Parking
Wrong Way
Parked on Sidewalk
Fire Hydrant
12" From Curb
Physically Disabled (Public and Private)
Counterfeiting or User of Counterfeit Permits,
Tokens or Script
Unauthorized Use of Permits
All Other Infractions Not Specified Above
2003 RATE
$65
$17
$27
$56
$17
$22
$17
$56
$27
$10
$250
$500
$150
$27
Table B - B1
EXHIBIT B
FIRE DEPARTMENT- RATE TABLE E
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
FIRE DEPARTMENT
2003 RATE
AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE
ALS Residents
ALS Non-Residents
BLS Residents
BLS Non-Residents
Mileage
EMS SERVICE CALL TO ASSISTED LIVING, LONG TERM
CARE AND ADULT CARE FACILITIES
FIRE RESCUE BOAT RESPONSE
Resident
Non-Residents
HAZARD MATERIALS RESPONSE
Rice Hull Ash
Absorbent Pads
Stand-By-Time
Per crew of 3
Fire Engine - Crew of 4
Active Firefighting
Fire Engine
Aerial Ladder
FALSE ALARM FEE
SPRINKLER/FIRE ALARM PLANS
$375
$440
$310
$370
$5/mile
$100 After first
response per quarter
$115
$200
Actual Cost per Bag
Actual Cost per Bag
$98/hour
$115/hour
$121/hour
$200/hour
$120 for second
$225 for 3 or more
per quarter
UBC Rates*
*Uniform Building Code as Amended
Table E - E1
EXHIBIT C
I1(
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
NON-RESIDENT FEE - BASE FEE PLUS 20%
FACILITY USE RENTAL RATES Facility use policies apply.
Appropriate taxes are included in rates unless otherwise noted.
SHERIDAN COMMUNITY CENTER - ROOM RENTAL RATES
(GrouD A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
Recreation and/or educational purposes only.
I:','~,,r /A% I-,,N,,r '
~ ./ ~o:s .............. *; .....'~'~' nctcd. Per hour, two
(2) hour minimum
Daytime (Monday - Friday: 7:308:00 AM to 5:305:00 PM)
Lounge
Room A, B, C, or Conference Room
A~, .... rccm ""'" - =ddGym
...... ,.,.~ gym
t~-,,m /A,,`4H',-~-;,,rv'~ I
~j,,, ~,l~v,,~ ~v/ ~, ,~v~., . .,, ,,,,,,.
Eveninqs (Monday - T~....-.---,`4°"Fridn'"-.. 5:305:00 PM to ! 0:3010:00 PM)/
Saturday and Sunday
Lounge
Room A B C '"- r,,-,,.,~ ...... c~,,,.,,-,,
Conference Room
Ak ......... ~"" Gy
............ ~,,-- Gym - =dd m
~'-~,m lA, ,A;{.^,,;, ,m I I~,,~
"'J'" ~.~1~'''' '"'"'1 I'"'"' ''~--"~ '" ' .... "
Entire building - Up to eight (8} hours
Additional staff (per hour}
(GrouD B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
............................. purpose: on .
Table F - F1 EXHIBIT D
2002200~
RATE
$!e.756.25
$12.oo5.00
$!2.0015.00
$~2.oo
$22.5012.i50
$10.00
5.5020.00
$e2.0o
$~5.5o
$400.00
$10.75
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
Ail Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
SHERIDAN COMMUNITY CENTER - ROOM RENTAL RATES
Four/'~ h ........ ; ............. ,; ..... "~"-' nctcd Per hour, two
(2) hour minimum
Daytime {Monday - Friday: 7:30 AM to 5:30 PM)
Lounge
Room A, B, C, or Conferonco Room
Conference Room
AI-..-.,,~ .,'..',m ,',1,,~. __ o,-I~1 GV
............ ~.,.~ gym _~_ m
~'"'"_,... (^ud!todum ' '~'~......, Entire Buildinq - Up to eiRht (8) hours
~],,, ~ ....... ~ ~Cr ..........
20022003
RATE
$45.0025.00
~15.00
$20.00
~40.00
$!so.oesoo.oo
$52.75
$35.75 ,
$37.75
BREMERTON SR. CITIZENS CENTER - ROOM RENTAL RATES
20022003
RATE
.......... ~ =nd c!dcr.
(Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
Room Rental Fees - per hour, two (2/hour minimum
Cardroom/Meetin,q Room
Main Room
Table F- F2
EXHIBIT D
$~,0.75,1,5.0o
$~,0.75
$~, 0.75
$!e.5025.00
PARKS RECREATION DEPT- RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
BREMERTON SR. CITIZENS CENTER - ROOM RENTAL RATES
20032003
RATE
Ma~n Room & Kitchen
Additional staffing per hour
a~,~ ,~ ..... ~ on m~nutesEntiro Facili~ up to oi~ht (8) hours
(Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
Room Rental Fees - per hour, (two) 2 hour minimum
Cardroom/Meetinq Room
Main Room
Main Room (Gc~dcn)
Ma~n Recto & Kitchen
~aa~- Room, Kitchen, ~-~ ~'~ ..... (Golden)
Additional staffin0 per hour
A~t~ana~ t~me per ~ 20 m~nutesEntiro FaciliW- ~p to oiflht {8)
hours
$I 0.75
$2!.7510.00
· O~ '7~
$10.75
$!0.75200.i00
$!~.2530.00
$! e.25
$!e.25
$1~.25
$32.5020.00
$do.25
$16.25
~00.00
JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER
(Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
Private - Non-Profit
Up to 50 participants
Team
Staffing
51 - 100
101-150+
Deep Lanes
Shallow Lanes
Staffing
School Lessons
Up to 35 students
Per hr
each added hour
Per hr
Per hr
Gallery
Table F- F3
Per hr per lane
Per hr per lane
Per hr as needed
EXHIBIT D
2002200~
RATE
$52.00
$10.00
$62.00
$72.00
$5.00
$3.00
$2.00
$15.oo
$52.00
PARKS RECREATION DEPT- RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER
36 - 45 students
46 - 55 students
(Groul3 B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
Commercial Per hr
Deep Lanes Per hr per lane
Shallow Lanes Per hr per lane
Staffing Per hr as needed
300,32003
RATE
$60.00
$72.00
$60.00
$6.00
$4.00
$15.00
20022003
EVERGREEN PARK SHELTERS - RESERVATION FEER RATE
Four (4) hour sessions per reservation unless noted.
Note: Shelter #4 is not reservable. Use of shelter #4 is on a first come/first served
basis.
Parties who have reserved the other Evergreen Park shelters may not use this shelter
at the same time.
(Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rate-
Shelter 1
Shelter 2, 3, 5, or 6f
Shelter 4 (not reservable)
"v,,..v. . T~b!csUppe r NAD
~Lent Landing
(Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rate~
Shelter 1
Shelter 2, 3, 5, or 6
Shelter 4 (not reservable)
'Jnccvcrcd TablccUpper NAD
a~'"'*~" 5Lent Landin.q
$25.0030.00
$-1-'1-~=~)15.00
$! ! .50
no charge
$6.oo15.00
$! !.5015.00
$! ..50
$37.5060.00
$-1--7.,9930.00
$17.oo
no charge
$ 3o.o0
$!7.0030.00
$!7.09
Table F- F4
EXHIBIT D
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
PARK RESERVATION PROCESSING FEES
'- .... /,~ ~' .... sc-d ...... reser';=tlcn ' '"'~-' noted.All Parks
except Upper NAD and Lent Landin,q
20022003
RATE
$6.OOLO.O0
ATHLETIC FIELD- RESERVATIONS
Per hour unless noted
(Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
(Group B) COMMERCIAL - Rental Rates
Game Fee - Softball
Game Fee - Soccer
20022003
RATE
$!!.0012.00
$16.2522.00
$2!.5022.00
$30.0035.00
BLUEBERRY PARK - PEA PATCH ANNUAL RATE
Recreational purposes only.
20022003
RATE
$28.2534.00
PROGRAM FEES & CHARGES
New Programs
20022003
RATE
not to
exceed cost
plus 25%
GLENN JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER
20022003
RATE
ADMISSIONS
Youth (0-3 yrs.)
Youth (4-17 yrs.)
Adult (18-54 yrs.)
Seniors (55 & up)
Disabled
Adult Fitness
Senior Fitness
Disabled Fitness
Special Public
PUNCH CARDS
Youth
Youth
Adult
Adult
Table F- F5
10 punch
20 punch
10 punch
20 punch
EXHIBIT D
NC
$2.25
$3.00
$2.25
$2.25
$3.00
$2.25
$2.25
$1.00
$18.00
$36.00
$24.00
$48.00
PARKS RECREATION DEPT- RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
GLENN JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER
Senior/Disabled
Senior/Disabled
Fitness/Lesson
Fitness/Lesson
Senior/Disabled Fitness
Senior/Disabled Fitness
10 punch
20 punch
10 punch
20 punch
10 punch
20 punch
PASSES
Youth
Youth
Adult
Adult
Senior/Disabled
Senior/Disabled
6 months
12 months
6 months
12 months
6 months
12 months
SWIMMING LESSONS
Youth/Adult
Private
Semi-Private
Parent Tot
Family Lessons
30 min.
30 min.
30 min.
4 lessons
ITEMS FOR SALE
Basic goggles
Deluxe goggles
Latex cap
Ear plug
Nose plug
New items
(includes Washington State Sales Tax)
20022003
RATE
$18.00
$36.00
$24.00
$48.00
$18.00
$36.00
$100.00
$190.00
$135.00
$250.00
$1oo.oo
$190.00
$3.25
$12.00
$18.oo
$3.0o
$65.0O
$5.00
$12.00
$3.00
$2.00
$2.00
not to
exceed cost
plus 75%
ATHLETIC PROGRAM FEES
VOLLEYBALL
Co-ed (Fall &Winter)
Men and Women (Spring)
Men and Co-ed Sand (Summer)
Open Gym (Oct. - June)
per team
per team
per team
per person
· ='- AG - FOOT~-ALL
...... ~ ~ ~' ~'/
,.,v,l~A~n~', v ~1 ~,,'~,~ ~'~ ,Dl~x ~v'a.~]~, ~ fn~,~ ~'1[~11~"1 ~
Table F - F6 EXHIBIT D
20022003
RATE
$200.00
$200.00
$85.0011G. 00
$!.502.00
PARKS RECREATION DEPT- RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
ATHLETIC PROGRAM FEES
20022003
RATE
SOCCER
Player's fee
per player
$37.0O
BASKETBALL
Men's League (Fall & Winter)
Men's League - Players fee (F & W)
Boy's League (Winter)
Girl's (Fall)
Blacktop League (Summer)
per team
per player
per team
per player
$298A~400.00
$1o.5o
,~225.00
$'!.7.7554.00
no charge
SOFTBALL
Men's League (Spring)
Men's League - Players fee (Spg)
Sunday Co-ed (Spring)
Sunday Co-ed - Players fee (Spg)
Co-ed League (Fall)
Co-ed - Players fee (Fall)
Men's League (Fall)
Men's League - Players fee (Fall)
per team
per player
per team
per player
per team
per player
per team
per player
$d2~, .25440.00
$16.00
$29--1~=~)320.00
$!0.5011.00
$3~5.00350.00
$!0.5012.00
$3!..°.25350.00
$!0.5012.00
TOURNAMENTS (SOFTBALL AND SOCCER)
-- INVITATIONAL TOURNAMENTS
Lions - One Day
Lions - Two Day
Lions - Three Day
Pendergast - One Day
Pendergast - Two Day
Pendergast - Three Day
-- STATE TOURNAMENTS
Lions - One Day
Lions - Two Day
Lions - Three Day
Pendergast - One Day
Pendergast - Two Day
Pendergast - Three Day
$2! 8.25221
$3d5.0035~
$~.53.2546~
$237.0029(
~48.~
$59'!..7561
$287.7527(
~40C
$50~.7551
~39(
$~73.7558(
$582.0071
~.00
'.00
~.00
,.00
;.00
~.00
~.00
~.00
~.00
~.00
,.00
-- Regional and National Tournaments will pay no less than State fees, but rates will
be negotiated.
~ $2.00
Table F - F7
EXHIBIT D
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
ATHLETIC PROGRAM FEES
o,/,; C~ ,-,,.,-,,,;,.1~,. f,.,,-,
20022003
RATE
'I f~O/_
DI?~'~Li I, JIT ~.
,,~""' ch=rgc
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER AND RECREATION DIVISION PROGRAMS
PROGRAM FEE FORMULAS. Except for the Sr. Citizens Trip program,
participant fees for activities (programs, classes, events, etc.) promoted by the Sr.
Citizen Center and the Recreation Division are established by the following formulas:
A. Activities when the instructor is on the payroll.
[(Total class hours including preparation) x (Instructor's hourly wage) x (1.2
Administration factor)] divided by(minimum # of students per activity)] + (the cost of group
supplies divided by minimum # of students) + Cost of individual class supplies, if
applicable = Student class fee for City of Bremerton Resident.
B. Activities when the instructor is on contract.
[(Price per student required by the Instructor less class supply fees) x (1.2 Administration
factor)] + Class supply fees = Student class fee for City of Bremerton Resident.
C. Non-Resident Fees
For recreation classes, programs, swim passes and. ^,.~,,v*;'' r-,,,~,,,vv, ,,~, rentals - ranging
from:
$5.00 to $25.00 add on 20%
$25.01 to $50.00 add a flat $5.00
$50.01 to $100.00 add a flat $10.00
$100.01 to $200.00 add a flat $20.00
$200.01 + add a flat $40.00
For Sr. Gitiz-eR-Center activities, participants pay an annual membership fee of $5
(resident) or $10 (non resident) in lieu of the 20% non-resident rate.
20032003
RATE
SENIOR CENTER TRIPS
actual costs
plus 5%
Table F- F8
EXHIBIT D
PARKS RECREATION DEPT- RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
IVY GREEN CEMETERY - FEES AND CHARGES
ADULT BURIAL
Grave Site
Opening/Closing
Liner
Oversize Liner (if required)
Grave Side Service Preparation (optional)
20022003 20022003
RATE RATE
RESIDENT NON-
RESIDENT
$537.00 $644.00
$367.00 $440.00
$415.00 $498.00
$622.00 $746.00
$122.00 $146.00
VETERANS PLOT
(Burialmustbeapprovedbythe KitsapCountyAIliedVeteransCouncilCommiEee)
Opening/Closing
Liner
Oversize Liner (if required)
Grave Side Service Preparation (optional)
Stone Marker Setting
Bronze Marker Setting
$367.00 $440.00
$415.00 $498.00
$622.00 $746.00
$122.00 $146.00
$74.00 $89.00
$66.00 $79.00
INFANT BURIAL
Infant Plot in Babyland
Opening/Closing
Liner
Grave Side Service Preparation (optional)
$171.00 $205.00
$266.00 $319.00
$187.00 $224.00
$0.00 $147.00
DISINTERNMENT
1. Removal of remains from one grave to another within Ivy Green
Cemetery
Removal & opening of new site $915.00
Site Purchase & Perpetual care $537.00
Liner $415.00
$1,098.00
$644.00
$498.00
Removal of remains from Ivy Green Cemetery to any other location
other than Ivy Green Cemetery.
Removal (only) $610.00
$732.00
ADDITIONAL BURIAL COSTS
Week day (receiving or services after 2:00 PM)
2 hr. max. $122.00 $146.00
Saturday (No Sunday or holiday)
4 hour max. $244.00 $293.00
Grave Side Service Preparation includes canopy, chairs, greens and/or lowering
devise.
Table F- F9
EXHIBIT D
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
LINERS
Adult
Infant
Cremation Vault (2 piece)
Ovemize Liner (if required)
20022003 20022003
RATE RATE
RESIDENT NON-
RESIDENT
$415.00 $498.00
$187.00 $224.00
$85.00 $102.00
$622.00 $746.00
OPENING AND CLOSING
Adult
Infant (Babyland)
Urn Interment (per urn)
$366.00 $439.00
$266.00 $319.00
$73.00 $88.00
BURIAL SITES
Adult
Infant (Babyland)
Infant (any site not in Babyland)
$537.00 $645.00
$171.00 $205.00
$537.00 $644.00
INURNMENT
(Must own or have authorization to use adult grave site prior to inurnment process)
Cement Vault $85.00 $102.00
Opening/Closing $73.00 $88.00
Grave Side Service Preparation (optional) $122.00 $146.00
DlSURNMENTS
Urn $146.00 $175.00
RAISE GRAVE $98.00 $118.00
CEMENT WALLS & CAPPING GRAVE SITE
The above rates were not raised since 1995. A 15% increase is shown in 12/1/99 to
compensate.
MARKERS
Installation charges and requirements.
The fee for setting markers into four inch collar and installation shall be charged as
follows unless purchased through the City of Bremerton or Ivy Green Cemetery. The
price does not include tax.
5" x 8" bronze
4" x 12" x 2" x 3"
8" x 16" x2" x 3"
10" x 20" x 2" x 3"
12" x 24" x 2" x 3"
12" x 24" bronze
12" x 36" x 2" x 3"
31ustax $33.00 $40.00
31ustax $39.00 $47.00
31ustax $57.00 $68.00
31ustax $68.00 $82.00
~lustax $74.00 $89.00
~lustax $66.00 $79.00
~lustax $92.00 $110.00
Table F- Fl0
EXHIBIT D
PARKS RECREATION DEPT - RATE TABLE F
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
20022003 20032003
RATE RATE
RESIDENT NON-
RESIDENT
14" X 36" X 2" X 3" plus tax $101.00 $121.00
Note: Markers sold by the City of Bremerton or Ivy Green Cemetery will not have
an installation fee charged.
All markers must be flush to the ground surface unless mating to a marker in place,
All markers not conforming to basic sizes will be charged the next
larger size.
Table F- F11
EXHIBIT D
PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES- RATE TABLE G
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
Public Works and Utilities Department
2003 RATE
RIGHT-OF WAY USE PERMITS FEES
Type A (Short Term Use) Regular
$140
Type B (Disturbance of ROW) Sidewalk Repairs
Driveway, Transverse Street Patch and
Spot Patches
New Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Longitudinal Street Patch
New Street
Water & Sewer Mains & Laterals ROW Permit
$5O
$140
$1/ft with a
$140 minimum
$3/ft with a
$600 minimum
$50
Type C (Long Term Use)
Application and Processing
Use longer than one year
$100
1/10 adjoining land value set in
the County Assessor's records
per square foot of impacted
ROW annually with a $100
minimum.
Use shorter than one year
1/50 adjoining land value set in
the County Assessor's records
per square foot of impacted
ROW monthly with a $100
minimum.
Type D Regular (Franchised Utility Routine Maintenance)
$100
Plan Reviews
$0.1 O/feet of
improvement
with $100
minimum
Additional Work
RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION
$40/hour +
equipment
charges
$547
TELECOM MASTER PERMIT FEE
$500/one time
TELECOM LICENSE FEE
$200/onetime
Table G - G1
EXHIBIT E
MUNICIPAL COURT - RATE TABLE B
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
MUNICIPAL COURT
HEARING EXAMINER APPEAL
PARKING FINES
Overtime or Non-Payment in Collection Devices:
1st Violation in 30 Days
2nd Violation in 30 Days
3rd Violation in 30 Days
Loading Zones
No Parking
Wrong Way
Parked on Sidewalk
Fire Hydrant
12" From Curb
Physically Disabled (Public and Private
Counterfeiting or .Use of
Above
Unauthorized Use of
All Other Infractions
pt
12/31/1999
$55.00
$15.00
$25.00
$50.00
$15.00
$20.00
0.00
$250.00
$500.00
$150.00
$25.00
01/01/01
$60.00
$16.00
$26.(
!1.00
$16.00
$53.00
$26.00
$1o.oo
$250.00
$500.00
$150.00'
$26.00
01/01/02
$65.00
~17.00
$27.00
$56.00
$17.00
$22.OO
$17.00
$56.00
$27.00
$1o.oo
$25o.od
$500.00
$150.00
$27.00
TABLE B - B1
FIRE DEPARTMENT - RATE TABLE E
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
RE DEPARTMENT
AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE
12/31/1999
EAT_ES.
01/01/01
ALS Residents
ALS Non-Reside~ts
BLS Residents
BLS Non-Residents
$255.00
$310.00
$205.00
$255.00
$285.00
$345.00
$225.0O
$285.00
Mileage
$6.00/mile after
10 miles
$7.00/mile
10 miles
FIRE RESCUE BOAT RESPONSE
Resident
Non-Resident
$103.00
$180.00
HAZARD MATERIALS RESPONSE
Rice Hull, Ash
Absorbent Pads
Stand-By-Time
........ Per crew of 3
Fire Engine - Crew of 4
Active Firefighting
Fire Engine
Aerial Ladder
Actual Cost per Bag
Actual Cost per
$77.2{
$1
$103
per Bag
Cost per Bag
$79.50/hr
$106.00/hr
$106.00/hr
$185.00/hr
FALSE ALARM FEE
SPRINKLER/FIRE ALA~
*Uniform .Building d
0.00 for
3 °r more
UBC Rates*
$110.00
$215.00for
'3 or more
UBC Rates*
01/01/02
00
~65,00
i!oo
,00/mile after
10 miles'
$110.00
$190.00
Actual Cost per Bag
Actual Cost per Bag
$82.00/hr
$109.00/hr
$109.00/hr'
$190.00/hr
$115.00
$220.00~r
3 or more
UBC Ra~tes*
TABLE E - E1
PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES - RATE TABLE G
All Rates Listed Are "Not To Exceed" Fees
-_F 3-Erc-wo R I~S-,~N-D-UTIEIT lES' 12/31/1999 01101101
DEPARTMENT E .T_ES RATES
01/01/02
RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMITS FEES
Type A (Short Term Use)
Regular
Type B (Disturbance of ROW) Sidewalk Repairs
Driveway, Transverse Street Patch
and Spot Patches
New Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk
Longitudinal Street Patch
New Street
Water & Sewer Mains &
Laterals ROW Permit
Type C (Long Term Use)
Application and Processing
Use - Longer than One Year
$65.00 $70.00 ,~7_5.00 ·
$15.00 $17.50 $~5.00
$65.00 $70.00 .00
$1.00/FT with a $2.00/ft ~/ith a
$100 minimum $105 $110'minimum
$3.00/ft with a $5.00/ff*with a
$300 minimum ~5 minimum ' $310 minimum
$15.00 $20.00 '
$' $105.00 $110.00
land value set in the county Assessor's
;r square foot of impacted ROW annually.with a
minimum. This is valid through 12/1/2002
Use Shprter than One Year
Type D Regular~~
Plan Review(Fsr
Additi~ .~~~~
RIGHT-OF VACATION
Maintenance)
1/50 adjoining land value set in the County Assessor's
records per square foot of imPacted ROW monthly with a
$100.00 minimum. This is valid through 12/1/2002.
$100.00 $105.00 $110.00
· 1 O/feet of
improvement with
$100 minimum
$40.00/hour +
equipment
charges
$517.00
.15/feet of
improvement with
$100 minimum
$45.00/hour +
equipment
'charges
$532.00
.20/feet of
improvement with
$100 minimum
' $50.00/hour +
equipment
charges
$547.00
131
TABLE G - G1
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
1. SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON FOR AGENDA: Nov. 20 and Nov. 26, 2002
ORDINANCE RELATING TO HEARING ORIGINATING DEPT: City Attorney's Office
EXAMINER APPLICATIONS AND APPEALS ORIGINATOR: Roger A. Lubovich
DATE SUBMITTED: November 7, 2002
2. CLEARANCES: (Comment on back if necessary)
R~J~I~R Al [,UBOVICH, City Attorney
~T CHAIRMAN
OPERATIONS CHAIRMAN
3. EXHIBITS:
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
ENDORSEM~
MAYOR
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT .~,/~-~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The proposed ordinance amends chapters 2.13, 17.04, 18.02, and 18.02 BMC relating to the filing of Hearing
Examiner applications and appeals and correcting code provisions relating to appeals to be heard by the
Administrative Hearing Examiner.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
Move to approve the proposed ordinance on first reading.
Move to pass Ordinance No.
on second reading.
7. NOTICE OF ACTION:
PULLED ]'"'l TABLED [--I
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
APPROVED [-]
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: City Attorney
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: City Attorney
EXPIRATION DATE: n/a
REVIEW DATE: n/a
DISAPPROVED [-']
AMENDED~~
8. AGENDA BILL NO.:
9. IMPACT OF NON-PASSAGE:
10. IMPACT ON STAFFING, BUDGETS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
11. RESEARCH SOURCES:
133
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending Section 2.13.090 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code relating to the filing of land use
applications and appeals before the administrative hearing
examiner; amending Sections 17.04.070 and 18.02.100 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code relating to appeals to the
administrative hearing examiner; repealing Section 18.03.130 of
the Bremerton Municipal Code; and adding a new section, Section
18.03.155 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to appeals to
the administrative hearing examiner.
WHEREAS, the current provisions of Section 2.13.090 of the Bremerton
Municipal Code provides for the filing procedures relating to applications to be heard by the
Administrative Hearing Examiner; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the provisions of Section 2.13.090
in order to provide for filing procedures relating to appeals and applications to be heard by the
Administrative Hearing Examiner; and
WHEREAS, the current provisions of Section 17.04.070 and 18.02.100 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code relating to appeals to the administrative hearing examiner do not
designate the administrative hearing examiner as the board of appeals pursuant to various
uniform codes adopted by the City; and
WHEREAS, the current provisions of Chapter 18.03 of the Bremerton Municipal
Code relating to Appeals do not contain provisions relating to the administrative hearing
examiner; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the provisions of Sections
17.04.070 and 18.02.100 and Chapter 18.03 relating to appeals to the Administrative Hearing
Examiner; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 2.13.090 of the Bremerton Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
2.13.090 Filing of Applications and Appeals.
Applications for all matters to be heard by the Administrative Hearing Examiner in which
the Administrative Hearing Examiner is to render a decision or recommendation r~!a6ag-to~
; ~^~ ~ c~.~,. :~ t-~.~..~ ~ a~ ~s~ sh~l be filed with the Depa~ment of Community
1
Appeals to Administrative Hearing Examiner
Development. All appeals, including appeals of land use decisions as provided in this
^ ~:~,:~ c~ ~n ^,~. .... **~'~ to be heard by the Administrative Hearing Examiner
chapter,, ~rv ..............................
shall be filed with the City Clerk. Applications for a decision, recommendation or an appeal
shall be filed with the applicable filing fee as set forth in chapter 3.01 BMC. When it is found an
application or appeal meets the filing requirements of the effected ~City Codes, role or
regulation, the application shall be accepted. The Administrative Hearing Examiner shall be
responsible for assigning a date for the public hearing for each application or appeal. Hearings
on project permit applications are subject to the notice and hearing requirements set forth in the
Bremerton Municipal Code.
SECTION 2. Section 17.04.070 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Appeals" is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.04.070 Appeals.
Appeals of administrative determinations applying the Uniform Building Code, Uniform
Plumbing Code, Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings and the Bremerton
Housing Code shall be heard by the Administrative Hearing Examiner pursuant to Chapter 2.13
BMC, who shall serve as the Board of Appeals pursuant to the Uniform Building Code as
adopted in Chapter 17.04 BMC.
SECTION 3. Section 18.02.100 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Appeals" is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.02.100 Appeals.
Appeals of administrative determinations applying the Uniform Fire Code, City of
Bremerton Fire Sprinkler Code, City of Bremerton Fire Alarm Code and City of Bremerton False
Fire Alarm Code shall be heard by the Administrative Hearing Examiner pursuant to Chapter
2.13 BMC, who shall serve as the Board of Appeals pursuant to the Uniform Fire Code as
adopted in Chapter 18.02 BMC.
SECTION 4. Section 18.03.130 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Appeals" is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION 5. A new section, Section 18.03.155 entitled "Appeals" is hereby
added to the Bremerton Municipal Code to read as follows:
18.03.155 Appeals.
Appeals of administrative determinations applying the provisions of this Chapter shall be
heard by the Administrative Hearing Examiner pursuant to Chapter 2.13 BMC, who shall serve
as the Board of Appeals pursuant to the Uniform Fire Code as adopted in Chapter 18.02 BMC.
2
Appeals to Administrative Hearing Examiner
SECTION 6. Severabili~_. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
APPROVED by the City Council the
PASSED by the City Council the
day of ., 2002
day of ,2002
Approved this day of
CAROL ARENDS, Council President
,2002
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHLEEN MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attomey
PUBLISHED the
EFFECTIVE the
ORDINANCE NO.
day of ,2002
day of ,2002
R:\LEGAL\Ordinances~Hearing ExaminefiAppeals.d0c
3
I ?, Appeals to Administrative Hearing Examiner
l O(o
1. SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING
Regarding the 2003 Budget
AGENDA BILL
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
FOR AGENDA OF:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ORIGINATOR:
DATE SUBMITTED:
Nov. 20, 2002
Finance
D. Saunders
Nov. 15, 2002
2. CI r:ARANCES: Comment of back if necessary)
3. EXHIBITS:
ENDORSE(~S .... ~
MAYOR ',-.--.-----,,,' ~
APPROVED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR SUBMITTAL:
~""PCOUNCILPRESIDENT /x~~ ~
4. SUMMARY STATEMENT AND REQUIREMENT FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
State statute requires that the City hold a public hearing regarding the 2003 budget prior to adoption.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
No Council action is required. Public input only.
9. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL:
EXPIRATION DATE:
REVIEW DATE:
Mayor
N/A
N/A
PULLED ~ TABLED
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE:
10. NOTICE OF ACTION
APPROVED ~ DISAPPROVED
AMENDED
11. AGENDA BILL NO:
/$7
2. CLEARANCE COMMENTS:
5. IMPACT ON NON-PASSAGE:
6. IMPACT ON STAFFING~ BUDGETS~ FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER RESOURCES:
7. RESEARCH SOURCES:
CITY OF BREMERTON
NOTICE OF FILING OF PRELIMINARY BUDGET
AND
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE Preliminary Budget for 2003 has been filed with the
City Clerk as required by law.
This is to further
of Bremerton will hold a
at City Hall, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington.
2003
General Fund $ 27,354,626
Water 15,511,750
Wastewater 19,229,380
Stormwater Utility 1,659,507
All Other Funds 55,261,665
TOTAL $119,016,928
The above information together with a copy of the entire proposed budget, will be available at
the City Clerk's office on November 1, 2002.
Citizens attending the public hearing shall have the right to provide written and oral comments
regarding the Preliminary Budget. Written comments may be submitted prior to the hearing by
citizens who cannot attend by sending to the City Clerk, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, WA 98337.
Special assistance will be offered disabled persons.
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
Publication Dates:
Number of Insertions: Two
No. Affidavits Required: Two
November 4 & 11, 2002